Codebook adaptation in MIMO communication systems using multilevel codebooks

- Marvell World Trade Ltd.

A method includes holding in a receiver a definition of a codebook including precoding matrices, and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks including different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook. A sub-codebook is selected in coordination with a transmitter, for use in a given time interval or frequency range. A Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from the transmitter is received. Feedback is generated in the receiver based on the received MIMO signal. The feedback is indicative of one or more preferred precoding matrices, which are chosen from the selected sub-codebook and which are to be used in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in respective partitions of the given time interval or frequency range. The feedback is transmitted from the receiver to the transmitter.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/023,555, filed Feb. 9, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/303,217, filed Feb. 10, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/329,798, filed Apr. 30, 2010. The disclosures of all these related applications are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates generally to communication systems, and particularly to methods and systems for providing communication channel feedback.

BACKGROUND

In some Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) communication systems, the transmitter adapts its transmission based on communication channel feedback that is produced by the receiver. In some cases, for example in Long-Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) systems, the transmitter selects a precoding scheme for distributing the signal to the various transmit antenna ports based on the channel feedback. An example channel feedback scheme is described in “Correlation Based Explicit Feedback,” document R1-100719 (R1-100423), 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting, Valencia, Spain, Jan. 18-22, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In some channel feedback methods, the transmitter and receiver use a predefined set of precoding matrices (a “codebook”), and the channel feedback comprises preferred Precoding Matrix Indicators (PMI) that point to precoding matrices selected from the codebook.

Channel feedback schemes that modify the codebook used by the transmitter and the receiver over time based on a signal Spatial Covariance Function (SCF) have been proposed. Such schemes are sometimes referred to as “codebook adaptation” schemes. An example of codebook adaptation is described in “Adaptive Codebook Designs for MU-MIMO,” document R1-091282, Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Technical Specification Group (TSG) Radio Access Network (RAN) Working Group 1 (WG1) meeting, Seoul, Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The description above is presented as a general overview of related art in this field and should not be construed as an admission that any of the information it contains constitutes prior art against the present patent application.

SUMMARY

An embodiment that is described herein provides a method that includes holding in a receiver a definition of a codebook including precoding matrices, and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks including different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook. A sub-codebook is selected in coordination with a transmitter, for use in a given time interval or frequency range. A Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from the transmitter is received. Feedback is generated in the receiver based on the received MIMO signal. The feedback is indicative of one or more preferred precoding matrices, which are chosen from the selected sub-codebook and which are to be used in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in respective partitions of the given time interval or frequency range. The feedback is transmitted from the receiver to the transmitter.

In some embodiments, holding the definition includes arranging the sub-codebooks in the codebook in multiple levels that progressively increase in precoding resolution and decrease in precoding range. In an embodiment, holding the definition includes adding to each of the sub-codebooks a diluted set of the precoding matrices having a broadest precoding range.

In a disclosed embodiment, holding the definition includes defining each sub-codebook to represent a respective angular range of transmission beam directions of the transmitter, and arranging the sub-codebooks in the levels includes populating the levels with the sub-codebooks that progressively decrease in a size of the angular range. In an example embodiment, arranging the sub-codebooks in the levels includes causing respective angular ranges of the sub-codebooks in a given level to partially overlap. In another embodiment, selecting the sub-codebook includes signaling between the transmitter and the receiver a respective level and a respective index within the level of the selected sub-codebook.

In some embodiments, holding the definition includes formulating each of at least some of the precoding matrices using a respective set of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) coefficients. In an embodiment, selecting the sub-codebook includes deciding on the selected sub-codebook in the receiver and indicating the selected sub-codebook to the transmitter. In a disclosed embodiment, selecting the sub-codebook includes receiving a notification of the selected sub-codebook from the transmitter.

In another embodiment, selecting the sub-codebook includes evaluating a Spatial Covariance Function (SCF) of a communication channel over which the MIMO signal is received, and selecting the sub-codebook based on the evaluated SCF. In an embodiment, evaluating the SCF includes estimating the SCF independently in each of the transmitter and the receiver, and selecting the sub-codebook independently in each of the transmitter and the receiver based on the independently-evaluated SCF.

There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein, apparatus including a memory, a receiver, a processor and a feedback transmitter. The memory is configured to hold a definition of a codebook including precoding matrices and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks including different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook. The receiver is configured to receive a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from a remote transmitter. The processor is configured to select in coordination with the remote transmitter a sub-codebook for use in a given time or frequency range, and to generate, based on the received MIMO signal, feedback that is indicative of one or more preferred precoding matrices, which are chosen from the selected sub-codebook and which are to be used in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in respective partitions of the given time or frequency range. The feedback transmitter is configured to transmit the feedback to the remote transmitter.

In some embodiments, a mobile communication terminal includes the disclosed apparatus. In some embodiments, a chipset for processing signals in a mobile communication terminal includes the disclosed apparatus.

In some disclosed embodiments, a receiver holds a definition of a codebook including precoding matrices and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks including different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook. A sub-codebook is selected in coordination with a transmitter, for use in a given time or frequency range. A Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from the transmitter is received. Based on the received MIMO signal, a preferred precoding matrix is chosen from the selected sub-codebook for use in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in the given time or frequency range. An indication of the preferred precoding matrix is sent from the receiver to the transmitter.

The present disclosure will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) communication system, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein;

FIG. 2 is a diagram that schematically illustrates a multi-level codebook, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart that schematically illustrates a method for providing communication channel feedback, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein; and

FIGS. 4 and 5 are diagrams that schematically illustrate multi-level codebooks, in accordance with embodiments that are described herein.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Any set of precoding matrices (“codebook”) can be viewed as covering a certain range of possible precoding matrices with a certain precoding resolution or accuracy. When designing codebook-based feedback schemes, precoding accuracy and precoding range are often traded off against feedback bandwidth. For example, although a large codebook may cover a large precoding range at high precoding accuracy, such a codebook typically requires large feedback bandwidth in order to signal the preferred precoding matrices. A small codebook requires less feedback bandwidth, but this bandwidth saving typically comes at the expense of smaller precoding range and/or poorer precoding accuracy.

Embodiments that are described herein provide improved methods and systems for providing channel feedback in MIMO communication systems. In the disclosed embodiments, the transmitter and receiver hold mutually-agreed definitions of a codebook and of multiple sub-codebooks, i.e., multiple different subsets of the codebook. For a given time interval or frequency range, the transmitter and receiver apply a certain sub-codebook instead of the entire codebook. In other words, when calculating channel feedback for precoding signals in the given time interval or frequency range, the receiver selects preferred precoding matrices only from the corresponding sub-codebook and not from the entire codebook. As a result, the feedback bandwidth (e.g., the number of bits needed for signaling the preferred precoding matrix) is reduced.

In some embodiments, the receiver signals the channel feedback to the transmitter at two time/frequency granularities: Selection of the sub-codebook is signaled at a relatively coarse granularity, while selection of the preferred precoding matrix within the selected sub-codebook is signaled at finer granularity. In an example embodiment, the receiver selects a (possibly different) sub-codebook every several Transmission Time Intervals (TTIs), and chooses a preferred precoding matrix from the currently-selected sub-codebook every TTI.

Since the receiver selects the preferred precoding matrices only from a partial sub-codebook and not from the entire codebook, the number of bits needed for signaling the selected matrices is small. Signaling of the valid codebook is carried out at coarse granularity that has little effect on feedback bandwidth. Thus, feedback bandwidth is reduced without degradation in precoding range or accuracy.

Unlike some codebook adaptation schemes that adapt the actual precoding matrices over time, the precoding matrices signaled by the receiver in the disclosed techniques are all predefined and agreed upon between the transmitter and the receiver. As such, the receiver signals suitable indications of the selected matrices, e.g., matrix indices, and has no need to signal entire matrices or adaptations of entire matrices. Moreover, the precoding matrices used in the disclosed feedback schemes are typically designed for simplified implementation of the precoding operation, e.g., matrices whose elements are drawn from a simple alphabet and/or Constant Modulus (CM) matrices.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) communication system 20, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein. In the present example, system 20 comprises an LTE or LTE-A system. In alternative embodiments, however, system 20 may operate in accordance with any other suitable communication standard or specification that uses MIMO signals, such as, for example, Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), WiMAX or WiFi systems.

System 20 comprises a Base Station (BS) 24, which communicates with a mobile communication terminal 28 (also referred to as User Equipment—UE). Although FIG. 1 shows only a single BS and a single UE for the sake of clarity, real-life communication systems typically comprise multiple BSs 24 and multiple UEs 28. BS 24 comprises a BS processor 32, which manages the operation of the BS. A BS transceiver (TRX) 36 generates downlink MIMO signals for transmission to UEs 28 and receives uplink signals from the UEs. Amongst other tasks, TRX 36 precodes the downlink signals destined to a given UE using a precoding matrix that is selected based on feedback from that UE. BS 24 transmits the downlink signals and receives the uplink signals using an array of BS antennas 40.

UE 28 comprises one or more antennas 44, which receive the MIMO downlink signals that are transmitted from BS 24, and transmit the uplink signals to the BS. UE 28 comprises a downlink receiver (RX) 48 that receives and demodulates the downlink signals, an uplink transmitter (TX) 56 that generates and transmits the uplink signals, and a UE processor 52 that manages the UE operation and controls the various UE elements.

In some embodiments, UE processor 52 comprises a feedback calculation module 60, which calculates feedback regarding the downlink MIMO communication channel between BS antennas 40 and UE antennas 44. Feedback module 60 calculates the feedback based on the downlink signals received by downlink receiver 48, e.g., based on reference signals that are transmitted as part of the downlink signals. Examples of reference signals comprise Common Reference Signals (CRS) in LTE systems, and Channel State Information Reference Signals (CSI-RS) in LTE-A systems. Alternatively, module 60 may calculate the feedback based on any other suitable part of the received downlink signals. Module 60 provides the calculated feedback to uplink transmitter 56, and the uplink transmitter transmits the feedback information to BS 24.

In BS 24, BS TRX 36 receives and demodulates the uplink signal, so as to extract the feedback sent by UE 28. BS processor 32 uses the feedback to control subsequent downlink transmissions. Typically, the BS processor sets the downlink precoding scheme (the relative signal phases and amplitudes in the different antennas of array 40) based on the feedback.

In the present example, the channel feedback scheme in system 20 uses a predefined codebook, i.e., a list of precoding matrices that are agreed upon between BS 24 and UE 28. In addition, BS 24 and UE 28 hold agreed-upon definitions of multiple sub-codebooks, i.e., multiple different subsets of the codebook. The use of the sub-codebooks for providing efficient feedback is explained in detail further below. In an embodiment, UE 28 comprises a memory 64, which holds definitions 68 of the codebook and sub-codebooks. Memory 64 may comprise any suitable type of memory, e.g., Random Access Memory (RAM) or non-volatile memory such as Flash memory. BS 24 also holds the definitions of the codebook and sub-codebooks in a suitable memory (not shown in the figure) that is accessible to BS processor 32.

The BS and UE configurations shown in FIG. 1 are example configurations, which are depicted solely for the sake of clarity. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable BS and UE configurations can also be used. Some UE and BS elements that are not mandatory for understanding of the disclosed techniques have been omitted from the figures for the sake of clarity. The different BS and UE elements typically are implemented using dedicated hardware, such as using one or more Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Radio frequency Integrated Circuits (RFIC) and/or Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). Alternatively, some elements may be implemented using software executing on programmable hardware, or using a combination of hardware and software elements.

In some embodiments, some or all of the elements of UE 28 are fabricated in a chip-set. When implementing some or all of the disclosed techniques in software on a programmable processor, the software may be downloaded to the processor in electronic form, over a network, for example, or it may, alternatively or additionally, be provided and/or stored on non-transitory tangible media, such as magnetic, optical or electronic memory.

As noted above, BS 24 and UE 28 hold a definition of multiple sub-codebooks of the codebook. Each sub-codebook comprises a respective subset of the precoding matrices in the codebook. Overlap is typically permitted between sub-codebooks. In other words, a precoding matrix is permitted to appear in more than one sub-codebook. Typically, the BS and UE select a given sub-codebook for precoding signals that fall in a given time interval or frequency range. In some embodiments, the sub-codebook selection is based on the signal at the UE. Thus, when calculating the channel feedback, the UE chooses the preferred precoding matrix only from the appropriate sub-codebook (whose identity is known to the BS) and not from the entire codebook. Since the sub-codebook size is considerably smaller than the codebook size, the UE is able to signal the identity of the preferred precoding matrix using a small number of bits.

The codebook can be viewed as covering a certain range or space of precoding matrices. In some embodiments, each sub-codebook covers a certain sub-range or sub-space. For illustrative purposes (and purely by way of example) consider an implementation in each precoding matrix in the codebook corresponds to a certain beam direction. In other words, each precoding matrix causes BS 24 to transmit the downlink signal in a certain geometrical angle relative to antenna array 40. In this scenario, the codebook can be viewed as covering the angular coverage area of BS 24 with a certain angular resolution. Each sub-codebook can be viewed as covering a certain sub-range of the angular coverage area.

In this illustrative example, when UE 28 is located in a certain angular sector in the BS coverage area, the BS and UE may select and apply a sub-codebook that is suitable for covering this angular sector. Using this technique, the entire coverage area of BS 24 is covered with precoding matrices at high angular resolution. At the same time, this high resolution does not require high feedback bandwidth, since the precoding matrices are chosen only from the currently-valid (and relatively small-size) sub-codebook.

When the UE moves relative to the BS such that the currently-valid sub-codebook no longer provides adequate coverage, the BS and UE typically switch to another sub-codebook that better matches the UE's new location. The change of sub-codebook involves some signaling overhead between the UE and BS, but his event occurs at relatively large intervals, and the effect of the overhead on the overall feedback bandwidth is typically small. (Note that in many practical scenarios the preferred beam direction for transmitting to the UE differs from the actual geometrical direction of the UE relative to the BS antenna array, e.g., because of multipath. Nevertheless, the illustrative example described above holds for multipath scenarios, as well.)

In some embodiments, the sub-codebooks are arranged in multiple levels, such that each level increases in precoding accuracy or resolution, but decreases in precoding range. In an example embodiment, the UE and BS signal the selected codebook by signaling the level number, and an index of the selected codebook within this level. In alternative embodiments, various other multi-level codebook structures and signaling schemes can be used.

FIG. 2 is a diagram that schematically illustrates codebook definition 68, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein. In the present example, the codebook is partitioned into a total of seven sub-codebooks that are arranged in three levels. Each sub-codebook comprises multiple precoding matrices 72 (referred to as codewords in this context).

Each sub-codebook is identified by a level index Lε{0, 1, 2}, and a sub-codebook index I within the level. In the present example, the first level (L=0) includes a single sub-codebook (L=0, I=0) that covers the entire precoding range with a relatively coarse precoding resolution. The second level (L=1) includes two sub-codebooks (L=1, I=0 and L=1, I=1) that cover two respective sub-ranges (e.g., two angular coverage sectors) with higher resolution than that of level L=0. A certain overlap exists between the two sub-codebooks of Level L=1.

The third level (L=2) includes four sub-codebooks (L=2, I=0, L=2, I=1, L=2, I=2 and L=2, I=3) that cover four respective sub-ranges (e.g., four angular coverage sectors) that are smaller in precoding range but higher in precoding resolution than the sub-codebooks of the preceding level L=1. The four sub-codebooks of level L=2 also have a certain overlap. In some embodiments, BS and UE 28 coordinate the selection of a given sub-codebook by signaling the level index and sub-codebook index values, i.e., the values of L and I.

The sub-codebook definition of FIG. 2 is an example definition, which is chosen purely for the sake of conceptual clarity. In alternative embodiments, system 20 may use any other suitable configuration of sub-codebooks. When using a multi-level sub-codebook configuration, any suitable number of levels and any suitable number of sub-codebooks per level can be used. Further alternatively, system 20 may use a sub-codebook scheme that is not arranged in levels. In such an arrangement, each sub-codebook comprises any suitable number of precoding matrices (codewords).

In some embodiments, system 20 selects sub-codebooks at a certain coarse time granularity (i.e., with relatively long time intervals between successive selections), and chooses precoding matrices from these sub-codebooks at a certain fine time granularity (i.e., with relatively short time intervals between precoding matrix selection). Each precoding matrix would then correspond to a given wide frequency range. In a typical embodiment (although not necessarily) the precoding matrices are not produced simultaneously but rather in succession, one matrix for each time interval.

In alternative embodiments, system 20 selects sub-codebooks at a certain coarse frequency granularity (i.e., the selected sub-codebook corresponds to a relatively wide frequency band), and chooses precoding matrices from these sub-codebooks at a certain fine frequency granularity (i.e., the selected precoding matrix corresponds to a relatively narrow partial sub-band within the frequency band). In an example embodiment of this sort, both the sub-codebook selection and precoding matrices selections are made at a single time instant.

In an example embodiment, system 20 uses wideband sub-codebooks, i.e., sub-codebooks that are valid over the entire frequency range, and re-selects a sub-codebook at certain time intervals. In alternative embodiments, system 20 re-selects sub-codebooks for various partial spectral sub-bands. The description that follows demonstrates the dual-granularity operation in the time domain, for the sake of clarity. In alternative embodiments, however, similar dual-granularity operation is applied in the frequency domain.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart that schematically illustrates a method for providing communication channel feedback, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein. The method begins by defining the codebook and sub-codebooks to be used by system 20, at a definition operation 80. In this embodiment, system 20 selects a sub-code book for every coarse-granularity feedback period, which in the present example comprises a predefined number of TTIs (e.g., ten TTIs). Within a certain coarse-granularity feedback period, system 20 selects a preferred precoding matrix from the applicable sub-codebook every TTI. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable time intervals can be used.

At a sub-codebook selection operation 84, BS 24 and UE 28 coordinate a selection of a sub-codebook for use in the next coarse-granularity feedback period. Receiver 48 of UE 28 receives downlink MIMO signals, at a reception operation 88. Module 60 in UE processor 52 chooses a preferred precoding matrix for the next TTI based on the received downlink MIMO signals, at a matrix selection operation 92. Module 60 chooses the preferred precoding matrix from the sub-codebook that was selected at operation 84 above.

Transmitter 56 of UE 28 transmits to BS feedback that is indicative of the chosen preferred precoding matrix, at a feedback transmission operation 96. BS processor 36 precodes the downlink MIMO signals in the next TTI based on the preferred precoding matrix that was indicated in the feedback.

UE processor 52 checks whether the present coarse-granularity feedback period has ended, at a checking operation 100. If the coarse-granularity feedback period has not yet ended, the method loops back to operation 88 above, for receiving the next TTI and selecting the next preferred precoding matrix. If the coarse-granularity feedback period has ended, the method loops back to operation 84 above, in which system 20 re-selects a sub-codebook for use in the next coarse-granularity feedback period.

In embodiments that use a multilevel codebook, the number of sub-codebooks in a given level L is denoted M(L). In the example of FIG. 2, M(L)=2L, although any other suitable level sizes can be used. The precoding matrices in the codebook can be defined in any suitable manner. In an example embodiment, the precoding matrices comprise Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) coefficients. A DFT-based codebook of rank 1 is useful, for example, for highly-correlated BS antennas. This property is addressed, for example, in “Precoding Options for 8Tx Antennas in LTE-A DL,” document R1-090388, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.

For eight BS transmit antennas, it is possible in principle to use the columns of the 8-by-8 DFT matrix given by:

D 8 ⁡ ( n , k ) = 1 8 ⁢ ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ ⁢ k 8 ⁢ n ) , ⁢ k = 0 ⁢ ⁢ … ⁢ ⁢ 7 , n = 0 ⁢ ⁢ … ⁢ ⁢ 7 Equation ⁢ ⁢ 1
as eight codewords (precoding matrices) of a size-8 codebook, wherein k denotes the codeword index and n denotes the codeword element index.

This eight-vector codebook can be viewed as covering the angular coverage area of the BS using eight precoding matrices whose corresponding beam directions are distributed uniformly in azimuth. A finer-resolution, sixteen-vector codebook for example is given by:

D 8 2 ⁡ ( n , k ) = 1 8 ⁢ ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ ⁢ k 2 · 8 ⁢ n ) , ⁢ k = 0 ⁢ ⁢ … ⁢ ⁢ 15 , n = 0 ⁢ ⁢ … ⁢ ⁢ 7 Equation ⁢ ⁢ 2

The finer-resolution codebook of Equation 2 has twice as many codewords as the codebook of Equation 1, and therefore would require considerably higher feedback bandwidth. Alternatively, the disclosed multilevel codebook configurations enable system 20 to achieve the high precoding resolution of the finer-resolution codebook with little or no increase in feedback bandwidth.

In an example embodiment, the codebook has a multilevel structure as shown in FIG. 2 above. In this example, the precoding resolution of the sub-codebooks increases by a factor of two from one level to the next. The number of sub-codebooks in the Lth level is given by:

M ⁡ ( L ) = { 2 L + 2 L > 0 1 L = 0 Equation ⁢ ⁢ 3

The elements in the multilevel codebook are given by:

C N L , k 0 ⁡ ( n , i ) = 1 N ⁢ ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ 2 · 2 L · 8 ⁢ n ⁡ ( k 0 + i ) ) Equation ⁢ ⁢ 4
wherein L=0 . . . Lmax, k0=0 . . . M(L)−1, i=0 . . . 15 and n=0 . . . N−1. The level index L and the “rotation” k0 identify the sub-codebook, I denotes the codeword index, N denotes the number of transmit antennas (and thus the dimension of the codeword), and n denotes the codeword element index. Note that there is overlap between codewords of neighboring sub-codebooks since M>2L.

For N=8, the top-level sub-codebook is given by:
C80,0(n,i)=D82(n,i)  Equation 5:
and BS 24 and UE 28 switch from this sub-codebook as necessary to the various sub-codebooks C8L,k0. At any given level L, all the codewords belong to a specific set of vectors of length N. This set corresponds to the first N elements of all the columns of a 2L+1·N-dimensional DFT matrix. The various elements in the various codewords of the various sub-codebooks belong to the alphabet of a DFT of dimension 2Lmax+1·N.

The description that follows describes another multilevel DFT-based codebook, in accordance with another example embodiment. This example is used for enhancing a channel feedback scheme that is specified in the LTE release 8 specifications. In LTE release 8, the UE transmits Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI) feedback either a-periodically on a high-capacity Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH), or periodically on a low-capacity Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH).

In an embodiment, the precoding resolution of the PUSCH-based feedback is enhanced by increasing the codebook size, for example from four bits to eight bits. The PUCCH-based PMI feedback, however, is typically limited to four bits because of the limited capacity of this channel. Thus, in this embodiment, the precoding resolution of the PUCCH-based PMI feedback is increased using a multilevel codebook.

Consider, for example, a three-level codebook in which the sub-codebook size (in bits) at level L is denoted B(L). In the present example L=0 . . . 2 and B(L)=2L+4, i.e., B(0)=4, B(1)=6 and B(2)=8. The L=2, eight-bit sub-codebook comprises the codebook specified for PUSCH feedback in the LTE specification. The other sub-codebooks are defined to have a size of four bits. Switching between sub-codebooks is determined based on the level L and the rotation k0 (which identifies the four-bit sub-codebook to which the PMI feedback corresponds).

Since DFT-based codewords can be viewed as related to respective transmission beam angles, all the codewords of a given sub-codebook should typically be contiguous in angular coverage. Therefore, an optimum-granularity choice for the number of sub-codebooks (i.e., the number of values that k0 can take) is the number of rotations that are needed to map all the codewords in level L, which is equal to the number of codewords. Thus, we get:
M(L)=2B(L)  Equation 6:

Alternatively, other suitable choices of M can also be used. A finest-granularity choice would typically allow rotation at the angular resolution of the highest-level (i.e., eight-bit) sub-codebook. A coarser-granularity choice may use the rule in Equation 3 above. In other words, any element in the multi-level codebook is given by:

C N L ⁡ ( n , k ) = 1 N ⁢ ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ M ⁡ ( L ) ⁢ nk ) ) Equation ⁢ ⁢ 7
wherein k=0 . . . M−1 denotes the codeword index, N denotes the number of transmit antennas (and thus the dimension of the codeword), and n=0 . . . N−1 denotes the codeword element index.

The Lth sub-codebook is further divided into sub-codebooks, and the elements of sub-codebook k0 are given by:

C N L , k 0 ⁡ ( n , k ) = 1 N ⁢ ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ M ⁡ ( L ) ⁢ n ⁡ ( k - k 0 ) ) Equation ⁢ ⁢ 8
wherein k now has a smaller range of values k=0 . . . M(0)−1, i.e., sixteen codewords.

Let OS(L) be a DFT over-sampling factor that is defined as the ratio between the sub-codebook size and the DFT dimension N, i.e., OS(L)=M(L)/N. Using this notation, we can write:

C N L , k 0 ⁡ ( n , k ) = 1 N ⁢ ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ OS ⁡ ( L ) ⁢ N ⁢ n ⁡ ( k - k 0 ) ) Equation ⁢ ⁢ 9

FIG. 4 is a diagram that schematically illustrates a multi-level codebook, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein. The codebook in question is a multilevel, 16-DFT-based multilevel codebook. The codebook has two levels such that B(0)=2 and B(1)=4. FIG. 4 illustrates four example sub-codebooks from this multilevel codebook. Each arrow in the figure represents a codeword, i.e., a precoding matrix. The arrow directions correspond to beam azimuth angles that are achieved by the respective precoding matrices. The azimuth angles in this example correspond to a uniformly-spaced linear antenna array with half-wavelength (λ/2) spacing between adjacent antennas. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable selection of azimuth angles can be used.

The description above mainly addresses DFT-based codebooks. In these codebooks, all the precoding matrices are Constant Modulus (CM) matrices. Precoding using CM matrices causes the transmit antennas to transmit at equal power levels—sometimes a desirable property. In alternative embodiments, however, system 20 uses codebooks in which the precoding matrices are not necessarily DFT-based, but nevertheless have the CM property. Codebooks that are only partially DFT-based are described, for example, in “Codebook for 8Tx DL SU-MIMO for LTE-A,” document R1-094686, 3GPP TSG RANI WG1 meeting, Jeju, Korea, Nov. 9-13, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In an example embodiment, the codewords in the codebook are mapped to the azimuth angle dimension, for example by correlating them with the azimuth-ordered DFT vectors. Once each kth codeword corresponds to the kth DFT-based vector, the elements of the rotated k0 sub-codebook are given by:

C N L , k 0 ⁡ ( n , k ) = C N L ⁡ ( n , k ) · ⅇ ( - j ⁢ 2 ⁢ ⁢ π ⁢ M ⁡ ( L ) ⁢ nk 0 ) ) Equation ⁢ ⁢ 10

In various embodiments, the optimal sub-codebook for a given feedback period (or any other time interval or frequency range) is selected by the UE, by the BS, or both. In an example embodiment, UE processor 52 conducts an exhaustive search over the sub-codebooks. The UE processor selects the sub-codebook that maximizes a certain performance measure, e.g., a predicted cumulative downlink throughput.

In alternative embodiments, the sub-codebook is selected based on the channel Spatial Covariance Function (SCF). The SCF matrix R is defined as the expected value of the matrix HHH, wherein H denotes the channel matrix. The expectation is typically evaluated over the entire frequency range and over time periods that are long relative to the feedback update period. In one example SCF-based method, the BS or UE computes the strongest eigenvector of the SCF matrix (i.e., the eigenvector having the strongest eigenvalue), and finds the codeword Ceig at level Lmax that is closest in some sense (e.g., Chordal distance or correlation) to this eigenvector. The BS or UE then refines the search to the sub-codebooks that contain codeword Ceig.

In another example SCF-based technique, the BS or UE computes the ratio between the strongest and second-strongest eigenvalues of the SCF matrix, and selects the sub-codebook based on this ratio. The ratio between the strongest and second-strongest eigenvalues is typically indicative of the spread of the received signal spatial directions over individual frequency and time instances. Thus, when the ratio is close to unity, the BS or UE select a sub-codebook from a high level L, and vice versa. The actual mapping of eigenvalue ratios to codebook levels can be set, for example, by simulation.

In a disclosed embodiment, the BS or UE first determines the desired codebook level using the eigenvalue ratio. Then, the BS or UE selects within this level a codeword Ceig that is closest (e.g., according to Chordal distance or correlation) to the strongest eigenvector. Then, the BS or UE chooses the rotation k0 such that codeword Ceig is the central codeword in the sub-codebook (e.g., index k=8 in the four-bit sub-codebook example of FIG. 4).

In various embodiments, BS 24 and UE 28 coordinate the sub-codebook selection with one another in various ways. In some embodiments, the UE or BS selects the sub-codebook and signals the parameters of the selected sub-codebook (e.g., the values of L and k0) to the other end. In an example embodiment, the UE packs these parameters in a given number of bits, and transmits the bits using PUCCH and/or PUSCH signaling. The number of bits used for signaling the selected sub-codebook depends on the number of levels (maximal value of L) and the number of sub-codebooks per level M(L). For example, when Lmax=3 and M is given by Equation 3 above, the total number of sub-codebooks is 1+8+16=25, which can be signaled using five bits.

In alternative embodiments, the BS and UE each select the sub-codebook individually based on some feedback parameter that is known at both ends. In an example embodiment, the BS and UE each uses past PMI feedback reports to estimate the channel covariance matrix. Then, the BS and UE each selects the sub-codebook (e.g., selects L and k0) based on the estimated covariance matrix. This technique is carried out without explicit signaling of the sub-codebook selection between the BS and the UE. Example techniques of this sort are addressed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/321,386, filed Apr. 6, 2010, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

In some practical scenarios, the long-term covariance (which in some embodiments determines the selection of sub-codebook) may undergo abrupt changes. When such an abrupt change occurs, the selected sub-codebook may not be suitable for representing the desired precoding. Consider, for example, a scenario where sub-codebook selection has converged to a low-level (large L) sub-codebook having a small precoding range that covers a small range of azimuth angles. An abrupt change in the angle-of-arrival of the downlink signal may render the currently-selected sub-codebook useless. Recovering from such an event (i.e., selecting a new sub-codebook that matches the new signal angle-of-arrival) may take a long time, regardless of whether explicit or implicit signaling is used.

In some embodiments, the multilevel codebook design mitigates such scenarios by replacing some of the precoding matrices in a given high-level sub-codebook (that covers a narrow precoding range) with a diluted set of precoding matrices taken from the lowest-level (L=0) sub-codebook (that covers a wide precoding range). In other words, the high-level sub-codebook is appended with one or more precoding matrices that give some degree of wide precoding range, at the expense of losing some precoding accuracy within the original precoding range of the sub-codebook.

FIG. 5 is a diagram that schematically illustrates a multi-level codebook, in accordance with an embodiment that is described herein. FIG. 5 demonstrates the above-described technique. In the present example, the codebook has two levels (L=0,1). Level L=0 has two-bit sub-codebooks, and level L=1 has four-bit sub-codebooks.

In this embodiment, half of the codewords of level L=0 (e.g., every second codeword) are defined as a fixed eight-codeword sub-codebook denoted CB0. The 4-bit sub-codebook at level L=1 is truncated to eight codewords and combined with CB0. FIG. 5 illustrates this technique for the example codebook of FIG. 4 above, where the truncation of the L=1 sub-codebook retains the central two codewords, i.e., k=1 and k=2. Another possible choice would be to retain every second codeword out of the four, e.g., k=0 and k=3.

In the example of FIG. 5, a one-bit sub-codebook denoted CB0 is marked in the figure. Each of the level L=1 sub-codebooks are modified by replacing the two outer codewords (the precoding matrices having the smallest and largest rotation angles in the sub-codebook) with CB0. Thus, each level L=1 sub-codebook now has some degree of wide coverage.

In an example embodiment, a rank=1 codebook for four transmit antennas (4TX) that is specified in the LTE release 8 specifications is modified using the above technique. The original codebook comprises eight DFT-based codewords (with over-sampling ration of 2) and eight non-DFT codewords. The non-DFT codewords correspond to a diffuse, multimodal antenna pattern. In this embodiment, the eight non-DFT codewords are retained as the fixed CB0. The higher codebook levels are constructed exclusively from DFT-based codewords. Thus, any selected higher level sub-codebook comprises a combination of CB0 and eight high-resolution DFT-based codewords.

The codebook and sub-codebook configurations described herein are example configurations that are depicted solely for the sake of conceptual clarity. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable codebook and sub-codebook configurations can be used.

It is noted that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

holding in a receiver a definition of a codebook comprising precoding matrices and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks comprising different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook, wherein the sub-codebooks are arranged in multiple levels that differ from one another in precoding resolution and precoding range;
selecting in coordination with a transmitter a sub-codebook for use in a given time interval or frequency range;
receiving a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from the transmitter; and
based on the received MIMO signal, generating in the receiver feedback that is indicative of one or more preferred precoding matrices, which are chosen from the selected sub-codebook and which are to be used in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in respective partitions of the given time interval or frequency range, and transmitting the feedback from the receiver to the transmitter.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein holding the definition comprises arranging the sub-codebooks in the codebook such that the levels progressively increase in the precoding resolution and decrease in the precoding range.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein holding the definition comprises adding to each of the sub-codebooks a diluted set of the precoding matrices having a broadest precoding range.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein holding the definition comprises defining each sub-codebook to represent a respective angular range of transmission beam directions of the transmitter, and wherein arranging the sub-codebooks in the levels comprises populating the levels with the sub-codebooks that progressively decrease in a size of the angular range.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein arranging the sub-codebooks in the levels comprises causing respective angular ranges of the sub-codebooks in a given level to partially overlap.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein selecting the sub-codebook comprises signaling between the transmitter and the receiver a respective level and a respective index within the level of the selected sub-codebook.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein holding the definition comprises formulating each of at least some of the precoding matrices using a respective set of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) coefficients.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein selecting the sub-codebook comprises deciding on the selected sub-codebook in the receiver and indicating the selected sub-codebook to the transmitter.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein selecting the sub-codebook comprises receiving a notification of the selected sub-codebook from the transmitter.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein selecting the sub-codebook comprises evaluating a Spatial Covariance Function (SCF) of a communication channel over which the MIMO signal is received, and selecting the sub-codebook based on the evaluated SCF.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein evaluating the SCF comprises estimating the SCF independently in each of the transmitter and the receiver, and selecting the sub-codebook independently in each of the transmitter and the receiver based on the independently-evaluated SCF.

12. Apparatus, comprising:

a memory, which is configured to hold a definition of a codebook comprising precoding matrices and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks comprising different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook, wherein the sub-codebooks are arranged in multiple levels that differ from one another in precoding resolution and precoding range;
a receiver, which is configured to receive a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from a remote transmitter;
a processor, which is configured to select in coordination with the remote transmitter a sub-codebook for use in a given time or frequency range, and to generate, based on the received MIMO signal, feedback that is indicative of one or more preferred precoding matrices, which are chosen from the selected sub-codebook and which are to be used in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in respective partitions of the given time or frequency range; and
a feedback transmitter, which is configured to transmit the feedback to the remote transmitter.

13. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein, in accordance with the definition, the processor is configured to arrange the sub-codebooks in the codebook such that the levels progressively increase in the precoding resolution and decrease in the precoding range.

14. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein, in accordance with the definition, the processor is configured to add to each of the sub-codebooks a diluted set of the precoding matrices having a broadest precoding range.

15. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein, in accordance with the definition, the processor is configured to define each sub-codebook to represent a respective angular range of transmission beam directions of the transmitter, and to populate the levels with the sub-codebooks that progressively decrease in a size of the angular range.

16. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the processor is configured to decide on the selected sub-codebook, and to indicate the selected sub-codebook to the remote transmitter.

17. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the processor is configured to receive a notification of the selected sub-codebook from the remote transmitter.

18. A mobile communication terminal comprising the apparatus of claim 12.

19. A chipset for processing signals in a mobile communication terminal, comprising the apparatus of claim 12.

20. A method, comprising:

holding in a receiver a definition of a codebook comprising precoding matrices and a definition of multiple sub-codebooks comprising different respective subsets of the precoding matrices in the codebook, wherein the sub-codebooks are arranged in multiple levels that differ from one another in precoding resolution and precoding range;
selecting in coordination with a transmitter a sub-codebook for use in a given time or frequency range;
receiving a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) signal that is transmitted from the transmitter; and
based on the received MIMO signal, choosing from the selected sub-codebook a preferred precoding matrix for use in precoding subsequent MIMO signals in the given time or frequency range, and sending an indication of the preferred precoding matrix from the receiver to the transmitter.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5231629 July 27, 1993 Kotzin et al.
5263160 November 16, 1993 Porter, Jr. et al.
5349567 September 20, 1994 Reed
5940439 August 17, 1999 Kleider et al.
6466904 October 15, 2002 Gao et al.
6512750 January 28, 2003 Palenius
6757319 June 29, 2004 Parsa et al.
6865237 March 8, 2005 Boariu et al.
7839944 November 23, 2010 Lee et al.
7941186 May 10, 2011 Cho et al.
8036286 October 11, 2011 Lee et al.
8068555 November 29, 2011 Jongren et al.
8098750 January 17, 2012 Mueck et al.
8179775 May 15, 2012 Chen et al.
8325844 December 4, 2012 Walton et al.
20020001333 January 3, 2002 Glasheen et al.
20030035491 February 20, 2003 Walton et al.
20050108281 May 19, 2005 Kim et al.
20050141630 June 30, 2005 Catreux et al.
20050157810 July 21, 2005 Raleigh et al.
20050237920 October 27, 2005 Howard et al.
20050250544 November 10, 2005 Grant et al.
20050276317 December 15, 2005 Jeong et al.
20060014554 January 19, 2006 Gerlach
20060056538 March 16, 2006 Nam et al.
20060093060 May 4, 2006 Jung et al.
20060114858 June 1, 2006 Walton et al.
20060153112 July 13, 2006 Lim et al.
20060203777 September 14, 2006 Kim et al.
20060233131 October 19, 2006 Gore et al.
20060276212 December 7, 2006 Sampath et al.
20070058746 March 15, 2007 Gueguen
20070076810 April 5, 2007 Herrera et al.
20070099578 May 3, 2007 Adeney et al.
20070149229 June 28, 2007 Frederiksen et al.
20070153731 July 5, 2007 Fine
20070160162 July 12, 2007 Kim et al.
20070165738 July 19, 2007 Barriac et al.
20070217540 September 20, 2007 Onggosanusi et al.
20070223422 September 27, 2007 Kim et al.
20070223423 September 27, 2007 Kim et al.
20070230373 October 4, 2007 Li et al.
20070248068 October 25, 2007 Onggosanusi et al.
20070253386 November 1, 2007 Li et al.
20070270170 November 22, 2007 Yoon et al.
20080013610 January 17, 2008 Varadarajan et al.
20080025336 January 31, 2008 Cho et al.
20080039067 February 14, 2008 Jin et al.
20080043702 February 21, 2008 Moon et al.
20080049709 February 28, 2008 Pan et al.
20080080364 April 3, 2008 Barak et al.
20080080632 April 3, 2008 Kim et al.
20080080634 April 3, 2008 Kotecha et al.
20080080635 April 3, 2008 Hugl et al.
20080080637 April 3, 2008 Khan et al.
20080095258 April 24, 2008 She et al.
20080101407 May 1, 2008 Khan et al.
20080108310 May 8, 2008 Tong et al.
20080112351 May 15, 2008 Surineni et al.
20080130778 June 5, 2008 Xia et al.
20080144522 June 19, 2008 Chang et al.
20080165875 July 10, 2008 Mundarath et al.
20080186212 August 7, 2008 Clerckx et al.
20080192852 August 14, 2008 Kent et al.
20080198776 August 21, 2008 Seo
20080232494 September 25, 2008 Pan et al.
20080232503 September 25, 2008 Kim
20080247364 October 9, 2008 Kim et al.
20080247475 October 9, 2008 Kim et al.
20080268855 October 30, 2008 Hanuni et al.
20080268887 October 30, 2008 Jansen et al.
20080285433 November 20, 2008 Akita et al.
20080292013 November 27, 2008 Varadarajan et al.
20080298452 December 4, 2008 Sampath et al.
20080298482 December 4, 2008 Rensburg et al.
20080318606 December 25, 2008 Tsutsui et al.
20090011761 January 8, 2009 Han et al.
20090016263 January 15, 2009 Kishigami et al.
20090046800 February 19, 2009 Xu et al.
20090098876 April 16, 2009 Khan et al.
20090110114 April 30, 2009 Onggosanusi et al.
20090122857 May 14, 2009 Li et al.
20090161605 June 25, 2009 Shen et al.
20090180561 July 16, 2009 Kim et al.
20090252332 October 8, 2009 Chang et al.
20090252333 October 8, 2009 Chang et al.
20090282310 November 12, 2009 Seok et al.
20090296844 December 3, 2009 Ihm et al.
20090304109 December 10, 2009 Kotecha
20100019631 January 28, 2010 Olson et al.
20100031117 February 4, 2010 Lee et al.
20100034308 February 11, 2010 Kim et al.
20100035627 February 11, 2010 Hou et al.
20100054354 March 4, 2010 Tosato
20100056170 March 4, 2010 Lindoff et al.
20100061477 March 11, 2010 Lee et al.
20100067512 March 18, 2010 Nam et al.
20100069106 March 18, 2010 Swarts et al.
20100074301 March 25, 2010 Howard et al.
20100103834 April 29, 2010 Gorokhov et al.
20100113078 May 6, 2010 Farajidana et al.
20100158151 June 24, 2010 Krauss et al.
20100172424 July 8, 2010 Perets et al.
20100172430 July 8, 2010 Melzer et al.
20100173639 July 8, 2010 Li et al.
20100215112 August 26, 2010 Tsai et al.
20100220800 September 2, 2010 Erell et al.
20100238984 September 23, 2010 Sayana et al.
20100254474 October 7, 2010 Gomadam et al.
20100260234 October 14, 2010 Thomas et al.
20100260243 October 14, 2010 Ihm et al.
20100267341 October 21, 2010 Bergel et al.
20100271968 October 28, 2010 Liu et al.
20100272014 October 28, 2010 Orlik et al.
20100272032 October 28, 2010 Sayana et al.
20100273514 October 28, 2010 Koo et al.
20100278278 November 4, 2010 Lee et al.
20100284484 November 11, 2010 Jongren et al.
20100290548 November 18, 2010 Hoshino et al.
20100296603 November 25, 2010 Lee et al.
20110026413 February 3, 2011 Swarts et al.
20110034175 February 10, 2011 Fong et al.
20110058621 March 10, 2011 Clerckx et al.
20110064156 March 17, 2011 Kim et al.
20110077038 March 31, 2011 Montojo et al.
20110080969 April 7, 2011 Jongren et al.
20110085610 April 14, 2011 Zhuang et al.
20110096704 April 28, 2011 Erell et al.
20110103534 May 5, 2011 Axmon et al.
20110110403 May 12, 2011 Jongren
20110110450 May 12, 2011 Gomadam et al.
20110134774 June 9, 2011 Pelletier et al.
20110150052 June 23, 2011 Erell et al.
20110158190 June 30, 2011 Kuwahara et al.
20110164701 July 7, 2011 Nikopourdeilami et al.
20110170435 July 14, 2011 Kim et al.
20110170638 July 14, 2011 Yuan et al.
20110176439 July 21, 2011 Mondal et al.
20110188393 August 4, 2011 Mallik et al.
20110194594 August 11, 2011 Noh et al.
20110194638 August 11, 2011 Erell et al.
20110194644 August 11, 2011 Liu et al.
20110205930 August 25, 2011 Rahman et al.
20110216846 September 8, 2011 Lee et al.
20110235608 September 29, 2011 Koo et al.
20110250919 October 13, 2011 Barbieri et al.
20110261775 October 27, 2011 Kim et al.
20110268204 November 3, 2011 Choi et al.
20110274188 November 10, 2011 Sayana et al.
20110306341 December 15, 2011 Klein et al.
20120002568 January 5, 2012 Tiirola et al.
20120003926 January 5, 2012 Coldrey et al.
20120020433 January 26, 2012 Bhattad et al.
20120028628 February 2, 2012 Frenger et al.
20120033592 February 9, 2012 Kim et al.
20120033630 February 9, 2012 Chung et al.
20120034927 February 9, 2012 Papasakellariou et al.
20120039369 February 16, 2012 Choi et al.
20120058735 March 8, 2012 Vermani et al.
20120063336 March 15, 2012 Shany et al.
20120069887 March 22, 2012 Park et al.
20120069917 March 22, 2012 Liu et al.
20120076028 March 29, 2012 Ko et al.
20120076038 March 29, 2012 Shan et al.
20120087425 April 12, 2012 Gomadam et al.
20120087435 April 12, 2012 Gomadam et al.
20120134434 May 31, 2012 Chen et al.
20120188976 July 26, 2012 Kim et al.
20120219042 August 30, 2012 Onggosanusi et al.
20120219083 August 30, 2012 Tong et al.
20120257664 October 11, 2012 Yue et al.
20120275376 November 1, 2012 Sampath et al.
20120275386 November 1, 2012 Frenne et al.
20120281620 November 8, 2012 Sampath et al.
20120329502 December 27, 2012 Frederiksen et al.
20130028068 January 31, 2013 Park et al.
20130028344 January 31, 2013 Chen et al.
20130039284 February 14, 2013 Marinier et al.
20130051256 February 28, 2013 Ong et al.
20130077595 March 28, 2013 Aiba et al.
20130107916 May 2, 2013 Liu et al.
20130114427 May 9, 2013 Maattanen et al.
20130128847 May 23, 2013 Wang et al.
20130176991 July 11, 2013 Yi
20130182786 July 18, 2013 Frenne et al.
20130272221 October 17, 2013 Hoehne et al.
20140029586 January 30, 2014 Loehr et al.
20140051357 February 20, 2014 Steer et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2182754 May 2010 EP
2008236222 February 2008 JP
2008054125 March 2008 JP
2008118411 May 2008 JP
2008147792 June 2008 JP
2005117283 December 2005 WO
2007133564 November 2007 WO
2008009157 January 2008 WO
2008133582 November 2008 WO
2009116471 September 2009 WO
2010013950 February 2010 WO
2011147692 December 2011 WO
Other references
  • Motorola, “Codebook for 8Tx DL SU-MIMO for LTE-1”, TSG-RAN WG1 #59, Jeju, Korea, Nov. 9-13, 2009.
  • Alcatel-Lucent et al., “Way Forward on 8Tx Codebook for Rel.10 DL MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • Marvell, “Two-Component PMI Codebook for 8TX”, 3GPP TSG RAN # 62 Meeting, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • NTT DoCoMo, “Views on Codebook Design for Downlink 8Tx MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #59bis, Valencia, Spain, Jan. 18-22, 2010.
  • Samsung, “Codebook Design for 8 TX Transmission in LTE-A”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56, Athens, Greece, Feb. 9-13, 2009 Samsung, “UL Transmission Power Control in LTE-A”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56BIS, Seoul, Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009 (R1-091250).
  • Texas Instruments, “Higher CSI Feedback Accuracy for 8TX RE1.10 DL MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • Samsung, “Codebook Design for 8 TX Transmission in LTE-A”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56, Athens, Greece, Feb. 9-13, 2009.
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Requirements for Further Advancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) (LTE-Advanced) (Release 8), 3GPP TR 36.913 V8.0.1, Sophia Antipolis, France, Mar. 2009.
  • Motorola, “Uplink Power Control for E-UTRA”, 3GPP TSG RAN1 #48, St. Louis, USA, Feb. 12-16, 2007.
  • Nortel, “On the discussions of carrier aggregations”, 3GPP TSG-RAN Working Group 1 Meeting #55, Prague, Czech Republic, Nov. 10-14, 2008.
  • NTT DoCoMo, Inc., “Updated Views on Support of Wider Bandwidth in LTE-Advanced”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #54bis, Prague, Czech Republic, Sep. 29-Oct. 3, 2008.
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception (FDD) (Release 8), 3GPP TS 25.101 V8.5.1, Sophia Antipolis, France, Jan. 2009.
  • Lucent Technologies, “Link Error Prediction for E-DCH”, TSG-RAN WG1#35, Lisbon, Portugal, Nov. 17-21, 2003.
  • Ericsson, “On Channel Reciprocity for Enhanced DL Multi-Antenna Transmission”, TSG-RAN WG1 #59, Jeju, Korea, Nov 9-13, 2009.
  • Ericsson, “System-level evaluation of OFDM—further considerations”, TSG-RAN WG1 #35, Lisbon, Portugal, Nov. 17-21, 2003.
  • Nortel Networks, “OFDM Exponential Effective SIR Mapping Validation, EESM Simulation Results for System-Level Performance Evaluations, and Text Proposal for Section A.4.5 of TR 25.892”, 3GPP TSG-RAN-1/TSG-RAN-4 Ad Hoc, Espoo, Finland, Jan. 27-30, 2004.
  • Park et al., “Efficient Coherent Neighbour Cell Search for Synchronous 3GPP LTE System”, Electronic Letters, vol. 44, No. 21, Oct. 2008.
  • Motorola, “Low-Overhead Feedback of Spatial Covariance Matrix”, TSG-RAN WG1 #59, Jeju, Korea, Nov. 9-13, 2009.
  • Motorola, “Use of UL Covariance for Downlink MIMO in FDD”, TSG-RAN WG1 #59, Jeju, Korea, Nov. 9-13, 2009.
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Multiplexing and channel coding (Release 8)”, 3GPP TS 36.212 V8.6.0 (Mar. 2009), Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Samsung, “Discussion on Enhanced DL Beamforming”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56bis, Seoul, Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009.
  • Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell, “Correlation-based Explicit Feedback”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting # 59bis, Valencia, Spain, Jan. 18-22, 2010.
  • International Application PCT/IB2010/051088 Search Report dated Sep. 21, 2010.
  • International Application PCT/IB2010/053272 Search report dated Dec. 27, 2010.
  • Marvell Semiconductor, “Precoding Options for 8Tx Antennas in LTE-A DL”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55bis, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,075, filed Mar. 20, 2011.
  • Marvell, “Codebook Adaptation for ULA Antenna”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60, San Francisco, USA, Feb. 22, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/321,386, filed Apr. 6, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/294,737, filed Mar. 13, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/902,168, filed Oct. 12, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,237, filed Oct. 13, 2010.
  • Alcatel-Lucent, “Fractional Power Control Using Pilot Power Ration Measurements for the E-UTRA Uplink”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 # 48, St. Louis, USA, Feb. 12-16, 2007.
  • Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell, “Considerations on spatial covariance aided implicit feedback for MU-MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #59, Jeju, Korea, Nov. 9-13, 2009.
  • Catt, “Feedback enhancements for LTE-A downlink transmission”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #59, Jeju, Korea, Nov. 9-13, 2009.
  • Marvell, “Details of PUCCH 1-1 for 8Tx”, 3GPP TSG RAN # 63, Jacksonville, USA, Nov. 15-19, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/346,737, filed Jan. 10, 2012.
  • Ericsson et al., “Way Forward for Rel-10 Feedback Framework”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60, San Francisco, USA, Feb. 22, 2010.
  • Huawei, “Adaptive Feedback: A New Perspective of the Adaptive Codebook”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 meeting #58, Shenzhen, China, Aug. 24-28, 2009.
  • Motorola, “Interference Mitigation via Power Control and FSM Resource Allocation and UE Alignment for E-UTRA Uplink and TP”, 3GPPP TSG RAN1 # 44, Denver, USA, Feb. 13-17, 2006.
  • Marvell, “Successive Codebook Refinement: Further details and evaluation”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #60bis, Beijing, Apr. 12-16, 2010.
  • Marvell Semiconductor, “Feedback Methods for Exploiting Channel Correlation in LTE-A DL”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #57, Los Angeles, USA, Jun. 29-Jul. 3, 2009 (R1-092395).
  • Marvell Semiconductor, “Spatial Correlation based transmission schemes for LTE-A DL”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 meeting #58, Shenzhen, China, Aug. 24-28, 2009.
  • Samsung, “Comparisons and performance evaluation of differential feedback proposals for Rel 8 PMI enhancements”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #59bis, Valencia, Spain, Jan. 18-22, 2010.
  • International Application PCT/IB2009/052987 Search Report dated Jan. 27, 2010.
  • Rapporteur (NTT DoCoMo), “Text Proposal for RAN1 TR on LTE Advanced”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #53bis, Warsaw, Poland, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 2008.
  • Ericsson, “Design and Evaluation of Precoder Codebooks for CSI Feedback”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 61bis, Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010.
  • Samsung, “Coordinated Multi-Point Operation for LTE”, TSG RAN WG1 50, Istanbul, Turkey, Dec. 7-10, 2010.
  • Alcatel-Lucent et al., “Way Forward on CSI Feedback for Rel.10 DL MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • Alcatel-Lucent et al., “Further Analysis of Companion Feedback Performance and Feedback Signaling Overhead Reduction”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • Alcatel-Lucent et al., “Way Forward on CQI/PMI Reporting Enhancement on PUSCH 3-1 for 2, 4 and 8 TX”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62bis, Xian, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
  • Marvell, “CQI Enhancement for 4Tx”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #62bis, Xian, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
  • NEC Group, “Enhancing MU-MIMO CQI,” 3GPP TSG-RAN WGI #62bis, Xian, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
  • LG Electronics, “Further Discussion on CQI/PMI Enhancement”, 3GPP TSG RAN # 62BIS, Xian, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,152 Official Action dated Jun. 26, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,645 Official Action dated Aug. 31, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,647 Official Action dated Aug. 17, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,044 Official Action dated Jun. 29, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,509 Official Action dated Jun. 21, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,555 Official Action dated Sep. 14, 2012.
  • International Application PCT/IB2012/051511 Search Report dated Aug. 31, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,293, filed Mar. 29, 2012.
  • 3GPP TR 36.819 “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Coordinated Multi-Point Operation for LTE Physical Layer Aspects (release 11)”, version 11.0.0, Sep. 2011.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/558,405, filed Nov. 10, 2011.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/556,752, filed Nov. 7, 2011.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/585,556, filed Jan. 11, 2012.
  • Alcatel-Lucent et al., “Way Forward on Enhancement for Rel.10 DL MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • Samsung, “Preliminary CoMP JP Results for Homogeneous Networks”, 3GPP TSG RAN # 64, Taipei, Taiwan, Feb. 21-25, 2011.
  • Huawei, “Performance Evaluation of Phase 1: Downlink Homogeneous Network with High Tx Power RRHs”, 3GPP TSG RAN # 64, Taipei, Taiwan, Feb. 21-25, 2011.
  • ZTE, “Initial CoMP Evaluation for Homogeneous Network with High Tx Power RRHs”, 3GPP TSG RAN # 64, Taipei, Taiwan, Feb. 21-25, 2011.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,647 Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,647 Official Action dated Apr. 27, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,130, filed Mar. 1, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,044 Official Action dated Feb. 7, 2012.
  • JP Patent Application # 2011-551560 Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013.
  • JP Patent Application # 2012-506601 Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,878 Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,075 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2013.
  • Huang et al., “A Limited Feedback Precoding System with Hierarchical Codebook and Linear Receiver”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 4843-4848, Dec. 2008.
  • Kim et al., “Efficient Feedback via Subs pace-Based Channel Quantization for Distributed Cooperative Antenna Systems with Temporarily Correlated Channels”, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2008, Nov. 23, 2007.
  • Alcatel Lucent, “Overview of Hierarchical Codebook Approach”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #59bis, Valencia, Spain, Jan. 18-22, 2009.
  • JP Patent Application # 2011-024295 Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2012.
  • Samsung, “Precoding for polarized 4Tx configurations”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #48bis, St Julian's, Malta, Mar. 26-30, 2007.
  • Mondal et al., “Rank-Independent Codebook Design from a Quaternary Alphabet”, Proceedings of 41st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC), pp. 297-301, Nov. 7, 2007.
  • JP Patent Application # 2011-544111 Official Action dated Nov. 6, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,878 Official Action dated Apr. 1, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,555 Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2013.
  • International Application PCT/IB2012/056181 Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2013.
  • International Application PCT/IB2012/056289 Search Report dated Mar. 26, 2013.
  • International Application PCT/IB2012/056182 Search Report dated Feb. 26, 2013.
  • Japanese Patent Application # 2011024295 Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/902,168 Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,898 Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/052,075 Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/766,790 Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,237 Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2013.
  • International Application PCT/IB2013/052963 Search Report dated Sep. 27, 2013.
  • Japanese Patent Application # 2011-544111 Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/252,218 Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2013.
  • ZTE, “Link Analysis of 4Tx Codebook Design for DL SU-MIMO”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #48bis, St. Julians, Malta, Mar. 26-30, 2007.
  • Asahi, H., “A Function Generator for Walsh Order Hadamard Matrix and Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform”, Geoinformatics, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 3-9, year 2000.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/253,078 Office Action dated May 23, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,878 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2014.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/543,835 Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2013.
  • International Application No. PCT/IB2009/052726 Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2010.
  • International Application No. PCT/IB2010/050014 Search Report dated Jun. 15, 2010.
  • International Application No. PCT/IB2010/050797 Search Report dated Jul. 15, 2010.
  • International Application No. PCT/IB2010/051089 Search Report dated Jul. 9, 2010.
  • Ericsson, “Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced”, TSG-RAN WG1 #53bis, Warsaw, Poland, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 2008.
  • Viswanath et al., “Opportunistic Beamforming Using Dumb Antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 1277-1294, Jun. 2002.
  • Sharif et al., “On the Capacity of MIMO Broadcast Channels with Partial Side Information,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 506-522, Feb. 2005.
  • Texas Instruments, “Codebook Design for E-UTRA MIMO Pre-coding”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 46bis, Seoul, Korea, Oct. 9-13, 2006.
  • Samsung, “Codebook based Precoding for 8 Tx Transmission in LTE-A”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55, Prague, Czech Republic, Nov. 10-14, 2008.
  • Qualcomm Europe, “Link Analysis for 4x2 and 4x4 Precoder Set Decision”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #48bis, St. Julian's, Malta, Mar. 26-30, 2007.
  • 3GPP TR 25.892 V6.0.0, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Feasibility Study for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) for UTRAN enhancement (Release 6)”, Sophia Antipolis, France, Jun. 2004.
  • Samsung, “CQI reporting for MU-MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #54, Jeju, Korea, Aug. 18-22, 2008.
  • Motorola, “Some Results on DL-MIMO Enhancements for LTE-A”, TSG-RAN WG1 #55bis, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009.
  • Alcatel-Lucent, ““Best Companion” reporting for improved single-cell MU-MIMO pairing”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #56 Meeting, Athens, Greece, Feb. 9-13, 2009.
  • Nokia Siemens Networks, “LTE-Advanced SU-MIMO UE Transmission in LTE Release 8 Network”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #57, San Francisco, USA, May 4-8, 2009 (R1-091773).
  • 3GPP TS 25.214 V8.5.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Procedures (FDD) (Release 8), Sophia Antipolis, France, Mar. 2009.
  • IEEE Standard 802.16 for Local and metropolitan area networks, “Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems”, Revision of IEEE Standard 802.16—2001, IEEE Computer Society and IEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society, USA, Oct. 1, 2004.
  • NTT DoCoMo et al., “Prioritized Deployment Scenarios for LTE-Advanced Studies”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 Meeting # 50, Athens, Greece, Feb. 9-13, 2009 (R4-091011).
  • Hanzo et al., “OFDM and MCCDMA for Broadband Multi-User Communications, WLANs and Broadcasting”, Wiley-IEEE Press, chapter 14, pp. 485-548, Sep. 19, 2003.
  • China Mobile et al., “Framework for LTE PDSCH DRS Demodulation Requirements”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 Meeting #49, Prague, Czech Republic, Nov. 10-14, 2008.
  • Qualcomm Europe, “Downlink RS Structure in Support of Higher-Order MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #57, San Francisco, USA, May 4-8, 2009.
  • “RAN1 Chairman Notes”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55bis, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009.
  • Marvell Semiconductor, “Number of Codewords for 8x8 SU-MIMO in LTE-A DL”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55bis, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009.
  • LG Electronics, “Consideration of DL-MIMO in LTE-Advanced”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55, Prague, Czech Republic, Nov. 10-14, 2008.
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Further Advancements for E-UTRA Physical Layer Aspects (Release 9), 3GPP TS 36.814 V0.4.1 (Feb. 2009), Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • ETSI TS 136213, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA), Physical Layer Procedures”, V10.2.0, Jun. 2011.
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation (Release 8), 3GPP TS 36.211 V8.4.0 (Sep. 2008), Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Alcatel-Lucent, “CQI and CSI Feedback Compression”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #54bis, Prague, Czech Republic, Sep. 29-Oct. 3, 2008.
  • Huawei, “DL MIMO Codebook”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56bis, Seoul, South Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009.
  • Huawei, “Adaptive Codebook Designs for MU-MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56bis, Seoul, South Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009.
  • Motorola, “On UE Feedback to Support LTE-A MU-MIMO and CoMP Operations”, TSG-RAN WG1 #56bis, Seoul, South Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009.
  • Huawei, “Adaptive Codebook Designs for DL MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #57, San Francisco, CA USA, May 3-8, 2009.
  • Ericsson, “On CSI feedback for ITU Requirement Fulfilling CoMP Schemes”, TSG-RAN WG1 #57, San Francisco, USA, May 4-8, 2009.
  • Motorola, “Spatial Correlation Feedback to Support LTE-A MU-MIMO and CoMP: System Operation and Performance Results”, TSG-RAN WG1 #57, San Francisco, USA, May 4-8, 2009.
  • Xia et al., “Design and Analysis of Transmit—Beamforming based on Limited-Rate Feedback”, IEEE Transactions on signal processing (Draft), Minneapolis, MN, Mar. 16, 2005.
  • Huawei, “The Impact of CA on Mobility in LTE-A”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56, Athens, Greece, Feb. 9-13, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/111,475, filed Nov. 5, 2008.
  • Research in Motion, UK Limited, “Uplink Power Control for Carrier Aggregation”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting # 57b, Lon Angeles, USA, Jun. 29-Jul. 3, 2009 (R1-092415).
  • Nokia Siemens Networks, “PUSCH Power Control for LTE-Advanced”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting # 57bis, Los Angeles, USA, Jun. 29-Jul. 3, 2009 (R1-092574).
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Radio Frequency (RF) System Scenarios (Release 5), 3GPP TR 25.942 V5.3.0, Sophia Antipolis, France, Jun. 2004.
  • Nokia Siemens Networks, “Autonomous Component Carrier Selection for LTE Advanced”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #54, Jeju Island, Korea, Aug. 18-22, 2008 (R1-083103).
  • Nokia Siemens Networks, “Algorithms and Results for Autonomous Component Carrier Selection for LTE-Advanced”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55, Prague, Czech Republic, Nov. 10-14, 2008 (R1-084321).
  • Nokia Siemens Networks, “Use of Background Interference Matrix for Autonomous Component Carrier Selection for LTE-Advanced”, 3GPP TSA RAN WG1 Meeting #55-bis, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009 (R1-090235).
  • Qualcomm Europe, Notion of Anchor Carrier in LTE-A, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55-bis, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Jan. 12-16, 2009 (R1-080356).
  • Samsung, “UL Transmission Power Control in LTE-A”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56bis, Seoul, Korea, Mar. 23-27, 2009 (R1-091250).
  • International Application PCT/IB2010/055763 Search Report dated Jun. 14, 2011.
  • International Application PCT/IB2011/050015 Search Report dated Jul. 5, 2011.
  • Marvell, “Downlink MIMO with Coordinated Beamforming and Scheduling”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 59, Jeju, South Korea, Nov. 9-14, 2009.
  • Texas Instruments, “Views and Simulation Results on 4Tx Codebook Enhancement”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • Texas Instruments, “Higher CSI feedback accuracy for 4/8Tx Rel.10 DL MIMO”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,476 Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2014.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,593 Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2014.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,237 Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2014.
  • JP Application # 2012537460 Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2014.
  • NTT DoCoMo, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, “Views on Scalable CSI Feedback for DL CoMP in LTE-Advanced” , Meeting #58bis, R1-094243, pp. 1-5, Oct. 12-16, 2009.
  • NTT DoCoMo, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, “Views on Single-Cell CSI Feedback Enhancement for DL MU-MIMO in LTE-Advanced”, Meeting #58bis, R1-094241, pp. 1-6, Oct. 12-16, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,477 Official Action dated Apr. 14, 2014.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/610,904 Office Action dated May 1, 2014.
Patent History
Patent number: 8761297
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 15, 2013
Date of Patent: Jun 24, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20140105317
Assignee: Marvell World Trade Ltd. (St. Michael)
Inventors: Adoram Erell (Herzliya), Daniel Yellin (Ra'anana)
Primary Examiner: Daniel Washburn
Assistant Examiner: Berhanu Tadese
Application Number: 14/106,774
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Diversity (375/267); Plural Channels For Transmission Of A Single Pulse Train (375/260); Transmitters (375/295)
International Classification: H04B 7/04 (20060101);