Device and method for hallux valgus repair by intermedullary spring clip
A device for repairing Hallux Valgus (HV) is disclosed comprising a first arm adapted to be affixed inside the canal of the first metatarsus (1MT) of a human foot, a second arm adapted to be affixed inside the canal of the second metatarsus (2MT) of a human foot and a spring mechanism connected between the first arm and the second arm, active to push the 1MT closer to the 2MT. The device may comprise fixating means adapted to fixate said first arm inside said MT and said second arm inside said 2MT and the spring mechanism is removable from the first and the second arms.
Latest Bonfix Ltd. Patents:
Hallux valgus (HV) is a common foot deformity in which the big toe (the Hallux) deviates into the lateral or outer side of the foot (valgus deviation). This is accompanied by deviation of the first metatarsus (MT, 1MT) inward (varus). The two processes e.g. metatarsus varus and hallux valgus are linked Part (and at times all) of the repair means known in the art is aimed to reduce the varus deviation of the 1MT. The varus deviation of the 1MT increases the angle between that bone and the 2nd MT (2MT) creating a wide intermetatarsal angle (IMA). HV degree is defined as the angle between the longitudinal axis of 1MT and the axis of the proximal phalanx of the Hallux, and is expressed as HV angle (HVA). The two main parameters which define the HV degree are the HVA and IMA.
Accordingly, in surgery the goals are to reduce both angles. The basic or common prior art surgery often aims to correct the IMA by sawing the 1MT and shifting its distal part toward the 2nd MT. Attempts to correct the IMA without sawing the 1MT, as known in the art, incorporate usually a suture or a cable that is passed between 1MT and 2MT. the most common is the Mini Tightrope© endo-button device. These modes entail inherent problems including reported up to 30% of fractures of the 2nd MT.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONA device for repairing Hallux Valgus (HV) according to embodiments of the present invention is disclosed comprising a first arm adapted to be affixed inside the canal of the first metatarsus (1 MT) of a human foot, a second arm adapted to be affixed inside the canal of the second metatarsus (2MT) of a human foot and a spring mechanism connected between said first arm and said second arm, active to push said 1MT closer to said 2MT. According to some embodiments the device may further comprise fixating means adapted to fixate said first arm inside said 1MT and said second arm inside said 2MT and the spring mechanism is removable from the first and the second arms.
According to yet other embodiments the spring mechanism may be adapted to be connected to the first arm and the second arm after the first and the second arms are installed and affixed inside said 1MT and 2MT respectively.
According to some embodiments the spring mechanism may be adapted to provide a first pulling force between the first and the second arms in a first plane being the plane common to said 1MT and 2MT and a second pulling force between the 1MT and 2MT in a plane perpendicular to said first plane.
According to some embodiments at least one of the first and the second arms is affixed to its respective MT by fixing means wherein the fixing means is at least one from the list consisting: friction unit, fixating screw and clamp.
According to some embodiments the first arm comprising a first portion being formed as a longitudinal tubular structure slightly banana-like bent and a second portion close to the proximal end of said first portion angled with respect to said first portion and provided with a gripping point close to its proximal end adapted to connect to said spring mechanism.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTIONIn the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
Reference is made now to
Descriptive Anatomy, 1-2 Metatarsal Zones
In order to understand and direct the introduction and placement of a device according to embodiments of the present invention into, or onto the 1MT and 2MT, six (6) zones in the 1MT and 2MT have been defined as seen in
Zone 0 is the base of 2MT, which is located between the adjacent cuneiforms. There is no contact between 1MT and 2MT at that region. However, a strong plantar ligament, the Lisfranc ligament that originates from the medial cuneiform inserts on the plantar aspect of the base of 2MT. This ligament may keep the first ray and 2nd ray close together, so it can be seen as a hinge, on which the 1MT deviates from the 2MT. There are question about the existence, measurements and importance of the hypermobile 1st ray. Often, in cases of hypermobile 1st ray the planned surgery is to fuse the joint between the medial cuneiform and the 1MT (Lapidus procedure). Some surgeons fuse at the same time the base of the 2nd MT as well, to create a stiff configuration between the 1t and 2nd MT's.
Hypermobility of the 1st ray is checked mainly as translation in the dorsal-plantar plane, but at times, medial displacement is observed at the base of the 1MT. It is therefore logical to view the Lisfranc ligament as the safe (and constant) axis of the motion between 1-2MT.
Zone 1 is at the very base of 1MT. At that point usually t1MT is parallel to 2MT and forms a joint with it. The distance between the two is minimal (practically there is no distance between them at the proximal part). The distal part of Zone 1 is just when the lateral cortex of the MT starts to form a bent, which is the transition point from 1st to 2nd zone. At this point there is slight widening between the two MT's, which is responsible for the slope of region 1.
Zone 2 is the area of slope where the 1MT deviates further away from 2MT. the measured slope at this region is roughly about 6.0 mm/1.0 cm. this slope encompass also the slight deviation and narrowing of the 2MT at this zone. The length of zone 2 is 8.5-10.5 mm.
Zone 3 is the zone where the two MT's are separated, and in this region in the normal patient without Hallux Valgus the distance between the MT's is almost constant (there is small curve in this region but this is insignificant. The length of zone 3 is 24-30 mm. The importance of these regions is that in some of the embodiments they direct the shape and the entrance location of the device or the more convenient location to apply the arms of the device on each of the metatarsals. It is convenient and spacious in this zone to contain the spring mechanism or the bulk of the mechanism.
Zone 4 is the neck region, in this zone the MT's shaft start their expansion toward the head. The bone is becoming wider. The bone changes from diaphyseal to metaphyseal and the relatively loose canal gives way to spongeiotic bone. The relevance of this zone is that it may be difficult to a blunt tip to penetrate into it from the intramedullary canal without resistance. However, at the same time this implies that the tip of an intramedullary device may get good or reasonable purchase in that region.
Zone 5 is the head Zone. The distance in the AP view between the borders of the MT may narrow to 4.0 mm (range ˜3.0-6.0 mm in the non HV foot). Table 1 below presents typical longitudinal and latitudinal dimensions of a human foot
The various zones are presented in
Sizes and Measurements
The width and length of the metatarsals were studied to get an impression of the physical constrains that apply to a device according to embodiments of the present invention. The average width of the 2MT is 7.6 mm in women (N=12) and 8.4 mm in men (N=6), as presented in Table 1:
The width of the longitudinal canal of the 2MT was measured (the measure between the inner sides of the cortices) and was found to be roughly 40-50% of the outer diameter of the shaft. This means that the outer diameter of an implant in the 2MT needs to be in the order of 2.5 to 4.0 mm. In the 1MT the width may be much larger, in the order of 11.5-12.5 mm in diameter. The inner diameter, which reflects the canal diameter, is much larger in the 1MT compared to the 2MT, and is roughly ⅔ of the outer diameter of the 1 MT. This means that the canal diameter in the narrowest spot is about 8.0 mm (range 7.0-9.0 mm).
Dorso-Plantar Morphology and Declination Angle
Looking at the sagittal plane or a lateral view weight bearing X ray reveals that there is declination angle to the metatarsals. Traditionally this is considered as 20° down slope for the 1st MT, 15° to 2MT, and 12°, 10° and 8° to the 3rd, 4th and 5th MT. The implant planning should relate to these values but more so it shall take care of the relative motion between 1MT and 2MT.
Another morphological parameter that needs to be understood is the slope of the plantar cortex of the metatarsals 1-4. They all are much wider at the base in the dorsal-plantar aspect. The upper part is more or less flat. The slope of the base occupies about one third of the length of 1MT and roughly one quarter of the length of 2MT-4MT. The relationship between the slope and the Zones of the 1MT, as described for the purpose of inserting the device can be seen.
1MT and 2MT Zones description in LAT view of the foot: Reference is made to
Metatarsal Cortex Thickness
It is of noteworthy for further understanding the rational of some of the embodiments of this invention (e.g. the intramedullary arms construct) to clarify the thickness of the metatarsal cortices. The lateral cortex of 1MT and the medial cortex of 2MT are significantly (roughly about 30% more) thicker than the adjacent cortex of the same metatarsal. This thickness implies increased load and increased strength; hence the metatarsals are expected to be more resistant to forces acting on these cortices than the medial cortex of 1MT and the lateral cortex of 2MT.
Embodiments of a device and method of treatment according to the present invention may comprise of a device with two arms that are connected to each other in a springiness manner so that a springy force acts to pull the two arms close to each other. The arms produce, each, a basis for a gripping point which is firmly attached to its respective MT. The gripping points may be connected by a spring-like element in order to enable activation of the springy force onto the MTs.
According to some embodiments one of the arms may be inserted into the medullary canal of 1MT and the other into the medullary canal of the 2MT, as is described in details herein below. Reference is made now to
In the intramedullary embodiment the forces between 1MT and 2MT are acting mainly on the lateral cortex of 1MT and the medial cortex of 2MT.
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
A basic design of a device according to embodiments of the present invention may comprise two arms connected to each other or to a spring mechanism at one of their ends. In the basic embodiment the arms are built to introduce into the medullary canal of 1MT and 2MT and hold there snugly. A springy force acting to bring the arms closer to each other when placed in the treated foot is achieved by the shape of the arms, the connection between them to a spring mechanism and a designed construction of the spring mechanism. According to some embodiments of the present invention the spring-generated force may be in the range of 20-40N.
The relatively big difference between the canal size in 1 MT compared with that of the 2MT may have an impact on the design, the size and shape of the arms of a device of the relevant MTs, according to embodiments of the present invention. Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
There are few possible configurations of the arms according to embodiments of the present invention. In case of arms that are affixed to the treated MT by insertion into the medullary canal, the arms should be somewhat tapered and curved at their tip to allow gliding penetration into the medullary canal of the respective treated fingers, e.g. 1MT and 2MT, through a drill hole. The design of the arms is influenced by the shape and width of the medullary canal. In the 1MT the canal is wide, in the order of 9-12 mm. the arm that is introduced through a smaller hole needs to have significant expandable capabilities in order to achieve snug fit in the MTs.
When a HV repair device according to embodiments of the present invention includes intramedullary arms for introduction purposes the device should preferably be composed of three separable basic elements-two arms and a spring mechanism element that may be connected, each in its preferred time, before or during surgery, as may be convenient thus leaving maximal comfort in introduction and assembling of the device. According to some embodiments the HV repair device may be produced of a single unit comprising two arms and a spring mechanism or of two elements one comprising an arm and a spring mechanism and the other comprising an arm. These basic parts may be a first arm that may be connected to 1MT, a second arm that is connected to 2MT and a spring or spring like mechanism attaching said first and said second arms. The arms or spring mechanism are manufactured to exert a defined width and elastic force between them, with direction to pull the arms towards each other. The device may be inserted into the relevant MT's through a small cut on the dorsum of the foot close to the bases of the two MT's or through a similar but extensile approach. In yet another embodiment the penetration point into the MT medullary canal can be at a more distal point with the arm of each said MT holding both distally from and proximally to the entrance point.
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
The first group of fixating means for intramedullary arms which is based on snug fit or high friction between the arm and the medullar canal may be divided to 3 sub groups: non-expandable means, self expandable means and aided expandable means. In many of the embodiments it is possible to coat the implant with hysroxyapatite or any other known material that promotes incorporation between the arm and the MT bone. However, it is preferable to abolish movement at the initial period after the surgery.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,127,597 to Beyar et al. describes various fixating means for fixating bones. U.S. Pat. No. 4,204,531 to Aginsky describes expandable nail for repairing broken bone. However neither Beyar et al. nor Aginsky describe means for affixing an arm of a HV repair device to a bone nor are they meant to intact not broken bone.
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
In the typical form interlocking screws are penetrated from one bone cortex to a usually pre-drilled hole in the device and through it to the cortex on the other side of the bone. For the purpose of stabilizing, the intramedullary arm or rod fixation through one cortex is feasible. This can be by means of a screw that goes from the bone to the fixation device or from the fixation device to the bone. The tunnel within the bone can be with a thread so that the screw is locked in the device. Yet in another embodiment a slot or slots may be made in the intramedullary arm and locked screw may be served to expand the arm's diameter at its passage point through the arm, thus achieving through screwing snug fit of the screw within the intramedullary arm and sung fit of the intramedullary arm within the bone. For such purposes the screw part that affixes within the arm may have a changing diameter.
Reference is made now to
Reference is made now to
As mentioned above it is crucial that the system will afford relative motion in the vertical plane between the two arms of the device (hence between the two MTs). Since 1MT has motion in the vertical (sagittal) plane in every step and the 2MT has practically no motion (or very little) in the sagittal plane there is relative motion in the sagittal plane between 1MT and 2MT that needs to be enabled. In some constructs no motion is desired between the bone and the device. That sagittal or vertical motion therefore should occur in the spring or the spring mechanism and not transferred to the arms. At the same time the spring should act and induce forces that bring the two arms together. To avoid brakeage of the clip due to a too high rotational strain a spring should afford this type of movement as well. This may be achieved by twisting the spring part so that in one zone it affords axial moments and yet in another zone that is in right angle to the previous one sagittal movement takes place. Reference is made now again to
The motion of the joint between the medial cuneiform and its corresponding 1MT in maneuver moving them upward (dorsiflexion [DF]) and downward (plantar flexion [PF]) is, typically, of 3.5° (range 1.9°-5.3°). The motion between middle cuneiform and its corresponding 2MT is, typically, of 0.6° (range 0.1°-1.0°). There is also a supination movement of the foot, however it was found that in 20° supination motion of the cuneiform, the twist of 1MT joint is 1.3°±1.0°. The average reported motion of the first ray for hallux valgus patients before surgery is 9 mm and the motion is increased with Hyperlaxity and with plantar flexed position of the ankle Since the measurements were done at the proximal part of the metatarsus, e.g. where a device according to embodiments of the present invention is to be inserted, the figures presented above should be considered as the actual movement that the device should accommodate. The spring-like mechanism of a device according to embodiments of the present invention needs to allow almost unrestraint free vertical (sagittal) motion of the 1MT with respect to the 2MT and act in the horizontal plane (the plane of the sole of the foot) to keep the two metatarsal together.
The second MT remains relatively fixed. It is assumed that part of the 1MT motion is rotation around the axis of the 2MT. A device according to embodiments of the present invention needs to afford up to 9-10 mm vertical motion of 1MT in the sagittal plane, while the transverse distance is 15-20 mm after IMA correction. This distance is composed of the width between the cortices, the thickness of the cortices and part of the width of the canal. In between the MT's the distance is more in the order of 10 mm. The spring mechanism should be made accordingly. This may be by selection of configuration and/or materials of the spring, as is known in the art.
The reported motion in midfoot pronation is associated with pronation of the big toe and slight subluxed position of the sesamoids. Since the lateral sesamoid is attached to 2MT through the transverse metatarsal ligament, and is affixed to the 1MT head through the sesamoid metatarsal ligaments, it is considered that in the normal person during gait for a large extent the distance between the distal part of 1MT and 2MT remain relatively constant. The Lisfranc ligament retains a constant distance between the medial cuneiform, which articulates with 1MT and the base of 2MT. According to reasonable approximation, that with the limitation of motion occurring between 1MT and medial cuneiform, and motion between 1MT head and its sesamoid complex, the distance between 1MT and 2MT remains constant. Hence, the documented sagittal motion of the first ray is, to some extent, a radial motion of 1MT on the axis of 2MT.
In cases of severe deformity and very increased IMA, the pressure that the spring applies on the MT's might be too high with risk of stress fracture. To reduce the initial pressure the spring mechanism may be designed to have springy effect that maintains pulling force at substantially same amount regardless of the value of IMA, or limits the springy force under a defined limitation at high values of IMA as is known in the art. Similarly, the spring mechanism may be adjustable, so to allow the adjustment of force as needed, both during the surgical operation and/or afterwards.
Bunionette deformity and affiliated conditions often are composed of valgus deviation of the 5th metatarsal (5MT), away from the 4th MT (4MT) thus creating a large intermetatarsal angle between them (4-5 IMA). The common consequences or accompaniments of wide 4-5 IMA is the creation of painful bony prominence on the lateral aspect of the foot, at the level of the 5MT head. This is similar to and in some respects a mirror image of the same deformity involving the big toe, the bunion. Since this involves the lesser toe complex it is called bunionette. In bunionette deformity the 5th toe often drift into varus. Splay foot is a situation, in which the foot is wide and often causes difficulty in foot wear. This situation usually is composed mainly of increased 1-2 IMA as well as 4-5 IMA. Often the prior art correction of this malady entails osteotomy of the 5MT and shifting its head medially, thus narrowing the 4-5 IMA. The arms and spring mechanism which were described above with respect to the repair of 1MT-2MT HV are applicable to the 4MT-5MT extended IMA, with the required changes, mainly due to smaller dimensions of the cortex and its canals.
Reference is made to
Similarly when the method of installation is selected by affixing the arms onto the outer face of the respective MT, after performing the operations of block 1001 the first arm is attached to the outer face o1 MT and affixed to it (block 1022), the second arm is attached to the outer face of 2MT and affixed to it (block 1024) and a spring mechanism is connected between gripping points of the first and the second arms (Block 1026). Finally, and the influence of the torque produced between 1MT and 2MT is allowed to take effect (block 10208).
While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Claims
1. A device for repairing Hallux Valgus (HV) comprising:
- a. a first arm adapted to be longitudinally disposed in the first metatarsus (1MT) of a human foot;
- b. a second arm adapted to be longitudinally disposed in the second metatarsus (2MT) of a human foot; and
- c. a spring mechanism interconnecting said first arm and said second arm, operable to draw said 1MT and 2MT together;
- wherein at least one of said arms further comprises fixing means adapted for fixation of said first and/or second arm inside the canal of the respective first and/or second metatarsus; and
- wherein said spring mechanism comprises first and second extending portions that provide a first spring force between said first and said second arms about a pivot point in a first plane being the plane common to said 1MT and 2MT and a second spring force, less than the first spring force, between said 1MT and 2MT in a second plane not coincident with said first plane.
2. The device of claim 1, wherein said spring mechanism is releasably connectable to said first and second arms.
3. The device of claim 2, wherein said spring mechanism is adapted to be connected to said first and second arm after installing and affixing said first and second arm within said 1MT and 2MT respectively.
4. A device for repairing Hallux Valgus (HV) comprising:
- a. a first arm adapted to be longitudinally disposed in the first metatarsus (1MT) of a human foot;
- b. a second arm adapted to be longitudinally disposed in the second metatarsus (2MT) of a human foot; and
- c. a spring mechanism interconnecting said first arm and said second arm, operable to draw said 1MT and 2MT together;
- wherein at least one of said first and second arms is shaped in a longitudinal tubular arc-like manner for fixation of said first and/or second arm inside the canal of the respective first and/or second metatarsus; said arm is provided with a gripping point connecting said spring mechanism thereto.
5. A device for repairing Hallux Valgus (HV) comprising: a first arm adapted to be affixed inside the canal of the first metatarsus (1MT) of a human foot; a second arm adapted to be affixed inside the canal of the second metatarsus (2MT) of a human foot; and a spring mechanism interconnecting said first arm and said second arm, adapted to draw said first and second arms together; wherein
- at least one of said arms comprises a curved elongated member adapted to be longitudinally disposed in and fitted snugly in zone 3 of a medullary canal of 1MT or 2 MT and having a curved and tapered tip for insertion longitudinally in the medullary canal; and wherein
- the spring mechanism comprises first and second spring attachments, each adapted to be attached at a respective attachment end thereof to the respective first and second arms, and a spring between the first and second spring attachments and opposite the attachments ends of the first and second arms.
4204531 | May 27, 1980 | Aginsky |
6127597 | October 3, 2000 | Beyar et al. |
20090036893 | February 5, 2009 | Kartalian et al. |
20100082068 | April 1, 2010 | Graham |
20100211071 | August 19, 2010 | Lettmann et al. |
20120101502 | April 26, 2012 | Kartalian |
- Arnold, et al., Biomechanical In Vitro—Stability Testing on Human Specimens of a Locking Plate System Against Conventional Screw Fixation of a Proximal First Metatarsal Lateral Displacement Osteotomy, The Open Orthopaedics Journal, Mar. 8, 2012, pp. 133-139, vol. 6, Bentham Science Publishers, Bethesda, MD.
- United States Patent and Trademark Office, “International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/IL2013/050362”, Date: Sep. 13, 2013, USA.
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 29, 2013
Date of Patent: Oct 17, 2017
Patent Publication Number: 20150112446
Assignee: Bonfix Ltd. (Jerusalem)
Inventors: Eyal Aharon Melamed (Tivon), Matan Lev-Ari Melamed (Tivon)
Primary Examiner: Christopher D Prone
Assistant Examiner: Suba Ganesan
Application Number: 14/397,966
International Classification: A61F 2/42 (20060101); A61B 17/56 (20060101); A61B 17/72 (20060101); A61B 17/80 (20060101); A61B 17/82 (20060101);