Kiwi plant named ‘AU Fitzgerald’

- Auburn University

A new and distinct cultivar of the species Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev. is described. The parentage of this new cultivar is unknown, but it is most likely an open pollinated ‘Haywood’ as it was grown from seed collected from fruit purchased in a grocery store. The new cultivar is distinguished by a lower chilling requirement and higher yields, smaller fruit with a greater length times diameter ratio, and the fruit has a lower pH and higher titratable acidity, % soluble solids, % dry matter, reducing and total sugars, total and reduced form of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C), Vitamin C antioxidant capacity and cellular capacity to reduce free radicals is higher, lower levels of β-carotene, higher chlorophyll levels (a and b), lower phenolic content and higher flavonoid content than the comparison cultivar ‘Hayward’ in Alabama.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/150,857, filed on April 30, 2008, and entitled “Kiwi plant named ‘AU Authur’” is incorporated by reference herein.

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev.

Variety denomination: ‘AU FITZGERALD’.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

‘Hayward’ is the most commercialized female kiwi cultivar grown and marketed in the world. The ‘Hayward’ cultivar is produced commercially in California in the U.S. and in New Zealand, and is the kiwi fruit most often found in U.S. grocery stores. Attributes of the ‘Hayward’ cultivar that have led to its dominance of the kiwi market in the past are its distinctive green flesh, good flavor and long storage life. It is not known what male cultivar was used to pollinate the female flowers that produced the fruit and seed that resulted in the new cultivar. ‘Matua’ and ‘Tomuri’ are two male cultivars frequently used.

Both the ‘Hayward’ cultivar and the present invention are deciduous vines of Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev. The Actinidia deliciosa species originated in China and parts of Asia and is known as the Chinese gooseberry. Plant material of this species was taken to New Zealand where new cultivars such as ‘Hayward’ were developed. Due to the appearance of the fruit of the Chinese gooseberry, it was given the name kiwi fruit in New Zealand after the native kiwi bird.

Many plantings of the ‘Hayward’ cultivar were established in Alabama as well as the adjoining southeastern states. These plantings were established near the coast in most cases. The vines grew vigorously but were unfruitful. In Alabama, research plantings were established in different locations that varied from the coast to the center of the state. The location that the kiwi have been most productive is in the center of the state in Chilton County where the commercial peach industry is located. The ‘Hayward’ cultivar has not been productive there.

Research has shown that the ‘Hayward’ cultivar requires at least 900 hours of chilling for sufficient vegetative budbreak and flower development and that 1150 hours chilling is required for maximum flowering. From chilling requirement research, flower abortion decreased as chilling hours received increased for all cultivars.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Mrs. A. A. Fitzgerald of Summerdale, Ala. purchased kiwi fruit from a local grocery store and planted some seeds from the fruit. She ended up with one female and one male plant that bloomed together, were very productive and matured a crop of quality fruit. The fruit purchased was probably from the ‘Hayward’ cultivar.

The present invention relates to a new and distinctive kiwi cultivar having a generally cylindrical shaped fruit that has brown skin covered with medium length brown hairs that strongly adhere to the skin surface. The pericarp of the fruit is green.

In the climate of central Alabama, vegetative bud break occurs during the last two weeks of March and the bloom period occurs during the last week of April and the first two weeks of May, depending on the climate during the season. The fruit reaches a minimum percent soluble solids level of 6.5 in central Alabama by mid-October.

The seed from which ‘AU Fitzgerald’ originated from was originally planted at Summerdale, Ala., near the Gulf Coast in Baldwin County. It was very fruitful at its original location indicating it has a lower chilling requirement than the ‘Hayward’. ‘AU Fitzgerald’retained a statistically greater number of flowers than ‘Hayward’ at 700, 800 and 1000 chilling hours received. The data indicates that ‘AU Fitzgerald’ has a lower chilling requirement than ‘Hayward’, which explains the greater fruit set and yield of ‘AU Fitzgerald’ compared to ‘Hayward’ in Alabama.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a photograph of hanging fruit of the ‘AU Fitzgerald’ cultivar.

FIG. 2 is a photograph of vines with fruit of the ‘AU Fitzgerald’ cultivar.

FIG. 3 is a photograph of fruit of the ‘AU Fitzgerald’ cultivar and the ‘Hayward’ cultivar.

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

The new cultivar ‘AU Fitzgerald’ is pistillate, with imperfect flowers, e.g. the flowers produce only sterile pollen and thus require a pollinizer for fruit production. Two A. deliciosa pollinizers, ‘Matua’ and ‘AU Authur’ have been used to pollinize ‘AU Fitzgerald’.

The new cultivar is able to be asexually reproduced by softwood and hardwood cuttings or by grafting or budding on to a seedling or cutting grown rootstock. The new cultivar was asexually reproduced at the Chilton Area Research and Extension Center at Clanton, Ala., US. The instant plant was grafted on a rootstock named Bruno. The unique characteristics come true to form and are established and transmitted through succeeding asexual propagations.

The distinctive characteristics of this new kiwi cultivar described in detail below have been observed in a replicated field experiment at the Chilton Area Research and Extension Center at Clanton, Ala., US. The plants were one year old rooted cuttings when planted. The ‘Hayward’ cultivar was evaluated in the same replicated field experiment and was used as the standard cultivar for comparison.

Both the ‘AU Fitzgerald’ and ‘Hayward’ have a fruit shape in cross section that is generally cylindrical. However, the ‘AU Fitzgerald’ fruit is oblong to slightly ovate, whereas the ‘Hayward’ fruit is more broad elliptic to oblong. ‘AU Fitzgerald’ has a greater fruit length to diameter ratio. The shoulder on the stalk end of the fruit of each cultivar is rounded and flat and the stylar end of the fruit is flat and flush. The cultivars do not differ in flesh or skin color as measured by the Minolta calorimeter and The Royal Horticulture Society's Colour Chart (2001); however, higher chlorophyll a and b content were measured in ‘AU Fitzgerald’ and higher β-carotene content was measured in ‘Hayward’.

‘AU Fitzgerald’ has a lower chilling requirement, smaller fruit size, greater fruit length to diameter ratio, greater fruit set and crop load, and the fruit has a lower pH and higher titratable acidity, % soluble solids, % dry matter, reducing and total sugars, total and reduced form of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C), Vitamin C antioxidant capacity and cellular capacity to reduce free radicals is higher, lower levels of β-carotene, higher chlorophyll levels (a and b), lower phenolic content and higher flavonoid content than the comparison cultivar ‘Hayward’ in Alabama.

The table below illustrates the specific differences between the ‘AU Fitzgerald’ cultivar and the ‘Hayward’ cultivar.

TABLE I Comparison of ‘AU Fitzgerald’ and ‘Hayward’ cultivars. ‘AU Fitzgerald’ ‘Hayward’ Plant Plant: sex expression female (flowers imperfect) Plant: ploidy hexaploid Plant: vigor medium Young shoot: hairs present Young shoot: medium density of hairs Young shoot: short hirsute type of hairs Young shoot: medium anthocyanin coloration of growing tip Young shoot: absent anthocyanin coloration of leaf axil Plant: average plant is a vine trained height and spread to grow on a trellis sys- tem. In the T-bar system rows are spaced 16 feet apart and plants are planted 8 feet apart in the row. The trellis is 6 feet wide. The vines are very vigorous and will cover the trellis by the end of the second year. To maintain and control the plant, the vines are pruned in the dor- mant season and several times during the growing season. Stem Stem: coloration weak of leaf axil Stem: diameter medium Stem base diameter mean 16.7 mm mean 14.8 mm (range 15.6-18.7 mm) (range 14.6-15.1 mm) Stem mid section mean 11.5 mm mean 10.4 mm diameter (range 11.3-11.8 mm) (range 9.3-11.6 mm) Stem: dormant bud 7.4 mm (6.4-9.2 mm) 7.71 mm (7.1-9.1 diameter mm) Stem: color on upper dark brown (N199B) dark brown (200B) side of shoot Stem: character smooth of bark Stem: hairs present Stem: conspicuous- conspicuous ness of lenticels Stem: number of medium (258/sq cm) medium (239/sq cm) lenticels range (200-323/sq cm) range (181-329/sq cm) Stem: color of lenticels brownish-white Stem: size of bud support medium Stem: visibility of bud almost buried (dormant canes) Stem: number of medium hairs visible on bud (dormant canes) Stem: leaf scar length (mm) - 4.8 (range 3.8-5.4) width (mm) - 4.3 (range 3.7-5.8) Leaf (Mature) Leaf shape: orbicular to broadly orbicular to reni- cordate forme Leaf base shape: rounded to somewhat cordate, lobes cordate, lobes small and small and touch- touching to slightly ing to slightly overlapping overlapping Leaf tip shape: round and shallowly rounded, rarely cuspidate at tip refuse with broad cuspidate at tip Leaf margin: entire Leaf adaxial light-med green (147A), surface: glabrous except for sparse, un- branched hairs on veins Leaf abaxial light green (148A), light green (147B); surface: dense, stellate dense, stellate pubescence everywhere pubescence every- except along main where except along veins which are densely main veins which tomentose with are densely to- unbranched hairs mentose with un- branched hairs Leaf length (cm): 17(15.4-19.3)[15] 17.1(15.1-21.5)[15] Leaf width (cm): 14(12.8-15.5)[15] 14.3(13.0-17.3)[15] Leaf ratio (l/w): 1.2(1.1-1.4)[15] 1.2(1.0-1.7)[15] Leaf petiole 4.9(4.3-5.6)[15] 4.7(3.8-5.8)[15] length (cm): Leaf 1° vein pinnate; veins ter- organization: minating as small extended points or mucros at leaf margins Leaf 2° vein ± parallel organization: Leaf puckering: moderate weak Leaf variegation: none Leaf spines on none lower leaf surface: Petiole: 200B Peduncle: 149B Flower Inflorescence#: mean 1.8 (range mean 1.0 (range 1-3) [23] 1-1) [17] 1° Pedicel length (cm): 4.9(3.8-6.0)[13] 5.0(3.8-5.8)[16] 2° Pedicel length (cm): 2.4(1.8-3.2)[13] n/a Pedicel pubescence: minutely, densely tomentose, un- branched Sepal#: 6.4(4-10)[10] 6.3(5-8)[15] Sepal color: 152D greenish-tan Sepal pubescence: minutely, densely tomentose, un- branched Flower color: 10D Flower width (cm): 6.4(5.3-7.5)[17] 5.6(4.8-6.0)[13] Petal orientation: overlapping: sides reflexed Petal#: 6.7(5-10) [23] 7.3 (6-9) [14] Petal length (cm): 2.8(2.2-3.3)[20] 2.6(2.3-3.1)[20] Petal width (cm): 2.4(1.8-2.9)[20] 2.0(1.5-2.7)[20] Petal ratio (l/w): 1.2(1.0-1.4)[20] 1.3(1.1-1.8)[20] Petal arrangement: overlapping Ovary shape: globose to oblong globose Ovary pubescence: strongly expressed (minutely, densely pilose, unbranched) Style#: Average 32 >20 Range 29-36 Style orientation: upright to spreading Stamen#: Average 170 >40 Range 160-190 Anther length (mm): 2.5-3.5 2.0-3.0 Chilling requirement <800 1150 hours: Filament: 10C Anther: 21B Style: 10C Fruit Fruit: average size (g) 60.2 77.9 (50.4-75.0) (64.1-89.7) Fruit: length (mm) 64.3 63.3 (57.0-69.8) (61.0-65.2) Fruit: width (max) (mm) 43.7 49.0 (40.7-46.5) 47.1-50.8 Fruit: L/A ratio 1.46 1.29 (max width) Fruit: width (min) (mm) 38.5 44.8 34.9-41.3 42.6-46.2 Fruit: L/D ratio 1.68 1.42 (min width) Fruit: core diameter 13.9 12.4 (max) (mm) (5.0-24.3) (7.5-14.9) Fruit: core diameter 6.7 9.9 (min) (mm) (3.3-15.0) (4.6-18.8) Fruit: locule number 37.9 38.4 (31-51) (31-46) Fruit: peduncle length 59.6 46.88 (mm) 50.7-64.7 38.6-55.9 Fruit: peduncle width 2.3 2.8 (mm) (1.7-2.7) (2.3-3.2) Fruit: general shape cylindrical, ovate cylindrical, oblong Fruit: cross-section round at median Fruit: general shape flat, flush of stylar end Fruit: skin color at 199A harvest Fruit: skin color change absent during ripening Fruit: skin color at brown maturity for consumption Fruit: hairs present Fruit: density of hairs medium Fruit: types of hairs hirsute Fruit: hair length (mm) medium (1.1-2.5) Fruit: concentration of uniform hairs Fruit: adherence of strong hairs to skin (when rubbed) Fruit: core diameter large (14.5 mm by (at largest diameter) 7.0 mm) Fruit: core shape elliptical (in cross section) Fruit: core woody spike present Fruit: prominence of core medium woody spike Fruit: outer pericarp 147B color at maturity for consumption Fruit: inner pericarp 148B color (locules) at ma- turity for consumption Fruit: core color at 147D maturity Fruit: seed color at 202A maturity in flesh Fruit: seed color N199D when dry Physiochemical and Antioxidant Characteristics at Harvest pH 3.83 3.89 % Titratable Acidity 0.61 0.49 (TA) % Soluble Solid 7.40 5.90 (SS) Sugar/Acid Ratio 12.10 12.30 (SS/TA) Firmness (kg) 6.05 6.27 % dry matter 20.10 17.30 Sugar (mg/g.fw) Reducing sugar 25.87 16.01 Non-reducing sugar 11.59 18.63 Total sugar 37.46 34.64 Vitamin C (mg/100 g.fw) Total ascorbic acid 74.49 70.13 Ascorbic acid 67.10 61.15 Dehydroascorbic acid 7.39 8.98 TAA ratio % Hayward 1.06 1.00 AA ratio to TAA 0.90 0.82 Antioxidant Vitamin C equivalent 92.00 68.50 antioxidant capacity (VCEAC) (mg/100 g.fw) Total Vit C/Total anti- 0.81 1.02 oxidant ratio (%) - X DPPH (mg/100 g.fw) 168.90 129.60 β-carotene (mg/100 g.fw) 0.38 0.42 β-carotene ratio to 0.90 1.00 Hayward Chlorophyll a + b ratio 1.05 1.00 to Hayward Chlorophyll a (mg/ 0.97 0.91 100 g.fw) Chlorophyll b (mg/ 0.53 0.53 100 g.fw) Chlorophyll a + b 1.50 1.44 (mg/100 g.fw) Sensory Characteristics at Consumption Stage % Soluble Solids (SS) 16.40 14.10 % Dry matter 19.05 17.30 Firmness(kg) <0.12 <0.12 Total Phenolics and Total Flavonoids at Consumption Stage Total phenolics (mg 88.50 94.20 GAE/100 g.fw) Total flavonoids 28.90 27.00 (mg CE/100 g.fw)

Notes regarding Table I:
1. Horticulture terminology is used in accordance with revised UPOV guidelines for kiwi.
2. Characters of comparison cultivar ‘Hayward’ are noted opposite that character when significantly different.
3. ‘Hayward’ plants were observed in the same replicated study as the new cultivar.
4. All dimensions are in millimeters unless otherwise stated; weights are in grams.

Claims

1. A new and distinct variety of Actinidia deliciosa plant named ‘AU Fitzgerald’, substantially as described and illustrated herein.

Patent History
Patent number: PP21005
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 30, 2008
Date of Patent: May 25, 2010
Assignee: Auburn University (Auburn, AL)
Inventors: W. Alfred Dozier, Jr. (Opelika, AL), Floyd M. Woods (Auburn, AL), Curtis J. Hansen (Opelika, AL), Jim Pitts (Clanton, AL), Robert C. Ebel (Immokalee, FL), Grace Montgomery Fitzgerald (Summerdale, AL), John P. Fitzgerald, legal representative (Summerdale, AL)
Primary Examiner: June Hwu
Attorney: Haverstock & Owens LLP
Application Number: 12/150,769
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Fruit (including Ornamental Variety) (PLT/156)
International Classification: A01H 5/00 (20060101);