Optical interface devices having balanced amplification

An optical interface devices (OID) routes signals entering each of its ports to all other ports. The OID passively routes the optical signals and performs no conversion of the signals into the electrical domain. In addition to signal routing, the OID also performs bi-directional amplification of the optical signals to compensate for splitting losses, coupling losses, signal variations, and to provide additional gain. As a result, the power level of a signal entering one port is the same power level at which corresponding signals exit all other ports of the OID. The OID is useful in a number of network topologies, including but not limited to bus, point-to-point, star, ring, broken ring, hub, and a tree-like topology. The OID enables signal quality to be maintained throughout the network which is especially beneficial in the transmission of Radio Frequency and other analog signals.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference, provisional application Ser. No. 60/414,746 entitled “Optical Interface Devices Having Balanced Amplification,” filed on Sep. 27, 2002.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates generally to systems and methods for providing an optical interface and, more particularly, to systems, methods, and devices for routing optical signals and for compensating for optical losses.

BACKGROUND

Optical communication has many benefits over transmission of signals in an electrical domain. For one, the losses in an optical medium are much less than those incurred in an electrical medium. As a result, signals can travel greater distances through an optical fiber before any necessary regeneration. Another advantage is that optical signals are much less susceptible to electromagnetic radiation. An electrical medium, such as a coaxial cable, generates electromagnetic fields as the signals travel down the cable. These electromagnetic fields can induce noise in neighboring cables and cause interference with the signals traveling on such cables. In addition, noise can be induced upon the coaxial cable signals from the electromagnetic fields generated by the neighboring cables. For these and many other reasons, optical communication is often the preferred mode of communication.

In optical communication networks, as with electrical communication networks, the network needs some manner of adding and dropping signals at points throughout the network. One approach to adding and dropping signals onto an optical medium involves the use of regeneration devices. These regeneration devices convert the optical signals traveling along the optical medium into the electrical domain and route these electrical signals to terminal equipment. Any electrical signals that need to be added and forwarded on to the optical medium are added to the electrical signals that had been detected. A combination of these signals is then converted into optical signals and passed along the optical medium. Some drawbacks to this approach include the loss of signal quality in needing to convert the optical signals into electrical signals and then back to optical signals at each node or station throughout the network, the accompanying loss of speed and increase in latency, and the limitations in bandwidth associated with the electrical medium.

Rather than coupling signals in the electrical domain, a preferred device for coupling signals operates purely in the optical domain. By maintaining the signals in the optical domain, the coupling device can maintain signal quality, operate at higher speeds and at an increased bandwidth. U.S. Pat. No. 5,901,260, which is incorporated by reference, is an example of an optical interface device operating solely in the optical domain. This optical interface device is useful in routing optical signals traveling along either direction on an optical bus to a node and for directing signals from that node onto the bus in both directions. With such an optical interface device, signals that originate at any node within a network can be transmitted to every other node and, conversely, signals from all of the nodes are received at each node. This type of optical interface device is useful in an optical transport system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,801, which is incorporated by reference.

While optical interface devices have many advantages over electrical interface devices, optical interface devices can still limit the performance of the network. For example, each time optical signals are diverted off of an optical bus to a node, the optical interface device necessarily reduces the optical signal level. Consequently, after a certain number of nodes, the remaining signal has such a low optical signal to noise level that the signal is underneath the noise floor and can no longer be detected. In addition to those losses due to splitting of the signal at each node, the optical interface device also introduces losses resulting from the imperfect coupling of light from an input optical fiber to the optical interface device, from the optical interface device to an exit optical fiber, and from the optical interface device to the terminal equipment. The optical interface device therefore introduces losses at each node, which causes the signal to vary at points throughout the network.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,801 describes a network having a number of optical interface devices that bi-directionally amplifies the optical signals. By amplifying the optical signals traveling along the optical bus, the number of nodes along the network can be greatly increased. The optical amplifier may comprise a fiber amplifier and, more particularly a rare earth doped fiber amplifier. The doped fiber amplifier is energized with an excitation light, typically at 980 nanometers. This fiber amplifier may be located between nodes along the bus and/or between the terminal equipment and the optical interface device.

As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,801, the length of the rare earth doped fiber influences the amount of amplification provided by the fiber amplifier. By placing the fiber amplifiers between each node, the fiber amplifiers can compensate for losses incurred by splitting the signals at each node. Thus, a signal that originates at one end of the bus can travel along the bus, have a fraction of the signal diverted at each node, and then be amplified after incurring those losses. This approach to amplification, as mentioned above, greatly increases the number of nodes that may be in a network. This approach to amplification, however, is more challenging when the network topology is dynamic. For example, a network may have different amplification needs with an initial set of nodes than it would need later when nodes are added at other points within the network, are removed from the network, or are placed at different points within the network. The placement of fiber amplifiers at certain points may therefore not be optimal for a different configuration of nodes on the network. As a result, the signal level and quality of the signal may vary throughout the network. For certain types of signals, these variations may not affect performance of the network overall. On the other hand, for other types of signals, such as radio frequency (RF) signals and other analog signals, maintaining a consistent signal dynamic range and waveform quality throughout the network is imperative.

SUMMARY

The invention addresses the problems above by providing systems, networks, and devices for coupling and routing optical signals. An optical interface device according to a preferred embodiment of the invention has three ports with the signals entering any one of the ports being split and routed to each of the other two ports. The optical interface device maintains the optical signal level so that the level of the signal entering one of the three ports is the same level at which the signal exits the other two ports.

The optical interface device is very beneficial in the use of networks carrying radio frequency (RF) and other analog signals as it provides the least interference with the preservation of the quality of the dynamic range and waveform of these signals. The optical interface device may be used in many different network topologies, such as but not limited to, a bus, ring, star, or tree-like topology. In the preferred embodiment, the optical interface device has a balanced set of fiber amplifiers providing the necessary amplification of these signals. These fiber amplifiers are pumped with an excitation light, such as at 980 nanometers.

Other advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the description below, and from the accompanying papers forming this application.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, disclose the principles of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an optical interface device according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 2(A) and 2(B) are exemplary networks having the optical interface device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a more detailed diagram of the optical interface device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a more detailed diagram of the optical interface device of FIG. 1 according to another embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 5 is a detailed diagram of an optical interface device according to another embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 6 is a detailed diagram of an optical interface device according to a further embodiment of the invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An optical interface device (OID) 10 according to a preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to FIG. 1. The OID 10 has a number of ports, in this example three ports A, B, and C, and operates such that the output to any one of its ports is split and routed to each of the other ports. For example, a signal entering port A is split and directed to each of the ports B and C. Similarly, signals entering port B are split and routed to ports A and C and signals entering port C are split and routed to ports A and B.

The OID 10 operates solely in the optical domain and thus does not require any electrical regeneration of the optical signals. Because the optical signals are not converted into electrical signals and then regenerated as optical signals, the OID 10 is able to operate at higher speeds and have a lower latency than electrical interface devices. The OID 10 is also able to preserve signal quality by avoiding the deterioration that often occurs when converting signals between the electrical and optical domains.

The OID 10 furthermore provides balanced amplification of the signals entering each of the ports. This balanced amplification operates such that the power level of the signals entering any of the ports is equal to the power level of the corresponding signals that exit the other two ports. For example, a 10 dBm optical signal entering port A is split into two components, routed to ports B and C, and each of the signals at ports B and C is a 10 dB optical signal.

The OID 10 may operate in a number of different environments, including a variety of different network topologies. One such network is the simple interconnection of two or more devices coupled to the ports A, B, and/or C. Thus, the OID 10 may interconnect a first device coupled to port A with a second device on port B. Additionally, the OID 10 may couple each of the first and second devices on ports A and B, respectively, with a third device on port C. As mentioned above, the routing of signals between each of the ports A, B, and C is performed passively without any conversion into the electrical domain.

FIGS. 2(A) and 2(B) illustrate two other network topologies within which the OID 10 may operate. With reference to FIG. 2(A), the network has a bus 12, such as a bi-directional bus, which interconnects a number of OIDs 10A. In the example shown in FIG. 2(A), each OID 10A has a first port receiving signals from a preceding OID 10A and a second port passing signals to the next OID 10A. Each OID 10A also has a line 14 for providing and/or receiving signals from terminal equipment. Each OID 10A can be associated with a node or point within the network, such as a workstation on a Local Area Network (LAN). The OID 10A is not limited to such a use and FIG. 2(A) illustrates the ability of the OID 10A to operate in a bus network. As will be apparent from this bus topology example, the OIDs 10A can also operate in a ring, broken ring, or point to point network topology.

FIG. 2(B) provides an example of a tree-like network having a number of OIDs 10B. The network has a first OID 10B that couples the signals on a first line 16A with signals traveling along branch lines 16B. These branch lines 16B may feed into additional OIDs 10B along that branch and/or into OIDs B along different branches. For instance, the upper branch 16B is coupled to an OID 10B that is connected to lines 16C. In addition to this tree-like topology, the OIDs 10B may also operate in a star network as well as those having hubs and/or switches.

For the networks shown and suggested by both FIGS. 2(A) and 2(B), the OIDs 10 enable signals generated anywhere in the network to be routed to any other OID 10 with minimal loss in signal quality or signal power level. This ability to maintain the signal waveform is of utmost importance in the transmission of analog signals, especially Radio Frequency (RF) signals. RF and other analog signals contain a great deal of information within the waveform itself and within the signal level. As a result, when an analog signal is transmitted at one point within a network, all other nodes within the network must receive the same exact signal in order to provide consistency and integrity throughout the network.

The OID 10 may be fabricated with any technology. FIG. 3 provides an example of the OID 10 fabricated using discrete components. The OID 10 has three ports A, B, and C. A 50/50 coupler 21 is positioned at each port and splits the incoming signal into two equal components that are directed along one of the three legs within the OID 10. Thus, each leg of the OID 10 interconnects one of the ports to the other two ports. The 50/50 couplers 21 at each port also combine the signals traveling in the opposite direction along the legs which originate from the two other ports.

For example, a signal entering port A is divided into two components A1 and A2 by the 50/50 coupler 21 with component A1 traveling to port B and component A2 traveling to port C. Similarly, a signal B at port B is divided into components B1 and B2 by the 50/50 coupler 21 at port B and a signal C at port C is divided into components C1 and C2 by the 50/50 coupler 21 at port C. The 50/50 coupler 21 at port A combines the signals B1 and C1 and route them so they exit port A. Similarly, the 50/50 coupler 21 at port B combines the signals A1 and C2 and route them so they exit port B and the 50/50 coupler 21 at port C combines the signals A2 and B2 and route them so they exit port C.

Each leg provides for bi-directional amplification of the optical signals. The OID 10 has fiber amplifiers 20 and, more preferably rare earth doped fiber amplifiers, such as erbium doped fiber amplifiers. The amplifiers 20 preferably amplify the optical signals to compensate for optical splitting and coupling loss, which in the Figure are shown by 7.8 dB. This amplification compensates for the 6 dB splitting loss resulting from the 50/50 coupler 21 as well as an additional 1.8 dB loss from losses associated with coupling of the rare earth doped fiber, optional connectors, lengths of fiber and manufacturing component variations. Because the coupling losses associated with the OID 10 will vary with the precise couplers used and the optical medium to which the OID is coupled, the precise amount of amplification provided by the fiber amplifiers 20 may vary.

The fiber amplifiers 20 receive an excitation light from a pump P which is divided into the three essentially equal components and provided to each leg through a 68/32 coupler 25 and a 50/50 coupler 26. The excitation light is coupled to each leg of the OID 10 through couplers 22, which are preferably wavelength division multiplexers 22. The excitation light in this example is at 980 nm while the optical signals have wavelengths of light within the 1550 nm window.

According to another embodiment shown in FIG. 4, an OID 30 may include a plurality of pumps, such as three pumps P1, P2, and P3 for separately providing excitation light to each of the three legs. With this example, the OID 30 need not have the couplers 25 and 26 for dividing the excitation light into thirds for each of the three legs. In this manner, each of three erbium loops 40 may be pumped from independent power suppliers P1, P2, and P3 so that they may be independently regulated. In the example shown in FIG. 4, each of the rare earth amplifiers 40 has its own controllable 980 nm excitation light sources, P1, P2 and P3, which can independently provide different amplification levels in each leg, as shown by example as 6.8 dB, 7.8 dB and 8.8 dB of gain. The amplification may differ in the legs if the losses and the signals traveling in each leg are not the same.

FIG. 5 is yet another embodiment of an OID 50 according to an embodiment of the invention. The OID 50 is similar to the OID 20 shown in FIG. 3 but has an additional optical amplifier 52. The optical amplifier 52 may comprise any type of amplifier and, in the example shown in FIG. 5, is a fiber amplifier. The fiber amplifier 52 receives an excitation signal from a pump P2. The amplifier 52 enables some additional amplification of the optical signals beyond that offered by the amplifiers 20, such as but not limited to 6 dB. While just one additional amplifier 52 is shown, it should be understood that the OID 50 may comprise additional amplifiers for amplifying optical signals originating and/or exiting from each of the ports A, B, and C. Furthermore, while the amplifier 52 is illustrated as being at a location other than on one of the legs, the amplifier 52 may be located on one of the legs. As a result, the amplifiers 20 may be configured not only to amplify the optical signals to compensate for coupling, splitting losses, and signal variations but may also provide some additional gain.

FIG. 6 is another example of an OID 60 according to an embodiment of the invention. As shown in this figure, the OID 60 has optical amplifiers 20 within each leg of the OID and has an additional optical amplifier 62 located on the receiving side of port B. Thus, optical signals received at port B from either port A or port C undergo amplification through fiber amplifiers 20 to compensate for coupling, splitting losses, signal variations and undergo amplification through amplifier 62 to provide additional gain.

The OIDs 10 shown in FIGS. 3 to 6 are non-limiting examples of how an OID may be fabricated. In addition to using discrete components, the OID may be fabricated using semiconductor technology, through polymers, ion migration, and other existing or future developed techniques.

The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.

The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and their practical applications so as to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.

Claims

1. An optical interface device, comprising:

a first port;
a second port;
a third port;
each of the first, second, and third ports for receiving optical signals;
a first coupler for splitting optical signals from the first port into a plurality of optical signal components and for routing one of the optical signal components to each of the second and third ports;
a second coupler for splitting optical signals from the second port into a plurality of optical signal components and for routing one of the optical signal components to each of the first and third ports;
a third coupler for splitting optical signals from the third port into a plurality of optical signal components and for routing one of the optical signal components to each of the first and second ports;
a first optical amplifier located between the first and second ports for amplifying optical signals routed between the first and second ports;
a second optical amplifier located between the second and third ports for amplifying optical signals routed between the second and third ports;
a third optical amplifier located between the first and third ports for amplifying optical signals routed between the first and third ports;
wherein each of the first, second, and third optical amplifiers has a gain that is sufficient to compensate for coupling losses associated with the first, second, and third ports, respectively, and splitting losses associated with the first, second, and third splitter, respectively.

2. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third amplifiers comprise fiber amplifiers.

3. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third couplers comprise 50/50 splitters.

4. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the optical interface device has more than three ports.

5. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the gain is the same for each of the first, second, and third optical amplifiers.

6. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the gain in the first optical amplifier differs from the gain in the second and third optical amplifier.

7. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a fourth optical amplifier associated with the first port, the fourth optical amplifier for providing optical amplification of signals traveling between the first port and the first coupler.

8. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein each of the first, second, and third optical amplifiers receive an excitation signal from a common pump.

9. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third optical amplifiers receive excitation signals from different pumps.

10. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third optical couplers split the optical signals into equal optical components.

11. An optical interface device, comprising:

means for receiving an optical signal from a first port;
means for separating the optical signal into a plurality of signal components;
means for amplifying the optical signal components to compensate for losses associated with the receiving means and the separating means, the amplifying means generating amplified optical signal components; and
means for passing the amplified optical signal components from at least a second port and a third port.

12. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the receiving means comprises a port.

13. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the separating means comprises a splitter.

14. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the amplifying means comprises a fiber amplifier.

15. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the amplifying means amplifies each signal component with the same gain.

16. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the amplifying means amplifies the signal components with different gains.

17. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, further comprising second amplifying means for amplifying the optical signal.

18. A method for routing an optical signal from a first line onto at least a second line and a third line, comprising:

receiving the optical signal from the first line;
splitting the optical signal into a plurality of signal components;
amplifying each of the signal components to compensate for coupling and splitting losses, the amplifying of the signal components resulting in amplified signal components; and
passing the amplified signal components onto each of the second line and the third line.

19. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein splitting comprises splitting the optical signal into equal optical signal components.

20. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein amplifying comprises amplifying the optical signal components to a level greater than a level of the optical signal.

21. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein splitting comprises splitting the optical signal into two optical signal components and the passing comprises passing the two optical signal components onto the second and third lines.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3883217 May 1975 Love et al.
3887876 June 1975 Zeidler
3936141 February 3, 1976 Milton
3943358 March 9, 1976 Reymond et al.
4054366 October 18, 1977 Barnoski et al.
4166946 September 4, 1979 Chown et al.
4234969 November 18, 1980 Singh
4249266 February 1981 Nakamori
4301543 November 1981 Palmer
4307933 December 29, 1981 Palmer et al.
4317614 March 2, 1982 Palmer
4366565 December 28, 1982 Herskowitz
4367460 January 4, 1983 Hodara
4400054 August 23, 1983 Biard et al.
4423922 January 3, 1984 Porter
4435849 March 6, 1984 Ilgner et al.
4446515 May 1, 1984 Sauer et al.
4457581 July 3, 1984 Johnson et al.
4482980 November 13, 1984 Korowitz et al.
4506153 March 19, 1985 Ohno
4543574 September 24, 1985 Takagi et al.
4545074 October 1, 1985 Balliet et al.
4554511 November 19, 1985 Braun
4577184 March 18, 1986 Hodara et al.
4595839 June 17, 1986 Braun et al.
4630256 December 16, 1986 Albanese
4654890 March 31, 1987 Hasegawa et al.
4671608 June 9, 1987 Konishi
4674830 June 23, 1987 Shaw et al.
4705350 November 10, 1987 Cheng
4715012 December 22, 1987 Mueller, Jr.
4717229 January 5, 1988 Cutler
4731784 March 15, 1988 Keller et al.
4739183 April 19, 1988 Tokura et al.
4756595 July 12, 1988 Braun et al.
4759011 July 19, 1988 Hicks, Jr.
4761833 August 1988 Epworth
4786130 November 22, 1988 Georgiou et al.
4810052 March 7, 1989 Fling
4829593 May 9, 1989 Hara
4845483 July 4, 1989 Negishi
4850047 July 18, 1989 Iguchi et al.
4883335 November 28, 1989 Alferness et al.
4898565 February 6, 1990 Braun
4932004 June 5, 1990 Hodara et al.
4946244 August 7, 1990 Schembri
4947134 August 7, 1990 Olsson
4948218 August 14, 1990 Kobayashi et al.
4958354 September 18, 1990 Urakami et al.
4959837 September 25, 1990 Febrier et al.
5029306 July 2, 1991 Bull et al.
5046137 September 3, 1991 Kurobe et al.
5055827 October 8, 1991 Philipp
5058101 October 15, 1991 Albanese et al.
5058974 October 22, 1991 Mollenauer
5080505 January 14, 1992 Epworth
5083874 January 28, 1992 Aida et al.
5117196 May 26, 1992 Epworth et al.
5117303 May 26, 1992 Desurvire et al.
5129019 July 7, 1992 Robberg et al.
5133031 July 21, 1992 Tanaka et al.
5179603 January 12, 1993 Hall et al.
5181134 January 19, 1993 Fatehi et al.
5185735 February 9, 1993 Ernst
5187605 February 16, 1993 Shikata et al.
5189541 February 23, 1993 Konishi
5212577 May 18, 1993 Nakamura et al.
5222166 June 22, 1993 Weltha
5267071 November 30, 1993 Little et al.
5283687 February 1, 1994 Hsu et al.
5296957 March 22, 1994 Takahashi et al.
5307197 April 26, 1994 Tanabe et al.
5309564 May 3, 1994 Bradley et al.
5315424 May 24, 1994 Boden et al.
5317580 May 31, 1994 Auffret et al.
5319642 June 7, 1994 Ota
5345230 September 6, 1994 Jackson et al.
5347384 September 13, 1994 McReynolds et al.
5361262 November 1, 1994 Cheung
5363367 November 8, 1994 Kobayashi et al.
5369516 November 29, 1994 Uchida
5392154 February 21, 1995 Lin et al.
5412746 May 2, 1995 Rossberg et al.
5414416 May 9, 1995 Yamakita et al.
5424864 June 13, 1995 Emura
5432874 July 11, 1995 Muraguchi
5434861 July 18, 1995 Pritty et al.
5471342 November 28, 1995 Junginger et al.
5479082 December 26, 1995 Calvani et al.
5481478 January 2, 1996 Palmieri et al.
5483233 January 9, 1996 Pettitt et al.
5500857 March 19, 1996 Nakata
5500867 March 19, 1996 Krasulick
5502589 March 26, 1996 Yamamoto et al.
5506709 April 9, 1996 Segal et al.
5508689 April 16, 1996 Rado et al.
5517622 May 14, 1996 Ivanoff et al.
5533153 July 2, 1996 Ota
5539558 July 23, 1996 Yonemura et al.
5548431 August 20, 1996 Shin et al.
5552921 September 3, 1996 Hetzel et al.
5572612 November 5, 1996 Delavaux et al.
5615290 March 25, 1997 Harasawa et al.
5623169 April 22, 1997 Sugimoto et al.
5664035 September 2, 1997 Tsuji et al.
5682525 October 28, 1997 Bouve et al.
5684899 November 4, 1997 Ota
5712932 January 27, 1998 Alexander et al.
5712937 January 27, 1998 Asawa et al.
5717795 February 10, 1998 Sharma et al.
5732086 March 24, 1998 Liang et al.
5745479 April 28, 1998 Burns et al.
5764821 June 9, 1998 Glance
5777561 July 7, 1998 Chieu et al.
5778118 July 7, 1998 Sridhar
5793908 August 11, 1998 Mizuochi et al.
5796890 August 18, 1998 Tsuji et al.
5801865 September 1, 1998 Weis et al.
5809187 September 15, 1998 Peck, Jr. et al.
5815294 September 29, 1998 Ishikawa et al.
5825515 October 20, 1998 Anderson
5825949 October 20, 1998 Choy et al.
5838989 November 17, 1998 Hutchison et al.
5854698 December 29, 1998 Eskildsen et al.
5866898 February 2, 1999 Hodgson et al.
5880863 March 9, 1999 Rideout et al.
5894362 April 13, 1999 Onaka et al.
5896417 April 20, 1999 Lau
5898673 April 27, 1999 Riggan et al.
5898801 April 27, 1999 Braun et al.
5901260 May 4, 1999 Braun et al.
5910851 June 8, 1999 Flaherty
5937032 August 10, 1999 Nummelin et al.
5943148 August 24, 1999 Hamel et al.
5949560 September 7, 1999 Roberts et al.
5995258 November 30, 1999 Weber et al.
6008915 December 28, 1999 Zyskind
6014481 January 11, 2000 Kremers
6075628 June 13, 2000 Fisher et al.
6075648 June 13, 2000 Yamamoto et al.
6084233 July 4, 2000 Hodgson et al.
6111888 August 29, 2000 Green et al.
6122095 September 19, 2000 Fatchi
6128111 October 3, 2000 Roberts
6140920 October 31, 2000 Roberts
6157725 December 5, 2000 Becker
6175533 January 16, 2001 Lee et al.
6317718 November 13, 2001 Fano
6345137 February 5, 2002 Imajo
6385366 May 7, 2002 Lin
6449072 September 10, 2002 Sian et al.
6499027 December 24, 2002 Weinberger
6611751 August 26, 2003 Warren
6636320 October 21, 2003 Wetzel
6665676 December 16, 2003 Twig et al.
6895185 May 17, 2005 Chung et al.
6912339 June 28, 2005 Whittaker
6944447 September 13, 2005 Portman et al.
6993938 February 7, 2006 Stewart
7085497 August 1, 2006 Tiemann et al.
7107285 September 12, 2006 von Kaenel et al.
20020018260 February 14, 2002 Kisovec et al.
20020044565 April 18, 2002 Park
20020067893 June 6, 2002 Uken
20020101874 August 1, 2002 Whittaker et al.
20040076434 April 22, 2004 Whittaker et al.
20050213973 September 29, 2005 Rohrer et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
3007958 March 1984 DE
3807072 August 1988 DE
3938856 November 1989 DE
41 02 459 July 1992 DE
4331330 September 1993 DE
4226838 February 1994 DE
42 26 838 February 1994 DE
4427187 February 1996 DE
0 069356 January 1983 EP
000103873 March 1984 EP
0 105 753 April 1984 EP
0 164 652 December 1985 EP
0 211 221 February 1987 EP
0 231 635 August 1987 EP
0 356 090 February 1990 EP
0 380 341 August 1990 EP
0 393 293 October 1990 EP
0 414 333 February 1991 EP
0 905 936 March 1991 EP
0 451 426 October 1991 EP
0 503 212 September 1992 EP
0 528 636 February 1993 EP
0 425 626 October 1993 EP
0 739 103 October 1996 EP
0 744 797 November 1996 EP
0 899 161 March 1999 EP
0 350 720 January 2001 EP
1 246 378 October 2002 EP
1 260 840 November 2002 EP
2574565 June 1986 FR
2073877 October 1981 GB
2087679 May 1982 GB
2102232 January 1983 GB
2 118 319 October 1983 GB
2189961 November 1987 GB
2255683 November 1992 GB
11-87823 July 1989 JP
7-202921 August 1995 JP
9/51322 February 1997 JP
9-321739 December 1997 JP
10-107773 April 1998 JP
11-331224 March 1999 JP
WO 93/03406 February 1993 WO
WO 00/57582 September 2000 WO
Other references
  • Personick, Stewart D., Optical Fiber Transmission Systems, 1981, pp. 1-3.
  • H. Hodara, and E. Miles, “High-Speed Local Area Networks”, Fiber and Integrated Optics: (1992) pp. 253-277.
  • N.A. Olsson, Lightwave Systems With Optical Amplifiers, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jul. 1989, pp. 1071-1082 (Jul. 1989).
  • ITU-T Recommendation G.681, Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks; Functional characteristics of interoffice and long-haul systems using optical amplifiers, including optical multiplexing (Oct. 1996).
  • ITU-T Recommendation G.692, Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks; Optical Interfaces for multichannel systems with optical amplifiers (Oct. 1998).
  • Chart and figures for optical fiber cable and baseband transmission, available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/WFW/wfw31/1_ch1.asp.
  • HDR 7.0 2 73; 7.0 Fiber Optic Ethernet—Types FOIRL and 10 BASE-F available at http://www.uni-trier.de/infos/ether/ethernet-guide/ethernet-guide.html.
  • 3.0 IEEE Acronyms, available at http://spacey.net/ldavis/Design_Ethernet_Note.html, no date.
  • Fibre Channel—Overview of the Technology, Sep. 9, 2000, pp. 1-9 available at http://fibrechannel.org/technology.
  • Bi-Directional Optical Backplane Bus for Board to Board Optoelectronic Interconnects, Gicheri Kim, Jinghuai Fa and Ray T. Chen, 1-4 (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://ece.utexas.edu/projects/ece/mrc/profs/chen_projects/optbus/optbus.html.
  • SOME Bus (Simultaneous Optical Multiprocessor Exchange Bus)(Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://eb.uah.edu/˜cohen/some_bus/some_bus.html.
  • Integrated Explorations of the Spectral, Temporal and Spatial Degrees of Freedom 1 (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://thebusinessedge.com/reruns/cito/sargent/sld001.htm.
  • Challenges in IP LANs on Higher-Dimensional Encoding (slide 4) (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://thebusinessedge.com/reruns/cito/sargent/sld004.htm.
  • 0034-P PCI 1-Gig Fibre Channel Optical Host Bus Adapter 1-4 available at http://solutions.sun.com/dbsearch/index.cgi?STATE=product&CMD=show&p_id=58181 (Sep. 9, 2000).
  • Architectural and Engineering Isues for Building an Optical Internet 1-55 (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://www.canet3.net/papers/ArschandEngissues.html.
  • Baker, Monomode Fiber-Optic Design with Local-Area and Long-Haul Network Applications, pp. 370-371.
  • Karim, Chapter 9: Electro-Optical Devices and Systems, Fiber-Optics-Based Devices and Systems, pp. 434-435.
  • Chinlon Lin, Systems Applications of WDM Technologies in Optical Communications, SPIE-International Society for Optical Engineering (Aug. 15-18, 1994).
  • Manuel Lopez-Amo, Loudon T Blair & Paul Urquhart, Wavelength-Division-Multiplexed distributed optical fiber amplifier bus network for data and sensors, Optics Letter 1159-61 (Jul. 15, 1993).
  • Francesco Matera & Marina Settembre, Performance Evaluation of Optically Amplified Systems Operating in Optical Networks, Microwave & Optical Technology Letters (Nov. 1996).
  • Spirit et al., 140-km 20-Gbit/s repeaterless transmission employing distributed erbium amplification, Optical Fiber Communication Conference (1992).
  • Philip J. Koopman, Jr., and Bhargav P. Upender., “Time Division Multiple Access Without a Bus Master,” United Technologies Research Center, UTRC Technical Report RR-9500470 (Jun. 1995).
  • Technical Report CSRI-209 entitled “A New Binary Logarithmic Arbitration Method for Ethernet,” by Mart L. Molle of Computer Systems Research Institute, pp. 1-57 (Apr. 1994).
  • WRL Research Report 88/4 entitled “Measured Capacity of an Ethernet: Myths and Reality” by David R. Boggs, et al., printed by Digital Western Research Laboratory, Palo Alto, California (Sep. 1998) (pp. 1-31), originally published in Proceedings of the SIGCOMM '88 Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols, ACM SIGCOMM, Stanford, California, Aug. 1988.
  • Yamashita, et al., “Studies of a system gathering multi-channel visual signals using a single optical fiber and a bi-directional optical amplifier,” T.IEE Japan, 119-C(12):1528-1534 (1999).
  • Kempainen, “Optical Networking lightens carrier-backbone burden,” EDN, pp. 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 72 (Oct. 8, 1998).
  • Thomas, et al., “Physics in the Whirlwind of Optical Communications,” Physics Today, pp. 30-36 (Sep. 2000).
  • Press Release entitled “Lucent Technologies announces record-breaking 320-channel optical networking system,” (pp. 1-2) (Apr. 17, 2000).
  • Iannone, et al., “A 160-km transparent metro WDM ring network featuring cascaded erbium-doped waveguide amplifiers,” published by Optical Society of America (2000).
  • “Performance Management—Management of SONET Networks—White Paper,” Clear Communications, Sonet and Performance Management, Issuel, Apr. 1996 (pp. 1-21).
  • Cisco Wavelength Router Manager—Data Sheet, www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/olso/cwrm_ds.htm (Apr. 25, 2001).
  • Keyserling, A. and R.C.L., “Chapter 2: Number, Dimensions, Manderibrot, Chaos, 4 Attractors, Music and Color,” www.chanceandchoice.com/ChanceandChoice/chapter2.html.
  • Gallardo, et al., “Fast Simulation of Broadband Telecommunications Networks Carrying Long-Range Dependent Bursty Traffic,” Preceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 374-381 (Winter 1999).
  • Willinger, et al., “Self-Similarity Through High-Variability: Statistical Analysis of Ethernet LAN Traffic at the Source Level,” pp. 1-31 (Apr. 15, 1997).
  • DeCotignie, J.D., et al., “Producer-Distributor-Consumer Model on Controller Area Network,” Proceedings of the IFAC/IFIC Workshop, Real Time Programming, 1995, pp. 35-42, XP002074139, Oxford, Great Britain.
  • Liew, “A Broad-Band Optical Network Based on Hierarchical Multiplexing of Wavelengths and RF Subcarariers,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, 7(11):1825-1838 (1989).
  • AJ-Raweshidy and Komaki, Radio Over Fiber Technologies.
  • Fibre Channel Overview http://his.web.cem.ch/HIS/fcs/spec/overview.htm, pp. 1-10 (Nov. 15, 2002).
  • Ethernet FAST Ethernet Fiber Optic Media Converters, http://www.versitron.com/Ethernet.html, 2 pages (Nov. 5, 2002).
  • HomeNetHelp.com, http://www.homenethelp.com/web/explain.about-hubs-and-switches.asp, 5 pages (Nov. 5, 2002).
  • Fibre Channel, http://www.lol.unh.edu/training/fc/fc_tutorial.html, 22 pages (Nov. 5, 2002).
  • Paper authored by Stewart, William L. and James G. Blaylock, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, entitled ‘The Challenge of Transmitting Super-High Frequency Radio Signals Over Short-Fiber-Optic Networks on Aerospace Platforms,’, pp. 3-1 to 3-8 (Oct. 2002).
  • Stewart, William L., Senior Staff Specialist, and James Blaylock, Senior Staff Specialist, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, presentation entitled ‘The Challenge of Transmitting Super-High Frequency Radio Signals Over Short-Fiber-Optic Networks on Aerospace Platforms,’, 21st DASC: Oct. 31, 2002 (Oct. 2002), 14 pages.
  • Whittaker et al., “Optical Distribution Network . . . ”, Pub. No.: 2004/0076434 A1, publication date: Apr. 22, 2004.*
  • International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/30326.
  • International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/29970.
  • International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/03310.
  • International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/03329.
  • International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/10053.
Patent History
Patent number: RE40425
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 24, 2005
Date of Patent: Jul 8, 2008
Assignee: Lockheed Martin Corporation (Bethesda, MD)
Inventors: G. Allan Whittaker (Alpharetta, GA), Wilber A. Williams (Acworth, GA)
Primary Examiner: Jack Berman
Assistant Examiner: Zia R. Hashmi
Attorney: Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
Application Number: 11/258,588
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Plural (e.g., Data Bus) (385/24)
International Classification: H04B 10/207 (20060101);