Microelectrochemical systems device and method for fabricating same

One aspect of the invention provides a method for fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device. The method comprises fabricating an array of first elements, each first element conforming to a first geometry; fabricating at least one array of second elements, each second element conforming to a second geometry; wherein fabricating the arrays comprises selecting a defining aspect of each of the first and second geometries based on a defining characteristic of each of the first and second elements; and normalizing differences in an actuation voltage required to actuate each of the first and second elements, wherein the differences are as a result of the selected defining aspect, the defining characteristic of each of the elements being unchanged.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the actuation of microelectromechanical systems devices. In particular, it relates to the actuation or driving of elements in an array in a microelectromechanical systems device.

BACKGROUND

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices may include arrays of elements wherein the elements are operable between one or more driven and undriven states by the application of an actuation voltage. Depending on the particular microelectromechanical systems device, the elements may include interferometric modulators (IMODs), switches, Infra Red (IR) detectors, etc.

In some microelectromechanical systems devices, it may be necessary to have multiple arrays, wherein each array comprises only elements of a particular type, and wherein each element type requires a different actuation voltage. An example of such a device is the color IMOD-based display described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,937, which includes three sets or arrays of IMODs designed to switch between the colors red/black, green/black and blue/black. Each array of IMODS has a different actuation voltage.

Driving the elements in these multiple arrays between their undriven and driven states present a challenge because different actuation voltages are required.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a microelectromechanical systems device comprising a plurality of elements each having at least two layers disposed in a stacked relationship with a gap therebetween when the element is in an undriven state, the plurality of elements being of at least two different types, each differing in a height of its gap; and a driving mechanism to drive the plurality of elements to a driven state, wherein one of the layers of each element is electrostatically displaced relative to the other layer, and wherein a minimum voltage required to actuate the driving mechanism is substantially the same for each type of element.

According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a method of fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device comprising constructing an array of elements, each element having a first layer, a second layer spaced from the first layer by a gap when in an undriven state, and an electrode layer to electrostatically drive the second layer to contact the first layer corresponding to a driven state when energized, the elements being of at least two different types which differ in a height of its gap, wherein said constructing includes changing a configuration of each element type to compensate for differences in a voltage required to drive each element to its driven state.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a microelectromechanical systems device comprising a plurality of elements, each having a first layer, a second layer spaced therefrom by a gap when in an undriven state, and an electrode layer to electrostatically drive the second layer to contact the first layer corresponding to a driven state when energized, the elements being of at least two different kinds, each differing in a height of its gap; and an element driving mechanism comprising an integrated drive circuit having multilevel outputs to energize the electrode layer of each element to cause the element to change from its undriven state to its driven state.

According to yet a further aspect of the invention there is a provided a method for fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device, the method comprising fabricating an array of first elements, each first element conforming to a first geometry; fabricating at least one array of second elements, each second element conforming to a second geometry; wherein fabricating the arrays comprises selecting a defining aspect of each of the first and second geometries based on a defining characteristic of each of the first and second elements; and normalizing differences in an actuation voltage required to actuate each of the first and second elements, wherein the differences are as a result of the selected defining aspect, the defining characteristics of each of the elements being unchanged.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a simplified drawing of a generic MEMs device to which aspects of the present invention apply;

FIG. 2 shows an example of how the geometry of the elements in the MEMs device of FIG. 1 may be changed, according to one embodiment of the invention, to normalize the actuation voltages of the elements;

FIG. 3A shows a different geometry for a driven layer of an element, wherein the driven layer has tabs;

FIG. 3B shows a three dimensional view of the driven layer of FIG. 3A supported on supports;

FIG. 3C shows the driven layer of FIG. 3A with a different configuration for the tabs;

FIG. 4 shows an example of how the configuration of an electrode within each element may be changed in order to achieve voltage normalization in one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 5 shows an example of how the stiffness of the layer which is driven in each element may be varied in order to achieve voltage normalization in accordance with another embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 6 shows a simplified drawing of an IMOD-based display array wherein the thickness of the layer which is driven within each IMOD is changed in order to achieve voltage normalization, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 7 shows a schematic end view of an IMOD which includes a dielectric stack; and

FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of a driver in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 shows, in simplified form, a generic structure of a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device 100 to which aspects of the present invention relate. Referring to FIG. 1, it will be seen that the MEMs device 100 comprises two elements which are designated 102 and 104 respectively. The element 102 and the element 104 each have a common lower or base layer 106. Element 102 has an upper layer 108 which is spaced from the base layer 106 by a number of supports which are in the form of posts 110. Likewise, element 104 has an upper layer 112 which is spaced from the base layer 106 by supports in the form of posts 114. It will be apparent that posts 114 are higher than posts 110 and so the height of a gap 116 between layer 106 and layer 108 is less than that of a gap 118 between layer 112 and layer 106. Because of the differences in the heights of gaps 116 and 118, an actuation voltage required to electrostatically drive layers 108 and 112 respectively from an undriven state, corresponding to the state showing FIG. 1 of the drawings, to a driven state (not shown), in which the layers 106 and 112 contact the base layer 116, is different. Thus, any driving mechanism must take into account these differences in the actuation voltages.

As stated above, FIG. 1 is intended to be a simplified drawing of a generic MEMs device to which aspects of the present invention apply. In actual embodiments, the MEMs device 100 may include multiple arrays each array comprising elements such as the elements 102 or 108. Thus, the elements in each array would require a different actuation voltage. An example of one such MEMs device is provided by the IMOD display described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,937. In this example, there are three arrays, each comprising elements in the form of IMODs designed to have a particular optical characteristic which arises from a size of an air gap in each IMOD. Each array comprises only IMODs which have a particular optical characteristic. As a result, different actuation voltages are required to drive the IMODs in each array.

Embodiments of the present invention are concerned with the problem of driving MEMs devices such as are described above, wherein different actuation voltages are required by the elements within th e MEMs device. In describing specific embodiments of the invention, reference will be made to a MEMs device such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,937. However, it must be borne in mind that the invention is applicable to any MEMs device comprising elements which each require a different actuation voltage to drive or actuate the element resulting in a geometric configuration or state of the element being changed. Such elements may include IMODs, switches, Infra Red (IR) detectors, etc., where the change in the geometric configuration comprises driving one layer of the element to contact another layer. The layer that is driven will be referred to as the driven layer to distinguish it from the undriven layer.

According to embodiments of the present invention, the actuation voltage required to actuate each of the elements is normalized. This is achieved by changing a geometry of the elements within each array. Naturally, aspects of the geometry of an element which impart a defining characteristic to the element are not changed. Thus, in the case of the IMOD displays of U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,937, the height of the air gap in each element (IMOD) imparts a defining optical characteristic to the IMOD and so the one aspect of geometry of an IMOD that is not changed is the height of the air gap.

FIG. 2 of the drawings shows an example wherein the geometry of the element 102 shown in FIG. 1 of the drawings has been changed by increasing the number of posts 110 and by decreasing the spacing therebetween. Thus the layer 108 is supported by posts 110 to a greater degree and therefore a greater actuation voltage will be required to drive layer 108 to contact layer 106. By selecting the number of posts 110 and the spacing therebetween it will be appreciated that the actuation voltages required to drive element 102 and 108 may be normalized.

In other embodiments, the geometry of the driven layer may be changed in order to increase or decrease the degree of support provided thereto. This is illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B of the drawings. Referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, a layer 300, which is similar to layers 108 and 112 of FIGS. 1 and 2, is shown. The layer 300 has a different geometry to that of layers 108 and 112 by virtue of tabs 302 which form tethers which themselves are supported on posts 304. Thus, the thickness and length of the tabs may be varied to change the degree of support to the layer 300. Assuming that an actuation voltage is required to drive layer 300 into the plane of the drawings it will be appreciated that the tabs 302 in FIG. 3A offer a greater degree of support than the tabs 302 shown in FIG. 3C of the drawings. Thus, a lesser actuation voltage will be required to drive layer 300 in FIG. 3C of the drawings than in FIG. 3A of the drawings. Embodiments of the present invention use the principles illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3C of the drawings to normalize the actuation voltage required to actuate elements within a MEMs device wherein an operatively upper layer (driven layer) is to be driven towards an operatively lower layer across a gap. When the gap is large, the geometry of the tabs is varied in accordance with the principles shown in FIGS. 3A and 3C to reduce the degree of support provided to the driven layer. On the other hand when the gap is small then the geometry of the supports is varied to provide a greater degree of support to the driven layer. In this way, regardless of the size of the gap through which a layer must be driven, the voltage required to drive the layer can be normalized.

Although not shown in FIGS. 1 or 2 of the drawings, a driving mechanism to drive layers 108 and 112 comprises electrodes to electrostatically drive layers 108 and 112 towards base layer 106. The electrodes are disposed on layer 106. An example of an electrode is indicated generally by reference numeral 400 in FIG. 4 of the drawings. According to some embodiments of the present invention, in order to normalize the voltage required to drive or actuate elements within an MEMs device, the configuration of electrode 400 may be changed. Changing the configuration of the electrode may include changing the shape of the electrode or providing apertures therein, for example, such as slots 402 shown in electrode 400. Thus, if a layer is to be driven across a small gap, the electrode may have slots such as slots 402 which serve to reduce the effective electrostatic force created by the electrode. This allows the actuation voltage to be normalized regardless of the height of the gap across which a layer has to be driven.

According to other embodiments of the present invention, changing the geometry of the elements in order to normalize the actuation voltage may include changing the stiffness of the driven layer. One way of changing the stiffness of the driven layer includes changing the Young's Modulus thereof. Thus, the layer which is required to be driven across a small air gap would be made of a material which has a higher Young's Modulus than a layer which has to be driven across a greater air gap.

Another method of changing the stiffness of the driven layer is to form apertures therein to reduce its stiffness. This is shown in FIG. 5, of the drawings where a layer 500 which includes, in addition to tabs 502 apertures or slots 504 formed therein.

Various aspects of the present invention may be applied in combination, thus in the example shown in FIG. 5, it will be seen that while layer 500 has slots formed therein, the layer itself will be supported on tabs 502 which have a thickness which is selected so that it provides a degree of support to the layer 500 to allow an actuation voltage required to actuate layer 500 to be normalized.

FIG. 6 of the drawings shows a simplified version 600 of an IMOD based display such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,937. The display 600 includes three arrays 602, 604 and 606. Each array is fabricated on a substrate 608 and includes a 2×4 grid of IMODs. Each IMOD includes an upper layer 610 which in use is driven towards a common lower layer 612 across a gap. The layers 610 are self-supporting by virtue of having two downwardly extending limbs 611. Each IMOD has an electrode 614 which is disposed on layer 612. It will be seen that the IMODs within array 602 have the highest gap, the IMODs within array 604 have an intermediate size gap and the IMODs within array 606 have the smallest gap. This is because the IMODs in array 602, 604 and 606 are fabricated to have the defining characteristic that they each reflect red, green, and blue light, respectively, when in an undriven state. Thus, an actuation voltage required to drive the layers 610 towards the layer 612 will increase as the height of the gap through which the layer must be driven increases. Thus, the IMODs within array 602 will require a greater actuation voltage than the IMODs within array 604 or array 606. One embodiment of the present invention allows the actuation voltages to be normalized by changing the thickness of the layers 610 in inverse proportion to the size of the gap through which it must be driven. Thus, in FIG. 6, the thickness of the layers 610 have been selected to normalize the actuation voltages required by the IMODs within each array.

In another embodiment of the invention, the actuation voltages may be normalized by increasing or decreasing the tensile stress of each of the layers 610 as the height of the gap through which the layers must be driven increases or decreases, respectively. This can be accomplished by controlling deposition parameters of the film such as deposition pressure, power, and electric field bias.

FIG. 7 of the drawings shows an embodiment of a MEMs device 700 which includes an IMOD comprising a mechanical layer 702 which is supported on posts 704 which are formed on a substrate 706. Disposed on substrate 706 is an electrode 708 on which is formed a dielectric stack 710. The space between mechanical layer 702 and dielectric stack 708 defines an air gap. In use, an actuation voltage is applied to drive layer 702 to contact the dielectric stack 710. The device 700 will typically include three sets of IMODs each differing in the height of its air gap so as to reflect red, blue and green light, respectively, when in an undriven state. In order to normalize the actuation voltages required by each set of IMODs, the dielectric constant of the dielectric stack 710 is varied, in one embodiment of the invention, so that the higher the air gap, the greater the dielectric constant. Alternatively, the thickness of the dielectric stack may be varied so that the thickness of the dielectric stack is increased (or decreased) as the height of the air gap is decreased (or increased).

According to another embodiment of the invention, the problem of driving different elements within a MEMs device wherein the elements require different actuation voltages is solved by providing a driving mechanism such as the one shown in FIG. 8 of the drawings. Referring to FIG. 8, the driving mechanism comprises a driver chip 800 which includes an integrated drive circuit which has multi-level outputs 802, 804, and 806. Each of the outputs 804 to 806 delivers a different voltage and may be used, in one embodiment to drive IMODs with different sized air gaps for example IMODs 808, 810, 812 which reflect red, green, and blue light, respectively, when in an undriven state. The design and integration of components within driver chip 800 is well-known and is therefore is not further described.

Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that the various modification and changes can be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than in a restrictive sense.

Claims

1. A microelectromechanical systems device comprising:

a plurality of elements each having at least two layers, the layers being disposed in a stacked relationship with a gap therebetween when the element is in an undriven state, the plurality of elements being of at least two different types, defining at least a first region having elements only of a first type and a second region having elements only of a second type, wherein each type differing differs in a height of its gap, wherein the elements within the first region are substantially co-planar, and wherein the elements within the second region are substantially co-planar; and
a driving mechanism circuit configured to drive the plurality of elements to a driven state, wherein one of the layers of each element is configured to electrostatically displaced relative to the other layer to close the gap between the layers, and wherein a minimum voltage required to actuate the driving mechanism electrostatically displace the layer to a driven state is substantially different for each type of element.

2. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of elements are arranged in an array structure wherein the plurality of elements are substantially co-planar.

3. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 2, further comprising a plurality of said array structures each containing only elements of one type.

4. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the electrostatically displaceable layer is self-supporting comprising es a plurality of spaced apart limbs which rest on a substrate.

5. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 3 1, wherein the layers of each element in an array are continuous, the electrostatically displaceable layer being supported by a support structure comprising a plurality of supports spaced along a first axis and extending in a direction which is transverse thereto, each support having a support surface to support the electrostatically displaceable layer above the other layer when the elements are in the undriven state.

6. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 5, wherein the spacing between the supports along the first axis in each array depends on the height of the gap between the layers, the higher the gap, the greater the spacing.

7. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 5, wherein an area of the support surface of each support in an array is a function of the height of the gap between the layers, the higher the gap, the smaller the area.

8. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the electrostatically displaceable layer of each element has a Young's Modulus which is a function of the height of its gap, the higher the gap, the lower the Young's Modulus.

9. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein a thickness of the electrostatically displaceable layer of each element is a function of the height of its gap, the higher the gap, the smaller the thickness.

10. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the electrostatically displaceable layer of at least those elements having the highest gap have apertures formed therein to reduce a stiffness thereof.

11. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the electrostatically displaceable layer of each element is under tensile stress to a degree which increases as the height of its gap decreases.

12. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the driving mechanism circuit comprises an electrode layer to electrostatically displace the electrostatically displaceable layer when energized, wherein the electrode layers which drive at least those elements having the smallest gap have apertures formed therein to increase the minimum voltage required to energize the electrode layers.

13. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the electrostatically displaceable layer of each element is formed on a dielectric material having a dielectric constant which is a function of the height of the gap of the element, the higher the gap, the greater the dielectric constant.

14. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the electrostatically displaceable layer of each element is formed on a dielectric material having a thickness which is a function of the height of the gap of the element, the higher the gap, the lower the thickness.

15. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 11, wherein the minimum voltage is not substantially the same for each kind type of element.

16. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein each of the elements defines an interferometric modulator which configured to modulates light.

17. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 16, comprising three different kinds types of interferometric modulators, each differing in a height of its gap to reflect red, blue, or green light, respectively when in the undriven state.

18. A method for of fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device comprising:

constructing an array a plurality of elements, each element having a first layer, a second layer spaced from the first layer by a gap when in an undriven state, and an electrode layer configured to electrostatically drive the second layer to contact the first layer corresponding to when in a driven state when energized, the elements being of at least two different types, each type differing in a height of its gap, wherein said constructing includes changing a configuration of each at least one element type to compensate for reduce a differences in between a voltage required to drive each the at least one element type and another voltage required to drive another element type to its their respective driven state.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the first and second layers of each element in an array are defined by continuous layers which are supported by a support structure comprising a plurality of supports spaced along a first axis and extending in a direction which is transverse thereto, each support having a support surface to support the first layer above the second layer when the elements are in the undriven state, wherein changing the configuration of each element type then comprising comprises changing the spacing between the supports.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein changing the configuration of each element type comprises changing an area of the support surface of each support.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein changing the configuration of each element type comprises using a material having a different Young's Modulus for the second layer of each element type.

22. The method of claim 18, wherein changing a configuration of each element type comprises changing a thickness of the second layer of each element type.

23. The method of claim 18, wherein changing a configuration of each element type comprises forming apertures in the second layers of at least those elements having the highest gap.

24. The method of claim 18, wherein changing a configuration of each element type comprises subjecting the second layer of each element to tensile stress to a degree which is inversely proportional to the height of its gap.

25. The method of claim 18, wherein changing a configuration of each element type comprises forming apertures in the electrode layer of at least those element types having the smallest gap.

26. The method of claim 18, wherein the second layer of each element is formed on a dielectric material, wherein changing a configuration of each element type then comprising comprises changing the dielectric constant of the dielectric material on which the second layer of each element is formed.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein changing a configuration of each element type comprises changing a thickness of the dielectric material.

28. The method of claim 18, wherein the elements are interferometric modulators which configured to modulate light.

29. A microelectromechanical systems device comprising:

a plurality of elements, each element having a first layer, a second layer spaced from the first layer by a gap when in an undriven state, and an electrode layer configured to electrostatically drive the second layer to contact the first layer corresponding to a driven state when the electrode layer is energized, the elements being of at least two different kinds, each kind of element differing in at least a height of its gap; and
an element driving mechanism comprising an integrated a drive circuit having multilevel outputs configured to energize the electrode layer of each element to cause the element to change from its undriven state to its driven state.

30. A method for fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device, the method comprising:

fabricating an array a plurality of first elements, each first element conforming to a first geometry;
fabricating at least one array of a plurality of second elements, each second element conforming to a second geometry; wherein
fabricating the arrays first and second elements comprises selecting a defining an aspect of each of the first and second geometries based on a defining characteristic of each of the first and second elements; and normalizing differences in an actuation voltage required to actuate each of the first and second elements, wherein the differences in the actuation voltages are as a result of the selected defining aspect, the defining characteristic of each of the elements being unchanged of the first and second geometries.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the normalizing comprises changing an other aspects of the first and second geometries without changing the defining selected aspects of the first and second geometries.

32. The method of claim 30 31, wherein the defining selected aspect comprises a gap between an operatively upper and lower layer of each element, the upper and lower layers being separated by supports.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein each element comprises an electrode to electrostatically drive the upper layer towards the lower layer when actuated by the actuation voltage.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein changing the said other aspects comprises at least a changes selected from the group comprising changing a thickness of the upper layer, and changing a distance between the supports.

35. The method of claim 31 32, wherein the normalizing comprises changing a stiffness of the upper layer of each first and second element.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein changing the stiffness comprises changing the Young's modulus of the upper layer of each first and second element.

37. The method of claim 35, wherein changing the stiffness comprises forming apertures in the upper layer to reduce the stiffness thereof.

38. The method of claim 33, wherein the normalizing comprises changing a configuration of the electrode of each first or second element.

39. The method of claim 38, wherein changing a configuration of the electrode comprises forming apertures therein.

40. The method of claim 30, wherein the elements are formed on a dielectric material, the normalization then comprising wherein normalizing the differences comprises changing the dielectric properties of the dielectric material.

41. The method of claim 30, wherein the first and second elements are pixels.

42. A microelectromechanical systems device comprising:

a first element having a first element characteristic and at least two layers with a first gap between the two layers, wherein one layer of the at least two layers of the first element is configured to move relative to another layer and substantially close the first gap upon applying at least a first voltage to the first element; and
a second element having a second element characteristic and at least two layers with a second gap between the two layers, wherein one layer of the at least two layers of the second element is configured to move relative to another layer and substantially close the second gap upon applying at least a second voltage to the second element, wherein the first and second element characteristics are different, wherein a size of the first gap is different than a size of the second gap, wherein the first and second voltages comprise respective mimimum sufficient voltages sufficient to substantially close the gap in the respective element, and wherein the first and second voltages are substantially the same.

43. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, further comprising a circuit configured to apply the first voltage to at least the first element and the second voltage to at least the second element.

44. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 43, wherein the driving circuit comprises an electrode layer in each of the first and second elements, and wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to the presence of at least one aperture in the electrode layer of at least one of the first and second elements.

45. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, further comprising a plurality of the first and second elements arranged in a substantially co-planar array.

46. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 45, further comprising at least two of the substantially co-planar arrays, wherein one of said at least two substantially co-planar arrays comprises only first elements and one of said at least two substantially co-planar arrays comprises only second elements.

47. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the at least two layers of the respective first and second elements are continuous.

48. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein each movable layer is supported by a support structure comprising a plurality of supports spaced along a first axis and extending in a direction which is transverse to the first axis, and each support having a support surface to support the movable layer above the other of the at least two layers of the respective element.

49. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 48, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to the spacing between the supports along the first axis, wherein the spacing is a function of the size of the gap between the at least two layers of the respective element.

50. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 48, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to an area of the support surface of each support, and wherein the area of the support surface is a function of the height of the gap between the at least two layers.

51. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to a Young's Modulus of the movable layer, wherein the Young's Modulus is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

52. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to a thickness of the movable layer, wherein the thickness is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

53. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to the presence of at least an aperture formed on the movable layer of at least one of the first and second elements.

54. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to a tensile stress of the movable layer, wherein the tensile stress is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

55. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second element relate to a dielectric material of the first and second elements, wherein the dielectric material comprises a dielectric constant that is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

56. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the element characteristics of the first and second elements relate to a dielectric material of the first and second elements, wherein a thickness of the dielectric material is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

57. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein the minimum voltage is the same for the first and second elements.

58. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 42, wherein each of the first and second elements are interferometric modulators configured to modulate light.

59. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 58, further comprising a third element, wherein the first, second and third elements each comprise an interferometric modulators, each element differing in a height of its gap to reflect red, blue, or green light, respectively.

60. A microelectromechanical systems device comprising:

a first element comprising a first electrode and at least two layers with a first gap between the two layers, wherein at least one of the at least two layers of the first element is configured to move relative to another layer and substantially close the first gap upon applying a first voltage to at least the first electrode; and
a second element comprising a second electrode and at least two layers with a second gap between the two layers, wherein a size of the first gap is different than a size of the second gap, wherein at least one of the at least two layers of the second element is configured to move relative to another layer and substantially close the second gap upon applying a second voltage to at least the second electrode, wherein the first and second voltages are different;
wherein a plurality of said first and second elements are arranged in a substantially co-planar array.

61. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, further comprising a circuit configured to apply the first voltage to at least the first electrode and the second voltage to at least the second electrode.

62. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein the first electrode is located over one of the at least two layers of the first element, and the second electrode is located over one of the at least two layers of the second element.

63. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, further comprising at least two of the substantially co-planar arrays, wherein one of said at least two substantially co-planar arrays comprises only first elements and one of said at least two substantially co-planar arrays comprises only second elements.

64. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein the at least two layers of the respective first and second elements are continuous.

65. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein in each of the first and second elements the layer configured to move relative to another layer is supported by a support structure comprising a plurality of supports spaced along a first axis and extending in a direction which is transverse to the first axis.

66. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 65, wherein the spacing between the supports along the first axis is a function of the size of the gap between the at least two layers of the respective element.

67. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 65, wherein an area of the support surface of each support is a function of the height of the gap between the at least two layers of the respective element.

68. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein in each of the first and second elements the layer configured to move relative to another layer is characterized by a Young's Modulus, wherein the Young's Modulus is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

69. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein in each of the first and second elements the layer configured to move relative to another layer has a thickness that is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

70. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein at least the element having the largest gap size has at least one aperture formed in the layer configured to move relative to another layer.

71. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein in each of the first and second elements the layer configured to move relative to another layer is subject to a tensile stress that is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

72. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein the element having the smallest gap size has at least one aperture formed in its electrode layer.

73. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein each of the first and second elements further comprises a dielectric material located between the at least two layers, wherein the dielectric material is characterized by a dielectric constant that is a function of the size of the gap of the respective element.

74. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 60, wherein each of the elements is an interferometric modulator configured to modulate light.

75. The microelectromechanical systems device of claim 74, further comprising a third element, wherein the first, second and third elements each comprise an interferometric modulators, each of the elements differing in a height of its gap to reflect one of red, blue, and green light.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2534846 December 1950 Ambrose et al.
3037189 May 1962 Barrett et al.
3210757 October 1965 Jacob
3439973 April 1969 Paul et al.
3443854 May 1969 Weiss
3653741 April 1972 Marks
3656836 April 1972 de Cremoux et al.
3725868 April 1973 Malmer, Jr. et al.
3813265 May 1974 Marks
3955190 May 4, 1976 Teraishi
3955880 May 11, 1976 Lierke
4099854 July 11, 1978 Decker et al.
4196396 April 1, 1980 Smith
4228437 October 14, 1980 Shelton
4377324 March 22, 1983 Durand et al.
4389096 June 21, 1983 Hori et al.
4392711 July 12, 1983 Moraw et al.
4403248 September 6, 1983 te Velde
4441791 April 10, 1984 Hornbeck
4445050 April 24, 1984 Marks
4459182 July 10, 1984 te Velde
4482213 November 13, 1984 Piliavin et al.
4500171 February 19, 1985 Penz et al.
4519676 May 28, 1985 te Velde
4531126 July 23, 1985 Sadones
4566935 January 28, 1986 Hornbeck
4571603 February 18, 1986 Hornbeck et al.
4596992 June 24, 1986 Hornbeck
4615595 October 7, 1986 Hornbeck
4662746 May 5, 1987 Hornbeck
4663083 May 5, 1987 Marks
4666254 May 19, 1987 Itoh et al.
4681403 July 21, 1987 te Velde et al.
4710732 December 1, 1987 Hornbeck
4748366 May 31, 1988 Taylor
4786128 November 22, 1988 Birnbach
4790635 December 13, 1988 Apsley
4856863 August 15, 1989 Sampsell et al.
4857978 August 15, 1989 Goldburt et al.
4859060 August 22, 1989 Katagiri et al.
4900136 February 13, 1990 Goldburt et al.
4900395 February 13, 1990 Syverson et al.
4937496 June 26, 1990 Neiger et al.
4954789 September 4, 1990 Sampsell
4956619 September 11, 1990 Hornbeck
4965562 October 23, 1990 Verhulst
4982184 January 1, 1991 Kirkwood
5018256 May 28, 1991 Hornbeck
5022745 June 11, 1991 Zahowski et al.
5028939 July 2, 1991 Hornbeck et al.
5037173 August 6, 1991 Sampsell et al.
5044736 September 3, 1991 Jaskie et al.
5061049 October 29, 1991 Hornbeck
5075796 December 24, 1991 Schildkraut et al.
5078479 January 7, 1992 Vuilleumier
5079544 January 7, 1992 DeMond et al.
5083857 January 28, 1992 Hornbeck
5096279 March 17, 1992 Hornbeck et al.
5099353 March 24, 1992 Hornbeck
5124834 June 23, 1992 Cusano et al.
5136669 August 4, 1992 Gerdt
5142405 August 25, 1992 Hornbeck
5142414 August 25, 1992 Koehler
5153771 October 6, 1992 Link et al.
5162787 November 10, 1992 Thompson et al.
5168406 December 1, 1992 Nelson
5170156 December 8, 1992 DeMond et al.
5172262 December 15, 1992 Hornbeck
5179274 January 12, 1993 Sampsell
5192395 March 9, 1993 Boysel et al.
5192946 March 9, 1993 Thompson et al.
5206629 April 27, 1993 DeMond et al.
5212582 May 18, 1993 Nelson
5214419 May 25, 1993 DeMond et al.
5214420 May 25, 1993 Thompson et al.
5216537 June 1, 1993 Hornbeck
5226099 July 6, 1993 Mignardi et al.
5228013 July 13, 1993 Bik
5231532 July 27, 1993 Magel et al.
5233385 August 3, 1993 Sampsell
5233456 August 3, 1993 Nelson
5233459 August 3, 1993 Bozler et al.
5254980 October 19, 1993 Hendrix et al.
5272473 December 21, 1993 Thompson et al.
5278652 January 11, 1994 Urbanus et al.
5280277 January 18, 1994 Hornbeck
5287096 February 15, 1994 Thompson et al.
5293272 March 8, 1994 Jannson et al.
5296950 March 22, 1994 Lin et al.
5305640 April 26, 1994 Boysel et al.
5311360 May 10, 1994 Bloom et al.
5312513 May 17, 1994 Florence et al.
5315370 May 24, 1994 Bulow
5323002 June 21, 1994 Sampsell et al.
5324683 June 28, 1994 Fitch et al.
5325116 June 28, 1994 Sampsell
5326430 July 5, 1994 Cronin et al.
5327286 July 5, 1994 Sampsell et al.
5331454 July 19, 1994 Hornbeck
5339116 August 16, 1994 Urbanus et al.
5345328 September 6, 1994 Fritz et al.
5355357 October 11, 1994 Yamamori et al.
5358601 October 25, 1994 Cathey
5365283 November 15, 1994 Doherty et al.
5381232 January 10, 1995 Van Wijk
5381253 January 10, 1995 Sharp et al.
5401983 March 28, 1995 Jokerst et al.
5411769 May 2, 1995 Hornbeck
5444566 August 22, 1995 Gale et al.
5446479 August 29, 1995 Thompson et al.
5448314 September 5, 1995 Heimbuch et al.
5452024 September 19, 1995 Sampsell
5454906 October 3, 1995 Baker et al.
5457493 October 10, 1995 Leddy et al.
5457566 October 10, 1995 Sampsell et al.
5459602 October 17, 1995 Sampsell
5459610 October 17, 1995 Bloom et al.
5461041 October 24, 1995 Bergink et al.
5474865 December 12, 1995 Vasudev
5489952 February 6, 1996 Gove et al.
5497172 March 5, 1996 Doherty et al.
5497197 March 5, 1996 Gove et al.
5499037 March 12, 1996 Nakagawa et al.
5499062 March 12, 1996 Urbanus
5500635 March 19, 1996 Mott
5500761 March 19, 1996 Goossen et al.
5506597 April 9, 1996 Thompson et al.
5515076 May 7, 1996 Thompson et al.
5517347 May 14, 1996 Sampsell
5523803 June 4, 1996 Urbanus et al.
5526051 June 11, 1996 Gove et al.
5526172 June 11, 1996 Kanack
5526327 June 11, 1996 Cordova, Jr.
5526688 June 18, 1996 Boysel et al.
5535047 July 9, 1996 Hornbeck
5548301 August 20, 1996 Kornher et al.
5551293 September 3, 1996 Boysel et al.
5552924 September 3, 1996 Tregilgas
5552925 September 3, 1996 Worley
5559358 September 24, 1996 Burns et al.
5563398 October 8, 1996 Sampsell
5567334 October 22, 1996 Baker et al.
5570135 October 29, 1996 Gove et al.
5579149 November 26, 1996 Moret et al.
5581272 December 3, 1996 Conner et al.
5583688 December 10, 1996 Hornbeck
5589852 December 31, 1996 Thompson et al.
5597736 January 28, 1997 Sampsell
5600383 February 4, 1997 Hornbeck
5602671 February 11, 1997 Hornbeck
5606441 February 25, 1997 Florence et al.
5608468 March 4, 1997 Gove et al.
5610438 March 11, 1997 Wallace et al.
5610624 March 11, 1997 Bhuva
5610625 March 11, 1997 Sampsell
5614937 March 25, 1997 Nelson
5619059 April 8, 1997 Li et al.
5619365 April 8, 1997 Rhoades et al.
5619366 April 8, 1997 Rhoads et al.
5629790 May 13, 1997 Neukermans et al.
5633652 May 27, 1997 Kanbe et al.
5636052 June 3, 1997 Arney et al.
5636185 June 3, 1997 Brewer et al.
5638084 June 10, 1997 Kalt
5638946 June 17, 1997 Zavracky
5641391 June 24, 1997 Hunter et al.
5646768 July 8, 1997 Kaeiyama
5650881 July 22, 1997 Hornbeck
5654741 August 5, 1997 Sampsell et al.
5657099 August 12, 1997 Doherty et al.
5659374 August 19, 1997 Gale, Jr. et al.
5661591 August 26, 1997 Lin et al.
5665997 September 9, 1997 Weaver et al.
5673139 September 30, 1997 Johnson
5683591 November 4, 1997 Offenberg
5703710 December 30, 1997 Brinkman et al.
5710656 January 20, 1998 Goossen
5726480 March 10, 1998 Pister
5739945 April 14, 1998 Tayebati
5740150 April 14, 1998 Uchimaru et al.
5745193 April 28, 1998 Urbanus et al.
5745281 April 28, 1998 Yi et al.
5751469 May 12, 1998 Arney et al.
5771116 June 23, 1998 Miller et al.
5784190 July 21, 1998 Worley
5784212 July 21, 1998 Hornbeck
5786927 July 28, 1998 Greywall et al.
5793504 August 11, 1998 Stoll
5808780 September 15, 1998 McDonald
5808781 September 15, 1998 Arney et al.
5818095 October 6, 1998 Sampsell
5825528 October 20, 1998 Goossen
5835255 November 10, 1998 Miles
5838484 November 17, 1998 Goossen
5842088 November 24, 1998 Thompson
5905482 May 18, 1999 Hughes et al.
5912758 June 15, 1999 Knipe et al.
5943158 August 24, 1999 Ford et al.
5959763 September 28, 1999 Bozler et al.
5986796 November 16, 1999 Miles
5994174 November 30, 1999 Carey et al.
6028690 February 22, 2000 Carter et al.
6038056 March 14, 2000 Florence et al.
6040937 March 21, 2000 Miles
6046840 April 4, 2000 Huibers
6049317 April 11, 2000 Thompson et al.
6055090 April 25, 2000 Miles
6056406 May 2, 2000 Park
6061075 May 9, 2000 Nelson et al.
6097145 August 1, 2000 Kastalsky et al.
6099132 August 8, 2000 Kaeriyama
6100861 August 8, 2000 Cohen et al.
6100872 August 8, 2000 Aratani et al.
6113239 September 5, 2000 Sampsell et al.
6147790 November 14, 2000 Meier et al.
6158156 December 12, 2000 Patrick
6160833 December 12, 2000 Floyd et al.
6171945 January 9, 2001 Mandal et al.
6172797 January 9, 2001 Huibers
6180428 January 30, 2001 Peeters et al.
6195196 February 27, 2001 Kimura et al.
6201633 March 13, 2001 Peeters et al.
6215221 April 10, 2001 Cabuz et al.
6232936 May 15, 2001 Gove et al.
6239777 May 29, 2001 Sugahara et al.
6243149 June 5, 2001 Swanson et al.
6282010 August 28, 2001 Sulzbach et al.
6285424 September 4, 2001 Yoshida
6288472 September 11, 2001 Cabuz et al.
6288824 September 11, 2001 Kastalsky
6295154 September 25, 2001 Laor et al.
6323982 November 27, 2001 Hornbeck
6327071 December 4, 2001 Kimura
6331909 December 18, 2001 Dunfield
6335831 January 1, 2002 Kowarz et al.
6356254 March 12, 2002 Kimura
6356378 March 12, 2002 Huibers
6358021 March 19, 2002 Cabuz
6376787 April 23, 2002 Martin et al.
6407851 June 18, 2002 Islam et al.
6417868 July 9, 2002 Bock et al.
6433917 August 13, 2002 Mei et al.
6438282 August 20, 2002 Takeda et al.
6447126 September 10, 2002 Hornbeck
6449084 September 10, 2002 Guo
6456420 September 24, 2002 Goodwin-Johansson
6465355 October 15, 2002 Horsley
6466190 October 15, 2002 Evoy
6466354 October 15, 2002 Gudeman
6466358 October 15, 2002 Tew
6473072 October 29, 2002 Comiskey et al.
6473274 October 29, 2002 Maimone et al.
6480177 November 12, 2002 Doherty et al.
6496122 December 17, 2002 Sampsell
6545335 April 8, 2003 Chua et al.
6548908 April 15, 2003 Chua et al.
6549338 April 15, 2003 Wolverton et al.
6552840 April 22, 2003 Knipe
6574033 June 3, 2003 Chui et al.
6589625 July 8, 2003 Kothari et al.
6600201 July 29, 2003 Hartwell et al.
6606175 August 12, 2003 Sampsell et al.
6608268 August 19, 2003 Goldsmith
6624944 September 23, 2003 Wallace et al.
6625047 September 23, 2003 Coleman, Jr.
6630786 October 7, 2003 Cummings et al.
6632698 October 14, 2003 Ives
6635919 October 21, 2003 Melendez et al.
6643069 November 4, 2003 Dewald
6650455 November 18, 2003 Miles
6657832 December 2, 2003 Williams et al.
6660656 December 9, 2003 Cheung et al.
6674090 January 6, 2004 Chua et al.
6674562 January 6, 2004 Miles
6680792 January 20, 2004 Miles
6710908 March 23, 2004 Miles et al.
6741383 May 25, 2004 Huibers et al.
6775174 August 10, 2004 Huffman et al.
6778155 August 17, 2004 Doherty et al.
6794119 September 21, 2004 Miles
6809788 October 26, 2004 Yamada et al.
6853129 February 8, 2005 Cummings et al.
6859218 February 22, 2005 Luman et al.
6862029 March 1, 2005 D'Souza et al.
6867896 March 15, 2005 Miles
6891658 May 10, 2005 Whitehead et al.
6947200 September 20, 2005 Huibers
7008812 March 7, 2006 Carley
7053737 May 30, 2006 Schwartz et al.
7075700 July 11, 2006 Muenter
7123216 October 17, 2006 Miles
7161728 January 9, 2007 Sampsell et al.
7205722 April 17, 2007 Koshio et al.
20010003487 June 14, 2001 Miles
20010028503 October 11, 2001 Flanders et al.
20020014579 February 7, 2002 Dunfield
20020015215 February 7, 2002 Miles
20020021485 February 21, 2002 Pilossof
20020024711 February 28, 2002 Miles
20020054424 May 9, 2002 Miles
20020070931 June 13, 2002 Ishikawa
20020075555 June 20, 2002 Miles
20020114558 August 22, 2002 Nemirovsky
20020126364 September 12, 2002 Miles
20020139981 October 3, 2002 Young
20020149828 October 17, 2002 Miles
20020149850 October 17, 2002 Heffner et al.
20020167072 November 14, 2002 Andosca
20020167730 November 14, 2002 Needham et al.
20030015936 January 23, 2003 Yoon et al.
20030016428 January 23, 2003 Kato et al.
20030035196 February 20, 2003 Walker
20030053078 March 20, 2003 Missey et al.
20030156315 August 21, 2003 Li et al.
20030210851 November 13, 2003 Fu et al.
20040027701 February 12, 2004 Ishikawa
20040051929 March 18, 2004 Sampsell et al.
20040056742 March 25, 2004 Dabbaj
20040100677 May 27, 2004 Huibers et al.
20050195467 September 8, 2005 Kothari et al.
20050249966 November 10, 2005 Tung et al.
20060044654 March 2, 2006 Vandorpe et al.
20060066599 March 30, 2006 Chui
20060066640 March 30, 2006 Kothari et al.
20060066935 March 30, 2006 Cummings et al.
20060067643 March 30, 2006 Chui
20060077152 April 13, 2006 Chui et al.
20060077507 April 13, 2006 Chui et al.
20060077508 April 13, 2006 Chui et al.
20060077515 April 13, 2006 Cummings et al.
20060077516 April 13, 2006 Kothari
20060079048 April 13, 2006 Sampsell
20060139723 June 29, 2006 Miles
20070229936 October 4, 2007 Miles
20080037093 February 14, 2008 Miles
20080088904 April 17, 2008 Miles
20080088911 April 17, 2008 Miles
20080088912 April 17, 2008 Miles
20080106782 May 8, 2008 Miles
Foreign Patent Documents
4108966 September 1992 DE
0 310 176 April 1989 EP
0 361 981 April 1990 EP
0 667 548 August 1995 EP
0 788 005 August 1997 EP
1484635 December 2004 EP
62 082454 April 1987 JP
2000-75224 March 1990 JP
05275401 October 1993 JP
9-127439 May 1997 JP
11211999 August 1999 JP
2000306515 November 2000 JP
2002-062490 February 2002 JP
2003-195201 July 2003 JP
157313 May 1991 WO
WO 95/30924 November 1995 WO
WO 97/17628 May 1997 WO
WO 99/52006 October 1999 WO
WO 99/52006 October 1999 WO
WO 02/079853 October 2002 WO
WO 03/007049 January 2003 WO
WO 03/014789 February 2003 WO
WO 03/054925 July 2003 WO
WO 03/069404 August 2003 WO
WO 03/069413 August 2003 WO
WO 03/073151 September 2003 WO
WO 2005/010566 February 2005 WO
Other references
  • Pape et al., Characteristics of the deformable mirror device for optical information processing, Optical Engineering, 22(6):676-681, Nov.-Dec. 1983.
  • Notice of Grounds for Rejection in Korean App. No. 2004-7013279, dated Sep. 30, 2008.
  • Office Action for Japanese Patent App. No. 2003-571782 dated Aug. 20, 2007.
  • ISR and WO for PCT/US02/013462 filed Apr. 29, 2002.
  • IPER for PCT/US02/013462 filed Apr. 29, 2002.
  • Akasaka, “Three-Dimensional IC Trends”, Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 74, No. 12, pp. 1703-1714, (Dec. 1986).
  • Aratani et al., “Process and Design Considerations for Surface Micromachined Beams for a Tuneable Interferometer Array in Silicon,” Proc. IEEE Microelectromechanical Workshop, Fort Lauderdale, FL, pp. 230-235 (Feb. 1993).
  • Aratani K., et al., “Surface micromachined tuneable interferometer array,” Sensors and Actuators, pp. 17-23, (1994).
  • Bass, “Handbook of Optics, vol. I, Fundamentals, Techniques, and Design, Second Edition,” McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, pp. 2.29-2.36 (1995).
  • Butler et al., “An Embedded Overlay Concept for Microsystems Packaging,” IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging IEEE USA, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 617-622, XP002379648 (2000).
  • Chiou et al., “A Novel Capacitance Control Design of Tunable Capacitor Using Multiple Electrostatic Driving Electrodes,” IEEE NANO 2001, M 3.1, Nanoelectronics and Giga-Scale Systems (Special Session), Oct. 29, 2001, pp. 319-324.
  • ChunJun Wang et al., “Flexible circuit-based RF MEMS Switches,” MEMS. XP002379649 pp. 757-762, (Nov. 2001).
  • Conner, “Hybrid Color Display Using Optical Interference Filter Array,” SID Digest, pp. 577-580 (1993).
  • Fan et al., “Channel Drop Filters in Photonic Crystals,” Optics Express, vol. 3, No. 1, 1998.
  • Giles et al., “A Silicon MEMS Optical Switch Attenuator and Its Use in Lightwave Subsystems,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 18-25, (Jan./Feb. 1999).
  • Goossen et al., “Possible Display Applications of the Silicon Mechanical Anti-Reflection Switch,” Society for Information Display (1994).
  • Goossen et al., “Silicon Modulator Based on Mechanically-Active Anti-Reflection Layer with 1Mbit/sec Capability for Fiber-in-the-Loop Applications,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, pp. 1119-1121 (Sep. 1994).
  • Goossen, “MEMS-based variable optical interference devices,” Optical MEMS, 2000 IEEE/LEDS Int'l. Conf. on Aug. 21-24, 2000, Piscatawny, NJ, Aug. 21, 2000, pp. 17-18.
  • Gosh, “West Germany Grabs the Lead in X-Ray Lithography,” Electronics pp. 78-80 (Feb. 5, 1987).
  • Howard et al., “Nanometer-Scale Fabrication Techniques”, VLSI Electronics: Microstructure Science, vol. 5, pp. 145-153 and pp. 166-173 (1982).
  • Ibbotson et al., “Comparison of XeF2 and F-atom reactions with Si and SiO2,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 1129-1131 (Jun. 1984).
  • Jackson “Classical Electrodynamics”, John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 568-573. (date unknown).
  • Jerman et al., “A Miniature Fabry-Perot Interferometer with a Corrugated Silicon Diaphragm Support”, (1988).
  • Jerman et al., “Miniature Fabry-Perot Inferometers Micromachined in Silicon for Use in Optical Fiber WDM Systems,” Transducers, San Francisco, Jun. 24-27, 1991, Proceedings on the Int'l. Conf. on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, vol. Conf. 6, Jun. 24, 1991, pp. 372-375.
  • Joannopoulos et al., “Molding the Flow of Light,” Photonic Crystals. 1995.
  • Johnson “Optical Scanners”, Microwave Scanning Antennas, vol. 1, p. 251-261, (1964).
  • Kim et al., “Control of Optical Transmission Through metals Perforated With Subwave-Length Hole Arrays,” Optic Letters, vol. 24, No. 4, Feb. 15, 1999, pp. 256-257.
  • Circle 36: Light over Matter, Circle No. 36 (Jun. 1993).
  • Lin et al., “Free-Space Micromachined Optical Switches for Optical Networking,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 5, No. 1m Jan./Feb. 1999, pp. 4-9.
  • Little et al., “Vertically Coupled Microring Resonator Channel Droping Filter,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 2, 1999.
  • Magel, “Integrated Optic Devices Using Micromachined Metal Membranes,” SPIE vol. 2686, 0-8194-2060-3/1996.
  • Miles, Mark W., “A New Reflective FPD Technology Using Interferometric Modulation”, The Proceedings of the Society for Information Display (May 11-16, 1997).
  • Nagami et al., “Plastic Cell Architecture: Towards Reconfigurable Computing for General-Purpose,” IEEE Worshop on FPGA-based Custom Computing Machines, (1998).
  • Newsbreaks, “Quantum-trench devices might operate at terahertz frequencies”, Laser Focus World (May 1993).
  • Oliner et al., “Radiating Elements and Mutual Coupling”, Microwave Scanning Antennas, vol. 2, pp. 131-141, (1966).
  • Peerlings et al., “Long Resonator Micromachined Turnable GaAs-A1As Fabry-Perot Filter,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE Service Center, Piscatawny, NJ, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 1235-1237.
  • Raley et al., “A Fabry-Perot Microinterferometer for Visible Wavelengths”, IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Jun. 1992, Hilton Head, SC.
  • Schnakenberg, et al. TMAHW Etchants for Silicon Micromachining. 1991 International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators-Digest of Technical Papers. pp. 815-818.
  • Science and Technology, The Economist, May 22, 1999, pp. 89-90.
  • Sperger et al., “High Performance Patterned All-Dielelctric Interference Colour Filter for Display Application”, SID Digest, pp. 81-83, (1994).
  • Stone, “Radiation and Optics, An Introduction to the Classical Theory”, McGraw-Hill, pp. 340-343, (1963).
  • Walker, et al., “Electron-beam-tunable Interference Filter Spatial Light Modualtor”, Optics Letters vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 345-347, (May 1988).
  • Williams, et al., Etch Rates for Micromachining Processing. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 256-259, (Dec. 1996).
  • Winters, et al., The etching of silicon with XeF2 vapor. Applied Physics Letters, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 70-73, (Jan. 1979).
  • Winton, John M., “A novel way to capture solar energy”, Chemical Week, (May 1985).
  • Wu, “Design of a Reflective Color LCD Using Optical Interference Reflectors”, ASIA Display '95, pp. 929-931, (Oct. 1995).
  • Wu et al., “MEMS Designed for Tunable Capacitors,” Microwave Symposium Digest, 1998 IEEE MTT-S Int'l., Baltimore, MD, Jun. 7-12, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 127-129.
  • Zhou et al., “Waveguide Panel Display Using Electromechanical Spatial Modulators,” SID Digest, vol. XXIX, 1998.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2005/005919 dated Aug. 24, 2005.
  • International Search Report Application No. PCT/US2005/026448, Dated Nov. 23, 2005.
  • International Search Report Application No. PCT/US2005/029820, Dated Dec. 27, 2005.
  • International Search Report Application No. PCT/US2005/030962, Dated Aug. 31, 2005.
  • International Search Report Application No. PCT/US2005/034465, Dated Sep. 23, 2005.
  • European Search Report Application No. 05255693.3-2217, dated May 24, 2006.
  • European Search Report Application No. EP 05 25 5673 in 9 pages, dated Jan. 23, 2006.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 162/2005, Dated Jul. 14, 2005.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 164/2005, Dated Jul. 4, 2005.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 140/2005, Dated Jul. 15, 2005.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 161/2005, Dated Jul. 15, 2005.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 150/2005, Dated Jul. 29, 2005.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 144/2005, Dated Aug. 11, 2005.
  • Austrian Search Report No. 66/2005, Dated May 9, 2005.
  • Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2002 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/084,893.
  • English translation of First Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2006 in Chinese App. No. 02828352.
  • English translation of Second Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2006 in Chinese App. No. 02828352.
  • English translation of Third Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007 in Chinese App. No. 02828352.
  • Fork et al., “P-67: Chip on Glass Bonding using StressedMetal™ Technology” Sid 05 Digest May 24, 2005.
  • Notice of Grounds for Rejection in Korean App. No. 2004-7013279, dated Apr. 30, 2009.
Patent History
Patent number: RE42119
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 2, 2005
Date of Patent: Feb 8, 2011
Assignee: QUALCOMM MEMS Technologies, Inc. (San Diego, CA)
Inventors: Clarence Chui (San Jose, CA), Mark W. Miles (Atlanta, GA)
Primary Examiner: William C Choi
Attorney: Knobb Martens Olson & Bear LLP
Application Number: 11/144,210
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Shape Or Contour Of Light Control Surface Altered (359/291); Using Reflective Or Cavity Structure (359/247)
International Classification: G02B 26/00 (20060101); G02F 1/07 (20060101);