Filter for extreme ultraviolet lithography

- ASML Netherlands B.V.

An apparatus, suited, for example, for extreme ultraviolet lithography, includes a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source. Between the radiation source and the processing organ a filter is placed which, in the radial direction from the radiation source, comprises a plurality of foils or plates.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/NL99/00090 filed Feb. 19, 1999.

More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,359,969. The reissue applications are continuation reissue application Ser. No. 13/276,888 and parent reissue application Ser. No. 10/803,201 (the present application), both of which are reissue applications of U.S. Pat. No. 6,359,969.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Apparatus suited for extreme ultraviolet lithography, comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source, and a filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles which are radiated by a radiation source.

The invention relates to an apparatus comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source, wherein a filter is placed between the radiation source and the processing organ, which filter comprises a plurality of foils or plates.

Such an apparatus may be used in the production of integrated circuits, that is to say in a lithographical application. The invention may also be applied in various other fields. For a good understanding of the invention, however, a lithographical application will serve well as illustration. Continuous attempts are made to make integrated circuits smaller and smaller in order to improve the processing speed of the integrated circuits.

According to the prior art, such integrated circuits are manufactured chiefly by using lithography with visible and ultraviolet light. With these known technologies, it is possible to manufacture integrated circuits that may be as short as 120 nanometers. The ultraviolet light used with said circuits has a wavelength of 193 nanometers. The known techniques do not allow a further decrease of the dimensions of the integrated circuits, and a possible solution is the use of lithography on the basis of extreme ultraviolet light. Such light has a wavelength of 13 nanometers. The known optical elements cannot be used at this wavelength. The known mirrors and lenses absorb too large a portion of the extreme ultraviolet light. In order to allow for this, the processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source is a multi-layer mirror which consists of 40 or more molybdenum layers alternating with silicon layers.

In such an apparatus for extreme ultraviolet lithography a laser plasma source is used to generate a plasma by heating an object by means of a laser source of high energy density, for example of at least 1011W/cm2. The object heated by the laser will function as source of secondary emission of mainly shortwave radiation. However, this will also release undesirable particles and atoms producing the effect of debris in the apparatus. The objective of the invention is to prevent the production of said debris.

WO 96/10324 discloses such an apparatus for the generation of radiation. This apparatus uses a fast rotating target which is heated by the laser source and which produces the secondary emission. Due to the kinetic energy of the particles formed from the plasma on the rotating target, this apparatus has a filtering effect in respect of the so-called macro-particles. However, trapping atoms, and in particular the fastest micro-particles, is not possible in this known apparatus.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,794 concerns a filter apparatus comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source, wherein a filter is placed between the radiation source and the processing organ, which filter comprises a plurality of foils or plates, including a baffle for diffusing hot gases and directing them away from a window of sight. Due to the placement of the baffle, the said window of sight is rather narrow.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is the object of the invention to circumvent the drawbacks of the prior art. According to the invention, this is realized by the apparatus, for example for extreme ultraviolet lithography, comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source, wherein a filter is placed between the radiation source and the processing organ, which filter comprises a plurality of foils or plates, which is characterized in that each foil or plate essentially points in the radial direction when viewed from the radiation source. Surprisingly, it has been shown that this very simple measure not only makes it possible to trap atoms and micro-particles, but also clusters of such micro-particles, respectively the smallest macro-particles.

Quite advantageous is that the apparatus according to the invention shows no limitation with respect to the effectively usable angle of sight due to the fact that the apparatus embodied with the filter according to the invention provides full optical transparency.

A first preferred embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention is characterized in that the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.

A second preferred embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention is characterized in that the foils or plates are cone-shaped and are positioned concentrically.

Preferably, in the radial direction the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.

Such an apparatus is used with a buffer gas in which the radiation source and the processing organ are placed. Appropriately, the distance between the radiation source and the filter's proximal end in relation to the radiation source is then selected subject to the pressure and the type of buffer gas. A very suitable choice of buffer gas is krypton, whose pressure is 0.5 Torr, and the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm. This setting affords sufficient opportunity for the particles to be trapped in the filter to take on the temperature of the buffer gas, for example room temperature, thereby sufficiently reducing the particle's velocity before it enters the filter.

It is further desirable to select the length of the filter, which is formed by the distance between the filter's proximal end and its distal end in relation to the radiation source, subject to the pressure of the buffer gas and the form of the filter. Especially the gas pressure determines the mean free path length for the particles to be trapped; a lower gas pressure corresponds to an increased free path length. This can be partially compensated by the form of the filter. For example, using the above-mentioned honeycomb construction provides a larger surface area, affording greater opportunity for the particles to actually be trapped.

It has been shown that good results can be obtained when the length of the filter is at least 1 cm. This filter length corresponds with a usual gas pressure of, for example, 100 mTorr.

As already mentioned above, the apparatus is operational at room temperature. The measure of maintaining the filter at a temperature which is approximately below room temperature allows the residence time of the atoms and particles trapped on a foil or plate to be increased, and accordingly the effectiveness of the filter to be improved.

It is further desirable that the number of plates in the filter should be adjusted subject to the thickness of each plate and the desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula

d d + d f × 100 ⁢ %
in which d=the distance between two plates of the filter at the side of the radiation source; and df=the thickness of a plate of the filter.

In this way the light output of the integral apparatus can be maintained at an adequate level, while the effectiveness of the filter can still be 100%. The apparatus is then preferably characterized in that the number of plates is adjusted such that the distance between two plates is approximately 1 mm.

The effectiveness of the filter may be improved further by roughening the surface of the plates.

The invention is further embodied in a separate filter for suppressing undesirable atomic and microscopic particles emitted by a radiation source, wherein a plurality of plates are positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another, for trapping atomic and microscopic particles on their respective surfaces.

Such a separate filter is characterized in that the plates are directed radially away from the radiation source.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 shows schematically a radiation source together with a filter according to the invention;

FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of the filter according to the invention; and

FIG. 3 shows schematically two more preferred embodiments of the filter according to the invention.; and

FIG. 4 shows schematically an embodiment of the filter according to the invention.

In the Figs., identical reference numbers relate to similar parts.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 shows a radiation source indicated by reference number 1, and a filter which is generally indicated by reference number 2. The processing organ that is used in the apparatus for, for example, extreme ultraviolet lithography, is not shown as PO. This processing organ is located at the side of the filter 2 facing away from the radiation source 1. The filter 2 comprises a number of plates 3 positioned in a radial direction from the radiation source 1. It is possible to position said plates in a honeycomb construction, or as a plurality of concentric cones as shown in FIG. 3.

FIGS. 1 and 2 show that in the direction of radiation from the source 1, the plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed next to one another. The proximal end 4 of the filter 2 is at a distance X from the radiation source 1, which distance is selected depending on the pressure and the type of buffer gas in which the radiation source 1, the processing organ (not shown), and also the filter 2, are placed. If the apparatus is used for extreme ultraviolet lithography, the buffer gas is preferably krypton having a pressure of 0.5 Torr, and the value of X may be 5 cm. The length of the plates of the filter is indicated by L. The value of L is selected depending on the pressure of the buffer gas and the form of the filter 2. The value of L, that is to say the length of the filter, is at least 1 cm. In FIG. 1, this value is approximately 10 cm. The thickness of the plates 3 may be, for example, 0.1 mm, and the spacing between the plates at the side nearest the radiation source 1, may be approximately 1 mm. This may result in an optical transparency of the filter 2, which is determined by the formula

d d + d f × 100 ⁢ %
in which d=the distance between two plates of the filter at the proximal side of the filter; and df=the thickness of a plate of the filter.

The effectiveness of the filter can be promoted if the surface of the plates 3 is slightly roughened.

When the apparatus is used for extreme ultraviolet lithography, radiation is used having a wavelength of 13.5 nanometers. Various inert gasses may be used as buffer gas, such as helium and krypton which, compared with other gasses have the lowest absorption coefficient at this wavelength. Krypton is better able to meet the requirements of the present application because the atomic mass of krypton is more compatible with that of the atomic- and microparticles emitted by the radiation source, which augments the inhibition of said undesirable particles. The krypton gas used is maintained at a pressure of at least several mTorr. It should be noted that taken over a distance of 20 cm at a pressure of 0.5 Torr, the optical transparency of krypton for the desired radiation is approximately 90%. The filter used in the apparatus is comprised of copper plates (other materials are also possible) which have a length of 7 cm and are positioned at 2 cm from the radiation source. At a plate thickness of 0.2 mm and with the plates being spaced at approximately 0.8 mm at the side of the radiation source, the filter will have a geometrical transparency of approximately 80%. The effectiveness of the filter was measured at room temperature and at a temperature of approximately −90° C. At both these temperatures the effectiveness of the filter was shown to be very high, almost 100.

It will be clear to the person skilled in the art that the various dimensions of the filter forming part of the apparatus according to the invention, as well as the distance from the filter to the radiation source, has to be determined in practice on the basis of the above-mentioned inter-relating ratios. It is therefore possible to apply diverse variations to the above description, without departing from the idea of the invention as specified in the appended claims.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. An apparatus comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing radiation from the radiation source, wherein a filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles is placed between the radiation source and the processing organ, which filter comprises a plurality of foils or plates having surfaces for trapping atomic and microscopic particles thereon, wherein each foil or plate essentially points in a radial direction when viewed from the radiation source.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the foils or plates are coneshaped and are positioned concentrically.

4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein in the radial direction the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.

5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the radiation source and the processing organ are placed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of buffer gas.

6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.

7. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein a length of the filter, which is formed by the distance between the proximal end of the filter and its distal end in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to the pressure of the buffer gas and a form of the filter.

8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.

9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the number of plates in the filter is adjusted subject to a thickness of each plate and a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula d d + d f × 100 ⁢ % in which d=a distance between two plates of the filter at a proximal side of the filter; and df=a thickness of a plate of the filter.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the number of plates is adjusted such that the distance between two plates is approximately 1 mm.

11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a surface of the plates is rough.

12. A filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles which are emitted by a radiation source, wherein a plurality of plates are positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another, for trapping atomic and microscopic particles on their respective surfaces, wherein the plates are directed radially from the radiation source.

13. A filter to suppress undesired atomic and microscopic particles from a radiation source, the filter comprising a plurality of foils or plates having a surface configured to trap atomic and microscopic particles thereon, wherein each foil or plate essentially extends away from the radiation source.

14. The filter according to claim 13, wherein each foil or plate extends essentially radially from the radiation source.

15. The filter according to claim 14, wherein the foils or plates are cone shaped and are positioned concentrically.

16. The filter according to claim 14, wherein a foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates is positioned substantially orthogonally to another foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates.

17. The filter according to claim 14, wherein the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.

18. The filter according to claim 13, wherein each foil or plate is positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another.

19. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.

20. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the filter is to be disposed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of the buffer gas.

21. The filter according to claim 20, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.

22. The filter according to claim 13, wherein a length of the filter, which is the distance between a proximal end of the filter and a distal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to a pressure of a buffer gas, in which the filter is to be disposed, and a form of the filter.

23. The filter according to claim 22, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.

24. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the number of foils or plates in the filter, a thickness of a foil or plate in the filter, a distance between two foils or plates in the filter or any combination thereof is based on a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula: d d + d f × 100 ⁢ % wherein d is a distance between two foils or plates of the filter at a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source and df is a thickness of a foil or plate of the filter.

25. The filter according to claim 24, wherein the distance between two foils or plates in the filter is approximately 1 mm.

26. The filter according to claim 13, wherein a surface of the foil or plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.

27. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the filter is configured to allow transmission therethrough of extreme ultraviolet radiation.

28. The filter according to claim 27, wherein the extreme ultraviolet radiation has a wavelength of about 13 nm.

29. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the foils or plates comprise copper.

30. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the filter has an optical transparency of at least about 80%.

31. A lithographic apparatus, comprising:

a filter comprising a plurality of foils or plates having a surface configured to trap thereon atomic and microscopic particles from a radiation source, wherein each foil or plate essentially extends away from the radiation source; and
at least one optical element configured to receive radiation from the radiation source via the filter.

32. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein each foil or plate extends essentially radially from the radiation source.

33. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the foils or plates are cone shaped and are positioned concentrically.

34. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein a foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates is positioned substantially orthogonally to another foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates.

35. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.

36. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein each foil or plate is positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another.

37. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.

38. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the filter is disposed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of the buffer gas.

39. The apparatus according to claim 38, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.

40. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein a length of the filter, which is the distance between a proximal end of the filter and a distal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to a pressure of a buffer gas, in which the filter is disposed, and a form of the filter.

41. The apparatus according to claim 40, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.

42. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the number of foils or plates in the filter, a thickness of a foil or plate in the filter, a distance between two foils or plates in the filter or any combination thereof is based on a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula: d d + d f × 100 ⁢ % wherein d is a distance between two foils or plates of the filter at a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source and df is a thickness of a foil or plate of the filter.

43. The apparatus according to claim 42, wherein the distance between two foils or plates of the filter is approximately 1 mm.

44. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein a surface of the foil or plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.

45. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the radiation comprises extreme ultraviolet radiation.

46. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein a wavelength of the radiation is about 13 nm.

47. The apparatus according to claim 46, wherein the wavelength of the radiation is 13.5 nm.

48. The apparatus according to claim 40, wherein the at least one optical element comprises a plurality of multi-layer mirrors.

49. The apparatus according to claim 48, wherein at least one of the plurality of multi-layer mirrors comprises alternating molybdenum and silicon layers.

50. The apparatus according to claim 31, comprising the radiation source, the radiation source comprising an extreme ultraviolet radiation plasma source.

51. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the filter has an optical transparency of at least about 80%.

52. A radiation source system, comprising:

an extreme ultraviolet radiation plasma source; and
a filter to suppress undesired atomic and microscopic particles comprising a plurality of foils or plates having a surface configured to trap thereon atomic and microscopic particles from the plasma source, wherein each foil or plate essentially extends away from the plasma source.

53. The system according to claim 52, wherein each foil or plate extends essentially radially from the plasma source.

54. The system according to claim 53, wherein the foils or plates are cone shaped and are positioned concentrically.

55. The system according to claim 53, wherein a foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates is positioned substantially orthogonally to another foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates.

56. The system according to claim 52, wherein a surface of the foil or plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.

57. The system according to claim 52, wherein a wavelength of the extreme ultraviolet radiation is about 13 nm.

58. The system according to claim 57, wherein the wavelength of the radiation is 13.5 nm.

59. The system according to claim 52, wherein the filter is positioned between the plasma source and a lithographic apparatus comprising one or more multilayer mirrors.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1865441 July 1932 Mutscheller
3418467 December 1968 Spielberg et al.
4242588 December 30, 1980 Silk et al.
4340818 July 20, 1982 Barnes
4408338 October 4, 1983 Grobman
4672648 June 9, 1987 Mattson et al.
4741012 April 26, 1988 Duinker et al.
4825454 April 25, 1989 Annis et al.
4837794 June 6, 1989 Riordan et al.
5099134 March 24, 1992 Hase et al.
5265144 November 23, 1993 Harding et al.
5550678 August 27, 1996 Morby
5570408 October 29, 1996 Gibson
5768339 June 16, 1998 O'Hara
6275568 August 14, 2001 Prins et al.
6838684 January 4, 2005 Bakker et al.
7034308 April 25, 2006 Bakker et al.
7057190 June 6, 2006 Bakker et al.
7106832 September 12, 2006 Klunder et al.
7145132 December 5, 2006 Bakker et al.
20060139604 June 29, 2006 Wassink et al.
20060169929 August 3, 2006 Wassink
20060186353 August 24, 2006 Wassink
20060219958 October 5, 2006 Wassink
20060261290 November 23, 2006 Van Herpen et al.
20070018118 January 25, 2007 Sjmaenok et al.
20070023706 February 1, 2007 Sjmaenok et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
07180042 July 1995 EP
0682125 November 1995 EP
1 274 287 January 2003 EP
2 083 969 March 1982 GB
7-180042 July 1995 JP
08-321395 December 1996 JP
09-237695 September 1997 JP
09-245992 September 1997 JP
9-320792 December 1997 JP
2000-98098 April 2000 JP
2001-57298 February 2001 JP
WO 96/10324 April 1996 WO
WO 99/42904 August 1999 WO
WO 01/37309 May 2001 WO
Other references
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/433,761, filed May 15, 2006, Arnoud Cornelis Wassink.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/319,190, filed Dec. 28, 2005, Derk Jan Wilfred Klunder.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/294,347, filed Dec. 6, 2005, Derk Jan Wilfred Klunder.
  • “Collimator for X-Ray Lithography,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Sep. 1990, 33(4):278-9.
  • Vartanian et al., “Polycapillary Collimator For Point Source Proximity X-ray Lithography,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology, 1993, Part B, 11(6):3003-7.
  • Japanese Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-532779, dated Sep. 3, 2007.
  • European Office Action for European Application No. 03 076 346.0 dated Jan. 25, 2010.
  • European Office Action for European Application No. 03 076 346.0—1226 dated Aug. 19, 2009.
Patent History
Patent number: RE43036
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 18, 2004
Date of Patent: Dec 20, 2011
Assignee: ASML Netherlands B.V. (Veldhoven)
Inventor: Leonid Aizikovitch Sjmaenok (Nieuwegein)
Primary Examiner: Irakli Kiknadze
Attorney: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Application Number: 10/803,201
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Filter (378/156); Single Filter With Plural Elements (378/158)
International Classification: G21K 3/00 (20060101);