Low temperature, extrudable, high density reactive materials

- Orbital ATK, Inc.

A reactive material for use as a reactive liner in penetrating (shape-charge) warheads and for use in reactive fragments in fragmenting warheads is disclosed. The reactive material comprises an oxidizing agent and a metal filler or metal/metal oxide filler. The oxidizing agent comprises a fluoropolymer having high fluorine content, a low melt temperature, and a high mechanical strength. Preferably, the fluoropolymer is a thermoplastic fluoropolymer, such as a polymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride. The metal filler comprises a high density, reactive metal. Preferably, the metal filler is hafnium or tantalum. The reactive material is safely processed at temperatures significantly below the thermal autoignition point of the reactive material.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This The present application is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,962,634, issued Nov. 8, 2005. The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/368,284, filed Mar. 28, 2002, for LOW TEMPERATURE EXTRUDABLE, HIGH DENSITY REACTIVE MATERIALS. Additionally, this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/789,479, filed Feb. 21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,593,410, issued Jul. 15, 2003, for HIGH STRENGTH REACTIVE MATERIALS, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/184,316, filed Feb. 23, 2000.

The present application is also related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/184,316, filed Feb. 23, 2000, entitled “High Strength Reactive Materials,” now abandoned; U.S. Pat. No. 6,593,410, issued Jul. 15, 2003, entitled “High Strength Reactive Materials;” U.S. Pat. No. 7,307,117, issued Dec. 11, 2007, entitled “High Strength Reactive Materials And Methods Of Making;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/801,946, filed Mar. 15, 2004, entitled “Reactive Compositions Including Metal,” now abandoned; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/620,205, filed Jan. 5, 2007, entitled “Reactive Compositions Including Metal,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,715, issued Dec. 13, 2011; U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,258, issued Jan. 29, 2013, entitled “Reactive Compositions Including Metal;” U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/553,430, filed Mar. 15, 2004, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Projectiles and Related Methods,” now abandoned; U.S. Pat. No. 7,603,951, issued Oct. 20, 2009, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Projectiles and Related Methods;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/801,948, filed Mar. 15, 2004, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Munition Compositions and Projectiles Containing Same,” now abandoned; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/127,627, filed May 27, 2008, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Munition Compositions and Projectiles Containing Same,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,568,541, issued Oct. 29, 2013; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/062,635, filed Oct. 24, 2013, entitled “Reactive Material Compositions and Projectiles Including the Same;” U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/723,465, filed Oct. 4, 2005, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Projectiles And Related Methods,” now abandoned; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/538,763, filed Oct. 4, 2006, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Projectiles And Related Methods,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,122,833, issued Feb. 28, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/372,804, filed Feb. 14, 2012, entitled “Reactive Material Enhanced Projectiles and Related Methods;” U.S. Pat. No. 7,614,348, issued Nov. 10, 2009, entitled “Weapons And Weapon Components Incorporating Reactive Materials And Related Methods;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/697,005, filed Apr. 5, 2007, entitled “Consumable Reactive Material Fragments, Ordnance Incorporating Structures For Producing The Same, And Methods Of Creating The Same,” pending; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/690,016, filed Mar. 22, 2007, entitled “Reactive Material Compositions, Shot Shells Including Reactive Materials, and a Method of Producing Same,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,977,420, issued Jul. 12, 2011.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to a reactive material suitable for use as a shape-charge liner in a penetrating warhead and in reactive fragments in a fragmentary warhead. More specifically, the invention relates to a reactive material comprising a fluoropolymer and a metal filler. This reactive material is capable of being safely processed at temperatures significantly below the thermal autoignition point of the reactive material.

2. State of the Art

A penetrating warhead 2 used in a projectile or missile typically comprises a case 4, an explosive material 6, an initiator, and a liner 8, as shown in FIG. 1A. The case 4 is generally a cylindrical tube comprised of steel, plastic, or a composite material. At least a portion of the case 4 is typically filled with the explosive material 6. When the explosive material 6 in the warhead 2 is detonated, the liner 8 forms a high-velocity jet that has a high kinetic energy capable of penetrating solid objects, such as a target. The liner 8 is formed from a solid material that is formed into a jet responsive to detonation of the explosive charge. The liner material is typically a high density, ductile material, such as a metal, a metal alloy, a ceramic, or a glass. The metals commonly used in liners include copper, aluminum, depleted uranium, tungsten, or tantalum. In addition to penetrating warheads 2, fragmentary warheads 10 are commonly used. As illustrated in FIG. 1B, the fragmentary warhead 10 typically comprises fragments 12 of material that are projected at a target upon detonation of the explosive material 6 of the warhead 10. The fragments 12 must be able to withstand the explosive force of the detonation, otherwise the force commonly breaks up the fragments, thereby reducing their ability to penetrate the target.

Depending on the mechanical strength characteristics of the target, penetration by the liner 8 or fragments 12 may heavily damage or destroy the target. However, if the target is an armored vehicle or other heavily armored target, the liner 8 or fragments 12 may not cause the desired degree of damage. To improve the destructive capability of the warhead, the liner 8 or fragments 12 may be provided with the ability to produce secondary reactions that cause additional damage. These secondary reactions commonly include incendiary reactions. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,795 to LaRocca et al., pyrophoric metals are added to the liner to provide the desired incendiary effects. In LaRocca et al., a double-layered liner is disclosed, where a layer of dense metal provides the penetration ability and a layer of light metal, such as aluminum or magnesium, produces the incendiary effects.

While metals have been commonly used in liners, reactive materials have also been used. As known in the art and used herein, the term “reactive material” refers to a material comprising a metal that reacts with an oxidizing agent. Upon impact with a target, the reactive material of the liner produces a high burst of energy. A known reactive material includes an aluminum and polytetrafluoroethylene (“PTFE”) material, referred to herein as an “Al/PTFE” reactive material. PTFE is available from DuPont under the tradename TEFLON®. PTFE has the highest fluorine content of all fluoropolymers, is the most resistant fluoropolymer to chemical attack, and requires high processing temperatures to achieve its maximum strength. PTFE is used in reactive materials because its high fluorine content makes it a strong oxidizing agent. The Al/PTFE reactive material has good penetration ability in light armor or thin-skinned targets, such as aircraft, due to the density of the aluminum. The Al/PTFE reactive material also provides incendiary reactions because the reactive material ignites upon penetration into the target.

To form Al/PTFE high strength components, such as reactive fragments 12 for fragmentary warheads 10, the reactive material is pressed into billets or pressed preforms. The pressed preforms are then sintered and annealed at high temperatures, typically 350-390° C. Due to PTFE's high melting temperature of 342° C., these high sintering temperatures are necessary to form reactive materials using PTFE. The currently preferred technique for forming Al/PTFE fragments comprises blending the PTFE and aluminum in a solvent. The solution of Al/PTFE is spread on a tray and dried in an oven. The dried composition is then conditioned to 185° F. and pressed in a 185° F. heated die. The pressed preform is then heated to 350-390° C. for sintering. Since the PTFE is highly viscous at this temperature range, it maintains its approximate shape. The sintered preform is then cooled at a set rate to minimize cracking and maximize the mechanical properties of the Al/PTFE reactive material. The mechanical properties of the Al/PTFE reactive material are inversely related to the degree of crystallinity in the PTFE. In general, high crystallinity in the PTFE results in low tensile strength and high elongation. The current processing techniques available to form high strength components from Al/PTFE are limited due to PTFE's high viscosity at the 350-390° C. temperatures required for sintering.

To further increase the penetration ability of warheads, reactive materials comprising PTFE and metals with a higher density than aluminum have been produced. These higher density metals included tantalum and tungsten, which are more chemically reactive with PTFE at the sinter temperatures than aluminum. These Ta/PTFE and W/PTFE reactive materials were processed, using the same conditions as the Al/PTFE reactive material, to form 3.5-inch diameter and 1-inch diameter pucks. However, under these reaction conditions, the Ta/PTFE and W/PTFE reactive materials exhibited undesirable grain cracking resulting from volatile chemical reactions during the sintering process. The tungsten and tantalum reacted with trace amounts of hydrofluoric acid (“HF”) present at the temperatures used during the sintering process to produce highly volatile reaction products. The Ta/PTFE reactive material formed volatile tantalum fluoride compounds that were extremely exothermic. Accelerated Rate calorimetry (“ARC”) testing of the Ta/PTFE material revealed an exotherm that occurred at only a few degrees higher than the sintering temperature. This exotherm occurred at 375° C. In addition, the strong exothermic reaction caused the Ta/PTFE reactive material to autoignite at 307° C. during an experimental sinter cycle. The W/PTFE reactive material off-gassed during the sintering process due to the formation of highly volatile tungsten fluoride compounds (such as WF6 and WOF4) that caused severe cracking of the pressed preforms. These highly exothermic reactions raised concerns regarding the safety of processing the Ta/PTFE reactive materials at the high temperatures necessary to process PTFE. The highly exothermic reactions also raised concerns regarding the quality of the W/PTFE reactive materials due to the observed cracking.

Reactive materials comprising a metal and a fluoropolymer have also been used in military pyrotechnics. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,886,293 to Nauflett et al., a process of producing energetic materials for use in military pyrotechnics is disclosed. The energetic material comprises a magnesium fluoropolymer, specifically magnesium/TEFLON®/Viton® (“MTV”). Viton® is a copolymer of vinylidenefluoride-hexafluoropropylene. The resulting energetic material is used to produce rocket motor igniters and aircraft decoy flares.

In light of the processing and safety problems associated with Ta/PTFE and W/PTFE reactive materials, it would be highly desirable to develop a reactive material having a high penetration ability that can be safely processed at temperatures lower than the 350-390° C. temperatures required to process PTFE. Ideally, the desired reactive material would be processed at temperatures below the autoignition temperature at which volatile metal fluoride compounds form.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a reactive material comprising at least one metal filler and an oxidizing agent. The oxidizing agent comprises a fluoropolymer having a high fluorine content, a low melt temperature, and a high mechanical strength. Preferably, the fluoropolymer is a thermoplastic fluoropolymer, such as a polymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride. The metal filler comprises a high density, reactive metal, such as hafnium, tantalum, magnesium, titanium, tungsten, aluminum, magnesium/aluminum alloys, or zirconium. The metal filler may be a metal/metal oxide filler or an intermetallic filler. The reactive material is processed at temperatures significantly below the thermal autoignition point of the reactive material.

The present invention also relates to an article, such as a warhead, comprising the reactive material.

In addition, the present invention relates to a method of safely processing a reactive material. The method comprises mixing at least one metal filler with an oxidizing agent to form the reactive material. The reactive material is then processed at a temperature below the thermal autoignition point of the reactive material.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming that which is regarded as the present invention, the advantages of this invention can be more readily ascertained from the following description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIGS. 1A and 1B schematically illustrate a penetrating warhead and a fragmentary head;

FIG. 2 shows ARC temperature and pressure v. time plots for a step heat run performed on a composition of Ta/THV 220;

FIG. 3 shows ARC temperature and pressure v. time plots for a 250° C./24 hour isothermal age run performed on a composition of Ta/THV 220;

FIGS. 4 and 5 show ARC temperature and pressure v. time plots for a 200° C./24 hour isothermal age run performed on different sample sizes of a composition of Ta/THV 220;

FIG. 6 shows ARC temperature and pressure v. time plots for a step heat run performed on a composition of Hf/THV 220;

FIG. 7 shows ARC self-heat rate v. temperature plots for a step heat run performed on a composition of Hf/THV 220; and

FIG. 8 shows thermal stability results for a 200° C./24 hour isothermal age run performed on a composition of Hf/THV 220.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The reactive material of the present invention may be used as a reactive liner 8 in penetrating (shape-charge) warheads 2 and in high strength reactive fragments 12 in fragmentary warheads 10, as illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B. The reactive material comprises an oxidizing and at least one metal filler and may be safely processed at temperatures significantly below the thermal autoignition point of the reactive material. The reactive fragments 12 and reactive liners 8 are able to penetrate solid targets and produce incendiary effects after the fragments/liners have penetrated the target, thereby increasing the destructive effect of the warheads.

The oxidizing agent may provide strength to the reactive material so that the reactive material survives detonation of the warhead. In addition, the oxidizing agent may be a strong oxidizer so that secondary reactions, such as incendiary reactions, occur when the reactive material penetrates its target. The incendiary reactions may also be due to afterburning of the metal filler, which is caused by a reaction between the metal filler and atmospheric oxygen. The oxidizing agent may accelerate the rate of metal filler/atmospheric oxygen reaction. Preferably, the oxidizing agent is a fluoropolymer or fluoroelastomer with a high fluorine content, a low melt temperature, and a high mechanical strength. More preferably, the oxidizing agent is a thermoplastic fluoropolymer.

The high mechanical strength of the fluoropolymer may provide the reactive material with the strength to survive the detonation or explosive launch of the warhead. The mechanical strength of the fluoropolymer may be particularly important in fragmentary warheads 10 because coherent fragments 12 must survive the detonation in order to impact the target. The high fluorine content of the fluoropolymer may provide the necessary oxidizing strength to produce incendiary reactions with the metal filler when the reactive material penetrates its target. The heat generated when the reactive material penetrates the target may cause the fluorines in the fluoropolymer to be liberated from the hydrocarbon chain of the fluoropolymer and to exothermically react with the metal filler. The low melt temperature of the fluoropolymer may help to ensure that the reactive material may be processed at a temperature below which the rate of metal reacting with trace amounts of HF is greatly reduced or eliminated.

By reducing the temperature at which the reactive material is processed, the safety concerns identified previously may be eliminated or greatly reduced. In order to improve the safety of processing the reactive materials, the melting temperature of the fluoropolymer may not exceed the autoignition temperature of the reactive material (the fluoropolymer/metal filler composition). In other words, the reactive material may not produce an exotherm or exotherms at or below the processing temperature. The processing temperature of the reactive metal may vary depending on the melting point of the fluoropolymer and the amount of metal filler present. To provide an adequate margin of safety, the processing temperature may be no higher than 50° C. below the thermal autoignition point of the reactive material or the temperature at which an exotherm occurs. However, depending on the acceptable degree of risk in processing the reactive materials, this 50° C. margin of error may be reduced as long as the melting temperature of the fluoropolymer does not exceed the autoignition temperature of the reactive material.

The fluoropolymer of the reactive material may be selected based on its low-temperature processing capability, cost, availability, fluorine content, mechanical properties of the unfilled fluoropolymer, melting point, viscosity at desired processing temperature, and compatibility of the fluoropolymer with reactive metal fillers. Properties of selected commercially available fluoropolymers are shown in Table 1. These fluoropolymers are available from Dupont, Dyneon LLC, and Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. The fluoropolymer of the present invention may include, but is not limited to, a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride (“THV”), a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether (“PFA”), a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene (“ETFE”), or a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene (“FEP”).

TABLE 1 Properties of Selected Fluoropolymers Tensile (%) Fluorine Strength Elonga- Melting Content (psi) tion at Point (% by Polymer at 23° C. 23° C. (° C.) Solubility weight) Polytetrafluorethylene PTFE 4500 400 342 Insoluble 76   (TEFLON ®) TFM 1700 5800 650 342 Insoluble 76   Modified PTFE Fluoroelastastomers (Gums) Viton A 2000 350 260 Soluble in 65.9 (Fluorel 2175) ketones/esters FEX 5832X 2000 200 260 Soluble in 70.5 terpolymer ketones/esters Fluorothermoplastic Terpolymer of Tetrafluoroethylene, Hexafluoroproplyene, and Vinylidenefluoride THV 220 2900 600 120 Soluble in 70.5 ketones/ Esters (100%) THV X 310 3480 500 140 Soluble in 71-72 ketones/esters (partial) THV 415 4060 500 155 Soluble in 71-72 ketones/esters (partial) THV 500 4060 500 165 Soluble in 72.4 ketones/esters (partial) HTEX 1510 4800 500 165 Insoluble 67.0 Fluorothermoplastic Copolymer of Tetrafluoroethylene and Perfluorovinylether PFA 4350 400 310 Insoluble 76   Fluorothermoplastic Copolymer of Tetrafluoroethylene and Hexafluoropropylene FEP 2900-4300 350 260 Insoluble 76   Fluorothermoplastic Copolymer of Tetrafluoroethylene and Ethylene ETFE 6700 325 260 Practically 61.0 insoluble

In addition to using one fluoropolymer as the oxidizing agent, it is also contemplated that a combination of at least two fluoropolymers may be used. For sake of example only, a combination of PTFE and THV 220 or a combination of two different THV polymers may be used. At least two fluoropolymers may be present in percentages sufficient to provide the high fluorine content, the low melt temperature, and the high mechanical strength to the reactive material.

The fluorine content of the fluoropolymer is preferably greater than approximately 45% by weight. However, a fluoropolymer having a lower fluorine may be used depending on the mechanical properties of the fluoropolymer. In other words, a fluoropolymer having a fluorine content less than approximately 45% by weight may be used if the fluoropolymer has a high tensile strength and a high percentage of elongation, in addition to the desired low melt temperature.

Preferably, the fluoropolymer of the reactive material is THV 220, available from Dyneon LLC (Oakdale, Minn.), because THV 220 is easy to process due to its complete solubility in conventional solvents and its low melt temperature. THV 220 has a melt temperature of 222° C. below the melt temperature of PTFE. Conventional solvents include ketones and esters and, more specifically, acetone and ethyl acetate. The low melt temperature of THV 220 allows the reactive material to be processed at temperatures significantly below the thermal autoignition point using conventional batch mixers. THV 220 is further preferable because the sintering process required to produce PTFE reactive materials may be eliminated, thereby increasing production efficiency.

In addition to THV 220, other THV polymers including, but not limited to, THV X 310, THV 415, THV 500, and HTEX 1510, all available from Dyneon LLC, may be used as the fluoropolymer of the reactive material. The primary advantage offered by THV polymers is the significantly reduced process temperature and the elimination of the sintering process required in PTFE processing. Other fluoropolymers may also be used in the reactive material as long as these fluoropolymers have the desired properties of a high fluorine content, a low melt temperature, and a high mechanical strength.

The metal filler of the reactive material may be a reactive, high density metal that provides the requisite penetrating power and energy release for the warhead. The metal filler may be magnesium, aluminum, magnesium/aluminum alloys, iron, copper, zirconium, titanium, zinc, boron, silicon, manganese, tin, hafnium, tungsten, depleted uranium, or tantalum, or metal carbides, oxides, or nitrides of these metals. The metal filler may have a density that is approximately equal or greater than the density of magnesium (1.74 g/cm3). In addition, the metal filler may be at least as reactive with the oxidizing agent as magnesium or aluminum. Preferably, the metal filler is hafnium, tantalum, magnesium, titanium, tungsten, aluminum, magnesium/aluminum alloys, or zirconium. The metal fillers may be combined with the reactive material in powdered form. However, intermetallic thermitic and incendiary mixes of the metal filler may also be used within the scope of the invention. The metal filler may also be a combination or blend of two or more of these metals. For example, the metal filler may be a blend of hafnium and tantalum. In addition, the metal filler may be a metal/metal oxide filler (a thermite), such as Fe2O3/aluminum, Fe2O3/zirconium, CuO/aluminum, Fe2O3/titanium, tantalum/iron oxide, manganese dioxide/aluminum, or other thermite compositions. Intermetallic fillers that include a blend of two or more of the metals may also be used. The intermetallic fillers may include a blend of unreacted metals that have differing numbers of molar ratios of each of the two or more metals, such as one mole of hafnium and two moles of aluminum; one mole of hafnium and one mole of aluminum; one mole of hafnium and two moles of boron; one mole of nickel and one mole of aluminum; one mole of titanium and one mole of aluminum; one mole of titanium and two moles of aluminum; one mole of zirconium and one mole of aluminum; one mole of zirconium and two moles of aluminum; one mole of molybdenum and two moles of aluminum; one mole of aluminum and two moles of boron; one mole of hafnium and two moles of boron; one mole of tantalum and one mole of boron; one mole of titanium and two moles of boron; one mole of zirconium and one mole of boron; or other intermetallic compositions may also be used.

The fluoropolymer may be present in the reactive material at approximately 15-90% by weight. Preferably, the fluoropolymer is present at approximately 25-75% by weight. The metal filler may be present at approximately 10-85% by weight.

The reactive material may be produced by mixing the fluoropolymer and the metal filler, as known in the art. If the fluoropolymer is soluble in ketones or esters, a particle size of the fluoropolymer may not be critical to the operability of the present invention. However, if the fluoropolymer is insoluble in ketones or esters, the fluoropolymer may be commercially obtained in milled form or may be processed to its milled form, as known in the art. The insoluble fluoropolyner preferably has a small particle size, such as an average particle size of approximately 1 micron. The fluoropolymer may then be combined with the metal filler and blended with a solvent to form a suspension of reactive material. A twin-screw extruder may also be used to compound or mix the metal filler with the fluoropolymer if solvents are undesirable. If the fluoropolymer is soluble in ketones or esters, the reactive material may be mixed by a solvent loss technique or a polymer precipitation technique, which are described in more detail below.

After the fluoropolymer and metal filler are mixed, the reactive material may be processed by pressing or extrusion to manufacture near-net-shape preforms. A reactive material comprising a fluoropolymer that is insoluble in ketones or esters may be directly pressed or extruded, as described below. A reactive material comprising a soluble fluoropolymer may be processed by the polymer precipitation or solvent loss techniques, followed by pressing or extrusion. If the reactive material is processed by pressing, the solution of reactive material is dried in an oven. The dried reactive material is then loaded into a die that is heated to approximately 165-180° C. This temperature is dependent on the melting point and the viscosity of the reactive material. Higher temperatures will be required to process reactive materials comprising fluoropolymers with higher melting points. The reactive material is melted under pressure (approximately 1500 psi) and under vacuum. This pressure is dependent on the rheology of the reactive material. The die is cooled to below the melt temperature of the die (approximately 80-100° C.) for several minutes. The pressing pressure is then increased to approximately 3000-4000 psi and the cooling of the die is continued to 50-60° C. It is essential that the die have a slow cooling rate to maximize polymer crystallinity and mechanical properties. Once the reactive material is adequately cooled, it is pressed from the die and allowed to cool to ambient room temperature.

If the reactive material is processed by extrusion, the solution of reactive material is dried in an oven. The dried reactive material is then loaded into an extruder heated to approximately 165-180° C. The reactive material is melted under pressure (approximately 1500 psi) and under vacuum. The pressure required to melt the reactive material is dependent on the fluoropolymer used in the reactive material and the metal content in the reactive material. The extrusion pressure is then increased to form an extrudate, which is then cut into pieces and allowed to cool to ambient room temperature.

It is also contemplated that these reactive materials may be used to allow near-net-shape fabrication of components using injection molding or extrusion, thereby reducing waste and machining time.

The processed reactive materials formed by either of these methods may be analyzed to determine the percentage of theoretical maximum density (“% of TMD”) for each reactive material. The % of TMD is measured as known in the art. If the reactive material has a % of TMD equal to approximately 100%, it indicates that no voids are present in the reactive material. The desired % of TMD of the reactive material may range between approximately 80-100%. Preferably, the % of TMID of the reactive material is between approximately 90-100% and, more preferably, between approximately 95-100%. The desired % of TMD may depend on the ultimate application in which the reactive material may be used.

The reactive material having a sufficient % of TMD may be used in reactive fragments 12 for fragmentary warheads 10 or liners 8 in penetrating warheads 2. In a penetrating warhead 2, the reactive material may be machined, pressed, or extruded into a desired shape for use as the liner 8. In addition, the reactive material may be placed into a mold to produce the desired shape of the liner 8. For example, the reactive material is weighed into the desired quantity. TEFLON® tape is placed on a top surface of a first copper dish and a bottom surface of a second copper dish. The first copper dish is heated in a 170° C. oven. A TEFLON® brick is placed over the first copper dish and the reactive material is stacked into the middle of the first copper dish. The reactive material is heated for about 45 minutes or until it becomes easily pliable. The second copper dish is placed on top of the material and lightly pressed down, making sure that the alignment of the dish is flat. A TEFLON® donut is placed on top of the second copper dish and two metal weights are placed on top of the TEFLON® donut. The TEFLON® donut and metal weights are arranged so that the weight is pressing straight down on the reactive material to ensure that the reactive material will have a uniform thickness. The set-up is left for 45 minutes in the oven and then removed. The mold is removed from the TEFLON® brick and cooled for 15 minutes. The two copper dishes are then pried off, thereby releasing a liner formed from the reactive material in the desired shape. The liner may be formed into a shape up to several inches thick.

In a fragmentary warhead 10, which comprises fragments 12 of reactive material, the reactive material may be processed into the desired fragment shapes by extrusion or pressing. These reactive fragments 12 may have a thickness up to several inches thick. The dimensions of a liner 8 or reactive fragments 12 may vary, depending on the application in which the reactive material is being used. Therefore, each application may require optimization testing.

The reactive material of the present invention may be deposited in the warhead as known in the art. The reactive material may replace the conventional liner 8, such as the copper liner, that is used in penetrating warheads 2. In addition, it is also contemplated that the reactive material may be used in addition to the copper liner. For example, the reactive material may be deposited on top of the copper liner. The reactive material may also be formed into reactive fragments 12 for use in a fragmentary warhead 10. These reactive fragments 12 may be secured in the warhead as known in the art.

The reactive materials of the present invention significantly reduce or eliminate the safety concerns associated with the processing of high density, reactive metals and fluoropolymers. These reactive materials can be processed at dramatically lower temperatures and pressures in comparison to the temperatures and pressures required to process PTFE reactive materials. These reactive materials can also be processed more efficiently because the sintering step necessary to process PTFE is eliminated. The reactive materials also allow near-net-shape fabrication of reactive material components using injection molding or extrusion, thus reducing waste. In addition, waste is eliminated because the reactive material can be readily recycled into new components. Finally, processing of these reactive materials eliminates the use of solvent in the process as they may be mixed or compounded in a twin screw extruder.

EXAMPLE 1 Compositions of Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 Reactive Materials

The compositions of Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2 High Density Reactive Material Compositions Theoretical Filler Fluoropolymer Maximum Metal Density Density Wt % Wt % Vol % Vol % Density Filler Fluoropolymer (g/cm3) (g/cm3) Metal Fluoropolymer Metal Fluoropolymer (g/cm3) Tantalum THV 220 16.69 1.95 71.70 28.30 22.84 77.16 5.317 Tantalum THV 220 16.69 1.95 47.20 52.80 9.46 90.54 3.344 Hafnium THV 220 13.30 1.95 67.00 33.00 22.94 77.06 4.554 Hafnium THV 220 13.30 1.95 52.50 47.50 13.95 86.05 3.533

EXAMPLE 2 Mixing of Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 Reactive Materials

The Ta/THV 220 reactive materials were mixed using two techniques, the solvent loss technique and the polymer precipitation technique, to determine which technique provided the best mixing. Two small 10-gram mixes were made using both techniques. In the solvent loss method, the THV 220 was dissolved in acetone. The tantalum was mixed in with the THV 220 while stirring continuously to drive off the acetone. Small chunks of homogeneous, tantalum-filled THV 220 material were produced, which were then dried in a forced-air oven. The solvent loss technique resulted in a well mixed composition of tantalum-filled THV 220. However, one disadvantage of this technique is that solvent is required when the reactive material is produced in batch mixes.

In the polymer precipitation technique, THV 220 was dissolved in acetone and tantalum was mixed into the solution. A non-polar solvent, such as hexane or heptane, was then added to change the polarity of the solution, forcing the THV 220 to precipitate. One advantage of this technique is its increased speed, which reduces the time needed for mixing. In addition, this process works extremely well with reactive materials that have less than 20 percent by volume of the fluoropolymer. However, the high-density Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials contained approximately 70% by volume of THV 220, which resulted in large sticky agglomerates that were hard to process.

Samples of the Ta/THV 220 reactive materials produced by the two techniques were submitted for safety characterization testing. Surprisingly, the safety characteristics of the reactive materials varied with onset temperature sensitivity depending on how the samples were processed. The polymer precipitation technique created a reactive material that was more easily ignited, which may be related to the presence of uncoated tantalum that is extremely thermally unstable in an oxygen atmosphere. The safety characteristics of the Ta/THV 220 reactive materials produced by the solvent loss and polymer precipitation techniques are listed in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Safety Data For Ta/THV 220 Reactive Materials Comparing The Solvent Loss Technique To The Polymer Precipitation Technique Thiokol ABL Sliding Thiokol Simulated Bulk Impact Friction ESD Auto Ignition DSC Onset Thiokol Composition (cm) (lbs@8 ft/s) (Joules) Onset Temp (° F.) Temp (° C.) Safety Class 30.0% THV 220 >46 800 >8.0 Onset 500 F. 435.2 Green Line- 70.0% Tantalum Burned Safe to Solvent Loss Process 30.0% THV 220 >46 800 >8.0 Onset 500 F. 360.7 Green Line- 70.0% Tantalum Burned Safe to Polymer Precip. Process 30.0% THV 220 ARC Step Heated to 350° C., Ignited 70.0% Tantalum Solvent Loss 30.0% THV 220 ARC: 5 gram sample isothermally aged at 250° C., ignited after 6 hours 70.0% Tantalum Polymer Precip.

Based on the safety data for the Ta/THV 220 reactive material and the processing issues involved with the polymer precipitation technique, the solvent loss technique was used to produce subsequent Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials. A total of 3×1000 -gram mixes were made with tantalum and hafnium, respectively.

EXAMPLE 3 Additional Compositions of Reactive Materials Comprising Fluoropolymers and Metal Fillers

Reactive materials comprising one of THV 220, THV X 310, THV 415, THV 500, or HTEX 1510 as the fluoropolymer and one of tantalum, hafnium, aluminum, magnesium, tungsten, titanium, or zirconium as the metal filler are produced as described in Examples 1 and 2. For each reactive material, the weight percentage of fluoropolymer and metal filler is determined as known in the art.

EXAMPLE 4 Thermal Stability Testing on Ta/THV 220 And Hf/THV 220 Reactive Materials

Thermal stability tests were performed on samples of the Ta/THV 220 and the Hf/THV 220 reactive materials. All samples were placed into sealed one-inch diameter, spherical titanium bombs with a 1¼-inch stem. Four runs were made on the Ta/THV 220 mixes as described below:

    • 1. Step heat run, 50-580° C., 5° C. steps, 70% Ta/30% THV 220 Mix #4 (#909), 0.33 grams;
    • 2. 250° C./24 hour isothermal age run, “isotracked” mode, Ta/THV 220 1791-64-1, 5.11 grams;
    • 3. 200° C./24 hour isothermal age run, “isofixed” mode, 70% Ta/30% THV 220 Solvent Loss 1665-74-1, 1.52 grams; and
    • 4. 200° C./24 hour isothermal age run, “isofixed” mode, 70% Ta/30% THV 220 Solvent Loss 1665-74-1, 5.27 grams.

In ARC isothermal aging, the difference between the “isotracked” and “isofixed” modes was that during the “isotracked” mode, the calorimeter walls tracked the bomb temperature during the entire course of the run. In the “isofixed” mode, the calorimeter walls remained at the isothermal age temperature until the sample self-heated beyond the isothermal age temperature plus an “isothermal window” (approximately 2° C). When the isothermal window was exceeded and the self-heat rate exceeded the preset threshold (0.020° C./minute for all tests reported) the walls of the calorimeter began to track the bomb.

The “isofixed” algorithm was used for isothermal aging on the original ARC. The disadvantage to the “isotracked” mode was that the calorimeter was more likely to drift and even registered false exotherms during a long isothermal age run. Long-term temperature stability was better with the classic “isofixed” aging mode. Since some positive temperature drift problems were experienced in the “isotracked” mode, all remaining experiments were conducted in the “isofixed” mode.

The results of the Ta/THV 220 step heat run on a 0.3267 gram sample are shown in FIG. 2. No exotherms (self-heat rates in excess of 0.02° C./minute) were observed up to roughly 310° C. For purposes of these experiments, exotherms were defined as self-heat rates in excess of 0.02° C./minute. However, it is to be understood that this definition may vary, as known in the art, depending on the safety protocol used. Upon heating to 310° C., the sample exothermed and apparently exploded during the wait period. However, 310° C. is significantly above the temperatures that will be used to process the Ta/THV 220 reactive materials. One would expect to detect the exotherm at lower temperatures with larger samples, which better simulate a true bulk thermal runaway, but unfortunately these could not be allowed to autoignite because bomb rupture would occur.

The 250° C./24 hour isothermal age run was performed on the Ta/THV 220 reactive material (using a different sample than the original run, possibly with different thermal stability characteristics) on a 5.1143 gram sample. This sample size was large enough to provide a good simulation of a bulk sample. Also, isothermal aging did a better job than step heating of unmasking initially slow autocatalytic reactions that can lead to a sudden thermal runaway. FIG. 3 shows the temperature versus time behavior of this sample, which autoignited after less than seven hours at 250° C. This temperature is also significantly above the temperatures that will be used to process the Ta/THV 220 reactive materials.

Two additional isothermal age runs were conducted on a different sample (a solvent loss process) at a lower temperature, 200° C., for 24 hours, using progressively larger samples (1.5191 grams, then 5.267 grams). These results are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. No exotherms (self-heat rates in excess of 0.02° C./minute) were detected with either sample. The 1.5 gram sample showed a slight temperature rise at the start of the run, which may have been due to calorimeter drift. The second run using a 5.3 gram sample did not show this behavior. This temperature is also above the temperatures that will be used to process the Ta/THV 220 reactive materials.

For the Hf/THV 220, two runs were made:

    • 1. step heat run, 50-580° C., 5° C. steps, 70% Hf/30% THV 220 1791-66-1 #1065, 0.31 gram sample; and
    • 2. 200° C./24 hour isothermal age run, 70% HUf/30% THV 220 1791-66-1 #1065, 5.16 gram sample.

FIGS. 6 and 7 show the temperature/pressure v. time and self-heat rate v. temperature curves respectively for a small (0.3109 gram) sample of Hf/THV 220 reactive material. Starting at about 275° C., there were several small exotherms with self-heat rates near the exotherm threshold (0.020° C./min) that were not sustained. When the self-heat rate dropped below the exotherm threshold, step heating resumed, which happened several times between 275 and 355° C. At 355° C., a sustained exotherm was finally observed. However, 355° C. is significantly above the temperatures that will be used to process the Hf/THV 220 reactive materials. The lower temperature exothermic behavior may have had a contribution from calorimeter drift. It is also unclear what happened to the pressure trace on this run at high temperatures.

Finally, a 200° C./24 hour isothermal age experiment was conducted on a 5.17 gram sample of material. As shown in FIG. 8, no appreciable self-heating or exothermic behavior was observed at this temperature.

The results of these stability tests on the Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials indicated that no thermal hazard potential exists for the proposed extrusion involving short-term exposure of the Ta/THV 220 (solvent loss process) and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials to temperatures of approximately 140° C. In fact, both reactive materials were thermally stable at temperatures of approximately 200° C.

EXAMPLE 5 Thermal Stability Testing on Additional Compositions of Reactive Materials Comprising Fluoropolymers and Metal Fillers

Reactive materials produced according to Example 3 are evaluated for thermal stability according to Example 4. Thermal stability tests are performed as described in Example 4.

Reactive materials are obtained that have no thermal hazard potential for the proposed extrusion involving short-term exposure of these reactive materials to temperatures slightly greater than the melt temperature of the specific fluoropolymers used in the composition.

EXAMPLE 6 Processing of Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 Reactive Materials

The mixed Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials were processed by pressing or ram extrusion. The two methods were evaluated to determine whether the method of processing affected the reactive material. Initially, the reactive material was pressed into right circular cylinders and evaluated and eliminated for safety reasons due to the large amount of flashing produced when small samples of inert THV 220 (NaCl/THV 220 and KCl/THV 220) compositions were pressed. Pressing the Al/THV 220, Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 200 reactive materials while they were being melted potentially presented a safety hazard due to the flashing formed around the pressing ram. Coupled with the fact that the tantalum and hafnium metal fillers are extremely sensitive to electrostatic discharge (“ESD”), ram extrusion was pursued as the processing technique. By using extrusion, flashing is eliminated, exposure of personnel to the reactive materials is minimized, and safety is improved.

Ram extrusion was used to fabricate 1.1-inch diameter cylinders because the extrusion produced reactive material with low void content, thereby yielding high-density reactive material close to the theoretical maximum density. With both the Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials, multiple extrusions were performed with quantities restricted by volumetric limitations. On average, each extrusion produced enough material to make six 1.1-inch cylinders with very few voids. Unconsolidated reactive material was loaded into the top of the extruder barrel and heated under vacuum until it melted. Pressure was then applied to the ram, which forced the soft reactive material through the die and formed a cylindrical extrudate. As the extrudate grew in length, it eventually contacted a conveyor, which applied backpressure. The backpressure caused the extrudate to bulge near the die where the extrudate was still soft. The resulting extrudates therefore had sections of varying diameter.

Visual inspection of the extruded Hf/THV 220 reactive material showed the presence of shiny specks randomly dispersed in the material. This was compared to the extruded Ta/THV 220 reactive material, where no specks were present. The shiny specs in the Hf/THV 220 extrudates were believed to be uncoated particles of Hf.

The processed Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 extrudates were evaluated to determine the % of TMD for each sample.

EXAMPLE 7 Processing of Additional Compositions of Reactive Materials Comprising Fluoropolymers and Metal Fillers

Reactive materials comprising the metal fillers and fluoropolymers described in Example 3 are processed as described in Example 6.

The extrudates from these processed reactive materials are evaluated to determine the % of TMD for each sample.

EXAMPLE 8 TMD Values of Ta/THV 220 Extrudates

The % of TMD values for the Ta/THV 220 extrudates were calculated and are presented in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Ta/THV 220 TMD Data Testing Date Sample Position Density (g/cc) % of TMD Jan. 21, 2002 Middle of Rod 5.256 98.86 Feb. 4, 2002 End of Delivered Rod 5.281 99.32 Feb. 4, 2002 Middle of Rod 5.254 98.81 Feb. 4, 2002 Middle of Rod 5.281 99.32 Feb. 4, 2002 End of Delivered Rod 5.275 99.21 Average 5.269 99.106

As shown in Table 4, these Ta/THV 220 extrudates had TMD values ranging from 98.81-99.32%, with an average TMD value of 99.106%. These TMD values are significantly higher than the average TMD value for W/PTFE, which was determined to be approximately 96% (data not shown). These TMD values are also higher than the TMD values for Al/THV 220, which were determined to range from approximately 97.9%-99.2% (data not shown).

EXAMPLE 9 TMD Values For Hf/THV 220 Extrudates

The % of TMD values for the Hf/THV 220 extrudates were calculated and are presented in Table 5. When hafnium was used as the metal filler, the extrudate density was not as close to the % of TMD as the Ta/THV 220 extrudates. The lower % of TMD may be related to changes in the reactive material's rheology or poor bonding of the THV 220 to the surface of the hafnium powder. As previously mentioned, the Hf/THV 220 extrudates comprised small shiny specks that were believed to be uncoated Hf particles. The lower density values of the Hf/THV 220 extrudate support this observation because the uncoated Hf would result in microscopic voids in the material, thereby reducing the % of TMD.

TABLE 5 Hf/THV 220 TMD Data Testing Date Sample Position Density (g/cc) % of TMD Feb. 4, 2002 End of Delivered Rod 4.427 97.21 Feb. 4, 2002 End of Delivered Rod 4.440 97.49 Feb. 4, 2002 End of Delivered Rod 4.450 97.71 Feb. 4, 2002 End of Delivered Rod 4.444 97.58 Average 4.440 97.50

The TMD values for the Hf/THV 220 reactive materials are slightly lower than the TMD values for the Ta/THV 220 reactive materials. However, the % of TMD for the Hf/THV 220 reactive materials are higher than the average TMD value for W/PTFE, which was determined to be approximately 96% (data not shown). These TMD values are also comparable to the TMD values for Al/THV 220, which were determined to range from approximately 97.9%-99.2% (data not shown).

EXAMPLE 10 TMD Values for Additional Compositions of Reactive Materials Comprising Fluoropolymers and Metal Fillers

The % of TMD values for the reactive materials comprising the metal fillers and fluoropolymers described in Example 3 are measured. Reactive materials that have TMD values greater than the average TMD value for W/PTFE are obtained. The average TMD value for W/PTFE was determined to be approximately 96% (data not shown).

EXAMPLE 11 Penetration Ability of Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 Reactive Materials

The Ta/THV 220 and Hf/THV 220 reactive materials exhibited improved penetration into solid targets compared to the Ta/PTFE and W/PTFE reactive materials (data not shown).

EXAMPLE 12 Penetration Ability of Additional Compositions of Reactive Materials Comprising Fluoropolymers and Metal Fillers

Reactive materials comprising the metal fillers and fluoropolymers described in Example 3 are obtained. These reactive materials have improved penetration into solid targets compared to the Ta/PTFE and W/PTFE reactive materials.

Claims

1. A composition for a reactive material, comprising consisting of:

an oxidizing agent comprising a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and
at least one metal filler,
the fluoropolymer present in the composition at from approximately 15% by weight to approximately 90% by weight.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the fluoropolymer is present in the reactive material at approximately 15-90% by weight.

3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the fluoropolymer is present in the reactive material composition at from approximately 25% by weight to approximately 25-75% 75% by weight.

4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the oxidizing agent has a fluorine content of greater than approximately 45% by weight.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one metal filler comprises a metal having a density approximately equal to or greater than the density of magnesium.

6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one metal filler is present in the reactive material composition at from approximately 10% by weight to approximately 10-85% 85% by weight.

7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one metal filler is selected from the group consisting of magnesium, aluminum, magnesium/aluminum alloys, iron, copper, zirconium, titanium, zinc, manganese, tin, boron, silicon, hafnium, tungsten, depleted uranium, and tantalum, and metal carbides, oxides, and nitrides thereof.

8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one metal filler is a metal/metal oxide thermite or a metal/metal intermetallic.

9. The composition of claim 1, wherein a processing temperature of the reactive material is substantially below a thermal autoignition temperature of the reactive material.

10. An article comprising a liner formed from a reactive material, the reactive material, comprising:

a reactive material liner consisting of: an oxidizing agent comprising a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and
at least one metal filler,
the fluoropolymer present in the reactive material liner at from approximately 15% by weight to approximately 90% by weight.

11. The article of claim 10, wherein the at least one metal filler comprises a metal having a density approximately equal to or greater than the density of magnesium.

12. The article of claim 10, wherein the at least one metal filler is selected from the group consisting of magnesium, aluminum, magnesium/aluminum alloys, iron, copper, zirconium, titanium, zinc, manganese, tin, boron, silicon, hafnium, tungsten, depleted uranium, and tantalum, and metal carbides, oxides, and nitrides thereof.

13. The article of claim 10, wherein the at least one metal filler is a metal/metal oxide thermite or a metal/metal intermetallic.

14. The article of claim 10, wherein the at least one metal filler is present in the reactive material at approximately 10-85% by weight.

15. The article of claim 10, wherein a processing temperature of the reactive material is substantially below a thermal autoignition temperature of the reactive material.

16. The article of claim 10, wherein the fluoropolymer is present in the reactive material at approximately 15-90% by weight.

17. The ice of claim 10, wherein the fluoropolymer is present in the reactive material at approximately 25-75% by weight.

18. A method of processing a reactive material, comprising:

mixing at least one metal filler with an oxidizing agent a fluoropolymer to form a reactive material consisting of the at least one metal filler and the fluoropolymer, the oxidizing agent comprising a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene, and the fluoropolymer present in the reactive material at from approximately 15% by weight to approximately 90% by weight; and
processing the reactive material at a temperature that does not exceed a thermal autoignition temperature of the reactive material.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein mixing at least one metal filler with an oxidizing agent comprises mixing the at least one metal filler selected from the group consisting of magnesium, aluminum, magnesium/aluminum alloys, iron, copper, zirconium, titanium, zinc, manganese, tin, boron, silicon, hafnium, tungsten, depleted uranium, and tantalum, and metal carbides, oxides, and nitrides thereof, with the oxidizing agent.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein mixing at least one metal filler with an oxidizing agent comprises mixing at least one metal/metal oxide with the oxidizing agent.

21. A method of processing a reactive material, comprising:

mixing a metal filler with an oxidizing agent to form a reactive material, the oxidizing agent comprising a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and
processing the reactive material at a temperature substantially below a thermal autoignition point of the reactive material.

22. An artillery projectile comprising a liner formed from a reactive material, the reactive material, comprising:

an oxidizing agent comprising a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and
at least one metal filler
a reactive material liner consisting of: a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and at least one metal filler,
the fluoropolymer present in the reactive material liner at from approximately 15% by weight to approximately 90% by weight.

23. A warhead comprising fragments or a liner formed from a reactive material, the reactive material, comprising:

an oxidizing agent comprising a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and
at least one metal filler
reactive material fragments or a reactive material liner, the reactive material fragments or the reactive material liner consisting of: a fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene; and at least one metal filler,
the fluoropolymer present in the reactive material fragments or the reactive material liner at from approximately 15% by weight to approximately 90% by weight.

24. A warhead for use in a projectile, comprising:

a case;
an explosive material;
an initiator; and
a liner or fragments, the liner or fragments formed from a reactive material comprising consisting of at least one metal filler and an oxidizing agent, wherein the oxidizing agent comprises a from approximately 15% by weight to approximately 90% by weight of a fluoropolymer, the fluoropolymer selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic terpolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorovinylether, a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene, and a thermoplastic copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
359491 March 1887 Bagger
2217645 October 1940 DeWilde et al.
2326147 August 1943 Landen
2359317 October 1944 Landen
2398287 April 1946 Christie
2424970 August 1947 Church et al.
2425005 August 1947 Rechel
2425418 August 1947 Burdett et al.
2446268 August 1948 Dawson
2459175 January 1949 Moore
2703531 March 1955 Graumann et al.
2961712 November 1960 Davis
3133841 May 1964 Kuehl
3158994 December 1964 Hodgson
3191535 June 1965 Mulloy
3325316 June 1967 MacDonald
3348484 October 1967 Grandy
3414443 December 1968 Pheasant et al.
3434420 March 1969 Ciccone et al.
3463047 August 1969 Germershausen
3669020 June 1972 Waite et al.
3677183 July 1972 Talley
3730093 May 1973 Cummings
3734788 May 1973 Kaufman
3745076 July 1973 Sickman
3770525 November 1973 Villey-Desmeserets
3799054 March 1974 LaRocca
3894867 July 1975 Fishman et al.
3951068 April 20, 1976 Schroeder
3961576 June 8, 1976 Montgomery, Jr.
3978796 September 7, 1976 Hackman
3980612 September 14, 1976 Gangal
4006687 February 8, 1977 Ridgeway
4011818 March 15, 1977 Stosz, Jr. et al.
4029868 June 14, 1977 Carlson
4037539 July 26, 1977 Hackman
4096804 June 27, 1978 Bilsbury
4106411 August 15, 1978 Borcher et al.
4112846 September 12, 1978 Gilbert et al.
4131498 December 26, 1978 Lucy
4153661 May 8, 1979 Ree et al.
4179992 December 25, 1979 Ramnarace et al.
4237787 December 9, 1980 Wacula et al.
4280408 July 28, 1981 Weber et al.
4331080 May 25, 1982 West et al.
4348958 September 14, 1982 Day
4351240 September 28, 1982 McCubbin et al.
4368296 January 11, 1983 Kuhls et al.
4381692 May 3, 1983 Weintraub
4383485 May 17, 1983 Coates et al.
4419936 December 13, 1983 Coates et al.
4432816 February 21, 1984 Kennedy et al.
4435481 March 6, 1984 Baldi
4445947 May 1, 1984 Shaw et al.
4449456 May 22, 1984 Foss et al.
4503776 March 12, 1985 Nussbaum et al.
4572077 February 25, 1986 Antoine et al.
4612860 September 23, 1986 Flatau
4655139 April 7, 1987 Wilhelm
4662280 May 5, 1987 Becker et al.
4665113 May 12, 1987 Eberl
4693181 September 15, 1987 Dadley et al.
4747892 May 31, 1988 Spencer
H540 November 1, 1988 Caponi
4807795 February 28, 1989 LaRocca et al.
4853294 August 1, 1989 Everett et al.
4955939 September 11, 1990 Petrousky et al.
4958570 September 25, 1990 Harris
4970960 November 20, 1990 Feldmann
4985190 January 15, 1991 Ishikawa et al.
5045114 September 3, 1991 Bigalk et al.
5049212 September 17, 1991 Colick
5055539 October 8, 1991 Hengel et al.
5067995 November 26, 1991 Nutt
H1047 May 5, 1992 Henderson et al.
5121691 June 16, 1992 Nicolas
5157225 October 20, 1992 Adams et al.
5175392 December 29, 1992 Denis
5198616 March 30, 1993 Anderson
5259317 November 9, 1993 Lips
5313890 May 24, 1994 Cuadros
5323707 June 28, 1994 Norton et al.
5339624 August 23, 1994 Calsson et al.
5347907 September 20, 1994 Strandli et al.
5411615 May 2, 1995 Sumrail et al.
H1504 December 5, 1995 Crabtree
5472536 December 5, 1995 Doris et al.
5474625 December 12, 1995 Duong et al.
5518807 May 21, 1996 Chan et al.
5531844 July 2, 1996 Brown et al.
5535679 July 16, 1996 Craddock
5549948 August 27, 1996 Blong et al.
5561260 October 1, 1996 Towning et al.
5585594 December 17, 1996 Pelham
5623120 April 22, 1997 Brown
5627339 May 6, 1997 Brown et al.
5652408 July 29, 1997 Nicolas
5672843 September 30, 1997 Evans et al.
5710217 January 20, 1998 Blong et al.
5721392 February 24, 1998 Chan et al.
5763519 June 9, 1998 Springsteen
5792977 August 11, 1998 Chawla
5801325 September 1, 1998 Willer et al.
5811726 September 22, 1998 Brown et al.
5852256 December 22, 1998 Hornig
5886293 March 23, 1999 Nauflett et al.
5910638 June 8, 1999 Spencer et al.
5913256 June 15, 1999 Lowden et al.
5945629 August 31, 1999 Schildknecht et al.
5997668 December 7, 1999 Aubert et al.
6042702 March 28, 2000 Kolouch et al.
6105505 August 22, 2000 Jones
6115894 September 12, 2000 Huffman
6119600 September 19, 2000 Burri
6132536 October 17, 2000 Hohmann et al.
6186072 February 13, 2001 Hickerson, Jr. et al.
6293201 September 25, 2001 Consaga
6308634 October 30, 2001 Fong
6315847 November 13, 2001 Lee et al.
6334394 January 1, 2002 Zimmermann et al.
6354222 March 12, 2002 Becker et al.
6363828 April 2, 2002 Sherlock et al.
6371219 April 16, 2002 Collins et al.
6427599 August 6, 2002 Posson et al.
6439315 August 27, 2002 Onuki
6484642 November 26, 2002 Kuhns et al.
6485586 November 26, 2002 Gill et al.
6536351 March 25, 2003 Böcker et al.
6547993 April 15, 2003 Joshi
6588344 July 8, 2003 Clark et al.
6593410 July 15, 2003 Nielson et al.
6635130 October 21, 2003 Koch
6659013 December 9, 2003 Kellner
6679176 January 20, 2004 Zavitsanos et al.
6799518 October 5, 2004 Williams
6832740 December 21, 2004 Ransom
6846372 January 25, 2005 Guirguis
6896751 May 24, 2005 Posson et al.
6945175 September 20, 2005 Gotzmer et al.
6962634 November 8, 2005 Nielson et al.
7000547 February 21, 2006 Amick
7017496 March 28, 2006 Lloyd
7040235 May 9, 2006 Lloyd
7143698 December 5, 2006 Lloyd
7191709 March 20, 2007 Nechitailo
7194961 March 27, 2007 Nechitailo
7231876 June 19, 2007 Kellner
7278353 October 9, 2007 Langan et al.
7278354 October 9, 2007 Langan et al.
7307117 December 11, 2007 Nielson et al.
7380503 June 3, 2008 Williams et al.
7603951 October 20, 2009 Rose et al.
7614348 November 10, 2009 Truitt et al.
7621222 November 24, 2009 Lloyd
20030051629 March 20, 2003 Zavitsanos
20030140811 July 31, 2003 Bone
20040116576 June 17, 2004 Nielson
20050067072 March 31, 2005 Vavrick
20050087088 April 28, 2005 Lacy et al.
20050199323 September 15, 2005 Nielson et al.
20060011086 January 19, 2006 Rose et al.
20060086279 April 27, 2006 Lloyd
20070272112 November 29, 2007 Nielson et al.
20080202373 August 28, 2008 Hugus et al.
20090211484 August 27, 2009 Truitt et al.
20090320711 December 31, 2009 Lloyd
Foreign Patent Documents
315857 June 1920 DE
3240310 June 1983 DE
102 24 503 December 2002 DE
0051375 January 1989 EP
0 487 472 May 1992 EP
0 487 473 May 1992 EP
0 684 938 December 1995 EP
0770449 May 1997 EP
856233 June 1940 FR
2749382 December 1997 FR
384966 December 1932 GB
488909 July 1938 GB
0588671 November 1944 GB
0968507 November 1960 GB
1007227 October 1965 GB
1 591 092 June 1981 GB
2295664 June 1996 GB
2100763 December 1997 RU
WO 93/21135 October 1993 WO
9607700 March 1996 WO
WO 99/18050 April 1999 WO
WO 0062009 October 2000 WO
WO 0177607 October 2001 WO
0200741 January 2002 WO
WO 02/40213 May 2002 WO
Other references
  • Fischer, S.H., et al., “Theoretical Energy Release of Thermites, Intermetallics, and Combustible Metals,” To be presented at the 24th International Pyrotechnics Seminar, Monterey, CA, Jul. 1998, 61 pages.
  • Indium Corporation of America Europe and Asia Indalloy Speciality Alloys Mechanical Properties as viewed at www.indium.com on Aug. 7, 2006.
  • Lycos Wired News Adding More Bang to Navy Missiles 5 pages Dec. 26, 2002 http://wired.com.
  • Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 06020829 dated Oct. 30, 2007.
  • Patriot Air & Missile Defense System: How Patriot Works http://static.howstuffworks.com © 2002 Raytheon Company.
  • Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) 17 pages Various Dates as viewed at http://www.missilethreat.com. on Nov. 27, 2006.
  • Reactive Tungsten Alloy for Inert Warheads Navy SBIR FY2004.2 1 page.
  • Reactive Materials Advanced Energetic Materials (2004) http://www.nap.com © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences pp. 20-23.
  • Search Report for French Application No. 0502466, dated Nov. 8, 2005 prepared by the EPO for the French Patent Office.
  • Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2007 prepared by the EPO for the French Patent Office in FR 0502374.
  • Search Report dated Oct. 18, 2007 prepared by the EPO for the French Patent Office in FR 0502373.
  • SpaceRef.com Better Warheads Through Plastics from Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 2 pages Dec. 2, 2002 http://www.spaceref.com.
  • The Ordnance Shop Sidewinder Guided Missile 3 pages as viewed at http://www.ordnance.org on Jul. 26, 2006.
  • UK Search Report of Jun. 30, 2005 for Great Britain Application No. GB0505223.8.
  • UK Search Report of Jun. 29, 2005 for Great Britain Application No. GB0505222.0.
  • UK Search Report of Jun. 8, 2005 for Great Britain Application No. GB0505220.4.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/801,946, filed Mar. 15, 2004 entitled Reactive Compositions Including Metal and Methods of Forming Same.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/538,763, filed Oct. 4, 2006 entitled Reactive Material Enhanced Projectiles and Related Methods.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/512,058, filed Aug. 29, 2006 entitled Weapons and Weapon Components Incorporating Reactive Materials and Related Methods.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/690,016, filed Mar. 22, 2007 entitled Reactive Material Compositions Shot Shells Including Reactive Materials and a Method of Producing Same.
  • PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/076672 mailed Jul. 28, 2008.
  • 3M Material Safety Data Sheet, pp. 1-7, © 2005, 3M Company.
  • DuPont Fluoropolymers, Food Processing and Industrial Bakeware Coatings, http://222.dupont.com/teflon/bakeware/power.html, © 2003 E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company.
  • DuPont Teflon®, Industrial Coatings, http://www.dupont.com/teflon/coatings/basic—types.html, © 2003 E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company.
  • Hackh's Chemical Dictionary, 4th Ed., Dec. 4, 1974, p. 663.
  • Zumdahl, Steven S., Chemistry, Polymers, pp. 931-934 (no date).
  • Fischer et al., “A survey in combustible metals, thermites, and intermetallics for pyrotechnic applications”, published by Sandia National Laboratories (Sand 95-2448C), presented at AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FI. Jul. 1-3, 1996, pp. 1-13.
  • Hackh's Chemical Dictionary, 4th Ed., Dec. 4, 1974, p. 663.
  • Partial European Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2004.
Patent History
Patent number: RE45899
Type: Grant
Filed: Jul 22, 2009
Date of Patent: Feb 23, 2016
Assignee: Orbital ATK, Inc. (Plymouth, MN)
Inventors: Daniel B. Nielson (Tremonton, UT), Richard M. Truitt (Champlin, MN), Nikki Rasmussen (Logan, UT)
Primary Examiner: Carlos Lopez
Application Number: 12/507,605
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Flare Contains Resin (149/116)
International Classification: C06B 45/10 (20060101); F42B 1/032 (20060101); C06B 27/00 (20060101); F42B 12/32 (20060101);