Selective photocoagulation

A method of scanning a laser beam across a set of cells includes during a first interval, scanning a laser beam across a set of cells; and during a second interval, deflecting the laser beam away from the set of cells. The first interval is selected to cause microcavitation in at least a portion of the cells from the set of cells.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/428,018, filed Jun. 30, 2006, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/296,417, filed Jul. 9, 2003, which is the U.S. national stage of PCT Application No. US01/17818, filed Jun. 1, 2001, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/209,010, filed Jun. 1, 2000. The contents of all the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by this reference.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT

This invention was made with Government support under Grant Nos. F49620-96-1-0241 and F49620-00-1-0179 awarded by the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research and Grant No. EY012970 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention relates to methods and devices useful in laser surgical techniques. More particularly, the invention relates to methods of determining therapeutic end points and preventing collateral damage in laser surgical techniques.

BACKGROUND

Laser surgery has become a generally useful technique, requiring specialized equipment and techniques. Laser surgery is indicated in the treatment of many eye diseases. For example, lasers are used to treat the ocular complications of diabetes. For glaucoma patients, lasers help to control the pressure inside the eye when medications alone do not succeed. Lasers are used to seal holes in the retina, and prevent or treat retinal detachments. Macular degeneration is another condition where lasers can sometimes help prevent vision loss. Laser surgery is also used after cataract surgery to improve vision, if necessary.

The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a single cell layer, situated in the back of the eye behind a sensitive neuroretinal layer, with a high pigment density that can be targeted by laser irradiation. Retinal laser surgery can be classified into techniques which rely on thermal damage to the neuroretinal layer (such as retinal welding), and those that desirably do not involve damage to the neuroretinal layer (such as photocoagulative treatment of central serous retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and drusen).

Conventional laser photocoagulation of the retina is performed with long pulses (on the order of from about 10 to about 500 ms) generated from a continuous wave laser, with the majority of the energy absorbed by the RPE. Heat diffusion during the long exposure to the laser pulse results in a relatively large zone of thermal damage, causing irreversible thermally-induced damage of not only the RPE cells, but also the photoreceptors and the choroicapillaris, producing scotomas (blind spots) in the treated areas.

Selective RPE photocoagulation is a recently developed therapeutic approach that uses short (microsecond) laser pulses to, ideally, target retinal pigment epithelial cells while not affecting adjacent photoreceptors in the retina, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,259 to Birngruber, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,596 to Latina. These treatment methods do not produce blind spots, as does conventional laser photocoagulation. In fact, these treatments do not produce any visible changes in the fundus during treatment. However, clinicians have to rely on post surgery fluorescein angiography to determine if the treatment endpoint has been reached, a procedure that requires approximately an hour and is inconvenient for the patient.

SUMMARY

The invention results from the discovery that detection of microbubbles within retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells formed upon absorption of pulsed laser radiation by RPE cells can be used to inhibit or prevent thermal and mechanical damage to cells proximate to those undergoing laser treatment. Thus, the invention allows substantially instantaneous control over the laser dosimetry to ensure that laser energy reaches the threshold required for RPE cell killing (a therapeutic endpoint), but avoids the administration of laser energies sufficient to damage adjacent cells, such as photoreceptors (collateral damage control).

As used herein, “microcavitation” refers to the sudden formation and collapse of microbubbles in a liquid, events which are primarily caused by the absorption of light by chromophores in the liquid. This term also applies to bubbles formed transiently by local heating. The term does not necessarily require pressure changes to exist.

In one aspect, the invention features a method of scanning a laser beam across a set of cells. The method includes, during a first interval, scanning a laser beam across a set of cells; and during a second interval, deflecting the laser beam away from the set of cells. The first interval is selected to cause microcavitation in at least a portion of the cells from the set of cells.

Some practices further include selecting the first interval to have a length that is about 40% of the length of the combined first and second intervals.

Other practices include causing the first interval to end upon detecting a selected extent of the microcavitation.

Additional practices include those in which scanning includes scanning at a scan rate between about 0.1 to about 10 microseconds per pixel, those in which scanning includes scanning at a scan rate between about 0.5 to about 7 microseconds per pixel, and those in which scanning includes scanning at a scan rate between about 1 to about 5 microseconds per pixel.

Other practices also include receiving a feedback signal indicative of microcavitation in the set of cells. In some of these practices, scanning is carried out at least in part on the basis of the feedback signal.

Additional practices include those in which scanning and deflecting both include modulating an acoustic-optical scanner, those in which scanning and deflecting both include rotating a polygonal mirror, those in which scanning and deflecting both include operating a galvometric scanner, and those in which scanning and deflecting both include operating a resonance scanner.

Additional practices include those in which the fluence of the laser beam is changed for a subsequence scan of the laser beam. These practices include those in which fluence is changed in response to a parameter of light scattered from the target cells. Exemplary parameters include those derived from or dependent on polarization, intensity, and/or Doppler shift of light scattered from target cells. As used herein, a parameter derived from, or dependent upon, a value of some property of the light includes the value itself.

In another aspect, the invention features an apparatus for scanning a laser beam across an array of cells. Such an apparatus includes a laser for providing a laser beam; a scanner disposed in the path of the laser beam; and a controller for causing the scanner to scan the laser beam across a cell array at a rate selected to cause microcavitation in the cell array.

In some embodiments, the controller is configured to cause the scanner to deflect the beam away from the cell array in response to detection of a selected extent of microcavitation within the cell array. In other embodiments, the controller is configured to cause the scanner to scan the laser beam across the cell array during a first interval and to deflect the laser beam away from the cell array during a second interval.

Other embodiments include those in which the controller is configured to cause the first interval to be about 40% of the sum of the combined first and second intervals, those in which the controller is configured to cause the scanner to scan the laser beam though an angle between about 0.1 degrees and about 5 degrees, those in which the controller is configured to cause the scanner to scan at a rate of between about 0.1 microseconds per pixel to about 10 microseconds per pixel, those in which the controller is configured to cause the scanner to scan at a rate of between about 0.5 to about 7 microseconds per pixel, and those in which the controller is configured to cause the scanner to scan at a rate of between about 1 to about 5 microseconds per pixel.

Additional embodiments further include a detector for receiving a signal indicative of microcavitation in the cell array.

In other embodiments, the controller is configured to control the scanner at least in part on the basis of a signal indicative of microcavitation in the cell array.

Embodiments also include those in which the scanner includes an acousto-optic scanner, those in which the scanner includes a polygonal mirror, those in which the scanner includes a galvometric scanner, and those in which the scanner includes a resonance scanner.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described below. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.

The present invention allows selective photocoagulation to be carried out without the need for an inconvenient post-operative determination of a therapeutic endpoint. The present invention allows the photocoagulation of RPE cells without complications and tissue destruction that can occur with conventional laser retinal surgery. The present invention provides an apparatus that is specifically suited for determination of a real-time therapeutic endpoint, and feedback based on this determination to minimize collateral damage which can arise from mechanical and thermal damage associated with photocoagulation therapies.

Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description, and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic of a representative laser surgery system according to a particular embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 is an oscilloscope trace of reflectivity versus time.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention is based on the optical measurement of the onset of laser-induced cavitation and feedback to the laser source or to the operator to control the delivered laser energy based on the measurement. The absorption of laser energy by chromophores (specifically melanosomes) within, or proximate to, cells produces transient (lifetimes on the order of nanoseconds to microseconds) microcavitation bubbles with diameters on the order of micrometers. The bubbles arise since the laser excitation of the chromophores can rapidly produce local heating in the immediate vicinity of the chromophores. It has been observed that the local heating can be intense enough to vaporize a thin layer of liquid in intimate contact with the chromophores. Detection of the presence of microbubbles is a way to determine the amount of heating caused by laser energy. Microcavitation causes a temporary and measurable change in the reflectivity of the cells being irradiated. This change is used to adjust the energy of the laser source and thereby minimize damage to proximate cells that are not desirably exposed to the same laser energies used to cause photocoagulation or thermal energies that can kill those proximate cells.

Selective RPE photocoagulation with the feedback of the present invention provides useful therapeutic outcomes. While not bound by any particular theory of operation, it is believed that the selective killing of diseased RPE cells can stimulate neighboring RPE cells to proliferate and form a new and properly functional RPE cell layer to replace those killed by selective photocoagulation. Thus, selective RPE photocoagulation can serve as a method of treatment for diseases believed to be associated with the RPE, such as central serous retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and drusen.

Referring to FIG. 1, a representative laser surgery system is shown. Treatment laser source 10 sends treatment laser beam 12 to dichroic beam splitter 14. Dichroic beam splitter 14 is adapted to allow transmittance of treatment beam 12. Treatment beam 12 is focused by focusing lens 22 to impinge on mirror 24 that directs treatment beam 12 through contact lens 26 into eye 28. Scanner 64 can be used to controllably scan the electromagnetic radiation across the cells of eye 28. The position of scanner 64 is variable, and an illustrative example of a position is provided in FIG. 1. Optional probe laser 30 produces probe beam 32, which is directed onto polarizing beam splitter 34, directing probe beam 32 toward quarter wave plate 36. Probe beam 32 impinges on dichroic beam splitter 14, which is adapted to reflect probe beam 32 along substantially the same path as treatment beam 12. Probe beam 32 is reflected back along the same path and a fraction of probe beam 32 passes through polarizing filter 34, through focusing lens 38, and into detector 40. The probe laser and beam is optional. The interior of eye 28 is illuminated by slit lamp 42. Detector 40 sends detector signal 44 to discriminator 46 for determination of the presence of signal peak 48. Determination of the presence of signal peak 48 leads to signal 50 being sent to converter 52 which either sends signal 54 to laser source 10 immediately, or stores the current treatment laser energy value and, according to a multiplier value input to the converter, sends signal 54 to laser source 10 when the treatment laser energy reaches a value equal to the current treatment laser energy value plus some fraction of that value, determined by the multiplier value. Signal 54 can be a stop ramp signal, or can be a signal to input into controller 62, to modulate the electromagnetic radiation.

In some embodiments, interferometer 60 can be introduced between eye 28 and detector 40. in such embodiments, probe beam 32 (alternatively, treatment laser beam 12) is divided, so that a first portion of the beam impinges eye 28, and a second portion of the beam impinges interferometer 60. The position of interferometer 60 is variable, and an illustrative example of a position is shown in FIG. 1. Detector 40 operates to detect interference between these portions of the beam, for example frequency or intensity interferences.

Treatment Laser Source

The treatment laser source provides a treatment beam having the following characteristics. The wavelength of light (that is, the energy of light) of the treatment beam is chosen to be selectively absorbed by the target tissue. The wavelength of the light source is desirably within the absorption spectrum of the chromophore present within or proximate to the cell or group of cells to be treated. For example, a treatment laser that produces visible light can be used in the practice of the invention. Visible light is generally light having a wavelength of from about 400 nm to about 800 nm. For retinal pigment epithelial cells, preferred wavelengths for the treatment beam range front about 400 nm to about 600 nm, for example, from about 450 nm to about 550 nm.

For other medical procedures which can benefit from selective photocoagulation, such as treatment of neural tissue by laser surgery, other lasers can be utilized. For example, if a chromophoric material such as lamp black, or other laser light absorbing material, were delivered within, or bound to the surface of, tumor cells or other cells to be killed, the laser wavelength could be a longer wavelength light source tailored to the chromophoric material. The chromophore can be delivered to be absorbed within a cell, or can be bound to the surface of the cell, for example, by antibodies, or by covalent or ionic bonding. Chromophores which can be used in the practice of the invention can be any which will produce heat upon laser irradiation sufficient to create microbubbles, e.g., melanin, carbon black, gold, iron oxide, and other laser phototherapy chromophores known to those of skill in the art.

Light of significantly shorter wavelength than visible light can be absorbed directly by a wide variety of proteins, nucleotides, and many other cellular materials that tend to be distributed throughout cells generally. Thus, a treatment beam of a wavelength much shorter than 400 nm, for example, below 360 nm, does not tend to selectively affect cells containing visible-light chromophores, and thus should be avoided. Further, a treatment beam of significantly longer wavelength than visible light is not particularly strongly absorbed by the chromophores of the RPE, and therefore penetrates deeper into the choroid, effectively creating a thicker heat reservoir under the photoreceptors. This thicker heat reservoir takes longer to cool (since the cooling time increases as the square of the layer thickness), and releases more energy into the adjacent tissue. Thus, photoreceptors are more likely to be damaged with a treatment beam of near infrared wavelength, even if the pulse duration is shortened.

A laser which produces pulsed light can be used in the new methods. For example, pulses of pulse widths less than about 10 microseconds (μs) are desirable, for example less than about 5 μs, 1 μs, 100 nanoseconds (ns), 1 ns, or 100 picoseconds (ps). Pulse width (that is, pulse duration) of the laser is chosen to be sufficiently short that heat conduction away from the absorbing tissue to the surrounding tissue is minimized.

Alternatively, a laser that produces continuous light can be used. In such embodiments, the continuous light can be “chopped,” for example, by an opto-acoustic modulator, which produces pulsed light. Such a chopper can be placed immediately in front of the laser source, so as to produce the same “chopped” light in both the through and reflected beam fractions.

In some embodiments, the laser energy is delivered to particular tissue areas, even to the limit of individual cells, as a train of short pulses. Each pulse within the train does not contain enough energy to cause mechanical disruption, but the effect of all short pulses cumulatively creates selective thermal damage at the RPE. Such trains are characterized, in part, by a repetition rate. In particular methods of treating tissue within the eye, the repetition rate is desirably high enough so that the pulse train be delivered to the tissue within less than about 1 second, so that the effects of eye movement car be minimized. On the other hand, the repetition rate is desirably not so high as to be substantially equivalent to continuous wave excitation, which can produce heating effects in the bulk tissue. The repetition rate varies from about 10 Hz to about 500 Hz, for example, from about 50 Hz to about 2000 Hz, or from about 100 Hz to about 1000 Hz.

In traditional photocoagulation, with pulse widths of from about 50 to 500 ms, laser-tissue interaction is well described by thermal processes; absorption of light energy by the RPE is accompanied by heat diffusion away front the absorbing layer to the adjacent tissue, producing a zone of thermal damage which is visible under opthalmoscopic examination as a coagulated lesion on the retina. This thermal process remains for pulse widths down to the sub-millisecond range. For shorter pulse widths (ns and ps) on the other hand, very little thermal diffusion can take place on the timescale of the laser pulse. The laser energy is selectively deposited into the melanin granules within the RPE, creating a situation in which the temperature distribution in the cell is highly non-uniform. Discrete hot spots are created within the cell, at the energy absorbing granules, while the rest of the cell experiences little heating. Thermal diffusion creates temperature equilibrium on the timescale of microseconds after the laser pulse (for a melanosome of approximately 1 μm, the thermal relaxation takes place in approximately 1 μs). The average temperature of the whole cell after thermal relaxation is much lower than the initial temperature spikes created upon excitation. RPE killing is observed only when the laser fluence exceeds a threshold for initiating microscopic cavitation bubble formation inside the RPE cells. Transient heating alone below bubble formation does not appear to lead to cell killing.

Microbubbles originate from explosive vaporization of a thin (less than about 0.1 μm) layer of fluid surrounding the individual heated particles. The explosive growth of microbubbles is observed within less than a nanosecond after the particles are irradiated with a 30 picosecond laser pulse, but the bubbles are not stable. After an initial expansion to a maximum diameter of a few micrometers, the bubbles collapse with a lifetime of about 0.1 to 1 microsecond, the lifetime being fluence dependent. For fluences up to a few times the microcavitation threshold, coalescing bubbles can form from individual bubbles, and can collapse entirely within the cell, that is, the cell is not blown apart by the microexplosion. The cell retains its shape with little apparent change in morphology. Laser induced microcavitation is described generally in Kelly et al., “Microcavitation and cell injury in RPE cells following short-pulsed laser irradiation,” Proc. SPIE 2975 (1997), and in Lin et al., “Selective Cell Killing by Microparticle Absorption of Pulsed Laser Radiation,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Elect., Vol. 5, No. 4, July/August 1999, pp 963-8.

At laser fluences of approximately five times the cavitation threshold, irradiated cells undergo a remarkable expansion which does not burst the cells, but distends them severely. At lower fluences, the bubbles are smaller, and the morphology of the cells changes very little after bubble collapse. Individual melanosomes also undergo cavitation in a similar manner. After bubble collapse, the melanosomes can remain intact.

A train of pulses with respect to particular areas of tissue can be produced by using a continuous wave laser and rapidly scanning the beam over the area of tissue, so that each RPE cell effectively is exposed only to a short pulse, such as a microsecond pulse. The cells or tissue to be treated can be repetitively exposed to such scans, to simulate multiple pulse exposures. Single pulses can produce unwanted mechanical perturbation of the cells or tissue being treated. The desired pulse width and repetition rate can be obtained by proper setting of the scanning speed (pixels/second) and scanning range. Scanning ranges can be any dimensions less than about 1000 μm× about 1000 μm, for example about 300 μm× about 300 μm. The scanning fields need not be square, but can be rectangular, or any shape convenient to scan. The scan lines need not be contiguous. Separated scan lines can further minimize thermal build-up in the bulk tissue. The exact dimensions will depend on the particular optics utilized in the surgical setup, as can be recognized and optimized by those of skill in the art.

In some embodiments, the laser beam is scanned by an opto-acoustic deflector, Which can deflect a continuous wave laser. The continuous wave laser is able to remain “on” essentially 100% of the time. The scanning methodology can be defined by parameters of scanning speed and scan angle. Useful scanning speed can range from about 0.1 to about 10 μs per pixel, for example, from about 0.5 to about 7 μs per pixel, or from about 1 to about 5 μs per pixel. The scan angle can range from about 0.1 to about 5 degrees, for example, from about 0.5 to about 2 degrees.

Scanning can be carried out by a number of different scanning devices, such as two-dimensional acousto-optic deflectors (2D-AOD), galvometric scanners, rotating polygons, and resonance scanners. In some embodiments, acousto-optic deflectors are useful, because of their speed, linearity across the scan, and variable scan ranges, leading to more efficient data collection than is available with some other scanning devices. In addition, because 2D-AOD scanning uses sound waves in a crystal, there are no moving parts. Suitable AOD scanners are commercially available, for example, from Brimrose Corp. Suitable scanners include a two orthogonal AO crystals to scan the optical beam in x and y directions. Scanning can be carried up to 1.6 degrees on either axis, equivalent to a scan of 480 μm by 480 μm on the fundus of the eye if no contact lens is used.

Desirable laser fluences for selective photocoagulation are dependent on the detection of microcavitation, the particular pulse width for pulsed lasers or chopped beams, the wavelength of laser light employed, the type of cell irradiated, and the concentration of chromophore irradiated. For example, for treatment of RPE cells using 8 ns pulse widths of 532 nm light, the treatment laser fluences which are desirable range from about 0.08 to about 0.16 J/cm2. For treatment of RPE cells using 3 μs pulse widths of 532 nm light, the treatment laser fluences which are desirable range front about 0.22 to about 0.44 J/cm2.

Particular treatment lasers which can be used in the practice of the invention include continuous wave lasers, including gas lasers such as argon ion, krypton ion lasers adjusted to produce visible light, as well as solid state lasers which produce visible light, such as Nd-YAG lasers. A variety of excimer-pumped or YAG laser-pumped dye lasers can also be used to readily produce pulsed visible excitation. In some embodiments, the treatment laser source utilized is an Nd-YAG laser operating at 532 nm.

Probe/Detection

As shown in FIG. 1, the invention can also utilize a probe source that provides a probe beam. The wavelength of the probe beam can vary, but it should be recognized that generally, it is considered desirable to filter the generally intense treatment laser beam so that it does not saturate the detector, and that filter means are generally not extremely selective, so that spectral information in the immediate wavelength vicinity of the treatment beam may not be available for monitoring. Therefore, it may be preferable to use probe source which can illuminate in spectral regions somewhat removed from the treatment source wavelength, for example, at least about 3 nm, 5 nm, or 7 nm away.

Detection of bubbles formed with a scanning excitation laser beam can be done with the probe beam scanned together with the excitation beam. Alternatively, the probe beam can be left stationary somewhere within the scanning field, for example near the center of the scanning field. In such a configuration, the stationary probe beam will detect a bubble only when the excitation beam imparts enough energy to the spot covered by the probe beam to produce a bubble, giving rise to a time-dependent signal synchronized with the scan. Alternatively, back-scattering of the excitation beam itself can be used to monitor bubble formation. In such a configuration, the back-scattering intensity is detected by a detector and compared with a reference intensity generated from the excitation beam itself. Below the bubble formation threshold, the back-scattering signal will be proportional to the reference intensity, with some variation as the beam scans over the treatment area. Above the bubble formation threshold, the back-scattering signal will be enhanced and show much greater fluctuation due to the expansion and collapse of bubbles. The increase in light fluctuation can be used as a signature for the onset of bubble formation.

The intensity of the probe beam must be sufficient to allow monitoring of the transient events within the cell or tissue of interest. The optical properties of the sample can dictate the intensity considerations for the probe source. On the other hand, the intensity should not be so great as to independently cause heating within the cell or tissue. The adjustment of the intensity of the probe source to meet these criteria is within the capabilities of one of ordinary skill in the art.

The particular absorbance and reflectance properties can dictate the geometry of the probe and detection instruments. Any geometry which allows detection of scattered light can be used. In particular embodiments, the probe source can be used in a through-sample or reflective (back-scattering) geometry. For in vivo applications, through-sample will not generally be possible. Back-scattering geometries are generally more useful for in vivo treatment. In some embodiments, the geometry is a back-scattering detection of an optical probe beam. For example a helium neon (HeNe) laser can be focused to a 10 μm diameter spot on the tissue to be treated. The probe laser power should be adjusted to prevent heating of the tissue by the probe beam, and can be from about 0.01 to about 1 mW, for example, from about 0.05 to about 1 mW, or from about 0.1 to about 1 mW.

The probe beam can be continuous wave or pulsed. If the probe beam is pulsed, and the treatment beam is scanned, the probe beam is desirably synchronized with the treatment beam to improve signal quality.

Detection of an optical probe can be accomplished by photodiodes, photomultiplier tubes (PMT), and other similar and associated devices known in the art. The various advantages and capabilities of optical detection systems are discussed in numerous references known to those of skill in the art. For the present purposes, important capabilities of an optical detection system are speed and sensitivity. In particular embodiments, an avalanche-type photodiode can be used, with a confocal aperture placed in front of the opening. Bandpass filters can be employed to substantially eliminate the signal from reaching the detector and overloading or possibly damaging the detector.

The output of the detector is fed into a monitoring device, such as an oscilloscope, a cathode ray-type monitor, a pen recorder, or other monitoring device. In particular embodiments, the output of the detector is fed into a digital oscilloscope, which is synchronously triggered by the laser source producing the excitation beam.

Methods of Treatment

The invention includes methods of treating tissue by killing cells, individually and in groups. These methods are carried out by administering laser energy sufficient to photocoagulate the cells within particular tissue, or regions of tissue, while avoiding harm to adjacent or neighboring tissue, or regions of tissue. These methods involve the formation of microbubbles within the individual target cells or groups of target cells, but without allowing heat transfer sufficient to cause significant damage to cells proximate the target cells. Bubble formation is used as a treatment endpoint monitor. Even if bubble formation occurs at a fluence above the threshold for RPE cell killing, it can still be used to mark the treatment endpoint as long as the degree of tissue damage at this fluence is well confined to the RPE and spares the photoreceptors.

For example, methods of treating particular cells in RPE tissue involve exercising substantially precise control over the laser dosimetry administered. Such control is achieved by a real-time monitor that reflects the state of affairs within the tissue being treated. The control is based on the use of microbubble detection to determine the end-point of laser therapy for target cells, and to prevent damage to cells proximate the target cells.

As a first step to carry out therapeutic treatment involving the inventive method, target cells are identified. Target cells can be any which can benefit from selective photocoagulation treatment. Target cells must be able to absorb laser energy selectively, or be treated to be able to absorb laser energy selectively (e.g., by the introduction of a chromophore). Suitable target cells for selective photocoagulation are those target cells which are proximate to cells which should not be photocoagulated. For example, retinal pigment epithelial cells, which are proximate to neuroretinal cells, are well suited for selective photocoagulation. Brain tumor cells, which are proximate to normally functioning cells, can also be target cells. Target cells are prepared for exposure to a treatment laser beam by positioning focusing optics, such as a contact lens for RPE cell treatment. The application of a contact lens for laser eye surgery is well known to those of skill in the art. The treatment laser is activated to operate initially at a low beam intensity, for example, from about 10% to about 80%, for example, from about 25% to about 80%, or from about 50% to about 75%, of the ED50 threshold determined for a particular pulse width and cell type. For example, for selective RPE photocoagulation, the laser can be initially operated at beam fluences of from about 0.008 to about 0.064 J/cm2, for an 8 ns pulse width, or from about 0.022 to about 0.176 J/cm2 for a 3 μs pulse. The laser beam fluence can be slowly increased While monitoring parameters of the scattered treatment beam, as determined from a back-scattering geometry, for example. One useful parameter is the intensity of the treatment beam scattered from target cells. Other useful parameters can be polarization of light scattered from target cells, or Doppler shifts of light scattered from target cells, which arise due to the expansion and other movement of microbubbles.

The monitoring should be carried out so as to determine if there is any change, for example, a positive change, in the reflectivity of the target cells. As used in this context, a “change” refers to a difference in signal which is detectable by a sustained change in the slope in a plot of target cell reflectance versus time, by a sustained change in relative target cell reflectance signal as compared to a baseline reflectance, or by observation of a visually apparent peak in a plot of target cell reflectance versus time. In embodiments which monitor changes in a scanning treatment beam, the background reflectance may fluctuate as the treatment beam passes over the relatively inhomogeneous surfaces of target cells, which can include structures such as blood vessels, which can show changes in reflectivity even in the absence of bubble formation. The formation of microbubbles is expected to be discernable over this fluctuating background, so that peaks due to bubble formation may be somewhat more difficult to detect, but not prohibitively difficult. The detection of microbubbles correlates with the laser beam energy which is referred to as ED50, that is the laser dose necessary to result in death of 50% of target cells.

Upon detection of a change in reflectivity, by digital, analog, or manual means, the treatment laser beam intensity can be immediately or subsequently modulated, that is, by discontinuing the increase in treatment laser beam energy. In some embodiments, the detection of microbubbles signifies an immediate or substantially immediate halt in the ramp of beam intensity increase. In some embodiments, the detection of microbubbles will cause the beam intensity to be noted, as a digital or analog value (as a threshold value, that is ED50) and the ramp of beam intensity will be continued until a value of ED50+xED50 is reached, where x is greater than zero, and less than about two.

Bubble formation can form near the end of the laser pulse, if the laser energy is initially selected to be low relative to the bubble formation threshold. and gradually increased to reach this threshold. Therefore, the back-scattered signal intensity should show a sudden increase near the end of the laser pulse if a bubble is produced. By comparing the incoming pulse shape with the scattered pulse shape, the onset of bubble formation can be determined.

Particular diseases in the retina are associated with retinal pigment epithelium. The RPE has as a primary function the exchange of nutrients to and from neuroretinal and other cells. These diseases include, for example, central serous retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and drusen. The invention provides a means of treatment of such diseases by selective RPE photocoagulation.

EXAMPLES

The following examples illustrate certain properties and advantages inherent in some particular embodiments of the invention.

Example 1 Ex Vivo Transient Bubble Formation

Porcine eyes of approximately 20 mm diameter were prepared 0 to 4 hours after enucleation. The eyes were dissected, and the vitreous was removed. A sheet of 1 cm2 was cut out of the equatorial region of the eye and the sample was suspended in 0.9% saline solution. After 20 minutes the retina could be easily peeled off. The sample was flattened at the edges using a plastic ring. The RPE was covered with diluted Calcein AM (Molecular Probes) 1:1000 in PBS or Dulbecos modified eagle medium (Gibco). A cover slip was applied on top. After 20 minutes, viable cells accumulated enough fluorescent Calcein to be distinguished from dead cells by fluorescence microscopy. Calcein fluorescence was excited at 488 nm and detected from 540 nm to 800 nm. One fluorescence image was taken before and a second 15-30 minutes after irradiation. Non-fluorescing cells where classified as dead. For 12 ns experiments, the sample temperature was 20° C. For 6 μs pulses, the sample was kept at 35° C. The thresholds were calculated using a PC program for probit analyses (Cain et al., “A Comparison of Various Probit Methods for Analyzing Yes/No Data on a Log Scale,” US Air Force Armstrong Laboratory, AL/OE-TR-1996-0102, 1996) after Finney (“Probit Analysis,” 3rd ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 1971). A 20× objective (NA 0.42, 25 mm working distance) was used to image the cells onto a CCD camera. The spatial resolution of the setup was approximately 1 μm. A frequency-doubled, Nd:YAG Laser (Continuum, SEO 1-2-3, λ=532 nm, 6 mm beam) was used for 12 ns irradiation. A 200 μm section from the center of the beam was imaged on the sample to give a flat top image of 20 μm diameter. The intensity variations at the sample due to hot spots in the beam were below 15%, as determined by a fluorescing target within the area of irradiation. 6 μs Pulses were chopped from a cw frequency doubled Nd:YAG Laser (Verdi, Coherent, λ=532 nm). The Gaussian-shaped spot had FWHM of 16 μm on the sample. To probe the bubble formation, the collimated beam of a diode laser (SF830S-18, Microlaser Systems, 830 nm, 1.5×2 mm beam diameter) was focused (7×10 μm FWHM) onto the RPE cell with a maximum power of 1 mW at the sample. The average Nd:YAG power was 75 mW. The probe beam was switched on for less then 10 μs and switched off (1% power) 2-4 μs after the end of the pulse. The light was detected in a confocal geometry and also slightly off the optical axis to reduce back reflectance and scattering from the optical system and from tissue layers other than the RPE. The detector used was an avalanche photodiode (Hamamatsu C-5460), including a high-speed amplifier with 10 MHz bandwidth.

For 12 ns pulses, 4 samples from 4 different eyes were taken, on which a total of 117 spots were irradiated at different fluences (40 controls with Nd:YAG only, 77 including probe beam). The threshold for cavitation and cell death were the same, as displayed in Table 1. FLL refers to the fluence lower threshold level, FUL is the fluence upper threshold level, and Fluence is the mean of these two determinations. The # cells is the number of cells exposed to irradiation.

TABLE 1 12 Nanosecond Thresholds for Cavitation and Cell Death Fluence FLL Fluence FUL Fluence # (mJ/cm2) (mJ/cm2) (mJ/cm2) slope cells cell death 71 66 75 17 77 cavitation 71 67 75 16 77 control 71 66 81 14 40

FIG. 2 is an oscilloscope trace of a reflectance signal at 1.1 times threshold with a minimal lifetime of 200 ns. The diode laser was switched on at 0.2 μs and switched off at +3.4 As to minimize sample heating. The Nd:YAG laser was fired at 1.2 μs, which caused a detectable increase in probe beam back scattering in a single RPE cell.

Example 2 In Vivo Treatment of RPE Tissue

A total of six eyes of three chinchilla gray rabbits are used. The rabbits are anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride (30 mg/kg) and xylazine hydrochloride (6 mg/kg). The eyes are dilated with 1 drop of cyclopentolate hydrochloride and 1 drop of 5% phenylephrine hydrochloride, then a −67 diopter Goldmann planoconcave lens is placed on the eye.

For laser irradiation, the output of a Q-switch, frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser at a wavelength of 532 nm is used. The pulse width is controlled by shaping the high voltage pulse applied to the Pockel's cell while actively monitoring the intracavity energy build up. Without the active feedback, the normal Q-switch output pulse width is typically 250 ns with pulse energies of several mJ at a repetition rate of 500 Hz. A probe beam is provided by a HeNe laser at 0.5 mW. The back scattered probe beam is detected by an avalanche photodiode. The output of the detector is fed into an oscilloscope.

Under slitlamp examination, four 100 μm marker lesions are placed outside the corners of a designated 300 μm×300 μm treatment area, using 100 ms of continuous laser exposure each (approximately 100 mW). Then the treatment beam is turned on, and 100 successive scans are delivered to the treatment area. Each eye receives four such treatment spots with laser power settings of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 times the ED50 threshold as determined above. All laser treatment procedures are recorded with a CCD camera and a video tape recorder. Fundus imaging and fluorescein angiography is performed at 1 hour after irradiation. Changes in probe beam scattering are detected and displayed on the oscilloscope. The detection of microbubbles is accompanied by stabilization of laser fluence at 1.5 ED50. Treatment is further carried out at this fluence.

At the completion of the treatment, the animals are sacrificed with pentobarbital injection. The eyes are enucleated and processed for light and electron microscopy examination. The total time from laser exposure to enucleation is approximately 2 hours. Each enucleated eye is fixed in phosphate-buffered 2% glutaraldehyde for 24 hours. The anterior segments and vitreous are removed, and the posterior eye is postfixed in phosphate-buffered 2% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, and embedded in epoxy resin. Thick sections (approximately 1 μm) for light microscopy are stained with toluidine blue. Thin sections for electron microscopy are stained with uranyl acetate/lead acetate. Areas treated by the scanning laser are compared with control areas and with marker lesions (coagulated with continuous wave laser) for damage to the photoreceptors, RPE, Bruch's membrane, and the choriocapillaris. Comparison is made to verify that the RPE cells are photodamaged and the photoreceptors, Bruch's membrane, and the choriocapillaris are undamaged and viable.

Other Embodiments

It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the forgoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims:

Claims

1. A method of photocoagulating cells, the method comprising:

during a first interval, scanning a laser beam across a set of cells, wherein one or more laser parameters and a length of the first interval are selected to cause microcavitation in the set of cells;
during a second interval, deflecting the laser beam away from the set of cells;
detecting radiation from the set of cells;
determining an extent of the microcavitation occurring in the set of cells based on the detected radiation; and
ending the first interval and beginning the second interval after a selected extent of the microcavitation has occurred in the set of cells.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting the first interval to have a length that is about 40% of the length of the combined first and second intervals.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein scanning comprises scanning at a scan rate between about 0.1 to about 10 microseconds per pixel.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein scanning comprises scanning at a scan rate between about 0.5 to about 7 microseconds per pixel.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein scanning comprises scanning at a scan rate between about 1 to about 5 microseconds per pixel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the radiation from the set of cells forms a feedback signal indicative of microcavitation in the set of cells.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein scanning comprises scanning at least in part on the basis of the feedback signal.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein scanning and deflecting both comprise modulating an acoustic-optical scanner.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein scanning and deflecting both comprise rotating a polygonal mirror.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein scanning and deflecting both comprise operating a resonance scanner.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising changing a fluence of the laser beam for a subsequent scan of the beam.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein changing the fluence comprises changing the fluence in response to a parameter of light scattered from the cells.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the fluence in response to a parameter comprises changing the fluence in response to polarization of light scattered from the cells.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the fluence in response to a parameter comprises changing the fluence in response to Doppler shift of light scattered from the cells.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the fluence in response to a parameter comprises changing the fluence in response to the intensity of light scattered from the cells.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the cells comprise retinal cells.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the microcavitation comprises microbubble formation in the set of cells.

18. A method of treatment, comprising:

using the method of claim 1 in treating at least one of glaucoma, ocular complications due to diabetes, macular degeneration, and retinal detachment in a patient.

19. A method of causing photocoagulation of cells, the method comprising:

scanning a laser across a set of cells at a scanning frequency and laser power selected to cause microcavitation in the set of cells;
detecting microcavitation in the set of cells; and
terminating the scanning when a selected extent of microcavitation has occurred,
wherein scanning the laser comprises: defining a first scan line; defining a second scan line; defining a third scan line disposed between the first and second scan lines; scanning the laser across the first scan line; skipping over the third scan line; and scanning the laser across the second scan line, whereby heat generated by scanning across the first scan line dissipates into cells located along the third scan line.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the cells comprise retinal cells.

21. The method of claim 19, wherein the microcavitation comprises microbubble formation in the subset of cells.

22. A method of treatment, comprising:

using the method of claim 19 in treating at least one of glaucoma, ocular complications due to diabetes, macular degeneration, and retinal detachment in a patient.

23. A method of treating tissue cells, the method comprising:

during a first interval, scanning a laser beam across a set of tissue cells, wherein one or more laser parameters and a length of the first interval are selected to cause changes in one or more properties of the set of cells;
during a second interval, deflecting the laser beam away from the set of cells;
detecting radiation from the set of cells;
determining an extent of the changes in the one or more properties occurring in the set of cells based on the detected radiation; and
ending the first interval and beginning the second interval after a selected extent of changes in the one or more properties has occurred in the set of cells.

24. The method of claim 23, further comprising selecting the first interval to have a length that is about 40% of the length of the combined first and second intervals.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein scanning comprises scanning at a scan rate between about 0.1 to about 10 microseconds per pixel.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein scanning comprises scanning at a scan rate between about 0.5 to about 7 microseconds per pixel.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein scanning comprises scanning at a scan rate between about 1 to about 5 microseconds per pixel.

28. The method of claim 23, wherein the radiation from the set of cells forms a feedback signal indicative of the changes in the one or more properties of the set of cells.

29. The method of claim 28, wherein scanning comprises scanning at least in part on the basis of the feedback signal.

30. The method of claim 23, wherein scanning and deflecting both comprise modulating an acoustic-optical scanner.

31. The method of claim 23, wherein scanning and deflecting both comprise rotating a polygonal mirror.

32. The method of claim 23, wherein scanning and deflecting both comprise operating a resonance scanner.

33. The method of claim 23, further comprising changing a fluence of the laser beam for a subsequent scan of the beam.

34. The method of claim 33, further comprising changing the fluence in response to an intensity of light scattered from the cells.

35. The method of claim 34, further comprising changing the fluence in response to a polarization of light from the cells.

36. The method of claim 34, further comprising changing the fluence in response to a Doppler shift of light from the cells.

37. The method of claim 34, further comprising changing the fluence in response to a fluctuation of light from the cells.

38. The method of claim 23, wherein the cells comprise retinal cells.

39. The method of claim 23, wherein scanning the laser beam across the set of cells causes microbubble formation in the set of cells.

40. A method of treatment comprising:

using the method of claim 23 in treating at least one of glaucoma, ocular complications due to diabetes, macular degeneration, and retinal detachment in a patient.

41. The method of claim 23, further comprising selecting the one or more laser parameters and the length of the first interval to cause microcavitation in the set of cells.

42. The method of claim 23, wherein the changes in the one or more properties comprise a change in reflectivity of the cells.

43. The method of claim 23, wherein the detected radiation comprises a change in backscattered light intensity.

44. The method of claim 23, wherein the detected radiation comprises fluctuations in light intensity.

45. The method of claim 23, wherein the detected radiation comprises a change in polarization.

46. The method of claim 23, wherein the detected radiation comprises a Doppler shift.

47. The method of claim 23, further comprising scanning the laser beam across the set of tissue cells during the first interval to at least partially photocoagulate the set of cells.

48. The method of claim 23, further comprising scanning the laser beam across the set of tissue cells during the first interval to kill at least some of the set of cells.

49. The method of claim 23, wherein the one or more properties are optical properties.

50. The method of claim 23, wherein the cells comprise eye tissue cells.

51. The method of claim 23, wherein the cells comprise brain tissue cells.

52. A method of treating tissue cells, the method comprising:

scanning a laser across a set of tissue cells at a scanning frequency and laser power selected to cause changes in one or more properties of the set of cells;
detecting the changes in the one or more properties of the set of cells; and
terminating the scanning when a selected extent of changes in the one or more properties of the set of cells has occurred,
wherein scanning the laser comprises: defining a first scan line; defining a second scan line; defining a third scan line disposed between the first and second scan lines; scanning the laser across the first scan line; skipping over the third scan line; and scanning the laser across the second scan line, whereby heat generated by scanning across the first scan line dissipates into cells located along the third scan line.

53. The method of claim 52, wherein the cells comprise retinal cells.

54. The method of claim 52, wherein scanning the laser across the set of cells causes microbubble formation in the set of cells.

55. A method of treatment, comprising:

using the method of claim 52 in treating at least one of glaucoma, ocular complications due to diabetes, macular degeneration, and retinal detachment in a patient.

56. The method of claim 52, further comprising selecting the scanning frequency and laser power to cause microcavitation in the set of cells.

57. The method of claim 52, wherein the changes in the one or more properties of the set of cells comprise a change in reflectivity of the cells.

58. The method of claim 52, wherein detecting the changes in the one or more properties of the set of cells comprises measuring radiation from the set of cells.

59. The method of claim 58, wherein the measured radiation comprises a change in backscattered light intensity.

60. The method of claim 58, wherein the measured radiation comprises fluctuations in intensity.

61. The method of claim 58, wherein the measured radiation comprises a change in polarization.

62. The method of claim 58, wherein the measured radiation comprises a Doppler shift.

63. The method of claim 52, further comprising scanning the laser across the set of tissue cells to at least partially photocoagulate the set of cells.

64. The method of claim 52, further comprising scanning the laser across the set of tissue cells to kill at least some of the set of cells.

65. The method of claim 52, wherein the one or more properties are optical properties.

66. The method of claim 52, wherein the cells comprise eye tissue cells.

67. The method of claim 52, wherein the cells comprise brain tissue cells.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4644948 February 24, 1987 Lang et al.
4758081 July 19, 1988 Barnes
5029220 July 2, 1991 Juday
5209221 May 11, 1993 Riedlinger
5254112 October 19, 1993 Sinofsky et al.
5302259 April 12, 1994 Birngruber
5430509 July 4, 1995 Kobayashi
5459570 October 17, 1995 Swanson et al.
5520679 May 28, 1996 Lin
5549596 August 27, 1996 Latina
5549598 August 27, 1996 O'Donnell
5549599 August 27, 1996 Sumiya
5620437 April 15, 1997 Sumiya
5630810 May 20, 1997 Machat
5778133 July 7, 1998 Plesko
5782822 July 21, 1998 Telfair et al.
5997141 December 7, 1999 Heacock
6059772 May 9, 2000 Hsia et al.
6099522 August 8, 2000 Knopp et al.
6110165 August 29, 2000 Ota
6186628 February 13, 2001 Van de Velde
6319274 November 20, 2001 Shadduck
6325792 December 4, 2001 Swinger et al.
6428532 August 6, 2002 Doukas et al.
6610051 August 26, 2003 Bille
6671043 December 30, 2003 Huettman
6706036 March 16, 2004 Lai
6743221 June 1, 2004 Hobart et al.
6745775 June 8, 2004 Lin
6887232 May 3, 2005 Bille
7036516 May 2, 2006 Dees
7115120 October 3, 2006 Lin
RE40002 January 15, 2008 Lin
7354432 April 8, 2008 Eells et al.
7763017 July 27, 2010 Lin
7766903 August 3, 2010 Blumenkranz et al.
7947036 May 24, 2011 Lin
8006702 August 30, 2011 Lin
8187257 May 29, 2012 Lin
8366704 February 5, 2013 Lin et al.
20010034319 October 25, 2001 McMillan et al.
20020198516 December 26, 2002 Knopp et al.
20030050678 March 13, 2003 Sierra et al.
20040039378 February 26, 2004 Lin
20040059321 March 25, 2004 Knopp
20040102765 May 27, 2004 Koenig
20040176752 September 9, 2004 Alfano et al.
20050021013 January 27, 2005 Visuri et al.
20050159793 July 21, 2005 Streeter
20050197655 September 8, 2005 Telfair et al.
20060074468 April 6, 2006 Neev
20060111697 May 25, 2006 Brinkmann et al.
20060161145 July 20, 2006 Lin et al.
20060259022 November 16, 2006 Lin
20070213693 September 13, 2007 Plunkett
20080259422 October 23, 2008 Lin
20080281306 November 13, 2008 Lin
20100049173 February 25, 2010 Plunkett et al.
20110306919 December 15, 2011 Latina et al.
20120029490 February 2, 2012 Lin et al.
20120296320 November 22, 2012 Lin et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2001-149403 June 2001 JP
99/65431 December 1999 WO
2001/91661 December 2001 WO
2004/043234 May 2004 WO
2005/065116 July 2005 WO
2007/053701 May 2007 WO
2007/092349 August 2007 WO
2008/049164 May 2008 WO
2009/092112 July 2009 WO
Other references
  • Office Action issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,410,962, dated Aug. 19, 2013.
  • Communication from EPO in European Patent Application No. 01941803.7, dated Jul. 14, 2009.
  • English translation of Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2008-538118, dated Sep. 20, 2011.
  • Extended European Search Report in EP Application No. 13179365.5, dated Jun. 26, 2014, 9 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/031599, dated Jul. 20, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2001/17818, dated May 27, 2003, 3 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/42696, dated May 15, 2008, 8 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/021811, dated Jul. 26, 2011, 5 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 31, 2009 from International Application No. PCT/US2009/031599.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 17, 2007 from International Application No. PCT/US2006/42696, 11 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2010/021811, dated Jan. 22, 2010, 11 pages.
  • International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2001/17818, dated Aug. 31, 2001, 1 page.
  • Office Action in Australian Patent Application No. 2006308721, dated Aug. 26, 2011.
  • Office Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,410,962, dated Dec. 19, 2008.
  • Office Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,410,962, dated Sep. 7, 2010.
  • Office Action in European Patent Application No. 01941803.7, dated May 29, 2007.
  • Office Action in European Patent Application No. 01941803.7, dated May 8, 2006.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/296,417, dated Aug. 11, 2004.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/296,417, dated Dec. 1, 2005.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/296,417, dated May 17, 2005.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,677, dated Jul. 11, 2011.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,677, dated Oct. 5, 2010.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,018, dated Aug. 20, 2009.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,018, dated Feb. 9, 2009.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,018, dated Jun. 12, 2008.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,018, dated Jun. 4, 2007.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,612, dated Oct. 8, 2009.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,612, dated Sep. 29, 2010.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/178,384, dated Aug. 25, 2010.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/178,384, dated Oct. 8, 2009.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/863,281, dated Sep. 4, 2014.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/145,605, dated Aug. 28, 2013, 14 pages.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/145,605, dated Feb. 5, 2103, 18 pages.
  • Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/145,605, dated Mar. 17, 2014, 13 pages.
  • Office Action issued in European Application No. 09702254.5, dated Aug. 27, 2012, 4 pages.
  • Office Action issued in European Application No. 09702254.5, dated Feb. 15, 2012.
  • Office Action issued in European Application No. 10000476.1, dated Aug. 29, 2012, 5 pages.
  • Office Action issued in European Application No. 10000476.1, dated Feb. 7, 2014, 5 pages.
  • Office Action issued in IL Application No. 207,701 on Aug. 25, 2013, 1 page (English translation only).
  • Office Action issued in IL Application No. 207,701, dated Jun. 18, 2012, 1 page (English translation only).
  • Partial European Search Report in EP Application No. 13179365.5, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 5 pages.
  • Search Report in European Application No. 10000476.1, dated Sep. 21, 2010, 6 pages.
  • Search Report in European Patent Application No. 01941803.7, dated Feb. 21, 2005, 5 pages.
  • Search Report in European Patent Application No. 06827308.5, dated May 21, 2012, 7 pages.
  • Summons to attend oral proceedings in European Patent Application No. 01941803.7, dated Mar. 26, 2009.
  • Supplementary European Search Report for application No. EP 09702254.5, dated Dec. 16, 2010.
  • Alt, (Aug. 2008). “Detection of Intracellular Cavitation during Selective Targeting of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium with a Laser Scanner,” (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Publication No. [3324371]), 209 pages.
  • Framme et al., “Selective Targeting of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Rabbit Eyes with a Scanning Laser Beam,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., Apr. 2007 48(4):1782-1792.
  • Lee et al., “Optical detection of intracellular cavitation during selective laser targeting of the retinal pigment epithelium: dependence of cell death mechanism on pulse duration,” J Biomed Optics., 2007, 14 pages.
  • Mills et al., “Microcavitation and spot size dependence for damage of artificially pigmented hTERT-RPE1 cells,” Laser Interaction with Tissue and Cells XV, Proc. SPIE, 2004, 5319:245-251.
  • Pollack et al. “Tissue Effects of Subclinical Diode Laser Treatment of the Retina” Arch. Ophthalmol., 1998, 116(12):1633-1639.
  • Roach et al., “Retinal Response of Macaca mulatta to picosecond laser pulses of varying energy and spot size,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2004, 9(5):1288-1296.
  • Schuele et al., “RPE Damage Thresholds and Mechanisms for Laser Exposure in the Microsecond-to-Millisecond Time Regimen,” Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci., 46:714-719 (2005).
  • Kelly et al., “Microcavitation and Cell Injury in RPE Cells Following Short-Pulsed Laser Irradiation”, SPIE 2975:174-179 (1997).
  • Lin et al., “Selective Cell Killing by Microparticle Absorption of Pulsed Laser Radiation”, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Elect. 5(4):963-968 (1999).
  • Vogel et al., “Cavitation bubble dynamics and acoustic transient generation in ocular surgery with pulsed neodymium: YAG lasers.” Ophthalmology; vol. 93, No. 10, pp. 1259-1269, Oct. 1986.
  • Juhasz et al., “Time-resolved observations of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water.” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 23-31, Jan. 1996.
Patent History
Patent number: RE46493
Type: Grant
Filed: Aug 29, 2013
Date of Patent: Aug 1, 2017
Assignee: The General Hospital Corporation (Boston, MA)
Inventor: Charles P. Lin (Arlington, MA)
Primary Examiner: Ahmed Farah
Application Number: 14/013,917
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Methods (128/898)
International Classification: A61B 19/00 (20060101); A61F 9/008 (20060101);