Aggregating completion messages in a sideband interface

- Intel

In one embodiment, the present invention includes a method for receiving a request in a router from a first endpoint coupled to the router, where the request is for an aggregated completion. In turn, the router can forward the request to multiple target agents, receive a response from each of the target agents, and consolidate the responses into an aggregated completion. Then, the router can send the aggregated completion to the first endpoint. Other embodiments are described and claimed.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
BACKGROUND

Mainstream processor chips, both in high performance and low power segments, are increasingly integrating additional functionality such as graphics, display engines, security engines, PCIe™ ports (i.e., ports in accordance with the Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCI Express™ (PCIe™)) Specification Base Specification version 2.0 (published 2007) (hereafter the PCIe™ specification) and other PCIe™ based peripheral devices, while maintaining legacy support for devices compliant with a PCI specification such as the Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) Local Bus Specification, version 3.0 (published 2002) (hereafter the PCI specification).

Such designs are highly segmented due to varying requirements from the server, desktop, mobile, embedded, ultra-mobile and mobile Internet device segments. Different markets seek to use single chip system-on-chip (SoC) solutions that combine at least some of processor cores, memory controllers, input/output controllers and other segment specific acceleration elements onto a single chip. However, designs that accumulate these features are slow to emerge due to the difficulty of integrating different intellectual property (IP) blocks on a single die. This is especially so, as IP blocks can have various requirements and design uniqueness, and can require many specialized wires, communication protocols and so forth to enable their incorporation into an SoC. As a result, each SoC or other advanced semiconductor device that is developed requires a great amount of design complexity and customization to incorporate different IP blocks into a single device. This is so, as a given IP block typically needs to be re-designed to accommodate interface and signaling requirements of a given SoC.

In many computer systems, an IP block or agent can send a broadcast or multicast request to many or all other agents within the system. When this request is for a read operation, the agent will receive a completion/reply for every agent or targeted agent in the system. It is thus the agent's responsibility to aggregate the status and the data of all of these completions. The sending of these multiple completions raises complexity for the requesting agent and consumes bandwidth and other resources.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a basic interconnect architecture in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of further details of an interconnect architecture in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a high level block diagram of a SoC in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a sideband interconnection in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of details of signaling available for a sideband interface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a method of handling sideband completions in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a more detailed block diagram of a portion of a SoC in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of another SoC in accordance with an embodiment the present invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments may be used to aggregate completions over a sideband interface. In this way, transmission of multiple unicast read requests in a sideband fabric can be avoided, e.g., when identical registers in multiple agents are to be read or multicast/broadcast completion status is to be determined. In some embodiments an initiating master agent can receive an aggregated completion responsive to a multicast or broadcast non-posted request from that initiating master agent. To identify a request for aggregated completions, a predetermined aggregation indicator may be included in the request. In some embodiments, this indicator may be a predetermined port identifier (ID) that is reserved for all endpoints initiating multicast/broadcast non-posted requests that request a single aggregated completion back from a fabric that couples agents together.

Embodiments can be used in many different types of systems. As examples, implementations described herein may be used in connection with semiconductor devices such as processors or other semiconductor devices that can be fabricated on a single semiconductor die. In particular implementations, the device may be a system-on-chip (SoC) or other advanced processor or chipset that includes various homogeneous and/or heterogeneous processing agents, and additional components such as networking components, e.g., routers, controllers, bridge devices, devices, memories and so forth.

Some implementations may be used in a semiconductor device that is designed according to a given specification such as an integrated on-chip system fabric (IOSF) specification issued by a semiconductor manufacturer to provide a standardized on-die interconnect protocol for attaching intellectual property (IP) blocks within a chip, including a SoC. Such IP blocks can be of varying types, including general-purpose processors such as in-order or out-of-order cores, fixed function units, graphics processors, IO controllers, display controllers, media processors among many others. By standardizing an interconnect protocol, a framework is thus realized for a broad use of IP agents in different types of chips. Accordingly, not only can the semiconductor manufacturer efficiently design different types of chips across a wide variety of customer segments, it can also, via the specification, enable third parties to design logic such as IP agents to be incorporated in such chips. And furthermore, by providing multiple options for many facets of the interconnect protocol, reuse of designs is efficiently accommodated. Although embodiments are described herein in connection with this IOSF specification, understand the scope of the present invention is not limited in this regard and embodiments can be used in many different types of systems.

Referring now to FIG. 1, shown is a block diagram of a basic interconnect architecture in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, system 10 may be a portion of a system-on-chip or any other semiconductor device such as a highly integrated processor complex or an integrated IO hub, and includes a fabric 20 that acts as an interconnect between various components. In the implementation shown, these components include IP agents 30 and 40, which can be independent IP blocks to provide various functionality such as compute capabilities, graphics capabilities, media processing capabilities and so forth. These IP agents are thus IP blocks or logical devices having an interface that is compliant with the IOSF specification, in one embodiment. As further seen, fabric 20 also interfaces to a bridge 50. Although not shown for ease of illustration in the embodiment of FIG. 1, understand that bridge 50 may act as an interface to other system components, e.g., on the same chip or on one or more different chips.

As will be described further below, each of the elements shown in FIG. 1, namely the fabric, the IP agents, and the bridge may include one or more interfaces to handle communication of various signals. These interfaces may be defined according to the IOSF specification, which defines signals for communication on these interfaces, protocols used for information exchange between agents, arbitration and flow control mechanisms used to initiate and manage information exchange, supported address decoding and translation capabilities, messaging for in-band or out-of-band communication, power management, test, validation and debug support.

The IOSF specification includes 3 independent interfaces that can be provided for each agent, namely a primary interface, a sideband message interface and a testability and debug interface (design for test (DFT), design for debug (DFD) interface). According to the IOSF specification, an agent may support any combination of these interfaces. Specifically, an agent can support 0-N primary interfaces, 0-N sideband message interfaces, and optional DFx interfaces. However, according to the specification, an agent must support at least one of these 3 interfaces.

Fabric 20 may be a hardware element that moves data between different agents. Note that the topology of fabric 20 will be product specific. As examples, a fabric can be implemented as a bus, a hierarchical bus, a cascaded hub or so forth. Referring now to FIG. 2, shown is a block diagram of further details of an interconnect architecture in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the IOSF specification defines three distinct fabrics, namely a primary interface fabric 112, a DFx fabric 114, and a sideband fabric 116. Primary interface fabric 112 is used for all in-band communication between agents and memory, e.g., between a host processor such as a central processing unit (CPU) or other processor and an agent. Primary interface fabric 112 may further enable communication of peer transactions between agents and supported fabrics. All transaction types including memory, input output (IO), configuration, and in-band messaging can be delivered via primary interface fabric 112. Thus the primary interface fabric may act as a high performance interface for data transferred between peers and/or communications with upstream components.

In various implementations, primary interface fabric 112 implements a split transaction protocol to achieve maximum concurrency. That is, this protocol provides for a request phase, a grant phase, and a command and data phase. Primary interface fabric 112 supports three basic request types: posted, non-posted, and completions, in various embodiments. Generally, a posted transaction is a transaction which when sent by a source is considered complete by the source and the source does not receive a completion or other confirmation message regarding the transaction. One such example of a posted transaction may be a write transaction. In contrast, a non-posted transaction is not considered completed by the source until a return message is received, namely a completion. One example of a non-posted transaction is a read transaction in which the source agent requests a read of data. Accordingly, the completion message provides the requested data.

In addition, primary interface fabric 112 supports the concept of distinct channels to provide a mechanism for independent data flows throughout the system. As will be described further, primary interface fabric 112 may itself include a master interface that initiates transactions and a target interface that receives transactions. The primary master interface can further be sub-divided into a request interface, a command interface, and a data interface. The request interface can be used to provide control for movement of a transaction's command and data. In various embodiments, primary interface fabric 112 may support PCI ordering rules and enumeration.

In turn, sideband interface fabric 116 may be a standard mechanism for communicating all out-of-band information. In this way, special-purpose wires designed for a given implementation can be avoided, enhancing the ability of IP reuse across a wide variety of chips. Thus in contrast to an IP block that uses dedicated wires to handle out-of-band communications such as status, interrupt, power management, fuse distribution, configuration shadowing, test modes and so forth, a sideband interface fabric 116 according to the IOSF specification standardizes all out-of-band communication, promoting modularity and reducing validation requirements for IP reuse across different designs. In general, sideband interface fabric 116 may be used to communicate non-performance critical information, rather than for performance critical data transfers, which typically may be communicated via primary interface fabric 112.

As further illustrated in FIG. 2, IP agents 130, 140, and 150 may each include a corresponding primary interface, a sideband interface and a DFx interface. However, as discussed above, each agent need not include every one of these interfaces, and a given IP agent may include only a single interface, in some embodiments.

Using an IOSF specification, various types of chips can be designed having a wide variety of different functionality. Referring now to FIG. 3, shown is a high level block diagram of a SoC in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, SoC 200 may include various components, all of which can be integrated on a single semiconductor die to provide for various processing capabilities at high speeds and low power, consuming a comparatively small amount of real estate. As seen in FIG. 3, SoC 200 includes a plurality of cores 2050-205n. In various embodiments, cores 205 can be relatively simple in-order cores or more complex out-of-order cores. Or a combination of in-order and out-of-order cores can be present in a single SoC. As seen, cores 205 can be interconnected via a coherent interconnect 215, which further couples to a cache memory 210, e.g., a shared last level cache (LLC). Although the scope of the present invention is not limited in this regard, in one embodiment coherent interconnect 215 may be in accordance with the Quick Path Interconnect (QPI)™ specification available from Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif.

As further seen in FIG. 3, coherent interconnect 215 may communicate via a bridge 220 to a fabric 250, which may be an IOSF fabric. Coherent interconnect 215 may further communicate via an integrated memory controller 215 to an off-chip memory (not shown for ease of illustration the embodiment of FIG. 3), and further through bridge 230 to fabric 250.

As further seen in FIG. 3, various components can couple to fabric 250 including a content processing module (CPM) 240 which can be used for performing various operations such as security processing, cryptographic functions and so forth. In addition, a display processor 245 can be part of a media processing pipeline that renders video for an associated display.

As further seen, fabric 250 may further couple to an IP agent 255. Although only a single agent is shown for ease of illustration in the FIG. 3 embodiment, understand that multiple such agents are possible in different embodiments. In addition, to enable communication with other on-chip devices, fabric 250 may further communicate with a PCIe™ controller 260 and a universal serial bus (USB) controller 265, both of which can communicate with various devices according to these protocols. Finally, shown in the embodiment of FIG. 3 is a bridge 270, which can be used to communicate with additional components of other protocols, such as an open core protocol (OCP) or an ARM advanced microcontroller bus architecture (AMBA) protocol. Although shown with these particular components in the embodiment of FIG. 3, understand that the scope of the present invention is not limited in this way and in different embodiments additional or different components may be present.

Furthermore, understand that while shown as a single die SoC implementation in FIG. 3, embodiments can further be implemented in a system in which multiple chips communicate with each other via a non-IOSF interface. Referring now to FIG. 4, shown is a block diagram of a system in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 4, the system may include a SoC 200′, which may include many components similar to those discussed above with regard to FIG. 3, and an additional off-die interface 275. Accordingly, SoC 200′ can communicate with another chip 280 which may include various functionality to enable communication between these two chips, as well as to various off-chip devices such as different peripherals according to one or more different specifications. Specifically, a second chip 280 is shown to include an off-die interface 282 to enable communication with SoC 200′, and which in turn communicates with a fabric 290, which may be an IOSF fabric according to an embodiment of the present invention. As seen, fabric 290 may further be coupled to various controllers in communication with off-chip devices, including a PCIe™ controller 292, a USB controller 294, and a bridge 296.

As discussed above, in various embodiments all out-of-band communications may be via a sideband message interface. Referring now to FIG. 5, shown is a block diagram of a sideband interconnection in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5, sideband interface system 175 includes multiple routers 180 and 190, which are shown in the embodiment of FIG. 5 as being coupled via a point-to-point (PTP) interconnect 185. In turn, each router can be coupled to various endpoints, which can be, for example, IP agents or other components of a given system. Specifically, router 180 couples to a plurality of endpoints 186a-186e and router 190 couples to a plurality of endpoints 196x-196z.

Referring now to FIG. 6, shown is a block diagram of details of signaling available for a sideband interface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 6, interconnection between a router 180 and an endpoint 186 is shown. As seen, router 180 may include a target interface 181 and a master interface 182. In general, target interface 181 may be configured to receive incoming signals, while master interface 182 may be configured to transmit outgoing signals. As seen, endpoint 186 also includes a master interface 187 and a target interface 188.

FIG. 6 further shows details of the various signaling available for the sideband interface, including credit information, put information, end of message signaling, and data. Specifically, credit updates can be communicated via sideband interfaces as a non-posted credit update signal (NPCUP) and a posted credit update signal (PCCUP). In addition, put signals may be provided (NPPUT and PCPUT). In addition, an end of message (EOM) signal can be communicated. Finally, data may be communicated via payload packets which in one embodiment can be implemented via a byte-wide communication channel. Although shown with this particular implementation in the embodiment of FIG. 6, the scope of the present invention is not limited in this regard. Whenever a credit Put signal is high, this means that a credit is being returned. Whenever a put signal is high, it means that the payload (e.g., data) signal is valid. Whenever a Put and EOM are high at the same time, it means that the current payload is the last payload of the message. Note that the interface can both “put” a data payload and “put” a credit in the same clock cycle.

Aggregated completions may be used in various instances. For example, such completions can be used for register shadowing in multiple agents. If registers are shadowed in multiple agents, a master agent can issue a multicast read request to the shadow register in each of these agents and request an aggregated response. If the aggregated response does not match with its expected value of the register being shadowed, the agent can determine that the shadow update has yet to complete, or that an error has occurred. Another use case may be for reading duplicate status registers in multiple agents. For example, if multiple agents include one or more duplicate status registers that are updated on a given condition (e.g., a link status register of multiple PCIe lanes), a master agent can issue a multicast read to these status registers and request an aggregated response. The aggregated response thus provides an indication as to whether a specific condition has been updated in each of the status registers. A still further use case may be for determining completion status for a multicast/broadcast transaction.

In this example, an initiating master agent can send, e.g., a non-posted multicast/broadcast write transaction with a source identifier (ID) having a predetermined value (e.g., a source ID of FEh) that indicates that an aggregated response is requested, and in turn receive a single aggregated completion. A successful response status in the aggregated completion thus indicates to the initiating agent that the write message has successfully completed in all target agents.

Aggregated responses in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention may also be used to determine a power state of agents in the system. An initiating master can send a single non-posted multicast/broadcast write transaction with a source ID indicative of an aggregated response request (e.g., a source ID having a value of FEh) to query the power state of all agents in the system. If the completion is received with a power down status, then the master agent can determine that all agents were powered down. Likewise, if the completion is received with a successful status, the master agent can determine that all agents have power. Conversely, if the completion has a mixed status, the master agent can determine that the system has a mix of powered, unpowered, or otherwise misbehaving agents. And in some embodiments, each agent can have a pre-defined bit to set, such that when set, it is an indication of the agent having power and an identification of the agent. If the router completes the message for an agent, it would indicate the power down status and also not be able to set the agent's specific bit. Still other use cases may enable a multicast/broadcast read request with aggregation to avoid multiple unicast read requests.

Messages sent to a broadcast port ID or group port ID (multicast) may be either posted or non-posted. In the case of a non-posted operation, the sender can use the aggregate request indicator as its source port ID if it seeks aggregation of all completions by the fabric and agents with multiple port IDs. In other words, by using this specified port ID (e.g., OxFE) as a source port ID within a request, a single completion is guaranteed to be returned to the sender responsive to the request. Thus when a non-posted request is sent with this aggregation source port ID, aggregated completions can be collected in the router coupled to the requester, and a single response status is returned.

In various embodiments, routers can apply a “bitwise OR” or a “multi-bit OR” operation to the completion response status they receive before sending the aggregated completion to the ingress port of the requesting agent. When aggregating completions with data, the data returned to the requester can be the bitwise OR of the corresponding data from each completer. If a combination of completion with data and completion without data responses are received by the router, then the aggregated completion can be formed as a completion with data message, where the aggregated response status field is the bitwise OR of the status fields of all received completion messages and the aggregated data is the bitwise OR of the data from all received completion with data messages. In some embodiments, a router may synthesize or create a completion for certain components. For example, a router can synthesize a response for a powered down endpoint, and in some embodiments the response for such endpoints can be considered as a received completion for the purposes of aggregation.

Sideband agents having multiple port IDs can send a single aggregated completion for non-posted messages received with an aggregation request. Such sideband agents with multiple port IDs that aggregate completions may operate similarly to a router with regard to aggregations. That is, such agents may follow all aggregation rules defined for routers.

Thus as a result of data aggregation in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an endpoint that initiates a broadcast or multicast can receive a completion with data response indicating successful, unsuccessful/not supported, powered down, or multicast mixed status.

In contrast to a conventional receipt and processing of separate responses in a requesting agent, embodiments may locate the responsibility for aggregation to a system's sideband routers, which may simplify agent design. And by placing this responsibility in the router, this functionality from multiple agents in the system can be aggregated into a shared object (the router), which may lead to a decrease in system gate count, and also simplify agent design by allowing each agent to be agnostic of the total size of the sideband network.

Embodiments thus enable aggregation via usage of an aggregation indicator (e.g., a predetermined port ID (e.g., network address)) as the source address to indicate to all routers in the system that they should aggregate completions. Responsive to detection of such a request, the system routers can aggregate both status and data for a given completion.

Referring now to FIG. 7, shown is a flow diagram of a method of handling sideband completions in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 7, method 300 may be implemented in a router, switch or other device that provides an aggregation function. For example, in some implementations an endpoint itself can perform a partial aggregation before sending an aggregated completion back to a requester. In the context of FIG. 7 however, it is assumed that the aggregator is a router. As seen in FIG. 7, method 300 may begin by receiving a multicast request in the router (block 310). This multicast request may come from a coupled endpoint, e.g., an IP agent coupled to the router. This multicast request can be a request that is directed to more than one agent of a SoC, or it can be a broadcast request directed to all agents of the SoC. At diamond 315 it can be determined whether an aggregate completion is requested. Although the scope of the present invention is not limited in this regard, in one embodiment this determination can be based on a source identifier associated with the request. That is, a predetermined source identifier value can thus provide this indication of an aggregated completion request. If such a request is received, as seen in FIG. 7 control passes to block 320.

At block 320, the router can forward the request to the indicated endpoints. For example, in a broadcast request the router can forward the request along to all system agents, while for a multicast request, the router can forward the request to the indicated agents. In some embodiments, the router can determine whether each agent has available resources, e.g., as determined with reference to a credit counter, before sending the requests along.

Still referring to FIG. 7, next at block 325 individual responses can be received at the router from the indicated endpoints. Note that although shown in FIG. 7 as receiving an individual response from each endpoint, as discussed above in an embodiment in which an endpoint includes multiple ports, the endpoint can aggregate responses from these multiple ports prior to sending its individual response. Or, another router element may aggregate responses for its coupled agents.

Control then passes to block 330 where the status from these individual responses can be aggregated. More specifically in one embodiment aggregation logic of the router can operate to aggregate status information and data information separately, e.g., by respective bitwise operations. Of course, rather than a single bit from each individual response, the bitwise ORs may be of multi-bit length. Control then passes to block 340, where a completion can be sent back to the requesting agent with aggregated status and data.

If instead at diamond 315 it is determined that an aggregated completion is not requested, control passes to diamond 350 where it can be determined whether the received request is a non-posted request. If not (that is, the request is a posted request), control passes to block 355 where the request can be forwarded to the indicated endpoints. If instead, the request is a non-posted request, it is forwarded to the indicated endpoints at block 360. Thereafter, individual responses can be received from the indicated endpoints and individual completions can be sent back to the requester (block 370). Thus as seen in FIG. 7, more efficient processing can be realized by aggregating completions in a router, and thus sending a single completion back to the requester, rather than the bandwidth, latency and other delays associated with sending individual completions from every indicated endpoint. Although shown with this particular implementation in the embodiment of FIG. 7, understand the scope of the present invention is not limited in this regard.

Although the SoCs of FIGS. 3 and 4 are at a high level, understand that additional functionality may be present. Referring now to FIG. 8, shown is a more detailed block diagram of a portion of a SoC in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 8, the portion of SoC 700 shown may correspond to non-core portions coupled below a memory controller hub or other interface logic that can in turn interface to multiple processor cores, as well as to system memory.

Thus as seen, an off-die interface 710 (which in one embodiment can be a direct media interface (DMI)) may couple to a hub 715, e.g., an input/output hub that in turn provides communication between various peripheral devices. Although not shown for ease of illustration in FIG. 8, understand that various engines such as a manageability engine and a virtualization engine can also be directly coupled to hub 715.

To provide connection to multiple buses, which may be multi-point or shared buses in accordance with the IOSF specification, an IOSF controller 720 may couple between hub 715 and bus 730, which may be an IOSF bus that thus incorporates elements of the fabric as well as routers. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 8, first IOSF bus 730 may have coupled to it various controllers to provide for control of off-chip devices. Specifically, seen is a PCI controller 722, a SATA controller 724, and a USB controller 726. In turn, a second IOSF bus 750 may couple to a system management bus 752 and to a real time clock 754.

As further seen in FIG. 8, first IOSF bus 730 may couple to an IOSF bridge 735 for both primary and sideband information that in turn provides interconnection to a third bus 740, e.g., of a different protocol, to which various controllers and components may be attached. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 8, such components include a flash controller 741 to provide an interface to a non-volatile memory, a legacy device 742, which may implement various legacy functions, e.g., of a PCI specification and further may include an interrupt controller and timer. In addition, interfaces for audio 743, USB 744, gigabyte Ethernet (GbE) 745, serial peripheral interface (SPI) 746 and PCI 747 may all be provided. Although shown with this particular implementation in the embodiment of FIG. 8, understand the scope of the present invention is not limited in this regard.

Still other implementations are possible. Referring now to FIG. 9, shown is a block diagram of another SoC in accordance with an embodiment the present invention. As shown in FIG. 9, SoC 800 may be configured for use, e.g., in server systems. As seen in FIG. 8, SoC may include a platform controller hub (PCH) 840, which may generally include components such as seen in the embodiment of FIG. 8. Namely, multiple IOSF buses 730 and 740 may be present, along with a bridge 735 to couple the buses. Bus 730 may include various agents coupled to it, including a PCIe controller 722, SATA controller 724, and a USB controller 726. In turn, via an IOSF controller 720, communication may occur via an additional bus 718, which may communicate with upstream devices, such as cores or other processing units (not shown for ease of illustration in the embodiment of FIG. 9).

As further seen in FIG. 9, for providing communications with other server-based components, an additional IOSF bus 820 may be provided, which in turn can communicate with an IOSF controller 822 and an upstream switch port 824 (e.g., an X16 port) that may be coupled to an upstream bus 825. Also coupled to bus 820 may be multiple downstream switch ports 826 and 828.

Furthermore, to enable communications, e.g., with storage units of a server-based system, a switch port 830 may couple between bus 820 and another IOSF bus 850, which in turn may be coupled to a storage controller unit (SCU) 855, which may be a multi-function device for coupling with various storage devices.

Embodiments may be implemented in code and may be stored on a non-transitory storage medium having stored thereon instructions which can be used to program a system to perform the instructions. The storage medium may include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, solid state drives (SSDs), compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), static random access memories (SRAMs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), flash memories, electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic or optical cards, or any other type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions.

While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.

Claims

1. An apparatus comprising:

a router including a plurality of interfaces each to couple to one or more of a plurality of endpoints and to route requests received from the plurality of endpoints to at least one destination endpoint, the router including an aggregation logic to, responsive to an aggregation request from a first endpoint, combine a plurality of responses received from at least some of the plurality of endpoints into a combined response and to send the combined response to the first endpoint, the aggregation request including an aggregation indicator corresponding to a predetermined source port identifier to indicate a request for the combined response, wherein the predetermined source port identifier is reserved for use by the plurality of endpoints for issuance of aggregation requests.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein responsive to the aggregation request, the router is to obtain a status of each of a plurality of target agents.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the aggregation request comprises a multicast request and which replaces a plurality of unicast requests from the first endpoint, wherein the router includes a first target interface to receive the aggregation request from the first endpoint and a first master interface to send the combined response to the first endpoint.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the aggregation logic is to consolidate status information of the responses and to consolidate data information of the responses, the status consolidation comprising a bitwise logical operation between a status portion of the responses, and the data consolidation comprising a bitwise logical operation between a data portion of the responses.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a second endpoint includes a plurality of ports, the second endpoint further including an aggregation logic to, responsive to an aggregation request received from the router, combine a plurality of responses received from portions of the second endpoint associated with each of the plurality of ports into a combined response and to send the combined response to the router.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plurality of endpoints each include a shadow register and the combined response is to indicate whether an update to the shadow register of the plurality of endpoints has completed.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the aggregation logic is to determine a power status of the plurality of endpoints responsive to the combined response.

8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the router is to indicate the power status for an endpoint that is powered down.

9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the apparatus comprises a system-on-chip (SoC) including the plurality of endpoints and the router fabricated on a single semiconductor die.

10. A system on chip (SoC) comprising:

a router having a master interface, a target interface, and an aggregation logic, wherein responsive to an aggregation request from a first endpoint, the aggregation logic is to combine a plurality of responses received from at least some of a plurality of endpoints into a combined response and to send the combined response to the first endpoint, the aggregation request including a predetermined source port identifier to indicate the aggregation request, wherein the predetermined source port identifier is reserved for the plurality of endpoints to use for sending aggregation requests; and
the plurality of endpoints coupled to the router.

11. The SoC of claim 10, wherein responsive to the aggregation request, a status of each of the plurality of endpoints is obtained.

12. The SoC of claim 10, wherein the aggregation request comprises a multicast request and which replaces a plurality of unicast requests from the first endpoint, wherein the target interface is to receive the aggregation request from the first endpoint and the master interface is to send the combined response to the first endpoint.

13. The SoC of claim 10, wherein the aggregation logic is to consolidate status information of the responses and to consolidate data information of the responses, the status consolidation comprising a bitwise logical operation between a status portion of the responses, and the data consolidation comprising a bitwise logical operation between a data portion of the responses.

14. The SoC of claim 10, wherein a second endpoint includes a plurality of ports, the second endpoint further including an aggregation logic to, responsive to an aggregation request received from the router, combine a plurality of responses received in the second endpoint into a combined response and to send the combined response to the router.

15. The SoC of claim 10, wherein at least some of the plurality of endpoints comprise a general purpose processor and at least one of the plurality of endpoints comprises a fixed function unit.

16. The SoC of claim 15, wherein at least one of the plurality of endpoints comprises a third party logic.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5493566 February 20, 1996 Ljungberg et al.
6009488 December 28, 1999 Kavipurapu
6233632 May 15, 2001 Meiyappan et al.
6427169 July 30, 2002 Elzur
6611893 August 26, 2003 Lee et al.
6694380 February 17, 2004 Wolrich et al.
6725313 April 20, 2004 Wingard et al.
6810460 October 26, 2004 Kirkwood
6816938 November 9, 2004 Edara et al.
7065733 June 20, 2006 Goodnow et al.
7457905 November 25, 2008 Gehman
7506089 March 17, 2009 Cho et al.
7573295 August 11, 2009 Stadler
7673087 March 2, 2010 Ansari et al.
7685346 March 23, 2010 Teh
7725757 May 25, 2010 Mandhani et al.
7734856 June 8, 2010 Reinig
7783819 August 24, 2010 Mandhani
7793345 September 7, 2010 Weber et al.
7873068 January 18, 2011 Klinglesmith et al.
7979592 July 12, 2011 Pettey et al.
7990999 August 2, 2011 Lee
8010731 August 30, 2011 Mandhani
8023508 September 20, 2011 Horton
8199157 June 12, 2012 Park et al.
8225019 July 17, 2012 Asnaashari
8286014 October 9, 2012 Han et al.
8364874 January 29, 2013 Schlansker et al.
8437369 May 7, 2013 Shaikli
8443422 May 14, 2013 Weber et al.
20020038401 March 28, 2002 Zaidi
20030088722 May 8, 2003 Price
20030126336 July 3, 2003 Creta
20040177176 September 9, 2004 Li et al.
20040208512 October 21, 2004 Peddanarappagari et al.
20040249985 December 9, 2004 Mori et al.
20050010687 January 13, 2005 Dai
20050120323 June 2, 2005 Goodnow et al.
20050137966 June 23, 2005 Munguia et al.
20050177664 August 11, 2005 Cho et al.
20050289369 December 29, 2005 Chung et al.
20050289374 December 29, 2005 Kim et al.
20060047849 March 2, 2006 Mukherjee
20060140126 June 29, 2006 Zhong
20060218336 September 28, 2006 Ishizawa et al.
20070006108 January 4, 2007 Bueti
20070067549 March 22, 2007 Gehman
20080059441 March 6, 2008 Gaug et al.
20080082840 April 3, 2008 Kendall et al.
20080147858 June 19, 2008 Prakash et al.
20080163005 July 3, 2008 Sonksen et al.
20080235415 September 25, 2008 Clark et al.
20080288689 November 20, 2008 Hoang et al.
20080310458 December 18, 2008 Rijpkema
20090119432 May 7, 2009 Lee et al.
20090235099 September 17, 2009 Branover et al.
20090249098 October 1, 2009 Han et al.
20090296740 December 3, 2009 Wagh
20100042606 February 18, 2010 Srivastava et al.
20100106912 April 29, 2010 Cypher et al.
20100199010 August 5, 2010 Goren et al.
20100262855 October 14, 2010 Buch et al.
20100278195 November 4, 2010 Wagh
20110047272 February 24, 2011 Bosneag
20110078315 March 31, 2011 Matsushita et al.
20110078356 March 31, 2011 Shoemaker
20110093576 April 21, 2011 Cherian et al.
20110179248 July 21, 2011 Lee
20120066468 March 15, 2012 Nakajima et al.
20120079590 March 29, 2012 Sastry et al.
20120233514 September 13, 2012 Patil et al.
20120311213 December 6, 2012 Bender et al.
20130054845 February 28, 2013 Nimmala et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
10-2005-0077437 August 2005 KR
10-2005-0082834 August 2005 KR
2005071553 August 2005 WO
Other references
  • PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0, PCI Express, Published 2007, pp. 1-19.
  • PCI Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0, PCI-SIG, vol. 1, Published 2002, pp. 1-12.
  • International Searching Authority, “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” mailed Mar. 8, 2013, in International application No. PCT/US2012/056828.
  • Intel Corporation, “An Introduction to the Intel QuickPath Interconnect,” Jan. 2009, pp. 1-22.
  • Sousek, et al., “PCI Express Core Integration with the OCP Bus,” CAST, Inc., 2006, 15 pages.
  • Mentor Graphics, “PCI Express to AMBA 3 AXI Bridge IP,” Mentor Graphics, Jun. 2007, 2 pages.
  • Everton Carara, et al., “Communication Models in Networks-on-Chip,” 18th IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping (RSP '07), 2007, pp. 57-60.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,234, filed Sep. 29, 2011, entitled, “Sending Packets With Expanded Headers”, by Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,232, filed Sep. 29, 2011, entitled, “Common Idle State, Active State and Credit Management for an Interface”, by Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,252, filed Sep. 29, 2011, entitled, “Providing Error Handling Support to Legacy Devices”, by Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,263, filed Sep. 29, 2011, entitled, “Providing Multiple Decode Options for a System-On-Chip (SoC) Fabric”, by Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,270, filed Sep. 29, 2011, entitled, “Supporting Multiple Channels of a Single Interface”, by Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,276, filed Sep. 29, 2011, entitled, “Issuing Requests to a Fabric”, by Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,362, filed Aug. 31, 2011, entitled, “Integrating Intellectual Property (IP) Blocks Into a Processor”, by Prashanth Nimmala, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,244, filed Nov. 29, 2011, entitled, “Providing a Sideband Message Interface for System on a Chip (SoC)”, by Robert P. Adler, et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,354, filed Aug. 31, 2011, entitled, “Providing Adaptive Bandwidth Allocation for a Fixed Priority Arbiter”, by Kie Woon Lim, et al.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2013 with Reply filed Sep. 3, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,232.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,252.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2013 with Reply filed Jul. 22, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,263.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2013 with Reply filed Sep. 9, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,270.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2013 with Reply filed Sep. 17, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,276.
Patent History
Patent number: 8711875
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 29, 2011
Date of Patent: Apr 29, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20130083794
Assignee: Intel Corporation (Santa Clara, CA)
Inventors: Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy (Sunnyvale, CA), Mikal C. Hunsaker (El Dorado Hills, CA), Michael T. Klinglesmith (Portland, OR), Blaise Fanning (Folsom, CA), Mohan K. Nair (Portland, OR), Joseph Murray (Scottsdale, AZ), Rohit R. Verma (Fremont, CA), Gary J. Lavelle (Newtown, PA), Robert P. Adler (Santa Clara, CA)
Primary Examiner: Omar Ghowrwal
Application Number: 13/248,243
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Details Of Circuit Or Interface For Connecting User To The Network (370/463); Physical Configuration Of Semiconductor (e.g., Mesa, Bevel, Groove, Etc.) (257/618)
International Classification: H04L 12/66 (20060101); H01L 29/06 (20060101);