Methods and compositions relating to the treatment of cancer

The compositions and methods described herein relate to the treatment of cancer, e.g. by reducing the regression of cancer cells from regressing into cancer stem cell-like phenotypes and/or reducing the development of drug-resistant cancer cells. In some embodiments, the compositions and methods relate to inhibitors of PI3K pathway kinases and Src family kinases.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 National Phase Entry Application of International Application No. PCT/US2014/015957 filed Feb. 12, 2014, which designates the U.S., and which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/766,325 filed Feb. 19, 2013 and 61/814,441 filed Apr. 22, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with federal funding under Grant No. 1RO1CA135242-01A2 awarded by the National Institutes of Health and Grant Nos. W81XWH-07-1-0482 and W81XWH-09-1-0700 awarded by the Department of Defense. The U.S. government has certain rights in the invention.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Jan. 21, 2014, is named 043214-076692-PCT_SL.txt and is 219,710 bytes in size.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The technology described herein relates to methods and compositions of treating cancer.

BACKGROUND

Acquired resistance to chemotherapy is a key obstacle to successful cancer treatment. Often, a course of treatment with chemotherapy does not result in the death of all cancer cells present in a subject. The surviving cells can cause the subject to relapse. The existence of cancer cells resistant to chemotherapeutics was originally explained by the presence of mutations in the DNA of a subset of cancer cells which conferred resistance to treatment (Cairns, 1975). However, chemotherapeutic resistance has been observed in tumor cells which do not have such mutations (Marusyk et al. 2012; Okabe et al. 2008; Berrieman et al. 2004; and Talpaz et al. 2002), indicating that this explanation is incomplete.

A more recently developed theory to explain non-genetic resistance to chemotherapeutics has revolved around “cancer stem cells” (CSCs). CSCs are believed to be static population of cells that have phenotypes which make them instrinically resistant to chemotherapeutics. According to this theory, while fully mature cancer cells are killed by the chemotherapy, the CSCs survive and produce new mature cancer cells, leading to tumor regrowth and relapse (Dean et al. 2005; Shackleton et al. 2009). However, recent experimental evidence demonstrates that instead of a static population of CSCs, there are individual cancer cells which can transition to CSC-like phenotypes and subsequently return to their original phenotype (Gupta et al., 2011).

SUMMARY

Provided herein are novel compositions and methods for the treatment of cancer. Specifically, the novel compositions are directed to preventing cancer cells from regressing into cancer stem cell-like phenotypes, a mechanism that has been identified by the inventors as important in development of resistance to cytotoxic cancer treatments. Accordingly, the invention provides novel compositions incorporating a cancer cell targeting moiety with kinase inhibitors that are directed to inhibit two important pathways for cancer cell regression that the inventors have discovered, namely, PI3K pathway kinases and Src family kinases.

The novel compositions specifically target cancer cells that can escape the chemotherapy by regressing into stem cell-like state that can escape cancer treatment. Thus, the compositions significantly reduce or prevent development of drug resistant cancer cells.

The invention is based, at least in part, on the discovery that tumor cells can be induced to temporarily acquire chemoresistant phenotypes, i.e., they become transiently tolerant. These cells can acquire stemlike properties, induce expression and functional activity of CSC biomarkers, and reorganize a redundant kinase-signaling network to persist and re-emerge from drug treatments. Also demonstrated herein is that this chemoresistant behavior can be prevented by a combination treatment of kinase inhibitors. Accordingly, provided herein are methods and compositions relating to the treatment of cancer, e.g. preventing the emergence of chemoresistant cancer cells.

In one aspect, described herein is a composition comprising a combination of a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell; and a kinase inhibitor, capable of inhibiting the activity of at least one PI3K pathway kinase and at least one Src family kinase. In some embodiments, the PI3K pathway kinase is selected from the group consisting of Akt; BCR-Abl; PRAS40; mTOR; S6K; Rsk1; Rsk2; and Rsk3. In some embodiments, the PI3K pathway kinase is BCR-Abl. In some embodiments, the kinase inhibitor comprises a dual kinase inhibitor. In some embodiments, the dual kinase inhibitor is dasatinib. In some embodiments, the kinase inhibitor comprises a mixture of at least two kinase inhibitors.

In one aspect, described herein is a composition comprising a combination of a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell; a kinase inhibitor capable of inhibiting the activity at least one Src family kinase; and an EGFR inhibitor.

In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the Src family kinase is selected from the group consisting of Src; Yes; Fyn; Fgr; Lck; Hck; Blk; Lyn; and Frk. In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the Src family kinase is selected from the group consisting of Src; Yes; Fyn; and Fgr. In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the Src family kinase is Src.

In one aspect, described herein is a composition comprising a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell; and dasatinib.

In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell is an antibody or antigen-binding portion of an antibody. In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell is an aptamer. In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the binding reagent is conjugated to the dual kinase inhibitor. In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the dual kinase inhibitor is selected from Formula I and Formula II,


wherein the structure of Formula I or Formula II is conjugated to a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell.

In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell binds specifically to a cell surface protein selected from the group consisting of: CD44; and isoforms thereof; cluster of differentiation protein family polypeptides; CD24; EpCAM; CD133; ganglioside GD2; epithelial specific antigen (ESA); Pgp; BCRP; MDR; ABC transport protein family polypeptides; EGFR; HER-2; ER; PR; IGF1R; insulin receptor; and EGFR-IGFR heterodimers.

In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the composition further comprises a scaffold material. In some embodiments, the scaffold material is selected from the group consisting of a nanoparticle; a matrix; a hydrogel; and a biodegradable scaffold material.

In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the composition further comprises an EGFR inhibitor. In some embodiments, the EGFR inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of erlotinib; cetuximab; gefitinib; panitumumab; zaltuumumab; nimotuzmab; matuzaumab; and lapatinib. In some embodiments, the EGFR inhibitor is erlotinib.

In some embodiments of any of the foregoing aspects, the composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

In one aspect, described herein is a method for treating cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject in need of treatment for cancer a combination of a cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and dasatinib or a composition as described herein. In some embodiments, the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent is selected from the group consisting of: doxorubicin; taxanes; cabazitaxel; vincristine; anti-tubulin chemotherapies; and vinblastine. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered during a period in which at least a subpopulation of cancer cells in the subject display increased levels of CD44 on the cell surface. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered during a period in which tumor growth plateaus. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered at least 4 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered no more than about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered from about 4 hours to about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered from about 4 hours to about 96 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered from about 12 hours to about 96 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered about 72 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered within 10 days after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, the composition as described herein is administered within 7 days after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, the subject is further administered an EGFR inhibitor. In some embodiments, the EGFR inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of erlotinib; cetuximab; gefitinib; panitumumab; zaltuumumab; nimotuzmab; matuzaumab; and lapatinib. In some embodiments, the EGFR inhibitor is erlotinib.

In one aspect, described herein is a method of identifying a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell, the method comprising detecting, in a cancer cell, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PRAS40, Src and Hck; wherein increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 indicates the cancer cell is a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell. In some embodiments, the method further comprises detecting the expression level of CD44, wherein increased expression of CD44 indicates the cancer cell is a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell.

In one aspect, described herein is a method of treatment of a cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising detecting, in a cancer cell, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PRAS40, Src and Hck; and administering a composition as described herein to the subject when increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 is detected. In some embodiments, the method further comprises detecting the expression level of CD44, and administering the composition as described herein to the subject when increased expression of CD44 is detected.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-1N demonstrate the CSC properties induced in a subset of chemotherapy-tolerant cancer cells. FIG. 1A depicts a graph of CD44 expression. Human breast cancer tissue was obtained from taxane-refractory patients and thin biopsies were subsequently utilized for an explant model and either left untreated (time 0), treated with a taxane-containing regimen or DMSO control (72 h). CD44 expression was quantified visually for intensity of staining and proportion of cells positive for CD44 (N=7, FIG. 9 shows patient history). FIG. 1B depicts representative immunohistochemistry images of human explant studies following incubation with indicated chemotherapeutic regimens or control vehicles (72 h). Panels indicate CD44 expression, activated caspase-3 (apoptosis) and ki-67 proliferative marker performed on serial sections (N=7). FIG. 1C depicts graphs of FACS analysis. 468 cells were incubated with 10 nM DTX (24) and labeled with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting CD44 analyzed by FACS. Note induction of CD44 surface expression in response to sub-lethal dose of chemotherapy. FIG. 1D depicts a schematic for the generation of a DTX tolerant cell (DTC) subpopulation. Following DTX treatment in parent cells (48 h) cells were washed and selected based on substrate re-attachment and acute population outgrowth (24 h) (‘DTC’ were exposed to 100 nM DTX). FIG. 1E depicts a graph of apoptosis. Parent 468 cells were untreated, treated with 100 nM DTX (48 h) or DTC were generated as described. Floating and attached cells were collected and active apoptosis was quantified by annexin V/Propidium iodide (PI) by FACS (left panel, error bars indicate SEM from 3 samples) or applied to western blot to detect activated (cleaved) caspase-3 (right panel). FIG. 1F depicts images of membranes from a phosphorylation assay. Equal concentration of cell extract from parent 231 or a subset of DTC were analyzed by a p53 phosphorylation array; no change between arrays indicate parental toxic burden in the DTC subset, reference spots normalize membranes. FIG. 1G depicts fluorescence microscopy images. 468 Parent cells or a subset of DTC were labeled with fluorescent CD44 antibody and analyzed by fluorescent microscopy; DAPI nuclear counterstain. FIG. 1H depicts a graph. A subset of 468 cells were isolated by the schematic depicted in FIG. 1D utilizing the following concentrations of DTX: 10 nM (10DT), 50 nM (50DT) or 100 nM (100DT), following incubation with fluorescently-conjugated CD44 antibody, cells were analyzed by FACS. Histogram represents quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence performed from duplicate plates (Error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 1I depicts FAC analysis results. Parent cells or a subset of DTC were generated from the indicated cell lines. Cells were incubated with fluorescently conjugated CD44 and analyzed by FACS, note increase of CD44 in DTC subset. FIG. 1J depicts FAC analysis results. Surviving 231 cells were isolated following 500 nM doxorubicin by the treatment-scheme outlined in FIG. 1D and defined as ‘Dox-TC’. Subsequently, cells were stained with fluorescently conjugated CD44 antibody and analyzed by FACS. FIG. 11K depicts FAC analysis results. 468 parent cells and a subset of DTC were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting EpCAM and analyzed by FACS. FIG. 1L depicts FAC analysis results. 468 Parent cells or a subset of DTC were labeled with CD44-APC and CD24-PE antibodies and analyzed by FACS; DAPI nuclear counterstain. FIG. 1M depicts the survival curve of 468 parent cells and a subset of DTC following 48 h exposure to indicated chemotherapy. Data points indicate values from 3 separate samples. Similar results identified from other cell lines (data not shown). FIG. 1N depicts the survival curve of 468 and a subset of DTC following 48 h exposure to Doxorubucin at indicated concentrations. Data points indicate values from 3 separate samples. Similar results identified from other cell lines (data not shown).

FIGS. 2A-2I demonstrate cancer stem cell mimicry involved in adaptive chemoresistance. FIG. 2A depicts FAC analysis results. Parent cells or DTC subsets isolated from 231 and 468 cells were analyzed for size based on three dimensional light scattering during flow cytometry. Note the tight correlation between parent and DTC within circumscribed gate indicating largest 20% of parent cells (FSC:A vs. SSC:A). FIG. 11A shows similar analysis performed in parental and DTC cells obtained from multiple cell lines. FIG. 2B depicts graphs of parent or DTC subsets isolated from 231 and 468 cells and analyzed for cell diameter (μm) post-trypsinization. Translucent box indicates approximate largest 20% of parent cells; note that the majority of DTC exist in this constraint. FIG. 11B shows similar analysis performed in cells following 4 hours treatment with increasing concentrations of DTX. FIG. 11C depicts microscopy images and graphs. 231 and 468 parent cells were treated with an isotonic solution (1×PBS) or hypotonic solution (PBS+Sterile H2O; 2:1) for 15 minutes. Upper panels show representative bright field microscopy (20×), note the visual increase of size as a result of swelling in hypotonic solution. Lower panels show histogram analysis of forward scatter (FSC:A) parameter during FACS. Note the decrease of FSC:A as a consequence of osmosis-dependent cell swelling. FIG. 2D depicts FAC analysis results. Parent cells were isolated by cell sorting utilizing three-dimensional light scattering parameters to capture the 20% largest (large) and 20% smallest (small) cells following doublet discrimination. Image depicts example of cell sorting analysis. Enrichment of ˜60-70% could be achieved and in some cases were enriched—for several times. FIG. 2E depicts graphs of fold change diameter. Following isolation of cells based on size (FIG. 2D), cells which adhered to culture plates were analyzed based on cell diameter (μm) and quantified as fold change diameter from the ‘small’ subset determined from >150 individual cells each (*p<0.05, error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 2F depicts graphs of cell survival. Cell survival was determined following incubation of 468Large/Small and 231 Large/Small with DTX or doxorubicin (48 h) at indicated concentrations. Histogram shows fold change viability. (*p<0.05, error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 11C shows example of full cytotoxicity curve with multiple concentrations of chemotherapy in the 231Large/Small cells. FIG. 2G depicts graphs of cell cycle. 231 and 468 parent cells were analyzed for cell cycle by propidium iodide solution and FACS. Cells were gated based on the 20% largest or 20% smallest (FSCA: vs. SSC:A) following doublet discrimination. Histogram shows % of cells in the indicated cell cycle, error bars indicate SEM. FIG. 2H depicts graphs of cell cycle. 231 parent cells or the DTC subset were analyzed by cell cycle utilizing a propidium iodide solution. Histogram shows % of cells in the indicated cell cycle, error bars indicate SEM. Similar analysis was performed in the 468 and DTC subset (FIG. 11D). FIG. 2I depicts FACS analysis results. 231 and 468 parent cells were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting CD44 and analyzed by FACS. Cells were gated based on the 20% largest or 20% smallest (FSCA: vs. SSC:A) following doublet discrimination. Cell extract from equal number of cells obtained from cell sorting Large and Small populations was analyzed by western blot for CD44 expression.

FIGS. 3A-3G demonstrate that Cancer Stem Cell mimicry and adaptive chemoresistance is transient. FIG. 3A depicts FAC analysis results. Parent 468 cells or DTC were labeled with fluorescent CD44 antibody and analyzed by FACS. Circumscribed gate indicates equivalent size cells between cell lines (FSC:A vs. SSC:A), CD44 mean fluorescent intensity (CD44 per cell) was quantified within this gate and expressed as fold change from parent cells (error bars indicate SEM, *p<0.05). FIG. 3B depicts FAC analysis results. Parent cells or DTC from each cell line were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting CD44 and analyzed by FACS. Gating indicates highest fluorescence of CD44 in parental cells. Note the ‘generation’ of CD44High cells detected within the DTC subsets not originally detected in the parent cell lines. FIG. 3C depicts FAC analysis results. 231 parent and DTC cells were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting CD44 and analyzed by FACS. Schematic illustrates FACS isolation of DTC cells which express more CD44 than any cells from the parent population (3.5%+/−1.1%) and define these as CD44New. Expansion of CD44New in culture was performed with serum-containing medium requiring passaging before regaining proliferative capacity at day ˜23 and full confluency by day ˜35 (ParentPhenocopy). FIG. 3D depicts 231, DTC or 231Phenocopy cells visualized by brightfield microscopy (20×). Note regain of parental morphology in the DTCPhenocopy. FIG. 3E depicts FAC analysis results. 231, DTC or 231Phenocopy were labeled with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting CD44 and analyzed by FACS. Note the re-equilibration of CD44 expression in 231Phenocopy indicated by gate. FIG. 3F depicts graphs of 231, DTC or 231Phenocopy analyzed utilizing propidium iodide solution and FACS to determine cell cycle status. FIG. 3G depicts a graph of 231, DTC or 231Phenocopy survival curves, indicating % viability of control in response to increasing concentrations of DTX chemotherapy (48 h).

FIGS. 4A-4I demonstrate that chemotherapy-induced CD44 functionally engages EGFR to promote survival of DTCs. FIG. 4A depicts western blot analysis. Cell extract from 468 parent and DTC were analyzed by western blot analysis for phosphorylated and total ERM and AKT. 13-Actin used as loading control. FIG. 4B depicts graphs of cell survival curve indicating % viability of control in 468 parent cells and DTC (left panel) or 231 parent cells and DTC (right panel) following incubation (48 h) with indicated concentrations of the PI3K/Akt inhibitors LY294002 or P1-103, respectively. Data points indicate values obtained from triplicate experiments (error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 4C depicts graphs and images of western blots. 468 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting ezrin and subsequently incubated with DTX (10 nM) or Vincristine (5 nM). Western blot analysis indicates phosphorylated residues and total protein levels, 13-Actin loading control. (Upper panel) Values obtained from triplicate experiments were quantified by protein band optical density and expressed as fold change from control of siScrambled or siEzrin transfections (error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 4D depicts graphs of 468 cells transfected with siEzrin incubated with indicated concentrations of chemotherapy and analyzed for viability (48 h). Each data point was obtained from triplicate experiment (data expressed as % viability of control, *p<0.05, error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 4E depicts images of western blots. Cell extract from 468 parent cells treated with 10 nM DTX+/−1 tM erlotinib (24 h) was analyzed by western blot for phosphorylated and total ERM and AKT protein. 13-Actin used as loading control. Note the inability of erlotinib to prevent ERM-complex activation. FIG. 4F depicts images of western blots. 468 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting CD44 or scrambled control and incubated with DTX (5 nM or 10 nM) for 24 h. Cell extract was analyzed by western blot. Note the increase of Akt, ezrin and ERM-complex signaling are attenuated when CD44 is silenced. 13-Actin used as loading control. FIG. 4G depicts images of western blots. 468 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting CD44 or scrambled control. Following incubation with indicated doses of vincristine or DTX, monoclonal antibody targeting Akt was immunoprecipitated from cell extract and applied to western blot analysis. Note the inability of Akt-ERM-EGFR to complex in the absence of CD44 expression. Total Akt used as loading control. FIG. 4H depicts images of western blots. 468 cells were incubated with DTX (10 nM)+/−erlotininb (1 tM) for 24 h. Following immunoprecipitation (IP) with monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR, cell extract was applied to western blot (WB) analysis to detect total CD44 protein. Major band was detected at 97kd (arrow). Lower panel indicates similar treatments performed western blot (WB) for CD44v6 identified at a similar molecular weight as pan-CD44 (97kd). Supplemental FIG. 4C shows similar analysis in 231 cells. Total EGFR used as loading control. FIG. 4I depicts images of western blots. Cell extract from 468 parent cells or DTC was incubated with monoclonal antibody detecting EGFR. Following immunoprecipitation (IP) Western blot (WB) was performed to detect total CD44 or CD44v6. Similar findings were observed in 231 and DTC cells (FIG. 12D). Total EGFR used as loading control.

FIGS. 5A-5H demonstrate that Akt and Src family kinase (SFK) survival signaling is functionally tied to CSC mimicry, which can be blocked using molecularly-targeted agents. FIG. 5A depicts graphs of the responses of cells to various drugs. Right panels indicate examples of cell viability assays performed in 231 parent and DTC incubated (48 h) with indicated concentrations of kinase inhibitors (table). Lower left panel shows drug sensitivity index (SI) calculated as the average cell viability across 4 drug concentrations: 10 nM, 100 nM, 1000 nM and 10 μM and expressed as fold change DTC:parent; SI<1 indicates drug resistance of DTC compared to parent; SI=1 indicates parental drug sensitivity; SI>1 indicates greater sensitivity of drug in DTC. FIG. 5B depicts a graph of drug sensitivity index (SI) of dasatinib determined in DTC isolated from multiple cell lines. SI>1 indicates greater sensitivity of DTC compared to parent in response to dasatinib (48 h). FIG. 5C depicts a graph of drug sensitivity index (SI) of dasatinib determined in 231 parent, DTC and 231Phenocopy. Note re-equilibrated, parental SI in the 231Phenocopy indicating temporal constraint of DTC dasatinib sensitivity. FIG. 5D depicts a graph of a cell viability assay performed in 231 DTC cells incubated with BCR/Abl kinase inhibitor, imatinib+/−Src Family kinase (SFK) inhibitor PP2. Note, combination of inhibitors does not further attenuate survival of DTC indicating BCR/Abl is not a key pathway of survival beyond SFK in DTC subset. FIG. 5E depicts a table showing kinases and phosphorylated residues from Akt-family and Src-family kinases analyzed in phosphorylation arrays found in FIG. 5F. FIG. 5F depicts phosphorylation assay membranes and a graph. Cell extract from 231 parent and DTC was applied to a phosphorylation array. Far right western blot indicates phosphorylated Src inhibitory residue (Y527) and shows β-Actin loading control. Optical density of phosphorylation array performed from 231 parent and DTC indicates Akt-family and SFK residues increased in DTC compared to parent cells, quantified and expressed as fold change. Values were determined from quadruplicate spots per phosphorylated residue determined from 2 independent experiments (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 5G depicts phorphorylation array membranes. CD44 was immunoprecipitated from 231DTC and 468DTC cell extract and applied to a phosphorylation array. PBS control spots indicate exposure control of correlative arrays. Note: optical density of spots indicate enhanced physical association of phosphorylated protein with CD44 in the DTC subset. FIG. 5H depicts western blot images and a graph of the results. 231 DTC cells were incubated with dasatinib at indicated concentrations (4 h) and cell extract was applied to western blot analysis to detect phosphorylated and total Akt. Optical density of protein bands were quantified from three independent experiments and expressed as fold change from control. β-Actin used as loading control (*p<0.05, error bars indicate SEM).

FIGS. 6A-6I demonstrate the role of chemotherapy-induced CD44 expression in activation of adaptive resistance response in vivo. FIG. 6A depicts a graph of relative tumor volume expressed as fold increase from day 1 following DTX treatment on days 2 and 5 at 10 mg/kg i.v. and 15 mg/kg i.p., respectively, or vehicle control at similar time points. Box indicates time points when tumor tissue was harvested for subsequent experiments. FIG. 6B depicts a image of a representative western blot of mouse-specific CD44 (ABIN135065) from combined tumor tissue homogenate from at least 3 mice of each control day 9, DTX-treated day 9 or 19 and a graph of optical density of the results. Optical density of CD44 protein expression was determined from western blots performed on 3 separate tissue homogenates and expressed as fold change from control day 9. (*p<0.05 between indicated groups, error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 6C depicts images of representative IHC of CD44 (IM7) evaluated from tumors harvested from control day 9, DTX-treated day 9 or 19 (20×). FIG. 6D depicts a graph of the quantitation of CD44 expression from IHC of in vivo tumor tissue from at least 3 mice per group was determined by multiplying intensity of staining at the cellular level (1-4) with percentage of cells stained from at least 25 independent fields per group in a blinded fashion. FIG. 6E depicts a graph of kinase activity determined by optical density of protein bands obtained from western blot of phosphorylated PRAS40 and SrcY527 from tumor tissue of at least 3 mice from each group. Data are expressed as the difference in fold change from control day 9 of phosphorylated residue:total protein and normalized to 13-Actin. (*p<0.05, error bars indicate SEM). FIG. 6F depicts representative IHC images of phosphorylated Hck (Y410) from tumors of at least 3 mice per group harvested from control day 9, DTX-treated day 9 or 19. Note enhanced nuclear localization of signal at DTX day 9 with variable enhanced cytoplasmic staining compared to control day 9 and DTX day 19. FIG. 6G depicts western blots of combined lysate of tumor homogenate of at least 3 mice per group incubated with antibody detecting total Hck or PRAS40. Following immunoprecipitation (IP) eluent was applied to immunoblots (IB) to detect CD44 physical co-localization (ABIN135065). Total protein of each target used as loading control. FIG. 6H depicts a graph of tumor response. Tumors treated with DTX on days 2 and 5 were followed-up with adjuvant dasatinib in two schedules 1. Day 8 post tumor burden defined as ‘early dasatinib’ or 2. Day 14 post tumor burden defined as ‘late dasatinib’. Histogram shows specific growth rate calculated by the formula (ln [V2/V1]/[t2−t1]) where V2 and t2=Day 5 and V1 and t1=Day 0. (*p<0.05 compared to day 0, #p<0.05 between indicated groups. Error bars indicate SEM) N=4 per group. FIG. 6I depicts graphs of relative tumor volume fold-change from Day 0 (1 day prior to initiation of dasatinib treatment). Left panel shows tumor volumes from ‘early dasatinib’, right panel shows tumor volumes from ‘late dasatinib’. (#p<0.05 compared to day 0, *p<0.05 between indicated groups on day 5).

FIGS. 7A-7H demonstrate temporal targeting of redundant signaling cascades in vivo and re-sensitizing refractory human tumor tissue with appropriate dasatinib drug-schedule. FIG. 7A depicts a 3-dimensional schematic of PI103-dasatinib chimeric nanoparticle (DPNP). PI103 conjugated to cholesterol stabilizes the lipid membrane while dasatinib is encapsulated within the nanoparticle decorated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). FIG. 7B depicts western blots images. Cell extract from 231 DTC treated with indicated drugs for 24 h was applied to western blot analysis for indicated phosphorylated residues. 13-Actin used as loading control. FIG. 7C depicts graphs of cell viability analysis of 231 DTC (left panel) and 468DTC (right panel) following incubation with dasatinib or DPNP (48 h). FIG. 7D depicts a graph of relative change in tumor volume following DTX pre-treatment or vehicle control with sequential addition of individual kinase inhibitors or DPNP administered at low dose on 3 independent occasions. N=4 per group (*p<0.05 between indicated groups on final day). Note DPNP treatment in DTX-naïve cells is insignificant compared to untreated vehicle control emphasizing the requirement for sequential addition of cytotoxics and kinase-inhibiting drugs. FIG. 7E depicts images of tissue obtained from a stage IV metastatic breast cancer patient, cut into thin slices and treated with the indicated drug regimens for 48 h as described in methods. Paraffin-embedded tissue was analyzed by H&E (top panels) or IHC for active apoptosis (cleaved caspase-3). FIG. 7F depicts a graph of activation of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-8 determined from the refractory breast cancer explant shown in FIG. 7E. FIG. 7G depicts a schematic of the generation of CSC mimicry. Induction of CD44 expression as a consequence of phenotypic plasticity re-organizes a survival-signaling kinase network which exposes a therapeutic vulnerability. CSC mimicry, if left untreated, will re-assume a heterogeneous landscape. FIG. 7H depicts a schematic summarizing the temporal window to exploit for kinase therapy when the frequency of CSC mimicry peaks and vulnerability to secondary kinase inhibitors is maximal.

FIG. 8A depicts a schematic of the transition of cancer cell phenotypes. FIG. 8B depicts a schematic model of the signaling pathways involved in control of the transiently tolerant phenotype.

FIG. 9 depicts a table of human refractory explant patient information.

FIGS. 10A-10F demonstrate the characterization of chemotherapy-tolerant cells. FIG. 10A depicts a graph of cell viability analysis of 468 parent cells following short-burst (24 h) treatment with 5 nM and 10 nM doses of DTX. Histogram indicates % cell viability of control obtained from triplicate experiments (error bars indicate SEM). Note preservation of viability between treated and untreated control groups indicating no selection of viable subsets. FIG. 10B depicts FACS analysis of 231 cells treated with increasing doses of DTX for 4 hours, fixed and stained with fluorescently-conjugated CD44 antibody. Quantification of CD44 mean fluorescent intensity was determined from 3 independent experiments (error bars indicate SEM, **p<0.01). FIG. 10C depicts FACS analysis and a graph of 468 parent cells incubated with 10 nM docetaxel at 75% confluency for 24 h and analyzed by flow cytometry for surface protein expression of CD24 and CD44 expression. Note the induction of both CD44 and CD24 in response to chemotherapy. FIG. 10D depicts FACS analysis of 231 parent cells or a subset of DTC incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibody detecting EpCAM. Cells were processed by flow cytometry and represented as FSC:A vs. EpCAM fluorescence. FIG. 10E depicts a graph of 231 DTC isolated as described, following fixation in formalin cells were labeled with fluorescently-tagged CD24 and analyzed by flow cytometry. Histogram graph indicates up regulation of CD24 in the DTC subset. FIG. 10F depicts a graph of the cell viability curve of 231 or a subset of DTC incubated with increasing doses of docetaxel or doxorubicin in the presence or absence of the drug-efflux inhibitor, elacridar.

FIGS. 11A-11E demonstrate the characterization of cancer stem cell mimicry. FIG. 11A depicts FACS analysis. (Left two panels) Parent cells or a DTC subset isolated from multiple cell lines were analyzed by flow cytometry to demonstrate size of cells based on 3-dimensional light-scattering parameters. Note correlation between parent and DTC within circumscribed gate indicating largest 20% of parent cells (FSC:A vs. SSC:A). (Right panel) 231 or a subset of Dox-TC isolated following the protocol outlined in FIG. 1D and utilizing 500 nM doxorubicin was analyzed by flow cytometry. Note correlation between parent and Dox-TC within the circumscribed gate indicating 20% largest parent cells. FIG. 11B depicts graphs of 231 cells treated with increasing doses of docetaxel for 4 hours and processed by a cell counter to determine cell diameter in microns. Note the increase in size can be observed after only 4 hours treatment, an effect which appeared to be dose-dependent. FIG. 11C depicts a graph of the viability curve of 231 parent cells sorted based on size, as described in methods. Cells were immediately plated into 96 well plates and treated with indicated concentrations of chemotherapy for 48 hours. Data points were averaged from triplicate experiments. Similar results were observed in 468 cells (data not shown). Fold increase of cell viability can be found in FIG. 3C. FIG. 11D depicts a graph of cell cycle analysis utilizing a propidium iodide solution processed by flow cytometry was performed in 468 parent cells or a DTC subset. Histogram shows % of cells in the indicated cell cycle, error bars indicate SEM. Results correlate to FIG. 2H of similar analysis performed in 231 parent cells and DTC. FIG. 11E depicts graphs of FACS analysis. Parent 231 cells were processed by FACS to isolate CD44High cells. Note: the proportion of CD44High (depicted as black dots) correlates to the largest population of cells determined by three dimensional light scattering parameters, an effect in contrast to CD44Low (grey dots).

FIGS. 12A-12D demonstrate the elucidation of the functional implication of CD44 induction in CSC mimicry. FIG. 12A depicts a graph of Parent 468 and DTC cells analyzed by an EGFR phosphorylation array (RayBiotech). Histogram analysis represents the fold change of phosphorylated EGFR residues in DTC compared to 468 parent. Values were determined from normalized array membranes according to manufacturers instructions. Array was performed on at least 3 independent cell lysate extracts. Error bars indicate standard error from the mean (SEM) (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). Upper panel shows Co-immunoprecipitation of EGFR from unstimulated 468 and DTC cell lysate. Western analysis was performed using antibodies targeting phosphorylated tyrosine or EGFR as loading control. FIG. 12B depicts a graph of cell survival analysis of Ezrin-knockdown 468 parental cells or a scrambled control treated with docetaxel chemotherapy at the indicated concentrations for 48 hours+/−the EGFR kinase inhibitor erlotinib (1 μM). Values are expressed as % of the respective control. All error bars indicate standard error from the mean (SEM). (n.s.=not statistically significant) FIG. 12C depicts the results of EGFR immunoprecipitation (IP) performed using cell extract from MDA-MB-231 cells incubated with docetaxel (10 nM) in the presence or absence of erlotinib (1 μM) for 24 hours. Western blotting (WB) was performed using antibodies targeting total CD44 or EGFR as loading control. Indicated CD44 band appeared at 97kd (arrow). FIG. 12D depicts the results of immunoprecipitation. DTC were generated from MDA-MB-231 cells as described previously Immunoprecipitation (IP) from cell extract was performed using monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR. Western blot (WB) analysis was performed using antibodies targeting CD44v6 (clone VFF18) or EGFR as loading control.

FIGS. 13A-13B demonstrate targeting signaling redundancies evoked in CSC mimicry. FIG. 13A depicts images of immunohistochemistry. Balb/C Mice were injected with 4T-1 mouse mammary carcinoma cells per left flank and once tumors were palpable, injected with docetaxel (DTX) or vehicle control on day 2 and 5 and tumors were harvested on day 9 (control and DTX) and day 19 (DTX). Images are representative of immunohistochemistry of Phosphorylated PRAS40 was analyzed from tissue, note the increase in nuclear staining of p-PRAS40 increased from DTX-treated day 9, compared to control and reduced by day 19. FIG. 13B depicts graph of cell viability. DTC were generated from 231 or 468 cells as described previously. Cells were subsequently treated for 48 h with indicated concentrations of dasatinib, PI103 or a 1:1 combination of both inhibitors. Note synergy of combination therapy.

FIG. 14 depicts a schematic hypothetical model for the continuum of phenotypes and the emergence of CSC mimicry. Without wishing to be bound by theory, cells can be considered as either chemotherapy sensitive (left-hand extreme) or inherently chemotherapy resistant (right-hand extreme, also denoted as putative population of CSC). Between these two phenotypic extremes lie a continuum of phenotypes which shuttle variably through these states of chemo-resistant and chemo-sensitive. Introduction of chemotherapy (lightning bolts) can deterministically alter the phenotype of cancer cells existing within the continuum by shuttling them to more closely, yet imperfectly mimic the most inherently resistant subset of cells (CSC mimicry). Utilizing adaptive mechanisms obtained by this transition, cells can overcome chemotherapy and re-emerge.

FIG. 15 depicts a schematic of the synthesis of some embodiments of the antibody-drug conjugates described herein.

FIGS. 16A-16B demonstrate that inhibiting mimicy ablates acquired chemoresistant cancer cells. FIG. 16A depicts graphs of FACs analysis, demonstrating that Akt inhibitors prevent the accumulation of “large” DTC cells in culture. FIG. 16B depicts a graph demonstrating that inhibition of DNA accumulation and progression through the cell cycle is prevented by Akt inhibitors.

FIG. 17 depicts a schematic of PI103-cholesterol conjugatesynthesis.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The technology described herein relates to the inventors' characterization of transiently tolerant cancer cells which display chemoresistance. As used herein, the term “transiently tolerant cancer cell” refers to a cell which is genetically identical to chemosensitive cancer cells but due to changes in subcellular organization, gene expression, and/or signaling activity has acquired chemoresistance and/or other stem-like properties, e.g. pluripotency, multipotency, and/or self-renewal. In some embodiments, the conversion to a chemoresistant phenotype can be temporary. In some embodiments, the conversion to a chemoresistant phenotype can be reversible. In some embodiments, the development of chemoresistance follows the expression of transiently tolerant cancer cell markers (e.g. CD44 and others described below herein), e.g. the development of measureable chemoresistance can be a later step in the conversion to a transiently tolerant cancer cell phenotype. In some embodiments, chemoresistance (e.g. the acquisition of transiently tolerant phenotypes) can be induced by exposure to a chemotherapeutic agent (e.g. a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic).

As described herein, the development of a chemoresistant phenotype can be prevented by inhibiting redundant kinase pathways. Specifically, inhibition of the PI3K kinase pathway and/or EGFR in combination with inhibition of a Src family kinase can prevent the development of a chemoresistant phenotype. An “inhibitor” of a given pathway and/or enzyme is a molecule and/or composition that interferes with or inhibits the activity of the pathway and/or enzyme, e.g. at least 10% inhibition, 20% inhibition, 30% inhibition, 40% inhibition, 50% inhibition, 75% inhibition, 80% inhibition, 90% inhibition, 95% inhibition, 98% inhibition, or greater inhibition Inhibitors of a given pathway and/or group of enzymes can inhibit one member of that pathway and/or group or multiple members of the pathway and/or group, e.g. 1 member, 2 members, 3 members, 4 members, or more members Inhibitors can encompass numerous classes of chemical molecules, e.g., small organic or inorganic molecules, polysaccharides, biological macromolecules, e.g., peptides, proteins, peptide analogs and derivatives, peptidomimetics, antibodies, antibody fragments, nucleic acids, nucleic acid analogs and derivatives, an extract made from biological materials such as bacteria, plants, fungi, or animal cells or tissues, naturally occurring or synthetic compositions.

As used herein, the “PI3K kinase pathway” (also referred to herein as the “Akt/BCR-Abl pathway”) refers to a signaling pathway beginning with the interaction of PI3K with an activated receptor, resulting in the phosphorylation of the 3 position hydroxyl group of the inositol ring of phosphatidylinositols. The pathway then cascades through a branched series of signaling molecules, ultimately regulating apoptosis. When the PI3K kinase pathway is overactive, as in many cancers, apoptosis is suppressed, thereby allowing abnormally high levels of proliferation. In some embodiments, an inhibitor of the PI3K pathway can be an inhibitor of a PI3K pathway kinase. Non-limiting examples of PI3K pathways kinases can include Akt, BCR-Abl, PRAS40, mTOR, S6K, Rsk1, Rsk2, and/or Rsk3. In some embodiments, a PI3K pathway kinase can be BCR-Abl. The sequences of PI3K pathway kinases are well known in the art, eg. human Akt (NCBI Gene ID:207) (SEQ ID NO: 21 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 22 (polypeptide)); human BCR-Abl (NCBI Gene ID:25) (SEQ ID NO: 23 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 24 (polypeptide)); human PRAS40 (NCBI Gene ID:84335) (SEQ ID NO: 25 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 26 (polypeptide)); human mTOR (NCBI Gene ID:2475) (SEQ ID NO: 27 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 28 (polypeptide)); human S6K (NCBI Gene ID:6198) (SEQ ID NO: 29 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 30 (polypeptide)); human Rsk1 (NCBI Gene ID:6195) (SEQ ID NO: 31 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 32 (polypeptide)); human Rsk2 (NCBI Gene ID:6197) (SEQ ID NO: 33 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 34 (polypeptide)); and human Rsk3 (NCBI Gene ID:6196) (SEQ ID NO: 35 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 36 (polypeptide)).

Inhibitors of PI3K pathway kinases can include but are not limited to e.g. A-674563, AT7867, AT9283, AZD8055, BEZ235, BI-D1870, CCT128930, danusertib (PHA-739358), dasatinib (BMS-354825), deforolimus (Ridaforolimus), everolimus (RAD001), fingolimod (FTY720), GSK690693, H 89, imatinib, Ku-0063794, MK-2206, nilotinib, perifosine, PF-04691502, PHT-427, PI-103, ponatinib, PP242, rapamycin (sirolimus), rebastinib (DCC-2036), saracatinib (AZD0530), temsirolimus (Torisel), ticribine, WP1130, and XL765 Inhibitors of PI3K include, but are not limited to, BGT226 and BEZ235. Inhibitors of Akt include, but are not limited to, perifosine Inhibitors of mTOR include, but are not limited to, rapamycin, temsirolimus, and everolimus Inhibition of a PI3K pathway kinase can be determined, e.g. by in vitro assays to determine the activity of a PI3K pathway kinase, e.g. the ability to phosphorylate a target polypeptide. Such assays are readily understood by one of skill in the art.

As used herein, the term “EGFR” or “Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor” refers to a transmembrane receptor that binds to ligands including epidemeral growth factor “EGF” and TGFα. Ligand recognition causes autophosphorylation of EGFR and activates the MAPK, Akt, and/or JNK pathways, leading to cellular proliferation. The sequences of EGFR are well known in the art, eg. human EGFR (NCBI Gene ID:1956) (SEQ ID NO: 1 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 2 (polypeptide)).

Inhibitors of EGFR can include but are not limited to aeroplysinin, afatinib, AG 1478, AG-490, AG-494, AG 555, AG 825, ARRY334543, AST 1306, AZD8931, BDPQ, BIBU 1361, BIBX 1382, BPIQ-I, BPIQ-II, butein, canertinib, cetuximab; CGP-74514A, CL-387,785, CUDC101, dacomitinib, DAPH, daphnetin, erbstatin analog, erlotinib; gefitinib, GW 583340, GW2974, HDS 029, hypericin, lapatinib, lavendustin A, lavendustin C, LFM-A12, matuzaumab; neratinib, nimotuzmab, panitumumab, PD 153035, PD 168393, pelitinib, PP 3, RG-13022, TAK 165, TAK 285, tyrphostin 47, tyrphostin 51, tyrphostin AG1478, tyrphostin AG183 tyrphostin AG 528, tyrphostin B44, tyrphostin RG 14620, vatalinib, WZ 4002, WZ8040, XL657, and zaltuumumab. In some embodiments, the EGFR inhibitor can be erlotinib; cetuximab; gefitinib; panitumumab; zaltuumumab; nimotuzmab; matuzaumab; or lapatinib. In some embodiments, the EGFR inhibitor can be erlotinib. Inhibition of EGFR can be determined, e.g. by assays to determine the level of phosphorylated EGFR, e.g. using phosphor-specific anti-EGFR antibodies (e.g. Cat. No. 1727-1; Abcam: Cambridge, Mass.). Such assays are readily understood by one of skill in the art.

As used herein, the term “Src kinase family” refers to a family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, encompassing the SrcA subfamily (Src, Yes, Fyn, and Fgr), the SrcB subfamily (Lck, Hck, Blk, and Lyn) and Frk. Non-limiting examples of Src family kinase can include Src, Yes, Fyn, Fgr, Lck, Hck, Blk, Lyn, and/or Frk. In some embodiments, a Src family kinase can be Src, Yes, Fyn, and Fgr. In some embodiments, a Src family kinase can be Src. The sequences of Src kinase family members are well known in the art, eg. human Src (NCBI Gene ID:6714) (SEQ ID NO: 3 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 4 (polypeptide)); human Yes (NCBI Gene ID:7525) (SEQ ID NO: 5 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 6 (polypeptide)); human Fyn (NCBI Gene ID:2534) (SEQ ID NO: 7 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 8 (polypeptide)); human Fgr (NCBI Gene ID:2268) (SEQ ID NO: 9 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 10 (polypeptide)); human Lck (NCBI Gene ID:3932) (SEQ ID NO: 11 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 12 (polypeptide)); human Hck (NCBI Gene ID:3055) (SEQ ID NO: 13 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 14 (polypeptide)); human Blk (NCBI Gene ID:640) (SEQ ID NO: 15 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 16 (polypeptide)); human Lyn (NCBI Gene ID:4067) (SEQ ID NO: 17 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 18 (polypeptide)) and human Frk (NCBI Gene ID:2444) (SEQ ID NO: 19 (mRNA) and SEQ ID NO: 20 (polypeptide)).

Inhibitors of Src family kinases can include but are not limited to 1-Naphthyl PP1, A 419259, AP23846, AZM 475271, bosutinib, dasatinib, DCC-2036, herbimycin A, ibrutinib (PCI-32765), KX2-391, MNS, NVP-BHG712, PD 166285, piceatannol, ponatinib (AP24534), PP1, PP2, saracatinib, SrcI1, TG100435 and XL228. Inhibition of a Src family kinase can be determined, e.g. by in vitro assays to determine the activity of a Src kinase, e.g. the ability to phosphorylate a target polypeptide. Such assays are readily understood by one of skill in the art.

In one aspect, the technology described herein relates to a composition comprising a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell and a kinase inhibitor capable of inhibiting the activity of at least one PI3K pathway kinase and at least one Src family kinase. In some embodiments, the kinase inhibitor can be a dual kinase inhibitor, e.g. a single molecule that can inhibit the activity of at least one PI3K pathway kinase and at least one Src family kinase. In some embodiments, the dual kinase inhibitor can be, e.g. dasatinib. In some embodiments, the kinase inhibitor can comprise a mixture of at least two different kinase inhibitors, e.g. a Src kinase inhibitor and a separate BCR-Abl kinase inhibitor. In some embodiments, one of the kinase inhibitors in a mixture of at least two different kinase inhibitors can be a dual kinase inhibitor. In some embodiments, the composition can further comprise an EGFR inhibitor.

In one aspect, the technology described herein relates to a composition comprising a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell, an EGFR inhibitor, and a kinase inhibitor capable of inhibiting a Src family kinase.

The binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell can target the kinase inhibitor (e.g. dual kinase inhibitor) to the cancer cells which are in need of inhibition of chemoresistance, reduce the effective dose, and/or reduce off-target effects.

As used herein, a “binding reagent specific for” a given entity is an agent that can bind specifically to that entity. As used herein, the term “specific binding” refers to a chemical interaction between two molecules, compounds, cells and/or particles wherein the first entity binds to the second, target entity with greater specificity and affinity than it binds to a third entity which is a non-target. In some embodiments, specific binding can refer to an affinity of the first entity for the second target entity which is at least 10 times, at least 50 times, at least 100 times, at least 500 times, at least 1000 times or greater than the affinity for the third nontarget entity. In some embodiments, “selectively binds” or “specifically binds” can refer to the ability of a binding reagent described herein to bind to a target, such as a molecule present on the cell-surface, with a KD of 10−5 M (10000 nM) or less, e.g., 10−6 M or less, 10−7 M or less, 10−8 M or less, 10−9 M or less, 10−10 M or less, 10−11 M or less, or 10−12 M or less. Specific binding can be influenced by, for example, the affinity and avidity of the binding agent and the concentration of binding agent. The person of ordinary skill in the art can determine appropriate conditions under which the binding agents described herein selectively bind the targets using any suitable methods, such as titration of a binding agent in a suitable binding assay.

A binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell can bind one or more markers (e.g. cell surface protein) which are markers of a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or cancer stem cell phenotype. Methods for identifying such markers are known in the art, e.g. by subtractive hybridization. Examples of markers of transiently tolerant cancer cell or cancer stem cell phenotypes are known in the art and described herein. Non-limiting examples of markers of transiently tolerant cancer cells and/or cancer stem cells can include CD44 and isoforms thereof; cluster of differentiation protein family polypeptides; CD24; EpCAM; CD133; ganglioside GD2; epithelial specific antigen (ESA); Pgp; BCRP; MDR; ABC transport protein family polypeptides; EGFR; HER-2; ER; PR; IGF1R; insulin receptor; and EGFR-IGFR heterodimers. The sequences of such marker polypeptides are known in the art, e.g. human CD44 (NCBI Gene ID No: 960; SEQ ID NO: 37; NCBI Ref Seq: NP_000601). As described herein, the transiently tolerant cancer cell phenotype mimics, in many respects, the cancer stem cell phenotype. Accordingly, as demonstrated herein, makers of the cancer stem cell phenotype can also be markers of the transiently tolerant cancer cell phenotype, e.g. CD44.

In some embodiments, a binding reagent can be an antibody reagent, e.g. an antibody, a monoclonal antibody, or antigen-binding fragments and/or portions thereof. Antibody reagents specific for markers of transiently tolerant cancer cells and/or cancer stem cells are readily generated by one of skill in the art, as described below herein and are available commercially, e.g. anti-CD44 antibody (Cat. No. 1998-1; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-CD24 antibody (Cat. No. ab77219; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-EpCAM antibody (Cat. No. ab20160; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-CD133 antibody (Cat No. MAB4310; Millipore, Billerica, Mass.), anti-ESA antibody (Cat. No. ab73988; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-BCRP antibody (Cat. No. ab24114; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-MDR antibody (Cat No. P7965; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.), anti-EGFR antibody (Cat. No. 1727-1; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-HER-2 antibody (Cat. No. 2064-1; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-ER antibody (Cat. No. ab2746; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), anti-PR antibody (Cat. No. ab2764; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), and anti-IGF1R antibody (Cat. No. ab16890; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.).

In some embodiments, a binding reagent can be an aptamer. Aptamers are short synthetic single-stranded oligonucleotides that specifically bind to various molecular targets such as small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids, and even cells and tissues. These small nucleic acid molecules can form secondary and tertiary structures capable of specifically binding proteins or other cellular targets, and are essentially a chemical equivalent of antibodies. Aptamers are highly specific, relatively small in size, and non-immunogenic. Aptamers are generally selected from a biopanning method known as SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential enrichment) (Ellington et al. Nature. 1990; 346(6287):818-822; Tuerk et al., Science. 1990; 249(4968):505-510; Ni et al., Curr Med Chem. 2011; 18(27):4206-14; which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties). Methods of generating an apatmer for any given target are well known in the art. Preclinical studies using, e.g. aptamer-siRNA chimeras and aptamer targeted nanoparticle therapeutics have been very successful in mouse models of cancer and HIV (Ni et al., Curr Med Chem. 2011; 18(27):4206-14).

In some embodiments of multiple aspects described herein, the PI3K pathway kinase can be BCR-Abl and the Src family kinase can be Src. In some embodiments, the dual kinase inhibitor is dasatinib (also known as BMS-354825 and SPRYCEL™), e.g. an inhibitor of BCR-Abl and Src having the structure of Formula III. In one aspect, the technology described herein relates to a composition comprising a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell; and dasatinib.

In some embodiments, the composition described herein can have a structure selected from Formula I and Formula II, wherein the structure of Formula I or II is conjugated to a binding reagent molecule specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell. In some embodiments, the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell can be an antibody specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or cancer stem cell marker, e.g. CD44. In some embodiments, the binding reagent can be bound to and/or conjugated to multiple inhibitor molecules. In some embodiments, multiple molecules having a structure of Formula I or II can be conjugated to the binding reagent. In some embodiments, the ratio of a given inhibitor molecule (e.g. dasatinib) to the binding reagent molecule can be from about 1:1 to about 1,000:1, e.g. a single binding reagent molecule can be linked to, conjugated to, etc. from about 1 to about 1,000 individual inhibitor molecules. In some embodiments, the ratio of a given inhibitor molecule (e.g. dasatinib) to the binding reagent molecule can be from about 10:1 to about 500:1. In some embodiments, the ratio of a given inhibitor molecule (e.g. dasatinib) to the binding reagent molecule can be from about 40:1 to about 200:1.

The components of a composition described herein (e.g. a binding reagent and a kinase inhibitor and/or EGFR inhibitor) can be individually physically associated with the composition and/or physically associated with each other, e.g. the components can be bound to each other and/or conjugated to each other. In some embodiments, binding can be non-covalent, e.g., by hydrogen, electrostatic, or van der waals interactions, however, binding may also be covalent. By “conjugated” is meant the covalent linkage of at least two molecules. In some embodiments, the composition can be an antibody-drug conjugate.

In some embodiments, a scaffold material can comprise the plurality of components described herein. Scaffold materials suitable for use in therapeutic compositions are known in the art and can include, but are not limited to, a nanoparticle; a matrix; a hydrogel; and a biomaterial, biocompatible, and/or biodegradable scaffold material. As used herein, the term “nanoparticle” refers to particles that are on the order of about 10−9 or one billionth of a meter. The term “nanoparticle” includes nanospheres; nanorods; nanoshells; and nanoprisms; and these nanoparticles may be part of a nanonetwork.

The term “nanoparticles” also encompasses liposomes and lipid particles having the size of a nanoparticle. As used herein, the term “matrix” refers to a 3-dimensional structure comprising the components of a composition described herein (e.g. a binding reagent, kinase inhibitor, and/or EGFR inhibitor). Non-limiting examples of matrix structures include foams; hydrogels; electrospun fibers; gels; fiber mats; sponges; 3-dimensional scaffolds; non-woven mats; woven materials; knit materials; fiber bundles; and fibers and other material formats (See, e.g. Rockwood et al. Nature Protocols 2011 6:1612-1631 and US Patent Publications 2011/0167602; 2011/0009960; 2012/0296352; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,172,901; each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety). The structure of the matrix can be selected by one of skill in the art depending upon the intended application of the composition, e.g. electrospun matrices can have greater surface area than foams.

In some embodiments, the scaffold is a hydrogel. As used herein, the term “hydrogel” refers to a three-dimensional polymeric structure that is insoluble in water but which is capable of absorbing and retaining large quantities of water to form a stable, often soft and pliable, structure. In some embodiments, water can penetrate in between the polymer chains of the polymer network, subsequently causing swelling and the formation of a hydrogel. In general, hydrogels are superabsorbent. Hydrogels have many desirable properties for biomedical applications. For example, they can be made nontoxic and compatible with tissue, and they are highly permeable to water, ions, and small molecules. Hydrogels are super-absorbent (they can contain over 99% water) and can be comprised of natural (e.g., silk) or synthetic polymers, e.g., PEG.

As used herein, “biomaterial” refers to a material that is biocompatible and biodegradable. As used herein, the term “biocompatible” refers to substances that are not toxic to cells. In some embodiments, a substance is considered to be “biocompatible” if its addition to cells in vitro results in less than or equal to approximately 20% cell death. In some embodiments, a substance is considered to be “biocompatible” if its addition to cells in vivo does not induce inflammation and/or other adverse effects in vivo. As used herein, the term “biodegradable” refers to substances that are degraded under physiological conditions. In some embodiments, a biodegradable substance is a substance that is broken down by cellular machinery. In some embodiments, a biodegradable substance is a substance that is broken down by chemical processes.

In some embodiments, the scaffold can be a nanoparticle. In some embodiments, a nanoparticle can comprise dasatinib and PI103. In an exemplary embodiment, nanoparticles as described herein can be made as follows: 10 mg of L-α-phosphatidylcholine, 2 mg PI103-cholesterol conjugate, 2 mg of Dasatinib and 22 mg of 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine-N-[Amino(Polythylene Glycol)2000](DSPE-PEG) are dissolved in 1.0 mL DCM and 0.5 mL of methanol. Solvent is evaporated into a thin and uniform lipid-drug film using a rotary evaporator. The lipid-drug film is then hydrated with 2.0 mL H2O for 1 h at 60° C. The mixtures can be passed though Sephadex G-25 column and extruded at 65° C. to obtain sub 200 nm particles. In some embodiments, the nanoparticle can further comprise a binding reagent specific for transiently tolerant cells.

In one aspect, described herein is a method of treatment comprising administering a cytotoxic chemotherapy to a subject in need of treatment for cancer and administering dasatinib and/or a composition as described herein. In some embodiments, the composition and/or dasatinib can be administered concomitantly and/or after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, the composition and/or dasatinib can be administered after the cytotoxic chemotherapy.

In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered during a period in which at least a subpopulation of cancer cells in the subject display increased levels of CD44 on the cell surface. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered during a period in which tumor growth plateaus. Methods of measuring the expression of a marker on a cell and/or measuring cell growth are well known in the art. By way of non-limiting example, CD44 expression can be measured by FACS analysis as described in the Examples herein, e.g. by contacting cells with a detectably labeled anti-CD44 antibody and detecting the amount of label bound to each cell via FACS.

In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered at least 4 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered no more than about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered from about 4 hours to about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered from about 4 hours to about 96 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered from about 12 hours to about 96 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered about 72 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered within about 10 days of the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy, e.g. no later than about 10 days, no later than about 9 days, no later than about 8 days, no later than about 7 days, no later than about 6 days, no later than about 5 days, no later than about 4 days, no later than about 3 days, no later than about 2 days, no later than about 1 day, or on the same day as the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy. In some embodiments, dasatinib and/or the composition as described herein can be administered within about 7 days of the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.

In some embodiments, the subject can be further administered an EGFR inhibitor, e.g. at the same time as the administration of the dasatinib and/or composition as described herein or at a different time.

As used herein, a “cytoxic chemotherapy” refers a substance that inhibits or prevents the function of cells and/or causes destruction of cells. Non-limiting examples of cytotoxic chemotherapies can include taxanes (e.g. paclitaxel (TAXOL™), cabazitaxel, and docetaxel); cytotoxic antibiotics such as anthracyclines (e.g. doxorubicin, daunorubicin, valrubicin, idarubicin, and epirubicin), actinomycin, bleomycin, plicamycin, and mitomycin; vinca alkaloids (e.g. vincristine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, and vindesine); and anti-tubulin chemotherapies. Cytotoxic chemotherapies can include toxins, such as small molecule toxins or enzymatically active toxins of bacterial, fungal, plant or animal origin, including fragments and/or variants thereof as well as radiation therapies.

As described herein, the inventors have characterized transiently tolerant cancer cells. The inventors have found that the phosphorylation levels of at least PRAS40, Src, and Hck, as well as the expression level of CD44 can vary between chemoresistant and chemosensitive cells. Accordingly, in one aspect, the technology described herein relates to a method of identifying a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell and/or a cell likely to develop tolerance to chemotherapy, the method comprising detecting, in a cancer cell, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PRAS40, Src and Hck wherein increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 indicates the cancer cell is a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell, and/or is likely to develop tolerance to chemotherapy. In some embodiments, the method can further comprise detecting the expression level of CD44, wherein increased expression of CD44 indicates the cancer cell is a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell and/or is likely to develop tolerance to chemotherapy.

In one aspect, described herein, is a method of treatment comprising detecting, in a cancer cell obtained from a subject, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PRAS40, Src and Hck; and administering a treatment as described above herein if increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 is detected. In some embodiments, the method further comprises detecting the expression level of CD44, wherein increased expression of CD44 indicates the subject is a candidate for treatment.

In one aspect, described herein, is a method of determining if a subject is in need of a treatment as described herein, the method comprising detecting, in a cancer cell obtained from the subject, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of PRAS40, Src and Hck; wherein if increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 is detected, the subject is in need of treatment as described herein. In some embodiments, the method further comprises detecting the expression level of CD44, wherein increased expression of CD44 indicates the subject is a candidate for treatment.

Detection of the level of phosphorylation of PRAS40, Src and/or Hck and/or the expression level of CD44 can be according to any method known in the art Immunological methods to detect protein levels and/or phosphorylated proteins in accordance with the present technology include, but are not limited to antibody techniques such as immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS), immunoblotting, radioimmunoassays, western blotting, immunoprecipitation, enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA), and derivative techniques that make use of antibody reagents as described herein. Antibody reagents specific for each of the markers described herein can be made by methods known to one of skill in the art or obtained commercially, e.g. anti-Hck(phosphoY411 (Cat. No. 61055; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.)), anti-Src(phosphoTyr527) (Cat. No. 2105; Cell Signaling Technology; Danvers, Mass.), anti-PRAS40(T246) (Cat. No. 5401-1; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.), and anti-CD44 (Cat. No. 1998-1; Abcam; Cambridge, Mass.).

Immunochemistry is a family of techniques based on the use of a specific antibody, wherein antibodies are used to specifically target molecules inside or on the surface of cells. In some embodiments, immunohistochemistry (“IHC”) and immunocytochemistry (“ICC”) techniques can be used to detect or measure the levels of platelet-adherent leukocytes. IHC is the application of immunochemistry to tissue sections, whereas ICC is the application of immunochemistry to cells or tissue imprints after they have undergone specific cytological preparations such as, for example, liquid-based preparations. In some instances, signal amplification may be integrated into the particular protocol, wherein a secondary antibody, that includes a label, follows the application of an antibody reagent specific for platelets or leukocytes. Typically, for immunohistochemistry, tissue obtained from a subject and fixed by a suitable fixing agent such as alcohol, acetone, and paraformaldehyde, is sectioned and reacted with an antibody. Conventional methods for immunohistochemistry are described in Buchwalow and Bocker (Eds) “Immunohistochemistry: Basics and Methods” Springer (2010): Lin and Prichard “Handbook of Practical Immunohistochemistry” Springer (2011); which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. In some embodiments, immunocytochemistry may be utilized where, in general, tissue or cells are obtained from a subject are fixed by a suitable fixing agent such as alcohol, acetone, and paraformaldehyde, to which is reacted an antibody. Methods of immunocytological staining of human samples is known to those of skill in the art and described, for example, in Burry. “Immunocytochemistry: A Practical Guide for Biomedical Research” Springer (2009); which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

In one embodiment, an assay, method, and/or system as described herein can comprise an ELISA. In an exemplary embodiment, a first antibody reagent can be immobilized on a solid support (usually a polystyrene micro titer plate). The solid support can be contacted with a sample obtained from a subject, and the antibody reagent will bind (“capture”) cells for which it is specific (e.g. phosphoisoforms of PRAS40, Src and/or Hck and/or CD44). The solid support can then be contacted with a second labeled antibody reagent (e.g. a detection antibody reagent). The detection antibody reagent can, e.g. comprise a detectable signal, be covalently linked to an enzyme, or can itself be detected by a secondary antibody which is linked to an enzyme through bio-conjugation. The presence of a signal indicates that both the first antibody reagent immobilized on the support and the second “detection” antibody reagent have bound to a cell, i.e. the presence of a signal indicates the presence of cell expressing a detectable level of a marker described herein. Between each step the plate is typically washed with a mild detergent solution to remove any proteins or antibodies that are not specifically bound. After the final wash step the plate is developed by adding an enzymatic substrate to produce a visible signal, which indicates the quantity of transiently tolerant cancer cell markers in the sample. Older ELISAs utilize chromogenic substrates, though newer assays employ fluorogenic substrates with much higher sensitivity. There are other different forms of ELISA, which are well known to those skilled in the art. The standard techniques known in the art for ELISA are described in “Methods in Immunodiagnosis”, 2nd Edition, Rose and Bigazzi, eds. John Wiley & Sons, 1980; Campbell et al., “Methods and Immunology”, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., 1964; and Oellerich, M. 1984, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 22:895-904. These references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

In one embodiment, the assays, systems, and methods described herein can comprise a lateral flow immunoassay test (LFIA), also known as the immunochromatographic assay, or strip test to measure or determine the level of phosphorylation of PRAS40, Src and/or Hck and/or the expression level of CD44 in a sample. LFIAs are a simple device intended to detect the presence (or absence) of a marker in a sample. There are currently many LFIA tests are used for medical diagnostics either for home testing, point of care testing, or laboratory use. LFIA tests are a form of immunoassay in which the test sample flows along a solid substrate via capillary action. After the sample is applied to the test it encounters a colored antibody reagent which mixes with the sample, and if bound to a portion of the sample, transits the substrate encountering lines or zones which have been pretreated with a second antibody reagent. Depending upon the level of maker present in the sample the colored antibody reagent can become bound at the test line or zone. LFIAs are essentially immunoassays adapted to operate along a single axis to suit the test strip format or a dipstick format. Strip tests are extremely versatile and can be easily modified by one skilled in the art for detecting an enormous range of antigens from fluid samples such as blood, water samples etc. Strip tests are also known as dip stick test, the name bearing from the literal action of “dipping” the test strip into a fluid sample to be tested. LFIA strip test are easy to use, require minimum training and can easily be included as components of point-of-care test (POCT) diagnostics to be use on site in the field. LFIA tests can be operated as either competitive or sandwich assays. Sandwich LFIAs are similar to sandwich ELISA. The sample first encounters colored particles which are labeled with antibody reagents specific for a target (e.g. a CD44-specific antibody reagent). The test line will also contain antibody reagents. The test line will show as a colored band in positive samples. In some embodiments, the lateral flow immunoassay can be a double antibody sandwich assay, a competitive assay, a quantitative assay or variations thereof. There are a number of variations on lateral flow technology. It is also possible to apply multiple capture zones to create a multiplex test.

A typical test strip consists of the following components: (1) sample application area comprising an absorbent pad (i. e. the matrix or material) onto which the test sample is applied; (2) conjugate or reagent pad—this contains antibody reagent(s) specific to the target which can be conjugated to colored particles (usually colloidal gold particles, or latex microspheres); (3) test results area comprising a reaction membrane—typically a hydrophobic nitrocellulose or cellulose acetate membrane onto which antibody reagents are immobilized in a line across the membrane as a capture zone or test line (a control zone may also be present, containing antibodies specific for the antibody reagents conjugated to the particles or microspheres); and (4) optional wick or waste reservoir—a further absorbent pad designed to draw the sample across the reaction membrane by capillary action and collect it. The components of the strip are usually fixed to an inert backing material and may be presented in a simple dipstick format or within a plastic casing with a sample port and reaction window showing the capture and control zones. While not strictly necessary, most tests will incorporate a second line which contains an antibody that picks up free latex/gold in order to confirm the test has operated correctly.

The use of “dip sticks” or LFIA test strips and other solid supports have been described in the art in the context of an immunoassay for a number of antigen biomarkers. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,943,522; 6,485,982; 6,187,598; 5,770,460; 5,622,871; 6,565,808, U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/278,676; U.S. Ser. No. 09/579,673 and U.S. Ser. No. 10/717,082, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, are non-limiting examples of such lateral flow test devices. Three U.S. patents (U.S. Pat. No. 4,444,880, issued to H. Tom; U.S. Pat. No. 4,305,924, issued to R. N. Piasio; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,135,884, issued to J. T. Shen) describe the use of “dip stick” technology to detect soluble antigens via immunochemical assays. The apparatuses and methods of these three patents broadly describe a first component fixed to a solid surface on a “dip stick” which is exposed to a solution containing a soluble antigen that binds to the component fixed upon the “dip stick,” prior to detection of the component-antigen complex upon the stick. It is within the skill of one in the art to modify the teaching of these “dip stick” technology for the detection of the level of phosphorylation of PRAS40, Src and/or Hck and/or the expression level of CD44.

In some embodiments, detection of phosphorylation of PRAS40, Src and/or Hck and/or the expression level of CD44 can be performed using flow cytometry. In some embodiments, detection of phosphorylation of PRAS40, Src and/or Hck and/or the expression level of CD44 can be performed using immunocytological methods, e.g. FACS.

Flow cytometry is a well-known technique for analyzing and sorting cells (or other small particles) suspended in a fluid stream. This technique allows simultaneous analysis of the physical and/or chemical characteristics of single cells flowing through an optical, electronic, or magnetic detection apparatus. As applied to FACS, the flow cytometer consists of a flow cell which carries the cells in a fluid stream in single file through a light source with excites the fluorescently labeled detection marker(s) (for example, antibody reagents) and measures the fluorescent character of the cell. The fluid stream is then ejected through a nozzle and a charging ring, under pressure, which breaks the fluid into droplets. The flow cell device and fluid stream is calibrated such that there is a relatively large distance between individual cells, resulting in a low probability that any droplet contains more than a single cell or bound group of cells. The charging ring charges the droplets based on the fluorescence characteristic of the cell which is contained therein. The charged droplets are then deflected by an electrostatically-charged deflection system which diverts the droplets into various containers based upon their charge (related to the fluorescence intensity of the cell). A FACS system (e.g. the FACSARIA™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and FLOWJO™ Version 7.6.4 (TreeStar)) can detect and record the number of total cells as well as the number of cells which display one or more fluorescent characteristics, e.g. (a) the total number of cells in a sample and (b) the number of cells with an antibody reagent specifically bound to them. In some embodiments, the level of transiently tolerant cancer cells and/or cells likely to become chemoresistant can be determined using high-throughput FACS (see, e.g. US Patent Publication 2009/0239235 describing a technology commercially available as FACSCANTO™ from BD Biosciences and which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety).

In some embodiments, one or more of the antibody reagents described herein can comprise a detectable label and/or comprise the ability to generate a detectable signal (e.g. by catalyzing reaction converting a compound to a detectable product). Detectable labels can comprise, for example, a light-absorbing dye, a fluorescent dye, or a radioactive label. Detectable labels, methods of detecting them, and methods of incorporating them into an antibody reagent are well known in the art.

In some embodiments, detectable labels can include labels that can be detected by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electromagnetic, radiochemical, or chemical means, such as fluorescence, chemifluoresence, or chemiluminescence, or any other appropriate means. The detectable labels used in the methods described herein can be primary labels (where the label comprises a moiety that is directly detectable or that produces a directly detectable moiety) or secondary labels (where the detectable label binds to another moiety to produce a detectable signal, e.g., as is common in immunological labeling using secondary and tertiary antibodies). The detectable label can be linked by covalent or non-covalent means to the antibody reagent. Alternatively, a detectable label can be linked such as by directly labeling a molecule that achieves binding, to the antibody reagent via a ligand-receptor binding pair arrangement or other such specific recognition molecules. Detectable labels can include, but are not limited to radioisotopes, bioluminescent compounds, chromophores, antibodies, chemiluminescent compounds, fluorescent compounds, metal chelates, and enzymes.

In other embodiments, the detection antibody is label with a fluorescent compound. When the fluorescently labeled antibody is exposed to light of the proper wavelength, its presence can then be detected due to fluorescence. In some embodiments, a detectable label can be a fluorescent dye molecule, or fluorophore including, but not limited to fluorescein, phycoerythrin, phycocyanin, o-phthaldehyde, fluorescamine, Cy3™, Cy5™, allophycocyanine, Texas Red, peridenin chlorophyll, cyanine, tandem conjugates such as phycoerythrin-Cy5™, green fluorescent protein, rhodamine, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and Oregon Green™, rhodamine and derivatives (e.g., Texas red and tetrarhodimine isothiocynate (TRITC)), biotin, phycoerythrin, AMCA. CyDyes™, 6-carboxyfhiorescein (commonly known by the abbreviations FAM and F), 6-carboxy-2′,4′,7′,4,7-hexachlorofluorescein (HEX), 6-carboxy-4′,5′-dichloro-2′,7′-dimethoxyfluorescein (JOE or J), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-6carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA or T), 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX or R), 5-carboxyrhodamine-6G (R6G5 or G5), 6-carboxyrhodamine-6G (R6G6 or G6), and rhodamine 110; cyanine dyes, e.g. Cy3, Cy5 and Cy7 dyes; coumarins, e.g. umbelliferone, benzimide dyes, e.g. Hoechst 33258: phenanthridine dyes, e.g. Texas Red; ethidium dyes; acridine dyes; carbazole dyes; phenoxazine dyes: porphyrin dyes; polymethine dyes, e.g. cyanine dyes such as Cy3, Cy5, etc; BODIPY dyes and quinoline dyes.

In some embodiments, a detectable label can be a radiolabel including, but not limited to 3H, 125I, 35S, 14C, 32P, and 33P.

In some embodiments, a detectable label can be an enzyme including, but not limited to horseradish peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase. An enzymatic label can produce, for example, a chemiluminescent signal, a color signal, or a fluorescent signal. Enzymes contemplated for use to detectably label an antibody reagent include, but are not limited to, malate dehydrogenase, staphylococcal nuclease, delta-V-steroid isomerase, yeast alcohol dehydrogenase, alpha-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase, triose phosphate isomerase, horseradish peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, asparaginase, glucose oxidase, beta-galactosidase, ribonuclease, urease, catalase, glucose-VI-phosphate dehydrogenase, glucoamylase and acetylcholinesterase.

In some embodiments, a detectable label is a chemiluminescent label, including, but not limited to lucigenin, luminol, luciferin, isoluminol, theromatic acridinium ester, imidazole, acridinium salt and oxalate ester.

In some embodiments, a detectable label can be a spectral colorimetric label including, but not limited to colloidal gold or colored glass or plastic (e.g., polystyrene. polypropylene, and latex) beads.

In some embodiments, antibodies can also be labeled with a detectable tag, such as c-Myc, HA, VSV-G, HSV, FLAG, V5, HIS, or biotin. Other detection systems can also be used, for example, a biotin-streptavidin system. In this system, the antibodies immunoreactive (i. e. specific for) with the biomarker of interest is biotinylated. Quantity of biotinylated antibody bound to the biomarker is determined using a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate and a chromagenic substrate. Such streptavidin peroxidase detection kits are commercially available, e. g. from DAKO; Carpinteria, Calif.

An antibody reagent can also be detectably labeled using fluorescence emitting metals such as 152Eu, or others of the lanthanide series. These metals can be attached to the antibody reagent using such metal chelating groups as diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).

In some embodiments, the level of CD44 can be detected by detecting the level of mRNA encoding CD44. Such molecules can be isolated, derived, or amplified from a biological sample, such as a biopsy or blood sample. Assays for detecting mRNA transcripts are well known in the art and include, but are not limited to, PCR procedures, RT-PCR, Northern blot analysis, RNAse protection assay, microarray analysis, hybridization methods etc. In some embodiments, mRNA transcript expression product levels are assayed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

The nucleic acid sequences of, e.g. CD44 have been assigned NCBI accession numbers for different species such as human, mouse and rat. In particular, the NCBI accession number for the nucleic acid sequences of the human CD44 expression product is included herein. Accordingly, a skilled artisan can design appropriate primers based on the known sequence for determining the mRNA level of CD44. In some embodiments, the RNA transcript level can be measured using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Nucleic acid and ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules can be isolated from a particular biological sample using any of a number of procedures, which are well-known in the art, the particular isolation procedure chosen being appropriate for the particular biological sample. For example, freeze-thaw and alkaline lysis procedures can be useful for obtaining nucleic acid molecules from solid materials; and proteinase K extraction can be used to obtain nucleic acid from blood (Roiff, A et al. PCR: Clinical Diagnostics and Research, Springer (1994)).

In general, the PCR procedure describes a method of gene amplification which is comprised of (i) sequence-specific hybridization of primers to specific genes or sequences within a nucleic acid sample or library, (ii) subsequent amplification involving multiple rounds of annealing, elongation, and denaturation using a thermostable DNA polymerase, and (iii) screening the PCR products for a band of the correct size. The primers used are oligonucleotides of sufficient length and appropriate sequence to provide initiation of polymerization, i.e. each primer is specifically designed to be complementary to a strand of the genomic locus to be amplified. In an alternative embodiment, mRNA level of gene expression products described herein can be determined by reverse-transcription (RT) PCR and by quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) or real-time PCR methods. Methods of RT-PCR and QRT-PCR are well known in the art.

In some embodiments, the methods described herein relate to treating a subject having or diagnosed as having cancer. Subjects having, e.g. cancer can be identified by a physician using current methods of diagnosing cancer. Symptoms and/or complications of cancer which characterize these conditions and aid in diagnosis are well known in the art and include but are not limited to, growth of a tumor, impaired function of the organ or tissue harboring cancer cells, etc. Tests that may aid in a diagnosis of, e.g. cancer include, but are not limited to, tissue biopsies and histological examination. A family history of cancer or exposure to risk factors for cancer (e.g. smoking or radiation) can also aid in determining if a subject is likely to have cancer or in making a diagnosis of cancer.

The compositions and methods described herein can be administered to a subject having or diagnosed as having cancer. In some embodiments, the methods described herein comprise administering an effective amount of compositions described herein to a subject in order to alleviate a symptom of a cancer. As used herein, “alleviating a symptom of a cancer” is ameliorating any condition or symptom associated with the cancer. As compared with an equivalent untreated control, such reduction is by at least 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% or more as measured by any standard technique. A variety of means for administering the compositions described herein to subjects are known to those of skill in the art. Such methods can include, but are not limited to oral, parenteral, intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous, transdermal, airway (aerosol), pulmonary, cutaneous, topical, injection, or intratumoral administration. Administration can be local or systemic.

The term “effective amount” as used herein refers to the amount of a composition needed to alleviate at least one or more symptom of the disease or disorder, and relates to a sufficient amount of pharmacological composition to provide the desired effect. The term “therapeutically effective amount” therefore refers to an amount of a composition that is sufficient to provide a particular anti-tumor effect when administered to a typical subject. An effective amount as used herein, in various contexts, would also include an amount sufficient to delay the development of a symptom of the disease, alter the course of a symptom disease (for example but not limited to, slowing the progression of a symptom of the disease), or reverse a symptom of the disease. Thus, it is not generally practicable to specify an exact “effective amount”. However, for any given case, an appropriate “effective amount” can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art using only routine experimentation.

Effective amounts, toxicity, and therapeutic efficacy can be determined by standard pharmaceutical procedures in cell cultures or experimental animals, e.g., for determining the LD50 (the dose lethal to 50% of the population) and the ED50 (the dose therapeutically effective in 50% of the population). The dosage can vary depending upon the dosage form employed and the route of administration utilized. The dose ratio between toxic and therapeutic effects is the therapeutic index and can be expressed as the ratio LD50/ED50. Compositions and methods that exhibit large therapeutic indices are preferred. A therapeutically effective dose can be estimated initially from cell culture assays. Also, a dose can be formulated in animal models to achieve a circulating plasma concentration range that includes the IC50 (i.e., the concentration of a composition described herein, which achieves a half-maximal inhibition of symptoms) as determined in cell culture, or in an appropriate animal model. Levels in plasma can be measured, for example, by high performance liquid chromatography. The effects of any particular dosage can be monitored by a suitable bioassay, e.g., assay for the presence of chemoresistant cells and/or tumor size, among others. The dosage can be determined by a physician and adjusted, as necessary, to suit observed effects of the treatment.

In some embodiments, the dosage of an inhibitor as described herein (e.g. a kinase inhibitor or EGFR inhibitor) is less than a cytotoxic dose of that inhibitor. In some embodiments, the dosage of an inhibitor as described herein is 50% or less of a cytotoxic dose of that inhibitor, e.g. 50% or less, 40% or less, 30% or less, 20% or less, or 10% or less. In some embodiments, the dosage of an inhibitor as described herein is 40% or less of a cytotoxic dose of that inhibitor. In some embodiments, the dosage of an inhibitor as described herein is 30% or less of a cytotoxic dose of that inhibitor. In some embodiments, the dosage of an inhibitor as described herein is 20% or less of a cytotoxic dose of that inhibitor. In some embodiments, the dosage of an inhibitor as described herein is 10% or less of a cytotoxic dose of that inhibitor.

In some embodiments, the technology described herein relates to a composition as described herein, and optionally a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and diluents include saline, aqueous buffer solutions, solvents and/or dispersion media. The use of such carriers and diluents is well known in the art. Some non-limiting examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers include: (1) sugars, such as lactose, glucose and sucrose; (2) starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; (3) cellulose, and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose acetate; (4) powdered tragacanth; (5) malt; (6) gelatin; (7) lubricating agents, such as magnesium stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate and talc; (8) excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; (9) oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; (10) glycols, such as propylene glycol; (11) polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG); (12) esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; (13) agar; (14) buffering agents, such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; (15) alginic acid; (16) pyrogen-free water; (17) isotonic saline; (18) Ringer's solution; (19) ethyl alcohol; (20) pH buffered solutions; (21) polyesters, polycarbonates and/or polyanhydrides; (22) bulking agents, such as polypeptides and amino acids (23) serum component, such as serum albumin, HDL and LDL; (22) C2-C12 alcohols, such as ethanol; and (23) other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations. Wetting agents, coloring agents, release agents, coating agents, sweetening agents, flavoring agents, perfuming agents, preservative and antioxidants can also be present in the formulation. The terms such as “excipient”, “carrier”, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” or the like are used interchangeably herein. In some embodiments, the carrier inhibits the degradation of the active agent, e.g. a composition as described herein.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition as described herein can be a parenteral dose form. Since administration of parenteral dosage forms typically bypasses the patient's natural defenses against contaminants, parenteral dosage forms are preferably sterile or capable of being sterilized prior to administration to a patient. Examples of parenteral dosage forms include, but are not limited to, solutions ready for injection, dry products ready to be dissolved or suspended in a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle for injection, suspensions ready for injection, and emulsions. In addition, controlled-release parenteral dosage forms can be prepared for administration of a patient, including, but not limited to, DUROS®-type dosage forms and dose-dumping.

Suitable vehicles that can be used to provide parenteral dosage forms are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples include, without limitation: sterile water; water for injection USP; saline solution; glucose solution; aqueous vehicles such as but not limited to, sodium chloride injection, Ringer's injection, dextrose Injection, dextrose and sodium chloride injection, and lactated Ringer's injection; water-miscible vehicles such as, but not limited to, ethyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, and propylene glycol; and non-aqueous vehicles such as, but not limited to, corn oil, cottonseed oil, peanut oil, sesame oil, ethyl oleate, isopropyl myristate, and benzyl benzoate. Compounds that alter or modify the solubility of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a composition as disclosed herein can also be incorporated into the parenteral dosage forms of the disclosure, including conventional and controlled-release parenteral dosage forms.

Pharmaceutical compositions can also be formulated to be suitable for oral administration, for example as discrete dosage forms, such as, but not limited to, tablets (including without limitation scored or coated tablets), pills, caplets, capsules, chewable tablets, powder packets, cachets, troches, wafers, aerosol sprays, or liquids, such as but not limited to, syrups, elixirs, solutions or suspensions in an aqueous liquid, a non-aqueous liquid, an oil-in-water emulsion, or a water-in-oil emulsion. Such compositions contain a predetermined amount of the pharmaceutically acceptable salt of the disclosed compounds, and may be prepared by methods of pharmacy well known to those skilled in the art. See generally, Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 21st Ed., Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia Pa. (2005).

Conventional dosage forms generally provide rapid or immediate drug release from the formulation. Depending on the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of the drug, use of conventional dosage forms can lead to wide fluctuations in the concentrations of the drug in a patient's blood and other tissues. These fluctuations can impact a number of parameters, such as dose frequency, onset of action, duration of efficacy, maintenance of therapeutic blood levels, toxicity, side effects, and the like. Advantageously, controlled-release formulations can be used to control a drug's onset of action, duration of action, plasma levels within the therapeutic window, and peak blood levels. In particular, controlled- or extended-release dosage forms or formulations can be used to ensure that the maximum effectiveness of a drug is achieved while minimizing potential adverse effects and safety concerns, which can occur both from under-dosing a drug (i.e., going below the minimum therapeutic levels) as well as exceeding the toxicity level for the drug. In some embodiments, the composition can be administered in a sustained release formulation.

Controlled-release pharmaceutical products have a common goal of improving drug therapy over that achieved by their non-controlled release counterparts. Ideally, the use of an optimally designed controlled-release preparation in medical treatment is characterized by a minimum of drug substance being employed to cure or control the condition in a minimum amount of time. Advantages of controlled-release formulations include: 1) extended activity of the drug; 2) reduced dosage frequency; 3) increased patient compliance; 4) usage of less total drug; 5) reduction in local or systemic side effects; 6) minimization of drug accumulation; 7) reduction in blood level fluctuations; 8) improvement in efficacy of treatment; 9) reduction of potentiation or loss of drug activity; and 10) improvement in speed of control of diseases or conditions. Kim, Cherng-ju, Controlled Release Dosage Form Design, 2 (Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, Pa.: 2000).

Most controlled-release formulations are designed to initially release an amount of drug (active ingredient) that promptly produces the desired therapeutic effect, and gradually and continually release other amounts of drug to maintain this level of therapeutic or prophylactic effect over an extended period of time. In order to maintain this constant level of drug in the body, the drug must be released from the dosage form at a rate that will replace the amount of drug being metabolized and excreted from the body. Controlled-release of an active ingredient can be stimulated by various conditions including, but not limited to, pH, ionic strength, osmotic pressure, temperature, enzymes, water, and other physiological conditions or compounds.

A variety of known controlled- or extended-release dosage forms, formulations, and devices can be adapted for use with the salts and compositions of the disclosure. Examples include, but are not limited to, those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,845,770; 3,916,899; 3,536,809; 3,598,123; 4,008,719; 5,674,533; 5,059,595; 5,591,767; 5,120,548; 5,073,543; 5,639,476; 5,354,556; 5,733,566; and 6,365,185 B1; each of which is incorporated herein by reference. These dosage forms can be used to provide slow or controlled-release of one or more active ingredients using, for example, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, other polymer matrices, gels, permeable membranes, osmotic systems (such as OROS® (Alza Corporation, Mountain View, Calif. USA)), or a combination thereof to provide the desired release profile in varying proportions.

The methods described herein can further comprise administering an additional agent and/or treatment to the subject, e.g. as part of a combinatorial therapy. Non-limiting examples of an additional agent and/or treatment can include radiation therapy, surgery, gemcitabine, cisplastin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, bortezomib, AMG479, vorinostat, rituximab, temozolomide, rapamycin, ABT-737, PI-103; alkylating agents such as thiotepa and CYTOXAN® cyclosphosphamide; alkyl sulfonates such as busulfan, improsulfan and piposulfan; aziridines such as benzodopa, carboquone, meturedopa, and uredopa; ethylenimines and methylamelamines including altretamine, triethylenemelamine, trietylenephosphoramide, triethiylenethiophosphoramide and trimethylolomelamine; acetogenins (especially bullatacin and bullatacinone); a camptothecin (including the synthetic analogue topotecan); bryostatin; callystatin; CC-1065 (including its adozelesin, carzelesin and bizelesin synthetic analogues); cryptophycins (particularly cryptophycin 1 and cryptophycin 8); dolastatin; duocarmycin (including the synthetic analogues, KW-2189 and CB1-TM1); eleutherobin; pancratistatin; a sarcodictyin; spongistatin; nitrogen mustards such as chlorambucil, chlornaphazine, cholophosphamide, estramustine, ifosfamide, mechlorethamine, mechlorethamine oxide hydrochloride, melphalan, novembichin, phenesterine, prednimustine, trofosfamide, uracil mustard; nitrosureas such as carmustine, chlorozotocin, fotemustine, lomustine, nimustine, and ranimnustine; antibiotics such as the enediyne antibiotics (e.g., calicheamicin, especially calicheamicin gamma1 I and calicheamicin omegall (see, e.g., Agnew, Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl., 33: 183-186 (1994)); dynemicin, including dynemicin A; bisphosphonates, such as clodronate; an esperamicin; as well as neocarzinostatin chromophore and related chromoprotein enediyne antiobiotic chromophores), aclacinomysins, actinomycin, authramycin, azaserine, bleomycins, cactinomycin, carabicin, caminomycin, carzinophilin, chromomycinis, dactinomycin, daunorubicin, detorubicin, 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine, ADRIAMYCIN@ doxorubicin (including morpholino-doxorubicin, cyanomorpholino-doxorubicin, 2-pyrrolino-doxorubicin and deoxydoxorubicin), epirubicin, esorubicin, idarubicin, marcellomycin, mitomycins such as mitomycin C, mycophenolic acid, nogalamycin, olivomycins, peplomycin, potfiromycin, puromycin, quelamycin, rodorubicin, streptonigrin, streptozocin, tubercidin, ubenimex, zinostatin, zorubicin; anti-metabolites such as methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); folic acid analogues such as denopterin, methotrexate, pteropterin, trimetrexate; purine analogs such as fludarabine, 6-mercaptopurine, thiamiprine, thioguanine; pyrimidine analogs such as ancitabine, azacitidine, 6-azauridine, carmofur, cytarabine, dideoxyuridine, doxifluridine, enocitabine, floxuridine; androgens such as calusterone, dromostanolone propionate, epitiostanol, mepitiostane, testolactone; anti-adrenals such as aminoglutethimide, mitotane, trilostane; folic acid replenisher such as frolinic acid; aceglatone; aldophosphamide glycoside; aminolevulinic acid; eniluracil; amsacrine; bestrabucil; bisantrene; edatraxate; defofamine; demecolcine; diaziquone; elformithine; elliptinium acetate; an epothilone; etoglucid; gallium nitrate; hydroxyurea; lentinan; lonidainine; maytansinoids such as maytansine and ansamitocins; mitoguazone; mitoxantrone; mopidanmol; nitraerine; pentostatin; phenamet; pirarubicin; losoxantrone; podophyllinic acid; 2-ethylhydrazide; procarbazine; PSK® polysaccharide complex (JHS Natural Products, Eugene, Oreg.); razoxane; rhizoxin; sizofuran; spirogermanium; tenuazonic acid; triaziquone; 2,2′,2″-trichlorotriethylamine; trichothecenes (especially T-2 toxin, verracurin A, roridin A and anguidine); urethan; vindesine; dacarbazine; mannomustine; mitobronitol; mitolactol; pipobroman; gacytosine; arabinoside (“Ara-C”); cyclophosphamide; thiotepa; taxoids, e.g., TAXOL® paclitaxel (Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, N.J.), ABRAXANE® Cremophor-free, albumin-engineered nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel (American Pharmaceutical Partners, Schaumberg, Ill.), and TAXOTERE® doxetaxel (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France); chloranbucil; GEMZAR® gemcitabine; 6-thioguanine; mercaptopurine; methotrexate; platinum analogs such as cisplatin, oxaliplatin and carboplatin; vinblastine; platinum; etoposide (VP-16); ifosfamide; mitoxantrone; vincristine; NAVELBINE™ vinorelbine; novantrone; teniposide; edatrexate; daunomycin; aminopterin; xeloda; ibandronate; irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) (including the treatment regimen of irinotecan with 5-FU and leucovorin); topoisomerase inhibitor RFS 2000; difluoromethylornithine (DMFO); retinoids such as retinoic acid; capecitabine; combretastatin; leucovorin (LV); oxaliplatin, including the oxaliplatin treatment regimen (FOLFOX); lapatinib (Tykerb™); inhibitors of PKC-alpha, Raf, H-Ras, EGFR (e.g., erlotinib (Tarceva®)) and VEGF-A that reduce cell proliferation and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, acids or derivatives of any of the above. In addition, the methods of treatment can further include the use of radiation or radiation therapy. Further, the methods of treatment can further include the use of surgical treatments.

In certain embodiments, an effective dose of a composition as described herein can be administered to a patient once. In certain embodiments, an effective dose of a composition can be administered to a patient repeatedly. For systemic administration, subjects can be administered a therapeutic amount of a composition, such as, e.g. 0.1 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, or more.

In some embodiments, after an initial treatment regimen, the treatments can be administered on a less frequent basis. For example, after treatment biweekly for three months, treatment can be repeated once per month, for six months or a year or longer. Treatment according to the methods described herein can reduce levels of a marker or symptom of a condition, e.g. tumor size and/or rate of growth by at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80% or at least 90% or more.

The dosage of a composition as described herein can be determined by a physician and adjusted, as necessary, to suit observed effects of the treatment. With respect to duration and frequency of treatment, it is typical for skilled clinicians to monitor subjects in order to determine when the treatment is providing therapeutic benefit, and to determine whether to increase or decrease dosage, increase or decrease administration frequency, discontinue treatment, resume treatment, or make other alterations to the treatment regimen. The dosing schedule can vary from once a week to daily depending on a number of clinical factors, such as the subject's sensitivity to a composition. The desired dose or amount of activation can be administered at one time or divided into subdoses, e.g., 2-4 subdoses and administered over a period of time, e.g., at appropriate intervals through the day or other appropriate schedule. In some embodiments, administration can be chronic, e.g., one or more doses and/or treatments daily over a period of weeks or months. Examples of dosing and/or treatment schedules are administration daily, twice daily, three times daily or four or more times daily over a period of 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, or 6 months, or more. A composition can be administered over a period of time, such as over a 5 minute, 10 minute, 15 minute, 20 minute, or 25 minute period.

The dosage ranges for the administration of a composition as described herein, according to the methods described herein depend upon, for example, the form of a composition, its potency, and the extent to which symptoms, markers, or indicators of a condition described herein are desired to be reduced, for example the percentage reduction desired for, e.g. tumor size and/or rate of growth. The dosage should not be so large as to cause adverse side effects. Generally, the dosage will vary with the age, condition, and sex of the patient and can be determined by one of skill in the art. The dosage can also be adjusted by the individual physician in the event of any complication.

The efficacy of a composition in, e.g. the treatment of a condition described herein, or to induce a response as described herein (e.g. reduction in tumor size) can be determined by the skilled clinician. However, a treatment is considered “effective treatment,” as the term is used herein, if one or more of the signs or symptoms of a condition described herein are altered in a beneficial manner, other clinically accepted symptoms are improved, or even ameliorated, or a desired response is induced e.g., by at least 10% following treatment according to the methods described herein. Efficacy can be assessed, for example, by measuring a marker, indicator, symptom, and/or the incidence of a condition treated according to the methods described herein or any other measurable parameter appropriate, e.g. tumor size. Efficacy can also be measured by a failure of an individual to worsen as assessed by hospitalization, or need for medical interventions (i.e., progression of the disease is halted). Methods of measuring these indicators are known to those of skill in the art and/or are described herein. Treatment includes any treatment of a disease in an individual or an animal (some non-limiting examples include a human or an animal) and includes: (1) inhibiting the disease, e.g., preventing a worsening of symptoms (e.g. pain or inflammation); or (2) relieving the severity of the disease, e.g., causing regression of symptoms. An effective amount for the treatment of a disease means that amount which, when administered to a subject in need thereof, is sufficient to result in effective treatment as that term is defined herein, for that disease. Efficacy of an agent can be determined by assessing physical indicators of a condition or desired response, (e.g. tumor size). It is well within the ability of one skilled in the art to monitor efficacy of administration and/or treatment by measuring any one of such parameters, or any combination of parameters. Efficacy can be assessed in animal models of a condition described herein, for example treatment of cancer. When using an experimental animal model, efficacy of treatment is evidenced when a statistically significant change in a marker is observed, e.g. tumor size.

In vitro and animal model assays are provided herein which allow the assessment of a given dose of a composition. By way of non-limiting example, the effects of a dose of a composition as described herein can be assessed by determining cell viability. A non-limiting example of a protocol for such an assay is as follows: Cells (e.g. tumor cells) can be grown to semi-confluence and treated with a chemotherapeutic (e.g. cytotoxic) agent and/or the compositions described herein in serum containing medium. Following incubation, cells can be washed and recovered in serum and phenol red-free RPMI or DMEM and treated with MTS ONE solution (Promega) as described previously (Chaudhuri et al., 2009).

The efficacy of a given dosage combination can also be assessed in an animal model, e.g. a mouse model of cancer. For example, MDA-MB-231 cells suspended in 100 μL PBS can be injected into the flank of 5-6 week old Nu/Nu Crl:NU-Foxn1nu nude mice. Once tumors became palpable, day 0 (approximately 3 weeks after implant) a chemotherapeutic (e.g. cytotoxic) agent and/or the compositions described herein can be administered, e.g. intraperitoneally. Tumors can be harvested, e.g. on day 6 and tumor volume determined.

For convenience, the meaning of some terms and phrases used in the specification, examples, and appended claims, are provided below. Unless stated otherwise, or implicit from context, the following terms and phrases include the meanings provided below. The definitions are provided to aid in describing particular embodiments, and are not intended to limit the claimed invention, because the scope of the invention is limited only by the claims. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. If there is an apparent discrepancy between the usage of a term in the art and its definition provided herein, the definition provided within the specification shall prevail.

For convenience, certain terms employed herein, in the specification, examples and appended claims are collected here.

The terms “decrease”, “reduced”, “reduction”, or “inhibit” are all used herein to mean a decrease by a statistically significant amount. In some embodiments, “reduce,” “reduction” or “decrease” or “inhibit” typically means a decrease by at least 10% as compared to a reference level (e.g. the absence of a given treatment) and can include, for example, a decrease by at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more. As used herein, “reduction” or “inhibition” does not encompass a complete inhibition or reduction as compared to a reference level. “Complete inhibition” is a 100% inhibition as compared to a reference level. A decrease can be preferably down to a level accepted as within the range of normal for an individual without a given disorder.

The terms “increased”, “increase”, “enhance”, or “activate” are all used herein to mean an increase by a statically significant amount. In some embodiments, the terms “increased”, “increase”, “enhance”, or “activate” can mean an increase of at least 10% as compared to a reference level, for example an increase of at least about 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 90% or up to and including a 100% increase or any increase between 10-100% as compared to a reference level, or at least about a 2-fold, or at least about a 3-fold, or at least about a 4-fold, or at least about a 5-fold or at least about a 10-fold increase, or any increase between 2-fold and 10-fold or greater as compared to a reference level. In the context of a marker or symptom, a “increase” is a statistically significant increase in such level.

As used herein, a “subject” means a human or animal. Usually the animal is a vertebrate such as a primate, rodent, domestic animal or game animal. Primates include chimpanzees, cynomologous monkeys, spider monkeys, and macaques, e.g., Rhesus. Rodents include mice, rats, woodchucks, ferrets, rabbits and hamsters. Domestic and game animals include cows, horses, pigs, deer, bison, buffalo, feline species, e.g., domestic cat, canine species, e.g., dog, fox, wolf, avian species, e.g., chicken, emu, ostrich, and fish, e.g., trout, catfish and salmon. In some embodiments, the subject is a mammal, e.g., a primate, e.g., a human. The terms, “individual,” “patient” and “subject” are used interchangeably herein.

Preferably, the subject is a mammal. The mammal can be a human, non-human primate, mouse, rat, dog, cat, horse, or cow, but is not limited to these examples. Mammals other than humans can be advantageously used as subjects that represent animal models of cancer. A subject can be male or female.

A subject can be one who has been previously diagnosed with or identified as suffering from or having a condition in need of treatment (e.g. cancer) or one or more complications related to such a condition, and optionally, have already undergone treatment for cancer or the one or more complications related to cancer. Alternatively, a subject can also be one who has not been previously diagnosed as having cancer or one or more complications related to cancer. For example, a subject can be one who exhibits one or more risk factors for cancer or one or more complications related to cancer or a subject who does not exhibit risk factors.

A “subject in need” of treatment for a particular condition can be a subject having that condition, diagnosed as having that condition, or at risk of developing that condition.

As used herein, the terms “protein” and “polypeptide” are used interchangeably herein to designate a series of amino acid residues, connected to each other by peptide bonds between the alpha-amino and carboxy groups of adjacent residues. The terms “protein”, and “polypeptide” refer to a polymer of amino acids, including modified amino acids (e.g., phosphorylated, glycated, glycosylated, etc.) and amino acid analogs, regardless of its size or function. “Protein” and “polypeptide” are often used in reference to relatively large polypeptides, whereas the term “peptide” is often used in reference to small polypeptides, but usage of these terms in the art overlaps. The terms “protein” and “polypeptide” are used interchangeably herein when referring to a gene product and fragments thereof. Thus, exemplary polypeptides or proteins include gene products, naturally occurring proteins, homologs, orthologs, paralogs, fragments and other equivalents, variants, fragments, and analogs of the foregoing.

As used herein an “antibody” refers to IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD or IgE molecules or antigen-specific antibody fragments thereof (including, but not limited to, a Fab, F(ab′)2, Fv, disulphide linked Fv, scFv, single domain antibody, closed conformation multispecific antibody, disulphide-linked scfv, diabody), whether derived from any species that naturally produces an antibody, or created by recombinant DNA technology; whether isolated from serum, B-cells, hybridomas, transfectomas, yeast or bacteria.

As used herein, the term “antibody reagent” refers to a polypeptide that includes at least one immunoglobulin variable domain or immunoglobulin variable domain sequence and which specifically binds a given antigen. An antibody reagent can comprise an antibody or a polypeptide comprising an antigen-binding domain of an antibody. In some embodiments, an antibody reagent can comprise a monoclonal antibody or a polypeptide comprising an antigen-binding domain of a monoclonal antibody. For example, an antibody can include a heavy (H) chain variable region (abbreviated herein as VH), and a light (L) chain variable region (abbreviated herein as VL). In another example, an antibody includes two heavy (H) chain variable regions and two light (L) chain variable regions. The term “antibody reagent” encompasses antigen-binding fragments of antibodies (e.g., single chain antibodies, Fab and sFab fragments, F(ab′)2, Fd fragments, Fv fragments, scFv, and domain antibodies (dAb) fragments (see, e.g. de Wildt et al., Eur J. Immunol 1996; 26(3):629-39; which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety)) as well as complete antibodies. An antibody can have the structural features of IgA, IgG, IgE, IgD, IgM (as well as subtypes and combinations thereof). Antibodies can be from any source, including mouse, rabbit, pig, rat, and primate (human and non-human primate) and primatized antibodies. Antibodies also include midibodies, humanized antibodies, chimeric antibodies, and the like.

The VH and VL regions can be further subdivided into regions of hypervariability, termed “complementarity determining regions” (“CDR”), interspersed with regions that are more conserved, termed “framework regions” (“FR”). The extent of the framework region and CDRs has been precisely defined (see, Kabat, E. A., et al. (1991) Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, Fifth Edition, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH Publication No. 91-3242, and Chothia, C. et al. (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 196:901-917; which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties). Each VH and VL is typically composed of three CDRs and four FRs, arranged from amino-terminus to carboxy-terminus in the following order: FR1, CDR1, FR2, CDR2, FR3, CDR3, FR4.

The terms “antigen-binding fragment” or “antigen-binding domain”, which are used interchangeably herein are used to refer to one or more fragments of a full length antibody that retain the ability to specifically bind to a target of interest. Examples of binding fragments encompassed within the term “antigen-binding fragment” of a full length antibody include (i) a Fab fragment, a monovalent fragment consisting of the VL, VH, CL and CH1 domains; (ii) a F(ab′)2 fragment, a bivalent fragment including two Fab fragments linked by a disulfide bridge at the hinge region; (iii) an Fd fragment consisting of the VH and CH1 domains; (iv) an Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single arm of an antibody, (v) a dAb fragment (Ward et al., (1989) Nature 341:544-546; which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety), which consists of a VH or VL domain; and (vi) an isolated complementarity determining region (CDR) that retains specific antigen-binding functionality. Furthermore, although the two domains of the Fv fragment, VL and VH, are coded for by separate genes, they can be joined, using recombinant methods, by a synthetic linker that enables them to be made as a single protein chain in which the VL and VH regions pair to form monovalent molecules known as single chain Fv (scFv). See e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,260,203, 4,946,778, and 4,881,175; Bird et al. (1988) Science 242:423-426; and Huston et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879-5883. Antibody fragments can be obtained using any appropriate technique including conventional techniques known to those of skill in the art. The term “monospecific antibody” refers to an antibody that displays a single binding specificity and affinity for a particular target, e.g., epitope. This term includes a “monoclonal antibody” or “monoclonal antibody composition,” which as used herein refer to a preparation of antibodies or fragments thereof of single molecular composition, irrespective of how the antibody was generated.

A further kind of antibody reagent is an intrabody i.e. an intracellular antibody (See, generally, Hood et al., Immunology, Benjamin, N.Y., 2ND ed. (1984), Harlow and Lane, Antibodies. A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1988) and Hunkapiller and Hood, Nature, 323, 15-16 (1986), which are incorporated herein by reference). Intrabodies work within the cell and bind intracellular protein. Intrabodies can include whole antibodies or antibody binding fragments thereof, e.g. single Fv, Fab and F(ab)′2, etc. Methods for intrabody production are well known to those of skill in the art, e.g. as described in WO 2002/086096. Antibodies will usually bind with at least a KD of about 1 mM, more usually at least about 300 μM, typically at least about 10 μM, more typically at least about 30 μM, preferably at least about 10 μM, and more preferably at least about 3 μM or better.).

Traditionally, monoclonal antibodies have been produced as native molecules in murine hybridoma lines. In addition to that technology, the methods and compositions described herein provide for recombinant DNA expression of monoclonal antibodies. This allows the production of humanized antibodies as well as a spectrum of antibody derivatives and fusion proteins in a host species of choice. The production of antibodies in bacteria, yeast, transgenic animals and chicken eggs are also alternatives to hybridoma-based production systems. The main advantages of transgenic animals are potential high yields from renewable sources.

As used herein, an “epitope” can be formed both from contiguous amino acids, or noncontiguous amino acids juxtaposed by folding of a protein. Epitopes formed from contiguous amino acids are typically retained on exposure to denaturing solvents, whereas epitopes formed by folding are typically lost on treatment with denaturing solvents. An epitope typically includes at least 3, and more usually, at least 5, about 9, or about 8-10 amino acids in a unique spatial conformation. An “epitope” includes the unit of structure conventionally bound by an immunoglobulin VH/VL pair. Epitopes define the minimum binding site for an antibody, and thus represent the target of specificity of an antibody. In the case of a single domain antibody, an epitope represents the unit of structure bound by a variable domain in isolation. The terms “antigenic determinant” and “epitope” can also be used interchangeably herein.

Nucleic acid molecules encoding amino acid sequence variants of antibodies are prepared by a variety of methods known in the art. These methods include, but are not limited to, isolation from a natural source (in the case of naturally occurring amino acid sequence variants) or preparation by oligonucleotide-mediated (or site-directed) mutagenesis, PCR mutagenesis, and cassette mutagenesis of an earlier prepared variant or a non-variant version of the antibody. A nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antibody, antigen-binding portion thereof, or polypeptide as described herein can be recombined with vector DNA in accordance with conventional techniques, including blunt-ended or staggered-ended termini for ligation, restriction enzyme digestion to provide appropriate termini, filling in of cohesive ends as appropriate, alkaline phosphatase treatment to avoid undesirable joining, and ligation with appropriate ligases. Techniques for such manipulations are disclosed, e.g., by Maniatis et al., Molecular Cloning, Lab. Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, N Y, 1982 and 1989), and Ausubel, 1987, 1993, and can be used to construct nucleic acid sequences which encode a monoclonal antibody molecule or antigen binding region thereof. A nucleic acid molecule, such as DNA, is said to be “capable of expressing” a polypeptide if it contains nucleotide sequences which contain transcriptional and translational regulatory information and such sequences are “operably linked” to nucleotide sequences which encode the polypeptide. An operable linkage is a linkage in which the regulatory DNA sequences and the DNA sequence sought to be expressed are connected in such a way as to permit gene expression as peptides or antibody portions in recoverable amounts. The precise nature of the regulatory regions needed for gene expression may vary from organism to organism, as is well known in the analogous art. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., 1989; Ausubel et al., 1987-1993.

Accordingly, the expression of an antibody or antigen-binding portion thereof as described herein can occur in either prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. Suitable hosts include bacterial or eukaryotic hosts, including yeast, insects, fungi, bird and mammalian cells either in vivo, or in situ, or host cells of mammalian, insect, bird or yeast origin. The mammalian cell or tissue can be of human, primate, hamster, rabbit, rodent, cow, pig, sheep, horse, goat, dog or cat origin, but any other mammalian cell may be used. Further, by use of, for example, the yeast ubiquitin hydrolase system, in vivo synthesis of ubiquitin-transmembrane polypeptide fusion proteins can be accomplished. The fusion proteins so produced can be processed in vivo or purified and processed in vitro, allowing synthesis of an antibody or portion thereof as described herein with a specified amino terminus sequence. Moreover, problems associated with retention of initiation codon-derived methionine residues in direct yeast (or bacterial) expression may be avoided. Sabin et al., 7 Bio/Technol. 705 (1989); Miller et al., 7 Bio/Technol. 698 (1989). Any of a series of yeast gene expression systems incorporating promoter and termination elements from the actively expressed genes coding for glycolytic enzymes produced in large quantities when yeast are grown in media rich in glucose can be utilized to obtain recombinant antibodies or antigen-binding portions thereof. Known glycolytic genes can also provide very efficient transcriptional control signals. For example, the promoter and terminator signals of the phosphoglycerate kinase gene can be utilized.

Production of antibodies or antigen-binding portions thereof as described herein can be achieved in insects, for example, by infecting the insect host with a baculovirus engineered to express a transmembrane polypeptide by methods known to those of skill in the art. See Ausubel et al., 1987, 1993.

In some embodiments, the introduced nucleotide sequence is incorporated into a plasmid or viral vector capable of autonomous replication in the recipient host. Any of a wide variety of vectors can be employed for this purpose and are known and available to those of ordinary skill in the art. See, e.g., Ausubel et al., 1987, 1993. Factors of importance in selecting a particular plasmid or viral vector include: the ease with which recipient cells that contain the vector may be recognized and selected from those recipient cells which do not contain the vector; the number of copies of the vector which are desired in a particular host; and whether it is desirable to be able to “shuttle” the vector between host cells of different species.

Example prokaryotic vectors known in the art include plasmids such as those capable of replication in E. coli., for example. Other gene expression elements useful for the expression of cDNA encoding antibodies or antigen-binding portions thereof include, but are not limited to (a) viral transcription promoters and their enhancer elements, such as the SV40 early promoter (Okayama et al., 3 Mol. Cell. Biol. 280 (1983)), Rous sarcoma virus LTR (Gorman et al., 79 PNAS 6777 (1982)), and Moloney murine leukemia virus LTR (Grosschedl et al., 41 Cell 885 (1985)); (b) splice regions and polyadenylation sites such as those derived from the SV40 late region (Okayarea et al., 1983), and (c) polyadenylation sites such as in SV40 (Okayama et al., 1983) Immunoglobulin cDNA genes can be expressed as described by Liu et al., infra, and Weidle et al., 51 Gene 21 (1987), using as expression elements the SV40 early promoter and its enhancer, the mouse immunoglobulin H chain promoter enhancers, SV40 late region mRNA splicing, rabbit S-globin intervening sequence, immunoglobulin and rabbit S-globin polyadenylation sites, and SV40 polyadenylation elements.

For immunoglobulin genes comprised of part cDNA, part genomic DNA (Whittle et al., 1 Protein Engin. 499 (1987)), the transcriptional promoter can be human cytomegalovirus, the promoter enhancers can be cytomegalovirus and mouse/human immunoglobulin, and mRNA splicing and polyadenylation regions can be the native chromosomal immunoglobulin sequences.

In some embodiments, for expression of cDNA genes in rodent cells, the transcriptional promoter is a viral LTR sequence, the transcriptional promoter enhancers are either or both the mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer and the viral LTR enhancer, the splice region contains an intron of greater than 31 bp, and the polyadenylation and transcription termination regions are derived from the native chromosomal sequence corresponding to the immunoglobulin chain being synthesized. In other embodiments, cDNA sequences encoding other proteins are combined with the above-recited expression elements to achieve expression of the proteins in mammalian cells.

Each fused gene is assembled in, or inserted into, an expression vector. Recipient cells capable of expressing the chimeric immunoglobulin chain gene product are then transfected singly with an antibody, antigen-binding portion thereof, or chimeric H or chimeric L chain-encoding gene, or are co-transfected with a chimeric H and a chimeric L chain gene. The transfected recipient cells are cultured under conditions that permit expression of the incorporated genes and the expressed immunoglobulin chains or intact antibodies or fragments are recovered from the culture.

In some embodiments, the fused genes encoding the antibody, antigen-binding fragment thereof, or chimeric H and L chains, or portions thereof are assembled in separate expression vectors that are then used to co-transfect a recipient cell. Each vector can contain two selectable genes, a first selectable gene designed for selection in a bacterial system and a second selectable gene designed for selection in a eukaryotic system, wherein each vector has a different pair of genes. This strategy results in vectors which first direct the production, and permit amplification, of the fused genes in a bacterial system. The genes so produced and amplified in a bacterial host are subsequently used to co-transfect a eukaryotic cell, and allow selection of a co-transfected cell carrying the desired transfected genes. Non-limiting examples of selectable genes for use in a bacterial system are the gene that confers resistance to ampicillin and the gene that confers resistance to chloramphenicol. Selectable genes for use in eukaryotic transfectants include the xanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase gene (designated gpt) and the phosphotransferase gene from Tn5 (designated neo). Alternatively the fused genes encoding chimeric H and L chains can be assembled on the same expression vector.

For transfection of the expression vectors and production of the chimeric, humanized, or composite human antibodies described herein, the recipient cell line can be a myeloma cell. Myeloma cells can synthesize, assemble and secrete immunoglobulins encoded by transfected immunoglobulin genes and possess the mechanism for glycosylation of the immunoglobulin. For example, in some embodiments, the recipient cell is the recombinant Ig-producing myeloma cell SP2/0 (ATCC #CRL 8287). SP2/0 cells produce only immunoglobulin encoded by the transfected genes. Myeloma cells can be grown in culture or in the peritoneal cavity of a mouse, where secreted immunoglobulin can be obtained from ascites fluid. Other suitable recipient cells include lymphoid cells such as B lymphocytes of human or non-human origin, hybridoma cells of human or non-human origin, or interspecies heterohybridoma cells.

An expression vector carrying a chimeric, humanized, or composite human antibody construct, antibody, or antigen-binding portion thereof as described herein can be introduced into an appropriate host cell by any of a variety of suitable means, including such biochemical means as transformation, transfection, conjugation, protoplast fusion, calcium phosphate-precipitation, and application with polycations such as diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) dextran, and such mechanical means as electroporation, direct microinjection, and microprojectile bombardment. Johnston et al., 240 Science 1538 (1988), as known to one of ordinary skill in the art.

Yeast provides certain advantages over bacteria for the production of immunoglobulin H and L chains. Yeasts carry out post-translational peptide modifications including glycosylation. A number of recombinant DNA strategies exist that utilize strong promoter sequences and high copy number plasmids which can be used for production of the desired proteins in yeast. Yeast recognizes leader sequences of cloned mammalian gene products and secretes peptides bearing leader sequences (i.e., pre-peptides). Hitzman et al., 11th Intl. Conf. Yeast, Genetics & Molec. Biol. (Montpelier, France, 1982).

Yeast gene expression systems can be routinely evaluated for the levels of production, secretion and the stability of antibodies, and assembled chimeric, humanized, or composite human antibodies, portions and regions thereof. Any of a series of yeast gene expression systems incorporating promoter and termination elements from the actively expressed genes coding for glycolytic enzymes produced in large quantities when yeasts are grown in media rich in glucose can be utilized. Known glycolytic genes can also provide very efficient transcription control signals. For example, the promoter and terminator signals of the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) gene can be utilized. A number of approaches can be taken for evaluating optimal expression plasmids for the expression of cloned immunoglobulin cDNAs in yeast. See II DNA Cloning 45, (Glover, ed., IRL Press, 1985) and e.g., U.S. Publication No. US 2006/0270045 A1.

Bacterial strains can also be utilized as hosts for the production of the antibody molecules or peptides described herein, E. coli K12 strains such as E. coli W3110 (ATCC 27325), Bacillus species, enterobacteria such as Salmonella typhimurium or Serratia marcescens, and various Pseudomonas species can be used. Plasmid vectors containing replicon and control sequences which are derived from species compatible with a host cell are used in connection with these bacterial hosts. The vector carries a replication site, as well as specific genes which are capable of providing phenotypic selection in transformed cells. A number of approaches can be taken for evaluating the expression plasmids for the production of chimeric, humanized, or composite humanized antibodies and fragments thereof encoded by the cloned immunoglobulin cDNAs or CDRs in bacteria (see Glover, 1985; Ausubel, 1987, 1993; Sambrook, 1989; Colligan, 1992-1996).

Host mammalian cells can be grown in vitro or in vivo. Mammalian cells provide post-translational modifications to immunoglobulin protein molecules including leader peptide removal, folding and assembly of H and L chains, glycosylation of the antibody molecules, and secretion of functional antibody protein.

In some embodiments, one or more antibodies or antibody reagents thereof as described herein can be produced in vivo in an animal that has been engineered or transfected with one or more nucleic acid molecules encoding the polypeptides, according to any suitable method.

In some embodiments, an antibody or antibody reagent as described herein is produced in a cell-free system. Nonlimiting exemplary cell-free systems are described, e.g., in Sitaraman et al., Methods Mol. Biol. 498: 229-44 (2009); Spirin, Trends Biotechnol. 22: 538-45 (2004); Endo et al., Biotechnol. Adv. 21: 695-713 (2003).

Many vector systems are available for the expression of cloned H and L chain genes in mammalian cells (see Glover, 1985). Different approaches can be followed to obtain complete H2L2 antibodies. As discussed above, it is possible to co-express H and L chains in the same cells to achieve intracellular association and linkage of H and L chains into complete tetrameric H2L2 antibodies or antigen-binding portions thereof. The co-expression can occur by using either the same or different plasmids in the same host. Genes for both H and L chains or portions thereof can be placed into the same plasmid, which is then transfected into cells, thereby selecting directly for cells that express both chains. Alternatively, cells can be transfected first with a plasmid encoding one chain, for example the L chain, followed by transfection of the resulting cell line with an H chain plasmid containing a second selectable marker. Cell lines producing antibodies, antigen-binding portions thereof and/or H2L2 molecules via either route could be transfected with plasmids encoding additional copies of peptides, H, L, or H plus L chains in conjunction with additional selectable markers to generate cell lines with enhanced properties, such as higher production of assembled H2L2 antibody molecules or enhanced stability of the transfected cell lines.

Additionally, plants have emerged as a convenient, safe and economical alternative main-stream expression systems for recombinant antibody production, which are based on large scale culture of microbes or animal cells. Antibodies can be expressed in plant cell culture, or plants grown conventionally. The expression in plants may be systemic, limited to susb-cellular plastids, or limited to seeds (endosperms). See, e.g., U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/0167531; U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,560; U.S. Pat. No. 6,512,162; WO 0129242. Several plant-derived antibodies have reached advanced stages of development, including clinical trials (see, e.g., Biolex, NC).

In some aspects, provided herein are methods and systems for the production of a humanized antibody, which is prepared by a process which comprises maintaining a host transformed with a first expression vector which encodes the light chain of the humanized antibody and with a second expression vector which encodes the heavy chain of the humanized antibody under such conditions that each chain is expressed and isolating the humanized antibody formed by assembly of the thus-expressed chains. The first and second expression vectors can be the same vector. Also provided herein are DNA sequences encoding the light chain or the heavy chain of the humanized antibody; an expression vector which incorporates a said DNA sequence; and a host transformed with a said expression vector.

Generating a humanized antibody from the sequences and information provided herein can be practiced by those of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation. In one approach, there are four general steps employed to humanize a monoclonal antibody, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,585,089; U.S. Pat. No. 6,835,823; U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,989. These are: (1) determining the nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of the starting antibody light and heavy variable domains; (2) designing the humanized antibody, i.e., deciding which antibody framework region to use during the humanizing process; (3) the actual humanizing methodologies/techniques; and (4) the transfection and expression of the humanized antibody.

Usually the CDR regions in humanized antibodies and human antibody variants are substantially identical, and more usually, identical to the corresponding CDR regions in the mouse or human antibody from which they were derived. Although not usually desirable, it is sometimes possible to make one or more conservative amino acid substitutions of CDR residues without appreciably affecting the binding affinity of the resulting humanized immunoglobulin or human antibody variant. Occasionally, substitutions of CDR regions can enhance binding affinity.

In addition, techniques developed for the production of “chimeric antibodies” (see Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81:851-855 (1984); Neuberger et al., Nature 312:604-608 (1984); Takeda et al., Nature 314:452-454 (1985); which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties) by splicing genes from a mouse, or other species, antibody molecule of appropriate antigen specificity together with genes from a human antibody molecule of appropriate biological activity can be used. A chimeric antibody is a molecule in which different portions are derived from different animal species, such as those having a variable region derived from a murine monoclonal antibody and a human immunoglobulin constant region, e.g., humanized antibodies. The variable segments of chimeric antibodies are typically linked to at least a portion of an immunoglobulin constant region (Fc), typically that of a human immunoglobulin. Human constant region DNA sequences can be isolated in accordance with well-known procedures from a variety of human cells, such as immortalized B-cells (WO 87/02671; which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety). The antibody can contain both light chain and heavy chain constant regions. The heavy chain constant region can include CH1, hinge, CH2, CH3, and, sometimes, CH4 regions. For therapeutic purposes, the CH2 domain can be deleted or omitted.

Alternatively, techniques described for the production of single chain antibodies (see, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778; Bird, Science 242:423-42 (1988); Huston et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879-5883 (1988); and Ward et al., Nature 334:544-54 (1989); which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties) can be adapted to produce single chain antibodies. Single chain antibodies are formed by linking the heavy and light chain fragments of the Fv region via an amino acid bridge, resulting in a single chain polypeptide. Techniques for the assembly of functional Fv fragments in E. coli can also be used (see, e.g. Skerra et al., Science 242:1038-1041 (1988); which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety).

Chimeric, humanized and human antibodies are typically produced by recombinant expression. Recombinant polynucleotide constructs typically include an expression control sequence operably linked to the coding sequences of antibody chains, including naturally-associated or heterologous promoter regions. Preferably, the expression control sequences are eukaryotic promoter systems in vectors capable of transforming or transfecting eukaryotic host cells. Once the vector has been incorporated into the appropriate host, the host is maintained under conditions suitable for high level expression of the nucleotide sequences, and the collection and purification of the cross-reacting antibodies. These expression vectors are typically replicable in the host organisms either as episomes or as an integral part of the host chromosomal DNA. Commonly, expression vectors contain selection markers, e.g., ampicillin-resistance or hygromycin-resistance, to permit detection of those cells transformed with the desired DNA sequences. E. coli is one prokaryotic host particularly useful for cloning the DNA sequences. Microbes, such as yeast are also useful for expression. Saccharomyces is a preferred yeast host, with suitable vectors having expression control sequences, an origin of replication, termination sequences and the like as desired. Typical promoters include 3-phosphoglycerate kinase and other glycolytic enzymes. Inducible yeast promoters include, among others, promoters from alcohol dehydrogenase, isocytochrome C, and enzymes responsible for maltose and galactose utilization. Mammalian cells are a preferred host for expressing nucleotide segments encoding immunoglobulins or fragments thereof. See Winnacker, From Genes to Clones, (VCH Publishers, N Y, 1987), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A number of suitable host cell lines capable of secreting intact heterologous proteins have been developed in the art, and include CHO cell lines, various COS cell lines, HeLa cells, L cells and multiple myeloma cell lines. Expression vectors for these cells can include expression control sequences, such as an origin of replication, a promoter, an enhancer (Queen et al., “Cell-type Specific Regulation of a Kappa Immunoglobulin Gene by Promoter and Enhancer Elements,” Immunol Rev 89:49 (1986), incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and necessary processing information sites, such as ribosome binding sites, RNA splice sites, polyadenylation sites, and transcriptional terminator sequences. Preferred expression control sequences are promoters substantially similar to a region of the endogenous genes, cytomegalovirus, SV40, adenovirus, bovine papillomavirus, and the like. See Co et al., “Chimeric and Humanized Antibodies with Specificity for the CD33 Antigen,” J Immunol 148:1149 (1992), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Alternatively, antibody coding sequences can be incorporated in transgenes for introduction into the genome of a transgenic animal and subsequent expression in the milk of the transgenic animal (e.g., according to methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,957, U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,489, U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,992, all incorporated by reference herein in their entireties). Suitable transgenes include coding sequences for light and/or heavy chains in operable linkage with a promoter and enhancer from a mammary gland specific gene, such as casein or beta lactoglobulin. The vectors containing the DNA segments of interest can be transferred into the host cell by well-known methods, depending on the type of cellular host. For example, calcium chloride transfection is commonly utilized for prokaryotic cells, whereas calcium phosphate treatment, electroporation, lipofection, biolistics or viral-based transfection can be used for other cellular hosts. Other methods used to transform mammalian cells include the use of polybrene, protoplast fusion, liposomes, electroporation, and microinjection (see generally, Sambrook et al., supra, which is herein incorporated by reference in is entirety). For production of transgenic animals, transgenes can be microinjected into fertilized oocytes, or can be incorporated into the genome of embryonic stem cells, and the nuclei of such cells transferred into enucleated oocytes. Once expressed, antibodies can be purified according to standard procedures of the art, including HPLC purification, column chromatography, gel electrophoresis and the like (see generally, Scopes, Protein Purification (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1982), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).

Once expressed, the whole antibodies, their dimers, individual light and heavy chains, or other immunoglobulin forms of the present invention can be recovered and purified by known techniques, e.g., immunoabsorption or immunoaffinity chromatography, chromatographic methods such as HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography), ammonium sulfate precipitation, gel electrophoresis, or any combination of these. See generally, Scopes, PROTEIN PURIF. (Springer-Verlag, N Y, 1982). Substantially pure immunoglobulins of at least about 90% to 95% homogeneity are advantageous, as are those with 98% to 99% or more homogeneity, particularly for pharmaceutical uses. Once purified, partially or to homogeneity as desired, a humanized or composite human antibody can then be used therapeutically or in developing and performing assay procedures, immunofluorescent stainings, and the like. See generally, Vols. I & II Immunol Meth. (Lefkovits & Pernis, eds., Acad. Press, N Y, 1979 and 1981).

Additionally, and as described herein, a recombinant humanized antibody can be further optimized to decrease potential immunogenicity, while maintaining functional activity, for therapy in humans. In this regard, functional activity means a polypeptide capable of displaying one or more known functional activities associated with a recombinant antibody or antibody reagent thereof as described herein. Such functional activities include, e.g. the ability to bind to a cancer cell marker.

As used herein, the term “nucleic acid” or “nucleic acid sequence” refers to any molecule, preferably a polymeric molecule, incorporating units of ribonucleic acid, deoxyribonucleic acid or an analog thereof. The nucleic acid can be either single-stranded or double-stranded. A single-stranded nucleic acid can be one nucleic acid strand of a denatured double-stranded DNA. Alternatively, it can be a single-stranded nucleic acid not derived from any double-stranded DNA. In one aspect, the nucleic acid can be DNA. In another aspect, the nucleic acid can be RNA. Suitable nucleic acid molecules are DNA, including genomic DNA or cDNA. Other suitable nucleic acid molecules are RNA, including mRNA.

As used herein, a “portion” refers to a part or fraction of a whole, e.g. a part or fraction of a molecule and/or compound.

The term “stem cell” as used herein, as used in the context of or with reference to a “cancer stem cell” refers to an undifferentiated cell which is capable of proliferation and giving rise to more progenitor cells having the ability to generate a large number of mother cells that can in turn give rise to differentiated, or differentiable daughter cells. The daughter cells themselves can be induced to proliferate and produce progeny that subsequently differentiate into one or more mature cell types, while also retaining one or more cells with parental developmental potential. The term “cancer stem cell” refers then, to a cell with the capacity or potential, under particular circumstances, to differentiate to a more specialized or differentiated phenotype, and which retains the capacity, under certain circumstances, to proliferate without substantially differentiating. In one embodiment, the term progenitor or stem cell refers to a generalized mother cell whose descendants (progeny) specialize, often in different directions, by differentiation, e.g., by acquiring completely individual characters, as occurs in progressive diversification of embryonic cells and tissues. Cellular differentiation is a complex process typically occurring through many cell divisions. A differentiated cell can derive from a multipotent cell which itself is derived from a multipotent cell, and so on. While each of these multipotent cells can be considered stem cells, the range of cell types each can give rise to can vary considerably. Some differentiated cells also have the capacity to give rise to cells of greater developmental potential. Such capacity can be natural or can be induced artificially upon treatment with various factors. In many biological instances, stem cells are also “multipotent” because they can produce progeny of more than one distinct cell type, but this is not required for “sternness.” Self-renewal is the other classical part of the stem cell definition, and it is essential as used in this document. In theory, self-renewal can occur by either of two major mechanisms. Stem cells can divide asymmetrically, with one daughter retaining the stem state and the other daughter expressing some distinct other specific function and phenotype. Alternatively, some of the stem cells in a population can divide symmetrically into two stems, thus maintaining some stem cells in the population as a whole, while other cells in the population give rise to differentiated progeny only. Formally, it is possible that cells that begin as stem cells might proceed toward a differentiated phenotype, but then “reverse” and re-express the stem cell phenotype, a term often referred to as “dedifferentiation”. Cancer stem cells have the ability for self-renewal, multipotent differentiation and vigorous proliferative capacity. In some embodiments, cancer stem cells or cells having a cancer stem cell-like phenotype are chemoresistant.

As used herein, the term “chemoresistant” refers to tumor cells which show little or no significant detectable response to an agent used in chemotherapy. As used herein, the term “chemosensitive” refers to tumor cells which show a detectable response to an agent used in chemotherapy. Chemoresistance and/or chemosensitivity can be in reference to one or more agents, e.g. a cell can be chemoresistant or chemosensitive to one agent, to two agents, to three agents or more agents. Chemoresistance and/or chemosenstivity can vary with time for any given cell and/or tumor.

As used herein, the terms “treat,” “treatment,” “treating,” or “amelioration” refer to therapeutic treatments, wherein the object is to reverse, alleviate, ameliorate, inhibit, slow down or stop the progression or severity of a condition associated with a disease or disorder, e.g. cancer. The term “treating” includes reducing or alleviating at least one adverse effect or symptom of a condition, disease or disorder associated with a cancer. Treatment is generally “effective” if one or more symptoms or clinical markers are reduced. Alternatively, treatment is “effective” if the progression of a disease is reduced or halted. That is, “treatment” includes not just the improvement of symptoms or markers, but also a cessation of, or at least slowing of, progress or worsening of symptoms compared to what would be expected in the absence of treatment. Beneficial or desired clinical results include, but are not limited to, alleviation of one or more symptom(s), diminishment of extent of disease, stabilized (i.e., not worsening) state of disease, delay or slowing of disease progression, amelioration or palliation of the disease state, remission (whether partial or total), and/or decreased mortality, whether detectable or undetectable. The term “treatment” of a disease also includes providing relief from the symptoms or side-effects of the disease (including palliative treatment).

As used herein, the term “pharmaceutical composition” refers to the active agent in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier e.g. a carrier commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry. The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable” is employed herein to refer to those compounds, materials, compositions, and/or dosage forms which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of human beings and animals without excessive toxicity, irritation, allergic response, or other problem or complication, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio.

As used herein, the term “administering,” refers to the placement of a compound as disclosed herein into a subject by a method or route which results in at least partial delivery of the agent at a desired site. Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds disclosed herein can be administered by any appropriate route which results in an effective treatment in the subject.

The term “statistically significant” or “significantly” refers to statistical significance and generally means a two standard deviation (2SD) or greater difference.

Other than in the operating examples, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients or reaction conditions used herein should be understood as modified in all instances by the term “about.” The term “about” when used in connection with percentages can mean±1%.

As used herein the term “comprising” or “comprises” is used in reference to compositions, methods, and respective component(s) thereof, that are essential to the method or composition, yet open to the inclusion of unspecified elements, whether essential or not.

The term “consisting of” refers to compositions, methods, and respective components thereof as described herein, which are exclusive of any element not recited in that description of the embodiment.

As used herein the term “consisting essentially of” refers to those elements required for a given embodiment. The term permits the presence of elements that do not materially affect the basic and novel or functional characteristic(s) of that embodiment.

The singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the word “or” is intended to include “and” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of this disclosure, suitable methods and materials are described below. The abbreviation, “e.g.” is derived from the Latin exempli gratia, and is used herein to indicate a non-limiting example. Thus, the abbreviation “e.g.” is synonymous with the term “for example.”

Definitions of common terms in cell biology and molecular biology can be found in “The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy”, 19th Edition, published by Merck Research Laboratories, 2006 (ISBN 0-911910-19-0); Robert S. Porter et al. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology, published by Blackwell Science Ltd., 1994 (ISBN 0-632-02182-9); Benjamin Lewin, Genes X, published by Jones & Bartlett Publishing, 2009 (ISBN-10: 0763766321); Kendrew et al. (eds.), Molecular Biology and Biotechnology: a Comprehensive Desk Reference, published by VCH Publishers, Inc., 1995 (ISBN 1-56081-569-8) and Current Protocols in Protein Sciences 2009, Wiley Intersciences, Coligan et al., eds.

Unless otherwise stated, the present invention was performed using standard procedures, as described, for example in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (3 ed.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., USA (2001); Davis et al., Basic Methods in Molecular Biology, Elsevier Science Publishing, Inc., New York, USA (1995); or Methods in Enzymology: Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques Vol. 152, S. L. Berger and A. R. Kimmel Eds., Academic Press Inc., San Diego, USA (1987); Current Protocols in Protein Science (CPPS) (John E. Coligan, et. al., ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.), Current Protocols in Cell Biology (CPCB) (Juan S. Bonifacino et. al. ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.), and Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique by R. Ian Freshney, Publisher: Wiley-Liss; 5th edition (2005), Animal Cell Culture Methods (Methods in Cell Biology, Vol. 57, Jennie P. Mather and David Barnes editors, Academic Press, 1st edition, 1998) which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

Other terms are defined herein within the description of the various aspects of the invention.

All patents and other publications; including literature references, issued patents, published patent applications, and co-pending patent applications; cited throughout this application are expressly incorporated herein by reference for the purpose of describing and disclosing, for example, the methodologies described in such publications that might be used in connection with the technology described herein. These publications are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing in this regard should be construed as an admission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention or for any other reason. All statements as to the date or representation as to the contents of these documents is based on the information available to the applicants and does not constitute any admission as to the correctness of the dates or contents of these documents.

The description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise form disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while method steps or functions are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform functions in a different order, or functions may be performed substantially concurrently. The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other procedures or methods as appropriate. The various embodiments described herein can be combined to provide further embodiments. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the compositions, functions and concepts of the above references and application to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure. Moreover, due to biological functional equivalency considerations, some changes can be made in protein structure without affecting the biological or chemical action in kind or amount. These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the detailed description. All such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.

Specific elements of any of the foregoing embodiments can be combined or substituted for elements in other embodiments. Furthermore, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the disclosure have been described in the context of these embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the disclosure.

The technology described herein is further illustrated by the following examples which in no way should be construed as being further limiting.

Some embodiments of the technology described herein can be defined according to any of the following numbered paragraphs:

    • 1. A composition comprising a combination of
      • a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell; and
      • a kinase inhibitor, capable of inhibiting the activity of at least one PI3K pathway kinase and at least one Src family kinase.
    • 2. The composition of paragraph 1, wherein the PI3K pathway kinase is selected from the group consisting of Akt; BCR-Abl; PRAS40; mTOR; S6K; Rsk1; Rsk2; and Rsk3.
    • 3. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-2, wherein the PI3K pathway kinase is BCR-Abl.
    • 4. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-3, wherein the kinase inhibitor comprises a dual kinase inhibitor.
    • 5. The composition of paragraph 4, wherein the dual kinase inhibitor is dasatinib.
    • 6. The compositions of any of paragraphs 1-5, wherein the kinase inhibitor comprises a mixture of at least two kinase inhibitors.
    • 7. A composition comprising a combination of
      • a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell;
      • a kinase inhibitor capable of inhibiting the activity at least one Src family kinase;
      • and an EGFR inhibitor.
    • 8. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-7, wherein the Src family kinase is selected from the group consisting of Src; Yes; Fyn; Fgr; Lck; Hck; Blk; Lyn; and Frk.
    • 9. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-8, wherein the Src family kinase is selected from the group consisting of Src; Yes; Fyn; and Fgr.
    • 10. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-9, wherein the Src family kinase is Src.
    • 11. A composition comprising
      • a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell; and
      • dasatinib.
    • 12. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-11, wherein the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell is an antibody or antigen-binding portion of an antibody.
    • 13. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-11, wherein the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell is an aptamer.
    • 14. The composition of paragraph 12, wherein the binding reagent is conjugated to the dual kinase inhibitor.
    • 15. The composition of paragraph 14, wherein the dual kinase inhibitor is selected from Formula I and Formula II,


wherein the structure of Formula I or Formula II is conjugated to a binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell.

    • 16. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-15, wherein the binding reagent specific for a transiently tolerant cancer cell and/or a cancer stem cell binds specifically to a cell surface protein selected from the group consisting of:
      • CD44; and isoforms thereof; cluster of differentiation protein family polypeptides; CD24; EpCAM; CD133; ganglioside GD2; epithelial specific antigen (ESA); Pgp; BCRP; MDR; ABC transport protein family polypeptides; EGFR; HER-2; ER; PR; IGF1R; insulin receptor; and EGFR-IGFR heterodimers.
    • 17. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-16, further comprising a scaffold material.
    • 18. The composition of paragraph 17, wherein the scaffold material is selected from the group consisting of:
      • a nanoparticle; a matrix; a hydrogel; and a biodegradable scaffold material.
    • 19. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-18, further comprising an EGFR inhibitor.
    • 20. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-19, wherein the EGFR inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of:
      • erlotinib; cetuximab; gefitinib; panitumumab; zaltuumumab; nimotuzmab; matuzaumab; and lapatinib.
    • 21. The composition of paragraph 20, wherein the EGFR inhibitor is erlotinib.
    • 22. The composition of any of paragraphs 1-21, further comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
    • 23. A method for treating cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject in need of treatment for cancer a combination of a cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and dasatinib or a composition of any of paragraphs 1-22.
    • 24. The method of paragraph 23, wherein the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent is selected from the group consisting of: doxorubicin; taxanes; cabazitaxel; vincristine; anti-tubulin chemotherapies; and vinblastine.
    • 25. The method of any of paragraphs 23-24, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.
    • 26. The method of any of paragraphs 23-25, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered during a period in which at least a subpopulation of cancer cells in the subject display increased levels of CD44 on the cell surface.
    • 27. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered during a period in which tumor growth plateaus.
    • 28. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered at least 4 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.
    • 29. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered no more than about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.
    • 30. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered from about 4 hours to about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.
    • 31. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered from about 4 hours to about 96 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.
    • 32. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered from about 12 hours to about 96 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.
    • 33. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered about 72 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.
    • 34. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered within 10 days after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.
    • 35. The method of paragraph 23-26, wherein the composition of any of paragraphs 1-22 is administered within 7 days after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.
    • 36. The method of any of paragraphs 23-35, wherein the subject is further administered an EGFR inhibitor.
    • 37. The method of paragraph 36, wherein the EGFR inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of:
      • erlotinib; cetuximab; gefitinib; panitumumab; zaltuumumab; nimotuzmab; matuzaumab; and lapatinib.
    • 38. The method of paragraph 37, wherein the EGFR inhibitor is erlotinib.
    • 39. A method of identifying a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell, the method comprising;
      • detecting, in a cancer cell, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of:
        • PRAS40, Src and Hck;
      • wherein increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 indicates the cancer cell is a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell.
    • 40. The method of paragraph 39, further comprising detecting the expression level of CD44, wherein increased expression of CD44 indicates the cancer cell is a chemotherapy tolerant cancer cell.
    • 41. A method of treatment of a cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising;
      • detecting, in a cancer cell, the phosphorylation level of at least one gene selected from the group consisting of:
        • PRAS40, Src and Hck; and
      • administering a composition of paragraphs 1-22 to the subject when increased phosphorylation of the Y411 residue of Hck, decreased phosphorylation of the Tyr527 residue of Src; or increased phosphorylation of T246 residue of PRAS40 is detected.
    • 42. The method of paragraph 41, further comprising detecting the expression level of CD44, and administering the composition of paragraphs 1-22 to the subject when increased expression of CD44 is detected.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Temporal Tumor Cell Switching to Stem-Like Phenocopies Predipsoses a Vulnerable Chemoresistant Transition

Acquired resistance to chemotherapy is a key obstacle to successful cancer treatment. A number of reports have implicated the existence of inalterable cancer stem cells (CSC) capable of inherently overcoming chemotherapy and re-populating a viable tumor. However, intratumoral heterogeneity, intrinsic plasticity and fundamental Darwinian dynamics challenge this static CSC paradigm. Described herein is a transitional state of chemoresistance conferred by the induced, ephemeral emergence of stemlike phenocopies mimicking a subset of inherently chemoresistant cells and predisposing therapeutic vulnerability. It is demonstrated herein that transitory induction of a CSC biomarker (CD44) functionally engages receptor tyrosine kinases to re-organize a cortex network and trigger survival via phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI(3)K) and Src-Family Kinase (SFK) signaling-redundancy. Utilizing dasatinib in sequence with docetaxel during a temporally-dependent window of therapeutic opportunity, significant tumor regression is observed in a highly aggressive in-vivo cancer model. These findings reveal novel insight into the CSC hypothesis and non-genetic mechanisms of chemoresistance, invoking temporality and Darwinian dynamics to address the global role of heterogeneity. Furthermore, the results conclude on the importance of kinase redundancies, drug combination and schedule-dependency, impacting immediately the clinical management of cancer.

The inability of chemotherapy to completely ablate tumor cells and the resulting relapse remains a vital obstacle in the clinical management of cancer. The conventional model for the development of resistance to chemotherapy is built on the stochastic acquisition of resistance-favored mutations (Cairns, 1975). However, this antiquated paradigm ignores the emergence of competing phenotypic variants as a consequence of the non-genetic heterogeneity of cancer (Marusyk et al., 2012). For example, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells in patients treated with the drug imatinib, will survive an immediate blast phase, even re-growing during treatment despite an absence of genetic alterations which confer imatinib-resistance (Okabe et al., 2008; Talpaz et al., 2002). Similarly in other tumors, resistance to cytotoxic antitubulin chemotherapy can occur independent of mutation status (Berrieman et al., 2004). Such phenomena are commonly associated with non-genetic alterations such as enhancement of redundant signaling circuitry (Logue and Morrison, 2012). Indeed, Darwinian dynamics suggest that adaptive responses to microenvironmental stressors such as cytotoxic and targeted chemotherapies may precede mutations and therefore serve as substrates for the somatic evolution of cancer (Gillies et al., 2012). Therefore, understanding non-genetic mechanisms of adaptive chemoresistance becomes a key challenge in the development of successful therapeutic interventions.

As a prominent theory of intrinsic chemoresistance, researchers have evolved a cancer stem cell (CSC) model which underscores a static population of cells capable of exerting phenotypic advantages to overcome chemotherapy and re-produce a viable tumor (Dean et al., 2005). Indeed, the CSC model has served as the central paradigm by which researchers describe the non-genetic basis of chemoresistance (Shackleton et al., 2009). However, the CSC model does not incorporate mechanisms of adaptive, rather than inherent resistance. Indeed, the central dogma of the CSC hypothesis posits an inherent inalterability, thus ignoring intrinsic parameters of plasticity; a potential and fundamental flaw of this model. For example, recent experimental evidence demonstrates that cancer cells exert stochastic state-transitions and phenotypic variations giving rise to CSC characteristics from non-stem-like cells, subsequently returning to phenotypic equilibrium (Gupta et al., 2011). Alternatively, microenvironmental cues, such as exogenous stressors, are integral to the maintenance of tumorigenic populations including putative CSC (Bissell and Labarge, 2005). Such hypotheses indicate that beyond stochastic flux, deterministic acquisition of phenotypic, stem-like properties may be invoked to overcome exogenous stimuli and potentially occurring as a transitory property. Indeed, identifying and exploiting temporality during drug treatment may optimize the efficacy of available therapeutics (Gillies et al., 2012), yet no studies have identified a mechanistic basis or validated this contention particularly as it relates to the CSC model.

Although CSCs have emerged as critical constituents in tumorigenicity, there remains a poor understanding for the mechanisms and cellular determinants which drive acquired and adaptive resistance. The results described herein provide for unification of the CSC theory with non-genetic mechanisms of adaptive resistance, invoking the elegant principles of Darwinian dynamics to describe a transitory property of cancer cell behavior. Identified herein are tumor cells that are induced to temporally switch to phenocopies which mimic inherent chemoresistance. Through acquisition of stemlike properties, induction and functional engagement of a CSC biomarker, cancer cells confer a transient ability to reorganize a redundant kinase-signaling network to persist and re-emerge from cytotoxic stress. This temporal plasticity can be exploited by a schedule-dependent combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and a rationally derived kinase inhibitor as provided herein Enhancing this effect, chimeric-nanoformulations limit toxicity and provide a spatial advantage over free-drugs. The findings presented here elucidate novel biological principles of cancer progression and chemoresistance, impacting directly the method of cancer treatment.

Development of resistance to chemotherapy is a key obstacle in successful cancer treatment. While the underlying dogma of chemoresistance was built on heritable mutations and selection under pressure, emerging evidence indicates that distinct epigenetic mechanisms or cellular heterogeneity can drive therapeutic resistance. Described herein is a novel phenomenon, which is termed cancer stem cell (CSC) ‘mimicry’, where tumor cells can transiently acquire morphological and phenotypic characteristics mimicking stem-like cells as a consequence of chemotherapeutic stress. Using taxane-resistant human breast cancer explants and by inducing chemotherapeutic stress in cancer cell lines, the transient acquisition of the CSC biomarker (CD44) is demonstrated in a small population of reversibly chemo-tolerant cells, which functionally engages and re-organizes a cortex network of tyrosine kinases triggering survival via phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K) and Src-Family Kinase (SFK) signaling, and permitting re-growth of a heterogeneous population. The disruption of this semistable state of CSC mimicry can be achieved using PI3K inhibitors, and dasatinib, a Src kinase inhibitor in vitro and in vivo, but only within a temporal constraint. Combinations of a PI3K inhibitor and dasatinib in a multifunctional nanoparticle exhibited synergistic tumor inhibition in sequence with docetaxel. These results suggest that temporal combinations of taxanes with PI3K- and SFK-inhibitors can emerge as therapeutic strategies for the management of taxane-refractory breast cancer. The current study supports the emerging paradigm that cancer cells can exist in a continuum of distinct phenotypic states, unifying the divergent theories of cancer stem cells and cell signaling-driven adaptive resistance underlying chemotherapy failure

The inability of chemotherapy to completely ablate tumor cells and the resulting relapse remains a vital obstacle in the treatment of cancer. The central model for the development of resistance to chemotherapy is built on a somatic version of Darwinian evolution, where the stochastic acquisition of resistance-favored mutations that are selected under chemotherapy pressure (Cairns, 1975). However, this dogma is increasingly being challenged by the emerging evidence of non-genetic mechanisms driving chemotherapy tolerance (Marusyk et al., 2012). For example, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells in patients treated with the drug imatinib can survive an immediate blast phase, and can even grow during treatment, despite an absence of genetic alterations which confer imatinib-resistance (Okabe et al., 2008; Talpaz et al., 2002). Similarly, resistance to cytotoxic antitubulin chemotherapy can arise independent of mutation status (Berrieman et al., 2004). Furthermore, in a recent study, Kreso et al demonstrated that variability in chemotherapy tolerance could exist within lineages from a single clone in colorectal cancer (Kreso et al., 2013). Indeed, in a perspective, Brock et al argued that non-genetic individuality among clonal cells may also serve as a substrate for somatic Darwinian evolution (Brock et al., 2009). However, the mechanisms contributing to these phenomena remain poorly understood.

Two divergent theories have emerged to explain the non-genetic basis of chemoresistance. The first relies on a hierarchical model, where minor, static populations of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are tumorigenic are also the ones that are inherently resistant to chemotherapy (Shackleton et al., 2009). CSCs are thought to exploit drug-efflux proteins, relative dormancy or epigenetic switches to overcome chemotherapeutic stress (Vincent and Van Seuningen, 2012). However, the true contribution of cancer stem cells in the development of therapeutic resistance remains debatable (Marusyk and Polyak, 2013). The recent results of Kreso et al lend credence to the argument that alternative mechanisms besides CSCs may be involved in mediating non-genetic origins of resistance (Kreso et al., 2013). Indeed, another emerging theory of ‘adaptive chemoresistance’ addresses the evidence for phenotypic heterogeneity arising from stochasticity in gene expression and activation of survival pathways. For example, dysregulation and feedback activation of cortex signaling kinases leads to the resistance against promising targeted therapeutics such as dual Akt/mTOR inhibitors in malignant breast cancer models (Muranen et al., 2012). Similarly in other solid malignancies, the engagement of a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and altered chromatin state have been implicated in downstream epigenetic alterations conferring adaptive resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy (Sharma et al., 2010). Indeed, uncontrolled activation of kinase circuitry is regarded as a major constituent of acquired chemoresistance (Huang and Hung, 2009) which can be further enhanced through complex signaling redundancy (Logue and Morrison, 2012).

It is demonstrated herein that cancer cells can potentially exist in a continuum in-between stem-like and non-stem cell states tending towards the former under chemotherapeutic pressure. These imperfect mimics of cancer stem-like cells over-express the CSC-biomarker, CD44, which acts as a scaffold to transiently reorganize a redundant kinase-signaling network to persist, re-emerge from cytotoxic stress and re-equilibrate a heterogeneous phenotype. Interestingly, a therapeutic vulnerability emerges from this transiently-induced plasticity, which can be exploited by the temporally rational combination of kinase inhibitors with chemotherapy. The findings presented here elucidate novel biological principles potentially unifying the divergent theories of chemotherapy tolerance, directly impacting the clinical management of cancer.

Results

Atypical Cancer Stem-Like Cell Descriptors are Induced within a Chemoresistant State.

Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for patients with metastatic breast cancer that is hormone resistant or estrogen/progesterone receptor negative or for patients who experience rapid progression. While anthracyclines are used as the first-line chemotherapy in adjuvant or metastatic setting, taxanes are the standard of care in the case of subsequent disease progression (Pal et al., 2011). To study the mechanisms which contribute to adaptive chemoresistance under conditions that closely mimic the clinical pathology, explant cultures were generated from tumor biopsy of seven taxane-refractory breast cancer patients cultured in autologous serum (See FIG. 9 for patient history). The explants were then incubated ex vivo with docetaxel (DTX) for 72 h. Interestingly, as shown in FIG. 1A, immunohistochemistry profiling revealed that treatment with a taxane-containing regimen induced the over-expression of CD44 (FIGS. 1A-1B), which correlated with reduced apoptosis (decreased expression of cleaved caspase-3) and a reduced proliferative capacity indicated by Ki-67 staining (FIG. 1B). A similar observation was made in the case of explants treated with a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin (Doxil), indicating that this phenomenon was not restricted to taxanes. In contrast to the notion that CSCs are enriched in response to chemotherapy, these data indicated that a putative stem-like quiescent state is inducible in response to chemotherapy. This observation was validated using the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) MDA-MB-468 (468) cell line. Consistent with the ex vivo results, induction of CD44 was observed following 24 hour incubation with docetaxel (DTX) chemotherapy without selecting for viable subsets (FIGS. 1C and 1 OA), an effect observed in a dose-dependent manner in another TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231 (231) as early as 4 hours post treatment (FIG. 10B). Surprisingly, in contrast to the classic definition of a breast CSC as exhibiting a CD44HI, CD24−/low signature (Al-Hajj et al., 2003), which is predicted to be the chemoresistant CSC population selected under chemotherapeutic pressure (Dean et al., 2005), docetaxel chemotherapy induced a CD44HI, CD24+/HI signature (FIG. 10C), indicative of the induction of an atypical or ‘imperfect’ subset of CSCs in response to chemotherapeutic pressure.

To test whether chemotherapy-induced CD44 expression correlates with survival, a subset of cells was isolated which could overcome an extended (48 hr) DTX insult at a lethal concentration greater than 20 times published IC50 values (Watters et al., 2004). The cells were further selected for viability and chemoresistance based on the capacity for substrate reattachment (Matrone et al., 2010) and a subsequent acute population-outgrowth, terming this subpopulation ‘DTX tolerant cells’ (DTC) (FIG. 1D). In contrast to chemotherapy-treated parent 468, DTC displayed low Annexin V positivity (FIG. 1E, left panel), caspase-3 activity (FIG. 1E, right panel) and elicited a parental toxic-burden indicated by p53 phosphorylation (FIG. 1F)(MacLaine and Hupp, 2011). Importantly, a chemotherapy-induced CD44 signature was identified (FIG. 1G), an effect which directly correlated to dose-dependent tolerance to DTX (DT) (FIG. 1H). Additionally, the enhanced CD44 expression was identified in DTCs generated from the human TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 (231), non-TNBC murine mammary carcinoma 4T-1 and KRas/PTEN 4306 murine ovarian cancer cells (FIG. 1I). Interestingly, the cells found tolerant to doxorubicin (Dox-TC) also demonstrated a robust expression of CD44, suggesting a broad, non-cytotoxic-selective response consistent with the explant data (FIG. 1J). Furthermore, as shown in FIGS. 1K and 1 OD, the DTCs were also found to upregulate EpCAM, a TNBC CSC surface marker (Stratford et al., 2010) associated with negative clinical prognosis (Schmidt et al., 2008). Consistent with the imperfectly-induced subset of CSC from above with a CD24 enhanced profile, selection under chemotherapeutic pressure showed preservation of this acquired phenotypic alteration (FIGS. 1L and 10E). Finally, the susceptibility of DTC to chemotherapy was tested, and an acquired resistance to multiple classes of taxanes (FIG. 1M) as well as the anthracycline, doxorubicin was found, suggesting a more universal resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy compared to parent cell (FIG. 1N). It was significant to note that the DTCs were insensitive to cabazitaxel, a novel taxane that does not act as a PgP substrate (Bouchet and Galmarini, 2010). Furthermore, treatment with the PgP transport inhibitor, elacridar, could not augment cytotoxic sensitivity (FIG. 1 OF), indicating drug efflux, which has been implicated in mediating resistance to chemotherapy in classical CSCs, does not support adaptive resistance observed in the current study.

Induced Cellular Mimicry of a Stem-Like Population.

While CSCs have been considered a subset of parental cells with inherent chemoresistance, biomarker identification alone is an imperfect way to designate this population (Zapperi and La Porta, 2012). Therefore morphological and phenotypic similarities between DTC and a subset of parental cells with an inherent capacity to overcome chemotherapy were investigated. One of the most striking alterations of the DTC subset was a systematized change in size firmly correlating to the largest 20% of the parent population (FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 11A), an induced effect confirmed as early as 4 hours following exposure to chemotherapy (FIG. 11B). Indeed, cell size has emerged as a robust determinant of cellular identity, indicative of signaling processes, growth states and homeostasis (Jorgensen and Tyers, 2004). Incubation in hypotonic saline solution for 15 min altered the visually perceived size of parent cells yet resulted in reduction of the forward scatter parameter during flow cytometry (FIG. 2C) confirming the assertion that DTC are not merely osmotically swollen. Utilizing cell sorting strategy based on three-dimensional light scattering parameters, the 20% largest and 20% smallest cells were isolated from the parent population (FIG. 2D), achieving enrichment of approximately 60-70% (data not shown) which was confirmed by measuring cell diameter following substrate re-attachment (FIG. 2E). Cytotoxicity analysis indicated MDA-MB-231 Large and MDA-MB-468Large subsets resisted high dose chemotherapy compared to their smaller counterparts by augmenting their viability 1.2 to 1.5 fold in response to high doses (FIGS. 2F and 11C).

It was next investigated whether other phenotypic properties correlate with CSC characteristics. Recent evidence obtained through evaluation of human solid malignancies suggests a G2/M ‘lock’, or extended cell cycle, is a common feature of CSC populations and serves a putative chemoresistant role (Harper et al., 2010). Population gating for the largest 20% of parent cells during FACS analysis correlated with a G2/M-polyploidy-heavy cell cycle status. In contrast, the smallest 20% subset presented a G1,S-heavy cell cycle status (FIG. 2G). Similar to parental ‘large cells’, the DTC subset demonstrated a major shift to G2/M and enhanced polyploidization compared to parent cells (FIGS. 2H and 11D). These results suggest that in contrast to a cell cycle lock as a pre-catastrophic phase, this signature may confer a cytoprotective mechanism.

Since CD44 expression was notably increased in the DTCs, it was sought to identify whether ‘large’ parental cells displayed a similar, relative enhancement of CD44. Utilizing fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) isolated CD44Hi cells correlated to the largest population determined by three-dimensional light scattering (FIG. 11E). Similarly, population gating during FACS confirmed enhanced expression of CD44 in the 20% largest cells compared to the 20% smallest, which was validated by western blot (FIG. 2I).

Induced CSC-Mimicry is Capable of Re-Equilibrating a Heterogeneous Landscape.

To confirm whether DTCs comprised of a homogenous set of only large inherently chemoresistant CD44Hi cells described above, ‘similar sized’ populations using side and forward scatter were selected from both parent and DTC cells. Analysis of the mean fluorescent intensity (fluorescence per cell) of CD44 revealed that the parent cells, of equal size to DTC, express less CD44 than DTC cells (FIG. 3A), indicating that DTC population represent a heterogeneous mixture of inherently resistant cancer cells and ‘induced’, imperfect stem-like cells. Significantly, we identified a population of cells within the DTC which exerted enhanced CD44 expression beyond that of any parental cell (Cells observed to the right of the red gate in the DTC subset). This subset of cells was termed ‘CD44New’ (FIG. 3B). Utilizing FACS, the CD44New population was isolated and readapted into culture until they regained a proliferative capacity, defining the resulting expanded population as 231Phenocopy (FIG. 3C). CD44New remained quiescent for a period of approximately 23 days, and full repopulation occurs by approximately 35 days, an observation consistent between cell lines. Characterization of the 231Phenocopy revealed a heterogeneous morphology similar to parent cells (FIG. 3D), including CD44 expression (FIG. 3E) indicating achievement of a phenotypic equilibrium; an effect previously predicted through stochasticity (Gupta et al., 2011). Concurrently, cell cycle (FIG. 3F) and response to chemotherapy were found to re-equilibrate to parental status (FIG. 3G).

Chemotherapy-Induced CD44 Engages a Scaffold-Kinase Interaction with EGFR to Elicit Akt Survival Signaling.

It was next explored if the induction of CD44 has a functional implication. Since CD44 expression could be induced with short burst chemotherapy treatment (described above), this incubation period was utilized to dissect a mechanism involving CD44 over-expression. Interestingly, CD44 has been reported to function in membrane-recruitment of ezrin, a known adaptor of AKT (Gautreau et al., 1999) that has recently been shown to correlate with invasiveness of breast cancer (Sarrio et al., 2006), and the cortex complex with Radixin and Moesin (ERM) (Mori et al., 2008). Indeed, western blotting indicated activation of these cortex proteins are enhanced in the DTC subset compared to parent (FIG. 4A). Importantly, PI3K/AKT is one of the most abundantly dysregulated oncogenic drivers in a large fraction of cancers, particularly TNBC (Di Cosimo and Baselga, 2010), yet mechanisms implicating this pathway in adaptive resistance remain poorly understood (Huang and Hung, 2009). Finally, that inhibition of AKT pathway-activation using multiple small molecule inhibitors of PI3Kinase resulted in similar decrease in cell viability in both parental and DTCs (FIG. 4B) suggesting AKT is a critical component of survival for the DTC subset.

Since total AKT and ERM protein levels appeared constant between parent and DTC, the findings indicated a re-wiring of the kinase network. Therefore, it was desired to identify a mechanism underlying chemotherapy-induced AKT signaling as an early event to predispose the DTC subset. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA) gene knockdown, it was confirmed that ezrin lies upstream of AKT activated in response to chemotherapy (FIG. 4C). Furthermore, silencing ezrin augmented sensitivity to antitubulins (FIG. 4D). In agreement with a phosphorylation array performed in the DTC subset (FIG. 12A) and consistent with previous speculation that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activates AKT in response to chemotherapy (Huang and Hung, 2009), the EGFR-selective inhibitor, erlotinib, prevented induction of AKT and ezrin signaling (FIGS. 4E and 12B). However ERM-complex signaling remained intact (FIG. 4E) suggesting that CD44 could act as a scaffolding partner to support this cortex signaling event. Indeed, siRNA-mediated gene-knockdown of CD44 attenuated ezrin, AKT and ERM-complex signaling in response to acute treatment with chemotherapy (FIG. 4F). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation revealed CD44 expression was critical to engage the complexation of EGFR, AKT and ERM cortex-signaling components (FIG. 4G). These findings suggested CD44 and EGFR cooperate in a scaffold-kinase fashion to recruit and subsequently activate AKT in response to chemotherapy. Immunoprecipitation of EGFR confirmed an enhanced, physical association with CD44 is elicited in response to DTX; inhibiting the kinase activity of EGFR was found to modulate this interaction (FIG. 4H, upper panel). A variant of CD44 (CD44v6) was identified as the putative isoform which interacts with EGFR (FIG. 4H, lower panel and FIG. 12C). Importantly, this enhanced scaffolding effect was preserved in the basal state of the DTC subset (FIGS. 4I and 12D). Taken together, these are the first evidence that induction and functional engagement of a CSC biomarker with RTKs to re-organize a kinase signaling network confers a chemoresistant advantage through an adaptive response. This finding is in contrast to the paradigm that CSC biomarkers serve as innocuous gauges of differentiation.

Dasatinib Attenuates a Rewired Kinase Network in DTCs.

Although inhibition of the AKT pathway resulted in reduced DTC viability, the sensitivity of DTCs to the PI3K inhibitor, PI103, was similar to the sensitivity of the parent population, with a subset in both cell populations escaping PI103-induced cell death. Therefore, a drug screen was performed with a library of single and dual kinase inhibitors which exert nanomolar affinity, identifying dasatinib, a dual Src Family kinase (SFK), BCR-Abl inhibitor, as the only candidate drug which exerted greater sensitivity in the DTC than the parental cell line (Sensitivity index >1, FIG. 5A). This enhanced dasatinib sensitivity-index was consistent in additional DTC subsets derived from multiple cancer types (FIG. 5B). Interestingly, the 231Phenocopy regained parental sensitivity to dasatinib (FIG. 5C) suggesting temporality is a parameter in susceptibility of the cells to dasatinib. Since dasatinib is a dual kinase inhibitor, targeting both SFK and BCR-Abl, we tested whether both targets were required to sensitize the DTC subset. Cell viability analysis utilizing the SFK-selective inhibitor, PP2, and BCR-Abl-selective inhibitor, imatinib, separately and in combination indicated that dual inhibition does not further augment the sensitivity of the DTC population, effectively eliminating the BCR-Abl pathway as a key component for DTC survival (FIG. 5D).

A phosphorylation array was used to analyze specific AKT-family and SFK residues enhanced in the DTC subset (FIG. 5E). A significant increase in the phosphorylation status of multiple residues implicated within these pathways was quantified by optical density (FIG. 5F). Interestingly, the activating residue of Src (Y416) was unchanged between parent and DTC, yet Src inactivation (Y527) diminished nearly completely (FIG. 5F western blot). Most significant activation was observed in the SFK protein Hck, as well as a robust activation of PRAS40, a novel substrate of AKT which relieves inhibition of mTOR to promote activation of key survival signaling pathways (Vander Haar et al., 2007). To investigate a functional involvement of CD44, a phosphorylation array was performed in the DTC subset following immunoprecipitation. The results indicated that key residues shown to be over-activated in the DTC subset physically associated with CD44 (FIG. 5G). These findings implicate CD44 as a robust scaffolding support for multiple AKT and SFK proteins. Indeed, a potential involvement of other RTKs is likely enhanced, similar to the effects observed between EGFR. Interestingly, western blots indicated that increasing doses of dasatinib reduced, to a minor degree, AKT signaling in the DTC subset (FIG. 5H) suggesting the existence of a cross-talk signaling-component between these critical survival kinases in the DTC subset and explains, in part, the potent effect of dasatinib.

Transient Expression of CD44 Physically Activates an Oncogenic Kinase Signature, In Vivo.

To validate the above mechanistic observations in vivo, 4T1 breast tumor-bearing mice were treated with DTX at the maximum tolerated doses (MTD). As shown in FIG. 6A, treatment with DTX inhibited tumor growth as compared with vehicle-treated tumors as evident by the separation of growth rates within 48 hours of administration of the first dose, but the tumor re-emerged robustly by day 19. Western blot analysis of tumor tissue harvested from control Day 9 and DTX-treated day 9 revealed significantly enhanced CD44 expression following DTX treatment, a transient effect that was found diminished by day 19 (FIG. 6B). To validate this analysis, immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed transient expression of CD44 exclusively in the cell membrane (FIG. 6C) as quantified for intensity of staining and percent of cells stained in a blinded fashion (FIG. 6D). It was next investigated whether a transient kinase signature encompassing key oncogenic residues which correlated to the in vitro studies could be detected. Reduction of the inhibitory residue of Src (Y527) and enhancement of activated PRAS40T246 occurred in DTX day 9 samples compared to control, an effect which diminished by day 19 as quantified by Western blot (FIG. 6E). In addition, IHC analysis revealed that Hck phosphorylation was markedly enhanced in DTX day 9 tissue compared to control which, again, was diminished by day 19 (FIG. 6F). Interestingly, although active Hck and PRAS40 (FIG. 13A) predominantly localized to the nucleus, immunoprecipitation from tumor lysate revealed that enhanced membrane-cortex interactions with CD44 were robust in DTX day 9 samples compared to control, an effect reduced in DTX day 19 samples (FIG. 6G). These findings indicate that CD44 functionally scaffolds key oncogenic kinases which, subsequent to activation, localize to the nucleus where their pro-survival effects are greatest (Paliwal et al., 2007; Saito et al., 2004).

Exploiting Temporality in Drug-Schedule In Vivo Targets the Emergence of CSC Mimicry and Re-Sensitizes Refractory Tumors.

Since these data suggested stem-like mimicry arises in a transient manner in response to chemotherapy, the efficacy of a temporally-constrained application of DTX and dasatinib in vivo was investigated. To address this question, dasatinib was administered in two phases; 1. ‘Early Dasatinib’, given 72 hours following DTX when tumor growth plateaued and a putative population of stem-like cells with an oncogenic signature arise, or 2. ‘Late Dasatinib’, administered 216 hours following administration of DTX when tumor burden and growth had significantly re-emerged, suggestive of stem-like diminishment. ‘Early’ administration of dasatinib significantly augmented the reversal of tumor growth rate, while ‘late’ administration was ineffective (FIG. 6H). Indeed, tumor regression could be achieved by this regimen in the early treatment group (FIG. 6I, left panel) compared to late treatment which showed no difference over a matched vehicle control (FIG. 6I right panel).

It was determined whether a combination of dasatinib with a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor could ablate signaling-redundancy and exert a synergistic outcome. Low doses of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, PI103, and dasatinib were used in combination to dissect a synergistic effect of these inhibitors in the DTC subsets (FIG. 13B). However, while dasatinib exerted a significant toxic burden in clinical trials (Herold et al., 2011), experience with PI3K inhibitors suggest a requirement for sustained inhibition of the pathway in the tumors (Courtney et al., 2010). It was rationalized that these challenges can be addressed using a multifunctional nanoparticle that can deliver both drugs. Nanoparticles harness the leaky vasculature of tumors and the ‘EPR (enhanced permeability and retention) effect, which enable preferential accumulation in the tumor (Maeda et al., 2013). To enable self-assembly into a nanostructure, we tethered PI103 to cholesterol derivative via the phenolic hydroxyl group of PI103, which further facilitated the entrapment of dasatinib by increasing membrane integrity (FIG. 7A) (attempts at entrapment of dasatinib in lipidic nanoparticles in the absence of the PI103-cholesterol conjugate resulted in unstable structures). As shown in FIG. 7B, the dasatinib-PI103 multifunctional nanoparticle (DPNP) inhibited redundant signaling compared with dasatinib alone, resulting in decreased cell viability (FIG. 7C). The multifunctional nanoparticles were tested in vivo, where the treatments were administered during an optimally-derived temporal window created by the administration of DTX. As shown in FIG. 7D, the treatment with DPNP post-treatment with DTX was significantly more effective than any single drug combination with DTX. Importantly, DPNP as a single agent was ineffective, thus supporting the importance of DTX schedule-dependency and the generation of vulnerable stem-like mimicry.

Finally, in a very preliminary study to explore potential clinical implications of the above results, the efficacy of DTX-dasatinib treatment in an explant derived from the biopsy of a clinically confirmed case of invasive carcinoma obtained from a stage IV, metastatic breast cancer patient who had relapsed from taxane chemotherapy was investigated. The explant was treated for 48 h with DMSO (vehicle), DTX, Dasatinib, or a combination of DTX and dasatinib. Strikingly, we observed that the combination of dasatinib with DTX could re-sensitize the refractory cancer tissue to chemotherapy as indicated by IHC of cleaved caspase 3 (FIG. 7E). Interestingly, quantification of caspase activity revealed this apoptotic response was specific to an intrinsic caspase-3 response as no change was observed in the caspase 8 levels (FIG. 7F). These results provide insight into the biological complexity of adaptive chemoresistance through the transient emergence of CSC mimicry. Additionally, therapeutic intervention that can target CSC mimicry can result in enhanced antitumor outcomes.

Discussion

While the emerging paradigm of chemotherapy failure is one built on inherent heterogeneity of the tumor (beyond the Darwinian principles of acquisition of mutations and selection pressure), the exact nature and diversity of heterogeneity is not fully defined. Heterogeneity contributing to chemotherapy failure could arise from distinct cell differentiation hierarchy, where non-stem cells are susceptible to chemotherapy while stem-like or cancer stem cells are inherently tolerant to cytotoxics (Shackleton et al., 2009). Similarly, phenotypic heterogeneity arising from stochasticity in activation of cell signaling/survival pathways can confer chemotherapy failure in subsets of cells (Brock et al., 2009). It is demonstrated herein that chemoresistance could additionally arise from a more dynamic heterogeneity, where cancer cells can exist in a continuum of phenotypic states tending, under chemotherapy pressure, to mimic a stem-like cell. In this state, cells exploit phenotypic advantages of stem-like properties to transiently rewire a distinct signaling network via CD44, EGFR, PI3K/AKT and SFK and evoke a survival response.

While the cancer stem-like cell conferring chemotherapy resistance/tolerance is an attractive hypothesis, clinical observations and mathematical analysis highlight the inconsistencies in the theory (Kern and Shibata, 2007). Indeed, recent evidence indicates that cancer stem-like cells can spontaneously arise de novo from non-stem like cells, supporting a more flexible model than the current differentiation hierarchy model (Gupta et al., 2011). The results described herein indicate that in addition to the inherently-resistant cells that exist in the parent population, an additional subset of cells can transiently acquire a state of imperfect ‘mimicry’ of a cancer stem cell in response to chemotherapy. While these cells exhibited enhanced size related to enrichment of DNA content >2N, a quiescent phase, re-population of a heterogeneous landscape, and the induction of CD44Hi consistent with a cancer stem cell identity, they were CD24+/Hi and inhibition of drug efflux had no impact on efficacy, suggesting that the newly generated cells were not true cancer stem cells but imperfect mimics. The imperfect mimicry supports the hypothesis that cells could exist in a continuum between non-stem cell and stem cell phenotypes, tending but not completely switching to the latter state under chemotherapy pressure (FIG. 14). Interestingly, this is synonymous to Batesian mimicry, where the mimic can acquire a degree of protection from predation (death) and environmental challenges (chemotherapy pressure) by exerting the phenotype of a dominant species (CSCs) (Johnstone, 2002). However, in contrast to an inheritable phenotypic alteration, presented herein is a context of ‘adaptive mimicry’. In the clinical translation of this phenomenon, repeated generation of CSC mimicry and enhancement of polyploidization may lead to generation of aneuploidy and accelerate a malignant conversion over time (Storchova and Pellman, 2004) and thus serving as a substrate for the somatic mutational evolution of cancer. Additionally, a transient drug-tolerant state can also confer the tumor the ability to survive long enough under chemotherapy insult to establish heritable and stable mechanisms of resistance. Similar behavior has been reported in bacterial cell populations, where a subset of cells can stochastically assume a distinct phenotype that confers tolerance to antibiotics not caused by genetic mutation or acquisition of plasmids but by reduced proliferation rates (Dawson et al., 2011). Indeed, the collective findings of Sharma et al and Kreso et al, highlight the analogy between the bacterial and the chemotherapy-tolerant cancer cells (Kreso et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 2010), and are consistent with the observation made herein that the induced multidrug tolerance does not involve drug efflux, and give rise to parental phenocopies on removal of chemotherapy pressure.

While CSCs have been explored more extensively as a driver for chemotherapy tolerance, emerging studies have implicated multiple mechanisms in driving an adaptive state of chemotherapy tolerance (Marusyk et al., 2012). Without wishing to be bound by theory, the data described herein indicates that the acquisition of CD44 enabled the tumor cells to scaffold and activate two critical signaling pathways, the PI3K-AKT and SFK families, which are pervasively implicated in pro-survival signaling. The combination of PI103 and dasatinib resulted in the synergistic induction of cell death in the DTC subset, indicating that while the two pathways can cross-talk, they may regulate disparate survival functions within a ‘stressed’ cancer cell. For example, AKT has been implicated in regulation of the cell cycle (Chang et al., 2003), and may thus serve to prevent mitotic catastrophe, a function not connected to SFK proteins. Therefore, the choice of kinase inhibitors in combinatorial regimens for the clinical management of cancer should be considered carefully as to disrupt unique survival components that confer resistance to cytotoxic agents.

The analysis presented herein challenges the classical notion of CSC biomarkers, such as CD44, as merely innocuous designations of differentiation and posits a functional role for the emergence of stem-like proteins in adaptive chemoresistance. Without wishing to be bound by theory, for example, EpCAM, a biomarker over expressed in the stem-like mimics, has been shown to coordinate functional activity of the AP-1 protein transcription factor (Sankpal et al., 2011). Similarly, other CSC surface markers and their supporting roles within the cortex may contribute important tumorigenic advantages. Indeed, among the plethora of cancer types which can arise from all tissue within the body, there is an equally diverse signature of stem-cell designations (Jaggupilli and Elkord, 2012). It may be the case that different tumors respond to chemotherapy by exerting a distinct signature of stem-like descriptors corresponding to unique oncogenic profile, thus asserting the rationale for tailored combinations of drugs to target these emergent populations.

A number of single-agent kinase inhibitors have been discarded in clinic due to the endpoint failure, never to emerge again for the treatment of particular cancer sub-types. For example, dasatinib had previously failed as a single-agent in the clinical management of TNBC (Finn et al., 2011), however the data presented herein indicates that dasatinib could emerge as an attractive therapeutic agent for TNBC primed with a taxane therapy. Indeed, these findings emphasize the importance of temporality in combining cytotoxics and targeted therapeutics; perhaps even warranting the re-examination of kinase inhibitors previously considered ineffective.

The upregulation of CD44 and the resultant rewiring of the intracellular signaling network via PI3K/AKT pathway and Src family kinases open up the possibility of overcoming adaptive resistance to taxanes with a combination of appropriate inhibitors (FIG. 7G). Interestingly, this window of therapeutic opportunity for using the kinase inhibitors such as dasatinib arises when the cells shuttle to the transient phenotype characterized by the rewired network state, and is lost when the tumor re-equilibrates to the parental phenocopy state (FIG. 7H). Indeed, these results highlight the emerging understanding of the importance of temporality or sequencing in the design of rational combinations for the treatment of cancer (Lee et al., 2012). Interestingly, the results with the multifunctional nanoparticles indicate that such mechanistically-inspired nanomedicines can address these developing needs. The key observation is the evolving convergence between the hierarchical (Dean et al., 2005) and the mechanism-driven phenotypic heterogeneity models (Meads et al., 2009) during the induction of adaptive resistance to chemotherapy. The full acquisition of a CSC phenotype is not necessary; instead even imperfect mimics can potentially mount a survival response. Indeed, Marusyk and Polyak recently articulated that ‘refraining from mapping the differences in cancer cell phenotypes into differentiation hierarchies would lead to more accurate scientific interpretation of the data, which is critical for clinical translation’ (Marusyk and Polyak, 2013). The current study highlights the potential complexities that might exist, where instead of simplistic static pools of CSCs and non-CSCs, tumor cells can exist in a dynamic equilibrium between the two states that can shift in the presence or absence of a catalyst, for example under chemotherapy pressure towards the CSC phenotype.

Experimental Procedures

Cell Culture and Generating a Subpopulation of Chemotherapy-Tolerant Breast Cancer Cells (DTC)

MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 were purchased from ATCC. For acute treatments, cells were plated at a density of 0.5-1×105 cells/ml and allowed to adhere for 24-48 hr. when cells reached ˜70% confluency they were treated with antitubulins at indicated concentrations for 4-24 hours and utilized for subsequent assays. To generate chemotherapy tolerant subset, cells were treated with indicated concentrations of chemotherapy (48). Following washes with PBS, adherent cells were trypsinized and re-plated at a density of 1.5-2×105 cells/ml and cultured in serum-containing medium. After 24 hours incubation, floating cells were removed and remaining cells were washed with 1×PBS and considered a subpopulation of chemotherapy-tolerant cells. A separate plate of control cells were maintained concurrently in serum containing medium and provided fresh media at every interval where DTC received fresh media.

In Vivo Experiments.

4-6 week old Balb/C mice (Charles River, Cambridge Mass.) were inoculated with 106 4 T-1 mouse mammary carcinoma cells in the left flank (Charles River, Cambridge Mass.). Mice identified with tumors were treated with docetaxel (DTX) or vehicle twice at 72 hour intervals at 10 mg/kg i.v. or 15 mg/kg i.p. and subsequently treated with dasatinib i.p. or nanoparticles i.v. 72 hours following the final DTX dose. Tumors were harvested at indicated time points and evaluated for protein phosphorylation and expression. Experimental detail provided in supplemental data.

Human Refractory Breast Cancer Explant.

Anonymous human breast cancer tissues (N=7) from patients refractory to taxane-containing regimens were incubated ex vivo in autologous patient serum in the presence or absence of taxane-containing or liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) regimens for 72 hours. Following fixation in formalin and paraffin embedding, tissue was processed by H&E to identify tumor cells and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to identify protein expression. IHC scores were determined in a third party blinded fashion by multiplying the intensity of staining at the cellular level with the percentage of cells stained per field of view.

Cytotoxicity Analysis and Calculation of Drug Sensitivity Index.

Following viability analyses conducted as described in supplemental data, drug sensitivity index (SI) was determined as follows: Cell viability was determined as % of control for treatment conditions of 10 nM, 100 nM 1000 nM and 10 μM to generate an average cell viability across these 4 drug concentrations. SI was calculated as a ratio of parent:DTC or parent:parentphenocopy. SI=1 correlates to parental sensitivity, SI<1 correlates to resistance compared to parent cell line and SI>1 correlates to enhanced sensitivity to the indicated drug compared to the parent cell line at the same concentration average.

FACS Analyses.

Following formalin fixation (4% in PBS) cells were blocked with 10% goat serum in 1×PBS and incubated with antibodies overnight at 4° C. Cells were processed by flow cytometry (Accuri C6, BD Ann Arbor, Mich.).

Synthesis of Chimeric Nanoparticles.

Dasatinib was encapsulated within a cholesterol-conjugated PI-103 lipid nanoparticle decorated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Unreacted drug was removed by Spehadex-G25 column and nanoparticles sized by lipid extrusion confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Loading of PI103-Dasatinib nanoparticle was determined in DMF by measuring absorbance at 270 and 285 nm respectively using UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Shimadzu 2450). Full nanoparticle formulation can be found in supplemental data.

Statistics.

Statistical analysis was carried out with Prism software (Graphpad, LaJolla Calif.) experimental data is expressed as mean±SEM and analyzed by student's T-test. Unless noted otherwise all p-values were obtained at the two-sided level of significance, p-values *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001. The data are expressed as a mean±SEM.

Antibodies and Reagents.

CD44 (Clone IM7 from eBioScience) conjugated to FITC (AnaSpec, Freemont Calif.), CD44 (clone ABIN135065, Antibodies Online, Atlanta Ga.) conjugated to Biotin (Thermo Fischer, Waltham, Mass.), epCAM-Cy5.5, CD24-PE and CD44-APC (BD biosciences, San Jose, Calif.) anti-Ezrin, ERM, p-ERM, IP-Specific EGFR, anti-Akt antibodies, cleaved caspase-3 and β-Actin were purchased from cell signaling technology (Cambridge, Mass.). Total EGFR polyclonal antibody specific for the cytoplasmic domain (clone 1005) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, Calif.). Monoclonal, neutralizing antibodies against EGFR (Clone LA1) and CD44v6 (clone VFF18) were purchased from Millipore (Billerica, Mass.), CD44v6 (Clone 2F10) was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). Unless noted otherwise, all reagents, small molecule inhibitors and chemotherapies were of the highest grade purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Vincristine was purchased from Tocris biosciences (Minneapolis, Minn.). Cabazitaxel, PI103, Dasatinib, Doxorubicin, LY294002 and Erlotinib were purchased from LC Labs (Woburn, Mass.). All chemotherapeutics and small molecule inhibitors were dissolved in DMSO to a stock concentration of 10 mM and kept frozen.

Cell Culture and Gene Knockdown with siRNA.

MDA-MB-231 (ATCC) were cultured in DMEM containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), MDA-MB-468 MDA-MB-435 and 4T-1 mammary carcinoma cells (ATCC) were cultured in RPMI containing 10% FBS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad Calif.) at 37 C and 5% CO2. During treatments with chemotherapeutics, cells were grown to semi-confluence and treated with indicated concentrations of chemotherapy in serum-containing medium for indicated time points. When small molecule inhibitors were included in treatments, they were added simultaneously with chemotherapy. For siRNA gene knockdown, cells were plated at a concentration of 5×104 cells/ml. Pre-validated Silencer Select siRNA targeting pan-CD44 (5′UAUUCCACGUGGAGAAAAAtt3′) (SEQ ID NO: 38) or Ezrin (5′CGUGGGAUGCUCAAAGAUAtt3′) (SEQ ID NO: 39) were purchased from Ambion (Invitrogen, Grand Island, N.Y.). siRNA plasmids were transfected using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad Calif.) following manufacturer protocol and cultured for 72 hours prior to treatment. Scrambled siRNA was used as a control.

Generating a Subpopulation of Chemotherapy-Tolerant Breast Cancer Cells (DTC) and Expanded (DTCE).

Cells were plated in 100 mm Plates at a density of 1×106 cells/ml and cultured for 48 hours. Cells were then treated with indicated concentrations of chemotherapy and cultured for 48 hours, docetaxel tolerant cells (DTC) were treated with 100 nM docetaxel which is a concentration >20 times the IC50. After 48 hours of treatment floating cells were washed with PBS, adherent cells were trypsinized and re-plated at a density of 1×105 cells/ml and cultured in serum-containing medium. After 24 hours incubation, floating cells were removed and remaining cells were washed with 1×PBS. The remaining adherent cells are considered a subpopulation of chemotherapy-tolerant cells. A separate plate of control cells were maintained concurrently in serum containing medium, at every interval where DTC received fresh media, parent cells were given fresh media as well and harvested at the same time as DTC. A schematic can be found in FIG. 1D. An expanded population of DTC (DTCE) were cultured in drug free media for an additional 23 days beyond DTC.

In Vivo Experiments.

1 million 4T-1 mouse mammary carcinoma cells suspended in 100 □L PBS were injected per left flank of 5-6 week old Balb/C (Charles River, Wilmington Mass.). DTX was dissolved in pure Ethanol at a concentration of 50 mg/ml mixed 1:1 with Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) and brought to a final working concentration with 5% glucose in PBS. Once Tumors became palpable (˜100 mm3), DTX or vehicle treatments were administered at 100 μL volumes. Dasatinib was dissolved in DMSO to working concentration and delivered as 50 μL injections on indicated days, 50□L DMSO used as a control in these studies. Tumor volumes were measured by a third party unaware of treatment conditions using digital calipers (Starlett, Athol, Mass.), volumes were assessed by the following formula: (Width×Width×length)/2 and expressed as relative volume increase from day 1. Tumor homogenate was prepared by homogenization of equal weight tissue sections incubated in 3×RIPA buffer containing 2× protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Mass.).

Human Explant Studies.

Anonymous human breast cancer tissues (N=7) from patients refractory to taxane-containing regimens and varying stages of disease (FIG. 9 shows patient history) were obtained from Mitra Biotech collected under IRB approval from HCG Bangalore Institute of Oncology with due consent. Fresh tumor tissues were collected from breast cancer patients immediately after surgical resection at HCG cancer hospital, Bangalore, India. The tumor samples were transported to the laboratory at 4° C., in appropriate transport buffer within 60 minutes post-resection, for ex-vivo studies and molecular and pathological evaluation. Tissues were cut into thin sections and cultured in 96 well plate using optimized conditions (Radhakrishnan et al., 2013). Tumors were treated with a taxane-containing regimen (Docetaxel+Doxorubicin+Cyclophosphamide) or other drugs as indicated. DMSO was used as a vehicle control. After 48 hrs of treatment, tumor cell viability was measured and release of soluble cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-8 were determined.

Cytotoxicity and Cell Viability Assays and Calculation of Drug Sensitivity Index.

Parent cells DTC or ParentPhenocopy were generated as described and plated at a concentration of 1.5×105 in a clear bottom 96-well plate. Cells were exposed to indicated treatments (100 mL) for 48 hours in serum containing medium. Following incubation, cells were washed 1 time with PBS and recovered in serum and phenol red-free RPMI or DMEM and subsequently treated with MTS following manufacturer protocol (Promega, Madison, Wis.). Drug sensitivity index (SI) was determined as follows: Cell viability was determined as % of control for treatment conditions of 10 nM, 100 nM 1000 nM and 10 μM to generate an average cell viability across these 4 drug concentrations. SI was calculated as a ratio of parent:DTC or parent:parentphenocopy. SI=1 correlates to parental sensitivity, SI<1 correlates to resistance compared to parent cell line and SI>1 correlates to enhanced sensitivity to the indicated drug compared to the parent cell line at the same concentration average.

Phosphorylation Arrays.

EGFR phosphorylation array was performed following manufacturer protocol (Raybiotech Inc. Norcross, Ga.). Values were determined by phosphorylated residue/Total EGFR and expressed as relative increase in DTC compared to parental control. The Proteome Profiler™ (R&D systems, Minneapolis Minn.) was used to identify phosphorylated residues correlating to p53, Akt and SFK-associated proteins. Following the Bradford protein analysis assay to normalize total protein content, cell lysate was applied to the phosphorylation membranes following manufacturer protocol. Western blot of total Actin was used to confirm equal loading of lysate. Membranes were visualized by chemiluminescence (Syngene, Cambridge UK). Optical densities were determined by Image J™ software and Adobe CS5™. Reference spots were used to normalize between array membranes.

FACS Analyses.

Cells were cultured as indicated and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at RT and blocked in 10% goat serum (v/v). Following PBS washes, cells were incubated with indicated antibodies for 60 minutes at room temperature or overnight at 4 C and analyzed by FACS (Accuri cyomteters Inc. Ann Arbor, Mich.). Cell cycle analyzed in propidium iodide solution following incubation in 70% Ethanol overnight at 4 C and following manufacturer protocol (Genscript USA Inc. Piscataway, N.J.). AnnexinV/PI was analyzed FACS following manufacturer protocol (BD, Ann Arbor Mich.). All FACS results were analyzed by FlowJo™ software following a rigorous doublet discrimination based on FSC:A vs. width as well as FSC:A vs. height (Tree Star Inc., Ashland Oreg.). Analyses were also performed through Accuri cFlow™ plus software to obtain and confirm mean fluorescent intensity. Cell Sorting: Cell sorting was performed on live cells. Briefly, cells were incubated with fluorescent antibody for 20 minutes at room temperature in PBS. Following washes, cells were sorted by FACS (BD FACS Aria HU Special Order, Ann Arbor Mich.). Isolation based on size in the FSC:A vs. SSC:A parameters determined after exclusion of doublets based on width and height vs. FSC:A or SSC:A scattering parameters (visual can be found in FIG. 2D). Validation was confirmed by re-analysis and in some instances were enriched twice or more.

Immunohistochemistry.

Human Tumor tissues were fixed in Phos stop (Roche) containing 4% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Prior to immunohistochemical staining of target proteins 4-μm-thick tissue sections mounted in poly L lysine coated glass slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Heat induced antigen retrieval was achieved using citrate buffer (pH7.8). The sections were soaked in Antigen Unmasking Solution (Vector Burlingame, Calif.) for 10 minutes followed by retrieval using a microwave for 25 minutes. Endogenous hydrogen peroxidase was blocked by incubating the sections with 3% H2O2 (Merck) for 15 minutes and washed in running tap water for 3 minutes followed by a wash in 1×TBS for 7 minutes. After initial blocking of the slides in 10% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratory) for one hour at room temperature tissue sections were incubated with primary antibodies for additional 1 hour at room temperature. Following primary antibodies were used: anti human Ki-67 (rabbit polyclonal from Vector Laboratory, 1:600 dilution), anti human cleaved caspase3 (rabbit polyclonal, clone D175, from Cell Signaling Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1:600 dilution). Anti human CD44 (Clone IM7) P-HckY410 (Cell Signaling tech.) p-PRAS40T246 (Cell Signaling Tech.) Secondary antibody (Signal Stain Boost IHC Detection Reagent, HRP, Rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology) was added to the sections and incubated for 45 minutes at room temperature and washed four times in 1×PBS for 3 minutes each. Appropriate Isotype matched IgG controls were included for each secondary antibody. Chromogenic development was done by exposure of tissues to DAB substrate (DAB Peroxidase Substrate Kit; Vector Labs). Images of immunostained sections were visualized by Leica DM4000 microscope at 200× or 400× magnifications and images were acquired. Immunoreactivity was scored by intensity of staining (0, no staining, 1 weak; 2 moderate; 3 strong) and percentage of positive cells. By multiplying both values, a final score was calculated. Scoring was performed in a blinded fashion by two experienced pathologists

Cells were generated as described above and plated in 4 chamber glass slides (BD Biosciences, San Jose Calif.) at a concentration of 100,000 cells/ml. Following treatments, cells were washed in PBS and fixed in 4% Paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes. Permeabilization, when necessary, was achieved with 10% (v/v) Goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame Calif.) and 0.05% Saponin (w/v) in PBS for 90 minutes. Blocking was performed in 10% (v/v) Goat serum in PBS. The cells were labeled with the indicated primary antibodies at 1:100 and tagged with FITC or unconjugated followed by a secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen Carlsbad Calif.) at 1:250 were added 24 hours later and incubated for 90 minutes at room temperature in blocking buffer and masked with DAPI-containing hard-set mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame Calif.). Bright field and fluorescent images were obtained using three channels on a NIKON Eclipse TI-U microscope with a 20×ELDW, 10× or 40× Plan-Apo objective lens (Nikon, Melville N.Y.). NIS Elements Viewer version 3.22 (Nikon, Melville N.Y.) software was used to capture the images to file. For histological quantification, IHC were scored blindly by a clinical pathologist based on number of cells which stain for the target protein (1-4) and multiplied by the intensity of staining as a subjective percentile. This value was expressed as IHC score to quantify the level of staining.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting.

Laemli sample buffer was prepared as a 5× solution containing β-mercaptoethanol as a reducing agent. Immunoprecipitaion was performed using both classic and direct IP kits purchased from Pierce following manufacturer protocols (Thermo Fisher inc. Rockford, Ill.). Briefly, cell lysates were prepared using IP/Lysis Buffer (Thermo Fisher inc. Rockford, Ill.) in the presence of 2×HALT protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher inc. Rockford, Ill.). For classic Immunoprecipitation, lysates were combined with indicated antibodies for 48 hours at 4 C and combined with protein A/G agarose beads for 4 hours prior to elution with 2× Laemli Buffer at 100 C. Direct immunoprecipitation was performed following manufacturer protocol. Briefly, antibodies were covalently attached to agarose beads, lysate was combined with antibody-agarose bead conjugates for 24 hours prior to washes and elution with provided Elution Buffer. Protein samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes prior to incubation at 4 C with indicated primary antibodies. PVDF membranes with primary antibody were incubated at room temperature with HRP conjugated secondary antibodies (BD Ann Arbor, Mich.) and resolved by chemiluminescence using the G-Box and Syngene software (Syngene Cambridge, UK). When possible, blots were stripped (Thermo Fischer, Rockford Ill.) and re-probed with a second primary antibody. Optical densities of western blots were measured using ImageJ™ open source software (National Institutes of Health) and validated using Adobe CS5™.

All chemical reagents were of analytical grade, used as supplied without further purification unless indicated. All reactions were performed under inert conditions unless otherwise indicated. Dichloromethane (DCM), anhydrous DCM, Methanol, Cholesterol, Dimethylamino Pyridine (DMAP), Succinic Anhydride, Sodium Sulfate, Pyridine, 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), L-α-phosphatidylcholine and Sephadex G-25 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PI-103 was purchased from Selleckchem and PI828 was purchased from Tocris Biosciences. 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine-N-[Amino(Polythylene Glycol)2000] and the mini handheld Extruder kit (including 0.2 μm Whatman Nucleopore Track-Etch Membrane, Whatman filter supports and 1.0 mL Hamiltonian syringes) were bought from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using precoated silica gel Aluminium sheets 60 F254 bought from EMD Laboratories. Spots on the TLC plates were visualized under UV light, and/or by treatment with alkaline permanganate solution followed by heating. Column chromatography was conducted using silica gel (230-400 mesh) from Qualigens. 1H spectra were recorded on Bruker DPX 400 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in 6 (ppm) units using residual 1H signals from deuterated solvents as references. Spectra were analyzed with Mest-Re-C Lite (Mestrelab Research) and/or XWinPlot (Bruker Biospin). Electrospray ionization mass spectra were recorded on a Micromass Q Tof 2 (Waters) and data were analyzed with MassLynx 4.0 (Waters) software.

Synthesis of PI103-Cholesterol Conjugate:

Cholesterol (500 mg, 1.29 mmol) was dissolved in 5 ml of anhydrous pyridine. Succinic anhydride (645 mg, 6.45 mmol) and catalytic amount of DMAP was added to the reaction mixture to form clear solution. The reaction mixture was flushed with argon and allowed to stir under argon atmosphere for 12 h. Then, pyridine was removed under vacuum and the crude residue was diluted in 30 ml DCM. It was washed with 1N HCl (30 ml) and water (30 ml). The organic layer was separated and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuo (FIG. 17). Completion of the reaction was confirmed by performing a TLC in 1:99 Methanol:DCM solvent mixture. The product was used for next step without further purification. PI-103 (25 mg, 0.072 mmol) was dissolved in 3 ml anhydrous DCM followed by addition of cholesterol-succinic acid (0.216 mmol, 105 mg), EDC (0.216 mmol, 41.4 mg) and DMAP (0.216, 26 mg). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 12 h under argon. Upon completion of reaction as monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was diluted with 10 ml DCM and washed with dilute HCl and water. The organic layers were separated, combined and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated under vacuum and the crude product was purified by using column chromatography, eluting with methanol:methylene chloride gradient, to give the PI-103 cholesterol conjugate as a light yellow solid (52 mg, 90%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.65-8.53 (m, 1H), 8.36 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J=1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.56-7.41 (m, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.28-4.15 (m, 2H), 3.97-3.86 (m, 2H), 3.64 (s, 1H), 2.93 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.76 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 1H), 2.17 (s, 1H), 1.59 (s, 4H), 1.29 (d, J=34.2 Hz, 3H), 1.25-1.23 (m, 6H), 1.13-0.80 (m, 13H), 0.66 (s, 2H), 0.03 (m, 12H). HRMS Calculated for [C50H64N4O6+H]+:817.4899 Found: 817.4883.

Dasatinib Chimeric Nanoparticle:

10 mg of L-α-phosphatidylcholine, 2 mg PI103-cholesterol conjugate (Described above), 2 mg of Dasatinib and 22 mg of 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine-N-[Amino(Polythylene Glycol)2000](DSPE-PEG) were dissolved in 1.0 mL DCM and 0.5 mL of methanol. Solvent was evaporated into a thin and uniform lipid-drug film using a rotary evaporator. The lipid-drug film was then hydrated with 2.0 mL H2O for 1 h at 60° C. The hydrated nanoparticles looked light yellow to white with little viscous texture. It was passed though Sephadex G-25 column and extruded at 65° C. to obtain sub 200 nm particles.

Loading of Drug from Nanoparticle:

A standard curve of PI103-Cholesterol conjugate and Dasatinib in DMF was generated by measuring absorbance at 270 and 285 nm respectively using UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Shimadzu 2450). A known concentration of nanoparticle was dissolved in DMF and the absorbance value at 270 and 285 nm was used to calculate the loading from standard curve.

Nanoparticle Characterization and Stability Studies:

The mean particle size of the nanoparticles was measured by Dynamic Light Scattering method using Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK). 10 μL of nanoparticles solution was diluted to 1 ml using DI water and 3 sets of 10 measurements each were performed at 90 degree scattering angle to get the average particle size. The zeta potential was measured using a Zetasizer ZS90 with the nanoparticles diluted in water for measurement according to the manufacturer's manual.

3Dimensional Illustration.

3D rendering was performed using the 3D Studio Max Software (Autodesk).

REFERENCES

  • Berrieman, H. K., Lind, M. J., and Cawkwell, L. (2004). Do beta-tubulin mutations have a role in resistance to chemotherapy? The lancet oncology 5, 158-164.
  • Bissell, M. J., and Labarge, M. A. (2005). Context, tissue plasticity, and cancer: are tumor stem cells also regulated by the microenvironment? Cancer cell 7, 17-23.
  • Bouchet, B. P., and Galmarini, C. M. (2010). Cabazitaxel, a new taxane with favorable properties. Drugs Today (Bare) 46, 735-742.
  • Brennan, M., Davison, P. F., and Paulus, H. (1985). Preparation of bispecific antibodies by chemical recombination of monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 fragments. Science 229, 81-83.
  • Cairns, J. (1975). Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255, 197-200.
  • Chaudhuri, P., Paraskar, A., Soni, S., Mashelkar, R. A., and Sengupta, S. (2009). Fullerenol-cytotoxic conjugates for cancer chemotherapy. ACS nano 3, 2505-2514.
  • Dean, M., Fojo, T., and Bates, S. (2005). Tumour stem cells and drug resistance. Nature reviews Cancer 5, 275-284.
  • Di Cosimo, S., and Baselga, J. (2010). Management of breast cancer with targeted agents: importance of heterogeneity. [corrected]. Nature reviews Clinical oncology 7, 139-147.
  • Dylla, S. J., Beviglia, L., Park, I. K., Chartier, C., Raval, J., Ngan, L., Pickell, K., Aguilar, J., Lazetic, S., Smith-Berdan, S., et al. (2008). Colorectal cancer stem cells are enriched in xenogeneic tumors following chemotherapy. PloS one 3, e2428.
  • Finn, R. S., Bengala, C., Ibrahim, N., Roche, H., Sparano, J., Strauss, L. C., Fairchild, J., Sy, O., and Goldstein, L. J. (2011). Dasatinib as a single agent in triple-negative breast cancer: results of an open-label phase 2 study. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17, 6905-6913.
  • Gautreau, A., Poullet, P., Louvard, D., and Arpin, M. (1999). Ezrin, a plasma membrane-microfilament linker, signals cell survival through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 7300-7305.
  • Gillies, R. J., Verduzco, D., and Gatenby, R. A. (2012). Evolutionary dynamics of carcinogenesis and why targeted therapy does not work. Nature reviews Cancer 12, 487-493.
  • Gupta, P. B., Fillmore, C. M., Jiang, G., Shapira, S. D., Tao, K., Kuperwasser, C., and Lander, E. S. (2011). Stochastic state transitions give rise to phenotypic equilibrium in populations of cancer cells. Cell 146, 633-644.
  • Harper, L. J., Costea, D. E., Gammon, L., Fazil, B., Biddle, A., and Mackenzie, I. C. (2010). Normal and malignant epithelial cells with stem-like properties have an extended G2 cell cycle phase that is associated with apoptotic resistance. BMC cancer 10, 166.
  • Huang, W. C., and Hung, M. C. (2009). Induction of Akt activity by chemotherapy confers acquired resistance. J Formos Med Assoc 108, 180-194.
  • Idowu, M. O., Kmieciak, M., Dumur, C., Burton, R. S., Grimes, M. M., Powers, C. N., and Manjili, M. H. (2012). CD44(+)/CD24(−/low) cancer stem/progenitor cells are more abundant in triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma phenotype and are associated with poor outcome. Human pathology 43, 364-373.
  • Johnstone, R. A. (2002). The evolution of inaccurate mimics Nature 418, 524-526.
  • Jorgensen, P., and Tyers, M. (2004). How cells coordinate growth and division. Current biology: CB 14, R1014-1027.
  • Logue, J. S., and Morrison, D. K. (2012). Complexity in the signaling network: insights from the use of targeted inhibitors in cancer therapy. Genes & development 26, 641-650.
  • MacLaine, N. J., and Hupp, T. R. (2011). How phosphorylation controls p53. Cell Cycle 10, 916-921.
  • Marusyk, A., Almendro, V., and Polyak, K. (2012). Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nature reviews Cancer 12, 323-334.
  • Matrone, M. A., Whipple, R. A., Thompson, K., Cho, E. H., Vitolo, M. I., Balzer, E. M., Yoon, J. R., Ioffe, O. B., Tuttle, K. C., Tan, M., and Martin, S. S. (2010). Metastatic breast tumors express increased tau, which promotes microtentacle formation and the reattachment of detached breast tumor cells. Oncogene 29, 3217-3227.
  • Mori, T., Kitano, K., Terawaki, S., Maesaki, R., Fukami, Y., and Hakoshima, T. (2008). Structural basis for CD44 recognition by ERM proteins. The Journal of biological chemistry 283, 29602-29612.
  • Okabe, S., Tauchi, T., and Ohyashiki, K. (2008). Characteristics of dasatinib- and imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 14, 6181-6186.
  • Pal, S. K., Childs, B. H., and Pegram, M. (2011). Triple negative breast cancer: unmet medical needs. Breast cancer research and treatment 125, 627-636.
  • Park, S. Y., Lee, H. E., Li, H., Shipitsin, M., Gelman, R., and Polyak, K. (2010). Heterogeneity for stem cell-related markers according to tumor subtype and histologic stage in breast cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 16, 876-887.
  • Sarrio, D., Rodriguez-Pinilla, S. M., Dotor, A., Calero, F., Hardisson, D., and Palacios, J. (2006). Abnormal ezrin localization is associated with clinicopathological features in invasive breast carcinomas. Breast cancer research and treatment 98, 71-79.
  • Shackleton, M., Quintana, E., Fearon, E. R., and Morrison, S. J. (2009). Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution. Cell 138, 822-829.
  • Talpaz, M., Silver, R. T., Druker, B. J., Goldman, J. M., Gambacorti-Passerini, C., Guilhot, F., Schiffer, C. A., Fischer, T., Deininger, M. W., Lennard, A. L., et al. (2002). Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase 2 study. Blood 99, 1928-1937.
  • Turner, N. C., and Reis-Filho, J. S. (2012). Genetic heterogeneity and cancer drug resistance. The lancet oncology 13, e178-185.
  • Vander Haar, E., Lee, S. I., Bandhakavi, S., Griffin, T. J., and Kim, D. H. (2007). Insulin signalling to mTOR mediated by the Akt/PKB substrate PRAS40. Nature cell biology 9, 316-323.
  • Watters, J. W., Kraja, A., Meucci, M. A., Province, M. A., and McLeod, H. L. (2004). Genome-wide discovery of loci influencing chemotherapy cytotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 11809-11814.

Claims

1. A method for treating breast cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject in need of treatment for breast cancer a combination of:

a. a cytotoxic taxane chemotherapy agent; and
b. a kinase inhibitor which inhibits the activity of at least Hck kinase, wherein the kinase inhibitor is A 419259.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject is further administered an EGFR inhibitor.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the kinase inhibitor is administered after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered during a period in which at least a subpopulation of cancer cells in the subject display increased levels of CD44 on the cell surface.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered during a period in which tumor growth plateaus.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered at least 4 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered no more than about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered from about 4 hours to about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered about 72 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered within 10 days after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.

11. A method for treating breast cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject in need of treatment for breast cancer a combination of:

a. a cytotoxic taxane chemotherapy agent, wherein the taxane is docetaxel; and
b. a kinase inhibitor which inhibits the activity of at least Hck kinase.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the subject is further administered an EGFR inhibitor.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the kinase inhibitor is dasatinib.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the kinase inhibitor is administered after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered during a period in which at least a subpopulation of cancer cells in the subject display increased levels of CD44 on the cell surface.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered during a period in which tumor growth plateaus.

17. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered at least 4 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered no more than about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

19. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered from about 4 hours to about 216 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent.

20. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered about 72 hours after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.

21. The method of claim 11, wherein the combination of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent and the kinase inhibitor is administered within 10 days after the administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
7400979 July 15, 2008 Borhani
10525060 January 7, 2020 Treon
20110318336 December 29, 2011 Petricoin et al.
20120165340 June 28, 2012 Furnari et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
1391213 February 2004 EP
2005046597 May 2005 WO
2009002993 December 2008 WO
2012075679 June 2012 WO
Other references
  • Boggon et al., “Structure and regulation of Src family kinases”, 2004, Oncogene, 23(48), pp. 7918-7927. (Year: 2004).
  • Koreckij et al., “Dasatinib inhibits the growth of prostate cancer in bone and provides additional protection from osteolysis”, 2009, British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), 263-268. (Year: 2009).
  • Montero et al., “Inhibition of Src Family Kinases and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases by Dasatinib: Possible Combinations in Solid Tumors”, 2011, Clin. Cancer Res., 17(17), pp. 5546-5552. (Year: 2011).
  • Pene-Dumitrescu et al., “An inhibitor-resistant mutant of Hck protects CML cells against the antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of the broad-spectrum Src family kinase inhibitor A-419259”, 2008, Oncogene, 27(56), pp. 7055-7069. (Year: 2008).
  • Fornier et al., “A phase I study of dasatinib and weekly paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer”, 2011, Annals of Oncology, 22(12), pp. 2575-2581. (Year: 2011).
  • Abrams et al., “Preclinical evaluation of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 as a single agent and in combination with “standard of care” therapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer”, 2003, Mol. Cancer Ther., 2(10), pp. 1011-1021. (Year: 2003).
  • Ciardiello et al., “Phase II study of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer”, 2006, British Journal of Cancer, 94(11), pp. 1604-1609. (Year: 2006).
  • Araujo et al., “Dasatinib combined with docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from a phase 1/2 study”, Cancer, 118(1): 63-71 (2012).
  • Gong et al., “Markers of tumor-initiating cells predict chemoresistance in breast cancer” PLoS One, 5(12): 1-11 (2012).
  • Gupta et al., “Stochastic state transitions give rise to phenotypic equilibrium in populations of cancer cells”, Cell, 146(4): 633-44 (2011).
  • Lee et al., “Sequential application of anti-cancer drugs enhances cell death by re-wiring apoptotic signaling networks”, Cell, 149(4): 780-94 (2012).
  • Madhunapantula et al., “PRAS40 Deregulates Apoptosis in Malignant Melanoma”, Cancer Res. 67(8): 3626-3636 (2007).
  • Goldman et al., “Chemotherapy-induced Akt survival signaling is regulated by CD44 Ezrin/Radaxin Moesin (ERM) scaffolding, dependent on EGFR activity”, Supplement 72(8) Cancer Research (2012).
  • Hellqvist et al., “CD44 monoclonal Antibody-Enhanced Clearance of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells From the Malignant Niche”, Blood 122:858 (2013).
  • Myssina et al., “Combined BCR-ABL inhibition with lentiviral-delivered shRNA and dasatinib augments induction of apoptosis in Philadelphia-positive cells”, Experimental Hematology 37(2):206-214 (2009).
  • Padhye et al., “Sustained Expression of the RON Receptor Tyrosine Kinase by Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells as a Potential Targeting Moiety for Antibody-Directed Chemotherapeutics”, Molecular Pharmaceuticals 8:2310-2319 (2011).
Patent History
Patent number: 10813931
Type: Grant
Filed: Feb 12, 2014
Date of Patent: Oct 27, 2020
Patent Publication Number: 20150374692
Assignee: THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, INC. (Boston, MA)
Inventors: Aaron Goldman (Somerville, MA), Ashish Kulkarni (Cambridge, MA), Shiladitya Sengupta (Waltham, MA)
Primary Examiner: My-Chau T. Tran
Application Number: 14/768,230
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Involving Transferase (435/15)
International Classification: A61K 31/506 (20060101); A61K 45/06 (20060101); A61K 31/7088 (20060101); A61K 31/337 (20060101); A61K 47/69 (20170101); A61P 35/00 (20060101); A61K 31/517 (20060101); C12N 15/113 (20100101); G01N 33/574 (20060101);