METHODS FOR CELL REPROGRAMMING AND GENOME ENGINEERING
Methods for producing engineered induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are provided comprising introducing a first nucleic acid into somatic cells for integration into their genome and reprogramming the cells to produce engineered iPS cells having the nucleic acid integrated into their genome. For example, in certain aspects the cells are reprogrammed by introduction of a genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factor and culturing of the cells under conditions sufficient to produce reprogrammed cells.
Latest Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. Patents:
- METHOD FOR REPRODUCIBLE DIFFERENTIATION OF CLINICAL-GRADE RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM CELLS
- METHODS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF IPS CELLS USING NON-VIRAL APPROACH
- Cardiomyocyte production
- METHODS FOR DIFFERENTIATING PLURIPOTENT CELLS
- PRODUCTION OF MIDBRAIN DOPAMINERGIC NEURONS AND METHODS FOR THE USE THEREOF
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/546,365, filed Jul. 11, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/506,314, filed Jul. 11, 2011, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of stem cell development. More particularly, it concerns the generation of engineered pluripotent stem cells.
2. Description of Related Art
The unlimited proliferation capability and pluripotent potential of human embryonic stem (ES) cells have offered unprecedented access to all cell types of the human body. Human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells derived directly from patient somatic cells with desired genetic background share these two key properties of human ES cells, which made these cells excellent candidates for disease models, drug screening, toxicity testing and transplantation therapies. However, genetic reprogramming of human somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) remains a time consuming, expensive and relatively inefficient process. Moreover, even when desired iPSCs have been produced many applications require further genetic modification of the cells in addition to extensive analysis and characterization of cell properties.
Therefore, there remains a need to address the inefficiency, high cost and other problems in preparing genetically engineered induced pluripotent stem cells.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention overcomes a major deficiency in the art by providing efficient methods for producing genetically engineered induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. In a first embodiment, a method for producing a population of engineered iPS cells is provided comprising (a) obtaining somatic cells; (b) introducing into said cells a first nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome of the cells and at least a second nucleic acid molecule comprising a genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factors; (c) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions; and (d) obtaining a population of iPS cells comprising said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome. Thus, as used here, the one or more reprogramming factor(s) are sufficient, when expressed in the somatic cell under appropriate cell culture conditions, to convert the somatic cell to a pluripotent stem cell. In a further aspect of the embodiment the method comprises producing at least a second population of iPS cells that do not comprise the first nucleic acid integrated in their genome. In certain aspects, the iPS cells and/or engineered iPS cells obtained by a method of the embodiment do not express reprogramming factors (i.e., the factor(s) encoded by the genetic element). In still further aspects, the iPS cells (and/or engineered iPS cells) obtained by such a method do not comprise the genetic element of the second nucleic acid molecule integrated into their genome. Thus, in certain aspects, the genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factor(s) is an extra-chromosomal genetic element.
In a second embodiment, a method for producing a population of engineered iPS cells is provided comprising (a) obtaining somatic cells; (b) introducing into the cells a first nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome of the cells; (c) introducing into said cells an extra-chromosomal genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factor(s); and (d) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions to produce a population of iPS cells comprising said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome. In certain aspects, the iPS cells and/or engineered iPS cells produced by a method of the embodiment do not comprise the extra-chromosomal genetic element integrated into their genome. In a further embodiment there is provided a method for producing a population of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and a population of engineered iPS cells, comprising (a) obtaining somatic cells; (b) introducing into said cells a first nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome of the cells; (c) introducing into said cells an extra-chromosomal genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factor(s); and (d) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions to produce a population of iPS cells and recovering both first iPS cells which comprise said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome and second iPS cells which do not comprise the first nucleic acid integrated in their genome, neither the first nor second iPS cells having the extra-chromosomal genetic element integrated into their genomes.
In a further aspect, iPS cells produced by a method of the embodiments comprise a first nucleic acid molecule integrated into their genome wherein the first nucleic acid is expressible. For example, the first nucleic acid can comprise at least one genetic element (e.g., an RNA or polypeptide coding sequence) that can be expressed in the iPS cells or in cells differentiated from the iPS cells under appropriate conditions. In some aspects, the first nucleic acid molecule includes a genetic element under the control of an inducible or tissue or cell specific promoter. Accordingly, the genetic element would be expressible under conditions wherein the promoter is active (e.g., in the presence of an inducing agent or in a particular differentiated cell type). In still a further aspect, a method of the embodiments comprises a step for screening or selecting for the presence of an expressible first nucleic acid molecule in the iPS cells.
In certain aspects of the embodiments, the first nucleic acid molecule and the second nucleic acid comprising the genetic element (that expresses one or more reprogramming factors) are introduced into the somatic cells no more than about one week apart, such as within 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 days of each other. In still further aspects, the first and second nucleic acid molecules are introduced into the cells during the same day, such as within 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 hours of each other. In yet a further aspect the first and second nucleic acid molecules are introduced into the cells essentially concomitantly. For example, a method according to the embodiments can comprise forming a composition comprising the somatic cells, the first nucleic acid molecule and the second nucleic acid molecule (comprising the genetic element) and culturing said composition.
Certain aspects of the embodiments concern a first nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome of the cells. Such a nucleic acid molecule may integrate into the cell genome at a selected genomic site or in a specific region or may integrate into the genome essentially randomly. In some cases, the first nucleic acid integrates into the genome in only one copy, at one site in the genome. In other cases, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or more copies of the nucleic acid integrate into the genome at either a single site (e.g., in an array of copies) or at multiple sites. A variety of mechanisms can be employed for introducing the first nucleic acid molecule into the genome of somatic cells. For example, in the case where integration is at an essentially random site(s) in the genome, the first nucleic acid can be introduced in a retroviral vector (e.g., a lentiviral vector), an adeno-associated virus vector (without a functional Rep gene) or as part of a transposon system, such as a piggyBac vector. In other aspects, the first nucleic acid is integrated into a selected genomic site, for example, the nucleic acid can be integrated at the AAVS1 integration site (e.g., by use of an adeno-associated virus vector in the presence of a functional Rep gene). Likewise, in certain aspects, integration at a selected genomic site can be by homologous recombination. For example, a meganuclease, a zinc-finger nuclease or a transcription activator-like effector endonuclease (TALEN) that cleaves genomic DNA at the selected site can be used to mediate integration at the selected site. As used herein, integration at a selected genomic site can comprise insertion of the nucleic acid molecules (or a portion thereof) between two contiguous nucleotide positions in the genome or between two nucleotide positions that are not contiguous (e.g., resulting in a replacement of intervening genomic sequences). For example, integration of the nucleic acid at selected genomic sites can comprise replacement of a gene exon, intron, promoter, coding sequence or an entire gene.
In further aspects of the embodiments, the first nucleic acid molecule comprises a coding sequence of a screenable or selectable marker. Alternatively or additionally, the first nucleic acid molecule comprises a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of a sequence that corrects a genetic defect in the cells; a sequence that provides resistance to a pathogen infection; a sequence that provides resistance to a drug; a sequence that provides sensitivity to a drug; a sequence that alters immunogencity of the cells; and a sequence that provides a genetic tag in the cells. In still further aspects, a method of the embodiments comprises introducing in the somatic cells a second, third, fourth or fifth nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome, wherein the nucleic acid molecules are different from one another and integrate into the genome independently of one another.
As used herein the genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factor(s) may be any genetic material or nucleic acids, such as DNA or RNA. In certain aspects, the genetic element may be integrated into the genome of a cell (i.e., either randomly or at a specific site as described in detail above). However, in certain preferred aspects, the genetic element is an element that remains extra-chromosomal upon introduction into the cells such as an episomal vector or RNA. For example, the episomal vector may comprise a replication origin and one or more expression cassettes for expression of reprogramming factors. Such one or more of the expression cassettes may further comprise a nucleotide sequence encoding a trans-acting factor that binds to the replication origin to replicate an extra-chromosomal template. Alternatively or additionally, the somatic cell may express such a trans-acting factor.
In certain aspects, episomal vectors for use according to the invention can be essentially free of bacterial elements. Such bacterial elements may be components of the vector backbone that is required for plasmid propagation in bacteria, such as bacterial origin of replication, e.g., the pUC replication origin, and bacterial selection cassette, e.g., an ampicillin selection cassette.
In exemplary embodiments, the replication origin may be a replication origin of a lymphotrophic herpes virus or a gamma herpesvirus, an adenovirus, SV40, a bovine papilloma virus, or a yeast, such as a replication origin of a lymphotrophic herpes virus or a gamma herpesvirus corresponding to oriP of EBV. In a further aspect, the lymphotrophic herpes virus may be Epstein Barr virus (EBV), Kaposi's sarcroma herpes virus (KSHV), Herpes virus saimiri (HS), or Marek's disease virus (MDV).
For replication and transient maintenance of extra-chromosomal genetic elements, the trans-acting factor may be a polypeptide corresponding to, or a derivative of, a wild-type protein of EBNA-1 (EBV nuclear antigen 1) of EBV, preferably in the presence of a replication origin corresponding to OriP of EBV. The derivative may have a reduced ability to activate transcription from an integrated template as compared to wild-type EBNA-1 and thus reduced chances to ectopically activate chromosome genes to cause oncogenic transformation. Meanwhile, the derivative may activate transcription at least 5% that of the corresponding wild-type protein from an extra-chromosomal template after the derivative binds the replication origin.
For reprogramming of somatic cells, certain aspects of the present methods may involve using the reprogramming factors sufficient, when expressed in the somatic cell under appropriate cell culture conditions, to convert the somatic cell to a pluripotent stem cell. For example, the reprogramming factor(s) can comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of Sox, Oct, Nanog, Lin-28, Klf4, C-myc, L-myc and SV40LT, for example, a set of Sox, Oct, Nanog, and optionally Lin-28, a set of Sox, Oct, Klf4, and optionally C-myc, or a combination of these factors. In certain aspects, to reduce the potential toxic effect of C-myc expression, the SV40 large T gene (SV40LT) may be included with c-Myc. In certain aspects to further improve reprogramming efficiency, Myc mutants, variants or homologs that are deficient in transformation may be used. Non-limiting examples include a Myc proto-oncogene family member such as LMYC (NM_001033081), MYC with 41 amino acid deleted at the N-terminus (dN2MYC), or MYC with mutation at amino acid 136 (W136E).
In certain aspects, the somatic cells for use according to the embodiments are primary human cells, which are cells directly obtained from a living human subject, and may exclude the use of an established or immortalized cell line. Some aspects can comprise the use of terminally differentiated human cells. Non-limiting examples of the primary human cell include a fibroblast, a keratinocyte, a hematopoietic cell, a mesenchymal cell, an adipose cell, an endothelial cell, a neural cell, a muscle cell, an epithelial cell, a mammary cell, a liver cell, a kidney cell, a skin cell, a digestive tract cell, a cumulus cell, a gland cell, or a pancreatic islet cell. More specifically, the primary human cell may be a hematopoietic progenitor cell, such as a CD34+ cell. The primary human cell may be obtained from a blood sample, a hair sample, a skin sample, a saliva sample, a solid tissue sample or any sources known to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
In certain aspects, culturing cells under reprogramming conditions comprises culturing the cells in a reprogramming medium. For example, a reprogramming medium may comprise one or more signaling inhibitor(s) (e.g., an inhibitor that has been added to the medium). The signaling inhibitors may be one or more selected from the group consisting of a glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) inhibitor, a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor, a transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) receptor inhibitor, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and a combination thereof. Particularly, the reprogramming medium can comprise a combination of GSK-3β inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, TGF-β receptor inhibitor, and optionally, LIF. The medium may further comprise externally added ROCK inhibitor or Myosin II inhibitor. The ROCK inhibitor may be HA-100. The medium may further comprise externally added FGF. In certain aspects, the composition may further comprise a chemically defined medium. Non-limiting examples of a chemically defined medium include TeSR medium, human embryonic cell culture medium, N2B27 medium, E8 medium (Chen et al., 2011, incorporated herein by reference) commercialized as Essential 8™ medium, and derivatives thereof. Further methods for reprogramming of somatic cells are detailed in U.S. Patent Publn. 20110104125, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In still further aspects, methods according to the embodiments comprise culturing cells in the presence of feeder cells, such as irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cells. Alternatively, cells may be cultured in conditions essentially free of feeder cells. For example, a method according to the embodiments may comprise culturing cells in the presence of a matrix component to replace feeder cells to support culture of the cell population. Such a matrix component for cell adhesion can be any material intended to attach stem cells or feeder cells (if used). Non-limiting examples of the matrix component include collagen, gelatin, poly-L-lysine, poly-D-lysine, vitronectin, laminin, and fibronectin and mixtures thereof, for example, Matrigel™ and lysed cell membrane preparations. In a particular example, the matrix composition includes a fibronectin fragment, such as RetroNectin® (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,686,278; 6,033,907, 7,083,979 and 6,670,177, incorporated herein by reference). RetroNectin® is a ˜63 kDa protein of (574 amino acids) that contains a central cell-binding domain (type III repeat, 8, 9, 10), a high affinity heparin-binding domain II (type III repeat, 12, 13, 14), and CS1 site within the alternatively spliced IIICS region of human fibronectin.
In some aspects, culturing of cells under reprogramming conditions comprises culturing the cells for at least from about one day, one week or one month under reprogramming conditions. For example, the cells can be cultured in a reprogramming medium (e.g., a medium comprising signaling inhibitors as described above) for at least or about 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 days, or any range derivable therein. The reprogramming conditions may last a period including at least from about one day to five days after introduction of the first nucleic acid molecule and/or the extra-chromosomal element into the somatic cells. The starting and ending time points may be selected from the 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 days, or any range derivable therein after the introduction, for example, from about one day to fifteen days post-transfection of the nucleic acids.
In yet further aspects of the embodiments culturing the cells under reprogramming conditions further comprises selecting or screening the cells for the presence of the first nucleic acid molecule. For example, the cells can be selected or screened by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) or flow cytometry. Alternatively or additionally, the first nucleic acid may comprise a drug resistance marker and the cells can be selected by addition of an appropriate drug to the cell culture medium (e.g., puromycin). Accordingly, in certain aspects, culturing the cells under reprogramming conditions comprises culturing the cells in a reprogramming medium that comprises drug for selection of cells comprising the first nucleic acid molecule. For example, cells can be cultured in the presence of the selection drug beginning about 1 to 10 days (e.g., about 1 to 2 days, 1 to 3 days or 1 to 5 days) after introduction of the first nucleic acid molecule and/or extra-chromosomal genetic element into the cells. Likewise, in certain aspects, the cells are cultured in the presence of the drug for at least about 1 to 10 days, such as for about 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or more days. Thus, in certain embodiments, cells may be cultured in the presence of a selection drug for the entire time that they are in a reprogramming medium (e.g., at least until iPS cells are produced). However, in alternative embodiments, the drug selection only is performed during a portion of the period that the cells are in a reprogramming medium.
In yet a further aspect, the methods of the embodiments may further comprise selecting iPS cells, for example, based on one or more embryonic cell characteristics, such as an ES cell-like morphology. Thus, in still further embodiments, a method comprises selecting pluripotent cells based on the expression of at least a first marker of pluripotency and selecting cells for the presence of the first nucleic acid molecule. Such selection steps can be performed sequentially or essentially concomitantly. For example, a population of cells that express at least a first marker of pluripotency (e.g., Tra160) can be isolated by picking of a clonal cell colony or by FACS. The pluripotent population can then be further separated into cells that comprise the first nucleic acid molecule (engineered iPS cells) and cells that do not comprise the first nucleic acid molecule (iPS cells).
In further aspects of the embodiments, a method of the embodiments comprises the step of (e) culturing the iPS cells and/or engineered iPS cells under expansion conditions. For example, after reprogramming (and/or screening or selection), the cells can be subjected to expansion conditions, such as by culturing in an expansion medium. The expansion medium may, for example, be essentially free of externally added GSK-3 inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, and TGF-β receptor inhibitor. In certain aspects, the expansion medium may have one or more of the signaling inhibitors and/or LIF. Examples of expansion media include, but are not limited to, a normal ES cell culture medium, Essential 8 medium or TeSR medium.
In still a further aspect a method of the embodiments comprises (f) characterizing the iPS cells and/or engineered iPS cells. For example, characterizing the iPS cells can comprise detecting one or more pluripotency markers; performing a karoytype analysis; detecting the presence of the first nucleic acid molecule; determining the sequence of the first nucleic acid molecule; detecting the presence of the extra-chromosomal genetic element; teratoma formation analysis; epigenetic analysis; RNA expression analysis; protein expression analysis; or small tandem repeat (STR) detection.
In certain aspects, starting cells for the present methods may comprise at least or about 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013 cells or any range derivable therein. The starting cell population may have a seeding density of at least or about 10, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 cells/ml, or any range derivable therein.
Embodiments discussed in the context of methods and/or compositions of the invention may be employed with respect to any other method or composition described herein. Thus, an embodiment pertaining to one method or composition may be applied to other methods and compositions of the invention as well.
As used herein the terms “encode” or “encoding” with reference to a nucleic acid are used to make the invention readily understandable by the skilled artisan; however, these terms may be used interchangeably with “comprise” or “comprising” respectively.
As used herein the specification, “a” or “an” may mean one or more. As used herein in the claim(s), when used in conjunction with the word “comprising”, the words “a” or “an” may mean one or more than one.
The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.” As used herein “another” may mean at least a second or more.
Throughout this application, the term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error for the device, the method being employed to determine the value, or the variation that exists among the study subjects.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.
A variety of protocols for procuring iPS cells, both as therapeutics and as research tools, require that the cells be engineered with exogenous nucleic acid molecules incorporated into their genome. However, reprogramming of iPS cells is, itself, a complex, time consuming and expensive process. Further genomic engineering of such cells complicates and lengthens the production process and increases the cost of any resulting cells. The field is therefore in need of improved methods for production of engineered iPS cells.
The present invention is based, in part, on the surprising discovery of methods that allow for virtually simultaneous reprogramming and engineering of cells to produce genetically engineered iPS cells. In particular, it has been found that, even after successful reprogramming, iPS cells can be produced with an engineered construct in their genome which is not silenced during the reprogramming process and can be expressed in the iPS cells (or differentiated cells produced therefrom). Moreover, despite the need for stringent control of cell culture conditions during somatic cell reprogramming, cells can be screened or even selected for genomic integration of a selected nucleic acid molecule during the reprogramming process. After such parallel selection (or screening) and reprogramming iPS cell clones representing individual integration events can be isolated and expanded. This combined process, an example of which is depicted in
Further advances in the composition and methods for production of engineered iPS cell populations are also described below.
II. DefinitionsA “primary cell,” as used herein, refers to a cell directly obtained from a living organism or a progeny thereof without being established or immobilized into a cell line. A “human primary cell” refers to a primary cell obtained from a living human subject.
“Embryonic stem (ES) cells” are pluripotent stem cells derived from early embryos. An ES cell was first established in 1981, which has also been applied to production of knockout mice since 1989. In 1998, a human ES cell was established, which is currently becoming available for regenerative medicine.
“Induced pluripotent stem cells,” commonly abbreviated as iPS cells or iPSCs, refer to a type of pluripotent stem cell artificially prepared from a non-pluripotent cell, typically an adult somatic cell, or terminally differentiated cell, such as fibroblast, a hematopoietic cell, a myocyte, a neuron, an epidermal cell, or the like, by reprogramming.
“Pluripotency” refers to a stem cell that has the potential to differentiate into all cells constituting one or more tissues or organs, or preferably, any of the three germ layers: endoderm (interior stomach lining, gastrointestinal tract, the lungs), mesoderm (muscle, bone, blood, urogenital), or ectoderm (epidermal tissues and nervous system). “Pluripotent stem cells” used herein refer to cells that can differentiate into cells derived from any of the three germ layers, for example, direct descendants of totipotent cells, embryonic stem cell, or induced pluripotent stem cells.
As used herein, the term “somatic cell” refers to any cell other than germ cells, such as an egg, a sperm, or the like, which does not directly transfer its DNA to the next generation. Typically, somatic cells have limited or no pluripotency. Somatic cells used herein may be naturally-occurring or genetically modified.
“Reprogramming” is a process that confers on a cell a measurably increased capacity to form progeny of at least one new cell type, either in culture or in vivo, than it would have under the same conditions without reprogramming. More specifically, reprogramming is a process that confers on a somatic cell a pluripotent potential. This means that after sufficient proliferation, a measurable proportion of progeny having phenotypic characteristics of the new cell type if essentially no such progeny could form before reprogramming; otherwise, the proportion having characteristics of the new cell type is measurably more than before reprogramming. Under certain conditions, the proportion of progeny with characteristics of the new cell type may be at least about 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 5%, 25% or more in the in order of increasing preference.
As used herein the term “engineered” in reference to cells refers to cells that comprise at least one genetic element exogenous to the cell that is integrated into the cell genome. In some aspects, the exogenous genetic element can be integrated at a random location in the cell genome. In other aspects, the genetic element is integrated at a specific site in the genome. For example, the genetic element may be integrated at a specific position to replace an endogenous nucleic acid sequence, such as to provide a change relative to the endogenous sequence (e.g., a change in single nucleotide position).
The term “exogenous,” when used in relation to a protein, gene, nucleic acid, polynucleotide, genetic elements, or vector elements in a cell or organism, refers to a protein, gene, nucleic acid, polynucleotide, genetic element or vector element which has been introduced into the cell or organism by artificial or natural means, or in relation to a cell, refers to a cell which was isolated and subsequently introduced to other cells or to an organism by artificial or natural means. An exogenous nucleic acid may be from a different organism or cell, or it may be one or more additional copies of a nucleic acid which occurs naturally within the organism or cell. An exogenous cell may be from a different organism, or it may be from the same organism. By way of a non-limiting example, an exogenous nucleic acid is in a chromosomal location different from that of natural cells, or is otherwise flanked by a different nucleic acid sequence than that found in nature. Alternatively, an exogenous nucleic acid may be extrachromosomal, such as in an episomal vector.
The term “drug” refers to a molecule including, but not limited to, small molecules, nucleic acids and proteins or combinations thereof that alter or are candidates for altering a phenotype associated with disease.
An “origin of replication” (“ori”) or “replication origin” is a DNA sequence, e.g., in a lymphotrophic herpes virus, that when present in a plasmid in a cell is capable of maintaining linked sequences in the plasmid, and/or a site at or near where DNA synthesis initiates. An on for EBV includes FR sequences (20 imperfect copies of a 30 bp repeat), and preferably DS sequences, however, other sites in EBV bind EBNA-1, e.g., Rep* sequences can substitute for DS as an origin of replication (Kirchmaier and Sugden, 1998). Thus, a replication origin of EBV includes FR, DS or Rep* sequences or any functionally equivalent sequences through nucleic acid modifications or synthetic combination derived therefrom. For example, the present invention may also use genetically engineered replication origin of EBV, such as by insertion or mutation of individual elements, as specifically described in Lindner et at (2008).
A “lymphotrophic” herpes virus is a herpes virus that replicates in a lymphoblast (e.g., a human B lymphoblast) or other cell types and replicates extra-chromosomally for at least a part of its natural life-cycle. After infecting a host, these viruses latently infect the host by maintaining the viral genome as a plasmid. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is not a “lymphotrophic” herpes virus. Exemplary lymphotropic herpes viruses include, but are not limited to EBV, Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus (KSHV), Herpes virus saimiri (HS) and Marek's disease virus (MDV).
A “vector” or “construct” (sometimes referred to as gene delivery or gene transfer “vehicle”) refers to a macromolecule or complex of molecules comprising a polynucleotide to be delivered to a host cell, either in vitro or in vivo.
A “plasmid”, a common type of a vector, is an extra-chromosomal DNA molecule separate from the chromosomal DNA which is capable of replicating independently of the chromosomal DNA. In certain cases, it is circular and double-stranded.
A “template” as used herein is a DNA or RNA molecule which contains a replication origin. An “integrated template” is one which is stably maintained in the genome of the cell, e.g., integrated into a chromosome of that cell. An “extra-chromosomal template” is one which is maintained stably in a cell but which is not integrated into the chromosome.
By “expression construct” or “expression cassette” is meant a nucleic acid molecule that is capable of directing transcription. An expression construct includes, at the least, a promoter or a structure functionally equivalent to a promoter. Additional elements, such as an enhancer, and/or a transcription termination signal, may also be included. A nucleic acid molecule may be DNA or RNA.
The term “corresponds to” is used herein to mean that a polynucleotide sequence is homologous (i.e., is identical, not strictly evolutionarily related) to all or a portion of a reference polynucleotide sequence, or that a polypeptide sequence is identical to a reference polypeptide sequence. In contradistinction, the term “complementary to” is used herein to mean that the complementary sequence is homologous to all or a portion of a reference polynucleotide sequence. For illustration, the nucleotide sequence “TATAC” corresponds to a reference sequence “TATAC” and is complementary to a reference sequence “GTATA”.
III. iPS CellsInduced pluripotent stem cells, commonly abbreviated as iPS cells or iPSCs, are a type of pluripotent stem cell artificially derived from a non-pluripotent cell, typically an adult somatic cell. Induced pluripotent stem cells are believed to be similar if not identical to natural pluripotent stem cells, such as embryonic stem cells in many respects, such as in terms of the expression of certain stem cell genes and proteins, chromatin methylation patterns, doubling time, embryoid body formation, teratoma formation, viable chimera formation, and potency and differentiability, but the full extent of their relation to natural pluripotent stem cells is still being assessed.
Generation of induced pluripotent cells derived from human tissue other than of embryonic origin is desired to alleviate ethical concerns regarding experimental use of embryos and embryonic tissue. The promise of therapeutic applications from induced pluripotent cells has been touted. Medical applications include treatments for Alzheimer's disease, Diabetes and Spinal cord injuries to name a few. Other applications include disease modeling and pharmaceutical drug screening.
iPS cells were first produced in 2006 (Takahashi et al., 2006) from mouse cells and in 2007 from human cells (Takahashi et al., 2007; Yu et al, 2007). This has been cited as an important advancement in stem cell research, as it may allow researchers to obtain pluripotent stem cells, which are important in research and potentially have therapeutic uses, without the controversial use of embryos. The first successful demonstration of generating induced pluripotent cells (iPS cells) from mouse or human tissue involved the use of retroviral vectors expressing a specific set of transcription factors. Research in the laboratories of James Thomson and Shinya Yamanaka has demonstrated that introduction of specific transcription factors by retroviral vectors into mouse or human fibroblasts is sufficient to reprogram those cells to undifferentiated pluripotent stems cells. The factors used by Thomson include Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Lin28. The factors used by Yamanaka include Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc. Reprogramming via either gene set is accomplished by integration into the host cell genome and expression of the transcription factors. Oct4 and Sox2 appear to be essential transcription factors required for reprogramming. The efficiency of reprogramming is low with frequencies in the range of 0.01-0.02% of the starting cell population.
Original embryonic stem cells (ES cells) are pluripotent stem cells derived from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst, an early-stage embryo. ES cells are distinguished by two distinctive properties: their pluripotency and their capability to self-renew themselves indefinitely. ES cells are pluripotent, that is, they are able to differentiate into all derivatives of the three primary germ layers: ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm. Additionally, under defined conditions, embryonic stem cells are capable of propagating themselves indefinitely. This allows embryonic stem cells to be employed as useful tools for both research and regenerative medicine, because they can produce limitless numbers of themselves for continued research or clinical use.
However, there are notable differences between mouse and human ES cells. Human ES cells, when discovered by James Thomson, were found to be different than mouse ES cells in their potency and in their culture conditions, notable by being totally non-responsive to LIF (a required element in culturing mouse ES cells), which results from an inactive leukemia inhibitory factor pathway in human ES cells. Existing human iPS cells are similar to human ES cells in these regards, therefore they could termed human ES cell-like iPS cells.
IV. Genome Integration of Nucleic AcidsIn certain embodiments, the invention involves genomic integration of nucleic acid molecules via genetic engineering. For example, such nucleic acids may be used to correct a genetic defect in the cells, provide resistance to a pathogen infection, provide resistance to a drug, provide sensitivity to a drug, to alter the immunogencity of the cells or to provide a genetic tag in the cells (e.g., an expressed fluorescent marker). Methods for effecting either site-specific or random genome integration of such nucleic acid molecules are known in the art and can be used for genetic engineering.
A. Viral Vectors
In certain aspects, viral vectors may be employed to facilitate integration of nucleic acid molecules into the genome of cells. Retroviruses, for example, can be used to randomly integrate nucleic acid molecules into a host cell genome. In order to construct a retroviral vector, a nucleic acid is inserted into the viral genome in the place of certain viral sequences to produce a virus that is replication-defective. In order to produce virions, a packaging cell line containing the gag, pol, and env genes but without the LTR and packaging components is constructed (Mann et al., 1983). When a recombinant plasmid containing a cDNA, together with the retroviral LTR and packaging sequences is introduced into a special cell line (e.g., by calcium phosphate precipitation for example), the packaging sequence allows the RNA transcript of the recombinant plasmid to be packaged into viral particles, which are then secreted into the culture media (Nicolas and Rubenstein, 1988; Temin, 1986; Mann et al., 1983). The media containing the recombinant retroviruses is then collected, optionally concentrated, and used for gene transfer. Retroviral vectors are able to infect a broad variety of cell types. However, integration and stable expression require the division of host cells (Paskind et al., 1975).
Lentiviruses are complex retroviruses, which, in addition to the common retroviral genes gag, pol, and env, contain other genes with regulatory or structural function. Lentiviral vectors are well known in the art (see, for example, Naldini et al., 1996; Zufferey et al., 1997; Blomer et al., 1997; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,013,516 and 5,994,136).
Recombinant lentiviral vectors are capable of infecting non-dividing cells and can be used for both in vivo and ex vivo gene transfer and expression of nucleic acid sequences. For example, recombinant lentivirus capable of infecting a non-dividing cell wherein a suitable host cell is transfected with two or more vectors carrying the packaging functions, namely gag, pol and env, as well as rev and tat is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,136, incorporated herein by reference.
Likewise, adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors can be used to mediate integration of a nucleic acid molecules into a host cell genome. For example, a gut-less AAV vector can be used such that inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of the virus flank the nucleic acid molecule for integration. If a cell is transduced with such a vector, essentially random genome integration can be achieved. On the other hand, if cells are transduced in the presence of a functional AAV Rep gene (either in the virus or expressed in trans) then site-specific integration of the sequence at the AAVS1 integration site can be accomplished.
B. Transposon-Based Integration Systems
According to another particular embodiment the integration of a nucleic acid may use a transposon—transposase system. Such systems can be used to effectively and randomly insert a nucleic acid molecule into a cell genome. For example, the used transposon—transposase system could be the well known Sleeping Beauty, the Frog Prince transposon—transposase system (for the description of the latter see e.g., EP1507865), or the TTAA-specific transposon piggyB ac system.
Transposons are sequences of DNA that can move around to different positions within the genome of a single cell, a process called transposition. In the process, they can cause mutations and change the amount of DNA in the genome. Transposons were also once called jumping genes, and are examples of mobile genetic elements.
There are a variety of mobile genetic elements, and they can be grouped based on their mechanism of transposition. Class I mobile genetic elements, or retrotransposons, copy themselves by first being transcribed to RNA, then reverse transcribed back to DNA by reverse transcriptase, and then being inserted at another position in the genome. Class II mobile genetic elements move directly from one position to another using a transposase to “cut and paste” them within the genome. Any such system can be used to mediate genomic integration of nucleic acid molecules according to the embodiments.
C. Homologous Recombination
In certain aspects of the invention, nucleic acid molecules can be introduced into cells in a specific manner for genome engineering, for example, via homologous recombination. As discussed above, some approaches to express genes in cells involve the use of viral vectors or transgenes that integrate randomly in the genome. These approaches, however, have the drawback of integration occurring either at sites that are unable to effectively mediate expression from the integrated nucleic or that result in the disruption of native genes. Problems associated with random integration could be partially overcome by homologous recombination to a specific locus in the target genome, e.g., the AAVS1 or Rosa26 locus.
Homologous recombination (HR), also known as general recombination, is a type of genetic recombination used in all forms of life in which nucleotide sequences are exchanged between two similar or identical strands of DNA. The technique has been the standard method for genome engineering in mammalian cells since the mid 1980s. The process involves several steps of physical breaking and the eventual rejoining of DNA. This process is most widely used to repair potentially lethal double-strand breaks in DNA. In addition, homologous recombination produces new combinations of DNA sequences during meiosis, the process by which eukaryotes make germ cells like sperm and ova. These new combinations of DNA represent genetic variation in offspring which allow populations to evolutionarily adapt to changing environmental conditions over time. Homologous recombination is also used in horizontal gene transfer to exchange genetic material between different strains and species of bacteria and viruses. Homologous recombination is also used as a technique in molecular biology for introducing genetic changes into target organisms.
Homologous recombination can be used as targeted genome modification. The efficiency of standard HR in mammalian cells is only 10−6 to 10−9 of cells treated (Capecchi, 1990). The use of meganucleases, or homing endonucleases, such as I-SceI have been used to increase the efficiency of HR. Both natural meganucleases as well as engineered meganucleases with modified targeting specificities have been utilized to increase HR efficiency (Pingoud and Silva, 2007; Chevalier et al., 2002).
On the path toward increasing the efficiency of HR has been to engineer chimeric endonucleases with programmable DNA specificity domains (Silva et al., 2011). Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN) are one example of such a chimeric molecule in which Zinc-finger DNA binding domains are fused with the catalytic domain of a Type IIS restriction endonuclease such as FokI (as reviewed in Durai et al., 2005; PCT/US2004/030606).
Another class of such specificity molecules includes Transcription Activator Like Effector (TALE) DNA binding domains fused to the catalytic domain of a Type IIS restriction endonuclease such as FokI (Miller et al., 2011: PCT/IB2010/000154). TALENs can be designed for site-specific genome modification at virtually any given site of interest (Cermak et al., 2011; Christian et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011; Miller et al., 2011; Weber et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011). The site-specific DNA binding domain is expressed as a fusion protein with a DNA cleavage enzyme such as Fok I. The DNA binding domain is a scaffold of repeating amino acids; linking each of the repeats are two variable amino acids that bind to a single nucleotide in the DNA. For example, Asn-Asn binds guanosine, Asn-Ile binds adenosine, Asn-Gly bind thymidine, and His-Asp binds Cytosine. These two amino acids are known as the Repeat Variable Diresidue or RVD. There are many different RVD's and they can be engineered into the TAL Effector/Fokl protein construct to create a specific TALEN. The RNA encoding the recombinant TALEN can then be purified and transfected into a cell for site-specific genome modification. Once the TALEN introduces the double strand DNA break, the DNA can be modified by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or by homologous directed repair (HDR). This allows DNA mutagenesis, deletions, or additions depending on what additional sequences are present during the DNA repair.
V. Genetic Elements for ReprogrammingInduction of pluripotent stem cells from human somatic cells has been achieved using retroviruses or lentiviral vectors for ectopic expression of reprogramming genes. Recombinant retroviruses such as the Moloney murine leukemia virus have the ability to integrate into the host genome in a stable fashion. They contain a reverse transcriptase which allows integration into the host genome. Lentiviruses are a subclass of retroviruses. They are widely adapted as vectors thanks to their ability to integrate into the genome of non-dividing as well as dividing cells. The viral genome in the form of RNA is reverse-transcribed when the virus enters the cell to produce DNA, which is then inserted into the genome at a random position by the viral integrase enzyme. Therefore, current technology of successful reprogramming is dependent on integration-based viral approaches.
However, in certain embodiments, methods of the present invention makes use of extra-chromosomal genetic element for reprogramming. For example, extra-chromosomally replicating vectors, or vectors capable of replicating episomally (see U.S. Patent Publn. 20100003757, incorporated herein by reference) can be employed. In further aspects, RNA molecules encoding reprogramming factors or reprogramming factor proteins can be employed. In each case, expression of reprogramming factors can be used in combination with culturing of cells in the presence of cellular signaling inhibitors to achieve optimal reprogramming efficiency and kinetics.
A number of DNA viruses, such as adenoviruses, Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40), bovine papilloma virus (BPV), or budding yeast ARS (Autonomously Replicating Sequences)-containing plasmids replicate extra-chromosomally in mammalian cells. These episomal plasmids are intrinsically free from all these disadvantages (Bode et al., 2001) associated with integrating vectors. A lymphotrophic herpes virus-based system including Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) may also replicate extra-chromosomally and help deliver reprogramming genes to somatic cells.
For example, the episomal vector-based approach used in the invention extracts robust elements necessary for the successful replication and maintenance of an EBV element-based system without compromising the system's tractability in a clinical setting as described in detail below. The useful EBV elements are OriP and EBNA-1, or their variants or functional equivalents. An additional advantage of this system is that these exogenous elements will be lost with time after being introduced into cells, leading to self-sustained iPS cells essentially free of these elements.
A. Epstein-Barr Virus
The Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), also called Human herpesvirus 4 (HHV-4), is a virus of the herpes family (which includes Herpes simplex virus and Cytomegalovirus), and is one of the most common viruses in humans. EBV maintains its genome extra-chromosomally and works in collaboration with host cell machinery for efficient replication and maintenance (Lindner and Sugden, 2007), relying solely on two essential features for its replication and its retention within cells during cell division (Yates et al. 1985; Yates et al. 1984). One element, commonly referred to as oriP, exists in cis and serves as the origin of replication. The other factor, EBNA-1, functions in trans by binding to sequences within oriP to promote replication and maintenance of the plasmid DNA. As a non-limiting example, certain aspects of the invention extract these two features and use them in the context of a vector to shuttle the genes necessary for reprogramming somatic cells to facilitate the replication and sustained expression of these genes over conventional plasmids.
B. Replication Origin
In certain aspects, a replication origin of EBV, OriP, may be used. OriP is the site at or near which DNA replication initiates and is composed of two cis-acting sequences approximately 1 kilobase pair apart known as the family of repeats (FR) and the dyad symmetry (DS).
FR is composed of 21 imperfect copies of a 30 bp repeat and contains 20 high affinity EBNA-1-binding sites. When FR is bound by EBNA-1, it both serves as a transcriptional enhancer of promoters in cis up to 10 kb away (Reisman and Sugden, 1986; Yates, 1988; Sugden and Warren, 1989; Wysokenski and Yates, 1989; Gahn and Sugden, 1995; Kennedy and Sugden, 2003; Altmann et al., 2006), and contributes to the nuclear retention and faithful maintenance of FR containing plasmids (Langle-Rouault et al., 1998; Kirchmaier and Sugden, 1995; Wang et al., 2006; Nanbo and Sugden, 2007). The efficient partitioning of oriP plasmids is also likely attributable to FR. While the virus has evolved to maintain 20 EBNA-1-binding sites in FR, efficient plasmid maintenance requires only seven of these sites, and can be reconstituted by a polymer of three copies of DS, having a total of 12 EBNA-1-binding sites (Wysokenski and Yates, 1989).
The dyad symmetry element (DS) is sufficient for initiation of DNA synthesis in the presence of EBNA-1 (Aiyar et al., 1998; Yates et al., 2000), and initiation occurs either at or near DS (Gahn and Schildkraut, 1989; Niller et al., 1995). Termination of viral DNA synthesis is thought to occur at FR, because when FR is bound by EBNA-1 it functions as a replication fork barrier as observed by 2D gel electrophoresis (Gahn and Schildkraut, 1989; Ermakova et al., 1996; Wang et al., 2006). Initiation of DNA synthesis from DS is licensed to once-per-cell-cycle (Adams, 1987; Yates and Guan, 1991), and is regulated by the components of the cellular replication system (Chaudhuri et al., 2001; Ritzi et al., 2003; Dhar et al., 2001; Schepers et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2005; Julien et al., 2004). DS contains four EBNA-1-binding sites, albeit with lower affinity than those found in FR (Reisman et al., 1985). The topology of DS is such that the four binding sites are arranged as two pairs of sites, with 21 bp center-to-center spacing between each pair and 33 bp center-to-center spacing between the two non-paired internal binding sites (Baer et al., 1984; Rawlins et al., 1985).
The functional roles of the elements within DS have been confirmed by studies of another region of EBV's genome, termed Rep*, which was identified as an element that can substitute for DS inefficiently (Kirchmaier and Sugden, 1998). Polymerizing Rep* eight times yielded an element as efficient as DS in its support of replication (Wang et al., 2006). Biochemical dissection of Rep* identified a pair of EBNA-1-binding sites with a 21 bp center-to-center spacing critical for its replicative function (ibid). The minimal replicator of Rep* was found to be the pair of EBNA-1-binding sites, as replicative function was retained even after all flanking sequences in the polymer were replaced with sequences derived from lambda phage. Comparisons of DS and Rep* have revealed a common mechanism: these replicators support the initiation of DNA synthesis by recruiting the cellular replicative machinery via a pair of appropriately spaced sites, bent and bound by EBNA-1.
There are other extra-chromosomal, licensed plasmids that replicate in mammalian cells that are unrelated to EBV and in some ways appear similar to the zone of initiation within the Raji strain of EBV. Hans Lipps and his colleagues have developed and studied plasmids that contain “nuclear scaffold/matrix attachment regions” (S/MARs) and a robust transcriptional unit (Piechaczek et al., 1999; Jenke et al., 2004). Their S/MAR is derived from the human interferon-beta gene, is A/T rich, and operationally defined by its association with the nuclear matrix and its preferential unwinding at low ionic strength or when embedded in supercoiled DNA (Bode et al., 1992). These plasmids replicate semiconservatively, bind ORC proteins, and support the initiation of DNA synthesis effectively randomly throughout their DNA (Schaarschmidt et al., 2004). They are efficiently maintained in proliferating hamster and human cells without drug selection and when introduced into swine embryos can support expression of GFP in most tissues of fetal animals (Manzini et al., 2006).
C. Trans-Acting Factor
A particular example of the trans-acting factor could be Epstein Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1), which is a DNA-binding protein that binds to FR and DS of oriP or Rep* to facilitate replication and faithful partitioning of the EBV-based vector to daughter cells independent of, but in concert with, cell chromosomes during each cell division.
The 641 amino acids (AA) of EBNA-1 have been categorized into domains associated with its varied functions by mutational and deletional analyses. Two regions, between AA40-89 and AA329-378 are capable of linking two DNA elements in cis or in trans when bound by EBNA-1, and have thus been termed Linking Region 1 and 2 (LR1, LR2) (Middleton and Sugden, 1992; Frappier and O'Donnell, 1991; Su et al., 1991; Mackey et al., 1995). Fusing these domains of EBNA-1 to GFP homes the GFP to mitotic chromosomes (Marechal et al., 1999; Kanda et al., 2001). LR1 and LR2 are functionally redundant for replication; a deletion of either one yields a derivative of EBNA-1 capable of supporting DNA replication (Mackey and Sugden, 1999; Sears et al., 2004). LR1 and LR2 are rich in arginine and glycine residues, and resemble the AT-hook motifs that bind A/T rich DNA (Aravind and Landsman, 1998), (Sears et al., 2004). An in vitro analysis of LR1 and LR2 of EBNA-1 has demonstrated their ability to bind to A/T rich DNA (Sears et al., 2004). When LR1, containing one such AT-hook, was fused to the DNA-binding and dimerization domain of EBNA-1, it was found to be sufficient for DNA replication of oriP plasmids, albeit less efficiently than the wild-type EBNA-1 (ibid).
LR1 and LR2 do differ, though. The C-terminal half of LR1 is composed of amino acids other than the repeated Arg-Gly of the N-terminal half, and is termed unique region 1 (UR1). UR1 is necessary for EBNA-1 to activate transcription efficiently from transfected and integrated reporter DNAs containing FR (Wu et al., 2002; Kennedy and Sugden, 2003; Altmann et al., 2006). UR1 is also essential for the efficient transformation of B-cells infected by EBV. When a derivative of EBNA-1 lacking this domain replaces the wild-type protein in the context of the whole virus, these derivative viruses have 0.1% of the transforming ability of the wild-type virus (Altmann et al., 2006).
LR2 is not required for EBNA-1's support of oriP replication (Shire et al., 1999; Mackey and Sugden, 1999; Sears et al., 2004). Additionally, the N-terminal half of EBNA-1 can be replaced with cellular proteins containing AT-hook motifs, such as HMGA1a, and still retain replicative function (Hung et al., 2001; Sears et al., 2003; Altmann et al., 2006). These findings indicate that it likely is the AT-hook activities of LR1 and LR2 that are required for the maintenance of oriP in human cells.
A third of EBNA-1's residues (AA91-328) consist of glycine-glycine-alanine (GGA) repeats, implicated in EBNA-1's ability to evade the host immune response by inhibiting proteosomal degradation and presentation (Levitskaya et al., 1995; Levitskaya et al., 1997). These repeats have also been found to inhibit translation of EBNA-1 in vitro and in vivo (Yin et al., 2003). However, the deletion of much of this domain has no apparent effect on functions of EBNA-1 in cell culture, making the role that this domain plays difficult to elucidate.
A nuclear localization signal (NLS) is encoded by AA379-386, which also associates with the cellular nuclear importation machinery (Kim et al., 1997; Fischer et al., 1997). Sequences within the Arg-Gly rich regions of LR1 and LR2 may also function as NLSs due to their highly basic content.
Lastly, the C-terminus (AA458-607) encodes the overlapping DNA-binding and dimerization domains of EBNA-1. The structure of these domains bound to DNA has been solved by X-ray crystallography, and was found to be similar to the DNA-binding domain of the E2 protein of papillomaviruses (Hegde et al., 1992; Kim et al., 2000; Bochkarev et al., 1996).
In specific embodiments of the invention, a reprogramming vector will contain both oriP and an abbreviated sequence encoding a version of EBNA-1 competent to support plasmid replication and its proper maintenance during cell division. The highly repetitive sequence within the amino-terminal one-third of wild-type EBNA-1 and removal of a 25 amino-acid region that has demonstrated toxicity in various cells are dispensable for EBNA-1's trans-acting function associated with oriP (Yates et al. 1985; Kennedy et al. 2003). Therefore, the abbreviated form of EBNA-1, known as deltaUR1, could be used alongside oriP within this episomal vector-based system in one embodiment.
In certain aspects, a derivative of EBNA-1 that may be used in the invention is a polypeptide which, relative to a corresponding wild-type polypeptide, has a modified amino acid sequence. The modifications include the deletion, insertion or substitution of at least one amino acid residue in a region corresponding to the unique region (residues about 65 to about 89) of LR1 (residues about 40 to about 89) in EBNA-1, and may include a deletion, insertion and/or substitution of one or more amino acid residues in regions corresponding to other residues of EBNA-1, e.g., about residue 1 to about residue 40, residues about 90 to about 328 (“Gly-Gly-Ala” repeat region), residues about 329 to about 377 (LR2), residues about 379 to about 386 (NLS), residues about 451 to about 608 (DNA binding and dimerization), or residues about 609 to about 641, so long as the resulting derivative has the desired properties, e.g., dimerizes and binds DNA containing an on corresponding to oriP, localizes to the nucleus, is not cytotoxic, and activates transcription from an extra-chromosomal but does not substantially active transcription from an integrated template.
D. Residue-Free Feature
Importantly, the replication and maintenance of oriP-based episomal vector is imperfect and is lost precipitously (25% per cell division) from cells within the first two weeks of its being introduced into cells; however, those cells that retain the plasmid lose it less frequently (3% per cell division) (Leight and Sugden, 2001; Nanbo and Sugden, 2007). Once selection for cells harboring the plasmid is removed, plasmids will be lost during each cell division until all of them have been eliminated over time without leaving a footprint of its former existence within the resulting daughter cells. Certain aspects of the invention make use of this footprint-less feature of the oriP-based system as an alternative to the current viral-associated approach to deliver genes to generate iPS cells. Other extra-chromosomal vectors will also be lost during replication and propagation of host cells and could also be employed in the present invention.
E. Reprogramming Factors
The generation of iPS cells is crucial on the genes used for the induction. The following factors or combination thereof could be used in the vector system disclosed in the present invention. In certain aspects, nucleic acids encoding Sox and Oct (preferably Oct3/4) will be included into the reprogramming vector. For example, a reprogramming vector may comprise expression cassettes encoding Sox2, Oct4, Nanog and optionally Lin-28, or expression cassettes encoding Sox2, Oct4, Klf4 and optionally C-myc, L-myc or Glis-1. Nucleic acids encoding these reprogramming factors may be comprised in the same expression cassette, different expression cassettes, the same reprogramming vector, or different reprogramming vectors.
Oct-3/4 and certain members of the Sox gene family (Sox1, Sox2, Sox3, and Sox15) have been identified as crucial transcriptional regulators involved in the induction process whose absence makes induction impossible. Additional genes, however, including certain members of the Klf family (Klf1, Klf2, Klf4, and Klf5), the Myc family (C-myc, L-myc, and N-myc), Nanog, and LIN28, have been identified to increase the induction efficiency.
Oct-3/4 (Pou5f1) is one of the family of octamer (“Oct”) transcription factors, and plays a crucial role in maintaining pluripotency. The absence of Oct-3/4 in Oct-3/4+cells, such as blastomeres and embryonic stem cells, leads to spontaneous trophoblast differentiation, and presence of Oct-3/4 thus gives rise to the pluripotency and differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells. Various other genes in the “Oct” family, including Oct-3/4's close relatives, Oct1 and Oct6, fail to elicit induction.
The Sox family of genes is associated with maintaining pluripotency similar to Oct-3/4, although it is associated with multipotent and unipotent stem cells in contrast with Oct-3/4, which is exclusively expressed in pluripotent stem cells. While Sox2 was the initial gene used for induction by Takahashi et al. (2006), Wernig et al. (2007), and Yu et al. (2007), other genes in the Sox family have been found to work as well in the induction process. Sox1 yields iPS cells with a similar efficiency as Sox2, and genes Sox3, Sox15, and Sox18 also generate iPS cells, although with decreased efficiency.
Nanog is a transcription factor critically involved with self-renewal of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. In humans, this protein is encoded by the NANOG gene. Nanog is a gene expressed in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and is thought to be a key factor in maintaining pluripotency. NANOG is thought to function in concert with other factors such as Oct4 (POU5F1) and Sox2 to establish ESC identity.
LIN28 is an mRNA binding protein expressed in embryonic stem cells and embryonic carcinoma cells associated with differentiation and proliferation. Yu et al. (2007) demonstrated it is a factor in iPS generation, although it is not essential.
Klf4 of the Klf family of genes was initially identified by Takahashi et al. (2006) and confirmed by Wernig et al. (2007) as a factor for the generation of mouse iPS cells and was demonstrated by Takahashi et al. (2007) as a factor for generation of human iPS cells. However, Yu et al. (2007) reported that Klf4 was not essential for generation of human iPS cells. Klf2 and Klf4 were found to be factors capable of generating iPS cells, and related genes Klf1 and Klf5 did as well, although with reduced efficiency.
The Myc family of genes are proto-oncogenes implicated in cancer. Takahashi et al. (2006) and Wernig et al. (2007) demonstrated that C-myc is a factor implicated in the generation of mouse iPS cells and Yamanaka et al. demonstrated it was a factor implicated in the generation of human iPS cells. However, Yu et al. (2007) and Takahashi et al. (2007) reported that c-myc was unnecessary for generation of human iPS cells. Usage of the “myc” family of genes in induction of iPS cells is troubling for the eventuality of iPS cells as clinical therapies, as 25% of mice transplanted with c-myc-induced iPS cells developed lethal teratomas. N-myc and L-myc have been identified to induce pluripotency instead of C-myc with similar efficiency. In certain aspects, Myc mutants, variants, homologs, or derivatives may be used, such as mutants that have reduced transformation of cells. Examples include LMYC (NM 001033081), MYC with 41 amino acids deleted at the N-terminus (dN2MYC), or MYC with mutation at amino acid position 136 (e.g., W136E).
VI. Cellular Signaling InhibitorsIn certain aspects of the invention, during at least part of the reprogramming process, the cell may be maintained in the presence of one or more signaling inhibitors which inhibit a signal transducer involved in a signaling cascade, e.g., in the presence of a MEK inhibitor, a GSK3 inhibitor, a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, both a MEK inhibitor and a GSK3 inhibitor, both a GSK3 inhibitor and a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, both a MEK inhibitor and a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, a combination of all three inhibitors, or inhibitor of other signal transducers within these same pathways. In certain aspects, ROCK inhibitors, such as HA-100 and H-1152, or Myosin II inhibitor, such as blebbistatin, may be used to facilitate clonal expansion of reprogrammed cells and resulting iPS cells. High concentration of FGF, in combination with specific reprogramming medium such as conditioned human ES cell culture medium or a chemically defined medium such as serum-free defined N2B27 medium, TeSR medium or Essential 8 medium may also be used to increase reprogramming efficiency.
In certain embodiments, in addition to introducing the cells with one or more reprogramming factors (e.g. two, three or more, as described herein) by extra-chromosome genetic elements, the cells are treated with a reprogramming medium comprising: a MEK inhibitor, a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, a GSK3 inhibitor, and optionally LIF, with the advantages such as improving reprogramming efficiency and kinetics and facilitating iPS cell identification in the primary reprogramming culture, thus preserving iPS cell clonality.
It will be understood that in these aspects and embodiments, other signaling inhibitors which inhibit a signaling component of the same signaling pathway (e.g. ERK1 or ERK2 cascade) may be substituted where desired for the MEK inhibitor. This may include inhibition of an upstream stimulus of the MAPK pathway, in particular through the FGF receptor (Ying, 2008). Likewise, the GSK3 inhibitor may be substituted where desired for other inhibitors of GSK3-related signaling pathways, such as insulin synthesis and Wnt/β-catenin signaling; the LIF may be substituted where desired for other activators of Stat3 or gp130 signaling.
Such a signaling inhibitor, e.g., a MEK inhibitor, a GSK3 inhibitor, a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, may be used at an effective concentration of at least or about 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500 to about 1000 μM, or any range derivable therein.
Inhibitors may be provided or obtained by those skilled in the art by conventional means or from conventional sources (see also WO2007113505).
A. Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Inhibitor
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) is a serine/threonine protein kinase that mediates the addition of phosphate molecules on certain serine and threonine amino acids in particular cellular substrates. The phosphorylation of these other proteins by GSK-3 usually inhibits the target protein (also called the “substrate”). As mentioned, GSK-3 is known for phosphorylating and thus inactivating glycogen synthase. It has also been implicated in the control of cellular response to damaged DNA and Wnt signaling. GSK-3 also phosphorylates Ci in the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway, targeting it for proteolysis to an inactive form. In addition to glycogen synthase, GSK-3 has many other substrates. However, GSK-3 is unusual among the kinases in that it usually requires a “priming kinase” to first phosphorylate a substrate.
The consequence of GSK-3 phosphorylation is usually inhibition of the substrate. For example, when GSK-3 phosphorylates another of its substrates, the NFAT family of transcription factors, these transcription factors can not translocate to the nucleus and are therefore inhibited. In addition to its important role in the Wnt signaling pathway, which is required for establishing tissue patterning during development, GSK-3 is also critical for the protein synthesis that is induced in settings such as skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Its roles as an NFAT kinase also places it as a key regulator of both differentiation and cellular proliferation.
GSK3 inhibition may refer to inhibition of one or more GSK3 enzymes. The family of GSK3 enzymes is well-known and a number of variants have been described (see e.g. Schaffer et al., 2003). In specific embodiments GSK3-β is inhibited. GSK3-α inhibitors are also suitable, and in certain aspects inhibitors for use in the invention inhibit both GSK3-α and GSK3-β.
Inhibitors of GSK3 can include antibodies that bind, dominant negative variants of, and siRNA and antisense nucleic acids that target GSK3. Examples of GSK3 inhibitors are described in Bennett et al. (2002) and in Ring et al. (2003).
Specific examples of GSK3 inhibitors include, but are not limited to, Kenpaullone, 1-Azakenpaullone, CHIR99021, CHIR98014, AR-A014418 (see, e.g., Gould et al., 2004), CT 99021 (see, e.g., Wagman, 2004), CT 20026 (see, Wagman, supra), SB415286, SB216763 (see, e.g., Martin et al., 2005), AR-A014418 (see, e.g., Noble et al., 2005), lithium (see, e.g., Gould et al., 2003), SB 415286 (see, e.g., Frame et al., 2001) and TDZD-8 (see, e.g., Chin et al., 2005). Further exemplary GSK3 inhibitors available from Calbiochem (see, e.g., Dalton et al., WO2008/094597, herein incorporated by reference), include but are not limited to BIO (2′Z,3′£)-6-Bromomdirubin-3′-oxime (GSK3 Inhibitor IX); BIO-Acetoxime (2′Z,3′E)-6-Bromoindirubin-3′-acetoxime (GSK3 Inhibitor X); (5-Methyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)-(2-phenylquinazolin-4-yl)amine (GSK3-Inhibitor XIII); Pyridocarbazole-cyclopenadienylruthenium complex (GSK3 Inhibitor 0); TDZD-8 4-Benzyl-2-methyl-1,2,4-thiadiazolidine-3,5-dione (GSK3beta Inhibitor I); 2-Thio(3-iodobenzyl)-5-(1-pyridyl)-[1,3,4]-oxadiazole (GSK3beta Inhibitor II); OTDZT 2,4-Dibenzyl-5-oxothiadiazolidine-3-thione (GSK3beta Inhibitor III); alpha-4-Dibromoacetophenone (GSK3beta Inhibitor VII); AR-AO 14418 N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-N′-(5-nitro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)urea (GSK-3beta Inhibitor VIII); 3-(1-(3-Hydroxypropyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl]-4-pyrazin-2-yl-pyrrole-2, 5-dione (GSK-3beta Inhibitor XI); TWS1 19 pyrrolopyrimidine compound (GSK3beta Inhibitor XII); L803 H-KEAPP APPQSpP-NH2 or its Myristoylated form (GSK3beta Inhibitor XIII); 2-Chloro-1-(4,5-dibromo-thiophen-2-yl)-ethanone (GSK3beta Inhibitor VI); AR-AO0144-18; SB216763; and SB415286.
GSK3 inhibitors can activate, for example, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Many of β-catenin downstream genes co-regulate pluripotency gene networks. For example, a GSK inhibitor activates cMyc expression as well as enhances its protein stability and transcriptional activity. Thus, in some embodiments, GSK3 inhibitors can be used to stimulate endogenous Myc polypeptide expression in a cell, thereby eliminating the need for Myc expression to induce pluripotency.
In addition, the structure of the active site of GSK3-β has been characterized and key residues that interact with specific and non-specific inhibitors have been identified (Bertrand et al., 2003). This structural characterization allows additional GSK inhibitors to be readily identified.
The inhibitors used herein are preferably specific for the kinase to be targeted. The inhibitors of certain embodiments are specific for GSK3-β and GSK3-α, substantially do not inhibit erk2 and substantially do not inhibit cdc2. Preferably the inhibitors have at least 100 fold, more preferably at least 200 fold, very preferably at least 400 fold selectivity for human GSK3 over mouse erk2 and/or human cdc2, measured as ratio of IC50 values; here, reference to GSK3 IC50 values refers to the mean values for human GSK3-β and GSK3-α. Good results have been obtained with CHIR99021 which is specific for GSK3. Suitable concentrations for use of CHIR99021 are in the range 0.01 to 100, preferably 0.1 to 20, more preferably 0.3 to 10 micromolar.
B. MEK inhibitor
MEK inhibitors, which include inhibitors of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPK/ERK kinase or MEK) or its related signaling pathways like MAPK cascade, may be used in certain aspects of the invention. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (sic) is a kinase enzyme which phosphorylates mitogen-activated protein kinase. It is also known as MAP2K. Extracellular stimuli lead to activation of a MAP kinase via a signaling cascade (“MAPK cascade”) composed of MAP kinase, MAP kinase kinase (MEK, MKK, MEKK, or MAP2K), and MAP kinase kinase kinase (MKKK or MAP3K).
A MEK inhibitor herein refers to MEK inhibitors in general. Thus, a MEK inhibitor refers to any inhibitor of a member of the MEK family of protein kinases, including MEK1, MEK2 and MEK5. Reference is also made to MEK1, MEK2 and MEK5 inhibitors. Examples of suitable MEK inhibitors, already known in the art, include the MEK1 inhibitors PD184352 and PD98059, inhibitors of MEK1 and MEK2 U0126 and SL327, and those discussed in Davies et al. (2000).
In particular, PD184352 and PD0325901 have been found to have a high degree of specificity and potency when compared to other known MEK inhibitors (Bain et al., 2007). Other MEK inhibitors and classes of MEK inhibitors are described in Zhang et al. (2000).
Inhibitors of MEK can include antibodies to, dominant negative variants of, and siRNA and antisense nucleic acids that suppress expression of MEK. Specific examples of MEK inhibitors include, but are not limited to, PD0325901 (see, e.g., Rinehart et al., 2004), PD98059 (available, e.g., from Cell Signaling Technology), U0126 (available, for example, from Cell Signaling Technology), SL327 (available, e.g., from Sigma-Aldrich), ARRY-162 (available, e.g., from Array Biopharma), PD184161 (see, e.g., Klein et al., 2006), PD184352 (CI-1040) (see, e.g., Mattingly et al., 2006), sunitinib (see, e.g., Voss, et al., US2008004287 incorporated herein by reference), sorafenib (see, Voss supra), Vandetanib (see, Voss supra), pazopanib (see, e.g., Voss supra), Axitinib (see, Voss supra) and PTK787 (see, Voss supra).
Currently, several MEK inhibitors are undergoing clinical trial evaluations. CI-1040 has been evaluate in Phase I and II clinical trials for cancer (see, e.g., Rinehart et al., 2004). Other MEK inhibitors being evaluated in clinical trials include PD 184352 (see, e.g., English et al., 2002), BAY 43-9006 (see, e.g., Chow et al., 2001), PD-325901 (also PD0325901), GSK1 120212, ARRY-438162, RDEA1 19, AZD6244 (also ARRY-142886 or ARRY-886), RO5126766, XL518 and AZD8330 (also ARRY-704).
Inhibition of MEKs can also be conveniently achieved using RNA-mediated interference (RNAi). Typically, a double-stranded RNA molecule complementary to all or part of a MEK gene is introduced into pluripotent cells, thus promoting specific degradation of MEK-encoding mRNA molecules. This post-transcriptional mechanism results in reduced or abolished expression of the targeted MEK gene. Suitable techniques and protocols for achieving MEK inhibition using RNAi are known.
A number of assays for identifying kinase inhibitors, including GSK3 inhibitors and MEK inhibitors, are known. For example, Davies et al. (2000) describes kinase assays in which a kinase is incubated in the presence of a peptide substrate and radiolabeled ATP. Phosphorylation of the substrate by the kinase results in incorporation of the label into the substrate. Aliquots of each reaction are immobilized on phosphocellulose paper and washed in phosphoric acid to remove free ATP. The activity of the substrate following incubation is then measured and provides an indication of kinase activity. The relative kinase activity in the presence and absence of candidate kinase inhibitors can be readily determined using such an assay. Downey et al. (1996) also describes assays for kinase activity which can be used to identify kinase inhibitors.
C. TGF-β Receptor Inhibitor
TGF-β receptor inhibitors may include any inhibitors of TGF signaling in general or inhibitors specific for TGF-β receptor (e.g., ALK5) inhibitors, which can include antibodies to, dominant negative variants of, and siRNA and antisense nucleic acids that suppress expression of, TGF beta receptors (e.g., ALK5). Exemplary TGFβ receptor/ALK5 inhibitors include, but are not limited to, SB431542 (see, e.g., Inman et al., 2002), A-83-01, also known as 3-(6-Methyl-2-pyridinyl)-N-phenyl-4-(4-quinolinyl)-1H-pyrazole-1-carbothioamide (see, e.g., Tojo et al., 2005, and commercially available from, e.g., Toicris Bioscience); 2-(3-(6-Methylpyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1, 5-naphthyridine, Wnt3a/BIO (see, e.g., Dalton, et al., WO2008/094597, herein incorporated by reference), BMP4 (see, Dalton, supra), GW788388 (-(4-[3-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]pyridin-2-yl}-N-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)benzamide) (see, e.g., Gellibert et al., 2006), SM16 (see, e.g., Suzuki et al., 2007), IN-1130 (3-((5-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)-4-(quinoxalin-6-yl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl)benzamide) (see, e.g., Kim et al., 2008), GW6604 (2-phenyl-4-(3-pyridin-2-yl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)pyridine) (see, e.g., de Gouville et al., 2006), SB-505124 (2-(5-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-2-tert-butyl-3H-imidazol-4-yl)-6-methylpyridine hydrochloride) (see, e.g., DaCosta et al., 2004) and pyrimidine derivatives (see, e.g., those listed in Stiefl et al., WO2008/006583, herein incorporated by reference).
Further, while an “ALK5 inhibitor” is not intended to encompass non-specific kinase inhibitors, an “ALK5 inhibitor” should be understood to encompass inhibitors that inhibit ALK4 and/or ALK7 in addition to ALK5, such as, for example, SB-431542 (see, e.g., Inman et al., 2002). Without intending to limit the scope of the invention, it is believed that ALK5 inhibitors affect the mesenchymal to epithelial conversion/transition (MET) process. TGFβ/activin pathway is a driver for epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). The inventors contemplate that inhibiting the TGFβ/activin pathway can facilitate MET (i.e., reprogramming) process.
It is believed that inhibition of the TGFβ/activin pathway will have similar effects. Thus, any inhibitor (e.g., upstream or downstream) of the TGFβ/activin pathway can be used in combination with, or instead of, TGF-β/ALK5 inhibitors as described herein. Exemplary TGFβ/activin pathway inhibitors include but are not limited to: TGF beta receptor inhibitors, inhibitors of SMAD 2/3 phosphorylation, inhibitors of the interaction of SMAD 2/3 and SMAD 4, and activators/agonists of SMAD 6 and SMAD 7. Furthermore, the categorizations described herein are merely for organizational purposes and one of skill in the art would know that compounds can affect one or more points within a pathway, and thus compounds may function in more than one of the defined categories.
TGF beta receptor inhibitors can include antibodies to, dominant negative variants of, and siRNA or antisense nucleic acids that target TGF beta receptors. Specific examples of inhibitors include but are not limited to SU5416; 2-(5-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-2-tert-butyl-3H-imidazol-4-yl)-6-methylpyridine hydrochloride (SB-505124); lerdelimumb (CAT-152); metelimumab (CAT-192); GC-1008; IDl 1; AP-12009; AP-11014; LY550410; LY580276; LY364947; LY2109761; SB-505124; SB-431542; SD-208; SM16; NPC-30345; Ki26894; SB-203580; SD-093; Gleevec; 3,5,7,2′,4′-pentahydroxyfiavone (Morin); activin-M108A; P144; soluble TBR2-Fc; and antisense transfected tumor cells that target TGF beta receptors (See, e.g., Wrzesinski et al., 2007; Kaminska et al., 2005; and Chang et al., 2007).
D. ROCK Inhibitors and Myosin II ATPase Inhibitors
Pluripotent stem cells, especially human ES cells and iPS cells, are vulnerable to apoptosis upon cellular detachment and dissociation, which are important for clonal isolation or expansion and differentiation induction. Recently, a small class of molecules have been found to increase clonal efficiency and survival of dissociated pluripotent stem cells, such as Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitors, which are inhibitors for ROCK-related signaling pathways, for example, Rho-specific inhibitors, ROCK-specific inhibitors or myosin II-specific inhibitors. In certain aspects of the invention, ROCK inhibitors may be used for culturing and passaging of pluripotent stem cells and/or differentiation of the stem cells. Therefore, ROCK inhibitors could be present in any cell culture medium in which pluripotent stem cells grow, dissociate, form aggregates, or undergo differentiation, such as an adherent culture or suspension culture. Unless otherwise stated herein, myosin II inhibitors, such as blebbistatin, can substitute for the experimental use of ROCK inhibitors.
ROCK signaling pathways may include Rho family GTPases; ROCK, a major effector kinase downstream of Rho; Myosin II, the predominant effector downstream of ROCK (Harb et al., 2008); and any intermediate, upstream, or downstream signal processors. ROCK may phosphorylate and inactivate myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 (MYPT1), one of the major downstream targets of ROCK that negatively regulates myosin function through dephosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC).
ROCKs are serine/threonine kinases that serve as a target proteins for Rho (of which three isoforms exist—RhoA, RhoB and RhoC). Theses kinases were initially characterized as mediators of the formation of RhoA-induced stress fibers and focal adhesions. The two ROCK isoforms—ROCK1 (p160ROCK, also called ROKβ) and ROCK2 (ROKα)—are comprised of a N-terminal kinase domain, followed by a coiled-coil domain containing a Rho-binding domain and a pleckstrin-homology domain (PH). Both ROCKs are cytoskeletal regulators, mediating RhoA effects on stress fiber formation, smooth muscle contraction, cell adhesion, membrane ruffling and cell motility. ROCKs may exert their biological activity by targeting downstream molecules, such as myosin II, myosin light chain (MLC), MLC phosphatase (MLCP) and the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN).
Non-limiting examples of ROCK inhibitors include HA-100, Y-27632, H-1152, Fasudil (also referred to as HA1077), Y-30141 (described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,838), Wf-536, HA-1077, hydroxyl-HA-1077, GSK269962A, SB-772077-B, and derivatives thereof, and antisense nucleic acid for ROCK, RNA interference inducing nucleic acid (for example, siRNA), competitive peptides, antagonist peptides, inhibitory antibodies, antibody-ScFV fragments, dominant negative variants and expression vectors thereof. Further, since other low molecular compounds are known as ROCK inhibitors, such compounds or derivatives thereof can be also used in embodiments (for example, refer to U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 20050209261, 20050192304, 20040014755, 20040002508, 20040002507, 20030125344 and 20030087919, and International Patent Publication Nos. 2003/062227, 2003/059913, 2003/062225, 2002/076976 and 2004/039796, which are hereby incorporated by reference). In certain aspects of the present invention, a combination of one or two or more of the ROCK inhibitors can also be used.
Rho-specific inhibitors, such as Clostridium botulinum C3 exoenzyme, and/or Myosin II-specific inhibitors may also be used as a ROCK inhibitor in certain aspects of the invention.
VII. Culturing of Reprogrammed CellsThe starting cell and the end, reprogrammed cell generally have differing requirements for culture medium and conditions. Likewise, when simultaneously selecting cells for integration of an engineering construct, a selective drug may be added to the culture medium during specific portions of the reprogramming process. To allow for this while also allowing that reprogramming of the cell is taking place, it is usual to carry out at least an initial stage of culture, after introduction of the reprogramming factors, in the presence of medium and under culture conditions known to be suitable for growth of the starting cell. However, this initial stage may also include a selection drug, such that only cells comprising a resistance marker proliferate during this initial growth phase.
This is followed by a subsequent period of culture in the presence of a reprogramming medium (in the absence or presence of a selection drug) and under conditions known to be suitable for pluripotent cells—on feeders with serum or use chemically-defined medium or feeder-free conditions. Suitable feeders (if used) include primary or immortalized fibroblast lines, typically inactivated so they do not overgrow the growth of the cells being reprogrammed. After a sufficient time for reprogramming, the reprogrammed cells may be further cultured for expansion of iPS cells either before or after selection of iPS cells in an expansion medium. Such an expansion medium may comprise one or more signaling inhibitors as described above or comprise a culture medium essentially free of these inhibitors.
The initial stage of culture is preferably for a period of up to 6 days, more preferably up to 4 days and in particular embodiments, described below for not more than 3 days, and more particularly up to or about one day. The subsequent stage of culture in reprogramming medium comprising one or more signaling inhibitors is suitably for a period of at least or about 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 days, or any range derivable therein, and can be for a period of up to 120 days, preferably up to 10 days, or until detection of iPS cells and/or engineered iPS cells. In a specific embodiment described below used to generate reprogrammed human cells, the initial stage of culture was for a period of about 1 day and the subsequent stage was for about 9 to 28 days by culture in a reprogramming condition the presence of a reprogramming medium comprising a MEK inhibitor, a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, and a GSK3 inhibitor. The reprogramming condition may be essentially free of feeder cells. In further aspects, the reprogramming medium may be chemically defined. To improve reprogramming, the reprogramming medium may further comprise high concentration of FGF and may be essentially free of TGFβ.
The combination of a MEK inhibitor, a TGF-β receptor inhibitor, and a GSK3 inhibitor may facilitate the reprogramming process, including increasing reprogramming efficiency and shortening reprogramming time. LIF is an example of an activator of gp130 signaling, another being IL-6 in combination with soluble IL-6 receptor, and promotes growth and survival of the cell as it is in the process of being reprogrammed. During reprogramming, cells may be cultured in the presence of LIF; using LIF may help reprogrammed cells in certain aspects of the present invention to improve cell survival and clonogenicity.
A. Stem Cell Culture Conditions in General
The culturing conditions according to the present invention will be appropriately defined depending on the medium and stem cells used. The medium according to certain aspects of the present invention can be prepared using a medium used for culturing animal cells as its basal medium, such as any of TeSR, Essential 8 medium, BME, BGJb, CMRL 1066, Glasgow MEM, Improved MEM Zinc Option, IMDM, Medium 199, Eagle MEM, αMEM, DMEM, Ham, RPMI 1640, and Fischer's media, as well as any combinations thereof, but the medium is not particularly limited thereto as far as it can be used for culturing animal cells.
The medium according to the present invention can be a serum-containing or serum-free medium. The serum-free medium refers to media with no unprocessed or unpurified serum, and accordingly can include media with purified blood-derived components or animal tissue-derived components (such as growth factors). From the aspect of preventing contamination with heterogeneous animal-derived components, serum can be derived from the same animal as that of the stem cell(s).
The medium according to the present invention may contain or may not contain any alternatives to serum. The alternatives to serum can include materials which appropriately contain albumin (such as lipid-rich albumin, albumin substitutes such as recombinant albumin, plant starch, dextrans and protein hydrolysates), transferrin (or other iron transporters), fatty acids, insulin, collagen precursors, trace elements, 2-mercaptoethanol, 3′-thiolglycerol, or equivalents thereto. The alternatives to serum can be prepared by the method disclosed in International Publication No. 98/30679, for example. Alternatively, any commercially available materials can be used for more convenience. The commercially available materials include knockout Serum Replacement (KSR), Chemically-defined Lipid concentrated (Gibco), and Glutamax (Gibco).
The medium of the present invention can also contain fatty acids or lipids, amino acids (such as non-essential amino acids), vitamin(s), growth factors, cytokines, antioxidant substances, 2-mercaptoethanol, pyruvic acid, buffering agents, and inorganic salts. The concentration of 2-mercaptoethanol can be, for example, about 0.05 to 1.0 mM, and particularly about 0.1 to 0.5 mM, but the concentration is particularly not limited thereto as long as it is appropriate for culturing the stem cell(s).
A culture vessel used for culturing the stem cell(s) can include, but is particularly not limited to: flask, flask for tissue culture, dish, petri dish, dish for tissue culture, multi dish, micro plate, micro-well plate, multi plate, multi-well plate, micro slide, chamber slide, tube, tray, CellSTACK® Chambers, culture bag, and roller bottle, as long as it is capable of culturing the stem cells therein. The stem cells may be cultured in a volume of at least or about 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 ml, 100 ml, 150 ml, 200 ml, 250 ml, 300 ml, 350 ml, 400 ml, 450 ml, 500 ml, 550 ml, 600 ml, 800 ml, 1000 ml, 1500 ml, or any range derivable therein, depending on the needs of the culture. In a certain embodiment, the culture vessel may be a bioreactor, which may refer to any device or system that supports a biologically active environment. The bioreactor may have a volume of at least or about 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 500 liters, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15 cubic meters, or any range derivable therein.
The culture vessel can be cellular adhesive or non-adhesive and selected depending on the purpose. The cellular adhesive culture vessel can be coated with any of substrates for cell adhesion such as extracellular matrix (ECM) to improve the adhesiveness of the vessel surface to the cells. The substrate for cell adhesion can be any material intended to attach stem cells or feeder cells (if used). The substrate for cell adhesion includes collagen, gelatin, poly-L-lysine, poly-D-lysine, vitronectin, laminin, fibronectin, and RetroNectin and mixtures thereof for example Matrigel™, and lysed cell membrane preparations (Klimanskaya et al., 2005).
Other culturing conditions can be appropriately defined. For example, the culturing temperature can be about 30 to 40° C., for example, at least or about 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39° C. but particularly not limited to them. The CO2 concentration can be about 1 to 10%, for example, about 2 to 5%, or any range derivable therein. The oxygen tension can be at least or about 1, 5, 8, 10, 20%, or any range derivable therein.
The methods of the present invention in certain aspects can be used for adhesion culture of stem cells, for example. In this case, the cells can be cultured in the presence of feeder cells. In the case where the feeder cells are used in the methods of the present invention, stromal cells such as fetal fibroblasts can be used as feeder cells (for example, refer to; Hogan et al., Manipulating the Mouse Embryo, A Laboratory Manual (1994); Gene Targeting, A Practical Approach (1993); Martin (1981); Evans and Kaufman (1981); Jainchill et al., (1969); Nakano et al. (1996); Kodama et al. (1982); and International Publication Nos. 01/088100 and 2005/080554).
The methods of the present invention in certain aspects can also be used for a suspension culture of stem cells, including suspension culture on carriers (Fernandes et al., 2004) or gel/biopolymer encapsulation (United States Publication 2007/0116680). The term suspension culture of the stem cells means that the stem cells are cultured under non-adherent condition with respect to the culture vessel or feeder cells (if used) in a medium. The suspension culture of stem cells includes a dissociation culture of stem cells and an aggregate suspension culture of stem cells. The term dissociation culture of stem cells means that suspended stem cells is cultured, and the dissociation culture of stem cells include those of single stem cell or those of small cell aggregates composed of a plurality of stem cells (for example, about 2 to 400 cells). When the aforementioned dissociation culture is continued, the cultured, dissociated cells form a larger aggregate of stem cells, and thereafter an aggregate suspension culture can be performed. The aggregate suspension culture includes an embryoid culture method (see Keller et al., 1995), and a SFEB method (Watanabe et al., 2005; International Publication No. 2005/123902).
B. Culturing of Pluripotent Stem Cells
Depending on culture conditions, pluripotent stem cells can produce colonies of differentiated cells or undifferentiated cells. The term “differentiate” means the progression of a cell down a developmental pathway. The term “differentiated” is a relative term describing a cell's progression down a developmental pathway in comparison with another cell. For example, a pluripotent cell can give rise to any cell of the body, while a more differentiated cell such as a hematopoetic cell will give rise to fewer cell types.
Cultures of pluripotent stem cells are described as “undifferentiated” when a substantial proportion of stem cells and their derivatives in the population display morphological characteristics of undifferentiated cells, clearly distinguishing them from differentiated cells of embryo or adult origin. Undifferentiated ES or iPS cells are recognized by those skilled in the art, and typically appear in the two dimensions of a microscopic view in colonies of cells with high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios and prominent nucleoli. It is understood that colonies of undifferentiated cells can have neighboring cells that are differentiated.
ES cells can be maintained in an undifferentiated state by culturing the cells in the presence of serum and a feeder layer, typically mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Other methods for maintaining stem cells in an undifferentiated state are also known. For example, mouse ES cells can be maintained in an undifferentiated state by culturing in the presence of LIF without a feeder layer. However, unlike mouse ES cells, pre-existing human ES cells do not respond to LIF. Human ES cells can be maintained in an undifferentiated state by culturing ES cells on a feeder layer of fibroblasts in the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor (Amit et al., 2000), or by culturing on a protein matrix, such as Matrigel™ or laminin, without a feeder layer and in the presence of fibroblast-conditioned medium plus basic fibroblast growth factor (Xu et al., 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,833,269).
Methods for preparing and culturing ES cells can be found in standard textbooks and reviews in cell biology, tissue culture, and embryology, including teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells: A practical approach (1987); Guide to Techniques in Mouse Development (1993); Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation in vitro (1993); Properties and uses of Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Application to Human Biology and Gene Therapy (1998), all incorporated herein by reference. Standard methods used in tissue culture generally are described in Animal Cell Culture (1987); Gene Transfer Vectors for Mammalian Cells (1987); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology and Short Protocols in Molecular Biology (1987 & 1995).
After somatic cells are introduced or contacted with reprogramming factors, these cells may be cultured in a medium sufficient to maintain the pluripotency and the undifferentiated state. Culturing of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells generated in this invention can use various medium and techniques developed to culture primate pluripotent stem cells, more specially, embryonic stem cells, as described in U.S. Pat. Publication 20070238170 and U.S. Pat. Publication 20030211603, and U.S. Pat. Publication 20080171385, which are hereby incorporated by reference. It is appreciated that additional methods for the culture and maintenance of pluripotent stem cells, as would be known to one of skill, may be used with the present invention.
In certain embodiments, undefined conditions may be used; for example, pluripotent cells may be cultured on fibroblast feeder cells or a medium that has been exposed to fibroblast feeder cells in order to maintain the stem cells in an undifferentiated state.
Alternately, pluripotent cells may be cultured and maintained in an essentially undifferentiated state using defined, feeder-independent culture system, such as a TeSR medium (Ludwig et al., 2006a; Ludwig et al., 2006b) or Essential 8 medium. Feeder-independent culture systems and media may be used to culture and maintain pluripotent cells. These approaches allow derived human iPS cells as well as human embryonic stem cells to remain in an essentially undifferentiated state without the need for mouse fibroblast “feeder layers.” As described herein, various modifications may be made to these methods in order to reduce costs as desired.
Various matrix components may be used in culturing and maintaining human pluripotent stem cells. For example, Matrigel™, collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin in combination may be used to coat a culturing surface as a means of providing a solid support for pluripotent cell growth, as described in Ludwig et al. (2006a; 2006b), which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. Particularly, Matrigel™ may be used to provide a substrate for cell culture and maintenance of human pluripotent stem cells. Matrigel™ is a gelatinous protein mixture secreted by mouse tumor cells and is commercially available from BD Biosciences (New Jersey, USA). This mixture resembles the complex extracellular environment found in many tissues and is used by cell biologists as a substrate for cell culture.
C. Cell Passaging
Certain aspects of the present invention can further involve a step of dissociating stem cells. Stem cell dissociation can be performed using any known procedures. These procedures include treatments with a chelating agent (such as EDTA), an enzyme (such as trypsin, collagenase), or the like, and operations such as mechanical dissociation (such as pipetting). The stem cell(s) can be treated with the ROCK inhibitor before and/or after dissociation. For example, the stem cell(s) can be treated only after dissociation.
In some further embodiments of pluripotent stem cell culturing, once a culture container is full, the colony may be split into aggregated cells or even single cells by any method suitable for dissociation, which cell are then placed into new culture containers for passaging. Cell passaging is a technique that enables to keep cells alive and growing under cultured conditions for extended periods of time. Cells usually would be passed when they are about 70%-100% confluent.
Single-cell dissociation of pluripotent stem cells followed by single cell passaging may be used in the present methods with several advantages, like facilitating cell expansion, cell sorting, and defined seeding for differentiation and enabling automatization of culture procedures and clonal expansion. For example, progeny cell clonally derivable from a single cell may be homogenous in genetic structure and/or synchronized in cell cycle, which may increase targeted differentiation. Exemplary methods for single cell passaging may be as described in U.S. Pat. App. 20080171385, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In certain embodiments, pluripotent stem cells may be dissociated into single individual cells, or a combination of single individual cells and small cell clusters comprising 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 cells or more. The dissociation may be achieved by mechanical force, or by a cell dissociation agent, such as NaCitrate, or an enzyme, for example, trypsin, trypsin-EDTA, TrypLE Select, or the like.
Based on the source of pluripotent stem cells and the need for expansion, the dissociated cells may be transferred individually or in small clusters to new culture containers in a splitting ratio such as at least or about 1:2, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, 1:8, 1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:50, 1:100, 1:150, 1:200, or any range derivable therein. Suspension cell line split ratios may be done on volume of culture cell suspension. The passage interval may be at least or about every 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 days or any range derivable therein. For example, the achievable split ratios for the different enzymatic passaging protocols may be 1:2 every 3-7 days, 1:3 every 4-7 days, and 1:5 to 1:10 approximately every 7 days, 1:50 to 1:100 every 7 days. When high split ratios are used, the passage interval may be extended to at least 12-14 days or any time period without cell loss due to excessive spontaneous differentiation or cell death.
In certain aspects, single cell passaging may be in the presence of a small molecule effective for increasing cloning efficiency and cell survival, such as a ROCK inhibitor as described above. Such a ROCK inhibitor, e.g., Y-27632, HA-1077, H-1152, HA-100, or blebbistatin, may be used at an effective concentration, for example, at least or about 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 to about 100 μM, or any range derivable therein.
VIII. Selection of iPS and Engineered iPS CellsIn certain aspects of the invention, after one or more extra-chromosomal genetic element and one or more nucleic acid molecule for integration are introduced into somatic cells, cells may be cultured for expansion (optionally selected for the presence of vector elements like positive selection or screenable marker) and these genetic elements will express reprogramming factors in these cells and replicate and partition along with cell division. These expressed reprogramming factors will reprogram somatic cell genome to establish a self-sustaining pluripotent state, and in the meantime or after removal of positive selection of the presence of vectors, exogenous genetic elements will be lost gradually. These induced pluripotent stem cells could be selected from progeny derived from these somatic cells based on embryonic stem cell characteristics because they are expected to be substantially identical to pluripotent embryonic stem cells. An additional negative selection step could be also employed to accelerate or help selection of iPS cells essentially free of extra-chromosomal genetic elements by testing the absence of reprogramming vector DNA or using selection markers.
A. Selection for Embryonic Stem Cell Characteristics
The successfully generated iPSCs from previous studies were remarkably similar to naturally-isolated pluripotent stem cells (such as mouse and human embryonic stem cells, mESCs and hESCs, respectively) in the following respects, thus confirming the identity, authenticity, and pluripotency of iPSCs to naturally-isolated pluripotent stem cells. Thus, induced pluripotent stem cells generated from the methods disclosed in this invention could be selected based on one or more of following embryonic stem cell characteristics.
i. Cellular Biological Properties
Morphology:
iPSCs are morphologically similar to ESCs. Each cell may have round shape, large nucleolus and scant cytoplasm. Colonies of iPSCs could be also similar to that of ESCs. Human iPSCs form sharp-edged, flat, tightly-packed colonies similar to hESCs and mouse iPSCs form the colonies similar to mESCs, less flatter and more aggregated colonies than that of hESCs. In certain embodiments, the present method may generate large human iPS cells, which may have a diameter of at least or about 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 mm, or any range derivable therein, and be easily discernable from non-iPS cells.
Growth Properties:
Doubling time and mitotic activity are cornerstones of ESCs, as stem cells must self-renew as part of their definition. iPSCs could be mitotically active, actively self-renewing, proliferating, and dividing at a rate equal to ESCs.
Stem Cell Markers:
iPSCs may express cell surface antigenic markers expressed on ESCs. Human iPSCs expressed the markers specific to hESC, including, but not limited to, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, TRA-2-49/6E, and Nanog. Mouse iPSCs expressed SSEA-1 but not SSEA-3 nor SSEA-4, similarly to mESCs.
Stem Cell Genes:
iPSCs may express genes expressed in undifferentiated ESCs, including Oct-3/4, Sox2, Nanog, GDF3, REX1, FGF4, ESG1, DPPA2, DPPA4, and hTERT.
Telomerase Activity:
Telomerases are necessary to sustain cell division unrestricted by the Hayflick limit of ˜50 cell divisions. Human ESCs express high telomerase activity to sustain self-renewal and proliferation, and iPSCs also demonstrate high telomerase activity and express hTERT (human telomerase reverse transcriptase), a necessary component in the telomerase protein complex.
Pluripotency:
iPSCs will be capable of differentiation in a fashion similar to ESCs into fully differentiated tissues.
Neural Differentiation:
iPSCs could be differentiated into neurons, expressing βIII-tubulin, tyrosine hydroxylase, AADC, DAT, ChAT, LMX1B, and MAP2. The presence of catecholamine-associated enzymes may indicate that iPSCs, like hESCs, may be differentiable into dopaminergic neurons. Stem cell-associated genes will be downregulated after differentiation.
Cardiac Differentiation:
iPSCs could be differentiated into cardiomyocytes that spontaneously begin beating. Cardiomyocytes express TnTc, MEF2C, MYL2A, MYHCβ, TNNT2 and NKX2.5. Stem cell-associated genes will be downregulated after differentiation.
Teratoma Formation:
iPSCs injected into immunodeficient mice may spontaneously formed teratomas after certain time, such as nine weeks. Teratomas are tumors of multiple lineages containing tissue derived from the three germ layers endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm; this is unlike other tumors, which typically are of only one cell type. Teratoma formation is a landmark test for pluripotency.
Embryoid Body:
Human ESCs in culture spontaneously form ball-like embryo-like structures termed “embryoid bodies,” which consist of a core of mitotically active and differentiating hESCs and a periphery of fully differentiated cells from all three germ layers. iPSCs may also form embryoid bodies and have peripheral differentiated cells.
Blastocyst Injection:
Human ESCs naturally reside within the inner cell mass (embryoblast) of blastocysts, and in the embryoblast, differentiate into the embryo while the blastocyst's shell (trophoblast) differentiates into extraembryonic tissues. The hollow trophoblast is unable to form a living embryo, and thus it is necessary for the embryonic stem cells within the embryoblast to differentiate and form the embryo. iPSCs injected by micropipette into a trophoblast to generate a blastocyst transferred to recipient females may result in chimeric living mouse pups: mice with iPSC derivatives incorporated all across their bodies with 10%-90 and chimerism.
ii. Epigenetic Reprogramming
Promoter Demethylation:
Methylation is the transfer of a methyl group to a DNA base, typically the transfer of a methyl group to a cytosine molecule in a CpG site (adjacent cytosine/guanine sequence). Widespread methylation of a gene interferes with expression by preventing the activity of expression proteins or recruiting enzymes that interfere with expression. Thus, methylation of a gene effectively silences it by preventing transcription. Promoters of pluripotency-associated genes, including Oct-3/4, Rex1, and Nanog, may be demethylated in iPSCs, showing their promoter activity and the active promotion and expression of pluripotency-associated genes in iPSCs.
Histone Demethylation:
Histones are compacting proteins that are structurally localized to DNA sequences that can effect their activity through various chromatin-related modifications. H3 histones associated with Oct-3/4, Sox2, and Nanog may be demethylated to activate the expression of Oct-3/4, Sox2, and Nanog.
B. Selection for Residue Free Feature
A reprogramming vector such as oriP-based vector in this invention could replicate extra-chromosomally and be lost from host cells after generations. However, an additional selection step for progeny cells essentially free of extra-chromosomal vector elements may facilitate this process. For example, a sample of progeny cell may be extracted to test the presence or loss of extra-chromosomal vector elements as known in the art (Leight and Sugden, 2001).
A reprogramming vector may further comprise a selection marker, more specifically, a negative selection marker, such as a gene encoding a thymidine kinase to select for progeny cells essentially free of such a selection marker. The human herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase type 1 gene (HSVtk) acts as a conditional lethal marker in mammalian cells. The HSVtk-encoded enzyme is able to phosphorylate certain nucleoside analogs (e.g., ganciclovir, an antiherpetic drug), thus converting them to toxic DNA replication inhibitors. An alternative or a complementary approach is to test the absence of extra-chromosomal genetic elements in progeny cells, using conventional methods, such as RT-PCR, PCR, FISH (Fluorescent in situ hybridization), gene array, or hybridization (e.g., Southern blot).
IX. Nucleic Acid Molecule Construction and DeliveryIn certain embodiments, genetic elements comprising reprogramming factors and/or nucleic acid molecules for genome integration are constructed to comprise functional genetic elements, such as elements for expression of a coding sequence. Details of components of these vectors and delivery methods are disclosed below.
A. Regulatory Elements
Eukaryotic expression cassettes included in the vectors preferably contain (in a 5′-to-3′ direction) an eukaryotic transcriptional promoter operably linked to a protein-coding sequence, splice signals including intervening sequences, and a transcriptional termination/polyadenylation sequence.
i. Promoter/Enhancers
A “promoter” is a control sequence that is a region of a nucleic acid sequence at which initiation and rate of transcription are controlled. It may contain genetic elements at which regulatory proteins and molecules may bind, such as RNA polymerase and other transcription factors, to initiate the specific transcription a nucleic acid sequence. The phrases “operatively positioned,” “operatively linked,” “under control,” and “under transcriptional control” mean that a promoter is in a correct functional location and/or orientation in relation to a nucleic acid sequence to control transcriptional initiation and/or expression of that sequence.
Promoters suitable for use in EBNA-1-encoding vector of the invention are those that direct the expression of the expression cassettes encoding the EBNA-1 protein to result in sufficient steady-state levels of EBNA-1 protein to stably maintain EBV oriP-containing vectors. Promoters may be also used for efficient expression of expression cassettes encoding reprogramming factors.
A promoter generally comprises a sequence that functions to position the start site for RNA synthesis. The best known example of this is the TATA box, but in some promoters lacking a TATA box, such as, for example, the promoter for the mammalian terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase gene and the promoter for the SV40 late genes, a discrete element overlying the start site itself to help fix the place of initiation. Additional promoter elements regulate the frequency of transcriptional initiation. Typically, these are located in the region 30-110 bp upstream of the start site, although a number of promoters have been shown to contain functional elements downstream of the start site as well. To bring a coding sequence “under the control of” a promoter, one positions the 5′ end of the transcription initiation site of the transcriptional reading frame “downstream” of (i.e., 3′ of) the chosen promoter. The “upstream” promoter stimulates transcription of the DNA and promotes expression of the encoded RNA.
The spacing between promoter elements frequently is flexible, so that promoter function is preserved when elements are inverted or moved relative to one another. In the tk promoter, the spacing between promoter elements can be increased to 50 bp apart before activity begins to decline. Depending on the promoter, it appears that individual elements can function either cooperatively or independently to activate transcription. A promoter may or may not be used in conjunction with an “enhancer,” which refers to a cis-acting regulatory sequence involved in the transcriptional activation of a nucleic acid sequence.
A promoter may be one naturally associated with a nucleic acid sequence, as may be obtained by isolating the 5′ non-coding sequences located upstream of the coding segment and/or exon. Such a promoter can be referred to as “endogenous.” Similarly, an enhancer may be one naturally associated with a nucleic acid sequence, located either downstream or upstream of that sequence. Alternatively, certain advantages will be gained by positioning the coding nucleic acid segment under the control of a recombinant or heterologous promoter, which refers to a promoter that is not normally associated with a nucleic acid sequence in its natural environment. A recombinant or heterologous enhancer refers also to an enhancer not normally associated with a nucleic acid sequence in its natural environment. Such promoters or enhancers may include promoters or enhancers of other genes, and promoters or enhancers isolated from any other virus, or prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell, and promoters or enhancers not “naturally occurring,” i.e., containing different elements of different transcriptional regulatory regions, and/or mutations that alter expression. For example, promoters that are most commonly used in recombinant DNA construction include the β-lactamase (penicillinase), lactose and tryptophan (trp) promoter systems. In addition to producing nucleic acid sequences of promoters and enhancers synthetically, sequences may be produced using recombinant cloning and/or nucleic acid amplification technology, including PCR™, in connection with the compositions disclosed herein (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,202 and 5,928,906, each incorporated herein by reference). Furthermore, it is contemplated the control sequences that direct transcription and/or expression of sequences within non-nuclear organelles such as mitochondria, chloroplasts, and the like, can be employed as well.
Naturally, it will be important to employ a promoter and/or enhancer that effectively directs the expression of the DNA segment in the organelle, cell type, tissue, organ, or organism chosen for expression. Those of skill in the art of molecular biology generally know the use of promoters, enhancers, and cell type combinations for protein expression (see, for example Sambrook et al. 1989, incorporated herein by reference). The promoters employed may be constitutive, tissue-specific, inducible, and/or useful under the appropriate conditions to direct high level expression of the introduced DNA segment, such as is advantageous in the large-scale production of recombinant proteins and/or peptides. The promoter may be heterologous or endogenous.
Additionally any promoter/enhancer combination (as per, for example, the Eukaryotic Promoter Data Base EPDB, the World Wide Web at epd.isb-sib.ch/) could also be used to drive expression. Use of a T3, T7 or SP6 cytoplasmic expression system is another possible embodiment. Eukaryotic cells can support cytoplasmic transcription from certain bacterial promoters if the appropriate bacterial polymerase is provided, either as part of the delivery complex or as an additional genetic expression construct.
Non-limiting examples of promoters include early or late viral promoters, such as, SV40 early or late promoters, cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoters, Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) early promoters; eukaryotic cell promoters, such as, e. g., beta actin promoter (Ng, 1989, Quitsche et al., 1989), GADPH promoter (Alexander et al., 1988, Ercolani et al., 1988), metallothionein promoter (Karin et al., 1989; Richards et al., 1984); and concatenated response element promoters, such as cyclic AMP response element promoters (cre), serum response element promoter (sre), phorbol ester promoter (TPA) and response element promoters (tre) near a minimal TATA box. It is also possible to use human growth hormone promoter sequences (e.g., the human growth hormone minimal promoter described at Genbank, accession no. X05244, nucleotide 283-341) or a mouse mammary tumor promoter (available from the ATCC, Cat. No. ATCC 45007). A specific example could be a phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter.
ii. Initiation Signals and Internal Ribosome Binding Sites and Protease Cleavage Sites/Self-Cleaving Peptides
A specific initiation signal also may be required for efficient translation of coding sequences. These signals include the ATG initiation codon or adjacent sequences. Exogenous translational control signals, including the ATG initiation codon, may need to be provided. One of ordinary skill in the art would readily be capable of determining this and providing the necessary signals. It is well known that the initiation codon must be “in-frame” with the reading frame of the desired coding sequence to ensure translation of the entire insert. The exogenous translational control signals and initiation codons can be either natural or synthetic. The efficiency of expression may be enhanced by the inclusion of appropriate transcription enhancer elements.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the use of internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) elements are used to create multigene, or polycistronic, messages. IRES elements are able to bypass the ribosome scanning model of 5′ methylated Cap dependent translation and begin translation at internal sites (Pelletier and Sonenberg, 1988). IRES elements from two members of the picornavirus family (polio and encephalomyocarditis) have been described (Pelletier and Sonenberg, 1988), as well an IRES from a mammalian message (Macejak and Sarnow, 1991). IRES elements can be linked to heterologous open reading frames. Multiple open reading frames can be transcribed together, each separated by an IRES, creating polycistronic messages. By virtue of the IRES element, each open reading frame is accessible to ribosomes for efficient translation. Multiple genes can be efficiently expressed using a single promoter/enhancer to transcribe a single message (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,925,565 and 5,935,819, each herein incorporated by reference).
In certain embodiments of the invention, the genes encoding markers or other proteins may be connected to one another by a sequence (there may be more than one) coding for a protease cleavage site (i.e., a sequence comprising the recognition site of a protease) or at least one self-cleaving peptide.
Suitable protease cleavages sites and self-cleaving peptides are known to the skilled person (see, e.g., in Ryan et al., 1997; Scymczak et al., 2004). Preferred examples of protease cleavage sites are the cleavage sites of potyvirus NIa proteases (e.g., tobacco etch virus protease), potyvirus HC proteases, potyvirus P1 (P35) proteases, byovirus Nla proteases, byovirus RNA-2-encoded proteases, aphthovirus L proteases, enterovirus 2A proteases, rhinovirus 2A proteases, picorna 3C proteases, comovirus 24K proteases, nepovirus 24K proteases, RTSV (rice tungro spherical virus) 3Ciike protease, PY\IF (parsnip yellow fleck virus) 3C-like protease, thrombin, factor Xa and enterokinase.
Preferred self-cleaving peptides (also called “cis-acting hydrolytic elements”, CHYSEL; see deFelipe (2002)) are derived from potyvirus and cardiovirus 2A peptides. Especially preferred self-cleaving peptides are selected from 2A peptides derived from FMDV (foot-and-mouth disease virus), equine rhinitis A virus, Thoseá asigna virus and porcine teschovirus.
iii. Multiple Cloning Sites
Vectors can include a multiple cloning site (MCS), which is a nucleic acid region that contains multiple restriction enzyme sites, any of which can be used in conjunction with standard recombinant technology to digest the vector (see, for example, Carbonelli et al., 1999, Levenson et al., 1998, and Cocea, 1997, incorporated herein by reference.) “Restriction enzyme digestion” refers to catalytic cleavage of a nucleic acid molecule with an enzyme that functions only at specific locations in a nucleic acid molecule. Many of these restriction enzymes are commercially available. Use of such enzymes is widely understood by those of skill in the art. Frequently, a vector is linearized or fragmented using a restriction enzyme that cuts within the MCS to enable exogenous sequences to be ligated to the vector. “Ligation” refers to the process of forming phosphodiester bonds between two nucleic acid fragments, which may or may not be contiguous with each other. Techniques involving restriction enzymes and ligation reactions are well known to those of skill in the art of recombinant technology.
iv. Splicing Sites
Most transcribed eukaryotic RNA molecules will undergo RNA splicing to remove introns from the primary transcripts. Vectors containing genomic eukaryotic sequences may require donor and/or acceptor splicing sites to ensure proper processing of the transcript for protein expression (see, for example, Chandler et al., 1997, herein incorporated by reference.)
v. Termination Signals
The vectors or constructs of the present invention will generally comprise at least one termination signal. A “termination signal” or “terminator” is comprised of the DNA sequences involved in specific termination of an RNA transcript by an RNA polymerase. Thus, in certain embodiments a termination signal that ends the production of an RNA transcript is contemplated. A terminator may be necessary in vivo to achieve desirable message levels.
In eukaryotic systems, the terminator region may also comprise specific DNA sequences that permit site-specific cleavage of the new transcript so as to expose a polyadenylation site. This signals a specialized endogenous polymerase to add a stretch of about 200 A residues (polyA) to the 3′ end of the transcript. RNA molecules modified with this polyA tail appear to more stable and are translated more efficiently. Thus, in other embodiments involving eukaryotes, it is preferred that that terminator comprises a signal for the cleavage of the RNA, and it is more preferred that the terminator signal promotes polyadenylation of the message. The terminator and/or polyadenylation site elements can serve to enhance message levels and to minimize read through from the cassette into other sequences.
Terminators contemplated for use in the invention include any known terminator of transcription described herein or known to one of ordinary skill in the art, including but not limited to, for example, the termination sequences of genes, such as for example the bovine growth hormone terminator or viral termination sequences, such as for example the SV40 terminator. In certain embodiments, the termination signal may be a lack of transcribable or translatable sequence, such as due to a sequence truncation.
vi. Polyadenylation Signals
In expression, particularly eukaryotic expression, one will typically include a polyadenylation signal to effect proper polyadenylation of the transcript. The nature of the polyadenylation signal is not believed to be crucial to the successful practice of the invention, and any such sequence may be employed. Preferred embodiments include the SV40 polyadenylation signal or the bovine growth hormone polyadenylation signal, convenient and known to function well in various target cells. Polyadenylation may increase the stability of the transcript or may facilitate cytoplasmic transport.
vii. Origins of Replication
In order to propagate a vector in a host cell, it may contain one or more origins of replication sites (often termed “ori”), for example, a nucleic acid sequence corresponding to oriP of EBV as described above, which is a specific nucleic acid sequence at which replication is initiated. Alternatively a replication origin of other extra-chromosomally replicating virus as described above or an autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) can be employed.
viii. Selection and Screenable Markers
In certain embodiments of the invention, cells containing a nucleic acid construct of the present invention may be identified or selected in vitro or in vivo by including a marker in the expression cassette. Such markers would confer an identifiable change to the cell permitting easy identification of cells containing the expression cassette. Generally, a selection marker is one that confers a property that allows for selection. A positive selection marker is one in which the presence of the marker allows for its selection, while a negative selection marker is one in which its presence prevents its selection. An example of a positive selection marker is a drug resistance marker.
Usually the inclusion of a drug selection marker aids in the cloning and identification of transformants, for example, genes that confer resistance to neomycin, puromycin, blastocidin, geneticin, hygromycin, DHFR, GPT, zeocin and histidinol are useful selection markers. In addition to markers conferring a phenotype that allows for the discrimination of transformants based on the implementation of conditions, other types of markers including screenable markers such as GFP, whose basis is colorimetric analysis, are also contemplated. Alternatively, screenable enzymes as negative selection markers such as herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (tk) or chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) may be utilized. One of skill in the art would also know how to employ immunologic markers, possibly in conjunction with FACS analysis. The marker used is not believed to be important, so long as it is capable of being expressed simultaneously with the nucleic acid encoding a gene product. Further examples of selection and screenable markers are well known to one of skill in the art.
Certain embodiments of the present invention utilize screenable reporter genes to indicate specific property of cells, for example, differentiation along a defined cell lineage by activating a condition-responsive regulatory element which controls the reporter marker gene expression.
Examples of such reporters include genes encoding cell surface proteins (e.g., CD4, HA epitope), fluorescent proteins, antigenic determinants and enzymes (e.g., β-galactosidase or a nitroreductase). The vector containing cells may be isolated, e.g., by FACS using fluorescently-tagged antibodies to the cell surface protein or substrates that can be converted to fluorescent products by a vector encoded enzyme. In certain aspects cell-permeable dyes can be used to identify cells expressing a reporter. For example, expression of a NFAT nitroreductase gene can be detected by using a cell permeable pro-fluorogenic substrate such as CytoCy5S (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,633,158, 5,780,585, 5,977,065 and EP Patent No. EP 1252520, each incorporate herein by reference).
In specific embodiments, the reporter gene is a fluorescent protein. A broad range of fluorescent protein genetic variants have been developed that feature fluorescence emission spectral profiles spanning almost the entire visible light spectrum (see Table 1 for non-limiting examples). Mutagenesis efforts in the original Aequorea victoria jellyfish green fluorescent protein have resulted in new fluorescent probes that range in color from blue to yellow, and are some of the most widely used in vivo reporter molecules in biological research. Longer wavelength fluorescent proteins, emitting in the orange and red spectral regions, have been developed from the marine anemone, Discosoma striata, and reef corals belonging to the class Anthozoa. Still other species have been mined to produce similar proteins having cyan, green, yellow, orange, and deep red fluorescence emission. Developmental research efforts are ongoing to improve the brightness and stability of fluorescent proteins, thus improving their overall usefulness.
B. Nucleic Acid Delivery
Introduction of a nucleic acid, be it a reprogramming vector or other molecule for genome integration, into somatic cells according to the current invention may use any suitable methods for nucleic acid delivery for transformation of a cell, as described herein or as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Such methods include, but are not limited to, direct delivery of DNA such as by ex vivo transfection (Wilson et al., 1989, Nabel et al., 1989); by injection (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,994,624, 5,981,274, 5,945,100, 5,780,448, 5,736,524, 5,702,932, 5,656,610, 5,589,466 and 5,580,859, each incorporated herein by reference), including microinjection (Harland and Weintraub, 1985; U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,215, incorporated herein by reference); by electroporation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253, incorporated herein by reference; Tur-Kaspa et al., 1986; Potter et al., 1984); by calcium phosphate precipitation (Graham and Van Der Eb, 1973; Chen and Okayama, 1987; Rippe et al., 1990); by using DEAE-dextran followed by polyethylene glycol (Gopal, 1985); by direct sonic loading (Fechheimer et al., 1987); by liposome mediated transfection (Nicolau and Sene, 1982; Fraley et al., 1979; Nicolau et al., 1987; Wong et al., 1980; Kaneda et al., 1989; Kato et al., 1991) and receptor-mediated transfection (Wu and Wu, 1987; Wu and Wu, 1988); by microprojectile bombardment (PCT Application Nos. WO 94/09699 and 95/06128; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,610,042; 5,322,783 5,563,055, 5,550,318, 5,538,877 and 5,538,880, and each incorporated herein by reference); by agitation with silicon carbide fibers (Kaeppler et al., 1990; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,302,523 and 5,464,765, each incorporated herein by reference); by desiccation/inhibition-mediated DNA uptake (Potrykus et al., 1985), and any combination of such methods. Through the application of techniques such as these, organelle(s), cell(s), tissue(s) or organism(s) may be stably or transiently transformed.
i. Liposome-Mediated Transfection
In a certain embodiment of the invention, a nucleic acid may be entrapped in a lipid complex such as, for example, a liposome. Liposomes are vesicular structures characterized by a phospholipid bilayer membrane and an inner aqueous medium. Multilamellar liposomes have multiple lipid layers separated by aqueous medium. They form spontaneously when phospholipids are suspended in an excess of aqueous solution. The lipid components undergo self-rearrangement before the formation of closed structures and entrap water and dissolved solutes between the lipid bilayers (Ghosh and Bachhawat, 1991). Also contemplated is a nucleic acid complexed with Lipofectamine (Gibco BRL) or Superfect (Qiagen). The amount of liposomes used may vary upon the nature of the liposome as well as the cell used, for example, about 5 to about 20 μg vector DNA per 1 to 10 million of cells may be contemplated.
Liposome-mediated nucleic acid delivery and expression of foreign DNA in vitro has been very successful (Nicolau and Sene, 1982; Fraley et al., 1979; Nicolau et al., 1987). The feasibility of liposome-mediated delivery and expression of foreign DNA in cultured chick embryo, HeLa and hepatoma cells has also been demonstrated (Wong et al., 1980).
In certain embodiments of the invention, a liposome may be complexed with a hemagglutinating virus (HVJ). This has been shown to facilitate fusion with the cell membrane and promote cell entry of liposome-encapsulated DNA (Kaneda et al., 1989). In other embodiments, a liposome may be complexed or employed in conjunction with nuclear non-histone chromosomal proteins (HMG-1) (Kato et al., 1991). In yet further embodiments, a liposome may be complexed or employed in conjunction with both HVJ and HMG-1. In other embodiments, a delivery vehicle may comprise a ligand and a liposome.
ii. Electroporation
In certain embodiments of the present invention, a nucleic acid is introduced into an organelle, a cell, a tissue or an organism via electroporation. One type of electroporation is nucleofection, in which nucleic acid is transferred to a cell through the use of a device called a Nucleofector and in combination with cell specific reagents (such as the Amaxa system; Lonza Cologne AG). Electroporation involves the exposure of a suspension of cells and DNA to a high-voltage electric discharge. Recipient cells can be made more susceptible to transformation by mechanical wounding. Also the amount of vectors used may vary upon the nature of the cells used, for example, about 5 to about 20 μg vector DNA per 1 to 10 million of cells may be contemplated.
Transfection of eukaryotic cells using electroporation has been quite successful. Mouse pre-B lymphocytes have been transfected with human kappa-immunoglobulin genes (Potter et al., 1984), and rat hepatocytes have been transfected with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene (Tur-Kaspa et al., 1986) in this manner.
iii. Calcium Phosphate
In other embodiments of the present invention, a nucleic acid is introduced to the cells using calcium phosphate precipitation. Human KB cells have been transfected with adenovirus 5 DNA (Graham and Van Der Eb, 1973) using this technique. Also in this manner, mouse L(A9), mouse C127, CHO, CV-1, BHK, NIH3T3 and HeLa cells were transfected with a neomycin marker gene (Chen and Okayama, 1987), and rat hepatocytes were transfected with a variety of marker genes (Rippe et al., 1990).
iv. DEAE-Dextran
In another embodiment, a nucleic acid is delivered into a cell using DEAE-dextran followed by polyethylene glycol. In this manner, reporter plasmids were introduced into mouse myeloma and erythroleukemia cells (Gopal, 1985).
v. Sonication Loading
Additional embodiments of the present invention include the introduction of a nucleic acid by direct sonic loading. LTK− fibroblasts have been transfected with the thymidine kinase gene by sonication loading (Fechheimer et al., 1987).
vi. Receptor Mediated Transfection
Still further, a nucleic acid may be delivered to a target cell via receptor-mediated delivery vehicles. These take advantage of the selective uptake of macromolecules by receptor-mediated endocytosis that will be occurring in a target cell. In view of the cell type-specific distribution of various receptors, this delivery method adds another degree of specificity to the present invention.
Certain receptor-mediated gene targeting vehicles comprise a cell receptor-specific ligand and a nucleic acid-binding agent. Others comprise a cell receptor-specific ligand to which the nucleic acid to be delivered has been operatively attached. Several ligands have been used for receptor-mediated gene transfer (Wu and Wu, 1987; Wagner et al., 1990; Perales et al., 1994; Myers, EPO 0273085), which establishes the operability of the technique. Specific delivery in the context of another mammalian cell type has been described (Wu and Wu, 1993; incorporated herein by reference). In certain aspects of the present invention, a ligand will be chosen to correspond to a receptor specifically expressed on the target cell population.
In other embodiments, a nucleic acid delivery vehicle component of a cell-specific nucleic acid targeting vehicle may comprise a specific binding ligand in combination with a liposome. The nucleic acid(s) to be delivered are housed within the liposome and the specific binding ligand is functionally incorporated into the liposome membrane. The liposome will thus specifically bind to the receptor(s) of a target cell and deliver the contents to a cell. Such systems have been shown to be functional using systems in which, for example, epidermal growth factor (EGF) is used in the receptor-mediated delivery of a nucleic acid to cells that exhibit upregulation of the EGF receptor.
In still further embodiments, the nucleic acid delivery vehicle component of a targeted delivery vehicle may be a liposome itself, which will preferably comprise one or more lipids or glycoproteins that direct cell-specific binding. For example, lactosyl-ceramide, a galactose-terminal asialganglioside, have been incorporated into liposomes and observed an increase in the uptake of the insulin gene by hepatocytes (Nicolau et al., 1987). It is contemplated that the tissue-specific transforming constructs of the present invention can be specifically delivered into a target cell in a similar manner.
vii Microprojectile Bombardment
Microprojectile bombardment techniques can be used to introduce a nucleic acid into at least one, organelle, cell, tissue or organism (U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318; U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,880; U.S. Pat. No. 5,610,042; and PCT Application WO 94/09699; each of which is incorporated herein by reference). This method depends on the ability to accelerate DNA-coated microprojectiles to a high velocity allowing them to pierce cell membranes and enter cells without killing them (Klein et al., 1987). There are a wide variety of microprojectile bombardment techniques known in the art, many of which are applicable to the invention.
In this microprojectile bombardment, one or more particles may be coated with at least one nucleic acid and delivered into cells by a propelling force. Several devices for accelerating small particles have been developed. One such device relies on a high voltage discharge to generate an electrical current, which in turn provides the motive force (Yang et al., 1990). The microprojectiles used have consisted of biologically inert substances such as tungsten or gold particles or beads. Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, platinum, and preferably, gold. It is contemplated that in some instances DNA precipitation onto metal particles would not be necessary for DNA delivery to a recipient cell using microprojectile bombardment. However, it is contemplated that particles may contain DNA rather than be coated with DNA. DNA-coated particles may increase the level of DNA delivery via particle bombardment but are not, in and of themselves, necessary.
For the bombardment, cells in suspension are concentrated on filters or solid culture medium. Alternatively, immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium. The cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate.
X. ExamplesThe following examples are included to demonstrate preferred embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Example 1 Genome Engineering and Episomal Reprogramming of Human Foreskin Fibroblast Cells Using a Zinc Finger Nuclease Initial Cell PreparationLive normal human neonatal dermal fibroblast (HNDF) cells were purchased from AllCells, LLC (Emeryville, Calif., ID# NF090119, Cat# HN006002). Fibroblasts were cultured in Neonatal Human Dermal Fibroblast Medium with supplement (NHNDF basal medium+supplement) from AllCells, LLC. (Emeryville, Calif., Cat# HN006006 and HN006007). Cells from a T75 flask were split 1:10 using a standard trypsin/EDTA method and some of the cells were plated in a 12 well plate to be used to generate a kill curve using puromycin. Six wells were seeded with a 1:5 dilution of cells and 6 wells were seeded with a 1:10 dilution of cells. Six vials of cells were frozen with approximately 1M cells per vial. Frozen cells were at passage 2.
Engineering CellsSix days post-split, confluent fibroblasts were harvested by Trypsin/EDTA dissociation. Cells were counted using a hemocytometer and four million cells were pelleted, washed twice with phosphate buffered saline, resuspended in 200 μl of Amaxa NHDF nucleofection solution from Lonza (Walkersville, Md., Cat# VPD-1001), and split into two 100 μl tubes. 15 μg of plasmid 1024 (
One well of the GFP transfected NHDF was exposed to 0.5 μg/ml puromycin in order to monitor the rate of cell death in puromycin negative NHDF. Four of five wells on the high density plate of the transfected AAVS1 HDNFs were exposed to 0.5 μg/ml puromycin. Medium was changed on Days 1, 3, and 4. On Day 5, medium was changed to non-selective medium. Puromycin selected wells were triturated to remove dead, adherent cells. All of the transfected GFP cells were removed, and all but approximately 15% of the transfected AAVS1 cells were removed. On Day 6, the NHDF transfected AAVS1 cells had begun to recover from selection and proliferate. The unselected NHDF transfected AAVS1 well was expanded to a E-well plate. On Day 8, five wells of the unselected NHDF transfected AAVS1 cells were harvested and the genomic DNA was purified. One well was used for passage to a new 6-well plate. On Day 10, PCR was performed on the unselected NHDF transfected AAVS1 cells with primers to detected the integrated and wild-type AAVS1 locus. Cells constitutively expressing GFP were used as a positive control, and iPSC derived cardiomyocytes were used as a negative control. The following parameters and reagents were used for the PCR reaction: PCR: 98° 30 sec, [98° 10 s, 68° 20 s, 72° 60 s]×35 cycles, 72° 2 min. reaction components are shown in Table 2, below. PCR primers were:
Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products showed the correct insertion of the recombinant plasmid at the AAVS1 site in the fibroblasts.
Media were also prepared for use after nucleofection. Components for N2B27 medium are shown in Table 3. In each case the components were combined and passed through a 0.22 μm filter.
The zinc finger nuclease modified NHDF (Normal Human Fetal Fibroblasts) from above were nucleofected with reprogramming DNA vectors.
Briefly, three reprogramming vectors (#34—
To the second 1.5 mL tube containing the reprogramming plasmids, 8.1 μg of plasmid 1036 was added (1036, see
Day 2—cells were switched to reprogramming medium (see N2B27—Table 5). Some were fluorescing.
Day 4—cells were fed with reprogramming medium
Day 6—cells were fed with reprogramming medium
Day 8—cells were fed with reprogramming medium
Day 10—cells were fed with reprogramming medium. Images were acquired.
Day 12—cells were fed with reprogramming medium
Day 13—cells were fed with TeSR
Day 15—cells were fed with TeSR
Day 17—cells were fed with TeSR
Day 20—cells were fed with TeSR
Day 21—performed live stain and pick colonies
Day 27—picked P2 clones
Results from the experiments with zinc finger nuclease mediated integration followed by cell reprogramming in fibroblasts are summarized below and all cellular phenotypes are described in
-
- Starting cells for sequential engineering then reprogramming: 4 million expanded primary human fibroblasts
- Percentage of cells successfully engineered with drug resistance and selected: Approximately 15%
- Starting drug resistant expanded cells for Reprogramming: 2 million
- Number of reprogrammed colonies (pluripotent) immunostaining positive (red) for Tra-160: >100
- Number of unstained colonies (likely partially reprogrammed): Approximately 20
Results from the experiments with simultaneous genome engineering with zinc finger nuclease mediated integration and vectors containing reprogramming factors in fibroblasts are summarized below:
-
- Starting cells for simultaneous engineering and reprogramming: 2 million expanded primary human fibroblasts
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red) and expressing green zsGFP: 14 (Note: After passage 1, there were 6 red and green colonies, 3 red only colonies and 5 colonies that did not survive picking.)
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red only): approximately 40
- Number of green only cells: too numerous to count (These were likely engineered fibroblasts.)
- Number of unstained colonies: approximately 20 (These were likely partially reprogrammed colonies.)
- Number of colorless fibroblasts: too numerous to count (These were starting fibroblasts with no modifications.)
A method for episomal reprogramming and genome engineering as exemplified here is provided as
Reagents were initially prepared for the experiments. A list of such reagents is provided in Table 4.
Initial Cell Culture
Adult PBMCs were cultured for 6 days as follows prior to engineering/reprogramming.
EB (erythroblast) expansion medium was prepared as shown in Table 5. Each cytokine is dissolved according to recommendations from manufacturer. Stock solutions are prepared in sterile PBS+2 mg/ml BSA. The thawed cytokine aliquots can be stored at 4° C. up to 2 weeks. It is advisable to use antibiotics at initiation of primary cell culture. Gentamycin (10 μg/ml final concentration) was used (Invitrogen).
One vial of 10×107 PBMCs was removed from liquid nitrogen and thawed in a 37° C. water bath. The cells were transferred dropwise to a 50 ml conical tube containing 30 ml StemSpan® SFEM. The tube was centrifuged at 1200 RPM for 5 minutes. The cells were resuspended in 10 mL StemSpan® SFEM and then counted using a hemocytometer. 9.4×107 cells were recovered. The cells were centrifuged again at 1200 RPM and resuspended in 94 ml EB expansion medium+10 μg/ml gentamycin for a final cell density of 1×106 cells/ml. To E-well plates, 2 ml of cells were added per well for a total of 44 wells. The cells were incubated at 37° C., 5% CO2 over the weekend and then 2 ml of EB expansion medium was added to each well.
Nucleofection
Nucleofection (Day 0), suspended cells were collected and counted using a hemocytometer. 1.8×107 cells were recovered. Flow cytometry was conducted on a small sample of cells.
RetroNectin-coated plates were used for this experiment. RetroNectin stock (1 mg/mL) was diluted to 5 μg/mL with standard 1×PBS and gently mixed by inversion. Diluted RetroNectin (1 mL) was added to each well of a non-tissue treated 6 well plate. To ensure even dispersal, the plate was tapped. Plates were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Alternatively, plates can be wrapped with parafilm and placed on an even surface at 4° C. overnight for use the following day. The treated wells were washed with 1×PBS, 2 mL of 2% BSA solution were added and plates were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. Wells were washed with 1×PBS and used immediately.
A DNA master mix for each of the experimental conditions was created as follows:
Wells 1.1-1.6: Piggybac transposase DNA vector+Reprogramming DNA vectors (#34, #36 & #123;
Control Wells 3.1-3.2: Reprogramming DNA vectors (#34, #36 & #123;
The appropriate volume of the master mix was placed on the side of each cuvette. Cells were combined with nucleofection solution for a density of 1×107 cells/100 μl. 100 μl of cells were added to the electroporation cuvette and flicked several times to mix in the master mix. The cells were electroporated (well 1.5 had an error of Arc.c.1). Immediately following electroporation, 500 μl of reprogramming medium was added to each cuvette following electroporation. The contents of the cuvette were transferred to 1 well of a 6-well plate containing 2 ml reprogramming medium. Plates were incubated at 37° C., 5% CO2.
Day 2—Changed medium to reprogramming medium. Spun down each well of cells and resuspended cells in 2 ml reprogramming medium
Day 4—Added 2 ml reprogramming medium
Day 6—Removed 1 ml medium, replaced with 2 ml fresh reprogramming medium.
Day 8—Removed 2 ml medium, replaced with 2 ml fresh reprogramming medium.
Day 11—Removed 1.5 ml medium, replaced with 2 ml TeSR2. Performed a cursory count of fluorescent green colonies in each well.
Day 13—75% of medium removed. Fed with 2 ml TeSR2.
Day 15—Fed with TeSR2
Day 18—Fed with TeSR2
Day 19—Live cell staining, pick colonies (AS)
Day 20—Live cell staining and picking of colonies (SD)
Results from the experiments with the piggyBac vector integration are summarized below:
-
- Starting cells for simultaneous engineering and reprogramming: 6 million expanded human PBMCs (6 wells total)
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red) and expressing green zsGFP: 100's
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red only): approximately 50
- Number of green only cells: 2
- Control wells for piggyBac (no transposase added): 2 million human PBMCs (2 wells total)
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red) and expressing green zsGFP: 0
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red only): 100's
- Number of green only cells: 0
The same process was used as described in Example 2 except the experimental conditions were as follows:
Wells 2.1-2.6: Zinc finger nuclease encoding RNA+Reprogramming vectors+vector 1036 for ZsGreen gene expression to be inserted by zinc-finger nuclease. DNA to be inserted at the AAVS1 zinc finger cut site. Used 12.0 μL master mix+5 μl ZFN RNA+1 million cells/nucleofection/well, as shown in Table 8 below. The general scheme is described in
Control Wells 4.2-4.3: These wells became contaminated and did not produce results. No zinc finger nuclease encoding RNA+reprogramming DNA vectors+vector #1036. Used 12.0 μL master mix+1 million cells/nucleofection/well, as shown in Table 9 below.
The appropriate volume of the master mix was placed on the side of each cuvette (zinc finger mRNA was added to the master mix just before use). The remainder of the procedure was the same as described in Example 2.
Results from the experiments with the zinc finger nuclease are summarized below:
-
- Starting cells for simultaneous engineering and reprogramming: 6 million expanded human PBMCs (6 wells)
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red) and expressing green zsGFP: 15
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red only): approximately 200
- Number of green only cells: 1
- Control wells for zinc finger experiment (no zinc finger nuclease added): both wells were contaminated and did not give data.
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red) and expressing green zsGFP: 0
- Number of early cell colonies positive for anti-Tra160 (red only): 100's
- Number of green only cells: 0
As is presented in
Below is a detailed example analysis of microplate and flask usage during cell reprogramming and genome engineering steps:
Colony picking and expansion after reprogramming for 1 donor sample: 44 total plates used to obtain 3 colonies.
Colony picking and expansion after genome engineering iPSCs for 1 donor sample: 69 total plates used to obtain 3 colonies.
Genome engineering of primary cells followed by drug selection and expansion for 1 donor: 1 plate and 2 T-flasks used, no picking of colonies performed.
Simultaneous genome engineering and reprogramming of primary cells for 1 donor sample: 44 total plates used to obtain 3 colonies.
To summarize, Process 1 uses 113 plates (69+44) per donor for 3 colonies selected and characterized and 3 additional colonies frozen). Processes 2 and 3 use 44 or 45 plates, respectively, and save roughly 68 plates per donor. If high throughput donor sample preparation is employed, performing either of Processes 2 or 3 compared to Process 1 can result in significant materials savings with Process 3 further providing the greatest time savings (19% savings compared to Process 2). In summary, employing Process 3, in which cell reprogramming and genome engineering are performed simultaneously, provides a significant improvement in the current best practices for the industrialization of genome engineered iPSC production.
Example 5 Design of TALE Nuclease Targeting the MYH6 GeneThe last intron of the human MYH6 gene is targeted for homologous recombination in order to produce a fusion protein under the control of the native MYH6 promoter. The targeted human sequence Chromosome 14 (minus strand), intron 38-39, position 23,851,273-23,851,636, is 364 bp long. Twenty seven possible TAL Effector binding sites (plus strand) were identified and range from recognizing 16 to 30 bp DNA using the software program provided at the Iowa State University website (boglabx.plp.iastate.edu/TALENT/). Sixteen of the sequences are exemplified below in Table 10. To select the optimal DNA binding domain, the uniqueness of each sequence is examined using BLAST homology analysis against the human genome and transcribed sequences. The optimal sequences will be as long as possible but still unique and have the appropriate length (16-25 bp) for the best binding affinity. By example, the TALEN at position 294, the HD binds C, NG binds, T, and NN binds G.
Typically, several TALENs are constructed and tested for efficiency and specificity when introducing the double strand breaks. For each TALEN, a pair of flanking homologous arms are identified which span the DNA break site. These arms are typically 500-1500 bp long, although a range of sizes may be used.
Simultaneous genome engineering and reprogramming of somatic cells, using the designed TALENs, can be accomplished as outlined in Examples 1-3; however, the vector for integration in this example comprises MYH6 sequences that flank the TALEN site in the MYH6 gene.
All of the methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
REFERENCESThe following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,523
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,783
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,765
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,838
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,877
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,880
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,859
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,466
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,610,042
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,656,610
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,932
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,524
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,448
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,215
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,925,565
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,906
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,819
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,100
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,274
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,624
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,833,269
- U.S. application Ser. No. 12/478,154
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2002/0076976
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2003/0059913
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2003/0062225
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2003/0062227
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2003/0087919
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2003/0125344
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2003/0211603
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2004/0002507
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2004/0002508
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2004/0014755
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2004/0039796
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2005/0192304
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2005/0209261
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2005/123902
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2007/0116680
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2007/0238170
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2008/004287
- U.S. Patent Publn. 2008/0171385
- A practical approach, 1987.
- Adams, J. Virol., 61(5):1743-1746, 1987.
- Aiyar et al., EMBO J., 17(21):6394-6403, 1998.
- Alexander et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:5092-5096, 1988.
- Altmann et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103(38):14188-14193, 2006.
- Amit et al., Dev Biol., 227(2):271-8, 2000.
- Animal Cell Culture, 1987.
- Aravind and Landsman, Nucleic Acids Res., 26(19):4413-4421, 1998.
- Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, N.Y., 1994.
- Baer et al., Biochemistry, 39:7041-7049, 2000.
- Baer et al., Nature, 310(5974):207-211, 1984.
- Bain et al., Biochem. J., 408(3):297-315, 2007.
- Bennett et al, J. Biol. Chem., 277:34, 2002.
- Bertrand et al., J. Mol Biol., 333(2):393-407, 2003.
- Bingham, Cell, 90(3):385-387, 1997.
- Bochkarev et al., Cell, 84(5):791-800, 1996.
- Bode et al., Biol. Chem., 381:801-813, 2000.
- Bode et al., Gene Ther. Mol. Biol., 6:33-46, 2001.
- Bode et al., Science, 255(5041):195-197, 1992.
- Buecker et al., Cell Stem Cell, 6:535-546, 2010.
- Buehr et al., Cell, 135:1287, 2008.
- Carbonelli et al., FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 177(1):75-82, 1999.
- Cermak et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 39(12):e82, 2011.
- Chandler et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94(8):3596-601, 1997.
- Chang, et al., Frontiers in Bioscience, 12:4393-4401, 2007.
- Chaudhuri et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98(18):10085-10089, 2001.
- Chen and Okayama, Mol. Cell Biol., 7(8):2745-2752, 1987.
- Chen et al., Nature Methods, 8:424-429, 2011.
- Chen et al., Cell Stem Cell, 7:240-248, 2010.
- Chen et al., Gene Ther., 11:856-864, 2004.
- Chin et al., Molecular Brain Res., 137(1-2):193-201, 2005.
- Chow et al., Cytometry Commun. Clinical Cytometry, 46:72-78, 2001.
- Christian et al., Genetics, 186(2):757-761, 2010.
- Cocea, Biotechniques, 23(5):814-816, 1997.
- Current Protocols in Molecular Biology and Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, 1987; 1995.
- DaCosta et al., Molec. Pharmacol., 65(3):744-752, 2004.
- Davies et al., Biochem 1, 351:95-105, 2000. deFelipe, Curr. Gene Ther., 2:355-378, 2002. de Gouville et al., Drug News Perspective, 19(2):85-90, 2006.
- Dhar et al., Cell, 106(3):287-296, 2001.
- Downey et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271(35):21005-21011, 1996.
- Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation in vitro, 1993.
- English et al., Trends in Pharmac. Sci 23(1):40-45, 2002.
- Ercolani et al., J Biol. Chem., 263:15335-15341, 1988.
- Ermakova et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271(51):33009-33017, 1996.
- Esteban et al., J. Biol. Chem., 284:17634-17640, 2009.
- European Appln. EPO 0273085 Evans and Kaufman, Nature, 292:154-156, 1981.
- Evans, et al., In: Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology, Devita et al. (Eds.), Lippincot-Raven, NY, 1054-1087, 1997.
- Fechheimer et al., Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:8463-8467, 1987.
- Fernandes et al., Nature Cell Biology, 6:1082-1093, 2004.
- Fischer et al., J. Virol., 71:5148-5146, 1997.
- Fraley et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76:3348-3352, 1979.
- Frame et al, Biochemical J., 359:1-16, 2001.
- Frappier and O'Donnell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88(23):10875-10879, 1991.
- Fusaki et al., Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci., 85:348-362, 2009.
- Gahn and Schildkraut, Cell, 58(3):527-535, 1989.
- Gahn and Sugden, J. Virol., 69(4):2633-2636, 1995.
- Garrick et al., Nat. Genet., 18:56-59, 1998.
- Gellibert, et al., J. Med. Chem., 49(7):2210-2221, 2006.
- Gene Targeting, A Practical Approach, 1993.
- Gene Transfer Vectors for Mammalian Cells, 1987.
- Ghosh and Bachhawat, In: Liver Diseases, Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy Using Specific Receptors and Ligands, Wu et al. (Eds.), Marcel Dekker, NY, 87-104, 1991.
- Gopal, Mol. Cell Biol., 5:1188-1190, 1985.
- Gould et al, Intl. J. Neuropsychopharmacology, 7:387-390, 2004.
- Gould et al, Pharmacological Res., 48:49-53, 2003.
- Graham and Van Der Eb, Virology, 52:456-467, 1973.
- Guide to Techniques in Mouse Development (1993)
- Hanna et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107:9222-9227, 2010.
- Harb et al., PLoS One, 3(8):e3001, 2008.
- Harland and Weintraub, J. Cell Biol., 101(3):1094-1099, 1985.
- Hegde et al., Nature, 359(6395):505-512, 1992.
- Hogan et al., In: Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1994.
- Hung et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98(4):1865-1870, 2001.
- Inman et al., Molec. Pharmacol., 62(1):65-74, 2002.
- Jainchill et al., J. Virol., 4(5):549-53, 1969.
- Jenke et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (31), 11322-11327, 2004.
- Jia et al., Nat. Methods, 7:197-199, 2010.
- Julien et al., Virology, 326(2):317-328, 0.2004.
- Kaeppler et al., Plant Cell Reports, 9:415-418, 1990.
- Kahn et al., Molecular Therapy, 18(6): 1192-1199, 2010.
- Kaji et al., Nature, 458:771-775, 2009.
- Kameda et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 349:1269-1277, 2006.
- Kaminska et al., Acta Biochimica Polonica, 52(2):329-337, 2005.
- Kanda et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 21(10):3576-3588, 0.2001.
- Kaneda et al., Science, 243:375-378, 1989.
- Karin et al. Cell, 36:371-379, 1989.
- Kato et al, J. Biol. Chem., 266:3361-3364, 1991.
- Keller et al., Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 7(6):862-9, 1995.
- Kennedy and Sugden, Mol. Cell. Biol., 23(19):6901-6908, 2003.
- Kennedy et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100:14269-14274, 2003.
- Kim et al., Cell Stem Cell, 4:472, 2009.
- Kim et al., J. Biol. Chem., 275(40):31245-31254, 2000.
- Kim et al., Virology, 239(2):340-351, 1997.
- Kim et al., Xenobiotica, 38(3):325-339, 2008.
- Kirchmaier and Sugden, J. Virol., 69(2):1280-1283, 1995.
- Kirchmaier and Sugden, J. Virol., 72(6):4657-4666, 1998.
- Klein et al, Neoplasia, 8:1-8, 2006.
- Klein et al., Nature, 327:70-73, 1987.
- Klimanskaya et al., Lancet., 365(9471):1636-41, 2005.
- Kodama et al. J. Cell Physiol., 112(1):89-95, 1982.
- Langle-Rouault et al., J. Virol., 72(7):6181-6185, 1998.
- Leight and Sugden, Mol. Cell Bio., 21:4149-61, 2001.
- Levenson et al., Hum. Gene Ther., 9(8):1233-1236, 1998.
- Levitskaya et al., Nature, 375(6533):685-688, 1995.
- Levitskaya et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94(23):12616-12621, 1997.
- Li et al., Cell Stem Cell, 4:16, 2009.
- Li et al., Cell Stem Cell, 4:16-19, 2009.
- Li et al., Cell, 135:1299, 2008.
- Li et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 39(1):359-372, 2011.
- Lin et al., Nat. Methods, 6:805-808, 2009.
- Lindner and Sugden, Plasmid, 58:1-12, 2007.
- Lindner et. al. J. Virol., 82(12):5693-702, 2008.
- Liu et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 346:131-139, 2006.
- Liu et al., Cell Stem Cell 3, 587-590, 2008.
- Loh et al., Blood, 113:5476-5479, 2009.
- Lowry et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105:2883, 2008.
- Ludwig et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 24(2):185-187, 2006b.
- Ludwig et al., Nat. Methods, 3(8):637-46, 2006a.
- Ludwig et al., Nat. Methods, 3:637-646, 2006c.
- Macejak and Sarnow, Nature, 353:90-94, 1991.
- Mackey and Sugden, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19(5):3349-3359, 1999.
- Mackey et al., J. Virol., 69(10):6199-6208, 1995.
- Maniatis, et al., Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1988.
- Manzini et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103(47):17672-17677, 2006.
- Marechal et al., J. Virol., 73(5):4385-4392, 1999.
- Martin, et al., Nature Immunology, 6:111-184, 2005.
- Martin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78(12):7634-8, 1981.
- Mattingly et al, J. Pharmacol. Experimen. Therap., 316:456-465, 2006.
- Middleton and Sugden, J. Virol., 66(1):489-495, 1992.
- Middleton and Sugden, J. Virol., 68:4067-4071, 1994.
- Miller et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 29(2):143-148, 2011.
- Nabel et al., Science, 244(4910):1342-1344, 1989.
- Nakagawa et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107(32):14152-7, 2010. Nakano et al., Science, 272(5262):722-4, 1996.
- Nanbo et al., EMBO J., 26:4252-62, 2007.
- Ng, Nuc. Acid Res., 17:601-615, 1989.
- Nicolau and Sene, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 721:185-190, 1982.
- Nicolau et al., Methods Enzymol., 149:157-176, 1987.
- Niller et al., J. Biol. Chem., 270(21):12864-12868, 1995.
- Noble et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Science, USA, 102:6990-6995, 2005.
- Okita et al., Nature, 448:313, 2007.
- Okita et al., Nature, 448:313-317, 2007.
- Okita et al., Science, 322:949, 2008.
- Okita et al., Science, 322:949-953, 2008.
- Park et al., Nature, 451:141, 2008.
- PCT Appln. WO 2007/113505
- PCT Appln. WO 2008/006583
- PCT Appln. WO 2008/094597
- PCT Appln. WO 94/09699
- PCT Appln. WO 95/06128
- PCT Publn. PCT 2005/080554
- PCT Publn. WO 01/088100
- PCT Publn. WO 98/30679
- Pelletier and Sonenberg, Nature, 334(6180):320-325, 1988.
- Perales et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91:4086-4090, 1994.
- Piechaczek et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 27(2):426-428, 1999.
- Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 199(2):169-177, 1985.
- Potter et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:7161-7165, 1984.
- Properties and uses of Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Application to Human Biology and Gene Therapy (1998)
- Quitsche et al., J. Biol. Chem., 264:9539-9545, 1989.
- Rawlins et al., Cell, 42((3):859-868, 1985.
- Reisman and Sugden, Mol. Cell. Biol., 6(11):3838-3846, 1986.
- Reisman et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 5(8):1822-1832, 1985.
- Richards et al., Cell, 37:263-272, 1984.
- Rinehart et al., J. Clinical Oncol., 22:4456-4462, 2004.
- Ring et al., Diabetes, 52:588-595, 2003.
- Rippe, et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 10:689-695, 1990.
- Ritzi et al., J. Cell Sci., 116(Pt 19):3971-3984, 2003.
- Ryan et al., J. Gener. Virol., 78:699-722, 1997.
- Sambrook et al., In: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989.
- Schaarschmidt et al., EMBO J., 23(1):191-201, 0.2004.
- Schaffer et al., Gene, 302(1-2):73-81, 2003.
- Schepers et al., EMBO J., 20(16):4588-4602, 2001.
- Scymczak et al., Nature Biotech., 5:589-594, 2004.
- Sears et al., J. Virol., 77(21):11767-11780, 2003.
- Sears et al., J. Virol., 78(21):11487-11505, 2004.
- Shi et al., Cell Stem Cell, 3:568, 2008.
- Shimada et al., Mol. Reprod. Dev, 77:2, 2010.
- Shire et al., J. Virol., 73(4):2587-2595, 1999.
- Silva et al., PLoS Biol., 6:e253, 2008.
- Stadtfeld et al., Cell Stem Cell, 2:230-240, 2008.
- Stadtfeld et al., Science, 322:945, 2008.
- Stadtfeld et al., Science, 322:945-949, 2008.
- Su et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88(23):10870-19874, 1991.
- Sugden and Warren, J. Virol., 63(6):2644-2649, 1989.
- Sun et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106:15720-15725, 2009.
- Suzuki et al., Cancer Res., 67(5):2351-2359, 2007.
- Takahashi et al., Cell, 126(4):663-676, 2006.
- Takahashi et al., Cell, 131:861, 2007.
- Thomson et al., Science, 282:1145, 1998.
- Tojo, et al., Cancer Science, 96(11):791-800, 2005,
- Tur-Kaspa et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 6:716-718, 1986.
- Wagman, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 10:1105-1137, 2004.
- Wagner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87(9):3410-3414, 1990.
- Wang et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 26(3):1124-1134, 2006.
- Watanabe et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 25:681-686, 2007.
- Watanabe et al., Nat. Neurosci., 8(3):288-96, 2005.
- Weber et al., PLoS One, 6(5):e19722, 2011.
- Wernig et al., Nature, 448(7151):318-24, 2007.
- Wilson et al., Science, 244:1344-1346, 1989.
- Woltjen et al., Nature, 458:766, 2009.
- Woltjen et al., Nature, 458:766-770, 2009.
- Wong et al., Gene, 10:87-94, 1980.
- Wrzesinski et al., Clinical Cancer Res., 13(18):5262-5270, 2007.
- Wu and Wu, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 12:159-167, 1993.
- Wu and Wu, Biochemistry, 27: 887-892, 1988.
- Wu and Wu, J. Biol. Chem., 262:4429-4432, 1987.
- Wu et al., J. Virol., 76(5):2480-2490, 2002.
- Wysokenski and Yates, J. Virol., 63(6):2657-2666, 1989.
- Xu et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 19:971, 2001.
- Xu et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 19:971-974, 2001.
- Yamanaka et al., Cell, 131(5):861-72, 2007.
- Yang and Russell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:4144-4148, 1990.
- Yates and Guan, J. Virol., 65(1):483-488, 1991.
- Yates and Guan, J. Virol., 65:483-488, 1991.
- Yates et al., J. Virol., 74(10):4512-4522, 2000.
- Yates et al., Nature, 313:812-815, 1985.
- Yates et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:3806-3810, 1984.
- Yates, Cancer Cells, (6)197-205, 1988.
- Yin et al., Science, 301(5638):1371-1374, 2003.
- Ying, Nature, 453:519-23, 2008.
- Yu et al., Science, 318:1917, 2007.
- Yu et al., Science, 324:797, 2009.
- Yu et al., Science, 324:797-801, 2009.
- Zhang et al., Bioorganic Med. Chem. Letters; 10:2825-2828, 2000.
- Zhang et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 29(2):149-153, 2011.
- Zhou and Freed, Stem Cells, 2009 (Ahead of Epub Print).
- Zhou et al., Cell Stem Cell, 4:381-384, 2009.
- Zhou et al., EMBO J. 24(7):1406-1417, 2005.
Claims
1. A method for producing a population of human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, comprising:
- a) obtaining human somatic cells;
- b) introducing into said human somatic cells a first vector comprising a first nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome of the cells and at least a second vector comprising a second nucleic acid molecule comprising a genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factors sufficient when expressed in the somatic cell to convert the somatic cell to a pluripotent stem cell, wherein the second nucleic acid molecule is an episomal vector;
- c) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions; and
- d) obtaining a population of iPS cells comprising said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome, wherein said first nucleic acid is expressible and wherein the second nucleic acid molecule is not present in the iPS cells.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- d) obtaining a population of iPS cells comprising cells that (i) comprise said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome and cells which (ii) do not comprise the first nucleic acid integrated in their genome.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- d) obtaining a first population of iPS cells which comprise said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome and a second population of iPS cells which do not comprise the first nucleic acid integrated in their genome.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- d) screening or selecting iPS cells that comprise an expressible first nucleic acid integrated in their genome thereby obtaining the population of iPS cells wherein said first nucleic acid is expressible.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first nucleic acid is expressible upon differentiation of the iPS cells.
6. The method of claim 1, further defined as forming a composition comprising the somatic cells, the first nucleic acid molecule and the second nucleic acid molecule and culturing said composition.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first or second nucleic acid molecule is randomly integrated into the genome of the cells.
8-9. (canceled)
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first or second nucleic acid molecule is integrated into a selected genomic site of the cells.
11-13. (canceled)
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the first nucleic acid molecule comprises a coding sequence of a screenable or selectable marker.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the first nucleic acid molecule comprises a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of a sequence that corrects a genetic defect in the cells; a sequence that provides resistance to a pathogen infection; a sequence that provides resistance to a drug; a sequence that provides sensitivity to a drug; a sequence that alters immunogencity of the cells; and a sequence that provides a genetic tag in the cells.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the somatic cell is a human fibroblast, keratinocyte, hematopoietic cell, mesenchymal cell, adipose cell, endothelial cell, epithelial cell, neural cell, muscle cell, mammary cell, liver cell, kidney cell, skin cell, digestive tract cell, cumulus cell, gland cell, or pancreatic islet cell.
17-19. (canceled)
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the episomal vector comprises a replication origin and one or more expression cassettes for expression of reprogramming factors, wherein one or more of said expression cassettes further comprise a nucleotide sequence encoding a trans-acting factor that binds to the replication origin to replicate an extra-chromosomal template, and/or wherein the somatic cell expresses such a trans-acting factor.
21. The method of claim 1, wherein the reprogramming factor comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of Sox, Oct, Nanog, Lin-28, Klf4, C-myc, L-myc, a myc mutant or homolog that is deficient in transformation, and SV40LT.
22. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions comprises culturing the cells essentially free of feeder cells.
23. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions comprises culturing the cells in the presence of a matrix component.
24. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c) further comprises selecting or screening said cells for the presence of the first nucleic acid molecule.
25-28. (canceled)
29. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions comprises culturing the cells for at least from about one day to fifteen days under reprogramming conditions.
30-34. (canceled)
35. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- (e) culturing the iPS cells under expansion conditions.
36-40. (canceled)
41. A method for producing a population of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and a population of engineered iPS cells, comprising:
- a) obtaining somatic cells;
- b) introducing into said cells a first nucleic acid molecule for integration into the genome of the cells and at least a second nucleic acid molecule comprising a genetic element that expresses one or more reprogramming factors sufficient when expressed in the somatic cell to convert the somatic cell to a pluripotent stem cell;
- c) culturing said cells under reprogramming conditions; and
- d) obtaining a first population of iPS cells which comprise said first nucleic acid integrated in their genome and a second population of iPS cells which do not comprise the first nucleic acid integrated in their genome.
Type: Application
Filed: Feb 23, 2016
Publication Date: Sep 29, 2016
Applicant: Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. (Madison, WI)
Inventors: Thomas J. BURKE (Madison, WI), Michael MILLER (Madison, WI), Michael McLACHLAN (Verona, WI), Sarah Jane DICKERSON (Madison, WI), Anne STROUSE (Madison, WI)
Application Number: 15/051,541
