TIME-GATED DETECTION, DUAL-LAYER SPAD-BASED ELECTRON DETECTION
Electron beam modulation in response to optical pump pulses applied to a sample is measured using SPAD elements. Individual detection events are used to form histograms of numbers of events in time bins associated with pump pulse timing. The histograms can be produced at a SPAD array, simplifying data transfer. In some examples, two SPAD arrays are stacked and a coincidence circuit discriminates signal events from noise events by determining corresponding events are detected withing a predetermined time window.
Latest FEI Company Patents:
- System and method for preparation and delivery of biological samples for charged particle analysis
- System and methods for automated processing of multiple samples in a BIB system
- Stroboscopic illumination synchronized electron detection and imaging
- Systems and methods for performing sample lift-out for highly reactive materials
- Concurrent laser cleaning and spectroscopic cleanliness monitoring
The disclosure pertains to time-resolved electron microscopy.
BACKGROUNDConventional time-resolved electron microscopy revolves around synchronizing a pump pulse such as a laser pulse, a microwave pulse, a temperature pulse, a mechanical or other excitation to start a sample probing process. Typically, the pump pulse is directed to a sample to interact with the sample and initiate a sample response. A probe pulse is then directed to the pumped sample and response to the probe pulse is measured. Temporal response can be obtained by varying the temporal delay of the probe pulse with respect to the pump pulse. The probe pulse can be an electron beam pulse produced in response to the pump laser, often by frequency doubling the pump pulse, and generating an electron beam pulse in response to the frequency doubled pump pulse. Pulse/probe pulses are repeated to permit increasing signal-to-noise ratio and varying the pulse/probe temporal delay permits reconstruction of sample temporal response. These pump/probe measurements can require lengthy acquisition times to provide adequate signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, the electron beam modulation and associated temporal delay complicate measurement setup.
Certain electron detectors can provide high temporal resolution but exhibit high noise so that signal to noise ratios are low. For example, single photon avalanche detectors (SPADs) can produce an avalanche-based output signal in response to a single electron. Unfortunately, SPADs also produce output signals (dark counts) in the absence of electron beam input. These dark counts can be reduced by SPAD cooling but cannot be distinguished from real signal.
In view of the above, alternatives to conventional pump/probe measurement approaches are needed as well as alternative detector configurations.
SUMMARYCharged particle (CP) detectors comprise a first single photon detector (SPD) array and a second SPD array, aligned with respect to the first SPD array along a CP beam axis. A coincidence detector is secured to one of the first SPD array and the second SPD array and operable to indicate detection events corresponding to detection of a charged-particle in corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array within a predetermined time window. In some examples, the first SPD array and the second SPD array are defined on a first substrate and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate is fixed with respect to the second substrate. In further example, the first substrate and the second substrate are semiconductor substrates in which SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array, respectively, are defined, and the first SPD and the second SPD are single photon avalanche detectors (SPADs). In typical examples, the coincidence detector includes a corresponding coincidence detector element for each pair of corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array. In some cases, the first SPD array and the second SPD array include different numbers of SPD elements, wherein the coincidence detector is configured to indicate detection events in response to detection of a charged particle in at least one SPD element of the first SPD array and at least one SPD element of the second SPD array. The coincidence detector can be defined on a third substrate that is secured to at least one of the first substrate and the second substrate. In other examples, a frame is situated to align the first SPD array and the second SPD array and at least one spacer is situated to define a separation of the first SPD array and the second SPD array. The first SPD array and the second SPD array can be defined on a first and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate can be fixed with respect to the second substrate. A third substrate is coupled to the first SPD array and the second SPD array to receive detection events from the first SPD array and the second SPD array and produce a time stamp associated with each received detection event for a plurality of corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array. In some examples, the third substrate is coupled to the first SPD array and the second SPD array to receive detection events from the first SPD array and the second SPD array and produce histograms of detection events for a plurality of corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array. The first SPD and the SPD arrays can be single photon avalanche detector (SPAD) arrays.
Methods comprising, in an electron microscope, directing an electron beam to a sample and detecting events based on a modulation of the electron beam in response to corresponding pump beam pulses directed to the sample in a first single photon detector (SPD) array. The detected events are associated with time bins corresponding to elapsed times from application of the corresponding pump beam pulses. Typically, a histogram of numbers of the detected events is formed. In some embodiments, the electron beam is repetitively blanked for at least a portion of time intervals between corresponding pump beam pulses. The electron beam can be unblanked based on application of the pump pulses and in some examples, the electron beam is unblanked at a fixed time delay with respect to the pump beam pulses and the pump beam pulses and the electron beam blanking are applied at a fixed repetition frequency. The fixed repetition frequency can be between 100 Hz and 300 MHz and the electron beam can be repetitively blanked for an interval of at least 95% of a fixed period associated with the fixed repetition frequency.
According to representative embodiments, the first SPD array is a single photon avalanched detector (SPAD) array and, with a second SPAD array secured to the first SPAD array, it is determined if coincident events are detected corresponding to the events detected with the first SPAD array. A histogram is formed based on the coincident events, wherein a time bin for each coincident event is based on a time with respect to an associated pump beam pulse. In some examples, the first SPAD array and the second SPAD array are defined on a first and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate is fixed with respect to the second substrate, and a third substrate is coupled to the first SPAD array and the second SPAD array and is operable to produce histograms of detection events for a plurality of corresponding SPAD array elements of the first SPAD array and the second SPAD array.
The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the disclosed technology will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
Unlike conventional pump-probe methods used in electron microscopy, in the disclosed approaches, an electron beam need not be modulated, but a SPAD array and pump pulses are synchronized with a gating signal applied to the SPAD array. Time resolutions of 5-30 ps or better can be achievable, even with scintillator based detectors. The electron beam which serves as a probe beam can be left on as in conventional transmission electron microscopy or, alternatively, modulated at a slower timescale using an electrostatic blanker or other modulator, to reduce dose on the sample.
SPAD arrays can operate in histogramming mode in which detection events are added to a histogram as acquired so that storage and transmission of raw, individual arrival times is not needed. Such “in-pixel” histograms are based on event times relative to a gate pulse or other synchronization pulse that can be provided by a dedicated clock circuit or based on a repetition rate of the pump pulses. The data rate required to get the image off-chip is greatly is reduced since only summary statistics (such as histograms) are communicated, not individual event times.
In measurements in which only a fraction of probe beam electrons are captured by a detector such as (weak) diffraction or (core-loss) EELS, the disclosed approaches can provide a substantial increase in throughput even compared to conventional pump-probe techniques at similar time resolutions, with much reduced complexity. Increased throughput can lead to reduced total measurement time, and better sample survival under the multitude of pump pulses.
The examples below generally include arrays of single photon avalanche detectors (SPADs) based on semiconductors such as Si, Ge, InGaAs, or other materials. The disclosed arrangements are generally suited to detection of charged particles such as electrons that can be transmitted by one SPAD to another SPAD that is suitably aligned, but the disclosed approaches are suitable for other charged-particle beam beams. The disclosed approaches can also be used with, for example, measurements based on a short pump pulses and a continuous probe. The pump pulses can be optical or charged particle beam pulses, mechanical, temperature, or other excitations. In some examples below, one-dimensional SPAD arrays are shown for convenient illustration but two-dimensional SPAD arrays can also be provided in which SPAD elements arranged in N by M arrays, wherein N, M are positive integers, are stacked. In typical examples, each of the stacked SPADs has the same numbers (N by M) of SPAD elements, but different numbers can be used. In addition, the SPAD elements cam be semiconductor based devices but elements of other kinds can be used such as, for example, superconducting nanowire single photon detectors, photomultiplier tubes, microchannel plate photomultipliers, superconducting transition-edge sensors, and single photon quantum dot detectors. Detectors that operate in Geiger mode such as SPADs can be used with temporal histogramming as discussed below to record signal waveforms. Detectors that exhibit analog or other or non-Geiger responses can be used with histogramming as well, if suitably processed for histogramming. As used herein, single photon detector refers to a photon or charged particle detector that produces a Geiger-mode response to a single photon or charged particle. A Geiger mode response is substantially independent of a number of photons or charged particles detected. Such a response can be referred to as a binary response that varies from on to off.
SPAD elements produce an avalanche response in response to a received charged particle. Such responses are referred to herein as events or detection events. Such events can be used to reconstruct a temporal waveform by forming a histogram of numbers of events as a function of time. SPADs can be defined on substrates such as semiconductor substrates or defined as discrete devices that are then arranged and secured on a substrate for support. In typical examples, silicon substrates are used but SPAD elements can be defined in other semiconductors such as germanium and InGaAs.
In some examples disclosed herein, time resolution is determined by the SPAD elements, and a probe (electron) pulse can be almost arbitrarily long. However, probe pulse duration is generally limited to reduce dose and pile-up distortion due to SPAD element dead time but probe electron pulse duration and timing are less critical than in conventional pump-probe measurements. In conventional pump-probe measurements, time resolution is determined by probe pulse duration and measurement throughput is low.
In the examples, optical pump pulses are applied to a sample and modulation of an electron beam directed to the sample is detected with a SPAD array. Typically the electron beam is blocked or attenuated during at least some times intervals at which electron beam modulation by the sample in response to an optical pump pulse is not of interest, generally to reduce electron dose on a sample. As used herein, “blanking” or “beam blanking” refers to attenuating, blocking, or deflecting an electron beam in this way. Such blanking can be provided by modulation of an electron beam source or using one or more electron beam deflectors or other electron optic elements.
While the examples are generally directed to pump/probe measurements, the disclosed approaches can be used for temporal characterization of various electron beam modulation techniques, such as fast (electrostatic) beam blanking, RF chopped pulse trains, etc. and hence could be used to demonstrate and confirm the performance of such techniques. In this case, the SPAD is synchronized to a suitable output of the beam modulation technique rather than a pump source such as a pump laser.
Example 1Referring to
The gate signal generator 106 is also coupled to one or more SPAD arrays 112 that produce detection events based on modulation of the electron beam in response to the pump pulses. In the example of
As shown in
The beam deflector 130 can be controlled to deflect the electron beam until the pump pulse is applied. In this way, the SPAD array 112 and the sample 111 receive reduced electron beam dose as compared with use of an unmodulated electron beam. In addition, blanking the electron beam reduces pileup distortion that causes histograms produced with the SPAD array output signals to show response to the probe pulse with significantly reduced amplitude. For example, for an unblanked beam, a SPAD detector array element is likely to respond to electron beam portions unrelated to the response of the sample 110 to the pump pulse. Thus, a histogram of arrival times can be skewed to earlier histogram bins. Although not shown in
Pile-up distortion can be compensated or partially compensated digitally, by reducing electron current or changing the timing of the electron beam unblanking, i.e. after each pump pulse, unblanking the electron beam for only part of the time window of interest; then varying the unblanking interval between subsequent pump pulses.
Varying SPAD gate timing can also be used with histogram time bin definitions remaining relative to the pump pulse and not relative to the SPAD gate.
Example 2In another example illustrated in
The system 200 includes an electron beam source 202 that directs an electron beam 206 to a sample 210 via an electron-optical column 204. A beam blanker 208 can be used to reduce sample dose, if desired. The sample 210 can be situated on a sample stage 212 and electron beams portions from the sample are directed to a detector such as SPAD array 214A that can be coupled to a signal processor substrate 214B for processing SPAD array signals such as for time correlation and histogramming. A laser 216 directs a pulsed laser beam to a light optical system 224 that directs a pump beam 222 to the sample 210. In some alternatives, the electron beam 206 can be produced in response to the pulsed laser beam if desired, typically via a second harmonic generator 218 to increase laser photon energy. However, in typical examples, the electron beam 206 is modulated by modulation of the electron beam source 202 or with a beam deflector 208. As noted above, the electron beam 206 is modulated to reduce electron beam dose at the sample 210 outside of a time window of interest.
The SPAD array 214A is coupled to a gate generator 230 that receives a gate signal from a delay generator 232 that can activate the SPAD array 214A at random times or predetermined times associated with pump pulses. As shown, the delay generator is included in a controller 250 that also provides gate signals to one or more of the laser 216, the electron beam source 202 and/or the beam deflector 208. In some examples, the laser 216 provides pulses at a fixed frequency and gate signals are times based on the fixed frequency. SPAD array output signals are directed to a processor 240 for time correlation and time histogramming, but these operations can also be performed at the signal processor substrate 214B as well. In some examples, the controller 250 is coupled to the laser 216 to establish laser pulse characteristics such as pulse duration, repetition rate, and pulse energy.
As shown in
Referring to
The system 300 can be operated as follows. First, note that in conventional optical pump/probe systems using electron beam probes, a pulsed laser is used to produce a pump pulse that is directed to a sample and a portion of the pulsed laser output is used to generate an electron beam probe pulse that is directed to the sample with various delays between the pump and probe pulses. By varying the pump/probe delay, response of the sample to the pump can be measured with a slow detector. Using a sufficient number of pump/probe delays, the temporal response of the sample to the pump can be measured. By contrast, in systems such as the system 300, a detector (e.g., SPAD array 314A) is gated by a SPAD gate generator 311 to initiate data acquisition. As shown in
The configuration of
The controller 309 can produce time-correlation of SPAD detector array signals (time correlated single photon detection-TCSPD) and produce histograms for each element of SPAD detector array 314A. In some cases, some such processing is provided with an adjacent or integrated signal processing substrate 314B.
In another approach, the electron beam source 302 can be responsive to optical pulses from a laser 316 so that the electron beam 306 is a pulsed electron beam or includes a pulsed component. In some examples, electron beam pulses are produced by photoemission and a laser beam output can be frequency doubled at a second harmonic generator 318 to improve photoemission efficiency based on a work function of an electron emitter. In addition, a variable delay generator 320 can be provided to control relative timing of electron pulses with respect to optical pulses (i.e., pump pulses) in a laser beam 322 that is directed to the sample 310 via a light optical system 324. Electron beam blanking is generally not necessary as the electron beam can be pulsed. Electron beam and laser beam propagation to the sample 310 are situated within a vacuum enclosure 301.
Example 4. Stacked SPADsSPADs can operate with high temporal resolution of 30 ps or better. In some examples, two SPAD-based detection wafers (referred to for convenience as a top and a middle layer) that include an array of SPAD elements (also referred to as pixels) are fixed to a third wafer (referred to for convenience as a bottom wafer) on which processing circuitry is defined. In some examples, processing circuitry is located elsewhere to avoid exposure to the electron beam. Because high energy electrons are not blocked by the upper detector, they can create free charge carriers in SPAD elements in both SPAD-based detection wafers. Therefore, a single electron can generate a detection event in corresponding SPAD elements in both SPAD-based detectors. A timing circuit can be used to time the detection event in each SPAD-based detector with accuracies of about 30 ps or less. By correlation based on the detection times, simultaneous detection events in the top and middle layers can be distinguished from noise events. The wafers can be coupled with copper-to-copper direct hybrid bonding and interconnected with Through-Silicon-Vias (TSVs) that permit 3D interconnection between layers.
Example 5. SPADs with Integrated HistogrammingSPADs and other single event detectors can produce large numbers of detection events that can be processed to determine temporal waveforms. This can require high speed data transfer and/or data storage of the detection events. In examples disclosed herein, SPAD arrays are operated in a so-called histogramming mode in which individual detection events are processed on-chip at each SPAD array or at each SPAD element to produce event histograms for each pixel. In this histograms, the bins correspond to electron arrival times relative to each gate or pump pulse. Pump-probe TEM measurements can be done in a stroboscopic mode in which a pump-probe sequence is repeated a large number of times to collect detection events for histogramming. Detection events can be acquired for predetermined time, to produce a sufficient number of detection events, or for other time intervals. Detection events are accumulated into per-element (per-pixel) histograms as the detection events are acquired to produce histograms of numbers of detection events in a plurality of time bins relative to a gating signal. After detection events are acquired and processed to produce histograms, the histograms can be transferred from the SPAD arrays so that total data transfer requirements are substantially reduced. Detection event data such as event times need not be transferred.
Example 6With reference to
In the example of
Coincidence detection, SPAD array bias, and other processing and control circuitry can be defined in the third substrate 406, In some cases, some circuit elements are defined generally in the first substrate 402 and the second substrate 404 or at, near, or in conjunction with the SPAD elements. In this example, the substrates 402, 404, 406 can be bonded to each other, with SPAD elements suitably aligned with respect to the axis 416.
Referring to
Although not shown in
With reference to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As used in this application and in the claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Additionally, the term “includes” means “comprises.” Further, the term “coupled” does not exclude the presence of intermediate elements between the coupled items.
The systems, apparatus, and methods described herein should not be construed as limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and non-obvious features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another. The disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus are not limited to any specific aspect or feature or combinations thereof, nor do the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved. Any theories of operation are to facilitate explanation, but the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus are not limited to such theories of operation.
Although the operations of some of the disclosed methods are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language set forth below. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus can be used in conjunction with other systems, methods, and apparatus. Additionally, the description sometimes uses terms like “produce” and “provide” to describe the disclosed methods. These terms are high-level abstractions of the actual operations that are performed. The actual operations that correspond to these terms will vary depending on the particular implementation and are readily discernible by one of ordinary skill in the art.
In some examples, values, procedures, or apparatus' are referred to as “lowest”, “best”, “minimum,” or the like. It will be appreciated that such descriptions are intended to indicate that a selection among many used functional alternatives can be made, and such selections need not be better, smaller, or otherwise preferable to other selections.
Examples are described with reference to directions indicated as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” and the like. These terms are used for convenient description, but do not imply any particular spatial orientation.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed technology may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the disclosure.
Claims
1. A charged particle (CP) detector, comprising:
- a first single photon detector (SPD) array;
- a second SPD array, aligned with respect to the first SPD array along a CP beam axis; and
- a coincidence detector secured to one of the first SPD array and the second SPD array and operable to indicate detection events corresponding to detection of a charged-particle in corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array within a predetermined time window.
2. The CP detector of claim 1, wherein the first SPD array and the second SPD array are defined on a first substrate and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate is fixed with respect to the second substrate.
3. The CP detector of claim 2, wherein the first substrate and the second substrate are semiconductor substrates in which SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array, respectively, are defined, and the first SPD and the second SPD are single photon avalanche detectors (SPADs).
4. The CP detector of claim 2, wherein the coincidence detector includes a corresponding coincidence detector element for each pair of corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array.
5. The CP detector of claim 2, the first SPD array and the second SPD array include different numbers of SPD elements, wherein the coincidence detector is configured to indicate detection events in response to detection of a charged particle in at least one SPD element of the first SPD array and at least one SPD element of the second SPD array.
6. The CP detector of claim 4, wherein the coincidence detector is defined on a third substrate that is secured to at least one of the first substrate and the second substrate.
7. The CP detector of claim 1, further comprising:
- a frame situated to align the first SPD array and the second SPD array; and
- at least one spacer situated to define a separation of the first SPD array and the second SPD array.
8. The CP detector of claim 1, wherein the first SPD array and the second SPD array are defined on a first and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate is fixed with respect to the second substrate, and further comprising:
- a third substrate coupled to the first SPD array and the second SPD array to receive detection events from the first SPD array and the second SPD array and produce a time stamp associated with each received detection event for a plurality of corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array.
9. The CP detector of claim 1, wherein the first SPD array and the second SPD array are defined on a first and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate is fixed with respect to the second substrate, and further comprising:
- a third substrate coupled to the first SPD array and the second SPD array to receive detection events from the first SPD array and the second SPD array and produce histograms of detection events for a plurality of corresponding SPD array elements of the first SPD array and the second SPD array.
10. The CP detector of claim 9, wherein the first SPD and the SPD arrays are single photon avalanched detector (SPAD) arrays.
11. The CP detector of claim 10, wherein the first, second, and third substrates are fixed with respect to each other.
12. A method, comprising:
- in an electron microscope,
- directing an electron beam to a sample;
- detecting events based on a modulation of the electron beam in response to corresponding pump pulses directed to the sample in a first single photon detector (SPD) array; and
- associating the detected events with time bins corresponding to elapsed times from application of the corresponding pump beam pulses.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising forming a histogram of numbers of the detected events.
14. The method of claim 12, further comprising repetitively blanking the electron beam for at least a portion of time intervals between corresponding pump pulses.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the electron beam is unblanked based on application of the pump pulses.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the electron beam is unblanked at a fixed time delay with respect to the pump pulses.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the pump pulses and the electron beam blanking are applied at a fixed repetition frequency.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the fixed repetition frequency is between 100 Hz and 300 MHz and the electron beam is repetitively blanked for an interval of at least 95% of a fixed period associated with the fixed repetition frequency.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein the first SPD array is a single photon avalanched detector (SPAD) array, further comprising:
- with a second SPAD array secured to the first SPAD array, determining if coincident events are detected corresponding to the events detected with the first SPAD array; and
- forming a histogram based on the coincident events, wherein a time bin for each coincident event is based on a time with respect to an associated pump beam pulse.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the first SPAD array and the second SPAD array are defined on a first and a second substrate, respectively, and the first substrate is fixed with respect to the second substrate, and a third substrate coupled to the first SPAD array and the second SPAD array is operable to produce histograms of detection events for a plurality of corresponding SPAD array elements of the first SPAD array and the second SPAD array.
Type: Application
Filed: Jun 30, 2021
Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023
Applicant: FEI Company (Hillsboro, OR)
Inventors: Bart Jozef Janssen (Lent), Gerard van Veen (Riethoven), Erik Kieft (Eindhoven)
Application Number: 17/364,621