Molecular Atomic Clock With Wave Propagating Rotational Spectroscopy Cell
In an example, an apparatus comprises a sealed container containing a dipolar gas. The apparatus also comprises a first transmit antenna, a second transmit antenna, and a receive antenna each communicatively coupled to the sealed container. The apparatus also comprises a control circuit including a transceiver, the control circuit having a first transmit output, a second transmit output, and a receive input, the first transmit output coupled to the first transmit antenna, the second transmit output coupled to the second transmit antenna, and the receive input coupled to the receive antenna.
Latest Texas Instruments Incorporated Patents:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/001,356, filed Aug. 24, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/234,492 filed Dec. 27, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,754,302, granted on Aug. 25, 2020, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/612,074 filed Dec. 29, 2017, all of which are hereby fully incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
This application is related to co-pending co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/871,835 filed May 11, 2020.
BACKGROUNDPrecision clock signals, usable as a base frequency source either directly, or converted (e.g., divided down) to some multiple of a base frequency source, can be generated from various circuits and configurations. One precision clock signal example is an atomic clock, so named as its signal is produced in response to the natural and quantum response of atoms or molecules, to an excitation source. In one approach, such atoms are in the form of alkali metals stored in a chamber, where the excitation source can be one or more lasers directed to the cell and the response of the chamber atoms is detected by measuring the amount of laser energy (photons) that passes through the chamber as the laser frequency sweeps across a range. In another approach, such molecules are in the form of dipolar gases also stored in a chamber, where the excitation source is an electromagnetic wave propagating through the chamber and the response of the chamber atoms is detected by measuring the amount of electromagnetic energy that passes through the chamber as the energy source sweeps across a range.
Further to the above, an example of a millimeter wave atomic clock is described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,529,334 (“the '334 Patent”), issued Dec. 27, 2016, hereby incorporated fully herein by reference, and which is co-assigned to the same assignee as the present application. The '334 Patent illustrates, among various other things, an atomic clock apparatus including a sealed cavity storing a dipolar gas, with an electromagnetic entrance into which an electromagnetic wave (or field) enters near a first end of the cavity and an electromagnetic exit from which an electromagnetic wave exits near a second end of the cavity. The electromagnetic wave that so exits is measured to determine an amount of absorption by (or transmission through) the dipolar gas, with the measure indicative of the quantum response of the gas as a function of the wave frequency. The '334 Patent also discusses a selection of pressure for the cavity-sealed dipolar gas, noting that pressure reduction below a desired pressure would reduce the magnitude of the peak response transition, thereby degrading the ability to detect and track the quantum response of the dipolar gas.
SUMMARYIn a clock apparatus, a signal waveguide includes: a gas cell having a sealed interior; and a dipolar gas inside the sealed interior. A first apparatus is configured to provide a first electromagnetic wave through the sealed interior along a first direction. A second apparatus is configured to provide a second electromagnetic wave through the sealed interior along a second direction, in which the second direction is opposite the first direction. Also, the clock apparatus includes receiving apparatus coupled to the signal waveguide and configured to detect an amount of energy in the second electromagnetic wave passing through the dipolar gas.
This description relates to precision frequency clock signals generated from molecular rotational quantum response in a cell, and more particularly to a system incorporating wave interrogation of the cell.
Cell 12 is preferably formed in connection with an integrated circuit wafer, which can include multiple layers affixed relative to a semiconductor substrate (see, e.g., the incorporated by reference U.S. Pat. No. 9,529,334). In the illustration of
Bidirectional coupler 14 provides structure, described below, for propagating electromagnetic waves in both directions along axis 12AX of cell 12. Accordingly, in the example of
Transceiver 16 is both for transmitting (TX) and receiving (RX) signals. Transceiver 16 includes four example blocks 18, 20, 22, and 24 for accomplishing the transceiver and signal responsiveness described herein. Accordingly, a signal generator 18 is connected, and is modulated by a modulator 20, to provide a base frequency controlled TX signal that, as described below, is swept across a particular frequency range from below to past the intrinsic quantum rotational state transition frequency for the dipolar gas in cell 12 (e.g., 183.31 GHz for water). Modulator 20 modulates the frequency of the interrogation signal provided by the signal generator 18. The modulation frequency ranges, for example, between 10 to 50 KHz. After the signal passes through the gas cell, it is received by a lock in amplifier 22, via an input 16IN coupled to receive the RX signal from a receive antenna ANTRX. Particularly, antenna ANTRX is positioned proximate a third passage 12P3 of cell 12, so that electromagnetic energy from along axis 12AX may be communicated from passage 12P3, as an exit, to receive antenna ANTRX and then to transceiver 16 and, more particularly, to lock in amplifier 22. Generally, lock in amplifier 22 uses the signal from the modulator 20 to measure the RX signal at the same modulation frequency provided by modulator 20. In this way, lock in amplifier 22 is able to reject noise outside the modulation frequency and thereby reduce the noise from the system.
The TX signal may be a sinusoid, although other periodic oscillating signals also may be used, so long as such signal includes a Fourier component in the frequency of interest. The TX signal is connected, via an output 16OUT, to bidirectional coupler 14. Under feedback control, signal generator 18 also provides the ultimately-refined reference clock REFCLK. The RX signal represents an amount of the originally transmitted signal TX that passes through cell 12 and contains the information of the absorption of the dipolar gas at the quantum rotations transition frequency. In response, lock in amplifier 22 provides a signal that is the first derivative of the signal as it is swept in frequency. Consequently, at the frequency corresponding to the quantum rotational molecular transition, the first derivative is zero, and the error signal ERR is zero. At frequencies different from the quantum rotational transition, the signal ERR is not zero and provides a correction to the loop filter 24, allowing it to “lock” the clock to the quantum transition frequency. This apparatus also filters out noise as detected by reference to the modulation frequency provided by modulator 20. In one example, lock in amplifier 22 provides the error signal ERR as an in-phase output, and the error signal ERR is used as an input by a loop filter 24 (or controller circuit) for providing a control output signal CO to signal generator 18. As further described below, such feedback selectively adjusts the TX output signal frequency, following an initial sweep, to ultimately maintain this frequency at a peak absorption frequency of the dipolar molecular gas inside the sealed interior of cell 12, with that maintained frequency providing a stable output reference clock REFCLK. In some examples, the RF power of the TX and RX loop is controlled so as to avoid or mitigate stark shift effects (frequency shifts in response to quantum transition produced by the presence of an electric field).
The overall operation of system 101 is described in connection with the flow chart method 30 of
In step 34, transceiver 16 converges to, or locks in at, a Doppler free frequency fT at which peak absorption of the electromagnetic wave occurs in the dipolar gas sealed in cell 12, in response to the sweeping frequency from step 32 and the corresponding detected response. Particularly, steps 32 and 34 may essentially occur simultaneously, as during step 34, receive antenna ANTRX couples the RX signal, which occurs from the TX signal of step 32, to lock in amplifier 22. Lock in amplifier 22 also receives the modulation frequency from modulator 20, so that according to lock-in methodology, noise may be reduced from the received signal so as to detect the received energy corresponding to the base frequency TX signal that is input to cell 12 from signal generator 18. Further, lock in amplifier 22 (or associated circuitry) evaluates a derivative of the RX signal as the step 32 sweep occurs. Accordingly, as the RX signal is changing (in response to a quantum response in cell 12), the derivative is non-zero, whereas as the RX signal reaches a peak (maximum or minimum) the derivative approaches or is zero. This derivative determination provides an error signal ERR, connected as an output to loop filter 24, and as further explained below the error ERR signal is expected to reach zero at three different TX base frequencies.
In step 36, loop filter 24 provides a control signal CO to signal generator 18, so as to refine control of signal generator 18 to make adjustments in the frequency of TX to restrain or refine that frequency in a feedback look controlled manner to thereafter maintain the base frequency of TX at the center frequency among the three different TX base frequencies for which the error signal ERR is zero. This center frequency represents the frequency fT at which peak absorption occurs of the electromagnetic wave occurs in the cell dipolar gas. In this regard, loop filter 24 is preferably a proportional integral derivative (PID) circuit, with an output that sums values, multiplied times respective controlled parameters, corresponding to the three factors (i.e., proportional, integral, derivative) that give the PID circuit its name. Accordingly, the output of loop filter 24 facilitates a clock signal with good stability and reduces or eliminates the possibility of the signal generator creating a signal that oscillates around the around desired frequency. Accordingly, at this point, the TX signal should maintain a base frequency at or near the intrinsic transitional quantum frequency of the dipolar gas, and that same base frequency is output as the reference clock signal REFCLK, as may be used by other circuitry requiring a frequency-precise clock signal. Indeed, method 30 may be regarded as an ongoing loop running at selected (or all) times that the clock is operational and endeavoring to lock the clock at most or all instants where, once locked after an initial scan of steps 32 and 34, the loop continues to perform across a second frequency range that is smaller in bandwidth than the above-described step 32 initial frequency range FR, where the second frequency range is expected to still include the center frequency representing frequency fT. Accordingly, the step 32 sweep and step 34 response detection can essentially repeat in step 36, but using a narrower bandwidth for more efficient refinement or maintenance of the base frequency at the peak absorption frequency fT, as further described hereinbelow.
Given the preceding, system 101 facilitates electromagnetic interrogation of the dipolar gas within cell 12, by transmitting TX at varying (e.g., sweeping) frequencies within a defined band around a suspected quantum absorption frequency at which the transmission efficiency of cell 12 is minimal (absorption is maximal), and when the system detects a null or minima in transmission energy (or maximum in absorption), the TX output signal frequency is regulated to operate at the frequency so detected, thereby in response to the natural quantum behavior of the dipole. As a result, REFCLK, like that quantum behavior, is generally stable with respect to time (does not degrade or drift over time) and is largely independent of temperature and a number of other variables.
The Allan deviation (which is the square root of the Allan variance) is a measure of frequency stability of clock signals (e.g., in clocks, oscillators, amplifiers), and in effect is a measure of frequency distribution over a number of samples—so if the Allan deviation measure is lower, then the variance of distribution is lower, and the performance of the clock signal is better. Further, the Allan deviation is inversely proportional to both the quality factor (Q) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the frequency response curve (such as in transceiver 16), as it processes the received RX signal response to detect an absorption peak frequency. Thus, by increasing one or both of the Q and SNR of the system, the Allan deviation measure is improved. One approach can achieve certain improvement in the Allan deviation by reducing pressure within the cell, which reduces the width of the transition caused by pressure broadening phenomena, as such an approach will improve Q only down to a certain pressure. But for pressures below a certain value (e.g., 0.1 mbar), the width cannot be reduced further because of Doppler broadening, which is independent of pressure and mostly dependent on the temperature of the gas. However, pressure reduction reduces the number of molecules available for interrogation, thereby reducing the amplitude of the quantum transition signal. Accordingly, an optimum pressure can be found (for water this pressure is approximately 0.1 mbar) where the SNR can be maximized by having the minimum transition width possible and the maximum amplitude possible.
As described above, Doppler broadening is an effect caused by the distribution of velocities of atoms/molecules, especially in response to higher temperatures. Particularly, for atoms having velocities in a same direction as the direction of propagation of the electromagnetic wave, the Doppler effect will cause the transition of the dipolar molecules from the lower energy vibrational state to the higher energy vibrational state to occur when the frequency of the electromagnetic signal is lower than the frequency that corresponds to the energy difference of the two vibrational states (E=h f) (e.g., 183.31 GHz for water). Conversely, for atoms having velocities in an opposing direction as the unidirectional signal, the Doppler effect will cause the rotational transition of those atoms to occur at an excitation frequency that is higher than the intrinsic quantum rotational state transition frequency for the dipole. Thus, the result of Doppler spreading is a wider spectral line when interrogating these atoms/molecules, which accordingly provides less accuracy in identifying a particular frequency of quantum transition.
The contrast of example embodiment benefits, particularly in connection with the description above and the example embodiment implementation of bidirectional signal paths along majority 12M of cell 12, are further shown by the plot of
Further regarding the
Referring in more detail to coupler 14 of
In system 106, an electromagnetic signal is transmitted from ANTTXPROBE, via first passage 12P1 into cell 12, that signal propagates as a wave along the interior of extension portion 12EP1 in a direction D1, and it continues into continuous chamber portion 12CCP so that direction D1 thereby can be characterized as counterclockwise in
The number of wave circulations facilitated in an example embodiment, may repeat a number of times, effectively providing a wave interrogation of the dipolar gas molecules along an effective length far in excess of a single path interrogation along the circumference of portion 12CCP.
The number of circulations will be a function primarily of the quality factor of the cavity (not to be confused with the quality factor of the quantum absorption). The quality factor of an electromagnetic cavity is defined by the ratio of energy stored in the resonator to the energy supplied to it. Accordingly, the more efficient (better performing) the walls of the cavity in communicating the wave through the cavity, the better will be the confinement and the better will be the quality factor of the cavity and the larger will be the number of circulations. The circulation number could be even in excess of 100 circulations under resonance conditions, as can be confirmed, for example, by evaluating strength of a given energy signal in the dipolar gas. Also recognized, however, is that a detrimental effect may occur if the cavity quality factor is above a particular threshold. In example embodiment methodology, therefore, a cavity may be implemented and tested for a power broadening effect, as may be detected, for example, from an increase in the width of the quantum transition, reducing the transition quality factor. Such an effect may occur when power applied by the transmitter is increased, or the intensity of the electric field in the cavity reaches high values due to high quality factor of the cavity. Increasing power in this way could be considered an effective way to improve device performance so as to increase SNR, but such power may concurrently diminish the Q of the response curve. And because Allan deviation is inversely proportional to both SNR and Q of the frequency response curve, a point of diminishing return is reached if SNR increases by a percentage that exceeds a comparable percentage decrease in Q that was caused by the SNR increase—so optimum performance is achieved in the example embodiments by maximizing the product of SNR and Q. Accordingly, in an example embodiment, a cell design may be created and tested at increasing levels of TX energy, and if it is found that an increased signal energy is causing too much power broadening so as to undesirably reduce Q beyond an acceptable level, then that effect may be reduced by diminishing the quality factor of the cell design. Example embodiments to accomplish such quality factor reduction may be achieved by making the walls of the cavity less efficient, for example by making adding roughness to the walls or using higher resistivity metals (e.g., switching from gold to aluminum). Example embodiments include a roughness of 500 Angstroms, but alternatives are contemplated with a roughness greater than 500 Angstroms, and up to 2 micrometers.
Given the structure of system 106, as waves circulate as described above, a portion of the energy will exit the circular cross-sectioned portion of cell 12, via extension portion 12EP3, to third passage 12P3, and a portion of that energy is thereby communicated to antenna ANTRX and then be received by transceiver 16, consistent with above-described embodiments. However, the nature of a continuous passage causes the remaining energy of the wave to continue to circulate multiple times through the passage, thereby providing additional energy opportunities to interrogate the dipolar gas cells within cell 12. As a result, the number of molecules interrogated is increased, thereby improving the SNR performance as compared to a single-pass interrogation system, and advancing toward near saturation operation. Moreover, by using a pump and probe architecture, the system provides a Doppler free transition.
In another aspect of system 106, in an example embodiment, the shape and dimensions of cell 12, and particularly its chamber continuous portion 12CCP, are preferably selected to facilitate resonance of the wave passing therethrough and to circulate a number of times. For example,
where,
-
- Dm is the middle diameter of portion 12CCP, that is, the distance halfway between outer diameter 12OD and inner diameter 12ID (i.e., Dm=(12OD+12ID)/2);
- N is an integer of 1 or greater; and
- λg is the above-introduced guided wavelength of the wave through chamber continuous portion 12CCP.
Thus, with Equation 1 providing for a middle diameter Dm of cell 12, it is anticipated that as the wave circulates repeatedly an integer number of times around chamber continuous portion 12CCP (passing a point from which it earlier entered portion 12CCP started or previously passed), the wave energy will be constructive in phase, so as to provide beneficial signal performance.
Further in connection with
P=Nλg Equation 2
Accordingly, for example embodiments with a chamber continuous portion that is non-circular, Equation 2 sets forth a preferred perimeter for that portion. Lastly in connection with
As described above, various example embodiments provide a system generating frequency clock signals from atomic rotational quantum response in a cell using bidirectional wave interrogation of the cell. For example, Q factor of the system response is improved (increased), thereby correspondingly improving Allan deviation.
Also, as described above, various example embodiments provide a system generating frequency clock signals from atomic rotational quantum response in a cell using a continuous chamber providing a circulating interrogation of the cell. For example, SNR of the system response is improved. Moreover, the system may perform well independent of pressure of the (e.g., dipolar) gas stored in the cell.
Modifications are possible in the described embodiments, and other embodiments are possible, within the scope of the claims.
Claims
1. An apparatus comprising:
- a sealed container containing a dipolar gas;
- a first transmit antenna, a second transmit antenna, and a receive antenna each communicatively coupled to the sealed container; and
- a control circuit including a transceiver, the control circuit having a first transmit output, a second transmit output, and a receive input, the first transmit output coupled to the first transmit antenna, the second transmit output coupled to the second transmit antenna, and the receive input coupled to the receive antenna.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control circuit is configured to provide a first signal at the first transmit output, and provide a second signal at the second transmit output; and
- wherein the first transmit antenna is configured to transmit the first signal in the sealed container in a first direction, and the second transmit antenna is configured to transmit the second signal in the sealed container in a second direction opposite to the first direction.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control circuit includes a bi-directional coupler having a coupler input, a first coupler output, and a second coupler output, the first coupler output coupled to the first transmit output, and the second coupler output coupled to the second transmit output; and
- wherein the transceiver includes: a signal generator having a first output, a reference clock output, and a control input, the first output coupled to the coupler input; and a lock in amplifier having an amplifier input and an amplifier output, the amplifier input coupled to the receive input, and the amplifier output coupled to the control input.
4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the control input is a first control input, the amplifier input is a first amplifier input, the signal generator has a second control input, the lock in amplifier has a second amplifier input, and the control circuit includes a modulator having a first modulator output coupled to the second control input and a second modulator output coupled to the second amplifier input.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, further comprising an error processing circuit coupled between the amplifier output and the first control input.
6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the error processing circuit includes at least one of: a filter, or a proportional integral derivative (PID) circuit.
7. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the bi-directional coupler includes a pair of coupled conductors.
8. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the bi-directional coupler includes a sidewall aperture coupler.
9. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the bi-directional coupler is configured to:
- receive a first signal at the coupler input;
- provide the first signal at the first coupler output; and
- provide a second signal as an attenuated version of the first signal at the second coupler output.
10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control circuit has a clock output.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the control circuit is configured to:
- provide a first signal at the first transmit output;
- provide a second signal at the second transmit output;
- receive a third signal at the receive input;
- determine, based on the third signal, a first frequency of a first peak absorption of the first and second signals by the dipolar gas;
- determine, based on the third signal, a second frequency of a second peak absorption of the first and second signals by the dipolar gas;
- determine a third frequency based on the first and second frequencies; and
- provide a fourth signal having the third frequency at the clock output.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the sealed container has a longitudinal portion and a branch portion.
13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the first transmit antenna is communicatively coupled to the branch portion, and the second transmit antenna and the receive antenna are communicatively coupled to the longitudinal portion.
14. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the first and second transmit antennas are communicatively coupled to the longitudinal portion, and the receive antenna is communicatively coupled to the branch portion.
15. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the branch portion is a first branch portion, and the sealed container has a second branch portion, the first and second branch portions extending towards opposite sides of the longitudinal portion.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the first transmit antenna is communicatively coupled to the longitudinal portion, the second transmit antenna is communicatively coupled to the first branch portion, and the receive antenna is communicatively coupled to the second branch portion.
17. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the sealed container has a circular portion, a first branch portion, a second branch portion, and a third branch portion; and
- wherein the first transmit antenna, the second transmit antenna, and the receive antenna are communicatively coupled to, respectively, the first branch portion, the second branch portion, and the third branch portion.
18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the control circuit is configured to provide a first signal at the first transmit output, and provide a second signal at the second transmit output, the first and second signals having a particular wavelength when propagating in the dipolar gas; and
- wherein a diameter of the circular portion is based on the wavelength.
19. An apparatus comprising:
- a sealed container containing a dipolar gas, the sealed container having a branch portion and a longitudinal portion;
- a transmit antenna communicatively coupled to a first end of the longitudinal portion;
- a receive antenna communicatively coupled to the branch portion; and
- an electromagnetic reflector at a second end of the longitudinal portion, the second end being opposite to the first end; and
- a control circuit including a transceiver, the control circuit having a transmit output and a receive input, the transmit output coupled to the transmit antenna, and the receive input coupled to the receive antenna.
20. An apparatus comprising:
- a sealed container containing a dipolar gas, the sealed container having a circular portion, a first branch portion, and a second branch portion;
- a transmit antenna communicatively coupled to the first branch portion;
- a receive antenna communicatively coupled to the second branch portion; and
- a control circuit including a transceiver, the control circuit having a transmit output and a receive input, the transmit output coupled to the transmit antenna, and the receive input coupled to the receive antenna.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the control circuit is configured to provide a signal at the transmit output, the signal having a particular wavelength when propagating in the dipolar gas; and
- wherein a diameter of the circular portion is based on the wavelength.
Type: Application
Filed: Oct 20, 2023
Publication Date: Feb 8, 2024
Applicant: Texas Instruments Incorporated (Dallas, TX)
Inventors: Juan Alejandro Herbsommer (Allen, TX), Argyrios Dellis (McKinney, TX), Adam Joseph Fruehling (Dallas, TX)
Application Number: 18/491,304