GOLF CLUB HEAD WITH COMPOSITE FACEPLATE

Golf club heads have a composite faceplate having an Impact Response Modulator disposed in the sole to improve ball flight characteristics. The Impact Response Modulator (IRM) includes a casing with a plurality of casing walls that form an aperture therebetween. The faceplate structurally reinforces the IRM by forming the casing walls out of high-strength material, thereby improving faceplate deflection while maintaining sufficient durability.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/699,398, filed on Sep. 26, 2024, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/784,868, filed on Apr. 7, 2025, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/874,540, filed on Sep. 2, 2025, all of which are incorporated in their entirety.

FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention generally relates to golf equipment, and more particularly, to golf club heads having sole openings to increase the flexure of the strike face.

BACKGROUND

The strike face of a golf club head deflects upon impact with a golf ball to impart ball flight characteristics such as ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate. More deflection will increase energy transfer between the club head and the golf ball at impact, thereby increasing ball speed. Strike face deflection also influences the launch angle at impact as well as the amount of backspin imparted to the golf ball, wherein a lower backspin rate leads to a more piercing ball flight that cuts through the air increasing carry distance. Traditionally, certain golf club heads, particularly wood-type golf club heads, include features that increase strike face deflection, such as slits, slots, openings, channels, flexures, or other known features that abruptly change geometry and/or create discontinuities in the club head. Features that increase strike face deflection, however, often increase resulting stresses in the area adjacent said features, thereby reducing club head durability. To counter those stresses, conventional golf club heads employ build-ups, increased thicknesses, or other structural features adjacent the flexure to improve durability, at the sacrifice of performance. Consequently, conventional golf club heads fail to increase strike face deflection without compromising club head durability.

Conventional flexure features are typically formed of the same material as the body. Consequently, conventional clubs employ build-ups, increased thicknesses, or other structural features adjacent the flexure to improve durability, at the sacrifice of performance.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a top, front, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a bottom, front, toe-side perspective view of the golf club head of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a front, elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a toe-side, elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a bottom view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a detailed, plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 1, in cross-section.

FIG. 9 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 1, in cross-section.

FIG. 10 is a heel-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 11 is a detailed, toe-side, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 12 is a detailed, toe-side, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 13 a detailed, plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 12, in cross-section.

FIG. 14 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 15 is a top, front, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a bottom, front, toe-side perspective view of the golf club head of FIG. 15.

FIG. 17 is an exploded, bottom, front, toe-side perspective view of the golf club head of FIG. 15.

FIG. 18 is a bottom, front, toe-side perspective view of a composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 15.

FIG. 19 an exploded, plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 15.

FIG. 20 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 21 is a heel-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head comprising a composite faceplate, in cross-section.

FIG. 22 is a toe-side elevation view of a golf club head of the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 23 is a toe-side elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 22, in cross-section.

FIG. 24 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 25 is a front, toe-side perspective view of the golf club head of FIG. 24.

FIG. 26 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 27 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 28 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 29 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 30 is a plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 29, in cross-section.

FIG. 31 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 32 is a plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 31, in cross-section.

FIG. 33 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 34 a plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 33, in cross-section.

FIG. 35 is a detailed, plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 20, in cross-section.

FIG. 36 is a plan view of a golf club head of the present invention.

FIG. 37 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of the golf club head of FIG. 36, in cross-section.

FIG. 38 is a top, rear, toe-side perspective view of a composite faceplate.

FIG. 39 is a front view of the composite faceplate of FIG. 38.

FIG. 40 is a toe-side, detailed, elevation view of a golf club head of the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 41 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of the golf club of FIG. 40, in cross-section.

FIG. 42 is a bottom, front, toe-side perspective view of a composite faceplate from the golf club head of FIG. 40.

FIG. 43 is a toe-side elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 44 is a bottom plan view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 45 is a bottom plan view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 46 is a bottom plan view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 47 is a toe-side, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 48 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 49 is a toe-side elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 48, in cross-section.

FIG. 50 is a bottom plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 48.

FIG. 51 is a rear, toe-side perspective view of a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 52 is a toe-side elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 51, in cross-section.

FIG. 53 is a bottom plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 51.

FIG. 54 is a toe-side, elevation view of a golf club head according to the present invention, in cross-section.

FIG. 55 is a top plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 54.

FIG. 56 is a block diagram of a method of fabricating a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 57 is a plan view of a composite faceplate in an intermediate state.

FIG. 58 is a plan view of a composite faceplate in an intermediate state.

FIG. 59 is a plan view of a composite faceplate in an intermediate state.

FIG. 60 is a top, rear, toe-side, perspective view of a composite faceplate in a final state.

FIG. 61 is a block diagram of a method of fabricating a golf club head according to the present invention.

FIG. 62 is a plan view of a composite faceplate in an intermediate state.

FIG. 63 is a top, rear, toe-side perspective view of a composite faceplate in a final state.

FIG. 64 is a top, rear, toe-side, perspective view of the composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 36.

FIG. 65 is a bottom, front, toe-side perspective view of the composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 36.

FIG. 66 is a bottom plan view of the golf club head composite faceplate of FIG. 36.

FIG. 67 is a top, rear, toe-side, perspective view of the composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 38.

FIG. 68 is a front view of the composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 38.

FIG. 69 a plan view of the composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 38.

FIG. 70 a rear perspective view of the composite faceplate of the golf club head of FIG. 22.

FIG. 71 a plan view of the composite faceplate of FIG. 24, in an intermediate state.

FIG. 72 a top, rear, toe-side perspective view of the composite faceplate of FIG. 24, in an intermediate state.

FIG. 73 a top, rear, toe-side perspective view of the composite faceplate of FIG. 24, in a final state.

FIG. 74 is a rear, heel-side perspective view of a composite faceplate embodiment.

FIG. 75 is a plan view of the golf club head composite faceplate of FIG. 74.

FIG. 76 is a front, heel-side perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a body of a golf club head.

FIG. 77 is a rear, heel-side perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a composite faceplate.

FIG. 78 is a plan view of the composite faceplate of FIG. 77.

FIG. 79 is a front, heel-side perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a body of a golf club head.

FIG. 80 is a bottom plan view of a golf club head with casing formed lower strength material.

FIG. 81 is a bottom plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 80.

FIG. 82 is a bottom plan view of a golf club head with a composite faceplate according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Wood-type golf club heads (i.e., drivers, fairway woods, or hybrids) having an impact response modulator (hereafter “IRM”) monolithically formed with a strike face, are described herein that improve performance and durability. The IRM is positioned in the sole proximate the strike face to strategically weaken the sole, increasing strike face deflection, and improving ball flight performance. The IRM comprises a casing that forms one or more walls defining an aperture into the club head. The aperture is an opening through the sole that communicates between the environment surrounding the club head and the interior cavity of the club head. The IRM further comprises an insert disposed within the aperture and formed of a flexible, polymeric material. The casing may be provided in a composite faceplate that has one or more buffer zones that facilitate the assembly process. As used herein, the phrase “composite faceplate” does not suggest a particular material used to form the faceplate, as further defined below.

The composite faceplate is formed of a high-strength material that improves performance and durability. More specifically, the composite faceplate has a strike face intended to impact a ball. The high-strength material allows the strike face and IRM to have a reduced thickness, improving performance while maintaining sufficient durability. The composite faceplate is a monolithic component that forms at least a portion of the strike face and comprises a sole return that forms both the casing and a forward portion of the sole. At impact, stress from the strike face flows into the forward portion of the sole, where the casing resides. Stress in the casing walls is reduced by forming the casing with a high-strength faceplate material. Accordingly, the casing walls can have a reduced thickness, be placed closer to the strike face without exceeding the yield strength of the high-strength material, or a combination thereof. The selected use of a high-strength material increases strike face deflection and durability, facilitates fabrication, and maintain discretionary weight over a clubhead without this monolithic construction.

The composite faceplate comprises a face region and a sole return, wherein the entire casing and the entire aperture reside within the sole return. A peripheral wall of the composite faceplate entirely surrounds the face and sole return regions. In some embodiments, the peripheral wall is continuously joined or attached to the body, such that there are no portions of the periphery that are unattached to the body. Accordingly, the body forms no portion of the casing. In other embodiments, the peripheral wall is partially or intermittently joined or attached to the body. The periphery of the composite faceplate is spaced away from the casing walls so that no joints or connections are proximate the casing walls. Furthermore, by having a monolithic, composite faceplate that forms the entire casing, joints or connections between the composite faceplate and the body are spaced from the slot and therefore minimally impact slot performance while reducing areas of potential failure increasing durability of the casing walls.

I. Definitions

The golf club heads disclosed herein include a composite faceplate that improves durability and performance. The phrase “composite faceplate” is defined herein as a unitary, complex structure having multiple, integrally formed and interconnected portions, and does not limit, describe, or suggest a particular material used to form the faceplate. More specifically, the composite faceplates disclosed herein include at least a face region, forming a strike surface of the golf club head, and a sole return region that can include a casing, extending rearwardly of the face region. As such, each of the composite faceplates disclosed herein forms different, distinct regions of the golf club head and is attached to the body as a unit or module.

The terms “first,” “second,” “third,” “fourth,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments described herein are, for example, capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms “include,” and “have,” and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus.

The terms “left,” “right,” “front,” “back,” “top,” “bottom,” “over,” “under,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing permanent relative positions. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the apparatus, methods, and/or articles of manufacture described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein.

The term “strike face,” as used herein, refers to a club head front surface that is configured to strike a golf ball. The term “strike face” can be used interchangeably with the term “face.”

The strike face 102 is bounded by an outer edge referred to as a “strike face perimeter.” The strike face perimeter is defined where the curvature of the golf club head 100 deviates from a bulge curvature and/or roll curvature of the strike face 102 (defined below). The strike face perimeter includes at least an upper edge 118 that defines a transition between the strike face 102 and the crown 110 and a leading edge 103 that defines a transition from the strike face 102 to the sole 112. The upper edge 118 defines a face apex (FA), located at the intersection between the upper edge 118 and the YZ plane (described below). The leading edge 103 defines a face nadir (FN) located at the intersection between the leading edge 103 and the YZ plane. The strike face 102 further defines a face center (FC), which is the geometric centerpoint of the strike face perimeter, illustrated in FIG. 3. The face center (FC) can be located in accordance with the definition of a golf governing body such as the United States Golf Association (USGA).

The strike face 102 comprises a bulge curvature and a roll curvature. The bulge curvature is the curvature of the strike face 102 in the heel-to-toe direction. The roll curvature is the curvature of the strike face in a crown-to-sole direction. The bulge curvature and the roll curvature each respectively comprise a bulge radius and a roll radius defining the radii of curvature associated with each of the bulge curvature and the roll curvature. The bulge curvature and/or the roll curvature can comprise one or more radii.

The golf club head 100 defines a ground plane (GP) as a reference plane associated with the surface on which a golf ball is placed. The ground plane GP is a horizontal plane tangent to the sole 112 in the address position. The ground plane GP is illustrated in FIG. 3.

The golf club head 100 defines a loft plane 15 as a plane that is tangent to the strike face 102 at the face center (FC). The loft plane 15 is illustrated in FIG. 4.

The golf club head 100 defines a loft angle 20 as the angle measured between the loft plane 15 and the XY plane (defined below). The loft angle 20 is illustrated in FIG. 4.

The golf club head 100 defines a lie angle 25 as the angle between a hosel axis 30, extending longitudinally through the hosel 105, and the ground plane GP. The lie angle 25 is measured from a front view of the golf club head 100, as illustrated in FIG. 3.

The golf club head 100 can define an address position, wherein the golf club head 100 is oriented such that the golf club head 100 forms its intended loft angle 20 and lie angle 25. For example, in the address position, the loft plane 15 and the XY plane form the intended loft angle 20 between one another. Likewise, in the address position, the hosel axis 30 and the ground plane GP form the intended lie angle 25 between one another.

As illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, the golf club head 100 defines a primary coordinate system centered about the face center (FC). The primary coordinate system comprises an X-axis 40, a Y-axis 50, and a Z-axis 60. The X-axis 40 extends in a heel-to-toe direction, parallel to the ground plane GP. The X-axis 40 is positive towards the heel 104 and negative towards the toe 106. The Y-axis 50 extends in a crown-to-sole direction and is orthogonal to both the ground plane GP and the X-axis 40. The Y-axis 50 is positive towards the crown 110 and negative towards the sole 112. The Z-axis 60 extends in a front-to-rear direction, parallel to the ground plane GP, and is orthogonal to both the X-axis 40 and the Y-axis 50. The Z-axis 60 is positive towards the strike face 102 and negative towards the rear 111.

The primary coordinate system, as described herein, defines an XY plane as a vertical plane extending along the X-axis 40 and the Y-axis 50. The primary coordinate system defines an XZ plane as a horizontal plane extending along the X-axis 40 and the Z-axis 60. The primary coordinate system further defines a YZ plane as a vertical plane extending along the Y-axis 50 and the Z-axis 60. The XY plane, the XZ plane, and the YZ plane are all perpendicular to one another and intersect at the primary coordinate system origin located at the face center (FC). In these or other embodiments, the golf club head 100 can be viewed from a front view when the strike face 102 is viewed from a direction perpendicular to the XY plane. Further, in these or other embodiments, the golf club head 100 can be viewed from a side view when the heel 104 or the toe 106 is viewed from a direction perpendicular to the YZ plane.

The golf club head 100 comprises a club head center of gravity (hereafter “CG” or “club head CG”), referring to the point at which the mass is centered within the golf club head 100. The club head CG is illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4.

The “body depth,” or “depth” DB of the club head 100, as used herein, refers to a front-to-rear dimension measured across the body. Referring to FIG. 4, the body depth DB is measured parallel to the Z-axis 60 from the leading edge 103 to the rearward-most point of the body 101.

The “body height,” or “height” HB of the club head 100, as described herein, can refer to a crown-to-sole dimension measured across the body 101. Referring to FIG. 3, the body height HB can be measured as a vertical distance (parallel to the Y-axis 50) between the ground plane GP and the highest point of the crown 110. In many embodiments, the height HB can be measured according to a golf governing body such as the United States Golf Association (USGA).

The “body width,” or “width” WB of the club head 100, as described herein, can refer to a heel-to-toe dimension measured across the body. Referring to FIG. 3, the body width WB can be measured parallel to the X-axis 40 from a body heel apex (BHA) to a body toe apex (BTA). The body toe apex (BTA) is defined as the toeward-most point of the body 101. The body heel apex (BHA) is heelward-most point of the heel 104 that is located at a height 0.875 mm from the ground plane GP. In many embodiments, the body width (WB) can be measured according to a golf governing body such as the United States Golf Association (USGA). The ranges specified for the body depth (DB), body height (HB), and body width (WB) can be designed in accordance with the USGA regulations.

The “Impact Response Modulator” or “IRM” described herein, comprises a casing, an aperture, and an insert. The IRM is a club head feature that increases strike face deflection at impact with a golf ball.

The “casing” refers to a component of the IRM that comprises one or more walls and or structures defining an aperture that communicates between the environment surrounding the club head and the interior cavity of the club head.

“Driver” golf club heads as used herein comprise a loft angle less than approximately 16 degrees, less than approximately 15 degrees, less than approximately 14 degrees, less than approximately 13 degrees, less than approximately 12 degrees, less than approximately 11 degrees, or less than approximately 10 degrees. Further, in many embodiments, “driver golf club heads” as used herein comprises a volume greater than approximately 400 cc, greater than approximately 425 cc, greater than approximately 445 cc, greater than approximately 450 cc, greater than approximately 455 cc, greater than approximately 460 cc, greater than approximately 475 cc, greater than approximately 500 cc, greater than approximately 525 cc, greater than approximately 550 cc, greater than approximately 575 cc, greater than approximately 600 cc, greater than approximately 625 cc, greater than approximately 650 cc, greater than approximately 675 cc, or greater than approximately 700 cc. In some embodiments, the volume of the driver can be approximately 400 cc-600 cc, 425 cc-500 cc, approximately 500 cc-600 cc, approximately 500 cc-650 cc, approximately 550 cc-700 cc, approximately 600 cc-650 cc, approximately 600 cc-700 cc, or approximately 600 cc-800 cc.

Driver embodiments can comprise a body height HB between 2.0 and 3.0 inches. In some driver embodiments, the body height HB can be between 2.0 and 2.2 inches, between 2.2 and 2.4 inches, between 2.4 and 2.6 inches, between 2.6 and 2.8 inches, or between 2.8 and 3.0 inches. In some driver embodiments, the body height HB can be greater than 2.0 inches, greater than 2.2 inches, greater than 2.4 inches, greater than 2.6 inches, greater than 2.8 inches, or greater than 3.0 inches.

Driver embodiments can comprise a body width WB between 4.4 and 5.0 inches. In some driver embodiments, the body width WB can be between 4.4 and 4.6 inches, between 4.6 and 4.8 inches, or between 4.8 and 5.0 inches. In some driver embodiments, the body width WB can be greater than 4.4 inches, greater than 4.6 inches, greater than 4.8 inches, or greater than 5.0 inches.

Driver embodiments can comprise a body depth DB between 4.3 and 4.9 inches. In some driver embodiments, the body depth DB can be between 4.3 and 4.5 inches, between 4.5 and 4.7 inches, or between 4.7 and 4.9 inches. In some driver embodiments, the body depth DB can be greater than 4.3 inches, greater than 4.5 inches, greater than 4.7 inches, or greater than 4.9 inches.

“Fairway wood” golf club heads as used herein comprise a loft angle less than approximately 35 degrees, less than approximately 34 degrees, less than approximately 33 degrees, less than approximately 32 degrees, less than approximately 31 degrees, or less than approximately 30 degrees. Further, in some embodiments, the loft angle of the fairway wood club heads can be greater than approximately 12 degrees, greater than approximately 13 degrees, greater than approximately 14 degrees, greater than approximately 15 degrees, greater than approximately 16 degrees, greater than approximately 17 degrees, greater than approximately 18 degrees, greater than approximately 19 degrees, or greater than approximately 20 degrees. For example, in other embodiments, the loft angle of the fairway wood can be between 12 degrees and 35 degrees, between 15 degrees and 35 degrees, between 20 degrees and 35 degrees, or between 12 degrees and 30 degrees.

Further, “fairway wood” golf club heads as used herein comprises a volume less than approximately 400 cc, less than approximately 375 cc, less than approximately 350 cc, less than approximately 325 cc, less than approximately 300 cc, less than approximately 275 cc, less than approximately 250 cc, less than approximately 225 cc, or less than approximately 200 cc. In some embodiments, the volume of the fairway wood can be approximately 150 cc-200 cc, approximately 150 cc-250 cc, approximately 150 cc-300 cc, approximately 150 cc-350 cc, approximately 150 cc-400 cc, approximately 300 cc-400 cc, approximately 325 cc-400 cc, approximately 350 cc-400 cc, approximately 250 cc-400 cc, approximately 250-350 cc, or approximately 275-375 cc.

Fairway wood embodiments can comprise a body height HB between 1.25 and 1.75 inches. In some fairway wood embodiments, the body height HB can be between 1.25 and 1.40 inches, between 1.40 and 1.55 inches, or between 1.55 and 1.75 inches.

Fairway wood embodiments can comprise a body width WB between 3.75 and 4.5 inches. In some fairway wood embodiments, the body width WB can be between 3.75 and 4.0 inches, between 4.0 and 4.25 inches, or between 4.25 and 4.5 inches.

Fairway wood embodiments can comprise a body depth DB between 3.0 and 4.0 inches. In some fairway wood embodiments, the body depth DB can be between 3.0 and 3.3 inches, between 3.3 and 3.6 inches, between 3.6 and 3.8 inches, or between 3.8 and 4.0 inches.

“Hybrid” golf club heads as used herein comprise a loft angle less than approximately 40 degrees, less than approximately 39 degrees, less than approximately 38 degrees, less than approximately 37 degrees, less than approximately 36 degrees, less than approximately 35 degrees, less than approximately 34 degrees, less than approximately 33 degrees, less than approximately 32 degrees, less than approximately 31 degrees, or less than approximately 30 degrees. Further, in many embodiments, the loft angle of the hybrid can be greater than approximately 16 degrees, greater than approximately 17 degrees, greater than approximately 18 degrees, greater than approximately 19 degrees, greater than approximately 20 degrees, greater than approximately 21 degrees, greater than approximately 22 degrees, greater than approximately 23 degrees, greater than approximately 24 degrees, or greater than approximately 25 degrees.

Further, “hybrid” golf club heads as used herein comprise a volume less than approximately 200 cc, less than approximately 175 cc, less than approximately 150 cc, less than approximately 125 cc, less than approximately 100 cc, or less than approximately 75 cc. In some embodiments, the volume of the hybrid can be approximately 100 cc-150 cc, approximately 75 cc-150 cc, approximately 100 cc-125 cc, or approximately 75 cc-125 cc.

Other features and aspects will become apparent by consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. Before any embodiments of the disclosure are explained in detail, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details or embodiment and the arrangement of components as set forth in the following description or as illustrated in the drawings. The disclosure is capable of supporting other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. It should be understood that the description of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the disclosure from covering all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.

II. General Description of a Golf Club Head

Various embodiments of a golf club comprising a composite faceplate, having both a face region and a sole return region that integrally forms the entire casing and aperture, are illustrated in the figures. More specifically, the composite faceplate is monolithically formed from a high-strength material so that the sole return encompasses the entirety of the casing and the aperture it defines. The composite faceplate is joined with the body to form a club head. The golf club is generally understood to comprise the club head, a shaft, and a grip. The club head is configured to receive the shaft, and the grip is secured to the shaft.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2 the club head 100 defines a crown 110, a sole 112 opposite the crown 110, a heel 104, a toe 106, a front 108, a rear 111, and a strike face 102. The club head 100 further comprises a hosel 105, which is configured to receive the shaft. In some embodiments, as illustrated in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2, the club head 100 comprises a body 101 and a composite faceplate coupled together to form an interior cavity. According to certain embodiments, the body 101 forms at least portions of one or more of the crown 110, the sole 112, the heel 104, the toe 106, and the strike face 102. A front of the body 101 further includes a frame for attaching to the composite faceplate. The composite faceplate is coupled to the frame and comprises a sole return region 116 that is integral with the face region and includes the entire casing and aperture. Specific configurations of the body 101 and the composite faceplate are described in further detail below. In some embodiments, the perimeter of the composite faceplate is joined to the body through a simple, permanent joining process, such as welding or brazing. In other embodiments, the composite faceplate can be joined to the body through adhesive or mechanical coupling means.

The features discussed below are demonstrated on club head 100. While different embodiments may comprise different numbering schemes (i.e., 1xx, 2xx, 3xx numbering schemes, etc.) similar elements are numbered similarly between embodiments (i.e., club head 100 comprises a crown 110 and a sole 112, whereas club head 200 comprises a crown 210 and a sole 212). Any one or more of the features below can be used in combination with one another.

The composite faceplate comprises a high-strength material having sufficient strength to withstand repeated impacts with a golf ball. In some embodiments, the composite faceplate material can be a high-strength steel alloy such as, for example, but not limited to Carpenter 455, Carpenter 475, HT1770, M455 (H900), M475 (H975), 4140, 4340, C300, C350, 6150 steel, K301, Carpenter 158, Carpenter 450, Carpenter 465, Carpenter 431, Inconel 718, Aermet 100, Maraging Steel (MSL 350, MSL 450), H13 Tool Steel, 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, 18Ni (300M), S7 Tool Steel, D2 Tool Steel, 440C Stainless Steel, SKD11, SAE 9260, 10B21 Boron Steel, 52100 Steel, Tungsten Carbide Steel, Viking 80, or 4130 Chromoly Steel.

In other embodiments, the composite faceplate material can be a high-strength titanium alloy, for example, but not limited to HST 220, Ti-3-8-6-4-4, Ti-10-2-3, Ti 15-3-3-3, Ti 15-5-3, Ti185, Ti 6-6-2, Ti-7s, Ti-9s, Ti-92, Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-6-4), Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr (Ti-3-8-6-4-4), Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al (Ti-10-2-3), Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn (Ti-15-3-3-3), Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al (Ti-15-5-3), Ti-185, Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn (Ti-6-6-2), Ti-7Al-4Mo (Ti-7s), Ti-9Al-2Mo (Ti-9s), Ti-9s+, Ti-9Al-2V (Ti-92), Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V (Ti-8-1-1), Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr (Ti-5553), Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo (Ti-6-2-4-2), Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo (Ti-6-2-4-6), Ti-6Al-7Nb, Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe (Ti-55511), Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al, Ti-1100, Ti-6Al-2.75Sn-4Zr-0.4Mo-0.45Si-0.1Y (IMI 829), Ti-5Al-2Sn-2Zr-4Mo-4Cr (Ti-17), Ti-9-2-2, Beta-C Titanium (Ti-Beta C), or Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn-0.5Si (Ti-4-4-2-0.5Si).

The body 101 can comprise one or more body materials. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the body 101 comprises a metal material, such as steel, stainless steel, tungsten, aluminum, titanium, vanadium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, other metals, or metal alloys. In some embodiments, the metal material can comprise a Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V alloy, Ti-8Al-2V (Ti-8-1-1-plus), or a 17-4 stainless steel. In some embodiments, the metal material can comprise Ni (Nickel)-Co (Cobalt)-Cr (Chromium)-Steel Alloy, 565 Steel, AISI type 304 or AISI type 630 stainless steel, 17-4 stainless steel, 431 stainless steel, 304 stainless steel, 316 stainless steel, 8620 carbon steel, 1020 carbon steel, 1025 carbon steel, 17-7 PH stainless steel, 303 stainless steel, AUS-8 stainless steel, and gray cast iron or ductile iron titanium alloys such as, but not limited to, Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-6-4), Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn-0.5Si (Ti-4-4-2-0.5Si), Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo (Ti-6-2-4-2), Ti-5Al-2.5Sn, Ti-3Al-2.5V, Ti-6Al-1Zr-1Nb-1Mo (Ti-6-1-1-1), Ti-0.3Mo-0.8Ni, and Ti-6Al-7Nb, an amorphous metal alloy, or other similar metals.

In some embodiments, at least portions of the body 101 comprises one or more lightweight materials, such as a carbon-composite material. The phrase “carbon-composite material” is defined herein as the type of material, such as a carbon reinforced fiber material or any other carbon organic based material. This is in contrast to the phrase “composite faceplate,” which as noted above is defined as a multi-faced component having integrally provided, interconnected structures that form distinct regions of the golf club head. In some embodiments, portions of the crown 110, the sole 112, the heel 104, the toe 106, or a combination thereof can be formed by a carbon-composite material. In some embodiments, the club head 100 can comprise one or more carbon-composite panels. In some embodiments, referring to FIG. 5, the club head 100 can comprise a crown panel 196 of a carbon-composite material. The crown panel 196 can comprise a heel wrap 197a and a toe wrap 197b that each extend over the heel 104 and toc 106, respectively, to form portions of the sole 112. Further, in some embodiments, the club head 100 can comprise a sole panel 198 of carbon-composite material that forms at least a portion of the sole 112, as illustrated in FIG. 5. In other embodiments, referring to FIG. 7, the club head 100 can comprise a central panel 199 that continuously wraps around the crown 110, sole 112, heel 104, toe 106, or various combinations thereof. In other embodiments, the body 101 may be formed entirely of carbon-composite material.

In some embodiments, the carbon-composite material can comprise a polymer resin and reinforcing fiber. The polymer resin can comprise a thermoset or a thermoplastic resin. In some embodiments, the carbon-composite material can comprise a carbon fiber composite material having multiple layers of unidirectional carbon fibers formed as a single, continuous piece. In some embodiments, the carbon-composite material can comprise a bi-directional woven carbon fiber composite material having a single layer formed as a single, continuous piece. In some embodiments, the carbon-composite material can comprise a fiber reinforced thermo-plastic material. The carbon-composite material can be extruded, compression molded, injection molded, blow molded or bladder molded, 3-D printed, or otherwise formed by any other appropriate forming means.

According to certain aspects of the present invention, the composite faceplate material comprises a high-yield strength. In some embodiments, the composite faceplate material comprises a yield strength greater than 130 ksi, greater than 145 ksi, greater than 155 ksi, greater than 165 ksi, greater than 175 ksi, greater than 185 ksi, greater than 195 ksi, greater than 200 ksi, greater than 210 ksi, greater than 220 ksi, greater than 230 ksi, greater than 240 ksi, greater than 250 ksi, greater than 260 ksi, greater than 270 ksi, greater than 280 ksi, greater than 290 ksi, greater than 300 ksi, greater than 310 ksi, greater than 320 ksi, greater than 330 ksi, greater than 340 ksi, or greater than 350 ksi.

When the composite faceplate is joined to a portion of the body formed of a metal material, the yield strength of the composite faceplate material is greater than the yield strength of that metal material. For example, when the frame of the body comprises a metal material, the yield strength of the frame material is less than that of the composite faceplate material. In some embodiments, the frame material has yield strength from 100 ksi to 165 ksi. In some embodiments, frame material has a yield strength of less than 165 ksi, less than 155 ksi, less than 145 ksi, less than 135 ksi, less than 125 ksi, less than 115 ksi, or less than 105 ksi. Regardless of the specific yield strength of the frame material, the yield strength of the composite faceplate will be greater.

In some embodiments, the club head 100 comprises a composite faceplate strength ratio comparing the yield strength of the composite faceplate material to the yield strength of the body material. In some embodiments, the composite faceplate strength ratio can be greater than 1.25, greater than 1.35, greater than 1.45, greater than 1.55, greater than 1.65, greater than 1.75, greater than 1.85, greater than 1.95 or greater than 2.0.

III. Impact Response Modulator

As previously mentioned, the golf club head 100 comprises an Impact Response Modulator 120 (hereafter “IRM”), having increased face deflection at impact with a golf ball. The IRM 120 is provided in the composite faceplate, which is formed of a high-strength material that reinforces the IRM 120 to improve durability of the golf club head. Referring to FIG. 2, the IRM 120 is disposed in the sole 112, proximate the strike face 102 and within the composite faceplate. The IRM 120 strategically weakens the sole 112 to increase strike face deflection. The IRM 120 comprises a casing 130 surrounding an aperture 140 that is configured to receive an insert 170. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the IRM 120 extends in a substantially heel-to-toe direction across the sole 112 to increase strike face deflection.

The casing 130 includes walls that form and surround the aperture 140. As illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9, the casing 130 comprises a front wall 132 spaced rearward of the strike face 102, a rear wall 142 spaced rearward from the front wall 132, a heel wall 152 extending between the front wall 132 and the rear wall 142 at a heel end of the casing 130, and a toe wall 154 extending between the front wall 132 and the rear wall 142 at a toe end of the casing 130. The front wall 132, the rear wall 142, the heel wall 152, and the toe wall 154 each extend upward from the sole 112 and collectively border and define the aperture 140 therebetween. The aperture 140 is a through-hole fluidly communicating between the club head exterior and the interior cavity. As described above, the entire casing 130 is formed by the sole return region 116 of the composite faceplate, and therefore is fully surrounded by the high-strength material. The front wall 132 comprises a front wall front surface 134 disposed towards the strike face 102, a front wall rear surface 136 disposed towards the aperture 140, a front wall base 133, and a front wall top surface 138 opposite the front wall base 133. The rear wall 142 comprises a rear wall front surface 144 disposed towards the aperture 140, a rear wall rear surface 146 disposed towards the rear 111, a rear wall base 143, and a rear wall top surface 148 opposite the rear wall base 143.

To improve durability, the front wall 132 is separated from the strike face 102 by a sole transition region 166 formed from the high-strength material. The sole transition region 166 forms an integral part of the composite faceplate. The sole transition region 166 separates the front wall 132 from the strike face 102 by an offset distance OD, which is described in further detail below. As such, the casing 130 comprises a front wall 132 that partially forms the aperture 140 and is distinct from the strike face 102. Spacing the front wall of the casing away from the strike face increases durability while maintaining performance. The sole transition region dissipates stress and evenly transfers the flow of stress from the face to the front wall of the casing.

Further, as best illustrated in FIG. 10, the strike face 102, the sole transition region 166, and the front wall 132 combine to collectively define a U-shaped trough 175. The U-shaped trough 175 can open toward and fluidly communicate with the interior cavity 107 and can be in fluid communication therewith. The U-shaped trough 175 can run along the length of the casing 130, between the front wall 132 and the strike face 102. The strike face 102, the forward sole region 166, and the front wall 132 monolithically form the high-strength U-shaped trough 175.

The forward sole region 166 balances durability and strike face deflection by spacing the casing 130 and the aperture 140 rearward of the strike face 102. If not for the forward sole region 166, the casing 130 and/or the aperture 140 would directly abut the strike face 102. In such cases, the impact stress and in the casing 130 and the strike face 102 would lend to lead to failure, and the strike face 102 and/or the casing walls would need to be significantly thickened to preserve durability. Doing so would hinder strike face deflection such that any performance gains achieved by the inclusion of the IRM 120 would be lost or greatly diminished. Spacing the casing 130 and the aperture 140 rearward of the strike face 102 by the forward sole region 166 allows the strike face 102 and casing walls to be thinned, therefore increasing strike face deflection.

The casing 130 can comprise a front wall height FWH, as best illustrated in FIG. 10, measured as the distance between the front wall base 133 and the front wall top surface 138, along the front wall rear surface 136. The front wall height FWH can be selected to increase strike face deflection without compromising durability. Specifically, decreasing the front wall height FWH increases strike face deflection but potentially decreases durability by reducing the amount of material and cross-sectional area of the front wall. Reinforcing the casing 130 with high-strength material, as described herein, allows the front wall height FWH to be reduced while maintaining durability. The front wall height FWH can be constant along the length of the casing 130, or the front wall height FWH can vary along the length of the casing 130. In many embodiments, the front wall height FWH can be measured within a vertical plane extending through the face center (FC) in a front-to-back direction. In some embodiments, the front wall height FWH can be between 0.050 and 0.10 inch, 0.10 and 0.20 inch, 0.20 and 0.30 inch, 0.30 and 0.40 inch, between 0.40 and 0.50 inch. In some embodiments, the front wall height FWH can be less than 0.50 inch, less than 0.40 inch, less than 0.30 inch, less than 0.20 inch, or less than 0.10 inch. Forming the entire casing 130 out of high-strength faceplate material allows the front wall height FWH to be reduced, which, as discussed in Example 2 below, improves ball speed and spin rate.

As mentioned above, the casing 130 also comprises an offset distance OD, as best illustrated in FIG. 10, measured as the distance from the leading edge 103 to the front wall base 133, in a strike face-to-rear direction. The casing offset distance OD can be selected to increase strike face deflection without compromising durability. Specifically, decreasing the offset distance OD increases strike face deflection, but potentially decreases durability. Reinforcing the casing 130 with high-strength material, as described herein, allows the offset distance OD to be reduced while maintaining durability. In many embodiments, the offset distance OD can be measured at or near a center of the aperture, within a vertical plane extending through the face center (FC) in a front-to-back direction. In some embodiments, the offset distance OD can be between 0.075 and 0.10 inch, 0.10 and 0.20 inch, 0.20 and 0.30 inch, 0.30 and 0.40 inch, 0.40 and 0.50 inch, 0.50 and 0.60 inch, 0.60 and 0.70 inch, 0.70 and 0.80 inch, 0.80 and 0.90 inch, or between 0.90 and 1.00 inch. In some embodiments, the offset distance can be less than 1.0 inch, less than 0.90 inch, less than 0.80 inch, less than 0.70 inch, less than 0.60 inch less than 0.50 inch, less than 0.40 inch, less than 0.30 inch, less than 0.20 inch, or less than 0.10 inch. In some embodiments, the casing offset distance OD can be 0.075 inch, 0.080 inch, 0.085 inch, 0.090 inch, 0.095 inch, 0.10 inch, 0.15 inch, 0.20 inch, 0.25 inch, 0.30 inch, 0.35 inch, 0.40 inch, 0.45 inch, 0.50 inch, 0.55 inch, 0.60 inch, 0.65 inch, 0.70 inch, 0.75 inch, 0.80 inch, 0.85 inch, 0.90 inch, 0.95 inch, or 1.0 inch. In some embodiments, the offset distance OD can be greater than 0.075 inch, greater than 0.080 inch, greater than 0.085 inch, greater than 0.090 inch, greater than 0.095 inch, greater than 0.10 inch, greater than 0.15 inch, greater than 0.20 inch, greater than 0.25 inch, greater than 0.30 inch, greater than 0.35 inch, greater than 0.40 inch, greater than 0.45 inch, greater than 0.50 inch, greater than 0.55 inch, greater than 0.60 inch, greater than 0.65 inch, greater than 0.70 inch, greater than 0.75 inch, greater than 0.80 inch, greater than 0.85 inch, greater than 0.90 inch, greater than 0.95 inch, or greater than 1.0 inch. Forming the entire casing 130 out of high-strength faceplate material allows the offset distance OD to be reduced, which, as discussed in Example 2 below, improves ball speed and spin rate.

The front wall 132 comprises a front wall thickness FWT, as best illustrated in FIG. 9, measured as the distance between front wall front surface 134 and the front wall rear surface 136. As mentioned above, the front wall thickness FWT can be selected to increase strike face deflection without compromising durability. Specifically, the front wall thickness FWT can be increased to lower strike face deflection but improve durability. Decreasing the front wall thickness FWT increases strike face deflection but potentially lowers or negatively affects durability. Reinforcing the casing 130 with high-strength material, as described herein, allows the front wall thickness FWT to be reduced while maintaining durability. In many embodiments, the front wall thickness FWT can be measured within a vertical plane extending through the face center (FC) in a front-to-back direction. In some embodiments, the front wall thickness FWT can be between 0.010 and 0.025 inch, 0.025 and 0.050 inch, 0.050 and 0.075 inch, 0.075 and 0.100 inch, 0.100 and 0.125 inch, 0.125 and 0.150 inch, or between 0.150 and 0.175 inch. In some embodiments, the front wall thickness FWT can be less than 0.175 inch, less than 0.150 inch, less than 0.125 inch, less than 0.100 inch, less than 0.075 inch, less than 0.050 inch, less than 0.025 inch, or less than 0.010 inch.

In some embodiments, the casing can comprise reliefs having relief angles, defined below. The relief angles can be selected to either increase strike face deflection and decrease durability, or decrease strike face deflection and increase durability. Specifically, increasing the relief angle (i.e., angling the relief more rearwardly), decreases strike face deflection but increases durability. Similarly, decreasing the relief angle (i.e., angling the relief more flat or parallel to the length of the casing), increases strike face deflection but decreases durability. The use of a fixed shaft-receiving mechanism or an adjustable shaft-receiving mechanism can affect whether or not the casing includes a heel relief. An adjustable shaft-receiving structure comprises a heel recess or indentation for a mechanical fastener. The heel recess prevents the casing from extending into the heel thereby preventing the casing from including a heel relief.

In some embodiments, the casing can comprise a heel relief, a toe relief, or both. In some embodiments, the heel relief angle can be the same as the toe relief angle. In other embodiments, the heel relief angle can be different than the toe relief angle. For example, in some embodiments, the club head can comprise only a toe relief angle when used in conjunction with a lower hosel socket. In other embodiments, the casing can include both a heel relief angle and toe relief angle. The heel relief angle and toe relief angle relieve stress buildup at the heel end and toe end, respectively, thereby improving durability of the casing.

The casing comprises a heel relief angle measured as the angle between a line that extends between the intersection of the heel plane and the front wall bottom rear edge to the absolute heel point and the leading edge plane. The heel relief angle can range between 2 and 75 degrees. The heel relief angle can range between 2 and 10 degrees, 10 and 15 degrees, 15 and 20 degrees, 20 and 25 degrees, 25 and 30 degrees, 30 and 35 degrees, 35 and 40 degrees, 40 and 45 degrees, 45 and 50 degrees, 50 and 55 degrees, 55 and 60 degrees, 60 and 65 degrees, 65 and 70 degrees, or between 70 and 75 degrees. In one embodiment, the heel relief angle is 53 degrees.

The casing comprises a toe relief angle measured as the angle between a line that extends between the intersection of the toe plane and the front wall bottom rear edge to the absolute toe point and the leading edge plane. The toe relief angle can range between 2 and 75 degrees. The toe relief angle TRA can range between 2 and 10 degrees, 10 and 15 degrees, 15 and 20 degrees, 20 and 25 degrees, 25 and 30 degrees, 30 and 35 degrees, 35 and 40 degrees, 40 and 45 degrees, 45 and 50 degrees, 50 and 55 degrees, 55 and 60 degrees, 60 and 65 degrees, 65 and 70 degrees, or between 70 and 75 degrees. In one embodiment, the toe relief angle is 53.38 degrees.

The above IRM geometries, as well as additional geometries are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 19/212,636, filed on May 19, 2025, of which the contents of which are fully incorporated herein.

In some embodiments, the IRM further comprises an insert 170 disposed within the aperture 140 and formed of a flexible, polymeric material. The insert 170, as best illustrated in FIG. 11, closes off the aperture 140 to prevent debris from migrating into the interior chamber. The insert 170 also can impact the performance of the IRM and durability of the club head. The insert 170 is configured to engage the casing walls. In some embodiments, the insert 170 is sized to frictionally engage the casing 130, thereby securing the insert 170 within the casing 130. The material composition, overall construction, inclusion of multiple or combinations of materials, and geometry of the insert 170 can affect the overall performance (bending, retraction rate, reactivity to force) of the IRM. The insert 170 and the casing 130 can comprise complementary geometries that provide durability and mechanically interlock or otherwise fit and secure the insert 170 within the casing 130, even after repeated, significant impacts. In some embodiments, the insert 170 has a solid construction that entirely fills the aperture 140 with material between the casing front wall 132 and the casing rear wall 142. In some embodiments, the insert 170 can be hollowed out or provided with some other suitable geometry that creates a gap 171 or channel within the insert 170, as illustrated in FIG. 11. Details of other suitable inserts to be used with the IRM are described in patent application Ser. No. 19/090,340, filed on Mar. 25, 2025, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein.

In some embodiments, the insert 170 can be retained within the casing walls 132, 142, 152, 154 by at least one tab 145, as illustrated in FIGS. 12 and 13. The at least one tab 145 can extend into the aperture 140 defined by the walls of the casing. The at least one tab 145 provides a physical barrier or stop for the insert 170 to prevent the insert 170 from being forced into the interior cavity of the club head at impact.

IV. Impact Response Modulator with High-Strength Material Reinforcement

As described above, the composite faceplate forms the entire casing and aperture, as well as a part of the strike face. The composite faceplate is formed of a high-strength material that reinforces the casing to increase strike face deflection without compromising durability. The composite faceplate also positions joints and connections away from the aperture/casing walls to facilitate fabrication and assembly while reducing the number of failure points on the walls of the casing that experience high stress.

Various embodiments of composite faceplates formed of a high-strength material forming the entire casing are described in further detail below. Specifically, embodiments of fairway wood-type club heads and driver-type club heads are shown with different hosel configurations and other features. The different hosel configurations affect the total length of the casing, and therefore performance. For example, in some embodiments, the club head comprises a bottom-adjustable hosel having a lower hosel socket in the sole. In these embodiments, the casing and aperture are relatively shorter to provide space on the sole to accommodate the lower hosel socket. In other embodiments, the lower hosel socket is omitted, thereby increasing available space on the sole to accommodate a longer casing and aperture.

In one embodiment, a fairway wood-type club head comprises a bottom-adjustable hosel and a composite faceplate formed a high-strength material. In another embodiment, a fairway wood type club head comprises a fixed or top-adjustable hosel configuration and an composite faceplate formed of a high-strength material. In another embodiment, a driver-type club head comprises a bottom-adjustable hosel and a composite faceplate formed of a high-strength material. In another embodiment, a driver-type club head comprises a fixed or top-adjustable hosel configuration and a composite faceplate formed of a high-strength material. Aspects of the present invention may be utilized in other club head types such as irons or hybrid-type club heads.

A bottom-adjustable hosel, as described above, is an adjustable hosel configuration comprising a bottom opening, or a lower hosel socket, located on the sole of the club head that receives a fastener to secure the shaft to the club head. Bottom-adjustable hosels allow the club head to be fixed at an angle relative to the shaft, thereby setting the club head to a particular loft and/or lie angle. The lower hosel socket limit available space for, and/or otherwise, may interfere with, the IRM and the composite faceplate. In some embodiments, the lower hosel socket is formed in the body and does not form part of the composite faceplate. In other embodiments, the lower hosel socket is incorporated into the composite faceplate.

A top-adjustable hosel or fixed hosel configuration, as described above, is a hosel configuration that lacks a bottom opening to increase the length of the slot thereby increasing performance. The lack of a lower hosel socket further improves manufacturability of joining the composite faceplate to the body by simplifying the weld line. In these embodiments, the hosel configuration may be top-adjustable or fixed. A top-adjustable hosel refers to a hosel configuration in which does not have a bottom opening but can still be adjusted into different loft/lie configurations in the top hosel portion. Alternatively, the hosel configuration may be fixed in which the shaft in permanently and non-adjustably secured to the hosel, removing the need for a lower hosel socket on the sole. Both the top-adjustable configuration and fixed configuration removes the need for a bottom opening, thereby allowing the length of the casing to increase, thereby increasing flexure and performance. Details of composite faceplate embodiments which utilize top-adjustable or fixed hosel configurations are described in further detail below.

A fairway wood-type club head 1000 comprises a composite faceplate 1050 having a face region and a sole return region that forms the entire casing to increase performance while maintaining durability, as illustrated in FIGS. 14-16. In some embodiments, the composite faceplate 1050 has a periphery that is continuously coupled or attached to the body of the club head so that there are no unattached portions of the perimeter of the composite faceplate, which increases durability. Specifically, a continuously coupled periphery results in no joints or connections in the walls of the casing that experience deflection during impact with a golf ball.

The interface at which the composite faceplate is joined to the body may be located to facilitate fabrication and assembly. For example, a heel section of the peripheral wall may be spaced from both the casing and the lower hosel socket to permit welding without impacting those structures. In this embodiment, the body has a sole opening to harbor and secure a bottom-adjustable hosel. The sole opening is formed within the body material and not the composite faceplate, as illustrated in FIG. 16. The shape of this region of the hosel and bottom opening can be easily casted with the body of the club head if loft/lie adjustability is desired. As such, the golf club head 1000 comprising a high-strength composite faceplate entirely surrounding the casing increases performances, maintains durability, and provides loft/lie adjustability to the end user.

The body 1001 of the golf club head 1000 may be formed of one or more materials having a yield strength less than that of the composite faceplate 1050. More specifically, the body 1001 may have a crown 1010, a sole 1012, a toe end 1006, and heel end 1004, a rear end 1011, a front 1008, a hosel 1005, and a frame 1013 forming a front 1008 of the body 1001. The frame 1013 may be formed of the same material as some or all of the rest of the body 1001, or may be formed of a different material. In either event, the frame 1013 may be formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, as illustrated in FIG. 15. The frame 1013 further comprises a frame crown 1014 forming a forward portion of the crown 1010, a frame sole 1015 forming a forward portion of the sole 1012, a frame toe end 1017 forming a forward portion of the toe end 1006, a frame heel end 1016 forming a forward portion of the heel end 1004, and a lower hosel socket 1018 adjacent the frame sole 1015 and the frame heel end 1016, defining a socket perimeter 1022 having a socket perimeter inboard section 1023 and a socket perimeter outboard section 1024. The frame is configured to receive the composite faceplate 1050.

The composite faceplate 1050 is coupled to the body 1001 to form an interior cavity 1007 of the golf club head 1000. The composite faceplate 1050 is formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material. The composite faceplate having a yield strength that is greater than the frame yield strength increases the durability and performance of the casing, the strike face, and surrounding transition regions that experience high-stress during impact with a golf ball.

The composite faceplate 1050 comprises a face region 1051 which forms a portion of the strike face 1002 at the front 1008 of the body 1001. The face region 1051 comprises a strike surface 1052 configured to impact a golf ball, a face region toe side 1053 located toe-ward of the strike surface 1052 and bordering the frame toe end 1017, a face region heel side 1054 located heel-ward of the strike surface 1052 and bordering the frame heel end 1016, a face region crown side 1055 located crown-ward of the strike surface 1052 and bordering the frame crown 1014, and a face region sole side 1056 located sole-ward of the strike surface 1052 and defining a sole leading edge 1057.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole return region 1058, formed integral with the face region 1051 having a casing 1030 with an aperture 1040 within a sole return sole wall 1059 to improve ball speed and spin characteristics. The high-strength material of the composite faceplate 1050 and thus the casing, improves performance and durability. The casing 1030 includes a front wall 1032, a rear wall 1038, a toe wall 1036, and a heel wall 1034, wherein the front wall 1032, the rear wall 1038, the toe wall 1036, and the heel wall 1034 define an aperture 1040. Advantageously, the body 1001 does not form any portion of the aperture 1040.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole transition region 1060, formed integral with the face region 1051 and the sole return region 1058 that spaces the aperture from the leading edge to improve bending and durability. More specifically, the sole transition region extends from the sole leading edge 1057 of the face region 1051 to the casing front wall 1032. The sole transition region 1060 can further define aperture offset distance (OD) as defined above, and measured between the sole leading edge 1057 and the casing front wall 1032. The sole transition region 1060 can improve bending and durability of the composite faceplate and casing by spacing the casing away from the strike surface 1052 and face region 1051.

A peripheral wall 1061 of the composite faceplate 1050 is joined to the body 1001, to form the golf club head. More specifically, the peripheral wall 1061 extends around entireties of the face region 1051, the sole return region 1058, and the sole transition region 1060, and is joined to the frame 1013 of the body 1001, such as by welding. The peripheral wall comprises a peripheral wall heel section 1062, disposed between the casing heel wall 1034 and the lower hosel socket of the frame, that is spaced from both the sole return heel wall and the socket perimeter inboard section by a heel buffer distance. The peripheral wall 1061 further comprises a peripheral wall sole section 1063, disposed between the casing rear wall 1038 and the frame sole 1015, that is spaced from the casing rear wall 1038 by a sole buffer distance. Both the heel buffer distance and sole buffer distance are between 0.05 and 0.25 inch to sufficient space the joint of the frame and composite faceplate away from the walls of the casing to improve durability. In some embodiments, the peripheral wall 1061 is continuously joined to the frame 1013. In other embodiments, the peripheral wall is partially or intermittently joined to the frame 1013.

A golf club head 1100, as illustrated in FIGS. 20 and 21, comprises a composite faceplate 1150 that is similar to the composite faceplate 1050 described above, but further comprises a crown return region 1165. The crown return region 1165 further reinforces a forward portion of the crown 1110 that may otherwise experience high stress during impact. Specifically, the composite faceplate 1150 comprises a crown return region 1165, formed integral with the face region 1151, the sole return region 1158 and casing 1130, and the sole transition region 1160. The crown return region 1165 includes a crown return crown wall 1166 extending rearwardly of the face region 1151. The crown return region 1165 is formed by the same high-strength material to further increase durability and performance of the crown region.

The composite faceplate 1150 further comprises a crown transition region 1167, formed integral with the face region 1151, the sole return region 1158, the sole transition region 1160, and the crown return region 1165. The crown transition region 1167 extends from a crown leading edge 1168 of the face region 1151 to the crown return crown wall 1166 of the crown return region 1165.

In this embodiment, the peripheral wall 1161 extends entirely around the face region 1151, the sole return region 1158, the sole transition region 1160, the crown return region 1165, and the crown transition region 1167, and is joined to the frame 1113 of the body 1101. The crown transition region 1167 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region.

In some embodiments, the high-strength crown return region 1165 further comprises an indent 1141, as shown in FIG. 21. The indent 1141 is recessed into an interior surface of the crown return region 1165. The indent 1141 is a region of reduced thickness relative to the remainder of the crown return region 1165. In the illustrated embodiment, the indent 1141 is isolated within the crown return region 1165, such that the indent perimeter is located entirely within the bounds of the crown return region 1165. The indent 1141 increases strike face deflection without compromising faceplate durability. The indent 1141 can increase ball speed by upwards of 0.5 mph (without compromising durability) over a club head comprising a crown return without an indent. Specifically, the indent 1141 can weaken the forward portion of the crown 1110, thereby increasing the amount the crown 1110 deflects upward at impact. This increased upward crown deflection in turn increases the amount of strike face deflection. The isolation of the indent 1141 within the crown return region 1165 yields additional deflection without exceeding the yield strength of the faceplate material.

The crown return region 1165 extends rearwardly away from the crown leading edge 1168 by at least a distance of 0.10 inch to provide sufficient coverage of high-strength material in the forward portion of the crown. In some embodiments, the crown return region 1165 extends between 0.10 and 1.25 inches rearwardly from the crown leading edge. For example, the crown return region 1165 can extend between 0.10 and 0.25, 0.25 and 0.50 inch, 0.50 and 0.75 inch, 0.75 and 1.00 inch, or between 1.00 and 1.25 inches.

The indent 1141 comprises an indent thickness TI that is reduced in comparison to the crown return thickness TCR. In some embodiments, the indent thickness TI can be between 0.005 and 0.020 inch, whereas the crown return thickness TCR can be between 0.020 and 0.050 inch. In some embodiments, the indent thickness TI can be less than 0.020 inch, less than 0.015 inch, or less than 0.010 inch. Further, the crown return region 1165 can comprise an indent thickness ratio TI/TCR defined as the indent thickness TI divided by the crown return thickness TCR. In some embodiments, the indent thickness ratio TI/TCR can be less than 0.5, less than 0.4, less than 0.3, less than 0.2, or less than 0.1.

In the illustrated embodiment, the indent 1141 is located approximately in the center of the crown return region 1165 and extends in a generally heel-to-toe direction. In other embodiments, the indent 1141 can be offset towards to the toe 1106 or towards the heel 1104. In the illustrated embodiment, the indent 1141 has an approximately rectangular shape. In other embodiments, the indent 1141 can have other shapes such as an elongated oval or an arcuate shape. Altering the position and shape of the indent can target specific portions of the strike face and change flexure response, as desired. The indent # can be applied to club heads (# of crown returns) described below.

The club head 1100 having a composite faceplate 1150 formed of a high-strength material, and comprising a crown return region 1165 and a sole return region 1158, further increases durability and performance of the club head by reinforcing areas of high-stress with a high yield strength material. In other embodiments, the composite faceplate 1150 can further form other areas of the club head body 1001 with high-strength materials, such as the hosel.

A golf club head 1200, as illustrated in FIG. 22, comprises a composite faceplate 1250 that is similar to composite faceplate 1050 described above, but further incorporates a lower hosel region 1269. In this embodiment, a peripheral wall 1261 of the composite faceplate 1250 extends around and fully encompasses a lower hosel socket 1218 and corresponding structure. The peripheral wall 1261 of the composite faceplate 1250 comprises a relatively small thickness and is offset from the lower hosel socket 1218 to facilitate welding composite faceplate 1250 to the frame 1213, if needed. In this embodiment, the composite faceplate 1250 comprising the lower hosel region 1269 increases the overall durability of club head 1200 while maintaining adjustability of loft and/or lie angles.

Specifically, the composite faceplate 1250 comprises a lower hosel region 1269, formed integrally with the face region 1251, the sole return region 1258, and the sole transition region 1260, and extends between the face region heel side 1254 and the sole return sole wall 1259 of the sole return region 1258. The lower hosel region 1269 includes a lower hosel socket 1218 defining a socket perimeter 1222 having a socket perimeter outboard section 1224 and a socket perimeter inboard section 1223. The lower hosel socket 1218 is monolithically and entirely formed with the composite faceplate 1250 to increase the amount of high-strength material coverage in the club head, particularly in areas that experience high-stress.

The peripheral wall heel section 1262 of the composite faceplate 1250 is disposed between the frame heel end 1216 and the lower hosel socket 1218 of the lower hosel region 1269 and is spaced from the socket perimeter outboard section 1224 by a heel buffer distance. The heel buffer distance is least 0.05 inch to allow for sufficient clearance for welding the peripheral wall 1261 to the frame 1213. In other embodiments, the heel buffer distance can be less than 0.049 inches if improved welding or other techniques are used.

Furthermore, by forming the lower hosel socket 1218 integrally with the composite faceplate 1250, the casing 1230 can be positioned closer to lower hosel socket 1218, thereby extending the effective length of the casing 1230 to increase bending and deflection. Because the peripheral wall heel section 1262 does not lie between the socket perimeter inboard section 1223 and the casing heel wall 1234, additional buffer spacing is not required between the hosel and the casing. As such, the length of the casing, and therefore the aperture, can be increased to improve performance.

A golf club head 1300 and a body 1301, as shown in FIG. 24, comprises a composite faceplate 1350 that combines elements of the features of composite faceplates 1150, 1250 described above. Specifically, this composite faceplate 1350 forms both the lower hosel socket 1318 and a crown return region 1365 to further increase the overall durability of the club head. The composite faceplate 1350 further comprises partial heel and toe wraps to increase the coverage of high-strength material proximate the casing and striking surface.

Specifically, the composite faceplate 1350 comprises a toe wrap region 1370 that is formed integrally with the face region 1351, the sole return region 1358, the sole transition region 1360, and the lower hosel region 1369. The toe wrap region 1370 extends rearward of the face region toe side 1353. The toe wrap region 1370 extends rearward of the face region toe side 1353 such that the peripheral wall 1361 extends entirely around the toe wrap region 1370. The toe wrap region 1370 includes a toe lateral wall 1371. In some embodiments, the toe lateral wall 1371 can be approximately horizontal with the ground plane. In other embodiments, the toe lateral wall 1371 can formed at an angle relative to the ground plane.

The composite faceplate 1350 further comprises a heel wrap region 1372 formed integrally with the face region 1351, the sole return region 1358, the sole transition region 1360, and the lower hosel region 1369. The heel wrap region 1372 extends rearward of the face region heel side 1354 such that the peripheral wall 1361 extends entirely around the heel wrap region 1372. The heel wrap region 1372 includes a heel lateral wall 1373. In some embodiments, the heel lateral wall 1373 can be approximately horizontal with the ground plane. In other embodiments, the heel lateral wall 1373 can formed at an angle relative to the ground plane.

In some embodiments, the composite faceplate 1450 is coupled to a mass pad 1479 of the body 1401 having an increased thickness than a surrounding wall thickness of the sole 1412, as illustrated in FIG. 26. The mass pad 1479 alters the center of gravity of the club head as desired. For example, the mass pad 1479 may be located in a forward sole 1412 position to lower the center of gravity to increase the launch angle. In another example, the mass pad 1479 may be located in a forward toe position or a forward heel position to shift the center of gravity toeward or heelward to impart a draw or fade bias, as desired. By positioning the mass pad 1479 to border the sole weldline 1481, which is the interface between the sole return region of the composite faceplate and the frame, the CG is shifted further forward when it is spaced rearward of the interface. The thicknesses of the body 1401 and composite faceplate 1450, in this embodiment, can be greater than 0.050 inches.

In some embodiments, a club head 1500 comprising a body and a composite faceplate can further comprise a sole trough located at the joint or junction between the body and the composite faceplate for ease of manufacture and weldability, as illustrated in FIG. 27. The trough is an area of relatively thin walls to permit the weld or other type of joint to sufficiently penetrate though the walls and fully join the body to the composite faceplate. The trough comprises a composite faceplate side and a body side. The body comprises a mass pad that extends up to the trough to shift the CG faceward and soleward to improve launch and spin characteristics. In the trough embodiments, the thickness of the components at the interface between the body and the composite faceplate are less than 0.050 inch.

By incorporating a sole trough 1578 between the composite faceplate 1550 and the club head body 1501, the golf club head 1500 may comprise a variety of sole mass pads 1579 for shifting the CG faceward and soleward. When combined with the composite faceplate 1550, these features synergistically improve launch efficiency, spin rates, and carry distance, while maintaining durability in the golf club head 1500. Each of the sole mass pad 1579 embodiments can be integrally formed or co-casted with an interior surface 1580 of the sole 1512. More specifically, the sole mass pad 1579 can be configured as increased sole thickness at the interior surface 1580 of the sole 1512 and define a front wall 1582, a rear wall 1583, a heel wall 1584, and a toe wall 1585. In preferred embodiments, the sole mass pad 1579 is positioned centrally on the sole 1512 to control spin and increase ball speed. However, the sole mass pad 1579 may also be shifted closer to the heel end 1504 or the toe end 1506, and/or extend only partially along the width of the sole 1512 for influencing the club head MOI properties, forgiveness, and shot shape tendencies.

The composite faceplate 1550 may be coupled to club head bodies 1501 comprising differently shaped sole mass pads 1579 for reducing spin rates, improving vertical launch performance, and increasing distance. As described above, each of the various sole mass pad 1579 embodiments distribute mass forward and soleward in the club head 1500 without interfering with the increased strike face deflection and durability characteristics of the composite faceplate 1550. In some embodiments, for example, the sole mass pad 1579 may comprise a substantially rectangular shape when viewing the golf club head 1500 from a cross-sectional toe- or heel-side view. As shown in FIGS. 22-24, the front 1582, rear 1583, heel 1584, and toe 1585 walls extend crownward substantially perpendicular to the ground plane 10 and define a planar upper surface 1586 therebetween that extends substantially parallel to the ground plane 10. As such, the sole mass pad 1579 defines a substantially constant thickness 1587, measured perpendicular to the ground plane 10 from the exterior surface 1509 of the sole 1512 to the upper surface 1586. By comprising a uniform thickness 1587, the sole mass pad 1579 produces predictable moment characteristics in the golf club head 1500 to maintain the increased strike face deflection and durability characteristics of the composite faceplate 1550.

In additional embodiments, the composite faceplate 1550 may be coupled to a body 1501 comprising a substantially triangular sole mass pad 1579 when viewing the golf club head 1500 from a cross-sectional toe- or heel-side view. As shown in FIGS. 29 and 30, the heel 1584 and toe 1585 walls extend crownward substantially perpendicular to the ground plane 10. Alternatively, the front 1582 and rear 1583 walls extend crownward at acute angles relative to the ground plane 10. The front 1582 and rear 1583 walls converge to form an apex 1588, defining a maximum thickness 1587 of the sole mass pad 1579. As similarly described above, the thickness 1587 is measured perpendicular to the ground plane 10 from the exterior surface 1509 of the sole 1512 to the apex 1588. In preferred embodiments, the slopes of the front 1582 and rear 1583 walls vary to shift the apex 1588 forward and bias mass toward the face region 1551 of the golf club head 1500. In doing so, the sole mass pad 1579 concentrates club head mass forward and soleward without interfering with the casing 1530. Therefore, the triangular sole mass pad 1579 delivers improved spin rates and launch conditions without compromising the dynamic behavior and durability of the composite faceplate 1550.

In even further embodiments, the composite faceplate 1550 may be coupled to a body 1501 comprising a sole mass pad 1579 that forms a mass pad extension 1590. As shown in FIGS. 31-34, the front 1582, rear 1583, heel 1584, and toc 1585 walls of the sole mass pad 1579 extend crownward substantially perpendicular to the ground plane 10, and the mass pad extension 1590 protrudes faceward from the front wall 1582 such that at least a portion of the mass pad extension 1590 overhangs the trough 1578 and the sole weld line 1581. The mass pad extension 1590 comprises an upper surface 1591, a lower surface 1592, and a forward surface 1593 therebetween that defines the forward most extent of the mass pad extension 1590. In particular, the upper surface 1591 and lower surface 1592 define planar surfaces that extend substantially parallel relative to the ground plane 10 and the forward surface 1593 extends substantially perpendicular relative to the ground plane 10. The lower surface 1592 can be vertically spaced an offset distance 1594 from the sole return region 1558 such that the mass pad extension 1590 does not interfere with the trough 1578 or the sole weld line 1581 between the composite faceplate 1550 and the body 1501. Therefore, the mass pad extension 1590 shifts the CG as forward and soleward as possible without compromising the structural and functional integrity of the composite faceplate 1550.

In some embodiments, the casing 330 can comprise one or more end reinforcements 326 that dissipate stress within the casing 330. The end reinforcements 326 can be regions of the sole 312 having increased thickness that surround one or more of the casing walls. The end reinforcements 326 are concentrations of club head mass with a substantially greater thickness than the surrounding casing walls. In addition to integrally forming the casing walls, the faceplate 314 can also form the end reinforcement(s) 326, as illustrated in FIG. 13. The high-strength faceplate material combines with the end reinforcement(s) to reduce stress near the casing heel wall 352 or the casing toe wall 354. Further, in some embodiments, the high-strength faceplate material allows the thickness of the end reinforcements to be reduced without exceeding the faceplate material's yield strength, thereby increasing strike face deflection and creating discretionary mass. In the illustrated embodiment, the sole return 316 forms a toe end reinforcement 326 located near the casing toe wall 354. In other embodiments, the sole return 316 can form a heel end reinforcement located near the casing heel wall 352 instead of, or in addition to, the toe end reinforcement 326. Although the end reinforcement(s) 326 are concentrations of club head mass located on the casing walls, their location towards the heel wall 352 and or/the toe wall 354 does not hinder strike face deflection. In the illustrated embodiment, the end reinforcement(s) 326 can be generally circular in shape. In other embodiments, the end reinforcement(s) can be any suitable shape for reducing stress near the heel wall 352 or the toe wall 354.

The end reinforcement(s) can each comprise a thickness (i.e., a heel end reinforcement thickness or a toe end reinforcement thickness) measured from the aperture 340 to the opposing surface of the end reinforcement. As discussed above, the end reinforcement(s) can have substantially larger thicknesses than the remainder of the casing walls. Specifically, in some embodiments, the heel end reinforcement thickness and/or the toe end reinforcement thickness can be at least 50% greater, 75% greater, 100% greater, 150% greater, 200% greater, or 300% greater than the front wall thickness FWT.

In another embodiment, a fairway wood golf club head 2000 comprises a composite faceplate and a top-adjustable or fixed hosel configuration so that the casing/aperture can be longer to increase bending and performance of the casing. As described above, the top-adjustable and fixed hosel configurations remove the need for a lower hosel socket, thereby allowing the lengths of the casing and aperture to increase. A longer aperture increases bending and deflection of the casing experiences, thereby returning more energy back to the strike face to increase ball speed. The golf club head 2000 may comprise either a fixed hosel or a top-adjustable hosel, as desired.

The golf club head 2000 comprises a body 2001 having a crown 2010, a sole 2012, a toe end 2006, a heel end 2004, a rear end 2011, a front 2008, a hosel 2005 defining a hosel axis 2009, and a frame 2013 forming a front 2008 of the body 2001 and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, as illustrated in FIGS. 36 and 37. The frame 2013 further comprises a frame crown 2014 forming a forward portion of the crown 2010, a frame sole 2015 forming a forward portion of the sole 2012, a frame toe end 2017 forming a forward portion of the toe end 2006, and a frame heel end 2016 forming a forward portion of the heel end 2004. The frame 2013 is configured to receive the composite faceplate 2050. The body 2001 lacks a lower hosel socket, and instead includes a top hosel 2005 formed on the heel end 2004 of the crown 2010.

The composite faceplate 2050 is coupled to the body 2001 to form an interior cavity 2007 of the golf club head 2000. The composite faceplate 2050 is formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material. The composite faceplate 2050 having a yield strength that is greater than the body 2001 and frame 2013 yield strength increases the durability and performance of the casing, the strike face, and surrounding transition regions that experience high-stress during impact with a golf ball.

The composite faceplate 2050 comprises a face region 2051 which forms a portion of the strike face 2002 of the front 2008 of the body 2001. The face region 2051 comprises a strike surface 2052 configured to impact a golf ball, a face region toe side 2053 located toe-ward of the strike surface 2052 and bordering the frame toe end 2017, a face region heel side 2054 located heel-ward of the strike surface 2052 and bordering the frame heel end 2016, a face region crown side 2055 located crown-ward of the strike surface 2052 and bordering the frame crown 2014, and a face region sole side 2056 located sole-ward of the strike surface 2052 and defining a sole leading edge 2057.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole return region 2058, formed integral with the face region 2051. The sole return region has a casing 2030 to improve ball speed and spin characteristics. Forming the casing within the sole wall 2059 of the sole return region 2058 and thereby of the high-strength material of the composite faceplate, the casing performance and durability can be further improved over a casing formed within a body and of lower yield strength. The casing 2030 includes a front wall 2032, a rear wall 2039, a toe wall 2036, and a heel wall 2034, wherein the front wall 2032, the rear wall 2039, the toe wall 2036, and the heel wall 2034 define an aperture 2040. The body 2001 does not form any portion of the aperture 2040. Furthermore, the casing heel wall 2034 is heelward of the hosel axis 2009 to increase the effective length of the casing 2030 and aperture 2040.

In this embodiment, the casing comprises a Total Length (TL), measured from the absolute toe point to the absolute heel point, parallel to the x-axis 40, that can be between 2.60 to 4.0 inches. For example, the total length TL can range from 2.60 to 3.0 inches, 3.0 to 3.5 inches, or 3.5 to 4.0 inches. In one embodiment, the total length TL is 2.681 inches.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole transition region 2065, formed integral with the face region 2051 and the sole return region 2058, extending from the sole leading edge 2057 of the face region 2051 to the casing front wall 2032. The sole transition region 2065 can further define an aperture offset distance (OD) as defined above, and measured between the sole leading edge 2057 and the casing front wall 2032. The sole transition region 2065 can improve bending and durability of the composite faceplate and casing by spacing the casing away from the strike surface 2052 and face region 2051.

The composite faceplate 2050 further comprises a peripheral wall 2061, extending around the entirety of the face region 2051, the sole return region 2058, and the sole transition region 2060, and is joined to the frame 2013 of the body 2001. The peripheral wall 2061 comprises a peripheral wall heel section 2062 disposed heelward of casing heel wall 2034 and heelward of the hosel axis 2009. The peripheral wall 2061 further comprises a peripheral wall sole section 2063 disposed between the casing rear wall 2038 and the frame sole 2015, spaced from the casing rear wall 2038 by a sole buffer distance. The sole buffer distance is between 0.05 and 0.25 inch to space the joint of the frame and composite faceplate away from the walls of the casing to improve durability.

In another embodiment, a golf club head 2100 comprises a composite faceplate 2150 that is similar to the composite faceplate 2050 described above, but further comprises a crown return region 2165, as shown in FIGS. 38 and 39. The crown return region 2165 further reinforces a forward portion of the crown 2110 that experience high stress during impact. Specifically, the composite faceplate 2150 comprises a crown return region 2165, formed integral with the face region 2151, the sole return region 2158, and the sole transition region 2160, and includes a crown return crown wall 2166 extending rearwardly of the face region 2151. The crown return region 2165 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region. In this embodiment, the golf club head 2100 lacks a lower hosel socket so that the casing can be longer to increase the flexure and performance of the casing.

The composite faceplate 2150 further comprises a crown transition region 2167, formed integral with the face region 2151, the sole return region 2158, the sole transition region 2160, and the crown return region 2165, extending from a crown leading edge 2168 of the face region 2151 to the crown return crown wall 2166 of the crown return region 2165. As such, the peripheral wall 2161 extends entirely around the face region 2151, the sole return region 2158, the sole transition region 2160, the crown return region 2165, and the crown transition region 2167, and is joined to the frame 2113 of the body 2101. The crown transition region 2167 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region.

In another embodiment, a golf club head comprises a crown return and a long casing formed in a high-strength composite faceplate to increase performance and durability of the golf club head. The golf club head 2200 is similar to club head 2100 described above but further comprises partial heel and toe wraps, similar to club head 1300 described above.

In all embodiments of golf club heads 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 2000, 2100 described above, the front wall of the casing is offset from the leading by a distance of at least 0.075 inch to further increase durability while maintaining performance of the casing. Offsetting the casing front wall away from the strike face allows stress to flow around the leading edge and onto the sole. Furthermore, the stress flows throw high-strength material of the composite faceplate.

In another embodiment, and according to aspects of the present invention, a driver type club head 3000 comprises a composite faceplate 3050 that comprises a sole return that forms the entire casing to increase performance while maintaining durability, as illustrated in FIGS. 40-46. The composite faceplate 3050 has a periphery that is coupled or attached to the body of the club head, also referred to as the frame. In some embodiments the periphery is continuously joined to the frame, such that there are no unattached portions of the composite faceplate 3050. A continuously coupled periphery results in no joints or connections in the walls of the casing that experience deflection during impact with a golf ball. Durability is increased by spacing the joints and connections away from the walls of the casing. In this embodiment, the body has a sole opening to harbor and secure a bottom-adjustable hosel. The sole opening is formed within the body material and not the composite faceplate, as illustrated in FIG. 41. The shape of this region of the hosel and bottom opening can be easily casted with the body of the club head if loft/lie adjustability is desired. As such, the golf club head 3000 comprising a high-strength composite faceplate entirely surrounding the casing increases performances, maintains durability, and provides loft/lie adjustability to the end user.

The golf club head 3000 comprises a body 3001 having a crown 3010, a sole 3012, a toe end 3006, and heel end 3004, a rear end 3011, a front 3008, a hosel 3005, and a frame 3013 forming a front 3008 of the body 3001 and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, as illustrated in FIG. 40. The frame 3013 further comprises a frame crown 3014 forming a forward portion of the crown 3010, a frame sole 3015 forming a forward portion of the sole 3012, a frame toe end 3017 forming a forward portion of the toe end 3006, a frame heel end 3016 forming a forward portion of the heel end 3004, and a lower hosel socket 3018 adjacent the frame sole 3015 and the frame heel end 3016, defining a socket perimeter 3022 having a socket perimeter inboard section 3023 and a socket perimeter outboard section 3024. The frame 3013 is configured to receive the composite faceplate 3050.

The composite faceplate 3050 is coupled to the body 3001 to form an interior cavity 3007 of the golf club head 3000. The composite faceplate 3050 is formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material. The composite faceplate having a yield strength that is greater than the body and frame yield strength increases the durability and performance of the casing, the strike face, and surrounding transition regions that experience high-stress during impact with a golf ball.

The composite faceplate 3050 comprises a face region 3051 which forms a portion of the strike face 3002 and the front 3008 of the body 3001. The face region 3051 comprises a strike surface 3051 configured to impact a golf ball, a face region toe side 3053 located toe-ward of the strike surface 3051 and bordering the frame toe end 3017, a face region heel side 3054 located heel-ward of the strike surface 3051 and bordering the frame heel end 3016, a face region crown side 3055 located crown-ward of the strike surface 3051 and bordering the frame crown 3014, and a face region sole side 3056 located sole-ward of the strike surface 3051 and defining a sole leading edge 3057.

The composite faceplate 3050 further comprises a sole return region 3058, formed integral with the face region 3051. The sole return region has a casing 3030 to improve ball speed and spin characteristics. Forming the casing 3030 within the sole wall 3059 of the sole return region 3058 and thereby of the high-strength material of the composite faceplate 3050, the casing 2020 performance and durability can be further improved over a casing formed within a body and of lower yield strength. The casing 3030 includes a front wall 3032, a rear wall 3039, a toc wall 3036, and a heel wall 3034, wherein the front wall 3032, the rear wall 3039, the toc wall 3036, and the heel wall 3034 define an aperture 3040. The body 3001 does not form any portion of the aperture 3040.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole transition region 3060, formed integral with the face region 3051 and the sole return region 3058, extending from the sole leading edge 3057 of the face region 3051 to the casing front wall 3032. The sole transition region 3060 can further define aperture offset distance (OD) as defined above, and measured between the sole leading edge 3057 and the casing front wall 3032. The sole transition region 3060 can improve bending and durability of the composite faceplate and casing by spacing the casing away from the strike surface 3052 and face region 3051.

The composite faceplate 3050 further comprises a peripheral wall 3061, extending around the entirety of the face region 3051, the sole return region 3058, and the sole transition region 3060, joined to the frame 3013 of the body 3001. The peripheral wall comprises a peripheral wall heel section 3062 disposed between the casing heel wall 3034 and the lower hosel socket of the frame, spaced from both the sole return heel wall and the socket perimeter inboard section by a heel buffer distance. The peripheral wall 3061 further comprises a peripheral wall sole section 3063 disposed between the casing rear wall 3038 and the frame sole 3015, spaced from the casing rear wall 3038 by a sole buffer distance. Both the heel buffer distance and sole buffer distance are between 0.05 and 0.25 inch to space the joint of the frame and composite faceplate away from the walls of the casing to improve durability. In some embodiments, the peripheral wall 3061 is continuously joined to the frame 3013.

In another embodiment, a driver type golf club head 3100 comprises a composite faceplate 3150 that is similar to the composite faceplate 3050 described above, but further comprising a crown return region 3165, as shown in FIG. 47. The crown return region further reinforces a forward portion of the crown 3110 that experience high stress during impact. Specifically, the composite faceplate 3150 comprises a crown return region 3165, formed integral with the face region 3151, the sole return region 3158, and the sole transition region 3160, and includes a crown return crown wall 3166 extending rearwardly of the face region 3151. The crown return region 3165 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region.

The composite faceplate 3150 further comprises a crown transition region 3167, formed integral with the face region 3151, the sole return region 3158, the sole transition region 3160, and the crown return region 3165, extending from a crown leading edge 3168 of the face region 3151 to the crown return crown wall 3166 of the crown return region 3165. As such, the peripheral wall 3161 extends entirely around the face region 3151, the sole return region 3158, the sole transition region 3160, the crown return region 3165, and the crown transition region 3167, and is joined to the frame 3113 of the body 3101. The crown transition region 3167 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region.

The crown return region 3165 extends rearwardly away from the crown leading edge 3168 by at least a distance of 0.075 inch to provide sufficient coverage of high-strength material in the forward portion of the crown. In some embodiments, the crown return region 3165 extends a distance by at least 0.5 inches rearwardly of the crown leading edge 3168.

In another embodiment, a golf club head 3200 further comprises a composite faceplate 3250 that is similar to composite faceplate 3050 described above, but further comprises a lower hosel region 3269, as illustrated in FIGS. 48-50. In this embodiment, a peripheral wall 3261 of the composite faceplate 3250 extends around and fully encompasses a lower hosel socket 3218 and corresponding structure. The peripheral wall 3261 of the composite faceplate 3250 comprises a relatively small thickness and is offset from the lower hosel socket 3218 for case of weldability of the composite faceplate 3250 to the frame 3213. In this embodiment, the composite faceplate 3250 comprising the lower hosel 3214 increases the overall durability of club head 3200 while maintaining adjustability.

Specifically, the composite faceplate 3250 comprises a lower hosel region 3269, formed integrally with the face region 3251, the sole return region 3258, and the sole transition region 3260, and extends between the face region heel side 3254 and the sole return sole wall 3259 of the sole return region 3258. The lower hosel region 3269 includes a lower hosel socket 3218 defining a socket perimeter 3222 having a socket perimeter outboard section 3224 and a socket perimeter inboard section 3223. The lower hosel socket 3218 is monolithically and entirely formed with the composite faceplate 3250 to increase the amount of high-strength material coverage in the club head, particularly in areas that experience high-stress.

The peripheral wall heel section 3262 of the composite faceplate 3250 is disposed between the frame heel end 3216 and the lower hosel socket 3218 of the lower hosel region 3269 and is spaced from the socket perimeter outboard section 3224 by a heel buffer distance. In some embodiments, the heel buffer distance is least 0.025 inch to facilitate certain methods of joining the composite faceplate to the body, such as welding. In other embodiments, the heel buffer distance can be less than 0.025 inches.

Furthermore, by forming the lower hosel socket 3218 integrally with the composite faceplate 3250, the casing 3230 can positioned closer to lower hosel socket 3218, thereby extending the effective length of the casing 3230 to increase bending and deflection. Because the peripheral wall heel section 3262 does not lie between the socket perimeter inboard section 3223 and the casing heel wall 3234, the buffer distance does not exist within the region between the hosel and the casing. As such, the length of the casing can be longer to increase the performance of the casing.

In another embodiment, a driver type golf club head 4000 comprises a composite faceplate 4050 and a top-adjustable or fixed hosel configuration so that the casing/aperture can be longer to increase bending and performance of the casing. As described above, the top-adjustable and fixed hosel configurations remove the need for a lower hosel socket, thereby allowing the lengths of the casing and aperture to be increased. A longer aperture increases bending and deflection of the casing, thereby returning more energy back to the strike face to increase ball speed. The golf club head 4000 may comprise either a fixed hosel or a top-adjustable hosel, as desired.

The golf club head 4000 comprises a body 4001 having a crown 4010, a sole 4012, a toe end 4006, a heel end 4004, a rear end 4011, a front 4008, a hosel 4005 defining a hosel axis 4009, and a frame 4013 forming a front 4008 of the body 4001 and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, as illustrated in FIG. 52. The frame 4013 further comprises a frame crown 4014 forming a forward portion of the crown 4010, a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole 4012, a frame toe end 4017 forming a forward portion of the toe end 4006, and a frame heel end 4016 forming a forward portion of the heel end 4004. The frame 4013 is configured to receive the composite faceplate 4050. The body 4001 lacks a lower hosel socket and instead includes a top hosel formed on the heel end of the crown 4010.

The composite faceplate 4050 is coupled to the body 4001 to form an interior cavity 4007 of the golf club head 4000. The composite faceplate 4050 is formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material. The composite faceplate 4050 having a yield strength that is greater than the body 4001 and frame 4013 yield strength increases the durability and performance of the casing, the strike face, and surrounding transition regions that experience high-stress during impact with a golf ball.

The composite faceplate 4050 comprises a face region 4051 which forms a portion of the strike face 4002 at the front 4008 of the body 4001. The face region 4051 comprises a strike surface 4052 configured to impact a golf ball, a face region toe side 4053 located toe-ward of the strike surface 4052 and bordering the frame toe end 4017, a face region heel side 4054 located heel-ward of the strike surface 4052 and bordering the frame heel end 4016, a face region crown side 4055 located crown-ward of the strike surface 4052 and bordering the frame crown 4014, and a face region sole side 4056 located sole-ward of the strike surface 4052 and defining a sole leading edge 4057.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole return region 4058, formed integral with the face region 4051. The sole return region has a casing 4030 to improve ball speed and spin characteristics. Forming the casing within the sole wall 4059 or the sole return region 4058 and thereby of the high-strength material of the composite faceplate, the casing performance and durability can be further improved over a casing formed within a body and of lower yield strength. The casing 4030 includes a front wall 4032, a rear wall 4039, a toe wall 4036, and a heel wall 4034, wherein the front wall 4032, the rear wall 4039, the toe wall 4036, and the heel wall 4034 define an aperture 4040. The body 4001 does not form any portion of the aperture 4040. Furthermore, the casing heel wall 4034 is heelward of the hosel axis 4009 to increase the effective length of the casing 4030 and aperture 4040.

The composite faceplate further comprises a sole transition region 4065, formed integral with the face region 4051 and the sole return region 4058, extending from the sole leading edge 4057 of the face region 4051 to the casing front wall 4032. The sole transition region 4065 can further define an aperture offset distance (OD) as defined above, and measured between the sole leading edge 4057 and the casing front wall 4032. The sole transition region 4065 can improve bending and durability of the composite faceplate and casing by spacing the casing away from the strike surface 4052 and face region 4051.

The composite faceplate 4050 further comprises a peripheral wall 4061, extending around the entirety of the face region 4051, the sole return region 4058, and the sole transition region 4060, and is joined to the frame 4013 of the body 4001. The peripheral wall 4061 comprises a peripheral wall heel section 4062 disposed heelward of casing heel wall 4034 and heelward of the hosel axis 4009. The peripheral wall 4061 further comprises a peripheral wall sole section 4063 disposed between the casing rear wall 4038 and the frame sole 4015, spaced from the casing rear wall 4038 by a sole buffer distance. The sole buffer distance is between 0.05 and 0.25 inch to space the joint of the frame and composite faceplate away from the walls of the casing to improve durability.

In this embodiment, the casing comprises a Total Length (TL), measured from the absolute toe point to the absolute heel point, parallel to the x-axis 40, that can be between 2.60 to 4.0 inches. For example, the total length TL can range from 2.60 to 3.0 inches, 3.0 to 3.5 inches, or 3.5 to 4.0 inches. In one embodiment, the total length TL is 2.65 inches.

In another embodiment, a golf club head 4100 comprises a composite faceplate 4150 that is similar to the composite faceplate 4050 described above, but further comprises a crown return region 4165, as shown in FIG. 54. The crown return region 4165 further reinforces a forward portion of the crown 4110 that experience high stress during impact. Specifically, the composite faceplate 4150 comprises a crown return region 4165, formed integral with the face region 4151, the sole return region 4158, and the sole transition region 4160, and includes a crown return crown wall 4166 extending rearwardly of the face region 4151. The crown return region 4165 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region. In this embodiment, the golf club head 4100 lacks a lower hosel socket so that the casing can be longer to increase the flexure and performance of the casing.

The composite faceplate 4150 further comprises a crown transition region 4167, formed integral with the face region 4151, the sole return region 4158, the sole transition region 4160, and the crown return region 4165, extending from a crown leading edge 4168 of the face region 4151 to the crown return crown wall 4166 of the crown return region 4165. As such, the peripheral wall 4161 extends entirely around the face region 4151, the sole return region 4158, the sole transition region 4160, the crown return region 4165, and the crown transition region 4167, and is joined to the frame 4113 of the body 4101. The crown transition region 4167 is formed by the same high-strength material as the composite faceplate that has a higher yield strength than the frame to further increase durability and performance of the crown region.

In some embodiments, the crown return region 4165 may comprise turbulators 4172 to decrease the drag of the driver-type golf club head. The turbulators 4172 are formed integral with the composite faceplate 4150 and therefore are formed in a forward portion of the crown. In some embodiments, there can be additional turbulators formed on the body. In some embodiments, the crown return region 4165 of the composite faceplate 4150 comprises at least 2 turbulators 4172.

V. Method of forming Impact Response Modulator with High-Strength Material

Any of the above embodiments of the composite faceplate can be formed through one or more methods, such as forming. In other embodiments, the composite faceplate may be forged into a rough shape and then bent to a final geometry. Still further, the composite faceplate may be casted or formed through additive manufacturing.

In some embodiments, the faceplate that integrally forms the casing can be manufactured via a multi-stage forging process. FIG. 56 illustrates a process flow diagram of said multi-stage forging process 5000 suitable for forming a monolithic faceplate with an integral casing. Referring to block 5100, a solid block billet of faceplate material is rough forged. The solid block billet can comprise any suitable faceplate material described herein, including C300 steel and T9s+ titanium.

Referring to block 5200, the solid block billet is initially forged into an intermediate composite faceplate 519. The solid block billet can be heated to a desired forging temperature, and a forging pressure can be applied to shape the malleable billet into the intermediate composite faceplate 519. In some embodiments, the forging temperature can be between 700° C. and 1100° C. In some embodiments, the forging pressure can be between 500 tons and 800 tons. The intermediate composite faceplate 519, illustrated in FIG. 57, comprises a strike surface 552, a sole return region 558, and a sole transition region 560 therebetween. The strike surface 552 can be substantially flat such that the bottom surfaces of the strike surface 552, the sole return region 558, and the sole transition region 560 are all substantially coplanar. The desired casing wall geometries for both the front wall 532 and the rear wall 542 can be formed into the sole return region 558 during this initial forging step. As illustrated in FIG. 57, the initial forging step does not form an aperture entirely through the sole return region 558. After the initial forging step, the space between the intermediate composite faceplate slit walls can be occupied by billet material.

Next, referring to block 5300, the billet material between the front wall 532 and the rear wall 542 is machined away to form an aperture 540. In some embodiments, a one-step process can be used to form by fully machining the aperture 540 through the sole return region 558. In other embodiments, the aperture 540 can be formed through a two-step process comprising an aperture machining step followed by an aperture precision forging step. In such embodiments, the aperture machining step creates a pilot recess that extends only partially through the sole return region 558. The aperture precision forging step can thereafter press through the pilot recess, forming the final, desired aperture geometry by pressing all the way through the sole return region 558.

Referring to block 5400, the desired strike face geometry can be formed. In some embodiments, as illustrated in FIG. 58, a Variable Face Thickness (VFT) geometry 590 (described in further detail below) can be formed into the strike surface 552. In some embodiments, the VFT geometry 590 can be machined into the strike surface 552. In other embodiments, the VFT geometry 590 can be precision forged into the strike surface 552. In some embodiments, the VFT geometry 502 can be formed into the strike surface 552 via a combination of machining and precision forging. In such cases, a VFT machining step can initially form the general shape of the VFT geometry 502, and subsequently, a VFT precision forging step can clean up any imperfections or machining marks, thereby creating a more precise VFT geometry.

Similarly, the geometry of the transition component can be formed by machining, precision forging, or a combination thereof. The sole transition region 560 can be formed to a specific desired thickness to balance strike face deflection with durability. In some embodiments, the transition component thickness can be substantially uniform. In other embodiments, the transition component thickness can vary such that a central portion of the sole transition region 560 comprises a greater thickness than the transition component thickness proximate the heel and toe. In such embodiments, the increased thickness near the center of the transition portion 503 can reinforce the casing front wall 532 and improve durability without sacrificing strike face deflection.

Referring to block 5500, the intermediate composite faceplate 519 is forged into its ultimate configuration via a bending precision forging step. In some embodiments, prior to the bending precision forging step, a die 547 can be placed into the aperture 540 to prevent the aperture 540 from collapsing during bending, as illustrated in FIG. 59. The bending precision forging step can occur at a similar or different forging temperature and forming pressure within the ranges described in relation to block 5200. During the bending precision forging step, the intermediate composite faceplate is bent about the sole transition region 560. The strike surface 552 can be bent upwards relative to the sole return region 558 to match the desired loft angle for the finished faceplate. This bending precision forging step creates a monolithic composite faceplate 550 that integrally forms the casing 530, as illustrated in FIG. 60.

The multi-stage forging process described above can be especially useful in manufacturing faceplates with integral sole returns forming the casing, but without additional returns such as a crown return, a toe return, or a heel return. This configuration simplifies manufacturing, as only a single bending precision forging step is required to bend the strike surface 552 relative to the sole return region 558. In other embodiments, the multi-stage forging process can be used to manufacture a faceplate integrally forming the entire casing and also including a crown return, sole return, toe return, or any combination thereof. In such embodiments, the multi-stage forging process can include multiple bending precision forging steps to bend the various returns relative to the strike face component.

In alternative embodiments, the composite faceplate and casing can be manufactured via a multi-stage forming process 6000, as illustrated in the process flow diagram of FIG. 61. The multi-stage forming process differs from the previously described multi-stage forging process in that the process begins with rough forging a sheet material instead of a solid block billet. The forming process facilitated the creation of complex geometries and thin-walled structures. Similar to the solid block billet described above, the sheet material can comprise a suitable faceplate material, including C300 steel and T9s+ titanium.

As referenced in block 6100, the sheet material is rough forged to redistribute material and selectively increase thickness in designated regions of the sheet. In particular, the sheet material can be heated to a desired rough forging temperature to allow the sheet material to become sufficiently malleable. In some embodiments, the rough forging temperature can be between 700° C. and 1100° C. Upon heating, a rough forging pressure can be applied to the sheet material to locally thicken or thin designated regions of the sheet to meet specific structural or functional requirements. In some embodiments, the rough forging pressure can be between 800 tons and 1200 tons.

Following rough forging, a detailed forging step, as shown in block 6200, is carried out to refine the geometry and surface features of the metal sheet. Similar to the rough forging step, the sheet material can be heated to a desired detailed forging temperature, and a detailed forging pressure can be applied to shape the malleable sheet material. In some embodiments, the rough forging temperature can be between 700° C. and 1100° C. and the rough forging pressure can be between 800 and 1200 tons. By refining the geometry and surface features, the detailed forging step ensures precise dimensional tolerances and localized thickness variations necessary to optimize the sheet for the subsequent forming process, described in greater detail below.

Once detail forging is complete, the sheet material is formed into a substantially flat intermediate composite faceplate 619 comprising specific strike face and sole geometries, as referenced in block 6300. For example, the sheet material can undergo any suitable forming process to define a strike surface 652 and a sole return region 658, as illustrated in FIG. 62. More specifically, the forming process configures the sole return region 658 to include the casing comprising a defined front wall 632 and rear wall 642. The forming process additionally defines a sole transition region 660 positioned between the strike surface 652 and the casing front wall 632, thereby separating the strike surface 652 and the casing. Further, the sole transition region 660 functions as a designated bending surface in a subsequent forming process, described in greater detail below. In exemplary embodiments, the forming step does not form an aperture entirely through the sole return region 658. Upon completion of the forming step, the space between the front wall 632 and rear wall 642 of the casing can be occupied by sheet material.

Similar to the previous forging steps, a forming pressure can be applied to shape the components of the intermediate composite faceplate 619. In some embodiments, the forming pressure can be between 100 and 500 tons. In some embodiments, the forming pressure can be applied by stamping, embossing, or otherwise forming the intermediate composite faceplate 619. In even further embodiments, the components are machined into the intermediate composite faceplate 619.

Thereafter, the intermediate composite faceplate 619 undergoes a controlled bending process along the sole transition region 660, as shown in block 6400, establishing the intended strike surface 652 and sole return region 658 configurations for final assembly. In particular, the strike surface 652 can be bent upwards relative to the sole return region 658 to match the desired loft angle for the finished faceplate. This controlled bending process creates a monolithic composite faceplate 650 that integrally forms the casing 630, as illustrated in FIG. 63.

In the final step of the multi-step forming process, an aperture 640 is machined into the casing 630 of the sole return region 658. In some embodiments, the aperture 640 can be fully machined through the sole return region 658. In other embodiments, the aperture 640 can be formed through a two-step process comprising an aperture machining step followed by an aperture precision forging step. In some embodiments, the aperture machining step creates a pilot recess that extends only partially through the sole return component. The aperture precision forging step can thereafter press through the pilot recess and form the remainder of the aperture 640 all the way through the sole return region 658.

The composite faceplate created with any of the above methods of manufacturing can be attached, fused, or joined to the club head body through various means. In one example, the composite faceplate can be welded to the body. The body has a frame with complementary geometry to the composite faceplate so that the periphery of the composite faceplate is continuously or intermittently welded to the body. Accordingly, the casing remains completely surrounded by high-strength material without any joints/connections located near the walls of the casing. In other embodiments, the composite faceplate can be adhesively, mechanically, removably, or co-casted to club head body. Still further, multiple different joining methods may be used on different sections of the peripheral wall.

CLAUSES

Clause 1. A golf club head comprising: a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; a lower hosel socket, adjacent the frame sole and the frame heel end; a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club head, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a casing including: a front wall, the front wall including a front wall front surface, a front wall rear surface, a front wall base, and a front wall top surface; a rear wall, the rear wall including a rear wall front surface, a rear wall rear surface, a rear wall base, and a rear wall top surface; a toe wall; and a heel wall, wherein the front wall, the rear wall, the toe wall, and the heel wall define an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, continuously joined to the frame of the body.

Clause 2. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the first yield strength of the frame is less than 150 ksi.

Clause 3. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the second yield strength of the composite faceplate is greater than 195 ksi.

Clause 4. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the frame material is formed from 17-4 stainless steel.

Clause 5. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the composite faceplate material is formed from c300 maraging steel.

Clause 6. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein a ratio of the second yield strength to the first yield strength is at least 1.5.

Clause 7. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the peripheral wall further comprises a peripheral wall sole section, disposed between the rear wall of the casing and the frame sole, spaced from the rear wall of the casing by a sole buffer distance of at least 0.10 inch.

Clause 8. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein an insert is disposed within the aperture.

Clause 9. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the front wall of the casing is offset from the sole leading edge by a distance of at least 0.25 inch.

Clause 10. The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the peripheral wall further comprises a peripheral heel section, disposed between the lower hosel socket and the heel wall of the casing.

Clause 11. A golf club head comprising: a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; and a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a casing including: a front wall, the front wall including a front wall front surface, a front wall rear surface, a front wall base, and a front wall top surface; a rear wall, the rear wall including a rear wall front surface, a rear wall rear surface, a rear wall base, and a rear wall top surface; a toe wall; and a heel wall, wherein the front wall, the rear wall, the toe wall, and the heel wall define an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region; a lower hosel region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, extending between the face region heel side and the sole return sole wall of the sole return region, the lower hosel region including a lower hosel socket defining a socket perimeter having an socket perimeter outboard section; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region and is continuously joined to the frame of the body.

Clause 12. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the peripheral wall further comprises a peripheral wall heel section, disposed between the frame heel end and the lower hosel socket of the lower hosel region, spaced from the socket perimeter outboard section by a heel buffer distance of at least 0.075 inch.

Clause 13. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the first yield strength of the frame is less than 150 ksi.

Clause 14. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the second yield strength of the composite faceplate is greater than 195 ksi.

Clause 15. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the frame material is formed from 17-4 stainless steel.

Clause 16. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the composite faceplate material is formed from c300 maraging steel.

Clause 17. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein a ratio of the second yield strength to the first yield strength is at least 1.5.

Clause 18. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein an insert is disposed within the aperture.

Clause 19. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the front wall of the casing is offset from the sole leading edge by a distance of at least 0.25 inch.

Clause 20. The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the composite faceplate further comprises: a toe wrap region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region, extending rearward of the face region toe side; and a heel wrap region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region, extending rearward of the face region heel side.

Clause 21. A golf club head, comprising: a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; and a lower hosel socket, adjacent the frame sole and the frame heel end, defining a socket perimeter having a socket perimeter inboard section; and a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; and a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a sole return sole wall extending rearward of the face region; a sole return toc wall, extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a toe side of the sole return region; a sole return heel wall opposite the sole return toe wall and extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a heel side of the sole return region; a sole return front wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the face region, and connecting between the sole return toe wall and the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall comprising: a front wall forward surface; a front wall rearward surface spaced rearward of the front wall forward surface; a front wall base; and a front wall top surface spaced above the front wall base; wherein the front wall rearward surface defines a rearward surface midpoint, equidistant from the sole return toe wall and the sole return heel wall; a sole return rear wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the sole return front wall, and connecting between the sole return toe wall and the sole return rear wall, the sole return rear wall comprising: a rear wall forward surface spaced from and facing the front wall rearward surface; a rear wall rear surface spaced rearward of the rear wall forward surface; a rear wall base; and a rear wall top surface spaced above the rear wall base; wherein the sole return toe wall, the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall, and the sole return rear wall border an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region, the sole transition region defining an aperture distance between the sole leading edge of the face region and the rearward surface midpoint, measured in an imaginary vertical plane passing through the rearward surface midpoint and perpendicular to both the strike surface and a ground surface; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, continuously joined to the frame of the body, the peripheral wall comprising: a peripheral wall heel section, disposed between the sole return heel wall and the lower hosel socket of the frame, spaced from both the sole return heel wall and the socket perimeter inboard section by a heel buffer distance; and a peripheral wall sole section disposed between the sole return rear wall and the frame sole, spaced from the sole return rear wall by a sole buffer distance.

Clause 22. A golf club head, comprising: a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; and a lower hosel socket, adjacent the frame sole and the frame heel end, defining a socket perimeter having a socket perimeter inboard section; and a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and defining a crown leading edge; and a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a sole return sole wall extending rearward of the face region; a sole return toe wall, extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a toe side of the sole return region; a sole return heel wall opposite the sole return toe wall and extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a heel side of the sole return region; a sole return front wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the face region, and connecting between the sole return toe wall and the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall comprising: a front wall forward surface; a front wall rearward surface spaced rearward of the front wall forward surface; a front wall base; and a front wall top surface spaced above the front wall base; wherein the front wall rearward surface defines a rearward surface midpoint, equidistant from the sole return toc wall and the sole return heel wall; a sole return rear wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the sole return front wall, and connecting between the sole return toc wall and the sole return rear wall, the sole return rear wall comprising: a rear wall forward surface spaced from and facing the front wall rearward surface; a rear wall rear surface spaced rearward of the rear wall forward surface; a rear wall base; and a rear wall top surface spaced above the rear wall base; wherein the sole return toc wall, the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall, and the sole return rear wall border an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region, the sole transition region defining an aperture distance between the sole leading edge of the face region and the rearward surface midpoint, measured in an imaginary vertical plane passing through the rearward surface midpoint and perpendicular to both the strike surface and a ground surface; a crown return region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, including a crown return crown wall extending rearwardly of the face region; a crown transition region, formed integral with the face region, the sole region, the sole transition region, and the crown return region, extending from the crown leading edge of the face region to the crown return crown wall of the crown return region; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, the crown return region, and the crown transition region, continuously joined to the frame of the body, the peripheral wall comprising: a peripheral wall heel section, disposed between the sole return heel wall and the lower hosel socket of the frame, spaced from both the sole return heel wall and the socket perimeter inboard section by a heel buffer distance; and a peripheral wall sole section, disposed between the sole return rear wall and the frame sole, spaced from the sole return rear wall by a sole buffer distance.

Clause 23. A golf club head, comprising: a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; and a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; and a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a sole return sole wall extending rearward of the face region; a sole return toe wall, extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a toe side of the sole return region; a sole return heel wall opposite the sole return toe wall and extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a heel side of the sole return region; a sole return front wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the face region, and connecting between the sole return toe wall and the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall comprising: a front wall forward surface; a front wall rearward surface spaced rearward of the front wall forward surface; a front wall base; and a front wall top surface spaced above the front wall base; wherein the front wall rearward surface defines a rearward surface midpoint, equidistant from the sole return toe wall and the sole return heel wall; a sole return rear wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the sole return front wall, and connecting between the sole return toe wall and the sole return rear wall, the sole return rear wall comprising: a rear wall forward surface spaced from and facing the front wall rearward surface; a rear wall rear surface spaced rearward of the rear wall forward surface; a rear wall base; and a rear wall top surface spaced above the rear wall base; wherein the sole return toe wall, the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall, and the sole return rear wall border an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region, the sole transition region defining an aperture distance between the sole leading edge of the face region and the rearward surface midpoint, measured in an imaginary vertical plane passing through the rearward surface midpoint and perpendicular to both the strike surface and a ground surface; a lower hosel region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, extending between the face region heel side and the sole return sole wall of the sole return region, the lower hosel region including a lower hosel socket defining a socket perimeter having a socket perimeter outboard section; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region, continuously joined to the frame of the body, the peripheral wall comprising: a peripheral wall heel section, disposed between the frame heel end and the lower hosel socket of the lower hosel region, spaced from the socket perimeter outboard section by a heel buffer distance; and a peripheral wall sole section, disposed between the sole return rear wall and the frame sole, spaced from the sole return rear wall by a sole buffer distance.

Clause 24. A golf club head, comprising: a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; and a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; and a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a sole return sole wall extending rearward of the face region; a sole return toe wall, extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a toe side of the sole return region; a sole return heel wall opposite the sole return toc wall and extending upward from the sole return sole wall at a heel side of the sole return region; a sole return front wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the face region, and connecting between the sole return toc wall and the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall comprising: a front wall forward surface; a front wall rearward surface spaced rearward of the front wall forward surface; a front wall base; and a front wall top surface spaced above the front wall base; wherein the front wall rearward surface defines a rearward surface midpoint, equidistant from the sole return toe wall and the sole return heel wall; a sole return rear wall extending upward from the sole return sole wall, spaced rearward of the sole return front wall, and connecting between the sole return toe wall and the sole return rear wall, the sole return rear wall comprising: a rear wall forward surface spaced from and facing the front wall rearward surface; a rear wall rear surface spaced rearward of the rear wall forward surface; a rear wall base; and a rear wall top surface spaced above the rear wall base; wherein the sole return toe wall, the sole return heel wall, the sole return front wall, and the sole return rear wall border an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region, the sole transition region defining an aperture distance between the sole leading edge of the face region and the rearward surface midpoint, measured in an imaginary vertical plane passing through the rearward surface midpoint and perpendicular to both the strike surface and a ground surface; a lower hosel region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, disposed between the face region heel side and the sole return sole wall of the sole return region, the lower hosel region including a lower hosel socket defining a socket perimeter having a socket perimeter outboard section; a toe wrap region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region, extending rearward of the face region toe side; a heel wrap region, formed integral with the face region, the sole region, the sole transition region, the lower hosel region, and the toe wrap region, extending rearward of the face region heel side; a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, the lower hosel region, the toe wrap region, and the heel wrap region, continuously joined to the frame of the body, the peripheral wall comprising: a peripheral wall heel section, disposed between the frame heel end and the lower hosel socket of the lower hosel region, spaced from the socket perimeter outboard section by a heel buffer distance; and a peripheral wall sole section, disposed between the sole return rear wall and the frame sole, spaced from the sole return rear wall by a sole buffer distance.

EXAMPLES A. Example 1—Ball Flight Performance of Golf Club Head with IRM

The ball flight performance characteristics of an exemplary fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator (IRM) were compared to those of a control club head without an IRM. The exemplary club head comprised a reverse L-cup faceplate with a crown return, but no sole return. The exemplary IRM included a casing formed by the body. The casing included a toe relief and formed an aperture that received a polymeric insert. The control club head was substantially similar to the exemplary club head but was devoid of an Impact Response Modulator entirely.

The exemplary and control club heads were used by golfers and shots were studied for various ball flight characteristics, including ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate. The player test involved 19 golfers hitting a representative number of golf shots with the exemplary club head and the control club head. The ball flight results of the player test are displayed in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 Player Test Ball Flight Characteristics Launch Carry Ball Speed Angle Spin Rate Distance Club Head (mph) (degrees) (rpm) (yards) Exemplary 155.5 10.4 3547 252.1 Control 154.5 10.3 3911 248.7

As displayed in Table 1 above, the exemplary club head exhibited an increase in ball speed of 1.0 mph and a decrease in spin rate of 364 rpm in comparison to the control club head, with a similar launch angle. The decreased spin rate created a more piercing ball flight that cuts through the air and travels further. These improved ball flight characteristics increased carry distance by 3.4 yards on average.

In addition to the performance results obtained through player testing, robotic testing was used to compare ball flight characteristics between the exemplary club head and the control club head. A robotic swing apparatus tested both club heads by hitting golf balls at various locations along the strike face, including the face center (FC), and three “low” locations respectively located at 0.1 inch, 0.2 inch, and 0.3 inch below the face center (FC). Table 3 displays the results of the robotic testing at each location, as well as the averages over all locations.

TABLE 2 Robotic Testing Ball Flight Characteristics Ball Speed Spin Rate Carry Distance Club Head Location (mph) (rpm) (yards) Exemplary Face Center 151.9 3203 249.0 0.1 inch low 151.6 3383 244.0 0.2 inch low 150.6 3265 235.4 0.3 inch low 150.7 3070 221.3 Average 151.2 3230 237.4 Control Face Center 150.5 3714 240.0 0.1 inch low 149.8 3916 237.7 0.2 inch low 149.4 3835 231.3 0.3 inch low 149.8 3543 220.2 Average 149.9 3752 232.3

At the face center (FC), the exemplary club head exhibited an increase in ball speed of 1.4 mph and a decrease in spin of 511 rpm over the control club head. It was further observed that the ball impacts of the exemplary club head over the control club head created a more piercing ball flight that cut through the air and traveled further. These improvements resulted in an increase in carry distance of 9.0 yards. On average across all locations, the exemplary club head exhibited an increase in ball speed of 1.3 mph and a decrease in spin of 522 rpm in comparison to the control club head, resulting in an increase in carry distance of 5.1 yards. Overall, results of both the player test and the robotic test illustrate the benefits of the IRM. The comparative tests illustrate the general efficacy of the IRM in comparison to a club head without an IRM. In particular, the IRM allowed the sole to bend at impact, thereby increasing strike face deflection and delofting the strike face. As such, the exemplary club head exhibited improved ball speed, spin rate, and distance in comparison to the control club head devoid of the IRM. As discussed above, performance can be further improved through high-strength reinforcement of the casing.

B. Example 2—Ball Flight Performance of IRM with High-Strength Material Reinforcement

The example below explored an Impact Response Modulator with a casing reinforced by high-strength material. The ball flight performance characteristics of an exemplary fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator with a casing reinforced by high-strength material were compared to those of a control fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator with a casing formed by the body material. The exemplary club head comprised a high-strength faceplate and a separately formed high-strength component located on the sole and forming the Impact Response Modulator and entire casing, which allowed for reduced casing wall heights and decreased offset distance between the casing front wall and the strike face while maintaining durability. In particular, the high-strength faceplate and high-strength sole casing were formed of C300 steel, comprising a material yield strength of 255 ksi. The control club head comprised an Impact Response Modulator with a casing formed by body material, which required increased casing wall heights and a greater offset distance to maintain structural integrity. The control club head body, Impact Response Modulator, and casing comprised a 17-4 steel material, comprising a lower material strength of 150 ksi. The control club head had a front wall height FWH of 0.274 inch, whereas the exemplary club head had a reduced front wall height FWH of 0.192 inch due to the high-strength material reinforcement. The offset distance OD from the casing front wall to the strike face in the control club head was 0.24 inch, whereas the exemplary club head had a reduced offset distance OD of 0.177 inch. The reduced front wall height FWH and offset distance OD each increase the amount the casing bends at impact, thereby increasing strike face deflection.

The exemplary and control club heads were used by golfers and shots were studied for various ball flight characteristics, including ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate, via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations. The analysis simulated center strikes at 115 mph club head speed. The results are displayed in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3 Ball Flight Characteristics Launch Ball Speed Angle Spin Rate Club Head (mph) (degrees) (rpm) Exemplary 144.7 11.55 2532 Control 141.5 11.4 2919

As displayed in Table 3 above, the exemplary club head exhibited an increase in ball speed of 3.2 mph, a decrease in spin rate of 387 rpm, and similar launch angle. The high-strength IRM component allowed the casing walls to be shortened and moved closer to the strike face, thereby increasing strike face deflection. Although the casing was not integrally formed with the faceplate, the example demonstrates that reinforcing the casing with a high-strength component results in measurable performance benefits, including an increased ball speed and reduced spin rate. Physical testing (i.e., player testing and robotic testing) will be conducted on prototypes corresponding to the embodiments described herein, which include forged and formed faceplates having sole returns that integrally form the entire casing. Similar ball speed and spin rate improvements are expected for the exemplary club head.

C. Example 3—Durability Performance of Golf Club Head Comprising IRM Spaced Rearwardly from Strike Face

The durability performance characteristics of an exemplary fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator spaced rearwardly from the strike face were compared to those of a control fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator positioned directly adjacent to the strike face of the club head. The exemplary club head, as shown in FIGS. 74-76, comprised a forged or formed C300 steel composite faceplate 7050, including a strike surface 7052 and a sole return region 7058 that integrally formed the entire casing 7030 and a formed slot. Specifically, the exemplary casing 7030 included a front wall 7032 positioned proximate the strike surface 7052 and sole transition region 7060 yet separated an offset distance OD therefrom. In turn, the combination of the strike surface 7052, sole transition region 7060, and front wall 7032 comprised a U-shaped sole return region 7058 when viewed in cross-section. The offset distance OD defined between the front wall 7032 and the sole transition region 7060 is 0.090 in. The control club head, as shown in FIGS. 77-79, also included a forged or formed C300 steel composite faceplate 8050 comprising a sole transition region 8060 that integrally formed the entire casing 8030. However, the casing 8030 was devoid of sole return region and a front wall. Instead, the aperture 8040 was positioned directly adjacent to the rear of the strike surface 8052 and sole transition region 8060, thereby defining an offset distance OD of 0.001 in.

Durability characteristics in the strike surface and club head body, including maximum structural stress values, were determined via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations. The analysis simulated center strikes at 115 mph club head speed. The material stress yield limits and results are displayed in Table 4 below.

TABLE 4 Durability Characteristics Yield of Composite Yield of Composite faceplate Body faceplate Material Material Peak Stress Body Peak Club Head (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) Stress (ksi) Exemplary 255 150 258 131 Control 255 150 271 158

As displayed in Table 4 above, both the exemplary and control club heads exhibited equivalent faceplate peak stress values approaching and surpassing the C300 stress yield limit of 255 ksi. However, as shown in FIGS. 74 and 75, the maximum stress region 7090 of the exemplary club head is only present in the casing heel wall 7034. In particular, a maximum stress region defines any region that exhibits stress levels at or above the material stress yield limit. Because the maximum stress region 7090 is only present in the casing heel wall 7034, only a small area of the casing 7030 is subject to high stresses at impact. Further, the specific heel wall maximum stress region 7090 of the exemplary golf club head is subject to stress under compression. Due to the structure and characteristics of C300 steel, the material can withstand repeated high levels of stress under compression without risks of crack propagation and/or buckling over time. On the other hand, the control club head exhibited multiple maximum stress regions 8090 dispersed over large areas of the strike face 8002, casing heel 8034, and toe walls 8036, as shown in FIGS. 77 and 78. Such areas of the integrated component 8050 and casing 8030 are subject to stress under tension at impact. While strong under compressive stresses, C300 steel is weaker and will fracture over time when exposed to repeated high levels of stress under tension over multiple, larger areas of the club head.

Additionally, Table 4 displays that the exemplary club head exhibited a decrease in club head body peak stress of 27 ksi compared to the control club head. Because the club head body peak stress is less than the body material stress yield, the exemplary club head does not comprise maximum stress regions within the club head body, as shown in FIG. 76. On the other hand, the control club head exhibits multiple maximum stress regions 8090 dispersed over large areas of the crown 8010 and sole 8012, as shown in FIG. 79. As described above, such areas of the control club head body are subject to stress under tension upon impacting a golf ball and thus, will fracture over time when exposed to repeated high levels of stress under tension. Therefore, this data demonstrates that spacing the casing matters for stress management. An offset distance OD of 0.090 in. from the sole transition region via the sole return region 7058 (as demonstrated by the exemplary club head) results in measurable durability benefits in the composite faceplate and club head body in comparison to a casing with an offset distance OD of only 0.001 in. from the sole transition region.

D. Example 4—Durability Performance of IRM with High-Strength Material Reinforcement

The durability performance characteristics of an exemplary fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator with a casing reinforced by high-strength material were compared to those of a control club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator with a casing formed by the body material that was a lesser strength than the casing of the exemplary fairway-wood type club head. Both the exemplary and control club heads comprised casings with equivalent lengths and depths. The two club heads differed, however, because the exemplary club head comprised a forged C300 steel casing, having a tensile yield strength of 255 ksi, and the control club head comprised a casing formed by the casted 17-4 steel body material, having a tensile yield strength of 150 ksi. Because the exemplary club head casing was formed of the higher strength C300 steel material, the exemplary club head casing additionally incorporated a reduced casing front wall height (FWH) and a decreased offset distance (OD) between the casing front wall and the strike face. In particular, the control club head had a front wall height FWH of 0.300 inch, whereas the exemplary club head had a reduced front wall height FWH of 0.211 inch due to the high-strength material reinforcement. Further, the offset distance OD from the casing front wall to the strike face in the control club head was 0.150 inch, whereas the exemplary club head had a reduced offset distance OD of 0.090 inch. A reduction in front wall and sole return region surface area limits the amount of material that can disperse impact stresses. As such, the reduced front wall height FWH and offset distance OD each allow for increased strike face deflection but also contribute to decreased Impact Response Modulator and golf club head durability.

Impact Response Modulator and club head body durability were determined via an air cannon test. For this test, golf balls repeatedly impacted the strike face until the golf club head exhibited signs of damage, such as cracks in the strike face, cracks in the sole, or other club head deformities. An increased impact speed was imparted onto the exemplary vs. control clubs. More specifically, the golf ball impacted the strike face at 115 miles per hour for the first 2000 shots, 125 miles per hour for shots 2001-2500, 135 miles per hour for shots 2501-3000, and 145 miles per hour for shots 3001-3500. Despite having a reduced front wall height (FWH) and offset distance (OD), the high-strength C300 steel casing (255 ksi) of the exemplary club head exhibited greater durability performance in comparison to the 17-4 steel body material casing (150 ksi) of the control club head. In particular, the control club head exhibited sole cracks after 2798 impacts. The exemplary club head, however, showed no sign of club head body damage until the 3377th impact. Because of the graduated increased of ball speed mph over a larger number of hits, the exemplary club strike face was impacted with 10 mph of greater speed than the control club strike face (at failure). As proven by the durability testing results, reinforcing the Impact Response Modulator casing with a high-strength material, such as C300 steel, provided the Impact Response Modulator and golf club head with greater structural integrity capable of withstanding repeated high-speed impacts. Although the casing of the exemplary club head featured an inherently less durable design with the reduced front wall height FWH and offset distance OD, the incorporation of the high-strength material allowed for a level of durability capable of resisting degradation and exceeding the performance of the control club head.

E. Example 5—Ball Flight Performance of Composite Faceplate with High-Strength Material Reinforcement

The ball flight performance characteristics of driver type golf club heads with various casing embodiments were tested via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations. All the club heads were formed of the same body material and comprised similar back weighting. Each casing embodiment, however, either comprised different casing lengths or were formed of a different casing material. The analysis simulated face center (FC) and low center (LC) strikes at 105 mph club head speed. Ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate were collected as comparative results across the various casing embodiments. The following casing designs were studied: (1) a control golf club head comprising a lower hosel socket and an Impact Response Modulator with a casing formed by the 17-4 steel body material; (2) a golf club head comprising a lower hosel socket and a Ti-9s+ composite faceplate with an Impact Response Modulator and a casing; and (3) a golf club head devoid of a lower hosel socket and comprising a Ti-9s+ composite faceplate with an Impact Response Modulator and a casing. Due to the presence of the lower hosel socket, club heads (1) and (2) comprise casings extending only partially across the width of the club head. In particular, the casings of club heads (1) and (2) comprise a casing length, measured from the heel wall to the toe wall, of 2.33 in. Alternatively, club head (3), which lacks a lower hosel socket, comprises a casing extending across the entire width of the club head. In particular, the casing of club head (3) comprises a casing length, measured from the heel wall to the toe wall, of 2.84 in. The ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate results of the face center (FC) and lower center (LC) strikes are displayed in Tables 5 and 6 below, respectively.

TABLE 5 Ball Flight Characteristics, Face Center Location Ball Speed Spin Rate Club Head (mph) (rpm) Club Head (1) 154.3 2407 Club Head (2) 154.57 2401 Club Head (3) 154.41 2184

TABLE 6 Ball Flight Characteristics, Low Center Location Ball Speed Spin Rate Club Head (mph) (rpm) Club Head (1) 153.15 3092 Club Head (2) 153.37 2878 Club Head (3) 153.38 2763

As illustrated by Tables 5 and 6, golf club (1) exhibited the worst ball flight performance and golf club (3) exhibited the best combined ball and spin rate improvements, on average, for face center and low center strikes. In particular, golf club (1) exhibited the lowest ball speeds and greatest spin rates in comparison to golf clubs (2) and (3) for both the face center and low center strikes. Golf club (2) performed significantly better for face center and low center strikes with an average ball speed increase of 0.245 mph and an average spin rate decrease of 110 rpm in comparison to golf club (1). Lastly, golf club (3) also performed significantly better for face center and lower center strikes with an average ball speed increase of 0.17 mph and an average spin rate decrease of 276 mph in comparison to golf club (1). Despite golf club (3) exhibiting a lower ball speed increase than golf club (2) in comparison to the control golf club (1), golf club (3) exhibited the most significant improvements in spin rate, especially with low center strikes. Low spin is especially desirable for high swing speeds (over 100 mph) that result in greater compression and friction between the golf ball and strike surface. By reducing spin rates, golfers with high swing speeds can maximize distance and reduce shot curvature.

As proven by the ball flight performance testing results, incorporating the Ti-9s+ composite faceplate on a golf club head with a lower hosel socket contributed to an increased ball speed and a reduced spin rate. Further, removing the lower hosel socket and incorporating the C300 steel composite faceplate with a full-length casing collectively provided golf club (3) with greater ball speed and reduced spin rate for both face center (FC) and low center (LC) strikes. Such improvements, especially the reduced spin rate, result in golf club (3) maximizing distance, improving trajectory stability, and reducing the effects of drag during flight.

F. Example 6—Impact Behavior of Golf Club Head with Composite Faceplate and Casing

The impact behavior characteristics of driver type golf club heads with various casing embodiments were tested via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations. All the club heads were formed of the same body material and comprised similar back weighting. Each casing embodiment, however, either comprised different casing lengths or were reinforced with a different casing material. The analysis simulated face center strikes at 105 mph club head speed. Ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate were collected results across the various casing embodiments. More specifically, an FEA dynamic solver computed a maximum displacement (in.) of the casing front wall over the duration of impact. A greater maximum displacement is a direct indicator of greater energy absorption and thus, greater energy transfer back to the golf ball for increased ball speed and reduced spin rate. The impact behavior comparison was made between clubs (1), (2), and (3), as described in Example 5. In particular, club (1) is a control club head comprising a lower hosel socket and Impact Response Modulator with a casing formed by the 17-4 steel body material; club (2) is a club head comprising a lower hosel socket and a Ti-9s+ composite faceplate with an Impact Response Modulator and a casing; and club (3) is a club head devoid of a lower hosel socket and comprising a Ti-9s+ composite faceplate with an Impact Response Modulator and casing. The maximum front wall displacement values for club heads (1), (2), and (3) are displayed in Table 7 below.

TABLE 7 Ball Flight Characteristics, Face Center Location Front Wall Max Displacement Club Head (in.) Club Head (1) 0.024 Club Head (2) 0.039 Club Head (3) 0.056

As illustrated by Table 7, golf club (1) exhibited the worst impact behavior performance. Club (3) exhibited the most dynamic impact behavior. In particular, golf club (1) exhibited the lowest front wall displacement values in comparison to golf clubs (2) and (3). Golf club (2) performed significantly better with a displacement increase of 0.015 in. in comparison to golf club (1). Lastly, golf club (3) performed significantly better with a displacement increase of 0.032 in. in comparison to golf club (1).

As proven by the ball flight performance testing results and consistent with the ball flight performance results of Example 5, incorporating the Ti-9s+ composite faceplate on a golf club head with a lower hosel socket contributed to an increased casing front wall displacement. The combination of removing the lower hosel socket and incorporating the Ti-9s+ composite faceplate with a full-length casing collectively provided golf club (3) with a front wall displacement value capable of maximizing energy transfer into the golf ball, thereby increasing ball speed, improving trajectory stability, and reducing the effects of drag during flight.

G. Example 7—Modal Analysis

The vibrational impact response characteristics of an exemplary fairway-wood type club head comprising a composite faceplate with a high-strength Impact Response Modulator and casing were compared to those of a control fairway-wood type club head comprising an Impact Response Modulator with a casing formed by the body material. The body material comprises a lower yield strength than the exemplary club's composite faceplate material. The exemplary club head, as shown in FIG. 80, comprised a forged C300 steel composite faceplate 9050, having a strike surface 9052 and an Impact Response Modulator with a casing 9030. More specifically, the C300 steel composite faceplate 9050 comprised a material yield strength of 255 ksi. The control club head, as shown in FIGS. 81 and 82, also included an Impact Response Modulator with a casing 10030, however the Impact Response Modulator and casing were not integrally formed with the strike surface. Instead, the Impact Response Modulator with the casing 10030 were formed of the 17-4 steel club head body material, having a lower material yield strength of 150 ksi.

The vibrational impact response characteristics of the club head were determined via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations. The analysis evaluated the vibrational behavior of the club head in response to undamped, free vibrations in various directions and deformation patterns. More specifically, the analysis focused on peak excitation regions 9095, 10095 of the club head in the dominant vibrational frequency (hereafter referred to as “first mode”) observed at impact. A peak excitation region 9095, 10095 defines any region of the club head that experiences at least 70% peak vibrational excitation in the first mode at impact. The lower the club head volume of these peak excitation regions 9095, 10095, the easier it is to dampen summative modes in the club head that contribute to the increased resonance and duration of post-impact vibrations. Therefore, a smaller peak excitation region volume facilitates the ability to attenuate vibrations that contribute to undesired sound and impact feel. The peak excitation region volumes (in.3) for the exemplary and control club heads are displayed in Table 8 below.

TABLE 7 Ball Flight Characteristics, Face Center Location Peak Excitation Region Volume Club Head (in.3) Exemplary 0.067 Control 0.238

As displayed in Table 8 above, the exemplary club head exhibited a much smaller peak excitation region volume in comparison to the control club head. In particular, the peak excitation region 9095 of the exemplary club head is only present in a small region of the sole 9012 rearward of the casing 9030, as shown in FIG. 80. There were no additional peak excitation regions in the crown, face, or skirt. Due to the localized peak excitation region 9095, the exemplary club head can more easily dampen post-impact vibrations that contribute to undesirable sound and feel. On the other hand, the control club head exhibited multiple peak excitation regions 10095 dispersed over large areas of the crown 10010 and sole 10012, as shown in FIGS. 81-82. Because the peak excitation regions 10095 comprised a much larger volume and covered more components of the club head, the control club head would not be able to attenuate the resonance and duration of post-impact vibrations as the exemplary club would. Therefore, this data demonstrates that integrally forming the strike surface, Impact Response Modulator, and casing from a high-strength material, as demonstrated by the exemplary club head, results in measurable vibrational impact response benefits that contribute to improved feel and sound.

H. Example 8—Robotic Performance

A robot test was conducted to compare the performance of exemplary club head of the present invention to a control club head. The exemplary club head was similar to the golf club head 1200 above in that the exemplary club head had a composite faceplate formed of a higher strength material than the body. The composite faceplate included a sole return region having a casing forming an aperture. The composite faceplate further formed a lower hosel region including a lower hosel socket. The control club head lacked a composite faceplate, but still included a casing formed by the body that was a lower strength material over the high strength material of the composite faceplate of the exemplary club head.

The robot was programmed to deliver both clubs with the same club head speed and impact dynamics, and repeatedly striking the ball at the same location. The resulting ball speed for each club head was recorded and averaged, and displayed in Table 8 below.

TABLE 8 Ball Flight Characteristics, Face Center Location Club Head Average Ball Speed Average Spin Exemplary Club Head 152.3 mph 2819 rpm Control Club Head 151.2 mph 3336 rpm

As illustrated in Table 8 above, the exemplary club head having a high-strength casing exhibited an increase of 1.1 mph ball speed and a decrease in spin of 517 rpm over the control club head having a lower strength casing. The high-strength material allows for the casing to be thinner while maintaining sufficient durability so that the casing can flex more during impact with the golf ball. The increased flexure results in at least 1 mph increase in ball speed and a 517 rpm decrease in spin over a casing with lower yield strength found in the body of the club head. Low spin is especially desirable for high swing speeds (over 100 mph) that result in greater compression and friction between the golf ball and strike surface. By reducing spin rates, golfers with high swing speeds can maximize distance and reduce shot curvature.

Claims

1. A golf club head comprising:

a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end; and a lower hosel socket, adjacent the frame sole and the frame heel end;
a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club head, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; and a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a casing including: a front wall, the front wall including a front wall front surface, a front wall rear surface, a front wall base, and a front wall top surface; a rear wall, the rear wall including a rear wall front surface, a rear wall rear surface, a rear wall base, and a rear wall top surface; a toe wall; and a heel wall, wherein the front wall, the rear wall, the toe wall, and the heel wall define an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, continuously joined to the frame of the body.

2. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the first yield strength of the frame is less than 150 ksi.

3. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the second yield strength of the composite faceplate is greater than 195 ksi.

4. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the frame material is formed from 17-4 stainless steel.

5. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the composite faceplate material is formed from c300 maraging steel.

6. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein a ratio of the second yield strength to the first yield strength is at least 1.5.

7. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the peripheral wall further comprises a peripheral wall sole section, disposed between the rear wall of the casing and the frame sole, spaced from the rear wall of the casing by a sole buffer distance of at least 0.10 inch.

8. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein an insert is disposed within the aperture.

9. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the front wall of the casing is offset from the sole leading edge by a distance of at least 0.25 inch.

10. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the peripheral wall further comprises a peripheral heel section, disposed between the lower hosel socket and the heel wall of the casing.

11. A golf club head comprising:

a body comprising: a crown; a sole opposite the crown; a toe end; a heel end opposite the toe end; a rear end; a frame forming a front of the body and formed of a frame material having a first yield strength, the frame comprising: a frame crown forming a forward portion of the crown; a frame sole forming a forward portion of the sole; a frame toe end forming a forward portion of the toe end; and a frame heel end forming a forward portion of the heel end;
a composite faceplate coupled to the body to form an interior cavity of the golf club, the composite faceplate formed of a composite faceplate material having a second yield strength greater than the first yield strength of the frame material, the composite faceplate comprising: a face region, comprising; a strike surface; a face region toe side located toe-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame toe end; a face region heel side located heel-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame heel end; a face region crown side located crown-ward of the strike surface and bordering the frame crown; and a face region sole side located sole-ward of the strike surface and defining a sole leading edge; a sole return region, formed integral with the face region, comprising: a casing including: a front wall, the front wall including a front wall front surface, a front wall rear surface, a front wall base, and a front wall top surface; a rear wall, the rear wall including a rear wall front surface, a rear wall rear surface, a rear wall base, and a rear wall top surface; a toe wall; and a heel wall, wherein the front wall, the rear wall, the toe wall, and the heel wall define an aperture; a sole transition region, formed integral with the face region and the sole return region, extending from the sole leading edge of the face region to the sole return front wall of the sole region; a lower hosel region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, and the sole transition region, extending between the face region heel side and the sole return sole wall of the sole return region, the lower hosel region including a lower hosel socket defining a socket perimeter having an socket perimeter outboard section; and a peripheral wall, extending around entireties of the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region and is continuously joined to the frame of the body.

12. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the peripheral wall further comprises a peripheral wall heel section, disposed between the frame heel end and the lower hosel socket of the lowerhosel region, spaced from the socket perimeter outboard section by a heel buffer distance of at least 0.075 inch.

13. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the first yield strength of the frame is less than 150 ksi.

14. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the second yield strength of the composite faceplate is greater than 195 ksi.

15. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the frame material is formed from 17-4 stainless steel.

16. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the composite faceplate material is formed from c300 maraging steel.

17. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein a ratio of the second yield strength to the first yield strength is at least 1.5.

18. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein an insert is disposed within the aperture.

19. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the front wall of the casing is offset from the sole leading edge by a distance of at least 0.25 inch.

20. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the composite faceplate further comprises:

a toe wrap region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region, extending rearward of the face region toe side; and
a heel wrap region, formed integral with the face region, the sole return region, the sole transition region, and the lower hosel region, extending rearward of the face region heel side.
Patent History
Publication number: 20260084014
Type: Application
Filed: Sep 24, 2025
Publication Date: Mar 26, 2026
Applicant: KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION (Phoenix, AZ)
Inventors: Matthew T. Schier (Phoenix, AZ), Eric J. Morales (Laveen, AZ), Cory S. Bacon (Scottsdale, AZ), Cole D. Brubaker (Scottsdale, AZ), Taylor T. Morton (Phoenix, AZ), Mark C. Bloxham (Phoenix, AZ), Jesus D. Gamboa (Phoenix, AZ), Mitchell J. Simonet (Phoenix, AZ)
Application Number: 19/339,232
Classifications
International Classification: A63B 53/04 (20150101);