Support for cylinders in a paper shredder
A support placed in the cutting path of a multicylinder cutting assembly to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating. In the preferred embodiment, the support comprises a base and two arm members extending upward from the base. The invention also includes a shredder comprising at least two cylinders; a plurality of cutting disks arranged on the cylinders; spacers alternatingly arranged on the cylinders between the cutting disks; and at least one support placed under the cylinders for preventing the cylinders from separating.
Latest Fellowes Manufacturing Company Patents:
This invention pertains to the field of shredders. More specifically, the invention encompasses a shaft support for cylinders in a paper shredder.
Shafts for cutting cylinders are typically manufactured in one of two ways. They may be machined from a solid cylinder of steel. Alternately, they may be built up using separate cutters of steel, sintered metal, or other hard material on a shaft which uses the cross section of a polygon, a key, or some other feature to transmit power from the shaft to the cutters.
It is economically advantageous to make the cutting shaft as small in diameter as possible. However, the cutting cylinder experiences a considerable outward force as it attempts to cut increasing thicknesses of paper. Consequently, as the amount of paper to be shredded increases, a point is eventually reached where the paper bends the cutting cylinders. This results in paper passing through the shredder without being cut. One normal solution to this problem is to increase the diameter of the shaft or the beam strength of the material comprising the shaft. Unfortunately, this solution increases the cost of the paper shredder. An equally common solution is to decrease the power input. This solution is also undesirable because it decreases the capacity of the shredder. A large capacity shredder with a small diameter cutting cylinder would be a welcome improvement in the art.
SUMMARYThe present invention includes a support placed in the cutting path of a multicylinder cutting assembly to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating. In the preferred embodiment, the support comprises a base and two arm members extending upward from the base such that each arm member is associated with a separate cutting cylinder.
The invention also encompasses a shredder comprising at least two cylinders; a plurality of cutting disks arranged on the cylinders; spacers alternatingly arranged on the cylinders between the cutting disks; and at least one support placed under the cylinders for preventing the cylinders from separating during operation of the shredder.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 is a front view of the preferred embodiment of the support of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the support of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the support of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a side view of two cutting cylinders placed in a paper shredder that includes the support of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the cutting cylinders of FIG. 4 taken along the line 5--5.
FIG. 6 is a front view of a second embodiment of the support of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a side view of the support of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 is a bottom view of the support of FIG. 6.
FIG. 9 is a side view of two cutting cylinders placed in a paper shredder that includes the support of FIG. 6.
FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the cutting cylinders of FIG. 9 taken along the line 10--10.
FIG. 11 is a front view of a third embodiment of the support of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is a side view of the support of FIG. 11.
FIG. 13 is a bottom view of the support of FIG. 11.
FIG. 14 is a side view of two cutting cylinders placed in a paper shredder that includes the support of FIG. 11.
FIG. 15 is a cross-sectional view of the cutting cylinders of FIG. 14 taken along the line 15--15.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to a mid-shaft support for use in a paper shredder. The support is placed in the cutting path of a multicylinder cutting assembly to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating. The preferred support 10 of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 1-5. As shown in FIG. 1, the support 10 comprises a base 20 and two arm members 30, 40 extending upward from the base 20. The width or thickness of the support 10 may vary. As depicted in FIGS. 4 and 5, each arm member 30, 40 of the support 10 should easily fit between two cutting disks on a cutting cylinder. In addition, the contour of the base 20 of the support 10 may vary. It is possible for the base 20 to be straight. However, a linear base 20 may be problematic because the support 10 is placed directly in the paper path and therefore becomes an obstacle for the shredded paper as it passes through the shredder. A nonlinear base 20 decreases the probability that the shredded paper will gather in the paper path. Therefore, the base 20 of the support 10 is preferably nonlinear as depicted in FIG. 3.
FIG. 4 illustrates the support 10 as it is properly positioned in a paper shredder. The shredder includes at least two cutting cylinders 50, 60. In the preferred embodiment, each cutting cylinder comprises a shaft 51, 61, a plurality of cutting disks 70 and a plurality of spacers 80. The spacers 80 may be formed integral with the cutting disks 70 or they may be separate components. The cutting disks 70 and spacers 80 may be placed on the shafts 51, 61 in any arrangement that will produce the desired cut. In the preferred embodiment depicted in FIG. 5, the cutting disks 70 and spacers 80 are alternatingly arranged on the shafts 51 and 61.
As best shown in FIGS. 4, 9, and 14, a vertical cutting path 7 is defined by a substantially vertical plane through the area where the cutting disks 70 of the cutting cylinders 50, 60 interleave. For the preferred embodiment, the portion of the base 20 that is within the cutting path 7 is represented by opposing dashed brackets and the reference numeral 20a, as shown in FIG. 3.
The method of securing the support 10 in position is not critical and may be accomplished by any feasible means. For example, the support 10 may be configured so that the arm members 30, 40 engage or surround part of the cutting cylinders 51, 61. Alternately, the support 10 may be secured in position by one or a plurality of shafts. In the preferred embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the support 10 includes a small recess 31, 41 where the arm members 30, 40 meet the base 20. The recess 31, 41 is adapted to receive a portion of another component that is associated with the cutting cylinders 51, 61, such as a stripper.
During operation of the shredder, the arm members 30, 40 of the support 10 prohibit the cutting cylinders 50, 60 from separating because they limit the amount of bending that may occur in the shafts 51, 61.
The support 10 may be manufactured from any material that is sufficiently strong to accomplish the function of limiting the bending of the cutting cylinders 50, 60. The preferred support 10 is made of cold, rolled steel.
There are many possible variations of the preferred embodiment. For example, a second embodiment is illustrated in FIGS. 6-10. For the second embodiment, the portion of the base 20 that is within the cutting path 7 is represented by opposing dashed brackets and the reference numeral 20b, as shown in FIG. 8. In this embodiment, the arm members 30, 40 include a recessed portion 32, 42 along their inside edges. These recesses 32, 42 surround a portion of the cutting cylinder. More specifically, the recesses 32, 42 surround a portion of the spacer 80, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 10. As depicted in FIGS. 7 and 9, the base 20 has a different contour than the embodiment of FIGS. 1-5. In addition, this embodiment includes two apertures 21, 22 in the base which receive shafts that secure the support 10 in place.
A third embodiment is shown in FIGS. 11-15. This embodiment also includes recesses 33, 43 along the inside edge of the arm members 30, 40. However, the recesses 33, 43 of this embodiment are shaped slightly differently than those of the second embodiment. As most clearly illustrated in FIG. 13, the contour of the base 20 is also different. For the third embodiment, the portion of the base 20 that is within the cutting path 7 is represented by opposing dashed brackets and the reference numeral 20c, as shown in FIG. 13. Furthermore, the base 20 includes one aperture 23 which receives a shaft that secures the support 10 in place.
There are many advantages to the support of the present invention. Firstly, the support increases the capacity of small diameter cutting cylinders several fold without diminishing the quality of the cut. Secondly, the addition of the mid-shaft support does not increase the noise level of the operating paper shredder. Thirdly, the cost of introducing mid-shaft supports is minimal, especially when compared to the cost of using large diameter shafts or shafts made of stronger material.
It should be appreciated that the apparatus of the present invention is capable of being incorporated in the form of a variety of embodiments, only a few of which have been illustrated and described above. The invention may be embodied in other forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive, and the scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Claims
1. A support device for shafts of cutting cylinders for a shredder wherein the cylinders include a plurality of cutting disks that define a vertical cutting path, the device comprising:
- a support placed across the cutting path to prevent the shafts of the cutting cylinders from separating.
2. In a paper shredder having a pair of cutting cylinders with a plurality of cutting disks that define a vertical cutting path, a support placed across the cutting path of the paper shredder, the support comprising:
- a) a base and
- b) two arm members extending upward from the base such that each arm member is associated with a different cutting cylinder.
3. The support recited in claim 2 wherein the base is nonlinear.
4. A support placed across a vertical cutting path defined by a pair of cutting disks of cutting cylinders of a paper shredder, the support comprising:
- a) a base and
- b) two arm members extending upward from the base such that each arm member is associated with a different cutting cylinder, each arm member having an inside edge and an outside edge, each arm member further having a recess along a portion of the inside edge.
5. The support recited in claim 4 wherein the base is nonlinear.
6. A shredder comprising:
- a) a housing
- b) at least two cutting cylinders, each cylinder comprising:
- i) a shaft;
- ii) a plurality of cutting disks arranged on the shaft;
- iii) a plurality of spacers alternatingly arranged on the shaft between the cutting disks; and
- c) at least one support placed across a vertical cutting path defined by the cutting disks of the cylinders for preventing the cylinders from separating.
7. The shredder of claim 6 wherein there are two cylinders.
8. The shredder of claim 6 wherein the spacers are integral with the cutting disks.
9. The shredder of claim 6 wherein the support is integral with the housing of the shredder.
10. The shredder of claim 6 wherein the support further comprises:
- a) a base and
- b) two arm members extending upward from the base, each arm member having an inside edge and an outside edge, each arm member further having a recess along a portion of the inside edge, the recess adapted to substantially abut a portion of a spacer.
11. The support recited in claim 10 wherein the base is nonlinear.
1019828 | March 1912 | O'Bryan |
1090914 | March 1914 | Guettler |
1178386 | April 1916 | Edwards |
1673336 | June 1928 | Lehmicke |
1699157 | January 1929 | Pendleton |
1731967 | October 1929 | Antonsen |
2182219 | December 1939 | Ashley |
2202843 | June 1940 | Edwards |
2216612 | October 1940 | Dimm et al. |
2224948 | December 1940 | Bloomquist |
2236969 | April 1941 | Flateboe |
2259015 | October 1941 | Anderson et al. |
2381775 | August 1945 | Roddy |
2554114 | May 1951 | Menkin et al. |
2657720 | November 1953 | Wolfe |
2770302 | November 1956 | Lee |
2873923 | February 1959 | Bergman |
2894697 | July 1959 | Panning et al. |
3033064 | May 1962 | Lee |
3126931 | March 1964 | Blanshine et al. |
3286574 | November 1966 | Durand |
3369763 | February 1968 | Perry |
3396914 | August 1968 | Liebman |
3510077 | May 1970 | Priscu |
3524597 | August 1970 | Burden, Jr. et al. |
3529782 | September 1970 | Liebman |
3620461 | November 1971 | Pelleschi et al. |
3620462 | November 1971 | Dooley, Jr. |
3630460 | December 1971 | Goldhammer |
3664592 | May 1972 | Schweigert et al. |
3682402 | August 1972 | Goldhammer |
3711034 | January 1973 | Ehinger |
3724766 | April 1973 | Bosland |
3790093 | February 1974 | McIntyre |
3797765 | March 1974 | Samuels |
3860180 | January 1975 | Goldhammer |
3880361 | April 1975 | Schwarz |
3894697 | July 1975 | Lawson et al. |
3921920 | November 1975 | Brocard |
3931935 | January 13, 1976 | Holman |
3960334 | June 1, 1976 | Wudyka |
4009838 | March 1, 1977 | Tashman |
4018392 | April 19, 1977 | Wagner |
4034918 | July 12, 1977 | Culbertson et al. |
4068805 | January 17, 1978 | Oswald |
4106708 | August 15, 1978 | Kropa |
4157671 | June 12, 1979 | Goldhammer |
4172400 | October 30, 1979 | Brierley |
4194698 | March 25, 1980 | Kosmowski |
4200239 | April 29, 1980 | Simone et al. |
4226372 | October 7, 1980 | Wigand |
4257565 | March 24, 1981 | Hatanaka |
4260115 | April 7, 1981 | Hatanaka |
4330092 | May 18, 1982 | Roman |
4334650 | June 15, 1982 | Hardwick et al. |
4346851 | August 31, 1982 | Bernardi et al. |
4349159 | September 14, 1982 | Hardwick et al. |
4351485 | September 28, 1982 | Hardwick et al. |
4355766 | October 26, 1982 | Wigand |
4363453 | December 14, 1982 | Hill et al. |
4385732 | May 31, 1983 | Williams |
4394983 | July 26, 1983 | Ulsky |
4399946 | August 23, 1983 | Stevenson |
4411391 | October 25, 1983 | Crane |
4426044 | January 17, 1984 | Butler |
4489897 | December 25, 1984 | Turner et al. |
4522096 | June 11, 1985 | Niven, Jr. |
4545537 | October 8, 1985 | Kimura et al. |
4557421 | December 10, 1985 | Probst et al. |
4558827 | December 17, 1985 | Berger |
4562971 | January 7, 1986 | Schwelling |
4564146 | January 14, 1986 | Bleasdale |
4565330 | January 21, 1986 | Katoh |
4615490 | October 7, 1986 | Goldhammer |
4619407 | October 28, 1986 | Goldhammer |
4625925 | December 2, 1986 | Goldhammer |
4627581 | December 9, 1986 | Holiman et al. |
4627582 | December 9, 1986 | Goldhammer |
4637560 | January 20, 1987 | Goldhammer |
4650128 | March 17, 1987 | Goldhammer |
4651610 | March 24, 1987 | Schwelling |
4657192 | April 14, 1987 | Browning |
4688730 | August 25, 1987 | Dahle |
4690340 | September 1, 1987 | Hatanaka |
4691871 | September 8, 1987 | Mochizuki |
4693428 | September 15, 1987 | Raterman et al. |
4709197 | November 24, 1987 | Goldhammer et al. |
4717085 | January 5, 1988 | Crane |
4773603 | September 27, 1988 | Schwelling |
4809916 | March 7, 1989 | Schwelling |
4830295 | May 16, 1989 | Schwelling |
4860963 | August 29, 1989 | Goldhammer et al. |
4881692 | November 21, 1989 | Goldhammer et al. |
4889291 | December 26, 1989 | Goldhammer et al. |
4919345 | April 24, 1990 | Burlington et al. |
4936517 | June 26, 1990 | Kammerer et al. |
4997134 | March 5, 1991 | MacGregor |
5044270 | September 3, 1991 | Schwelling |
5071080 | December 10, 1991 | Herbst et al. |
5141168 | August 25, 1992 | Pepper |
5163629 | November 17, 1992 | Raterman et al. |
5170702 | December 15, 1992 | Schwelling |
5230477 | July 27, 1993 | Strohmeyer |
5261614 | November 16, 1993 | Schwelling |
5295633 | March 22, 1994 | Kimbro et al. |
5400978 | March 28, 1995 | Strohmeyer |
5409171 | April 25, 1995 | Stangenberg et al. |
10681 | October 1979 | EPX |
0069721 | September 1982 | EPX |
3001507 | July 1981 | DEX |
3312173A1 | November 1984 | DEX |
705066 | March 1954 | GBX |
1468662 | May 1973 | GBX |
1502076 | February 1978 | GBX |
1569375 | June 1980 | GBX |
2059804A | August 1980 | GBX |
2097717A | March 1982 | GBX |
Type: Grant
Filed: Jul 8, 1997
Date of Patent: Nov 3, 1998
Assignee: Fellowes Manufacturing Company (Itasca, IL)
Inventor: Bruce R. Kroger (West Chicago, IL)
Primary Examiner: John M. Husar
Law Firm: Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione
Application Number: 8/889,243