Integrated multi-mode mammography/tomosynthesis x-ray system and method
A system for multi-mode breast x-ray imaging which comprises a compression arm assembly for compressing and immobilizing a breast for x-ray imaging, an x-ray tube assembly, and an x-ray image receptor is provided. The system is configured for a plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
Latest Hologic, Inc. Patents:
- CAPACITY MEASURING DEVICES FOR CRYOGEN VESSELS, AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
- BIOIMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND METHOD
- Vaginal cuff closure laparoscopic suture passer
- Breast biopsy and needle localization using tomosynthesis systems
- System for improved tissue handling and in line analysis of the tissue
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/631,296, filed Nov. 26, 2004 and entitled “INTEGRATED MULTI-MODE MAMMOGRAPHY/TOMOSYNTHESIS X-RAY SYSTEM AND METHOD”, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
FIELDThis patent specification pertains to x-ray mammography and, more specifically, to an integrated system for selectively carrying out x-ray mammography and/or tomosynthesis imaging and a method of using such a system.
BACKGROUNDX-ray mammography has long been a screening modality for breast cancer and other lesions, and also has been relied on for diagnostic and other purposes. For many years, the breast image was recorded on x-ray film but more recently digital x-ray image receptors have come into use, as in the Selenia™ mammography system available from Hologic Inc. of Bedford, Mass. and its division Lorad Corporation of Danbury, Conn. For mammograms, a cone-shaped or pyramid-shaped x-ray beam passes through the compressed breast and forms a two-dimensional projection image. Any one of a number of orientations can be used, such as cranial-caudal (CC) or MLO (mediolateral-oblique) orientation. More recently, breast x-ray tomosynthesis has been proposed. The technology typically involves taking two-dimensional (2D) projection images of the immobilized breast at each of a number of angles of the x-ray beam relative to the breast and processing the resulting x-ray measurements to reconstruct images of breast slices that typically are in planes transverse to the x-ray beam axis, such as parallel to the image plane of a mammogram of the same breast. The range of angles is substantially less than in computerized tomography, i.e. substantially less than 180°, e.g. ±15°. Tomosynthesis technology is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,486 filed Nov. 26, 2003; a prototype of a unit with at least some of the described features was shown at the 2003 Radiological Society of North America meeting in Chicago, Ill. Additional prototypes are in clinical testing in this country as of the filing of this patent specification. Other approaches to tomosynthesis also have been proposed: see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,496,557, 5,051,904, 5,359,637, 6,289,235, and 6,647,092, published U.S. Patent Applications Nos. 2001/0038861, 2004/066882, 2004/0066884, and 2004/0066904, and Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis (GE Brochure 98-5493, November 1998). How to reconstruct tomosynthesis images is discussed in DG Grant, “Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional imaging technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, Vol BME-19, #1, (January 1972), pp 20-28. See, also, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/628,516, filed Nov. 15, 2004, and entitled “Matching geometry generation and display of mammograms and tomosynthesis images”. Mammography systems can also be used in interventional procedures, such as biopsy, by adding a biopsy station (for example, the StereoLoc II™ Upright Stereotactic Breast Biopsy System, which is available from Hologic, Inc.). The patents, applications, brochures, and article cited above are hereby incorporated by reference in this patent specification as though fully set forth herein.
In clinical use, it can be desirable for a number of reasons to assess both tomosynthesis images and conventional mammograms of the patient's breasts. For example, the decades of conventional mammograms have enabled medical professionals to develop valuable interpretation expertise. Mammograms may offer good visualization of microcalcifications, and can offer higher spatial resolution compared with tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis images may have different desirable characteristics—e.g., they may offer better visualization of structures that can be obscured by overlying or underlying tissue in a conventional mammogram.
While the existing and proposed systems for x-ray mammography and tomosynthesis offer many advantages, it is believed that a need still exists for further improvements to make mammography/tomosynthesis more useful, and that it is particularly desirable to make it possible to use the same system in different modes of operation and thereby reduce acquisition and operating costs and provide greater clinical value and convenience.
SUMMARYThis patent specification describes examples of systems and methods for multi-mode breast x-ray imaging. A single system carries out breast imaging in modes that include standard mammography, diagnostic mammography, dynamic imaging such as with a contrast agent and at different x-ray energies, tomosynthesis imaging, combined standard and tomosynthesis imaging during a single breast compression, needle localization, and stereotactic imaging with a biopsy station mounted to the system.
In an example of a system using the teachings of this patent specification, a compression arm assembly for compressing and immobilizing the breast for x-ray imaging, an x-ray tube assembly, and an x-ray image receptor can be angled relative to each other for different imaging protocols and modes. They can be independently rotated and synchronized as needed, or can be mechanically linked for appropriate synchronized rotation. A patient shield can be mounted to the compression arm assembly to provide a mechanical interlock against patient contact with the rotating x-ray tube assembly. A fully retractable anti-scatter grid can be used that can cover the imaging area of the x-ray receptor in some modes but be retracted completely outside the imaging area for other modes.
The exemplary system further includes a breast compression paddle that is laterally movable, under manual control or when motorized and operating under software control. The compression paddle can shift automatically depending on the view to be acquired. For example, the paddle can be centered on the x-ray receptor for a CC view, shifted to one lateral side of the receptor for an MLO view of one breast and to the other lateral side of the receptor for an MLO view of the other breast. The paddle can be automatically recognized by the system when mounted so that the shifts can be adjusted to the type of paddle.
The compression paddle can be easily removable from a support that has a mechanism for laterally moving the paddle and for allowing the paddle to tilt for better conformance with the breast for selected image modes but locking the paddle against tilt for other modes. With the movement mechanism in the support and not integral with the paddle, the paddle can be simple and inexpensive, and easy to mount to and remove from the support. A number of relatively inexpensive paddles of different sizes and shapes can be provided and conveniently interchanged to suit different procedures and patients.
In describing examples and preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure of this patent specification is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner.
As illustrated in
The illustrated system has several modes of operation. An example of typical workflow generally applicable for each mode is illustrated in
701, in which a user/technologist logs in;
702, in which patient demographics are entered;
703, which comprises review of previous examination;
704, in which the study is selected;
705, in which the technique is set up or an auto-setup of technique is performed;
706, in which the patient is positioned;
707, in which the technique is verified and/or modified;
708, in which the technique is confirmed;
710, in which the exposure button is pushed;
710, in which the technologist reviews the preview image, such as for parameters indicated in the box to the right;
711, in which a decision is made whether to accept the image;
712, in which the image is rejected if step 711 has not accepted the image;
713, in which the image accepted in step 712 is saved (sent to the output device);
714, in which a test is made whether after step 714 (or 713) the study is complete and, if not, the process returns to step 705; and
715, which closes the procedure if step 715 determines that the study is complete.
In standard mammography mode, typically used for screening mammography, tube arm assembly 106 and compression arm assembly 110 are coupled and locked together by 410 in a relative position such as seen in
801, in which the examination is setup and the patient is positioned;
802, in which the expose button is pressed;
803, in which the system is ready for exposure and x-ray begins;
804, in which exposure takes place in an x-ray window;
805, in which a decision is made whether to view a preview image;
806, in which the preview image is viewed if the decision at step 805 was to do so;
807, in which a test is made to determine whether the study is complete, and the process is directed to repeating step 801 is the study is not complete;
808, in which a full image is captured, whether or not previewed; and
809, in which the procedure is closed if the test at step 807 determines that the study is complete; and
810, in which the captured image is saved;
The steps illustrated in
901, in which the detector receives an image capture request;
902, in which the detector is ready for image capture;
903, in which an exposure window is open;
903, in which the detector is read out;
904, in which the image data is available to the host; and
906, in which a test is made whether the host is done with reading the data and, if the host is done reading the data, returns theprocess to step 901 but if the host is not done with reading the data, recycles through step 906 until the test answer is that the host is done reading the data.
In a diagnostic mode, the patient's breast can be spaced from upper surface 116, for example by an x-ray translucent spacer 1002 (
In a dynamic imaging mode, a number of breast images are taken while the patient's breast remains compressed. In one technique, an agent such as iodine is injected into the patient and after a suitable waiting time such as about one minute for a maximum uptake, two images breast are taken in rapid succession, for example one at an x-ray energy just above the K-edge of iodine and one at an energy just below the K-edge. Alternatively, a succession of breast images can be taken at a single x-ray energy band or bands just above and below the K-edge, or at another x-ray energy range, to track the uptake of agent over time. Another technique adds taking a baseline breast image before or soon after injecting the agent and using it together with later breast images to generate subtraction images that provide better visualization of anatomy that may be of interest. Still another dynamic imaging mode technique comprises injecting a contrast agent and taking a succession of images over a period such as 5-7 minutes, for example one image every minute, and processing the image data to generate for each pixel, or at least for each pixel of interest, a histogram of the change in the pixel value, to thereby use the manner in which pixel values change to differential abnormal tissue. For this mode, work-station 102 can store preset data that commands gantry 100 and work-station 102 to take a desired sequence of images for the dynamic mode technique selected by the operator, such that the command data sets the appropriate parameters such as x-ray energy, dose, timing of images, etc. Alternatively, such processing to assess changes in pixel values can be done for a region of interest rather than over individual pixels, to produce information such as a measure of changes in the average pixel values in the region of interest.
In tomosynthesis mode, tube arm assembly 106 and compression arm assembly 110 are decoupled by unit 410 such that compression arm assembly 110 stays in one position, compressing the patient's breast, while tube arm assembly 106 rotates about axis 402, for example between the position illustrated in
The steps illustrated in
1301, in which the examination is setup and the patient is positioned;
1302, in which the expose button is pressed;
1303, in which the system is ready for exposure and x-ray begins;
1304, in which exposure takes place in an x-ray window, and is repeated as indicated in the box to the right;
1305, in which a test is made whether to view a projection preview image
1306, in which the preview image is viewed if the decision at step 1306 was to do So;
1307, in which a test is made to determine whether the study is complete, and the process is directed to repeating step 1301 is the study is not complete;
1308, in which reconstruction and full image capture take place, whether or not the preview image was viewed in step 1307;
1309, in which the procedure is closed if the test at step 1307 determines that the study is complete; and
1310, in which the image from step 1308.
The steps illustrated in
1401, in which the detector receives a tomo capture request;
1402, in which the detector is ready for capture;
1403, in which an exposure window is open;
1404, in which the detector is read out;
1404, in which the expose/readout cycle is repeated the expose/readout cycle is repeated as indicated in the box to the right; and
1405, in which all image frames are available to the host; and
1406, in which a test is made whether the host is done with reading the data and, if so, the process is returned to step 1401 but if not, step 1407 recycles until the test answer is that the host is done reading the data.
In a combination mode, during a single compression of the patient's breast the system takes a conventional mammogram and tomosynthesis images. In this mode, while the breast remains compressed in compression arm assembly 110, (1) tube arm assembly 106 sweeps and x-ray receptor 502 rocks, each through an appropriate angle, and exposures are taken for tomosynthesis images, and (2) a standard mammogram is taken. The standard mammogram can be taken at a 0° relative angle between tube arm assembly 106 and a normal to the imaging plane of x-ray receptor 502, and can be taken before or after the tomosynthesis images are taken or between the taking of two successive tomosynthesis images. Typically, each tomosynthesis image utilizes substantially lower x-ray dose than the standard mammogram. For example, the total x-ray dosage for tomosynthesis imaging in one sweep of tube arm assembly 106 can be approximately the same as that for a single standard mammogram, or up to approximately three times that dosage. The relationship between the two dosages can be user-selected.
1501, in which the examination is setup and the patient is positioned;
1502, in which the expose button is pressed;
1503, in which the system is ready for exposure and the scan starts;
1504, in which tomo exposure takes place in an x-ray window and projection exposures are repeated as indicated in the box to the right;
1505, in which a test is made whether to view a projection preview image
1506, in which the preview image is viewed if the decision at step 1506 was to do so;
1507, in which the C-arm is auto-positioned for standard scan, whether or not step
1505 determined that a preview image should be viewed;
1508, in which reconstruction is performed;
1509, in which a standard exposure is performed (x-ray begins);
1510, in which image preview takes place (tomo and standard);
1511, in which a test is made to determine whether the study is complete, and the process is directed to repeating step 1501 is the study is not complete;
1512, in which complete reconstruction and image capture take place; and
1513, in which the procedure is closed if the test at step 1511 determines that the study is complete.
The steps illustrated in
1601, in which the detector receives a combo capture request;
1602, in which a tomosynthesis image cycle is performed;
1603, in which a standard image cycle is performed; and
1604, in which a test is made to determine if the host is done with reading data and, if so, the process is returned to step 1601 but if not, the process cycles through step 1604 until the test shows that the host is done with reading data. Again, these are examples, and different steps or orders of steps can be used instead. For example, a preferred approach may be to take the standard mammogram first, then move arm 106 to one end of its rotational range for tomosynthesis and take the tomosynthesis images. The order in which the two types of images are taken may be optimized such that the overall imaging time is minimized, and an order that achieves such minimization can be the preferred order. The exposure (tube current mA, tube voltage kVp, and exposure length msec) techniques for the standard mammogram and the tomosynthesis exposures can be set manually, or by using automatic methods. If the standard mammogram is taken first, its exposure techniques can be used to set an optimal technique for the subsequent tomosynthesis images, and vice versa. The exposure technique can be modified dynamically, if the software senses that the signal reaching the image receptor is either too low or too high and adjust subsequent exposures as needed.
In a stereotactic mode, during a single compression of the patient's breast at least two images are taken, for example one at (+15)° angle and one at (−15°) angle of tube arm assembly 106 relative to compression arm assembly 110, although other angles can be used and more images can be taken. X-ray receptor 502 can remain in place for this procedure, or can be rocked through a selected angle, for example through an angle sufficient to maintain the same orientation of the imaging surface of receptor 502 relative to tube arm assembly 106. A spacer 1002 can be used for magnification. If x-ray receptor 502 remains in place despite rotation of arm 106, or if spacer 1002 is used, anti-scatter grid 504 is fully retracted; if x-ray receptor 502 maintains its orientation relative to tube arm assembly 106 and no spacer 1002 is used, anti-scatter grid 504 need not be retracted. As is known in the art, the two or more images can be used to identify the location of a lesion, so that needle biopsy can be used, for example with an upright needle biopsy station 412 (
In needle localization mode, x-ray images can be taken after a biopsy or other needle is inserted into the compressed breast. For this purpose, imaging such as in the stereotactic mode, the tomosynthesis mode, or the combined mode can be used.
In the disclosed system, compression paddle 122 is movable laterally, as generally described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0063509 A1, hereby incorporated by reference herein. In addition, compression paddle 122 can pivot about an axis along the patient's chest wall to conform the breast shape in certain procedures, as discussed in said U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,327. However, in the system of this patent specification compression paddle 122 is mounted differently and moves in a different manner.
As illustrated in
Importantly, compression paddle 122 is driven for lateral movement by components that are a part of support 510. Thus, compression paddle 122 can be a simple structure, and can even be disposable, with a new one used for each patient or for only a few patients. This can simplify and reduce the cost of using the system, because an imaging facility usually stocks a number of different paddles for different purposes. If the lateral movement mechanism is integral with a compression paddle, the paddle assembly is considerably larger, heavier and more expensive. But with a compression paddle 122 that relies for lateral movement on support 510, and is easily mounted by hand and without tools to support 510, by sliding compression paddle 122a into projection 510a and latching projection paddle 122b onto projection 510b, and is easily removed by reversing the process, the expense of keeping a number of different compression paddles in stock or replacing paddles with new ones is greatly reduced, as are the time and convenience when changing from one type of compression paddle to another. Compression paddle 122 can include a bar code that is automatically read by a bar code reader in support 510, to keep work-station 102 informed of the paddle currently mounted to support 510, for use in automating imaging protocols. For example, the bar code information can be checked to ensure through computer processing that the type of paddle that is currently mounted on support 510 matches the imaging that will be commanded, and the information from the sensor for whether compression paddle 122 is locked in non-tilting mode can be used to automatically make adjustments for compression height to ensure accurate automatic x-ray exposure operation. Further, the bar code information identifying the paddle can be used to automatically set collimation in x-ray tube assembly 108 so that the x-ray beam matches the size and shape of the currently installed compression paddle 122.
The above specific examples and embodiments are illustrative, and many variations can be introduced on these examples and embodiments without departing from the spirit of the disclosure or from the scope of the appended claims. For example, elements and/or features of different illustrative embodiments may be combined with each other and/or substituted for each other within the scope of this disclosure and appended claims.
Claims
1. A system for multi-mode breast x-ray imaging, comprising:
- an x-ray image receptor;
- an x-ray tube assembly selectively emitting an x-ray beam directed toward the x-ray image receptor; and
- a breast immobilizer between the x-ray tube assembly and the x-ray image receptor,
- wherein said x-ray tube assembly and said x-ray image receptor are supported and configured for movement according to a plurality of imaging protocols and modes, including a protocol and mode in which the x-ray tube assembly moves along a curved path through one angle relative to the breast immobilizer and the x-ray image receptor concurrently moves through a different angle, in angular extent, relative to the breast immobilizer.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein said x-ray tube assembly and said x-ray image receptor are mechanically linked for movement as a unit for at least one of the plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein said x-ray tube assembly and said x-ray image receptor move relative to each other for at least one of the plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
4. The system of claim 1, including a compression arm assembly supporting said breast immobilizer and said x-ray image receptor, wherein said compression arm assembly and said x-ray tube assembly are locked to each other for at least one of the plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
5. The system of claim 1, including a compression arm assembly supporting said breast immobilizer and said x-ray image receptor, wherein said compression arm assembly and said x-ray tube assembly move independent of each other for at least one of the plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
6. The system of claim 1, including a compression arm assembly supporting said breast immobilizer and said x-ray image receptor, wherein said compression arm assembly, said x-ray tube assembly and said x-ray image receptor are mechanically linked for movement as a unit for at least one of the plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
7. The system of claim 1, including a compression arm assembly supporting said breast immobilizer and said x-ray image receptor, wherein said compression arm assembly, said x-ray tube assembly and said x-ray image receptor move independent of each other for at least one of the plurality of imaging protocols and modes.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein said modes include at least a mammography mode and a tomosynthesis mode.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein said modes include a combination mode for taking both a mammogram and tomosynthesis images during a single breast compression.
10. A tomosynthesis/mammography system comprising:
- an x-ray source, a breast immobilizer, and an x-ray imaging receptor;
- said source, receptor and breast immobilizer being supported selectively for operation in: (a) a mammography mode in which the source, receptor and breast immobilizer rotate as a unit, and (b) a tomosynthesis mode in which the source rotates relative to the breast immobilizer and the receptor rocks relative to the breast immobilizer; and
- wherein in the tomosynthesis mode the angle through which the source rotates is different in angular extent from the angle through which the receptor rocks.
11. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 10 including a receptor housing shrouding at least a portion of said receptor and having an upper surface between the receptor and the source, said receptor being fixed relative to said upper housing in said mammography mode but rocking relative to the receptor housing in said tomosynthesis mode.
12. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 10 including a first support arm supporting the source and a second support arm supporting the receptor, and a main support to which said first and second arms are mounted for rotation as a unit in the mammography mode but for rotation of at least one relative to the other in the tomosynthesis mode.
13. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 12 in which said first and second arms rotate about a common axis.
14. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 12 including a couple/uncouple mechanism for locking the first and second arms for rotation as a unit in the mammography mode and uncoupling the first and second arm for rotation of at least one relative to the other in the tomosynthesis mode.
15. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 10 including an anti-scatter grid occupying a first position between the source and the receptor for system operation in the mammography mode and a grid drive moving the grid away from the first position thereof for system operation in the tomosynthesis mode.
16. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 15 in which said grid drive is motorized.
17. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 10 including a compression paddle mounted for tilting relative to the receptor in selected imaging modes but locked against tilting in other imaging modes.
18. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 10 including a compression paddle mounted for movement toward and away from the receptor to compress a patient's breast and for lateral movement relative to the receptor.
19. An x-ray tomosynthesis /mammography system as in claim 18 including a mechanism automatically shifting the compression paddle laterally relative to the receptor depending on a view to be acquired.
20. An x-ray tomography/mammography system as in claim 10 including a paddle support mounted for movement toward and away from the receptor, and a compression paddle removably mounted to the paddle support for movement therewith toward and away from the receptor housing and for lateral movement relative to the paddle support.
21. An x-ray tomography/mammography system as in claim 18 in which said lateral movement of the compression paddle relative to the paddle support is motorized.
22. A breast tomosynthesis system as in claim 11 in which said receptor housing encloses the x-ray imaging receptor.
23. A breast tomosynthesis method comprising:
- selectively locking to each other a first support arm supporting a source of an x-ray beam and a second arm supporting an x-ray imaging receptor for rotation as a unit and unlocking the first and second arm from each other for individual rotation of at least one of the arms relative to the other;
- selectively rocking the imaging receptor relative to the second support arm while rotating the first support arm;
- acquiring projection x-ray image data from the receptor while rotating the source support arm and rocking the image receptor; and
- computer-processing the image data into images for display and selectively displaying at least some of the images;
- in which the acquiring step comprises selectively acquiring tomosynthesis x-ray projection image data while the receptor is rocking and mammography x-ray image data when the receptor is not rocking.
24. A breast tomosynthesis method as in claim 23 including storing an imaging protocol in a computerized work station coupled with said source and receptor, said work station automatically controlling the acquiring step and the computer-processing step according to said stored imaging protocol to selectively acquire said tomosynthesis and mammography image data.
25. A breast tomosynthesis method as in claim 24 including an anti-scatter grid automatically controlled by said work station according to said stored protocol to move between a postion in the path of said x-ray beam and a position outside said path.
26. A breast tomosynthesis system as in claim 24 including a compression paddle automatically controlled by said work station according to said protocol to move to positions laterally offset relative to the receptor.
3502878 | March 1970 | Stewart |
3863073 | January 1975 | Wagner |
3971950 | July 27, 1976 | Evans et al. |
4160906 | July 10, 1979 | Daniels et al. |
4496557 | January 29, 1985 | Malen et al. |
4559641 | December 17, 1985 | Caugant et al. |
4744099 | May 10, 1988 | Huettenrauch et al. |
4773086 | September 20, 1988 | Fujita et al. |
4821727 | April 18, 1989 | Levene et al. |
4969174 | November 6, 1990 | Scheid et al. |
4989227 | January 29, 1991 | Tirelli et al. |
5018176 | May 21, 1991 | Romeas et al. |
RE33634 | July 9, 1991 | Yanaki |
5029193 | July 2, 1991 | Saffer |
5051904 | September 24, 1991 | Griffith |
5078142 | January 7, 1992 | Siczek et al. |
5163075 | November 10, 1992 | Lubinsky et al. |
5164976 | November 17, 1992 | Scheid et al. |
5199056 | March 30, 1993 | Darrah |
5240011 | August 31, 1993 | Assa |
5289520 | February 22, 1994 | Pellegrino et al. |
5359637 | October 25, 1994 | Webber |
5365562 | November 15, 1994 | Toker |
5415169 | May 16, 1995 | Siczek et al. |
5426685 | June 20, 1995 | Pellegrino et al. |
5452367 | September 19, 1995 | Bick et al. |
5506877 | April 9, 1996 | Niklason et al. |
5526394 | June 11, 1996 | Siczek et al. |
5539797 | July 23, 1996 | Heidsieck et al. |
5553111 | September 3, 1996 | Moore et al. |
5592562 | January 7, 1997 | Rooks |
5594769 | January 14, 1997 | Pellegrino et al. |
5596200 | January 21, 1997 | Sharma et al. |
5598454 | January 28, 1997 | Franetzke et al. |
5609152 | March 11, 1997 | Pellegrino et al. |
5627869 | May 6, 1997 | Andrew et al. |
5657362 | August 12, 1997 | Giger et al. |
5668889 | September 16, 1997 | Hara |
5706327 | January 6, 1998 | Adamkowski et al. |
5719952 | February 17, 1998 | Rooks |
5735264 | April 7, 1998 | Siczek et al. |
5769086 | June 23, 1998 | Ritchart et al. |
5803912 | September 8, 1998 | Siczek et al. |
5818898 | October 6, 1998 | Tsukamoto et al. |
5828722 | October 27, 1998 | Ploetz et al. |
5872828 | February 16, 1999 | Niklason et al. |
5878104 | March 2, 1999 | Ploetz |
5896437 | April 20, 1999 | Ploetz |
5986662 | November 16, 1999 | Argiro et al. |
6005907 | December 21, 1999 | Ploetz |
6022325 | February 8, 2000 | Siczek et al. |
6075879 | June 13, 2000 | Roehrig et al. |
6091841 | July 18, 2000 | Rogers et al. |
6137527 | October 24, 2000 | Abdel-Malek et al. |
6141398 | October 31, 2000 | He et al. |
6149301 | November 21, 2000 | Kautzer et al. |
6175117 | January 16, 2001 | Komardin et al. |
6196715 | March 6, 2001 | Nambu et al. |
6216540 | April 17, 2001 | Nelson et al. |
6219059 | April 17, 2001 | Argiro |
6233473 | May 15, 2001 | Shepherd et al. |
6243441 | June 5, 2001 | Zur |
6256370 | July 3, 2001 | Yavuz |
6272207 | August 7, 2001 | Tang |
6289235 | September 11, 2001 | Webber et al. |
6292530 | September 18, 2001 | Yavus et al. |
6327336 | December 4, 2001 | Gingold et al. |
6341156 | January 22, 2002 | Baetz et al. |
6375352 | April 23, 2002 | Hewes et al. |
6411836 | June 25, 2002 | Patel et al. |
6415015 | July 2, 2002 | Nicolas et al. |
6442288 | August 27, 2002 | Haerer et al. |
6459925 | October 1, 2002 | Nields et al. |
6556655 | April 29, 2003 | Chichereau et al. |
6597762 | July 22, 2003 | Ferrant et al. |
6611575 | August 26, 2003 | Alyassin et al. |
6620111 | September 16, 2003 | Stephens et al. |
6626849 | September 30, 2003 | Huitema et al. |
6633674 | October 14, 2003 | Barnes et al. |
6638235 | October 28, 2003 | Miller et al. |
6647092 | November 11, 2003 | Eberhard et al. |
6744848 | June 1, 2004 | Stanton et al. |
6748044 | June 8, 2004 | Sabol et al. |
6751285 | June 15, 2004 | Eberhard et al. |
6758824 | July 6, 2004 | Miller et al. |
6813334 | November 2, 2004 | Koppe et al. |
6882700 | April 19, 2005 | Wang et al. |
6885724 | April 26, 2005 | Li et al. |
6912319 | June 28, 2005 | Eberhard et al. |
6940943 | September 6, 2005 | Claus et al. |
6978040 | December 20, 2005 | Berestov |
6999554 | February 14, 2006 | Mertelmeier |
7110490 | September 19, 2006 | Eberhard et al. |
7123684 | October 17, 2006 | Jing et al. |
7127091 | October 24, 2006 | Op De Beek et al. |
7142633 | November 28, 2006 | Eberhard et al. |
7245694 | July 17, 2007 | Jing et al. |
7315607 | January 1, 2008 | Ramsauer |
7319735 | January 15, 2008 | DeFreitas et al. |
7323692 | January 29, 2008 | Rowlands et al. |
7430272 | September 30, 2008 | Jing et al. |
7443949 | October 28, 2008 | DeFreitas et al. |
7630533 | December 8, 2009 | Ruth et al. |
20010038681 | November 8, 2001 | Stanton et al. |
20010038861 | November 8, 2001 | Hsu et al. |
20020012450 | January 31, 2002 | Tsujii |
20020050986 | May 2, 2002 | Inoue et al. |
20030018272 | January 23, 2003 | Treado et al. |
20030073895 | April 17, 2003 | Nields et al. |
20030095624 | May 22, 2003 | Eberhard et al. |
20030194050 | October 16, 2003 | Eberhard et al. |
20030194051 | October 16, 2003 | Wang et al. |
20030194121 | October 16, 2003 | Eberhard et al. |
20030210254 | November 13, 2003 | Doan et al. |
20030215120 | November 20, 2003 | Uppaluri et al. |
20040066882 | April 8, 2004 | Eberhard et al. |
20040066884 | April 8, 2004 | Claus et al. |
20040066904 | April 8, 2004 | Eberhard et al. |
20040081273 | April 29, 2004 | Ning |
20040094167 | May 20, 2004 | Brady et al. |
20040101095 | May 27, 2004 | Jing et al. |
20040109529 | June 10, 2004 | Eberhard et al. |
20040171986 | September 2, 2004 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. |
20040267157 | December 30, 2004 | Miller et al. |
20050049521 | March 3, 2005 | Miller et al. |
20050063509 | March 24, 2005 | DeFreitas et al. |
20050078797 | April 14, 2005 | Danielsson et al. |
20050105679 | May 19, 2005 | Wu et al. |
20050113681 | May 26, 2005 | DeFreitas et al. |
20050113715 | May 26, 2005 | Schwindt et al. |
20050129172 | June 16, 2005 | Mertelmeier |
20050135555 | June 23, 2005 | Claus et al. |
20050135664 | June 23, 2005 | Kaufhold et al. |
20050226375 | October 13, 2005 | Eberhard et al. |
20060030784 | February 9, 2006 | Miller et al. |
20060074288 | April 6, 2006 | Kelly et al. |
20060094950 | May 4, 2006 | Ning |
20060098855 | May 11, 2006 | Gkanatsios et al. |
20060129062 | June 15, 2006 | Nicoson et al. |
20060155209 | July 13, 2006 | Miller et al. |
20060291618 | December 28, 2006 | Eberhard et al. |
20070030949 | February 8, 2007 | Jing et al. |
20070036265 | February 15, 2007 | Jing et al. |
20070223651 | September 27, 2007 | Wagenaar et al. |
20070225600 | September 27, 2007 | Weibrecht et al. |
20070242800 | October 18, 2007 | Jing et al. |
20080019581 | January 24, 2008 | Gkanatsios et al. |
20080045833 | February 21, 2008 | DeFreitas et al. |
20080095259 | April 24, 2008 | Dyer et al. |
20080112534 | May 15, 2008 | DeFreitas et al. |
20080130979 | June 5, 2008 | Ren et al. |
20090003519 | January 1, 2009 | DeFreitas et al. |
20090010384 | January 8, 2009 | Jing et al. |
20090080594 | March 26, 2009 | Brooks et al. |
20090080602 | March 26, 2009 | Brooks et al. |
20090123052 | May 14, 2009 | Ruth et al. |
20090135997 | May 28, 2009 | DeFreitas et al. |
20090141859 | June 4, 2009 | Gkanatsios et al. |
20090268865 | October 29, 2009 | Ren et al. |
20090304147 | December 10, 2009 | Jing et al. |
0775467 | May 1997 | EP |
0982001 | March 2000 | EP |
1428473 | June 2004 | EP |
1759637 | March 2007 | EP |
WO90/05485 | May 1990 | WO |
WO98/16903 | April 1998 | WO |
WO00/51484 | September 2000 | WO |
WO03/020114 | March 2003 | WO |
WO2004/043535 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2005/051197 | June 2005 | WO |
WO2005110230 | November 2005 | WO |
WO2005112767 | December 2005 | WO |
WO2006/055830 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006/058160 | June 2006 | WO |
WO2006/058160 | June 2006 | WO |
- Dec. 3, 2008 European search report in connection with counterpart European patent application No. 05852126.1.
- Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis (GE Brochure 98-5493, Nov. 1998). How to reconstruct tomosynthesis images is discussed in DG Grant.
- “Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional imaging technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, vol. BME-19, #1, (Jan. 1972), pp. 20-28.
- Application of Kenneth F. DeFreitas et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/350,213, filed Oct. 19, 2001.
- Application of Nikolaos A. Gkanatsios et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/604,069, filed Nov. 24, 2006.
- Kita et al., “Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using simulation of breast deformation”, Proceedings 1998 IEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recongnition, Santa Basbara, CA, Jun. 23-25, 1998, pp. 700-707.
- Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98/5493, Nov. 1998.
- Mammographic Accreditation Phantom, http://www.cirsinc.com/pdfs/015cp.pdf.
- Heang-Ping Chan et al., “ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005.
- Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Scale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005.
- Federica Pediconi et al., “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of a new software for MR-based breast imaging”, International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086.
- “Essentials for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography system”, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-EN-US, 2006.
- Senographe 700 & 800T (GE); 2-page download on Jun. 22, 2006 from www.gehealthcare.com/inen/rad/whe/products/mswh800t.html.; Figures 1-7 on 4 sheets re lateral shift compression paddle.
- “Lorad Selenia” Document B-BI-SEO US/Intl (May 2006) copy right Hologic 2006.
- “Filtered Back Projection,” (NYGREN) published May 8, 2007; URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/˜elec539/Projs97/cult/node2.html.
- Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,978 of Andrew Paul Smith et al., filed Mar. 3, 2009.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/491,147 of Georgia Hitzke et al. filed Jun. 24, 2009.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,450 of Baorui Ren et al., filed Jul. 22, 2009.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/535,343 of Baorui Ren et al., filed Aug. 4, 2009.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/539,460 of Nikolaos A. Gkanatsios et al., filed Aug. 11, 2009.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/541,715 of Zhenxue Jing et al., filed Aug. 14, 2009.
- U. S . Appl. No. 12/605,031 of Chris Ruth et al., filed Oct. 23, 2009.
- Aug. 12, 2009 International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2009/055981.
- Apr. 23, 2010 International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/026062.
- Wu Tao et al. (2003), “Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images”, Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 365-380.
- Wheeler F. W. et al. (2006), “Micro-Calcification Detection in Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, Conf-Physics of Semiconductor Devices—20011211 to 20011215—Delhi, SPIE, US, vol. 6144, pp. 614420-614421.
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 23, 2005
Date of Patent: Jan 11, 2011
Patent Publication Number: 20090003519
Assignee: Hologic, Inc. (Bedford, MA)
Inventors: Kenneth Defreitas (Patterson, NY), Tom Farbizio (Patterson, NY), Baori Ren (Andover, MA), Chris Ruth (Danvers, MA), Ian Shaw (Yorktown Heights, NY), Andrew Smith (Lexington, MA), Jay Stein (Boston, MA)
Primary Examiner: Edward J Glick
Assistant Examiner: Anastasia Midkiff
Attorney: Cooper & Dunham LLP
Application Number: 11/791,601
International Classification: H05G 1/58 (20060101); A61B 6/04 (20060101); G01N 23/00 (20060101);