Electrode configuration for implantable modulator
A device according to some embodiments may include an implantable flexible carrier and a pair of electrodes located on the carrier. The electrodes may be spaced from each other by a distance greater than 3 mm, and may be configured to cause, when supplied with an electrical signal, a unidirectional electric field sufficient to modulate at least one nerve.
Latest Nyxoah SA Patents:
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/541,651, filed Sep. 30, 2011, and also to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/657,424, filed Jun. 8, 2012, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELDEmbodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to devices and methods for modulating a nerve. More particularly, embodiments of the present disclosure relate to devices and methods for modulating a nerve through the delivery of energy via an implantable electrical modulator.
BACKGROUNDNeural modulation presents the opportunity to treat many physiological conditions and disorders by interacting with the body's own natural neural processes. Neural modulation includes inhibition (e.g. blockage), stimulation, modification, regulation, or therapeutic alteration of activity, electrical or chemical, in the central, peripheral, or autonomic nervous system. By modulating the activity of the nervous system, for example through the stimulation of nerves or the blockage of nerve signals, several different goals may be achieved. Motor neurons may be stimulated at appropriate times to cause muscle contractions. Sensory neurons may be blocked, for instance to relieve pain, or stimulated, for instance to provide a signal to a subject. In other examples, modulation of the autonomic nervous system may be used to adjust various involuntary physiological parameters, such as heart rate and blood pressure. Neural modulation may provide the opportunity to treat several diseases or physiological conditions, a few examples of which are described in detail below.
Among the conditions to which neural modulation may be applied is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OSA is a respiratory disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep. During the sleep of a person without OSA, the pharyngeal muscles relax during sleep and gradually collapse, narrowing the airway. The airway narrowing limits the effectiveness of the sleeper's breathing, causing a rise in CO2 levels in the blood. The increase in CO2 results in the pharyngeal muscles contracting to open the airway to restore proper breathing. The largest of the pharyngeal muscles responsible for upper airway dilation is the genioglossus muscle, which is one of several different muscles in the tongue. The genioglossus muscle is responsible for forward tongue movement and the stiffening of the anterior pharyngeal wall. In patients with OSA, the neuromuscular activity of the genioglossus muscle is decreased compared to normal individuals, accounting for insufficient response and contraction to open the airway as compared to a normal individual. This lack of response contributes to a partial or total airway obstruction, which significantly limits the effectiveness of the sleeper's breathing. In OSA patients, there are often several airway obstruction events during the night. Because of the obstruction, there is a gradual decrease of oxygen levels in the blood (hypoxemia). Hypoxemia leads to night time arousals, which may be registered by EEG, showing that the brain awakes from any stage of sleep to a short arousal. During the arousal, there is a conscious breath or gasp, which resolves the airway obstruction. An increase in sympathetic tone activity rate through the release of hormones such as epinephrine and noradrenaline also often occurs as a response to hypoxemia. As a result of the increase in sympathetic tone, the heart enlarges in an attempt to pump more blood and increase the blood pressure and heart rate, further arousing the patient. After the resolution of the apnea event, as the patient returns to sleep, the airway collapses again, leading to further arousals.
These repeated arousals, combined with repeated hypoxemia, leaves the patient sleep deprived, which leads to daytime somnolence and worsens cognitive function. This cycle can repeat itself up to hundreds of times per night in severe patients. Thus, the repeated fluctuations in and sympathetic tone and episodes of elevated blood pressure during the night evolve to high blood pressure through the entire day. Subsequently, high blood pressure and increased heart rate may cause other diseases.
Efforts for treating OSA include Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment, which requires the patient to wear a mask through which air is blown into the nostrils to keep the airway open. Other treatment options include the implantation of rigid inserts in the soft palate to provide structural support, tracheotomies, or tissue ablation.
Another condition to which neural modulation may be applied is the occurrence of migraine headaches. Pain sensation in the head is transmitted to the brain via the occipital nerve, specifically the greater occipital nerve, and the trigeminal nerve. When a subject experiences head pain, such as during a migraine headache, the inhibition of these nerves may serve to decrease or eliminate the sensation of pain.
Neural modulation may also be applied to hypertension. Blood pressure in the body is controlled via multiple feedback mechanisms. For example, baroreceptors in the carotid body in the carotid artery are sensitive to blood pressure changes within the carotid artery. The baroreceptors generate signals that are conducted to the brain via the glossopharyngeal nerve when blood pressure rises, signaling the brain to activate the body's regulation system to lower blood pressure, e.g. through changes to heart rate, and vasodilation/vasoconstriction. Conversely, parasympathetic nerve fibers on and around the renal arteries generate signals that are carried to the kidneys to initiate actions, such as salt retention and the release of angiotensin, which raise blood pressure. Modulating these nerves may provide the ability to exert some external control over blood pressure.
The foregoing are just a few examples of conditions to which neuromodulation may be of benefit, however embodiments of the invention described hereafter are not necessarily limited to treating only the above-described conditions.
SUMMARYA device according to some embodiments may include an implantable flexible carrier configured for implantation proximal to a genioglossus muscle of a subject and a pair of electrodes located on the carrier. The electrodes may be spaced from each other by a distance greater than 3 mm, and may be configured to facilitate, when supplied with an electrical signal, a substantially unidirectional electric field sufficient to modulate a hypoglossal nerve.
A device according to some embodiments may include an implantable flexible carrier and a pair of electrodes located on the carrier. The electrodes may be spaced from each other by a distance greater than 3 mm, and may be configured to facilitate, when supplied with an electrical signal, a substantially unidirectional electric field sufficient to modulate at least one nerve.
A device according to some embodiments may include an implantable flexible carrier configured for implantation in a blood vessel of a subject in a vicinity of at least one of a renal nerve, a carotid baroreceptor, and a glossopharyngeal nerve, and a pair of electrodes located on the carrier. The electrodes may be spaced from each other by a distance greater than 3 mm and may be configured to facilitate, when supplied with an electrical signal, a substantially unidirectional electric field sufficient to modulate the at least one of a renal nerve, a carotid baroreceptor, and a glossopharyngeal nerve.
A device according to some embodiments may include an implantable flexible carrier configured for location beneath the skin of a head of a subject, and a pair of electrodes located on the carrier. The electrodes may be configured for implantation beneath the skin of a substantially haired region of the head of the subject in a vicinity of an occipital nerve. In addition, the electrodes may be spaced from each other by a distance greater than 3 mm, and may be configured to facilitate, when supplied with an electrical signal, a substantially unidirectional electric field sufficient to modulate the occipital nerve.
Additional features of the disclosure will be set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the disclosed embodiments.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the embodiments disclosed herein.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to a device for modulating a nerve through the delivery of energy. Nerve modulation, or neural modulation, includes inhibition (e.g. blockage), stimulation, modification, regulation, or therapeutic alteration of activity, electrical or chemical, in the central, peripheral, or autonomic nervous system. Nerve modulation may take the form of nerve stimulation, which may include providing energy to the nerve to create a voltage change sufficient for the nerve to activate, or propagate an electrical signal of its own. Nerve modulation may also take the form of nerve inhibition, which may including providing energy to the nerve sufficient to prevent the nerve from propagating electrical signals. Nerve inhibition may be performed through the constant application of energy, and may also be performed through the application of enough energy to inhibit the function of the nerve for some time after the application. Other forms of neural modulation may modify the function of a nerve, causing a heightened or lessened degree of sensitivity. As referred to herein, modulation of a nerve may include modulation of an entire nerve and/or modulation of a portion of a nerve. For example, modulation of a motor neuron may be performed to affect only those portions of the neuron that are distal of the location to which energy is applied.
In patients with OSA, for example, a primary target response of nerve stimulation may include contraction of a tongue muscle (e.g., the muscle) in order to move the tongue to a position that does not block the patient's airway. In the treatment of migraine headaches, nerve inhibition may be used to reduce or eliminate the sensation of pain. In the treatment of hypertension, neural modulation may be used to increase, decrease, eliminate or otherwise modify nerve signals generated by the body to regulate blood pressure.
While embodiments of the present disclosure may be disclosed for use in patients with specific conditions, the embodiments may be used in conjunction with any patient/portion of a body where nerve modulation may be desired. That is, in addition to use in patients with OSA, migraine headaches, or hypertension, embodiments of the present disclosure may be use in many other areas, including, but not limited to: deep brain stimulation (e.g., treatment of epilepsy, Parkinson's, and depression); cardiac pace-making, stomach muscle stimulation (e.g., treatment of obesity), back pain, incontinence, menstrual pain, and/or any other condition that may be affected by neural modulation.
In treating OSA, implant unit 110 may be located on a genioglossus muscle of a patient. Such a location is suitable for modulation of the hypoglossal nerve, branches of which run inside the genioglossus muscle. Further details regarding implantation locations of an implant unit 110 for treatment of OSA are provided below with respect to
External unit 120 may be configured for location external to a patient, either directly contacting, or close to the skin 112 of the patient. External unit 120 may be configured to be affixed to the patient, for example, by adhering to the skin 112 of the patient, or through a band or other device configured to hold external unit 120 in place. Adherence to the skin of external unit 120 may occur such that it is in the vicinity of the location of implant unit 110.
External unit 120 may further be configured to be affixed to an alternative location proximate to the patient. For example, in one embodiment, the external unit may be configured to fixedly or removably adhere to a strap or a band that may be configured to wrap around a part of a patient's body. Alternatively, or in addition, the external unit may be configured to remain in a desired location external to the patient's body without adhering to that location.
The external unit 120 may include a housing. The housing may include any suitable container configured for retaining components. In addition, while the external unit is illustrated schematically in
As previously discussed, in some embodiments external unit 120 may be configured to adhere to a desired location. Accordingly, in some embodiments, at least one side of the housing may include an adhesive material. The adhesive material may include a biocompatible material and may allow for a patient to adhere the external unit to the desired location and remove the external unit upon completion of use. The adhesive may be configured for single or multiple uses of the external unit. Suitable adhesive materials may include, but are not limited to biocompatible glues, starches, elastomers, thermoplastics, and emulsions.
As shown in
The at least one processor may include any electric circuit that may be configured to perform a logic operation on at least one input variable. The at least one processor may therefore include one or more integrated circuits, microchips, microcontrollers, and microprocessors, which may be all or part of a central processing unit (CPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or any other circuit known to those skilled in the art that may be suitable for executing instructions or performing logic operations.
The power source may be configured to power various components within the external unit. As illustrated in
Signal source 142 may be configured for direct or indirect electrical communication with an amplifier 146. The amplifier may include any suitable device configured to amplify one or more signals generated from signal source 142. Amplifier 146 may include one or more of various types of amplification devices, including, for example, transistor based devices, operational amplifiers, RF amplifiers, power amplifiers, or any other type of device that can increase the gain associated one or more aspects of a signal. The amplifier may further be configured to output the amplified signals to one or more components within external unit 120.
The external unit may additionally include a primary antenna 150. The primary antenna may be configured as part of a circuit within external unit 120 and may be coupled either directly or indirectly to various components in external unit 120. For example, as shown in
The primary antenna may include any conductive structure that may be configured to create an electromagnetic field. The primary antenna may further be of any suitable size, shape, and/or configuration. The size, shape, and/or configuration may be determined by the size of the patient, the placement location of the implant unit, the size and/or shape of the implant unit, the amount of energy required to modulate a nerve, a location of a nerve to be modulated, the type of receiving electronics present on the implant unit, etc. The primary antenna may include any suitable antenna known to those skilled in the art that may be configured to send and/or receive signals. Suitable antennas may include, but are not limited to, a long-wire antenna, a patch antenna, a helical antenna, etc. In one embodiment, for example, as illustrated in
As noted, implant unit 110 may be configured to be implanted in a patient's body (e.g., beneath the patient's skin).
Implant unit 110 may be formed of any materials suitable for implantation into the body of a patient. In some embodiments, implant unit 110 may include a flexible carrier 161 (
Other components that may be included in or otherwise associated with the implant unit, such as those illustrated in
Implant unit 110 may additionally include a plurality of field-generating implant electrodes 158a, 158b. The electrodes may include any suitable shape and/or orientation on the implant unit so long as the electrodes may be configured to generate an electric field in the body of a patient. Implant electrodes 158a and 158b may also include any suitable conductive material (e.g., copper, silver, gold, platinum, iridium, platinum-iridium, platinum-gold, conductive polymers, etc.) or combinations of conductive (and/or noble metals) materials. In some embodiments, for example, the electrodes may include short line electrodes, circular electrodes, and/or circular pairs of electrodes. As shown in
Implant electrodes may have a thickness between about 200 nanometers and 1 millimeter. Anode and cathode electrode pairs may be spaced apart by about a distance of about 0.2 mm to 25 mm. In additional embodiments, anode and cathode electrode pairs may be spaced apart by a distance of about 1 mm to 10 mm, or between 4 mm and 7 mm. In other embodiments, anode and cathode electrode pairs may be spaced apart by a distance of approximately 6.3 mm. In still other embodiments, anode and cathode electrode pairs may be spaced from each other by a distance greater than about 3 mm.
Adjacent anodes or adjacent cathodes may be spaced apart by distances as small as 0.001 mm or less, or as great as 25 mm or more. In some embodiments, adjacent anodes or adjacent cathodes may be spaced apart by a distance between about 0.2 mm and 1 mm.
As illustrated in
Returning to
External unit 120 may communicate a primary signal on primary antenna to the secondary antenna 152 of implant unit 110. This communication may result from coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. Such coupling of the primary antenna and the secondary antenna may include any interaction between the primary antenna and the secondary antenna that causes a signal on the secondary antenna in response to a signal applied to the primary antenna. In some embodiments, coupling between the primary and secondary antennas may include capacitive coupling, inductive coupling, radiofrequency coupling, etc. and any combinations thereof.
Coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 may depend on the proximity of the primary antenna relative to the secondary antenna. That is, in some embodiments, an efficiency or degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 may depend on the proximity of the primary antenna to the secondary antenna. The proximity of the primary and secondary antennas may be expressed in terms of a coaxial offset (e.g., a distance between the primary and secondary antennas when central axes of the primary and secondary antennas are co-aligned), a lateral offset (e.g., a distance between a central axis of the primary antenna and a central axis of the secondary antenna), and/or an angular offset (e.g., an angular difference between the central axes of the primary and secondary antennas). In some embodiments, a theoretical maximum efficiency of coupling may exist between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 when both the coaxial offset, the lateral offset, and the angular offset are zero. Increasing any of the coaxial offset, the lateral offset, and the angular offset may have the effect of reducing the efficiency or degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152.
As a result of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152, a secondary signal may arise on secondary antenna 152 when the primary signal is present on the primary antenna 150. Such coupling may include inductive/magnetic coupling, RF coupling/transmission, capacitive coupling, or any other mechanism where a secondary signal may be generated on secondary antenna 152 in response to a primary signal generated on primary antenna 150. Coupling may refer to any interaction between the primary and secondary antennas. In addition to the coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152, circuit components associated with implant unit 110 may also affect the secondary signal on secondary antenna 152. Thus, the secondary signal on secondary antenna 152 may refer to any and all signals and signal components present on secondary antenna 152 regardless of the source.
While the presence of a primary signal on primary antenna 150 may cause or induce a secondary signal on secondary antenna 152, the coupling between the two antennas may also lead to a coupled signal or signal components on the primary antenna 150 as a result of the secondary signal present on secondary antenna 152. A signal on primary antenna 150 induced by a secondary signal on secondary antenna 152 may be referred to as a primary coupled signal component. The primary signal may refer to any and all signals or signal components present on primary antenna 150, regardless of source, and the primary coupled signal component may refer to any signal or signal component arising on the primary antenna as a result of coupling with signals present on secondary antenna 152. Thus, in some embodiments, the primary coupled signal component may contribute to the primary signal on primary antenna 150.
Implant unit 110 may be configured to respond to external unit 120. For example, in some embodiments, a primary signal generated on primary coil 150 may cause a secondary signal on secondary antenna 152, which in turn, may cause one or more responses by implant unit 110. In some embodiments, the response of implant unit 110 may include the generation of an electric field between implant electrodes 158a and 158b.
The field inducing signal may be generated as a result of conditioning of the secondary signal by circuitry 180. As shown in
As noted above, the field inducing signal may be configured to generate an electric field between implant electrodes 158a and 158b. In some instances, the magnitude and/or duration of the generated electric field resulting from the field inducing signal may be sufficient to modulate one or more nerves in the vicinity of electrodes 158a and 158b. In such cases, the field inducing signal may be referred to as a modulation signal. In other instances, the magnitude and/or duration of the field inducing signal may generate an electric field that does not result in nerve modulation. In such cases, the field inducing signal may be referred to as a sub-modulation signal.
Various types of field inducing signals may constitute modulation signals. For example, in some embodiments, a modulation signal may include a moderate amplitude and moderate duration, while in other embodiments, a modulation signal may include a higher amplitude and a shorter duration. Various amplitudes and/or durations of field-inducing signals across electrodes 158a, 158b may result in modulation signals, and whether a field-inducing signal rises to the level of a modulation signal can depend on many factors (e.g., distance from a particular nerve to be stimulated; whether the nerve is branched; orientation of the induced electric field with respect to the nerve; type of tissue present between the electrodes and the nerve; etc.).
As noted above, electrodes 158a, 158b may have various different configurations, and in some embodiments, the electrodes may be configured to emit a unidirectional electric field (e.g., in response to an applied DC voltage signal). Electrodes 158a, 158b may further be configured such that modulation of at least one nerve in the vicinity of the electrodes may be accomplished when non-nerve tissue is interposed between the electrodes and the at least one nerve. For example, such non-nerve tissue may include muscle tissue, connective tissue, fat, blood vessel, mucosal membrane, etc. may interposed between the electrodes and the nerve to be modulated. Electrodes 158a, 158b may be configured such that an electric field generated by the electrodes can penetrate the tissue interposed between the electrodes and the at least one nerve to be modulated. For example, in some embodiments the electrodes may be configured to generate an electric field enabling modulation of the at least one nerve when the tissue interposed between the electrodes and the at least one nerve has a thickness of greater than about 1 mm. In other embodiments the electrodes may be configured to generate an electric field enabling modulation of the at least one nerve when the tissue interposed between the electrodes and the at least one nerve has a thickness of greater than about 5 mm. In still other embodiments, the electrodes may be configured to generate an electric field enabling modulation of the at least one nerve when the electrodes and the at least one nerve are spaced apart by a distance between about 5 mm and 15 mm, or a distance between 0.1 mm and 25 mm.
As used herein, the term substantially unidirectional electric field may refer to an electric field having field lines parallel to one another, when viewed from an angle orthogonal to a plane on which the electrodes facilitating the electric field are located. For example, the electric field lines 220 illustrated in
The generation of electric fields configured to penetrate intervening tissue is now discussed with respect to
Naturally functioning neurons function by transmitting action potentials along their length. Structurally, neurons include multiple ion channels along their length that serve to maintain a voltage potential gradient across a plasma membrane between the interior and exterior of the neuron. Ion channels operate by maintaining an appropriate balance between positively charged sodium ions on one side of the plasma membrane and negatively charged potassium ions on the other side of the plasma membrane. A sufficiently high voltage potential difference created near an ion channel may exceed a membrane threshold potential of the ion channel. The ion channel may then be induced to activate, pumping the sodium and potassium ions across the plasma membrane to switch places in the vicinity of the activated ion channel. This, in turn, further alters the potential difference in the vicinity of the ion channel, which may serve to activate a neighboring ion channel. The cascading activation of adjacent ion channels may serve to propagate an action potential along the length of the neuron. Further, the activation of an ion channel in an individual neuron may induce the activation of ion channels in neighboring neurons that, bundled together, form nerve tissue. The activation of a single ion channel in a single neuron, however, may not be sufficient to induce the cascading activation of neighboring ion channels necessary to permit the propagation of an action potential. Thus, the more ion channels in a locality that may be recruited by an initial potential difference, caused through natural means such as the action of nerve endings or through artificial means, such as the application of electric fields, the more likely the propagation of an action potential may be. The process of artificially inducing the propagation of action potentials along the length of a nerve may be referred to as stimulation, or up modulation.
Neurons may also be prevented from functioning naturally through constant or substantially constant application of a voltage potential difference. After activation, each ion channel experiences a refractory period, during which it “resets” the sodium and potassium concentrations across the plasma membrane back to an initial state. Resetting the sodium and potassium concentrations causes the membrane threshold potential to return to an initial state. Until the ion channel restores an appropriate concentration of sodium and potassium across the plasma membrane, the membrane threshold potential will remain elevated, thus requiring a higher voltage potential to cause activation of the ion channel. If the membrane threshold potential is maintained at a high enough level, action potentials propagated by neighboring ion channels may not create a large enough voltage potential difference to surpass the membrane threshold potential and activate the ion channel. Thus, by maintaining a sufficient voltage potential difference in the vicinity of a particular ion channel, that ion channel may serve to block further signal transmission. The membrane threshold potential may also be raised without eliciting an initial activation of the ion channel. If an ion channel (or a plurality of ion channels) are subjected to an elevated voltage potential difference that is not high enough to surpass the membrane threshold potential, it may serve to raise the membrane threshold potential over time, thus having a similar effect to an ion channel that has not been permitted to properly restore ion concentrations. Thus, an ion channel may be recruited as a block without actually causing an initial action potential to propagate. This method may be valuable, for example, in pain management, where the propagation of pain signals is undesired. As described above with respect to stimulation, the larger the number of ion channels in a locality that may be recruited to serve as blocks, the more likely the chance that an action potential propagating along the length of the nerve will be blocked by the recruited ion channels, rather than traveling through neighboring, unblocked channels.
The number of ion channels recruited by a voltage potential difference may be increased in at least two ways. First, more ion channels may be recruited by utilizing a larger voltage potential difference in a local area. Second, more ion channels may be recruited by expanding the area affected by the voltage potential difference.
Returning to
In embodiments consistent with the present disclosure, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may be arranged on the surface of a muscle or other tissue, in order to modulate a nerve embedded within the muscle or other tissue. Thus, tissue may be interposed between modulation electrodes 158a, 158b and a nerve to be modulated. Modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may be spaced away from a nerve to be modulated. The structure and configuration of modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may play an important role in determining whether modulation of a nerve, which is spaced a certain distance away from the electrodes, may be achieved.
Electrode configurations A, B, and C show that when modulation electrodes 158a, 158b of a constant size are moved further apart, the depth of the electric field facilitated by the electrodes increases. The strength of the electric field for a given configuration may vary significantly depending on a location within the field. If a constant level of current is passed between modulation electrodes 158a and 158b, however, the larger field area of configuration C may exhibit a lower overall current density than the smaller field area of configuration A. A lower current density, in turn, implies a lower voltage potential difference between two points spaced equidistant from each other in the field facilitated by configuration C relative to that of the field facilitated by configuration A. Thus, while moving modulation electrodes 158a and 158b farther from each other increases the depth of the field, it also decreases the strength of the field. In order to modulate a nerve spaced away from modulation electrodes 158a, 158b, a distance between the electrodes may be selected in order to facilitate an electric field of strength sufficient to surpass a membrane threshold potential of the nerve (and thereby modulate it) at the depth of the nerve. If modulation electrodes 158a, 158b are too close together, the electric field may not extend deep enough into the tissue in order to modulate a nerve located therein. If modulation electrodes 158a, 158b are too far apart, the electric field may be too weak to modulate the nerve at the appropriate depth.
Appropriate distances between modulation electrodes 158a, 158b, may depend on an implant location and a nerve to be stimulated. For example, modulation point 901 is located at the same depth equidistant from the centers of modulation electrodes 158a, 158b in each of configurations A, B, and C, The figures illustrate that, in this example, configuration B is most likely to achieve the highest possible current density, and therefore voltage potential, at modulation point 901. The field of configuration A may not extend deeply enough, and the field of configuration C may be too weak at that depth.
In some embodiments, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may be spaced apart by about a distance of about 0.2 mm to 25 mm. In additional embodiments, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may be spaced apart by a distance of about 1 mm to 10 mm, or between 4 mm and 7 mm. In other embodiments modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may be spaced apart by between approximately 6 mm and 7 mm.
Electrode configurations D, E, and F show that when modulation electrodes 158a, 158b of a constant distance are changed in size, the shape of the electric field facilitated by the electrodes changes. If a constant level of current is passed between when modulation electrodes 158a and 158b, the smaller electrodes of configuration D may facilitate a deeper field than that of configurations E and F, although the effect is less significant relative to changes in distance between the electrodes. As noted above, the facilitated electric fields are not of uniform strength throughout, and thus the voltage potential at seemingly similar locations within each of the electric fields of configurations D, E, and, F may vary considerably. Appropriate sizes of modulation electrodes 158a, 158b, may therefore depend on an implant location and a nerve to be stimulated.
In some embodiments, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may have a surface area between approximately 0.01 mm2 and 80 mm2. In additional embodiments, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may have a surface area between approximately 0.1 mm2 and 4 mm2. In other embodiments modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may have a surface area of between approximately 0.25 mm2 and 0.35 mm2.
In some embodiments, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b may be arranged such that the electrodes are exposed on a single side of carrier 161. In such an embodiment, an electric field is generated only on the side of carrier 161 with exposed electrodes. Such a configuration may serve to reduce the amount of energy required to achieve neural modulation, because the entire electric field is generated on the same side of the carrier as the nerve, and little or no current is wasted traveling through tissue away from the nerve to be modulated. Such a configuration may also serve to make the modulation more selective. That is, by generating an electric field on the side of the carrier where there is a nerve to be modulated, nerves located in other areas of tissue (e.g. on the other side of the carrier from the nerve to be modulated), may avoid being accidentally modulated.
As discussed above, the utilization of electric fields having electrical field lines extending in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal direction of a nerve to be modulated may serve to lower the power requirements of modulation. This reduction in power requirements may permit the modulation of a nerve using less than 1.6 mA of current, less than 1.4 mA of current, less than 1.2 mA of current, less than 1 mA of current, less than 0.8 mA of current, less than 0.6 mA of current, less than 0.4 mA of current, and even less than 0.2 mA of current passed between modulation electrodes 158a, 158b.
Reducing the current flow required may have additional effects on the configuration of implant unit 110 and external unit 120. For example, the reduced current requirement may enable implant unit 110 to modulate a nerve without a requirement for a power storage unit, such as a battery or capacitor, to be implanted in conjunction with implant unit 110. For example, implant unit 110 may be capable of modulating a nerve using only the energy received via secondary antenna 152. Implant unit 110 may be configured to serve as a pass through that directs substantially all received energy to modulation electrodes 158a and 158b for nerve modulation. Substantially all received energy may refer to that portion of energy that is not dissipated or otherwise lost to the internal components of implant unit 110. Finally, the reduction in required current may also serve to reduce the amount of energy required by external unit 120. External unit 120 may be configured to operate successfully for an entire treatment session lasting from one to ten hours by utilizing a battery having a capacity of less than 240 mAh, less than 120 mAh, and even less than 60 mAh.
As discussed above, utilization of parallel fields may enable implant unit 110 to modulate nerves in a non-contacting fashion. Contactless neuromodulation may increase the efficacy of an implanted implant unit 110 over time compared to modulation techniques requiring contact with a nerve or muscle to be modulated. Over time, implantable devices may migrate within the body. Thus, an implantable device requiring nerve contact to initiate neural modulation may lose efficacy as the device moves within the body and loses contact with the nerve to be modulated. In contrast, implant unit 110, utilizing contactless modulation, may still effectively modulate a nerve even if it moves away from an initial implant location. Additionally, tissue growth and/or fibrosis may develop around an implantable device. This growth may serve to lessen or even eliminate the contact between a device designed for contact modulation and a nerve to be modulated. In contrast, implant unit 110, utilizing contactless modulation, may continue to effectively modulate a nerve if additional tissue forms between it and a nerve to be modulated.
As described above, modulation electrodes 158a, 158b, of implant unit 110 may be configured so as to facilitate the generation of an electric field sufficient to modulate a nerve even when a voltage signal of low current is applied to modulation electrodes 158a, 158b. In some embodiments consistent with the present disclosure, implant unit 110 may have no means of measuring the current of a voltage signal applied to modulation electrodes 158a, 158b. In such an embodiment, processor 144 may be configured to supply a voltage signal having a specific current value, for example, less than about 1.6 mAmps, as follows. Processor 144 may be configured to adjust the characteristics, for example, the voltage, of a primary signal. Processor 144 may detect coupling between primary antenna 152 and secondary antenna 162, and therefore determine the voltage of the secondary signal induced on the secondary antenna 162 by the primary signal. The voltage induced in the implant may drive a certain amount of current through the circuitry 180 of the implant to modulation electrodes 158a, 158b. The amount of current driven through the implant unit 110 may depend on the voltage of the secondary signal, the configuration of implant circuitry 180, and the resistance between modulation electrodes 158a, 158b. The resistance between modulation electrodes 158a, 158b, may vary for physiological reasons because tissue closes the circuit. Implant positioning, tissue composition, tissue hydration, and other physiological factors may all affect the resistance, and thus the current across the electrodes. The resistance, however, will vary within a small range, and the known factors, such as implant circuitry 180, will dominate these small variations. Thus, processor 144 may be configured with information about a configuration of implant unit 110, modulation electrodes, 158a, 158b, and ranges of variation of tissue impedance so as to be able to adjust the primary signal to an appropriate voltage in order to deliver the specified amount of current to modulation electrodes 158a, 158b in order to modulate a nerve.
The circuitry 180 of implant unit 110 may also be configured to deliver to the electrodes an electrical signal having a current less than about 1.6 milliamps. That is, the design of the implant circuitry 180, the values of the resistors, capacitors, diodes, and other electronic components of implant circuitry 180 may be chosen specifically such that when a primary signal on primary antenna 152 induces a secondary signal on secondary antenna 162, the voltage of the secondary signal will be sufficient to drive the specified amount of current across modulation electrodes 158a, 158b, in order to modulate a nerve. Whether a field inducing signal constitutes a modulation signal (resulting in an electric field that may cause nerve modulation) or a sub-modulation signal (resulting in an electric field not intended to cause nerve modulation) may ultimately be controlled by processor 144 of external unit 120. For example, in certain situations, processor 144 may determine that nerve modulation is appropriate. Under these conditions, processor 144 may cause signal source 144 and amplifier 146 to generate a modulation control signal on primary antenna 150 (i.e., a signal having a magnitude and/or duration selected such that a resulting secondary signal on secondary antenna 152 will provide a modulation signal at implant electrodes 158a and 158b).
Processor 144 may be configured to limit an amount of energy transferred from external unit 120 to implant unit 110. For example, in some embodiments, implant unit 110 may be associated with a threshold energy limit that may take into account multiple factors associated with the patient and/or the implant. For example, in some cases, certain nerves of a patient should receive no more than a predetermined maximum amount of energy to minimize the risk of damaging the nerves and/or surrounding tissue. Additionally, circuitry 180 of implant unit 110 may include components having a maximum operating voltage or power level that may contribute to a practical threshold energy limit of implant unit 110. For example, components including diodes may be included in implant unit 110 or in external unit 120 to limit power transferred from the external unit 120 to the implant unit 110. In some embodiments, diode 156 may function to limit the power level received by the patient. Processor 144 may be configured to account for such limitations when setting the magnitude and/or duration of a primary signal to be applied to primary antenna 150.
In addition to determining an upper limit of power that may be delivered to implant unit 110, processor 144 may also determine a lower power threshold based, at least in part, on an efficacy of the delivered power. The lower power threshold may be computed based on a minimum amount of power that enables nerve modulation (e.g., signals having power levels above the lower power threshold may constitute modulation signals while signals having power levels below the lower power threshold may constitute sub-modulation signals).
A lower power threshold may also be measured or provided in alternative ways. For example, appropriate circuitry or sensors in the implant unit 110 may measure a lower power threshold. A lower power threshold may be computed or sensed by an additional external device, and subsequently programmed into processor 144, or programmed into implant unit 110. Alternatively, implant unit 110 may be constructed with circuitry 180 specifically chosen to generate signals at the electrodes of at least the lower power threshold. In still another embodiment, an antenna of external unit 120 may be adjusted to accommodate or produce a signal corresponding to a specific lower power threshold. The lower power threshold may vary from patient to patient, and may take into account multiple factors, such as, for example, modulation characteristics of a particular patient's nerve fibers, a distance between implant unit 110 and external unit 120 after implantation, and the size and configuration of implant unit components (e.g., antenna and implant electrodes), etc.
Processor 144 may also be configured to cause application of sub-modulation control signals to primary antenna 150. Such sub-modulation control signals may include an amplitude and/or duration that result in a sub-modulation signal at electrodes 158a, 158b. While such sub-modulation control signals may not result in nerve modulation, such sub-modulation control signals may enable feedback-based control of the nerve modulation system. That is, in some embodiments, processor 144 may be configured to cause application of a sub-modulation control signal to primary antenna 150. This signal may induce a secondary signal on secondary antenna 152, which, in turn, induces a primary coupled signal component on primary antenna 150.
To analyze the primary coupled signal component induced on primary antenna 150, external unit 120 may include a feedback circuit 148 (e.g., a signal analyzer or detector, etc.), which may be placed in direct or indirect communication with primary antenna 150 and processor 144. Sub-modulation control signals may be applied to primary antenna 150 at any desired periodicity. In some embodiments, the sub-modulation control signals may be applied to primary antenna 150 at a rate of one every five seconds (or longer). In other embodiments, the sub-modulation control signals may be applied more frequently (e.g., once every two seconds, once per second, once per millisecond, once per nanosecond, or multiple times per second). Further, it should be noted that feedback may also be received upon application of modulation control signals to primary antenna 150 (i.e., those that result in nerve modulation), as such modulation control signals may also result in generation of a primary coupled signal component on primary antenna 150.
The primary coupled signal component may be fed to processor 144 by feedback circuit 148 and may be used as a basis for determining a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. The degree of coupling may enable determination of the efficacy of the energy transfer between two antennas. Processor 144 may also use the determined degree of coupling in regulating delivery of power to implant unit 110.
Processor 144 may be configured with any suitable logic for determining how to regulate power transfer to implant unit 110 based on the determined degree of coupling. Processor 144 may, for example, utilize a baseline coupling range. Presumably, while the patient is awake, the tongue is not blocking the patient's airway and moves with the patient's breathing in a natural range, where coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 may be within a baseline coupling range. A baseline coupling range may encompass a maximum coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. A baseline coupling range may also encompass a range that does not include a maximum coupling level between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. Processor 144 may be configured to determine the baseline coupling range based on a command from a user, such as the press of a button on the patch or the press of a button on a suitable remote device. Alternatively or additionally, processor 144 may be configured to automatically determine the baseline coupling range when external unit 120 is placed such that primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 are within range of each other. In such an embodiment, when processor 144 detects any degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152, it may immediately begin tracking a baseline coupling range. Processor 144 may then determine a baseline coupling range when it detects that the only movement between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 is caused by a patient's natural breathing rhythm (i.e., the patient has secured the external unit to an appropriate location on their body). Additionally, processor 144 may be configured such that it measures coupling between the primary antenna 150 and the secondary antenna 152 for a specified period of time after activation in order to determine a baseline coupling range, such as 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, etc.
Where the primary coupled signal component indicates that a degree of coupling has changed from a baseline coupling range, processor 144 may determine that secondary antenna 152 has moved with respect to primary antenna 150 (either in coaxial offset, lateral offset, or angular offset, or any combination). Such movement, for example, may be associated with a movement of the implant unit 110, and the tissue that it is associated with based on its implant location. Thus, in such situations, processor 144 may determine that modulation of a nerve in the patient's body is appropriate. More particularly, in response to an indication of a change in coupling, processor 144, in some embodiments, may cause application of a modulation control signal to primary antenna 150 in order to generate a modulation signal at implant electrodes 158a, 158b, e.g., to cause modulation of a nerve of the patient.
In an embodiment for the treatment of OSA, movement of an implant unit 110 may be associated with movement of the tongue, which may indicate the onset of a sleep apnea event or a sleep apnea precursor. The onset of a sleep apnea event of sleep apnea precursor may require the stimulation of the genioglossus muscle of the patient to relieve or avert the event. Such stimulation may result in contraction of the muscle and movement of the patient's tongue away from the patient's airway.
In embodiments for the treatment of head pain, including migraines, processor 144 may be configured to generate a modulation control signal based on a signal from a user, for example, or a detected level of neural activity in a sensory neuron (e.g. the greater occipital nerve or trigeminal nerve) associated with head pain. A modulation control signal generated by the processor and applied to the primary antenna 150 may generate a modulation signal at implant electrodes 158a, 158b, e.g., to cause inhibition or blocking (i.e. a down modulation) of a sensory nerve of the patient. Such inhibition or blocking may decrease or eliminate the sensation of pain for the patient.
In embodiments for the treatment of hypertension, processor 144 may be configured to generate a modulation control signal based on, for example, pre-programmed instructions and/or signals from an implant indicative of blood pressure. A modulation control signal generated by the processor and applied to the primary antenna 150 may generate a modulation signal at implant electrodes 158a, 158b, e.g., to cause either inhibition or stimulation of nerve of a patient, depending on the requirements. For example, a neuromodulator placed in a carotid artery or jugular vein (i.e. in the vicinity of a carotid baroreceptor), may receive a modulation control signal tailored to induce a stimulation signal at the electrodes, thereby causing the glossopharyngeal nerve associated with the carotid baroreceptors to fire at an increased rate in order to signal the brain to lower blood pressure. Similar modulation of the glossopharyngeal nerve may be achieved with a neuromodulator implanted in a subcutaneous location in a patient's neck or behind a patient's ear. A neuromodulator placed in a renal artery may receive a modulation control signal tailored to cause an inhibiting or blocking signal (i.e. a down modulation) at the electrodes, thereby inhibiting a signal to raise blood pressure carried from the renal nerves to the kidneys.
Modulation control signals may include stimulation control signals, and sub-modulation control signals may include sub-stimulation control signals. Stimulation control signals may have any amplitude, pulse duration, or frequency combination that results in a stimulation signal at electrodes 158a, 158b. In some embodiments (e.g., at a frequency of between about 6.5-13.6 MHz), stimulation control signals may include a pulse duration of greater than about 50 microseconds and/or an amplitude of approximately 0.5 amps, or between 0.1 amps and 1 amp, or between 0.05 amps and 3 amps. Sub-stimulation control signals may have a pulse duration less than about 500, or less than about 200 nanoseconds and/or an amplitude less than about 1 amp, 0.5 amps, 0.1 amps, 0.05 amps, or 0.01 amps. Of course, these values are meant to provide a general reference only, as various combinations of values higher than or lower than the exemplary guidelines provided may or may not result in nerve stimulation.
In some embodiments, stimulation control signals may include a pulse train, wherein each pulse includes a plurality of sub-pulses. An alternating current signal (e.g., at a frequency of between about 6.5-13.6 MHz) may be used to generate the pulse train, as follows. A sub-pulse may have a duration of between 50-250 microseconds, or a duration of between 1 microsecond and 2 milliseconds, during which an alternating current signal is turned on. For example, a 200 microsecond sub-pulse of a 10 MHz alternating current signal will include approximately 2000 periods. Each pulse may, in turn, have a duration of between 100 and 500 milliseconds, during which sub-pulses occur at a frequency of between 25 and 100 Hz. For example, a 200 millisecond pulse of 50 Hz sub-pulses will include approximately 10 sub-pulses. Finally, in a pulse train, each pulse may be separated from the next by a duration of between 0.2 and 2 seconds. For example, in a pulse train of 200 millisecond pulses, each separated by 1.3 seconds from the next, a new pulse will occur every 1.5 seconds. A pulse train of this embodiment may be utilized, for example, to provide ongoing stimulation during a treatment session. In the context of OSA, a treatment session may be a period of time during which a subject is asleep and in need of treatment to prevent OSA. Such a treatment session may last anywhere from about three to ten hours. In the context of other conditions to which neural modulators of the present disclosure are applied, a treatment session may be of varying length according to the duration of the treated condition.
Processor 144 may be configured to determine a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 by monitoring one or more aspects of the primary coupled signal component received through feedback circuit 148. In some embodiments, processor 144 may determine a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 by monitoring a voltage level associated with the primary coupled signal component, a current level, or any other attribute that may depend on the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. For example, in response to periodic sub-modulation signals applied to primary antenna 150, processor 144 may determine a baseline voltage level or current level associated with the primary coupled signal component. This baseline voltage level, for example, may be associated with a range of movement of the patient's tongue when a sleep apnea event or its precursor is not occurring, e.g. during normal breathing. As the patient's tongue moves toward a position associated with a sleep apnea event, moves in a manner consistent with a precursor of sleep apnea, or moves in any other manner (e.g., vibration, etc.), the coaxial, lateral, or angular offset between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 may change. As a result, the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 may change, and the voltage level or current level of the primary coupled signal component on primary antenna 150 may also change. Processor 144 may be configured to recognize a sleep apnea event or its precursor when a voltage level, current level, or other electrical characteristic associated with the primary coupled signal component changes by a predetermined amount or reaches a predetermined absolute value.
Processor 144 may be configured to determine a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 by monitoring other aspects of the primary coupled signal component. For example, in some embodiments, the non-linear behavior of circuitry 180 in implant unit 110 may be monitored to determine a degree of coupling. For example, the presence, absence, magnitude, reduction and/or onset of harmonic components in the primary coupled signal component on primary antenna 150 may reflect the behavior of circuitry 180 in response to various control signals (either sub-modulation or modulation control signals) and, therefore, may be used to determine a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152.
As shown in
In certain embodiments, circuitry 180 may include additional circuit components that alter the characteristics of the harmonics generated in circuitry 180 above a certain transition point. Monitoring how these non-linear harmonics behave above and below the transition point may enable a determination of a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. For example, as shown in
Monitoring the level at which this transition occurs may enable a determination of a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. For example, in some embodiments, a patient may attach external unit 120 over an area of the skin under which implant unit 110 resides. Processor 144 can proceed to cause a series of sub-modulation control signals to be applied to primary antenna 150, which in turn cause secondary signals on secondary antenna 152. These sub-modulation control signals may progress over a sweep or scan of various signal amplitude levels. By monitoring the resulting primary coupled signal component on primary antenna 150 (generated through coupling with the secondary signal on secondary antenna 152), processor 144 can determine the amplitude of primary signal (whether a sub-modulation control signal or other signal) that results in a secondary signal of sufficient magnitude to activate harmonics modifier circuit 154. That is, processor 144 can monitor the amplitude of the second, fourth, or sixth order harmonics and determine the amplitude of the primary signal at which the amplitude of any of the even harmonics drops.
In embodiments utilizing non-linear harmonics, the determined amplitude of the primary signal corresponding to the transition level of the Zener diodes (which may be referred to as a primary signal transition amplitude) may establish the baseline coupling range when the patient attaches external unit 120 to the skin. Thus, the initially determined primary signal transition amplitude may be fairly representative of a non-sleep apnea condition and may be used by processor 144 as a baseline in determining a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. Optionally, processor 144 may also be configured to monitor the primary signal transition amplitude over a series of scans and select the minimum value as a baseline, as the minimum value may correspond to a condition of maximum coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 during normal breathing conditions.
As the patient wears external unit 120, processor 144 may periodically scan over a range of primary signal amplitudes to determine a current value of the primary signal transition amplitude. In some embodiments, the range of amplitudes that processor 144 selects for the scan may be based on (e.g., near) the level of the baseline primary signal transition amplitude. If a periodic scan results in determination of a primary signal transition amplitude different from the baseline primary signal transition amplitude, processor 144 may determine that there has been a change from the baseline initial conditions. For example, in some embodiments, an increase in the primary signal transition amplitude over the baseline value may indicate that there has been a reduction in the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 (e.g., because the implant has moved or an internal state of the implant has changed).
In addition to determining whether a change in the degree of coupling has occurred, processor 144 may also be configured to determine a specific degree of coupling based on an observed primary signal transition amplitude. For example, in some embodiments, processor 144 may have access to a lookup table or a memory storing data that correlates various primary signal transition amplitudes with distances (or any other quantity indicative of a degree of coupling) between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. In other embodiments, processor 144 may be configured to calculate a degree of coupling based on performance characteristics of known circuit components.
By periodically determining a degree of coupling value, processor 144 may be configured to determine, in situ, appropriate parameter values for the modulation control signal that will ultimately result in nerve modulation. For example, by determining the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152, processor 144 may be configured to select characteristics of the modulation control signal (e.g., amplitude, pulse duration, frequency, etc.) that may provide a modulation signal at electrodes 158a, 158b in proportion to or otherwise related to the determined degree of coupling. In some embodiments, processor 144 may access a lookup table or other data stored in a memory correlating modulation control signal parameter values with degree of coupling. In this way, processor 144 may adjust the applied modulation control signal in response to an observed degree of coupling.
Additionally or alternatively, processor 144 may be configured to determine the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 during modulation. The tongue, or other structure on or near which the implant is located, and thus implant unit 110, may move as a result of modulation. Thus, the degree of coupling may change during modulation. Processor 144 may be configured to determine the degree of coupling as it changes during modulation, in order to dynamically adjust characteristics of the modulation control signal according to the changing degree of coupling. This adjustment may permit processor 144 to cause implant unit 110 to provide an appropriate modulation signal at electrodes 158a, 158b throughout a modulation event. For example, processor 144 may alter the primary signal in accordance with the changing degree of coupling in order to maintain a constant modulation signal, or to cause the modulation signal to be reduced in a controlled manner according to patient needs.
More particularly, the response of processor 144 may be correlated to the determined degree of coupling. In situations where processor 144 determines that the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna has fallen only slightly below a predetermined coupling threshold (e.g, during snoring or during a small vibration of the tongue or other sleep apnea event precursor), processor 144 may determine that only a small response is necessary. Thus, processor 144 may select modulation control signal parameters that will result in a relatively small response (e.g., a short stimulation of a nerve, small muscle contraction, etc.). Where, however, processor 144 determines that the degree of coupling has fallen substantially below the predetermined coupling threshold (e.g., where the tongue has moved enough to cause a sleep apnea event), processor 144 may determine that a larger response is required. As a result, processor 144 may select modulation control signal parameters that will result in a larger response. In some embodiments, only enough power may be transmitted to implant unit 110 to cause the desired level of response. In other words, processor 144 may be configured to cause a metered response based on the determined degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. As the determined degree of coupling decreases, processor 144 may cause transfer of power in increasing amounts. Such an approach may preserve battery life in the external unit 120, may protect circuitry 170 and circuitry 180, may increase effectiveness in addressing the type of detected condition (e.g., sleep apnea, snoring, tongue movement, etc.), and may be more comfortable for the patient.
In some embodiments, processor 144 may employ an iterative process in order to select modulation control signal parameters that result in a desired response level. For example, upon determining that a modulation control signal should be generated, processor 144 may cause generation of an initial modulation control signal based on a set of predetermined parameter values. If feedback from feedback circuit 148 indicates that a nerve has been modulated (e.g, if an increase in a degree of coupling is observed), then processor 144 may return to a monitoring mode by issuing sub-modulation control signals. If, on the other hand, the feedback suggests that the intended nerve modulation did not occur as a result of the intended modulation control signal or that modulation of the nerve occurred but only partially provided the desired result (e.g, movement of the tongue only partially away from the airway), processor 144 may change one or more parameter values associated with the modulation control signal (e.g., the amplitude, pulse duration, etc.).
Where no nerve modulation occurred, processor 144 may increase one or more parameters of the modulation control signal periodically until the feedback indicates that nerve modulation has occurred. Where nerve modulation occurred, but did not produce the desired result, processor 144 may re-evaluate the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 and select new parameters for the modulation control signal targeted toward achieving a desired result. For example, where stimulation of a nerve causes the tongue to move only partially away from the patient's airway, additional stimulation may be desired. Because the tongue has moved away from the airway, however, implant unit 110 may be closer to external unit 120 and, therefore, the degree of coupling may have increased. As a result, to move the tongue a remaining distance to a desired location may require transfer to implant unit 110 of a smaller amount of power than what was supplied prior to the last stimulation-induced movement of the tongue. Thus, based on a newly determined degree of coupling, processor 144 can select new parameters for the stimulation control signal aimed at moving the tongue the remaining distance to the desired location.
In one mode of operation, processor 144 may be configured to sweep over a range of parameter values until nerve modulation is achieved. For example, in circumstances where an applied sub-modulation control signal results in feedback indicating that nerve modulation is appropriate, processor 144 may use the last applied sub-modulation control signal as a starting point for generation of the modulation control signal. The amplitude and/or pulse duration (or other parameters) associated with the signal applied to primary antenna 150 may be iteratively increased by predetermined amounts and at a predetermined rate until the feedback indicates that nerve modulation has occurred.
Processor 144 may be configured to determine or derive various physiologic data based on the determined degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. For example, in some embodiments the degree of coupling may indicate a distance between external unit 120 and implant unit 110, which processor 144 may use to determine a position of external unit 120 or a relative position of a patient's tongue. Monitoring the degree of coupling can also provide such physiologic data as whether a patient's tongue is moving or vibrating (e.g, whether the patient is snoring), by how much the tongue is moving or vibrating, the direction of motion of the tongue, the rate of motion of the tongue, etc.
In response to any of these determined physiologic data, processor 144 may regulate delivery of power to implant unit 110 based on the determined physiologic data. For example, processor 144 may select parameters for a particular modulation control signal or series of modulation control signals for addressing a specific condition relating to the determined physiologic data. If the physiologic data indicates that the tongue is vibrating, for example, processor 144 may determine that a sleep apnea event is likely to occur and may issue a response by delivering power to implant unit 110 in an amount selected to address the particular situation. If the tongue is in a position blocking the patient's airway (or partially blocking a patient's airway), but the physiologic data indicates that the tongue is moving away from the airway, processor 144 may opt to not deliver power and wait to determine if the tongue clears on its own. Alternatively, processor 144 may deliver a small amount of power to implant unit 110 (e.g., especially where a determined rate of movement indicates that the tongue is moving slowly away from the patient's airway) to encourage the tongue to continue moving away from the patient's airway or to speed its progression away from the airway. Additionally or alternatively, processor 144 may deliver power to implant unit 110 to initiate a tongue movement, monitor the movement of the tongue, and deliver additional power, for example, a reduced amount of power, if necessary to encourage the tongue to continue moving away from the patient's airway. The scenarios described are exemplary only. Processor 144 may be configured with software and/or logic enabling it to address a variety of different physiologic scenarios with particularity. In each case, processor 144 may be configured to use the physiologic data to determine an amount of power to be delivered to implant unit 110 in order to modulate nerves associated with the tongue with the appropriate amount of energy.
The disclosed embodiments may be used in conjunction with a method for regulating delivery of power to an implant unit. The method may include determining a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 associated with external unit 120 and secondary antenna 152 associated with implant unit 110, implanted in the body of a patient. Determining the degree of coupling may be accomplished by processor 144 located external to implant unit 110 and that may be associated with external unit 120. Processor 144 may be configured to regulate delivery of power from the external unit to the implant unit based on the determined degree of coupling.
As previously discussed, the degree of coupling determination may enable the processor to further determine a location of the implant unit. The motion of the implant unit may correspond to motion of the body part where the implant unit may be attached. This may be considered physiologic data received by the processor. The processor may, accordingly, be configured to regulate delivery of power from the power source to the implant unit based on the physiologic data. In alternative embodiments, the degree of coupling determination may enable the processor to determine information pertaining to a condition of the implant unit. Such a condition may include location as well as information pertaining to an internal state of the implant unit. The processor may, according to the condition of the implant unit, be configured to regulate delivery of power from the power source to the implant unit based on the condition data.
In some embodiments, implant unit 110 may include a processor located on the implant. A processor located on implant unit 110 may perform all or some of the processes described with respect to the at least one processor associated with an external unit. For example, a processor associated with implant unit 110 may be configured to receive a control signal prompting the implant controller to turn on and cause a modulation signal to be applied to the implant electrodes for modulating a nerve. Such a processor may also be configured to monitor various sensors associated with the implant unit and to transmit this information back to and external unit. Power for the processor unit may be supplied by an onboard power source or received via transmissions from an external unit.
In other embodiments, implant unit 110 may be self-sufficient, including its own power source and a processor configured to operate the implant unit 110 with no external interaction. For example, with a suitable power source, the processor of implant unit 110 could be configured to monitor conditions in the body of a subject (via one or more sensors or other means), determining when those conditions warrant modulation of a nerve, and generate a signal to the electrodes to modulate a nerve. The power source could be regenerative based on movement or biological function; or the power sources could be periodically rechargeable from an external location, such as, for example, through induction.
In some embodiments, the at least one processor may be associated with the housing of external unit 120 and may be configured to communicate with a circuit implanted in the subject. The at least one processor may also be configured to receive a physiological signal from the subject via the implanted circuit. In response to the received physiological signal, the at least one processor may send a control signal, such as a closed loop control signal, to the implanted circuit. In some embodiments, the control signal may be predetermined to activate neuromuscular tissue within the tongue. Activating neuromuscular tissue may include, for example, causing muscular contractions and initiating a nerve action potential.
The physiological signal received from the implant unit may include any signal or signal component indicative of at least one physiological characteristic associated with the subject. In some embodiments, for example, the physiological characteristic may indicate whether a portion of the subject's body (e.g., the tongue) has moved, a direction of movement, a rate of change of movement, temperature, blood pressure, etc. The physiological signal may include any form of signal suitable for conveying information associated with at least some aspect of the subject. In some embodiments, the physiological signal may include an electromagnetic signal (e.g. microwave, infrared, radio-frequency (RF), etc.) having any desired waveform (e.g. sinusoidal, square wave, triangle wave, etc.). In some embodiments, the physiological signal may include any suitable amplitude or duration for transferring information about the subject.
In some embodiments, the physiological signal may include a primary coupled signal component on primary antenna 150. This primary coupled signal component may be induced on primary antenna 150 through coupling between primary antenna 150 of external unit 120 and secondary antenna 152 on implant unit 110.
In some embodiments, the physiological signal may include at least one aspect indicative of a movement of the subject's tongue. For example, movement of the tongue may cause relative motion between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152, and this relative motion may result in variation of a degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152. By monitoring the degree of coupling between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152, for example, by monitoring signals or signal components present on primary antenna 150, relative motion between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 and, therefore, movement of the subject's tongue, may be detected.
As noted, in response to a received physiological signal, the at least one processor may cause a response based on the physiological signal. For example, in some embodiments, the at least one processor may be configured to cause the generation of a control signal (e.g. a closed loop control signal) intended to control at least one aspect of implant unit 110. The control signal may include a modulation control signal applied to primary antenna 150 such that a resulting secondary signal on secondary antenna 152 will provide a modulation signal at implant electrodes 158a and 158b.
In some embodiments, the processor may be configured to detect a sleep disordered breathing event based on the physiological signal and send the closed loop control signal in response to the detected sleep disordered breathing event. In some embodiments, the sleep disordered breathing event may be a precursor of sleep apnea, and the control signal may be predetermined to activate neuromuscular tissue within the tongue and may cause movement of the subject's tongue, for example, in a direction away from the posterior pharyngeal wall. The at least one processor may be further configured to determine a severity of the sleep disordered breathing event based on the physiological signal and vary a power level or duration of the control signal based on the determined severity of the sleep disordered breathing event. The severity of the event may be determined, for example, based on a determination of the relative movement between primary antenna 150 and secondary antenna 152 (e.g., an amplitude of movement, a rate of movement, a direction of movement, etc.). In some embodiments, a control signal may be sent if the relative movement exceeds a certain threshold.
A control signal may include any signal having suitable characteristics for causing a desired response in implant unit 110. For example, a control signal may have any suitable amplitude, duration, pulse width, duty cycle, or waveform (e.g. a sinusoidal signal, square wave, triangle wave, etc.) for causing a desired effect on implant unit 110 (e.g., modulation of nerve tissue in the vicinity of implant unit 110, etc.). A control signal may be generated and sent (e.g., to implant unit 110) within any desired response time relative to receipt of a physiological signal. In some embodiments, the response time may be set at 1 second, 500 milliseconds, 200 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 50 milliseconds, 20 milliseconds, 5 milliseconds, 1 millisecond, or any other time greater than 0 seconds and less than about 2 seconds. The control signal may be closed loop. As used herein, the term closed loop control signal may refer to any signal at least partially responsive to another signal, such as a control signal sent in response to a physiological signal. Or it may include any feedback response.
Based on the physiological signal, the processor may determine a quantity of energy to be sent via the closed loop control signal to implant unit 110. The amount of energy to be sent may be determined and/or varied based on any relevant factor including, for example, the time of day, a relevant biological factor of the subject (blood pressure, pulse, level of brain activity, etc.), the severity of the detected event, other characteristics associated with the detected event, or on any combination of factors. As noted, in embodiments where the physiological signal indicates a sleep disordered breathing event, the processor may be configured to determine a severity of the sleep disordered breathing event based on the physiological signal. In such embodiments, the processor may also determine an amount of energy to be provided to implant unit 110 as a response to the detected sleep disordered breathing event and in view of the determined severity of the event. The determined amount of energy may be transferred to implant unit 110 over any suitable time duration and at any suitable power level. In some embodiments, the power level and/or the duration of the control signal may be varied, and such variation may be dependent on the determined severity of the sleep disordered breathing event.
The power level and/or duration of the control signal may also be determined based on other factors. For example, the processor may vary a power level or duration associated with the control signal based on the efficiency of energy transfer between external unit 120 and implant unit 110. The processor may have access to such information through pre-programming, lookup tables, information stored in memory, etc. Additionally or alternatively, the processor may be configured to determine the efficiency of energy transfer, e.g., by monitoring the primary coupled signal component present on primary antenna 150, or by any other suitable method.
The processor may also vary the power level or duration of the control signal based on the efficacy of implant unit 110 (e.g., the implant unit's ability to produce a desired effect in response to the control signal). For example, the processor may determine that a certain implant unit 110 requires a certain amount of energy, a control signal of at least a certain power level and/or signal duration, etc., in order to produce a desired response (e.g., a modulation signal having an amplitude/magnitude of at least a desired level, etc.). Such a determination can be based on feedback received from implant unit 110 or may be determined based on lookup tables, information stored in memory, etc. In some embodiments, the power level or duration of the control signal may be determined based on a known or feedback-determined efficacy threshold (e.g., an upper threshold at or above which a desired response may be achieved) associated with implant unit 110.
In some embodiments, implant unit 110 may be structurally configured to facilitate implantation in a location so as to increase the efficacy of modulation provided. For example,
In some embodiments, implant unit 110, including at least one pair of modulation electrodes, e.g. electrodes 158a, 158b, and at least one circuit may be configured for implantation through derma (i.e. skin) on an underside of a subject's chin. When implanted through derma on an underside of a subject's chin, an implant unit 110 may be located proximate to medial terminal fibers 1054 of the medial branch 1052 of a subject's hypoglossal nerve 1051. An exemplary implant location 1070 is depicted in
In some embodiments, implant unit 110 may be configured such that the electrodes 158a, 158b cause modulation of at least a portion of the subject's hypoglossal nerve through application of an electric field to a section of the hypoglossal nerve 1051 distal of a terminal bifurcation 1055 to lateral and medial branches 1053, 1052 of the hypoglossal nerve 1051. In additional or alternative embodiments, implant unit 110 may be located such that an electric field extending from the modulation electrodes 158a, 158b can modulate one or more of the medial terminal fibers 1054 of the medial branch 1052 of the hypoglossal nerve 1051. Thus, the medial branch 1053 or the medial terminal fibers 1054 may be modulated so as to cause a contraction of the genioglossus muscle 1060, which may be sufficient to either open or maintain a patient's airway. When implant unit 110 is located proximate to the medial terminal fibers 1054, the electric field may be configured so as to cause substantially no modulation of the lateral branch of the subject's hypoglossal nerve 1051. This may have the advantage of providing selective modulation targeting of the genioglossus muscle 1060.
As noted above, it may be difficult to modulate the medial terminal fibers 1054 of the hypoglossal nerve 1051 because of their location within the genioglossus muscle 1060. Implant unit 110 may be configured for location on a surface of the genioglossus muscle 1060. Electrodes 158a, 158b, of implant unit 110 may be configured to generate a parallel electric field 1090, sufficient to cause modulation of the medial terminal branches 1054 even when electrodes 158a, 158b are not in contact with the fibers of the nerve. That is, the anodes and the cathodes of the implant may be configured such that, when energized via a circuit associated with the implant 110 and electrodes 158a, 158b, the electric field 1090 extending between electrodes 158a, 158b may be in the form of a series of substantially parallel arcs extending through and into the muscle tissue on which the implant is located. A pair of parallel line electrodes or two series of circular electrodes may be suitable configurations for producing the appropriate parallel electric field lines. Thus, when suitably implanted, the electrodes of implant unit 110 may modulate a nerve in a contactless fashion, through the generation of parallel electric field lines.
Furthermore, the efficacy of modulation may be increased by an electrode configuration suitable for generating parallel electric field lines that run partially or substantially parallel to nerve fibers to be modulated. In some embodiments, the current induced by parallel electric field lines may have a greater modulation effect on a nerve fiber if the electric field lines 1090 and the nerve fibers to be modulated are partially or substantially parallel. The inset illustration of
In order to facilitate the modulation of the medial terminal fibers 1054, implant unit 110 may be designed or configured to ensure the appropriate location of electrodes when implanted. An exemplary implantation is depicted in
For example, a flexible carrier 161 of the implant may be configured such that at least a portion of a flexible carrier 161 of the implant is located at a position between the genioglossus muscle 1060 and the geniohyoid muscle 1061. Flexible carrier 161 may be further configured to permit at least one pair of electrodes arranged on flexible carrier 161 to lie between the genioglossus muscle 1060 and the mylohyoid muscle. Either or both of the extensions 162a and 162b of elongate arm 161 may be configured adapt to a contour of the genioglossus muscle. Either or both of the extensions 162a and 162b of elongate arm 161 may be configured to extend away from the underside of the subject's chin along a contour of the genioglossus muscle 1060. Either or both of extension arms 162a, 162b may be configured to wrap around the genioglossus muscle when an antenna 152 is located between the genioglossus 1060 and geniohyoid muscle 1061. In such a configuration, antenna 152 may be located in a plane substantially parallel with a plane defined by the underside of a subject's chin, as shown in
Flexible carrier 161 may be configured such that the at least one pair of spaced-apart electrodes can be located in a space between the subject's genioglossus muscle and an adjacent muscle. Flexible carrier 161 may be configured such that at least one pair of modulation electrodes 158a, 158b is configured for implantation adjacent to a horizontal compartment 1065 of the genioglossus muscle 1060. The horizontal compartment 1065 of the genioglossus 1060 is depicted in
As described above, implant 510 may extend across the hairline 502 to a location in the vicinity of an occipital nerve. In
The size and configuration of implant 510 illustrated in
Additional embodiments consistent with the present disclosure may include the following. A device, including an implantable flexible carrier, an implantable circuit, and, a pair of electrodes located on the carrier and in electrical communication with the implantable circuit. The electrodes may be configured to cause, when supplied with an electrical signal via the implantable circuit, a unidirectional electrical field. The pair of electrodes may be further configured to modulate the at least one nerve when non-nerve tissue is interposed between the electrodes and the at least one nerve. The electrodes may be configured with a spacing distance such that the unidirectional electrical field is sufficient to modulate at least one nerve located greater than 1 mm away from the electrodes. The flexible carrier may include attachment points configured for securing the flexible carrier to a surface of the non-nerve tissue. The flexible carrier may comprise an insulative coating, and the electrodes may be exposed on one side of the flexible carrier. The device may further include at least one pair of additional electrodes. The device may further include an antenna in electrical communication with the implantable circuit, wherein the antenna is adapted to receive a transmitted alternating current signal and a converter configured to convert the alternating current signal into a direct current signal for delivery to the at least one pair of implantable electrodes. The implantable circuit may located on the flexible carrier, and the antenna may be located on the flexible carrier.
Other embodiments of the present disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the present disclosure.
While this disclosure provides examples of the neuromodulation devices employed for the treatment of certain conditions, usage of the disclosed neuromodulation devices is not limited to the disclosed examples. The disclosure of uses of embodiments of the invention for neuromodulation are to be considered exemplary only. In its broadest sense, the invention may be used in connection with the treatment of any physiological condition through neuromodulation. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description.
Claims
1. A sleep disordered breathing therapy device, comprising:
- an implantable flexible carrier configured for implantation proximal to a genioglossus muscle of a subject;
- a pair of electrodes located on the implantable flexible carrier;
- a power interface located on the implantable flexible carrier configured to receive a power signal; and
- circuitry located on the implantable flexible carrier in electrical communication with the power interface and the pair of electrodes and configured to receive the power signal transferred from the power interface, and, in response to receiving the power signal, send an electrical signal to the electrodes,
- wherein the pair of electrodes are spaced from each other by a distance greater than 3 mm, and are configured to facilitate, when supplied with the electrical signal, a substantially unidirectional electric field sufficient to modulate a hypoglossal nerve, and
- wherein the pair of electrodes are further configured to modulate the hypoglossal nerve when tissue of the subject is interposed between the pair of electrodes and the hypoglossal nerve.
2. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein modulation of the hypoglossal nerve includes a stimulation signal sufficient to cause a contraction of the genioglossus muscle.
3. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein tissue of the subject includes tissue of the genioglossus muscle.
4. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein the tissue interposed between the pair of electrodes and the hypoglossal nerve is greater than 5 mm in thickness.
5. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein the pair of electrodes and the hypoglossal nerve are spaced apart by a distance greater than 5 mm.
6. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein the implantable flexible carrier comprises attachment points configured for securing the implantable flexible carrier to a surface of the genioglossus muscle.
7. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein the implantable flexible carrier comprises an insulative material, and wherein the pair of electrodes are exposed on one side of the implantable flexible carrier.
8. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, further comprising at least one pair of additional electrodes.
9. The sleep disordered breathing therapy device of claim 1, wherein the power interface includes an antenna adapted to receive a transmitted alternating current signal, and
- wherein the circuitry includes a converter configured to convert the alternating current signal into a direct current signal for delivery to the pair of electrodes.
| 3796221 | March 1974 | Hagfors |
| 3870051 | March 1975 | Brindley |
| 4765983 | August 23, 1988 | Takayanagi et al. |
| 4830008 | May 16, 1989 | Meer |
| 4837049 | June 6, 1989 | Byers et al. |
| 5094242 | March 10, 1992 | Gleason et al. |
| 5174287 | December 29, 1992 | Kallok et al. |
| 5178156 | January 12, 1993 | Takishima et al. |
| 5193539 | March 16, 1993 | Schulman et al. |
| 5485851 | January 23, 1996 | Erickson |
| 5540733 | July 30, 1996 | Testerman et al. |
| 5591216 | January 7, 1997 | Testerman et al. |
| 5697076 | December 9, 1997 | Troyk et al. |
| 5895360 | April 20, 1999 | Christopherson et al. |
| 5948006 | September 7, 1999 | Mann |
| 6024702 | February 15, 2000 | Iversen |
| 6026818 | February 22, 2000 | Blair et al. |
| 6038480 | March 14, 2000 | Hrdlicka et al. |
| 6051017 | April 18, 2000 | Loeb et al. |
| 6126611 | October 3, 2000 | Bourgeois et al. |
| 6163725 | December 19, 2000 | Peckham et al. |
| 6185296 | February 6, 2001 | Saitoh |
| 6210326 | April 3, 2001 | Ehwald |
| 6240316 | May 29, 2001 | Richmond et al. |
| 6275737 | August 14, 2001 | Mann |
| 6345202 | February 5, 2002 | Richmond et al. |
| 6572543 | June 3, 2003 | Christopherson et al. |
| 6587725 | July 1, 2003 | Durand et al. |
| 6587728 | July 1, 2003 | Fang et al. |
| 6625494 | September 23, 2003 | Fang et al. |
| 6636767 | October 21, 2003 | Knudson et al. |
| 6643552 | November 4, 2003 | Edell et al. |
| 6770022 | August 3, 2004 | Mechlenburg et al. |
| 6814706 | November 9, 2004 | Barton et al. |
| 7062330 | June 13, 2006 | Boveja et al. |
| 7155278 | December 26, 2006 | King et al. |
| 7272443 | September 18, 2007 | Min et al. |
| 7277749 | October 2, 2007 | Gordon et al. |
| 7295132 | November 13, 2007 | Steiner |
| 7367935 | May 6, 2008 | Mechlenburg et al. |
| 7371220 | May 13, 2008 | Koh et al. |
| 7447551 | November 4, 2008 | Kuo et al. |
| 7623929 | November 24, 2009 | Griffith |
| 7644714 | January 12, 2010 | Atkinson et al. |
| 7667511 | February 23, 2010 | Staszewski et al. |
| 7680538 | March 16, 2010 | Durand et al. |
| 7697990 | April 13, 2010 | Ujhazy et al. |
| 7709961 | May 4, 2010 | Greenberg et al. |
| 7725195 | May 25, 2010 | Lima et al. |
| 7729772 | June 1, 2010 | Williams et al. |
| 7729781 | June 1, 2010 | Swoyer et al. |
| 7733218 | June 8, 2010 | Drago et al. |
| 7756583 | July 13, 2010 | Demarais et al. |
| 7773695 | August 10, 2010 | Zhou et al. |
| 7809442 | October 5, 2010 | Bolea et al. |
| 7845357 | December 7, 2010 | Buscemi et al. |
| 7869885 | January 11, 2011 | Begnaud et al. |
| 8072310 | December 6, 2011 | Everhart |
| 20010018547 | August 30, 2001 | Mechlenburg et al. |
| 20020188333 | December 12, 2002 | Nowick et al. |
| 20030225403 | December 4, 2003 | Woloszko et al. |
| 20040049245 | March 11, 2004 | Gass et al. |
| 20040059392 | March 25, 2004 | Parramon et al. |
| 20040085792 | May 6, 2004 | Lin et al. |
| 20040102820 | May 27, 2004 | Moune et al. |
| 20040153127 | August 5, 2004 | Gordon et al. |
| 20040172089 | September 2, 2004 | Whitehurst et al. |
| 20040199212 | October 7, 2004 | Fischell et al. |
| 20050010265 | January 13, 2005 | Baru Fassio et al. |
| 20050043772 | February 24, 2005 | Stahmann et al. |
| 20050070971 | March 31, 2005 | Fowler et al. |
| 20050075694 | April 7, 2005 | Schmeling et al. |
| 20050075695 | April 7, 2005 | Schommer |
| 20050075700 | April 7, 2005 | Schommer |
| 20060062580 | March 23, 2006 | Mahbobi |
| 20060114104 | June 1, 2006 | Scaramozzino |
| 20060145878 | July 6, 2006 | Lehrman et al. |
| 20060180647 | August 17, 2006 | Hansen |
| 20060217779 | September 28, 2006 | Ransbury et al. |
| 20060224211 | October 5, 2006 | Durand et al. |
| 20060271110 | November 30, 2006 | Vernon et al. |
| 20070073357 | March 29, 2007 | Rooney et al. |
| 20070112404 | May 17, 2007 | Mann et al. |
| 20070150006 | June 28, 2007 | Libbus et al. |
| 20070150022 | June 28, 2007 | Ujhazy et al. |
| 20070173893 | July 26, 2007 | Pitts |
| 20070185546 | August 9, 2007 | Tseng et al. |
| 20070221231 | September 27, 2007 | Macken |
| 20070222560 | September 27, 2007 | Posamentier |
| 20070233204 | October 4, 2007 | Lima et al. |
| 20070255379 | November 1, 2007 | Williams et al. |
| 20070265606 | November 15, 2007 | DeBenedictis et al. |
| 20070290859 | December 20, 2007 | Held et al. |
| 20080021506 | January 24, 2008 | Grocela |
| 20080027503 | January 31, 2008 | Marrosu et al. |
| 20080030363 | February 7, 2008 | Rezvani et al. |
| 20080041398 | February 21, 2008 | Hegde et al. |
| 20080081982 | April 3, 2008 | Simon et al. |
| 20080103407 | May 1, 2008 | Bolea et al. |
| 20080109046 | May 8, 2008 | Lima et al. |
| 20080109047 | May 8, 2008 | Pless |
| 20080119911 | May 22, 2008 | Rosero |
| 20080132962 | June 5, 2008 | DiUbaldi et al. |
| 20080140152 | June 12, 2008 | Imran et al. |
| 20080165058 | July 10, 2008 | Ayachitula et al. |
| 20080243014 | October 2, 2008 | Moussavi et al. |
| 20080300654 | December 4, 2008 | Lambert et al. |
| 20080319506 | December 25, 2008 | Cauller |
| 20090048647 | February 19, 2009 | Tingey |
| 20090062675 | March 5, 2009 | Weigand et al. |
| 20090069648 | March 12, 2009 | Irazoqui et al. |
| 20090078274 | March 26, 2009 | Bhat et al. |
| 20090132018 | May 21, 2009 | DiUbaldi et al. |
| 20090157150 | June 18, 2009 | Cauller |
| 20090173351 | July 9, 2009 | Sahin et al. |
| 20090281595 | November 12, 2009 | King et al. |
| 20100030298 | February 4, 2010 | Martens et al. |
| 20100087896 | April 8, 2010 | McCreery |
| 20100094379 | April 15, 2010 | Meadows et al. |
| 20100114190 | May 6, 2010 | Bendett et al. |
| 20100121413 | May 13, 2010 | Willerton et al. |
| 20100125304 | May 20, 2010 | Faltys |
| 20100131029 | May 27, 2010 | Durand et al. |
| 20100137948 | June 3, 2010 | Aghassian et al. |
| 20100139667 | June 10, 2010 | Atkinson et al. |
| 20100152553 | June 17, 2010 | Ujhazy et al. |
| 20100191136 | July 29, 2010 | Wolford |
| 20100196744 | August 5, 2010 | Tucholski et al. |
| 20100198305 | August 5, 2010 | Farbarik |
| 20100222686 | September 2, 2010 | Fisher et al. |
| 20100228313 | September 9, 2010 | Starkebaum et al. |
| 20100234924 | September 16, 2010 | Willis |
| 20100241195 | September 23, 2010 | Meadows et al. |
| 20100292527 | November 18, 2010 | Schneider et al. |
| 20100312320 | December 9, 2010 | Faltys et al. |
| 20100331634 | December 30, 2010 | Muller et al. |
| 20110065979 | March 17, 2011 | Lehrman et al. |
| 20110071591 | March 24, 2011 | Bolea et al. |
| 20110093036 | April 21, 2011 | Mashiach |
| 20110112601 | May 12, 2011 | Meadows et al. |
| 20110152965 | June 23, 2011 | Mashiach et al. |
| 20110152966 | June 23, 2011 | Bolea et al. |
| 20110172733 | July 14, 2011 | Lima et al. |
| 20110213438 | September 1, 2011 | Lima et al. |
| 20110230702 | September 22, 2011 | Honour |
| 20110264163 | October 27, 2011 | Tracey et al. |
| 20110301670 | December 8, 2011 | Gross et al. |
| 20120123498 | May 17, 2012 | Gross |
| 10 2009027997 | January 2011 | DE |
| WO2007/098200 | August 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007/098202 | August 2007 | WO |
| WO2008/048471 | April 2008 | WO |
| WO 2011/077433 | June 2011 | WO |
- Brindley, G.S., Transmission of electrical stimuli along many independent channels through a fairly small area of intact skin, Proceedings of the Physiological Society, Dec. 1964, pp. 44-46.
- Tran W.H., First Subject Evaluated with Simulated BION Treatment in Posterior Genioglossus to Prevent Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of IEEE EMBS, Sep. 2004, pp. 4287-4289.
- Schwartz, Alan R., Therapeutic Stimulation of the Hypoglossal Nerve in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 127, Oct. 2001, pp. 1216-1223.
- Eastwood, P.R., Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Unilateral Hyopglossal Nerve Stimulation, American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, vol. 181, May 2010, pp. 5393-5394.
- Eisele, David W., Tongue neuromuscular and direct hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, Jun. 2003, pp. 501-510.
- Robblee, L.S., Studies of the electrochemistry of stimulating electrodes, National Institutes of Health, Contract No. N01-NS-8-2313, Nov. 1991, pp. 6-8.
- Levin, Morris, Nerve Blocks in the Treatment of Headaches, Neurotherapeutics: The Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Apr. 2010, pp. 197-203.
- Lundy, Larry, Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal, Cochlear Implant Fixation Using Resorbable Mesh, Jul. 1, 2011, 4 pages.
- Youbok Lee, “Antenna Circuit Design for RFID Applications,” Microchip Technology Inc., Dec. 5, 2002. pp. 1-50.
- Upson, James; King, Frederick; Roberts, Lamar; A constant amplitude transistorized unit for remote brain stimulation, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Jun. 11, 1962.
- Brindley, G.S., An implant to empty the bladder or close the urethra, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1977.
- Kaplan, Hilton; Loeb, Gerald; Design and Fabrication of an Injection Tool for Neuromuscular Microstimulators, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, No. 9., Jun. 24, 2009.
- Troyk, Philip; Schwan, Martin; Closed-Loop Class E Transcutaneous Power and Data Link for MicroImplants. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 6, Jun. 1992.
- Mithun, Joe; Rajkumar, Vikram; Shanmugapriya; Apnea Detecting Sensors; Sathyabama Deemed University, 2006.
- Babak, Ziaie; Nardin, Mark; Coghlan, Anthony; Najafi, Khalil, A Single-Channel Implantable Microstimulator for Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, No. 10, Oct. 1997.
- Robin, S; Sawan, M.; Harvey, J.F.; Abdel-Gawad, M.; Abdel-Baky, T.M.; Elhili, M.M., A New Implantable Microstimulator Dedicated to Selective Stimulation of the Bladder, 19th International Conference, IEEE/EMBS Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997.
- Troyk, P.R.; Donaldson N. de N.; Implantable FES Stimulation Systems: What is Needed, 2001 Neuromodulation Society, Neuromodulation, vol. 4, No. 4, 2001.
- Loeb, Gerald; Richmond, Frances; Moore, W. Henry; Peck, Raymond, 1st Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Oct. 2000.
- Harrison, Reid, Designing Efficient Inductive Power Links for Implantable Devices, University of Utah, 2007.
- Mohtashami, Saba, Electrochemical Properties of Flexible Electrodes for Implanted Neuromuscular Excitation Applications, McMaster University, Oct. 1, 2011.
- Baker, Michael; Sarpeshkar, Rahul, Feedback Analysis and DEsign of RF Power Links for Low-Power Bionic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 1, No. 1, Mar. 2007.
- Zierhofer, Clemens, HOchmair, Erwin, High-Efficiency Coupling-Insensitive Transcutaneous Power and Data Transmission Via an Inductive Link, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, No. 3, Jul. 1990.
- Tran, W.H., Loeb, G.E., Richmond, F.J.R.; Ahmed, R.; Clark, G.T.; Haberman, P.B., First Subject Evaluated with Simulated BION Treatment in Posterior Genioglossus to Prevent Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA, USA, Sep. 2004.
- Jow, Uei-Ming; Ghovanloo, Maysam, Design and Optimization of Printed Spiral Coils for Efficient Transcutaneous Inductive Power Transmission, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 1, No. 3, Sep. 2007.
- Steiglitz, Thomas, Polymer-based Substrates and Flexible Hybrid Assembly Techniques for Implantable Active Microdevices, Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology, 2002.
- Jarvis, Jonathan; Salmons, Stanley, The Application and Technology of Implantable Neuromuscular StimulatorsL an introduction and overview, Medical Engineering and Physics 23, 2001.
- Manola, Ljubomir; Holsheimer, Jan; Veltink, Peter; Bradley, Kerry; Peterson, David, Theoretical Investigation Into Longitudinal Cathodal Field Steering in Spinal Cord Stimulation, Neurmodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 2, 2007.
- Joho, Dominik, Plagemann, Christian, Burgard, Wolfram, Modeling RFID Signal Strength and Tag Detection for Localization and Mapping, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe Japan, May 2009.
- Werber, D.; Schwentner, A.; Biebl, E.M., Investigation of RF Transmission Properties of Human Tissues, Advances in Radio Science, vol. 4, 2006.
- Cameron, Tracy; Loeb, Gerald; Peck, Raymond; Schulman, Joseph; Strojnik, Primoz; Troyk, Philip, Micromodular Implants to Provide Electrical Stimulation of Paralyzed Muscles and Limbs, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1997.
- Mokwa, Wilfried; Schnakenberg, Uwe, Micro-Transponder Systems for Medical, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 50, No. 6, Dec. 2001.
- Grill, Warren; Veraart, Claude; Mortimer, Thomas, Selective Activation of Peripheral Nerve Fascicles: Use of Field Steering Currents, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 13, No. 2, 1991.
- Loeb, G.E.; Zamin, C.J.; Schulman, J.H.; Troyk, P.R., Injectable Microstimulator for Functional Electrical Stimulation, Med. and Biol. Eng. & Comput. 1991.
- Young, Darrin, Wireless Powering and Data Telemetry for Biomedical Implants, 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Minnesota, USA, Sep. 2009.
- Han, J.H.; Lim, H.G.; Kim, J.M.; Lee, C.W.; Park, I.Y.; Cho, J.H., Inductively-Coupled Control Unit for Fully Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Devices, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, China, Sep. 2005.
- Oliven, A; Kaufman, E.; Kaynan, R.; Golboda, T.; Oliven, R.; Geitini, L.; Odeh, M.; Tov, N.; Schwartz, A.R.; Kimel, E., Effects of Cross-Sectional Area, Compliance and External Pressure on Pharyngeal Collapsibility in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea, A68 Upper Airway and Respiratory Physiology, 2010.
- Yoo, Paul B.; Durand, Dominique, Effects of Selective Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation on Canine Upper Airway Mechanics, Journal of Applied Physiology, 2005.
- Huang, Jingtao; Sahin, Mesut; Durand, Dominique, Dilation of the oropharynx via selective stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve, Journal of Neural Engineering, 2005.
- Oliven, A; Tov, N.; Geitini, L.; Steinfeld, U.; Oliven, R.; Schwartz, A.R.; Odeh, M., Effect of Genioglossus Contraction on Pharyngeal Lumen and Airflow in Sleep Apnoea Patients, European Respiratory Journal, 2007.
- Davis, Ross; Cosendai, Gregoire; Arcos, Isabel; Kushner, Douglas; Mishler, Delta; Decker, Christopher; Ripley, Anne-Marie; Maceri, Dennis; Sanderson, Donna; Zilberman, Yitzhak; Schulman, Joseph, Development of the BION Microstimulator for Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Alfred Mann Foundation, 2003.
- Eastwood, P.R.; Barnes, M.; McEvoy, R.D; Wheatley, J; Walsh, J.H.; O'Donoghue, F.J.; Catcheside, P.; Tyler, L.; Maddison, K.J.; Rochford, P.D.; Antic, N.; Worsnop C.; Churchward, T.; Eckert, D.J.; Campbell, M.C., Hee, G.; Palme, C.E., Robinson, S.H.; Kezirian, E.; Goding, G.; Jordan, A.S.; Smith P.L.; Schwartz, A.R.; Malhotra, A.; Hillman, D.R., Feasibility of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Am. J. Respir Crit Care Med, 2010.
- Randerath, Winfried, Electrical Stimulation of the Upper Airways Muscles, Institute for Pheumology at the University Witten/Herdecke, 2006.
- Schwartz, Alan; Eisele, David; Hari, Anil; Testerman, Roy; Erickson, Donald; Smith, Philip, Electrical Stimulation of the Lingual Musculature in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Feb. 1996.
- Kezirian, Eric J.; Boudewyns, An; Eisele, David; Schwartz, Alan; Philip, Smith; Van de Heyning, Paul; De Backer, Wilfried, Electrical Stimulation of the Hypoglossal Nerve in the Treatment of Ostrcutive Sleep Apnea, Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2009.
- Isono, S.; Tanaka, A.; Nishino, T., Effects of Tongue Electrical Stimulation on Pharyngeal Mechanics in Anaesthetized Patients with Ostructive Sleep Apnoea, Eur Respir J, 1999.
- Fregosi, Ralph, Influence of Tongue Muscle Contraction and Dynamic Airway Pressure on Velopharyngeal Volume in the Rat, J. Appl. Physiol, Dec. 2007.
- Van de Heyning, Paul; Badr, M. Safwan; Baskin, Jonathan Z.; Bornemann, Michael Cramer; De Backer, Wilfried A.; Dotan, Yaniv; Hohenhorst, Winfried; Knaack, Lennart; Lin, Ho-Sheng, Maurer, Joachim T.; Netzer, Aviram; Odland, Rick M.; Oliven, Arie; Strohl, Kingman P.; Vanderveken, Olivier M.; Verbraecken, Johan; Woodson, B. Tucker, Implanted Upper Airway Stimulation Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, The Laryngoscope, Jul. 2012.
- Oliven, Ron; Tov, Naveh; Odeh, Majed; Gaitini, Luis; Steinfeld, Uri; Schwartz, Alan; Oliven, Arie, Interacting Effects of Genioglossus Stimulation and Mandibular Adavncements in Sleep Apnea, J. Appl. Physiol, 2009.
- Peng, Chih-Wei; Chen, Jia-Jin Jason; Lin, Chou-Ching K.; Poon, Paul Wai-Fung; Liang, Chih-Kuo; Lin, Kang-Ping, High Frequency Block of Selected Axons Using an Implantable Microstimulator, 2004.
- Burnett, Theresa; Mann, Eric; Cornell, Sonia; Ludlow, Christy, Laryngeal Elevation Achieved by Neuromuscular Stimulation at Rest, J. Appl. Physiol. 94, 2003.
- Hu, Linggang; Xu, Xiaomei; Gong, Yongsheng; Fan, Xiaofang; Wang, Liangxing; Zhang, Jianhua, Percutaneous Biphasic Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrom, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, No. 1, Jan. 2008.
- Dotan, Y.; Goliboda, T.; Netzer, A.; Geitini, L.; Oliven, A., Parameters Affecting the Mechanical Effect of Electrical Stimulation (ES) of the Tongue Muscles in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med, 2010.
- Yoo, Paul Byong-Suk, Selective Stimulation and Recording of the Canine Hypoglossal Nerve for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Case Western Reserve University, May 2004.
- Oliven, Arie, Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation, Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2011.
- Goding, George; Eisele, David; Testerman, Roy; Smith, Philip; Roertgen, Karen; Schwartz, Alan, Relief of Upper Airway Obstruction With Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in the Canine, Laryngoscope, 1998.
- Oliven, Arie; Schnall, Robert; Pillar, Giora; Gavriely, Noam; Oden, Majed, Sublingual Electrical Stimulation of the Tongue During Wakefulness and Sleep, Respiration Physiology, 127, 2001.
- Mwenge, Gimbada; Rombaux, Phillippe; Dury, Myriam; Lengele, Benoit; Rodenstein, Daniel, Targeted Hypoglossal Neurostimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A 1 year pillot study, ERJ Express, May 17, 2012.
- Mann, Eric; Burnett, Theresa; Cornell, Sonia; Ludlow, Christy, The Effect of Neuromuscular Stimulation of the Genioglossus on the Hypopharyngeal Airway, The Laryngoscope, 2002.
- Oliven, Arie; O'Hearn, Daniel; Boudewyns, An; Odeh, Majed; De Backer, Wilfried; van de Heyning, Paul; Smith, Philip; Eisele, David; Allan, Larry; Schneider, Hartmut; Testerman, Roy; Schwartz, Alan, Upper Airway Response to Electrical Stimulation of the Genioglossus in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, J. Appl. Physiol. vol. 95, 2003.
- Guillemeniualt, Christian; Powell, Nelson; Bowman, Bruce; Stoohs, Riccardo, The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Chest, Jan. 1995.
- Eastwood, Peter; Barnes, Maree; Walsh, Jennifer; Maddison, Kathleen; Hee, Geoffrey; Schwartz, Alan; Smith, Philip; Malhotra, Atul; McEvoy, Douglas; Wheatley, John; O'Donoghue, Fergal; Rochford, Peter; Churchward, Tom; Campbell, Matthew; Palme, Carsten; Robinson, Sam; Goding, George; Eckert, Danny; Jordan, Amy; Catcheside, Peter; Tyler, Louise; Antic, Nick; Worsnop, Christopher; Kezirian, Eric; Hillman, David, Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation, Sleep vol. 34, No. 11, 2011.
- Schwartz, Alan; Bennet, Marc; Smith, Philip; De Backer, Wilfried; Hedner, Jan; Boudewyns, An; Van de Heyning, Paul; Ejnell, Hasse; Hochban, Walter; Knaack, Lennart; Podszus, Thomas; Penzel, Thomas; Peter, J. Hermann; Goding, George; Erickson, Donald; Testerman, Roy; Ottenhoff, Frans; Eisele, David, Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation of the Hypoglossal Nerve in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, vol. 127, Oct. 2001.
- Randerath, Winfried, Galetke, Wolfgang; Domanski, Uinke; Weitkunat, Rolf; Ruhle, Karl-Heinz, Tongue-Muscle Training by Intraoral Electrical Neurostimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Sleep, vol. 27, No. 2, 2004.
- Eastwood, P.R.; Walsh, J.H.; Maddison, K.J.; Baker, V.A.; Tesfayesus, W.; Hillman, D.R., Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Unilateral Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation, Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181, 2010.
- Loeb, Gerald; Richmond, Frances; Baker, Lucinda, The BION devices: injectable interfaces with peripheral nerves and muscles, Neurosurgery Focus 20, 2006.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,686, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,694, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,762, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,793, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,819, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,690, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,748, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,757, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,712, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,701, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,725, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,730, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,741, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
- Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,721, filed Sep. 28, 2012.
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 28, 2012
Date of Patent: Feb 4, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20130085545
Assignee: Nyxoah SA (Mont-St-Guibert)
Inventor: Adi Mashiach (Mont-St-Guibert)
Primary Examiner: Brian T Gedeon
Assistant Examiner: Ankit Tejani
Application Number: 13/630,392
International Classification: A61N 1/05 (20060101);
