Method and system for managing security tiers

Techniques for reorganizing security levels without implicating accessibility to secured files classified in accordance to one of the security levels are disclosed. In a case of adding a new security level, the controllability or restrictiveness of the new security level is determined with respect to the most restrictive security level or the least security level in a set of existing security levels. A set of proper security parameters are then generated for the new security level and subsequently the existing security levels are reorganized to accommodate the new security level. In a case of removing a security level from the existing security levels, the security parameters for the security level to be deleted are either folded up or down to an immediate next security level, depending on implementation. As a result, the security parameters for the immediate next security level are updated to include those for the security level to be deleted such that the secured files classified at the security level to be deleted can still be accessed by those with proper clearance levels.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/076,254, filed Feb. 12, 2002, that claims the benefits of U.S. provisional application No. 60/339,634 filed Dec. 12, 2001. The application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/159,537 and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Securing Digital Assets”, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to the area of protecting data in an enterprise environment, and more particularly, relates to a method and system for managing security tiers or levels without implicating accessibilities to secured files classified according to a security level.

2. Description of Related Art

The Internet is the fastest growing telecommunications medium in history. This growth and the easy access it affords have significantly enhanced the opportunity to use advanced information technology for both the public and private sectors. It provides unprecedented opportunities for interaction and data sharing among businesses and individuals. However, the advantages provided by the Internet come with a significantly greater element of risk to the confidentiality and integrity of information. The Internet is a widely open, public and international network of interconnected computers and electronic devices. Without proper security means, an unauthorized person or machine may intercept any information traveling across the Internet and even get access to proprietary information stored in computers that interconnect to the Internet, but are otherwise generally inaccessible by the public.

There are many efforts in progress aimed at protecting proprietary information traveling across the Internet and controlling access to computers carrying the proprietary information. Cryptography allows people to carry over the confidence found in the physical world to the electronic world, thus allowing people to do business electronically without worries of deceit and deception. Every day hundreds of thousands of people interact electronically, whether it is through e-mail, e-commerce (business conducted over the Internet), ATM machines, or cellular phones. The perpetual increase of information transmitted electronically has lead to an increase reliance on cryptography.

One of the ongoing efforts in protecting the proprietary information traveling across the Internet is to use one or more cryptographic techniques to secure a private communication session between two communicating computers on the Internet. The cryptographic techniques provides a way to transmit information across an insecure communication channel without disclosing the contents of the information to anyone eavesdropping on the communication channel. Using an encryption process in a cryptographic technique, one party can protect the contents of the data in transit from access by an unauthorized third party yet the intended party can read the data using a corresponding decryption process.

A firewall is another security measure that protects the resources of a private network from users of other networks. However, it has been reported that many unauthorized accesses to proprietary information occur from the inside, as opposed to from the outside. An example of someone gaining unauthorized access from the inside is when restricted or proprietary information is accessed by someone within an organization who is not supposed to do so. Due to the open nature of the Internet, contractual information, customer data, executive communications, product specifications, and a host of other confidential and proprietary intellectual property, remains available and vulnerable to improper access and usage by unauthorized users within or outside a supposedly protected perimeter.

In fact, many businesses and organizations have been looking for effective ways to protect their proprietary information. Typically, businesses and organizations have deployed firewalls, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) to provide protection. Unfortunately, these various security means have been proven insufficient to reliably protect proprietary information residing on private networks. For example, depending on passwords to access sensitive documents from within often causes security breaches when the password of a few characters long is leaked or detected. Therefore, there is a need to provide more effective ways to secure and protect digital assets at all times.

When a security system is employed to secure files, it is sometimes desirable to classify the secured files according to a security level, for example, “top secret”, “secret” or “confidential”. When there is a need to add or delete additional security levels, the secured files originally classified should be still accessible. Thus there is a need for solutions that can manage the security levels dynamically without implicating accessibility to the secured files.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

This section is for the purpose of summarizing some aspects of the present invention and to briefly introduce some preferred embodiments. Simplifications or omissions in this section as well as in the abstract may be made to avoid obscuring the purpose therefor. Such simplifications or omissions are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.

The present invention is related to processes, systems, architectures and software products for providing pervasive security to digital assets at all times and is particularly suitable in an inter/intra enterprise environment. In general, pervasive security means that digital assets are secured at all times and can only be accessed by authenticated users with appropriate access rights or privileges, and proper security clearance in some cases, wherein the digital assets may include, but not be limited to, various types of documents, multimedia files, data, executable code, images and texts. According to one aspect of the present invention, secured files are in a secured form that only those with granted access rights can access. Even with the proper access privilege, when a secured file is classified, at least a security clearance key is needed to ensure those who have the right security clearance can ultimately access the contents in the classified secured file.

According to one aspect of the present invention, a new security level is to be inserted into a set of existing security levels. For example, a security level “secret” is added between the existing security levels “top secret” and “confidential”, resulting in a new set of security levels, “top secret”, “secret” and “confidential”. Without implicating the accessibility to secured files classified at one of the existing security levels, the controllability or restrictiveness of the new security level is determined with respect to the most restrictive security level or the least security level in the existing security levels. A set of proper security parameters are generated for the new security level and subsequently the existing security levels are mapped to accommodate the new security level.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a security level is removed from a set of existing security levels. For example, a security level “secret” is removed from the existing security levels “top secret”, “secret” and “confidential”, resulting in a new set of security levels including only “top secret” and “confidential”. Without implicating the accessibility to secured files classified at one of the existing security levels, the security parameters for the security level to be deleted are either folded up or down to an immediate next security level, depending on implementation. As a result, the security parameters for the immediate next security level are augmented to include those for the security level to be deleted such that the secured files classified at the security level to be deleted can still be accessed by those with proper clearance levels.

Depending on implementation and application, the present invention may be implemented in software, hardware or both in combination, and employed in a client machine or a server machine. According to one embodiment, the present invention is implemented in an executable form loaded in a computing device and activated when the security tiers or levels are changed to provide particular needs of an organization or organizations.

The present invention can be implemented as a method, a system, a process, software medium or other form, each yielding one or more of the following features, benefits and advantages. One of the features, benefits and advantages is the management mechanism of security levels in a security system, the mechanism provides flexibility in reorganizing security levels without implicating accessibility to secured files originally classified. Another one of the features, benefits and advantages is that secured files originally classified at a security level to be deleted can still be accessed by properly folding the security level to a next immediate security level.

Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon examining the following detailed description of an embodiment thereof, taken in conjunction with the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:

FIG. 1 shows a diagram of securing a created document according to one exemplary secured file form used in the present invention;

FIG. 2A shows a diagram of what is referred to herein as a two-pronged access scheme according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2B shows a flowchart of a process for granting a proper security clearance level (i.e., a clearance key) according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2C shows a diagram of generating a clearance key according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2D shows a diagram of generating a clearance key according to another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3A illustrates a set of security levels in a security system employed in an enterprise, a new security level being inserted to the existing security level;

FIG. 3B and FIG. 3C each illustrate a case in which a security level is folded into another security level;

FIG. 4A shows a flowchart or process of inserting a new security level into N security levels according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4B shows a flowchart or process of deleting a security level out of N security levels according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4C shows a flowchart or process of deleting a security level out of N security levels according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5A shows an exemplary implementation of dropping an ith level out of N existing level by folding the ith level to (i—i)th level and may be understood in conjunction with FIG. 5B and FIG. 5C;

FIG. 5B shows a table listing identifiers, levels, clearance keys and corresponding literal meanings according to one embodiment; and

FIG. 5C shows a clearance mapping table being entered and updated.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention pertains to a process, a system, a method and a software product for securing electronic data or digital assets. According to one aspect of the present invention, a new security level is to be inserted into a set of existing security levels. Without implicating the accessibility to secured files classified at one of the existing security levels, the controllability or restrictiveness of the new security level is determined with respect to the most restrictive security level or the least security level in the existing security levels. A set of proper security parameters are generated for the new security level and subsequently the existing security levels are mapped to accommodate the new security level. According to another aspect of the present invention, a security level is removed from a set of existing security levels. The security parameters for the security level to be deleted are either folded up or down to an immediate next security level, depending on implementation. As a result, the security parameters for the immediate next security level are augmented to include those for the security level to be deleted such that the secured files classified at the security level to be deleted can still be accessed by those with proper clearance levels.

There are numerous advantages, benefits, and features in the present invention. One of them is the mechanism contemplated herein capable of providing pervasive security to digital assets sought to be protected at all times. Another one is that the digital assets are presented in such a way that only those with proper access privilege as well as sufficient security clearance level can access information in the digital assets. Other advantages, benefits, and features in the present invention can be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art from the detailed description of the invention provided herein.

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will become obvious to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. The description and representation herein are the common means used by those experienced or skilled in the art to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present invention.

Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Further, the order of blocks in process flowcharts or diagrams representing one or more embodiments of the invention do not inherently indicate any particular order nor imply any limitations in the invention.

Embodiments of the present invention are discussed herein with reference to FIGS. 1-4B. However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the detailed description given herein with respect to these figures is for explanatory purposes as the invention extends beyond these limited embodiments.

Generally, a content created by a creator for the purpose of an entity is an intellectual property belonging to the creator or the entity. In an enterprise, any kind of information or intellectual property can be content, though it is commonly referred to as “information” instead of “content”. In either case, content or information is independent of its format, it may be in a printout or an electronic document. As used herein, content or information exists in a type of electronic data that is also referred to as a digital asset. A representation of the electronic data may include, but not be limited to, various types of documents, multimedia files, streaming data, dynamic or static data, executable code, images and texts.

To prevent contents in electronic data from an unauthorized access, the electronic data is typically stored in a form that is as close to impossible as possible to read without a priori knowledge. Its purpose is to ensure privacy by keeping the content hidden from anyone for whom it is not intended, even those who have access to the electronic data. Example of a priori knowledge may include, but not be limited to, a password, a secret phase, biometric information or one or more keys.

FIG. 1 shows an illustration diagram of securing a created document 100 according to one embodiment of the present invention. One of the purposes of creating a secured file 108 is to ensure that the contents in the document 100 can be only accessed by or revealed to an authorized user with proper access privilege. As used herein, the user may mean a human user, a software agent, a group of users or a member thereof, a device and/or application(s). Besides a human user who needs to access a secured document, a software application or agent sometimes needs to access the secured document in order to proceed forward. Accordingly, unless specifically stated, the “user” as used herein does not necessarily pertain to a human being.

After the document 100 is created, edited or opened with an application or authoring tool (e.g., Microsoft WORD), upon an activation of a command, such as “Save,” “Save As” or “Close”, or automatic saving invoked by an operating system, the application itself, or an approved application, the created document 100 is caused to undergo a securing process 101. The securing process 101 starts with an encryption process 102, namely the document 100 that has been created or is being written into a store is encrypted by a cipher (e.g., an encryption process) with a file key (i.e., a cipher key). In other words, the encrypted data portion 112 could not be opened without the file key. For the purpose of controlling the access to the contents in the document 100 or the resultant secured file 108, the file key or keys may be the same or different keys for encryption and decryption and are included as part of security information contained in or pointed to by a header 106. The file key or keys, once obtained, can be used to decrypt the encrypted data portion 112 to reveal the contents therein.

To ensure that only authorized users or members of an authorized group can access the secured file 108, a set of access rules 104 (an example is shown in the figure) for the document 100 is received or created and associated with the header 106. In general, the access rules 104 determine or regulate who and/or how the document 100, once secured, can be accessed. In some cases, the access rules 104 also determine or regulate when or where the document 100 can be accessed. In addition, security clearance information 107 is added to the header 106 if the secured file 108 is classified. In general, the security clearance information 107 is used to determine a level of access privilege or security level of a user who is attempting to access the contents in the secured file 108. For example, a secured file may be classified as “Top secret”, “Secret”, “Confidential”, and “Unclassified”.

According to one embodiment, the security clearance information 107 includes another layer of encryption of the file key with another key referred to herein as a clearance key. An authorized user must have a clearance key of proper security level in addition to an authenticated user key and proper access privilege to retrieve the file key. As used herein, a user key or a group key is a cipher key assigned to an authenticated user and may be used to access a secured file or secure a file, or create a secured file. The detail of obtaining such a user key upon a user being authenticated is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/074,804.

According to another embodiment, the security clearance information 107 includes a set of special access rules to guard the file key. The retrieval of the file key requires that the user passes an access rule measurement. Since access privilege of a user may be controlled via one or more system parameters (e.g., a policy), the access rule measurement can determine if the user has sufficient access privilege to retrieve the file key in conjunction with the corresponding user key. With the detailed description to follow, those skilled in the art can appreciate that other forms of the security clearance information 107 may be possible. Unless otherwise specified, the following description is based on the security clearance information 107 being another layer of encryption with one or more clearance keys.

In accordance with the security clearance information 107, a user may be assigned a hierarchical security clearance level based on, perhaps, a level of trust assigned to the user. A level of trust implies that one user may be more trusted than another and hence the more trusted user may access more classified files. Depending on implementation, a level of trust may be based on job responsibility of the user or a role of the user in a project or an organization background checks, psychological profiles, or length of service, etc. In any case, a level of trust assigned to the user augments additional aspect to the access privilege of the user such that the user must have proper security clearance to access a classified secured file even if the user is permitted by the access rules to access the file.

As will be further described in detail below, unless the level of security clearance of the user permits, a secured classified file (i.e., the file that is both secured and classified) may not be accessed even if the user has an authenticated user (or group) key and permitted by the access rules in the secured classified file. In one embodiment, the level of security clearance of the user is determined by one or more clearance keys assigned thereto. In general, a clearance key permits a user to access a secured file classified as “top secret”, the same clearance key may permit the user to access all secured files classified less secure, such as “secret” or “confidential”, where it has been assumed that the user has proper access privilege to be granted by the access rules in the file. In one embodiment, a clearance key is further secured by means of secondary authentication, such as re-login, biometric information verification and a second password. In other words, a clearance key may not be automatically released to or activated for a user upon an authenticated login, unless the user provides additional information.

In general, a header is a file structure, preferably small in size, and includes, or perhaps links to, security information about a resultant secured document. Depending on an exact implementation, the security information can be entirely included in a header or pointed to by a pointer that is included in the header. According to one embodiment, the access rules 104, as part of the security information, are included in the header 106. The security information further includes the file key and/or one or more clearance keys, in some cases, an off-line access permit (e.g. in the access rules) should such access be requested by an authorized user. The security information is then encrypted by a cipher (i.e., an en/decryption scheme) with a user key associated with an authorized user to produce encrypted security information 110. The encrypted header 106, if no other information is added thereto, is attached to or integrated with the encrypted data portion 112 to generate the resultant secured file 108. In a preferred embodiment, the header is placed at the beginning of the encrypted document (data portion) to facilitate an early detection of the secured nature of a secured file. One of the advantages of such placement is to enable an access application (i.e., an authoring or viewing tool) to immediately activate a document securing module (to be described where it deems appropriate) to decrypt the header if permitted. Nevertheless, there is no restriction as to where the encrypted header 106 is integrated with the encrypted data portion 112.

It is understood that a cipher may be implemented based on one of many available encryption/decryption schemes. Encryption and decryption generally require the use of some secret information, referred to as a key. For some encryption mechanisms, the same key is used for both encryption and decryption; for other mechanisms, the keys used for encryption and decryption are different. In any case, data can be encrypted with a key according to a predetermined cipher (i.e., encryption/decryption) scheme. Examples of such schemes may include, but not be limited to, Data Encryption Standard algorithm (DES), Blowfish block cipher and Twofish cipher. Therefore, the operations of the present invention are not limited to a choice of those commonly-used encryption/decryption schemes. Any cipher scheme that is effective and reliable may be used. Hence, the details of a particular scheme are not further discussed herein so as to avoid obscuring aspects of the present invention.

In essence, the secured document 108 includes two parts, the encrypted data portion 112 (i.e., encrypted version of the document itself) and the header 110 that may point to or include security information for the secured document 108. To access the contents in the encrypted data portion 112, one needs to obtain the file key to decrypt the encrypted data portion 112. To obtain the file key, one needs to be authenticated to get a user or group key and pass an access test in which at least the access rules in the security information are measured against the user's access privilege (i.e., access rights). If the secured file is classified, it further requires a security level clearance on the user. In general, the security clearance level of the user must be high enough before the file key can be retrieved. Alternatively, part of the access rules may be left non-encrypted for users authorized or non-authorized alike to view embedded access permissions of a secured file in a display application or markup language interpreter (e.g., a browser).

FIG. 2A shows a diagram 200 of what is referred to herein as a two-pronged access scheme according to one embodiment of the present invention. To access a secured file 201, a user needs to have access privilege based on a condition of “need to know” 202 that is to be measured against by the access rules 204 embedded in the secured file 201. If the secured file 201 is classified, the user must also have a higher security clearance level 206 that is measured against by the security clearance information 206 (e.g., one or more clearance keys. In other words, there are at least two key holes 210 that must be “inserted” with two proper keys before the secured classified file can be accessed.

FIG. 2B shows a flowchart 220 of process for granting a proper security clearance level (i.e., a clearance key) according to one embodiment of the present invention. The process 220 can be initiated with a request for a clearance key. Depending on implementation, the process 220 may be implemented in a machine (e.g., a central server, a local server or a client machine) that provides access control management to all secured files, perhaps, in an inter/intra enterprise environment, or a combination of a local client machine used by users and the machine.

At 222, the process 220 awaits a request for a clearance key. It is described that a secured file can be classified or unclassified. When it is determined that a user needs to access a secured file that is classified at a security level, such request is provided to activate the process 220. In general, the request pertains to a specific user or some members in a group. At 224, a corresponding account for the user is retrieved, provided there is the account for the user. If the account is not available, then the account shall be opened accordingly. Alternatively, the process 220 may be part of the process of opening an appropriate account for a user who has the need-to-know basis to access secured files at certain security or confidential level(s). Depending on implementation, the corresponding account information may include a username or identifier, membership information, designated access privilege, and a corresponding user key (which sometimes is a pair of a private key and a public key). At 226, a security level for the user is determined, which is usually done by the necessity. For example, an executive of an enterprise may be assigned the highest security clearance level and a front desk receptionist may be assigned the lowest security clearance level. Once the security level is determined, a clearance key is generated at 228.

Referring now to FIG. 2C, there is shown a diagram 240 of generating a clearance key according to one embodiment of the present invention. A key generator 244 receives one or more parameters 242 controlling the security level determined at 226 of FIG. 2B to generate a sequence of alpha-numeric characters or binary numbers as a key. Whether using a secret-key cryptosystem or a public-key cryptosystem, one needs a good source of random numbers for key generation. The main features of a good source are that it produces numbers that are unknown and unpredictable by potential adversaries. There are many ways to generate such numbers, for example, random numbers can be obtained from a physical process. Another approach is to use a pseudo-random number generator fed by a random seed. In any case, depending on the input 242, the generator 244 is configured to generate a clearance key of proper security level. In one embodiment, the key generator 244 generates keys 246 of different lengths or forms, each of the keys 246 corresponds to a security level, such as level 1 (highest security), level 2, . . . , level N (lowest security). In another embodiment, each of the keys 246 generated by the key generator 244 is embedded with a signature signifying a security level. Other methods of specifying a security level of a clearance key are possible. Although it is possible to implement in such a way that each clearance key with a certain security level can only access secured files classified in the same security level, it is preferable to permit a clearance key with a higher security level to access secured files classified in the lower security levels. In other words, a clearance key in level 1 (i.e., the highest security level primarily designated to secured files classified as “top secret”) can be used to access all secured classified files 248, while a clearance key in level 2 can be used to access all secured classified files 248 except for those classified as “top secret”. Likewise, a clearance key in level N can be only used to access secured files in security level N. One of the advantages for such arrangement is that a user needs only to have one clearance key, if the user has the need to access those secured classified files.

FIG. 2D shows a diagram of generating a clearance key according to another embodiment of the present invention. The key generator 244 receives one or more parameters 242 controlling the security level determined at 226 of FIG. 2B to generate a number of sets of alphanumeric or binary numbers as a primary key 246 and auxiliary keys 247. The primary key 246 is the one being requested, generated in accordance with the determined security level and can be used to facilitate the access to a secured file classified at a security or confidentiality level. The auxiliary keys are those keys generated to facilitate the access to secured files classified less than the security or confidentiality level. As shown in the figure, it is assumed that the primary key 246 is for accessing a secured file classified at level 2. Accordingly, the auxiliary keys 247 can be respectively used to access secured files classified level 3, level 4, . . . to level N, all less than level 2 in terms of security or confidentiality. To facilitate the description of the present invention, the following description is based on FIG. 2C and can be readily applied to FIGS. 2D.

Returning to FIG. 2B, after a proper clearance key is generated at 228, the clearance key is associated with the account at 230 so that the user will use the correct key to access a secured file that requires a clearance key. The process 220 now awaits any call for the clearance key at 232. Depending on implementation, the clearance key may be stored locally or remotely and retrievlable only when there is a need for it to access a classified secured file. In some cases, the clearance key can only be retrievlable when a user passes a secondary authentication means. For example, a user is entitled to access certain secured files classified at least at a security level. The clearance key associated with the user may be configured to be protected by means of secondary authentication, such as biometric information verification or a second password, to increase security level of the clearance key. When a non-secured classified file is accessed, the clearance key is not needed and therefore will not be released to or activated for the user. When a secured classified file is accessed, the process 220 goes to 234, wherein the clearance key is released to the user to facilitate the retrieval of the file key in the secured file, provided the user has furnished necessary information or passed secondary authentication if needed.

Clearance keys provide flexibilities for a security system to control access by authorized users to secured files that are classified accordingly. However, when levels of the security are fixed, the flexibilities are limited. As one of the features in the present invention, the levels of security can be added or adjusted up or down in a security system without compromising the security of the secured files that have been previously classified.

FIG. 3A illustrates security levels 302 in a security system employed in an enterprise. In general, there are N levels of security for secured files under the security system, where N is a finite integer, each level requires a set of security parameters to access secured files classified to the level or other levels below this level. For example, a secured file SF is classified at security level 2. To access the secured file, users in a designated group G2 shall posses at least two keys, a user key (e.g., UK2) and a clearance key (e.g., CK2) corresponding to the security level 2. The designated group includes a user or users authorized to access the secured files classified at this level or levels below this level. The user key for each of the users, if there are more than one users in the designated group, may not be necessary identical, as one user may be from one user group and another user may be from a different group. To facilitate the description of the present invention, the access relationship may be expressed as: SF ∀ (group, security-level, CK), which means a secured and classified file SF can be accessed with valid parameters of a designated group, a security-level, a clearance key. In particular, SF ∀ (G2, level2, C<) means that users in a group designated as G2 can access secured file classed at level 2 with a clearance key CK2, provided that each of the users in G2 has a valid user key. Alternatively, SF ∀ (G2, level1, level2, CK2) means that users in a group designated as G2 can access secured files classified at level 1 or level 2 with a clearance key CK2, provided that each of the users in G2 has a valid user key. The first access relationship indicates that the secured file SF can only be accessed by users in a group G2 authorized to access secured files classified at the security level 2. The second access relationship indicates that secured files classified at the security level 2 or one level below the security level 2 can be accessed by users authorized to access secured files classified at the security level 2. Depending on implementation, either one of the access relationships may be implemented.

For simplified illustration purpose, the first access relationship is shown in the figures and the following description is based on the first access relationship. Those skilled in the art can understand the implementation of the second access relationship given the detailed description herein. When an additional security level 304 is added between the security levels 1 and 2, the groups and corresponding keys have to be reassigned without affecting the accessibility to other secured files originally classified. According to one embodiment, the security level 1 is the most restrictive level. Since the added level 304 is less restrictive than the security level 1 but more restrictive than level 2, as shown in FIG. 3A, the added level 304 is thus classified as a new security level 2308. As a result, the rest of the original security levels, except for the security level 1, are reorganized, creating N+1 levels of security 310 and a new access relationship SF ∀ (GX, level 2, CKX), where GX is a newly authorized group to be permitted to access secured files at the security level 2 with a user key and the newly created clearance key CKX.

To maintain the accessibility of the originally authorized groups, the security levels are renumbered or remapped. If the original access relationship is SF ∀ (G2, level 2, CK2), there is now SF ∀ (G3, level 3, CK2), namely the original security level 2 is mapped to as security level 3.

FIG. 3B and FIG. 3C each illustrate a case in which a security level is folded into another security level. Originally, there are three security levels 320. Now the three security levels 320 are to be folded into two security levels 322 or 324. FIG. 3B shows the security levels 320 being folded up to an immediate next security level above, and FIG. 3C shows the security levels 322 being folded down to an immediate next security level below. In particular, in FIG. 3B, the security level 2 is to be folded into the security level 1, a higher security level. As a result of one security level being folded up, there are now two security levels 322. The authorization (i.e., security parameters) designated for the deleted security level (i.e., security level 2) need be merged with that for the security level 1. In other words, the original access relationships:

SF ∀ (G1, level 1, CK1);

SF ∀ (G2, level 2, CK2);

SF ∀ (G3, level 3, CK3);

are now correspondingly mapped to:

SF ∀ (G1, level 1, CK1, G2, level 2, CK2);

SF ∀ (G3, level 3, CK3).

In other words, those secured files classified at security level 2 can still be accessed by those with proper access privilege.

One the other hand, FIG. 3C shows the security level 2 is being folded to the security level 3. The authorization (i.e., security parameters) designated for the deleted security level (i.e., security level 2) need be merged with that for the security level 3. In other words, the original access relationships:

SF ∀ (G1, level 1, CK1);

SF ∀ (G2, level 2, CK2);

SF ∀ (G3, level 3, CK3);

are now correspondingly mapped to:

SF ∀ (G1, level 1, CK1);

SF ∀ (G3, level 3, CK3, G2, level 2, CK2).

In other words, those secured files classified at security level 2 can still be accessed by those with proper access privilege.

FIG. 4A shows a flowchart or process 400 of inserting a new security level into N security levels according to one embodiment of the present invention. The process 400 can be implemented in software, hardware or both of software and hardware. In a typical application, the process 400 is executed in a security system employed to manage secured files for an enterprise or a group of collaborative business entities.

At 402, the process 400 awaits a request to insert a new security level into N existing security levels. For example, a system was configured to manage secured files classified respectively in accordance with one of N security levels. In other words, there are N security levels in the system. For some reason, the system needs to be configured to manage N+1 security levels, namely a security level is to be added into the N security levels. Upon receiving a request to insert the new security level, the process 400 determines how restrictive the new security level is with respect to the N security level at 404. It is assumed that the 1 st security level in the N security levels is most restrictive while the Nth security level is least restrictive. The relative restrictiveness of the new security level is a relative position in the stack of the N security levels, indicating how less or more restrictive with respect to the 1 st security level or the Nth security level.

At 406, a set of security parameters is generated for the new security level. The security parameters include at least a clearance key and a relative security level (e.g., a tier rank). The clearance key may be respectively generated in accordance with FIG. 2C or FIG. 2D or other means known to those skilled in the art. The clearance key is associated with the new security level, and a group of users are then authorized to access secured files classified at this new security level.

At 408, the new security level is now created in the original N security levels, resulting N+1 security levels. Without implicating the accessibility to secured files classified at other security levels, the security levels below the new security level are mapped accordingly. For example, an ith security level in the original N security levels now becomes an (i+1) security level and the corresponding security parameters are also shifted accordingly. In another perspective, SF ∀ (Gi, level i, CKi) is now SF ∀ (G(i+1), level (i+1), CKi). At 410, a new set of security levels is created, which does not implicate the accessibility to secured files originally classified and the originally authenticated users are still able to access the secured files they are entitled to.

FIG. 4B is provided to further understand FIG. 4A with respect to one embodiment of the present invention and shows that a table 420 include clearance keys, each for a security level. A set of parameters 422 for a new security level X is generated. It is assumed that the new security level X is to be inserted between security levels 1 and 2. The table 424 shows the relative position of the new security level in the original N security levels in a system. The table 426 shows reordering of the security levels to accommodate the new level that is now with a tier rank being 2 and the corresponding clearance keys are respectively associated with their original ranks. As a result, the secured files classified per the original security levels are still accessible.

According to one embodiment, when an authorized user logins into the system, with the login information in reference to a group, the user is granted at least two keys (a corresponding clearance key and a user key) such that the user can access secured files classified at the granted security level or any levels below this security level. According to another embodiment, when an authorized user logins into the system, with the login information in reference to a group, the user is granted all keys pairs the user is entitled to such that the user can access secured files classified at this security level or any levels below this security level. It should be noted that “granting” herein does not necessarily means only that the user receives the keys from the system. Depending on implementation, one or more of the keys or part or whole of the keys may be stored in a local or remote machine and caused to be activated for use only after the user is authenticated.

FIG. 4C shows a flowchart or process 420 of deleting a security level out of N security levels according to one embodiment of the present invention. One of the features of the process 420 is to fold the deleted security level up or down to a next immediate security level so that users originally authorized to access secured files classified at the deleted security level can still access these secured files. The process 420 can be implemented in software, hardware or both of software and hardware. In a typical application, the process 420 is executed in a security system employed to manage secured files for an enterprise or a group of collaborative business entities.

At 422, the process 420 awaits a request to delete a security level out of N existing security levels. For example, a system was configured to manage secured files classified respectively in accordance with one of N security levels. In other words, there are N security levels in the system. For some reason, the system needs to be configured to manage N−1 security levels, namely one of the N security levels is to be deleted. Upon receiving the request to delete, for example, an ith security level, the process 420 determines at 424 whether the ith security level is the most restrictive. It is assumed that the 1st security level in the N security levels is most restrictive while the Nth security level is least restrictive. Accordingly, the process 420 determines at 424 whether the security level to be removed is the 1st security level. If it is indeed the 1st security level, the request is denied.

It should be noted that 424 is not a limitation in the present invention and it can be folded down to a next immediate level. According to one embodiment, it is designed to suit in a more practical situation. In general, it is just not desirable to have a most restrictive security level to be deleted. In some other case, it is also not desirable to have a least restrictive security level to be deleted as well. Optionally, another checking may be employed in the process 420 to determine at 424 whether the security level to be removed is the Nth security level.

Depending on implementation, at 426, the security level to be deleted is to be folded up or down to a next immediate security level. For example, an ith security level to be deleted can be merged with (i−1)th security level or (i+1)th security level. By merging the ith security level with its next immediate security level, it is possible to access those secured files classified at the ith security level even if this level is deleted.

To access those secured files classified at the ith security level, the security parameters, such as the keys and the group designations shall be retained. As a result, at 428, the security parameters for the ith security level are transferred or updated accordingly. In general, for the case of folding up, the security parameters for the ith security level are merged with those for the (i−1)th security level, for the case of folding down, the security parameters for the ith security level are merged with those for the (i+1)th security level. At 430, the security levels are reordered, for example from security levels 1 to N to 1 to (N−1).

FIG. 5A shows an exemplary implementation 500 of dropping an ith level out of N existing levels by folding the ith level to (i—i)th level and may be understood in conjunction with FIG. 5B and FIG. 5C. A table 510 in FIG. 5B shows that there are N security levels labeled as Level 1, 2, . . . , N, where Level 1 is most restricted and Level N is least restricted. A security clearance key is associated with one of the security levels. Each of the security levels may mean literally a type of security, such as “top secret”, “very secret”, . . . “insignificant”. Each of the N security levels is also identified by an identifier. According to one embodiment, the identifier is a sequence of digits (e.g. a hexadecimal number) generated in a system. For example in table 510, the identifier B5C indicates security level 1, and the identifier CD7 indicates security level 4. To facilitate the description of FIG. 5A, it is assumed that the ith security level to be dropped is the security level 4.

At 502, an identifier of the security level above the one being dropped is located, namely the identifier of the (i−1)th security level. According to the table 510, the identifier of the 3rd security level is FF5 (i.e., currentID=FF5). Given the two identifiers FF5 and C07, at 504, these two identifiers are entered in a mapping table at 504. FIG. 5C shows a corresponding mapping table 512 which may be referred to as clearance mapping table, in which two IDs (deletedID and currentD) now have two entries, each being one of the two identifiers.

At 506, the mapping table 512 is updated. There is no operation since there are any entries previously in the table 512. At 508, the user who is previously authorized to access secured files classified at CD7 is updated. According to one embodiment, a notification is sent to the user or users who may have been affected by dropping CD7 to cause the original clearance key (i.e., CK4) to be updated or exchanged with another clearance key (e.g., CD3 for FF5). According to another embodiment, when a secured file classified at CD7 is accessed, the original clearance key is used to access the file. At the time, the file is stored, saved or written back to a storage space, an updated clearance key (i.e., the key for FF5) is effectuated in accordance with CurrentID. In any case, the updating at 508 can be configured to be carried out transparently.

Next, it is assumed that another security level, Level 3, is to be dropped. Accordingly, at 502, the identifier (A92) of the security level above Level 3 is located. At 504, these two identifiers are entered, namely deletedID=FF5 and currentD=A92. At 506, the table 512 needs to be updated. Since there is are entries from a previous deletion of one security level, these entries are preferably updated, thus the CurrentID is assigned to be A92 as well as shown in FIG. 5C. The affected user or users are updated at 508 so that these users can still access the secured files classified at FF5.

FIGS. 5A, 5B and 5C show one exemplary implementation of folding up one deleted security level. Given the detailed description herein, other implementations including those to fold down a deleted security level can be readily developed by those skilled in art.

There are numerous features, advantages and benefits in the present invention. One of them is the mechanism provided to regroup security levels per a specific requirement without implicating the accessibility to secured files classified in accordance with the existing security levels. Another one of them is that a security level can be removed from a set of existing security levels while the security parameters for the security level to be deleted are either folded up or down to an immediate next security level. As a result, the security parameters for the immediate next security level are augmented to include those for the security level to be deleted such that the secured files classified at the security level to be deleted can still be accessed by those with proper clearance levels. Other features, advantages and benefits may be appreciated by those skilled in the art in the foregoing descriptions.

The present invention has been described in sufficient details with a certain degree of particularity. It is understood to those skilled in the art that the present disclosure of embodiments has been made by way of examples only and that numerous changes in the arrangement and combination of parts may be resorted without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description of embodiments.

Claims

1. In a system for providing restrictive access to contents in secured files, each of the secured files classified in accordance with one of N security levels, a A method for reorganizing the N security levels without implicating accessibilities to the secured files, each of the secured files classified in accordance with one of the N security levels, the method comprising:

determining, using a computing device, a new security level with respect to the N security levels, wherein a 1st security level is most restrictive and an Nth security level is least restrictive in among the N security levels;
generating, using the computing device, security parameters accordingly for the new security level, the new security level being ith less restrictive with respect to the 1st security level; and
mapping, using the computing device, an ith security level in the N security levels to an (i+1)th security level in the N security levels to accommodate the new security level such that there are now (N+1) security levels in the system,
wherein each of the secured files includes an encrypted data portion and a security portion that controls restrictive access to the encrypted data portion, the security portion including a file key encrypted by at least a first key and a second key and further protected by a set of rules, and
wherein both of the first key and the second key must be obtained by a user whose access privilege is satisfied by the rules before the contents of the each of the secured files can be accessed.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the security parameters includes at least a clearance key and one or more of the parameters pertain to a designated group of users authorized to access the secured files classified at the new security level.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the clearance key is associated with the designated group of users, and together with a user key associated with each of the users, allows access to files secured at the ith security level can now be accessed.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein, when if a user authorized to access secured files classified at the new security level logins logs into the system, the user is granted the clearance key, together with a user key authorized authorizing the user to access the secured files, those and secured files classified at the new security level can now be accessed by the users.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein, the clearance key is a private key in a pair of a public key and the private key, those and the secured files are classified at the new security level with the public key.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein, if the user is authorized at to access the ith security level in the original N security levels, the user is now granted a second user key and a second clearance key such that the contents in the secured files classified at the (i+1)th security level and below can be now accessed by the user.

7. The method of claim 6 1, wherein the first key determines if the user is authorized to access the secured files classified at one of the N security levels or one of the (N+1) security levels, and the second key is in accordance with the one of the N security levels or the one of the (N+1) security levels.

8. In a system for providing restrictive access to contents in secured files, at least some of the secured files classified in accordance with one of N security levels, a A method for reorganizing the N security levels without implicating accessibilities to the secured files, at least some of the secured files classified in accordance with one of the N security levels, the method comprising:

upon receiving a request to remove an ith security level out of the N security levels, determining, using a computing device, if an (i−1)th security level is a 1st security level or if an (i+1)th security level is an Nth security levels, wherein the 1st security level is most restrictive and the Nth security level is least restrictive in among the N security levels;
when if the (i−1)th security level is not the 1st security level and the (i+1)th security level is not the Nth security levels, merging, using the computing device, the ith security level with either the (i−1)th security level or the (i+1)th security level such that there are now (N−1) security levels in the system,
wherein each of the secured files includes an encrypted data portion and a security portion that controls restrictive access to the encrypted data portion, the security portion including a file key encrypted by at least a first key and a second key and further protected by a set of rules, and wherein both of the first key and the second key must be obtained by a user whose access privilege is satisfied by the rules before the contents of the each of the secured files can be accessed.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein users authorized to access secured files classified at the ith security level can now access secured files classified at the (i−1)th security level if the ith security level is has been merged with the (i−1)th security level.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein users authorized to access secured files classified at the ith security level can now access secured files classified at the (i+1)th security level if the ith security level is has been merged with the (i+1)th security level.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein at least two keys are needed to access secured files classified at the ith security level, and after the ith security level is has been merged with the (i−1)th or (i+1)th security level, the at lest two keys are incorporated into the (i−1)th or (i+1)th security level as such that users authorized to access the secured files classified at the ith security level can still access the secured files.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein, at the same time, the users can access secured files classified at the (i−1)th or (i+1)th security level.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the at least two keys include a first key associated with a designated group of users and a second key being a clearance key in accordance with the ith security level.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein, when if the user logins logs into the system, the user is granted the at least two keys.

15. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

when if the (i−1)th security level is the 1st security level, denying the request to remove the ith security level out of the N security levels; or
always folding down the ith security level with (i−1)th security level.

16. The method of claim 8 further comprising:

when if the (i−1)th security level is the N security level, denying the request to remove the ith security level out of the N security levels; or always folding up the ith security level with (i−1)th security level.

17. In a A system for providing restrictive access to contents in secured files, each of the secured files classified in accordance with one of N security levels, the system comprising:

a first machine loaded with a software module to reorganize the N security levels without implicating accessibilities to the secured files, wherein the 1st security level is most restrictive and the Nth security level is least restrictive in the N security levels, when and wherein, if the software module is executed, the first machine performs operations of: if a request of for deleting an ith security level out of the N security levels is received, determining if an (i−1)th security level is a 1 st security level or if an (i+1)th security level is an Nth security levels, wherein the 1st security level is most restrictive and the Nth security level is least restrictive in the N security levels; and when if the (i−1)th security level is not the 1st security level and the (i+1)th security level is not the Nth security levels, merging the ith security level with either the (i−1)th security level or the (i+1)th security level such that there are now (N−1) security levels in the system; and if a request of adding a new security level into the N security is received, determining a new security level with respect to the N security levels, wherein a 1 st security level is most restrictive and an Nth security level is least restrictive in the N security levels; generating security parameters accordingly for the new security level, the new security level being ith less restrictive with respect to the 1st security level; and mapping an ith security level in the N security levels to an (i+1)th security level in the N security levels to accommodate the new security level such that there are now (N+1) security levels in the system; and
a second machine, coupled to the first machine over a network, associated with a user that is granted with at least two keys to access one of the secured files classified at one of the N security levels,
wherein each of the secured files includes an encrypted data portion and a security portion that controls restrictive access to the encrypted data portion, the security portion including a file key encrypted by at least a first key and a second key and further protected by a set of rules, and
wherein both of the first key and the second key must be obtained by a user whose access privilege is satisfied by the rules before the contents of the each of the secured files can be accessed.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein one of the two keys granted to the user is a clearance key in accordance with the one of the N security levels.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the two keys granted to the user are folded to either the (i−1)th security level or the (i+1)th security level, when if the user is authorized to access secured files classified at the ith security level.

20. A tangible computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, if executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising:

determining a new security level with respect to the N security levels, wherein a 1st security level is most restrictive and an Nth security level is least restrictive among the N security levels;
generating security parameters accordingly for the new security level, the new security level being ith less restrictive with respect to the 1st security level; and
mapping an ith security level in the N security levels to an (i+1)th security level in the N security levels to accommodate the new security level such that there are (N+1) security levels in the system,
wherein each of the secured files includes an encrypted data portion and a security portion that controls restrictive access to the encrypted data portion, the security portion including a file key encrypted by at least a first key and a second key and further protected by a set of rules, and
wherein both of the first key and the second key must be obtained by a user whose access privilege is satisfied by the rules before the contents of the each of the secured files can be accessed.

21. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 20, wherein the security parameters include at least a clearance key and one or more of the parameters pertain to a designated group of users authorized to access the secured files classified at the new security level.

22. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 21, wherein the clearance key is associated with the designated group of users, and together with a user key associated with each of the users, allows access to files secured at the ith security level.

23. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 21, wherein, if a user authorized to access secured files classified at the new security level logs into the system, the user is granted the clearance key, together with a user key authorizing the user to access the secured files, and secured files classified at the new security level can be accessed by the user.

24. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 23, wherein the clearance key is a private key in a pair of a public key and the private key, and the secured files are classified at the new security level with the public key.

25. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 23, wherein, if the user is authorized to access the ith security level in the N security levels, the user is granted a second user key and a second clearance key such that the contents in the secured files classified at the (i+1)th security level and below can be accessed by the user.

26. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 25, wherein the first key determines if the user is authorized to access the secured files classified at one of the N security levels or one of the (N+1) security levels, and the second key is in accordance with the one of the N security levels or the one of the (N+1) security levels.

27. A tangible computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, if executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising:

upon receiving a request to remove an ith security level out of the N security levels, determining if an (i−1)th security level is a 1st security level or if an (i+1)th security level is an Nth security level, wherein the 1st security level is most restrictive and the Nth security level is least restrictive among the N security levels;
if the (i−1)th security level is not the 1st security level and the (i+1)th security level is not the Nth security level, merging the ith security level with either the (i−1)th security level or the (i+1)th security level such that there are (N−1) security levels in the system,
wherein each of the secured files includes an encrypted data portion and a security portion that controls restrictive access to the encrypted data portion, the security portion including a file key encrypted by at least a first key and a second key and further protected by a set of rules, and
wherein both of the first key and the second key must be obtained by a user whose access privilege is satisfied by the rules before the contents of each of the secured files can be accessed.

28. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 27, wherein users authorized to access secured files classified at the ith security level can access secured files classified at the (i−1)th security level if the ith security level has been merged with the (i−1)th security level.

29. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 27, wherein users authorized to access secured files classified at the ith security level can access secured files classified at the (i+1)th security level if the ith security level has been merged with the (i+1)th security level.

30. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 27, wherein at least two keys are needed to access secured files classified at the ith security level, and after the ith security level has been merged with the (i−1)th or (i+1)th security level, the at lest two keys are incorporated into the (i−1)th or (i+1)th security level such that users authorized to access the secured files classified at the ith security level can access the secured files.

31. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 30, wherein the users can access secured files classified at the (i−1)th or (i+1)th security level.

32. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 30, wherein the at least two keys include a first key associated with a designated group of users and a second key being a clearance key in accordance with the ith security level.

33. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 32, wherein, if the user logs into the system, the user is granted the at least two keys.

34. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 27, further comprising computer code for: if the (i−1)th security level is the 1st security level, denying the request to remove the ith security level out of the N security levels; or always folding down the ith security level with (i−1)th security level.

35. The computer-readable storage medium according to claim 27 further comprising computer code for: if the (i−1)th security level is the N security level, denying the request to remove the ith security level out of the N security levels; or always folding up the ith security level with (i−1)th security level.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4203166 May 1980 Ehrsam et al.
4734568 March 29, 1988 Watanabe
4757533 July 12, 1988 Allen et al.
4796220 January 3, 1989 Wolfe
4799258 January 17, 1989 Davies
4827508 May 2, 1989 Shear
4888800 December 19, 1989 Marshall et al.
4972472 November 20, 1990 Brown et al.
5032979 July 16, 1991 Hecht et al.
5052040 September 24, 1991 Preston et al.
5058164 October 15, 1991 Elmer et al.
5144660 September 1, 1992 Rose
5204897 April 20, 1993 Wyman
5220657 June 15, 1993 Bly et al.
5235641 August 10, 1993 Nozawa et al.
5247575 September 21, 1993 Sprague et al.
5276735 January 4, 1994 Boebert et al.
5301247 April 5, 1994 Rasmussen et al.
5319705 June 7, 1994 Halter et al.
5369702 November 29, 1994 Shanton
5375169 December 20, 1994 Seheidt et al.
5404404 April 4, 1995 Novorita
5406628 April 11, 1995 Beller et al.
5414852 May 9, 1995 Kramer et al.
5495533 February 27, 1996 Linehan et al.
5499297 March 12, 1996 Boebert
5502766 March 26, 1996 Boebert et al.
5535375 July 9, 1996 Eshel et al.
5557765 September 17, 1996 Lipner et al.
5570108 October 29, 1996 McLaughlin et al.
5584023 December 10, 1996 Hsu
5600722 February 4, 1997 Yamaguchi et al.
5606663 February 25, 1997 Kadooka
5655119 August 5, 1997 Davy
5661806 August 26, 1997 Nevoux et al.
5671412 September 23, 1997 Christiano
5673316 September 30, 1997 Auerbach et al.
5677953 October 14, 1997 Dolphin
5680452 October 21, 1997 Shanton
5684987 November 4, 1997 Mamiya et al.
5689718 November 18, 1997 Sakurai et al.
5699428 December 16, 1997 McDonnal et al.
5708709 January 13, 1998 Rose
5715403 February 3, 1998 Stefik
5717755 February 10, 1998 Shanton
5720033 February 17, 1998 Deo
5729734 March 17, 1998 Parker et al.
5732265 March 24, 1998 Dewitt et al.
5745573 April 28, 1998 Lipner et al.
5748736 May 5, 1998 Mittra
5751287 May 12, 1998 Hahn et al.
5757920 May 26, 1998 Misra et al.
5765152 June 9, 1998 Erickson
5778065 July 7, 1998 Hauser et al.
5787169 July 28, 1998 Eldridge et al.
5787173 July 28, 1998 Seheidt et al.
5787175 July 28, 1998 Carter
5790789 August 4, 1998 Suarez
5790790 August 4, 1998 Smith et al.
5813009 September 22, 1998 Johnson et al.
5821933 October 13, 1998 Keller et al.
5825876 October 20, 1998 Peterson
5835592 November 10, 1998 Chang et al.
5835601 November 10, 1998 Shimbo et al.
5857189 January 5, 1999 Riddle
5862325 January 19, 1999 Reed et al.
5870468 February 9, 1999 Harrison
5870477 February 9, 1999 Sasaki et al.
5881287 March 9, 1999 Mast
5892900 April 6, 1999 Ginter et al.
5893084 April 6, 1999 Morgan et al.
5898781 April 27, 1999 Shanton
5922073 July 13, 1999 Shimada
5923754 July 13, 1999 Angelo et al.
5933498 August 3, 1999 Schnek et al.
5944794 August 31, 1999 Okamoto et al.
5953419 September 14, 1999 Lohstroh et al.
5968177 October 19, 1999 Batten-Carew et al.
5970502 October 19, 1999 Salkewicz et al.
5987440 November 16, 1999 O'Neil et al.
5991879 November 23, 1999 Still
5999907 December 7, 1999 Donner
6014730 January 11, 2000 Ohtsu
6023506 February 8, 2000 Ote et al.
6032216 February 29, 2000 Schmuck et al.
6038322 March 14, 2000 Harkins
6044155 March 28, 2000 Thomlinson et al.
6055314 April 25, 2000 Spies et al.
6058424 May 2, 2000 Dixon et al.
6061790 May 9, 2000 Bodnar
6069957 May 30, 2000 Richards
6085323 July 4, 2000 Shimizu et al.
6088717 July 11, 2000 Reed et al.
6088805 July 11, 2000 Davis et al.
6098056 August 1, 2000 Rusnak et al.
6101507 August 8, 2000 Cane et al.
6105131 August 15, 2000 Carroll
6122630 September 19, 2000 Strickler et al.
6134327 October 17, 2000 Van Oorschot
6134658 October 17, 2000 Multerer et al.
6134660 October 17, 2000 Boneh et al.
6134664 October 17, 2000 Walker
6141754 October 31, 2000 Choy
6145084 November 7, 2000 Zuili
6158010 December 5, 2000 Moriconi et al.
6161139 December 12, 2000 Win et al.
6182142 January 30, 2001 Win et al.
6185684 February 6, 2001 Pravetz et al.
6192408 February 20, 2001 Vahalia et al.
6205549 March 20, 2001 Pravetz et al.
6212561 April 3, 2001 Sitaraman et al.
6223285 April 24, 2001 Komuro et al.
6226618 May 1, 2001 Downs et al.
6226745 May 1, 2001 Wiederhold et al.
6240188 May 29, 2001 Dondeti et al.
6249873 June 19, 2001 Richard et al.
6253193 June 26, 2001 Ginter et al.
6260040 July 10, 2001 Kauffman et al.
6260141 July 10, 2001 Park
6263348 July 17, 2001 Kathrow et al.
6272631 August 7, 2001 Thomlinson et al.
6272632 August 7, 2001 Carmen et al.
6282649 August 28, 2001 Lambert et al.
6289450 September 11, 2001 Pensak et al.
6292895 September 18, 2001 Baltzley
6292899 September 18, 2001 McBride
6295361 September 25, 2001 Kadansky et al.
6301614 October 9, 2001 Najork et al.
6308256 October 23, 2001 Folmsbee
6308273 October 23, 2001 Goertzel et al.
6314409 November 6, 2001 Schnek et al.
6317777 November 13, 2001 Skarbo et al.
6332025 December 18, 2001 Takahashi et al.
6336114 January 1, 2002 Garrison
6339423 January 15, 2002 Sampson et al.
6339825 January 15, 2002 Pensak et al.
6341164 January 22, 2002 Dilkie et al.
6343316 January 29, 2002 Sakata
6347374 February 12, 2002 Drake et al.
6349337 February 19, 2002 Parsons et al.
6351813 February 26, 2002 Mooney et al.
6356903 March 12, 2002 Baxter et al.
6356941 March 12, 2002 Cohen
6357010 March 12, 2002 Viets et al.
6363480 March 26, 2002 Perlman
6370249 April 9, 2002 Van Oorschot
6381698 April 30, 2002 Devanbu et al.
6389433 May 14, 2002 Bolosky et al.
6389538 May 14, 2002 Gruse et al.
6393420 May 21, 2002 Peters
6405315 June 11, 2002 Burns et al.
6421714 July 16, 2002 Rai et al.
6442688 August 27, 2002 Moses et al.
6442695 August 27, 2002 Dutcher et al.
6446090 September 3, 2002 Hart
6449721 September 10, 2002 Pensak et al.
6453353 September 17, 2002 Win et al.
6466932 October 15, 2002 Dennis et al.
6477544 November 5, 2002 Bolosky et al.
6490680 December 3, 2002 Scheidt et al.
6505300 January 7, 2003 Chan et al.
6510349 January 21, 2003 Schnek et al.
6519700 February 11, 2003 Ram et al.
6529956 March 4, 2003 Smith et al.
6530020 March 4, 2003 Aoki
6530024 March 4, 2003 Proctor
6542608 April 1, 2003 Scheidt et al.
6549623 April 15, 2003 Scheidt et al.
6550011 April 15, 2003 Sims
6557039 April 29, 2003 Leong et al.
6567914 May 20, 2003 Just et al.
6571291 May 27, 2003 Chow
6584466 June 24, 2003 Serbinis et al.
6587946 July 1, 2003 Jakobsson
6588673 July 8, 2003 Chan et al.
6594662 July 15, 2003 Sieffert et al.
6598161 July 22, 2003 Kluttz et al.
6603857 August 5, 2003 Batten-Carew et al.
6608636 August 19, 2003 Roseman
6611599 August 26, 2003 Natarajan
6611846 August 26, 2003 Stoodley
6615349 September 2, 2003 Hair
6615350 September 2, 2003 Schell et al.
6625650 September 23, 2003 Stelliga
6629243 September 30, 2003 Kleinman et al.
6633311 October 14, 2003 Douvikas et al.
6640307 October 28, 2003 Viets et al.
6646515 November 11, 2003 Jun et al.
6647388 November 11, 2003 Numao et al.
6678835 January 13, 2004 Shah et al.
6687822 February 3, 2004 Jakobsson
6711683 March 23, 2004 Laczko et al.
6718361 April 6, 2004 Basani et al.
6735701 May 11, 2004 Jacobson
6738908 May 18, 2004 Bonn et al.
6775779 August 10, 2004 England et al.
6782403 August 24, 2004 Kino et al.
6801999 October 5, 2004 Venkatesan et al.
6807534 October 19, 2004 Erickson
6807636 October 19, 2004 Hartman et al.
6810389 October 26, 2004 Meyer
6810479 October 26, 2004 Barlow et al.
6816871 November 9, 2004 Lee
6826698 November 30, 2004 Minkin et al.
6834333 December 21, 2004 Yoshino et al.
6834341 December 21, 2004 Bahl et al.
6845452 January 18, 2005 Roddy et al.
6851050 February 1, 2005 Singhal et al.
6865555 March 8, 2005 Novak
6874139 March 29, 2005 Krueger et al.
6877136 April 5, 2005 Bess et al.
6889210 May 3, 2005 Vainstein
6891953 May 10, 2005 DeMello et al.
6892201 May 10, 2005 Brown et al.
6892306 May 10, 2005 En-Seung et al.
6907034 June 14, 2005 Begis
6909708 June 21, 2005 Krishnaswamy et al.
6915434 July 5, 2005 Kuroda et al.
6920558 July 19, 2005 Sames et al.
6931450 August 16, 2005 Howard et al.
6931530 August 16, 2005 Pham et al.
6931597 August 16, 2005 Prakash
6938042 August 30, 2005 Aboulhosn et al.
6941355 September 6, 2005 Donaghey et al.
6941456 September 6, 2005 Wilson
6941472 September 6, 2005 Moriconi et al.
6944183 September 13, 2005 Iyer et al.
6947556 September 20, 2005 Matyas, Jr. et al.
6950818 September 27, 2005 Dennis et al.
6950936 September 27, 2005 Subramaniam et al.
6950941 September 27, 2005 Lee et al.
6950943 September 27, 2005 Bacha et al.
6952780 October 4, 2005 Olsen et al.
6957261 October 18, 2005 Lortz
6959308 October 25, 2005 Gramsamer et al.
6961849 November 1, 2005 Davis et al.
6968060 November 22, 2005 Pinkas
6971018 November 29, 2005 Witt et al.
6978376 December 20, 2005 Giroux et al.
6978377 December 20, 2005 Asano et al.
6988133 January 17, 2006 Zavalkovsky et al.
6988199 January 17, 2006 Toh et al.
6993135 January 31, 2006 Ishibashi
6996718 February 7, 2006 Henry et al.
7003117 February 21, 2006 Kacker et al.
7003560 February 21, 2006 Mullen et al.
7003661 February 21, 2006 Beattie et al.
7013332 March 14, 2006 Friedel et al.
7013485 March 14, 2006 Brown et al.
7020645 March 28, 2006 Bisbee et al.
7024427 April 4, 2006 Bobbitt et al.
7035854 April 25, 2006 Hsiao et al.
7035910 April 25, 2006 Dutta et al.
7046807 May 16, 2006 Hirano et al.
7051213 May 23, 2006 Kobayashi et al.
7058696 June 6, 2006 Phillips et al.
7058978 June 6, 2006 Feuerstein et al.
7073063 July 4, 2006 Peinado
7073073 July 4, 2006 Nonaka et al.
7076067 July 11, 2006 Raike et al.
7076312 July 11, 2006 Law et al.
7076469 July 11, 2006 Schreiber et al.
7076633 July 11, 2006 Tormasov et al.
7080077 July 18, 2006 Ramamurthy et al.
7095853 August 22, 2006 Morishita
7096266 August 22, 2006 Lewin et al.
7099926 August 29, 2006 Ims et al.
7107269 September 12, 2006 Arlein et al.
7107416 September 12, 2006 Stuart et al.
7117322 October 3, 2006 Hochberg et al.
7120635 October 10, 2006 Bhide et al.
7120757 October 10, 2006 Tsuge
7124164 October 17, 2006 Chemtob
7130964 October 31, 2006 Ims et al.
7131071 October 31, 2006 Gune et al.
7134041 November 7, 2006 Murray et al.
7136903 November 14, 2006 Phillips et al.
7145898 December 5, 2006 Elliott
7146388 December 5, 2006 Stakutis et al.
7146498 December 5, 2006 Takechi et al.
7159036 January 2, 2007 Hinchliffe et al.
7171557 January 30, 2007 Kallahalla et al.
7174563 February 6, 2007 Brownlie et al.
7177427 February 13, 2007 Komuro et al.
7178033 February 13, 2007 Garcia
7181017 February 20, 2007 Nagel et al.
7185364 February 27, 2007 Knouse et al.
7187033 March 6, 2007 Pendharkar
7188181 March 6, 2007 Squier et al.
7194764 March 20, 2007 Martherus et al.
7200747 April 3, 2007 Riedel et al.
7203317 April 10, 2007 Kallahalla et al.
7203968 April 10, 2007 Asano et al.
7219230 May 15, 2007 Riedel et al.
7224795 May 29, 2007 Takada et al.
7225256 May 29, 2007 Villavicencio
7227953 June 5, 2007 Shida
7233948 June 19, 2007 Shamoon et al.
7237002 June 26, 2007 Estrada et al.
7249044 July 24, 2007 Kumar et al.
7260555 August 21, 2007 Rossmann et al.
7265764 September 4, 2007 Alben et al.
7266684 September 4, 2007 Jancula
7280658 October 9, 2007 Amini et al.
7287055 October 23, 2007 Smith et al.
7290148 October 30, 2007 Tozawa et al.
7308702 December 11, 2007 Thomsen et al.
7313824 December 25, 2007 Bala et al.
7319752 January 15, 2008 Asano et al.
7340600 March 4, 2008 Corella
7362868 April 22, 2008 Madoukh et al.
7380120 May 27, 2008 Garcia
7383586 June 3, 2008 Cross et al.
7386529 June 10, 2008 Kiessig et al.
20010011254 August 2, 2001 Clark
20010021926 September 13, 2001 Schnek et al.
20010032181 October 18, 2001 Jakstadt et al.
20010034839 October 25, 2001 Karjoth et al.
20010044903 November 22, 2001 Yamamoto et al.
20010056550 December 27, 2001 Lee
20020010679 January 24, 2002 Felsher
20020016922 February 7, 2002 Richards et al.
20020031230 March 14, 2002 Sweet et al.
20020035624 March 21, 2002 Kim
20020046350 April 18, 2002 Lordemann et al.
20020050098 May 2, 2002 Chan
20020056042 May 9, 2002 Van Der Kaay et al.
20020062240 May 23, 2002 Morinville
20020062245 May 23, 2002 Niu et al.
20020069077 June 6, 2002 Brophy et al.
20020069272 June 6, 2002 Kim et al.
20020069363 June 6, 2002 Winburn
20020073320 June 13, 2002 Rinkevich et al.
20020077986 June 20, 2002 Kobata et al.
20020077988 June 20, 2002 Sasaki et al.
20020087479 July 4, 2002 Malcolm
20020099947 July 25, 2002 Evans
20020124180 September 5, 2002 Hagman
20020129235 September 12, 2002 Okamoto et al.
20020133699 September 19, 2002 Pueschel
20020138762 September 26, 2002 Horne
20020143710 October 3, 2002 Liu
20020143906 October 3, 2002 Tormasov et al.
20020156726 October 24, 2002 Kleckner et al.
20020157016 October 24, 2002 Russell et al.
20020169963 November 14, 2002 Seder et al.
20020169965 November 14, 2002 Hale et al.
20020172367 November 21, 2002 Mulder et al.
20020174109 November 21, 2002 Chandy et al.
20020176572 November 28, 2002 Ananth
20020178271 November 28, 2002 Graham et al.
20020194484 December 19, 2002 Bolosky et al.
20020198798 December 26, 2002 Ludwig et al.
20030009685 January 9, 2003 Choo et al.
20030014391 January 16, 2003 Evans et al.
20030023559 January 30, 2003 Choi et al.
20030028610 February 6, 2003 Pearson
20030033528 February 13, 2003 Ozog et al.
20030037133 February 20, 2003 Owens
20030037237 February 20, 2003 Abgrall et al.
20030037253 February 20, 2003 Blank et al.
20030046238 March 6, 2003 Nonaka et al.
20030051039 March 13, 2003 Brown et al.
20030056139 March 20, 2003 Murray et al.
20030074580 April 17, 2003 Knouse et al.
20030078959 April 24, 2003 Yeung et al.
20030079175 April 24, 2003 Limantsev
20030081784 May 1, 2003 Kallahalla et al.
20030081787 May 1, 2003 Kallahalla et al.
20030088517 May 8, 2003 Medoff
20030088783 May 8, 2003 DiPierro
20030101072 May 29, 2003 Dick et al.
20030110169 June 12, 2003 Zuili
20030110266 June 12, 2003 Rollins et al.
20030110397 June 12, 2003 Supramaniam
20030115146 June 19, 2003 Lee et al.
20030115570 June 19, 2003 Bisceglia
20030120601 June 26, 2003 Ouye
20030120684 June 26, 2003 Zuili et al.
20030126434 July 3, 2003 Lim et al.
20030154381 August 14, 2003 Ouye
20030159066 August 21, 2003 Staw et al.
20030172280 September 11, 2003 Scheidt et al.
20030177070 September 18, 2003 Viswanth et al.
20030177378 September 18, 2003 Wittkotter
20030182579 September 25, 2003 Leporini et al.
20030196096 October 16, 2003 Sutton
20030197729 October 23, 2003 Denoue et al.
20030200202 October 23, 2003 Hsiano et al.
20030217264 November 20, 2003 Martin et al.
20030217281 November 20, 2003 Ryan
20030217333 November 20, 2003 Smith et al.
20030226013 December 4, 2003 Dutertre
20030233650 December 18, 2003 Zaner et al.
20040022390 February 5, 2004 McDonald et al.
20040025037 February 5, 2004 Hair
20040039781 February 26, 2004 LaVallee et al.
20040064710 April 1, 2004 Vainstein
20040068524 April 8, 2004 Aboulhosn et al.
20040068664 April 8, 2004 Nachenberg et al.
20040073660 April 15, 2004 Toomey
20040073718 April 15, 2004 Johannessen et al.
20040088548 May 6, 2004 Smetters et al.
20040098580 May 20, 2004 DeTreville
20040103202 May 27, 2004 Hildenbrand et al.
20040103280 May 27, 2004 Balfanz et al.
20040133544 July 8, 2004 Kiessig et al.
20040158586 August 12, 2004 Tsai
20040193602 September 30, 2004 Liu et al.
20040193905 September 30, 2004 Lirov et al.
20040193912 September 30, 2004 Li et al.
20040199514 October 7, 2004 Rosenblatt et al.
20040215956 October 28, 2004 Venkatachary et al.
20040215962 October 28, 2004 Douceur et al.
20040243853 December 2, 2004 Swander et al.
20050021467 January 27, 2005 Franzdonk
20050021629 January 27, 2005 Cannata et al.
20050028006 February 3, 2005 Leser et al.
20050039034 February 17, 2005 Doyle et al.
20050071275 March 31, 2005 Vainstein et al.
20050071657 March 31, 2005 Ryan
20050071658 March 31, 2005 Nath et al.
20050081029 April 14, 2005 Thornton et al.
20050086531 April 21, 2005 Kenrich
20050091484 April 28, 2005 Thornton et al.
20050120199 June 2, 2005 Carter
20050138371 June 23, 2005 Supramaniam
20050138383 June 23, 2005 Vainstein
20050177716 August 11, 2005 Ginter et al.
20050177858 August 11, 2005 Ueda
20050198326 September 8, 2005 Schlimmer et al.
20050223242 October 6, 2005 Nath
20050223414 October 6, 2005 Kenrich et al.
20050235154 October 20, 2005 Serret-Avila
20050256909 November 17, 2005 Aboulhosn et al.
20050273600 December 8, 2005 Seeman
20050283610 December 22, 2005 Serret-Avila et al.
20050288961 December 29, 2005 Tabrizi
20060005021 January 5, 2006 Torrubia-Saez
20060075465 April 6, 2006 Ramanathan et al.
20060093150 May 4, 2006 Reddy et al.
20060168147 July 27, 2006 Inoue et al.
20060230437 October 12, 2006 Boyer et al.
20070006214 January 4, 2007 Dubal et al.
20070067837 March 22, 2007 Schuster
Foreign Patent Documents
0 647 253 September 1995 EP
0 672 991 September 1995 EP
0 809 170 November 1997 EP
0 913 966 May 1999 EP
0 913 967 May 1999 EP
0 950 941 October 1999 EP
0 950 941 October 1999 EP
1 107504 June 2001 EP
1 107 504 June 2001 EP
1 130 492 September 2001 EP
1 154 348 November 2001 EP
1324565 July 2003 EP
2 328 047 February 1999 GB
2001-036517 February 2001 JP
02001036517 February 2001 JP
2006244044 September 2006 JP
WO 96/41288 December 1996 WO
WO 01/61438 August 2001 WO
WO 01/63387 August 2001 WO
WO 01/63387 August 2001 WO
WO 01/77783 October 2001 WO
WO 01/78285 October 2001 WO
WO 01/84271 November 2001 WO
Other references
  • Search Report, completion date Apr. 14, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8533, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date Mar. 16, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8534, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date Mar. 2, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8535, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date Mar. 3, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8537, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date May 12, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8539, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date Jul. 6, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8529, 4 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date Oct. 8, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8536, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date May 8, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8540, 2 pages.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/259,075, entitled “Effectuating Access Policy Changes to Designated Places for Secured Files,” inventor Crocker, Sep. 27, 2002, 60 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/286,575, entitled “Method and Architecture for Providing Acess to Secured Data from Non-Secured Clients,” inventor Vainstein, Nov. 1, 2002, 46 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,363, entitled “Security System Using Indirect Key Generation from Access Rules and Methods Therefor,” inventor Vainstein, Nov. 15, 2002, 70 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/889,310, entitled “Methods and Systems for Providing Access Control to Electronic Data, ” inventor Rossmann, Aug. 10, 2007, 90 pgs.
  • Adobe Acrobat 5.0 Classroom in a Book, Adobe Press, Jun. 26, 2001, pp. 1-4.
  • Adobe Acrobat Security Settings, Acrobat 7.0, Nov. 15, 2004, pp. 1-4.
  • “Security Options”. Dec. 20, 2001. DC & Co. pp. 1-2.
  • Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 1997, Microsoft Press, Third Edition, p. 426.
  • Search Report, completion date May 8, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8530, 2 pages.
  • Search Report, completion date Oct. 2, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8531, 2 pages.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,194, entitled “Methods for identifying compunds that inhibit or reduce PTP1B expressions” inventor Rondinone, Feb. 12, 2002, 69 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,804, entitled “Secured Data Format for Access Control,” inventor Garcia, Feb. 12, 2002, 108 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/075,194, entitled “System and Method for Providing Multi-location Access Management to Secured Items,” inventor Vainstein et al., Feb. 12, 2002, 110 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,996, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Securing Electronic Data,” inventor Lee et al., Feb. 12, 2002, 111 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,825, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Accessing Secured Electronic Data Off-line, ” inventor Lee et al., Feb. 12, 2002, 108 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/105,532, entitled “System and Method for Providing Different Levels of Key Security for Controlling Access to Secured Items,” inventor Hildebrand et al., Mar. 20, 2002, 86 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/186,203, entitled “Method and System for Implementing Changes to Security Policies in a Distributed Security System,” inventor Huang, Jun. 26, 2002, 65 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/201,756, entitled “Managing Secured Files in Designated Locations,” inventor Alain, Jul. 22, 2002, 121 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/206,737, entitled “Method and System for Updating Keys in a Distributed Security System,” inventor Hildebrand, Jul. 26, 2002, 60 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/246,079, entitled “Security System for Generating Keys from Access rules in a Decentralized Manner and Methods Therefor,” inventor Hildebrand, Sep. 17, 2002, 78 pgs.
  • A Real-Time Push-Pull Communications Model for Distributed Real-Time and Multimedia Systems, Jan. 1999, School of Computer Sciences Carnegie Mellon University, Kanaka Juvva, Raj Rajkurmar.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/889,685, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Controlling the Speed Ranges of a Machine” inventor Thomas, Jul. 13, 2004, 18 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/028,397, entitled “Method and system for resisting use of a clipboard application,” inventor Zuili, Dec. 21, 2001, 38 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,277, entitled “Method and apparatus for uniquely identifying files,” inventor Ouye, Feb. 18, 2003, 25 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/327,320, entitled “Security system with staging capabilities” inventor Vainstein, Dec. 20, 2002, 39 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/286,524, entitled “Security system that uses indirect password-based encryption, ” inventor Gutnik, Nov. 1, 2002, 38 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/242,185, entitled “Method and system for protecting encrypted files transmitted over a network ” inventor Ryan, Sep. 11, 2002, 23 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,041, entitled “Method and system for fault-tolerant transfer of files across a network” inventor Kenrich, Aug. 15, 2003, 32 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,832, entitled “Method and system for enabling users of a group shared across multiple security systems to access secured files” inventor Ryan, Jun. 30, 2003, 33 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/448,806, entitled “Method and System for Using Remote Headers to Secure Electronic Files” inventor Ryan, May 30, 2003, 35 pgs.
  • “Windows 2000 EFS” in the Apr. 1999 issue of Windows NT magazine.
  • Microsoft Windows 200 server. Windows 2000 Group Policy White Paper, 2000.
  • Symantec. Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition Implementation Guide, 1999.
  • Crocker, Steven Toye, “Multi-level cryptographic transformations for securing digital assets,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/404,566,, filed Mar. 31, 2003.
  • Crocker, Steven Toye, “Effectuating access policy changes to designated places for secured files,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/259,075, filed Sep. 27, 2002.
  • Kenrich, Michael Frederick, “Multi-Level File Digest”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/894,493, filed Jul. 19, 2004.
  • Kinghorn, Gary Mark, “Method and system for protecting electronic data in enterprise environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,220, filed May 31, 2002.
  • Nath, Satyajit, “Method and system for securing digital assets using content type designations,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,587, filed Apr. 1, 2003.
  • Prakash, Nalini J., “Method and apparatus for securiting/unsecuring files crawling,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,102, filed Dec. 20, 2002.
  • Rossmann, Alain, “Hybrid systems for securing digital assets,” U.S Appl. No. 10/325,013, filed Dec. 20, 2002.
  • Expiration Mechanism for Chipcards, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Oct. 1, 2001, UK.
  • McDaniel et al. “Antigone: A Flexible Framework for Secure Group Communication,” Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 23, 1999.
  • Stallings, William, “Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice” 1999, pp. 333-337, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • “Affect,” The American Hertage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002. Retrieved May 4, 2006 from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=affect.
  • “Inside Encryping file system,” Part 1, from MSDN Oct. 2001, version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.
  • “Inside Encryping file system,” Part 2, from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.
  • “Security with Encryping File System,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.
  • “How EFS work,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.
  • “Encryping File System,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.
  • “Features of EFS” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.
  • Examination Report, completion date Jun. 18, 2008, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 258 532.7-1244, 6 pgs.
  • Office Action, dated May 10, 2005, for European Patent Application No. 02258532.7, 5 pgs.
  • Office Action, dated Dec. 5, 2006, for European Patent Application No. 02258532.7, 5 pgs.
  • Boneh et al., “Hierarchical Identity Based Encryption with Constant Size Ciphertext,” Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2005, vol. 3493, Jun. 20, 2005, pp. 440-456.
  • Boneh et al., “IBE Secure E-Mail,” Stanford University, Apr. 8, 2002.
  • IBM Technical Disclosure bulletin; Oct. 2001 UK; Expiration mechanism for chipcards.
Patent History
Patent number: RE41546
Type: Grant
Filed: May 2, 2007
Date of Patent: Aug 17, 2010
Inventor: Klimenty Vainstein (San Francisco, CA)
Primary Examiner: Pierre E Elisca
Attorney: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC
Application Number: 11/797,367