Switching device having a non-linear element

- Crossbar, Inc.

Method for a memory including a first, second, third and fourth cells include applying a read, program, or erase voltage, the first and second cells coupled to a first top interconnect, the third and fourth cells coupled to a second top interconnect, the first and third cells coupled to a first bottom interconnect, the second and fourth cells are to a second bottom interconnect, each cell includes a switching material overlying a non-linear element (NLE), the resistive switching material is associated with a first conductive threshold voltage, the NLE is associated with a lower, second conductive threshold voltage, comprising applying the read voltage between the first top and the first bottom electrode to switch the NLE of the first cell to conductive, while the NLEs of the second, third, and the fourth cells remain non-conductive, and detecting a read current across the first cell in response to the read voltage.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,767,441 B2 issued Jul. 1, 2014 that claims priority to and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/149,757, filed May 31, 2012. This application also 2011, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,502,185 on Aug. 6, 2013, and that claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/290,024, filed Nov. 4, 2011, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,227 on Jun. 18, 2013, which is a non-provisional of U.S. Application No. 61/410,035, filed Nov. 4, 2010, U.S. Application No. 61/712,171, filed Oct. 10, 2012, and U.S. application No. 61/786,100, filed Mar. 15, 2013. These cited documents are incorporated by reference herein, for all purposes.

JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

The presently claimed invention was made by or on behalf of the below listed parties to a joint university-corporation research agreement. The joint research agreement was in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made and the claimed invention was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement. The parties to the joint research agreement are The University of Michigan and Crossbar, Incorporated.

BACKGROUND

The present invention is related to switching devices. More particularly, the present invention provides a structure and a method for forming non-volatile resistive switching memory devices characterized by a suppression of current at low bias and a high measured ON/OFF resistance ratio.

The success of semiconductor devices has been mainly driven by an intensive transistor down-scaling process. However, as field effect transistors (FET) approach sizes less than 100 nm, problems such as short channel effect start to prevent proper device operation. Moreover, such sub 100 nm device size can lead to sub-threshold slope non-scaling and increased power dissipation. It is generally believed that transistor based memories such as those commonly known as Flash memory may approach an end to scaling within a decade. Flash memory is one type of non-volatile memory device.

Other non-volatile random access memory (RAM) devices such as ferroelectric RAM (Fe RAM), magneto-resistive RAM (MRAM), organic RAM (ORAM), and phase change RAM (PCRAM), among others, have been explored as next generation memory devices. These devices often require new materials and device structures to couple with silicon based devices to form a memory cell, which lack one or more key attributes. For example, Fe-RAM and MRAM devices have fast switching characteristics and good programming endurance, but their fabrication is not CMOS compatible and size is usually large. Switching for a PCRAM device uses Joules heating, which inherently has high power consumption. Organic RAM or ORAM is incompatible with large volume silicon based fabrication and device reliability is usually poor.

As integration of memory devices increases, the size of elements is reduced while the density of elements in a given area is increased. As a result, dark current or leakage current becomes more of a problem, where leakage current can return a false result for a read operation or cause an unintentional state change in a cell. The problem of leakage current is particularly acute in two-terminal devices, in which multiple memory cells can form leakage paths through interconnecting top and bottom electrodes.

Conventional approaches to suppressing leakage current in switching devices include coupling a vertical diode to a memory element. However, the external diode approach has several disadvantages. In general, the diode fabrication process is a high temperature process, typically conducted above 500 degrees Celsius. Because most diodes rely on a P/N junction, it is difficult to scale the diode height to achieve a memory and diode structure with a desirable aspect ratio. And finally, a conventional diode is only compatible with a unipolar switching device, and not a two-way bipolar device. It is therefore desirable to have a robust and scalable method and structure for a highly integrated memory that is not adversely affected by leak currents.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally related to switching devices. More particularly, the present invention provides a structure and a method for forming a non-volatile memory cell using resistive switching. It should be recognized that embodiments according the present invention have a much broader range of applicability.

In a specific embodiment, a switching device includes a substrate; a first electrode formed over the substrate; a second electrode formed over the first electrode; a switching medium disposed between the first and second electrode; and a nonlinear element disposed between the first and second electrodes and electrically coupled in series to the first electrode and the switching medium. The nonlinear element is configured to change from a first resistance state to a second resistance state on application of a voltage greater than a threshold.

The switching device includes a RRAM in an embodiment.

The switching device include a PCRAM in an embodiment.

The present invention has a number of advantages over conventional techniques. For example, embodiments of the present invention allow for a high density non-volatile memory characterized by high switching speed, low leakage current characteristic, and high device yield. Depending on the embodiment, one or more of these may be achieved. These and other advantages will be described below in more detail in the present specification.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Exemplary embodiments will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, wherein like designations denote like elements, and wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates a non-volatile memory device including a memory cell that has a bottom electrode, a switching medium, and a top electrode according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates I-V resistance switching characteristics of a resistive memory cell;

FIG. 3A illustrates a two-terminal memory cell that is placed in an ON state by applying a program voltage VPROGRAM to the top electrode;

FIG. 3B illustrates a two-terminal memory cell that is placed in an OFF state by applying an erase voltage VERASE to the top electrode;

FIG. 4 illustrates a memory array including a leakage current;

FIG. 5 illustrates a non-volatile memory cell including a nonlinear element according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6A illustrates I-V characteristics of a digital nonlinear element subjected to a voltage sweep;

FIG. 6B illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with a digital nonlinear element in an initially OFF state subjected to a positive voltage sweep;

FIG. 6C illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with a digital nonlinear element in an initially OFF state subjected to a negative voltage sweep;

FIG. 6D illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with a digital nonlinear element in an initially ON state subjected to a positive voltage sweep;

FIG. 6E illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with a digital nonlinear element in an initially ON state subjected to a negative voltage sweep;

FIG. 7A illustrates I-V characteristics of an analog nonlinear element subjected to a positive voltage sweep;

FIG. 7B illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with an analog nonlinear element in an initially OFF state subjected to a positive voltage sweep;

FIG. 7C illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with an analog nonlinear element in an initially OFF state subjected to a negative voltage sweep;

FIG. 7D illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with an analog nonlinear element in an initially ON state subjected to a positive voltage sweep;

FIG. 7E illustrates I-V characteristics of a switch combined with an analog nonlinear element in an initially ON state subjected to a negative voltage sweep; and

FIG. 8A illustrates I-V characteristics of a non-volatile memory cell including a nonlinear element according to an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 8B illustrates a memory array including leakage currents.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

The present invention is generally directed to a memory device. More particularly, the present invention provides a structure and a method for a resistive switching cell having a nonlinear element. The switching cell may be used in a Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) or any highly integrated device. It should be recognized that embodiments of the present invention can have a broader range of applicability. Although the present invention is described with respect to specific embodiments, the embodiments are only used for illustrative purposes and should not be considered limiting.

RRAM is typically a two terminal device in which a switching element is sandwiched between a top electrode and a bottom electrode. The resistance of the switching element is varied by applying a voltage to the electrodes or a current through the switching element. Resistive switching can be bipolar or unipolar. In bipolar switching, the change in resistance of the switching element depends on polarity and a magnitude of a current or voltage based applied electrical signal. In the case of unipolar switching, the change in resistance of the switching element depends only on the magnitude of the applied voltage or current and typically is a result of Joule heating within the switching element. Embodiments of the present invention are explained with respect to a two-terminal RRAM device using bipolar switching, but are not limited thereto. As used herein, the terms “RRAM” or “resistive memory cell” refer to a memory cell or memory device that uses a switching medium whose resistance can be controlled by applying an electrical signal without ferroelectricity, magnetization, and phase change of the switching medium. The present invention is not limited to implementation in RRAM, e.g., the invention may be implemented using the phase change RAM.

FIG. 1 illustrates a resistive memory cell 100 in a non-volatile memory device, e.g., a semiconductor memory chip. The memory cell includes a bottom electrode 102, a switching medium 104, and a top electrode 106 according an embodiment of the present invention. The switching medium 104 exhibits a resistance that can be selectively set to various values and reset using appropriate control circuitry. The memory cell 100 is a two-terminal resistive memory device, e.g., RRAM, in the present embodiment. Terms such as “top” or “bottom” are used for illustrative purpose only and should not construe to be limiting.

In the present embodiment, the memory cell 100 is an amorphous-silicon-based resistive memory cell and uses amorphous silicon (a-Si) as the switching medium 104. The resistance of the switching medium 104 changes according to formation or retrieval of a conductive filament inside the switching medium 104 according to a voltage applied to the electrodes. In an embodiment, the switching medium 104 is substantially free of dopants. In another embodiment, the switching medium 104 is a-Si doped with boron. In some embodiments, the resistive switching layer includes a silicon oxide, e.g. a silicon sub oxide, (e.g SixOy, where x 0<y<=1, 0<x<2,) or sub-oxide material such as Ge, SixGey, and SixGeyOz. It should be understood that any such sub-oxide refers to a non-stoichiometric oxide. An example of this is silicon oxide: stoichiometric silicon oxide is SiO2, and non-stoichiometric oxide may be SiOx where 0<x<2. In various embodiments, other forms of non-stoichiometric oxide may be formed or grown using various fabrication techniques.

The top electrode 106 is a conductive layer containing silver (Ag) and acts as the source of filament-forming ions in the a-Si structure. Although silver is used in the present embodiment, it will be understood that the top electrode 106 can be formed from various other suitable metals, such as gold (Au), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), tungsten (W), vanadium (V), and cobalt (Co). In certain embodiments, the bottom electrode 102 is pure metal, a boron-doped electrode, or other p-type polysilicon or silicon-germanium, which is in contact with a lower-end face of the a-Si structure. In an embodiment, the memory cell 100 is configured to store more than a single bit of information, e.g., by adjusting the external circuit resistance, as explained in application Ser. No. 12/575,921, filed on Oct. 9, 2009, which is entitled “Silicon-Based Nanoscale Resistive Device with Adjustable Resistance” and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIG. 2 illustrates resistance switching characteristics of the memory cell 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The switching medium 104 displays a bipolar switching effect. The resistance of the switching medium 104 changes depending on the polarity and magnitude of the voltage signal applied to the switching medium 104 via the top electrode 106 and the bottom electrodes 102. The memory cell 100 is changed into an ON state (low resistance state) when a positive voltage equal to or greater than a threshold program voltage (also referred to as a “program voltage”) VPROGRAM is applied. In an embodiment, the program voltage ranges between 1 volt to 5 volts depending on the materials used for the switching medium 104 and the top electrode 106. In another embodiment, the program voltage ranges between 1 volt and 3 volts. The memory cell 100 is switched back to an OFF state (high resistance state) when a negative voltage equal to or greater than a threshold erase voltage (also referred to as “erase voltage”) VERASE is applied. In an embodiment, the erase voltage ranges from −2 volts to −5 volts. The cell state is not affected if the voltage applied is between two threshold voltages VPROGRAM and VERASE, which enables a low-voltage read process. Once the memory cell 100 is set to a specific resistance state, the memory cell 100 retains the information for a certain period (or retention time) without electrical power.

FIG. 2 illustrates a current-voltage (I-V) relationship through a switching operation of a non-rectifying memory cell 100. Electrical current flows from the top electrode 106 to the bottom electrode 102 when the potential applied to the top electrode 106 is positive potential with respect to the bottom electrode 102. On the other hand, current flows in the reverse direction if the potential applied to the top electrode 106 is negative with respect to the bottom electrode 102.

FIGS. 3A and 39 illustrate a switching mechanism of the memory cell 100 during the ON and OFF states according to an embodiment of the present invention. The switching in the switching medium 104 is based on formation and retrieval of a conductive filament, or a plurality of filaments, in a filament region in the switching medium 104 according to the program and the erase voltages applied to the bottom electrode 102 and the top electrode 106 of the memory cell 100.

FIG. 3A illustrates the memory cell 100 that is placed in an ON state by applying the program voltage VPROGRAM to the top electrode 106. The switching medium 104, made of a-Si, is provided between the bottom electrode 102 and the top electrode 106. An upper portion of the switching medium 104 includes a metallic region (or conductive path) 302 that extends from the top electrode 106 to approximately 10 nm above the bottom electrode 102. The metallic region 302 is formed during an electroforming process when a slightly larger voltage than a subsequent switching voltage, e.g., 3˜5 V, is applied to the top electrode 106. This large voltage causes the electric field-induced diffusion of the metal ions from the top electrode 106 toward the bottom electrode 102, thereby forming a continuous conductive path 312. A lower portion of the switching medium 104 defines a filament region 304, wherein the filament 310 is formed when the program voltage VPROGRAM is applied after the electroforming process. The continuous conductive path 312 and the filament 310 can also be formed together during the electroforming process. The filament 310 comprises a series of metal particles, which are trapped in defect sites in a lower portion of the switching medium 104 when the program voltage VPROGRAM applied provides sufficient activation energy to push a number of metal ions from the metallic region 302 toward the bottom electrode 102.

The filament 310 is believed to be comprised of a collection of metal particles that are separated from each other by the non-conducting switching medium 104 and that do not define a continuous conductive path, unlike the continuous conductive path 312 in the metallic region 302. The filament 310 extends about 2 to 10 nm depending on implementation. The conduction mechanism in an ON state is electrons tunneling through the metal particles in the filament 310. The cell resistance is dominated by the tunneling resistance between the metal particle 306 and the bottom electrode 102. The metal particle 306 is a metal particle in the filament region 304 that is closest to the bottom electrode 102 and that is the last metal particle in the filament region 304 in an ON state.

FIG. 3B illustrates the memory cell 100 that is placed in an OFF state by applying an erase voltage VERASE to the top electrode 106. The erase voltage exerts sufficient electromagnetic force to dislodge the metal particles trapped in the defects sites of the a-Si and retrieves at least part of the filament 310 from the filament region 304. The metal particle 308 that is closest to the bottom electrode 102 in an OFF state is separated from the bottom electrode 102 by a distance greater than the metal particle 306 during an ON state. This increased distance between the metal particle 308 and the bottom electrode 102 places the memory cell 100 in a high resistance state compared to an ON state. In an embodiment, the resistance ratio between ON/OFF states ranges from 10E3 to 10E7. Memory cell 100 behaves like a resistor in an ON state and a capacitor in an OFF state (i.e., the switching medium 104 does not conduct a current in any meaningful amount and behaves as a dielectric in an OFF state). In an implementation, the resistance is 10E5 Ohm in an ON state and 10E10 Ohm in an OFF state. In another implementation, the resistance is 10E4 Ohm in an ON state and 10E9 Ohm in an OFF state. In yet another implementation, the resistance is at least 10E7 Ohm in an OFF state.

FIG. 4 illustrates a portion of an array 400 that is in a crossbar configuration in which the (common) top electrodes and the (common) bottom electrodes are arranged in an orthogonal manner according to an embodiment of the present invention. An array of such crossbar structures includes a plurality of parallel (common) top electrodes and a plurality of parallel (common) bottom electrodes with switching elements disposed between the intersection regions of the (common) top electrodes and the (common) bottom electrodes. Certain limitations may exist in such a configuration, as described below.

Four memory cells 402, 404, 406, and 408 are shown. Memory cells 404 and 406 share a common first top electrode 410, while cells 402 and 408 share a common second top electrode 418. The first top electrode 410 and the second top electrode 418 are arranged parallel to each other. Memory cells 402 and 404 share a common first bottom electrode 412 and cells 406 and 408 share a common second bottom electrode 420. The first bottom electrode 412 and the second bottom electrode 420 are spatially arranged parallel to each other. In addition, each of the top electrodes is configured to be non-parallel to each of the bottom electrodes.

To determine a state of a target cell which has a high resistance state, a voltage is applied and a current flowing through the target cell is measured. If some cells in the crossbar array are in low resistance states, the voltage applied to the target cell can cause a leakage current to flow through the untargeted cells instead. In this case the cells causing the leakage, including the target cell, are interconnected through shared electrodes. The leakage current can form a current path, commonly known as a sneak current or a sneak current path, through these untargeted cells. Such a sneak current can cause undesirable behavior in a switching array.

For example, in an exemplary array, cells 402, 404, and 406 are at a low resistance ON state, and cell 408 is at a high resistance OFF state. Because the ON state is characterized by a low resistance, a sneak path 416 may be formed allowing current to flow through cells 402, 404, and 406. Thus, when a read voltage is applied to target cell 408, leakage current flowing along sneak path 416 may cause an erroneous reading of an ON state result.

In some embodiments, a sneak path can be very short, existing in as few as two forward biased cells and one reverse biased cell. In addition, once started, a sneak path can propagate throughout the array through cells in the ON state. The most common conductive path in a switching array is the shared top and bottom electrodes. Sneak path 416 is only one example of a sneak path passing leakage current through an array.

To mitigate problems caused by leakage current in a switching array, a nonlinear element (NLE) may be included in a resistive switching device. NLEs can be generally divided into two categories: an NLE that exhibits digital-like behavior, or “digital NLE,” and an NLE that exhibits analog-like behavior, or an “analog NLE,” both of which are described in detail separately below. The categories of digital and analog behavior are not strictly defined, so it is possible for a particular NLE to have properties that are characteristic of both digital and analog behavior, or somewhere in between. In its most basic form, an NLE is an element that has a nonlinear response with respect to voltage, for instance, with a nonlinear I-V relationship. In most embodiments, the relationship is characterized by a high resistance state at low amplitude voltages and a lower resistance state at higher amplitude voltages, with a nonlinear transition from the high resistance state to the low resistance state. Unlike a switching medium, an NLE does not have a memory characteristic; an NLE returns to an original state when a voltage is no longer applied. An NLE that is suitable for suppressing leak currents is characterized by a high resistance state at a low bias, a lower resistance state at a higher bias, and a threshold between the states.

In an embodiment, an NLE is a two terminal device which shows an apparent threshold effect such that the resistance measured below a first voltage is significantly higher than the resistance measured above a second voltage. In a typical embodiment, the resistance below the first voltage is more than 100 times greater than the resistance above the second voltage. In other embodiments, the ratio may be in the range of about 100 to about 500 times, in the range of about 500 times to about 1000 times, in the range of about 1000 times to about 10,000 times, or the like, depending upon specific engineering requirements of the NLE material. In some embodiments, the first and second voltages are different, and are typically referred to as a hold voltage VHOLD and threshold voltage VTH, respectively. In other embodiments, the first voltage and second voltage may be the same. In various embodiments, these relationships may exist in both polarities of voltage, or only in one polarity, and the NLE can be a single material or multiple layers of different materials.

As shown in FIG. 5, to mitigate the effects of leakage current in a memory cell 500, an NLE 504 is electrically coupled in series to the top electrode 508, bottom electrode 502, and switching medium 506. An NLE 504 may be disposed between the bottom electrode 502 and switching medium 506. In other embodiments, the NLE is disposed between the top electrode 508 and the switching medium 506. Higher temperatures may be experienced by the lower portions of a semiconductor device during various semiconductor processes, so an NLE that is located lower in a stack structure may be designed to withstand higher temperatures than an NLE located further from the substrate.

The behavior of a digital NLE is characterized by abrupt changes in current at certain voltages, which may be referred to as threshold voltages. Such behavior is illustrated in FIG. 6A, which shows the results of a voltage sweep in an embodiment with respect to current on an NLE that is not coupled to a resistive switching device. As positive bias voltage is applied to the NLE, the NLE is in a resistive state characterized by high resistance until it reaches the threshold voltage VTH1. After this threshold has been reached, the NLE will retain its conductive state until the applied voltage drops below a hold voltage VHOLD1. Thus a NLE that is in a conductive state by having a voltage applied above VTH1 will continue to have a low resistance so long as a voltage above VHOLD1 is supplied to the NLE, after which it reverts to the original high-resistance state. An NLE does not have a memory characteristic, so the same I-V relationship is experienced every time a voltage is applied from an original state.

Referring back to FIG. 6A, when a negative bias voltage is applied that is more negative than a threshold voltage VTH2, an abrupt transition is experienced, and the resistance in the NLE is significantly reduced. The NLE retains its low resistance state until the voltage becomes less negative than a value VHOLD2, at which point the NLE reverts to an original high resistance state. Although FIG. 6A shows an embodiment with symmetrical I-V behavior between positive and negative bias performance, in other embodiments the relationship is not symmetrical.

FIGS. 6B to 6E show I-V relationships of an embodiment where an NLE is coupled to a memory cell (“combined device”), in this case a digital NLE. Memory cell 500 is an example of such a combined device. If the memory cell depicted in those figures was not coupled to the NLE, it would have an I-V response according to FIG. 2. Turning to FIG. 6B, an I-V curve showing a program operation switching a cell from an initially OFF state to an ON state is shown. To establish a conductive ON state in a cell, a voltage above VPROGRAMC is applied. VPROGRAMC is the program voltage for the combined device, which switches the combined device from an OFF state to an ON state. VHOLDC1 is the hold voltage of a combined device, which performs in essentially the same way as VHOLDC1 described above. In a preferred embodiment, VHOLD1 is less than VTH1, which is less than VPROGRAM.

The relationships between I-V performance in a memory cell, an NLE, and a combined device can also be explained through equations. The equations assume that both the NLE and the switching medium switch instantly (e.g., a few ns{tilde over ( )}a few hundreds of ns) when experiencing a threshold voltage. In addition to the definitions given above, the following variables are designated:

  • RMOFF=The OFF state resistance of a memory element
  • RMON=The ON state resistance of a memory element
  • RNOFF=The OFF state resistance of an NLE
  • RNON=The ON state resistance of an NLE

Using these variables, the relationship between the hold voltage of a combined device and the hold voltage of an NLE can be expressed as:
VHOLDC1=((RMON+RNON)/RNON)VHOLD1

The value for the program voltage of the combined device can be expressed as:
VPROGRAMC≃small{large((RMOFF+RNOFF)/RNOFF)VTH1,VPROGRAM),large(VTH1,((RMOFF+RNOFF)/RMOFF)VPROGRAM)}
Where “small” indicates the smaller of two values in a set, and “large” indicates the larger of two values in a set. In most embodiments, the VPROGRAM is significantly higher than VTH1, and VPROGRAMC is thus similar to VPROGRAM.

FIG. 6C shows the result of a negative voltage sweep of the same switch in an OFF state. Because it is already in the OFF state, a negative voltage does not cause an erase operation, and the cell remains in a high resistance OFF state.

FIGS. 6D and 6E show I-V relationships of a combined device (e.g. memory cell 500) where the memory cell is initially in a low-resistance ON state. FIG. 6D shows a read operation, where the read voltage must be greater than threshold voltage VTHC1 to return an accurate read value. As the read voltage drops below the hold voltage VHOLDC1, the resistance in the cell increases substantially. The threshold voltage of the combined device is related to the threshold voltage of the NLE through the following equation:
VTHC1=((RMON+RNOFF)/RNOFF)VTH1≃VTH1
Thus, the read threshold voltage of the combined device is approximately the same as the threshold voltage of the NLE, or VTHC1≅VTH1.

Similarly, as seen in FIG. 6E, an erase operation must overcome a second threshold value VTHC2 to allow current to start flowing through the cell, and the switch is changed to a high-resistance OFF state at voltage VERASEC Like the positive threshold voltage, the negative threshold voltage of the combined device is about the same as the negative threshold voltage of the NILE. The value of the erase voltage VERASEC in a combined device can be expressed as:
VERASEC≃large((RMON+RNON)/RMON)VERASE,VTH2)
The relationship between the negative threshold voltages of a discrete and combined device can be expressed as:
VTHC2=((RMON+RNOFF)/RNOFF)VTH2≃VTH2.
So that in most embodiments, VTHC2≅VTH2.

Various embodiments of a digital NLE can be made of many different materials. For example, a digital NLE can be a threshold device such as a film that experiences a field-driven metal-insulating (Mott) transition. Such materials are known in the art, and include VO2 and doped semiconductors. Other threshold devices include material that experiences resistance switching due to electronic mechanisms observed in metal oxides and other amorphous films, or other volatile resistive switching devices such as devices based on anion or cation motion in oxides, oxide heterostructures, or amorphous films. A digital NLE can also be in the form of a breakdown element exhibiting soft breakdown behavior such as SiO2, HfO2, and other dielectrics. Examples of such breakdown elements are described in further detail by application Ser. No. 12/826,653, filed on Jun. 29, 2010, which is entitled “Rectification Element for Resistive Switching for Non-volatile Memory Device and Method,” and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In other embodiments, the NLE may be a solid electrolyte material. The solid electrolyte material can include be chalcogenide based such as GexSy, GexSey, SbxTey, AgxSey, and CuxSy, or can be metal oxide based such as WOx, TiOx, AlOx, HfOx, CuOx, and TaOx, where 0<x<appropriate stoichiometric value (e.g. 2, 3, etc.) (e.g. GeS, GeSe, WO3, or SbTe, and the like).

As is known in the art, the precise values of threshold, hold, program and erase can be adjusted for different embodiments by changing the form of and materials used for the NLE and the memory cell. In various embodiments the threshold voltage for the NLE can be about the same as the hold voltage, the program voltage, or both. In other embodiments the threshold voltage for the NLE can exceed the program and erase voltages of a resistive switching device.

An analog NLE differs from a digital NLE in that its I-V relationship is characterized by a more gradual transition when current starts to flow through the element. As shown in FIG. 7A, which illustrates the response of an analog NLE to a voltage sweep, the current transition follows an exponential-like curve. The transition or threshold is therefore less abrupt than a digital NLE. Threshold voltage values where substantial current starts to flow through an analog NLE are designated as VA and VB for positive and negative bias values, respectively. Another significant difference between an analog and digital NLE is that an analog NLE does not experience the hysteretic hold voltage characteristic of a digital NLE.

FIGS. 7B to 7E show I-V characteristics of a combined device with an analog NLE. As shown in FIG. 7B, when a program voltage VPROGRAMC is applied to a combined device where the switch is initially in an OFF state, the switch changes to a low resistance ON state. The VPROGRAMC is approximately the sum of the VA of the NLE and the VPROGRAM of the switch as shown in FIG. 2, or VPROGRAMC≈VA+VPROGRAM. As a result, the programming voltage of a combined device with an analog NLE is typically higher than the programming voltage of a switching element alone.

Turning now to FIG. 7C, a negative voltage sweep of a combined device in an OFF state is shown. Because the switch is already in an OFF state, the negative voltage does not induce a state change, and the switch remains in a high resistance state.

FIG. 7D shows the result of a read operation in a combined switch that is in an ON state. In the present embodiment, VAC<VREAD<VPROGRAMC. Because the switch is already in a low-resistance ON state, current flow above the threshold voltage VAC is characterized by low resistance. Circuitry can detect the current flow, resulting in a positive read result. The value tier VA is not affected by the switching apparatus in most embodiments, so typically VAC≈VA.

FIG. 7E shows an I-V curve for an erase operation in a combined device. To change the switch from the ON state to the OFF state, a voltage of VERASEC is applied to the combined device, thereby increasing the resistance of the switch. The voltage required to complete an erase operation in a combined device is normally the sum of the erase value of the discrete switch and the threshold value of the analog NLE, or VERASEC≈VERASE+VB.

An analog NLE can be any element that exhibits the above described behavior. Examples of suitable materials include a punch-through diode, a Zener diode, an impact ionization (or avalanche) element, and a tunneling element such as a tunneling barrier layer. Such elements can be fabricated using standard fabrication techniques.

In most embodiments, |VA, VB|<|VPROGRAM, VERASE|. As is known in the art, the precise threshold values of VA, VB, program, and erase can be adjusted for different embodiments by changing the form of and materials used for the NLE and the memory cell. In various embodiments the threshold voltage for the NLE can be about the same as the program voltage. In other embodiments the threshold voltage can exceed the program and erase voltages.

In other embodiments, a resistive switching cell may be configured to retain multiple resistive states. That is, rather than being configured to have binary states of ON and OFF, a cell can retain a plurality of resistance states. An array of such switches has the same limitations regarding leakage current, and would similarly benefit from the inclusion of an NLE.

FIGS. 8A-B illustrate examples according to various embodiments of the present invention. In various embodiments of the present invention, as discussed in FIG. 4, when a program (or read or erase) voltage is applied to a target cell 408, e.g. across second top electrode 418 and second bottom electrode 420, a sneak path 416 may allow a sneak path current to flow through cells 402, 404 and 406. To reduce this, a non-linear element, described above (e.g. NLE 504 in FIG. 5), was incorporated in each memory cell. The characteristics of an example NLE was illustrated in FIG. 6A. More particularly, when a voltage across the NLE exceeded VTH1 the resistance for the NLE switched from a relatively non-conductive state to a relatively conductive state. Accordingly, in an example, to program target cell 408, a program voltage would be applied to target cell 408 that would exceed VTH1 and exceed the programming voltage of target cell 408 (VProgram, FIG. 8A). In another example, to read target cell 408, a read (or program) voltage would be applied to target cell 408 that would exceed VTH1, but would be less than the programming voltage of target cell 408 (VProgram, FIG. 8A).

In an example described in co-pending application Ser. No. 13/290,024, filed Nov. 4, 2011, incorporated by reference above, the read voltage to the target cell was limited to be no greater than three times the threshold voltage of the nonlinear element. This three times number assumed that unselected top electrodes and unselected bottom electrodes in the memory array were allowed to float. By way of explanation, using the numbering of FIG. 4 above, in FIG. 8B, the read voltage would not only be applied across target cell 408, but also across sneak path 416 through cells 402, 404 and 406. In such a configuration, if the read (or program) voltage exceeded three times the voltage threshold (e.g. 3×VTH1) of the non-linear element, the voltage across non-linear element of 402, for example, would also exceed VTH1. Accordingly, the NLE of 402 would switch to a relatively-conductive state, and significant current could flow through the sneak path 416. It was recognized in the above incorporated patent application, that to reduce sneak path current, unselected cells, e.g. 402, 404 and 406 had to have voltages applied that were lower than the threshold voltage (e.g. VTH1) of the non-linear elements. For example, when the read (or program) voltage (V408) is applied across target cell 408, the resultant relationships should be met: voltage across cell(s) V402<VTH1, voltage across cell(s) V404<VTH1, and voltage across cell(s) 406<VVTH1. Additionally, the voltages across these unselected cells should be greater than VTH2 (FIG. 8A). By observing such conditions, it is understood that NLEs of unselected cells (along sneak paths) should have voltages across hem such that they remained non-conductive, see suppressed region 800 in FIG. 8A.

In various embodiments of the present invention, in the example of FIG. 4, during a read operation (for example), when the read voltage Vread is applied to target cell 408, the voltage Vread (e.g. VTH1<Vread (V408)<Vprogram, e.g. Vread=2 volts) is applied to second top electrode 418 and ground (e.g. Vg, e.g. Vg=0 volts) is applied to the second bottom electrode 420. In the case of a program operation V408>Vprogram. To reduce power consumption/requirements of the memory, the inventors have recognized that it is advantageous to set unselected bit lines (e.g. top electrodes/conductors) and unselected word lines (e.g. bottom conductors/electrodes) to voltages other than floating during a read operation. The specific voltages may vary, and are generally guided by the following concepts.

For a read (or program or erase) operation, for memory cells, e.g. memory cells 402, that share second top electrode 418 (e.g. selected bit line), the difference (V402) between the voltage across second top electrode 418 (VSBL) and unselected word lines, (e.g. first bottom electrode 412) (VUSWL) should be less than the voltage threshold of the NLE of memory cells such as memory cell 402. In variable format: VSBL−VUSWL<VTH1 or V402<VTH1 (FIG. 8A). This condition would inhibit the NLE memory cells such as memory cell 402 from entering into relatively non-conductive states. It should be noted that, depending upon the polarity of V402, to inhibit the NLE of memory cells, such as memory cell 402 from become relatively non-conductive in a reverse-bias condition, the relationship maybe VTH2<V402<VTH1. This was graphically illustrated by the flat region in FIG. 6D (0 to VTHC1), and the flat region in FIG. 6E (VTHC2 to 0), illustrated together in region 800 in FIG. 8A. These restrictions are desirable also in program or erase operations upon memory cell 408. In other memory configurations, these specific relationships and polarities may be changed.

For a read (or program or erase) operation, for memory cells, e.g. memory cells 406, that share second bottom electrode 420 (e.g. selected word line), the difference V406 between the voltage across unselected bit lines (e.g. first top electrode 410) (VUSBL) and second bottom electrode 420 (e.g. selected word line) (VSWL) should be less than the voltage threshold of the NLE of memory cells such as memory cell 406. In variable format: VUSBL−VSWL<VTH1 V406<VTH1. This condition would inhibit the NLE of memory cells such as memory cell 406 from entering into relatively non-conductive states. It should be noted that, depending upon the polarity of V406, to inhibit the NLE of memory cells, such as memory cell 406 from become relatively non-conductive in a reverse-bias, the relationship maybe VTH2<V406<VTH1. This was graphically illustrated by the flat region in FIG. 6D (0 to VTHC1), and the flat region in FIG. 6E (VTHC2 to 0), illustrated together in region 800 in FIG. 8A. These restrictions are desirable also in program or erase operations upon memory cells 404. In various embodiments, VTH1 and |VTH2| may be different, or similar. In other memory configurations, these specific relationships and polarities may be changed.

For a read (or program or erase) operation, for memory cells, e.g. memory cells 404, that share unselected word lines (e.g. first bottom electrode 412), the difference (V404) between the voltage across unselected bit lines (e.g. first top electrode 410) (VUSBL) and unselected word lines (e.g. first bottom electrode 412) (VUSWL) should be less than the voltage threshold of the NLE of memory cells such as memory cells 404. In variable format: VUSBL−VUSWL<VTH1 or V404<VTH1. This condition would inhibit the NLE of memory cell 404 from entering into a relatively non-conductive state. It should be noted that depending upon the polarity of V404, to inhibit the NLE of memory cells, such as memory cell 404 from become relatively non-conductive in a reverse-bias, the relationship maybe VTH2<V404<VTH1. This was graphically illustrated by the flat region in FIG. 6D (0 to VTHC1), and the flat region in FIG. 6E (VTHC2 to 0), illustrated together in region 800 in FIG. 8A. These restrictions are desirable also in program or erase operations upon memory cells 404. In other memory configurations, these specific relationships and polarities may be changed.

FIGS. 8A-B illustrate an example according to various embodiments of the present invention. In one example of the above, the programming voltage Vprogram=2 volts, the positive threshold voltage (VTH1) of the NLE=1 volt, and the negative threshold voltage (VTH2) of the NLE=−2 volts. In such a configuration, to perform a program operation, the selected word line (e.g. second bottom electrode 420) is grounded (VSWL=0 volts), and selected bit line (e.g. second top electrode 418) (VSBL) is greater than the positive threshold voltage (e.g. VTH1 (1 volt)<VSBL, Vprogram (2 volts)). Thus, Vprogram=V408. Additionally, the unselected word lines (e.g. first bottom electrode 412) are set to about 1.5 volts (VUSWL=1.5 volts), accordingly, the voltage across memory cells such as memory cells 402 are less than the NLE switching voltage (e.g. VTH2 (˜2 volts)<V402 (2 volts−1.5 volts=0.5 volts)<VTH1 (1 volts). Further, the unselected bit lines (e.g. first top electrode 410) (VUSBL) are set to about 0.5 volts, accordingly, the voltage across memory cells such as memory cells 406 are thus less than the NLE switching voltage (e.g. VTH2 (−2 volts)<V406 (0.5 volts−0 volts=0.5 volts)<VTH1 (1 volts). Still further, from above the unselected bit lines (e.g. first top electrode 410) are set to about 0.5 volts (VUSBL=0.5 volts), and the unselected word lines (e.g. first bottom electrode 412.) (VUSWL) are set to about 1.5 volts (VUSWL=1.5 volts). In such a configuration, because the bottom electrodes (e.g. 412) have a higher voltage than the top electrodes (e.g. 410), memory cells, such as memory cells 404 are in a reverse bias voltage region. Accordingly, the voltage across memory cells such as memory cell 404 are less than the NLE switching voltage VTH1, but also need to be greater than VTH2: (e.g. VTH2 (−2 volts)<V404 (0.5 volts−1.5 volts=−1.0 volts)<VTH1 (1 volts). As mentioned above, these restrictions are also desirable in write and erase operations. For example in a read case VTH1<Vread (V408)<Vprogram; and in an erase case Verase (V408)<VTH2.

In various embodiments, based upon the voltages V408, V402, V406, V404, and the like, the current requirements of memory cells may be computed during read, program, or erase operations. For example, power consumption for memory cells such as memory cells 402 (along the selected bit line second top electrode 418) is the number of cells times the current across memory cells (V402 (e.g. 0.5 volts)/resistance of NLE in relatively non-conductive state); plus power consumption for memory cells such as memory cells 406 (along unselected bit lines, first top electrode 410) is the number of cells times the current across memory cells (V406 (e.g. 0.5 volts)/resistance of NLE in relatively non-conductive state); plus power consumption for memory cells such as memory cells 404 (along unselected bit lines, first top electrode 410, and along unselected word lines, first bottom electrode 412) is the number of cells times the current across the memory cells (V404 (e.g. −1 volt)/resistance of NLE in relatively non-conductive state). In some embodiments, setting of the bias voltages of unselected bit lines 410 (VUSBL) and unselected word lines may 412 (VUSWL) be made considering the power consumption described above.

In one example, using a large array (e.g. 100×100) of memory cells, if the voltage of the unselected bit lines (e.g. first top electrode 410) (VUSBL) and the unselected word lines (e.g. first bottom electrode 412) (VUSWL) are substantially the same the voltages, V404 is small (e.g. about 0). Accordingly, the power consumption of these memory cells (99 cells×99 cells=9801 cells) is small (e.g. about 0), and power consumed/required is computed, consumed, mainly from the memory cells along the selected bit line 418 (99 cells along the second top electrode 418) and from the memory cells along the selected word line 420 (99 cells along the second bottom electrode 420). In one example of this VSBL=4V, VSWL=0V, VUSBL=2V, VUSWL=2V.

Although certain of the above passages have been described with respect to a read operation, it should be understood that the above also apply to other operations, such as programming operations and erase operations. In each of these situations, embodiments of the present invention incorporating NLE elements within a memory cell help to reduce sneak paths/currents through unselected memory cells. More particularly, for memory cells 402, 404 and 406 along sneak path 416, the voltages across these cells should be within a NLE non-conductive (suppressed) region 800, illustrated in FIG. 8A, to reduce sneak path current. This is in comparison with the graph illustrated in FIG. 2, for embodiments without NLE-type elements.

In other embodiments, NLEs with different threshold voltages may be used, resistive switching material having different program and erase voltages may be used, different voltages may be applied to bias unselected word lines and/or unselected bit lines, different polarity materials may be used, and the like. Still other embodiments may be applied to unipolar-type memory cells.

In light of the present patent disclosure, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that in other embodiments, the voltages for selected bit lines, unselected bit lines, selected word lines, unselected word lines, NLE threshold voltages, read voltages, and the like may vary from those illustrated above, depending upon specific engineering requirements, e.g. power consumption, performance, and the like

The examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. Various modifications or alternatives in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application and scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. Method for operating a memory comprising:

applying a read voltage to the memory, wherein the memory comprising a plurality of cells including at least a first cell, a second cell, a third cell, and a fourth cell,
wherein the first cell and the second cell are coupled to a first top electrode,
wherein the third cell and the fourth cell are coupled to a second top electrode,
wherein the first cell and the third cell are coupled to a first bottom electrode,
wherein the second cell and the fourth cell are coupled to a second bottom electrode,
wherein each cell of the plurality of cells comprises a resistive switching material stack comprising a resistive switching material overlying a non-linear switching element material,
wherein the resistive switching material is characterized by a first voltage associated with switching from a non-conductive state to a conductive state,
wherein the non-linear switching element material is characterized by a second voltage associated with switching from a non-conductive state to a conductive state,
wherein the second voltage is less than the first voltage,
wherein the read voltage is between the first voltage and the second voltage, and
wherein applying the read voltage to the memory comprises applying the read voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode to thereby cause non-linear switching element material of the first cell to be in the conductive state, while maintaining non-linear switching element material of the second cell, the third cell, and the fourth cell to remain in the non-conductive state; and
detecting a read current across the first cell in response to the read voltage.;
wherein the resistive switching material is characterized by a third voltage associated with switching from the conductive state to the non-conductive state;
wherein the non-linear switching element material is characterized by a fourth voltage associated with switching from the non-conductive state to the conductive state; and
wherein the third voltage is less than the fourth voltage.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein a resistance of the non-conductive state is related to a resistance of the conductive state in a range of ratios selected from a group consisting of: about 100 to about 500 times greater, about 500 to about 1000 times greater, about 1000 times to about 10,000 times greater.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein while applying the read voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode, a voltage across the second cell is maintained at less than the second voltage.

4. The method of claim 1

wherein the resistive switching material is characterized by a third voltage associated with switching from the conductive state to the non-conductive state;
wherein the non-linear switching element material is characterized by a fourth voltage associated with switching from the non-conductive state to the conductive state; and
wherein the third voltage is less than the fourth voltage.

5. The method of claim 4 1 wherein while applying the read voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode, a voltage across the fourth cell is maintained at greater than the fourth voltage to thereby maintain the non-linear switching element material of the third cell in the non-conductive state.

6. The method of claim 4 1 wherein while applying the read voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode, the method further comprises applying a fifth voltage between ground and the read voltage to the second bottom electrode.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein while applying the read voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode, the method further comprises applying a sixth voltage between ground and the read voltage to the second top electrode.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein a difference between the sixth voltage and the fifth voltage is greater than the fourth voltage.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

applying a write voltage to the memory, wherein the write voltage exceeds the first voltage, wherein applying the write voltage to the memory comprises applying the write voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode to thereby cause the resistive switching material of the first cell to be in the conductive state.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein applying the write voltage to the first top electrode comprises applying the write voltage to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode to thereby cause the non-linear switching element material of the first cell to switch from the non-conductive state to the conductive state.

11. A memory operated according to the method described in claim 1.

12. A memory comprising:

a plurality of cells including at least a first cell, a second cell, a third cell, and a fourth cell, wherein each cell of the plurality of cells comprises a resistive switching material stack comprising a resistive switching material overlying a non-linear switching element material, wherein the resistive switching material is characterized by a first voltage associated with switching from a non-conductive state to a conductive state, wherein the non-linear switching element material is characterized by a second voltage associated with switching from a non-conductive state to a conductive state, wherein a second voltage is less than the first voltage;
a plurality of top electrodes including a first top electrode and a second top electrode, wherein the first cell and the second cell are coupled to the first top electrode, and wherein the third cell and the fourth cell are coupled to the second top electrode;
a plurality of bottom electrodes including a first bottom electrode and a second bottom electrode, wherein the first cell and the third cell are coupled to the first bottom electrode, and wherein the second cell and the fourth cell are coupled to the second bottom electrode, wherein a read current path is associated with the first cell, wherein non-read current paths are associated with the second cell, the third cell, and the fourth cell, wherein the non-linear switching element material of the first cell is configured to reduce resistance of the read current path, and wherein the non-linear switching element material of the second cell, the third cell, and the fourth cell are configured to increase resistance of the non-read current; and
a voltage source coupled to the plurality of top electrodes and to the plurality of bottom electrodes, wherein the voltage source is configured to provide a plurality of voltages to the plurality of top electrodes and to the plurality of bottom electrodes.;
wherein the resistive switching material is characterized by a third voltage associated with switching from the conductive state to the non-conductive state;
wherein the non-linear switching element material is characterized by a fourth voltage associated with switching from the non-conductive state to the conductive state; and
wherein the third voltage is less than the fourth voltage.

13. The memory of claim 12

wherein the non-linear switching element material of the first cell is configured to be in the conductive state dependent upon a read voltage that is greater than the second voltage but less than the first voltage, that is applied to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode; and
wherein the voltage source is configured to provide the read voltage.

14. The memory of claim 12

wherein the non-linear switching element material of the second cell is configured to be in the non-conductive state dependent upon a read voltage that is greater than the second voltage but less than the first voltage, is applied to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode; and
wherein the voltage source is configured to provide the read voltage.

15. The memory of claim 14 wherein when the read voltage is applied to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode, a voltage greater than ground is applied to the second bottom electrode such that a voltage across the second cell is less than the second voltage.

16. The memory of claim 12 wherein the resistive switching material is selected from a group consisting of: an amorphous silicon material, a silicon sub-oxide, a silicon germanium sub-oxide.

17. The memory of claim 12 wherein each of the plurality of bottom electrodes comprises a metal or a conductive silicon material selected from a group consisting of: a doped polysilicon, and a doped silicon germanium material.

18. The memory of claim 12

wherein the resistive switching material is characterized by a third voltage associated with switching from the conductive state to the non-conductive state;
wherein the non-linear switching element material is characterized by a fourth voltage associated with switching from the non-conductive state to the conductive state; and
wherein the third voltage is less than the fourth voltage.

19. The memory of claim 12

wherein the non-linear switching element material of the fourth cell is configured to be in the non-conductive state dependent upon a read voltage that is greater than the second voltage but less than the first voltage, that is applied to the first top electrode while grounding the first bottom electrode; and
wherein a voltage difference greater than the fourth voltage is applied to the fourth cell.

20. The memory of claim 12

wherein the voltage source is configured to provide a read voltage to the first top electrode, wherein the voltage source is configured to provide a fifth voltage to the second bottom electrode and a sixth voltage to the second top electrode, wherein a voltage difference between the second top electrode and the second bottom electrode is greater than the fourth voltage.

21. The memory of claim 12 wherein a ratio between the resistance of the first cell compared to a resistance of the second cell is greater than 1:1000.

22. The memory cell of claim 12 wherein the non-linear switching material is selected from a group consisting of: a solid electrolyte material and a metal sub-oxide.

23. The memory cell of claim 12 wherein the non-linear switching material is bi-polar.

24. The memory cell of claim 12 wherein the non-linear switching material consists of multiple layers of materials.

25. A method for operating a memory comprising:

applying a program voltage to the memory, wherein the memory comprising a plurality of cells including at least a first cell, a second cell, a third cell, and a fourth cell, wherein the first cell and the second cell are coupled to a first top electrode, wherein the third cell and the fourth cell are coupled to a second top electrode, wherein the first cell and the third cell are coupled to a first bottom electrode, wherein the second cell and the fourth cell are coupled to a second bottom electrode, wherein each cell of the plurality of cells comprises a resistive switching material stack comprising a resistive switching material having crystal defect regions and a non-linear switching element material, wherein each cell is characterized by a first first-polarity voltage associated with the resistive switching material switching from a non-conductive state to a conductive state and a first second-polarity voltage associated with the resistive switching material switching from the conductive state to the non-conductive state, wherein each cell is characterized by a second first-polarity voltage and a second second-polarity voltage associated with the non-linear switching element material switching from a second non-conductive state to a second conductive state, wherein the second first-polarity voltage is less than the first first-polarity voltage, wherein the first second-polarity voltage is less than the second second-polarity voltage, wherein the program voltage is greater than or equal to the first first-polarity voltage, and wherein applying the program voltage to the memory comprises applying the program voltage to the second top electrode;
grounding the second bottom electrode;
applying a first bias to the first top electrode and applying a second bias to the first bottom electrode;
causing a non-linear switching element material of the fourth cell to enter the conductive state and causing a resistive switching material of the fourth cell to enter the conductive state,
maintaining non-linear switching element materials of the first cell, the second cell, and the third cell in the non-conductive state in response to the applying the program voltage, grounding the second bottom electrode, the applying the first bias and the applying the second bias; and
removing the program voltage from the second top electrode, whereby the non-linear switching element material of the fourth cell returns to the non-conductive state, and wherein the resistive switching material of the fourth cell remains in the conductive state.

26. The method of claim 25

wherein applying the program voltage to the second top electrode while grounding the second bottom electrode causes metal particles from the second top electrode to diffuse into crystal defect regions of the resistive switching material of the fourth cell; and
wherein after removing the program voltage from the second top electrode, the metal particles from the second top electrode remain trapped in the crystal defect regions of the resistive switching material of the fourth cell.

27. The method of claim 25 wherein while applying the program voltage to the second top electrode while grounding the second bottom electrode, a voltage across the second cell is maintained at less than the second first-polarity voltage.

28. The method of claim 25

wherein the first and second first-polarity voltages are positive; and
wherein the first and second second-polarity voltage are negative.

29. The method of claim 28 wherein

applying the first bias to the first top electrode comprises applying a first bias voltage less than the second first-polarity voltage to the first top electrode; and
wherein a voltage across the second cell in response to the applying the first bias voltage is less than the second first-polarity voltage.

30. The method of claim 29

wherein applying the second bias to the first bottom electrode comprises applying a second bias voltage to the first bottom electrode;
wherein a voltage difference between the program voltage and the second bias voltage is less than the second first-polarity voltage; and
wherein a voltage across the third cell is less than the second first-polarity voltage.

31. The method of claim 30

wherein a voltage across the first cell comprises a third second-polarity voltage; and
wherein the second second-polarity voltage is less than the third second-polarity voltage.

32. The method of claim 25 wherein a resistance ratio between the second conductive state to the second non-conductive state of the non-linear switching element material is within a range of about 1,000 to about 10,000.

33. The method of claim 25 further comprising:

applying an erase voltage to the second top electrode;
further grounding the second bottom electrode;
further biasing the first top electrode;
further biasing the first bottom electrode to thereby cause the non-linear switching element material of the fourth cell to enter the conductive state and cause the resistive switching material of the fourth cell to enter the non-conductive state, while maintaining non-linear switching element materials of the first cell, the second cell, and the third cell in the non-conductive state; and
removing the erase voltage from the second top electrode, whereby the non-linear switching element material of the fourth cell returns to the non-conductive state, and wherein the resistive switching material of the fourth cell remains in the non-conductive state.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein:

the further biasing the first top electrode comprises applying a first bias voltage less than the second first-polarity voltage to the first top electrode; and
a voltage across the second cell in response to the applying the first bias voltage is greater than the second second-polarity voltage and less than the second first-polarity voltage.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
680652 August 1901 Leonard
4433468 February 28, 1984 Kawamata
4684972 August 4, 1987 Owen et al.
4741601 May 3, 1988 Saito
4994866 February 19, 1991 Awano
5139911 August 18, 1992 Yagi et al.
5242855 September 7, 1993 Oguro
5278085 January 11, 1994 Maddox, III et al.
5315131 May 24, 1994 Kishimoto et al.
5335219 August 2, 1994 Ovshinsky et al.
5360981 November 1, 1994 Owen et al.
5457649 October 10, 1995 Eichman et al.
5499208 March 12, 1996 Shoji
5538564 July 23, 1996 Kaschmitter
5541869 July 30, 1996 Rose et al.
5594363 January 14, 1997 Freeman et al.
5596214 January 21, 1997 Endo
5614756 March 25, 1997 Forouhi et al.
5627451 May 6, 1997 Takeda
5645628 July 8, 1997 Endo et al.
5673223 September 30, 1997 Park
5707487 January 13, 1998 Hori et al.
5714416 February 3, 1998 Eichman et al.
5751012 May 12, 1998 Wolstenholme et al.
5763898 June 9, 1998 Forouhi et al.
5840608 November 24, 1998 Chang
5923587 July 13, 1999 Choi
5970332 October 19, 1999 Pruijmboom et al.
5973335 October 26, 1999 Shannon
5998244 December 7, 1999 Wolstenholme et al.
6002268 December 14, 1999 Sasaki et al.
6037204 March 14, 2000 Chang et al.
6122318 September 19, 2000 Yamaguchi et al.
6128214 October 3, 2000 Kuekes et al.
6143642 November 7, 2000 Sur, Jr. et al.
6180998 January 30, 2001 Crafts
6181587 January 30, 2001 Kuramoto et al.
6181597 January 30, 2001 Nachumovsky
6259116 July 10, 2001 Shannon
6288435 September 11, 2001 Mei et al.
6291836 September 18, 2001 Kramer et al.
6436765 August 20, 2002 Liou et al.
6436818 August 20, 2002 Hu et al.
6492694 December 10, 2002 Noble et al.
6552932 April 22, 2003 Cernea
6627530 September 30, 2003 Li et al.
6724186 April 20, 2004 Jordil
6731535 May 4, 2004 Ooishi et al.
6740921 May 25, 2004 Matsuoka et al.
6762474 July 13, 2004 Mills, Jr.
6768157 July 27, 2004 Krieger et al.
6815286 November 9, 2004 Krieger et al.
6816405 November 9, 2004 Lu et al.
6821879 November 23, 2004 Wong
6838720 January 4, 2005 Krieger et al.
6848012 January 25, 2005 LeBlanc et al.
6849891 February 1, 2005 Hsu et al.
6858481 February 22, 2005 Krieger et al.
6858482 February 22, 2005 Gilton
6864127 March 8, 2005 Yamazaki et al.
6864522 March 8, 2005 Krieger et al.
6867618 March 15, 2005 Li
6881994 April 19, 2005 Lee et al.
6897519 May 24, 2005 Dosluoglu
6927430 August 9, 2005 Hsu
6939787 September 6, 2005 Ohtake et al.
6946719 September 20, 2005 Petti et al.
7020006 March 28, 2006 Chevallier et al.
7023093 April 4, 2006 Canaperi et al.
7026702 April 11, 2006 Krieger et al.
7087454 August 8, 2006 Campbell et al.
7102150 September 5, 2006 Harshfield et al.
7122853 October 17, 2006 Gaun et al.
7167387 January 23, 2007 Sugita et al.
7187577 March 6, 2007 Wang et al.
7221599 May 22, 2007 Gaun et al.
7238607 July 3, 2007 Dunton et al.
7238994 July 3, 2007 Chen et al.
7251152 July 31, 2007 Roehr
7254053 August 7, 2007 Krieger et al.
7274587 September 25, 2007 Yasuda
7289353 October 30, 2007 Spitzer et al.
7324363 January 29, 2008 Kerns et al.
7345907 March 18, 2008 Scheuerlein
7365411 April 29, 2008 Campbell
7405418 July 29, 2008 Happ et al.
7426128 September 16, 2008 Scheuerlein
7433253 October 7, 2008 Gogl et al.
7474000 January 6, 2009 Scheuerlein et al.
7479650 January 20, 2009 Gilton
7499355 March 3, 2009 Scheuerlein et al.
7515454 April 7, 2009 Symanczyk
7521705 April 21, 2009 Liu
7534625 May 19, 2009 Karpov et al.
7541252 June 2, 2009 Eun et al.
7550380 June 23, 2009 Elkins et al.
7561461 July 14, 2009 Nagai et al.
7566643 July 28, 2009 Czubatyi et al.
7606059 October 20, 2009 Toda
7615439 November 10, 2009 Schricker et al.
7629198 December 8, 2009 Kumar et al.
7667442 February 23, 2010 Itoh
7692959 April 6, 2010 Krusin-Elbaum et al.
7704788 April 27, 2010 Youn et al.
7719001 May 18, 2010 Nomura et al.
7728318 June 1, 2010 Raghuram et al.
7729158 June 1, 2010 Toda et al.
7746601 June 29, 2010 Sugiyama et al.
7746696 June 29, 2010 Paak
7749805 July 6, 2010 Pinnow et al.
7764536 July 27, 2010 Luo et al.
7772581 August 10, 2010 Lung
7776682 August 17, 2010 Nickel et al.
7778063 August 17, 2010 Brubaker et al.
7786464 August 31, 2010 Nirschl et al.
7786589 August 31, 2010 Matsunaga et al.
7791060 September 7, 2010 Aochi et al.
7824956 November 2, 2010 Schricker et al.
7829875 November 9, 2010 Scheuerlein
7830698 November 9, 2010 Chen et al.
7835170 November 16, 2010 Bertin et al.
7858468 December 28, 2010 Liu et al.
7859884 December 28, 2010 Scheuerlein
7869253 January 11, 2011 Liaw et al.
7875871 January 25, 2011 Kumar et al.
7881097 February 1, 2011 Hosomi et al.
7883964 February 8, 2011 Goda et al.
7897953 March 1, 2011 Liu
7898838 March 1, 2011 Chen et al.
7920412 April 5, 2011 Hosotani et al.
7924138 April 12, 2011 Kinoshita et al.
7927472 April 19, 2011 Takahashi et al.
7968419 June 28, 2011 Li et al.
7972897 July 5, 2011 Kumar et al.
7984776 July 26, 2011 Sastry et al.
8004882 August 23, 2011 Katti et al.
8018760 September 13, 2011 Muraoka et al.
8021897 September 20, 2011 Sills et al.
8045364 October 25, 2011 Schloss et al.
8054674 November 8, 2011 Tamai et al.
8054679 November 8, 2011 Nakai et al.
8067815 November 29, 2011 Chien et al.
8071972 December 6, 2011 Lu et al.
8084830 December 27, 2011 Kanno et al.
8088688 January 3, 2012 Herner
8097874 January 17, 2012 Venkatasamy et al.
8102018 January 24, 2012 Bertin et al.
8102698 January 24, 2012 Scheuerlein
8143092 March 27, 2012 Kumar et al.
8144498 March 27, 2012 Kumar et al.
8164948 April 24, 2012 Katti et al.
8168506 May 1, 2012 Herner
8183553 May 22, 2012 Phatak et al.
8187945 May 29, 2012 Herner
8198144 June 12, 2012 Herner
8207064 June 26, 2012 Bandyopadhyay et al.
8227787 July 24, 2012 Kumar et al.
8231998 July 31, 2012 Sastry et al.
8233308 July 31, 2012 Schricker et al.
8237146 August 7, 2012 Kreupl et al.
8243542 August 14, 2012 Bae et al.
8258020 September 4, 2012 Herner
8265136 September 11, 2012 Hong et al.
8274130 September 25, 2012 Mihnea et al.
8274812 September 25, 2012 Nazarian et al.
8305793 November 6, 2012 Majewski et al.
8315079 November 20, 2012 Kuo et al.
8320160 November 27, 2012 Nazarian
8351241 January 8, 2013 Lu et al.
8369129 February 5, 2013 Fujita et al.
8369139 February 5, 2013 Liu et al.
8374018 February 12, 2013 Lu
8385100 February 26, 2013 Kau et al.
8389971 March 5, 2013 Chen et al.
8394670 March 12, 2013 Herner
8399307 March 19, 2013 Herner
8441835 May 14, 2013 Jo et al.
8456892 June 4, 2013 Yasuda
8466005 June 18, 2013 Pramanik et al.
8467226 June 18, 2013 Bedeschi et al.
8467227 June 18, 2013 Jo
8502185 August 6, 2013 Lu et al.
8569104 October 29, 2013 Pham et al.
8587989 November 19, 2013 Manning et al.
8619459 December 31, 2013 Nguyen et al.
8658476 February 25, 2014 Sun et al.
8659003 February 25, 2014 Herner et al.
8675384 March 18, 2014 Kuo et al.
8693241 April 8, 2014 Kim et al.
8853759 October 7, 2014 Lee et al.
8934294 January 13, 2015 Kim et al.
8946667 February 3, 2015 Clark et al.
8946673 February 3, 2015 Kumar
8947908 February 3, 2015 Jo
8999811 April 7, 2015 Endo et al.
9093635 July 28, 2015 Kim et al.
9166163 October 20, 2015 Gee et al.
20020048940 April 25, 2002 Derderian et al.
20030006440 January 9, 2003 Uchiyama
20030036238 February 20, 2003 Toet et al.
20030052330 March 20, 2003 Klein
20030141565 July 31, 2003 Hirose et al.
20030174574 September 18, 2003 Perner et al.
20030194865 October 16, 2003 Gilton
20030206659 November 6, 2003 Hamanaka
20040026682 February 12, 2004 Jiang
20040036124 February 26, 2004 Vyvoda et al.
20040159835 August 19, 2004 Krieger et al.
20040170040 September 2, 2004 Rinerson et al.
20040192006 September 30, 2004 Campbell et al.
20040194340 October 7, 2004 Kobayashi
20040202041 October 14, 2004 Hidenori
20050019699 January 27, 2005 Moore
20050020510 January 27, 2005 Benedict
20050029587 February 10, 2005 Harshfield
20050041498 February 24, 2005 Resta et al.
20050052915 March 10, 2005 Herner et al.
20050062045 March 24, 2005 Bhattacharyya
20050073881 April 7, 2005 Tran et al.
20050101081 May 12, 2005 Goda et al.
20050175099 August 11, 2005 Sarkijarvi et al.
20060017488 January 26, 2006 Hsu et al.
20060054950 March 16, 2006 Baek et al.
20060134837 June 22, 2006 Subramanian et al.
20060154417 July 13, 2006 Shinmura et al.
20060215445 September 28, 2006 Baek et al.
20060231910 October 19, 2006 Hsieh et al.
20060246606 November 2, 2006 Hsu et al.
20060279979 December 14, 2006 Lowrey et al.
20060281244 December 14, 2006 Ichige et al.
20060286762 December 21, 2006 Tseng et al.
20070008773 January 11, 2007 Scheuerlein
20070015348 January 18, 2007 Hsu et al.
20070025144 February 1, 2007 Hsu et al.
20070035990 February 15, 2007 Hush
20070042612 February 22, 2007 Nishino et al.
20070045615 March 1, 2007 Cho et al.
20070069119 March 29, 2007 Appleyard et al.
20070087508 April 19, 2007 Herner et al.
20070090425 April 26, 2007 Kumar et al.
20070091685 April 26, 2007 Guterman et al.
20070105284 May 10, 2007 Herner et al.
20070105390 May 10, 2007 Oh
20070133250 June 14, 2007 Kim
20070133270 June 14, 2007 Jeong et al.
20070159869 July 12, 2007 Baek et al.
20070159876 July 12, 2007 Sugibayashi et al.
20070171698 July 26, 2007 Hoenigschmid et al.
20070205510 September 6, 2007 Lavoie et al.
20070228414 October 4, 2007 Kumar et al.
20070284575 December 13, 2007 Li et al.
20070290186 December 20, 2007 Bourim et al.
20070291527 December 20, 2007 Tsushima et al.
20070295950 December 27, 2007 Cho et al.
20070297501 December 27, 2007 Hussain et al.
20080002481 January 3, 2008 Gogl et al.
20080006907 January 10, 2008 Lee et al.
20080007987 January 10, 2008 Takashima
20080019163 January 24, 2008 Hoenigschmid et al.
20080043521 February 21, 2008 Liaw et al.
20080048164 February 28, 2008 Odagawa
20080083918 April 10, 2008 Aratani et al.
20080089110 April 17, 2008 Robinett et al.
20080090337 April 17, 2008 Williams
20080106925 May 8, 2008 Paz de Araujo et al.
20080106926 May 8, 2008 Brubaker et al.
20080165571 July 10, 2008 Lung
20080185567 August 7, 2008 Kumar et al.
20080192531 August 14, 2008 Tamura et al.
20080198934 August 21, 2008 Hong et al.
20080205179 August 28, 2008 Markert et al.
20080206931 August 28, 2008 Breuil et al.
20080220601 September 11, 2008 Kumar et al.
20080232160 September 25, 2008 Gopalakrishnan
20080278988 November 13, 2008 Ufert
20080278990 November 13, 2008 Kumar et al.
20080301497 December 4, 2008 Chung et al.
20080304312 December 11, 2008 Ho et al.
20080311722 December 18, 2008 Petti et al.
20090001343 January 1, 2009 Schricker et al.
20090001345 January 1, 2009 Schricker et al.
20090003717 January 1, 2009 Sekiguchi et al.
20090014703 January 15, 2009 Inaba
20090014707 January 15, 2009 Lu et al.
20090052226 February 26, 2009 Lee et al.
20090091981 April 9, 2009 Park et al.
20090095951 April 16, 2009 Kostylev et al.
20090109728 April 30, 2009 Maejima et al.
20090122591 May 14, 2009 Ryu
20090134432 May 28, 2009 Tabata et al.
20090141567 June 4, 2009 Lee et al.
20090152737 June 18, 2009 Harshfield
20090168486 July 2, 2009 Kumar
20090227067 September 10, 2009 Kumar et al.
20090231905 September 17, 2009 Sato
20090231910 September 17, 2009 Liu et al.
20090250787 October 8, 2009 Kutsunai
20090251941 October 8, 2009 Saito
20090256130 October 15, 2009 Schricker
20090257265 October 15, 2009 Chen et al.
20090267047 October 29, 2009 Sasago et al.
20090268513 October 29, 2009 De Ambroggi et al.
20090272962 November 5, 2009 Kumar et al.
20090283737 November 19, 2009 Kiyotoshi
20090298224 December 3, 2009 Lowrey
20090321706 December 31, 2009 Happ et al.
20090321789 December 31, 2009 Wang et al.
20100007937 January 14, 2010 Widjaja et al.
20100012914 January 21, 2010 Xu et al.
20100019221 January 28, 2010 Lung et al.
20100019310 January 28, 2010 Sakamoto
20100025675 February 4, 2010 Yamazaki et al.
20100032637 February 11, 2010 Kinoshita et al.
20100032638 February 11, 2010 Xu
20100032640 February 11, 2010 Xu
20100034518 February 11, 2010 Iwamoto et al.
20100038791 February 18, 2010 Lee et al.
20100039136 February 18, 2010 Chua-Eoan et al.
20100044708 February 25, 2010 Lin et al.
20100044798 February 25, 2010 Hooker et al.
20100046622 February 25, 2010 Doser et al.
20100067279 March 18, 2010 Choi
20100067282 March 18, 2010 Liu et al.
20100084625 April 8, 2010 Wicker et al.
20100085798 April 8, 2010 Lu et al.
20100085822 April 8, 2010 Yan et al.
20100090192 April 15, 2010 Goux et al.
20100101290 April 29, 2010 Bertolotto
20100102290 April 29, 2010 Lu et al.
20100110767 May 6, 2010 Katoh et al.
20100118587 May 13, 2010 Chen et al.
20100140614 June 10, 2010 Uchiyama et al.
20100157651 June 24, 2010 Kumar et al.
20100157656 June 24, 2010 Tsuchida
20100157659 June 24, 2010 Norman
20100157710 June 24, 2010 Lambertson et al.
20100163828 July 1, 2010 Tu
20100171086 July 8, 2010 Lung et al.
20100176367 July 15, 2010 Liu
20100176368 July 15, 2010 Ko et al.
20100182821 July 22, 2010 Muraoka et al.
20100203731 August 12, 2010 Kong et al.
20100219510 September 2, 2010 Scheuerlein et al.
20100221868 September 2, 2010 Sandoval
20100237314 September 23, 2010 Tsukamoto et al.
20100243983 September 30, 2010 Chiang et al.
20100258781 October 14, 2010 Phatak et al.
20100271885 October 28, 2010 Scheuerlein et al.
20100277969 November 4, 2010 Li et al.
20100321095 December 23, 2010 Mikawa et al.
20110006275 January 13, 2011 Roelofs et al.
20110007551 January 13, 2011 Tian et al.
20110033967 February 10, 2011 Lutz et al.
20110063888 March 17, 2011 Chi et al.
20110066878 March 17, 2011 Hosono et al.
20110068373 March 24, 2011 Minemura et al.
20110069533 March 24, 2011 Kurosawa et al.
20110089391 April 21, 2011 Mihnea et al.
20110122679 May 26, 2011 Chen et al.
20110128779 June 2, 2011 Redaelli et al.
20110133149 June 9, 2011 Sonehara
20110136327 June 9, 2011 Han et al.
20110151277 June 23, 2011 Nishihara et al.
20110155991 June 30, 2011 Chen
20110183525 July 28, 2011 Purushothaman et al.
20110193051 August 11, 2011 Nam et al.
20110194329 August 11, 2011 Ohba et al.
20110198557 August 18, 2011 Rajendran et al.
20110204312 August 25, 2011 Phatak
20110204314 August 25, 2011 Baek et al.
20110205780 August 25, 2011 Yasuda et al.
20110205782 August 25, 2011 Costa et al.
20110212616 September 1, 2011 Seidel et al.
20110227028 September 22, 2011 Sekar et al.
20110284814 November 24, 2011 Zhang
20110299324 December 8, 2011 Li et al.
20110305064 December 15, 2011 Jo et al.
20110310656 December 22, 2011 Kreupl et al.
20110312151 December 22, 2011 Herner
20110317470 December 29, 2011 Lu et al.
20120001145 January 5, 2012 Magistretti et al.
20120001146 January 5, 2012 Lu et al.
20120007035 January 12, 2012 Jo et al.
20120008366 January 12, 2012 Lu
20120012806 January 19, 2012 Herner
20120012808 January 19, 2012 Herner
20120015506 January 19, 2012 Jo et al.
20120025161 February 2, 2012 Rathor et al.
20120033479 February 9, 2012 Delucca et al.
20120043519 February 23, 2012 Jo et al.
20120043520 February 23, 2012 Herner et al.
20120043621 February 23, 2012 Herner
20120043654 February 23, 2012 Lu et al.
20120044751 February 23, 2012 Wang et al.
20120074374 March 29, 2012 Jo
20120074507 March 29, 2012 Jo et al.
20120076203 March 29, 2012 Sugimoto et al.
20120080798 April 5, 2012 Harshfield
20120087169 April 12, 2012 Kuo et al.
20120087172 April 12, 2012 Aoki
20120091420 April 19, 2012 Kusai et al.
20120104351 May 3, 2012 Wei et al.
20120108030 May 3, 2012 Herner
20120120712 May 17, 2012 Kawai et al.
20120122290 May 17, 2012 Nagashima
20120140816 June 7, 2012 Franche et al.
20120142163 June 7, 2012 Herner
20120145984 June 14, 2012 Rabkin et al.
20120147657 June 14, 2012 Sekar et al.
20120155146 June 21, 2012 Ueda et al.
20120176831 July 12, 2012 Xiao et al.
20120205606 August 16, 2012 Lee et al.
20120205793 August 16, 2012 Schieffer et al.
20120218807 August 30, 2012 Johnson
20120220100 August 30, 2012 Herner
20120224413 September 6, 2012 Zhang et al.
20120235112 September 20, 2012 Huo et al.
20120236625 September 20, 2012 Ohba et al.
20120241710 September 27, 2012 Liu et al.
20120243292 September 27, 2012 Takashima et al.
20120250183 October 4, 2012 Tamaoka et al.
20120252183 October 4, 2012 Herner
20120269275 October 25, 2012 Hannuksela
20120305874 December 6, 2012 Herner
20120305879 December 6, 2012 Lu et al.
20120320660 December 20, 2012 Nazarian et al.
20120326265 December 27, 2012 Lai et al.
20120327701 December 27, 2012 Nazarian
20130020548 January 24, 2013 Clark et al.
20130023085 January 24, 2013 Pramanik et al.
20130026440 January 31, 2013 Yang et al.
20130065066 March 14, 2013 Sambasivan et al.
20130075685 March 28, 2013 Li et al.
20130075688 March 28, 2013 Xu et al.
20130119341 May 16, 2013 Liu et al.
20130134379 May 30, 2013 Lu
20130166825 June 27, 2013 Kim et al.
20130207065 August 15, 2013 Chiang
20130214234 August 22, 2013 Gopalan et al.
20130235648 September 12, 2013 Kim et al.
20130264535 October 10, 2013 Sonehara
20130279240 October 24, 2013 Jo
20130308369 November 21, 2013 Lu et al.
20140015018 January 16, 2014 Kim
20140029327 January 30, 2014 Strachan et al.
20140070160 March 13, 2014 Ishikawa et al.
20140103284 April 17, 2014 Hsueh et al.
20140145135 May 29, 2014 Gee et al.
20140166961 June 19, 2014 Liao et al.
20140175360 June 26, 2014 Tendulkar et al.
20140177315 June 26, 2014 Pramanik et al.
20140192589 July 10, 2014 Maxwell et al.
20140197369 July 17, 2014 Sheng et al.
20140233294 August 21, 2014 Ting et al.
20140264236 September 18, 2014 Kim et al.
20140264250 September 18, 2014 Maxwell et al.
20140268997 September 18, 2014 Nazarian et al.
20140268998 September 18, 2014 Jo
20140269002 September 18, 2014 Jo
20140312296 October 23, 2014 Jo et al.
20140335675 November 13, 2014 Narayanan
20150070961 March 12, 2015 Katayama et al.
20150228334 August 13, 2015 Nazarian et al.
20160111640 April 21, 2016 Chang et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
101131872 February 2008 CN
101170132 April 2008 CN
101501850 August 2009 CN
101636792 January 2010 CN
102024494 April 2011 CN
102077296 May 2011 CN
1096465 May 2001 EP
2405441 January 2012 EP
2408035 January 2012 EP
2005506703 March 2005 JP
2006032951 February 2006 JP
2007067408 March 2007 JP
2007281208 October 2007 JP
2007328857 December 2007 JP
2008503085 January 2008 JP
2008147343 June 2008 JP
2009043873 February 2009 JP
2011-23645 February 2011 JP
2011065737 March 2011 JP
2012504840 February 2012 JP
2012505551 March 2012 JP
2012089567 May 2012 JP
2012533195 December 2012 JP
20090051206 May 2009 KR
20110014248 February 2011 KR
03034498 April 2003 WO
2005124787 December 2005 WO
2009005699 January 2009 WO
2010026654 March 2010 WO
2010042354 April 2010 WO
2010042732 April 2010 WO
2011008654 January 2011 WO
WO 2011/005266 January 2011 WO
2011133138 October 2011 WO
Other references
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/044077, mailed on Jan. 25, 2013, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/045312, mailed on Mar. 29, 2013, 11 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/042746, mailed on Sep. 6, 2013, 7 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,704, 47 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/061244, mailed on Jan. 28, 2014, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/077628, mailed on Apr. 29, 2014, 12 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application no. PCT/US2009/060023, mailed on May 18, 2010, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/061249, mailed on May 19, 2010, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/040090, mailed on Feb. 17, 2012, 5 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/045124, mailed on May 29, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/046036, mailed on Feb. 23, 2012, 3 pages.
  • Jafar M., et al., “Switching in Amorphous-silicon Devices,” Physical Review, 1994, vol. 49 (19), pp. 611-615.
  • Japanese Office Action and English Translation for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-153349 mailed Feb. 24, 2015, 9 pages.
  • Japanese Office Action and English Translation for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-153349 mailed Mar. 24, 2015, 9 pages.
  • Japanese Office Action (English Translation) for Japanese Application No. 2011-153349 mailed Feb. 24, 2015, 3 pages.
  • Japanese Office Action (English Translation) for Japanese Application No. 2013-525926 mailed Mar. 3, 2015, 4 pages.
  • Japanese Office Action (English Translation) for Japanese Application No. 2014-513700 mailed Jan. 12, 2016, 4 pages.
  • Japanese Search Report (English Translation) for Japanese Application No. 2013-525926 dated Feb. 9, 2015, 15 pages.
  • Japanese Search Report (English Translation) for Japanese Application No. 2011-153349 dated Feb. 9, 2015, 11 pages.
  • Japanese Search Report (English Translation) for Japanese Application No. 2014-513700 dated Jan. 14, 2016, 25 pages.
  • Jian Fill, et al., “Area-Dependent Switching in Thin Film-Silicon Devices,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 2003, vol. 762, pp. A 18.3.1-A 18.3.6.
  • Jian Fill, et al., “Switching and Filament Formation in hot-wire CVD p-type a-Si:H devices,” Thin Solid Films, Science Direct, 2003, vol. 430, pp. 249-252.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “A Silicon-Based Crossbar Ultra-High-Density Non-Volatile Memory”, SSEL Annual Report, 2007.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Ag/a-Si:1-1/c-Si Resistive Switching Nonvolatile Memory Devices,” Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Conference, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 116-117.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “CMOS Compatible Nanoscale Nonvolatile Resistance Switching Memory,” Nano Letters, 2008, vol. 8 (2), pp. 392-397.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Experimental, Modeling and Simulation Studies of Nanoscale Resistance Switching Devices”, 9.sup.th Conference on Nanotechnology, IEEE, 2009, pp. 493-495.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “High-Density Crossbar Arrays Based on a Si Memristive System,” Nano Letters, 2009, vol. 9 (2), pp. 870-874.
  • Jo S.H. et al., “High-Density Crossbar Arrays Based on a Si Memristive System”, Supporting Information, 2009, pp. 1-4.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Si Memristive Devices Applied to Memory and Neuromorphic Circuits”, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2010, pp. 13-16.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Si-Based Two-Terminal Resistive Switching Nonvolatile Memory”, IEEE, 2008.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Nanoscale Memristive Devices for Memory and Logic Applications”, Ph. D Dissertation, University of Michigan, 2010.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems,” Nano Letters, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 1297-1301.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Nonvolatile Resistive Switching Devices Based on Nanoscale Metal/Amorphous Silicon/Crystalline Silicon Junctions,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 2007, vol. 997.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Programmable Resistance Switching in Nanoscale Two-Terminal Devices,” Nano Letters, 2009, vol. 9 (1), pp. 496-500.
  • Jo S.H., et al., “Programmable Resistance Switching in Nanoscale Two-Terminal Devices,” Supporting Information, 2009, pp. 1-4.
  • Kuk-H Wan Kim et al., “Nanoscale Resistive Memory with Intrinsic Diode Characteristics and Long Endurance,” Applied Physics Letters, 2010, vol. 96, pp. 053106-1-053106-3.
  • Kund M., et al., “Conductive Bridging Ram (cbram): An Emerging Non-volatile Memory Technology Scalable to Sub 20nm”, IEEE, 2005.
  • Le Comber P.G., et al., “The Switching Mechanism in Amorphous Silicon Junctions,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1985, vol. 77 & 78, pp. 1373-1382.
  • Le Comber P.G., “Present and Future Applications of Amorphous Silicon and Its Alloys,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1989, vol. 115, pp. 1-13.
  • Lee S.H., et al., “Full Integration and Cell Characteristics for 64Mb Nonvolatile PRAM”, 2004 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, 2004, pp. 20-21.
  • Liu M., et al., “rFGA: CMOS-Nano Hybrid FPGA Using RRAM Components”, IEEE CB3 N171ntemational Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures, Anaheim, USA, Jun. 12-13, 2008, pp. 93-98.
  • Lu W., et al., “Nanoelectronics from the Bottom Up,” Nature Materials, 2007, vol. 6, pp. 841-850.
  • Lu W., et al., “Supporting Information”, 2008.
  • Marand, “Materials Engineering Science,” MESc. 5025 Lecture Notes: Chapter 7. Diffusion, University of Vermont. Retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 8, 2016.
  • Moopenn A. et al., “Programmable Synaptic Devices for Electronic Neural Nets,” Control and Computers, 1990, vol. 18 (2), pp. 37-41.
  • Muller D.A., et al., “The Electronic Structure at the Atomic Scale of Ultrathin Gate Oxides,” Nature, 1999, vol. 399, pp. 758-761.
  • Muller G., et al., “Status and Outlook of Emerging Nonvolatile Memory Technologies”, IEEE, 2004, pp. 567-570.
  • Newman R.C., “Defects in Silicon,” Reports on Progress in Physics, 1982, vol. 45, pp. 1163-1210.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,696, 15 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 141613,301 dated Mar. 31, 2015, 58 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 2, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,757, filed May 31, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/468,201, filed May 10, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,550, filed Aug. 29, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,725, filed May 1, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/582,086, filed Oct. 20, 2009.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,869, filed Mar. 22, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,096, filed Jun. 15, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed May 22, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,369, filed Jun. 14, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,770.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,135 filed Mar. 9, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,513, filed Dec. 8, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,824 filed Nov. 4, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/894,087, filed Sep. 29, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,036, filed Apr. 13, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 26, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,665, filed Aug. 24, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 27, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,941, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/290,024, filed Nov. 4, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,500, filed Jul. 29, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/651,169, filed Oct. 12, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 29, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,318, filed Jun. 14, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 29, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,807, filed May 31, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed May 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/833,898, filed Jul. 9, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,696, filed May 25, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 31, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,296 filed Mar. 18, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,817.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,941, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/034,390.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,299.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,677, 27 pages.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/027,045, 6 pages.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,665, 44 pages.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,136, 23 pages.
  • Office Action for European Application No. 11005649.6 dated Dec. 1, 2014, 2 pages.
  • Office Action for European Application No. 11005649.6 dated Nov. 17, 2015, 5 pages.
  • Office Action for European Application No. EP11005207.3 dated Aug. 8, 2012, 4 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/463,714 dated Dec. 7, 2012.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,022 dated May 7, 2015, 13 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,301 dated Jul. 31, 2015, 26 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/952,467 dated Jan. 15, 2016, 22 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,499 dated May 18, 2016, 10 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,430 dated Oct. 15, 2015, 57 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,430 dated Mar. 10, 2016, 78 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,430 dated Jul. 25, 2016, 79 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/213,953 dated Nov. 9, 2015, 20 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/383,079 dated May 10, 2016, 7 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/383,079 dated Aug. 4, 2015, 11 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,301 dated Feb. 4, 2016, 42 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,050 dated Mar. 11, 2016, 12 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/046,172 dated Apr. 20, 2016, 8 pages.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,077, filed Jun. 30, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/894,098, filed Sep. 29, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,704, filed Jul. 13, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 2, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,665, filed Aug. 24, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,082, 41 pages.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/870,919, filed Apr. 25, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Oct. 3, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/921,157, filed Jun. 18, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/833,898, filed Jul. 9, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,541, filed Oct. 19, 2007.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/034,390, filed Sep. 23, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,639, filed Aug. 1, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/072,657, filed Nov. 5, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/434,567, filed Mar. 29, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,264, filed Jun. 30, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/679,976, filed Nov. 16, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/582,086, filed Oct. 20, 2009.
  • Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,714, filed Mar. 30, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/651,169, filed Oct. 12, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 17, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,770.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 8, 2012 for EP Application No. EP11005207 filed Jun. 27, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Jan. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,432, filed Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,541, filed Oct. 19, 2007.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,710, filed Feb. 11, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,036, filed Apr. 13, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,691, filed Jan. 28, 2014.
  • Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,135, filed Mar. 9, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/920,021, filed Jun. 17, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/143,047, filed Jun. 30, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Feb. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,012, filed Sep. 14, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,698, filed Feb. 11, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,283, filed Jan. 11, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,941, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/167,920, filed Jun. 24, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,869, filed Mar. 22, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/756,498.
  • Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/253,796.
  • Office Action mailed Feb. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,077, filed Jun. 30, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,369, filed Jun. 14, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,704, filed Jul. 13, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/597,151.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/834,610, filed Jul. 12, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,283, filed Jan. 11, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed May 16, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 121815,318, filed Jun. 14, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,650, filed Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,410, filed Jun. 11, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,719, filed Oct. 27, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,770.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/582,086, filed Oct. 20, 2009.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,759, filed Aug. 14, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,757, filed May 31, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,188, filed May 7, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,639, filed Aug. 1, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed May 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,331, filed Dec. 21, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,653, filed May 31, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,600, filed May 25, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,036, filed Apr. 13, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed May 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,698, filed Feb. 11, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,704, filed Jul. 13, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,541, filed Oct. 19, 2007.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,719 filed Oct. 27, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,401, filed Jul. 22, 2011.
  • Terabe K., et al., “Quantized Conductance Atomic Switch,” Nature, 2005, vol. 433, pp. 47-50.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,699, filed Jul. 13, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,653, filed May 31, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/761,132, filed Feb. 6, 2013.
  • Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,650, filed Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,725, filed May 1, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,479, filed Jul. 29, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,232.
  • Office Action mailed Aug. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,714, filed Mar. 30, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,096, filed Jun. 15, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,513, filed Dec. 8, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/625,817, filed Nov. 25, 2009.
  • Office Action mailed Jan. 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/586,815, filed Aug. 15, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/466,008, filed May 7, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,432, filed Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,232, filed Oct. 7, 2010.
  • Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,449, filed Jun. 22, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,541, filed Oct. 19, 2007.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,401, filed Jul. 22, 2011.
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,653, filed May 2, 2012.
  • Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/034,390.
  • Office Action mailed May 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,299.
  • Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,817.
  • Owen A.E., et al., “Electronic Switching in Amorphous Silicon Devices: Properties of the Conducting Filament”, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, IEEE, 1998, pp. 830-833.
  • Owen A.E., et al., “Memory Switching in Amorphous Silicon Devices,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1983, vol. 50-60 (Pt.2), pp. 1273-1280.
  • Owen A.E., et al., “New Amorphous-Silicon Electrically Programmable Nonvolatile Switching Device,” Solid-State and Electron Devices, IEEE Proceedings, 1982, vol. 129 (Pt. 1), pp. 51-54.
  • Owen A.E., et al., “Switching in Amorphous Devices,” International Journal of Electronics, 1992, vol. 73 (5), pp. 897-906.
  • Rose M.J., et al., “Amorphous Silicon Analogue Memory Devices,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1989, vol. 115, pp. 168-170.
  • Russo U., et al., “Self-Accelerated Thermal Dissolution Model for Reset Programming in Unipolar Resistive-Switching Memory (RRAM) Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2009, vol. 56 (2), pp. 193-200.
  • Scott J.C., “Is There an Immortal Memory?,” American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2004, vol. 304 (5667), pp. 62-63.
  • Shin W., et al., “Effect of Native Oxide on Polycrystalline Silicon CMP,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2009, vol. 54 (3), pp. 1077-1081.
  • Stikeman A., Polymer Memory—The Plastic Path to Better Data Storage, Technology Review, Sep. 2002, pp. 31. Retrieved from the Internet.
  • Suehle J.S., et al., “Temperature Dependence of Soft Breakdown and Wear-out in Sub-3 Nm Si02 Films”, 38th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium, San Jose, California, 2000, pp. 33-39.
  • Sune J., et al., “Nondestructive Multiple Breakdown Events in Very Thin Si02 Films,” Applied Physics Letters, 1989, vol. 55, pp. 128-130.
  • Waser R., et al., “Nanoionics-based Resistive Switching Memories,” Nature Materials, 2007, vol. 6, pp. 833-835.
  • Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/060023, mailed on May 18, 2010, 3 pages.
  • Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/061249, mailed on May 19, 2010, 3 pages.
  • Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/040090, mailed on Feb. 17, 2012, 6 pages.
  • Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/045124, mailed on May 29, 2012, 5 pages.
  • Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/046036, mailed on Feb. 23, 2012, 4 pages.
  • Yin S., “Solution Processed Silver Sulfide Thin Films for Filament Memory Applications”, Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2010-166, Dec. 17, 2010, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved from the Internet.
  • Yuan H.C., et al., “Silicon Solar Cells with Front Hetero-Contact and Aluminum Alloy Back Junction”, NREL Conference Paper CP-520-42566, 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, May 11-16, 2008, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, San Diego, California.
  • Zankovych S., et al., “Nanoimprint Lithography: Challenges and Prospects,” Nanotechnology, 2001, vol. 12, pp. 91-95.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/588,202 dated Jan. 20, 2016, 15 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/588,202 dated Sep. 11, 2015, 9 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/588,202 dated May 10, 2016, 8 pages.
  • Advisory Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,704, filed Jul. 13, 2010.
  • Avila A., et al., “Switching in Coplanar Amorphous Hydrogenated Silicon Devices,” Solid-State Electronics, 2000, vol. 44 (1), pp. 17-27.
  • Cagli C., et al., “Evidence for Threshold Switching in the Set Process of Nio-based Rram and Physical Modeling for Set, Reset, Retention and Disturb Prediction”, 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 15-17, 2008, pp. 1-4, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Chang P.H., et al., “Aluminum Spiking at Contact Windows in Al/Ti-W/Si,” Applied Physics Letters, 1988, vol. 52 (4), pp. 272-274.
  • Chen Y., et al., “Nanoscale Molecular-switch Crossbar Circuits,” Nanotechnology, 2003, vol. 14, pp. 462-468.
  • Chinese Office Action (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201180050941.0 dated Apr. 3, 2015, 8 pages.
  • Chinese Office Action (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201280027066.9 dated Nov. 23, 2015, 6 pages.
  • Chinese Office Action (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201110195933.7 dated Jul. 31, 2014, 4 pages.
  • Chinese Office Action (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201110195933.7 dated May 18, 2015, 4 pages.
  • Chinese Office Action (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201180050941.0 dated Dec. 9, 2015, 5 pages.
  • Chinese Office Action (with English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201280027066.9 mailed on Jul. 4, 2016, 5 pages.
  • Chinese Office Action (with English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201290000773.4 dated Jun. 9, 2014, 3 pages.
  • Chinese Seach Report (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201180050941.0 dated Mar. 25, 2015, 1 page.
  • Chinese Search Report (English Translation) for Chinese Application No. 201280027066.9 dated Nov. 13, 2015, 2 pages.
  • Choi J.W., “Bistable [2]Rotaxane Based Molecular Electronics: Fundamentals and Applications”, Dissertation, Chapter 3, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 2007, pp. 79-120. Retrieved from the Internet.
  • Chou S.Y., et al., “Imprint Lithography With 25-Nanometer Resolution,” Science, 1996, vol. 272, pp. 85-87.
  • Collier C.P., et al., “Electronically Configurable Molecular-based Logic Gates,” Science, 1999, vol. 285 (5426), pp. 391-395.
  • Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Nov. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,665, 5 pages.
  • Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/952,467, 10 pages.
  • Corrected Notice of Allowability mailed Oct. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/733,828, filed Jan. 3, 2013.
  • Corrected Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,666 dated Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Dehon A., “Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics,” IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2003, vol. 2 (1), pp. 23-32.
  • Del Alamo J., et al., “Operating limits of Al-alloyed High-low Junction for BSF Solar Cells,” Solid-State Electronics, 1981, vol. 24, pp. 415-420.
  • Den Boer W., “Threshold Switching in Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, 1982, vol. 40, pp. 812-813.
  • Dey S.K., “Electrothermal Model of Switching in Amorphous Silicon Films,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology, 1980, vol. 17 (1), pp. 445-448.
  • Dong Y., et al., “Si/a-Si Core/Shell Nanowires as Nonvolatile Crossbar Switches,” Nano Letters, 2008, vol. 8 (2), pp. 386-391.
  • European Search Report for Application No. EP09819890.6 mailed on Mar. 27 , 2012.
  • European Search Report for Application No. EP11005207.3 mailed on Oct. 12, 2011.
  • European Search Report for Application No. EP14000949, mailed on Jun. 4, 2014, 7 pages.
  • European Search Report for European Application No. EP11005649 mailed Oct. 15, 2014, 2 pages.
  • Ex parte Quayle Action mailed May 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/826,653, filed Jun. 29, 2010.
  • Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,677, 21 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/040242, mailed on Jan. 31, 2013, 9 pages.
  • Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,817.
  • Final Office Action mailed May 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/253,796.
  • Final Office Action mailed Aug. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,096, filed Jun. 15, 2012.
  • Gangopadhyay S., et al., “Memory Switching in Sputtered Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon (a-Si:H),” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1985, vol. 24 (10), pp. 1363-1364.
  • Goronkin H., et al., High-Performance Emerging Solid-State Memory Technologies, MRS Bulletin, Nov. 2004, pp. 805-813. Retrieved from the Internet.
  • Hajto J., et al., “Amorphous & Microcrystalline Semiconductor Devices: Materials and Device Physics”, Artech House Publishers, Mar. 1, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 640-700.
  • Hajto J., et al., “Analogue Memory and Ballistic Electron Effects in Metal-amorphous Silicon Structures,” Philosophical Magazine, 1991, vol. 63 (1), pp. 349-369.
  • Hajto J., et al., “Electronic Switching in Amorphous-Semiconductor Thin Films”, Chapter 14, 1992, pp. 640-701.
  • Hajto J., et al., “The Programmability of Amorphous Silicon Analogue Memory Elements,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1990, vol. 192, pp. 405-410.
  • Holmes A.J., et al., “Design of Analogue Synapse Circuits using Non-Volatile a-Si:H Memory Devices”, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and System, 1994, pp. 351-354, vol. 6.
  • Hu J., et al., “AC Characteristics of Cr/p. sup.+a-Si:H/V Analog Switching Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2000, vol. 47 (9), pp. 1751-1757.
  • Hu X.Y., et al., “Write Amplification Analysis in Flash-based Solid State Drives”, Systor'09; 20090504-20090406, May 4, 2009, pp. 1-9.
  • Hudgens S., et al., “Overview of Phase-Change Chalcogenide Nonvolatile Memory Technology”, MRS Bulletin, Nov. 2004, pp. 829-832. Retrieved from the Internet.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/040362, mailed on Jan. 19, 2012, 7 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/046035, mailed on Mar. 27, 2012, 6 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,985, 9 pgs.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/213,953, 96 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,432, 25 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/213,953 dated Feb. 16, 2016, 21 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,022 dated Feb. 12, 2016, 13 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,022 dated Jun. 8, 2016, 57 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,022 dated Sep. 10, 2015, 13 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,650, filed Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/509,967 dated Feb. 17, 2016, 18 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/509,967 dated Jun. 16, 2016, 96 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,136 dated Aug. 3, 2015, 15 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 131952,467 dated May 20, 2016, 19 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/027,045 dated Jun. 9, 2015, 14 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/383,079 dated Jan. 4, 2016, 27 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,050 dated Jun. 22, 2016, 13 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,367 dated Jul. 13, 2016, 23 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/761,132, filed Feb. 6, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 5, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/940,920, filed Nov. 5, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,699, filed Jul. 13, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,258, filed May 27, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 8, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/733,828 filed Jan. 3, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 8, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,410, filed Jun. 11, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 8, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,152, filed Feb. 15, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 8, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,074, filed May 29, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,490, filed Jan. 23, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,012, filed Sep. 14, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/870,919, filed Apr. 25, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 10, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,657, filed Apr. 20, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/894,087, filed Sep. 29, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed May 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,824, filed Nov. 4, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,299.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,719, filed Oct. 27, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/034,390.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,725, filed May 1, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,666, filed Aug. 23, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/532,019, filed Jun. 25, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/894,098, filed Sep. 29, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/921,157, filed Jun. 18, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 16, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,264, filed Jun. 30, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/158,231, filed Jun. 10, 2011.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,331, filed Dec. 21, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,224, filed Aug. 22, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed May 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/290,024.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/679,976, filed Nov. 16, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/960,735, filed Aug. 6, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,653, filed May 2, 2012.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,232, filed Oct. 7, 2010.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/920,021, filed Jun. 17, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/586,815, filed Aug. 15, 2012.
  • Japanese Office Action mailed on Aug. 9, 2016 for Japanese Application No. 2014-513700, 8 pages (including translation).
  • Chinese Office Action mailed on Sep. 1, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201380027469.8, 8 pages (including translation).
  • Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/667,346, 27 pages.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,301, 43 pages.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/613,585, 9 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/588,202, 119 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 5, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,050, 113 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/213,953, 43 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/509,967 dated Oct. 24, 2016, 42 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/383,079 dated Aug. 17, 2016, 71 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,022 dated Oct. 26, 2016, 41 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/952,467 dated Sep. 28, 2016, 128 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/046,172 dated Oct. 4, 2016, 116 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/597,151 dated Oct. 20, 2016, 52 pages.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/588,136 dated Nov. 2, 2016, 132 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,677 dated Nov. 21, 2016, 97 pages.
  • Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 6, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/383,079, 33 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,499 dated Dec. 12, 2016, 125 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/040232 filed on May 31, 2012.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,759 dated May 7, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,224 dated May 23, 2013.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,759 dated Sep. 19, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/960,735 dated Dec. 6, 2013.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/054976, filed on Aug. 14, 2013.
Patent History
Patent number: RE46335
Type: Grant
Filed: Feb 2, 2015
Date of Patent: Mar 7, 2017
Assignee: Crossbar, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)
Inventors: Wei Lu (Ann Arbor, MI), Sung Hyun Jo (Sunnyvale, CA), Hagop Nazarian (San Jose, CA)
Primary Examiner: James Menefee
Application Number: 14/612,025
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Insulated Gate Capacitor Or Insulated Gate Transistor Combined With Capacitor (e.g., Dynamic Memory Cell) (257/296)
International Classification: G11C 11/00 (20060101); H01L 45/00 (20060101); G11C 13/00 (20060101); H01L 27/24 (20060101);