Open-loop method and system for controlling the storage and release cycles of an emission control device

- Ford

A method and system for controlling the operation of an internal combustion engine, wherein exhaust gas generated by the engine is directed through an emission control device, includes determining instantaneous rates of storage for a constituent of the exhaust gas, such as NOx, as well as the capacity reduction of the device to store the exhaust gas constituent as a function of a calculated value representing an amount of SOx which has accumulated in the device since a prior device-regeneration (desulfation) event. The calculated accumulated SOx value is also preferably used to schedule a device-regeneration event, as when the calculated accumulated SOx value exceeds a predetermined threshold value.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The invention relates to methods and systems for controlling the nominal storage and release times used in connection with an emission control device to facilitate “lean-burn” operation of an internal combustion engine.

2. Background Art

Generally, the operation of a vehicle's internal combustion engine produces engine exhaust gas that includes a variety of constituents, including carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The rates at which the engine generates these constituents are dependent upon a variety of factors, such as engine operating speed and load, engine temperature, spark timing, and EGR. Moreover, such engines often generate increased levels of one or more exhaust gas constituents, such as Nox, when the engine is operated in a lean-burn cycle, i.e., when engine operation includes engine operating conditions characterized by a ratio of intake air to injected fuel that is greater than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (a “lean” engine operating condition), for example, to achieve greater vehicle fuel economy.

In order to control these vehicle tailpipe emissions, the prior art teaches vehicle exhaust treatment systems that employ one or more three-way catalysts, also referred to as emission control devices, in an exhaust passage to store and release select exhaust gas constituents, such as NOx, depending upon engine operating conditions. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches an emission control device which stores exhaust gas NOx when the exhaust gas is lean, and releases previously-stored NOx when the exhaust gas is either stoichiometric or “rich” of stoichiometric, i.e., when the ratio of intake air to injected fuel is at or below the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Such systems often employ open-loop control of device storage and release times (also respectively known as device “fill” and “purge” times) so as to maximize the benefits of increased fuel efficiency obtained through lean engine operation without concomitantly increasing tailpipe emissions as the device becomes “filled.” The timing of each purge event must be controlled so that the device does not otherwise exceed its NO, storage capacity, because NOx would then pass through the device and effect an increase in tailpipe NOx emissions. The frequency of the purge is preferably controlled to avoid the purging of only partially filled devices, due to the fuel penalty associated with the purge event's enriched air-fuel mixture.

The prior art has recognized that the storage capacity of a given emission control device for a selected exhaust gas constituent is itself a function of many variables, including device temperature, device history, sulfation level, and the presence of any thermal damage to the device. Moreover, as the device approaches its maximum capacity, the prior art teaches that the incremental rate at which the device continues to store the selected exhaust gas constituent may begin to fall. Accordingly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches use of a nominal NOx-storage capacity for its disclosed device which is significantly less than the actual NOx-storage capacity of the device, to thereby provide the device with a perfect instantaneous NOx-retaining efficiency, that is, so that the device is able to store all engine-generated NOx as long as the cumulative stored NOx remains below this nominal capacity. A purge event is scheduled to rejuvenate the device whenever accumulated estimates of engine-generated NOx reach the device's nominal capacity.

The amount of the selected constituent gas that is actually stored in a given emission control device during vehicle operation depends on the concentration of the selected constituent gas in the engine feedgas, the exhaust flow rate, the ambient humidity, the device temperature, and other variables including the “poisoning” of the device with certain other constituents of the exhaust gas. For example, when an internal combustion engine is operated using a fuel containing sulfur, the prior art teaches that sulfur may be stored in the device and may correlatively cause a decrease in both the device's absolute capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, and the device's instantaneous constituent-storing efficiency. When such device sulfation exceeds a critical level, the stored SOx must be “burned off” or released during a desulfation event, during which device temperatures are raised above perhaps about 650° C. in the presence of excess HC and CO. By way of example only, U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,049 teaches a device desulfation method which includes raising the device temperature to at least 650° C. by introducing a source of secondary air into the exhaust upstream of the device when operating the engine with an enriched air-fuel mixture and relying on the resulting exothermic reaction to raise the device temperature to the desired level to purge the device of SOx.

Thus, it will be appreciated that both the device capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, and the actual quantity of the selected constituent stored in the device, are complex functions of many variables that prior art accumulation-model-based systems do not take into account. The inventors herein have recognized a need for a method and system for controlling an internal combustion engine whose exhaust gas is received by an emission control device which can more accurately determine the amount of the selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NOx, stored in an emission control device during lean engine operation and which, in response, can more closely regulate device fill and purge times to optimize tailpipe emissions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Under the invention, a method is provided for controlling the fill and purge cycle of an emission control device disposed in an exhaust treatment system for an internal combustion engine. Under the invention, values representing an instantaneous rate at which a selected constituent of the engine-generated exhaust gas, such as NOx, is stored in the device, and the instantaneous capacity of the device to store the selected constituent, are determined as a function of a calculated value representing an amount of SOx which has been accumulated in the device since an immediately prior desulfation event. More specifically, in a preferred embodiment, the calculated value representing the amount of accumulated SOx is determined as a function of the instantaneous fuel flow rate during lean and stoichiometric engine operating conditions, preferably further adjusted to reflect the effects of instantaneous air-fuel ratio and instantaneous device temperature on the accumulation of SOx in the device.

In accordance with another feature of the invention, in a preferred embodiment, the calculated value representing the amount of accumulated SOx is used to schedule a device-regeneration or “desulfation” event. Specifically, the value is preferably compared with a predetermined threshold value, with a desulfating engine operating condition being selected when the calculated accumulated SOx value exceeds the predetermined threshold value.

In accordance with another feature of the invention, the values representing the instantaneous storage rate for the selected constituent in the device, and the instantaneous storage capacity, are further determined as a function of a determined value representing a permanent reduction in the constituent storage capacity of the device due to thermal effects and “penetrated” or diffused sulfur which cannot otherwise be purged during a nominal device-desulfation event.

The above object and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The Drawing is a schematic of an exemplary system for practicing the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

Referring to the Drawing, an exemplary control system 10 for a four-cylinder gasoline-powered engine 12 for a motor vehicle includes an electronic engine controller 14 having ROM, RAM and a processor (“CPU”) as indicated, as well as an engine-off timer that provides a value for the elapsed time since the engine 12 was last turned off as a variable, “soak time.” The controller 14 controls the operation of each of a set of fuel injectors 16. The fuel injectors 16, which are of conventional design, are each positioned to inject fuel into a respective cylinder 18 of the engine 12 in precise quantities as determined by the controller 14. The controller 14 similarly controls the individual operation, i.e., timing, of the current directed through each of a set of spark plugs 20 in a known manner.

The controller 14 also controls an electronic throttle 22 that regulates the mass flow of air into the engine 12. An air mass flow sensor 24, positioned at the air intake of engine's intake manifold 26, provides a signal regarding the air mass flow resulting from positioning of the engine's throttle 22. The air flow signal from the air mass flow sensor 24 is utilized by the controller 14 to calculate an air mass value AM which is indicative of a mass of air flowing per unit time into the engine's induction system.

A first oxygen sensor 28 coupled to the engine's exhaust manifold detects the oxygen content of the exhaust gas generated by the engine 12 and transmits a representative output signal to the controller 14. The first oxygen sensor 28 provides feedback to the controller 14 for improved control of the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine 12, particularly during operation of the engine 12 at or about the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (&lgr;=1.00). A plurality of other sensors, including an engine speed sensor and an engine load sensor, indicated generally at 30, also generate additional signals in a known manner for use by the controller 14.

An exhaust system 32 transports exhaust gas produced from combustion of an air-fuel mixture in each cylinder 18 through a pair of emission control devices 34,36. A second oxygen sensor 40, which may also be a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned in the exhaust system 32 between the first and second devices 34,36. A third oxygen sensor 42, which likewise is a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned downstream of the second device 36. In accordance with another feature of the invention, a temperature sensor generates a signal representing the instantaneous temperature T of the second device 36, also useful in optimizing device performance as described more fully below.

Upon commencing lean engine operation, the controller 14 adjusts the output of the fuel injectors 16 to thereby achieve a lean air-fuel mixture for combustion within each cylinder 18 having an air-fuel ratio greater than about 1.3 times the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. In accordance with the invention, for each subsequent background loop of the controller 14 during lean engine operation, the controller 14 determines a value representing the instantaneous rate FG_NOX_RATE at which NOx is being generated by the engine 12 as a function of instantaneous engine operating conditions, which may include, without limitation, engine speed, engine load, air-fuel ratio, EGR, and spark.

By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the controller 14 retrieves a stored estimate FG_NOX_RATE for the instantaneous NOx-generation rate from a lookup table stored in ROM based upon sensed values for engine speed N and engine load LOAD, wherein the stored estimates FG_NOX_RATE are originally obtained from engine mapping data.

During a first engine operating condition, characterized by combustion in the engine 12 of a lean air-fuel mixture, the controller 14 determines a value FG_NOX_RATE representing the instantaneous rate, in grams-per-hour, at which NOx is being generated by the engine 12, preferably expressed by the following relationship:

FG_NOX_RATE=FNXXX1(N,LOAD)*FNXXA(&lgr;)*FNXXB(EGRACT)*FNXXC(SPK_DELTA)*FMXXD(ECT-200)

where:

FNXXX1(N,LOAD) is a lookup table containing NOx emission rate values, in grams-per-hour, for current engine speed N and engine load LOAD;

FNXXA(A) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for air-fuel ratio which inherently adjusts the FG_NOX_RATE value for barometric pressure;

FNXXB(EGRACT) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for actual exhaust gas recirculation percentage;

FNXXC(SPK_DELTA) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for the effect of knock sensor or hot open-loop induced spark retard, with NOx production being reduced with greater spark retard; and

FMXXD(ECT-200) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for the effect of engine coolant temperature above 200° F.

Preferably, the determined feedgas NOx rate FG_NOX_RATE is further modified to reflect any reduction in feedgas NOx concentration upon passage of the exhaust gas through the first device 34, as through use of a ROM-based lookup table of three-way catalyst efficiency in reducing NOx as a function of the current air-fuel ratio &lgr;, to obtain an adjusted instantaneous feedgas NOx rate ADJ_FG_NOX_RATE.

The controller 14 also calculates an instantaneous value INCREMENTAL_NOX_RATE representing the incremental rate at which NOx is stored in the second device 36 during each background loop (e.g., ti,j) executed by the controller 14 during a given lean operating condition, in accordance with the following formula:

INCREMENTAL_NOX_RATE=ADJ_FG_NOX_RATE*FNNXRT_EFF(T,TOTAL_NOX)*FNSX_EFF(SOX_GRAMS),

where:

FNNXRT_EFF(T,TOTAL_NOX) represents a lookup table for instantaneous device efficiency based on instantaneous device temperature T and a current value representing a cumulative amount TOTAL_NOX of NOx which has previously been stored in the second device 36 during a given lean engine operating condition, as described more fully below; and

FNSX_EFF(SOX_GRAMS) represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of a current value SOX_GRAMS representing an amount of SOx which has accumulated within the second device 36 since a prior desulfating event, the value SOX_GRAMS being itself determined based on fuel flow, as described more fully below.

The controller 14 thereafter updates a stored value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NOx which has been stored in the second device 36 during the given lean operating condition, in accordance with the following formula:

 TOTAL_NOX←TOTAL_NOX+INCREMENTAL_NOX_RATE*ti,j.

The controller 14 then determines a suitable value NOX_CAP representing the instantaneous NOx-storage capacity of the second device 36. By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the value NOX_CAP varies as a function of second device temperature T, a determined value FNSX_CAP representing the amount of accumulated SOx, and a determined value PERMANENT_AGING representing an adjustment of NOxstoring capacity due to thermal aging and penetrated sulfur (which cannot otherwise be purged from the second device 36 during a desulfation event). More specifically, in a preferred embodiment, the instantaneous NOx-storage capacity value NOX_CAP is calculated in accordance with the following formula:

NOX_CAP=NOX_PURGE*FNNX_CAP(T)*FNSX_CAP(SOX_GRAMS)*PERMANENT_AGING

where:

NOX_PURGE is a predetermined threshold value for second device NOx-storage capacity;

FNNX_CAP(T) represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of second device temperature T;

FNSX_EFF(SOX_GRAMS) represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of the current value SOX_GRAMS representing an amount of SOx which has accumulated within the second device 36 since a prior desulfating event; and

PERMANENT_AGING represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of thermal aging and permanent sulfation of the second device 36.

The controller 14 then compares the updated value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NOx stored in the second device 36 with the determined value NOX_CAP representing the second device's instantaneous NOx-storage capacity. The controller 14 discontinues the given lean operating condition and schedules a purge event when the updated value TOTAL_NOX exceeds the determined value NOX_CAP.

As noted above, the controller 14 determines values for FNSX_EFF and FNSX_CAP based upon the current value SOX_GRAMS representing the amount of SOx which has accumulated in the second device 36 since the last desulfation event, during both lean and stoichiometric engine operating conditions. In accordance with another feature of the invention, the controller 14 determines the current value SOX_GRAMS by determining a value DELTA_SOX representing an instantaneous amount of SOx which is being added to the second device 36 during a given background loop time ti,j, using the following formula:

DELTA_SOX=FNSOXFUEL(FUELFLOW_MFA AM,&lgr;,ti,j)*FNSOXADJ(&lgr;,T)*ti,j,

where:

FUELFLOW_MFA represents a calculated value for current fuel flow rate based on current air mass flow AM, the current air-fuel ratio &lgr;, and the background loop time ti,j;

FNSOXFUEL(FUELFLOW_MFA) represents an empirically established generated-SOx modifier which varies as a function of the current fuel flow rate FUELFLOW_MFA; and

FNSOXADJ(&lgr;,T) represents an empirically established generated-SOx modifier which varies as a function of both the current air-fuel ratio &lgr; and the instantaneous second device temperature T.

The controller 14 thereafter updates a stored value SOX_GRAMS representing the cumulative amount of SOx which has accumulated in the second device 36 since the last desulfation event, in accordance with the following formula:

SOX_GRAMS←SOX_GRAMS+DELTA_SOX.

In accordance with a further benefit of the invention, the current value SOX_GRAMS is also used to schedule a desulfation event. Specifically, the controller 14 compares the current value SOX_GRAMS to a predetermined threshold value SOX_MAX_GRAMS. The controller 14 schedules a desulfation event when the current value SOX_GRAMS exceeds the predetermined threshold value SOX_MAX_GRAMS.

While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

1. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:

determining a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device;
determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and
selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein determining the first value includes accumulating an instantaneous value representative of an incremental amount of accumulated SO x during an engine operating condition characterized by an air-fuel mixture that is not richer than a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the instantaneous value is adjusted based on at least one of an instantaneous air-fuel ratio and an instantaneous device temperature.

3. The method of claim 1, including resetting the first value to zero when selecting the desulfating engine operating condition.

4. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:

determining a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device;
determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and
selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the first value is determined as a function of the instantaneous fuel flow rate during engine operating conditions no richer than a stoichiometric engine operating condition.

5. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:

determining a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device;
determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and
selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, further including determining a third value representing a current capacity of the device to store the selected constituent as a function of the first value; and wherein selecting includes comparing the second value to the third value.

6. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:

determining a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device;
determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and
selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein selecting further includes comparing the first value with a predetermined threshold value.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the desulfating engine operating condition is selected when the first value exceeds the predetermined threshold value.

8. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:

a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value,
the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to accumulate an instantaneous value representative of an incremental amount of accumulated SO x during an engine operating condition characterized by an air-fuel mixture that is not richer than a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further arranged to adjust the instantaneous value based on at least one of an instantaneous air-fuel ratio and an instantaneous device temperature.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further arranged to reset the first value to zero when selecting the desulfating engine operating condition.

11. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:

a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value,
the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to determine the first value as a function of the instantaneous fuel flow rate during engine operating conditions no richer than a stoichiometric engine operating condition.

12. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:

a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value,
the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to determine a third value representing a current capacity of the device to store the selected constituent as a function of the first value, and wherein the controller is further arranged to compare the second value to the third value.

13. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:

a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SO x accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value,
the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to compare the first value with a predetermined threshold value.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the controller is further arranged to select the desulfating engine operating condition when the first value exceeds the predetermined threshold value.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3696618 October 1972 Boyd et al.
3969932 July 20, 1976 Rieger et al.
4033122 July 5, 1977 Masaki et al.
4036014 July 19, 1977 Ariga
4167924 September 18, 1979 Carlson et al.
4178883 December 18, 1979 Herth
4186296 January 29, 1980 Crump, Jr.
4251989 February 24, 1981 Norimatsu et al.
4533900 August 6, 1985 Muhlberger et al.
4622809 November 18, 1986 Abthoff et al.
4677955 July 7, 1987 Takao
4854123 August 8, 1989 Inoue et al.
4884066 November 28, 1989 Miyata et al.
4913122 April 3, 1990 Uchida et al.
4964272 October 23, 1990 Kayanuma
5009210 April 23, 1991 Nakagawa et al.
5088281 February 18, 1992 Izutani et al.
5097700 March 24, 1992 Nakane
5165230 November 24, 1992 Kayanuma et al.
5174111 December 29, 1992 Nomura et al.
5189876 March 2, 1993 Hirota et al.
5201802 April 13, 1993 Hirota et al.
5209061 May 11, 1993 Takeshima
5222471 June 29, 1993 Stueven
5233830 August 10, 1993 Takeshima et al.
5267439 December 7, 1993 Raff et al.
5270024 December 14, 1993 Kasahara et al.
5272871 December 28, 1993 Oshima et al.
5325664 July 5, 1994 Seki et al.
5331809 July 26, 1994 Takeshima et al.
5335538 August 9, 1994 Blischke et al.
5357750 October 25, 1994 Ito et al.
5359852 November 1, 1994 Curran et al.
5377484 January 3, 1995 Shimizu
5402641 April 4, 1995 Katoh et al.
5410873 May 2, 1995 Tashiro
5412945 May 9, 1995 Katoh et al.
5412946 May 9, 1995 Oshima et al.
5414994 May 16, 1995 Cullen et al.
5419122 May 30, 1995 Tabe et al.
5423181 June 13, 1995 Katoh et al.
5426934 June 27, 1995 Hunt et al.
5433074 July 18, 1995 Seto et al.
5437153 August 1, 1995 Takeshima et al.
5448886 September 12, 1995 Toyoda
5448887 September 12, 1995 Takeshima
5450722 September 19, 1995 Takeshima et al.
5452576 September 26, 1995 Hamburg et al.
5472673 December 5, 1995 Goto et al.
5473887 December 12, 1995 Takeshima et al.
5473890 December 12, 1995 Takeshima et al.
5483795 January 16, 1996 Katoh et al.
5531972 July 2, 1996 Rudy
5544482 August 13, 1996 Matsumoto et al.
5551231 September 3, 1996 Tanaka et al.
5554269 September 10, 1996 Joseph et al.
5569848 October 29, 1996 Sharp
5577382 November 26, 1996 Kihara et al.
5595060 January 21, 1997 Togai et al.
5598703 February 4, 1997 Hamburg et al.
5617722 April 8, 1997 Takaku
5622047 April 22, 1997 Yamashita et al.
5626014 May 6, 1997 Hepburn et al.
5626117 May 6, 1997 Wright et al.
5655363 August 12, 1997 Ito et al.
5657625 August 19, 1997 Koga et al.
5693877 December 2, 1997 Ohsuga et al.
5713199 February 3, 1998 Takeshima et al.
5715679 February 10, 1998 Asanuma et al.
5722236 March 3, 1998 Cullen et al.
5724808 March 10, 1998 Ito et al.
5729971 March 24, 1998 Matsuno et al.
5732554 March 31, 1998 Sasaki et al.
5735119 April 7, 1998 Asanuma et al.
5737917 April 14, 1998 Nagai
5740669 April 21, 1998 Kinugasa et al.
5743084 April 28, 1998 Hepburn
5743086 April 28, 1998 Nagai
5746049 May 5, 1998 Cullen et al.
5746052 May 5, 1998 Kinugasa et al.
5752492 May 19, 1998 Kato et al.
5771685 June 30, 1998 Hepburn
5771686 June 30, 1998 Pischinger et al.
5778666 July 14, 1998 Cullen et al.
5792436 August 11, 1998 Feeley et al.
5802843 September 8, 1998 Kurihara et al.
5803048 September 8, 1998 Yano et al.
5806306 September 15, 1998 Okamoto et al.
5813387 September 29, 1998 Minowa et al.
5831267 November 3, 1998 Jack et al.
5832722 November 10, 1998 Cullen et al.
5842339 December 1, 1998 Bush et al.
5842340 December 1, 1998 Bush et al.
5862661 January 26, 1999 Zhang et al.
5865027 February 2, 1999 Hanafusa et al.
5867983 February 9, 1999 Otani
5877413 March 2, 1999 Hamburg et al.
5910096 June 8, 1999 Hepburn et al.
5929320 July 27, 1999 Yoo
5934072 August 10, 1999 Hirota et al.
5938715 August 17, 1999 Zhang et al.
5953907 September 21, 1999 Kato et al.
5966930 October 19, 1999 Hatano et al.
5970707 October 26, 1999 Sawada et al.
5974788 November 2, 1999 Hepburn et al.
5974791 November 2, 1999 Hirota et al.
5974793 November 2, 1999 Kinugasa et al.
5974794 November 2, 1999 Gotoh et al.
5979161 November 9, 1999 Hanafusa et al.
5979404 November 9, 1999 Minowa et al.
5983627 November 16, 1999 Asik
5992142 November 30, 1999 Pott
5996338 December 7, 1999 Hirota
6003308 December 21, 1999 Tsutsumi et al.
6012282 January 11, 2000 Kato et al.
6012428 January 11, 2000 Yano et al.
6014859 January 18, 2000 Yoshizaki et al.
6023929 February 15, 2000 Ma
6026640 February 22, 2000 Kato et al.
6058700 May 9, 2000 Yamashita et al.
6073440 June 13, 2000 Douta et al.
6079204 June 27, 2000 Sun et al.
6092021 July 18, 2000 Ehlbeck et al.
6092369 July 25, 2000 Hosogai et al.
6101809 August 15, 2000 Ishuzuka et al.
6102019 August 15, 2000 Brooks
6105365 August 22, 2000 Deeba et al.
6119449 September 19, 2000 Köhler
6128899 October 10, 2000 Oono et al.
6134883 October 24, 2000 Kato et al.
6138453 October 31, 2000 Sawada et al.
6145302 November 14, 2000 Zhang et al.
6145305 November 14, 2000 Itou et al.
6148611 November 21, 2000 Sato
6148612 November 21, 2000 Yamashita et al.
6161378 December 19, 2000 Hanaoka et al.
6161428 December 19, 2000 Esteghlal et al.
6164064 December 26, 2000 Pott
6173571 January 16, 2001 Kaneko et al.
6189523 February 20, 2001 Weisbrod et al.
6199372 March 13, 2001 Wakamoto
6199373 March 13, 2001 Hepburn et al.
6202406 March 20, 2001 Griffin et al.
6205773 March 27, 2001 Suzuki
6214207 April 10, 2001 Miyata et al.
6216448 April 17, 2001 Schnaibel et al.
6216451 April 17, 2001 Schnaibel et al.
6233923 May 22, 2001 Itou et al.
6233925 May 22, 2001 Hirota et al.
6237330 May 29, 2001 Takahashi et al.
6244046 June 12, 2001 Yamashita et al.
6276130 August 21, 2001 Ito et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
196 07 151 July 1997 DE
0 351 197 January 1990 EP
0 444 783 September 1991 EP
0 503 882 September 1992 EP
0 508 389 January 1994 EP
62-97630 May 1987 JP
62-117620 May 1987 JP
64-53042 March 1989 JP
2-30915 February 1990 JP
2-33408 February 1990 JP
2-207159 August 1990 JP
3-135147 June 1991 JP
5-26080 February 1993 JP
5-106493 April 1993 JP
5-106494 April 1993 JP
6-58139 March 1994 JP
6-264787 September 1994 JP
7-97941 April 1995 JP
WO 98/27322 June 1998 WO
Other references
  • C. D. De Boer et al., “Engineered Control Strategies for Improved Catalytic Control of NO x in Lean Burn Applications,” SAE Technical Paper No. 881595, Oct. 10-13, 1988.
  • Y. Kaneko et al., “Effect of Air-Fuel Ratio Modulation on Conversion Efficiency of Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 780607, Jun. 5-9, 1978, pp. 119-127.
  • W. H. Holl, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions I. Engine-Emissions Relationships,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800051, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
  • A. H. Meitzler, “Application of Exhaust-Gas-Oxygen Sensors to the Study of Storage Effects in Automotive Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800019, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
  • J. Theis et al., “An Air/Fuel Algorithm to Improve the NO x Conversion of Copper-Based Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 922251, Oct. 19-22, 1992.
  • W. Wang, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions, II. Engine-Catalyst Characterization Under Cyclic Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800052, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
  • T. Yamamoto et al., “Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Three Way Catalytic Reaction,” JSAE 882072—882166.
Patent History
Patent number: 6490860
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 19, 2001
Date of Patent: Dec 10, 2002
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, Inc. (Dearborn, MI)
Inventors: David George Farmer (Plymouth, MI), Gopichandra Surnilla (West Bloomfield, MI), Michael John Cullen (Northville, MI)
Primary Examiner: Thomas Denion
Assistant Examiner: Binh Tran
Attorney, Agent or Law Firms: Julia Voutyras, Allan J. Lippa
Application Number: 09/884,331