Subcutaneous cavity marking device

These are subcutaneous cavity marking devices and methods. More particularly, upon insertion into a body, the cavity marking device and method enable one to determine the center, orientation, and periphery of the cavity by radiographic, mammographic, echogenic, or other non-invasive imaging techniques. Also, the device contains a bioabsorbable or non-bioabsorbable marker. The device may be combined with various substances enhancing the radiopaque, mammographic, or echogenic characteristics of the marker or the body allowing it to be observed by any non-invasive imaging techniques. This is further a method of marking a subcutaneous cavity using a bioabsorbable material and a bioabsorbable or non-bioabsorbable marker in conjunction with the material. The method also may combine any of the features as described with the device.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/805,652, filed Mar. 13, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,320,993, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/285,329, filed Apr. 2, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,356,782, which is a continuation-in-part or U.S. Ser. No. 09/220,618, filed Dec. 24, 1998, which is abandoned.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is directed to subcutaneous cavity marking devices and methods. More particularly, a cavity marking device and method is disclosed that enable one to determine the location, orientation, and periphery of the cavity by radiographic, mammographic, echographic, or other non-invasive techniques. The invention typically is made up of one or more resilient bodies and a radiopaque or echogenic marker.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Over 1.1 million breast biopsies are performed each year in the United States alone. Of these, about 80% of the lesions excised during biopsy are found to be benign while about 20% of these lesions are malignant.

In the field of breast cancer, stereotactically guided and percutaneous biopsy procedures have increased in frequency as well as in accuracy as modern imaging techniques allow the physician to locate lesions with ever-increasing precision. However, for any given biopsy procedure, a subsequent examination of the biopsy site is very often desirable. There is an important need to determine the location, most notably the center, as well as the orientation and periphery (margins) of the subcutaneous cavity from which the lesion is removed.

In those cases where the lesion is found to be benign, for example, a follow-up examination of the biopsy site is often performed to ensure the absence of any suspect tissue and the proper healing of the cavity from which the tissue was removed. This is also the case where the lesion is found to be malignant and the physician is confident that all suspect tissue was removed and the tissue in the region of the perimeter or margins of the cavity is “clean”.

In some cases, however, the physician may be concerned that the initial biopsy failed to remove a sufficient amount of the lesion. Such a lesion is colloquially referred to as a “dirty lesion” or “dirty margin” and requires follow-up observation of any suspect tissue growth in the surrounding marginal area of the initial biopsy site. Thus, a re-excision of the original biopsy site must often be performed. In such a case, the perimeter of the cavity must be identified since the cavity may contain cancerous cells. Identification of the cavity perimeter is necessary to avoid the risk of opening the cavity, which could release and spread cancerous cells. Moreover, the site of the re-excised procedure itself requires follow-up examination, providing further impetus for accurate identification of the location of the re-excised site. Therefore, a new marker will be placed after re-excision.

Prior methods of marking biopsy cavities utilize one or more tissue marking clips as the biopsy site marking device. Most commonly, these marker clips have a “horseshoe” configuration. The marker clips attach to the walls of the cavity when the free ends or limbs of the “horseshoe” are pinched together, trapping the tissue. This device has significant drawbacks.

For instance, prior to placing the marker clip at the cavity site, the site must be thoroughly cleaned, typically by vacuum, to remove any residual tissue debris. This minimizes the possibility that the marker clip attaches to any loose tissue as opposed to the cavity wall. Once the cavity is prepared, the clip must be examined to ensure that the limbs of the clip are substantially straight. If the limbs have been prematurely bent together, the clip will be discarded since it will most likely not attach properly to the cavity wall. Actual placement of the clip often requires additional vacuum of the cavity wall to draw the wall into the aperture between the limbs of the marking clip so that a better grip is obtained between the limbs of the clip. Additionally, there is always the possibility that the clip may detach from the cavity wall during or after withdrawal of the tools used to place the clip into the cavity.

Aside from the problems inherent in the placement of the marking clip, there are also limitations associated with how well the marking clip can identify a biopsy cavity. As the marking clip must trap tissue for proper attachment, in cases of endoscopic placement, the clip can only be placed on a wall of the cavity substantially opposite to the opening of the cavity.

Moreover, patient concern limits the number of clips that may be placed in a cavity. As a result, the medical practitioner is forced to identify the outline of a three dimensional cavity by a single point as defined by the marking clip. Obviously, determination of the periphery of a biopsy cavity from one point of the periphery is not possible.

These limitations are compounded as the biopsy cavity fills within a few hours with bodily fluids, which eventually renders the cavity invisible to non-invasive techniques. Another difficulty in viewing the clip stems from the fact that the clip is attached to the side, not the center, of the cavity. This makes determining the spatial orientation and position of the cavity difficult if not impossible during follow-up examination. Additionally, during a stereotactic breast biopsy procedure, the breast is under compression when the marking clip is placed. Upon release of the compressive force, determining the location of the clip can be unpredictable, and the orientation as well as the location of the periphery of the cavity are lost.

The marker clip does not aid in the healing process of the biopsy wound. Complications may arise if the marker strays from its original placement site. As described above, if a re-excision of the site is required, the marker clip may also interfere when excision of a target lesion is sought.

Other devices pertaining to biopsy aids are directed to assisting in the healing and closure of the biopsy wound; thus they do not aid the clinical need or desirability of accurately preserving the location and orientation of the biopsy cavity. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,347,234, 5,388,588, 5,326,350, 5,394,886, 5,467,780, 5,571,181, and 5,676,146.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to devices and procedures for percutaneously marking a biopsy cavity. In particular, the inventive device is a biopsy cavity-marking body made of a resilient, preferably bioabsorbable material having at least one preferably radiopaque or echogenic marker. The device may take on a variety of shapes and sizes tailored for the specific biopsy cavity to be filled. For example, the device in its simplest form is a spherical or cylindrical collagen sponge having a single radiopaque or echogenic marker located in its geometric center. Alternatively, the body may have multiple components linked together with multiple radiopaque or echogenic markers.

A further aspect of the invention allows the marker or the body, singly or in combination, to be constructed to have a varying rate of degradation or bioabsorption. For instance, the body may be constructed to have a layer of bioabsorbable material as an outer “shell.” Accordingly, prior to degradation of the shell, the body is palpable. Upon degradation of the shell, the remainder of the body would degrade at an accelerated rate in comparison to the outer shell.

The device may additionally contain a variety of drugs, such as hemostatic agents, pain-killing substances, or even healing or therapeutic agents that may be delivered directly to the biopsy cavity. Importantly, the device is capable of accurately marking a specific location, such as the center, of the biopsy cavity, and providing other information about the patient or the particular biopsy or device deployed.

The device is preferably, although not necessarily, delivered immediately after removal of the tissue specimen using the same device used to remove the tissue specimen itself. Such devices are described in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/145,487, filed Sep. 1, 1998 and entitled “PERCUTANEOUS TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE”, and pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/184,766, filed Nov. 2, 1998 and entitled “EXPANDABLE RING PERCUTANEOUS TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE” the entirety of each are which hereby incorporated by reference. The device is compressed and loaded into the access device and percutaneously advanced to the biopsy site where, upon exiting from the access device, it expands to substantially fill the cavity of the biopsy. Follow-up noninvasive detection techniques, such as x-ray mammography or ultrasound may then be used by the physician to identify, locate, and monitor the biopsy cavity site over a preferred period of time.

The device is usually inserted into the body either surgically via an opening in the body cavity, or through a minimally invasive procedure using such devices as a catheter, introducer or similar type device. When inserted via the minimally invasive procedure, the resiliency of the body allows the device to be compressed upon placement in a delivery device. Upon insertion of the cavity marking device into the cavity, the resiliency of the body causes the cavity marking device to self-expand, substantially filling the cavity. The resiliency of the body can be further pre-determined so that the body is palpable, thus allowing tactile location by a surgeon in subsequent follow-up examinations. Typically, the filler body is required to be palpable for approximately 3 months. However, this period may be increased or decreased as needed.

The expansion of the resilient body can be aided by the addition of a bio-compatible fluid which is absorbed into the body. For instance, the fluid can be a saline solution, a painkilling substance, a healing agent, a therapeutic fluid, or any combination of such fluids. The fluid or combination of fluids may be added to and absorbed by the body of the device before or after deployment of the device into a cavity. For example, the body of the device may be pre-soaked with the fluid and then delivered into the cavity. In this instance, the fluid aids the expansion of the body of the device upon deployment. Another example is provided as the device is delivered into the cavity without being pre-soaked. In such a case, fluid is delivered into the cavity after the body of the device is deployed into the cavity. Upon delivery of the fluid, the body of the device soaks the fluid, thereby aiding the expansion of the cavity marking device as it expands to fit the cavity. The fluid may be, but is not limited to being, delivered by the access device.

By “bio-compatible fluid” what is meant is a liquid, solution, or suspension that may contain inorganic or organic material. For instance, the bio-compatible fluid is preferably saline solution, but may be water or contain adjuvants such as medications to prevent infection, reduce pain, or the like. Obviously, the liquid is intended to be a type that does no harm to the body.

After placement of the cavity marking device into the cavity, the bioabsorbable body degrades at a predetermined rate. As the body of the cavity marking device is absorbed, tissue is substituted for the bioabsorbable material. Moreover, while the body degrades, the marker, which is usually suspended substantially in the volumetric center of the body of the device, is left in the center of the cavity. Thus, during a subsequent examination, a medical practitioner having knowledge of the dimensions of the body of the cavity marking device can determine the location as well as the periphery of the biopsy cavity. The orientation of the cavity is self-evident as the marker is left in substantially the center of the cavity. For the case where multiple markers are used, the markers are usually placed in a manner showing directionality.

Both the body and the marker can be made, via radiopaque or echogenic coatings or in situ, to degrade and absorb into the patient's body over a predetermined period of time. It is generally preferred that if the marker's radiopacity or echogenicity is chosen to degrade over time, such degradation does not take place within at least one year after implantation of the inventive device. In this way, if a new lump or calcification (in the case of a breast biopsy) is discovered after the biopsy, such a marker will allow the physician to know the relation of such new growth in relation to the region of excised tissue. On the other hand, and as discussed below, a bioabsorption period of three months is preferred for any such coatings on the perimeter of the body itself.

This invention further includes the act of filling the biopsy cavity with a bioabsorbable liquid, aerosol or gelatinous material, preferably gelatinous collagen, allowing the material to partially solidify or gel and then placing a marker, which may have a configuration as described above, into the center of the bioabsorbable material. The gel may also be made radiopaque or echogenic by the addition of radiopaque materials, such as barium- or bismuth-containing compounds and the like, as well as particulate radio-opaque fillers, e.g., powdered tantalum or tungsten, barium carbonate, bismuth oxide, barium sulfate, to the gel.

This method may be combined with any aspect of the previously described devices as needed. For instance, one could insert a hemostatic or pain-killing substance as described above into the biopsy cavity along with the bioabsorbable material. Alternatively, a bioabsorbable marker could be inserted into a predetermined location, such as the center, of the body of bioabsorbable material.

It is within the scope of this invention that either or both of the marker or markers and the bioabsorbable body may be radioactive, if a regimen of treatment using radioactivity is contemplated.

This procedure may be used in any internal, preferably soft, tissue, but is most useful in breast tissue, lung tissue, prostate tissue, lymph gland tissue, etc. Obviously, though, treatment and diagnosis of breast tissue problems forms the central theme of the invention.

In contrast to the marker clips as described above, the cavity marking device has the obvious advantage of marking the geometric center of a biopsy cavity. Also, unlike the marking clip which has the potential of attaching to loose tissue and moving after initial placement, the marking device self-expands upon insertion into the cavity, thus providing resistance against the walls of the cavity thereby anchoring itself within the cavity. The marking device may be configured to be substantially smaller, larger, or equal to the size of the cavity, however, in some cases the device will be configured to be larger than the cavity. This aspect of the biopsy marking device provides a cosmetic benefit to the patient, especially when the biopsy is taken from the breast. For example, the resistance provided by the cavity marking device against the walls of the cavity may minimize any “dimpling” effect observed in the skin when large pieces of tissue are removed, as, for example, during excisional biopsies.

Although the subcutaneous cavity marking device and method described above are suited for percutaneous placement of the marker within a biopsy cavity it is not intended that the invention is limited to such placement. The device and method are also appropriate for intra-operative or surgical placement of the marker within a biopsy cavity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A illustrates a tissue cavity marking device with a spherical body and a single centrally-located marker.

FIG. 1B shows a tissue cavity marking device with a cylindrical body and two ring-shaped markers aligned near the cylinder's longitudinal axis.

FIG. 1C shows another tissue cavity marking device with a multi-faced or irregular body and a single centrally-located marker.

FIG. 1D illustrates a tissue cavity marking device with a body having pores.

FIG. 1E is a partial cross-sectional view of FIG. 1D.

FIG. 1F illustrates a tissue cavity marking device with a body having an outer shell of a bioabsorbable material.

FIGS. 2A-2F illustrate various configurations of the marker.

FIG. 3A illustrates a cavity marking device having multiple body components traversed by a single wire or suture marker, or multiple wires or suture markers.

FIG. 3B illustrates a cavity marking device having a helically wound wire or suture marker.

FIG. 3C illustrates a cavity marking device having wire or suture markers on the perimeter of the body.

FIG. 3D illustrates a cavity marking device having wire or markers on the ends of the body.

FIGS. 4A-4C illustrate a method of marking a biopsy tissue cavity with the device of the present invention.

FIGS. 4D-4F illustrate a method of marking a biopsy tissue cavity with the device of the present invention wherein a bio-compatible fluid is delivered to the cavity marking device after placement.

FIGS. 4G-4I illustrate a method of marking a biopsy tissue cavity with the device of the present invention wherein a bio-compatible fluid is used to push the cavity marking device out of the access device and into the biopsy tissue cavity.

FIGS. 4J-4L illustrate a method of marking a biopsy tissue cavity with the device of the present invention wherein the body material of the marking device is deposited into the biopsy cavity prior to the placement of the marker within the biopsy device.

FIGS. 5A-B illustrate a spherical wire marking device for deployment without a filler body into a tissue cavity.

FIG. 5C illustrates a cylindrical wire marking device for deployment without a filler body into a tissue cavity.

FIGS. 5D-E illustrate a helical coil wire marking device for deployment without a filler body into a tissue cavity.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIGS. 1A-1C show various configurations of a preferred subcutaneous cavity marking device of the present invention. Here the marking device (100) is displayed as having either a generally spherical body (102) (FIG. 1A), a generally cylindrical body (104) (FIG. 1B), or a multi-faced or irregular body (106) (FIG. 1C). In general, it is within the scope of this invention for the body to assume a variety of shapes. For example, the body may be constructed to have substantially curved surfaces, such as the preferred spherical (102) and cylindrical (104) bodies of FIGS. 1A and 1B, respectively. The body may have conical or ellipsoidal, etc. shapes as well. It is further within the scope of this invention for the body to have substantially planar surfaces, such as polyhedric (i.e. cubic, tetrahedral, etc.) or prismatic, etc. forms. Finally, the body may also have an irregular or random shape, in the case of a gel, combining features of various curved and planar surfaces. Body (106) of FIG. 1C is an example of such an irregular body shape. The particular body shape will be chosen to best match to the biopsy cavity in which the device is placed. However, it is also contemplated that the body shape can be chosen to be considerably larger than the cavity. Therefore, expansion of the device will provide a significant resistance against the walls of the cavity. Moreover, the aspect ratio of the device is not limited to what is displayed in the figures. For example, the cylindrical body (104) may have a shorter or longer length as required.

In the bodies of FIGS. 1A and 1C, the generally spherical marker (150) is located at or near the geometric center of the body. Such a configuration will aid the physician in determining the exact location of the biopsy cavity, even after the body degrades and is absorbed into the human or mammalian body.

In the case of the ring-shaped markers (154) of FIG. 1B, they are generally aligned along the longitudinal axis (114) of body (104). Note that although the ring-shaped markers (154) are spatially oriented so that the longitudinal axis (114) of the body (104) lies along the longitudinal axes (not shown) of each marker (154), each marker may individually or together assume a wide variety of random or predetermined spatial orientations other than the aligned orientation as seen in FIG. 1C. It can be appreciated that any asymmetric marker such as marker (154) is useful in aiding a physician to determine the spatial orientation of the deployed inventive device.

Obviously, marker (150), (154) may reside in locations other than those demonstrated in FIGS. 1A-1C. It is, however, preferred that markers (150), (154) dwell in a predetermined, preferably central, location and orientation in the device body so to aid the physician in determining the location and orientation of the biopsy cavity. The markers herein described may be affixed to the interior or on the surface of the body by any number of suitable methods. For instance, the marker may be merely suspended in the interior of the body (especially in the case where the body is a gel), it may be woven into the body (especially in the case where the marker is a wire or suture), it may be press fit onto the body (especially in the case where the marker is a ring or band), or it may affixed to the body by a biocompatible adhesive. Any suitable means to affix or suspend the marker into the body in the preferred location is within the scope of the present invention.

Tissue regrowth in a particular orientation can also be promoted by a body design shown in FIG. 1D. Here, body (110) contains a number of pores (138) through which tissue may grow. The pores may also be aligned in a substantially parallel fashion, traversing the thickness of the body so that tissue may regrow from one side of the body through to the other side. This is demonstrated in inset FIG. 1E, which shows a portion (130) of FIG. 1D in partial longitudinal cross section, complete with pores (138) traversing through the thickness of portion (130). Such pores (138) can be parallel to each other as shown in FIG. 1E, or they may be perpendicularly, radially, or even randomly oriented in the device body.

A trio of markers is also shown in FIG. 1D evenly aligned along the body longitudinal axis (140). Barb marker (156), spherical marker (150), and ring-shaped marker (154) demonstrate the use of different multiple markers in a single body (110). As previously described, such a design helps a physician to determine the spatial orientation of the inventive device when it is deployed in a biopsy cavity. Although the barb marker (156) is illustrated in a ‘V’ configuration, it is an important aspect of the barb marker (156) to have a shape that is clearly not spherical. This allows the barb marker (156) to be easily distinguished from calcifications that may be observed during any non-invasive imaging techniques.

FIG. 1F depicts a further embodiment of the present invention in which body (112) is enveloped in a outer shell (142) consisting of a layer of bioabsorbable material such those mentioned above. This configuration allows the perimeter of the biopsy cavity to be marked to avoid exposing the cavity, in the case of a “dirty” margin where re-excision may be necessary, to remaining cancerous cells as the tissue begins to re-grow into the cavity. Such a shell (142) can be radiopaque and/or echogenic in situ, or it may be augmented with an additional coating of an echogenic and/or radiopaque material. The shell (142) can also be made to be palpable so that the physician or patient can be further aided in determining the location and integrity of the implanted inventive device.

Shell (142) may be designed to have a varying bioabsorption rate depending upon the thickness and type of material making up the shell (142). In general, the shell can be designed to degrade over a period ranging from as long as a year or more to as little as several months, weeks, or even days. It is preferred that such a bioabsorbable shell be designed to degrade between two and six months; especially preferred is three months. In the design of FIG. 1F, interior (144) of body (112) may be a cross-linked, collagenous material that is readily absorbed by the human or mammalian body once the shell (142) degrades. Interior (144) may be filled with a solid or gelatinous material that can be optionally made radiopaque by any number of techniques herein described.

As will be described in additional detail with respect to FIGS. 2A-2F, marker (150) in the device shown in FIG. 1F may be permanently radiopaque or echogenic, or it also may be bioabsorbable and optionally coated with a radiopaque and/or echogenic coating that similarly degrades over a predetermined period of time. It is more important from a clinical standpoint that the marker remain detectable either permanently or, if the patient is uncomfortable with such a scenario, for at least a period of about one to five years so that the physician may follow up with the patient to ensure the health of the tissue in the vicinity of the biopsy cavity. Especially preferable is a marker whose radiopacity or echogenicity lasts from between about one and three years.

Each of the bodies depicted in FIGS. 1A-1E may be made from a wide variety of solid, liquid, aerosol-spray, spongy, or expanding gelatinous bioabsorbable materials such as collagen, cross-linked collagen, regenerated cellulose, synthetic polymers, synthetic proteins, and combinations thereof. Also contemplated is a body made from a fibrin-collagen matrix, which further prevent unnecessary bleeding, and minimizes the possibility of hematoma formation.

Examples of synthetic bioabsorbable polymers that may be used for the body of the device are polyglycolide, or polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactide, or polylactic acid (PLA), poly s-caprolactone, polydioxanone, polylactide-co-glycolide, e.g., block or random copolymers of PGA and PLA, and other commercial bioabsorbable medical polymers. Preferred is spongy collagen or cellulose. As mentioned above, materials such as hemostatic and pain-killing substances may be incorporated into the body and marker of the cavity marking device. The use of hemostasis-promoting agents provides an obvious benefit as the device not only marks the site of the biopsy cavity but it aids in healing the cavity as well. Furthermore, such agents help to avoid hematomas. These hemostatic agents may include AVITENE Microfibrillar Collagen Hemostat, ACTIFOAM collagen sponge, sold by C. R. Bard Inc., GELFOAM, manufactured by Upjohn Company, SURGICEL Fibrillar from Ethicon Endosurgeries, Inc., and TISSEEL VH, a surgical fibrin sealant sold by Baxter Healthcare Corp. The device may also be made to emit therapeutic radiation to preferentially treat any suspect tissue remaining in or around the margin of the biopsy cavity. It is envisioned that the marker would be the best vehicle for dispensing such local radiation treatment or similar therapy. Also, the body itself may be, adapted to have radiopaque, echogenic, or other characteristics that allow the body to be located by non-invasive technique without the use of a marker. Such characteristics permit the possibility of locating and substantially identifying the cavity periphery after deployment but prior to absorption of the device. Furthermore, an echogenic coating may be placed over the radiopaque marker to increase the accuracy of locating the marker during ultrasound imaging.

FIGS. 2A-2F illustrate various forms of the marker (110). The marker (110) may be in the form of a sphere (150) (FIG. 2A), a hollow sphere (152) (FIG. 2B), a ring or band (154) (FIG. 2C), a barb (156) (FIG. 2D), or a flexible suture or flexible wire (158) (FIG. 2E). Also, the marker may have a distinguishing mark (170) (FIG. 2F). As mentioned above, the barb (156) is illustrated in FIG. 2D as having a “V” shape. The barb (156) is intended to distinguish the marker from calcifications when viewed under non-invasive imaging techniques. As such, the barb (156) is not limited to the “V” shape, rather it has a shape that is easily distinguishable from a spherical or oval calcification.

The hollow sphere (152) marker design of FIG. 2B is more susceptible to detection by ultrasound than the solid sphere (150) of FIG. 2A. Such sphere markers (150, 152) can be a silicon bead, for instance. In the case of a ring or band marker (154) seen in FIG. 2C, the body of the cavity marking device may be woven or placed through the band/ring (154). The marker may also be a wire or suture (158) as shown in FIG. 2E and as discussed in greater detail below. In such a case, the marker (158) may be affixed to the exterior perimeter of the body by an adhesive or woven through the body. Another improvement may arise from the marker wire or suture (158) being configured in a particular pattern within the body of the device, e.g., wrapping around the body in a helical manner. Further, the suture or wire marker can be deployed as a loosely wound ball or mass of suture that when deployed into a tissue cavity, fills the cavity. The suture or wire can also looped through the band/ring (154); in this configuration (not shown), the suture or wire can also act as the body of the inventive device. The suture or wire (158) is flexible to facilitate the expansion of the body while in the cavity. In the case of the marker (150) shown in FIG. 2F, distinguishing or identifying mark (170) can be in the form of simple marks as shown, or it may be one or more numbers, letters, symbols, or combinations thereof. These marks (160) are preferably located in more than one location on the marker (150) so that the marker may be readily and simply identified from multiple orientations under a variety of viewing conditions. Such a mark (170) can be used to identify the patient and her condition, provide information about the marker and body of the tissue cavity marking device, provide information about the circumstances and date of the implantation, who performed the procedure, where the procedure was performed, etc. In the case of multiple biopsy sites, this distinguishing mark (170) permits one to differentiate and identify each different site. The mark (170) may be applied via any number of techniques such as physical inscription, physical or plasma deposition, casting, adhesives, etc. The mark (170) may also be an electronic chip providing any necessary information in electronic form that can be remotely detected by appropriate means.

An important aspect of the invention is that the marker may be radiopaque, echogenic, mammographic, etc. so that it can be located by non-invasive techniques. Such a feature can be an inherent property of the material used for the marker. Alternatively, a coating or the like can be added to the marker to render the marker detectable or to enhance its detectability. For radiopacity, the marker may be made of a non-bioabsorbable radiopaque material such as platinum, platinum-iridium, platinum-nickel, platinum-tungsten, gold, silver, rhodium, tungsten, tantalum, titanium, nickel, nickel-titanium, their alloys, and stainless steel or any combination of these metals. By mammographic we mean that the component described is visible under radiography or any other traditional or advanced mammography technique in which breast tissue is imaged.

As previously discussed, the marker can alternatively be made of or coated with a bioabsorbable material. In this case, the marker can, for instance, be made from an additive-loaded polymer. The additive is a radiopaque, echogenic, or other type of substance that allows for the non-invasive detection of the marker. In the case of radiopaque additives, elements such as barium- and bismuth-containing compounds, as well as particulate radio-opaque fillers, e.g., powdered tantalum or tungsten, barium carbonate, bismuth oxide, barium sulfate, etc. are preferred. To aid in detection by ultrasound or similar imaging techniques, any component of the device may be combined, with an echogenic coating. One such coating is ECHO-COAT from STS Biopolymers. Such coatings contain echogenic features which provide the coated item with an acoustically reflective interface and a large acoustical impedance differential. As stated above, an echogenic coating may be placed over a radiopaque marker to increase the accuracy of locating the marker during ultrasound imaging.

Note that the radiopacity and echogenicity described herein for the marker and the body are not mutually exclusive. It is within the scope of the present invention for the marker or the body to be radiopaque but not necessarily echogenic, and for the marker or the body to be echogenic but not necessarily radiopaque. It is also within the scope of the invention that the marker and the body are both capable of being simultaneously radiopaque and echogenic. For example, if a platinum ring marker were coated with an echogenic coating, such a marker would be readily visible under x-ray and ultrasonic energy. A similar configuration can be envisioned for the body or for a body coating.

The marker is preferably large enough to be readily visible to the physician under x-ray or ultrasonic viewing, for example, yet be small enough to be able to be percutaneously deployed into the biopsy cavity and to not cause any difficulties with the patient. More specifically, the marker will not be large enough to be palpable or felt by the patient.

Another useful version of the invention is shown in FIG. 3A. In this device, there are several cylindrical body members (302); however, there is no limit to the number of body members that can make up the device. The body members (302) can individually or together take on a variety of sizes and shapes as discussed above depending on the characteristics of the biopsy cavity to be filled. The body members (302) may uniformly or in combination be made of one or more materials suitable for use in a biopsy cavity as previously described.

Here one or more markers may traverse two or more body member segments through the interior of the body members (302) as shown in FIG. 3A. Here, markers (318) are located substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis (320) of each right cylindrical body member (302) in their interior, connecting each body member (302) while marking their geometric center as between the markers. Such a marker (318) may be used in conjunction with the other markers as described above and may also be accompanied by one or more additional markers arranged randomly or in a predetermined pattern to variously mark particular sections of the device. Alternately, such a marker may, singly or in combination with other markers, be affixed on or near the surface of the sponge so as to mark the perimeter of the body member (302).

Of course, when used in conjunction with other connecting markers, marker (318) need not necessarily connect each body member; it may be used solely to indicate the orientation or location of each individual sponge or the entire device, depending on the material, geometry, size, orientation, etc. of marker (318). When not used in this connecting function, therefore, marker (318) need not traverse two body members (302) as shown in FIG. 3A.

A variety of patterns can be envisioned in which all or part of the perimeter of the sponge body is marked. For example, a marker (322) can wrap around the body (302) in a helical pattern (FIG. 3B), or it can be used in conjunction with other markers (324) in a pattern parallel to the longitudinal axis (320) of the body (302) (FIG. 3C). Another useful perimeter marking pattern is shown in FIG. 3D, where marker segments (326) are affixed at or near the surface of the circular bases of the cylindrical body (302) in a cross pattern, indicating the ends of the sponge and their center. As seen from the figures, the marker(s) may, but do not necessarily, have some texture. Any marker pattern, internal or external to the body, is within the scope of the present invention. For the applications depicted in FIGS. 3A-3D, it is preferred that the marker be a radiopaque or echogenic wire or suture.

Another possible configuration is obtained by combining the suture or wire markers (158) in a body with any other type marker (150, 152, 154, or 156) or vice versa. For example, in FIG. 3B, a spherical marker (150) may be placed in the center of the cylindrical body (302.) Therefore, the cylindrical body (302) would contain the suture or wire marker (322) wrapped helically adjacent to the outer perimeter, and a marker (150) would be placed in the center of the cylindrical body (302). Such a combination may be obtained with any of the body and marker configurations as defined above.

Also, turning back to the marking device (100) in FIG. 1A or the marking device (100) of FIG. 1B, the markers (150 or 154) may be substituted with one or more suture or wire markers (158) preferably, but not exclusively, extending through the center and pointing radially away from the center. This configuration allows marking of the cavity perimeter and establishing of the directionality of the cavity itself.

Any of the previously-described additional features of the inventive device, such as presence of pain-killing or hemostatic drugs, the capacity for the marker to emit therapeutic radiation for the treatment of various cancers, the various materials that may make up the marker and body, as well as their size, shape, orientation, geometry, etc. may be incorporated into the device described above in conjunction with FIGS. 3A-3D.

Turning now to FIGS. 4A-4C, a method of delivering the inventive device of FIG. 1A is shown. FIG. 4A details the marking device (402) just prior to delivery into a tissue cavity (404) of human or other mammalian tissue, preferably breast tissue (406). As can be seen, the step illustrated in FIG. 4A shows a suitable tubular percutaneous access device (400), such as a catheter or delivery tube, with a distal end (408) disposed in the interior of cavity (404). As previously described, the marking device (402) may be delivered percutaneously through the same access device (400) used to perform the biopsy in which tissue was removed from cavity (404). Although this is not necessary, it is less traumatic to the patient and allows more precise placement of the marking device (402) before fluid begins to fill the cavity (400).

In FIG. 4B, marking device (402) is shown being pushed out of the distal end (408) of access device (400) by a pusher (412) and resiliently expanding to substantially fill the tissue cavity (404).

Finally, in FIG. 4C, access device (400) is withdrawn from the breast tissue, leaving marking device (402) deployed to substantially fill the entire cavity (404) with radiopaque or echogenic marker (410) suspended in the geometric center of the marking device (402) and the cavity (404). As mentioned above, the marking device (402) may be sized to be larger than the cavity (404) thus providing a significant resistance against the walls of the cavity (404).

FIGS. 4D-4F show a method of delivering the marking device (402) into a tissue cavity (404) by a plunger (414) that is capable of both advancing the marking device (402) and delivering a bio-compatible fluid (416). The “bio-compatible fluid” is a liquid, solution, or suspension that may contain inorganic or organic material. The fluid (416) is preferably a saline solution, but may be water or contain adjuvants such as medications to prevent infection, reduce pain, or the like. Obviously, the fluid (416) is intended to be a type that does no harm to the body.

FIG. 4D details the marking device (402) prior to delivery into the tissue cavity (404). In FIG. 4E, a plunger (414) pushes the marking device (402) out of the access device (400). Upon, exiting the access device (400) the marking device (402) begins resiliently expanding to substantially fill the cavity (404).

FIG. 4F shows the plunger (414) delivering the bio-compatible fluid (416) into the cavity (404). The fluid (416) aids the marking device (402) in expanding to substantially fill the cavity (404). In this example, the bio-compatible fluid (416) is delivered subsequent to the placement of the marking device (402) in the cavity (404). The marking device (402) may also be soaked with fluid (416) prior to placement in the cavity (404).

FIGS. 4G-4I show another method of delivering the marking device (402) into the tissue cavity (404) by using the bio-compatible fluid (416) as the force to deliver the marking device (402) into the tissue cavity (404).

FIG. 4G details the marking device (402) prior to delivery into the tissue cavity (404). FIG. 4H illustrates flow of the bio-compatible fluid (416) in the access device (400), the fluid (416) flow then pushes the marking device (402) out of the access device (400).

FIG. 4I shows the delivery device (400) continuing to deliver the bio-compatible fluid (416) into the cavity (404). The fluid (416) aids the marking device (402) in expanding to substantially fill the cavity (404). In this example, the bio-compatible fluid (416) is delivered after the placement of the marking device (402) in the cavity (404) although the invention is not limited to the continued delivery of the fluid (416).

FIG. 4J-4K shows the method of delivering the body (418) of the cavity marking device directly into the cavity (404) prior to the placement of the marker (410) in the device (402).

FIG. 4J shows the deposit of the body material (418) into the cavity (404). In this case the body material (418) may be a gel type material as described above. FIG. 4K details the filling of the cavity (404) with the body material (418). At this point, the delivery device (not shown in FIG. 4K) may be withdrawn. FIG. 4L details the placement of the marker (410) into the body material (418).

FIGS. 5A-5E show yet another version of the invention in which a marker, preferably consisting of a radiopaque or echogenic wire, is deployed alone into a tissue cavity without the use of any body. In this device, the marker can be made of a shape memory material, such as a nickel-titanium alloy, which when deployed into the biopsy cavity, assumes a predetermined configuration to substantially fill the cavity, mark the cavity location and margin, and indicate the orientation of the marker inside the cavity.

In FIG. 5A, marker (500) is a three-dimensional sphere consisting of two rings (502), (504) pivotally connected at ends (506), (508) so to assume a spherical shape. Such a marker can be made of a shape memory metal so that when it is placed in a deployment tube (510) shown in FIG. 5B, marker (500) assumes a collapsed profile suitable for deployment through tube (510) by pusher (512). Upon exiting into the tissue cavity (not shown), marker (500) assumes the spherical shape of FIG. 5A to fill the cavity. The marker (500) may also be shaped into any similar shape such as an ellipsoidal shape.

Turning now to FIG. 5C, a marker (520) in the form of a wire cylinder is shown. Again, this device is structurally configured to assume the depicted cylindrical configuration when deployed in the tissue cavity, but may be (as described above) “collapsed” into a deployment tube for percutaneous delivery. This device is especially suitable for marking the distal and proximal ends of the tissue cavity due to its asymmetrical shape.

FIG. 5D shows a shape memory marker (530) in the form of a helical coil deployed into tissue cavity (532). Again, as seen in FIG. 5E, such a marker (530) may be deployed through delivery tube (510) by pusher (512) in a substantially elongated, straightened form, only to substantially assume the shape of the cavity (532) as shown in FIG. 5D. Any suitable delivery device or pusher (512) capable of deploying marker (530) into cavity (532) is within the scope of this invention.

Each of the markers shown in FIGS. 5A-5E is preferably a shape memory material coated or supplemented with a radiopacity-enhancing material, such as gold, platinum, or any other radiopaque material herein discussed. The markers may singly, or in combination with being radiopaque, be echogenic or be made echogenic by any of the materials or methods herein described.

From the foregoing, it is understood that the invention provides an improved subcutaneous cavity marking device and method. While the above descriptions have described the invention for use in the marking of biopsy cavities, the invention is not limited to such. One such application is evident as the invention may further be used as a lumpectomy site marker. In this use, the cavity marking device yield an improved benefit by marking the perimeter of the lumpectomy cavity.

The invention herein has been described by examples and a particularly desired way of practicing the invention has been described. However, the invention as claimed herein is not limited to that specific description in any manner. Equivalence to the description as hereinafter claimed is considered to be within the scope of protection of this patent.

Claims

1. A subcutaneous cavity marking device percutaneously implantable in breast tissue during a biopsy procedure comprising:

at least two implantable bodies, one made from a first material and another made from a second material wherein the first and second materials are different materials and the at least two implantable bodies are adapted to be inserted into a subcutaneous cavity created by removal of tissue, wherein the at least two implantable bodies are detectable via non-invasive techniques as tissue cavity markers; and
at least one of the at least two detectable bodies has a distinguishing shape and is disposed within the other of the at least two implantable bodies wherein the other of the at least two implantable bodies is bioabsorbable.

2. The device of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the at least two detectable bodies comprises a permanent marker.

3. The device of claim 2 wherein the permanent marker comprises a material selected from the group consisting of platinum, iridium, nickel, tungsten, tantalum, gold, silver, rhodium, titanium, alloys thereof and stainless steel.

4. The device of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the at least two detectable bodies comprises a bioabsorbable material.

5. The device of claim 4 wherein the bioabsorbable material comprises a polymer having a radiopaque additive.

6. The device of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the at least two detectable bodies is radiopaque.

7. The device of claim 1 wherein one of the at least two implantable bodies is detectable via ultrasound.

8. The device of claim 1 wherein one of the at least two implantable bodies has a plurality of pores.

9. The device of claim 8 wherein the pores are configured to promote tissue growth in a preferred orientation.

10. The device of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the at least two detectable bodies includes an identifying mark.

11. The device of claim 10 wherein the identifying mark comprises one or more numbers, letters, symbols, or combinations thereof.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2609347 September 1952 Wilson
2653917 September 1953 Hammon
2659935 November 1953 Hammon
2664366 December 1953 Wilson
2664367 December 1953 Wilson
2740405 April 1956 Riordan
2846407 August 1958 Wilson
2972350 February 1961 Deker
3001522 September 1961 Silverman
3194239 July 1965 Sullivan
3592185 July 1971 Frei
3823212 July 1974 Chvapil
3844272 October 1974 Banko
4087791 May 2, 1978 Lemberger
4114601 September 19, 1978 Abels
4197846 April 15, 1980 Bucalo
4202349 May 13, 1980 Jones
4230123 October 28, 1980 Hawkins, Jr.
4291013 September 22, 1981 Wahlig et al.
4298998 November 10, 1981 Naficy
4320321 March 16, 1982 Alexandrov
4347234 August 31, 1982 Wahlig et al.
4356572 November 2, 1982 Guillemin
4541438 September 17, 1985 Parker
4626251 December 2, 1986 Shen
4628944 December 16, 1986 MacGregor et al.
4636208 January 13, 1987 Rath
4639253 January 27, 1987 Dyer et al.
4645499 February 24, 1987 Rupinskas
4682606 July 28, 1987 DeCaprio
4693237 September 15, 1987 Hoffman
4704109 November 3, 1987 Rupinskas
4718897 January 12, 1988 Elves
4735210 April 5, 1988 Goldenberg
4735796 April 5, 1988 Gordon
4744364 May 17, 1988 Kensey
4787391 November 29, 1988 Elefteriades
4789401 December 6, 1988 Ebinger
4795463 January 3, 1989 Gerow
4803075 February 7, 1989 Wallace et al.
4812120 March 14, 1989 Flanagan et al.
4832686 May 23, 1989 Anderson
4852568 August 1, 1989 Kensey
4863470 September 5, 1989 Carter
4909250 March 20, 1990 Smith
4917694 April 17, 1990 Jessup
4944308 July 31, 1990 Akerfeldt
4966583 October 30, 1990 Debbas
4970298 November 13, 1990 Silver
4985019 January 15, 1991 Michelson
5002548 March 26, 1991 Campbell
5018530 May 28, 1991 Rank
5041103 August 20, 1991 Rupinskas
5041826 August 20, 1991 Milheiser
5045080 September 3, 1991 Dyer et al.
5057095 October 15, 1991 Fabian
5059197 October 22, 1991 Urie et al.
5085629 February 4, 1992 Goldberg et al.
5101827 April 7, 1992 Goldenberg
5108421 April 28, 1992 Fowler
5111828 May 12, 1992 Kornberg
5112325 May 12, 1992 Zachry
5114703 May 19, 1992 Wolf
5120802 June 9, 1992 Mares
5127916 July 7, 1992 Spencer
5148813 September 22, 1992 Bucalo
5183463 February 2, 1993 Debbas
5192300 March 9, 1993 Fowler
5195540 March 23, 1993 Shiber
5195988 March 23, 1993 Haaga
5197484 March 30, 1993 Kornberg
5201314 April 13, 1993 Bosley et al.
5204382 April 20, 1993 Wallace
5207705 May 4, 1993 Trudell et al.
5221269 June 22, 1993 Miller
5275616 January 4, 1994 Fowler
5300120 April 5, 1994 Knapp
5301682 April 12, 1994 Debbas
5326350 July 5, 1994 Li
5329944 July 19, 1994 Fabian et al.
5334216 August 2, 1994 Vidal et al.
5353804 October 11, 1994 Kornberg
5374246 December 20, 1994 Ray
5376376 December 27, 1994 Li
5380646 January 10, 1995 Knight et al.
5382251 January 17, 1995 Hood et al.
5388588 February 14, 1995 Nabai et al.
5394886 March 7, 1995 Nabai et al.
5403306 April 4, 1995 Edwards et al.
5405402 April 11, 1995 Dye et al.
5409004 April 25, 1995 Sloan
5433751 July 18, 1995 Christel et al.
5437279 August 1, 1995 Gray
5444113 August 22, 1995 Sinclair et al.
5451406 September 19, 1995 Lawin et al.
5456693 October 10, 1995 Conston et al.
5456718 October 10, 1995 Szymaitis
5460182 October 24, 1995 Goodman et al.
5467780 November 21, 1995 Nabai et al.
5478352 December 26, 1995 Fowler
5482040 January 9, 1996 Martin, Jr.
5487392 January 30, 1996 Haaga
5496536 March 5, 1996 Wolf
5507813 April 16, 1996 Dowd
5511566 April 30, 1996 Brand
5514379 May 7, 1996 Weissleder et al.
5546957 August 20, 1996 Heske
5555885 September 17, 1996 Chance
5560373 October 1, 1996 De Santis
5571181 November 5, 1996 Li
5571182 November 5, 1996 Ersek et al.
5575781 November 19, 1996 DeBusk
5579766 December 3, 1996 Gray
5582172 December 10, 1996 Papisov
5595177 January 21, 1997 Mena
5626611 May 6, 1997 Liu
5628744 May 13, 1997 Coleman
5632775 May 27, 1997 Suding et al.
5645566 July 8, 1997 Brenneman et al.
5662712 September 2, 1997 Pathak et al.
5664582 September 9, 1997 Szymaitis
5665063 September 9, 1997 Roth et al.
5670161 September 23, 1997 Healy et al.
5674288 October 7, 1997 Knapp
5676146 October 14, 1997 Scarborough
5697902 December 16, 1997 Goldenberg
5707393 January 13, 1998 Kensey et al.
5709676 January 20, 1998 Alt
5714551 February 3, 1998 Bezwada et al.
5716404 February 10, 1998 Vacanti
5716407 February 10, 1998 Knapp et al.
5718237 February 17, 1998 Haaga
5720772 February 24, 1998 Eckhouse
5725517 March 10, 1998 DeBusk
5725578 March 10, 1998 Knapp
5732704 March 31, 1998 Thurston
5752974 May 19, 1998 Rhee et al.
5776093 July 7, 1998 Goldenberg
5776094 July 7, 1998 Goldenberg
5795308 August 18, 1998 Russin
5803913 September 8, 1998 Khalkhali
5807276 September 15, 1998 Russin
5807581 September 15, 1998 Rosenblatt
5810806 September 22, 1998 Ritchart
5817033 October 6, 1998 DeSantis
5823198 October 20, 1998 Jones et al.
5827531 October 27, 1998 Morrison et al.
5853366 December 29, 1998 Dowlatshahi
5855609 January 5, 1999 Knapp
5856367 January 5, 1999 Barrows et al.
5857463 January 12, 1999 Thurston
5868778 February 9, 1999 Gershony
5869080 February 9, 1999 McGregor
5871501 February 16, 1999 Leschinsky et al.
5871535 February 16, 1999 Wolff et al.
5873904 February 23, 1999 Ragheb et al.
5879357 March 9, 1999 Heaton et al.
5895395 April 20, 1999 Yeung
5895640 April 20, 1999 Khalkhali
5899865 May 4, 1999 Chance
5913857 June 22, 1999 Ritchart
5922024 July 13, 1999 Janzen
5941890 August 24, 1999 Voegele
5941910 August 24, 1999 Schindler
5970986 October 26, 1999 Bolz
5977431 November 2, 1999 Knapp
5989265 November 23, 1999 Bouquet De La Joliniere et al.
5997468 December 7, 1999 Wolff et al.
6006750 December 28, 1999 Field
6007495 December 28, 1999 Matula
6030333 February 29, 2000 Siohansi et al.
6056700 May 2, 2000 Burney et al.
6057122 May 2, 2000 Davidson
6066325 May 23, 2000 Wallace
6068857 May 30, 2000 Weitschies et al.
6071301 June 6, 2000 Cragg et al.
6080099 June 27, 2000 Slater et al.
6083522 July 4, 2000 Chu
6092009 July 18, 2000 Glover
6106473 August 22, 2000 Violante et al.
6126675 October 3, 2000 Shchervinsky et al.
6159165 December 12, 2000 Ferrera et al.
6161034 December 12, 2000 Burbank et al.
6162192 December 19, 2000 Cragg
6174330 January 16, 2001 Stinson
6181960 January 30, 2001 Jensen et al.
6183497 February 6, 2001 Sing et al.
6197324 March 6, 2001 Crittenden
6200328 March 13, 2001 Cragg et al.
6214045 April 10, 2001 Corbitt, Jr. et al.
6228055 May 8, 2001 Foerster et al.
6231834 May 15, 2001 Unger et al.
6234177 May 22, 2001 Barsch
6270464 August 7, 2001 Fulton, III et al.
6309420 October 30, 2001 Preissman
6340367 January 22, 2002 Stinson et al.
6347241 February 12, 2002 Burbank
6356782 March 12, 2002 Sirimanne et al.
6371904 April 16, 2002 Sirimanne et al.
6666811 December 23, 2003 Good
6749554 June 15, 2004 Snow
8320993 November 27, 2012 Sirimanne et al.
20020012652 January 31, 2002 Levy et al.
20020107437 August 8, 2002 Sirimanne et al.
20040193044 September 30, 2004 Burbank
Foreign Patent Documents
2071840 May 1991 CA
935625 November 1955 DE
4330958 March 1995 DE
4403789 August 1995 DE
0146699 July 1985 EP
0255123 February 1988 EP
0293605 December 1988 EP
0350043 January 1990 EP
0481685 April 1992 EP
0534696 March 1993 EP
0769281 April 1997 EP
2714284 June 1995 FR
2132091 July 1984 GB
WO9015576 December 1990 WO
WO9319803 October 1993 WO
WO9608208 March 1996 WO
WO9627328 September 1996 WO
WO9809247 March 1998 WO
WO9843090 October 1998 WO
WO9843900 October 1998 WO
WO9847430 October 1998 WO
WO9852616 November 1998 WO
WO9852617 November 1998 WO
WO9925248 May 1999 WO
WO9946284 September 1999 WO
WO9911196 November 1999 WO
WO9966834 December 1999 WO
WO0024320 May 2000 WO
WO0032253 June 2000 WO
WO0038579 July 2000 WO
WO0045854 August 2000 WO
WO0045858 August 2000 WO
WO0100101 January 2001 WO
Other references
  • Hoffman, “Biodegradable Implants in Orthopaedic Surgery—A Review on the State-of-the-Art”, Clinical Materials 10 (1992), p. 75-80.
  • Hachisu, et al., “Endoscopic Clip-Marking of Lesions Using the Newly Developed HX-3L Clip,” Surgical Endoscopy (1989) vol. 3, pp. 142-147.
  • Hofman, “Biodegradable Implants in Orthopaedic Surgery—A Review on the State-of-the-Art,” Clinical Materials (1992) 10:75-80.
  • Pangman, “The Use of Plastic Prosthesis in Breast Plastic and Other Soft Tissue Surgery.” The Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, (Aug. 1995) 508.
  • Clarkson, “Sponge Implants for Flat Breasts,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, (1960) vol. 53: 880-881.
  • Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp., “Imagent Product Summary,” 5 pages (no date) http:www.allp.com/Imagent/Im.sub.--SUM.HTM.
  • Hofmann: “Biodegradable Implants in Traumatology: Review on the State-of-the-Art,”; Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1995) 114:123-132.
  • Alesch et al., (1992) “Marking of the Stereotactic Target Point by a Radiopaque Silicone Sphere” Acta Neurochirurgica vol. 115, 149-151.
  • Brannon-Peppas, Lisa. (1997). “Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery” Medical Plastics and Biomaterials, pp. 34-44.
  • Burbank, Fred and Forcier, Nancy. (1997). Tissue Marking Clip for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Initial Placement Accuracy, Long-term Stability, and Usefulness as a Guide . . . .
  • Freiherr, Greg. (1997). “Biotech Devices Promise Benefits in Wound Repair and Surgery,” Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry Magazine, 6 pages (www.devicelink.com).
  • Katz, Jon and Spera, Gabriel, (1998). “Biomaterials Research Focuses on Developing New Applications,” Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry,Magazine, 8 pgs (www.devicelink.com).
  • Middleton, John and Tipton, Arthur. (1998). “Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers as Medical Devices,” Medical Plastics and Biomaterials Magazine, 17 pages (www.devicelink.com).
  • Storey, Robson and Wiggins, Jeffrey. (1996), “Design and Fabrication of Polyester-Fiber and Matrix Composites for Totally Absorbable Biomaterials,” Medical Plastics and . . . .
  • Dufrane, P.et al. (1990). “Prebiopsy Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Cancer,” J. Beige De Radiologie 73(5):401-404.
Patent History
Patent number: 8600481
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 5, 2012
Date of Patent: Dec 3, 2013
Patent Publication Number: 20120330153
Assignee: Devicor Medical Products, Inc. (Pleasant Prairie, WI)
Inventors: D. Laksen Sirimanne (Palo Alto, CA), Douglas S. Sutton (Pacifica, CA), Natalie V. Fawzi (Belmont, CA), Gail Lebovic (Menlo Park, CA)
Primary Examiner: Ruth S Smith
Application Number: 13/604,158