System and method of scan controlled illumination of structures within an eye

- LensAR, Inc.

There is provided a system, apparatus and methods for enhancing the illumination of structures of the eye using predetermined scan patterns of an illuminating light beam. The systems, apparatus and methods further provide for obtaining enhanced single images of multiple structures of the eye.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 (e)(1) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/455,178, filed Oct. 15, 2010, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present inventions relate to methods and systems for illuminating, obtaining images of, and determining the shape and position of structures within an eye, and in particular, the cornea, natural human crystalline lens and adjacent structures of the eye. More particularly, the present inventions relate to variably controlled scanning of laser light illumination of such structures, controlled and predetermined digital capture of the images of the illuminated structures with an accurately calibrated digital camera and the creation of enhanced digital composite images of the illuminated structures.

2. Description of the Related Art

Presbyopia most often presents as a near vision deficiency, the inability to read small print, especially in dim lighting after about 40-45 years of age. Presbyopia, or the loss of accommodative amplitude with age, relates to the eye's inability to change the shape of the natural crystalline lens, which allows a person to change focus between far and near, and occurs in essentially 100% of the population. Accommodative amplitude has been shown to decline with age steadily through the fifth decade of life.

Cataracts, or the condition when the natural crystalline lens becomes opaque and clouds vision, occurs in millions of people per year and are treated effectively with surgical techniques, such as ultrasonic phacoemulsification pioneered by Kelman 30 years ago. Although the techniques have been refined over the years, safety concerns from ocular trauma, especially to the corneal endothelium from the ultrasonic energy required to break up a hardened cataract, is undesirable; especially for those with a compromised corneal endothelium, such as those with Fuchs Dystrophy. Moreover, the use of lasers in the treatment of cataracts has a further issue. Cataracts scatter light, including laser light, and thus, can prevent a laser treatment beam from having the desired tissue effect. Moreover, the light scattering effect of cataracts and other opacifications can make optically determining the position and shape of the lens difficult.

The established treatment for cataracts is the removal of the opacified human crystalline lens and its replacement with an intraocular lens (“IOL”). In general, IOLs include a small plastic lens with plastic side struts, called haptics, to hold the lens in place within the capsular bag inside the eye. Exemplary types of IOLs include monofocal lenses, multifocal IOLs which provide the patient with multiple-focused vision at far and reading distance, and accommodative IOLs which provide the patient with visual accommodation. The flexible nature of many IOLs enables them to be rolled and/or folded up for insertion into the lens capsule.

The removal of the opacified natural crystalline lens and replacement with a lens replacement material, such as an IOL, presently employs a capsulorhexis and/or a capsulotomy procedure. A capsulorhexis generally includes of the removal of a part of the anterior lens capsule and the creation of a hole or opening in the lens capsule, which results, at least in part, from a tearing action. A capsulotomy generally includes of a cutting of the lens capsule, without or with minimum tearing of the lens capsule. Thus, to remove the opacified natural lens material, the lens capsule is opened. There are several known techniques for performing a capsulorhexis and a capsulotomy, including the use of a Fugo plasma blade.

Recently laser systems and methods for treating of cataracts, presbyopia, performing capsulotomies, and for the sectioning and removal of natural crystalline lens material have been developed and introduced. Examples of such innovative and novel systems and methods are found in commonly assigned published patent applications US2007/0173794, US2007/0173795, US 2007/0185475, US 2010/0004641, US 2010/0004643, US 2010/0022994, US 2010/002995, US 2010/0042079, WO 2007/084627, and WO 2007/084694, the entire disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Further examples of such innovative and novel systems and methods are found in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/840,818, 12/831,859, 12/831,845, 12/831,783 and 12/842,870, the entire disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.

In the treatment of cataracts, presbyopia, conditions of the eye, and afflictions of the eye, and in particular, in using lasers for such treatments, the determination of the position (relative to other structures of the eye and/or relative to any treatment equipment, such as a laser), and the shape of the structures of the eye is essential to allow the precise application of laser energy to effect the treatment. In general, greater accuracy and precision in making such determinations is beneficial. Further, visual images of these structures for the treating physician to observe can be beneficial and can enhance the outcome of any procedures. Accordingly, as provided in detail in this specification, improvements in the illumination of structures of the eye are provided herein, which improvements give rise to improved determination of the position and shape of structures within the eye, as well as, enhanced images of those structures.

SUMMARY

It is desirable to have systems and methods that would provide enhanced images of the structures of the eye and that would provide for the position and shape of those structures. The present invention, among other things, solves these needs by providing controlled light beam illumination of such structures. Thus, there is provided herein systems and methods for the enhanced illumination of the structures of the eye and for the capture of single composite images of those structures having optimal illumination for each structure.

It is further desirable that the image capture device be well calibrated to permit dimensionally accurate images of the structures of the eye. Such calibration is desirable to eliminate sources of image distortion such as the tilt between the angle of illumination beam and the image plane of the image capture device used to form composite images of the structures of the eye or optical aberrations in the image capture device. Such sources of image distortion are common in imaging applications requiring a large depth of field, such as the present application in imaging the structures of the eye.

Thus, there is provided a method for enhancing the illumination of components of a multi-component structure, the method including: selecting a first predetermined illumination light scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and scan region; selecting a second predetermined illumination light scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and scan region; wherein, at least one of the second scan rate or area is different from the first scan rate or scan region; directing an illuminating light beam in the first scan pattern toward a first component of the multi-component structure, whereby a first illuminated image is created; directing an illuminating light beam in the second scan pattern toward a second component of the multi-component structure, whereby a second illumination image is created; digitally capturing the first illumination image on a first predetermined portion of an image capture device; digitally capturing the second illumination image on a second predetermined portion of the image capture device, wherein the second portion is different than the first portion; thus a single composite image of the illuminated components is created by the image capture device without need for registration of the first to the second illumination image.

There is further provided the forgoing method in which at least one of the predetermined illumination light scan patterns is optimized for the component to be scanned; the first component is the cornea of an eye; the first component is the natural crystalline lens of any eye; and/or the second component is the natural crystalline lens of the eye.

There is further provided a method to calibrate the image capture device so that there exists a known relationship or mapping between each point in the three dimensional volume of space containing the components of interest in the eye and the two dimensional image plane of the image capture device. The method includes a means to present one or more calibration targets to the image capture device, before (or after) use of the image capture device to generate images of structures in the eye, such calibration targets together include a three dimensional array or series of a plurality of uniquely identifiable objects with known positions in the volume of space in which the eye will be imaged. The method further includes means to capture one or more images of the calibration target(s) with the image capture device and identify some or all of the uniquely identifiable objects in the captured image(s) and to record the positions, within the captured image(s), of some or all of the uniquely identifiable objects. Further, the method includes a means to determine a linear or non-linear mathematical relationship or mapping between the known positions of the uniquely identifiable objects in the calibration target(s) and the recorded positions of the uniquely identifiable objects in the captured image(s). Still further, the method includes means to use the foregoing mapping to reduce or eliminate sources of image distortion in the image capture device or inherent in the geometrical arrangement of the image capture device with respect to the volume of space in which the object to be imaged, for example, structures within the eye or calibration target(s) and so be generate an image which is substantially dimensionally accurate. By dimensionally accurate is meant that the distances between entities, such as eye structures or parts of eye structures, in the image captured by the image capture device are substantially the same as corresponding distances between the same entities in the actual object being imaged, except for a single overall scale factor.

Yet further, there is provided a system for providing enhanced illumination of the components of a multi-component structure, the system having: an illumination source for providing an illumination beam; a scanner optically associated with the illumination light source for scanning the illumination beam; a control system, associated with the light source and scanner; the control system including: a first predetermined illumination beam scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and scan region; a second predetermined illumination scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and scan region; wherein, at least one of the second scan rate or region is different from the first scan rate or region; means for digitally capturing a first image generated by the first illuminating beam scan pattern; means for digitally capturing a second image generated by the second illuminating laser beam scan pattern; and, the means for digitally capturing the first image and the means for capturing the second image being different portions of the same means.

Additionally, there is provided a system for the enhanced illumination of the structures of the eye, the system having: an illumination source for providing an illumination beam; a scanner optically associated with the illumination source for scanning the illumination beam; a control system, associated with the illumination source and scanner; the control system including: a first predetermined illumination scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and scan region; a second predetermined illumination scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and scan region; wherein, at least one of the second scan rate or region is different from the first scan rate or area; region for digitally capturing a first image generated by the first illuminating beam scan pattern; means for digitally capturing a second image generated by the second illuminating beam scan pattern; and the means for digitally capturing the first image and the means for capturing the second image being different portions of the same means.

Yet further there is provided a method for enhancing the illumination of the structures of the eye, the method including: scanning an illumination beam in a predetermined rate and scan region over an area of a cornea of an eye; and, scanning the illumination beam at a predetermined rate and area over an area of a lens of the eye; wherein the illumination of the cornea is different from the illumination of the lens. This method may further be such that the illumination of the cornea and the lens are respectively optimal.

One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, based on the teachings set forth in these specifications and drawings, that there are various embodiments and implementations of these teachings to practice the present invention. Accordingly, the embodiments in this summary are not meant to limit these teachings in any way.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A to 1D are four different perspective illustrations of the same laser scanning illumination of the structures of the eye of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a pupil of an eye.

FIGS. 3 to 5 are single composite images of the eye obtained by the present invention.

FIG. 6 is an illustration of a therapeutic laser shot pattern that can be directed toward the eye based upon the enhanced images obtained by the present inventions.

FIG. 7A schematically shows a portion of a system for calibrating images of an object, such as an eye, in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 7B schematically shows a second portion of the system of FIG. 7A in accordance with the present invention.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS AND THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In general, the present inventions relates to methods and systems for providing enhanced laser scan illumination of the eye to provide for improved images of the structures of the eye, and in particular, the cornea and the natural crystalline lens. The present invention further relates to systems and methods utilizing the enhanced laser scan illumination for determining the shape and position of the cornea and the lens and to provide enhanced images of those structures.

In general, the present invention uses a light beam and scanner to illuminate the structures of the eye. The light beam can be generated by a non-coherent light source or a laser source. Examples of laser beam and scanner systems that can be used for illumination are disclosed in US 2007/0173794, US 2007/0173795,US 2007/0185475, US 2010/0004641, US 2010/0004643, US 2010/0022994, US 2010/002995, US 2010/0042079, WO 2007/084627, and WO 2007/084694. Further examples of such laser beam and scanner systems are found in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/840,818, 12/831,859, 12/831,845, 12/831,783 and12/842,870. In the case of using a laser source, the illumination laser should be an eye safe laser. Thus, the illumination laser could be a laser that is deferent from the therapeutic laser, or it could be the therapeutic laser, but at a power level that is below the threshold where the laser can affect the structures that are illuminated. In the case of using a non-coherent light source, the laser beam and scanner systems disclosed in the previously mentioned US 2007/0173794, US 2007/0173795, US 2007/0185475, US2010/0004641, US 2010/0004643, US 2010/0022994, US 2010/002995, US2010/0042079, WO 2007/084627, WO 2007/084694, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/840,818, 12/831,859, 12/831,845, 12/831,783 and 12/842,870 can be adapted to include such a non-coherent light source for illumination instead of a laser source.

In conventional illumination techniques, which illuminate all of the structures at once and capture an image of these illuminated structures for example with a digital camera; the images of the eye are over or under exposed in different areas and on different structures. Thus, with these conventional techniques it is believed that in general evenly illuminated clear and sharp images of multiple structures of the eye, in a single image, are difficult to obtain, if not unobtainable. Instead, such conventional images have over exposed or underexposed areas resulting in bright and dark spots that detrimentally affect the clarity and sharpness of the overall image. These detrimental effects are in part due to the different structures of the eye responding differently to the illumination light. Thus, illumination light that is best to capture, for example, an image of the anterior surface of the lens, may not be best to capture a peripheral edge of the cornea. However, in such “one illumination source fits” all type of techniques there no way, or at a minimum it is exceeding difficult, to tailor the illumination to all of the structures of the eye in a single image.

To solve these drawbacks of conventional illumination and image capture systems, the present inventions scan an illumination beam of light on the structures of the eye to be illuminated. The scan rate and scan area are predetermined based upon the structure of the eye to be illuminated, the section of that structure to be illuminated, and the relative location and size of the pupil. As the illumination beam of light is scanned along a section of a particular structure of the eye to be illuminated, the illuminated images from that scan are captured by predetermined pixels, or lines, on an image capture device, such as a digital camera. As additional structures in the eye are scanned, other predetermined pixels, or lines on the digital camera capture their illuminated images. In this way, a composite image, based upon each individual scan of each individual structure, of the illuminated structures of the eye is built, with each structure having the optimal illumination. Thus, the present system provides the ability to have predetermined and preselected multiple and varied illuminations of components parts, sub-structures, or structures of a multi-component structure, such as the human eye, and to create a single, clear and sharp image of all of those components in the multi-component structure. The images can be created real-time in a single procedure (serial collection of a plurality of illumination scans) without the need for subsequent or later digital alteration or digital enhancement of the images, such as by using software sold under the trademark PHOTOSHOP. Thus, for example in the present system and method the size of the pupil is determined. The scanning of light on a particular area of the cornea is performed. The scan preferably is from about 12-13 mm in length and at a rate that properly, and preferably optimally, illuminates the cornea based upon the setting of the camera. The illuminated images from this first scan would be for example captured by pixels at for example lines X to X+250 of the camera. The scan of a particular area of the anterior surface of the lens of the eye would then be performed (preferably the areas are directly anterior to the area of the cornea and thus a cross-section of the structures is obtained). To avoid interference from the pupil, this scan is from about 7 to 7.5 mm and at a rate that properly, and preferably optimally, illuminates the anterior capsule of the lens based upon the setting of the camera. The illuminated images for this second scan would be for example captured by pixels at for example lines X+252 to X+300. In this way both the scanned images of the cornea and the anterior capsule of the lens would be captured in a single image, with each having different and optimal illumination. The steps of scanning, and capturing images on further lines of the camera would be continued until all of the desired structures of the eye have been captured in a single image. Further, it should be understood, that the order of scans and the location of capture on the lines of the camera may vary for different applications. In addition, the light beam used in the scan can be generated by a laser or by a super luminescent diode (SLD). Use of an SLD is beneficial in that it is a non-coherent source that avoids laser speckle which degrades the image quality.

Turning to FIGS. 1A to 1D, there are four views from different perspectives of the images of scans of the illuminating light to create single composite images 100 of areas of the structures of the eye 120. Thus, in these figures there is shown a cornea 121 and a natural crystalline lens 122, which has an anterior capsule 123 and a posterior capsule 124. There is also shown an image window 125, which may be of the illumination system, such as a part of a patient interface. In these figures there are shown ray lines 130 signifying the scanned illumination light beam used to illuminate the structures of the eye. As can be seen from the image position 100, these figures show different perspective views of the same scans, image, and eye structures, but from different views (e.g., 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock if one were to use the face of a clock as a reference).

FIG. 2 shows a section of an eye 200, with a computer generated line 201 positioned concentrically with the edge of the pupil. This line 201 can be used to determine the diameter of the dilated pupil, which diameter may then be used to determine and optimize the length of a particular illumination scan of structures that are positioned posterior to the pupil.

FIG. 3 provides a single image 310 of the structures of the eye that was taken using scanned light illumination, which each scan having a different scan rate and scan area, which rates and areas were predetermined to optimize the images obtained. Thus, there is shown the cornea 300, the lens 301, and the lens anterior capful 302 and posterior capsule 303. Turning to FIG. 4 there is shown the same image 310 of FIG. 3 to which position and shape determination lines have been added via computer. Thus, line 401 follows the anterior surface of the cornea and has a plurality of points, of which points 401a, 401b and 401c are numbered for purposes of illustration and simplification of the drawing. Line 402 follows the posterior surface of the cornea and has a plurality of points, of which points 402a, 402b and 402c are numbered for purposes of illustration and simplification of the drawing. Line 403 follows the anterior lens capsule and has a plurality of points, of which points 403a, 403b and 403c are numbered for purposes of illustration and simplification of the drawing. Line 404 follows the posterior lens capsule and has a plurality of points, of which points 404a, 404b and 404c are numbered for purposes of illustration and simplification of the drawing. These various computer generated points and lines, which are generated based upon the enhanced image obtained from the light scan illumination, are used to determine the position and shape of the lens and cornea. This position and shape information can then be used to determine a shot pattern for the therapeutic laser such as the shot patterns shown in FIG. 6.

The scanned illumination techniques have the ability to obtain clear and sharp images of the peripheral edges of the cornea, i.e., the outer section of the cornea that is still clear but which is adjacent the sclera. Obtain clear images of this portion of the cornea, as well as obtaining precise position and shape of this section of the cornea is beneficial, for example during cataract surgery. It is this section of the eye that the incision is made to provide access to the lens. Because this area of the cornea is clear it is difficult for convention technology, such as OCT, to obtain the clarity and sharpness of images necessary to precisely determine the position and shape of this area. In addition, the scanned illumination techniques enhance details in the anterior and posterior capsules and enables imaging of posterior capsule through dense cataracts.

In order to correct for images generated in the systems and methods described previously with respect to FIGS. 1-6, a calibration procedure can be employed. As shown in FIGS. 7A-B, the calibration system 100 includes an image capture device 102, such as a camera, that including an image forming lens 104 and a planar detector 106 that has its plane angled relative to the optic axis A of the lens 104. An image receiving aperture 108 is aimed at an object volume 110, which contains the object of which the image capture device 102 forms an image. Such an arrangement, with an appropriately selected angle between the optic axis A of the lens 104 and the plane of the detector 106, allows the image capture device 102 to form an image with a large depth of focus in the z direction, which is aligned with the optic axis of the crystalline lens of an eye 120 as shown in FIG. 7B.

Referring to FIG. 7A, to calibrate the system, one or more targets, containing uniquely identifiable objects, such as squares 1, 2, . . . , are presented to the image capture device 102, usually sequentially. The targets are carefully made and are placed in exactly known positions. One example of such uniquely identifiable objects is ARTags as described in “Augmented Reality Tags”, Augmented Reality: A Practical Guide, Stephen Cawood and Mark Fiala.

One or more images are generated for each target. The images formed at planar detector 106 are sent to processor 112, wherein processor 112 analyzes each image and identifies some or all of the uniquely identifiable objects in the image and records the positions of the uniquely identifiable objects in a memory 114. The recorded positions are then sent to processor 116, which generates a linear or non-linear mathematical relationship or mapping between the positions of the uniquely identifiable objects in the images of the targets and the accurately known positions of the uniquely identifiable objects within the object volume. An example of such a mapping is the TSAI algorithm. R. Y. Tsai, An Efficient and Accurate Camera Calibration Technique for 3D Machine Vision, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami Beach, Fla. ,pp. 364-374, 1986.

The mapping is stored in memory 118 and is used to correct raw images generated by the image capture device to create dimensionally accurate images of the objects within the object volume. The use of uniquely identifiable objects greatly simplifies the process of generating the mathematical mapping required to create dimensionally accurate images.

The mapping determined above is used to process raw images of the structures within the eye, for example, surfaces and other features of the cornea and crystalline lens; c.f. FIG. 7B. As shown in FIG. 7B, the image capture device 102 forms raw images of the structures within the eye 120, which are situated in the object volume 122 and which are illuminated by a plane of light B which illuminates a longitudinal section of the eye 120. In FIG. 7B, the longitudinal section is perpendicular to the plane of the page. The raw images of the illuminated longitudinal section are subject to various sources of distortion including: the viewing angle between the optic axis of image capture device lens and the z axis, angle of the detector plane to the optic axis of the lens and optical aberrations in the image capture device lens. Accordingly, the raw images of the object volume 122 are stored in memory 124 and sent to processor 126. Using the calibrated mathematical mapping from memory 118, the processor 126 processes the raw images received from memory 124 to form substantially dimensionally accurate images of the eye that are stored in memory 128.

In other words, distances between structures or parts of structures measured on the processed images correspond, except for an overall scale factor to the corresponding distances in the illuminated longitudinal section of the eye.

The dimensionally accurate images allow the application of laser energy used in the treatment of cataracts to be accurately applied to specific areas within the eye, for example to cut a capsulotomy or to fragment the crystalline lens into pieces for easier removal in a cataract procedure.

With the above mentioned discussion of improved illumination and calibration, it is envisioned that such techniques could be applied to various imaging and beam placement systems. One example of such a system is presented herewith. For example, it is envisioned to apply the improved illumination and calibration to a system that uses a confocal system where the imaging and beam delivery systems are coaxial and share a common focus and optical pathway. Such a system would have no systematic errors between the imaging of the eye and the delivery of laser shots, such as femtosecond pulses. The imaging system could be based on the Scheimpflug principle so that a single image from the anterior cornea to the posterior capsule is captured resulting in enhanced depth of field. The scanning laser being such that it enhances contrast at important interfaces and, thus allows for anterior and posterior capsule-fragments to be closer to the posterior place due to the more accurate beam placement due to the present invention. A scanning beam camera and optics would be used to provide a high contrast to noise ratio. Such an imaging system would use three-dimensional reconstruction from ray tracing and so avoids two-dimensional stitching of multiple scans.

From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can readily ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and/or modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions.

Claims

1. A method for enhancing the illumination of components of a multi-component structure, the method comprising:

a. selecting a first predetermined illumination laser scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and area;
b. selecting a second predetermined illumination laser scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and area; wherein, at least one of the second scan rate or area is different from the first scan rate or area;
c. directing a first illuminating beam of light in the first scan pattern toward a first component of the multi-component structure, whereby a first illuminated image is created;
d. directing a second illuminating beam of light in the second scan pattern toward a second component of the multi-component structure, whereby a second illumination image is created;
e. digitally capturing the first illumination image on a first predetermined portion of an image capture device;
f. digitally capturing the second illumination image on a second predetermined portion of the image capture device, wherein the second portion is different than the first portion;
g. whereby a single composite image of the illuminated components is created by the image capture device.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the predetermined illumination laser scan patterns is optimized for the component to be scanned.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first component is the cornea of an eye.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first component is the natural crystalline lens of any eye.

5. The method of claim 3 wherein the second component is the natural crystalline lens of the eye.

6. A system for providing enhanced the illumination of the components of a multi-component structure, the system comprising:

a. an illumination light source for providing an illumination laser beam;
b. a scanner optically associated with the illumination light source for scanning the illumination beam;
c. a control system, associated with the illumination light source and scanner; the control system having a structure to control the illumination light source and the scanner so that the following scan patterns are generated: 1. a first predetermined illumination light scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and area; 2. a second predetermined illumination light scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and area; wherein, at least one of the second scan rate or area is different from the first scan rate or area; and
the system further comprising:
d. means for digitally capturing a first image generated by the first illumination light beam scan pattern;
e. means for digitally capturing a second image generated by the second illumination light beam scan pattern; and,
f. the means for digitally capturing the first image and the means for capturing the second image being different portions of the same means.

7. A system for providing enhanced the illumination of the structures of the eye, the system comprising:

a. an illumination light source for providing an illumination light beam;
b. a scanner optically associated with the illumination light source for scanning the illumination light beam;
c. a control system, associated with the illumination light source and scanner; the control system having a structure to control the illumination light source and the scanner so that the following scan patterns are generated: 1. a first predetermined illumination light scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and area; 2. a second predetermined illumination light scan pattern, having a predetermined rate and area; wherein, at least one of the second scan rate or area is different from the first scan rate or area; and
the system further comprising:
d. means for digitally capturing a first image generated by the first illuminating light beam scan pattern;
e. means for digitally capturing a second image generated by the second illuminating light beam scan pattern; and,
f. the means for digitally capturing the first image and the means for capturing the second image being different portions of the same means.

8. A method for enhancing the illumination of the structures of the eye, the method comprising:

scanning an illumination light beam in a predetermined rate and area over an area of a cornea of an eye; and,
scanning the illumination light beam in a predetermined rate and area over an area of a lens of the eye; wherein the illumination of the cornea is different from the illumination of the lens.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the illumination of the cornea and the lens are respectively optimal.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3074407 January 1963 Moon et al.
3971382 July 27, 1976 Krasnov
3982541 September 28, 1976 L'Esperance, Jr.
4024852 May 24, 1977 L'Esperance et al.
4263893 April 28, 1981 Pavlak et al.
4306546 December 22, 1981 Heine et al.
4309998 January 12, 1982 Aron nee Rosa et al.
4334736 June 15, 1982 Herbert
4381007 April 26, 1983 Doss
4394144 July 19, 1983 Aoki
4403841 September 13, 1983 Lang et al.
4461294 July 24, 1984 Baron
4477159 October 16, 1984 Mizuno et al.
4502816 March 5, 1985 Creter, Jr. et al.
4517980 May 21, 1985 Tagnon
4537193 August 27, 1985 Tanner
4538608 September 3, 1985 L'Esperance, Jr.
4554917 November 26, 1985 Tagnon
4561436 December 31, 1985 Munnerlyn
4565197 January 21, 1986 Daly
4573778 March 4, 1986 Shapiro
4576160 March 18, 1986 Tanaka
4579430 April 1, 1986 Bille
4580559 April 8, 1986 L'Esperance
4582405 April 15, 1986 Muller et al.
4583539 April 22, 1986 Karlin et al.
4588505 May 13, 1986 Walley et al.
4601037 July 15, 1986 McDonald
4601288 July 22, 1986 Myers
4607622 August 26, 1986 Fritch et al.
4628416 December 9, 1986 Dewey
4633866 January 6, 1987 Peyman et al.
4638801 January 27, 1987 Daly et al.
4644948 February 24, 1987 Lang et al.
4648400 March 10, 1987 Schneider et al.
4657013 April 14, 1987 Hoerenz et al.
4665913 May 19, 1987 L'Esperance, Jr.
4669466 June 2, 1987 L'Esperance, Jr.
4669839 June 2, 1987 Muchel
4682595 July 28, 1987 Hoerenz et al.
4686979 August 18, 1987 Gruen et al.
4686992 August 18, 1987 Dewey et al.
4702245 October 27, 1987 Schroder et al.
4702576 October 27, 1987 Magnante
4711540 December 8, 1987 Yoshino et al.
4711541 December 8, 1987 Yoshino et al.
4712543 December 15, 1987 Baron
4715703 December 29, 1987 Cornsweet et al.
4718418 January 12, 1988 L'Esperance, Jr.
4719912 January 19, 1988 Weinberg
4721379 January 26, 1988 L'Esperance
4724522 February 9, 1988 Belgorod
4729372 March 8, 1988 L'Esperance, Jr.
4729373 March 8, 1988 Peyman
4732148 March 22, 1988 L'Esperance, Jr.
4732460 March 22, 1988 Kele et al.
4736744 April 12, 1988 Koike et al.
4741612 May 3, 1988 Birngruber et al.
4744362 May 17, 1988 Gründler
4758081 July 19, 1988 Barnes
4765336 August 23, 1988 Blaha et al.
4770162 September 13, 1988 L'Esperance et al.
4770172 September 13, 1988 L'Esperance, Jr.
4770486 September 13, 1988 Wang et al.
4772116 September 20, 1988 Schroder et al.
4773414 September 27, 1988 L'Esperance, Jr.
4775361 October 4, 1988 Jacques et al.
4776687 October 11, 1988 Nakanishi et al.
4798204 January 17, 1989 L'Esperance, Jr.
4820264 April 11, 1989 Matsui et al.
4830483 May 16, 1989 Kohayakawa et al.
4832043 May 23, 1989 Ichihashi
4837857 June 6, 1989 Scheller et al.
4838266 June 13, 1989 Koziol et al.
4840175 June 20, 1989 Peyman
4846172 July 11, 1989 Berlin
4848340 July 18, 1989 Bille et al.
4854693 August 8, 1989 Ichihashi et al.
4856513 August 15, 1989 Muller
4862888 September 5, 1989 Yessik
4863261 September 5, 1989 Flammer
4865029 September 12, 1989 Pankratov
4865441 September 12, 1989 Reis
4866243 September 12, 1989 Sakane et al.
4870952 October 3, 1989 Martinez
4881808 November 21, 1989 Bille et al.
4883351 November 28, 1989 Weiss
4884884 December 5, 1989 Reis
4887019 December 12, 1989 Reis et al.
4887592 December 19, 1989 Loertscher
4891043 January 2, 1990 Zeimer et al.
4900143 February 13, 1990 Bessler et al.
4900145 February 13, 1990 Akiyama
4901718 February 20, 1990 Bille et al.
4902124 February 20, 1990 Roy, Sr. et al.
4903695 February 27, 1990 Warner et al.
4905711 March 6, 1990 Bennett et al.
4907586 March 13, 1990 Bille et al.
4911160 March 27, 1990 Thyzel
4911711 March 27, 1990 Telfair et al.
4917486 April 17, 1990 Raven et al.
4931053 June 5, 1990 L'Esperance, Jr.
4941093 July 10, 1990 Marshall et al.
4951663 August 28, 1990 L'Esperance, Jr.
4953969 September 4, 1990 Fedorov
4966577 October 30, 1990 Crosson et al.
4972836 November 27, 1990 Schenck et al.
4973330 November 27, 1990 Azema et al.
4976709 December 11, 1990 Sand
4988348 January 29, 1991 Bille
4994058 February 19, 1991 Raven et al.
5000561 March 19, 1991 Lawniczak et al.
5000751 March 19, 1991 Schroder et al.
5002571 March 26, 1991 O'Donnell, Jr. et al.
5013311 May 7, 1991 Nouri
5019074 May 28, 1991 Muller
5041134 August 20, 1991 O'Donnell
5048946 September 17, 1991 Sklar et al.
5049147 September 17, 1991 Danon
5054907 October 8, 1991 Sklar et al.
5057102 October 15, 1991 Tomioka et al.
5067951 November 26, 1991 Greve
5090798 February 25, 1992 Kohayakawa
5092863 March 3, 1992 Schanzlin
5094521 March 10, 1992 Jolson et al.
5098426 March 24, 1992 Sklar et al.
5102409 April 7, 1992 Balgorod
5108388 April 28, 1992 Trokel
5108412 April 28, 1992 Krumeich et al.
5112328 May 12, 1992 Taboada et al.
5116114 May 26, 1992 Nakamura et al.
5122135 June 16, 1992 Durr et al.
5123902 June 23, 1992 Muller et al.
5128509 July 7, 1992 Black et al.
5133708 July 28, 1992 Smith
5137530 August 11, 1992 Sand
5141506 August 25, 1992 York
5147349 September 15, 1992 Johnson et al.
5147352 September 15, 1992 Azema et al.
5152055 October 6, 1992 L'Esperance, III et al.
5152759 October 6, 1992 Parel et al.
5163934 November 17, 1992 Munnerlyn
5171242 December 15, 1992 Dewey et al.
5174021 December 29, 1992 L'Esperance, III et al.
5178635 January 12, 1993 Gwon et al.
5188631 February 23, 1993 L'Esperance, Jr.
5194948 March 16, 1993 L'Esperance, III et al.
5196006 March 23, 1993 Klopotek et al.
5196027 March 23, 1993 Thompson et al.
5201730 April 13, 1993 Easley et al.
5202708 April 13, 1993 Sasaki et al.
5203353 April 20, 1993 Easley et al.
5207668 May 4, 1993 L'Esperance, Jr.
5213092 May 25, 1993 Uram
5215104 June 1, 1993 Steinert
5217459 June 8, 1993 Kamerling
5219343 June 15, 1993 L'Esperance, Jr.
5219344 June 15, 1993 Yoder, Jr.
5222981 June 29, 1993 Werblin
5224942 July 6, 1993 Beuchat et al.
5226903 July 13, 1993 Mizuno
5246435 September 21, 1993 Bille et al.
5246436 September 21, 1993 Rowe
5257988 November 2, 1993 L'Esperance, Jr.
5258025 November 2, 1993 Fedorov et al.
5263950 November 23, 1993 L'Esperance, Jr.
5263951 November 23, 1993 Spears et al.
5275593 January 4, 1994 Easley et al.
5277911 January 11, 1994 Viegas et al.
5279298 January 18, 1994 Flower
5279611 January 18, 1994 McDonnell et al.
5281211 January 25, 1994 Parel et al.
5282798 February 1, 1994 Bruse et al.
5284477 February 8, 1994 Hanna et al.
5288293 February 22, 1994 O'Donnell, Jr.
5290272 March 1, 1994 Burstein et al.
5295989 March 22, 1994 Nakamura
5300020 April 5, 1994 L'Esperance, Jr.
5300061 April 5, 1994 Easley et al.
5300062 April 5, 1994 Ueno
5300063 April 5, 1994 Tano et al.
5300114 April 5, 1994 Gwon et al.
5304168 April 19, 1994 Sun
5304169 April 19, 1994 Sand
5311224 May 10, 1994 Enomoto
5312320 May 17, 1994 L'Esperance, Jr.
5312393 May 17, 1994 Mastel
5314422 May 24, 1994 Nizzola
5318047 June 7, 1994 Davenport et al.
5318560 June 7, 1994 Blount et al.
5323788 June 28, 1994 Silvestrini et al.
5324281 June 28, 1994 Muller
5325134 June 28, 1994 Kohayakawa
5334190 August 2, 1994 Seiler
5336215 August 9, 1994 Hsueh et al.
5336216 August 9, 1994 Dewey
5342351 August 30, 1994 Blaha et al.
5342370 August 30, 1994 Simon et al.
5345948 September 13, 1994 O'Donnell, Jr.
5346491 September 13, 1994 Oertli
5347329 September 13, 1994 Ota
5348551 September 20, 1994 Spears et al.
5350374 September 27, 1994 Smith
5354331 October 11, 1994 Schachar
5355181 October 11, 1994 Ashizaki et al.
5356407 October 18, 1994 Easley et al.
5356409 October 18, 1994 Nizzola
5360424 November 1, 1994 Klopotek
5364388 November 15, 1994 Koziol
5364390 November 15, 1994 Taboada et al.
5368590 November 29, 1994 Itoh
5370641 December 6, 1994 O'Donnell, Jr.
5372595 December 13, 1994 Gaasterland et al.
5374265 December 20, 1994 Sand
5376086 December 27, 1994 Khoobehi et al.
5391165 February 21, 1995 Fountain et al.
5395356 March 7, 1995 King et al.
5403307 April 4, 1995 Zelman
5408484 April 18, 1995 Weimel
5411501 May 2, 1995 Klopotek
5412561 May 2, 1995 Rosenshein et al.
5413555 May 9, 1995 McMahan
5423798 June 13, 1995 Crow
5423800 June 13, 1995 Ren et al.
5423801 June 13, 1995 Marshall et al.
5425727 June 20, 1995 Koziol
5425729 June 20, 1995 Ishida et al.
5425730 June 20, 1995 Luloh
5437657 August 1, 1995 Epstein
5437658 August 1, 1995 Muller et al.
5439462 August 8, 1995 Bille et al.
5441496 August 15, 1995 Easley et al.
5441511 August 15, 1995 Hanna
5442412 August 15, 1995 Frey et al.
5442487 August 15, 1995 Mizuno
5445633 August 29, 1995 Nakamura et al.
5460627 October 24, 1995 O'Donnell, Jr.
5461212 October 24, 1995 Seiler et al.
5462739 October 31, 1995 Dan et al.
5465737 November 14, 1995 Schachar
5470329 November 28, 1995 Sumiya
5474548 December 12, 1995 Knopp et al.
5476511 December 19, 1995 Gwon et al.
5480396 January 2, 1996 Simon et al.
5484432 January 16, 1996 Sand
5489299 February 6, 1996 Schachar
5503165 April 2, 1996 Schachar
5507740 April 16, 1996 O'Donnell, Jr.
5514124 May 7, 1996 Alpins
5514125 May 7, 1996 Lasser et al.
5520679 May 28, 1996 Lin
5527774 June 18, 1996 Girard
5529076 June 25, 1996 Schachar
5531753 July 2, 1996 Oliveira
5533997 July 9, 1996 Ruiz
5548352 August 20, 1996 Dewey
5549632 August 27, 1996 Lai
5556395 September 17, 1996 Shimmick et al.
5573544 November 12, 1996 Simon et al.
5594753 January 14, 1997 Frey et al.
5607472 March 4, 1997 Thompson
5616139 April 1, 1997 Okamoto
5618284 April 8, 1997 Sand
5620435 April 15, 1997 Belkin et al.
5627162 May 6, 1997 Gwon et al.
5632742 May 27, 1997 Frey et al.
5651782 July 29, 1997 Simon et al.
5656186 August 12, 1997 Mourou et al.
5684560 November 4, 1997 Roffman et al.
5699142 December 16, 1997 Lee et al.
5709868 January 20, 1998 Perricone
5722952 March 3, 1998 Schachar
5722970 March 3, 1998 Colvard et al.
5731909 March 24, 1998 Schachar
5738677 April 14, 1998 Colvard et al.
5752950 May 19, 1998 Frey et al.
5757462 May 26, 1998 Nanjo
5766171 June 16, 1998 Silvestrini
5773472 June 30, 1998 Stjernschantz et al.
5828686 October 27, 1998 Frey et al.
5843184 December 1, 1998 Cionni
5849006 December 15, 1998 Frey et al.
5886768 March 23, 1999 Knopp et al.
5907908 June 1, 1999 Cunanan et al.
5912915 June 15, 1999 Reed et al.
5919186 July 6, 1999 Bath
5928129 July 27, 1999 Ruiz
5980513 November 9, 1999 Frey et al.
5984916 November 16, 1999 Lai
5993441 November 30, 1999 Muller et al.
6007578 December 28, 1999 Schachar
6013101 January 11, 2000 Israel
6019472 February 1, 2000 Koester et al.
6022088 February 8, 2000 Metzler
6027494 February 22, 2000 Frey
6055259 April 25, 2000 Frey et al.
6059772 May 9, 2000 Hsia et al.
6070981 June 6, 2000 Mihashi et al.
6099522 August 8, 2000 Knopp et al.
6114651 September 5, 2000 Schluter et al.
6132424 October 17, 2000 Tang
6186148 February 13, 2001 Okada
6190375 February 20, 2001 Frey
6197018 March 6, 2001 O'Donnell
6197056 March 6, 2001 Schachar
6252595 June 26, 2001 Birmingham et al.
6254595 July 3, 2001 Juhasz et al.
6261220 July 17, 2001 Frey et al.
6271914 August 7, 2001 Frey et al.
6271915 August 7, 2001 Frey et al.
6275718 August 14, 2001 Lempert
6280435 August 28, 2001 Odrich et al.
6280468 August 28, 2001 Schachar
6299640 October 9, 2001 Schachar
6302879 October 16, 2001 Frey et al.
6312422 November 6, 2001 Dubnack
6312424 November 6, 2001 Largent
6313165 November 6, 2001 Grunberger et al.
6315773 November 13, 2001 Frey et al.
6319274 November 20, 2001 Shadduck
6322545 November 27, 2001 Schachar
6322556 November 27, 2001 Gwon et al.
6324191 November 27, 2001 Horvath
6325791 December 4, 2001 Shimoji
6325792 December 4, 2001 Swinger et al.
6328732 December 11, 2001 Donitzky et al.
6344040 February 5, 2002 Juhasz et al.
6373571 April 16, 2002 Juhasz et al.
D459806 July 2, 2002 Webb
D459807 July 2, 2002 Webb
6413262 July 2, 2002 Saishin et al.
D462442 September 3, 2002 Webb
D462443 September 3, 2002 Webb
6451008 September 17, 2002 Frey et al.
6460997 October 8, 2002 Frey et al.
6467906 October 22, 2002 Alpins
6493151 December 10, 2002 Schachar
6494910 December 17, 2002 Ganem et al.
6497483 December 24, 2002 Frey et al.
6530917 March 11, 2003 Seiler et al.
6544254 April 8, 2003 Bath
6547394 April 15, 2003 Doherty
6554825 April 29, 2003 Murray et al.
6585726 July 1, 2003 Frey et al.
6588902 July 8, 2003 Isogai
6588903 July 8, 2003 Rathjen
6592574 July 15, 2003 Shimmick et al.
6610686 August 26, 2003 Enrico et al.
6623476 September 23, 2003 Juhasz et al.
6626445 September 30, 2003 Murphy et al.
6626893 September 30, 2003 Frey et al.
6626894 September 30, 2003 Frey et al.
6626895 September 30, 2003 Frey et al.
6626896 September 30, 2003 Frey et al.
6626897 September 30, 2003 Frey et al.
6626898 September 30, 2003 Frey et al.
6648877 November 18, 2003 Juhasz et al.
6669342 December 30, 2003 Lieberman et al.
6676653 January 13, 2004 Juhasz et al.
6693927 February 17, 2004 Horvath et al.
6726679 April 27, 2004 Dick et al.
6849091 February 1, 2005 Cumming
6863667 March 8, 2005 Webb et al.
6905641 June 14, 2005 Platt et al.
6923955 August 2, 2005 Till et al.
6962583 November 8, 2005 Kadziauskas et al.
7044568 May 16, 2006 Olivera et al.
7077838 July 18, 2006 Wong
7182759 February 27, 2007 Kadziauskas et al.
7188949 March 13, 2007 Bandhauer et al.
7220255 May 22, 2007 Lai
7252662 August 7, 2007 McArdle et al.
7264355 September 4, 2007 Rathjen
RE40002 January 15, 2008 Lin
RE40184 March 25, 2008 Lin
7338167 March 4, 2008 Zelvin et al.
7357504 April 15, 2008 Fischer et al.
7364575 April 29, 2008 Van Saarloos
7390089 June 24, 2008 Loesel et al.
RE40420 July 1, 2008 Dick et al.
7402159 July 22, 2008 Loesel et al.
7467871 December 23, 2008 Lawhorn et al.
7479106 January 20, 2009 Banik et al.
7540613 June 2, 2009 Severns
7655002 February 2, 2010 Myers
7717908 May 18, 2010 Ruiz et al.
7766903 August 3, 2010 Blumenkranz et al.
7836894 November 23, 2010 Brinkmann et al.
7959289 June 14, 2011 Cattin-Liebl
8262553 September 11, 2012 Weston et al.
8262646 September 11, 2012 Frey et al.
8382745 February 26, 2013 Naranjo-Tackman et al.
8465478 June 18, 2013 Frey et al.
8475433 July 2, 2013 Mrochen et al.
8480659 July 9, 2013 Frey et al.
8500723 August 6, 2013 Frey et al.
8556425 October 15, 2013 Frey et al.
D694890 December 3, 2013 Bott et al.
D695408 December 10, 2013 Bott et al.
8617146 December 31, 2013 Naranjo-Tackman et al.
20010029363 October 11, 2001 Lin
20020004658 January 10, 2002 Munnerlyn et al.
20020025311 February 28, 2002 Till
20020029053 March 7, 2002 Gordon
20020049437 April 25, 2002 Silvestrini
20020049450 April 25, 2002 Myers
20020103478 August 1, 2002 Gwon et al.
20020110549 August 15, 2002 Till
20020138139 September 26, 2002 Till
20020140903 October 3, 2002 Schachar
20020159028 October 31, 2002 Masaki
20030050629 March 13, 2003 Kadziauskas et al.
20030055412 March 20, 2003 Lieberman et al.
20030076477 April 24, 2003 Matsumoto
20030076508 April 24, 2003 Cornsweet
20030109926 June 12, 2003 Portney
20030135272 July 17, 2003 Brady et al.
20030139737 July 24, 2003 Lin
20030212387 November 13, 2003 Kurtz et al.
20030220630 November 27, 2003 Lin et al.
20030236515 December 25, 2003 Lieberman et al.
20040054359 March 18, 2004 Ruiz et al.
20040059321 March 25, 2004 Knopp et al.
20040070761 April 15, 2004 Horvath et al.
20040106929 June 3, 2004 Masket
20040143244 July 22, 2004 Gray et al.
20040156014 August 12, 2004 Piers et al.
20040199149 October 7, 2004 Myers et al.
20040199150 October 7, 2004 Lai
20040243111 December 2, 2004 Bendett et al.
20040249403 December 9, 2004 Loomas et al.
20050107773 May 19, 2005 Bergt et al.
20050107775 May 19, 2005 Huang et al.
20050165387 July 28, 2005 Lubatschowski et al.
20050197655 September 8, 2005 Telfair et al.
20050203492 September 15, 2005 Nguyen et al.
20050241653 November 3, 2005 Van Heugten et al.
20050243276 November 3, 2005 Van Heugten et al.
20050270486 December 8, 2005 Teiwes et al.
20050286019 December 29, 2005 Wiltberger et al.
20060058682 March 16, 2006 Miller et al.
20060192921 August 31, 2006 Loesel et al.
20060195076 August 31, 2006 Blumenkranz et al.
20060215111 September 28, 2006 Mihashi
20060217688 September 28, 2006 Lai
20060259022 November 16, 2006 Lin
20070010803 January 11, 2007 Bischoff et al.
20070078447 April 5, 2007 Weinacht et al.
20070093795 April 26, 2007 Melcher et al.
20070093796 April 26, 2007 Raksi et al.
20070129693 June 7, 2007 Hunter et al.
20070173794 July 26, 2007 Frey et al.
20070173795 July 26, 2007 Frey et al.
20070185475 August 9, 2007 Frey et al.
20070265603 November 15, 2007 Pinelli
20080058841 March 6, 2008 Kurtz et al.
20080071254 March 20, 2008 Lummis et al.
20080077121 March 27, 2008 Rathjen
20080111972 May 15, 2008 Barth et al.
20080114386 May 15, 2008 Iliakis et al.
20080186551 August 7, 2008 Hanft et al.
20080275433 November 6, 2008 Russmann et al.
20080281303 November 13, 2008 Culbertson et al.
20080312675 December 18, 2008 Newcott et al.
20090012507 January 8, 2009 Culbertson et al.
20090069794 March 12, 2009 Kurtz
20090088734 April 2, 2009 Mordaunt
20090126870 May 21, 2009 Zadoyan et al.
20090131921 May 21, 2009 Kurtz
20090137988 May 28, 2009 Kurtz
20090137991 May 28, 2009 Kurtz
20090137993 May 28, 2009 Kurtz
20090157063 June 18, 2009 Ruiz et al.
20090161065 June 25, 2009 Smith, III et al.
20090171327 July 2, 2009 Kurtz et al.
20090177189 July 9, 2009 Raksi
20090187178 July 23, 2009 Muller et al.
20090192389 July 30, 2009 Eilers et al.
20090209954 August 20, 2009 Muller et al.
20090244482 October 1, 2009 Elsner et al.
20090281530 November 12, 2009 Korn
20090287232 November 19, 2009 Davis
20100002837 January 7, 2010 Gertner et al.
20100004641 January 7, 2010 Frey et al.
20100004643 January 7, 2010 Frey et al.
20100022994 January 28, 2010 Frey et al.
20100022995 January 28, 2010 Frey et al.
20100022996 January 28, 2010 Frey et al.
20100042079 February 18, 2010 Frey et al.
20100060855 March 11, 2010 Graether
20100114079 May 6, 2010 Myers et al.
20100249761 September 30, 2010 Ruiz et al.
20100256614 October 7, 2010 Donitzky et al.
20100256615 October 7, 2010 Blumenkranz et al.
20100274228 October 28, 2010 Mrochen et al.
20100292676 November 18, 2010 Larsen
20100292678 November 18, 2010 Frey et al.
20100312231 December 9, 2010 Singh
20100324542 December 23, 2010 Kurtz
20100331829 December 30, 2010 Bor et al.
20110022035 January 27, 2011 Porter et al.
20110022036 January 27, 2011 Frey et al.
20110028950 February 3, 2011 Raksi et al.
20110040293 February 17, 2011 Bor
20110092965 April 21, 2011 Slatkine
20110118712 May 19, 2011 Lubatschowski et al.
20110137301 June 9, 2011 Bartoli
20110149240 June 23, 2011 Alpins
20110160710 June 30, 2011 Frey et al.
20110160711 June 30, 2011 Naranjo-Tackman et al.
20110166557 July 7, 2011 Naranjo-Tackman et al.
20110172649 July 14, 2011 Schuele et al.
20110184395 July 28, 2011 Schuele et al.
20110187995 August 4, 2011 Frey et al.
20110190739 August 4, 2011 Frey et al.
20110190740 August 4, 2011 Frey et al.
20110292340 December 1, 2011 Shimizu et al.
20120016350 January 19, 2012 Myers et al.
20120089134 April 12, 2012 Horvath et al.
20120229767 September 13, 2012 Alpins
20120265181 October 18, 2012 Frey
20120271286 October 25, 2012 Curatu et al.
20120296321 November 22, 2012 Frey et al.
20120330290 December 27, 2012 Gray et al.
20130265542 October 10, 2013 Frey et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2553963 August 2005 CA
2680072 September 2008 CA
10 2005 001 249 July 2006 DE
0 397 962 November 1990 EP
0 933 060 August 1999 EP
1 970 034 September 2008 EP
2 497 087 July 1982 FR
5-115437 May 1993 JP
WO 91/19539 December 1991 WO
WO 01/13838 March 2001 WO
WO 03/002010 January 2003 WO
WO 2005/070358 August 2005 WO
WO 2006/074469 July 2006 WO
WO 2008/112292 September 2008 WO
WO 2008/150330 December 2008 WO
WO 2010/022745 March 2010 WO
WO 2012/051490 April 2012 WO
Other references
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/337,127, filed Jan. 20, 2006, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,819, filed May 1, 2006, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,285, filed Jul. 2, 2008, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,295, filed Jul. 2, 2008, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,021, filed Jul. 24, 2009, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,211, filed Jul. 24, 2009, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,412, filed Jul. 24, 2009, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,850, filed Jan. 12, 2010, Myers et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,845, filed Jul. 7, 2010, Naranjo-Tackman et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,859, filed Jul. 7, 2010, Naranjo-Tackman et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,783, filed Jul. 7, 2010, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,818, filed Jul. 21, 2010, Porter et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,870, filed Jul. 23, 2010, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 29/377,018, filed Oct. 15, 2010, Bott et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 29/377,054, filed Oct. 15, 2010, Bott et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,593, filed Jan. 28, 2010, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,499, filed Jan. 31, 2011, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,702, filed Jan. 31, 2011, Frey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/243,406, filed Sep. 23, 2011, Myers et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,130, filed Mar. 22, 2012, Frey.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,149, filed Mar. 22, 2012, Frey et al.
  • FDA PMA P030002 titled “crystalens™ Model AT-45 Accomodating Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens (OIO)”, dated Nov. 14, 2003, 16 pgs.
  • FDA PMA P040020 titled “AcrySof® ResSTOR® Apodized Diffractive Optic Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses, Models MA60d3 and SA60D3”, dated Mar. 21, 2005, 29 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2011/056279, dated Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,319, filed Mar. 22, 2012, Grey et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/435,103, filed Mar. 30, 2012, Curatu et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/681,004, filed Nov. 19, 2012, Frey et al.
  • Author unknown, “Statement of the Use of Animals in Opthalmic and Visual Research”, The Association for Research in Vision and Opthalmology, Obtained from the Internet at: http//www.arvo.org/aboutavro as of Nov. 18, 2010, 3 pgs.
  • Akchurin, Garif et al., “Evaluation of the degree of turbidity if cataract lens and its correlation with retinal visual acuity”, SPIE, vol. 3591, Jan. 1999, pp. 74-81.
  • Al-Ghoul, K. J. et al., “Distribution and Type of Morphological Damage in Human Nuclear Age-Related Cataracts”, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of North Carolina and Duke University Eye Center, 1996, pp. 237-251.
  • Al-Ghoul, Kristin J. et al., “Structural Evidence of Human Nuclear Fiber Compaction as a Function of Ageing and Cataractogenesis”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 72, 2001, pp. 199-214.
  • Alio, et al., “Crystalline Lens Optical Dysfunction through Aging”, Ophthalmology, vol. 112, No. 11, Nov. 2005, pp. 2022-2029.
  • Amann, Josef et al., “Increased Endothelial Cell Density in the Paracentral and Peripheral Regions of the Human Cornea”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 135, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 584-590.
  • Amendt, M. Strauss et al., “Modeling of bubble dynamics in relation to medical applications”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 2975, 1997, pp. 362-373.
  • Ansari, Rafat R. et al., “Measuring lens opacity: combining quasi-elastic light scattering with Scheimpflug imaging system”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3246, 1998, pp. 35-42.
  • Anschutz, Till, M.D., “Laser Correction of Hyperopia and Presbyopia”, vol. 34, No. 4, 1994, pp. 107-137.
  • Apple, David J. et al., “Preparation and Study of Human Eyes Obtained Postmortem with the Miyake Posterior Photographic Technique”, Ophthalmology, vol. 97, No. 6, Jun. 1990, pp. 810-816.
  • Armstrong, Larry “A cataract Breakthrough May Be on the Way”, Business Week, Mar. 23, 1998, pp. 90-92.
  • Aston, Adam, “Why Settle for 20/20?”, Business Week, Mar. 17, 2003, pp. 95-96.
  • Azzam, Naiel et al., “Long-term lens organ culture system to determine age-related effects of UV irradiation on the eye lens”, Experimental Eye Research, vol. 79, 2004, pp. 903-911.
  • Back, Arthur P. et al., “Correction of Presbyopia with Contact Lenses: Comparative Success Rates with Three Systems”, Optometry & Vision Science, 1989, vol. 66, No. 8, pp. 518-525.
  • Balaram, Mini et al., Noncontact Specular Microscopy of Human Lens Epithelium, IOVS, vol. 41, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 474-481.
  • Barak, Adiel et al., “Anterior capsulotomy using the CO2 laser”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3246, 1998, pp. 196-198.
  • Bath, Patricia E. et al., “Endocapsular Excimer Laser Phakoablation Through a 1-mm Incision”, Opthalmic Laser Therapy, vol. 2, No. 4, 1987, pp. 245-249.
  • Beers, A. P. A. et al. “Age-Related Changes in the Accommodation Mechanism”, Optometry and Vision Science, 1996, vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 235-242.
  • Beers, A. P. A. et al., “In Vivo Determination of the Biomechanical Properties of the Component Elements of the Accommodation Mechanism”, Vision Res., vol. 34, 1994, pp. 2897-2905.
  • Bellows, John G., M.D. et al., “B. Cataracta Complicata”, Traumatic Cataract, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 270-272.
  • Ben-Sira, I. et al., “Clinical method for measurement of light back scattering from the in vivo human lens”, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 19, No. 4 (Reports), Apr. 1980, pp. 435-437.
  • Benjamin, William J., “Borish's Clinical Refraction”, W.B. Saunders, publishers, copyright 1998, p. 110.
  • Bettelheim, Frederick A. et al., “Syneretic Response of Aging Normal Human Lens to Pressure”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 44, No. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 258-263.
  • Bigler, Emmanuel, “Depth of field and Scheimpflug's rule: a “minimalist” geometrical approach”, published unknown, 2002, pp. 1-17.
  • Billie, J. F. et al., “3D Imaging of the Human Eye Using the laser Tomographic Scanner Lts”, publisher unknown, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, 2 pgs.
  • Bito, L.Z. et al., “Age-dependent loss of accommodative amplitude in rhesus monkeys: an animal model for presbyopia”, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 23, No. 1, Jul. 1982, pp. 23-31.
  • Bliss, E. S., “Pulse Duration Dependence of laser Damage Mechamisms”, Opto-Electronics, vol. 3, 1971, pp. 99-108.
  • Bor, Zs. PhD., et al., “Plume Emission, Shock Wave and Surface Wave Formation During Excimer Laser Ablation of the Cornea”, Supplement to Retroactive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 9, Mar./Apr. 1993, pp. S111-S115.
  • Borja, David et al., “Crystalline Lens MTF Measurement During Simulated Accommodation”, Proc. of SPIE, 2005, vol. 5688, pp. 26-32.
  • Borkman, Raymond F. et al., “Evidence for a Free Radical Mechanism in Aging and u.v.—Irradiated Ocular Lenses”, Exp. Eye Res., 1977, vol. 25, pp. 303-309.
  • Braham, Lewis, “Eye Surgery: It's Getting Sharper”, Business Week, Oct. 18, 2004, pp. 142-143.
  • Breitenfeld, P. et al., “Finite Element Method-Simulation of the Human Lens During Accommodation”, publiasher unknown, vol. 5863, 2005, 9 pgs.
  • Breitling, Detlef et al., “Fundamental aspects in machining of metals with short and ultrashort laser pulses”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5339, 2004, pp. 1-15.
  • Brian, G. et al., “Cataract Blindness—Challenges for the 21st Century”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 79, No. 3, 2001, pp. 249-256.
  • Bron, A.J., “The Ageing Lens”, Opthalmologics, vol. 214, 2000, pp. 86-104.
  • Brown, Nicholas, “Dating the onset of cataract”, Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of the United Kingdom, vol. 96, 1976, pp. 18-23.
  • Brown, Nicholas “The Change in Lens Curvature with Age”, Exp. Eye Res. (1974), vol. 19, pp. 175-183.
  • Brown, Nicholas “The Change in Shape and Internal Form of the Lens of the Eye on Accommodation”, Exp. Eye Res. (1973) vol. 15, pp. 441-459.
  • Burd, H.J. et al., “Can reliable values of Young's modulus be deduced from Fisher's (1971) spinning lens measurements?”,Vision Research, vol. unknown, 2005, pp. 1-15.
  • Burd, H.J. et al., “Numerical modeling of the accommodating lens”, Vision Research, vol. 42, 2002, pp. 2235-2251.
  • Campbell, Melanie C. W., “Measurement of Refractive Index in an Intact Crystalline Lens”, Vision Research, vol. 24, No. 5, 1984, pp. 409-415.
  • Carey, James et al., “Propagation and Characterization of Ultrashort Laser Pulses”, Harvard University, 2003, pp. 1-30.
  • Chaker, M. et al., “Interaction of a 1 psec laser pulse with solid matter”, Phys. Fluids B 3, vol. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 167-175, plus cover page.
  • Charles, M. W. et al., “Dimensions of the Human Eye Relevant to Radiation Protection”, Phys. Med. Biol., 1975, vol. 20, No. 2, © 1975, pp. 202-218.
  • Chen, Wei-Li et al., Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Findings in Rabbit Eyes Undergoing Scleral Suction during Lamellar Refractive Surgery, IOVS, vol. 43, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 3665-3672.
  • Chien, C. Y. et al., “Production of a high-density and high-temperature plasma with an intense high-contrast subpicosecond laser”, Optics Letters, vol. 18, No. 18, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 1535-1537.
  • Claflin, E. S. et al., “Configuring an electrostatic membrane mirror by least-squares fitting with analytically derived influence functions”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., vol. 3, No. 11, 1986, pp. 1833-1839.
  • Coleman, D. Jackson et al., “Presbyopia, Accommodation, and the Mature Catenary”, Ophthalmology, vol. 108, No. 9, Sep. 2001, pp. 1544-1551.
  • Cook, Christopher A. et al., “Aging of the Human Crystalline Lens and Anterior Segment”, Vision Res., 1994, vol. 34, No. 22, pp. 2945-2954.
  • Corkum, P. B. et al., “Thermal Response of Metals to Ultrashort-Pulse Laser Excitation”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, No. 25, Dec. 19, 1988, pp. 2886-2889.
  • Costagliola, Ciro et al., “ArF 193 nm Excimer Laser Corneal Surgery as a Possible Risk Factor in Cataractogenesis”, Exp. Eye Res., 1994, vol. 58, pp. 453-457.
  • Cotlier, Edward, M.D., “The Lens”, Adler's Physiology of the Eye, copyright 2003, pp. 268-290.
  • Crawford, Kathryn S. et al., “The Role of the Iris in Accommodation of Rhesus Monkeys”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 31, No. 10, Oct. 1990, pp. 2185-2190.
  • Croft, Mary Ann et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia”, publisher unknown, vol. 41, 2001, pp. 33-46.
  • Croft, Mary Ann et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia: The Ciliary Neuromuscular View”, Opthalmol Clin N Am, vol. 19, 2006, pp. 13-24.
  • Croft, Mary Ann et al., Accommodative Ciliary Body and Lens Function in Rhesus Monkeys, I: Normal Lens, Zonule and Ciliary Process Configuration in the Iridectomized Eye, IOVS, vol. 47, No. 3, Mar. 2006, pp. 1076-1086.
  • Croft, Mary Ann et al., “The Zonula, Lens, and Circumlental Space in the Normal Iridectomized Rhesus Monkey Eye”, IOVS, vol. 47, No. 3, Mar. 2006, pp. 1087-1095.
  • Cromie, William J., “Laser Makes History's Fastest Holes”, The Harvard University Gazette, 1999, obtained at: http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/10.07/laser.html, 6 pags.
  • Czygan, G. et al., “Mechanical testing of isolated senile human eye lens nuclei”, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 18, No. 5, 1996, pp. 345-349.
  • Datta, Debajyoti, “Tissue Surgery and Subcellular Photodisruption with Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, Thesis for Dept. of Physics, Harvard University, May 2002, pp. 1-74.
  • Dausinger, Friedrich et al., “Micro-machining with ultrashort laser pulses: From basic understanding to technical applications”, publisher unknown, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 1-10.
  • Dholakia, Sheena A. et al., “Prospective evaluation of phacoemulsification in adults younger than 50 years”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 31, 2005, pp. 1327-1333.
  • Douven, Lucien F.A. et al., “Characterization of Mechanical Behaviour of Human Skin In Vivo”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3914, 2000, pp. 618-629.
  • Du, D. et al., “Laser-induced breakdown by impact ionization in SiO2 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 64, No. 23, Jun. 6, 1994, pp. 3071-3073.
  • Ehrmann, Klaus et al., “Evaluation of porcine crystalline lenses in comparison with molded polymer gel lenses with an improved ex vivo accommodation simulator”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5688, 2005, pp. 240-251.
  • Ehrmann, Klaus et al., “Ex Vivo Accommodation Simulator II—Concept and Preliminary Results”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5314, 2004, pp. 48-58.
  • Eisner, Georg, “Eye Surgery—An Introduction to operative technique”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980, pp. 14-19.
  • El-Osta, Austen a.R. et al., “In vitro model for the study of human posterior capsule opacification”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 29, 2003, pp. 1593-1600.
  • Erpelding, Todd N. et al., “Bubble-Based Acoustic Radiation Force for Monitoring Intraocular Lens Elasticity”, IEEE Intl Ultrasonics Symposium, volue unknown, 2004, pp. 732-735.
  • Fagerholm, Per P.P., “The Response of the Lens to Trauma”, Trans. Ophtal. Soc. U. K., 1982, vol. 102, p. 369-374.
  • Farnsworth, P.N. et al., “Anterior Zonular Shifts with Age”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 28, 1979, pp. 291-297.
  • Findl, Oliver et al., “Laserinterferometric Assessment of Pilocarpine-Induced Movement of an Accommodating Intraocular Lens—A Randomized Trial”, Ophthalmology, vol. 111, No. 8, Aug. 2004, pp. 1515-1521.
  • Fisher, R.F. et al., “Changes in lens fibres after damage to the lens capsule”, publisher unknown, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, 4 pgs.
  • Fisher, R.F., “Elastic Constants of the Human Lens Capsule”, J. Physiol., vol. 201, 1969, pp. 1-19.
  • Fisher, R.F., “Presbyopia and the Changes With Age in the Human Crystalline Lens”, J. Physiol., vol. 228, 1973, pp. 765-779.
  • Fisher, R. F., “The Ciliary Body in Accommodation”, Trans. Opthalmol. Soc. U.K., vol. 105, 1986, pp. 208-219.
  • Fisher, R.F., “The Elastic Constants of the Human Lens”, J. Physiol., vol. 212, 1971, pp. 147-180.
  • Fisher, R. F. et al., “The elastic constants and ultrastructural organization of a basement membrane (lens capsule)”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., vol. 193, 1976, pp. 335-358.
  • Fisher, R.F., “The Force of Contraction of the Human Ciliary Muscle During Accommodation”, J. Physiol., vol. 270, 1977, pp. 51-74.
  • Fisher, R. F., “The Mechanics of Accommodation in Relation to Presbyopia”, Eye, vol. 2, 1988, pp. 646-649.
  • Fleck, Brian W. et al., “Q-switched Nd:YAG laser disruption of rabbit lens nucleus”, Laser and Light in Ophthalmology, 1990, vol. 3. No. 3, pp. 227-232.
  • Foster, C. Stephen et al., “Smolin and Thoft's the Cornea: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353 No. 23, 2005, pp. 2519-2520.
  • Fujimoto, James et al., “Biomedical Optics”, Photonics West, Proc. of SPIE, vol. unknown, 2005, pp. 23-70.
  • Garner, LF et al., “Changes in Equivalent and Gradient Refractive Index of the Crystalline Lens with Accommodation”, Optom, Vis. Sci., vol. 74, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 114-119.
  • Garner, LF et al., “Changes in Ocular Dimensions and Refraction with Accommodation”, Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 17, No. 1, 1997, pp. 12-17.
  • Garner, Margaret H. et al., “Selective oxidation of cysteine and methionine in normal and senile cataractous lenses”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 77, No. 3, Mar. 1980, pp. 1274-1277.
  • Gayen, Tapan K. et al., “Near-infrared laser welding of aortic and skin tissues and microscopic investigation of welding efficacy”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4949, 2003, pp. 182-185.
  • Gershenzon, A. et al., “Clinical and Epidemiology—New software for lens retro-illumination digital image analysis”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 1999, vol. 27, pp. 170-172.
  • Giblin, Frank J. et al., “Nuclear Light Scattering, Disulfide Formation and Membrane Damage in Lenses of Older Guinea Pigs Treated with Hyperbaric Oxygen”, Exp. Eye Res., 1995, vol. 60, pp. 219-235.
  • Gills, James P., “Treating astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2002, vol. 13, pp. 2-6.
  • Gimbel, Howard V. et al., “Intrastromal Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Nd:YLF Laser”, publisher unknown, vol. 34, Iss. 4, 1994, pp. 139-145.
  • Glasser, Adrian et al., “Accommodative Changes in Lens Diameter in Rhesus Monkeys”, IOVSs, vol. 47, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 278-286.
  • Glasser, A. et al., “Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia”, Vision Research, vol. 39, 1999, pp. 1991-2015.
  • Glasser, Adrian et al., “On modeling the causes of presbyopia”, Vision Research, vol. 41, 2001, pp. 3083-3087.
  • Glasser, A. et al., “On the potential causes of presbyopia”, Vision Research, vol. 39, 1999, pp. 1267-1272.
  • Glasser, Adrian et al., “Presbyopia and the Optical Changes in the Human Crystalline Lens with Age”, Vision Res., vol. 38, No. 2, 1998, pp. 209-229.
  • Glasser, Adrian et al., “Ultrasound Biomicroscopy of the Aging Rhesus Monkey Ciliary Region”, Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 78, No. 6, 2001, pp. 417-424.
  • Goodenough, Daniel A., “Lens gap junctions: a structural hypothesis for nonregulated low-resistance intercellular pathways”, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., vol. 18, No. 11, Nov. 1979, pp. 1104-1122.
  • Grace, Jeffery M. et al., “Repetitively Pulsed Ruby Lasers As Light Sources for High-Speed Photography”, Optical Engineering, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1998, pp. 1-26.
  • Gwon, Arlene et al., “Focal laser photophacoablation of normal and cataractous lenses in rabbits: Preliminary report”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 21, May 1995, pp. 282-286.
  • Habib, Maged S. et al., “Myopic Intrastromal Photorefractive Keratectomy With the Neodymium-Yttrium Lithium Fluoride Picosecond Laser in the Cat Cornea”, Arch Ophthalmol., vol. 113, Apr. 1995, pp. 499-505.
  • Hahn, D.W., “Dynamics of Ablation Plume Particles Generated During Excimer Laser Corneal Ablation”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 16, 1995, pp. 384-389.
  • Hamaoui, Marie et al., “Ex-vivo testing of crystalline lens substitutes: a pilot study”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3908, 2000, pp. 123-130.
  • Hammer, Daniel X. et al., “Dual OCT/SLO Imager with Three-Dimensional Tracker”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5688, 2005, pp. 33-44.
  • Hammer, Daniel et al., “Shielding Properties of Laser-Induced Breakdown in Water for Pulse Durations From 5 ns to 125 fs”, Applied Optics, 1997, vol. 36, No. 22, pp. 5630-5640.
  • Hanson, S.R.A. et al., “The major in vivo modifications of the human water-insoluble lens crystallins are disulfide bonds, deamidation, methionine oxidation and backbone cleavage”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 71, 2000, pp. 195-207.
  • Hara, Tsutomu, M.D. et al., “Complications associated with endocapsular balloon implantation rabbit eyes”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 20, Sep. 1994, pp. 507 and 512.
  • Harding, J. J., “Disulphide Cross-linked Protein of High Molecular Weight in Human Cataractous Lens”, Exp. Eye Res. (1973), vol. 17, pp. 377-383.
  • Hartwick, Andrew T. E. et al., “Ephitelial activity of hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in cultured bovine lenses recovering from pharmaceutical-induced optical damage”, Molecular Vision, vol. 9, 2003, pp. 594-600.
  • Heisterkamp, Alexander et al., “Nonlinear effects inside corneal tissue after fs-photodisruption”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4433, 2001, pp. 55-60.
  • Heisterkamp, Alexander et al., “Pulse energy dependence of subcellular dissection by femtosecond laser pulses”, Optics Express, vol. 13, No. 10, May 2005, pp. 3690-3696.
  • Hemenger, Richard P. et al., “Change With Age of the Refractive Index Gradient of the Human Ocular Lens”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Mar. 1995. vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 703-707.
  • Heys, Karl Robert et al., “Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia?”, Molecular Vision, vol. 10, 2004, pp. 956-963.
  • Ho, A. et al., “Feasibility of simultaneous correction of ametropia by varying gel refractive index with phaco-ersatz”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4245, 2001, pp. 119-128.
  • Hoffman, Richard S. et al., “Refractive lens exchange as a refractive surgery modality”, Copyright© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 22-28.
  • Holzer, Mike P. et al., “Corneal flap complications in refractive surgery—Part 1: Development of an experimental animal model”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 29, Apr. 2003, pp. 795-802.
  • Holzer, Mike P. et al., “Corneal flap complications in refractive surgery—Part 2: Postoperative treatments of diffuse lamellar keratitis in an experimental animal model”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 29, Apr. 2003, pp. 803-807.
  • Horwitz, Joseph, “α-Crystallin can function as a molecular chaperone”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 89. Nov. 1992, pp. 10449-10453.
  • Hu, Tian-Sheng et al., “Reversal of Galactose Cataract with Sorbinil in Rats”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, May 1983, vol. 24, pp. 640-644.
  • Huber, G. et al., “Room-temperature 2-μm HO:YAG and 3-μm ER:YAG Lasers”, Journal de Physique, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, 3 pgs.
  • Hunter, David, “First, Gather the Data”, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, No. 4, Jan. 26, 2006, pp. 329-331.
  • Jacques, Paul F. et al., “Long-term vitamin C supplement use and prevalence of early age-related lens opacities”, Am J Clin Nutr, 1997; 66, pp. 911-6.
  • Johannesson, Mattias, “Active Range Imaging 2”, PhD-Thesis: SIMD architectures for Range and Radar Imaging, Linkoping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertations No. 399, 2005, pp. 1-34.
  • Jones, C.E. et al., “Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)”, Vision Research, vol. 45, 2005, pp. 2352-2366.
  • Juhasz, Tibor, Ph.D. et al., “Dynamics of Shock Waves and Cavitation Bubbles Generated by Picosecond Laser Pulses in Corneal Tissue and Water”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 15, 1994, pp. 91-98.
  • Juhasz, T. et al., “Time resolved observations of shock waves and cavitatin bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water”, Lasers in Surgery and Med, vol. 19, 1996, pp. 23-31.
  • Juhasz, T. et al., “Time-resolved Studies of Plasma-Mediated Surface Ablation of Soft Biological Tissue with Near-Infrared Picosecond Laser Pulses”, SPIE, vol. 2975, 1997, pp. 271-281.
  • Kasthurirangan, Sanjeev et al., “Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans”, Vision Research, vol. 43, 2003, pp. 2945-2956.
  • Kasthurirangan, Sanjeev, “Influence of Amplitude and Starting Point on Accommodative Dynamics in Humans”, IOVS, vol. 46, No. 9, Sep. 2005, pp. 3463-3472.
  • Kaufman, Paul L., M.D., “Accommodation and Presbyopia: Neuromuscular and Biophysical Aspects”, Adler's Physiology of the Eye, date unknown but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 391-411.
  • Klem, D. E. et al., “The Interaction of Intense Femtosecond Laser Pulses with Solid Targets”, paper prepared under the auspices of the U.S. Dept. of Energy for the Short Wavelength V: Physics with Intense Laser Pulses Second Topical Meeting on Mar. 29-31, published Dec. 30, 1992, 1993, 6 pgs.
  • Keeney, Arthur H., M.D., “Intralenticular Foreign Bodies”, Arch Ophthal., vol. 86, Nov. 1971, pp. 499-501.
  • König, Karsten et al., “Are Femtosecond Lasers Safe for Ophthalmic Applications?”, Fraunhofer Institute of Biomedical Technologies, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 1-16.
  • König, Karsten et al., “Cornea surgery with nanojoule femtosecond laser pulses”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5688, 2005, pp. 288-293.
  • König, Karsten et al., “First in vivo animal studies on intraocular nanosurgery and multiphoton tomography with low-energy 80 MHz near infrared femtosecond laser pulses”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5314, 2004, pp. 262-269.
  • Koopmans, Steven A. et al., “Polymer Refilling of Presbyopic Human Lenses in Vitro Restores the Ability to Undergo Accommodative Changes”, IOVS, vol. 44, No. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 250-257.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “A Model for Accommodation in the Young Human Eye: The Effects of Lens Elastic Anisotropy on the Mechanism”, Vision Res., vol. 23, No. 12, 1983, pp. 1679-1686.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia in the Human Eye—Aging of the Anterior Segment”, Vision Res., vol. 29, No. 12, 1989, pp. 1685-1692.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia in the Human Eye—Changes in the Anterior Segment and Crystalline Lens With Focus”, IOVS, vol. 38, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 569-578.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Analysis of Human Crystalline Lens Curvature as a Function of Accommodative State and Age”, Vision Res., vol. 24, No. 10, 1984, pp. 1141-1151.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “How the Human Eye Focuses”, Scientific American, Jul. 1988, pp. 92-99.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Model of the Accommodative Mechanism in the Human Eye”, Vis. Res., vol. 22, 1982, pp. 917-927.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Scheimpflug and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior segment: a comparative study”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 21, No. 3, Mar. 2004, pp. 346-354.
  • Koretz, Jane F. et al., “The Zones of Discontinuity in the Human Lens: Development and Distribution with Age”, Vision Res., vol. 34, No. 22, 1994, pp. 2955-2962.
  • Krag, Susanne et al., “Biomechanical Characteristics of the Human Anterior Lens Capsule in Relation to Age”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 38, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 357-362.
  • Krag, Susanne, “Biomechanical measurements of the lens capsule”, Scandinavian University Theses, 1999, 3 pgs.
  • Krag, Susanne et al., “Mechanical Properties of the Human Posterior Lens Capsule”, IOVS, vol. 44, No. 2, 2003, pp. 691-696.
  • Krauss, Joel et al., “Laser Interactions With the Cornea”, Survey of Ophthalmology A689, vol. 31, No. 1, Jul./Aug. 1986, pp. 37-53.
  • Kronemyer, Bob, “Accommodating IOL? Impossible, Recent Study Seems to Say”. Ocular Surgery News, http://www.slackmc.com, Sep. 15, 1996, 2 pgs.
  • Krueger, Ronald R. et al., “Experimental Increase in Accommodative Potential after Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Photodisruption of Paired Cadaver Lenses”, Ophthalmology, vol. 108, No. 11, 2001, pp. 2122-2129.
  • Krueger, Ronald R. et al., “First safety study of femtosecond laser photodisruption in animal lenses: Tissue morphology and cataractogenesis”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 31, Dec. 2005, pp. 2386-2394.
  • Krueger, Ronald R., M.D., et al., “Nonmechanical Microkeratomes Using Laser and Water Jet Technology”, Publisher unknown, date unknown but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 1-33.
  • Krueger, R.R., “Surf's Up—Catch a wave with a waterjet”, Jrn. Ref. Surg., vol. 14, No. 3, May/Jun. 1998, pp. 280-281.
  • Krueger, Ronald R., M.D. et al., “Ultrastructure of Picosecond Laser Intrastromal Photodisruption”, Journal of Retractive Surgery, vol. 12, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 607-612.
  • Kuizenga, Dirk J., “FM-Laser Operation of the Nd:YAG Laser”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 6, No. 11, 1970, pp. 673-677.
  • Kurapkienė, S. et al., “The relationship of ultrasonic and mechanical properties of human nuclear cataract. A pilot study”, Ultragarsas, vol. 54, No. 1, 2005, pp. 39-43.
  • Kurtz, Ron et al., “Femtosecond Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3591, 1999, pp. 209-219.
  • Kurtz, Ron et al., “Ophthalmic Applications of Femtosecond Lasers”, Proc. f SPIE, vol. 3616, 1999, pp. 51-65.
  • Kurtz, Ron M. et al., “Optimal Laser Parameters for Intrastromal Corneal Surgery”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3255, 1998, pp. 56-66.
  • Kurtz, Ron M., MD, et al., “Photo-disruption in the Human Cornea as a Function of Laser Pulse Width”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 13, Nov./Dec. 1997, pp. 653-658.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “A Quantitative Analysis of Sutural Contributions to Variability in Back Vertex Distance and Transmittance in Rabbit Lenses as a Function of Development, Growth, and Age”, Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 79, No. 3, Mar. 2002, pp. 193-204.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Anatomy of Aged and Senile Cataractous Lenses”, from “Biochemistry of the Crystalline Lens”, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 564-575.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Biochemistry of the Crystalline Lens; Anatomy of Aged and Senile Cataractous Lenses”, pp. 564-575.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Development of lens sutures”, Int. J. Dev. Biol., vol. 48, 2004, pp. 889-902.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Electron Microscope Observations of the Crystalline Lens”, Microscopy Research and Technique, 1996, vol. 33, pp. 441-479.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Fibre cell organization in crystalline lenses”, Experimental Eye Research, vol. 78, 2004, pp. 673-687.
  • Kuszak, J. et al., “Gap Junctions of Chick Lens Fiber Cells”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 27, 1978, pp. 495-498.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Lens Optical Quality and Lens Sutures”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 32, No. 7, Jun. 1991, pp. 2123-2129.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Lens Optical Quality is a Direct Function of Lens Sutural Architecture”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 32, No. 7, Jun. 1991, pp. 2119-2129.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Animal Model Lens Anatomy: Accommodative Range is Related to Fiber Structure and Organization”, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, 26 pgs.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Suppression of Post-Vitrectomy Lens Changes in the Rabbit by Novel Benzopyranyl Esters and Amides”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 75, 2002, pp. 459-473.
  • Kuszak, JR et al., “The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality II Primate Lenses”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 59, 1994, pp. 521-535.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “The Relationship Between Rabbit Lens Optical Quality and Sutural Anatomy after Vitrectomy”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 71, 2000, pp. 267-281.
  • Kuszak Jer R. et al., “The Structure of the Vertebrate Lens”, Chapter 4, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 71-118.
  • Kuszak, J. et al., “The Surface Morphology of Embryonic and Adult Chick Lens-Fiber Cells”, The American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 159, 1982, pp. 395-410.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “The Use of an Ex Vivo Mechanical Stretching Apparatus to Examine Fiber Ultrastructure During Accommodation”, undated but prior to Jul. 2009, 1 pg.
  • Kuwabara, Toichiro, et al., “Electron Microscopic Study of Galactose-Induced Cataract”, Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 8, No. 2, Apr. 1969, pp. 133-149.
  • L'Esperance, Jr. “Ophthalmic Lasers Photocoagulation, Photoradiation and Surgery”, 2nd Edition, The C.V. Mosby Company, copyright 1983, pp. 529-538.
  • Lerman, Sidney, et al., “A Method for Detecting 8-Methoxypsoralen in the Ocular Lens”, Science, vol. 197, Sep. 23, 1977, 1287-1288.
  • Lerman, Sidney, et al., “Photosensitization of the lens by 8-meth-oxypsoralen”, Invent. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., vol. 16, No. 11, Nov. 1977, pp. 1065-1068.
  • Lerman, Sidney, M.D., “Photosensitizing Drugs and Their Possible Role in Enhancing Ocular Toxicity”, Ophthalmology, vol. 93, No. 3, Mar. 1986, pp. 304-318.
  • Lerman, Sidney, et al., “Psoralen-long-wave Ultraviolet Therapy and Human Cataractogenesis”, Invent. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., vol. 23, No. 6, Dec. 1982, pp. 801-804.
  • Lerman, Sidney, et al., “Spectroscopic Evaluation and Classification of the Normal, Aging, and Cataractous Lens”, Ophthl. Res., vol. 8, 1976, pp. 335-353.
  • Lim, Seung Jeong, M.D. et al., “Analysis of zonular-free zone and lens size in relation to axial length of eye with age”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 24, Mar. 1998, pp. 390-396.
  • Liu, X. et al., “Competition between Ponderomotive abd Thermal Forces in Short-Scale-Length Laser Plasmas”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, No. 13, Sep. 28, 1992, pp. 1935-1938.
  • Liu, Xinbing et al., “In vivo plasma-mediated ablation as a function of laser pulse width”, SPIE, vol. 2975, 1997, pp. 282-288.
  • Loerscher, Hanspeter et al., “Noncontact Trephination of the Cornea Using a Pulsed Hydrogen Floride Laser”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 104, Nov. 1987, pp. 471-475.
  • Loesel, Frieder H. et al., “Laser-Induced Optical Breakdown on Hard and Soft Tissues and Its Dependence on the Pulse Duration: Experiment and Model”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 32, No. 10, Oct. 1996, pp. 1717-1722.
  • Lou, Marjorie F., et al., “Protein-Thiol Mixed Disulfides in Human Lens”, published by Academic Press Limited, 1992, pp. 889-896.
  • Lubatschowski, Holger, “Surgical Laser System for the Treatment of Presbyopia”, 7th Biotech in Europe Investor Forum, Switzerland, Oct. 2-3, 2007, 9 pgs.
  • Lutze, Margaret et al., “Lenses of Diabetic Patients “Yellow” at an Accelerated Rate Similar to Older Normals”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 32, No. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 194-199.
  • Maguen, Ezra, et al., “Excimer Laser Ablation of the Human Lens at 308 nm with a Fiber Delivery System”, J. Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 15, Jul. 1989, pp. 409-414.
  • Manns, Fabrice et al., “Radius of Curvature and Aspericity of the Anterior and Posterior Surface of Human Cadaver Crystalline Lenses”, Experimental Eye Research, 2004, vol. 78, pp. 39-51.
  • Marion, II, John E. et al., “Medical Applications of Ultra-Short Pulse Lasers”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3616, 1999, pp. 42-50.
  • Masters, B.R., “Three-dimensional Microscopic Tomographic Imaging of the Cataract in a Human Lens in Vivo”, Optics Express 332, vol. 3, No. 9, Oct. 1998, pp. 332-338.
  • Mathias, R.T. et al., “Physiological Properties of the Normal Lens”, Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 21-50.
  • McBrien, N. A et al., “Experimental Myopia in a Diurnal Mammal (Sciurus Carolinesis) with No Accommodative Ability”, J. Physiol., vol. 469, 1993, pp. 427-441.
  • McCourt, M. E et al., Refractive State, Depth of Focus, and Accommodation of the Eye of the California ground squirrel (Spermophiliu Beecheyi), Vision Res, vol. 24, No. 10, 1984, pp. 1261-1266.
  • McDonald, Marguerita B., et al., “Central Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia, The Blind Eye Study”, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 108, Jun. 1990, pp. 799-808.
  • Michael, Ralph et al., “Refractive Index of Lens Fiber Membranes in Different Parts of the Crystalline Lens”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4611, 2002, pp. 159-164.
  • Moffat, B.A. et al., “Age-Related Changes in Refractive Index Distribution and Power of the Human Lens as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Micro-Imaging In Vitro”, Vision Research, vol. 42, 2002, pp. 1683-1693.
  • Müller, F. et al., “A Comparative Study of Deposition of Thin Films by Laser Induced PVD with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses”, SPIE, vol. 1858, 1993, pp. 464-474.
  • Mutti, Donald O., et al., “A Video Technique for Phakometry of the Human Crystalline Lens”, Investigative Ophthalmology, & Visual Science, vol. 33, No. 5, Apr. 1992, pp. 1771-1781.
  • Myers, Raymond I. et al., “Feasibility of Using Lasers to Retard Cataract Development in the Ocular Lens by Restoring Lens Movement”; undated but prior to Jul. 2009, pp. 1-22.
  • Myers, Raymond I. et al., “Novel Approaches to Correction of Presbyopia With Laser Modification of the Crystalline Lens”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 14, Mar./Apr. 1998; pp. 136-139.
  • Nanevicz, Tania M., et al., “Excimer Laser Ablation of the Lens”, Arch Ophthamol, vol. 104, Dec. 1986, pp. 1825-1829.
  • Naranjo-Tackman, Ramon et al., “Subepithelial arquate (sic) incisions, using the femtosecond surgical laser, in post-phaco astigmatism: Preliminary visual and refractive results”, a powerpoint presentation shown at ESCRS meeting held in London England in Sep. 2006, 8 pgs.
  • Neev, Joseph, “Ultrashort Pulse Lasers: A New Tool for Biomedical Applications”, SPIE, vol. 3255; pp. 2-7.
  • Nichamin, Louis D., “Treating astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2003, vol. 14, p. 35-38.
  • Oberheide, Uwe et al., “Therapy Monitoring of Laser Cyclophotocoagulation”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4611, 2002, pp. 48-53.
  • O'Donnell, Colleen B., et al., “Ablation Smoothness as a Function of Excimer Laser Delivery System”, J. Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 22, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 682-685.
  • O'Donnell, Colleen B., et al., “Surface Roughness in PMMA is Linearly Related to the Amount of Excimer Laser Ablation”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 12, Jan./Feb. 1996, pp. 171-174.
  • Oriowo, Olanrewaju Matthew, “A Study of Ultraviolet Radiation Effects on Procine Crystalline Lens and Development of a New Assay Methodology for UV Cataractogenesis Investigation”, A Thesis Presented to the University of Waterloo, 2000, pp. i-xix and 1-218.
  • Ostrin, Lisa A. et al., “Comparisons Between Pharmacologically and Edinger-Westphal-Stimulated Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2005, vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 609-617.
  • Ostrin, Lisa A. et al., “Effects of Pirenzepine on Pupil Size and Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Oct. 2004, vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 3620-3628.
  • Ostrin, Lisa A. et al., “The Effects of Phenylephrine on Pupil Diameter and Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys”; Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2004, vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 215-221.
  • Parel, Jean-Marie et al., “Intraocular Implants for the Surgical Correction of Presbyopia”; In Ophthalmic Technologies X, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3908, 2000, pp. 115-122.
  • Patel, C.K. et al., “The Ageing Lens”, Association of Optometrists, City University, London; undated, www.optometry.co.uk; pp. 27-31.
  • Pau, Hans et al., “The increasing sclerosis of the human lens with age and its relevance to accommodation and presbyopia”, Graefe's Arch Clin Exp. Ophthalmol., (1991) vol. 229, pp. 294-296.
  • Payne, Peter A. et al., “Ophthalmic Applications of Laser-Generated Ultrasound”; SPIE, 2000, vol. 3908, pp. 13-22.
  • Peterson, Jennifer A. et al., “Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Cynomolgus Monkeys, Tono-Pen Versus Manometry”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1996, vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1197-1199.
  • Prokofeva, G. I et al., “Effects of Low-Intensity Infrared Laser Irradiation on the Eye, (An Experimental Study)”, Vestn. Oftalmol., vol. 112, No. 1, 1996, pp. 31-32, with English Abstract, 5 pgs.
  • Puliafito, Carmen A., M.D. et al., “High-Speed Photography of Excimer Laser Ablatio of the Cornea”, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 105, Sep. 1987, pp. 1255-1259.
  • Qian, Wen et al., “3 Year Simvastatin Treatment and Lens Nuclear Back Scattering”; J Ophthalmol, vol. 84, 2000, pp. 512-516.
  • Qian, Wen et al., “Universal Opacity Standard for Scheimpflug Photography”, Ophthalmic Res, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 292-298.
  • Rafferty, Nancy et al., “Lens Wound Healing and Cataractogenesis in a Pigmented Eye”, Exp. Eye Res. (1984), vol. 38, pp. 267-277.
  • Riley, Michael V., et al., “The Effects of UV-B Irradiation on the Corneal Endothelium”, Eye Research Institute of Oakland University, 1987, pp. 1021-1033.
  • Ripken, T. et al., “FEM Simulation of the Human Lens Compared to Ex-Vivo Porcine Lens Cutting Pattern: A Possible Treatment of Presbyopia”; undated, 11 pgs.
  • Ripken T. et al., “First in-vivo studies of Presbyopia treatment with ultrashort laser pulses”, Proc. SPIE 5142, vol. 137, 2003, 9 pgs.
  • Ripken, T. et al., “Fs-laser Induced Elasticity Changes to Improve Presbyopic Lens Accommodation”, undated, 10 pgs.
  • Ripken T. et al., “Investigations for the correction of Presbyopia by fs-laser induced cuts”, Proc. SPIE 5314, vol. 27, 2004, 9 pgs.
  • Rockwell, B.A. et al., “Safe Use of Ultra-short Lasers”; SPIE, vol. 3616, 1999, pp. 32-39.
  • Roesner, C.A.D. et al., “Light-Matter Interactions on the FEMTOSECOND Time Scale”, Department of Physics and Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University; undated, pp. 1-27.
  • Rol, Pascal et al., “An Optomechanical Eye Model for Observation of Lens Photoablation”; SPIE, 1997, vol. 2971, pp. 171-174.
  • Sacks, Zachary S. et al., “Laser Spot Size as a Function of Tissue Depth and Laser Wavelength in Human Sclera”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3255, pp. 67-76.
  • Sauteret, C. et al., “Laser designers eye petawatt power”, Laser Focus World, Oct. 1990, pp. 85-92 with cover page.
  • Scammon, Richard J. et al., “Simulations of Shock Waves and Cavitation Bubbles Produced in Water by Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3254, pp. 264-275.
  • Schachar, Ronald A. MD, PhD., et al., “A Revolutionary Variable Focus Lens”, Annals of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1996, pp. 11-18.
  • Schachar, Ronald A., M.D., “Cause and Treatment of Presbyopia With a Method for Increasing the Amplitude of Accommodation”, Annals of Ophthalmol, 1992, vol. 24, pp. 445-452.
  • Schachar, Ronald A., M.D. et al., “Experimental Destruction of Cataractous Lenses by Laser”, Ophthalmic Surgery, Surgical Forum, pp. 506-509.
  • Schachar, Ronald A., M.D. et al., “Experimental Support for Schachar's Hypothesis of Accommodation”, Ann Ophthalmol, 1993; vol. 25, pp. 404-409.
  • Schachar, Ronald A., MD, PhD, “Histology of the Ciliary Muscle-Zonular Connections”, Annals of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 1996, pp. 70-79.
  • Schachar, Ronald A. MD et al., “Mechanism of Human Accommodation as Analyzed by Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis”, Ann Ophthalmol; 2001; vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 103-112.
  • Schachar, Ronald A., MD, PhD, “Pathophysiology of Accommodation and Presbyopia, Understanding the Clinical Implications”, J. Florida M.A., vol. 81, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 268-271.
  • Schaeffel, Frank, “Kappa and Hirschberg Ratio Measured With an Automated Video Gaze Tracker”, Optometry and Vision Science, 2002, vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 329-334.
  • Schaffer, Chris B. et al., “Dynamics of Femtosecond Laser-Induced Breakdown in Water From Femtoseconds to Microseconds”, Optics Express, 2002, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 196-203.
  • Schaffer, Chris B. et al., “Morphology of Femtosecond Laser-Induced Structural Changes in Bulk Transparent Materials”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1441-1443.
  • Shen, Nan, et al., “Ablation of Cytoskeletal Filaments and Mitochondria in Live Cells Using a Femtosecond Laser Nanoscissor”, MCB, 2005, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 17-25.
  • Shen, Nan; “Photodisruption in Biological Tissues Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, A Thesis Presented to the Department of Physics, Harvard University, 2003, pp. 1-125.
  • Shen, Nan, et al., “Photodisruption in Biological Tissues and Single Cells Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, undated, 2 pgs.
  • Shen, Nan, et al., “Surface and Bulk Photodisruption in Turbid Tissue Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, Department of Physics and Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, undated, pp. 1-24.
  • Sher, Neal A., MD, “Hyperopic Refractive Surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2001, vol. 12, pp. 304-308.
  • Sivak, Jacob G., “Through the Lens Clearly: Phylogeny and Development, The Proctor Lecture”, Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2004, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 740-747.
  • Sliney, D. H et al., “Medical Lasers and Their Safe Use”, Springer Verlag, New York, 1993, pp. 42-50.
  • Slingsby, Christine, “Lens Crystallin Crystal Structures”, undated article, 3 pgs.
  • Söderberg, Per G., et al., “Angular Dependence of the Intensity of Back Scattered Light From Human Lenses With Nuclear Cataract, Implications for Measurement”, SPIE, 2000, vol. 3908, pp. 34-37.
  • Söderberg, Per G., et al., “External Standard for Measurements with the Scheimpflug Slitlamp Microscope”, SPIE, 1997, vol. 2971, pp. 8-13.
  • Soileau, M. J. et al., “Temporal Dependence of laser-Induced Breakdown in NaCl and Si02”, prepared for Dept. of Physics, North Texas State University, publication date unknown, 19 pgs.
  • Solomon, Ira Seth, M.D., “Aqueous Humor Dynamics”, undated, 17 pgs.
  • Spector, Abraham, “Aging of the Lens and Cataract Formation”, Aging and Human Visual Function, pp. 27-43.
  • Srinivasan, R., “Ablation of Polymers and Biological Tissue by Ultraviolet Lasers”, Oct. 1986, pp. 932-935.
  • Srinivasan R. et al., “Excimer Laser Surgery of the Cornea”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, 1993, pp. 710-715.
  • Stitzel, Joel D., et al., “A Nonlinear Finite Element Model of the Eye With Experimental Validation for the Prediction of Globe Rupture”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2002, vol. 45, 24 pgs.
  • Stitzel, Joel D., et al., “Blunt Trauma of the Aging Eye”, Arch Ophthalmol, 2005, vol. 123, pp. 789-794.
  • Strauss, Moshe, et al., “Two-Dimensional Rayleigh Model of Vapor Bubble Evolution”, SPIE, 1999, vol. 3601, pp. 212-224.
  • Strenk, Susan A., et al, “Age-Related Changes in Human Ciliary Muscle and Lens: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1999, vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 1162-1169.
  • Strenk, Susan A. et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Effects of Age and Accommodation on the Human Lens Cross-Sectional Area”, IOVS, 2004, Vo. 45, No. 2, pp. 539-545.
  • Strenk, Susan A., et al, “The Mechanism of Presbyopia”, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2004 vol. 11, pp. 1-15.
  • Stuart, B. C. et al., “Laser-Induced Damage in Dielectrics with Nanosecond to Subpicosecond Pulses”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, No. 12, Mar. 20, 1995, pp. 2248-2251.
  • Sweeney, Matthew H.J., et al., “Movement of Cysteine in Intact Monkey Lenses: The Major Site of Entry is the Germinative Region”, Experimental Eye Research, 2003, vol. 77. pp. 245-251.
  • Swegmark, Gunnar, “Studies With Impedance Cyclography on Human Ocular Accommodation at Different Ages”, ACTA Ophthalmologica, vol. 47, 1969, pp. 1186-1206.
  • Taboada, J., et al., “Optically Coupled Technique for Photorefractive Surgery of the Cornea”, Optics Letters, vol. 15, No. 9, May 1, 1990, pp. 458-460.
  • Taboada, J. et al., “Response of the Corneal Epithelium to KrF Excimer Laser Pulses”, Health Physics, vol. 30, 1981, pp. 677-683.
  • Tahi, Hassan, et al., “Restoring Accommodation: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Evaluation in Rabbits”, SPIE, 1999, vol. 3591, pp. 267-269.
  • Tamm, Svenja, et al., “Age-Related Changes of the Human Ciliary Muscle. A Quantitative Morphometric Study”, Mechanisms of Aging and Development, vol. 62, 1992, pp. 209-221.
  • Tang, Daxin; “Influence of Age, Diabetes, and Cataract on Calcium, Lipid-Calcium, and Protein-Calcium Relationships in Human Lenses”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2003, vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 2059-2066.
  • Taylor, Virginia L. et al., “Morphology of the Normal Human Lens”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 1996, vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 1396-1410.
  • Topilow, Harvey W., M.D., “Vitreous Changes in Retinal Branch Vein Occlusion”, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 105, Sep. 1987, 2 pgs.
  • Trokel, Stephen L., M.D., et al., “Excimer Laser Surgery of the Cornea”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. 710-715.
  • Tsai, Philbert S., “All-Optical, In-Situ Histology of Neuronal Tissue with Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, Imaging in Neuroscience and Development, CSHL Press, undated, 12 pgs.
  • Tsubota, Kazuo, “Application of Erbium: YAG Laser in Ocular Ablation”, Ophthalmologica, 1990, vol. 200, pp. 117-122.
  • Van Alphen, G.W.H.M. et al., “Elasticity of Tissues Involved in Accommodation”, Vision Res., vol. 31, No. 7/8, 1991, pp. 1417-1438.
  • Venugopalan, V. et al., “The Thermodynamic Response of Soft Biological Tissues to Ultraviolet Laser Irradiation”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 60, Oct. 1995, pp. 1258-1271.
  • Vilupuru, Abhiram S., “Optical and Biometric Relationships of the Isolated Pig Crystalline Lens”, Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., 2001, vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 296-311.
  • Vilupuru, Abhiram S., “Spatially Variant Changes in Lens Power During Ocular Accommodation in a Rhesus Monkey Eye”, Journal of Vision, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 299-309.
  • Vogel, Alfred et al., “Factors Determining the Refractive Effects of Intrastromal Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Picosecond Laser”, J. Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 23, Nov. 1997, pp. 1301-1310.
  • Vogel, Alfred et al., “Interaction of Laser-Produced Cavitation Bubbles With an Elastic Tissue Model”, SPIE, 2001, vol. 4257, pp. 167-177.
  • Vogel, Alfred et al., “Intraocular Photodisruption With Picosecond and Nanosecond laser Pulses: Tissue Effects in Cornea, Lens and Retina”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 1994, No. 7, vol. 35, pp. 3032-3044.
  • Vogel, Alfred et al., “Kinetics of Phase Transitions in Pulsed IR Laser Ablation of Biological Tissues”, SPIE, 2003, vol. 4961, pp. 66-74.
  • Vogel, Alfred et al., “Laser-Induced Breakdown in the Eye At Pulse Durations From 80 ns to 100 fs”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3255, pp. 34-49.
  • Vogel, Alfred et al., “Numerical Simulation of Optical Breakdown for Cellular Surgery at Nanosecond to Femtosecond Time Scales”, SPIE, 2001, vol. 4433, pp. 70-80.
  • Vrensen, G. F. J. M., “Aging of the human eye lens—A morphological point of view”, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., vol. 111A, 1995. pp. 519-553.
  • Waring III, George O., M.D., “Presbyopia and Accommodative Intraocular Lenses—the Next Frontier in Refractive Surgery?”, Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 421-423.
  • Weale, Robert D., Sc., “Presbyopia Toward the End of the 20th Century”, Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 34, No. 1, Jul.-Aug. 1989, pp. 15-29.
  • Werblin, Theodore P., M.D., “Should We Consider Clear Lens Extraction for Routine Refractive Surgery?”, Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 480-481.
  • Werner, Liliana, MD, et al., “Capsular Bag Opacification After Experimental Implantation of a New Accommodating Intraocular Lens in Rabbit Eyes”, J Cataract Refract Surg., 2004, vol. 30, pp. 1114-1123.
  • Werner, Liliana, MD. et al., “Posterior Capsule Opacification in Rabbit Eyes Implanted With 1-Piece and 3-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 805-811.
  • Wilks, S. C. et al., “Absorption of ultra-Intense Laser Pulses”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, No. 9, Aug. 31, 1992, pp. 1383-1386.
  • Wyatt, Harry J., “Application of a Simple Mechanical Model of Accommodation to the Aging Eye”, Eye Res., vol. 33, No. 5/6, 1993, pp. 731-738.
  • Ziebarth, Nöel, et al; “Non-contact Optical Measurement of Lens Capsule Thickness During Simulated Accommodation”, SPIE, 2005, vol. 5688, pp. 19-25.
  • Zuclich, Joseph A. et al., “A comparison of laser-induced retinal damage from infrared wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths”, Lasers and Light, vol. 8, No. 1, 1997, pp. 15-29.
  • Zuclich, Joseph A. et al., “In Situ Measurements of Lens Fluorescence and its Interference With Visual Function”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 33, No. 2, 1993, pp. 410-415.
  • Zuclich, Joseph, “In Vivo Measurements of Optical Properties of the Ocular Lens”, Reprinted from Proceedings of Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards, Jan. 26-27, 1994, SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vo. 2134B Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards, 1994, pp. 99-112.
  • Zuclich, J.A., et al., “Ocular Effects of Penetrating IR Laser Wavelengths”, Reprinted from Proceedings of Laser-Tissue Interaction VI, Feb. 6-9, 1995, SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2391, 1995, pp. 111-125.
  • Zuclich, Joseph A., et al., “Rapid Noninvasive Optical Characterization of the Human Lens”, Lasers in the Life Sciences, 6(1), 1994, pp. 39-53.
  • Zuclich, Joseph A., “Research on the Ocular Effects of Laser Radiation”, Published by Technology Incorporated: Life Sciences Division, publication date unknown, 59 pgs.
  • Zuclich, Joseph A., “Ultraviolet-Induced Photochemical Damage in Ocular Tissues”, Health Physics, vol. 56, No. 5, May 1989, pp. 671-681.
  • Zuclich, Joseph A., “Workshop on Long-Term Visual Health Risks of Optical Radiation -Thermal Cataracts Induced by Uv Laser Radiation”, Workshop Report, Cataract Working Group, publisher unknown, publication date unknown, 13 pgs.
  • Agrahari, S. et al., “The Potential of Photodisruption Laser Treatment of the Crystalline Lens to Rupture the Lens Capsule”, ARVO Abstract No. 07-A-6800, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Faraggi, E. et al., “Stress confinement, shock wave formation and laser induced damage”, Conference 5695: Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVI, Photonics West, undated, 1 pg.
  • Fisher, R F, “The ciliary body in accommodation”, Trans Ophthalmol. Soc. UK, 1989, vol. 105,1 pg.
  • Fisher, RF. “The mechanics of accommodation in relation to presbyopia”, Eye, 1988, vol. 2, 1 pg.
  • Frey, R. W. et al., “Modification of Lens Mechanics of Human Cadaver and Porcine Lenses Using Photodisruption Laser to Change Lens Power and Increase Flexibility”, ARVO Abstract No. 07-A-06652, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Garner, LF et al., “Changes in equivalent and gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens with accommodation”, Optom Vis. Sci., 1997, vol. 74,1 pg.
  • Garner LF et al., “Changes in ocular dimensions and refraction with accommodation”, Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 1997, vol. 17, 1 pg.
  • Gray, G. et al., “Constructions of a Computer Mesh Model of the Anatomical Human Crystalline Lens Fiber Ultrastructure”, ARVO Abstract, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Helsterkamp, A. et al., “Nanosurgery in live cells using ultrashort laser pulses”, Conference 5695: Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVI, Photonics West, undated, 1 pg.
  • Kuszak, J.R., “Progressively More Complex Star Sutures Formed in Primate Lenses During Periods of Development, Growth and Aging Are Related to Accommodation”, Abstracts Online, obtained from the Internet on Apr. 19, 2006 at: http://www.abstractsonline.com/viewer/viewAbstractPrintFriendly.asp?CKey={C8FDF5D . . . Apr. 19, 2006, I page.
  • Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Results From a Finite Element Model Analysis of the Accommodative Process Based on the Human Crystalline Lens Fiber Ultrastructure”, ARVO Abstract, 2006, 1 pg.
  • McBrien Na et al., “Experimental myopia in a diurnal mammal (Sciurus carolinensis) with no accommodative ability”, J Physiol., 1993, vol. 469, 1 pg.
  • McCourt Me et al., “Refractive state, depth of focus and accommodation of the eye of the California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi)”, Vision Res., 1984, vol. 24, 1 pg.
  • Oberheide, U. et al., “Flexibility Increase of Human Donor Lenses After Femosecond Laser Treatment (fs-Lentotomy)”, ARVO Abstract No. 3833/B571, 2007, 2 pgs.
  • Olmstead, T. et al., “The Use of an Off Axis Slit Laser Camera System for Determining Photodisruptive Laser Placement in Lenses”, ARVO Abstract No. 07-A-5967, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Rafferty, NS. et al., “Comparative study of actin filament patterns in lens epithelial cells, Are these determined by the mechanisms of lens accommodation?”, Curr Eye Res., 1989, vol. 8, 1 pg.
  • Roa, Ch. Mohan et al., “Level of Reduced Nucleotides and Lens Photodamage”, National Eye Institute, undated, 1 pg.
  • Subramaniam, H. et al., “Finite Element Analysis of the Accommodative Process in the Whole Globe”, ARVO Abstract No. 07-A-6249, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Van Alphen Gw et al., “Elasticity of tissues involved in accommodation”, Vision Res., 1991, vol. 31,1 pg.
  • Wang, B. et al., “In-vivo animal studies on intraocular nanosurgery with low-energy 80 MHZ near infrared femtosecond laser pulses”, Conference 5695: Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVI, Photonics West, undated, 1 pg.
  • Yeilding, R. H. et al., “Lens Culture System for Long Term Study of Porcine Lenses Pre and Post Laser Photodisruption Treatment”, ARVO Abstract No. 01-A-6495, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Zepkin, N. et al., “Measurement of Temperature Rise in Porcine Crystalline Lenses from a Photodisruption Laser”, ARVO Abstract No. 07-A-6709, 2006, 1 pg.
  • Zoltoski, R. K. et al., “Reverse Engineering of Human Lenses”, ARVO Abstract No. 2018/B159, 2007, 2 pgs. Presentation Materials.
  • AVRO, “Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Visual Research”, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, copyright © 2002, obtained from the Internet on Jan. 15, 2005 at: http://www.avro.org/AboutAvro/animalst.asp, 3 pgs.
  • Gattass, Rafael et al., “Femtosecond laser micromaching Applications in Technology and Biology”, Photonics West conference Jan. 2005, 78 pgs.
  • Hermans, E. et al., “Estimating the External Force Acting on the Human Eye Lens During Accommodation Using Finite Elements Modeling”, presentation on Accommodation & Presbyopia, May 2005, 1 pg.
  • Kuszak et al., “Light, scanning and electron micrographs have lead to the following interpretations of secondary fiber formation”, 2004, 16 pgs.
  • Lubatschowski, H. et al., “Treatment of Presbyopia by Cutting the Cystaline Lens: A Comparison of FEM Simulation and Ex vivo Studies”, Lazer Zentrum Hannover e.V., Publication date unknown, 22 pgs.
  • Mazur, Eric, “An Introduction to Femtosecond Laser Science”, Photonics West conference Jan. 2005, 291 pgs.
  • Nebel, Achim et al., “Fast Micromachining using Picosecond Lasers”, Photonics West conference Jan. 2005, 37 pgs.
  • OSN SuperSite, “Increase in lens stiffness with age may cause presbyopia, study suggests”, 2005, 1 pg.
  • “Presbyopia —preconditions”, Laser Zentrum Hannover, undated, 11 pgs.
  • “Principles of Ultrafast Laser Surgery Femtosecond Laser-Tissue Interaction”, copyright © Center for Ultrafast Optical Sciences, Un. Of Michigan, undated, 3 pgs.
  • Roundy, Carlos—“Propagation factor qualifies leaser bean performance”, Laser World Focus, undated, 3 pgs.
  • Shen, J. et al. “Measurement of the Lens Capsule Contraction Force in the Radial Direction”, presentation on Accommodation & Presbyopia, May 2005, 1 pg.
  • Figure 4.2—Optical constants for a “standard eye”, publication unknown, undated, 1 pg.
  • Picture of an eye obtained from the Internet on Mar. 28, 2005 at: http://www.opt.uh.edu/research/aglasser/aao/gonioani.gif, 1 pg.
  • Pictures of eyes, date and publisher unknown, 5 pgs.
  • Loesel paper graphs, date and publisher unknown, 2 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/142,255, date Dec. 27, 2013, Naranjo-Tackman et al.
  • Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/142,255, filed Dec. 27, 2013, 25 pgs.
Patent History
Patent number: 8801186
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 14, 2011
Date of Patent: Aug 12, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20120182522
Assignee: LensAR, Inc. (Orlando, FL)
Inventors: Rudolph W. Frey (Winter Park, FL), Richard Ty Olmstead (Oviedo, FL), Gary P. Gray (Orlando, FL), Steven E. Bott (Oviedo, FL), James Strobel (Titusville, FL)
Primary Examiner: Huy K Mai
Application Number: 13/273,653
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Including Illuminator (351/221); Using Photodetector (351/210); For Cornea Curvature Measurement (351/212); Methods Of Use (351/246)
International Classification: A61B 3/10 (20060101); A61B 3/107 (20060101); A61B 3/117 (20060101);