Wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle

- Ford

A system for detecting wheel lift of an automotive vehicle has a speed sensor (22) coupled to a wheel (12) of automotive vehicle (10). A torque control system (20) is coupled to wheel (12) to change the torque at the wheel. A controller (18) is coupled to the torque control system and a speed sensor. The controller (18) determines lift by changing the torque of the wheel, measuring the change in torque and indicating lift in response to change in torque which may be indicated by wheel speed.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to a dynamic behavior control apparatus for an automotive vehicle, and more specifically, to a method and apparatus for determining whether a wheel of an automotive vehicle has lifted from the pavement.

BACKGROUND

Dynamic control systems for automotive vehicles have recently begun to be offered on various products. Dynamic control systems typically control the yaw of the vehicle by controlling the braking effort at various wheels of the vehicle. By regulating the amount of braking at each corner of the vehicle, the desired direction of the vehicle may be maintained.

Typically, the dynamic control systems do not address roll of the vehicle. For high profile vehicles in particular, it would be desirable to control the rollover characteristics of the vehicle to maintain the vehicle position with respect to the road. That is, it is desirable to maintain contact of each of the four tires of the vehicle on the road.

Vehicle rollover and tilt control (or body roll) are distinguishable dynamic characteristics. Tilt control maintains the body on a plane or nearly on a plane parallel to the road surface. Rollover control is used to maintain the vehicle wheels on the road surface.

Such systems typically use position sensors to measure the relative distance between the vehicle body and the vehicle suspension. One drawback to such systems is that the distance from the body to the road must be inferred.

It would therefore be desirable to provide a rollover detection system having reduced costs and increased reliability in predicting the occurrence of a rollover.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore one object of the invention to provide a rollover detection system that may be used in conjunction with the dynamic stability control system of the vehicle to determine rollover.

In one aspect of the invention, a wheel lift identification system for an automotive vehicle includes a speed sensor coupled to the vehicle producing a wheel speed signal. A torque control system is coupled to the wheel for charging the torque at the wheel. A controller is coupled to the torque control system and the speed sensor. The controller determines lift by changing the torque of the wheel, measuring the change in wheel speed since the torque was changed, and indicating a wheel lift if the change in the wheel speed is greater than a predetermined value.

In a further aspect of the invention, a method for determining wheel lift of a vehicle comprises the steps of:

    • changing the torque of a wheel;
    • measuring the change in wheel speed since the step of changing torque; and,
    • indicating wheel lift if the change in wheel speed is greater than a predetermined value.

In a further aspect of the invention, the changing of the torque of the wheel may be performed by increasing the brake pressure for that wheel. When the wheel speed has significant deceleration, a wheel flag is set. When the brake pressure is released and the wheel speed changes greater than a reacceleration threshold, then wheel contact is assumed. If the wheel speed does not increase over the reacceleration threshold within a predetermined time, then wheel lift status is confirmed. As an alternative, driveline torque may be used.

One advantage of the invention is that in vehicles employing a dynamic stability control system, additional sensors may not be required.

Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent when viewed in light of the detailed description of the preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the attached drawings and appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a partial cutaway view of an automotive vehicle having a wheel lift identification system according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a wheel lift identification system according to the present invention.

FIG. 3A is a plot of pressure versus time for a wheel lift identification system according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3B is a plot of wheel speed versus time for a wheel lift identification system according to one embodiment of the present invention.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present invention is described with respect to a wheel lift identification system for an automotive vehicle. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be incorporated into a rollover prevention system for an automotive vehicle.

Referring now to FIG. 1, an automotive vehicle 10 has a plurality of wheels 12, two of which are shown as elevated above a road plane 14. A roll control system 16 is included within vehicle 10. The roll control system 16 is used to counteract the lifting of wheels 12 from road plane 14 as will be further described below. Roll control system 16 includes a roll controller 18 that is preferably microprocessor based. Roll controller 18 may be part of a dynamic stability control system of the automotive vehicle 10. Roll controller 18 is coupled to a torque control system 20 that is used to control the torque of the wheels 12. Although torque control system 20 is illustrated as a separate item, torque control system 20 may be included in roll controller 18 which may in turn be included within a dynamic stability control system. Torque control system 20 may act in conjunction with the electronic engine controller, a driveline engagement mechanism or braking system, or a combination of these to control the torque at one or all of the wheels 12. Torque controller 20 and roll controller 18 may be coupled to wheel speed sensors 22 located at each of the wheels 12. Wheel speed sensors 22 provide roll controller 18 with a signal indicative of the speed of the individual wheel to which it is attached. Various types of wheel speed sensors including toothed-wheel type systems would be evident to those skilled in the art.

Other sensors 24 may be coupled to roll control system 16. For example, roll angle sensors, steering wheel angle sensors, yaw rate sensors, and other sensors may be incorporated therein. Other sensors 24, as will be further described below, may be used to identify a condition suitable for the potential of wheel lift. Such a condition may initiate further action by roll control system 16 to verify wheel lift.

In the following example, the application of brake pressure is used to provide the change in torque. However, other methods such as applying engine torque may also be used to change the amount of torque at a wheel. Further references to the application of torque to a wheel may include hydraulic or electric brake torque, changes in engine torque or engagement of driveline torque through the use of an electronically controlled transfer case, differential, transmission or clutch. The present invention may also be used to determine if a sensor has failed in the roll control system 16. That is, if roll is suspected by a particular sensor but all other conditions or sensors indicate otherwise, the sensor may be operating improperly. Also, although speed is used, wheel acceleration may also be used in place of speed as would be evident to those skilled in the art.

Referring now to FIG. 2, in step 30, if a roll sensor failure is suspected or in step 32 if wheel lift is suspected by the roll control system 16, block 34 initiates the wheel lift determination process. In step 36, torque is applied to the wheel suspected of lifting and the wheel speed at the suspected wheel is stored. In step 38, the torque is increased by applying a test pulse of torque to the suspected wheel. Torque is applied until a torque threshold (Torque_Max) is achieved. In step 40, if the torque is greater than the Torque_Max, the torque is held constant in step 42. In step 44, if the time as counted by the Build_Counter is greater than a predetermined time, step 46 is executed in which the torque is released and the wheel speed at the initiation of the release of torque is stored. In step 44, if the counter is not greater than the predetermined hold time, the counter is incremented in step 48. After step 48 the change in wheel speed is compared to a predetermined change in wheel speed. If the wheel speed change is not greater than a predetermined speed in step 50, steps 38-44 are again executed. If the wheel speed change is greater than a predetermined speed, this indicates a lifted wheel. In this case, step 52 is executed in which a wheel lift status flag is set. After step 52, step 54 is executed in which the build counter is reset.

Referring back to step 40, if the torque is not greater than the torque threshold then step 50 is executed.

Referring back to step 46, after the wheel speed is recorded after the torque release, step 56 is executed. In step 56 torque is released. After step 56, step 58 is implemented in which the wheel speed change is compared to a reacceleration threshold. The reacceleration threshold is a predetermined value that corresponds to a wheel speed change that should be achieved should wheel contact be reestablished. The wheel speed change is determined from the time that the torque was released. If the wheel speed change is greater than a reacceleration threshold or if the wheel lift status from steo 52 is zero, wheel contact is assumed. In such a case the traction level may be calculated in step 60. If the wheel speed does not increase over the reacceleration threshold, then the wheel lift status is confirmed beginning with step 70.

Referring back to step 58, if the wheel speed is less than the reacceleration threshold, step 62 compares the Dump_Counter to a predetermined dump time. If the predetermined dump time is greater than the Dump_Counter, then the Dump_Counter is incremented in step 64 and steps 56 and 58 are again executed. If the Dump_Counter is greater than the predetermined dump time, then the wheel lift status flag is set in step 66 and the Dump_Counter is reset in step 68. After step 68, the process is reinitiated and returns to step 36.

Returning back to step 60, the traction level is calculated in step 60. After step 60, the plausibility of a sensor failure is determined. If, for example, the process was initiated based on the suspicion of a sensor failure from block 30 above and no wheel lift was detected, a sensor failure is indicated in step 72. For either result, if a sensor failure is indicated by block 70 or not, the build counter and Dump_Counter are cleared in block 74 and the wheel lift status is cleared in block 76. The end of the routine occurs in block 78.

Thus, as can be seen, the application of torque can be used to first determine whether a suspected wheel has lifted from the pavement. For confirmation, the removal of the torque and the resulting wheel speed change may be used to confirm the initial finding. Advantageously, the system may be implemented in a dynamic stability system of an automotive vehicle without adding further sensors. If rollover is detected, then the rollover can be corrected by applying the brakes or generating a steering correction.

Referring now to FIG. 3A, various lines 90, 92, 94 are illustrated during the build time to illustrate the variation in pressure of the braking system due to wear and other effects of the brakes. Lines 90, 9294 have little effect on the overall operation of the system. Thus, the thresholds and parameters are selected so that the system is robust to wear and system variation. The maximum pressure Pmax is reached and maintained for a hold time (such as set forth in step 42 above) until it is released.

Referring now to FIG. 3B, a plot of wheel speed corresponding to the various times is illustrated. As shown, the wheel speed of a loaded wheel is illustrated by line 96 which is higher than the wheel speed of a lifted wheel illustrated by line 98.

While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only in terms of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining wheel lift of a wheel of an automotive vehicle comprising the steps of:

applying a change of torque to the wheel;
measuring a change in a wheel condition since initiating the step of applying a change of torque;
indicating wheel lift if the change in the wheel condition is greater than a predetermined value.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the condition is one selected from the group of acceleration and speed.

3. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of removing the change of torque;

measuring a wheel condition after the step of removing the change of torque.

4. A method as recited in claim 3 further comprising the step of determining whether the second wheel condition is above a threshold.

5. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of applying a change of torque comprises applying a brake to the wheel.

6. A method as recited in claim 5 further comprising the step of releasing the brake;

determining a wheel condition after the step of releasing the brake;
when the wheel condition does not increase over a reacceleration threshold, confirming wheel lift;
when wheel speed condition increases over a reacceleration threshold, indicating wheel contact.

7. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of applying a change of torque comprises applying engine torque.

8. A method for monitoring a predetermined condition of an automotive vehicle having a plurality of wheels comprising the steps of:

determining a potential for the predetermined condition of the wheel;
measuring a first wheel speed of a suspected lifting wheel;
thereafter, changing the torque of a applied to the suspected lifting wheel from a first torque to a second torque;
changing the torque from the vehicle applied to the suspected lifting wheel from the second torque to the first torque;
measuring a second wheel speed of the suspected lifting wheel;
determining a wheel speed change as a function of the first wheel speed and the second wheel speed;
when the change in wheel speed is greater than a reacceleration threshold, confirming the wheel lift.

9. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein the predetermined condition is determining a potential for wheel lift comprises determining the potential for wheel lift as a function of roll angle, steering wheel angle, and road bank angle.

10. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein the step of changing the torque comprises the step of applying the brake.

11. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein the step of changing the torque comprises the step of applying engine torque.

12. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein a predetermined condition comprises a sensor failure.

13. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein the predetermined condition comprises wheel lift.

14. A method as recited in claim 8 further comprising the step of correcting lift by applying the brakes.

15. A method as recited in claim 8 further comprising the step of correcting lift by applying a steering correction.

16. A method as recited in claim 8 further comprising the step of calculating a traction level after the step of confirming wheel lift.

17. A system for detecting lift of a wheel of an automotive vehicle comprising:

a speed sensor coupled to the wheel producing a wheel speed signal;
a torque control system coupled to the wheel for changing the torque at applied to the wheel;
a controller coupled to the said torque control system and the wheel speed sensor, said controller determining lift by changing the torque of applied to the wheel, increasing the a brake torque until a maximum brake torque threshold is achieved, detecting a change in wheel speed since the application of the brake torque, comparing the change in wheel speed to a threshold, when the change in wheel speed is above the wheel speed change threshold value, indicating wheel lift, when the brake torque reaches a maximum value before the change in wheel speed reaches the threshold, holding the brake torque for a predetermined amount of time, continuing to monitor the change in wheel speed during a hold duration, determining a second change in wheel speed, comparing the second change in wheel speed to the threshold value, when the second chnage in wheel speed exceeds the threshold value during the hold duration, indicating lift.

18. A method for determining wheel lift of a vehicle comprising the steps of:

applying a torque to the a wheel by applying a brake torque;
increasing the brake torque to build until a maximum brake torque threshold is achieved;
detecting the a change in wheel speed since the application of brake torque;
comparing the change in wheel speed to a wheel speed change threshold;
when the change in speed is above the wheel speed change threshold value, indicating wheel lift;
when the brake torque reaches a maximum value before the change in wheel speed reaches the wheel speed change threshold, holding the torque for a predetermined amount of time;
continuing to monitor the change in wheel speed during a hold duration;
determining a second change in wheel speed;
comparing the second wheel speed to the threshold value;
when the second wheel speed exceeds the threshold value during the hold duration, indicating a wheel lift.

19. A method as recited in claim 18 further comprising the steps of:

releasing the torque;
determining a wheel speed change;
when the wheel speed change is greater than a reacceleration threshold, indicating wheel contact;
when the wheel speed change is less than the reacceleration threshold, confirming an indication of wheel lift.

20. A method as recited in claim 18 further comprising the step of calculating a traction level.

21. A method as recited in claim 18 further comprising the step of when wheel lift is detected, continually monitoring the wheel speed change for a sudden increase to acknowledge wheel contact.

22. A method for monitoring wheel lift of an automotive vehicle having a plurality of wheels comprising the steps of:

determining a potential for wheel lift of the wheel as a function of road bank angle;
measuring a first wheel speed of a suspected lifting wheel;
thereafter, changing a torque of the suspected lifting wheel from a first torque to a second torque;
changing the torque of the suspected lifting wheel from the second torque to the first torque;
measuring a second wheel speed of the suspected lifting wheel;
determining a wheel speed change as a function of the first wheel speed and the second wheel speed;
when the change in wheel speed is greater than a reacceleration threshold, confirming wheel lift.

23. A method for monitoring a sensor failure condition of an automotive vehicle having a plurality of wheels comprising the steps of:

determining a potential for sensor failure;
measuring a first wheel speed;
thereafter, changing a torque of a suspected lifting wheel from a first torque to a second torque;
changing the torque from the second torque to the first torque;
measuring a second wheel speed;
determining a wheel speed change as a function of the first wheel speed and the second wheel speed;
when the change in wheel speed is greater than a reacceleration threshold, confirming the sensor failure.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2917126 December 1959 Phillips
3604273 September 1971 Kwok et al.
3608925 September 1971 Murphy
3797893 March 1974 Burckhardt
3899028 August 1975 Morris et al.
3948567 April 6, 1976 Kasselmann et al.
3972543 August 3, 1976 Presley et al.
4023864 May 17, 1977 Lang et al.
RE30550 March 24, 1981 Reise
4480714 November 6, 1984 Yabuta et al.
4592565 June 3, 1986 Eagle
4597462 July 1, 1986 Sano et al.
4624476 November 25, 1986 Tanaka et al.
4650212 March 17, 1987 Yoshimura
4679808 July 14, 1987 Ito et al.
4690553 September 1, 1987 Fukamizu et al.
4705130 November 10, 1987 Fukunaga et al.
4761022 August 2, 1988 Ohashi et al.
4765649 August 23, 1988 Ikemoto et al.
4767588 August 30, 1988 Ito
4778773 October 18, 1988 Sukegawa
4809183 February 28, 1989 Eckert
4827416 May 2, 1989 Kawagoe et al.
4846496 July 11, 1989 Tanaka et al.
4872116 October 3, 1989 Ito et al.
4888696 December 19, 1989 Akatsu et al.
4898431 February 6, 1990 Karnopp et al.
4930082 May 29, 1990 Harara et al.
4951198 August 21, 1990 Watanabe et al.
4960292 October 2, 1990 Sadler
4964679 October 23, 1990 Rath
4967865 November 6, 1990 Schindler
4976330 December 11, 1990 Matsumoto
4998593 March 12, 1991 Karnopp et al.
5033770 July 23, 1991 Kamimura et al.
5058017 October 15, 1991 Adachi et al.
5066041 November 19, 1991 Kindermann et al.
5088040 February 11, 1992 Matsuda et al.
5089967 February 18, 1992 Haseda et al.
5163319 November 17, 1992 Spies et al.
5200896 April 6, 1993 Sato et al.
5208749 May 4, 1993 Adachi et al.
5224765 July 6, 1993 Matsuda
5228757 July 20, 1993 Ito et al.
5239868 August 31, 1993 Takenaka et al.
5247466 September 21, 1993 Shimada et al.
5261503 November 16, 1993 Yasui
5265020 November 23, 1993 Nakayama
5274576 December 28, 1993 Williams
5278761 January 11, 1994 Ander et al.
5282134 January 25, 1994 Gioutsos et al.
5297646 March 29, 1994 Yamamura et al.
5307274 April 26, 1994 Takata et al.
5311431 May 10, 1994 Cao et al.
5311956 May 17, 1994 Sugiyama
5324102 June 28, 1994 Roll et al.
5335176 August 2, 1994 Nakamura
5365439 November 15, 1994 Momose et al.
5370199 December 6, 1994 Akuta et al.
5408411 April 18, 1995 Nakamura et al.
5446658 August 29, 1995 Pastor et al.
5455770 October 3, 1995 Hadeler et al.
5510989 April 23, 1996 Zabler et al.
5515277 May 7, 1996 Mine
5548536 August 20, 1996 Ammon
5549328 August 27, 1996 Cubalchini
5560688 October 1, 1996 Schappler et al.
5579245 November 26, 1996 Kato
5598335 January 28, 1997 You
5602734 February 11, 1997 Kithil
5610575 March 11, 1997 Gioutsos
5627756 May 6, 1997 Fukada et al.
5634698 June 3, 1997 Cao et al.
5640324 June 17, 1997 Inagaki
5648903 July 15, 1997 Liubakka
5671982 September 30, 1997 Wanke
5676433 October 14, 1997 Inagaki et al.
5694319 December 2, 1997 Suissa et al.
5703776 December 30, 1997 Soung
5707117 January 13, 1998 Hu et al.
5707120 January 13, 1998 Monzaki et al.
5720533 February 24, 1998 Pastor et al.
5723782 March 3, 1998 Bolles, Jr.
5732377 March 24, 1998 Eckert
5732378 March 24, 1998 Eckert et al.
5732379 March 24, 1998 Eckert et al.
5736939 April 7, 1998 Corcoran
5737224 April 7, 1998 Jeenicke et al.
5740041 April 14, 1998 Iyoda
5740877 April 21, 1998 Sasaki
5742918 April 21, 1998 Ashrafi et al.
5742919 April 21, 1998 Ashrafi et al.
5762406 June 9, 1998 Yasui et al.
5782543 July 21, 1998 Monzaki et al.
5787375 July 28, 1998 Madau et al.
5801647 September 1, 1998 Survo et al.
5809434 September 15, 1998 Ashrafi et al.
5816670 October 6, 1998 Yamada et al.
5825284 October 20, 1998 Dunwoody et al.
5842143 November 24, 1998 Lohrenz et al.
5857160 January 5, 1999 Dickinson et al.
5857535 January 12, 1999 Brooks
5869943 February 9, 1999 Nakashima et al.
5878357 March 2, 1999 Sivashankar et al.
5890084 March 30, 1999 Halasz et al.
5893896 April 13, 1999 Imamura et al.
5925083 July 20, 1999 Ackermann
5931546 August 3, 1999 Nakashima et al.
5944137 August 31, 1999 Moser et al.
5944392 August 31, 1999 Tachihata et al.
5946644 August 31, 1999 Cowan et al.
5964819 October 12, 1999 Naito
5971503 October 26, 1999 Joyce et al.
6002974 December 14, 1999 Schiffmann
6002975 December 14, 1999 Schiffmann et al.
6026926 February 22, 2000 Noro et al.
6038495 March 14, 2000 Schiffman
6040916 March 21, 2000 Griesinger
6050360 April 18, 2000 Pattok et al.
6055472 April 25, 2000 Breunig et al.
6062336 May 16, 2000 Amberkar et al.
6065558 May 23, 2000 Wielenga
6073065 June 6, 2000 Brown et al.
6079513 June 27, 2000 Nishizaki et al.
6081761 June 27, 2000 Harada et al.
6085860 July 11, 2000 Hackl et al.
6086168 July 11, 2000 Rump
6089344 July 18, 2000 Baughn et al.
6104284 August 15, 2000 Otsuka
6121873 September 19, 2000 Yamada et al.
6122568 September 19, 2000 Madau et al.
6122584 September 19, 2000 Lin et al.
6129172 October 10, 2000 Yoshida
6141604 October 31, 2000 Mattes et al.
6141605 October 31, 2000 Joyce
6144904 November 7, 2000 Tseng
6149251 November 21, 2000 Wuerth et al.
6161905 December 19, 2000 Hac et al.
6169939 January 2, 2001 Raad et al.
6169946 January 2, 2001 Griessbach
6176555 January 23, 2001 Semsey
6178375 January 23, 2001 Breunig
6179310 January 30, 2001 Clare et al.
6179394 January 30, 2001 Browalski et al.
6184637 February 6, 2001 Yamawaki et al.
6185485 February 6, 2001 Ashrafti et al.
6185497 February 6, 2001 Taniguchi et al.
6186267 February 13, 2001 Hackl et al.
6192305 February 20, 2001 Schiffmann
6195606 February 27, 2001 Barta et al.
6198988 March 6, 2001 Tseng
6202009 March 13, 2001 Tseng
6202020 March 13, 2001 Kyrtsos
6206383 March 27, 2001 Burdock
6219604 April 17, 2001 Dilger et al.
6223114 April 24, 2001 Boros et al.
6226579 May 1, 2001 Hackl et al.
6227482 May 8, 2001 Yamamoto
6233510 May 15, 2001 Platner et al.
6236916 May 22, 2001 Staub et al.
6263261 July 17, 2001 Brown et al.
6266596 July 24, 2001 Hartman et al.
6272420 August 7, 2001 Schramm et al.
6278930 August 21, 2001 Yamada et al.
6282471 August 28, 2001 Burdock et al.
6282472 August 28, 2001 Jones et al.
6282474 August 28, 2001 Chou et al.
6290019 September 18, 2001 Kolassa et al.
6292734 September 18, 2001 Murakami et al.
6292759 September 18, 2001 Schiffmann
6311111 October 30, 2001 Leimbach et al.
6314329 November 6, 2001 Madau et al.
6315373 November 13, 2001 Yamada et al.
6321141 November 20, 2001 Leimbach
6324445 November 27, 2001 Tozu et al.
6324446 November 27, 2001 Brown et al.
6324458 November 27, 2001 Takagi et al.
6330522 December 11, 2001 Takeuchi
6332104 December 18, 2001 Brown et al.
6338012 January 8, 2002 Brown et al.
6349247 February 19, 2002 Schramm et al.
6351694 February 26, 2002 Tseng et al.
6352318 March 5, 2002 Hosomi et al.
6356188 March 12, 2002 Meyers et al.
6363309 March 26, 2002 Irie et al.
6370938 April 16, 2002 Leimbach et al.
6394240 May 28, 2002 Barwick
6397127 May 28, 2002 Meyers et al.
6419240 July 16, 2002 Burdock et al.
6424897 July 23, 2002 Mattes et al.
6428118 August 6, 2002 Blosch
6438464 August 20, 2002 Woywod et al.
6459990 October 1, 2002 McCall et al.
6471218 October 29, 2002 Burdock et al.
6477480 November 5, 2002 Tseng et al.
6496758 December 17, 2002 Rhode et al.
6496763 December 17, 2002 Griessbach
6498976 December 24, 2002 Ehlbeck et al.
6502023 December 31, 2002 Fukada
6526342 February 25, 2003 Burdock et al.
6529803 March 4, 2003 Meyers et al.
6542792 April 1, 2003 Schubert et al.
6547022 April 15, 2003 Hosomi et al.
6553284 April 22, 2003 Holst et al.
6554293 April 29, 2003 Fennel et al.
6556908 April 29, 2003 Lu et al.
6559634 May 6, 2003 Yamada
6593849 July 15, 2003 Chubb
6598946 July 29, 2003 Nagae
6600414 July 29, 2003 Foo et al.
6600985 July 29, 2003 Weaver
6618656 September 9, 2003 Kueblbeck et al.
6631317 October 7, 2003 Lu
6644454 November 11, 2003 Yamada et al.
6650971 November 18, 2003 Haas
6654674 November 25, 2003 Lu et al.
6657539 December 2, 2003 Yamamoto et al.
6681196 January 20, 2004 Glaser et al.
6704631 March 9, 2004 Winner et al.
6747553 June 8, 2004 Yamada et al.
6756890 June 29, 2004 Schramm et al.
6799092 September 28, 2004 Lu
20030182025 September 25, 2003 Tseng et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
36 16 907 November 1987 DE
38 15 938 November 1989 DE
43 21 571 January 1994 DE
42 27 886 February 1994 DE
42 28 893 March 1994 DE
43 35 979 April 1995 DE
43 42 732 June 1995 DE
199 07 633 October 1999 DE
10025493 May 2000 DE
10065010 December 2000 DE
10046036 March 2002 DE
10133409 January 2003 DE
0 430 813 December 1993 EP
0 662 601 July 1995 EP
0 758 601 February 1997 EP
1 046 571 April 2000 EP
1 197 409 September 2001 EP
24 25 342 December 1979 FR
2257403 January 1993 GB
2 342 078 April 2000 GB
62055211 September 1985 JP
63116918 May 1988 JP
63151539 June 1988 JP
63203456 August 1988 JP
1101238 April 1989 JP
2171373 July 1990 JP
3042360 February 1991 JP
3045452 February 1991 JP
4008837 January 1992 JP
5016699 January 1993 JP
5254406 October 1993 JP
6278586 October 1994 JP
6297985 October 1994 JP
6312612 November 1994 JP
8080825 March 1996 JP
9005352 January 1997 JP
10024819 January 1998 JP
10329682 December 1998 JP
11011272 January 1999 JP
11170992 June 1999 JP
11254992 September 1999 JP
11255093 September 1999 JP
11304663 October 1999 JP
11304662 November 1999 JP
11321603 November 1999 JP
816649 March 1981 SU
WO 02/20318 March 2002 WO
WO 03/072397 September 2003 WO
Other references
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/459,697, filed Jun. 11, 2003, Lu.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,909, filed Jun. 27, 2003, Lu.
  • A method for reducing on-road rollovers—anti-rollover braking, Thomas J. Wielenga, Dynamotive, LLC, International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, Mar. 1-4, 1999.
  • Eger, R., Majjad, R., Naser, N., “Rollover simulation based on a nonlinear model”, SAE 98020.
  • Nalecz, A.G., Bindemann, A.C., Brewer H.K., “Dynamic analysis of vehicle rollover”, 12th International Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, Goteborg, Sweden, May 29-Jun. 1, 1989.
  • Niii, N., Nishijima, Y., Nakagaw, K., “rollover analysis method of a large-size bus”, JSAE 9540020, 1995.
  • Eger, R., Kiencke, U., “Modeling of rollover sequences”, Control Engineering Practice 11 (2003) 209-216.
  • Chen, Bo-Chiuan, Peng, Huei; “A Real-time Rollover Threat Index for Sports Utility Vehicles”, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, Jun. 1999.
Patent History
Patent number: RE40268
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 21, 2004
Date of Patent: Apr 29, 2008
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Dearborn, MI)
Inventors: Joseph Carr Meyers (Farmington Hills, MI), Todd Allen Brown (Dearborn, MI)
Primary Examiner: Tai Nguyen
Attorney: Dickinson Wright PLLC
Application Number: 11/019,148