Hermetic seal and method to create the same

- IDC, LLC

An electronic display screen is created by processing a mirror on a substrate glass. A back plate glass is then placed on top of the substrate glass and sealed to the back plate glass. A hermetic seal that includes an adhesive mixed with zeolites is disclosed. The hermetic seal can seal the back plate glass with the substrate glass. The application of the hermetic seal is not limited to the electronic display screen. Rather, the hermetic seal can be used to seal a variety of surfaces including metals, polymers, plastics, alloys, ceramics and the like.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a hermetic seal and methods to create the same. Specifically, a functional hermetic seal is disclosed that includes an adhesive mixed with an active component that can act as an absorbing filter on a molecular level.

BACKGROUND

To create an electronic display screen, a micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) based device such as a mirror is sandwiched between two glass plates: the back plate glass stand the substrate glass. The mirror is typically processed on the substrate glass. The back plate glass is then placed on top of the substrate glass to form the sandwich. The purpose of the back plate glass is to act as a viewing surface and to provide mechanical and environmental protection to the mirror. The sandwich is also referred to as the package.

The MEMS based device that is packaged in this manner is susceptible to problems associated with moisture and other harmful contaminants. The presence of moisture can cause stiction (static friction). The stiction can result because of the physical hydrogen bonding between the two glass surfaces in contact or because of the surface tension forces that result when the moisture between the two glass surfaces undergoes capillary condensation during the actuation of the MEMS based device. The presence of moisture can also cause electrochemical corrosion; for example, if the mirror includes an aluminum mirror.

The presence of harmful contaminants and moisture can pose a danger to the functioning of MEMS based device. For example, chlorine and moisture can combine to form an acidic environment that can be harmful to the MEMS based device. It is important that the package is moisture and contaminant free for the life of the device.

There are various channels by which water vapor or the contaminant can find its way inside the package. The moisture can enter the package from the environment in which the MEMS device is packaged. The moisture can permeate into the package from outside. The contaminant can be formed as a result of the outgassing of package components such as glass and polymers, especially at elevated temperatures.

In the prior art, to prevent the moisture and the contaminant from entering the package, the back plate glass and the substrate glass of the package are sealed to each other by using techniques such as welding and soldering, and by using o-rings. These prior art techniques are lacking in at least two respects. One, welding and soldering materials and o-rings occupy space. Real estate in MEMS based device packages is tight and there is a growing need for smaller form factors. Two, these prior art techniques do not eliminate the moisture and contaminants that are formed inside the package as a result of, for example, outgassing.

A simple technique to effectively seal two surfaces to each other that does not occupy additional real estate is desirable.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figure of the accompanying drawing, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of package components that can be sealed with the hermetic seal of the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The hermetic seal including an adhesive mixed with an active component that can act as an absorbing filter on a molecular level is disclosed. The material can include a zeolite.

Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawing and the detailed description that follows.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following descriptions for the purposes of explanation, numerous details are set forth such as examples of specific materials and methods in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required in order to practice the present invention. In other instances, well known materials and methods have not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.

In this description, a hermetic seal and, methods to create the same are disclosed. The hermetic seal includes an adhesive mixed with molecular sieves or zeolites. In one embodiment, the zeolites can include aluminosilicate-structured minerals such as sodium aluminosilicate. In another embodiment, the zeolites can include microporous silicate-structured minerals. It will be appreciated that active components other than zeolites that can act as absorbing filters on a molecular level can also be used. In one embodiment, the adhesive can include an adhesive with low outgassing numbers. In other embodiments, the adhesives can include adhesives with various outgassing numbers.

In one embodiment, the zeolites are mixed with the adhesive in a weight: ratio of 50:50. In other embodiments, the zeolites are mixed with the adhesive in various weight ratios. In one embodiment, the zeolites include zeolites in the powder form. In another embodiment, the zeolites include zeolites pellets. In yet another embodiment, the zeolites include zeolites beads.

The hermetic seal of the present invention can be applied as a bead between two surfaces to seal the two surfaces. The surfaces can include glass, metal, polymer, plastic, alloy or ceramic surfaces, or a combination thereof. The amount of bead that is applied can depend on the estimated amount of moisture or contaminant gases that will have to be removed from the package during the life of the package. This amount can be calculated by considering factors such as the amount of moisture/contamination that is present inside the package when the package is formed, the permeation rate of the adhesive, and the outgassing potential of the package components.

The zeolites can absorb water molecules at high temperatures. Zeolites of different pore sizes can be selected to absorb different contaminants. In one embodiment, the zeolites are selected to absorb contaminant molecules such as aromatic branched-chain hydrocarbons that have critical diameters of up to ten angstroms. In another embodiment, zeolites of pore sizes between two and three angstroms can be selected to absorb molecules of diameters less than two angstroms, namely hydrogen and moisture molecules. In yet another embodiment, zeolites of pore sizes of fifty angstroms are used to absorb nitrogen and carbon dioxide. molecules. In yet another embodiment, the hermetic seal can include a mixture of zeolites of various pore sizes.

The hermetic seal of the present invention can be constructed in a simple manner without using techniques such as welding and soldering, or by using o-rings. The bead can be applied through a simple in-line manufacturing process. The bead occupies a negligible amount of real estate and it does not significantly bulk up the package. The hermetic seal includes active components in the form of zeolites that can trap the moisture and other contaminant gases in their pores. The hermetic seal provides mechanical support to the MEMS based device package.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of package components that can be sealed with the hermetic seal of the present invention. The components 100 for the MEMS based device in the form of a flat panel display are shown. The components include the substrate glass 110, the mirror 120, the hermetic seal bead 130 and the back plate glass 140. The mirror 120 is processed on the substrate glass 110. The bead 130 is applied to the substrate glass 110 around the perimeter of the mirror 120. The back plate glass 140 is placed on top of the substrate glass 110. The substrate glass 110 and the back plate glass 140 are sealed together by the bead 130 to form the package 100. In the ensuing description, the terms components 100 and package 100 are used interchangeably. Also, in the ensuing description, the terms bead 130 and hermetic seal 130 are used interchangeably.

The mirror 120 can be referred to as the MEMS based device or the MEMS structure. The package 100 can also be referred to as the glass sandwich. The package 100 formed by the components 100 can be a component of a flat panel display. An array of mirrors such as the mirror 120 can be processed on the substrate glass 110 to form the flat panel display. The back plate glass 140 serves as the viewing surface. The back plate glass 140 also serves a mechanical function because it prevents the user from touching the mirror 110.

The mirror 120 can be processed through conventional semiconductor technology processes. The mirror 120 can include a metallic mirror such as an aluminum mirror. It will be appreciated that in addition to the mirror 120, the package can include other display elements. It will be appreciated that clear plastic surfaces can replace the substrate glass 110 and the back plate glass 140.

The bead 130 can be applied around the perimeter of the mirror 120. For the embodiments in which the substrate glass 110 includes a plurality of mirrors 130 120, the bead 130 can be applied around the perimeter of the plurality of mirrors 120. In one embodiment, the bead 130 thickness is one hundred angstroms. In another embodiment, the bead 130 thickness is two hundred angstroms. In yet another embodiment, the bead 130 thickness is three hundred angstroms. In still other embodiments, beads 130 of various thicknesses that maintain a low form factor for the package 100 can be applied.

It will be appreciated that the application of the hermetic seal 130 of the present invention is not limited to the MEMS based products. The hermetic seal 130 can seal various surfaces of various devices and products. The hermetic seal 130 can seal surfaces including metals, plastics, polymers, ceramics, alloys and the like. The hermetic seal 130 of the present invention is ideal for the space critical environments because it occupies negligible real estate. The prior art seals that are formed by using techniques such as welding and soldering or by using o-rings can substantially bulk up the size of the package 100. The hermetic seal 130 can be applied through simple in-line manufacturing processes. The prior art techniques of welding and soldering require very high temperature processes that are expensive, can damage the package, and occupy valuable real estate.

The hermetic seal 130 acts as an environmental barrier by blocking humidity and chemical contaminants from entering the package 100. The hermetic seal 130 includes an adhesive mixed with an active component such as the zeolites. The adhesive alone, even a low permeation rate adhesive, cannot serve as a perfect environmental barrier because it eventually allows the contaminants and moisture to permeate. The active component can grab the contaminants and moisture that try to permeate into the package 100, instead of merely blocking their entry. The active component can grab the contaminant gases that result from outgassing of the components 100 after the package 100 is formed. The active component can grab the portion of the adhesive that evaporates into the package 100 while the adhesive is curing. The thickness of the bead 130 and the amount of active component that is mixed with the adhesive can depend on the package 100 estimated life time and the estimated amount of contaminants and moisture that can penetrate the package 100 during the expected life time.

In some embodiments, an outer bead 150 of adhesive is applied around the perimeter of the bead 130. The outer bead 150 can include a low permeation rate adhesive. The outer bead 150 can provide additional environmental protection to the package 100. The outer bead can be useful for the aggressive environment in which the bead 130 alone cannot serve as an effective hermetic seal without being loaded with an impractical amount of the active component. If the bead 130 includes a very high portion of zeolites in the zeolites-adhesive mixture, for example more than sixty percent zeolites by weight, the bead 130 can become microscopically porous. The bead 130 can also become highly non-viscous and thus difficult to apply. Also, the bead 130 with a high percentage of zeolite by weight may not provide a robust mechanical support to the package 100. In aggressive environments, the application of the outer bead 150 can slow down the penetration process of contaminants and moisture into the package 100.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims

1. A micro-electromechanical systems based device package comprising:

a back plate glass;
a substrate glass;
at least one mirror located between the substrate glass and the back plate glass; the at lease one mirror being configured to be actuated in an electronic display; and
a bead of an adhesive mixed with a zeolite, the adhesive applied between the back plate glass and the substrate glass; and, wherein the adhesive is applied substantially around the outer perimeter of the at least one mirror.
a mirror processed on the substrate glass.

2. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 1, including the bead being applied around the perimeter of the mirror.

3. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 1, wherein the bead adhesive acts as a hermetic seal.

4. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 1, wherein the bead adhesive traps moisture and other contaminant gases that can be harmful to the mirror.

5. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 1, wherein the micro-electromechanical systems device includes an electronic display screen.

6. A micro-electromechanical systems based (MEMS) device package comprising:

a back plate glass;
a substrate glass;
at least one MEMS structure located between the substrate glass and the back plate glass; and
a bead of an adhesive mixed with zeolites of different pore sizes, the adhesive applied between the back plate glass and the substrate glass, wherein the zeolites of different pore sizes are selected to absorb molecules of different diameters, wherein the adhesive is applied substantially around the outer perimeter of the at least one MEMS structure.

7. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 6, wherein some of the zeolites have a pore size to allow absorption of molecules having a diameter of up to ten angstroms.

8. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 6, wherein some of the zeolites have a pore size to allow absorption of molecules having a diameter of less than two angstroms.

9. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 6, wherein the pore sizes of some of the zeolites allow absorption of nitrogen and carbon dioxide molecules.

10. A micro-electromechanical systems based (MEMS) device package comprising:

a back plate glass;
a substrate glass;
at least one MEMS structure located between the substrate glass and the back plate glass, the at least one MEMS structure being configured to be actuated; and
a bead of an adhesive mixed with a zeolite, the adhesive applied between the back plate glass and the substrate glass, wherein the zeolite is selected to have a pore size which allows the zeolite to absorb a contaminant gas that is outgassed by components of the package the at least one MEMS structure, and wherein said pore size is up to about fifty Angstroms, wherein the adhesive is supplied substantially around the outer perimeter of the at least one MEMS structure.

11. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 10, wherein the zeolite has a pore size that allows it to absorb aromatic branched-chain hydrocarbons.

12. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 10, wherein the zeolite has a pore size that allows it to absorb hydrogen molecules.

13. The micro-electromechanical systems based device package of claim 10, wherein the zeolite has a pore size that allows it to absorb nitrogen and carbon dioxide molecules.

14. A micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) device, comprising:

a back plate;
a substrate;
at least one reflective MEMS device located between the substrate glass and the back plate glass; and
an adhesive mixed with a zeolite, the adhesive applied between the back plate and the substrate, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb contaminant molecules outgassed by the at least one MEMS device, said contaminant molecules having a diameter of up to about ten angstroms, and wherein the adhesive is applied substantially around the outer perimeter of the at least one MEMS device.

15. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 14, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb molecules having a diameter less than about two angstroms.

16. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 14, wherein the zeolite is selected to have a pore size between about two and three angstroms.

17. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 14, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb aromatic branched-chain hydrocarbons.

18. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 14, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb hydrogen molecules.

19. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 14, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb moisture molecules.

20. A micro-electromechanical systems device, comprising:

a back plate;
a substrate;
at least one mirror located between the substrate and the back plate, the at least one mirror being configured to be actuated; and
an adhesive mixed with a zeolite, the adhesive applied between the back plate and the substrate, wherein the zeolite is selected to have a pore size of about fifty angstroms, and wherein the adhesive is applied substantially around the outer perimeter of the at least one mirror.

21. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 20, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb nitrogen.

22. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 20, wherein the zeolite is selected to absorb carbon dioxide.

23. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the adhesive is applied as a bead between the back plate glass and the substrate glass.

24. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 6, wherein the adhesive is applied as a bead between the back plate glass and the substrate glass.

25. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 6, wherein the adhesive acts as a hermetic seal.

26. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 10, wherein the adhesive is applied as a bead between the back plate glass and the substrate glass.

27. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 10, wherein the adhesive acts as a hermetic seal.

28. The micro-electromechanical systems device of claim 1, wherein the at least one mirror comprises a plurality of mirrors, and wherein the adhesive is applied substantially around the perimeter of the plurality of mirrors.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2534846 December 1950 Ambrose et al.
3439973 April 1969 Paul et al.
3443854 May 1969 Weiss
3653741 April 1972 Marks
3656836 April 1972 de Cremoux et al.
3704806 December 1972 Plachenov et al.
3813265 May 1974 Marks
3900440 August 1975 Ohara et al.
3955880 May 11, 1976 Lierke
4036360 July 19, 1977 Deffeyes
4074480 February 21, 1978 Burton
4099854 July 11, 1978 Decker et al.
4228437 October 14, 1980 Shelton
4377324 March 22, 1983 Durand et al.
4389096 June 21, 1983 Hori et al.
4403248 September 6, 1983 Te Velde
4431691 February 14, 1984 Greenlee
4441791 April 10, 1984 Hornbeck
4445050 April 24, 1984 Marks
4482213 November 13, 1984 Piliavin et al.
4500171 February 19, 1985 Penz et al.
4519676 May 28, 1985 te Velde
4531126 July 23, 1985 Sadones
4552806 November 12, 1985 Hayashi et al.
4566935 January 28, 1986 Hornbeck
4571603 February 18, 1986 Hornbeck et al.
4596992 June 24, 1986 Hornbeck
4615595 October 7, 1986 Hornbeck
4662746 May 5, 1987 Hornbeck
4663083 May 5, 1987 Marks
4681403 July 21, 1987 te Velde et al.
4710732 December 1, 1987 Hornbeck
4748366 May 31, 1988 Taylor
4786128 November 22, 1988 Birnbach
4790635 December 13, 1988 Apsley
4856863 August 15, 1989 Sampsell et al.
4950344 August 21, 1990 Glover et al.
4954789 September 4, 1990 Sampsell
4956619 September 11, 1990 Hornbeck
4977009 December 11, 1990 Anderson et al.
4982184 January 1, 1991 Kirkwood
5018256 May 28, 1991 Hornbeck
5018258 May 28, 1991 Hornbeck
5022745 June 11, 1991 Zayhowski et al.
5028939 July 2, 1991 Hornbeck et al.
5037173 August 6, 1991 Sampsell et al.
5044736 September 3, 1991 Jaskie et al.
5061049 October 29, 1991 Hornbeck
5075796 December 24, 1991 Schildkraut et al.
5078479 January 7, 1992 Vuilleumier
5079544 January 7, 1992 DeMond et al.
5083857 January 28, 1992 Hornbeck
5095375 March 10, 1992 Bolt
5096279 March 17, 1992 Hornbeck et al.
5099353 March 24, 1992 Hornbeck
5124834 June 23, 1992 Cusano et al.
5142405 August 25, 1992 Hornbeck
5153771 October 6, 1992 Link et al.
5162787 November 10, 1992 Thompson et al.
5168406 December 1, 1992 Nelson
5170156 December 8, 1992 DeMond et al.
5172262 December 15, 1992 Hornbeck
5179274 January 12, 1993 Sampsell
5192395 March 9, 1993 Boysel et al.
5192946 March 9, 1993 Thompson et al.
5206629 April 27, 1993 DeMond et al.
5212582 May 18, 1993 Nelson
5214419 May 25, 1993 DeMond et al.
5214420 May 25, 1993 Thompson et al.
5216537 June 1, 1993 Hornbeck
5226099 July 6, 1993 Mignardi et al.
5231532 July 27, 1993 Magel et al.
5233385 August 3, 1993 Sampsell
5233456 August 3, 1993 Nelson
5233459 August 3, 1993 Bozler et al.
5244707 September 14, 1993 Shores
5254980 October 19, 1993 Hendrix et al.
5272473 December 21, 1993 Thompson et al.
5278652 January 11, 1994 Urbanus et al.
5280277 January 18, 1994 Hornbeck
5287096 February 15, 1994 Thompson et al.
5296950 March 22, 1994 Lin et al.
5304419 April 19, 1994 Shores
5305640 April 26, 1994 Boysel et al.
5311360 May 10, 1994 Bloom et al.
5312513 May 17, 1994 Florence et al.
5323002 June 21, 1994 Sampsell et al.
5325116 June 28, 1994 Sampsell
5327286 July 5, 1994 Sampsell et al.
5331454 July 19, 1994 Hornbeck
5339116 August 16, 1994 Urbanus et al.
5365283 November 15, 1994 Doherty et al.
5381253 January 10, 1995 Sharp et al.
5401983 March 28, 1995 Jokerst et al.
5411769 May 2, 1995 Hornbeck
5444566 August 22, 1995 Gale et al.
5446479 August 29, 1995 Thompson et al.
5448314 September 5, 1995 Heimbuch et al.
5452024 September 19, 1995 Sampsell
5454906 October 3, 1995 Baker et al.
5457493 October 10, 1995 Leddy et al.
5457566 October 10, 1995 Sampsell et al.
5459602 October 17, 1995 Sampsell
5459610 October 17, 1995 Bloom et al.
5461411 October 24, 1995 Florence et al.
5489952 February 6, 1996 Gove et al.
5497172 March 5, 1996 Doherty et al.
5497197 March 5, 1996 Gove et al.
5499062 March 12, 1996 Urbanus
5500635 March 19, 1996 Mott
5500761 March 19, 1996 Goossen et al.
5506597 April 9, 1996 Thompson et al.
5515076 May 7, 1996 Thompson et al.
5517347 May 14, 1996 Sampsell
5523803 June 4, 1996 Urbanus et al.
5526051 June 11, 1996 Gove et al.
5526172 June 11, 1996 Kanack
5526688 June 18, 1996 Boysel et al.
5535047 July 9, 1996 Hornbeck
5547823 August 20, 1996 Murasawa et al.
5548301 August 20, 1996 Kornher et al.
5550373 August 27, 1996 Cole et al.
5551293 September 3, 1996 Boysel et al.
5552924 September 3, 1996 Tregilgas
5553440 September 10, 1996 Bulger et al.
5559358 September 24, 1996 Burns et al.
5563398 October 8, 1996 Sampsell
5567334 October 22, 1996 Baker et al.
5570135 October 29, 1996 Gove et al.
5579149 November 26, 1996 Moret et al.
5581272 December 3, 1996 Conner et al.
5583688 December 10, 1996 Hornbeck
5589852 December 31, 1996 Thompson et al.
5591379 January 7, 1997 Shores
5597736 January 28, 1997 Sampsell
5600383 February 4, 1997 Hornbeck
5602671 February 11, 1997 Hornbeck
5606441 February 25, 1997 Florence et al.
5608468 March 4, 1997 Gove et al.
5610438 March 11, 1997 Wallace et al.
5610624 March 11, 1997 Bhuva
5610625 March 11, 1997 Sampsell
5619059 April 8, 1997 Li et al.
5619365 April 8, 1997 Rhoades et al.
5619366 April 8, 1997 Rhoades et al.
5636052 June 3, 1997 Arney et al.
5646768 July 8, 1997 Kaeiyama
5650881 July 22, 1997 Hornbeck
5654741 August 5, 1997 Sampsell et al.
5657099 August 12, 1997 Doherty et al.
5659374 August 19, 1997 Gale, Jr. et al.
5665997 September 9, 1997 Weaver et al.
5703710 December 30, 1997 Brinkman et al.
5710656 January 20, 1998 Goossen
5739945 April 14, 1998 Tayebati
5745193 April 28, 1998 Urbanus et al.
5745281 April 28, 1998 Yi et al.
5771116 June 23, 1998 Miller et al.
5784190 July 21, 1998 Worley
5784212 July 21, 1998 Hornbeck
5815141 September 29, 1998 Phares
5818095 October 6, 1998 Sampsell
5825528 October 20, 1998 Goosen
5835255 November 10, 1998 Miles
5842088 November 24, 1998 Thompson
5853662 December 29, 1998 Watanabe
5912758 June 15, 1999 Knipe et al.
5939785 August 17, 1999 Klonis et al.
5986796 November 16, 1999 Miles
6028690 February 22, 2000 Carter et al.
6038056 March 14, 2000 Florence et al.
6040937 March 21, 2000 Miles
6049317 April 11, 2000 Thompson
6055090 April 25, 2000 Miles
6061075 May 9, 2000 Nelson et al.
6099132 August 8, 2000 Kaeriyama
6113239 September 5, 2000 Sampsell et al.
6147790 November 14, 2000 Meier et al.
6160833 December 12, 2000 Floyd et al.
6180428 January 30, 2001 Peeters et al.
6201633 March 13, 2001 Peeters et al.
6232936 May 15, 2001 Gove et al.
6238755 May 29, 2001 Harvey et al.
6282010 August 28, 2001 Sulzbach et al.
6295154 September 25, 2001 Laor et al.
6323982 November 27, 2001 Hornbeck
6355328 March 12, 2002 Baratuci et al.
6447126 September 10, 2002 Hornbeck
6455927 September 24, 2002 Glenn et al.
6465355 October 15, 2002 Horsley
6466358 October 15, 2002 Tew
6473274 October 29, 2002 Maimone et al.
6480177 November 12, 2002 Doherty et al.
6496122 December 17, 2002 Sampsell
6545335 April 8, 2003 Chua et al.
6548908 April 15, 2003 Chua et al.
6549338 April 15, 2003 Wolverton et al.
6552840 April 22, 2003 Knipe
6582789 June 24, 2003 Sumi
6600201 July 29, 2003 Hartwell et al.
6606175 August 12, 2003 Sampsell et al.
6625047 September 23, 2003 Coleman, Jr.
6630786 October 7, 2003 Cummings et al.
6643069 November 4, 2003 Dewald
6650455 November 18, 2003 Miles
6674090 January 6, 2004 Chua et al.
6674562 January 6, 2004 Miles
6680792 January 20, 2004 Miles
6709750 March 23, 2004 Pohlmann et al.
6710908 March 23, 2004 Miles et al.
6775174 August 10, 2004 Huffman et al.
6778155 August 17, 2004 Doherty et al.
6822628 November 23, 2004 Dunphy et al.
6859218 February 22, 2005 Luman et al.
6862022 March 1, 2005 Slupe
6862029 March 1, 2005 D'Souza et al.
6867896 March 15, 2005 Miles
7012726 March 14, 2006 Miles
7012732 March 14, 2006 Miles
7042643 May 9, 2006 Miles
7119945 October 10, 2006 Kothari et al.
7123216 October 17, 2006 Miles
7130104 October 31, 2006 Cummings
7136213 November 14, 2006 Chui
7138984 November 21, 2006 Miles
7142346 November 28, 2006 Chui et al.
20010003487 June 14, 2001 Miles
20020015215 February 7, 2002 Miles
20020056898 May 16, 2002 Lopes et al.
20020075555 June 20, 2002 Miles
20020126364 September 12, 2002 Miles
20020187254 December 12, 2002 Ghosh
20030043157 March 6, 2003 Miles
20030072070 April 17, 2003 Miles
20030202266 October 30, 2003 Ring et al.
20040051929 March 18, 2004 Sampsell et al.
20040240032 December 2, 2004 Miles
20050254155 November 17, 2005 Plamateer et al.
20060066935 March 30, 2006 Cummings et al.
20070097477 May 3, 2007 Miles
Foreign Patent Documents
0 667 548 August 1995 EP
02-068513 March 1990 JP
03-199920 August 1991 JP
WO 97/17628 May 1997 WO
WO 95/30924 November 1997 WO
WO 99/52006 October 1999 WO
WO 99/52006 October 1999 WO
WO 03/007049 January 2003 WO
Other references
  • Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2002 in U.S. App. No. 09/921,196.
  • Akasaka, “Three-Dimensional IC Trends,” Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 74, No. 12, pp. 1703-1714 (Dec. 1986).
  • Aratani et al., “Process and Design Considerations for Surface Micromachined Beams for a Tuneable Interferometer Array in Silicon,” Proc. IEEE Microelectromechanical Workshop, Fort Lauderdale, FL, pp. 230-235 (Feb. 1993).
  • Aratani et al., “Surface Micromachined Tuneable Interferometer Array,” Sensors and Actuators, pp. 17-23 (1994).
  • Conner, “Hybrid Color Display Using Optical Interference Filter Array,” SID Digest, pp. 577-580 (1993).
  • Goossen et al., “Possible Display Applications of the Silicon Mechinical Anti-Reflection Switch, ” Society for Information Display (1994).
  • Goosen et al., “Silicoon Modulator Based on Mechanically-Active Anti-Reflection Layer with 1Mbit/sec Capability for Fiber-in-the-Loop Applications,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters (Sep. 1994).
  • Gosch, “West Germany Grabs the Lead in X-Ray Litography,” Electronics, pp. 78-80 (Feb. 5, 1987).
  • Howard et al., “Nanometer-Scale Fabrication Techniques,” VLSI Electronics:Microstructure Science, vol. 5, pp. 145-153 and pp. 166-173 (1982).
  • Jackson, “Classical Electrodynamics,” John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 568-573.
  • Jerman et al., “A Miniature Fabry-Perot Interfrometer with a Corrugated Silicon Diaphragm Support,” IEEE Electron Devices Society (1988).
  • Johnson “Optical Scanners,” Microwave Scanning Antennas, vol. 1, pp. 251-261 (1964).
  • “Light over Matter,” Circle No. 36 (Jun. 1993).
  • Miles, “A New Reflective FPD Technology Using Interferometric Modulation,” Society for Information Display '97 Digest, Session 7.3.
  • Newsbreaks, “Quantum-trench devices might operate at terahertz frequencies,” Laser Focus World (May 1993).
  • Oliner et al., “Radiating Elements and Mutual Coupling,” Microwave Scanning Antennas, vol. 2, pp. 134-194 (1966).
  • Raley et al., “A Fabry-Perot Microinterferometer for Visible Wavelenghts,” IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, SC (1992).
  • Sperger et al., “High Performance Patterned All-Dielectric Interference Colour Filter for Display Applications,” SID Digest, pp. 81-83 (1994).
  • Stone, “Radiation and Optics, An Introduction to the Classical Theory,” McGraw-Hill, pp. 340-343 (1963).
  • Walker, et al., “Electron-beam-tunable Interference Filter Spatial Light Modulator,” Optics Letters, vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 345-347 (May 1988).
  • Winton, John M., “A novel way to capture solar energy,” Chemical Week, pp. 17-18 (May 15, 1985).
  • Wu, “Design of a Reflective Color LCD Using Optical Interference Reflectors,” ASIA Display '95, pp. 929-931 (Oct. 16, 1995).
Patent History
Patent number: RE40436
Type: Grant
Filed: Jul 7, 2005
Date of Patent: Jul 15, 2008
Assignee: IDC, LLC (San Francisco, CA)
Inventors: Manish Kothari (Cupertino, CA), Clarence Chui (San Jose, CA)
Primary Examiner: Cathy F. Lam
Attorney: Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
Application Number: 11/176,878