Systems and methods for plasma collection

- FENWAL, INC.

A plasmapheresis system and a method for operating a plasmapheresis system are provided by which a volume of plasma product (i.e., anticoagulated plasma) so that that the targeted volume of pure plasma in the plasma product is determined based on donor-specific characteristics. In particular, the targeted amount of pure plasma to be collected is based on the weight, or the weight and the height, of the donor. The targeted volume of pure plasma to be collected, TVP, may be a multiple of the donors weight. Alternatively, TVP may be a multiple of the donor's total blood volume, TBV, with the TBV of the donor being determined based on the donor's weight and height. A target volume for the plasma product to be collected, TVPP, is established, and separation of whole blood into a plasma component and a second component continues until the volume of plasma product in a collection container equals TVPP.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 17/861,437, filed Jul. 11, 2022, which is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 17/306,099, filed May 3, 2021, which claims the benefit of U.S. 63/140,534, filed Jan. 22, 2021 and which is a Continuation-in Part of U.S. Ser. No. 16/739,441, filed Jan. 10, 2020; which is a Continuation of PCT/US2019/033318, filed May 21, 2019, which claims the benefit of each of U.S. 62/846,400, filed May 10, 2019, U.S. 62/752,480, filed Oct. 30, 2018, and U.S. 62/674,144, filed May 21, 2018, all of the above applications being incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

BACKGROUND

The present application relates to systems and methods for performing plasmapheresis and, more particularly, to plasmapheresis systems and methods in which the volume of pure plasma that may be collected from a particular donor is optimized.

Plasmapheresis is an apheresis procedure in which whole blood is withdrawn from a donor, plasma is separated from other cellular blood components (red blood cells, platelets, and leukocytes) and retained, and the cellular blood components are returned to the donor. The separation of the plasma from the cellular components is typically accomplished in an automated procedure by centrifugation or membrane filtration.

In automated plasmapheresis, whole blood is drawn from the donor, mixed at a specified ratio with anticoagulant, and then separated into plasma, red blood cells, and other cellular components. Once a target volume of anticoagulated plasma (or “plasma product”) has been collected, as determined by a weigh scale associated with a plasma collection container, the withdrawal of whole blood from the donor ceases, and the red blood cells and other cellular components are returned to the donor. Often, the plasma product is collected in multiple collection and reinfusion cycles, until the total target volume of anticoagulated plasma has been collected. The anticoagulated plasma may be used for later transfusion or further manufacturing.

Plasma that is collected to serve as a source material (“source plasma”) for further manufacturing is collected from multiple donors and combined or pooled together for this purpose. The FDA issued guidelines for registered blood collection centers as to the volume of plasma that may be collected as source plasma during plasmapheresis in order to improve the consistency of procedures for manufacturing source plasma, and to minimize the opportunity for staff error. (FDA Memo: “Volume Limits-Automated Collection of Source Plasma (11/4/92)”).

The FDA Memo set forth a simplified plasma volume nomogram, in which the volume (or weight) of pure (or raw) plasma that may be collected from a particular donor is limited to ensure donor safety and comfort. More specifically, the FDA nomogram limits the volume (or weight) of plasma based on the weight of the donor, and establishes the volume of anticoagulant that may be added to a 1:16 ratio of anticoagulant to anticoagulated blood, or 0.06 parts anticoagulant to 1 part anticoagulated blood, to arrive at a maximum collection volume for the total of the plasma plus the anticoagulant for a particular donor.

The simplified nomogram set forth in the FDA Memo has been the predominant method for determining plasma product collection volumes used by blood collection centers. Therefore, the plasmapheresis devices used at such centers are commonly programmed to collect a specified volume/weight of anticoagulated plasma (assuming a known density) in accordance with the maximum collection volume permitted by the FDA nomogram, with the anticoagulant being added to the whole blood at a 1:16 or 0.06 ratio.

One simplification made in the FDA nomogram is to exclude the consideration of donor hematocrit in determining the targeted collection volume for the plasma product. However, the relative proportions of pure plasma and anticoagulant in the plasma product depends on the donor blood hematocrit and the ratio at which the anticoagulant is combined with the donor's whole blood. As a consequence, higher hematocrit donors reach the maximum collection volume set forth in the FDA nomogram before reaching the maximum pure plasma volume that may be safely collected from the donor. This represents an inefficiency for the plasma collection center, in that the volume of pure plasma that is collected is less than the maximum amount possible.

Further, the amount of pure plasma that may be safely collected from a donor can depend on factors in addition to the donor's weight and hematocrit that affect the donor's total blood volume, such as the donor's height.

Because the source plasma from multiple donors is combined, it is important to maximize the pure plasma volume that may be collected from each individual donor, as even small gains in volume collected from each individual donor, when added together, result in a meaningful increase in the total volume of the pooled plasma. If a plasmapheresis device were to be able to better target the pure plasma volume, more plasma proteins could be collected from each donor, improving the overall efficiency of the plasma collection center. Accordingly, by way of the present disclosure, systems and methods for optimizing the volume of plasma collected are provided which are consistent with donor safety and comfort.

SUMMARY

In a first aspect of the present disclosure, a system is provided for collecting plasma from a donor in which the system comprises: a venipuncture needle for withdrawing whole blood from the donor, a blood separator for separating the whole blood into a plasma product and a second blood component comprising red blood cells, a donor line coupled to the venipuncture needle for introducing whole blood from the donor to the blood separator, a first pump for controlling flow through the donor line, an anticoagulant line coupled to an anticoagulant source for combining anticoagulant with the whole blood, and a second pump for controlling flow through the anticoagulant line.

A touchscreen is provided for receiving input from an operator to a controller programmed to control operation of the system. The controller is configured to determine a target volume of plasma product to be collected (TVPP), either based on the weight of the donor and the donor hematocrit, or based on the weight and height of the donor and the donor hematocrit, to control the system to operate a draw and return cycle to withdraw whole blood from the donor, to add anticoagulant to the whole blood at a pre-determined ratio (ACR), to separate the anticoagulated whole blood into the plasma product and the second component and to return the second component to the donor, and to stop withdrawing whole blood from the donor and initiate a final return of the second blood component when a measured volume of plasma product in a plasma collection container reaches the target volume for plasma product.

In a second aspect, the controller is programmed to calculate i) a target volume of pure plasma to be collected (TVP) based on the weight of the donor and ii) a percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected (% ACTVPP) based on the pre-determined anticoagulant ratio, ACR, and the donor hematocrit, wherein the TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP).

In a third aspect, the controller is programmed to calculate a total blood volume of the donor (TBV) based on the weight and height of the donor, a target volume of pure plasma to be collected (TVP) as a percentage of the TBV, and a percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected (% ACTVPP) based on the pre-determined anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and the donor hematocrit, wherein the TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP).

In a fourth aspect, the controller is programmed to calculate the total blood volume of the donor (TBV) based on the weight and height of the donor to calculate a body mass index for the donor (BMI) such that TBV=70/(sqrtBMI/22) (Lemmens equation).

In a fifth aspect, the controller is programmed to calculate the total blood volume of the donor (TBV) based on the weight (Wt), height (Ht) and sex (Male or Female) of the donor such that TBV=(0.3669*Ht3)+(0.03219*Wt)+0.6041 for Males and TBV=(0.3561*Ht3)+(0.03308*Wt)+0.1833 for Females, where Ht is in meters and Wt is in kilograms (Nadler's formula).

In a sixth aspect, methods are provided for performing plasmapheresis to collect a volume of plasma product (i.e., anticoagulated plasma, VPP) so that that the targeted volume of pure plasma (TVP) in the plasma product is determined based on donor-specific characteristics, consistent with the donor's safety and comfort. In particular, the targeted volume of pure plasma to be collected, TVP, is based on the weight, or the weight and the height, of the donor.

In a seventh aspect, the targeted volume of pure plasma to be collected, TVP, may be a multiple of the donor's weight. Alternatively, TVP may be a multiple of the donor's total blood volume, TBV, with the TBV of the donor being determined based on the donor's weight and height, using well established methodology, such as the Lemmens equation or Nadler's formula.

A target volume for the plasma product to be collected, TVPP, is established based on the target volume/weight of pure plasma and the percentage of anticoagulant, AC, in the plasma product, % ACTVPP, such that TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP), wherein % ACTVPP is based on an AC ratio, ACR, and the hematocrit of the donor.

Once the TVPP is determined, the plasmapheresis procedure is commenced, with whole blood being drawn from the donor, mixed at a specified ratio with anticoagulant, and then separated into plasma, red blood cells, and other cellular components. Once the TVPP has been collected, as determined by, e.g., a weigh scale associated with a plasma collection container, the withdrawal of whole blood from the donor ceases, and the red blood cells and other cellular components are returned to the donor.

In a seventh aspect, in determining the target amount for the plasma product to be collected, the hematocrit of the donor may be determined prior to the collection phase of each cycle, either by calculation or on the basis of a signal from a sensor or the like that is indicative of the donor's hematocrit. Further, the amount of plasma product in the plasma collection container may be determined by: e.g., a weigh scale associated with the plasma collection container or an optical sensor that directly measures the volume.

In other aspects, a method is provided for operating a plasmapheresis system to collect a plasma product volume that comprises the maximum allowable volume/weight of raw plasma in accordance with the limits set forth in the FDA nomogram based on the weight of the donor.

In order to collect the maximum volume/weight of raw plasma permitted by the FDA nomogram, a modified nomogram is provided that utilizes the donor's hematocrit to calculate a target volume/weight for a plasma product having the maximum volume of raw plasma permitted by the FDA nomogram. A calculated volume/weight of raw plasma is compared to the maximum volume/weight for the raw plasma permitted by the FDA nomogram. If the calculated volume/weight of raw plasma is less than the maximum permitted volume/weight, the volume/weight of the plasma product to be collected is adjusted upward from the maximum volume/weight permitted by the FDA nomogram for the plasma product by an amount equal to the difference plus the additional amount of anticoagulant that is added to process the additional volume/weight of plasma.

Thus, with the knowledge of the donor's hematocrit and the instrument's AC ratio, the volume of additional raw plasma that may be safely collected from the donor consistent with the limits set forth in the FDA nomogram is determined, and then the total volume/weight of plasma product to be collected based on the weight of the donor set forth in the FDA nomogram is adjusted accordingly.

Typically, plasmapheresis procedures involve sequential cycles of alternating phases, one in which whole blood is withdrawn from the donor and the plasma separated and collected, and the other in which the separated red blood cells and any other non-RBC cellular components are returned to the donor. The donor's hematocrit will change during the course of the plasmapheresis procedure, thus affecting the amount of anticoagulant in the plasma product collected from one cycle to the next.

Consequently, in the first aspect of the disclosure, before the commencement of the subsequent extraction/separation phase, a new hematocrit value for the donor is determined, and the target volume/weight of plasma product for the procedure is recalculated before the commencement of each extraction/separation phase to ensure that the maximum amount of raw plasma permitted by the FDA nomogram is collected.

In another aspect, a further method for collecting a volume of plasma during an apheresis procedure is provided. The steps of the method comprise: determining a total whole blood volume Vb for the donor; determining a volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected from the donor based on Vb; determining a target volume of plasma product (VPP) to be collected, wherein VF is equal to the volume of raw plasma (VRP) to be collected plus a volume of anticoagulant (VAC) that is added to the VRP during the apheresis procedure, such that VPP=VRP*K, where K=(ACR*(1−Hct/100)+1)/(ACR*(1−Hct/100)), based on an anticoagulant ratio (ACR, defined as the ratio of donor blood volume to anticoagulant volume for donor blood having no anticoagulant) established for the procedure and a Hct of the donor; withdrawing whole blood from the donor; adding anticoagulant to the whole blood in an amount consistent with the ACR; separating plasma product from the whole blood; and transferring the plasma product to a collection container until the volume of plasma product in the collection container reaches VPP. Because the plasmapheresis procedure comprises multiple extraction/separation and return phases, the VPP for the procedure is recalculated before each extraction/separation phase is commenced, based on a value for the hematocrit of the donor determined prior to the start of each draw phase, and the target volume for the plasma product adjusted accordingly. Alternatively. VRP may be determined based on a calculated value for the donor's total plasma volume, based on Vb and the donor's hematocrit.

In another aspect, a method for determining a volume of plasma product (VPP) that may be collected during an apheresis procedure is provided, wherein VPP is equal to a volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected plus a volume of anticoagulant (VAC) that is added to the VRP during the apheresis procedure. The steps of the method comprise: determining a weight (Wkg) and sex (M or F) of the donor, determining a hematocrit (Hct) for the donor; determining the volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected based on the weight (Wkg) and sex (M or F) of the donor; determining a ratio K between the VP and the VRP, such that K=VPP/VRP, based on an anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and the Hct of the donor; determining VPP, such that VPP=VRP*K. Further, K=(ACR*(1−Hct/100)+1)/(ACR*(1−Hct/100)). After VPP is determined, whole blood is withdrawn from the donor; anticoagulant is added to the whole blood in an amount consistent with the ACR; plasma product is separated from the whole blood; and plasma product is transferred to a collection container. After a desired amount of whole blood has been withdrawn from the donor, the red blood cells are returned to the donor. Then, the Hct of the donor and VPP are determined prior to each draw phase.

In a related aspect, the draw and separation steps are repeated until the volume of plasma product in the collection container reaches VPP.

In a related aspect, the donor's hematocrit subsequent to the first collection phase may be calculated by a volume balance, assuming that the donor's quantity of red blood cells is the same at the start of each draw cycle, while the total volume of blood decreases from one cycle to the next in an amount equal to the amount of raw plasma collected. Alternatively, the donor's hematocrit at the start of each draw cycle can be measured by an optical or other sensor.

In a further aspect, the volume of raw plasma that may be collected from a particular donor may be determined by any one of several different means. Such means include, e.g., the FDA nomogram, taking into account only the donor's weight; a modified FDA nomogram, further taking into account the donor's hematocrit, and taking a fraction of a total blood volume or total plasma volume calculated for a particular donor. The total blood volume or total plasma volume may be determined using, for example, Nadler's equations, Gilcher's Rule of Five, tables provided by the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH), or any other generally accepted method using the donor's height, weight, sex, and age, consistent with the safety and comfort of the donor.

In another aspect, an automated system for separating plasma from whole blood is provided that comprises a reusable hardware component and a disposable kit. The disposable kit further comprises i) a separator for separating whole blood into a plasma fraction and a concentrated cell fraction, the separator having an input having a blood line integrally connected thereto for transporting whole blood from a donor to the separator, a plasma output port integrally connected to a plasma collection container by a plasma line, and a concentrated cell outlet port integrally connected to a reservoir for receipt of concentrated cells prior to reinfusion to the donor; ii) a donor line terminating in a venipuncture needle for transporting whole blood from a donor to the blood line, iii) an anticoagulant line integrally connected to the blood line and configured to be connected to a source of anticoagulant for transporting anticoagulant to the donor line, and iv) a reinfusion line for transporting concentrated cells from the reservoir to the donor line.

The reusable hardware component further comprises i) a first peristaltic pump for delivering anticoagulant at a controlled rate into the blood line during a collection phase, ii) a second pump for delivering anticoagulated whole blood to the separator during the collection phase and for returning concentrated cellular components during a reinfusion phase, iii) a third pump for delivering concentrated cellular components from the separator to the reservoir during the collection phase, iv) a clamp associated with each of the blood line, plasma line, and reinfusion line, v) a weigh scale for weighing each of the plasma collection container, the reservoir and the source of anticoagulant, and vi) a programmable controller comprising a touch screen for receiving input from an operator, the programmable controller configured to receive a signal from each of the weigh scales and to automatically operate the first, second and third pumps and the clamps to separate whole blood into a plasma fraction and a concentrated cell fraction during the collection phase and to return concentrated cells to the donor during the reinfusion stage. The programmable controller is further configured to determine a target amount for the plasma product to be collected in the plasma collection container in accordance with any of the methods described herein, and to terminate the collection phase upon receiving a signal that the amount of plasma product in the plasma collection container equal to the target amount of the plasma product determined by the controller. In determining the target amount for the plasma product to be collected, the controller may be configured to calculate the hematocrit of the donor prior to the collection phase of each cycle. Alternatively, or additionally, the controller may receive a signal from a sensor or the like that is indicative of the donor's hematocrit. Further, the amount of plasma product in the plasma collection container may be determined by, e.g., the weigh scale associated with the plasma collection container or an optical sensor that directly measures the volume.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an exemplary plasmapheresis instrument suitable for use in the system and method of the present application.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a spinning membrane separator of the type incorporated in a disposable set, with portions broken away to show detail, usable with the plasmapheresis system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the front panel of the plasmapheresis system of FIG. 1 showing the components of the disposable set that are mounted thereto.

FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing operation of the plasmapheresis system in the collection phase.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing operation of the plasmapheresis system in the reinfusion phase.

FIGS. 6a and 6b are flow charts showing the steps of methods used in the present application for collecting a target volume of pure plasma.

FIG. 7 is a table that shows the volume of pure plasma, based on donor hematocrit, that is contained within a plasma product volume limit set by the FDA nomogram using a 1:16 ratio of anticoagulant to whole blood.

FIG. 8 is a table that shows the volume of “unclaimed” pure plasma in the plasma product based on the difference between the values set forth in FIG. 7 and the maximum volume of pure plasma that may be collected based on the FDA nomogram.

FIG. 9 is a table that shows the volume of plasma product that may be collected from a donor, based on the donor's weight and hematocrit, that results in the maximum permissible volume of pure plasma permitted by the FDA nomogram.

FIG. 10 is a table showing the inputs to a programmable controller for performing a hypothetical plasmapheresis procedure in accordance with the method of the present application.

FIGS. 11a, 11b comprise a table, broken into two parts illustrating how the donor's hematocrit increases over the course of a hypothetical plasmapheresis procedure based on the inputs from the table of FIG. 10, and resulting in an increase in the total collection volume of plasma product necessary to collect the target volume of pure plasma.

FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating IgG dilution during plasmapheresis.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A more detailed description of the systems and methods in accordance with the present disclosure is set forth below. It should be understood that the description below of specific devices and methods is intended to be exemplary, and not exhaustive of all possible variations or applications. Thus, the scope of the disclosure is not intended to be limiting, and should be understood to encompass variations or embodiments that would occur to persons of ordinary skill. Various aspects of the system and method are described in greater detail in US 2020/0147289, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In the context of the present application, plasmapheresis is performed on an automated system comprising a hardware component, generally designated 10, and a disposable set, generally designated 12, to collect plasma to be processed as source plasma. With reference to FIGS. 1-5, and as described in greater detail below, the disposable set 12 consists of an integrally connected separator, containers, and tubing to transport blood and solutions within a sterile fluid pathway.

The separator 14, best seen in FIG. 2, has a spinning membrane filter 16 mounted to a rotor 18 for rotation within a case 20 to separate blood into components. A detailed description of a spinning membrane separator may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,194,145 to Schoendorfer, which is incorporated herein by reference. As can be appreciated, in a different system, separation of the whole blood may be accomplished by centrifugation. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,542 to Williamson et al.

During plasmapheresis, anticoagulated whole blood enters the separator 14 through a whole blood input port 22. The plasma is separated by the spinning membrane filter and then passes out of a plasma output port 24, through a plasma line 26, and into a plasma collection container 28. Concentrated cells are pumped out of a concentrated cell output port 30 into a reservoir 32, where the cells remain until reinfusion to the donor.

The disposable set 12 also includes tubing lines for introducing whole blood from the donor into the system during collection and returning concentrated cells to the donor during reinfusion (donor line 34, which terminates in the venipuncture needle 36), and for transporting anticoagulated whole blood to the separator (blood line 38), concentrated cells into the reservoir (cell line 40), concentrated cells from the reservoir to the donor line (reinfusion line 42), plasma into the plasma collection container (plasma line 44), saline (saline line 46), and anticoagulant (AC line 48).

The hardware component 10 includes a programmable controller 50 and touch screen 52 with a graphical user interface (“GUI”) through which the operator controls the procedure. For example, the GUI permits entry of any of a donor ID, donor sex, donor height, donor weight, donor age, donor hematocrit/hemoglobin; a target saline infusion volume (if a saline protocol is selected), and a target plasma volume. The touch screen 52 also enables the operator to gather status information and handle error conditions.

Three peristaltic pumps are located on the front panel of the hardware component 10, including an AC pump 54, a blood pump 56, and a cell pump 58. The AC pump 54 delivers anticoagulant solution (AC) at a controlled rate into the blood line 38 as whole blood enters the set from the donor. The blood pump 56 delivers anticoagulated whole blood to the separator during the collection phase of the procedure and returns concentrated cellular components and, if desired, replacement fluid to the donor during the reinfusion phase of the procedure. The cell pump 58 delivers concentrated cellular components from the separator 14 to a reservoir during the collection phase.

The front panel also includes four clamps into which tubings from the disposable set 12 are installed, including a reinfusion clamp 60, a blood clamp 62, a saline clamp 64, and a plasma clamp 66. The reinfusion clamp 60 closes to block the reinfusion line (42) during the collection phase (FIG. 5) and is open during the reinfusion phase (FIG. 5) to allow the blood pump to reinfuse the concentrated cellular components from the reservoir 32 to the donor. The blood clamp 62 opens during the collection phase to allow anticoagulated whole blood to be pumped to the separator 14 and closes during the reinfusion phase to block the blood line 38. The saline clamp 64 closes to block the saline line 46 during the collection phase and during reinfusion of the separated cellular components. If saline is to be used as a replacement fluid, the saline clamp 64 opens during the reinfusion phase. The plasma clamp 66 opens during the collection phase to allow plasma to flow into the plasma collection container 28 and closes during the reinfusion phase.

The hardware component 10 includes three weigh scales to monitor the current plasma collection volume (scale 68), the AC solution volume (scale 70), and the concentrated cellular content volume (scale 72). The system also includes various sensors and detectors, including a venous pressure sensor 74, a separator pressure sensor 76, optical blood detectors 78, and an air detector 80.

The donor is connected to the system throughout the procedure. As illustrated, the disposable set 12 includes a single venipuncture needle 36, through which whole blood is drawn from the donor in a collection phase (FIG. 4) and concentrated cells are returned to the donor in a reinfusion stage (FIG. 5). As noted above, the plasmapheresis procedure may comprise a plurality of cycles each having a collection/separation phase followed by a return or reinfusion phase. During the collection phase, the whole blood is separated into plasma and concentrated cells. The disposable set includes a plasma collection container 28 for receipt of the separated plasma and a reservoir 32 for receipt of the concentrated cells. During the reinfusion phase, the concentrated cells from the reservoir 32 are reinfused to the donor through the venipuncture needle 36. Plasmapheresis performed with a single venipuncture needle 36 may involve multiple cycles of collection and reinfusion.

Returning to FIG. 4, during the collection phase, anticoagulant solution (AC) is pumped at a controlled rate and mixed with whole blood as it enters the disposable set 12. The anticoagulated blood is pumped to the separator 14, where plasma is separated from the cellular components and directed to the plasma collection container 28.

The cellular components are pumped from the separator 14 to the reservoir 32. The collection phase stops when the reservoir 32 reaches an expected volume of concentrated cells or if the target plasma collection volume has been achieved.

Then, the reinfusion phase begins. With reference to FIG. 5, during the reinfusion phase, the blood pump 56 reverses direction and pumps the concentrated cells from the reservoir 32 back to the donor through the apheresis needle 36. If a saline protocol was selected, by which saline is returned to the donor as a replacement fluid for the collected plasma, the final reinfusion phase is followed by saline infusion.

The automated plasma collection device is configured to collect a volume/weight of anticoagulated plasma (i.e., the plasma product) having the maximum volume/weight of raw plasma permitted for the donor under the limits set forth in the FDA nomogram. In order to maximize the volume of raw plasma comprising the plasma product, the device is programmed with a nomogram that accounts for the donor's hematocrit. With the knowledge of the donor's hematocrit and the instrument's AC ratio, the total volume/weight of plasma product to be collected can be determined such that the plasma product includes the maximum volume/weight of raw plasma fraction that may be collected from a donor, consistent with the limits for total volume/weight of raw plasma set forth in the FDA nomogram. By having the computations programmed into the controller, the likelihood of operator error is diminished in comparison to the off-line calculation of the collection volume that is then entered into the instrument.

During plasmapheresis, when anticoagulant is mixed with whole blood as it is drawn from the donor, the anticoagulant is evenly distributed within the pure/raw plasma in the blood. However, the amount of pure/raw plasma in the whole blood is dependent on the hematocrit (Hct) of the whole blood. The following relationships are established:
Volume of RBC=Volume of Whole Blood*Hct/100.  [1]
Volume of Pure/Raw Plasma=Volume of Whole Blood*(1−Hct/100).  [2]
When anticoagulant is mixed with the whole blood, it may be metered at an AC Ratio (ACR) of 16 parts of whole blood to 1 part of AC, or at 1 part of whole blood to 0.06 parts of AC.
ACR=Volume of Whole Blood/Volume of Anticoagulant(the donor blood having no anticoagulant).  [3]
(This yields a slightly different result from the FDA nomogram, which, as noted above, standardizes the volume of anticoagulant that may be added to a 1:16 ratio of anticoagulant to anticoagulated blood, or 0.06 parts anticoagulant to 1 part anticoagulated blood.)
Volume of Anticoagulated Blood=Volume of Anticoagulant+Volume of Whole Blood.   [4]
Combining equations gives:
Volume of Pure/Raw Plasma=ACR*Volume of Anticoagulant*(1−Hct/100).  [5]
Since the red cells are given back to the donor:
Volume collected Plasma Product=Volume of Pure/Raw Plasma+Volume of Anticoagulant.  [6]
Equations [5] and [6] can be combined to calculate the amount of anticoagulant in a given amount of collected plasma:
Volume of Anticoagulant=Volume of collected Plasma Product/(1+ACR*(1−Hct/100)).  [7]
Further
Volume of collected Plasma Product=Volume of Pure/Raw Plasma*K, where K=(ACR*(1−Hct/100)+1)/(ACR*(1−Hct/100)).  [8]

In view of the relationships expressed in the equations above, the volume of pure/raw plasma contained within the volume of plasma product permitted under the FDA nomogram can be determined based upon the hematocrit of the donor. The results of such calculations are set forth in FIG. 7, which shows the volume of pure/raw plasma based on donor hematocrit that is contained within a plasma product volume limit set by the FDA nomogram.

As can be appreciated with reference to FIG. 7, for donors weighing from 110 to 149 lbs. (for whom the maximum plasma product volume per the FDA nomogram is 690 mL), if the donor has a hematocrit of 42 or greater, the volume of raw plasma collected is less than the 625 mL permitted by the FDA nomogram. The situation is similar for donors having a weight of 150 to 174 lbs. (for whom the maximum plasma collection volume per the FDA nomogram is 825 mL) and for donors having a weight of 175 lbs. and up (for whom the maximum plasma collection volume per the FDA nomogram is 880 ml) when the donor's hematocrit is 40 or greater.

The table set forth in FIG. 8 presents the volume of “unclaimed” raw plasma in the plasma product based the difference between the values set forth in FIG. 7 and the maximum volume of pure/raw plasma that may be collected based on the FDA nomogram. Thus, as shown in the table set forth in FIG. 9, the plasma product collected from any particular donor may be adjusted from that set forth in the FDA nomogram by an amount corresponding to the amount of “unclaimed” pure/raw plasma set forth in FIG. 8 plus the amount of anticoagulant needed to process the additional volume.

Alternatively, the volume of plasma product to be collected may be calculated by first determining a weight and hematocrit (Hct) for the donor; determining the volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected based on the weight of the donor (Wkg); determining a ratio K between the VPP and the VRP, such that K=VPP/VRP, based on an anticoagulant ratio (ACR; 1:16 or 0.06:1, per the FDA nomogram) and the Hct of the donor; and determining VPP, such that VPP=VRP*K. Further, K=(ACR*(1−Hct/100)+1)/(ACR*(1−Hct/100)).

In a further alternative, the volume of plasma product that is to be collected (VPP) may be calculated by first determining the weight (Wkg) and hematocrit (Hct) of the donor; determining the volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected based on the weight of the donor (Wkg); determining the volume of anticoagulant to be added (VAC) based on the anticoagulant ratio (ACR; 1:16 or 0.06:1, per the FDA nomogram) and the hematocrit of the donor such that VAC=VRP*(ACR*(1−Hct/100)); and determining the collection volume such that VPP=VRP+VAC.

In keeping with one aspect of the disclosure, the automated plasma collection device is configured to collect a volume/weight of plasma product (pure plasma+anticoagulant) having a volume/weight of pure plasma permitted for the donor as determined by either of the two methods set forth in greater detail below.

With reference to FIG. 6a, a first method (70) for collecting a target volume of plasma product, TVPP, is illustrated. In the method, the target volume of plasma product (TVPP) is determined by first calculating a target volume of pure plasma to be collected (TVP) based on the weight of the donor (Step 72) and then determining a percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected (% ACTVPP) based on the pre-determined anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and the hematocrit of the donor, wherein the TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP) (Step 74). In this method no intervening calculation is required of either a total blood volume or a total plasma volume of the donor prior to determining the target collection volume of plasma for the donor, though, in alternate embodiments, such calculations may be included.

Various methods may be used for determining a target volume of pure plasma that may be collected directly from the weight of the donor. For example, the weight of the donor may be multiplied by an established constant “K1” (such as 10 mL/kg). Alternatively, the weight of the donor may be segregated into weight categories or ranges (e.g., at least three categories, at least six categories, etc.), with a fixed volume established for each category (as in the FDA nomogram discussed above, in which the ranges of donor weight are divided into three categories).

The anticoagulant ratio, ACR, may be defined in one of two different ways. In a first way, ACR is the ratio of the amount of whole blood to the amount of anticoagulant (ACR=WB/AC). In a second way, ACR is the ratio of volume of whole blood plus the volume of anticoagulant to the volume of anticoagulant (ACR=(WB+AC)/AC). If ACR=WB/AC, then the percent of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product, % ACTVPP, is determined according to the following equation: % ACTVPP=1/(1+ACR(1−Hct)), with ACR and Hct being expressed as percentages. If ACR=(WB+AC)/AC), then the percent of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product, % ACTVPP, is determined according to the following equation: % ACTVPP=1/(1+(ACR−1)(1−Hct)). The ACR may be expressed as either a ratio or a percentage, and may vary from 7:1 to 20:1, or from about 5% to 14%. An exemplary ACR is 16:1, or 6.25%.

Returning to FIG. 6a, once the TVPP has been determined, as described above, whole blood is withdrawn from the donor (Step 76) and combined with anticoagulant based on a predetermined ratio, ACR (Step 78). Anticoagulated whole blood is then introduced into separator 14, where it is separated into plasma and concentrated (red blood) cells (Step 80). Plasma product (pure plasma and anticoagulant) is collected in plasma collection container 28 (Step 82) while separated red blood cells are collected in reservoir 32. As the plasma product is being collected, the volume of plasma product, VPP, (pure plasma and anticoagulant) in the plasma container is determined (Step 84). When the VPP equals the Target volume of plasma product (TVPP), withdrawal of whole blood ceases and any remaining blood components (such as red blood cells) are returned to the donor (Step 86).

With reference to FIG. 6b, a second method (90) for collecting a target volume of plasma product. TVPP, is illustrated. In this method, the target volume of plasma product, TPPV, is determined by first calculating a total blood volume of the donor (TBV) based on the weight and height of the donor (Step 92), calculating a target volume of pure plasma product to be collected, TVP, as a percentage of the TBV (Step 94), and calculating a percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected (% ACTVPP) based on the pre-determined anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and the hematocrit of the donor (Step 96), and calculating TVPP wherein TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP) (Step 98). The % ACTVPP may be determined as described above in connection with the first method. In this method no calculation of a total plasma volume of the donor is required to determine the target collection volume of plasma for the donor.

A donor's plasma volume may be estimated based on the donor's total blood volume, and a volume of plasma that may be harvested consistent with donor safety and comfort may be based on this estimation. Methods utilizing donor parameters are commonly used estimate a donor's total blood volume. The donor's total blood volume may be determined using one or more of Lemmens equation (that uses the donor's body mass index to determine a total blood volume), Nadler's equations (that take into account the height, sex and weight of the donor), Gilcher's Rule of Five (that takes into account sex, weight and morphology (obese, thin, normal or muscular), or the standards of the International Counsel for Standardization in Haematology (“ICSH) as set forth in Br. J. Haem. 1995, 89:748-56) (that consider the height, weight, age, and sex of the donor). Any other methodology for determining donor's total blood volume may also be used. In another embodiment, a plurality of such methodologies may be used and the average, mean, or a weighted average of the methodologies may be taken as the donor's total blood volume. For example, once the donor's total blood volume is determined, the donor's plasma volume may be estimated by multiplying the total blood volume by a constant “K2”, where or K2 equals (1−Hct of the donor).

From an analysis of demographic, examination, and laboratory data from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, in which sex, age, height, weight, pregnancy data and hematocrit were extracted, presented in Pearson et al., Interpretation of measured red cell mass and plasma volume in adults: Expert Panel on Radionuclides of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology, British J. Haematology, 89: 748-756 (1995), (upon which the ICSH recommended formulae were derived), it has been determined that for donors having certain characteristics (namely low weight females with high hematocrits), up to 36% of the available plasma may be collected while staying within current regulations. Plasmapheresis procedures with such donors have been carried out routinely without adverse reactions, and thus are considered safe. This suggests that up to 36% of a donor's available plasma can be safely collected in a plasmapheresis procedure.

Given that only negative deviations of a donor's true blood volume from a predicted/calculated total blood volume present a potential risk, a further adjustment downward of the harvestable volume of plasma may be appropriate. Based on a consideration of the deviation between the calculated blood volume as determined in Pearson et al., cited above.

Thus, the total blood volume of the donor (TBV) may be calculated based on the weight (WA) and height (Ht) of the donor to calculate a body mass index for the donor (BMI) such that TBV=70/sqrt(BMI/22), where BMI=Wt/Ht2, and where Ht is in meters and Wt is in kilograms (Lemmens equation). See, “Estimating Blood Volume in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients,” Lemmens et al., Obesity Surgery 16, 2006, pp. 773-776.

Alternatively, the total blood volume of the donor (TBV) may be calculated based on the weight (Wt), height (Ht) and sex (Male or Female) of the donor such that TBV=(0.3669*Ht3)+(0.03219*Wt)+0.6041 for Males and TBV=(0.3561*Ht3)+(0.03308*Wt)+0.1833 for Females, where Ht is in meters and Wt is in kilograms (Nadler's formula).

The percentage by which TBV is multiplied to obtain TVP (and, ultimately TVPP) is selected to maximize the volume of pure plasma that is collected from the donor consistent with donor comfort and safety. The percentage ranges in various embodiments may be variously between approximately 1% and 15% of TBV, at least 15%, less than 18%, between about 15% and 17%, about 12%, about 16% or about 18%. The TVPP may also be subject to a maximum volume of, e.g., 1000 mL or 1050 mL to be collected regardless of the donor's TBV.

An adjustment, Vc, may be made to the calculated volume of whole blood TBV before calculating the target volume of pure plasma TVP, such that TVP=0.36(1−Hct)(TBV−Vc), where Vc=523 mL, based on a regression analysis of the experimental blood volume data presented in Retzlaff et al., Erythrocyte Volume, Plasma Volume, and Lean Body Mass in Adult Men and Women, J. Haematology, 33, 5:649-667 (1969). There is a 95% confidence that an individual's predicted blood volume will differ not more that 20.5%. Thus, a scaling factor of 0.795 may be applied to determination of harvestable raw plasma being 36% of the donor's total plasma volume described above, so that 28.6% of a donor's calculated volume of raw plasma may be harvested, consistent with donor safety and comfort.

Retuning to FIG. 6b, once the TVPP has been determined, as described above (based on the TBV), whole blood is withdrawn from the donor (Step 100) and combined with anticoagulant based on a predetermined ratio (Step 102). Anticoagulated whole blood is then introduced into separator 14 where it is separated into plasma and concentrated (red blood) cells (Step 104). Plasma product (pure plasma and anticoagulant) is collected in plasma collection container 28 (Step 106) while separated red blood cells are collected in reservoir 32. As the plasma product is being collected, the volume of plasma product, VPP, (pure plasma and anticoagulant) in the plasma container is determined (Step 108). When the VPP equals the Target volume of plasma product (TVPP), withdrawal of whole blood ceases and any remaining blood components (such as red blood cells) are returned to the donor (Step 110).

Thus, the collection volume (the volume of plasma product) is determined based on the volume of raw plasma volume that may be collected from a particular donor, the donor's hematocrit, and the fixed anticoagulant ratio (ACR). Consequently, this methodology allows for more consistent control for the raw plasma volume of the donor, which is the variable most related to donor safety.

In an exemplary method, the operator enters into the system controller the collection volume for the plasma product for the particular donor, based on the target volume of raw plasma that may be harvested. The target plasma collection volume may be as set forth in FIG. 9, based on the donor's weight and hematocrit for the initial collection phase, or by any of the other methods as set forth above. Alternatively, the controller is configured to calculate the target plasma product collection volume for the initial collection phase in accordance with a methodology such as those described above upon the operator entering, e.g., the donor's weight and hematocrit, and/or any of the additional donor-specific information (such as the donor's sex, height and age) required by the methodologies used for determining a donor's total blood volume, total plasma volume, and the target volume of harvestable plasma that may be collected.

In practice, the operator enters into the system controller the collection volume for the plasma product for the particular donor, based on the target volume of raw plasma that may be harvested. The target plasma collection volume may be as set forth in FIG. 9, based on the donor's weight and hematocrit for the initial collection phase, or by any of the other methods as set forth above. Alternatively, the controller is configured to calculate the target plasma product collection volume for the initial collection phase in accordance with a methodology such as those described above upon the operator entering, e.g., the donor's weight and hematocrit, and/or any of the additional donor-specific information (such as the donor's sex, height and age) required by the methodologies used for determining a donor's total blood volume, total plasma volume, and the target volume of harvestable plasma that may be collected.

Preferably, the system administrator will initially set an indication of whether the targeted collection volume of plasma product, TVPP, will be determined by the system (e.g., in accordance with one of the methods described above) or entered directly by the operator into the system. If the operator is to enter the TVPP, then the system administrator will disable the controller's capability to calculate a TVPP. The system administrator will also set an AC ratio to be used for all procedures. If the controller is to determine the TVPP, the administrator will set the system to allow the appropriate donor specific characteristics for calculating the TVPP in accordance with any of the methods described above to be entered into the controller, either by the operator or a donor management system, by which donor parameters used for qualification screening (such as weight, height, and hematocrit) can be electronically sent to the instrument, avoiding operator error in entering the donor parameters. The donor management system could also utilize the donor screening measurements, along with the relationship between pure plasma volume and collection volume, to automatically calculate a TVPP that it would transmit to the controller of the plasmapheresis device. Otherwise, the controller will calculate the TVPP before collection of whole blood form the donor starts. In addition, if the controller/donor management system is to calculate TVPP, the administrator will set the system to enable the operator to enter a TVPP other than the calculated volume. Further, the system will permit the operator to change the TVPP from the calculated TVPP, either before or during the procedure, if, for example, the estimated time for running/completing the procedure needs to be shortened for reasons of donor comfort or convenience. At the completion of the procedure the actual volume of plasma product collected, VPP, and the target volume, TVPP, will be displayed, as well as the actual volume of pure plasma collected and the target volume of plasma, TPV.

As noted above, plasmapheresis procedures may be performed with multiple cycles of collection/draw phases and return/reinfusion phases. If the return/reinfusion phase does not include reinfusion of a replacement fluid, the donor's hematocrit will increase from one cycle to the next. Consequently, if the target volume for plasma product is determined based only on the donor's initial hematocrit, and does not consider the donor's increasing hematocrit, the percentage of anticoagulant in the plasma product will be greater (and the volume of pure plasma less) than what was predicted by the initial calculation for determining the target volume of plasma product. Thus, in order to ensure that the volume of plasma product that is collected contains the maximum volume of raw plasma that was determined to be harvested from a particular donor, the target volume for plasma product is recalculated periodically throughout the plasmapheresis procedure, such as before the start of the collection phase of each cycle, to consider the change in the donor's hematocrit.

Accordingly, after the determination of the target volume for plasma product based on the donor's starting hematocrit is made, the plasmapheresis procedure commences with a first draw phase until a specified volume of whole blood (e.g., approximately 500 ml) has been withdrawn from the donor. Anticoagulant is added to the whole blood and the anticoagulated whole blood is separated into a plasma product, red blood cells, and other non-RBC blood components. At the conclusion of the first draw phase, the red blood cells and non-RBC blood components are returned to the donor. The current volume of plasma product collected after the first draw phase is determined by, e.g., the weigh scale. Then a current value for the hematocrit of the donor is established and a new target volume of plasma product to be collected is determined, and the second cycle of draw and return phases is performed. The cycle of draw and return phases is repeated until the target volume of plasma product tor the plasmapheresis procedure is collected, as recalculated prior to the start of each draw phase. After the final collection phase, the controller initiates the final red blood cell reinfusion stage, after which the donor is disconnected.

The benefits of performing a plasmapheresis procedure having multiple collection/reinfusion cycles in accordance with the methodology set forth above may be seen by reference to the tables of FIGS. 10 and 11a, 11b. FIG. 10 displays the input data for a hypothetical plasmapheresis procedure for a donor weighing 190 lbs. (86.4 kg) and having an initial hematocrit of 44. With reference to the table of FIG. 1, the simplified FDA nomogram would limit the volume of plasma to be collected from such a donor to 800 mL, and the total collection volume for the plasma product to 880 mL. In the present example, the FDA nomogram limit on the volume of raw plasma that may be collected is for illustrative purposes only. As set forth above, other methodologies may be used to determine the amount of raw plasma that may be safely extracted from a donor that would differ from that indicated by the FDA nomogram.

The number of collection and reinfusion cycles in a plasmapheresis procedure may vary from three to twelve. In the hypothetical plasmapheresis procedure, there are five collection and reinfusion cycles, which are chosen for illustrative purposes.

Before the commencement of the first collection cycle, the volume of raw plasma to be collected and the total target volume of plasma product to be collected are determined in accordance with the methodologies described above, based on the donor's initial hematocrit. As set forth in the first row of the table (Cycle 1 start), the initial target volume for the plasma product to be collected is 889 mL, which is the same as indicated by the table of FIG. 9 for a donor having a weight of 175 lbs. and up and a hematocrit of 44 in order to harvest the FDA limit of 800 mL of raw plasma from the donor.

During each collection phase, 500 mL of whole blood is drawn from the donor, to which anticoagulant is added at a predetermined ratio (i.e., 1:16), such that 31 mL is added for each collection cycle of 500 mL. The whole blood plus anticoagulant is separated into a plasma fraction and a red blood cell fraction.

During the first return phase (Cycle 1 return end), the red blood cells and “non-RBC” blood components are returned to the donor, so that at the end of the first return cycle the donor's hematocrit has increased to 45.6%, as calculated by the controller based on a blood volume being decreased by the amount of raw plasma collected, while the quantity of red blood cells in the total blood volume remains the same as at the start of the procedure. The controller can also account for the volume of anticoagulant that is reinfused in each return phase along with the red blood cells, as well as the residual anticoagulant in the donor's whole blood being drawn in cycles 2 and following, when determining the new hematocrit value for the next cycle. The volume of raw plasma and the total target volume of plasma product to be collected for the procedure are then recalculated based on the donor's new, increased hematocrit and raw plasma volume. This provides for a new total target collection volume of 891 mL.

The second collection phase is then performed, resulting in a total of 430 mL of plasma product comprising 386 mL of raw plasma being collected over the first two collection phases (Cycle 2 draw end). The red blood cells and “non-RBC” blood components are again returned to the donor, after which the donor's hematocrit is calculated to be 47.2%.

Two more collection phases of 500 mL are performed, each followed by a return phase, in which new values for the volume of raw plasma and total volume of plasma product to be collected are determined before the start of each collection phase. With the increasing hematocrit of the donor, the recalculated target collection volume for procedure increases to 893 mL (for the third collection phase) and then to 894 ml (for the fourth collection phase). A fifth “mini” collection cycle is performed to bring the volume of raw plasma collected up to the 800 mL permitted by the FDA nomogram for the hypothetical donor. The recalculated target collection volume of plasma product for the fifth collection phase remains at 894 mL.

Thus, as illustrated in the example above, when the target collection volume for the plasma product is recalculated for each collection phase, a target collection volume for the plasma product of 894 mL is obtained, which is required in order to collect the target volume of raw plasma of 800 mL. In contrast, 889 mL of plasma product would have been collected if the target collection volume is determined based only on the donor's initial hematocrit, or 880 mL if the target collection volume is based on the simplified FDA nomogram. In both cases, less than the target volume of 800 mL would have been collected.

The greater the accuracy with which the hematocrit of the donor can be determined, both before and during the procedure, the more likely the target volume of plasma product collected will include the maximum volume of raw plasma that can be collected for a particular donor. As described above, the hematocrit of the donor during the procedure is based on the assumptions that 100% of the red blood cells that are withdrawn in each draw cycle are reinfused in each return cycle, along with 100% of the non-RBC cellular products and a volume of anticoagulant. However, it has been determined that during the course of a blood separation procedure, interstitial fluid can shift to the intravascular space, resulting in restoring half of the withdrawn volume. See, Saito et al., Interstitial fluid shifts to plasma compartment during blood donation, Transfusion 2013; 53(11):2744-50. The shifted interstitial fluid is in addition to the red blood cells, non-RBC cellular products, and anticoagulant that are reinfused in each return phase. Thus, accounting for the shift of interstitial fluid would result in a more accurate hematocrit determination, and thus a more accurate determination of the target volume for plasma product that will result in the maximum amount of raw plasma.

The shift of interstitial fluid during plasmapheresis has been substantiated by tracking the level of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) of a donor over the course of a plasmapheresis procedure. See, e.g., Burkhardt et al., Immunoglobulin G levels during collection of large volume plasma for fractionation; Transfusion 2017; 56:417-420. If there were no shifting of interstitial fluid, the IgG level of the donor would be stable over the course of the plasmapheresis procedure. However, the IgG level has been shown to drop, and the amount that the IgG level drops is a function of the volume of interstitial fluid that has shifted to the blood system.

With reference to FIG. 12, a plot of volume of plasma collected (along the X-axis versus IgG concentration (along the Y-axis) that was developed empirically is shown. A 9% drop of the donor's IgG is seen from the baseline of zero plasma collected (at the start of the procedure) to 200 mL of plasma collected, and a drop of an additional 4% from 200 mL to 800 mL collected. This was attributable to a shift of interstitial fluid equal to approximately 9% of the donor's initial total blood volume (after 200 mL of plasma being collected) to approximately 13% of the donor's initial total blood volume (after 800 mL of plasma being collected).

The following relationship between the amount that the donor's IgG concentration and the volume of plasma collected has been established: y=1.0017x−0.02, where y=IgG concentration and x=plasma volume collected. Thus, the percentage of the donor's blood volume that is replaced by the shift of interstitial fluid is equal to Vb(1−y), where Vb is the donor's initial volume of whole blood. Thus, the shifted volume of interstitial fluid can be calculated based on the volume of plasma collected, and this amount can be added to the volume of red blood cells, non-RBC cellular products and anticoagulant reinfused in each return phase to determine the current total blood volume, and thus hematocrit, of the donor. As can be appreciated, the controller can be configured to automatically determine the volume of interstitial fluid that has shifted based on the volume of plasma collected, and to include the shifted volume when determining the donor's hematocrit prior to each draw phase.

Alternatively, other methods that directly measure the donor's hematocrit may be employed, such as an optical sensor or, if a centrifugal separator is being used, measuring the volume of red blood cells in the centrifuge.

In addition, anticoagulant may be introduced into the disposable kit prior to the commencement of the plasmapheresis procedure in pre-processing steps, such as for priming the disposable kit, performing one or more pre-cycles, or for performing other pre-procedure steps. To the extent that anticoagulant used for these purposes is ultimately directed to the plasma product collection container, it may be accounted for in determining the volume contained in the plasma collection container that results in the target volume of raw plasma being collected. This may be done, for example, by measuring the weight of the “full” container of anticoagulant and the weight of the container of anticoagulant prior to the commencement of the first draw cycle, and adding that volume of anticoagulant to the target volume of plasma product. The controller can be configured to automatically perform the steps necessary to account for the anticoagulant introduced into the plasma collection container separately from the anticoagulated plasma.

The methods and system set forth above have several aspects. In a first aspect, a method for collecting plasma in which plasma product is collected in multiple collection phases between which separated red blood cells are reinfused to the donor is provided. The method of this first aspect comprises a) determining a volume of whole blood (Vb) and hematocrit (Hct) for a donor; b) determining a volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected from the donor; c) determining a volume of plasma product (VPP) that may be collected, wherein the plasma product comprises the raw plasma volume plus a volume of anticoagulant; d) withdrawing whole blood from the donor; e) introducing anticoagulant into the withdrawn whole blood at a specified ratio (ACR); f) separating the withdrawn whole blood into a plasma product and a second component comprising red blood cells; g) collecting the plasma product in a plasma collection container; h) after a desired amount of whole blood has been withdrawn from the donor, returning the red blood cells to the donor; and i) determining the Hct of the donor and VPP prior to each collection phase.

In a second aspect, steps d)-i) are continued until a measured volume of plasma product in the collection container equals VPP.

In a third aspect, a method for collecting plasma in which plasma product is collected in multiple collection phases between which separated red blood cells are reinfused to the donor is provided. The method of this second aspect comprises: a) determining a volume of whole blood (Vb) and hematocrit (Hct) for a donor; b) determining a volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected from the donor based on Vb; c) determining a volume of anticoagulant VAC to be added to the VRP based on an anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and the Hct of the donor, such that VAC=VRP*(ACR*(1−Hct)); d) determining a volume of plasma product (VPP) that may be collected, wherein the plasma product comprises the raw plasma volume (VRP) plus the volume of anticoagulant (VAC); e) withdrawing whole blood from the donor; f) introducing anticoagulant into the withdrawn whole blood at the specified ratio (ACR); g) separating the withdrawn whole blood into a plasma product and a second component comprising red blood cells; h) collecting the plasma product in a plasma collection container; i) after a desired amount of whole blood has been withdrawn from the donor, returning the red blood cells to the donor; and j) determining the Hct of the donor and VPP prior to each collection phase.

In a fourth aspect, steps d)-j) are continued until a measured volume of plasma product in the collection container equals VPP.

In a fifth aspect, Vb is determined based on one or more donor specific characteristics including a donor's weight, height, sex, age, and morphology.

In a sixth aspect, a method is provided for collecting a volume of plasma product (VPP) in an apheresis procedure in which plasma product is collected in multiple collection phases between which separated red blood cells are reinfused to the donor. In the method of this fourth aspect, VPP is equal to a volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected from a donor plus a volume of anticoagulant (VAC) that is added to the VRP during the apheresis procedure. The steps of the method comprise: a) determining a weight (Wkg) and sex (M or F) for the donor; b) determining a hematocrit (Hct) for the donor; c) determining the volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected based on the weight (Wkg) and sex (M or F) of the donor; d) determining a ratio K between the VPP and the VRP, such that K=VPP/VRP, based on an anticoagulant ratio and the Hct of the donor; e) determining VPP, such that VPP=VRP*K; f) withdrawing whole blood from the donor; g) introducing anticoagulant into the withdrawn whole blood at a specified ratio (ACR); h) separating the withdrawn whole blood into a plasma product and a second component comprising red blood cells; i) collecting the plasma product in a plasma collection container; j) after a desired amount of whole blood has been withdrawn from the donor, returning the red blood cells to the donor; and k) determining the Hct of the donor and the target VPP prior to each collection phase.

In a seventh aspect, steps c)-k) are repeated until a measured volume of plasma product in the collection container equals VPP. Preferably, K=VPP/VRP=(ACR*(1−Hct/100)+1)/(ACR*(1−HCT/100)).

In an eighth aspect, a method is provided for collecting a volume of plasma product (VPP) in an apheresis procedure in which plasma product is collected in multiple collection phases between which separated red blood cells are reinfused to the donor. In this fifth aspect VPP is equal to a volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected from a donor plus a volume of anticoagulant (VAC) that is added to the VRP during the apheresis procedure. The steps of the method comprise: a) determining a weight (Wo) and sex (M or F) for the donor; b) determining a hematocrit (Hct) for the donor; c) determining the volume of raw plasma (VRP) that may be collected based on the weight of the donor (Wkg) and the sex (M or F) of the donor; d) determining the VAC to be added to the VRP based on an anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and the Hct of the donor, such that VAC=VRP*(ACR*(1−Hct)); e) determining VPP, such that VPP=VRP+VAC; f) withdrawing whole blood from the donor; g) introducing anticoagulant into the withdrawn whole blood at a specified ratio (ACR); h) separating the withdrawn whole blood into a plasma product and a second component comprising red blood cells; i) collecting the plasma product in a plasma collection container; j) after a desired amount of whole blood has been withdrawn from the donor, returning the red blood cells to the donor; and k) determining the Hct of the donor and VPP prior to each collection phase.

In a ninth aspect, steps d)-k) are continued until a measured volume of plasma product in the collection container equals VPP.

In a tenth aspect, VRP is determined by establishing the VRP for each of a plurality of ranges of donor weight, and selecting the VRP for the range of weight that is inclusive of the weight of the donor. The ranges of donor weight may be in three categories from 110 to 149 lbs., 150 to 174 lbs., and 175 lbs. and up.

In an eleventh aspect, VRP=K1*Wkg.

In a twelfth aspect, VRP is no greater than 28.6% of (1−Hct)*(Vb).

In a thirteenth aspect, Vb is determined using one of Nadler's equations, Gilcher's Rule of Five, the standards of the ICSH, and any other generally accepted methodology.

In a fourteenth aspect, VRP=Wkg*10 mL/kg.

In a fifteenth aspect, when donor parameters are used to estimate a total blood volume (Vb) for the donor, VRP=K2*Vb.

In a sixteenth aspect, an automated system for separating plasma from whole blood is provided comprising a reusable hardware component and a disposable kit. The disposable kit further comprises i) a separator for separating whole blood into a plasma fraction and a concentrated cell fraction, the separator having an input having a blood line integrally connected thereto for transporting whole blood from a donor to the separator, a plasma output port integrally connected to a plasma collection container by a plasma line, and a concentrated cell outlet port integrally connected to a reservoir for receipt of concentrated cells prior to reinfusion to the donor; ii) a donor line terminating in a venipuncture needle for transporting whole blood from a donor to the blood line, iii) an anticoagulant line integrally connected to the blood line and configured to be connected to a source of anticoagulant for transporting anticoagulant to the donor line, iv) a saline line configured to be attached to a source of saline for transporting saline to the blood line, and v) a reinfusion line for transporting concentrated cells from the reservoir to the donor line. The reusable hardware component further comprises i) a first peristaltic pump for delivering anticoagulant at a controlled rate into the blood line during a collection phase, ii) a second pump for delivering anticoagulated whole blood to the separator during the collection phase and for returning concentrated cellular components during a reinfusion phase, iii) a third pump for delivering concentrated cellular components from the separator to the reservoir during the collection phase, iv) a clamp associated with each of the blood line, plasma line, reinfusion line and saline line, v) a weigh scale for weighing each of the plasma collection container, the reservoir and the source of anticoagulant, and vi) a programmable controller comprising a touch screen for receiving input from an operator, the programmable controller configured to receive a signal from each of the weigh scales and to automatically operate the first, second and third pumps and the clamps to separate whole blood into a plasma fraction and a concentrated cell fraction during the collection phase and to return concentrated cells to the donor during the reinfusion stage. The programmable controller is further configured to determine the weight of the plasma fraction to be collected in the plasma collection container in accordance with any of the aspects described herein, and to terminate the collection phase upon receiving a signal from the weigh scale for the plasma collection container equal to the weight of the plasma fraction determined by the controller. In determining the target amount for the plasma product to be collected, the controller may be configured to calculate the hematocrit of the donor prior to the collection phase of each cycle. Alternatively, or additionally, the controller may receive a signal from a sensor or the like that is indicative of the donor's hematocrit. Further, the amount of plasma product in the plasma collection container may be determined by, e.g., the weigh scale associated with the plasma collection. In one embodiment, the separator comprises a spinning membrane separator.

It will be understood that the embodiments described are illustrative of some of the applications of the principles of the present subject matter. Numerous modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter, including those combinations of features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein. For these reasons, the scope of the claims is not limited to the above-description, but is set forth in the following claims.

Claims

1. A system for collecting plasma from a donor comprising:

a) a venipuncture needle for withdrawing whole blood from the donor,
b) a blood separator for separating the whole blood into a plasma product and a second blood component comprising red blood cells;
c) a donor line coupled to the venipuncture needle for introducing whole blood from the donor to the blood separator;
d) a first pump for controlling flow through the donor line;
e) an anticoagulant line coupled to an anticoagulant source for combining anticoagulant with the whole blood;
f) a second pump for controlling flow through the anticoagulant line;
g) a touchscreen is provided for receiving input from an operator; and
h) a programmable controller configured to: determine a target volume of plasma product to be collected (TVPP) based on a weight of the donor, or based on a weight and height of the donor, and a percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected (% ACTVPP) based on a pre-determined anticoagulant ratio (ACR) and a hematocrit (Hct) of the donor, control the system to operate a draw and return cycle to withdraw whole blood from the donor, add anticoagulant to the whole blood at a pre-determined ratio (ACR), separate the anticoagulated whole blood into the plasma product and the second component and to return the second component to the donor, and stop withdrawing whole blood from the donor and initiate a final return of the second blood component when a measured volume of plasma product in a plasma collection container reaches the target volume for plasma product, TVPP.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller is further programmed to calculate i) a target volume of pure plasma product to be collected (TVP) from the weight of the donor and ii) the percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected, % ACTVPP, based on the pre-determined anticoagulant ratio, ACR, and the hematocrit, Hct, of the donor, wherein the TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP).

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the controller is further programmed to calculate the target volume of pure plasma to be collected, TVP, as a multiple of the weight of the donor.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller is further programmed to calculate a total blood volume of the donor (TBV) based on the weight and height of the donor, a target volume of pure plasma product to be collected, TVP, as a percentage of the TBV, and the percentage of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product to be collected, % ACTVPP, based on the pre-determined anticoagulant ratio, ACR, and the hematocrit, Hct, of the donor, wherein the TVPP=TVP/(1−% ACTVPP).

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is further programmed to calculate the total blood volume of the donor, TBV, based on the weight and height of the donor to calculate a body mass index for the donor (BMI) such that TBV=70/sqrt (BMI/22), where BMI=Wt/Ht2.

6. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is further programmed to calculate the total blood volume of the donor (TBV) based on the weight (Wt), height (Ht) and sex (Male or Female) of the donor such that TBV=(0.3669*Ht3)+(0.03219*Wt)+0.6041 for Males and TBV=(0.3561*Ht3)+(0.03308*Wt)+0.1833 for Females, where Ht is in meters and Wt is in kilograms.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein ACR is the ratio of the amount of whole blood to the amount of anticoagulant (ACR=WB/AC), and the controller is further configured to determine the percent of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product, % ACTVPP, such that % ACTVPP=1/(1+ACR (1−Hct)).

8. The system of claim 1, wherein ACR is the ratio of volume of whole blood plus the volume of anticoagulant to the volume of anticoagulant (ACR=(WB+AC)/AC), and the controller is further configured to determine the percent of anticoagulant in the target volume of plasma product, % ACTVPP, such that % ACTVPP=1/(1+(ACR−1)(1−Hct)).

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1025059 April 1912 Joseph et al.
1611725 December 1926 Degerth et al.
2087778 July 1937 Nelin
2661150 December 1953 Abbott, Jr.
2750107 June 1956 More
2792172 May 1957 Tait
3096283 July 1963 Hein
3145713 August 1964 Latham
3239136 March 1966 Hein
3244362 April 1966 Hein
3244363 April 1966 Hein
3409213 November 1968 Latham
3456875 July 1969 Hein
3489145 January 1970 Judson et al.
3565330 February 1971 Allen
3655058 April 1972 Novak
3737096 June 1973 Jones et al.
3774840 November 1973 Boatright
3987961 October 26, 1976 Sinn et al.
4007871 February 15, 1977 Jones et al.
4010894 March 8, 1977 Kellogg et al.
4014497 March 29, 1977 Spiewok et al.
4040965 August 9, 1977 Kohlheb
4056224 November 1, 1977 Lolachi
4082217 April 4, 1978 Westberg
4086925 May 2, 1978 Dodge
4140268 February 20, 1979 Lacour
4142670 March 6, 1979 Ishimaru et al.
4151844 May 1, 1979 Almond et al.
4197847 April 15, 1980 Djerassi
4285464 August 25, 1981 Latham
4300717 November 17, 1981 Latham
4303193 December 1, 1981 Latham
4321921 March 30, 1982 Laszczower
4387848 June 14, 1983 Kellogg et al.
4425114 January 10, 1984 Schoendorfer et al.
4430072 February 7, 1984 Kellogg et al.
4447221 May 8, 1984 Mulzet
4457747 July 3, 1984 Tu
4464167 August 7, 1984 Schoendorfer et al.
4466888 August 21, 1984 Verkaart
4482342 November 13, 1984 Lueptow et al.
4490135 December 25, 1984 Troutner
4530691 July 23, 1985 Brown
4534863 August 13, 1985 Bacon et al.
4643714 February 17, 1987 Brose
4647279 March 3, 1987 Mulzet et al.
4655742 April 7, 1987 Vantard
4680025 July 14, 1987 Kruger et al.
4684361 August 4, 1987 Feldman et al.
4692136 September 8, 1987 Feldman et al.
4708712 November 24, 1987 Mulzet
4713176 December 15, 1987 Schoendorfer et al.
4734089 March 29, 1988 Cullis
4740202 April 26, 1988 Stacey et al.
4740313 April 26, 1988 Schoendorfer et al.
4755300 July 5, 1988 Fischel et al.
4767396 August 30, 1988 Powers
4795419 January 3, 1989 Yawn et al.
4795448 January 3, 1989 Stacey et al.
4806247 February 21, 1989 Schoendorfer et al.
4806252 February 21, 1989 Brown et al.
4808307 February 28, 1989 Fischel et al.
4850995 July 25, 1989 Tie et al.
4869812 September 26, 1989 Schoendorfer et al.
4871462 October 3, 1989 Fischel et al.
4876013 October 24, 1989 Shmidt et al.
4889524 December 26, 1989 Fell et al.
4898675 February 6, 1990 Lavender
4911833 March 27, 1990 Schoendorfer et al.
4934995 June 19, 1990 Cullis
4940543 July 10, 1990 Brown et al.
4943273 July 24, 1990 Pages
4968295 November 6, 1990 Neumann
4980054 December 25, 1990 Lavender
4983156 January 8, 1991 Knelson
4983158 January 8, 1991 Headley
4985153 January 15, 1991 Kuroda et al.
4994188 February 19, 1991 Prince
5039401 August 13, 1991 Columbus et al.
5045048 September 3, 1991 Kaleskas et al.
5098372 March 24, 1992 Jonsson
5098373 March 24, 1992 Polaschegg
5100372 March 31, 1992 Headley
5100564 March 31, 1992 Pall et al.
5112298 May 12, 1992 Prince et al.
5114396 May 19, 1992 Unger et al.
5135667 August 4, 1992 Schoendorfer
5141486 August 25, 1992 Antwiler et al.
5147290 September 15, 1992 Jonsson
5154716 October 13, 1992 Bauman et al.
5174894 December 29, 1992 Ohsawa et al.
5178603 January 12, 1993 Prince
5194145 March 16, 1993 Schoendorfer
5217426 June 8, 1993 Bacehowski et al.
5217427 June 8, 1993 Cullis
5234403 August 10, 1993 Yoda et al.
5254248 October 19, 1993 Nakamura
5273517 December 28, 1993 Barone et al.
5277701 January 11, 1994 Christie et al.
5298016 March 29, 1994 Gordon
5298171 March 29, 1994 Biesel
5300060 April 5, 1994 Nelson
5316540 May 31, 1994 Mcmannis et al.
5318511 June 7, 1994 Riquier et al.
5318512 June 7, 1994 Neumann
5348533 September 20, 1994 Papillon et al.
5368542 November 29, 1994 Mcmannis et al.
5368555 November 29, 1994 Sussman et al.
5386734 February 7, 1995 Pusinelli
5387174 February 7, 1995 Rochat
5387187 February 7, 1995 Fell et al.
5403272 April 4, 1995 Deniega et al.
5405308 April 11, 1995 Headley et al.
5417650 May 23, 1995 Gordon
5431814 July 11, 1995 Jorgensen
5437598 August 1, 1995 Delbert
5437624 August 1, 1995 Langley
5462667 October 31, 1995 Wollinsky et al.
5470483 November 28, 1995 Bene et al.
5484396 January 16, 1996 Naficy
5494592 February 27, 1996 Latham et al.
5496265 March 5, 1996 Langley et al.
5505685 April 9, 1996 Delbert
5514070 May 7, 1996 Pages
5543062 August 6, 1996 Nishimura
5551941 September 3, 1996 Howell
5585007 December 17, 1996 Antanavich et al.
5607579 March 4, 1997 Latham et al.
5649903 July 22, 1997 Deniega et al.
5651766 July 29, 1997 Kingsley et al.
5656163 August 12, 1997 Brown
5665061 September 9, 1997 Antwiler
5681273 October 28, 1997 Brown
5686696 November 11, 1997 Baker, Jr. et al.
5712798 January 27, 1998 Langley et al.
5728060 March 17, 1998 Kingsley et al.
5733253 March 31, 1998 Headley et al.
5733446 March 31, 1998 Holm
5733545 March 31, 1998 Hood, III
5738792 April 14, 1998 Schoendorfer
5762791 June 9, 1998 Deniega et al.
5779660 July 14, 1998 Kingsley et al.
5783085 July 21, 1998 Fischel
5792351 August 11, 1998 Wehrle et al.
5849203 December 15, 1998 Brown et al.
5882289 March 16, 1999 Sakota et al.
5906589 May 25, 1999 Gordon et al.
5919125 July 6, 1999 Berch
5964724 October 12, 1999 Rivera et al.
5970432 October 19, 1999 Ishimoto et al.
5980760 November 9, 1999 Min et al.
6007725 December 28, 1999 Brown
6059979 May 9, 2000 Brown
6080322 June 27, 2000 Deniega et al.
6183651 February 6, 2001 Brown et al.
6200287 March 13, 2001 Keller et al.
6204694 March 20, 2001 Sunter et al.
6207063 March 27, 2001 Brown
6234989 May 22, 2001 Brierton et al.
6251284 June 26, 2001 Bischof et al.
6284142 September 4, 2001 Muller
6287818 September 11, 2001 Kazimir et al.
6296602 October 2, 2001 Headley
6325775 December 4, 2001 Thom et al.
6348156 February 19, 2002 Vishnoi et al.
6405508 June 18, 2002 Janesky
6464624 October 15, 2002 Pages
6471855 October 29, 2002 Odak
6497676 December 24, 2002 Childers et al.
6558307 May 6, 2003 Headley
6623443 September 23, 2003 Polaschegg
6641552 November 4, 2003 Kingsley et al.
6695806 February 24, 2004 Gelfand et al.
6730054 May 4, 2004 Pierce et al.
6730055 May 4, 2004 Bainbridge et al.
6743192 June 1, 2004 Sakota et al.
6746547 June 8, 2004 Cole et al.
6983884 January 10, 2006 Auchlinleck
7050611 May 23, 2006 Bodicker et al.
7072769 July 4, 2006 Fletcher-Haynes et al.
7115205 October 3, 2006 Robinson et al.
7186231 March 6, 2007 Takagi et al.
7270645 September 18, 2007 Langley et al.
7282154 October 16, 2007 Muller
7354415 April 8, 2008 Bainbridge et al.
7476209 January 13, 2009 Gara et al.
7704454 April 27, 2010 Langley et al.
8628489 January 14, 2014 Pages et al.
8702637 April 22, 2014 Pages et al.
8759094 June 24, 2014 Ranby et al.
8840790 September 23, 2014 Wegener et al.
9011359 April 21, 2015 Wegener et al.
9095665 August 4, 2015 Pagès et al.
9283316 March 15, 2016 Flexman
9302042 April 5, 2016 Pages et al.
9364600 June 14, 2016 Pagès et al.
9393359 July 19, 2016 Boggs et al.
10758652 September 1, 2020 Ragusa
10946131 March 16, 2021 Patel et al.
10980934 April 20, 2021 Ragusa
11110216 September 7, 2021 Patel et al.
11412967 August 16, 2022 Patel
11801001 October 31, 2023 Patel
20010000018 March 15, 2001 Truong et al.
20010027156 October 4, 2001 Egozy et al.
20020043492 April 18, 2002 Bischof
20020062100 May 23, 2002 Pierce et al.
20020120227 August 29, 2002 Childers et al.
20020151804 October 17, 2002 O'mahony et al.
20030055375 March 20, 2003 Holst et al.
20030066807 April 10, 2003 Suzuki
20030125017 July 3, 2003 Greene et al.
20030125881 July 3, 2003 Ryan
20030140928 July 31, 2003 Bui et al.
20030175150 September 18, 2003 Grimm
20040183683 September 23, 2004 Funahashi
20040186409 September 23, 2004 Cavalcanti et al.
20040199098 October 7, 2004 Pierce et al.
20050131334 June 16, 2005 Langley et al.
20050209522 September 22, 2005 Tadokoro et al.
20050228238 October 13, 2005 Monitzer
20050235733 October 27, 2005 Holst et al.
20050258238 November 24, 2005 Chapman
20060058167 March 16, 2006 Ragusa et al.
20060093190 May 4, 2006 Cheng et al.
20060155236 July 13, 2006 Gara et al.
20060226086 October 12, 2006 Robinson et al.
20070018832 January 25, 2007 Beigel et al.
20070067452 March 22, 2007 Fung et al.
20070112289 May 17, 2007 Cavalcanti et al.
20070138069 June 21, 2007 Roncadi et al.
20070258626 November 8, 2007 Reiner
20070268130 November 22, 2007 Yee et al.
20080146993 June 19, 2008 Krishna
20090215602 August 27, 2009 Min et al.
20090275808 November 5, 2009 Dimaio et al.
20100100392 April 22, 2010 Rothman et al.
20120010062 January 12, 2012 Fletcher et al.
20120053501 March 1, 2012 Brown et al.
20120175313 July 12, 2012 Barry, Jr. et al.
20130081998 April 4, 2013 Chamney et al.
20130267884 October 10, 2013 Boggs et al.
20140039373 February 6, 2014 Ragusa et al.
20140356851 December 4, 2014 Pagès et al.
20150367063 December 24, 2015 Kimura
20170239409 August 24, 2017 De los Reyes, et al.
20180052978 February 22, 2018 Benjamin et al.
20180344910 December 6, 2018 Ragusa
20180344921 December 6, 2018 Ragusa
20200345924 November 5, 2020 Ragusa
20210015989 January 21, 2021 Patel et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2735985 October 2005 CN
102046223 May 2011 CN
102395392 March 2012 CN
104800905 July 2015 CN
204446748 July 2015 CN
112105403 December 2018 CN
0128683 December 1984 EP
0171749 February 1986 EP
0208061 January 1987 EP
0229504 July 1987 EP
0257755 March 1988 EP
0350162 January 1990 EP
0578086 January 1994 EP
0619145 October 1994 EP
0654277 May 1995 EP
0664159 July 1995 EP
0799645 October 1997 EP
0885619 December 1998 EP
1057534 December 2000 EP
1295619 March 2003 EP
1374927 January 2004 EP
2650030 October 2013 EP
2258898 October 1977 FR
2017110 October 1979 GB
S596952 January 1984 JP
S5969166 April 1984 JP
H0252665 February 1990 JP
H03131268 June 1991 JP
H0775746 March 1995 JP
H08131539 May 1996 JP
H09192215 July 1997 JP
2002282352 October 2002 JP
2002291872 October 2002 JP
2003525709 September 2003 JP
3936132 June 2007 JP
2008506424 March 2008 JP
2008194067 August 2008 JP
2014041600 March 2014 JP
2252788 May 2005 RU
660718 May 1979 SU
762982 September 1980 SU
1146098 March 1985 SU
8502561 June 1985 WO
9000059 January 1990 WO
9007383 July 1990 WO
9406535 March 1994 WO
9611747 April 1996 WO
9633023 October 1996 WO
0205059 January 2002 WO
2007041716 April 2007 WO
2018222441 December 2018 WO
2019084278 May 2019 WO
2019226654 November 2019 WO
Other references
  • 1 Supplementary European Search Report, App. No. 21883480.2, dated Jan. 25, 2024, 8 pages.
  • Vassallo, R.R. et al., Improved donor safety in high-volume apheresis collections, Transfusion Feb. 1, 2017 Blackwell Publishing Inc., USA, vol. 57, pp. 319-324, Feb. 2017.
  • Vurro, F. et al., Quantitative assessment of the anticoagulant in plasma units collected by plasmapheresis, Transfusion (Malden), vol. 59, pp. 2113-2120, Jun. 2019.
  • Way, B. et al., Inova blood donor center experience with Trima Accel 7, Transfusion Sep. 1, 2019 Blackwell Publishing Inc., vol. 59, pp. 48A-49A, Sep. 2019.
  • Way, B. et al., Inova blood donor center experience with Trima Accel 7, Transfusion Sep. 9, 2019 Blackwell Publishing Inc., vol. 59, p. 48A-49A, Sep. 2019.
  • Williams, A.E., FDA Considerations Regarding Frequent Plasma Collection Procedures, www.ihn-org.com, 2013.
  • Winters, J.L. et al., American Society for Apheresis guidelines on the use of apheresis in clinical practice: practical, concise, evidence-based recommendations for the apheresis practitioner, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 29, pp. 191-193, Aug. 2014.
  • Altunatas, F., et al., Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com. Tec Cell Separators, Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, vol. 35, pp. 368-373, 2008.
  • Amendment and Argument filed on Aug. 6, 2021 in Korean Application No. 10-2020-7033247 with English translation (11 pages.).
  • Amendment and Argument filed on Dec. 15, 2021 in Japanese Application No. 2020202093 with English translation (12 pages.).
  • Amendment and Reply in U.S. Appl. No. 16/739,441 dated Apr. 5, 2022, 13 pages.
  • Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,099, dated Nov. 2, 2021, 17 pages.
  • Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,099 dated Apr. 5, 2022, 18 pages.
  • Amendment to the application with English translation for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7033175 dated May 24, 2021 (11 pages).
  • Amendment to the application with English translation for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7033247 dated May 24, 2021 (40 pages).
  • Anonymous, 21 CFR Parts 606, 610, 630, et l.; Requirements for Blood and Blood Components Intended for Transfusion or for Further Manufacturing Use; Final Rule, Federal Register. vol. 80, 2015.
  • Anonymous, Code of Federal Regulations, §606.110 General donor eligibility requirements, Code of Federal Regulations, National Archives, May 2020.
  • Anonymous, Code of Federal Regulations, §630.10 General donor eligibility requirements, Code of Federal Regulations, National Archives, May 2020.
  • Anonymous, Code of Federal Regulations, §630.15 Donor eligibility requirements, Code of Federal Regulations, National Archives, May 2020.
  • Anonymous, Code of Federal Regulations, §640.65 Plasmapheresis, Code of Federal Regulations, National Archives, pp. 105-107, Apr. 2020.
  • Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary, U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,099, dated Nov. 5, 2021, 17 pages.
  • Bialkowski W., et al., Citrate anticoagulation: Are blood donors donating bone?, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 31, pp. 459-463, Oct. 2016.
  • Blaha, M. et al., Experience with extracorporeal elimination therapy in myasthenia gravis, Transfusion and Apheresis Science Elsevier Science, London, GB, vol. 45, pp. 252-256, 2011.
  • Burgstaler, E. A., Blood component collection by apheresis, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 21, pp. 142-151, Jul. 2006.
  • Burgstaler, E.A., et al., Paired comparison of therapeutic plasma exchange using the Fenwal Amicus versus TerumoBCT Spectra Optia, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 33, pp. 265-273, Jun. 2018.
  • Canadian Requisition by the Examiner in Accordance with Subsection 86(2) of the Patent Rules Dated Sep. 28., 2021 for Canadian Application No. 3,099,428.
  • Caridian BCT; Operator's Manual: Trims Accel® Automated Blood Collection System for Version 6.0 with Automated RBC Processes; Part No. 777095-197, Jun. 2010, (296 pages).
  • Charifa, A. et al., Transfusion medicine equations made internet accessible, American Journal of Clinical Pathology Oct. 10, 2018, Oxford University Press, vol. 150, Oct. 2018.
  • China National Intellectual Property Administration Notification of the First Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2021 for Chinese International Application No. 201980031598.1.
  • Colpo, A., et al., Therapeutic apheresis during pregnancy: A single center experience, Transfusion And Apheresis Science, Elsevier Science, London, GB, Sep. 5, 2019.
  • Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, App. No. 21198088.3, dated Jun. 13, 2022, 6 pages.
  • Compliance Program Guidance Manual, Chapter 42-Blood and Blood Components, Inspection of Source Plasma Establishments, Brokers, Testing Laboratories, and Contractors-7342.002, Completion Date: Jan. 31, 2019, (63 pages).
  • Cordts, P.R. et al., Poor predictive value of hematocrit and hemodynamic parameters for erythrocyte deficits after extensive elective vascular operations, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics, United States, vol. 175, pp. 243-248, Sep. 1992.
  • De Back, D. Z. et al., Therapeutic plasma apheresis: Expertise and indications, Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 58, pp. 254-257, Jun. 2019.
  • Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Volume Limits for Automated Collection of Source Plasma, Nov. 4, 1992 (3 pages).
  • Evers, D. et al., The efficiency of therapeutic erythrocytapheresis compared to phlebotomy: a mathematical tool for predicting response in hereditary hemochromatosis, polycythemia vera, and secondary erythrocytosis, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 29, pp. 133-138, Jun. 2014.
  • Evers, J. et al., Distribution of citrate and citrate infusion rate during donor plasmaphereses, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 31, pp. 59-62, Feb. 2016.
  • Examination report No. 1 for standard patent application for Australian patent No. 2019274489 dated Nov. 16, 2020 (4 pages).
  • Examination report No. 1 for standard patent application for Australian patent No. 2020267188 dated Nov. 25, 2020 (7 pages).
  • Examiner Requisition in Canada App. 3,099,428 dated Mar. 28, 2022, 4 pages.
  • Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2021 for European Application No. 21183088.0.
  • Extended European Search Report, counterpart EP Application No. 21168049.1 (dated Aug. 17, 2021) (8 pages).
  • Feldschuh, J. et al., Prediction of the Normal Blood Volume Relation of Blood Volume To Body Habitus, Circulation 1977, vol. 56, pp. 605-612, Oct. 1977.
  • Feldschuh, J. et al., The importance of correct norms in blood volume measurement, The American journal of the medical sciences, United States, vol. 334, pp. 41-46, Jul. 2007.
  • Fenwal: AMICUSTM Separator: Operator's Manual SW v. 4.3; REF 4R4580, 4R4580R, Jun. 2011, (501 pages).
  • Fenwal: AMICUSTM Separator: Therapeutics Supplement Manual SW v. 4.2, Mononuclear Cell Collection + Therapeutic Plasma Exchange; REF 4R4580, 4R4580R, Apr. 2011, (372 pages).
  • Fenwal: AMICUSTM Separator: Therapeutics Supplement Manual SW v. 4.3, Mononuclear Cell Collection + Therapeutic Plasma Exchange; REF 4R4580, 4R4580R, Mar. 2012, 372 pages.
  • Fresenius Kabi: AMICUS Separator: Operator's Manual SW v. 5.1, vol. 2—Platelets with Concurrent Plasma or RBC Collection, REF 4R4580, 4R4580R, 4R4580TH, 6R4580, 6R4580R, Mar. 2017, 352 pages.
  • Fresenius Kabi: AMICUS Separator: Operator's Manual SW v. 5.1, vol. 2—Platelets with Concurrent Plasma or RBC Collection, REF 4R4580, 4R4580R, 4R4580TH, 6R4580, 6R4560R, Mar. 2017, 352 pages.
  • Gokay, S. et al., Long-term efficacy of lipoprotein apheresis in the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia: Application of two different apheresis techniques in childhood, Transfusion and Apheresis Science, Elsevier Science, London, GB, vol. 54, pp. 282-288, Nov. 2, 2012.
  • Hadem, J. et al., Therapeutic plasma exchange as rescue therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: retrospective observational single-centre study of 23 patients, BMC Anesthesiology, Biomed Central, London, GB, vol. 14, p. 24, Apr. 2014.
  • Hafer, C. et al., Membrane versus centrifuge-based therapeutic plasma exchange: a randomized prospective crossover study, International urology and Nephrology, Akademiai, Budapest, HU, vol. 48, pp. 133-138, Nov. 3, 2015.
  • Hafer, C. et al., Pro: High dose of therapeutic plasma exchange—mind the gap!, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association—European Renal Association England; vol. 32, pp. 1457-1460, Sep. 1, 2017.
  • Hattersley, J.G. et al., Describing the effectiveness of immunosuppression drugs and apheresis in the treatment of transplant patients, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 109, pp. 126-133, Feb. 10, 2012.
  • Hauser, R. G. et al., Transfusion Medicine Equations Made Internet Accessible, Transfusion Medicine Reviews, Nov. 16, 2019 Grune and Stratton, Orlando, FL, US, vol. 34, Nov. 2019.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 1, 2021 for International Application No. PCT/US2021/047124.
  • Notice of Reasons for Refusal in JP Pat App 2022-104191, Dec. 14, 2023, 12 pages.
  • Notice of Reasons for Refusal in JP Pat App 2023-544359, Nov. 30, 2023, 11 pages.
  • China App. No. 202180091469.9, Feb. 29, 2024, Notification of the First Office Action, Text of the First Office Action, Search Report, 7 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 30, 2021 for International Application No. PCT/JS21/33835.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/033826, dated Aug. 3, 2018, 10 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/57528, dated Jan. 7, 2019, 17 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, counterpart International App. No. PCT/US2021/033835 (dated Sep. 30, 2021) (20 pages).
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, counterpart International Appl. No. PCT/US2019/033318 (dated Aug. 21, 2019) (14 pages).
  • Jia, Z.S. et al., Total blood volume of Asian patients undergoing cardiac surgery is far from that predicted by conventional methods, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, Italy, vol. 54, pp. 423-430, Jun. 2013.
  • Kawai, Y. et al., Therapeutic plasma exchange may improve hemodynamics and organ failure among children with sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome receiving extracorporeal life support, Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, United States, vol. 16, pp. 366-374, May 2015.
  • Keklik, M. et al., Effectiveness of the haemonetics MCS cell separator in the collection of apheresis platelets, Transfusion and Apheresis Science Elsevier Science, London, GB, vol. 53, pp. 396-398, Aug. 2015.
  • Kochinke, F. et al., Modelling of LDL-apheresis: System efficacy and rebound kinetics, Plasma Therapy and Transfusion Technology, vol. 9, pp. 35-44, 1988.
  • Kuan, Jew-Win et al., A randomized double blind control trial comparing filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in cyclophosphamide peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, Transfusion and Apheresis Science Elsevier Science, London, GB, vol. 53, pp. 196-204, Mar. 2015.
  • Kubeček, O. et al., Plasmafiltration as an effective method in the removal of circulating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and the reduction of mucocutaneous toxicity during the treatment of advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Springer Verlag, Berlin, DE, vol. 85, pp. 353-365, Nov. 14, 2019.
  • Lambert, C. et al., Plasma extraction rate and collection efficiency during therapeutic plasma exchange with Spectra Optia in comparison with Haemonetics MCS+, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 26, pp. 17-22, 2011.
  • Lemmens, H. et al., Estimating Blood Volume in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients, Obesity Surgery, vol. 16, pp. 773-776, 2006.
  • Lin, Shi-Woei et al., Optimal collecting policy for apheresis platelets in a regional blood center, Vox Sanguinis, vol. 115, Feb. 2020.
  • Linderkamp, O. et al., Estimation and Prediction of Blood Volume in Infants and Children, European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 125, pp. 227-234, Aug. 1977.
  • Lopez, A.J., et al., Monitoring and isolation of blood dendritic cells from apheresis products in healthy individuals: a platform for cancer immunotherapy, Journal of Immunological Methods, Sep. 15, 2002 Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 267, pp. 199-212, Sep. 2002.
  • Lopez, A.J., et al., Monitoring and isolation of blood dendritic cells from apheresis products in healthy individuals: a platform for cancer immunotherapy, Journal of Immunological Methods, Sep. 9, 2002 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 267, pp. 199-212, Sep. 2002.
  • Maitta, Robert W., Current state of apheresis technology and its applications, Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 57, pp. 606-613, Oct. 2018.
  • Merolle, L., et al., The effect of donor's characteristics on plasmapheresis products: insights for a personalised approach Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, Italy, May 2020.
  • Miladi, M.I. et al., Relevance of plasma exchange in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: Study of 11 cases, Revue de Medecine Interne Feb. 2008, France, vol. 29, pp. 87-93.
  • Milan, B. et al., Experience with extracorporeal elimination therapy in myasthenia gravis, Transfusion and Apheresis Science Elsevier Science, London, GB, vol. 45, pp. 252-256, 2011.
  • Neff, L.P., The use of theraputic plasma exchange (TPE) in the setting of refractory burn shock, Burns 2010 Elsevier Ltd., vol. 36, pp. 372-378, 2010.
  • Neyrinck, M.M et al., Calculations in apheresis, Journal of clinical apheresis, vol. 30, pp. 38-42, Feb. 2015.
  • Notice for Reasons for Refusal in Japan App. 2020-202093 dated Jan. 11, 2022, 3 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 17/386,992 dated Feb. 9, 2022, 8 pages.
  • Notice of Preliminary Rejection with English translation for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7033247 dated Mar. 22, 2021 (31 pages).
  • Notice of Reasons of Refusal with English translation, counterpart Japanese application 2020-202093 dated Jun. 15, 2021 (8 pages).
  • Notice of Reasons of Refusal with English translation, counterpart Japanese application 2020-557304 dated May 11, 2021 (8 pages).
  • Office communication in U.S. Appl. No. 17/078,824 dated Nov. 3, 2021, 22 pages.
  • Office communication in U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,099 dated Dec. 6, 2021, 17 pages.
  • Office communication in U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,099 dated Sep. 23, 2021, 19 pages.
  • Pearson, T.C. et al., Interpretation of measured red cell mass and plasma volume in adults: Expert Panel on Radionuclides of the International Council for Standardization in Haematolog, British journal of haematology, England, vol. 89, pp. 748-756, Apr. 1995.
  • Perry, F.A. et al., Blood volume replacement in surgical patients; Surgical Clinics of North America, pp. 301-313, Apr. 1956.
  • Pratx, L.B. et al., Development of apheresis techniques and equipment designed for patients weighing less than 10 kg, Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 57, pp. 331-336, Jun. 2018.
  • Request for Examination in EP21168049 dated Mar. 29, 2022, 12 pages.
  • Response to Examiner's Report for Australian Patent Application 2019274489 dated Mar. 16, 2021 (12 pages) (12 pages).
  • Response to Examiner's Report for Australian Patent Application 2020267188 dated Mar. 16, 2021 (12 pages) (20 pages).
  • Response to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/078,824 dated Apr. 4, 2022, 11 pages.
  • Response to Notice of Preliminary Rejection with English translation for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7033175 dated May 24, 2021 (33 pages).
  • Response to Notice of Preliminary Rejection with English translation for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7033247 dated May 24, 2021 (42 pages).
  • Russian Patent Office, Russian Search Report for RU2252788C1 with English translation dated Jun. 2, 2021 (4 pages).
  • Schettler, V. et al., How to optimize lipoprotein apheresis treatment-A second look, Atherosclerosis Supplements, vol. 14, pp. 89-92, Jan. 2013.
  • Schwartz, J. et al., Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 31, pp. 149-162, Jun. 2016.
  • Setia, R.D. et al., Comparison ofAmicus and COBE Spectrafor allogenic peripheral blood stem cell harvest: Study from tertiary care centre in India, Transfusion And Apheresis Science, Elsevier Science, London, GB, vol. 56, pp. 439-444, Apr. 24, 2017.
  • Simsir, I.Y. et al., Therapeutic plasmapheresis in thyrotoxic patients, Endocrine, Humana Press, Inc, US, vol. 62, pp. 144-148, Jul. 2, 2018.
  • Sprenger, K.B., Nomograms for the prediction of patients plasma vol. in plasma exchange therapy from height, weight, and hematocrit, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 3, pp. 185-190, Jan. 1987.
  • Staley, E. M. et al., A brief review of common mathematical calculations in therapeutic apheresis, Journal of clinical apheresis, United States, vol. 34, pp. 607-612, Oct. 2019.
  • Technical Manual 20th edition, Methods and Appendices, http://www.aabb.org/programs/publications/Pages/tech-manual-methods.aspx, 2020.
  • Trima Accel Automated Blood Collection System Service Manual, pp. 1-340 (2015).
  • Valbonesi, A.M. et al., Plateletpheresis: What's new?, Transfusion Science, Dec. 1, 1996 Pergamon Press, Oxford, GB, vol. 17, pp. 537-544, Dec. 1996.
  • Communication in EP Application No. EP21921581.1, dated Apr. 22, 2024, 7 pages.
  • The Second Office Action in China App. No. 202180071948.4, dated Jun. 29, 2024, 4 pages.
  • Decision of Refusal, Japan Patent App. No. 2023-544359 dated Jun. 6, 2024, 4 pages.
Patent History
Patent number: 12144624
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 22, 2023
Date of Patent: Nov 19, 2024
Patent Publication Number: 20240023855
Assignee: FENWAL, INC. (Lake Zurich, IL)
Inventors: Amit J. Patel (Algonquin, IL), Samantha M. Planas (Wauconda, IL), Walter T. Watts (Lake Forest, IL), Kyungyoon Min (Kildeer, IL), Daniel R. Boggs (Libertyville, IL), Katherine N. Radwanski (Highland Park, IL)
Primary Examiner: Benjamin S Melhus
Assistant Examiner: Severo Antonio P Lopez
Application Number: 18/371,795
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Flow Metering (702/45)
International Classification: A61B 5/15 (20060101);