Systems and methods for error injection in data storage systems
Embodiments of the solid-state storage system provided herein are configured to perform improved mechanisms for testing of error recovery of solid state storage devices. In some embodiments, the system is configured to introduce or inject errors into data storage commands or operations performed in the non-volatile memory. Injected errors include corruption of data stored in the non-volatile memory, deliberate failure to execute storage operations, and errors injected into communication protocols used between various elements of the device. In some embodiments, injected errors can include direct errors that trigger an immediate execution of error recovery mechanisms and delayed errors that trigger execution of error recovery mechanisms at a later time. Error recovery mechanisms can be tested in an efficient, reliable, and deterministic manner to help ensure effective operation of storage devices. The integrity of non-volatile memory can also be tested.
Latest Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Patents:
- Method to Enhance Spin Torque Layer Performance in a Spintronic Device
- Data Storage Device and Method for Reducing Read Disturbs When Reading Redundantly-Stored Data
- Non-volatile memory with enhanced program operation for last state on slow plane
- Magnetoresistive memory device including a magnetoresistance amplification layer
- Stress test for grown bad blocks
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/226,416, filed on Sep. 6, 2011 now abandoned, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND1. Technical Field
This disclosure relates to non-volatile storage subsystems, including but not limited to non-volatile drives. More particularly, the disclosure relates to systems and methods for improved mechanisms for testing of error recovery of solid state storage devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
Non-volatile memory devices can be used to store data communicated by host devices over various interfaces. Various communication protocols are used to facilitate this data exchange. These communication protocols need to be reliably implemented by data storage systems that include host devices and non-volatile memory devices.
Non-volatile memory devices store information in an array of memory cells constructed with floating gate transistors. Typically, non-volatile memory devices can endure a limited number of write cycles over its useful life. Various factors can contribute to data errors in non-volatile memory devices, which include charge loss or leakage over time, read disturb, and device wear caused by program/erase cycles. Non-volatile memory degradation can cause stored data to be corrupted. For example, when the number of bit errors on a read operation exceeds the ECC (error correction code) correction's capability of the non-volatile memory device, a read operation fails.
Data storage systems are generally required to meet certain thresholds for data reliability and for speed of data storage and retrieval. To meet these thresholds, data storage systems generally include various error recovery mechanisms, which need to be efficient and robust. Error recovery mechanisms can detect or correct errors due to the communication protocols as well as due to data errors of non-volatile memory devices. A reliable data storage system needs to implement capabilities to test the error recovery mechanisms in a timely, efficient, and reliable manner.
One known method for testing error recovery mechanisms is to program and erase non-volatile memory cells an arbitrary and random manner. However, this method tends to “wear out” or degrade the endurance of the non-volatile memory, while lacking the ability to perform tests in a deterministic manner. As a result, this method is generally not useful for testing error recovery mechanisms.
Systems and methods that embody the various features of the invention will now be described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
While certain embodiments of the inventions are described, these embodiments are presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions.
Overview
Embodiments of the solid-state storage system provided herein are configured to perform improved mechanisms for testing error recovery of data storage systems that include non-volatile memory comprising a plurality of storage elements, such as pages. Although “page” and “pages” are used throughout this disclosure, those skilled in art would appreciate that some embodiments are applicable to other units of storage such as planes, sectors, blocks, etc. In some embodiments, “error recovery” refers to error monitoring, error detection, and/or error correction.
In some embodiments, the above described improved mechanisms for testing error recovery are implemented in a system that includes a controller device coupled with a non-volatile memory (NVM) storage module which has a bridge device and a NVM storage unit with NVM elements (e.g., NAND). The controller device in one embodiment is configured to communicate with the bridge device over a high speed interface such as PCIe, and the bridge device is coupled with the NVM storage unit via an interface such as ONFI. The controller is provided physical, page-level access/control to the NVM in some embodiments. The respective capabilities of the controller and the bridge are further described below.
In some embodiments, the bridge device is configured to inject or introduce errors into storage access commands or operations performed in the non-volatile memory. The controller device can configure the bridge to inject errors. In some embodiments, an injected error can comprise a deliberate corruption of portions (or entirety) of data stored in the non-volatile memory. When the corrupted data is being retrieved, the bridge device can perform error recovery, which can include detecting and correcting data corruptions (e.g., by using ECC). In some embodiments, the efficiency (e.g., speed) of error recovery can be measured.
In some embodiments, injected error can comprise a deliberate introduction of errors into commands and/or messages exchanged between the controller device and the bridge over the high speed interface. For example, the bridge device can be configured to introduce errors into messages directed to various queues of the controller device used for facilitating communication over the high speed interface. The controller can perform error recovery, which includes detecting the injected errors, attempting to correct the injected errors, and/or discarding corrupted messages.
In some embodiments, injected errors can be categorized as “direct” or “delayed.” “Direct” errors can include errors that trigger an immediate or non-delayed error recovery following the execution of a storage access command or operation into which the error was introduced. For example, an injected error indicating that a non-volatile memory read operation failed is a direct error. “Delayed” error can include errors that are introduced but not detected or corrected until some time later. For example, an error injecting corruption of data stored in the non-volatile memory is a delayed error, which can be detected and corrected (e.g., by using ECC) during execution of a subsequent read operation of the corrupted data.
In some embodiments, the improved mechanisms for testing error recovery provide the capability of testing the system's response to expected and unexpected errors. For example, injected errors can be categorized as expected. On the other hand, the system can also respond to unexpected errors, such as unexpected failures of non-volatile memory cells. This has the effect of testing error recovery mechanisms of the system in an efficient and predictable manner, which helps to ensure a reliable system operation. In addition, error recovery mechanisms can be reliably tested and/or debugged more efficiently. Thus, the mechanisms described herein can help to ensure that error recovery mechanisms are performed within a preset time that can be derived from or is dictated by system requirements. The details of error injection mechanism performed by the bridge device can be abstracted from the controller, which makes the system modular and more dependable. Moreover, the improved mechanisms for testing error recovery help with ensuring integrity and/or reliability of the non-volatile memory, namely ensuring that it meets endurance (e.g., the number of program/erase cycles the non-volatile memory can endure before failure) and/or data retention (e.g., the measure of non-volatile memory cells' ability to retain data) criteria.
System Overview
Example storage systems implementing the various error recovery testing improvement mechanisms and components will now be described. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the error recovery testing improvement mechanisms may be implemented in various NVM storage systems that are different than those described in this disclosure.
In one embodiment, the non-volatile storage system 120 includes a controller 130 and a NVM storage module 150. The controller 130 in one embodiment communicates with a bridge device 152 within the NVM storage module 150 via a high level interface such as PCIe (through bus logic/interface 140). PCIe is used in one embodiment as it defines a rich packet based routing and Quality of Service (QoS) infrastructure and provides a high speed interface. The controller may include a processor 136 to control data functions, and the core may be coupled with static memory 132 and dynamic memory 134. The controller 130 may also include a data path 138 for processing/transferring data related to data access commands from the host system 110. In one embodiment, the controller 130 is implemented on a SoC (System on Chip), though those skilled in the art will recognize that other hardware/firmware implementations are possible.
In one embodiment, the use of PCIe means that the address range assigned to a device function is used for packet routing both on the fabric and within the device. In one embodiment, the PCIe transaction layer delivers packets to an internal register interface that is read by firmware. Advanced devices often direct incoming packets to internal RAM or hardware acceleration modules.
The bridge device 152 in one embodiment comprises bus logic/interface 154 for communicating with the bus logic/interface 140 (on the controller 130) over the high level interface bus. On the other end of the bridge, the bridge device 152 includes a low level interface 158 such as ONFI for communicating with the NVM storage 160 (e.g., NAND), which may include a number of storage devices such as flash dies 162, 164, 166, and 168. In some embodiments, the bridge device is configured to perform the reliability improvement functions, including reporting media health information to the controller or performing error injection. Although ONFI is depicted in this embodiment, other suitable flash memory interfaces may be used. In another embodiment, the bridge may use a different interface such as Toggle or a proprietary interface to communicate with the NVM storage 160, or send direct commands to the storage.
The architecture reduces latency and addresses the various design constraints while allowing the controller and bridge designers to optimize their respective portions of the architecture. In one embodiment, the controller is responsible for block level management, parity stripe layout, garbage collection, wear leveling, handling read disturb and error recovery. The bridge device, in one embodiment, manages the raw NVM flash interface. It may also provide one or more of: command queuing, error correction, XOR parity accumulator, data protection, and enhances block endurance. The interface between the bridge and the controller in one embodiment is a lightweight PCIe-based data and management interface. The controller uses the interface control command to configure the bridge and data commands to access the NVM media.
It is also noted that the controller uses physical page addressing instead of a logical one that is common in existing controller-bridge designs. The bridge can identify the relationship between pages, blocks, planes, and dies. This gives the controller the greatest flexibility for creating RAID stripe layout, performing data moves, and handling bad blocks. These details are abstracted from the bridge. When using direct addressing, the controller simply provides a set of direct page addresses in the command header to the bridge. In one embodiment, the pages are not necessarily sequential or even in the same block. In most cases, the controller will access pages spread across multiple planes and multiple dies in order to maximize concurrent hardware access.
Some embodiments of the controller-bridge architecture can be adapted for other uses. For example,
The hybrid application illustrates an additional advantage of the controller architecture. A hybrid drive typically includes an SSD that has its own internal controller that has a mapping table to address the NVM within the SSD. While the HDD portion of the hybrid is typically addressed directly, the hybrid controller uses a special mapping table to determine whether data is in the SSD or the HDD. The use of this special mapping table along with the internal SSD mapping table introduces duplicate overhead in cases where data is accessed in the SSD of the hybrid, since there are two mapping tables and there is significant cost associated with maintaining each table.
In contrast, because the controller 130 in the present architecture manages the NVM at both the block and page levels and the magnetic media, it can provide uniformed address management across the flash and magnetic media in a single location. Hence there is no need to have the two tables noted above. This has the advantages of reducing duplicative table lookups and all the associated costs/complexities related to maintaining separate mapping tables. Direct page addressing is used in the unified mapping scheme.
In addition, in a hybrid application, the NVM could still provide effective performance enhancement even when it has a large amount of bad blocks (e.g., 50%). In one hybrid embodiment, the controller also has efficient address gap handling capability (on gaps caused by the bad blocks). In an alternative hybrid embodiment, the unified addressing scheme does not necessarily require a bridge to work with the controller. The controller can potentially use a raw NVM interface (e.g., ONFI) to access the NVM.
In one embodiment, the controller sends data access commands to a command queue 262 in the bridge device. This is performed by the controller sending data command messages to the bridge (by writing to the command queue BAR (base address register)). In one embodiment, the command queue has room for sixteen messages, though the number of messages can vary in other embodiments. The command queue can be implemented in a number of ways. One option is full hardware automation where the controller simply writes to a fixed offset. Alternately it can be implemented in memory using a ring buffer or an array based linked list. In one embodiment, the implementation must allow for efficient insertion and notification with minimal bus traffic. In one embodiment, the controller knows the current queue depth based on the number of status responses the bridge has sent back (e.g., a message to the controller's completion queue indicating completion of a command). Note that the data commands are much smaller than the actual data. A given record slot in the queue is considered available once the bridge sends back a completion status or an error report.
In the embodiment shown in
On the controller side 210 are a set of data ports 214 at data addresses 212 and a number of status queues. In one embodiment, the status queues include an error queue 218, an information queue 222, and a command completion queue 226. These queues are responsible for receiving messages from the bridge regarding command processing, as well as current status of the bridge and the NVM. In one embodiment, the controller implements three status queues to simplify command transactions. The bridge uses the completion queue 226 to indicate when it has successfully completed one or more commands. The info queue 222 is used for non-critical information such as health reports. The error queue 218 allows the bridge to send detailed reports when one or more command fails. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the three queues could be combined into fewer queues or divided into additional queues. Alternatively, in lieu of these queues, the controller and the bridge may use an interrupt based system whereby the bridge would send an interrupt when it wishes to communicate with the controller. The controller may then check a message stored on the bridge side.
As shown in
Communications between the controller and the bridge are effected in one embodiment through a PCIe protocol stack 230 which includes a number of layers on both sides, including a transactional layer (232, 242), a data link layer (234, 240), and physical layer (236, 238). While PCIe is used in this disclosure to illustrate the operation of the controller and the bridge, other similar standards can be used as well.
The PCIe transaction layer assigns transmit credits based on how much room is left in its Virtual Channel (VC) buffer space. According to the PCIe specification, devices must implement VCO, though some devices implement additional VC to ensure high priority messages have dedicated resources. Packets are directed to the appropriated VC based on their Traffic Class (TC). The TC is also used to determine priority when packets are flowing over the PCIe fabric. Higher TC packets are generally given priority by the root complex, switches and end-devices.
In one embodiment, the controller is designed to operate using only VCO. In one embodiment, though the bridge may implement additional VC, it must be configurable so that it can operate in single VC mode. The messages communicated between the controller and the bridge will be better understood in view of the following brief description of the data processing flow. To service a read command from the host, the controller may first send a command message to the bridge's command queue. Once the bridge processes the command message, it will read the requested data from the NVM and send the read data back to a corresponding data port on the controller side. This action triggers the data path on the controller, which leads to the data being sent back to the host. Conversely, to service a write command from the host, the controller may first send a command message to the bridge's command queue. Once the bridge processes the command message, it will read from a corresponding data port on the controller side. This action triggers the data path on the controller, which leads to the write data being sent from a buffer in the controller to the bridge for writing to the NVM.
The controller in one embodiment communicates with the bridge using three message types of increasing priority: data to be written to the NVM for write commands (0), messages for the bridge's command queue (1) and messages for the bridge's admin queue (2). Those skilled in the art will recognize that different priorities may be assigned to these messages, and the messages could be combined into fewer types or divided into more types depending on the implementation. In one embodiment, under normal conditions, the controller sends a steady stream of data packets to the bridge.
In one embodiment, the bridge interacts with the controller using its own set of prioritized message types (listed here in increasing priority): data read from the NVM for read commands (0), messages for the controller's completion/info queues (1) and messages for the controller's error queue (2). Those skilled in the art will recognize that different priorities may be assigned to these messages, and the messages could be combined into fewer types or divided into more types depending on the implementation. As will be further described below, to facilitate fast processing of data access commands, a read or write by the bridge to a data port in the controller automatically triggers the data path in the controller. In one embodiment, it is not uncommon for the bridge to process several commands in parallel. In one embodiment, the bridge uses the completion queue 226 to notify the controller when commands have completed successfully. In additional, non-critical messages are sent to the info queue 222 while detailed error reports are sent to the error queue 218. In other embodiments, these queues may be combined into fewer queues (with different message types being distinguished by special flags or implied address values) or separated into more queues (e.g., different error queues for different types of error or different info queues for different types of information returned from the bridge).
In other embodiments where a different interface than PCIe is used, the PCIe protocol stack may be replaced with the appropriate stacks/layers of that interface. Those skilled in the art will recognized that other equivalent standardized interfaces (e.g., eMMC) may be adapted to replace PCIe. In other embodiments, a custom/proprietary interface may be used to handle communications between the controller and the bridge.
In some embodiments, commands sent to the command queue may include fields such as: a tag field, a priority field, a list of pages, and bits to control the XOR parity accumulator. When the bridge is ready to start working on a given command, it performs a read or a write operation on the appropriate data port 214 to trigger the data path on the controller side. In particular, in one embodiment, the data path includes logic for processing data transferred between the controller and the bridge. For example, for a write, write data is read from a memory buffer in the controller and processed by the data path (e.g., adding additional metadata) before it is sent to the bridge for writing to the NVM. Similarly, for a read, the data path also processes the incoming data from the bridge (e.g., stripping out metadata). The use of the data path on the controller simplifies the overall design and minimizes work that the bridge needs to perform for each command. Given the above, the data path needs to be configured/set up for the particular command that is currently being processed, so that the data to be transferred can be properly processed as being associated with the current command. This set up/configuration could be performed through some automation in the data path or by firmware on the controller processor 136. In either scenario, a read/write of a data port by the bridge in one embodiment triggers this configuration of the data path on the controller side. In other embodiments, multiple data paths may be used with each handling a subset of the data ports, though in this scenario the data paths would still operate based on the above described principles.
In some embodiments, for a read command, the bridge obtains data from the NVM and writes to a corresponding data port 214 and for a write command, the bridge reads data from a corresponding data port 214 and writes to the NVM. In other embodiments, other less efficient variations are possible. For example, the controller may read and write the transactions, and the bridge may simply notify that attention is needed via an interrupt, etc.
In some embodiments, each command in the bridge command queue 262 has a tag. When the bridge is ready to start working on a command that involves a data transfer, it accesses the data port 214 that matched the command tag. In one embodiment, the data path in the controller has sixteen ports defined by two values in the bridge CSR: base address and port size. These two values are sufficient to derive the location of all sixteen ports. In other embodiments, a different number of ports and/or a different address derivation scheme may be used.
In some embodiments, each data port (e.g., 0 to 15) is associated with a command tag. In one embodiment, commands are limited to eight pages. Under such an arrangement, the ports need to be at least 64K apart, though the spacing can be larger. Thus, performing a read or write on the port matching the command tag allows the controller to automatically identify the matching command and initiate the data path automation without additional control overhead.
For example, when the bridge accesses a particular data port address in the controller (e.g., No. 0 of 15) defined by the associated PCIe address range, the controller will understand that this is for the command associated with that tag. Thus, there is no need for the bridge to separately send a command tag, which reduces overhead as each additional communication between the bridge and the controller adds to the overall latency. To accomplish this, in one embodiment the controller automatically decodes the address (split the upper bits), and loads the registers to trigger/prime the host data path for processing (initiating the automation). However, those skilled in the art will recognize implementations other than the above described implied tag implementation could be used. For example, the bridge could send an explicit command tag message to the controller to indicate the command the bridge is currently working on and which data port it intends to use. The priming of the data path would then be dependent on that explicit command tag message. In other embodiments, the command tags as described above need not be used. Generally, any command configuration data that enables the bridge and/or the controller to keep track of the data port and command correlation can be used.
In some embodiments, the controller data path is automatically triggered when a data port is accessed by the bridge. In one embodiment, the data path must complete a command once it has been triggered, as there is no mechanism that allows the bridge to work on parts of a command. In one embodiment, when the bridge starts a write operation, the controller sends all pages to be written to the bridge in the order specified by the command message. Conversely, the controller may also require the bridge to send data for a read operation in the order specified by the command message. While the example provided herein shows one data path that handles both reads and writes, in other embodiments multiple data paths could be used. For example, in a multiple data path implementation each data path could be dedicated to a sub-set of the data ports, and/or certain data paths may be configured to handle reads and other data paths may be configured to handle writes. When the bridge executes the command, it returns status message(s) to one or more queues on the controller side. In an alternative embodiment, in lieu of using tags, the bridge may send the controller a block of data to program the data path. The bridge does not have to know what the data does. The block of program data would be sent first by the controller to the bridge along with the command. The bridge would then send the block back. The program data can be sent ahead of the data to be transferred for the command or it can be sent to another queue.
In another embodiment, instead of the implied command tag/data path trigger mechanism describe above, the controller-bridge could communicate in a controller-push model in which the controller sends data along with the commands to the bridge. The bridge would thus need a large volatile memory buffer capacity to hold the user data from the controller for the various commands in the bridge's command queue. This implementation could reduce latency but potentially increase the cost of bridge implementation as a large memory buffer will need to be added to the bridge. This also leads to increased power consumption by the bridge.
In some embodiments, the command queue 262 supports sophisticated queuing and out-of-order execution, while the admin queue is ordered. The various queues on both the controller and bridge sides can have a mixture of commands outstanding, and can be asynchronous. The mixture of commands is particularly notable in the bridge command queue as compared to the ONFI specifications. ONFI provides some basic queuing capability through its “read multiple” and “write multiple” commands. However, there can be no mixing of different types of commands. Moreover, commands are batch processed, which means that the commands must clear the queue completely before more commands can be accepted.
In contrast, the advanced queuing capability of the bridge can (1) accept mixed command types, (2) support out of order execution, and (3) allow the controller to send additional commands without having the queue(s) be cleared first. The bridge can also accept special commands from the controller to specify that a certain command be executed with high priority. The bridge manages several channels so it has the flexibility to re-order the commands it receives.
A unique feature in the queuing model is the implementation of a background priority in one embodiment. The background priority lets the bridge decide when to execute the command. In one embodiment, commands with the “background” flag are unordered and given the lowest priority. They may also be exempt from the command promotion timer requirement, which is a time value dictating a deadline by which a certain command should be executed. In one embodiment, although the order of command execution is left up to the bridge, a command cannot sit in the queue indefinitely. When the bridge is choosing between unordered commands on the pending list, it will give preference to commands that have expired promotion timers. The timeout value is set by the controller in the bridge control CSR field in one embodiment.
The bridge may work on these “background” commands when it has available resources. For example, background priority can be used for data retention, health scan, and error injection tasks. As another example, the controller may send down a block erase command with the background flag set. The bridge will perform the erase operation when the target die is not needed for other commands in the queue. In one embodiment, the “ordered,” “priority,” and “background” flags are mutually exclusive. This background command feature is currently absent in in-band I/O interfaces (e.g., UFS, eMMC, SAS or SATA), as they do not support background long running tasks.
Types of Error Injection
As previously discussed above, the above described controller-bridge environments are just several example implementations of error injection concepts. These concepts are broadly applicable to other NVM designs as well. Therefore, in the sections below, where appropriate, the various concepts and mechanisms of the some embodiments will be generally described as being performed by a “receiver” device and/or a “sender” or “requester” device.
In some embodiments, several types of error injection operations can be supported by the system, including “direct” and “delayed” operations. In some embodiments, the system can support the injection of “memory management errors” or “media errors” (i.e., non-volatile memory errors) and “protocol errors” (i.e., errors relating to the communication protocol between a sender and receiver).
In some embodiments, performing direct error injection causes an immediate error recovery following the execution of a storage access command or operation into which the error was introduced. As explained below, direct errors include read fail, program/copy fail, erase fail, data path errors, and queuing errors.
In some embodiments, performing delayed error injection includes introducing an error that is not detected and/or corrected until a later command or operation. As explained below, delayed errors include location not written/programmed, page correctible errors, and page uncorrectable errors. In some embodiments, delayed errors are detected and/or corrected when a subsequent read operation directed to the corrupted non-volatile memory location is executed.
In some embodiments, different types of injected errors relate to testing different types of error recovery mechanisms implemented by the system. For example, media errors can test error recovery mechanisms implemented by the bridge (e.g., ECC mechanisms) and the controller. The latter can include recovering from accessing corrupted data that could not be corrected by the ECC, which can include executing or adjusting parameters of a wear leveling policy, bad block management policy, data redundancy policy, programming policy, policy relating to shifting from multi-level cell mode to single-level cell mode, etc. Protocol errors can test error recovery mechanisms relating to the communication protocol between the controller and bridge, which can include detecting erroneous messages, requesting corrected messages, discarding erroneous messages, re-initializing the communication protocol, etc.
In some embodiments, a sender (e.g., a controller device) configures a receiver (e.g., a bridge device) to perform error injection. In some embodiments, the controller device configures the bridge device into error injection operating mode, which can persist until cleared by the controller device. For example, the error injection mode can be programmed by the controller in the CSR 252 illustrated in
In some embodiments, the bridge can generate and provide to the controller an error report reflecting the execution status of commands or operations into which errors were injected. As further explained below, information in the error report can include an indication of success or an appropriate error code. In some embodiments, the bridge can generate the error report due to direct or delayed errors. In some embodiments, the bridge can generate the error report due to a command or operation that triggers the error recovery in response to a previously introduced delayed error. In some embodiments, the bridge writes the generated error report to the controller's error queue 218, as is illustrated in
In some embodiments, error injection mechanisms can be performed before the system is put into operation (e.g., into use by a customer), such as during the development cycle, testing cycle, and quality assurance cycle. In some embodiments, error injections mechanisms can be performed when the system is already in operation. In some embodiments, error injection can be implemented in the background. As explained above, the bridge may work on these “background” error injection operations when it has resources not used for performing higher priority data access commands communicated by the controller. The bridge can perform background error injection operations periodically or whenever it has available resources.
Direct Error Injection
Examples of direct memory management errors include:
-
- Read fail: any read operation from a non-volatile memory location (e.g., a page) or range of locations is accepted by the bridge, but an error report reflecting that the read operation failed is generated and communicated to the controller. It is understood that the error is generated by the system and is does not reflect that non-volatile memory locations are unreliable. As explained below, in some embodiments, no data is returned to the controller. Format of the error report is explained below.
- Program fail/Copy fail: the bridge corrupts data such that it cannot be corrected by the error recovery mechanisms (e.g., by ECC). This causes the bridge to accept a program/copy operation directed to a non-volatile memory location (e.g., a page), but to generate an error report reflecting that the operation failed. It is understood that the error is generated by the system and is does not reflect that non-volatile memory locations are unreliable. Format of the error report is explained below.
- Erase fail: any erase operation directed to a non-volatile memory location (e.g., a block) or locations are accepted but not executed. The bridge generates an error report reflecting that erase operation failed. It is understood that the error is generated by the system and is does not reflect that non-volatile memory locations are unreliable. Format of the error report is explained below.
Examples of direct communication protocol errors include:
-
- Data path error: the bridge accesses incorrect data port address(es) in the controller address space 210 (
FIG. 2 ), which triggers incorrect data path(s), or sends an explicit command tag message(s) with incorrect command tag(s). - Queuing error: with reference to
FIG. 2 , the bridge sends incorrect messages to controller's command completion queue 226 (e.g., completion messages for commands that were never sent by the controller), info queue 222, and/or error queue 218. Another type of queuing error is disregarding the queuing order or constraints of the queues.
- Data path error: the bridge accesses incorrect data port address(es) in the controller address space 210 (
With reference to
Delayed Error Injection
-
- Page correctible error: the bridge silently (i.e., without the controller's knowledge) corrupts data programmed or written to non-volatile memory location(s) (e.g., page(s)) so that it is difficult, but possible to later recover the programmed data. The bridge indicates to the controller that the program or write operation was executed successfully.
- Page uncorrectable error: the bridge silently (i.e., without the controller's knowledge) corrupts data written to a non-volatile memory location(s) (e.g., page(s)) so that it is impossible to later recover the programmed data. The bridge indicates to the controller that the program or write operation was executed successfully.
- Location not written/Location not programmed: any write operation to non-volatile memory location(s) (e.g., page(s)) is accepted by the bridge, but the location(s) is not actually written/programmed. The bridge reports a successful completion of the write operation to the controller.
Next, the process transitions to block 404 where the bridge introduces a delayed error of the type specified in block 402. The error can be introduced into storage or data access operation(s) directed to a non-volatile memory address (e.g., a page) or range of non-volatile memory addresses (e.g., 64 pages). For example, the bridge can inject a page correctible error into a page write operation. In block 406, the bridge indicates to the controller that data access operation(s) encountered an error. The controller can treat the error as an expected error and not as a non-volatile memory defect. In block 408, the process can execute delayed error recovery. For example, the controller can request a page read operation directed to the page(s) corrupted by the bridge. This can cause the bridge to execute an ECC mechanism to recover the uncorrupted data.
In block 410, the bridge can return retrieved data to the controller. The controller can verify that recovered data matches the expected data (e.g., data that controller requested to be written in block 404). If the process verifies that the recovered data is correct, it transitions to block 414, where it determines whether to continue with error injection. In some embodiments, the bridge checks whether the controller programmed the CSR 252 illustrated in
If the process determines that retrieved data is incorrect, it transitions to block 412. In some embodiments, this indicates an unexpected error, which reflects a defect of non-volatile memory location(s) where data is stored. The process can execute error recovery relating to the non-volatile memory defect, which can include executing or adjusting parameters of a wear leveling policy, bad block management policy, data redundancy policy, programming policy, policy relating to shifting from multi-level cell mode to single-level cell mode, etc. The process then transitions to block 414 where it determines whether to continue with error injection, as explained above.
In some embodiments, if the process injects a page uncorrectable error in block 402, the bridge's error recovery mechanism (e.g., ECC) may not be able to correct the corruption of stored data. In this case, when the process attempts to retrieve data in block 408, the bridge may return an error and/or only that portion of the data which its error recovery mechanism was able to recover correctly. In block 410, the process can determine that the bridge behaved in an expected fashion, which is in accordance with the uncorrectable error mode of operation.
In some embodiments, the process injects a location not written/location not programmed error in block 402. When the process attempts to retrieve data in block 408, the bridge may generate an error report indicating an attempt to read an unprogrammed page. In block 410, the process can determine that the bridge behaved in an expected fashion, which is in accordance with location not written/location not programmed error mode of operation.
In some embodiments, the bridge can inject errors, such as page correctible or uncorrectable errors, by generating invalid (e.g., corrupted) ECC data when writing data to the non-volatile memory. When, at a later time, data is being retrieved, the bridge will detect a mismatch between stored data and ECC data and trigger error recovery mechanisms. In some embodiments, the bridge can inject errors, such as page correctible or uncorrectable errors, by corrupting data provided by the controller. In some embodiments, the bridge can corrupt data while it is being stored in an intermediate storage location (e.g., volatile memory buffer, such as DRAM buffer) before being written to the non-volatile memory. In some embodiments, the bridge disables ECC mechanism when writing corrupted data into non-volatile memory to ensure that corruptions will not be corrected while data is being written. The bridge can generate valid ECC data, namely correct ECC data corresponding to corrupted data being written. When, at a later time, data is being retrieved, the bridge may not detect corruption as ECC data will match corrupted data. However, the controller will detect that data was corrupted, which will trigger error recovery mechanisms. In some embodiments, retrieved, deliberately corrupted data could have been further corrupted due a non-volatile memory defect. The ECC mechanism may be able to detect these further corruptions (i.e., unexpected errors) and, in certain cases, correct them. As explained above, additional error recovery relating to the non-volatile memory defect can be triggered. In some embodiments, the bridge can inject errors, such as page correctible or uncorrectable errors, by adjusting programming algorithm parameters (e.g., programming time) to cause the programming operation to execute incorrectly, thus corrupting data as it is being written to the non-volatile memory. The bridge can write valid ECC data corresponding to uncorrupted data provided by the controller. When, at a later time, data is being retrieved, the bridge will detect a mismatch between stored data and ECC data and trigger error recovery mechanisms.
Error Report Format
Block 502 indicates success or error code corresponding to storage access operation executed in location(s) of non-volatile memory. The location(s) (e.g., page address(es)) may have been communicated to the bridge as a parameter of a storage access operation, as is explained with respect to
Block 520 indicates a first location of non-volatile memory into which an error was injected. For example, the first location can correspond to page 1 in a particular block of memory. The location (e.g., page address) may have been communicated to the bridge as a parameter of a storage access operation, as is explained with respect to
Similarly, block 524 indicates a second location of non-volatile memory into which an error was injected. For example, the second location can correspond to page 2 in a particular block of memory. Block 526 indicates success or error code corresponding to storage access operation executed in page 2. Block 530 indicates the Nth location of non-volatile memory into which an error was injected. For example, the Nth location can correspond to page N in a particular block of memory. Block 532 indicates success or error code corresponding to storage access operation executed in page N.
In some embodiments, as is illustrated in
In some embodiments, the error report 500B can include aggregated error reports corresponding to multiple error injection operations. For instance, it may be advantageous to minimize the traffic between the receiver (e.g., a bridge) and sender (e.g., a controller). In such embodiments, locations written in blocks 520, 524, and 530 can assist the controller in matching error information to the particular location in the non-volatile memory. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the error reporting can take on a wide variety of formats and that formats different from the various examples shown here may be used to report the injected errors described in this disclosure.
Other Variations
As used in this application, “non-volatile memory” typically refers to solid-state memory such as NAND flash. However, the systems and methods of this disclosure may also be useful in more conventional hard drives and hybrid drives including both solid-state and hard drive components. As such, while certain internal operations are referred to which typically are associated with solid-state drives, such as “wear leveling” and “garbage collection,” analogous operations for hard drives can also take advantage of some embodiments of this disclosure. Solid-state memory may comprise a wide variety of technologies, such as flash integrated circuits, Chalcogenide RAM (C-RAM), Phase Change Memory (PC-RAM or PRAM), Programmable Metallization Cell RAM (PMC-RAM or PMCm), Ovonic Unified Memory (OUM), Resistance RAM (RRAM), NAND memory, NOR memory, EEPROM, Ferroelectric Memory (FeRAM), or other discrete NVM (non-volatile memory) chips. The solid-state storage devices (e.g., dies) may be physically divided into planes, blocks, pages, and sectors, as is known in the art. Other forms of storage (e.g., battery backed-up volatile DRAM or SRAM devices, magnetic disk drives, etc.) may additionally or alternatively be used.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments, other types of error injection can be implemented. In addition, the actual steps taken in processes shown in
While certain embodiments of the inventions have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the inventions. For example, the various components illustrated in
Claims
1. A method for testing a non-volatile storage system comprising a bridge configured to communicate with a controller over a first interface for receiving data access commands from the controller and communicate with a non-volatile solid-state memory over a second interface for communicating data access operations, the method comprising:
- in accordance with a testing mode set by the controller, introducing, by the bridge, at least one error into execution of a storage access command directed to at least one memory location of a plurality of locations of the non-volatile memory;
- providing, by the bridge, a report to the controller, the report indicating at least one of successful completion of the command and error;
- executing, by at least one of the controller and the bridge, an error recovery mechanism configured to detect the introduced error; and
- in response to determining that the report indicates an unexpected error as a result of the at least one memory location being defective, imitating, by at least one of the controller and the bridge, the error recovery mechanism on the at least one memory location to correct the unexpected error.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- in response to determining that the report indicates an expected error as a result of the introduced error, initiating, by at least one of the controller and the bridge, the error recovery mechanism to correct the expected error.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising executing the error recovery mechanism without executing an additional command directed to the at least one memory location.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the testing mode comprises introducing, by the bridge, errors into messages exchanged between the bridge and the controller through the first interface.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the testing mode comprises one of: injecting a data path error and a queuing error.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the testing mode comprises one of: injecting a page correctible error, page uncorrectable error, location not written error, read fail error, program fail error, and erase fail error.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising executing the error recovery mechanism following execution of an additional command directed to the at least one memory location.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein:
- executing the command corrupts data stored in the at least one memory location,
- the additional command comprises a data read command, and
- the error recovery mechanism is executed based at least in part on data retrieved from the at least one memory location or on an error report indicating error encountered during execution of the data read command.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising programming, by the bridge, data to the non-volatile memory in response to the command.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the error is introduced by modifying at least one parameter the bridge uses to program the data at the at least one location.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the error recovery mechanism comprises error correction code (ECC) executed by the bridge and the introduced error is capable of being corrected by the ECC.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the error recovery mechanism comprises error correction code (ECC) executed by the bridge and the introduced error is not capable of being corrected by the ECC.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the introduced error comprises a corruption of data stored in the at least one memory location.
14. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing performance of the error recovery mechanism, wherein the assessing performance comprises measuring a time of execution of the error recovery mechanism.
15. A non-volatile storage system comprising:
- a controller configured to execute storage access commands received from a host system;
- a non-volatile solid-state memory comprising a plurality of locations configured to store data; and
- a bridge configured to: communicate with the controller over a first interface for receiving physical-address based storage access commands from the controller; communicate with the non-volatile memory over a second interface for communicating data access operations; introduce at least one error into execution of a storage access command directed to at least one memory location in accordance with a testing mode set by the controller; and provide to the controller a report indicating at least one of successful completion of the command and error,
- wherein at least one of the controller and the bridge is configured to execute an error recovery mechanism to recover from the introduced error and assess performance of the error recovery mechanism, and
- wherein at least one of the controller and the bridge is further configured to: in response to determining that the report indicates an unexpected error as a result of the at least one memory location being defective, initiate the error recovery mechanism on the at least one memory location to correct the unexpected error.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the at least one memory location comprises a page of the non-volatile memory.
17. The system of claim 15, wherein at least one of the controller and the bridge is further configured to:
- in response to determining that the report indicates an expected error as a result of the introduced error, initiate the error recovery mechanism to correct the expected error.
18. The system of claim 15, wherein the testing mode comprises one of:
- injecting a page correctible error, page uncorrectable error, location not written error, read fail error, program fail error, and erase fail error.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the error recovery mechanism comprises error correction code (ECC) executed by the bridge and the introduced error is capable of being corrected by the ECC.
20. The system of claim 18, wherein the error recovery mechanism comprises error correction code (ECC) executed by the bridge and the introduced error is not capable of being corrected by the ECC.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein the introduced error comprises a corruption of data stored in the at least one memory location.
22. The system of claim 15, wherein the bridge is further configured to:
- execute an additional command directed to the at least one memory location;
- generate a result of execution of the additional command; and
- communicate the result of execution to the controller, thereby causing the controller to execute the error recovery mechanism.
23. The system of claim 22, wherein:
- the execution of the command corrupts data stored in the at least one memory location,
- the additional command comprises a data read command, and
- the result of execution comprises at least one of retrieved data and an error report indicating error encountered during execution of the data read command.
24. The system of claim 23, wherein the execution of the command corrupts data in volatile memory before it is written to the at least one memory location.
25. The system of claim 15, wherein the testing mode comprises introducing, by the bridge, errors into messages exchanged between the bridge and the controller through the first interface.
26. The system of claim 25, wherein the testing mode comprises one of: injecting a data path error and a queuing error.
27. The system of claim 15, wherein the bridge is further configured to execute the error recovery mechanism.
| 6148354 | November 14, 2000 | Ban et al. |
| 6182248 | January 30, 2001 | Armstrong et al. |
| 6304984 | October 16, 2001 | Neal et al. |
| 6519718 | February 11, 2003 | Graham et al. |
| 6735661 | May 11, 2004 | Gelke et al. |
| 6785767 | August 31, 2004 | Coulson |
| 6988175 | January 17, 2006 | Lasser |
| 7103684 | September 5, 2006 | Chen et al. |
| 7127549 | October 24, 2006 | Sinclair |
| 7136973 | November 14, 2006 | Sinclair |
| 7460394 | December 2, 2008 | Happ et al. |
| 7594135 | September 22, 2009 | Gonzalez et al. |
| 7623401 | November 24, 2009 | Philipp et al. |
| 7631245 | December 8, 2009 | Lasser |
| 7716411 | May 11, 2010 | Panabaker et al. |
| 7861038 | December 28, 2010 | Fontenot et al. |
| 7861122 | December 28, 2010 | Cornwell et al. |
| 7957173 | June 7, 2011 | Kim |
| 7962777 | June 14, 2011 | Gonzalez et al. |
| 7970978 | June 28, 2011 | Luo et al. |
| 8065304 | November 22, 2011 | Ross |
| 8120969 | February 21, 2012 | Montierth et al. |
| 8291295 | October 16, 2012 | Harari et al. |
| 8315092 | November 20, 2012 | Strasser et al. |
| 8341374 | December 25, 2012 | Kwon et al. |
| 8443263 | May 14, 2013 | Selinger et al. |
| 8447920 | May 21, 2013 | Syu |
| 20020053010 | May 2, 2002 | Piccirillo et al. |
| 20030165076 | September 4, 2003 | Gorobets et al. |
| 20030172261 | September 11, 2003 | Lee et al. |
| 20050160217 | July 21, 2005 | Gonzalez et al. |
| 20050223373 | October 6, 2005 | Gage et al. |
| 20050251617 | November 10, 2005 | Sinclair et al. |
| 20060248387 | November 2, 2006 | Nicholson et al. |
| 20070038901 | February 15, 2007 | Shiota et al. |
| 20070180328 | August 2, 2007 | Cornwell et al. |
| 20070190328 | August 16, 2007 | Cowburn et al. |
| 20070220202 | September 20, 2007 | Sutardja et al. |
| 20070245092 | October 18, 2007 | Yeh |
| 20070288683 | December 13, 2007 | Panabaker et al. |
| 20070288692 | December 13, 2007 | Bruce et al. |
| 20080040531 | February 14, 2008 | Anderson |
| 20080192928 | August 14, 2008 | Yu et al. |
| 20080215808 | September 4, 2008 | Ashmore et al. |
| 20080250270 | October 9, 2008 | Bennett |
| 20090013233 | January 8, 2009 | Radke |
| 20090024793 | January 22, 2009 | Fontenot et al. |
| 20090037652 | February 5, 2009 | Yu et al. |
| 20090063730 | March 5, 2009 | Gower et al. |
| 20090158124 | June 18, 2009 | Kawai et al. |
| 20090172257 | July 2, 2009 | Prins et al. |
| 20090240873 | September 24, 2009 | Yu et al. |
| 20090282305 | November 12, 2009 | Chen et al. |
| 20090313411 | December 17, 2009 | Stenfort |
| 20100023800 | January 28, 2010 | Harari et al. |
| 20100037012 | February 11, 2010 | Yano et al. |
| 20100088459 | April 8, 2010 | Arya et al. |
| 20100100675 | April 22, 2010 | Furuhjelm |
| 20100122022 | May 13, 2010 | Luo et al. |
| 20100174851 | July 8, 2010 | Leibowitz et al. |
| 20100180182 | July 15, 2010 | Trantham |
| 20100205517 | August 12, 2010 | Lee et al. |
| 20100217924 | August 26, 2010 | Panabaker et al. |
| 20100268874 | October 21, 2010 | Pyeon |
| 20100281342 | November 4, 2010 | Chang et al. |
| 20100325352 | December 23, 2010 | Schuette et al. |
| 20100327923 | December 30, 2010 | Pyeon et al. |
| 20110010491 | January 13, 2011 | Anderson |
| 20110035540 | February 10, 2011 | Fitzgerald et al. |
| 20110040924 | February 17, 2011 | Selinger |
| 20110041039 | February 17, 2011 | Harari et al. |
| 20110082985 | April 7, 2011 | Haines et al. |
| 20110107076 | May 5, 2011 | Kim et al. |
| 20110119442 | May 19, 2011 | Haines et al. |
| 20110138112 | June 9, 2011 | Chiang et al. |
| 20110145489 | June 16, 2011 | Yu et al. |
| 20110283049 | November 17, 2011 | Kang et al. |
| 20110283135 | November 17, 2011 | Burger et al. |
| 20110289267 | November 24, 2011 | Flynn et al. |
| 20110320915 | December 29, 2011 | Khan |
| 20120102263 | April 26, 2012 | Aswadhati |
| 20120131268 | May 24, 2012 | Anderson |
| 20120203951 | August 9, 2012 | Wood et al. |
| 20120221922 | August 30, 2012 | Bennett |
| 20120233380 | September 13, 2012 | Butterfield |
| 20120260020 | October 11, 2012 | Suryabudi et al. |
| 20120265926 | October 18, 2012 | Tal et al. |
| 20120324191 | December 20, 2012 | Strange et al. |
| 20130060981 | March 7, 2013 | Horn et al. |
| 20130073785 | March 21, 2013 | Emma et al. |
| 20130132638 | May 23, 2013 | Horn et al. |
| WO 2011/019596 | February 2011 | WO |
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 15, 2011
Date of Patent: Apr 22, 2014
Assignee: Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Inventor: Sebastien A. Jean (Irvine, CA)
Primary Examiner: Joseph D Manoskey
Application Number: 13/297,089
International Classification: G06F 11/00 (20060101);
