Semiconductor devices with heterojunction barrier regions and methods of fabricating same

- Cree, Inc.

An electronic device includes a silicon carbide layer including an n-type drift region therein, a contact forming a junction, such as a Schottky junction, with the drift region, and a p-type junction barrier region on the silicon carbide layer. The p-type junction barrier region includes a p-type polysilicon region forming a P-N heterojunction with the drift region, and the p-type junction barrier region is electrically connected to the contact. Related methods are also disclosed.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to semiconductor devices and the fabrication of semiconductor devices and more particularly, to Junction Barrier Schottky (JBS) diodes, and the fabrication of such diodes.

BACKGROUND

High voltage silicon carbide (SiC) Schottky diodes, which may have voltage blocking ratings between, for example, about 600V and about 2.5 kV, are expected to compete with silicon PIN diodes having similar voltage ratings. Such diodes may handle as much as about 100 amps or more of forward current, depending on their active area design. High voltage Schottky diodes have a number of important applications, particularly in the field of power conditioning, distribution and control.

An important characteristic of a SiC Schottky diode in such applications is its switching speed. Silicon-based PIN devices typically exhibit relatively poor switching speeds. A silicon PIN diode may have a maximum switching speed of approximately 20 kHz, depending on its voltage rating. In contrast, silicon carbide-based Schottky devices are theoretically capable of much higher switching speeds, for example, in excess of about 100 times better than silicon. In addition, silicon carbide devices may be capable of handling a higher current density than silicon devices.

A conventional SiC Schottky diode structure has an n-type SiC substrate on which an n− epitaxial layer, which functions as a drift region, is formed. The device typically includes a Schottky contact formed directly on the n− layer. A junction termination region, such as a guard ring and/or p-type JTE (junction termination extension) region, is typically formed to surround the Schottky junction active region. The purpose of junction termination region is to reduce or prevent electric field crowding at the edges of the Schottky junction, and to reduce or prevent the depletion region from interacting with the surface of the device. Surface effects may cause the depletion region to spread unevenly, which may adversely affect the breakdown voltage of the device. Other termination techniques include field plates and floating field rings that may be more strongly influenced by surface effects. A channel stop region may also be formed by implantation of n-type dopants in order to prevent the depletion region from extending to the edge of the device.

Regardless of the type of termination used, the Schottky diode will fail if a large enough reverse voltage is applied to the junction. Such failures are generally catastrophic, and may damage or destroy the device. Furthermore, even before the junction has failed, a Schottky diode may experience large reverse leakage currents. In order to reduce such leakage currents, the junction barrier Schottky (JBS) diode was developed. JBS diodes are sometimes referred to as Merged PIN-Schottky (MPS) diodes. A conventional JBS diode 10 is illustrated in FIG. 1. As shown therein, a conventional JBS diode includes an n-type substrate 12 on which an n− drift layer 14 is formed. A plurality of p+ regions 16 are formed, typically by ion implantation, in the surface of the n− drift layer 14. A metal anode contact 18 is formed on the surface of the n− drift layer 14 in contact with both the n− drift layer 14 and the p+ regions 16. The anode contact 18 forms a Schottky junction with the exposed portions of the drift layer 14, and may form an ohmic contact with the p+ regions 16. A cathode contact 20 is formed on the substrate 12. Silicon carbide-based JBS diodes are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,104,043 and 6,524,900.

In forward operation, the junction J1 between the anode contact 18 and the drift layer 14 turns on before the junction J2 between the p+ regions 16 and the drift layer 14. Thus, at low forward voltages, the device exhibits Schottky diode behavior. That is, current transport in the device is dominated by majority carriers (electrons) injected across the Schottky junction J1 at low forward voltages. As there may be no minority carrier injection (and thus no minority charge storage) in the device at normal operating voltages, JBS diodes have fast switching speeds characteristic of Schottky diodes.

Under reverse bias conditions, however, the depletion regions formed by the PN junctions J2 between the p+ regions 16 and the drift layer 14 expand to block reverse current through the device 10, protecting the Schottky junction J1 and limiting reverse leakage current in the device 10. Thus, in reverse bias, the JBS diode 10 behaves like a PIN diode. The voltage blocking ability of the device 10 is typically determined by the thickness and doping of the drift layer 14 and the design of the edge termination.

SUMMARY

An electronic device according to some embodiments includes a silicon carbide layer including an n-type drift region therein, a contact forming a Schottky junction with the drift region, and a p-type junction barrier region on the silicon carbide layer. The p-type junction barrier region includes a p-type polysilicon region forming a P-N heterojunction with the drift region and the p-type junction barrier region is electrically connected to the contact.

The Schottky junction between the contact and the drift region may be configured to turn on at a lower forward voltage than the P-N heterojunction between the junction barrier region and the drift region.

The contact may form an ohmic contact to the p-type polysilicon region, and the P-N heterojunction between the heterojunction barrier region and the drift region may be configured to begin to conduct majority carriers at a higher forward voltage than a turn on voltage of the Schottky junction and at a lower voltage at which the P-N heterojunction between the heterojunction barrier region and the drift region begins to inject minority carriers into the drift region.

The electronic device may further include a guard ring termination region at a surface of the silicon carbide layer laterally adjacent to the contact. The guard ring termination region may include a second p-type polysilicon region on the drift region, the second p-type polysilicon region being electrically isolated from the contact under zero bias conditions.

The electronic device may further include a junction termination region at the surface of the silicon carbide layer having a conductivity type opposite the conductivity type of the drift region, the second p-type polysilicon region extends into the junction termination region.

The junction barrier region may include a plurality of p-type polysilicon regions in the drift region and at least one p-type polysilicon minority injector pad in the drift region beneath the contact and electrically connected to the contact.

The minority injector pad may have a surface area in a horizontal plane parallel to a major surface of the silicon carbide layer that is larger than a surface area in the horizontal plane of one of the plurality of p-type polysilicon regions in the junction barrier region.

The minority carrier injector pad may have a surface area in a horizontal plane parallel to a major surface of the silicon carbide layer that is at least about 10% of a surface area of the drift region in the horizontal plane below the contact.

The electronic device may further include an n+ silicon carbide contact layer on the drift region opposite the contact, and a second contact on the contact layer.

An electronic device according to further embodiments includes a drift region having a first conductivity type, a contact forming a junction with the drift region, and a junction barrier region on the drift region, the junction barrier region having a second conductivity type opposite the first conductivity type and including a heterojunction barrier region on the drift region. The heterojunction barrier region forms a P-N heterojunction with the drift region and is in electrical contact with the contact.

The Schottky junction between the contact and the drift region may be configured to turn on at a lower forward voltage than the P-N heterojunction between the heterojunction barrier region and the drift region.

The contact may form an ohmic contact to the heterojunction barrier region, and the P-N heterojunction between the heterojunction barrier region and the drift region may be configured to begin to conduct majority carriers at a higher forward voltage than a turn on voltage of the Schottky junction and at a lower voltage at which the P-N heterojunction between the heterojunction barrier region and the drift region begins to inject minority carriers into the drift region.

The electronic device may further include a guard ring termination region on the drift region and laterally adjacent to the Schottky junction. The guard ring termination region may include a second heterojunction barrier region.

The heterojunction barrier region may include a plurality of p-type polysilicon regions on the drift region and at least one p-type polysilicon minority injector pad on the drift region beneath the contact and electrically connected to the contact.

The minority carrier injection pad may have a width that is greater than a width of the junction barrier region.

The minority injector pad may have a horizontal surface area that is larger than a horizontal surface area of one of the plurality of p-type polysilicon regions in the junction barrier region.

The drift region may include n-type silicon carbide and the heterojunction barrier region may include p-type polysilicon. In some embodiments, the drift region may include n-type silicon carbide and the heterojunction barrier region may include p-type gallium nitride.

Some embodiments include a termination region at a surface of the drift region and defining an active region of the device within the termination region, wherein a ratio of a surface area of the active region occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions to a total surface area of the active region is about 2% to about 40%. In some embodiments, the ratio is about 4% to about 30%. In some other embodiments, the ratio is about 10% to about 30%, and in further embodiments the ratio is about 20% to about 30%.

Methods of forming an electronic device according to some embodiments include providing a drift region having a first conductivity type, providing a heterojunction barrier region on the drift region, the heterojunction barrier region including a material different from the drift region and having a conductivity type opposite the conductivity type of the drift region and providing a P-N heterojunction with the drift region, and forming a contact on the drift region and on the heterojunction barrier region, the contact forming a Schottky junction with the drift region and forming an ohmic junction with the heterojunction barrier region.

The drift region may include n-type silicon carbide and the heterojunction barrier region may include p-type polysilicon.

The methods may further include providing a guard ring termination region on the drift region laterally adjacent to the Schottky junction, the guard ring termination region may include a second heterojunction barrier region on the drift region.

Providing the heterojunction barrier region may include etching a recess in the drift region, depositing a polysilicon layer in the recess, doping the polysilicon layer to have a conductivity type opposite the conductivity type of the drift region, and patterning the polysilicon layer.

An electronic device according to further embodiments includes a silicon carbide layer including a drift region having a first conductivity type, a contact on a surface of the drift region and forming a Schottky junction with the drift region, and a guard ring in contact with the surface of the silicon carbide layer adjacent to the Schottky junction. The guard ring has a conductivity type opposite the conductivity type of the drift region and includes a material that forms a heterojunction with the silicon carbide layer. The guard ring may include polysilicon and/or gallium nitride.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate certain embodiment(s) of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a conventional JBS diode.

FIG. 2 is a top view of a JBS diode according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIGS. 3, 4 and 5 are cross-sectional views of JBS diodes according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional detail of portions of a JBS diode according to some embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 7 is a graph that schematically illustrates various regions in a current-voltage characteristic of a JBS diode according to some embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating simulated forward current-voltage curves at operating temperatures ranging from 25° C. to 200° C. for a device according to some embodiments.

FIGS. 9-12 are cross-sectional views illustrating the formation of JBS diodes according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIGS. 13A and 13B are cross-sectional views of JBS diodes according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating simulated horizontal electric field distributions for a device according to some embodiments.

 DETAlLED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.

It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present invention. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” “comprising,” “includes” and/or “including” when used herein, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of this specification and the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.

It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region or substrate is referred to as being “on” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly on or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.

Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “lateral” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer or region to another element, layer or region as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that these terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures.

Embodiments of the invention are described herein with reference to cross-section illustrations that are schematic illustrations of idealized embodiments (and intermediate structures) of the invention. The thickness of layers and regions in the drawings may be exaggerated for clarity. Additionally, variations from the shapes of the illustrations as a result, for example, of manufacturing techniques and/or tolerances, are to be expected. Thus, embodiments of the invention should not be construed as limited to the particular shapes of regions illustrated herein but are to include deviations in shapes that result, for example, from manufacturing. For example, an implanted region illustrated as a rectangle will, typically, have rounded or curved features and/or a gradient of implant concentration at its edges rather than a discrete change from implanted to non-implanted region. Likewise, a buried region formed by implantation may result in some implantation in the region between the buried region and the surface through which the implantation takes place. Thus, the regions illustrated in the figures are schematic in nature and their shapes are not intended to illustrate the actual shape of a region of a device and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

Some embodiments of the invention are described with reference to semiconductor layers and/or regions which are characterized as having a conductivity type such as n-type or p-type, which refers to the majority carrier concentration in the layer and/or region. Thus, n-type material has a majority equilibrium concentration of negatively charged electrons, while p-type material has a majority equilibrium concentration of positively charged holes. Some material may be designated with a “+” or “−” (as in n+, n−, p+, p−, n++, n−−, p++, p−−, or the like), to indicate a relatively larger (“+”) or smaller (“−”) concentration of majority carriers compared to another layer or region. However, such notation does not imply the existence of a particular concentration of majority or minority carriers in a layer or region.

According to some embodiments, a junction barrier Schottky diode includes features, such as junction barrier regions and/or edge termination features, on or in a drift layer, wherein the junction barrier regions and/or edge termination features are provided by regions of a different material type than the drift layer, and form respective heterojunctions with the drift layer. In some embodiments, the features, such as junction barrier regions and/or edge termination features, may include doped polysilicon, which can be formed, for example, using conventional processes that may not require ion implantation.

FIG. 2 is a top view of a diode 100 according to some embodiments of the invention, and FIG. 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of the diode 100 taken along line A-A of FIG. 2. FIGS. 4 and 5 are similar cross sectional illustrations of diodes 100′ and 100″, respectively, according to other embodiments. The dimensions of some features of the diodes 100, 100′, 100″ are exaggerated for clarity.

Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, the diode 100 includes an optional substrate 112 on which a layer 113 including a drift region 114 is formed. The layer 113 has an upper surface, opposite the substrate, in which a plurality of heterojunction barrier regions 130 are formed. A Schottky contact 118 is on the drift region 114. The Schottky contact 118 contacts the surface of the drift region 114 and forms a Schottky junction with the drift region 114. The Schottky contact 118 also contacts the plurality of heterojunction barrier regions 130.

The layer 113 may be formed, for example, from n-type silicon carbide of the 2H, 4H, 6H, 3C and/or 15R polytype. The drift region 114 may have a dopant concentration of about 2×1014 to about 1×1017 cm−3, depending on design requirements for voltage blocking and on-resistance for the diode 100. Other types of semiconductor materials, such as GaN, GaAs, silicon or germanium may be used. In particular embodiments, the drift region 114 includes 4H-SiC doped with n-type dopants at a concentration of about 5×1015 cm−3.

The heterojunction barrier regions 130 are formed from a semiconducting material that is different from the material of the drift region 114. The heterojunction barrier regions 130 have a conductivity type that is opposite the conductivity type of the drift region 114. Accordingly, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 form P-N heterojunctions with the drift region 114. Furthermore, the Schottky contact 118 may form an ohmic junction with the heterojunction barrier regions 130.

In some embodiments, the barrier height of the P-N heterojunction J3 between the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the drift layer may be higher than a barrier height of a Schottky junction J4 between a Schottky contact 118 and the drift region 114, so that the P-N heterojunction will turn on at a higher forward voltage than the Schottky junction J4 between the drift region 114 and the Schottky contact 118, as will be discussed in more detail below.

In the embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 are formed as stripe-shaped regions in the drift region 114. However, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 may be formed in other shapes, such as islands, squares, dots, hexagons, or any other desired shape.

In some embodiments, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 may be provided as regions of doped polysilicon. For example, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 may include polysilicon regions doped to have a conductivity that is opposite the conductivity type of the drift region 114, so that the heterojunction barrier regions 130 form P-N heterojunctions J3 with the drift region 114.

The heterojunction barrier regions 130 may be doped with p-type dopants, such as boron and/or aluminum, at a concentration of about 1×1017 to about 1×1020 cm−3, and may extend to a depth of about 0.3 to about 0.5 μm into the drift region 114 from the surface of the drift region 114. In particular embodiments, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 may be doped at a dopant concentration of about 5×1018 cm−3, and may extend to a depth of about 0.3 μm into the drift region 114 from the surface of the drift region 114.

One or more current surge pads 116 may also be provided in the drift region 114. The current surge pads 116 may be formed of the same material as the heterojunction barrier regions 130. For example, the current surge pads 116 may be provided as polysilicon regions doped with p-type dopants, such as boron and/or aluminum, at a concentration of about 1×1018 to about 1×1020 cm−3, and may extend to a depth of about 0.3 to about 0.5 μm into the drift region 114. In particular embodiments, the current surge pads 116 may be doped at a dopant concentration of about 5×1018 cm−3, and may extend to a depth of about 0.3 μm into the drift region 114. The current surge pads 116 have a larger width than the heterojunction barrier regions 130 to encourage the flow of surge current through the current surge pads at high forward voltages, as will be discussed in more detail below. For example, the current surge pads 116 may have a width of about 10 μm to about 250 μm. In particular embodiments, the current surge pads 116 may have a width of about 20 μm.

In some embodiments, the current surge pads 116 and/or heterojunction barrier regions 130 may be formed of other types of materials that can be doped to have a conductivity that is opposite the conductivity of the drift region 114 and can form a heterojunction with the drift region 114. For example, when the drift region comprises n-type silicon carbide, a material such as p-type gallium nitride can be used to form the current surge pads 116 and/or heterojunction barrier regions 130.

The heterojunction barrier regions 130 shown in the embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3 are provided as spaced apart striped regions that expose portions 114A of the surface of the drift region 114 and that extend across an active region 110 of the drift region 114 (except for the exposed portions 114A of the drift layer and the current surge pads 116). A metal Schottky contact 118 covers the drift region 114 and forms Schottky rectifying junctions with the exposed portions 114A of the drift region 114 as well as the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pads 116.

As used herein, the term “active region” refers to the two dimensional area of the device in which the Schottky metal contacts the drift layer, and includes the exposed portions 114A of the drift region 114, the heterojunction barrier 130 and the current surge pads 116. Accordingly, the active region includes the Schottky junction area but does not include, for example, the edge termination region described below.

The diode 100 may include an edge termination region 115 surrounding the active region 110 of the diode 100. The edge termination region 115 may include a junction termination extension (JTE) region, field rings, field plates, guard rings, and/or a combination of the foregoing or other terminations. In particular, the device 100 may include a plurality of guard rings 125, which may be formed of the same material as the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pad 116 and may also be doped to have a conductivity opposite the conductivity type of the drift region 114. A passivation layer, such as a field oxide layer 127, may be formed on the drift layer and may cover the guard rings 125. The guard rings 125 may be floating guard rings that are electrically isolated from the anode contact 118 under zero bias conditions.

In some embodiments, the edge termination region 115 includes a robust guard ring (RGR) termination as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,026,650, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully. In particular, the RGR termination may include an implanted region 160 of dopants having a conductivity opposite the conductivity of the drift layer. The implanted region 160 may extend to a depth in the drift region 114 that is greater or less than the depth of the guard rings 125. The implanted region 160 may have a net concentration of dopants having a conductivity opposite the conductivity type of the drift region 114 of about 1×1017 cm−3.

Additional conventional terminations of SiC Schottky diodes are described in “Planar Terminations in 4H-SiC Schottky Diodes With Low Leakage And High Yields” by Singh et al., ISPSD '97, pp. 157 160. A p-type epitaxy guard ring termination for a SiC Schottky Barrier Diode is described in “The Guard-Ring Termination for High-Voltage SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes” by Ueno et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 16, No. 7, July, 1995, pp. 331 332. Additionally, other termination techniques are described in published PCT Application No. WO 97/08754 entitled “SiC Semiconductor Device Comprising A PN Junction With A Voltage Absorbing Edge.”

The current surge pads 116 and the heterojunction barrier regions 130 may be formed within recesses in the drift region 114, and may protrude above an upper surface of the drift region 114. As the current surge pads 116 and the heterojunction barrier regions 130 have an opposite conductivity type from the drift region 114, the heterojunction barrier regions 130 form P-N junctions J3 with the drift region 114, while the current surge pads 116 form P-N junctions J5 with the drift region 114.

In the diode 100′ illustrated in FIG. 4, the current surge pads 116′, the heterojunction barrier regions 130′ and the guard rings 125′ are formed within recesses in the drift region 114, and are flush with the upper surface of the drift region 114. For example, polysilicon may be deposited into the recesses in the drift region 114 and planarized using a chemical-mechanical polish (CMP) or etch back technique to form the current surge pads 116′, the heterojunction barrier regions 130′, and/or the guard rings 125′, as shown in FIG. 4.

In the diode 100″ illustrated in FIG. 5, the current surge pads 116″, the heterojunction barrier regions 130″ and the guard rings 125″ are formed as discrete regions on the upper surface of the drift region 114, and do not extend into the drift region 114. For example, For example, polysilicon may be deposited onto the drift region 114 and patterned using photolithography to form the current surge pads 116″, the heterojunction barrier regions 130″, and/or the guard rings 125″, as shown in FIG. 5.

Referring again to FIG. 3, the ratio of the surface area of the active region 110 of the device 100 occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pads 116 to the total surface area of the active region 110 may affect both the reverse leakage current of the device 100 and the forward voltage drop of the device 100. For example, if the area occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pads 116 is increased relative to the total area of the active region 110, the reverse leakage current may be reduced, but the forward voltage drop of the device 100 may increase. Thus, the selection of the ratio of the surface area of the active region 110 of the device 100 occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pads 116 to the total surface area of the active region 110 may entail a trade-off between reverse leakage current and forward voltage drop. In some embodiments, the ratio of the surface area of the active region 110 of the device 100 occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pads 116 to the total surface area of the active region 110 may be between about 2% and 40%. In some other embodiments, the ratio of the surface area of the active region 110 of the device 100 occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the current surge pads 116 to the total surface area of the active region 110 may be between about 4% and 30%. In further embodiments, the ratio may be about 10% to about 30%, and in still further embodiments, the ratio may be about 20% to about 30%.

The Schottky contact 118 on the surface of the drift region 114 forms a Schottky junction J4 with the exposed portions 114A of the drift region 114 between adjacent heterojunction barrier regions 130. The anode contact 118 may include a metal, such as aluminum, titanium and/or nickel. In some embodiments, the anode contact 118 may form an ohmic contact with the current surge pad 116. A metal overlayer 119 may be formed on the Schottky contact 118. The metal overlayer 119 may comprise TiW/Al, for example, and may be provided as a contact layer on the Schottky contact 118.

A cathode contact 120 is formed on a side of the substrate 112 opposite the drift region 114 and/or directly on the drift region 114. The cathode contact 120 may include a metal, such as nickel, that is capable of forming an ohmic contact to n-type silicon carbide.

Under reverse bias conditions, the depletion regions formed by the p-n junctions J3 between the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the drift region 114, as well as the depletion region of the p-n junction J5, may expand to block reverse current through the device 100, protecting the Schottky junction J4 and limiting reverse leakage current in the device 100. Thus, in reverse bias, the diode 100 may function substantially like a PIN diode.

In forward operation, the Schottky junction J4 between the anode contact 118 and the exposed portions 114A of the drift region 114 turns on before the heterojunction J3 and the junction J5 between the current surge pad 116 and the drift region 114. Thus, at low forward voltages, the device exhibits Schottky diode behavior, and the operation of the diode 100 will be dominated by the injection of majority carriers across the Schottky junctions J3 and J4. Due to the absence of minority carrier injection under normal operating conditions, the diode 100 may have a very fast switching capability, which is characteristic of Schottky diodes in general.

The current surge pad 116 may be designed to begin to conduct at a forward voltage that is higher than the turn-on voltage of the Schottky junction J3. Thus, in the event of a current surge that causes the forward voltage of the diode 100 to increase, the p-n junction J5 will begin to conduct. Once the p-n junction J5 begins to conduct, the operation of the diode 100 is dominated by the injection and recombination of minority carriers across the p-n junction J5. In that case, the forward voltage drop of the diode 100 may be clamped, which may decrease the amount of power dissipated by the diode 100 for a given level of current. Thus, turn-on of the p-n junction J5 when the forward voltage of the diode 100 increases may reduce and/or prevent forward current runaway in the diode 100.

Furthermore, in a device according to some embodiments, the turn-on of the p-n junctions J3 and J5 may occur in stages. In a first stage, the Schottky junction J4 between the drift region 114 and the Schottky contact 118 may turn on, resulting in majority carrier conduction. In a second stage, as the bias on the P-N heterojunction J3 increases, majority carriers may be injected across the P-N heterojunction J3, allowing for further reduction in on-resistance. Furthermore, in a device according to some embodiments, the turn on of junction J5 may occur in stages, resulting in minority carrier injection allowing for surge current capability.

Forward current operation of a device according to some embodiments is illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7. In particular, FIG. 6 is a magnified illustration of a portion of a drift region 114 include a current surge pad 116 and two heterojunction barrier regions 130. Forward current components 40, 41 and 42 are illustrated in FIG. 6. FIG. 7 is a schematic graph of current density (J) versus forward voltage (V) for a Schottky diode according to some embodiments. As shown in FIG. 7, the current-voltage characteristic of a Schottky diode according to some embodiments may have three distinct regions of operation, shown in FIG. 7 as Region 1, Region 2 and Region 3.

Referring to FIG. 6, when a forward voltage is applied to the Schottky contact 118 relative to the drift region 114 that is sufficient to turn on the Schottky junction J4 between the Schottky contact 118 and the drift region 114, majority carriers (e.g., electrons in the case of an n-type drift layer) are injected into the drift layer, resulting in a Schottky current component 40. Before the P-N heterojunction J5 between the current surge pad 116 and the drift region 114 and the ohmic junction J6 between the anode contact 118 and the current surge pad 116 have turned on, the Schottky current component 40 is the only component of the device current. This is illustrated as Region 1 in the graph of FIG. 7, where the forward voltage of the device is between V1 and V2. V1 represents the turn-on voltage of the Schottky junction J4, while V2 represents the turn-on voltage of the heterojunction J3 between the heterojunction barrier region 130 and the drift region 114.

In particular embodiments, the turn-on voltage of the Schottky junction J4 may be about 0.8 V when the Schottky contact 118 is titanium and the drift region 114 is n-type silicon carbide, while the turn-on voltage of the junction J3 between the heterojunction barrier region 130 and the drift region 114 may be about 1.5 V.

As shown in FIG. 6, the Schottky current 40 spreads laterally beneath the current surge pad 116 and the heterojunction barrier regions 130, resulting in spreading resistance in the device. Thus, the current-voltage curve shown in FIG. 7 may have a relatively low slope in Region 1.

When the forward voltage of the device reaches V2, the heterojunction J3 between the heterojunction barrier region 130 and the drift region 114 and the heterojunction J5 between the current surge pad 116 and the drift region 114 may turn on, resulting in unipolar injection of electrons 41 into the drift region. The device may still exhibit some spreading resistance. However, the overall resistance of the device may decrease, resulting in a increased slope in Region 2 of the current-voltage curve shown in FIG. 7 relative to Region 1.

As the voltage on the device increases, the Schottky current through junction J4 increases. The voltage drop ΔV across the current surge pad 116 also increases to the point where the P-N heterojunction J5 between the current surge pad 116 and the drift region 114 begins to inject minority carriers 42 (e.g., holes in the case of an n-type drift layer) into the drift region 114. This condition is illustrated as Region 3 of FIG. 7. The resistance of the device is further reduced, increasing the slope of the current-voltage curve in Region 3.

It will be appreciated that the voltage drop ΔV across the half-width of the current surge pad 116, which is greater than the half-width of the heterojunction barrier regions 130, where “half-width” refers to the minimum lateral distance from an edge of the feature to a center of the feature, i.e., the minimum distance that laterally spreading current must travel to reach the center point of the feature. As the width of the current surge pad 116 is greater than the widths of the heterojunction barrier regions 130, the junction J5 between the current surge pad 116 and the drift layer will tend to turn on before the junctions between the heterojunction barrier regions 130 and the drift region 114.

Empirical forward current-voltage curves at operating temperatures ranging from 25° C. to 200° C. for a device according to some embodiments with p+ polysilicon as the Schottky contact are illustrated in FIG. 8. For example, a current-voltage curve according to some embodiments at 25° C. is illustrated as curve 191, while to a current-voltage curve according to some embodiments at 200° C. is illustrated as curve 192. These curves indicate that surge capability of diodes according to some embodiments is enhanced at high temperature, as the slope of the curves increases with temperature and forward voltage. The device illustrated in FIG. 8 starts conducting at about 1.8 V instead of the Ti—SiC Schottky turn-on voltage of 0.8V because polysilicon was used as the anode contact 118.

FIGS. 9-12 illustrate methods of forming devices according to some embodiments. Referring to FIG. 9, a drift region 114 is provided. The drift region 114 may be provided on a substrate 112. However, it will be appreciated that the substrate 112 is optional and may be removed or omitted in some embodiments.

The drift region 114 may be formed, for example, from n-type silicon carbide of the 2H, 4H, 6H, 3C and/or 15R polytype having a dopant concentration of about 2×1014 to about 1×1017 cm−3, depending on design requirements for voltage blocking and on-resistance for the diode 100. Other types of semiconductor materials, such as GaN, GaAs, silicon or germanium may be used. In particular embodiments, the drift region 114 includes 4H-SiC doped with n-type dopants at a concentration of about 5×1015 cm−3.

Optional implanted regions 160 may be formed at the device periphery to provide a robust guard ring termination.

A plurality of recesses 170, 171 and 172 are formed in a surface of a drift region 114, for example by masking and etching techniques which are well known in the art. The recesses 170, 171 and 172 may extend to a depth of about 0.3 to about 0.5 μm into the drift region 114 from the surface of the drift region 114. A layer of a material 180, such as polysilicon, which forms a heterojunction with the drift layer, is deposited on the surface of the drift layer and into the recesses 170, 171, 172. The layer 180 of polysilicon may be doped with p-type dopants, such as boron and/or aluminum, at a concentration of about 1×1018 to about 1×1019 cm−3, and in particular embodiments at a dopant concentration of about 5×1018 cm−3. The layer 180 of polysilicon may be doped using any conventional doping technique, such as in-situ doping, spinning-on, diffusion and drive-in annealing, etc.

The layer 180 may be patterned using photolithographic techniques to form respective current surge pads 116, heterojunction barrier regions 130 and/or guard rings 125 that protrude above the surface of the drift region 114 (FIG. 10). In some embodiments, the layer 180 may be planarized using chemical-mechanical polish and/or etchback techniques to form respective current surge pads 116, heterojunction barrier regions 130 and guard rings 125 that are flush with the surface of the drift region 114 (FIG. 11).

Referring to FIG. 12, a Schottky contact 118 may be formed on the drive region 114 and may include a metal, such as aluminum, titanium and/or nickel. In some embodiments, the contact 118 may form an ohmic contact with the current surge pad 116 and a Schottky contact with the drift region 114. A metal overlayer 119 may be formed on the Schottky contact 118. The metal overlayer 119 may comprise TiW/Al, for example, and may be provided as a contact layer on the Schottky contact 118.

A cathode contact 120 is formed on a side of the substrate 112 opposite the drift region 114. The cathode contact 120 may include a metal, such as nickel, that is capable of forming an ohmic contact to n-type silicon carbide.

An implanted region 160 of dopants having a conductivity opposite the conductivity of the drift layer may be formed beneath the guard rings 125 to probed a robust guard ring (RGR) termination. The implanted region 160 may extend to a depth in the drift layer that is greater or less than the depth of the guard rings, and may have a net concentration of dopants having a conductivity opposite the conductivity type of the drift region 114 of about 1×1017 cm−3. Finally, a field oxide layer 127 may be formed on the drift layer and may cover the guard rings 125.

Further embodiments are illustrated in FIGS. 13A and 13B, which are a cross-sectional views of devices 300 and 300′, respectively, that have a mesa termination (FIG. 13A) and a beveled edge termination (FIG. 13B), as opposed to guard ring termination.

FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating simulated horizontal electric field distributions for a device according to some embodiments including heterojunction barrier regions and a heterojunction guard ring termination (curve 201) and a device according to some embodiments including heterojunction barrier regions and a heterojunction guard ring termination with a robust guard ring termination including implanted regions 160 (curve 202). As can be seen in FIG. 14, a peak electric field 201P for the device represented by curve 201 may be substantially higher than a peak electric field 202P for the device represented by curve 202.

Embodiments of the present invention provide junction barrier Schottky semiconductor devices that may require no, or fewer, implantation steps compared to conventional JBS devices. Thus, cost and/or complexity of fabrication of such devices can be reduced. Furthermore, some embodiments use doped polysilicon features in a JBS diode. Polysilicon can be doped in many conventional techniques, and polysilicon processing techniques are compatible with high throughput processing. Furthermore, p-type polysilicon can act as a minority injector in surge current conditions in some embodiments, and the surge capability may be further enhanced at high temperature operation.

While embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to particular sequences of operations, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, certain operations within the sequence may be reordered while still benefiting from the teachings of the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention should not be construed as limited to the exact sequence of operations described herein.

In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed typical embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being set forth in the following claims.

Claims

1. An electronic device, comprising:

a silicon carbide layer including an n-type drift region therein;
a contact forming a Schottky junction with the drift region;
a p-type junction barrier region on the silicon carbide layer, the p-type junction barrier region including a p-type polysilicon region forming a P-N heterojunction with the drift region and the p-type junction barrier region being electrically connected to the contact; and
a p-type minority injector pad in the drift region beneath the contact and electrically connected to the contact, wherein the p-type minority injector pad region is configured to begin to conduct minority carriers at a higher forward voltage than when the P-N heterojunction begins to conduct majority carriers, the p-type polysilicon region and the p-type minority injector pad in the drift region and protruding above an upper surface of the drift region into the contact, wherein the p-type minority injector pad protrudes above an upper surface of the drift region into the contact further than the p-type polysilicon region.

2. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the Schottky junction between the contact and the drift region is configured to conduct current at a lower forward voltage than the P-N heterojunction between the junction barrier region and the drift region.

3. The electronic device of claim 2, wherein the contact forms an ohmic contact to the p-type polysilicon region, and wherein the P-N heterojunction between the junction barrier region and the drift region is configured to begin to conduct majority carriers at a higher forward voltage than a turn on voltage of the Schottky junction and at a lower voltage at which the P-N heterojunction between the junction barrier region and the drift region begins to inject minority carriers into the drift region.

4. The electronic device of claim 1, further comprising: a guard ring termination region at a surface of the silicon carbide layer laterally adjacent to the contact, wherein the guard ring termination region includes a second p-type polysilicon region on the drift region, the second p-type polysilicon region being electrically isolated from the contact under zero bias conditions.

5. The electronic device of claim 4, further comprising a junction termination region at the surface of the silicon carbide layer having a conductivity type opposite the conductivity type of the drift region, wherein the second p-type polysilicon region extends into the junction termination region.

6. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the junction barrier region comprises a plurality of p-type polysilicon regions in the drift region.

7. The electronic device of claim 6, wherein the minority injector pad has a surface area in a horizontal plane parallel to a major surface of the silicon carbide layer that is larger than a surface area in the horizontal plane of one of the plurality of p-type polysilicon regions in the junction barrier region.

8. The electronic device of claim 6, wherein the minority carrier injector pad has a surface area in a horizontal plane parallel to a major surface of the silicon carbide layer that is at least about 10% of a surface area of the drift region in the horizontal plane below the contact.

9. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the contact comprises a first contact, the device further comprising an n+ silicon carbide contact layer on the drift region opposite the contact, and a second contact on the contact layer.

10. An electronic device, comprising:

a drift region having a first conductivity type;
a contact on the drift region and forming a junction with the drift region;
a junction barrier region on the drift region, the junction barrier region having a second conductivity type opposite the first conductivity type and including a heterojunction barrier region on the drift region, wherein the heterojunction barrier region forms a P-N heterojunction with the drift region and is in electrical contact with the contact; and
a p-type minority injector pad in the drift region beneath the contact and electrically connected to the contact, the p-type minority injector pad region being configured to begin to conduct minority carriers at a higher forward voltage than when the P-N heterojunction begins to conduct majority carriers, wherein the junction between the contact and the drift region comprises a Schottky junction that is configured to conduct current at a lower forward voltage than the P-N heterojunction between the heterojunction barrier region and the drift region.

11. The electronic device of claim 10, further comprising:

a guard ring termination region on the drift region and laterally adjacent to the junction, wherein the guard ring termination region includes a second heterojunction barrier region.

12. The electronic device of claim 10, wherein the heterojunction barrier region comprises a plurality of p-type polysilicon regions on the drift region.

13. The electronic device of claim 12, wherein the minority carrier injection pad has a width that is greater than a width of the junction barrier region.

14. The electronic device of claim 12, wherein the minority injector pad has a horizontal surface area that is larger than a horizontal surface area of one of the plurality of p-type polysilicon regions in the junction barrier region.

15. The electronic device of claim 10, wherein the drift region comprises n-type silicon carbide and the heterojunction barrier region comprises p-type polysilicon.

16. The electronic device of claim 10, wherein the drift region comprises n-type silicon carbide and the heterojunction barrier region comprises p-type gallium nitride.

17. The electronic device of claim 10, further comprising:

a termination region at a surface of the drift region and defining an active region of the device within the termination region;
wherein a ratio of a surface area of the active region occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions to a total surface area of the active region is about 2% to about 40%.

18. The electronic device of claim 17, wherein the ratio of the surface area of the active region occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions to the total surface area of the active region is about 10% to about 30%.

19. The electronic device of claim 17, wherein the ratio of the surface area of the active region occupied by the heterojunction barrier regions to the total surface area of the active region is about 20% to about 30%.

20. An electronic device, comprising:

a silicon carbide layer including a drift region having a first conductivity type;
a contact on a surface of the drift region and forming a junction with the drift region;
a junction barrier region on the drift region, the junction barrier region having a second conductivity type opposite the first conductivity type and including a heterojunction barrier region on the drift region, wherein the heterojunction barrier region forms a P-N heterojunction with the drift region and is in electrical contact with the contact;
a p-type minority injector pad on the drift region beneath the contact and electrically connected to the contact, the p-type minority injector pad region being configured to begin to conduct minority carriers at a higher forward voltage than when the P-N heterojunction begins to conduct majority carriers; and
a beveled edge termination terminating the surface of the drift region proximate an edge of the contact.

21. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the p-type minority injector pad comprises polysilicon.

22. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the P-N heterojunction between the junction barrier region and the drift region is configured to begin to conduct majority carriers at a higher forward voltage than a turn on voltage of the Schottky junction.

23. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the p-type polysilicon region has an upper portion that extends laterally onto the upper surface of the drift region at a greater width than a portion of the p-type polysilicon region in the drift region, and wherein the p-type minority injector pad has an upper portion that extends laterally onto the upper surface of the drift region at a greater width than a portion of the p-type minority injector pad in the drift region.

24. The electronic device of claim 10, wherein the P-N heterojunction between the junction barrier region and the drift region is configured to begin to conduct majority carriers at a higher forward voltage than a turn on voltage of the junction between the contact and the drift region.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3439189 April 1969 Petry
3629011 December 1971 Tohi et al.
3924024 December 1975 Naber et al.
4160920 July 10, 1979 Courier de Mere
4242690 December 30, 1980 Temple
4466172 August 21, 1984 Batra
4581542 April 8, 1986 Steigerwald
4641174 February 3, 1987 Baliga
4644637 February 24, 1987 Temple
4811065 March 7, 1989 Cogan
4875083 October 17, 1989 Palmour
4927772 May 22, 1990 Arthur et al.
4945394 July 31, 1990 Palmour et al.
4946547 August 7, 1990 Palmour et al.
5011549 April 30, 1991 Kong et al.
5017976 May 21, 1991 Sugita
5028977 July 2, 1991 Kenneth et al.
5032888 July 16, 1991 Seki
5041881 August 20, 1991 Bishop et al.
5111253 May 5, 1992 Korman et al.
5155289 October 13, 1992 Bowles
5166760 November 24, 1992 Mori et al.
5170231 December 8, 1992 Fujii et al.
5170455 December 8, 1992 Goossen et al.
5184199 February 2, 1993 Fujii et al.
5192987 March 9, 1993 Khan et al.
5200022 April 6, 1993 Kong et al.
5210051 May 11, 1993 Carter, Jr.
5262669 November 16, 1993 Wakatabe et al.
5270554 December 14, 1993 Palmour
5292501 March 8, 1994 Degenhardt et al.
5296395 March 22, 1994 Khan et al.
5345100 September 6, 1994 Kan et al.
5348895 September 20, 1994 Smayling et al.
5371383 December 6, 1994 Miyata et al.
5384270 January 24, 1995 Ueno
5385855 January 31, 1995 Brown et al.
RE34861 February 14, 1995 Davis et al.
5393993 February 28, 1995 Edmond et al.
5393999 February 28, 1995 Malhi
5396085 March 7, 1995 Baliga
5399887 March 21, 1995 Weitzel et al.
5459107 October 17, 1995 Palmour
5468654 November 21, 1995 Harada
5473176 December 5, 1995 Kakumoto
5479316 December 26, 1995 Smrtic et al.
5488236 January 30, 1996 Baliga et al.
5506421 April 9, 1996 Palmour
5510281 April 23, 1996 Ghezzo et al.
5510630 April 23, 1996 Agarwal
5523589 June 4, 1996 Edmond et al.
5539217 July 23, 1996 Edmond et al.
5545905 August 13, 1996 Muraoka et al.
5587870 December 24, 1996 Anderson et al.
5629531 May 13, 1997 Palmour
5710059 January 20, 1998 Rottner
5726463 March 10, 1998 Brown et al.
5726469 March 10, 1998 Chen
5734180 March 31, 1998 Malhi
5739564 April 14, 1998 Kosa et al.
5753960 May 19, 1998 Dickmann
5763905 June 9, 1998 Harris
5776837 July 7, 1998 Palmour
5804483 September 8, 1998 Harris
5814859 September 29, 1998 Ghezzo et al.
5831288 November 3, 1998 Singh et al.
5837572 November 17, 1998 Gardner et al.
5851908 December 22, 1998 Harris et al.
5877041 March 2, 1999 Fuller
5877045 March 2, 1999 Kapoor
5885870 March 23, 1999 Maiti et al.
5914500 June 22, 1999 Bakowski et al.
5917203 June 29, 1999 Bhatnagar et al.
5939763 August 17, 1999 Hao et al.
5960289 September 28, 1999 Tsui et al.
5969378 October 19, 1999 Singh
5972801 October 26, 1999 Lipkin et al.
5976936 November 2, 1999 Miyajima et al.
5977605 November 2, 1999 Bakowsky et al.
6020600 February 1, 2000 Miyajima et al.
6025233 February 15, 2000 Teresawa
6025608 February 15, 2000 Harris et al.
6028012 February 22, 2000 Wang
6040237 March 21, 2000 Bakowski et al.
6048766 April 11, 2000 Gardner et al.
6054352 April 25, 2000 Ueno
6054728 April 25, 2000 Harada et al.
6063698 May 16, 2000 Tseng et al.
6083814 July 4, 2000 Nilsson
6096607 August 1, 2000 Ueno
6097046 August 1, 2000 Plumton
6100169 August 8, 2000 Suvorov et al.
6104043 August 15, 2000 Hermansson et al.
6107142 August 22, 2000 Suvorov et al.
6117735 September 12, 2000 Ueno
6121633 September 19, 2000 Singh et al.
6133587 October 17, 2000 Takeuchi et al.
6136727 October 24, 2000 Ueno
6136728 October 24, 2000 Wang
6165822 December 26, 2000 Okuno et al.
6180958 January 30, 2001 Cooper, Jr.
6190973 February 20, 2001 Berg et al.
6204135 March 20, 2001 Peters et al.
6204203 March 20, 2001 Narwankar et al.
6211035 April 3, 2001 Moise et al.
6218254 April 17, 2001 Singh et al.
6218680 April 17, 2001 Carter, Jr. et al.
6221688 April 24, 2001 Fujihira et al.
6221700 April 24, 2001 Okuno et al.
6228720 May 8, 2001 Kitabatake et al.
6238967 May 29, 2001 Shiho et al.
6239463 May 29, 2001 Williams et al.
6239466 May 29, 2001 Elasser et al.
6246076 June 12, 2001 Lipkin et al.
6297100 October 2, 2001 Kumar et al.
6297172 October 2, 2001 Kashiwagi
6303508 October 16, 2001 Alok
6316791 November 13, 2001 Schorner et al.
6316793 November 13, 2001 Sheppard et al.
6329675 December 11, 2001 Singh et al.
6344663 February 5, 2002 Slater, Jr. et al.
6365932 April 2, 2002 Kouno et al.
6388271 May 14, 2002 Mitlehner et al.
6399996 June 4, 2002 Chang et al.
6420225 July 16, 2002 Chang et al.
6429041 August 6, 2002 Ryu et al.
6448160 September 10, 2002 Chang et al.
6455892 September 24, 2002 Okuno et al.
6475889 November 5, 2002 Ring
6501145 December 31, 2002 Kaminski et al.
6515303 February 4, 2003 Ring
6524900 February 25, 2003 Dahlqvist et al.
6548333 April 15, 2003 Smith
6551865 April 22, 2003 Kumar et al.
6573534 June 3, 2003 Kumar et al.
6593620 July 15, 2003 Hshieh et al.
6610366 August 26, 2003 Lipkin
6627539 September 30, 2003 Zhao et al.
6649497 November 18, 2003 Ring
6649995 November 18, 2003 Tooi et al.
6653659 November 25, 2003 Ryu et al.
6696705 February 24, 2004 Barthelmess et al.
6703642 March 9, 2004 Shah
6743703 June 1, 2004 Rodov et al.
6767843 July 27, 2004 Lipkin et al.
6861723 March 1, 2005 Willmeroth
6936850 August 30, 2005 Friedrichs et al.
6946739 September 20, 2005 Ring
6949401 September 27, 2005 Kaminski et al.
6956238 October 18, 2005 Ryu et al.
6979863 December 27, 2005 Ryu
7026650 April 11, 2006 Ryu et al.
7074643 July 11, 2006 Ryu
7118970 October 10, 2006 Das et al.
7125786 October 24, 2006 Ring et al.
7183575 February 27, 2007 Shimoida et al.
7186609 March 6, 2007 Korec et al.
7221010 May 22, 2007 Ryu
7247550 July 24, 2007 Zhang
7253031 August 7, 2007 Takahashi
7279115 October 9, 2007 Sumakeris
7304363 December 4, 2007 Shah
7365363 April 29, 2008 Kojima et al.
7381992 June 3, 2008 Ryu
7528040 May 5, 2009 Das et al.
7544963 June 9, 2009 Saxler
7547578 June 16, 2009 Agarwal et al.
7548112 June 16, 2009 Sheppard
7605441 October 20, 2009 Nakazawa et al.
7649213 January 19, 2010 Hatakeyama et al.
7687825 March 30, 2010 Zhang
7728402 June 1, 2010 Zhang et al.
7781786 August 24, 2010 Hayashi et al.
7851881 December 14, 2010 Zhao et al.
7893467 February 22, 2011 Yamamoto et al.
7902054 March 8, 2011 Tsuchida et al.
7994033 August 9, 2011 Yoshii
8168582 May 1, 2012 Blanco et al.
8232558 July 31, 2012 Zhang et al.
8653534 February 18, 2014 Zhang et al.
8664665 March 4, 2014 Henning et al.
20010055852 December 27, 2001 Moise et al.
20020030191 March 14, 2002 Das et al.
20020038891 April 4, 2002 Ryu et al.
20020047125 April 25, 2002 Fukuda et al.
20020072247 June 13, 2002 Lipkin et al.
20020102358 August 1, 2002 Das et al.
20020121641 September 5, 2002 Alok et al.
20020125482 September 12, 2002 Friedrichs et al.
20020125541 September 12, 2002 Korec et al.
20030025175 February 6, 2003 Asano et al.
20030057482 March 27, 2003 Harada
20030107041 June 12, 2003 Tanimoto et al.
20030137010 July 24, 2003 Friedrichs et al.
20030178672 September 25, 2003 Hatakeyama et al.
20030201455 October 30, 2003 Takahashi et al.
20040016929 January 29, 2004 Nakatsuka et al.
20040031971 February 19, 2004 Shimoida et al.
20040079989 April 29, 2004 Kaneko et al.
20040082116 April 29, 2004 Kub et al.
20040173801 September 9, 2004 Willmeroth
20040183079 September 23, 2004 Kaneko et al.
20040211980 October 28, 2004 Ryu
20040212011 October 28, 2004 Ryu
20040256659 December 23, 2004 Kim et al.
20040259339 December 23, 2004 Tanabe et al.
20050001268 January 6, 2005 Baliga
20050012143 January 20, 2005 Tanaka et al.
20050062124 March 24, 2005 Chiola
20050104072 May 19, 2005 Slater, Jr. et al.
20050139936 June 30, 2005 Li
20050151138 July 14, 2005 Slater, Jr. et al.
20050181536 August 18, 2005 Tsuji
20050224838 October 13, 2005 Tanaka et al.
20050245034 November 3, 2005 Fukuda et al.
20050275055 December 15, 2005 Parthasarathy et al.
20060011128 January 19, 2006 Ellison et al.
20060060884 March 23, 2006 Ohyanagi et al.
20060086997 April 27, 2006 Kanaya et al.
20060211210 September 21, 2006 Bhat et al.
20060244010 November 2, 2006 Saxler
20060255423 November 16, 2006 Ryu et al.
20060261347 November 23, 2006 Ryu et al.
20060261876 November 23, 2006 Agarwal et al.
20060267021 November 30, 2006 Rowland et al.
20070023781 February 1, 2007 Mizukami et al.
20070066039 March 22, 2007 Agarwal et al.
20070120148 May 31, 2007 Nogome
20070164321 July 19, 2007 Sheppard
20070205122 September 6, 2007 Oda et al.
20070228505 October 4, 2007 Mazzola et al.
20070241427 October 18, 2007 Mochizuki et al.
20080001158 January 3, 2008 Das et al.
20080006848 January 10, 2008 Chen et al.
20080029838 February 7, 2008 Zhang et al.
20080105949 May 8, 2008 Zhang et al.
20080121993 May 29, 2008 Hefner et al.
20080191304 August 14, 2008 Zhang et al.
20080197439 August 21, 2008 Goerlach et al.
20080230787 September 25, 2008 Suziki et al.
20080246085 October 9, 2008 Saito et al.
20080251793 October 16, 2008 Mazzola
20080277669 November 13, 2008 Okuno et al.
20080296587 December 4, 2008 Yamamoto et al.
20080296771 December 4, 2008 Das et al.
20090008651 January 8, 2009 Okuno et al.
20090085064 April 2, 2009 Rueb et al.
20090121319 May 14, 2009 Zhang et al.
20090146154 June 11, 2009 Zhang et al.
20090212301 August 27, 2009 Zhang et al.
20090267141 October 29, 2009 Matocha et al.
20090267200 October 29, 2009 Gutt et al.
20090272983 November 5, 2009 Kumar et al.
20090289262 November 26, 2009 Zhang et al.
20100032685 February 11, 2010 Zhang et al.
20100133549 June 3, 2010 Zhang et al.
20100133550 June 3, 2010 Zhang et al.
20100140628 June 10, 2010 Zhang
20100244047 September 30, 2010 Hull et al.
20100277839 November 4, 2010 Nicholson et al.
20110095301 April 28, 2011 Tarui
20110204435 August 25, 2011 Disney
20110207321 August 25, 2011 Fujiwara et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
1259228 July 2000 CN
39 42 640 August 1990 DE
4210402 October 1992 DE
29504629 June 1995 DE
19633183 February 1998 DE
19633184 February 1998 DE
19723176 August 1998 DE
198 09 554 September 1998 DE
198 32 329 February 1999 DE
19900171 July 1999 DE
10036208 February 2002 DE
0 176 778 April 1986 EP
0380340 January 1989 EP
0 372 412 June 1990 EP
0 389 863 October 1990 EP
0 615 292 September 1994 EP
0637069 February 1995 EP
0735591 October 1996 EP
0837508 April 1998 EP
0 865 085 September 1998 EP
0992070 April 2000 EP
1 058 317 December 2000 EP
1 361 614 November 2003 EP
1 460 681 September 2004 EP
1 503 425 February 2005 EP
1 693896 August 2006 EP
1 806 787 July 2007 EP
1 845 561 October 2007 EP
1885000 February 2008 EP
2 015 364 January 2009 EP
2259326 December 2010 EP
60-240158 November 1985 JP
62136072 June 1987 JP
01117363 May 1989 JP
2137368 May 1990 JP
03034466 February 1991 JP
03105975 May 1991 JP
03157974 July 1991 JP
3-225870 October 1991 JP
7066433 March 1995 JP
08097441 April 1996 JP
08264766 October 1996 JP
08316164 November 1996 JP
09009522 January 1997 JP
09205202 August 1997 JP
11191559 July 1999 JP
11238742 August 1999 JP
11008399 September 1999 JP
11261061 September 1999 JP
11266017 September 1999 JP
11274487 October 1999 JP
2000049167 February 2000 JP
200077682 March 2000 JP
2000082812 March 2000 JP
2000-252478 September 2000 JP
02000252461 September 2000 JP
2001 085704 March 2001 JP
2001085704 March 2001 JP
2000106371 April 2001 JP
2002-314099 October 2002 JP
2002314099 October 2002 JP
2003318389 November 2003 JP
2005057080 March 2005 JP
2006324585 November 2006 JP
2007235768 September 2007 JP
2008042198 February 2008 JP
2008112774 May 2008 JP
WO 96/03774 February 1996 WO
WO 97/08754 March 1997 WO
WO 97/17730 May 1997 WO
WO 97/39485 October 1997 WO
WO 98/02916 January 1998 WO
WO 98/02924 January 1998 WO
WO 98/08259 February 1998 WO
WO 98/32178 July 1998 WO
WO 99/46809 September 1999 WO
WO99/63591 December 1999 WO
WO 00/13236 March 2000 WO
WO 01/78134 October 2001 WO
WO 2004/020706 March 2004 WO
WO 2004/079789 September 2004 WO
WO 2005/020308 March 2005 WO
WO 2006/135031 December 2006 WO
WO 2007/040710 April 2007 WO
2012128934 September 2012 WO
Other references
  • Torvik et al., Electrical characterization of GaN/SiC n-p. heterojunction diodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, (1998), pp. 1371-1373.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability Corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2010/035709; Date of Mailing: Dec. 15, 2011; 8 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability Corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2010/035713; Date of Mailing: Dec. 15, 2011; 8 pages.
  • “Insulated-gate bipolar transistor.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. Jun. 21, 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org.
  • A.K. Agarwal, J.B. Casady, L.B. Rowland, W.F. Valek, and C.D. Brandt, “1400 V 4H-SiC Power MOSFET's,” Materials Science Forum vols. 264-268, pp. 989-992, 1998.
  • A.K. Agarwal, J.B. Casady, L.B. Rowland, W.F. Valek, M.H. White, and C.D. Brandt, “1.1 kV 4H-SiC Power UMOSFET's,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 586-588, Dec. 1997.
  • A.K. Agarwal, N.S. Saks, S.S. Mani, V.S. Hegde and P.A. Sanger, “Investigation of Lateral RESURF, 6H-SiC MOSFETs,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, pp. 1307-1310, 2000.
  • A.K. Agarwal, S. Seshadri, and L.B. Rowland, “Temperature Dependence of Fowler-Nordheim Current in 6H-and 4H-SiC MOS Capacitors,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 592-594.
  • A.V. Suvorov, L.A. Lipkin, G.M. Johnson, R. Singh and J.W. Palmour, “4H-SiC Self-Aligned Implant-Diffused Structure for Power DMOSFETs,” Materials Science Forum vols. 338-342, pp. 1275-1278, 2000.
  • Agarwal et al. “A Critical Look at the Performance Advantages and Limitations of 4H-SiC Power UMOSFET Structures,” 1996 IEEE ISPSD and IC's Proc. , May 20-23, 1996, pp. 119-122.
  • Asano et al., “Dynamic Characteristics of 6.2kV High Voltage 4H-SiC pn Diode with Low Loss”, Transactions of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, Part D Inst. Electr. Eng. Japan, vol. 123D, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 623-627, XP8124184.
  • Ayalew, T, “Dissertation of Tesfaye Ayalew”, Section 4.4.3.1 MPS Diode Structure, SiC Semiconductor Devices Technology, Modeling, and Simulation, 2006.
  • Baliga “Insulated Gate Biopolar Transistor” Power Semiconductor Devices. PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA. 426-502 (1996).
  • Baliga “Power MOSFET” Power Semiconductor Devices. PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA 335-425 (1996).
  • Baliga, Power Semiconductor Devices, Chapter 7, PWS Publishing, 1996.
  • Bhatnagar et al. “Comparison of 6H-SiC, 3C-SiC, and Si for Power Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1993, pp. 645-655.
  • Buchner et al., “Laser Recrystallization of Polysilicon for Improved Device Quality”, Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 35, Polycrystalline Semiconductors, pp. 289-294.
  • Capano, M.A., et al., Ionization Energies and Electron Mobilities in Phosphorus—and Nitrogen-Implanted 4H-Silicon Carbide, IEEE ICSCRM Conference 1999, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (Oct. 10-13, 1999).
  • Chakraborty et al. “Interface Properties of N2O-annealed SiO2/SiC system,” Proceedings IEEE Hong Kong Electron Devices Meeting. Jun. 24, 2000, pp. 108-111.
  • Chang et al. “Observation of a Non-stoichiometric Layer at the Silicon Dioxide—Silicon Carbide Interface: Effect of Oxidation Temperature and Post-Oxidation Processing Conditions,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 640, 2001.
  • Chen et al. “Theoretical Analysis of Current Crowding Effect in Metal/AlGaN/GaN Schottky Diodes and Its Reduction by Using Polysilicon in Anode,” Chin. Phys. Lett., vol. 24, No. 7 (2007) pp. 2112-2114.
  • Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2010, corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 200780029460.5, 7 pages.
  • Cho et al. “Improvement of charge trapping by hydrogen post-oxidation annealing in gate oxide of 4H-SiC methel-oxide-semiconductor capacitors,” Applied Physics Letters. vol. 77, No. 8, pp. 1215-1217 (Aug. 21, 2000).
  • Chung et al. “Effects of anneals in ammonia on the interface trap density near athe band edges in 4H-silicon carbide metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors,” Applied Physics Letters. vol. 77, Nov. 27, 2000, pp. 3601-3603.
  • Chung et al., “The Effect of Si:C Source Ratio on SiO2/SiC Interface State Density for Nitrogen Doped 4H and 6H-SiC,” Materials Science Forum. (2000) vols. 338-342, pp. 1097-1100.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2004/004982, dated Jul. 22, 2004.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US01/30715.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US01/42414, dated Apr. 23, 2002.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US02/11691 dated Dec. 4, 2002.
  • D. Alok, E. Arnold, and R. Egloff, “Process Dependence of Inversion Layer Mobility in 4H-SiC Devices,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, pp. 1077-1080, 2000.
  • Dahlquist et al. “A 2.8kV, Forward Drop JBS Diode with Low Leakage,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, (2000) pp. 1179-1182.
  • Das, Mrinal K. Graduate thesis entitled, Fundamental Studies of the Silicon Carbide MOS Structure. Purdue University, 1999.
  • Dastidar, Sujoyita, A Study of P-Type Activation in Silicon Carbide, Thesis (Purdue University, May 1998).
  • De Meo et al., “Thermal Oxidation of SiC in N2O”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 141, 1994, pp. L150-L152.
  • del Prado et al. “Full Composition Range Silicon Oxynitride Films Deposited by ECR-PECVD at Room Temperatures,” Thin Solid Films. vol. 343-344 (1999) p. 437-440.
  • Dimitrijev et al., “Nitridation of Silicon-Dioxide Films Grown on 6H Silicon Carbide”, IEEE Electronic Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 5, May 5, 1997, pp. 175-177.
  • European Search Report for corresponding EP patent application No. 09177558.5 dated Feb. 22, 2010.
  • European Search Report for corresponding EP patent application No. 09163424.6 dated Apr. 9, 2010.
  • European Search Report; Application No. EP07120038; Jun. 16, 2008.
  • Extended European Search Report (12 pages) corresponding to European Application No. 07112298; Dated Feb. 18, 2009.
  • Fisher, C.A. et al., “The performance of high-voltage field relieved Schottky barrier diodes”, IEE Proceedings, vol. 132:6, Pt. I, pp. 257-260 (Dec. 1985).
  • Fukuda et al. “Improvement of SiO2/4H-SiC Interface Using High-Temperature Hydrogen Annealing at Low Pressure and Vacuum Annealing,” Jpn J. Appl. Phys. vol. 38, Apr. 1999, pp. 2306-2309.
  • Fukuda et al. “Improvement of SiO2/4H-SiC Interface by Using High Temperature Hydrogen Annealing at 1000° C.,” Extended Abstracts of the International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials. Japan Society of Applied Physics, Tokyo, Japan, Sep. 1998.
  • G.Y. Chung, C.C. Tin, J.R. Williams, K. McDonald, M. Di Ventra, S.T. Pantelides, L.C. Feldman, and R.A. Weller, “Effect of nitric oxide annealing on the interface trap densities near the band edges in the 4H polytype of silicon carbide,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 13, pp. 1713-1715, Mar. 2000.
  • G.Y. Chung, C.C. Tin, J.R. Williams, K. McDonald, R.K. Chanana, R.A. Weller, S.T. Pantelides, L.C. Feldman, O.W. Holland, M.K. Das, and J.W. Palmour, “Improved Inversion Channel Mobility for 4H-SiC MOSETs Following High Temperature Anneals in Nitric Oxide,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 4, Apr. 2001.
  • H.F. Li, S. Dimitrijev, H.B. Harrison, D. Sweatman, P.T. Tanner. “Improving SiO2 Grown on P-Type 4H-SiC by NO Annealing,” Materials Science Forum. vols. 264-268 (1998) pp. 869-872.
  • http://www.elec.gla.ac.uk; The Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT); Feb. 14, 2007.
  • Hubel, K, “Hybrid design improves diode robustness and boosts efficiency,” Compoundsemiconductor.net, 2006.
  • Hull et al., “Drift-Free 10-kV, 20-A 4H-SiC PiN Diodes,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 34, No. 4, 2005, pp. 341-344.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability (9 pages) corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2007/010192; Mailing Date: Sep. 23, 2008.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion (13 pages) corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2008/010538; Mailing Date: Dec. 22, 2008.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion (14 pages) corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2010/020071; Mailing Date: Mar. 26, 2010.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion (14 pages) corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2009/065251; Mailing Date: Jun. 1, 2010.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion (16 pages) corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2009/003089; Mailing Date: Aug. 20, 2009.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2007/014139; Feb. 4, 2008.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/025053 mailed on Jul. 2, 2010.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/000734, Apr. 23, 2009.
  • International Search Report, PCT/US2008/008574, Sep. 26, 2008.
  • Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/US2007/010192; Oct. 29, 2007.
  • Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/US2010/025053 mailed on May 3, 2010.
  • J. Tan, J.A. Cooper, Jr., and Mr. R. Melloch, “High-Voltage Accumulation-Layer UMOSFETs in 4H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 487-489, Dec. 1998.
  • J.B. Casady, A.K. Agarwal, L.B. Rowland, W.F. Valek, and C.D. Brandt, “900 V DMOS and 1100 V UMOS 4H-SiC Power FETs,” IEEE Device Research Conference, Ft. Collins, CO Jun. 23-25, 1997.
  • J.N. Shenoy, J.A. Cooper and M.R. Meelock, “High-Voltage Double-Implanted Power MOSFETs in 6H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 93-95, Mar. 1997.
  • J.T. Richmond, S. Ryu, A.K. Agarwal and J.W. Palmour, “Hybrid 4H-SiC MOS Gated Transistor (MGT)” (admitted prior art).
  • Jamet, et al. “Physical properties of N2O and NO-nitrided gate oxides grown on 4H SiC,” Applied Physics Letters. vol. 79, No. 3, Jul. 16, 2001, pp. 323-325.
  • K. Ueno and Tadaaki Oikawa, “Counter-Doped MOSFET's of 4H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 624-626, Dec. 1999.
  • K. Ueno, R. Asai, and T. Tsuji. “4H-SiC MOSFET's Utilizing the H2 Surface Cleaning Technique.” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1998, pp. 244-246.
  • Katsunori Ueno, Tatsue Urushidani, Kouicki Hahimoto, and Yasukazu Seki. “The Guard-Ring Termination for the High-Voltage SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes”. IEEE Electron Device Letters. vol. 16. No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 331-332.
  • Kinoshita et al., “Guard Ring Assisted RESURF: A New Termination Structure Providing Stable and High Breakdown Voltage for SiC Power Devices,” Tech. Digest of ISPSD '02, pp. 253-256.
  • Kobayashi et al. “Dielectric Breakdown and Current Conduction of Oxide/Nitride/Oxide Multi-Layer Structures,” 1990 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology. pp. 119-120.
  • Krishnaswami et al., “High Temperature characterization of 4H-SiC bipolar junction transistors”, Materials Science Forum, Aedermannsfdorf, CH, vol. 527-529, Jan. 1, 2006, pp. 1437-1440, XP009138720, ISSN: 0255-5476.
  • L.A. Lipkin and J.W. Palmour, “Low interface state density oxides on p-type SiC,” Materials Science Forum vols. 264-268, pp. 853-856, 1998.
  • Lai et al., “Interface Properties of N2O-Annealed NH3-Treated 6H-SiC MOS Capacitor,” Proc. 1999 IEEE Hong Kong Electron Devices Meeting, Jun. 26, 1999, pp. 46-49.
  • Leonhard et al. “Long term stability of gate-oxides on n- and p-type silicon carbide studied by charge injection techniques,” Materials Science Engineering, vol. 46, No. 1-3, Apr. 1997, pp. 263-266.
  • Levinshtein et al., “On the homogeneity of the turn-on process in high voltage 4H-SiC thyristors”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 49, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2005, pp. 233-237, XP004645018 Elsevier Science Publishers, Barking (GB) ISSN: 0038-1101.
  • Lipkin et al. “Insulator Investigation on SiC for Improved Reliability,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 525-532.
  • Lipkin et al. “Challenges and State-of-the-Art Oxides in SiC,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 640, 2001, pp. 27-29.
  • Losee et al., “Degraded Blocking Performance of 4H-SiC Rectifiers Under High dV/dt Conditions”, Proceedings of 17th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC's, 4 pages (May 23-26, 2005). XP010820730.
  • Losee et al., “High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Rectifiers with Single-Implant, Multi-Zone JTE Termination”, Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 2004 Proceedings. ISPSB '04. The 16th International Symposium on Kitakyushu Int. Conf. Center, Japan May 24-27, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, May 24, 2004, pp. 301-304, XP010723398.
  • M. Das et al., “A 13 kV 4H-SiC N-Channel IGBT with Low Rdiff, on and Fast Switching” presented at: International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials )ICSCRM), Otsu, Japan, Oct. 14-19, 2007.
  • M. K. Das, L.A. Lipkin, J.W. Palmour, G.Y. Chung, J.R. Williams, K. McDonald, and L.C. Feldman, “High Mobility 4H-SiC Inversion Mode MOSFETs Using Thermally Grown, NO Annealed SiO2,” IEEE Device Research Conference, Denver, CO Jun. 19-21, 2000.
  • M.A. Capano, S. Ryu, J.A. Cooper, Jr., M.R. Melloch, K. Rottner, S. Karlsson, N. Nordell, A. Powell, and D.E. Walker, Jr., “Surface Roughening in Ion Implanted 4H-Silicon Carbide,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 214-218, Mar. 1999.
  • M.K. Das, J.A. Cooper, Jr., M.R. Melloch, and M.A. Capano, “Inversion Channel Mobility in 4H- and 6H-SiC MOSFETs,” IEEE Semiconductor Interface Specialists Conference, San Diego, CA, Dec. 3-5, 1998.
  • Ma et al. “Fixed and trapped charges at oxide-nitride-oxide heterostructure interfaces formed by remote plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. vol. 11, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1993, pp. 1533-1540.
  • Mondal et al. “An Integrated 500-V Power DSMOSFET/Antiparallel Rectifier Device with Improved Diode Reverse Recovery Characteristics,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 562-564.
  • Motorola Power MOSFET Transistor Databook, 4th edition. Motorola, INc., 1989, pp. 2-5-4-2-5-7.
  • Mutin, P. Herbert, “Control of the Composition and Structure of Silicon Oxycarbide and Oxynitride Glasses Derived from Polysiloxane Precursors,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. vol. 14 (1999) pp. 27-38.
  • Myer-Ward et al. “Turning of Basal Plane Dislocations During Epitaxial Growth on 4 off-axis 4h-SiC” 7th European Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, Barcelona-Spain, Sep. 7-11, 2008 retrieved from http://ecscrm08.com/invited—presentations.html , retrieved Jul. 1, 2009.
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/026632, Date of Mailing: Oct. 8, 2010, 16 pages.
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/035713, Date of Mailing: Jul. 27, 2010, 14 pages.
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/042075, Date of Mailing: Sep. 24, 2010, 15 pages.
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2010/028612, Jun. 17, 2010.
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; International Search Report; Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2008/004239, Mar. 2, 2009.
  • P.J. Tobin, Y. Okada, S. A. Ajuria, V. Lakhotia, W.A. Feil, and R. I. Hedge, “Furnace formation of silicon oxynitride thin dielectrics in nitrous oxide (N20): The role of nitric oxide (NO).” Journal of Applied Physics. vol. 75, No. 3, Feb. 1, 1994, pp. 1811-1817.
  • P.M. Shenoy and B.J. Baliga, “The Planar 6H-SiC ACCUFET: A New High-Voltage Power MOSFET Structure,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 589-591, Dec. 1997.
  • P.T. Lai, Supratic Chakraborty, C.L. Chan, and Y.C. Cheng, “Effects of nitridation and annealing on interface properties of thermally oxidized SiO2/SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor system,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 25, pp. 3744-3746, Jun. 2000.
  • Palmour et al. “SiC Device Technology: Remaining Issues,” Diamond and Related Materials. vol. 6, 1997, pp. 1400-1404.
  • Palmour J: “Silicon Carbide npnp Thyristors”, NASA Technical Briefs—Electronics and Computers, Dec. 1, 2000, John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio (US); XP-002567723, http://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/7031-lew-16750?tmpl=component&print=1&page= retrieved on Feb. 10, 2010).
  • Panknin et al., “Electrical and microstructural properties of highly boron-implantation doped 6H-SiC”, Journal of Applied Physics 89:6, pp. 3162-3167 (Mar. 15, 2001).
  • Pantelides et al., “Atomic-Scale Engineering of the SiC-SiO2 Interface,” Materials Science Forum. (2000) vols. 338-342, pp. 1133-1136.
  • Patel, R., et al., Phosphorus-Implanted High-Voltage N.sup.+ P 4H-SiC Junction Rectifiers, Proceedings of 1998 International Symposium on Poer Semiconductor Devices & ICs, pp. 387-390 (Kyoto).
  • Q. Zhang et al. “12 kV 4H-SiC p-IGBTs with Record Low Specific On-Resistance” presented at: International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials (ICSCRM), Otsu, Japan, Oct. 14-19, 2007.
  • R. Schörner, P. Friedrichs, D. Peters, and D. Stephani, “Significantly Improved Performance of MOSFETs on Silicon Carbide Using the 15R-SiC Polytype,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 241-244, May 1999.
  • R. Schörner, P. Friedrichs, D. Peters, H. Mitlehner, B. Weis, and D. Stephani, “Rugged Power MOSFETs in 6H-SiC with Blocking Capability up to 1800 V,” Materials Science Forum vols. 338-342, pp. 1295-1298, 2000.
  • Ranbir Singh, Sei-Hyung Ryu and John W. Palmour, “High Temperature, High Current, 4H-SiC Accu-DMOSFET,” Materials Science Forum vols. 338-342, pp. 1271-1274, 2000.
  • Rao et al. “Al and N Ion Implantations in 6H-SiC,” Silicon Carbide and Related Materials. 1995 Conf, Kyoto, Japan. Published 1996.
  • Rao et al. “P-N Junction Formation in 6H-SiC by Acceptor Implantation into N-Type Substrate,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B. vol. 106, 1995, pp. 333-338.
  • Rao et al. “Silane overpressure post-implant annealing of A1 dopants in SiC: Cold wall CVD apparatus” Applied Surface Science 252: 3837-3842 (2006).
  • Rao, “Maturing ion-implantation technology and its device applications in SiC”, Solid State Electronics 47:2, pp. 213-222, Elsevier Science Publishers (Feb. 2003).
  • Ryu et al. Article and Presentation: “27 mΩ-cm2, 1.6 kV Power DiMOSFETs in 4H-SiC,” Proceedings of the 14 International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs 2002, Jun. 4-7, 2002, Santa Fe, NM.
  • S. Sridevan and B. Jayant Baliga, “Lateral N-Channel Inversion Mode 4H-SiC MOSFET's,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 228-230, Jul. 1998.
  • S. Sridevan, P.K. McLarty, and B.J. Baliga, “On the Presence of Aluminum in Thermally Grown Oxides on 6H-Silicon Carbide,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 136-138, Mar. 1996.
  • S.M. Sze Semiconductor Devices, Physics and Technology. 2nd Edition, © 2002 John Wiley and Sons, p. 130.
  • S.T. Pantelides, “Atomic Scale Engineering of SiC Dielectric Interfaces,” DARPA/MTO High Power and ONR Power Switching MURI Reviews, Rosslyn, VA, Aug. 10-12, 1999.
  • Senzaki et al.; Effects of Pyrogenic Reoxidation Annealing on Inversion Channel Mobility of 4H-SiC Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor Fabricated on (1120) Face; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Japan Society of Applied Physics, Tokyo, JP; vol. 40, No. 11B, Part 2; Nov. 2001; pp. L1201-L1203.
  • Singh, R. and J.W. Palmour, “Planer Terminations in 4H-SiC Schottky Diodes with Low Leakage and High Yields, ”IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 1997, pp. 157-160.
  • Stengl et al., “Variation of Lateral Doping—A New Concept to Avoid High Voltage Breakdown of Planar Junctions”, International Electron Devices Meeting; Washington, Dec. 1-4, 1985; pp. 154-157, XP002013050.
  • Stengl et al., Variation of Lateral Doping as a Field Terminator for High-Voltage Power Devices, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices; vol. ED-33, No. 3, Mar. 1986, pp. 426-428, XP000836911.
  • Streetman “Bipolar Junction Transistors” Solid State Electronic Devices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 228-284 (1980).
  • Sugawara et al., “3.6 kV 4H-SiC JBS Diodes with Low RonS”. Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342:2, pp. 1183-1186 (2000). XP-000944901.
  • Sundaresan et al., “Ultra-low resistivity A1 + implanted 4H-SiC obtained by microwave annealing and a protective graphite cap”, Solid-State Electronics vol. 52, 2008, pp. 140-145, XP022360431.
  • Suzuki et al. “Effect of Post-oxidation-annealing in Hydrogen on SiO2/4H-SiC Interface,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342 (2000) 1073-6.
  • Sze, S.M. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, John Wiley & Sons, p. 383-390, 1981.
  • Thomas et al., “Annealing of Ion Implantation Damage in SiC Using a Graphite Mask”, Material Research Society Symposium Y Proceedings vol. 572, Spring 1999, pp. 45-50.
  • Treu et al. “A Surge Current Stable and Avalanche Rugged SiC Merged pn Schottky Diode Blocking 600V Especially Suited for PFC Applications” Materials Science Forum vols. 527-529: 1155-1158 (2006).
  • V.R. Vathulya and M.H. White, “Characterization of Channel Mobility on Implanted SiC to Determine Polytype Suitability for the Power DIMOS Structure,” Electronic Materials Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 1999.
  • V.R. Vathulya, H. Shang, and M.H. White, “A Novel 6H-SiC Power DMOSFET with Implanted P-Well Spacer,” IEEE Electronic Device Letters, vol. 20, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 354-356.
  • V.V. Afanasev, M. Bassler, G. Pensl, and M. Schulz, “Intrinsic SiC/SiO2 Interface States,” Phy. Stat. Sol. (a), vol. 162, pp. 321-337, 1997.
  • Vassilevski et al., “High Voltage Silicon Carbide Schottky Diodes with Single Zone Junction Termination Extension”, Materials Science Forum, 2007 Trans Tech Publications, vols. 556-557 (2007) pp. 873-876, XP8124186.
  • Vassilevski et al., “Protection of selectively implanted and patterned silicon carbide surfaces with graphite capping layer during post-implantation annealing,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20 (2005) 271-278.
  • Wang et al. “High Temperature Characteristics of High-Quality SiC MIS Capacitors with O/N/O Gate Dielectric,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 47, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 458-462.
  • Williams et al. “Passivation of the 4H-SiC/SiO2 Interface with Nitric Oxide,” Materials Science Forum. vols. 389-393 (2002), pp. 967-972.
  • Xu et al. “Improved Performance and Reliability of N2O-Grown Oxynitride on 6H-SiH,” IEEE Electron Device Letters. vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, p. 298-300.
  • Y. Li et al., “High Voltage (3 kV) UMOSFETs in 4H-SiC,” Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002.
  • Y. Wang, C. Weitzel, and M. Bhatnagar, “Accumulation-Mode SiC Power MOSFET Design Issues,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, pp. 1287-1290.
  • Yilmaz, “Optimization and Surface Charge Sensitivity of High Voltage Blocking Structures with Shallow Junctions,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 3, Jul. 1991, pp. 1666-1675.
  • Zhang et al., “A 10-kV Monolithic Darlington Transistor with βforced of 336 in 4H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 142-144, XP011240662.
  • Zhang et al.; Design and Fabrications of High Voltage IGBTs on 4H-SiC; 2006 IEEE Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs, Napels, Italy Jun. 4-8, 2006, pp. 1-4.
  • Second European Examination Report Corresponding to International Application No. 07112298.0-2203; Date of Mailing: Jan. 16, 2012; 7 pages.
  • International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority corresponding to Application No. PCT/US2011/027383; Date of Mailing: May 20, 2011; 8 Pages.
  • Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued in corresponding application No. PCT/US2011/027383, Mailed Sep. 20, 2012, 7 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability Corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2011/031150; Date of Mailing: Oct. 26, 2012; 8 Pages.
  • Itoh “Analysis of Schottky Barrier Heights of Metal/SiC Contacts and Its Possible Application to High-Voltage Rectifying Devices” Phys. Stat. Sol. (A), vol. 162, 1997, pp. 225-245.
  • Itoh “Excellent Reverse Blocking Characteristics of High-Voltage 4H-SiC Schottky Rectifiers with Boron-Implanted Edge Termination” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 1996, pp. 139-141.
  • Karlsteen et al., “Electrical Properties of Inhomogeneous SiC MIS Structures,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 24, No. 7, 1995, pp. 853-861.
  • Matsunami, “Step-Controlled Epitaxial Growth of SiC: High Quality Honnoepitaxy,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. B201997, Oct. 27, 1996, pp. 153-173.
  • Mohammad, “Near Ideal Plantinum-GaN Schottky Diodes,” Electronic Letters, Mar. 14, 1996, vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 598-599.
  • Unknown, “Data Book for Metals” published as early as Mar. 19, 2009, p. 194.
  • Wang, “High Barrier Heigh GaN Schottky Diodes: Pt/GaN and Pd/GaN,” Applied Phys. Letters, vol. 68, No. 9, Feb. 26, 1996, pp. 1267-1269.
  • Wilamoski, “Schottky Diodes with High Breakdown Voltages,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 26, No. 5, 1983, pp. 491-493.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,749 mailed Jan. 25, 2013, 29 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,750 mailed Oct. 2, 2012, 15 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,752 mailed Mar. 21, 2013, 17 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,750 mailed Jan. 31, 2013, 7 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,750, mailed May 14, 2013, 8 pages.
  • Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,749, mailed Jun. 10, 2013, 33 pages.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2012/054091 mailed Dec. 5, 2012, 12 pages.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2012/054092 mailed Dec. 5, 2012, 12 pages.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2012/054093 mailed Dec. 5, 2012, 12 pages.
  • Baliga, B.J., “The Pinch Rectifier: A Low-Forward-Drop High-Speed Power Diode,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. EDL-5, No. 6, Jun. 1984, 3 pages.
  • Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,341, mailed Jul. 13, 2010, 6 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,341, mailed Oct. 18, 2010, 7 pages.
  • Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,341, mailed Jun. 21, 2011, 8 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,341, mailed Apr. 9, 2012, 8 pages.
  • Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-510504, mailed Mar. 26, 2013, 2 pages.
  • European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09750952.5-1235, mailed Mar. 8, 2012, 5 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/003089, mailed Nov. 23, 2010, 7 pages.
  • International Search Report for Patent Application No. PCT/2012/27874, mailed Jul. 13, 2012, 7 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/547,014, mailed Nov. 9, 2012, 13 pages.
  • Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/547,014, mailed Apr. 4, 2013, 8 pages.
  • Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-510504, mailed Apr. 26, 2013, 8 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,749, mailed Aug. 20, 2013, 9 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,750, mailed Aug. 23, 2013, 8 pages.
  • Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,752, mailed Jul. 29, 2013, 6 pages.
  • Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/547,014, mailed Jul. 31, 2013, 3 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/547,014, mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 8 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,752, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 10 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,749, mailed Oct. 28, 2013, 11 pages.
  • Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,752, mailed Jan. 13, 2014, 5 pages.
  • Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-557150, mailed Jan. 29, 2014, 9 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/054091, mailed Mar. 20, 2014, 7 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/054092, mailed Mar. 20, 2014, 7 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/054093, mailed Mar. 20, 2014, 7 pages.
  • European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11753868.6-1552, mailed Mar. 25, 2014, 9 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,416, mailed May 23, 2014, 11 pages.
  • Perez, Raul et al., “Planar Edge Termination Design and Technology, Considerations for 1.7-kV 4H-Sic PiN Diodes,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 10, Oct. 2005, IEEE, pp. 2309-2316.
  • Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 101133188, mailed Aug. 14, 2014, 18 pages.
  • Final Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,416, mailed Sep. 30, 2014, 9 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/169,266, mailed Oct. 22, 2014, 8 pages.
  • Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 101133195, mailed Sep. 1, 2014, 27 pages.
  • Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 101133190, mailed Sep. 24, 2014, 16 pages.
  • Decision of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-557150, issued Nov. 5, 2014, 6 pages.
  • Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,416, mailed Dec. 29, 2014, 3 pages.
  • Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14184967.9, mailed Feb. 6, 2015, 6 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,390, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 15 pages.
Patent History
Patent number: 9029975
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 8, 2010
Date of Patent: May 12, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20110215338
Assignee: Cree, Inc. (Durham, NC)
Inventor: Qingchun Zhang (Cary, NC)
Primary Examiner: Stephen W Smoot
Assistant Examiner: Sun M Kim
Application Number: 12/719,412
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: To Compound Semiconductor (257/472); Schottky Diode (epo) (257/E29.338)
International Classification: H01L 29/47 (20060101); H01L 29/16 (20060101); H01L 29/165 (20060101); H01L 29/66 (20060101); H01L 29/861 (20060101); H01L 29/872 (20060101); H01L 29/06 (20060101);