Methods and apparatus for applying periodic voltage using direct current
Methods and apparatus for applying pulsed DC power to a plasma processing chamber are disclosed. In some implementations, frequency of the applied power is varied to achieve desired processing effects such as deposition rate, arc rate, and film characteristics. In addition, a method and apparatus are disclosed that utilize a relatively high potential during a reverse-potential portion of a particular cycle to mitigate possible nodule formation on the target. The relative durations of the reverse-potential portion, a sputtering portion, and a recovery portion of the cycle are adjustable to effectuate desired processing effects.
Latest Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Patents:
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/941,548 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,359.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to plasma-based sputtering deposition. In particular, but not by way of limitation, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for plasma-based processing using a direct current power supply.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONPlasma processing techniques have found wide-spread use in industry for commercial processes such as plasma vapor deposition, sputtering, and so forth. These processes have become particularly useful in thin film applications. To generate plasma, a power supply creates an electric potential between a cathode and one or more anodes that are placed in a plasma chamber containing the process gases that form the plasma. When using these processes for deposition, the plasma acts upon the material of a target (also referred to as a sputtering source) placed in the plasma chamber that normally comprises the cathode surface. Plasma ions are accelerated towards the target and cause target material to be dislodged from the cathode surface on impact. The dislodged target material is then deposited on a substrate to form a film (e.g., thin film). The film may constitute material sputtered by the plasma from the target surface, as disclosed above, or may be the result of a reaction between the target material and some other element included in the plasma or process gases.
High frequency voltage sources (e.g., alternating-current (AC) power sources) have been used to generate a high electrical potential that produces a plasma within a plasma chamber. These high-frequency voltage sources are expensive to construct and maintain, as well as complicated to operate. Additionally, if the deposition material is formed by reaction with an element in the plasma or process gases, and further, is electronically insulating, the anode in the chamber can be coated with the insulator; this deposit can then prevent the anode from performing its function of collecting electrons from the plasma during the deposition process.
To overcome the disadvantages associated with high frequency voltage sources, alternating pulsed direct current power sources have been employed in anodeless dual magnetron-type systems such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,917,286, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The process of reversing polarities allows the electrodes to alternately act as an anode and as a cathode, and the sputtering process that occurs during the cathode phase cleans off any deposited insulating material and permits uninhibited operation of the electrode as an anode during the anode phase. Additionally, the process of reversing polarities allows both electrodes to alternatively act as a cathode so that both electrode surfaces are capable of providing target material.
Although the present pulsed direct current power sources are functional, they are not sufficiently accurate or otherwise satisfactory in many thin film processing applications to achieve, for example, uniformity and/or particle generation thresholds. Co-sputtering of an arbitrary stoichiometry is also not achievable with standard technology. Accordingly, methods and apparatus are needed to address the shortfalls of present technology and to provide other new and innovative features.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONExemplary embodiments of the present invention that are shown in the drawings are summarized below. These and other embodiments are more fully described in the Detailed Description section. It is to be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the forms described in this Summary of the Invention or in the Detailed Description. One skilled in the art can recognize that there are numerous modifications, equivalents and alternative constructions that fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as expressed in the claims.
Some embodiments of the invention may be characterized as a method, and means for carrying out the method, for applying pulsed DC power to a plasma processing chamber. The method in these embodiments includes applying a negative potential to a cathode during a sputtering portion of a particular cycle of the pulsed DC power for a first time duration; applying, during a reverse-potential portion of the particular cycle, a positive potential to the cathode that has a magnitude that is at least twenty percent of the magnitude of the negative potential; and applying, during a recovery portion of the particular cycle, a recovery potential for a third time duration that has a magnitude that is less than the magnitude of both the negative potential and the positive potential.
Other embodiments of the invention may be characterized as a power supply including a direct current power source configured to deliver power to a plasma sputtering chamber; a power control component in communication with the direct current power source and configured to direct the power to at least one electrode with an alternating polarity according to processor readable instructions; and a non-transitory, tangible computer readable storage medium, encoded with the processor readable instructions to perform a method for applying power, the method comprising: applying DC power pulses at a desired level of power to an electrode of a plasma processing chamber to sustain a plasma process that deposits a film on a substrate; monitoring an impedance of the plasma, the impedance providing an indication of a status of at least one processing effect; and adjusting, responsive to the monitored impedance, a frequency of the DC power pulses to alter the status of the processing effect.
Various objects and advantages and a more complete understanding of the present invention are apparent and more readily appreciated by reference to the following Detailed Description and to the appended claims when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings wherein:
that is greater than zero, according to an embodiment of the invention;
to receive DC power pulses delivered by DC power supply, according to an embodiment of the invention;
Referring now to the drawings, where like or similar elements are designated with identical reference numerals throughout the several views, and referring in particular to
It should also be recognized that, in alternative modes of operation discussed further herein, there may be only a single electrode 140 within the chamber 130 and the chamber itself may function as an electrode. In addition, although many embodiments are described as operating in the context of sputtering-type processing, it should be recognized that the power control component 110 may also be utilized in connection with PECVD processing (e.g., for gas ionization), substrate biasing (e.g., deposition and etch applications), and ion sources (e.g., as power delivery for an ion source).
In general, the DC power source 100 is configured to supply DC power to the power control component 110. In several embodiments, the DC power source 100 provides power in the range of 20 to 200 Kilowatts, but other power levels are certainly contemplated. And in many embodiments, the DC power source 100 is realized by multiple DC generators that are coupled together. In one embodiment for example, the DC power source is realized by three 50 Kilowatt DC generators to provide a 150 kW power supply.
The plasma 150 is formed from one or more gases, including a noble gas (e.g., argon) or other gaseous species, and may be formed from a chemical compound having a specified composition. In some embodiments, magnetic fields (not shown) are applied within and/or outside of the plasma sputtering chamber 130 (e.g., at locations around the electrodes 140) to promote the ionization of the gas and possibly the direction of plasma ions of the plasma 150 to any of the electrodes 140 and/or the substrate 160.
When plasma 150 is ignited and sustained in response to a voltage potential between electrodes 140, plasma ions are accelerated towards and impact an electrode 140 functioning as a cathode to cause atoms from the electrode 140 to be ejected. In some embodiments, the electrodes 140 are referred to as a target and the atoms (e.g., material) ejected toward the substrate is referred to as target atoms (e.g., target material). In many implementations, the target material includes a metallic substance such as aluminum or a different material such as a ceramic. And is some implementations (e.g., co-sputtering) the target material for each individual electrode 140 may include different material or composition.
Although not required, in many embodiments the DC power source 100 is configured to detect one or more arcs (e.g., micro arc and/or hard arcs) forming within the plasma sputtering chamber 130. An exemplary power supply that is configured with arc-handling capabilities is the ASCENT model DC generator available from Advanced Energy Incorporated in Fort Collins, Colo. In other embodiments, arc detection is carried out by the power control component 110. As one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates, an arc can have a detrimental effect on, for example, the plasma sputtering chamber 130 and/or an object (e.g., semiconductor substrate) within the plasma sputtering chamber 130.
The power control component 110 is generally configured to manage power produced by the DC power source 100 and to provide managed power to the sputtering chamber 130. Specifically, the power control component 110 is configured to manage the power from the DC power source 100 to the electrodes 140 such that a plasma 150 is ignited and/or sustained. In several embodiments for example, the power control component 110 is configured to send DC pulses of power with alternating polarities (“bipolar pulses”) to the electrodes 140 such that each of the electrodes 140 operates as a cathode for a period of time and as an anode for a period of time. And in other modes of operation, the power control component 110 provides pulses of power without alternating polarities (“unipolar pulses”) so that one or more electrodes 140 operates as a cathode and one or more of the electrodes 140 and/or the chamber 130 functions as an anode.
An advantage of the modes of operation in which alternating polarites of DC pulses are applied to the electrodes by the power control component 110, is flexibility with respect to the spacing of the electrodes because there are effectively no dedicated anodes. As a consequence, these “anodeless” modes of DC sputtering enables electrodes to be located as desired (e.g., to enhance film uniformity and/or to generate plasma where it is desired to be generated within the chamber 130), which in many implementations, reduces sources of contamination and results in a less complicated mechanical system.
Beneficially, the power control component 110 in several embodiments is configured to modulate an amount of power to each of, at least, a portion of the electrodes 140. As a consequence, the power control component 110 in many embodiments enables the amount of target material that is sputtered from one or more of the electrodes to be varied to enable the target material to be deposited on the substrate 160 in a desired manner. For example, in several embodiments, the power to one or more of the electrodes 140 is independently controllable to enable material to be deposited with a desired topology, resistance, strength, etc. Moreover, in many implementations, the power delivered to one or more of the electrodes is modulated responsive to feedback from the plasma chamber 130 (e.g., feedback indicative of a thickness of the deposited layer, resistance of the layer, optical properties of the layer, etc.).
By way of further example, the power control component 110 in many implementations is configured to enable a uniform deposition of target material on the substrate 160 by modulating power to one or more of the electrodes 140 while target material is being deposited on the substrate. Moreover, in some embodiments, the amount of target material remaining on an electrode may be monitored and the power applied to that electrode may be modulated based on the amount of target material remaining so as to enable the amount of target material that is utilized to be maximized without removing unwanted material from the electrode. This is a major benefit because target material is often very expensive and increasing an amount of target material that is used (while avoiding the removal of unwanted material from the electrode) will save a substantial amount of money, and in addition, the time periods between required maintenance may also be increased—again saving time and money—due to less contamination from unwanted removal of electrode material.
In many embodiments, the substrate 160 is held in a static position while material is deposited on the substrate 160. As a consequence, in these static-deposition embodiments, the amount of undesirable particles that become entrained in the plasma 150 due to moving parts is substantially reduced; thus the number of defects that are due to impurities in the layer deposited on the substrate are reduced. Moreover, particle-induced arcing is also reduced, which improves the quality of the processing. In alternative embodiments, the position of the substrate 160 is moved relative to the electrodes to achieve desired deposition characteristics.
Another advantage of many embodiments disclosed herein is the ability to carry out metallic sputtering with DC power (e.g., DC power with an alternating polarity). For example, many embodiments described herein enable metallic sputtering on a static or dynamic substrate utilizing techniques that modulate power to one or more of the electrodes.
In several embodiments, the power control component 110 is configured to trigger the DC pulses of power at frequencies around 0 Hz to 500 kHz. In some embodiments, the power control component 110 operates to provide DC pulses around 2 kKz to 50 kHz, and in other embodiments 10 Hz to 2 kHz, and in other implementations the power control component 110 operates to provide DC pulses around 10 Hz to 500 Hz. In one exemplary embodiment, the power control component delivers DC power pulses at a frequency of 60 Hz, and in yet other embodiments, the power control component 110 operates to provide DC pulses around 10 Hz to 50 Hz. And as discussed further herein, the power control component 110 is configured to provide either bipolar or unipolar pulses at much higher frequencies (e.g., 500 kHz) In many low frequency variations, the pulse width of each of the alternating power pulses is at least longer than the arc detection time of the DC power source 100. In other variations, the power controller 110 includes the arc management functionality to handle higher-frequency implementations.
In some embodiments, the pulse width of each of the bipolar and/or unipolar power pulses is shorter than a thermal time constant associated with one or more of the electrodes 140 to substantially prevent changes in temperature of one or more of the electrodes 140 that could affect deposition (e.g., uniformity, film quality, deposition rates). And in some variations, the pulses have characteristics (e.g., width, frequency, etc.) based on a thermal threshold condition. The thermal threshold condition can be associated with a component associated with the plasma sputtering chamber 130 (e.g., wiring, connectors, etc.) or an electrode 140 associated with the plasma sputtering chamber 130. For example, in some embodiments, the thermal threshold condition is defined to prevent a particular component associated with the plasma sputtering chamber 130 or electrode 140 from exceeding or falling below a specified temperature.
The power control component 110 in many embodiments includes one or more switches (not shown) such as, for example, an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and/or a control module (not shown). In some embodiments, the control module includes a control algorithm (e.g., open loop control algorithm or closed loop control algorithm) that is used in conjunction with one or more switches to produce DC power pulses according to pulse parameter values. In some embodiments, the pulse parameter values are accessed from a memory (not shown) associated with the power control component 110 and/or the DC power source 100.
In some embodiments, one or more of the functions of the power control component 110 are incorporated into the DC power source 100, and in other embodiments, one or more of the functions of the DC power source 100 are incorporated into the power control component 110. And in some variations, the modules disclosed herein are implemented by software, firmware and/or hardware that are dynamically modified and/or statically configured.
Referring next to
Switches 232, 234, 236, and 238 are alternately closed to apply power to electrodes 244 and 242 of the plasma sputtering chamber 240 in an alternating fashion such that a plasma is ignited and/or sustained in a plasma formation region 270. A substrate 260 is disposed within the plasma sputtering chamber 240 so that at least some material dislodged from the electrodes 242 and 244 by the plasma is deposited on the substrate 260 in a deposition layer 262 when the plasma is ignited and/or sustained in the plasma formation region 270. In some embodiments, at least two of the switches 232, 234, 236, and 238 are closed at substantially the same time (e.g., substantially simultaneously). The deposition layer 262, in some embodiments, is a thin-film transistor (TFT) deposition layer, but this is certainly not required and many other applications are contemplated.
By alternating current to the electrodes 242 and 244, one of the electrodes functions as a cathode for a period of time while the other functions as an anode during that period of time. For example, in a first state of operation, switches 232 and 236 are closed while switches 234 and 238 are open such that current flows from the DC power source 250 through electrode 242 and then through electrode 244. In this first state of operation, electrode 242 will be functioning as an anode while electrode 244 will be a functioning as a cathode. A plasma will be ignited and/or sustained in the plasma formation region 270 and the substrate 260 will be coated by material dislodged from electrode 242.
In a second state of operation, switches 234 and 238 are closed while switches 232 and 236 are open such that current flows from the DC power source 250 through electrode 244 and then through electrode 242. In this second state of operation, electrode 242 will be functioning as a cathode while electrode 244 will be a functioning as an anode. A plasma will be ignited and/or sustained in the plasma formation region 270 and the substrate 260 will be coated by material dislodged from electrode 244. In many embodiments, a control module 254 (e.g., a processor executing stored instructions) associated with the DC power source 250 is configured to trigger the switching of the switches 232, 234, 236, and 238 according to pulse parameter values. As discussed further herein, the power control component 230 need not operate in a bipolar manner, and in many modes of operation, the power control component provides unipolar pulses.
In some implementations, the electrodes 242 and 244 are separated by a space 220 that defines a volume 222 (shown in
The current discharge density in a volume such as volume 222 corresponds with ignition of a plasma within that volume. For example, a low current discharge density in the volume 222 corresponds with a low probability for ignition of a plasma within volume 222. In other words, the volume 222 can be defined such that the probability for ignition of high density plasma in the volume 222 is substantially lower than that in the plasma formation region 270. In some variations, the volume 222 is defined to satisfy a plasma formation criteria (e.g., threshold, condition) associated with the plasma formation region 270 and/or the volume 222. As discussed, an advantage of anodeless operation is the flexibility to alter the space 220 between the electrodes to effectuate desired sputtering characteristics.
The flow of current between the electrodes 242 and 244, and consequently plasma ignition, is modified using, for example, magnets (not shown) within the plasma chamber 240. For example, in some embodiments, the flow of current between the electrodes 242 and 244 is modified using one or more magnets or an electrically derived magnetic field to cause the current discharge, and thus the probability for plasma ignition, to be much higher in the plasma formation region 270 than in the volume 222.
In some embodiments, the size of the volume 222, process gas pressure, voltage applied to the electrodes, and/or direction of the magnetic field are defined to produce a specified ratio of current discharge density between the plasma formation region 270 and the volume 222. In some implementations, the spacing 220 is significantly smaller than a cathode dark space.
In some variations, the size of the spacing 220 is defined based on a target deposition profile (also referred to as a deposition profile target) associated with the deposition of material from the electrodes 242 and 244 on substrate 260 in the deposition layer 262. In other words, the electrodes 242 and 244 are positioned to achieve the target deposition profile and consequently define, at least in part, the spacing 220, and hence, the volume 222. In some embodiments, the target deposition profile is defined according to one or more deposition profile criteria (e.g., threshold, condition) associated with different locations (e.g., different spatial locations, different areas) associated with the deposition layer 262.
In some variations, for example, the space 220 and/or volume 222 are defined so that material deposited on the substrate 260 from the electrodes 242 and 244 in the deposition layer 262 will satisfy a set of deposition profile criteria (e.g., deposition uniformity criteria) associated with a thin-film transistor process. In some implementations, the target deposition profile includes a target chemical composition and/or a target thickness (e.g., substantially uniform thickness across the substrate 260).
The space 220 and/or volume 222 in many embodiments are defined to account for anisotropic sputtering from the electrodes 242 and 244. For example, the spacing 220 and volume 222 can be defined to reduce the effects of anisotropic sputtering to achieve a target deposition profile of the deposition layer 262 on the substrate 260.
In several embodiments, the spacing 220 (e.g., volume 222) and a distance 210 between the electrodes 242 and/or 244 and the substrate 260 are defined to achieve a particular target deposition profile on substrate 260. Decreasing the distance 210 between the electrodes 242 and/or 244 and the substrate 260, in many embodiments, increases the quality of the deposition layer 262 and/or increases the deposition rate of material from the electrodes 242 and/or 244. For example, in some embodiments, the space 220 (and volume 222) is decreased as the distance 210 is decreased to increase the uniformity of deposition on the substrate 260. In some embodiments, the space 220 (and volume 222) is increased as the distance 210 is decreased to increase the thickness uniformity of the deposition layer 262 on the substrate 260. In addition, process gas pressure cal also be adjusted to achieve desired uniformity and film properties.
Moreover, in some implementations the spacing 220 between the electrodes 242 and 244 is defined based on a pressure threshold condition. For example, in some embodiments, the electrodes 242 and 244 are positioned such that the probability of forming a plasma in volume 220 is minimized, based on the range of expected process gas species and pressures. Initiation of a plasma is dependent on the gas pressure and spacing of the electrodes and as such this may be optimized to reduce the probability of plasma formation.
In addition to the benefit of having more flexible electrode spacing as compared to prior art DC processing techniques, because the DC power pulses in many embodiments are delivered at an ultra-low frequency, the probability of heating of the substrate 260 is lower than that in an analogous AC powered system where, for example, stochastic heating of the substrate 260 can be a prevalent issue. Consequently, the distance 210 between the electrodes 242 and/or 244 and the substrate 260, in some embodiments, is smaller than that in an analogous AC powered system. By decreasing the distance 210, as compared with analogous AC power systems, the deposition profile of the deposition layer 262 can be more readily controlled and film properties can be improved.
And in some embodiments applying alternating DC power pulses, the pulses are delivered at an ultra-low frequency and the electrodes 242 and 244 are inherently both anodes and cathodes; thus, the necessity for anode cooling and plasma sputtering chamber 240 cooling is substantially reduced or eliminated in some embodiments.
In addition to spacing the electrodes 242, 244 to affect a deposition profile, the spacing 220, in some embodiments, is defined such that a probability for arcing or shorting between the electrodes 242 and 244 is substantially close to zero or maintained at an acceptably low level (e.g., below a maximum level) according to, for example, an arcing level criteria (e.g., threshold, condition). If arcing or shorting between the electrodes 242 and 244 occurs, formation of a plasma in the plasma formation region 270 can be detrimentally affected, but in some applications, a low level of arcing between the electrodes 242 and 244 can be tolerated.
In some embodiments, the space 220 and/or volume 222 between the electrodes 242 and 244 is defined so that arcing (e.g., number of arcs, arc current) can be maintained at a specified level without substantially affecting a target deposition profile of a deposition layer 262 on the substrate 260. For example, in some embodiments, the volume 222 is defined so that arcing will be below a specified level and one or more target deposition criteria will be satisfied.
Although decreasing the spacing 220 (e.g., volume 222) between the electrodes 242 and 244, in many embodiments, promotes increased uniformity across the deposition layer 262 (e.g., uniform thickness across the deposition layer 262) and decreases the probability for formation of unwanted plasma between the electrodes 242 and 244, the probability for undesirable arcing between the electrodes 242 and 244 is increased. As a consequence, the spacing 220 between the electrodes 242 and 244 is defined to satisfy (e.g., balance) one or more deposition profile criteria, one or more arcing level criteria, and/or one or more plasma formation criteria.
Although volume 222 is shown in
As shown, the positive DC pulses 410 have a pulse width 482 (e.g., pulse duration) and the negative DC pulses 420 have a pulse width 484. The positive pulses 410 have a pulse height 486 of +z and the negative pulses 420 have a pulse height 488 of −z. In some embodiments, the positive pulses 410 and the negative pulses 420 have the same or different voltage levels. The duty cycle of the positive pulses 410 is defined as the duration of a positive pulse 482 divided by the duration of a cycle 478 (e.g., pulse width of a positive pulse plus the pulse width of a negative pulse). And the duty cycle of the negative DC pulses 420 is defined as the duration of a negative pulse 484 divided by the duration of a cycle 478.
In many embodiments, each of the pulse widths 482 of the positive pulses 410 and the pulse widths 484 of the negative pulses 420 are defined to have a duration longer than a response time of a control loop (e.g., proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control loop, open loop control loop) associated with the DC power supply (e.g., DC power supply 170) to allow for time to accurately produce the DC power pulses 410 and 420.
Although not required, in some embodiments, each of the pulse widths 482 of the positive DC pulses 410 and the pulse widths 484 of the negative DC power pulses 420 are defined to have a duration that is longer than the arc detection time of a DC power supply and/or a duration that is shorter than a thermal time constant associated with an electrode (e.g., edge electrode near the edge of a substrate) to substantially prevent changes in temperature of the electrode that could affect deposition (e.g., uniformity of the deposition, deposition rate).
As shown in
To achieve a substantially instantaneous change between, for example, a negative DC pulse 420 and a positive DC pulse 410, one or more switches within a DC power supply such as that shown in
As shown in
It should be recognized that the magnitude of the pulses may vary depending upon the particular application. In the context of applying power as part of an ion source for example, the voltages may be 3000 Volts. By way of further example, in the context of bipolar pulses, the voltage may be between +/−3000 Volts. And in unipolar applications discussed further herein, the voltage may range between 0 and a positive 3000 Volts or 0 and a negative 3000 Volts. It should also be recognized that the depiction of negative or positive voltages herein is merely exemplary and that voltages that are depicted as negative may also be generated as positive voltages, and voltages that are depicted as positive voltages may be generated as negative voltages.
In some embodiments of the invention, the transition time period is substantially greater than zero. For example,
Referring back to
Even with a duty cycle that has a transition time period greater than zero such as that shown in
In some embodiments, the pulse widths 482 and 484, transition time period 430, pulse heights 486 and 488, and/or duty cycles, etc. are defined by pulse parameter values that are stored in a memory and/or accessed by a processor associated with the DC power supply or a component of a DC power supply (e.g., power control component 110 and/or DC power source 100). And these pulse parameter values may define the positive DC power pulses 410 and/or the negative DC power pulses 420.
The DC power supply 170, in some variations, is configured to reverse the polarity of a pulse to extinguish an arc in response to detecting the arc. In some embodiments, the DC power supply 170 is configured to deliver more than one positive DC pulse subsequent to another positive DC pulse or deliver more than one negative DC pulse subsequent to another negative DC pulse when delivering alternating power pulses.
Referring next to
Although certainly not required, in several embodiments, chamber 710 is configured to enable the substrate 720 to remain static during deposition of layer 722, and pulses are applied to the electrodes 730 to effectuate deposition of a deposition layer 722 in accordance with a target deposition profile 768 (e.g., a desired morphology (e.g., topology), thickness, resistance, optical property, film stress, density, crystallinity and/or adhesion, etc.) on the stationary substrate 720.
In many embodiments for example, power to one or more of the electrodes 730 is modulated to enable differential sputtering between the electrodes. In this way, the target deposition profile 768 may be achieved without moving the substrate 720 to accomplish a desired deposition profile. As a consequence, unlike prior art techniques that rely on motion of the substrate 720 to deposit the layer 722 with a desired profile 768, several embodiments of the present invention enable static-substrate deposition, which reduces the likelihood of undesirable particles being generated by the conveyer mechanism and undesirably transported to the surface of a moving substrate; thus reducing the likelihood of arcing and impurities in the layer 722.
For clarity,
In the exemplary embodiment depicted in
As shown in
In many variations, the DC pulses that are applied to each of the electrodes 730 are produced according to pulse parameter values (e.g., parameter values defining duty cycle, pulse width, pulse magnitude, etc.) that are defined to effectuate sputtering that produces the deposition profile 768. In many implementations for example, the DC pulses (e.g., negative DC pulses and/or positive DC pulses) that are applied to the electrodes 752 and 754 are coordinated to achieve substantially uniform deposition (e.g., without the tapered deposition profile) at the edge of the substrate 720.
For example, the time that electrode 752 is functioning as a cathode may be greater than the time that electrode 754 functions as a cathode. Also, the power level of DC power pulses delivered to electrode 752 while functioning as a cathode may be greater than the power level of DC power pulses delivered to electrode 754 while electrode 754 functions as a cathode.
As shown,
For example, starting at time P1 a positive DC pulse at a voltage of +x is delivered to electrode 752 from DC power supply 740 for period of time 882 and a negative DC pulse at a voltage of −x is delivered to electrode 754 for period of time 882. Similarly, starting at time P2 a negative DC pulse at a voltage of −y is delivered to electrode 752 from DC power supply 740 for period of time 884 and a negative DC pulse at a voltage of +y is delivered to electrode 754 for period of time 884.
In this embodiment, the total power delivered by the DC power supply 740 is smaller during time period 884 than during time period 882. By delivering positive DC pulses at higher power levels and for longer periods of time when electrode 752 is functioning as a cathode, the deposition rate near the edge of the substrate 720 (e.g., deposition rate corresponding with electrode 752) will be higher than the deposition rate corresponding with electrode 754.
Referring back to
The relative distance, in some variations, of an electrode to the substrate 720 and/or deposition layer 722 is different than another electrode. For example, electrode 752 and electrode 754 can be different distances from the substrate 720 to facilitate deposition of a particular deposition profile such as a uniform target deposition profile. And in some embodiments, the pulses (e.g., duty cycles) applied to an electrode is defined based on the distances of the electrode from the substrate 720 and/or deposition layer 722.
In some embodiments, a size (e.g., width, height), a shape (e.g., annular, rectangular), and/or a composition (e.g., specific chemical composition of metal, metallic compound, or ceramic) of one or more of the electrodes 730 is defined to facilitate deposition of a particular deposition profile. In some embodiments, one or more of the electrodes 730 can be a different size, shape, and/or composition than another of the electrodes 730. In some embodiments, one or more of the pulses (e.g., duty cycles) applied to an electrode are defined based on the size, shape, and/or composition of the electrodes.
In some embodiments, two of the electrodes 730 include different materials (e.g., different target materials), and DC pulses may be defined and applied (e.g., defined using pulse parameter values) to the electrodes 730 constructed of different materials to achieve a deposition layer 722 of a particular chemical composition (e.g., specified stoichiometry). One example is combining Indium and Tin target materials with Oxygen and Argon gas to metallic sputter Indium Tin Oxide. This type of sputtering, in some variations, is referred to as co-sputtering, and this technique is attractive because it can be used to deposit films with controlled mixtures of materials. This can be done to control stoichiometry or because a compound target material is difficult to sputter or expensive and/or difficult to create. As another example, Al2O3 can be deposited with a refractive index of about 1.66 and TiO2 can be deposited with a refractive index of about 2.4. A reactive co-sputtering process with an Al target and a Ti target and oxygen as the reactive gas is capable in principle of depositing films with a refractive index between 1.66 and 2.4.
In many embodiments electrodes 730 in the embodiment depicted in
By way of further example, in some variations, DC power supplies 740, 742 are configured to deliver DC pulses such that electrodes 754 and 756 are not functioning as cathodes at the same time to avoid simultaneously depositing material from both of the electrodes 754 and 756 at location 774. In some variations, DC power supplies 740 and 742 are configured to deliver DC power pulses such that electrodes 754 and 756 are functioning as cathodes or as anodes at the same time.
Although in this embodiment the electrodes 730 receive pulses from two different DC power supplies 740, 742, in some embodiments, the electrodes received power pulses from a single DC power supply that includes, for example, a multi-phase bridge in a power control component that controls and/or defines the distribution of power in DC pulses. This type of arrangement can be referred to as a multiple magnetron arrangement, and in some implementations, the electrodes 730 receive DC power pulses from more than two DC power supplies (e.g., one DC power supply for each electrode). And in other embodiments DC pulses are defined/coordinated between non-adjacent electrodes.
A processor 936 is configured to receive the feedback signal from the sensor 940 and trigger modification of one or more DC pulses applied by DC power supply 930 to the plasma sputtering chamber 910 based on the feedback signal. The plasma sputtering chamber 910 is used to sputter a deposition layer 922 on a substrate 920 disposed within the plasma sputtering chamber 910. In some embodiments, the deposition layer 922 is associated with a thin-film transistor process. Although the sensor 940 is depicted within the chamber 910, this is certainly not required, and one of ordinary skill will appreciate that the sensor 940 in some instances may be located outside of the chamber.
In some embodiments, the processor 936 is configured to query the sensor 940 for a feedback signal. In some embodiments, the sensor 940 is configured to send a feedback signal to the processor 936 when a change in, for example, a sensor measurement value (e.g., voltage signal) associated with the sensor 940 is detected. In some embodiments, the processor 936 is configured to periodically or randomly receive a feedback signal from the sensor 940 and trigger one or more changes in DC power pulses delivered by the DC power supply 930 when a change (e.g., change that exceeds a threshold condition) in a monitored parameter occurs.
In some embodiments, the sensor 940 is a thickness monitoring device (e.g., electrical and/or optical measuring device) configured to monitor the thickness of the deposition layer 922 and send information indicative of the thickness to the processor 936. In some embodiments, the sensor 940 is configured to monitor a portion (e.g., specified area, specific location) of the thickness of the deposition layer 922, and based on the information from the sensor, the processor 936 is configured to modulate the power that the DC power supply 930 applies to one or more of the electrodes 952, 954, 956. In some implementations, the processor 936 is configured to modify one or more pulse parameter values used to define one or more of the DC pulses. In some implementations, the sensor 940 is a pressure sensor, a deposition rate sensor, conductivity sensor or a temperature sensor.
In some embodiments, multiple sensors (not shown) are configured to send feedback signals to the processor 936, and the processor 936 is configured to change the DC pulses based on the combination of the feedback signals. In some implementations, one or more of the feedback signals are associated with different spatial locations of the deposition layer 922 and the processor 936 is configured to modify DC pulses corresponding with each of the spatial locations if necessary.
In some implementations, the processor 936 is configured to change (e.g., modify) or trigger a change in a pulse parameter value (e.g., stored in a memory (not shown)) associated with a DC pulse to cause a change in a DC pulse based on one or more feedback signals (e.g., deposition rate feedback signal, temperature feedback signal, pressure feedback signal). For example, the processor 936 may be configured to select one or more sets of pulse parameter values stored in a memory from a library of pulse parameter values based on one or more feedback signals from one or more sensors. In some alternative embodiments, the processor 936 is configured to calculate characteristics of a DC pulse that should be applied to one or more electrodes (e.g., based upon feedback from the sensor 940) using equations (e.g., an algorithm) stored in a memory. The DC power pulses, in some implementations, are modified by changing and/or managing (e.g., controlling) the current, duty cycle, and/or voltage to one or more of the electrodes 952, 954, 956.
As an example, in some embodiments data related to the DC pulses is collected and used to calculate an average sputter power for one or more of the electrodes 952, 954, 956, and the DC pulses are modified to maintain a specified average sputter power over a specified period of time. The specified average sputter power is, in many embodiments, associated with one or more electrodes, and in some embodiments, an average sputter power threshold or average sputter power condition is defined based on a desired target deposition profile.
Although the processor 936 is shown as a stand-alone component in
As shown in
As depicted, during the second time period 1004, the pulse width 1042 of the positive DC pulses 1040 is greater than the pulse width 1022 of positive pulses 1020 during the first time period 1002 and the pulse height B of the pulses during the second time period 1004 is less than the pulse height A of the of positive pulses 1020 during the first time period 1002.
Referring next to
As depicted, in some embodiments a pulse parameter value is defined for at least one electrode within a plasma sputtering chamber based on the target deposition profile (Block 1110). The pulse parameter value is defined to cause deposition according to the target deposition profile. As discussed, in some embodiments, pulse parameter values may be calculated during deposition and in other embodiments pulse parameter values may be predefined and accessed from a table.
Once a pulse parameter value is defined, a DC pulse is applied to the electrode based on the pulse parameter value, and a plasma is ignited within the plasma sputtering chamber in response to the DC pulse (Blocks 1120 and 1130).
As shown, once the plasma is ignited, the deposition layer is formed on the substrate within the plasma sputtering chamber (Block 1140). As previously discussed above, in many embodiments, while the deposition layer is formed, the substrate is statically maintained in substantially one position, and in other embodiments, the substrate is moved during deposition.
As depicted in
In response to the feedback from the chamber, in many implementations, the pulse parameter value is modified based on the received information and the desired target deposition profile (Block 1160). For example, if the property is a chemical composition and the information indicates that the chemical composition of the deposition layer is different than that specified target property associated with the target deposition profile, the pulse parameter value may be modified to cause sputtering that will satisfy the target property associated with the target deposition profile. As shown, after the pulse parameter value has been modified (Block 1160), a DC pulse is applied to the electrode based on the modified pulse parameter value (Block 1170).
Referring next to
Also shown are a power source and a plasma chamber that are coupled to the power controller. The power source in this embodiment may be either a voltage source or a current source, and it is contemplated that the power source may include multiple power supplies that operate at power levels that may be determined by factors such as the processing application, power supply availability, control considerations, etc.
As depicted, the electrodes in the chamber may be realized in a variety of different ways depending upon the desired effects within the chamber. In some implementations, there are multiple electrodes, which may be operated as both anodes and cathodes (e.g., bipolar modes of operation). And in other implementations, one electrode may operate as a cathode while another electrode may function as an anode (e.g., in a unipolar mode of operation). In addition, it is certainly contemplated that the chamber itself may function as an electrode (e.g., an anode).
Referring next to
As depicted, D1, D2, R3 L1 and C1 are part of the plasma current injector, and I1 and R2 represent components of the power source (e.g., the power source of an ASCENT power supply supplied by Advanced Energy Industries, Inc). Components S1 and V1 represent the switching components (e.g., IGBTs arranged in an H-bridge), and R1 and C2 represent a plasma load. While referring to
As depicted, effects of the current injector may be seen by noticing that the current is not a value of zero immediately following a voltage transition. In the waveform depicted in
Injection of additional current into the plasma immediately after a voltage transition can result in a significant deposition process advantage, and beneficially, the magnitude and duration of current injection may be programmed by adjusting the values of L1 and C1.
Referring next to
In many implementations, an H-bridge is a basic switching cell of the power controller. The operation of this cell is defined by technology limitations of the switching elements, and in order to increase the overall capabilities of the power controller, the N cells are integrated to interoperate. For example, operating the switching the cells in an interleaved mode allows an increase in switching frequency that is approximated by a multiple of the number of switching cells. (e.g., the N cells allows a maximum frequency to increase to fmax=fmaxsingle×N).
Switching in a parallel mode also increase the total output power of the box by a factor of “M” (having “M” paralleled switching cells) Po-total=M×Po-single.
It is possible to have a combination of the two modes and tailor the operation of the system to address specific frequency and power requirements. For example, having “M×N” cells would allow system to run “M” paralleled cells interleaved “N” times, operating at frequency fmax=fmaxsingle×N and providing output power Po-total=M×Po-single.
Referring next to
In addition, the duty cycle of the applied pulses may be adjusted to control film growth properties. For example, film growth can be modified by the average and peak power density on a cathode. And the off time of the plasma may also affect the growth. As a consequence, the duty cycle variability that is enabled by this architecture can be optimized for desired film growth and properties such as stress, optical transmission, and resistance. In addition, as discussed further herein, the frequency of the applied pulses may also be adjusted to achieve desired processing effects such as film growth properties and arc rates.
As shown, voltage and current are sensed at the output of the DC power supply to enable changes in plasma impedance, which is indicative of various processing effects (e.g., film properties and sputtering rate), to be monitored and utilized as an input to control the frequency and/or duty cycle to arrive at one or more desired processing effects.
Referring next to
In operation, during an arc condition, current ramps up through the inductor L1 as a time dependent function of the voltage across the inductor L1 during this interval. For example, the voltage across the inductor during this interval may be approximately 250 Volts in the case of the capacitance of C1 being equal to the capacitance of C2 and with a plasma process voltage of 600V resulting in each capacitor being charged to 300 Volts (half the process voltage) minus an arc voltage of about 50 Volts.
After an arc condition, current ramps down through the inductor as a time dependent function of the voltage across the inductor during this interval. The voltage across the inductor during this interval is approximately 300 Volts (half of the process voltage and the voltage drop across D1 and D2). It has been found that the maximum sustainable arc rate to avoid current ramp up with the exemplary snubber is approximately 22 kHz.
A beneficial feature of the exemplary snubber is that, in the case of repetitive arcing conditions, the snubber increasingly contributes less energy to the plasma load during each subsequent arc. The primary mechanism contributing to this effect is that the voltage across C2 is decreasing as charge from C2 is transferred into the plasma arc via the inductor.
Referring to
With respect to film properties, the impedance can relate to film growth characteristics such as crystallinity or stoichiometry. These relate to the measured performance of the film and include items such as film resistivity, optical properties (reflection, absorption, transmission), and film stress, etc. There is evidence that certain materials, such as ITO, exhibit lower resistance during low temperature deposition if the sputter voltage (impedance) is lower. And in connection with deposition rate, there are two main reasons that impedance can be related to deposition rate. The first is that if the voltage is sufficient for sputtering, then the deposition rate is proportional to electric current. As impedance is lowered the current increases for a given output power.
In addition, arc rates affect plasma impedance. During a reactive process there are significantly higher arc rates when the process is in the oxide or poisoned mode. The arc rates are reduced when operating in metal mode (oxygen or reactive gas deficient). As there is an impedance change between metal and poisoned modes of operation the control (reduction) of arc rate can be achieved by monitoring and maintaining a desired impedance.
As one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, the impedance of the plasma may be calculated by having any two values of power, current, and voltage at the output of the power supply.
As shown, responsive to the monitored impedance, a frequency of the DC power pulses is adjusted, if needed, to alter the status of the processing effect (Block 1920). A pulsed plasma (and the frequency thereof) affects film properties due to the removal and/or reversal of power (voltage) to the plasma. During the off time there can be a change in the film growth and structure which can alter many film performance properties. And a reversal in voltage (e.g., during each cycle) may clear charge build up on the target surface and may also drive ions into the substrate that will also affect film growth. Energetic ions that bombard the substrate may remove weakly bonded material, increase packing density, damage the film, etc. The film density and crystal structure, which are affected by the frequency of applied power, may affect performance in stress, resistance, etc.
In some modes of operation, the arc rate is monitored (Block 1930), and the frequency of the applied power is increased until the arc rate diminishes to an acceptable level (Block 1940). For example, a desirable processing effect (e.g., film stress or resistance) may be monitored (e.g., by monitoring plasma impedance), and the frequency of the applied power may be increased to reduce the arc rate without adversely affecting the desirable processing affect.
In addition to monitoring impedance (or instead of monitoring impedance), in some modes of operation, closed loop control may be implemented that utilizes a sensor to detect a processing effect. For example, optical characteristics of a deposited film may be measured using known techniques such as a plasma emission monitor (which detects the color aspect or stoichiometry of the plasma), an oxygen sensor (which electrically detects oxygen content in the chamber by means of a catalytic reaction), or a photospectrometer (which measures the film performance by optically measuring reflection or transmission of the film).
In some exemplary modes of operation, closed loop control may be used to maintain a working point for reactive sputtering. For example, DC pulses may be applied to operate a cathode in a plasma chamber that initially only includes a noble gas such as Argon. And then a percentage of gaseous diatomic oxygen in the processing chamber is increased in small increments (e.g., one percent in each increment). At each of these incremental steps, the process voltage may be documented and one or more processing effects (e.g., deposition rate, optical characteristic, stress, resistance, etc.) may be measured.
From this data, a “working point” may be defined based upon one or more desired processing effects. For example, the working point may be a point where the deposition rate and the status of a particular film property are desirable, and at this working point, both the percentage of diatomic oxygen in the chamber and the process voltage may be captured and stored. And then the frequency of the applied power may be increased or decreased in order to increase or decrease the working voltage to maintain a stable process.
Referring next to
Referring next to
In this mode of operation, it is possible to interleave/cycle t2 and t4 to reduce the switching loss per switch, and can be implemented with full voltage reversal (t2 becomes t3, and t4 becomes W.
Referring next to
In the context of ceramic targets, for example, nodule formation is almost always a concern. These nodules are typically oxide regions that are thought to be due to preferential sputtering of target materials that result from inclusions and insulative target regions. And the addition of oxygen to the process increases the likelihood of nodules. In solar film deposition, Aluminum doped zinc oxide (AZO) is particularly sensitive to nodule formation.
In addition, in order to avoid sputtering the chamber walls when the reverse-potential 2109 is at a high level, the reverse-potential 2109 may be applied for a duration 2108 that is relatively short. As depicted, a cycle 2112 of the exemplary waveform also includes a sputtering portion 2106 (during which sputtering occurs) and a recovery portion 2110 during which there is generally insufficient energy to support sputtering.
While referring to
As shown, during a reverse-potential portion 2109 of the cycle 2112, a positive potential is applied to the cathode for a second time duration 2108 that is less than the first time duration of the sputtering portion 2106 of the cycle 2112. A magnitude 2102 of the positive potential that is applied during the reverse-potential portion 2109 of the cycle 2112 is at least twenty percent of the magnitude 2104 of the negative potential (Block 2410). For example, if the magnitude 2104 of the negative potential that is applied during the sputtering portion 2106 of the cycle 2112 is 500 Volts, the magnitude 2102 of the positive potential during the reverse-potential portion 2109 of the cycle 2112 is at least 100 Volts. In contrast, prior techniques for applying a reverse-potential (e.g., for charge clearing) applied a positive potential that was substantially less than twenty percent of the magnitude of a negative sputtering voltage.
In other modes of operation, the magnitude 2102 of the positive potential is at least thirty percent of the magnitude 2104 of the negative potential that is applied during the sputtering portion 2106 of the cycle. And in yet other implementations, good results have been achieved when the magnitude 2102 of the positive potential is one hundred percent of the magnitude 2104 of the negative potential that is applied during the sputtering portion 2106 of the cycle. For example, substantial if not complete reduction of nodule formation has been achieved when the positive potential during the reverse-potential portion 2109 of the cycle 2112 is at least 500 Volts and the negative potential that is applied during the sputtering portion 2106 of the cycle 2112 is 500 Volts.
As shown, during a recovery portion 2110 of the cycle 2112, a recovery potential is applied for a third time duration that has a magnitude that is less than the magnitude 2104 of the negative potential applied during the sputtering portion 2106 and is less than the magnitude 2102 of the positive potential that is applied during the reverse-potential portion 2109 of the cycle 2112 (Block 2420). Thus, the cycle 2112 of the exemplary waveform includes three portions: the sputtering portion 2106, the reverse-potential portion 2109 and the recovery portion 2110. Although it is contemplated that other potentials may be applied during the cycle 2112 (to create more than three portions during a cycle), it has been found that control over the duration of each of these three portions 2106, 2109, 2110 enables a level of process control that was previously unavailable.
For example, the duration of the sputtering portion 2106 may be changed to affect the sputtering rate, the duration of the reverse-potential portion 2109 may be adjusted as needed to reduce nodule formation, and the recovery portion 2110 may be adjusted to achieve one or more desired film properties. And as discussed previously herein, the overall duration (and hence frequency) of the cycle 2112 may be varied to achieve desired processing effects such as arc management, film properties, and sputtering rate. In general, the frequency of the cycle is typically between zero and 350 kHz, but frequencies around 150 kHz have been found to provide a reasonable balance of desired processing effects.
Although the relative durations of the each of these three portions 2106, 2109, 2110 is certainly adjustable, in general the combined duration of the reverse-potential portion 2109 and the recovery portion 2110 is less than fifty percent of the duration of the cycle 2112, and in some implementations the combined duration of the reverse-potential portion 2109 and the recovery portion 2110 is approximately ten percent of the duration of the cycle 2112. In terms of time, for example, the reverse-potential portion 2109 is typically between one and ten microseconds and the recovery time is typically between zero and 20 microseconds.
As depicted, the exemplary switch sequence only requires one on/off transition per switch per period. And it should be noted that it is possible to reduce switching loss by cycling the t3 clamp period between the 1-2 and 0-3 switch pairs as shown.
Referring next to
Some embodiments relate to a computer storage product with a computer-readable medium (also referred to as a processor-readable medium) having instructions or computer code thereon for performing various computer-implemented operations. The media and computer code (also referred to as code) may be those specially designed and constructed for the specific purpose or purposes.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that embodiments described herein may be realized by a combination of hardware, firmware, software and a combination thereof. In some embodiments, non-transitory processor-readable media is utilized to store encoded instructions to effectuate processes described herein. Examples of processor-readable media include, but are not limited to: magnetic storage media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical storage media such as Compact Disc/Digital Video Discs (“CD/DVDs”), Compact Disc-Read Only Memories (“CD-ROMs”), and holographic devices; magneto-optical storage media such as floptical disks; carrier wave signals; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and execute program code, such as Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (“ASICs”), Programmable Logic Devices (“PLDs”), and ROM and RAM devices.
Examples of computer code include, but are not limited to, micro-code or micro-instructions, machine instructions, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher-level instructions that are executed by a computer using an interpreter. For example, an embodiment of the invention may be implemented using Java, C++, or other object-oriented programming language and development tools. Additional examples of computer code include, but are not limited to, control signals, encrypted code, and compressed code.
In conclusion, the disclosure describes, among other things, methods and apparatus for plasma-based sputtering deposition using a DC power. Those skilled in the art can readily recognize that numerous variations and substitutions may be made in the invention, its use and its configuration to achieve substantially the same results as achieved by the embodiments described herein. Accordingly, there is no intention to limit the invention to the disclosed exemplary forms. Many variations, modifications and alternative constructions fall within the scope and spirit of the disclosed invention.
Claims
1. A method for applying pulsed DC power to a plasma processing chamber, the method comprising:
- applying a negative potential to a cathode during a sputtering portion of a particular cycle of the pulsed DC power for a first time duration, the negative potential having a magnitude, whereby the application of the negative potential effectuates sputtering;
- applying, during a reverse-potential portion of the particular cycle, a positive potential to the cathode for a second time duration that is less than the first time duration, a magnitude of the positive potential is the same as the magnitude of the negative potential; and
- applying, during a recovery portion of the particular cycle, a recovery potential for a third time duration that has a magnitude that is less than the magnitude of the negative potential and is less than the magnitude of the positive potential; wherein
- the sum of the second and third time durations is less than the first time duration;
- the sum of the second and third time durations is less than ten percent of the particular cycle; and
- the second duration is less than ten percent of the particular cycle and at least one microsecond.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the second duration is less than 10 microseconds.
3. A power supply comprising:
- a power control component in communication a direct current power source and configured to direct the power to at least one electrode with an alternating polarity according to processor readable instructions; and
- a non-transitory, tangible computer readable storage medium, encoded with the processor readable instructions to perform a method for applying power, the method comprising: applying a negative potential to a cathode during a sputtering portion of a particular cycle of the pulsed DC power for a first time duration, the negative potential having a magnitude, whereby the application of the negative potential effectuates sputtering; applying, during a reverse-potential portion of the particular cycle, a positive potential to the cathode for a second time duration that is less than the first time duration, a magnitude of the positive potential is the same as the magnitude of the negative potential; and applying, during a recovery portion of the particular cycle, a recovery potential for a third time duration that has a magnitude that is less than the magnitude of the negative potential and is less than the magnitude of the positive potential; wherein the sum of the second and third time durations is less than the first time duration; the sum of the second and third time durations is less than ten percent of the particular cycle; and the second duration is less than ten percent of the particular cycle and at least one microsecond.
4. The power supply of claim 3, wherein the second duration is less than 10 microseconds.
4595482 | June 17, 1986 | Mintz |
5015493 | May 14, 1991 | Gruen |
5303139 | April 12, 1994 | Mark |
5383980 | January 24, 1995 | Melber et al. |
5427669 | June 27, 1995 | Drummond |
5576939 | November 19, 1996 | Drummond |
5651865 | July 29, 1997 | Sellers |
5660700 | August 26, 1997 | Shimizu et al. |
5681393 | October 28, 1997 | Takagi |
5718813 | February 17, 1998 | Drummond et al. |
5777863 | July 7, 1998 | Kowalevskii et al. |
5855745 | January 5, 1999 | Manley |
5917286 | June 29, 1999 | Scholl et al. |
6001224 | December 14, 1999 | Drummond |
6005218 | December 21, 1999 | Walde et al. |
6007879 | December 28, 1999 | Scholl |
6024844 | February 15, 2000 | Drummond et al. |
6051114 | April 18, 2000 | Yao et al. |
6063245 | May 16, 2000 | Frach et al. |
6093293 | July 25, 2000 | Haag et al. |
6171454 | January 9, 2001 | Weber et al. |
6217717 | April 17, 2001 | Drummond et al. |
6222321 | April 24, 2001 | Scholl et al. |
6338777 | January 15, 2002 | Longstreth White |
6340416 | January 22, 2002 | Goedicke et al. |
6344419 | February 5, 2002 | Forster et al. |
6350353 | February 26, 2002 | Gopalraja et al. |
6359424 | March 19, 2002 | Iida et al. |
6368477 | April 9, 2002 | Scholl |
6413382 | July 2, 2002 | Wang et al. |
6521099 | February 18, 2003 | Drummond et al. |
6522076 | February 18, 2003 | Goedicke et al. |
6527918 | March 4, 2003 | Goeckner et al. |
6532161 | March 11, 2003 | Kovalevskii et al. |
6567278 | May 20, 2003 | Rufer et al. |
6582566 | June 24, 2003 | List et al. |
6633017 | October 14, 2003 | Drummond et al. |
6735099 | May 11, 2004 | Mark |
6808607 | October 26, 2004 | Christie |
6853142 | February 8, 2005 | Chistyakov |
6863785 | March 8, 2005 | Shidoji et al. |
6872289 | March 29, 2005 | Mizuno et al. |
7247221 | July 24, 2007 | Stowell, Jr. |
7678239 | March 16, 2010 | Haag et al. |
8133359 | March 13, 2012 | Nauman et al. |
20020189938 | December 19, 2002 | Baldwin et al. |
20030209423 | November 13, 2003 | Christie |
20050006226 | January 13, 2005 | Baldwin et al. |
20050103620 | May 19, 2005 | Chistakov |
20050167263 | August 4, 2005 | Chistyakov |
20060016560 | January 26, 2006 | Yokogawa et al. |
20060027451 | February 9, 2006 | Park et al. |
20060278518 | December 14, 2006 | Kouznetsov |
20060279223 | December 14, 2006 | Chistyakov |
20090127101 | May 21, 2009 | Nauman et al. |
20110248633 | October 13, 2011 | Nauman et al. |
20120171390 | July 5, 2012 | Nauman et al. |
3538494 | July 1987 | DE |
2001-505622 | April 2001 | JP |
2006-117995 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-249473 | September 2006 | JP |
2006-299412 | November 2006 | JP |
2007-277638 | October 2007 | JP |
1020060052883 | May 2006 | KR |
9416458 | July 1994 | WO |
9423440 | October 1994 | WO |
9631899 | October 1996 | WO |
9742647 | November 1997 | WO |
2004106582 | September 2004 | WO |
2011143331 | November 2011 | WO |
- Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Chinese Office Action re Application No. 200880123933.2”, Mar. 21, 2013, p. 13, Published in: US.
- Shusaku Yamamoto, “Response to Japanese Office Action re Application No. 2010-534232”, Feb. 18, 2013, p. 17, Published in: JP.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Korean Office Action re Appl No. 10-2010-7011346”, Jun. 2, 2014, p. 17, Published in: KR.
- McDonald, Rodney Glenn, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,937”, Jun. 3, 2014, p. 43, Published in: US.
- McDonald, Rodney Glenn, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,937”, Jun. 4, 2013, p. 30, Published in: US.
- Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,937”, Mar. 26, 2013, p. 7, Published in: US.
- Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,937”, Jul. 31, 2013, p. 7, Published in: US.
- McDonald, Rodney Glen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,548”, May 4, 2011, Published in: US.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, “International Search Report and Written Opinion re Application No. PCT/US08/83640”, Jun. 26, 2009, Published in: KR.
- Williams, James, “International Search Report and Written Opinion re Application No. PCT/US11/036100”, Aug. 2, 2011, Published in: AU.
- Carniglia, C.K., “Method for Calculating the Sputter Distribution from a C-MAG Cylindrical Target in the Presence of Gas Scattering”, “39th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings”, 1996, pp. 211-216, Publisher: Society of Vacuum Coaters, Published in: US.
- Glaser, H.J., et al., “History of Glass Coating for Architectural Glazing”, “50th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings”, 2007, pp. 216-229, Publisher: Society of Vacuum Coaters, Published in: US.
- Heister, U., et al., “New Developments in the Field of MF-Sputtering with Dual Magnetron to Obtain Higher Productivity for Large Area Coatings”, “41st Annual Technical Conference Proceedings”, 1998, pp. 187-192, Publisher: Society of Vacuum Coaters, Published in: US.
- Madocks, J., et al., “The Economic Advantages of Gap Reduction for an Architectural Glass Coater”, “43rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000”, pp. 133-136, Publisher: Society of Vacuum Coaters, Published in: US.
- McDonald, Rodney Glenn, “Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,548”, Oct. 4, 2011, p. 17, Published in: US.
- Schilling, H., “A New Plant Generation for Large Area Vacuum Coating of Architectural and Automotive Glass”, “42nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings”, 1999, pp. 186-190, Publisher: Society of Vacuum Coaters, Published in: US.
- CIPO, Office Action re Chinese Patent Application No. 200880123933.2, Jul. 3, 2012, p. 7, Published in: CN.
- CIPO, Office Action re Chinese Patent Application No. 200880123933.2, Oct. 10, 2011, p. 19, Published in: CN.
- CIPO, Office Action re Chinese Patent Application No. 200880123933.2, Dec. 27, 2012, p. 6, Published in: CN.
- Gruber, Stephen S., Response to Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2011 re Chinese Patent Application No. 200880123933.2, Feb. 23, 2012, p. 10, Published in: US.
- Gruber, Stephen S., Response to Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2012 re Chinese Patent Application No. 200880123993.2, Aug. 31, 2012, p. 6, Published in: US.
- Swiatek, R., Communication re European Search Report regarding Application No. 08850815.5, Jun. 28, 2012, p. 9, Published in: DE.
- Ayusawa, T., Office Action re Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-534232, Nov. 27, 2012, p. 8, Published in: JP.
- McDonald, Rodney Glenn, Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,548, Dec. 2, 2011, p. 23, Published in: US.
- McDonald, Rodney Glenn, Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/417,937, Dec. 26, 2012, p. 13, Published in: US.
- Becamel, Philippe, International Preliminary Report on Patentability re Application No. PCT/US11/36100, Nov. 22, 2012, p. 6, Published in: PCT.
- Gruber, Stephen S., Response to Office Action dated May 4, 2011 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,548, Oct. 4, 2011, p. 14, Published in: US.
- O'Dowd, Sean R., Response to Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2011 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/941,548, Dec. 8, 2011, p. 9, Published in: US.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Korean Office Action re Application No. 10-2012-7031226”, Sep. 30, 2014, p. 8, Published in: KR.
Type: Grant
Filed: May 10, 2011
Date of Patent: May 26, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20110248633
Assignee: Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (Fort Collins, CO)
Inventors: Kenneth E. Nauman (Fort Collins, CO), Kenneth Finley (Mead, CO), Skip B. Larson (Fort Collins, CO), Doug Pelleymounter (Northfield, MN)
Primary Examiner: Rodney McDonald
Application Number: 13/104,942
International Classification: C23C 14/34 (20060101); H01J 37/34 (20060101); C23C 14/54 (20060101); C23C 14/56 (20060101); H05H 1/46 (20060101);