Methods of and apparatus for accessing a process chamber using a dual zone gas injector with improved optical access
An injector provides optical access into a process chamber along an axial path from a diagnostic end point outside the process chamber through an optical access window. A hollow housing body receives first and second process gases, and surrounds the axial path. A sleeve in the body is urged against the body to minimize particle generation, and defines a first gas bore injecting the first process gas into the process chamber. A second gas bore of the sleeve surrounds the axial path for injecting the second process gas into the process chamber, allowing an optical signal to have a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the end point. Methods provide a septum in the second bore dividing the second bore into apertures configured to reduce etching of and deposition on the optical access window and to maintain the desired SNR at the diagnostic end point.
Latest Lam Research Corporation Patents:
- SENSORS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING TOOLS
- Process control for ion energy delivery using multiple generators and phase control
- Chemical etch nonvolatile materials for MRAM patterning
- Non-elastomeric, non-polymeric, non-metallic membrane valves for semiconductor processing equipment
- In-situ PECVD cap layer
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/472,017, filed Jun. 20, 2006 for “Apparatus For Shielding Process Chamber Port Having Dual Zone and Optical Access Features”, in the names of Fangli J. Hao, Leonard Sharpless, and Harmeet Singh (the “Second Prior Application”). The Second Prior Application was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/341,079, filed Jan. 26, 2006 for “Apparatus For Shielding Process Chamber Port” in the names of Fangli J. Hao, John E. Daugherty, and Allan K. Ronne (the “First Prior Application”). This application is also related to the First Prior Application. The disclosure of each of the First Prior Application and the Second Prior Application is incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND1. Field
The present invention relates generally to semiconductor manufacturing and, more particularly, to methods of and apparatus for accessing a process chamber, wherein the access may be optical access through an optical access window, and protection of the optical access window from damage due to conditions originating in the process chamber is facilitated by an improved two-piece configuration of an injector.
2. Description of the Related Art
Vacuum processing chambers have been used for etching materials from substrates and for deposition of materials onto substrates. The substrates have been semiconductor wafers, for example. U.S. Pat. No. 6,230,651 to Ni et al. issued May 15, 2001 (assigned to Lam Research Corporation, the assignee of the present application) is incorporated herein by reference and illustrates an opening, or port, in a dielectric chamber window at a top of a processing chamber to provide access to an interior of the processing chamber, for etching and other processing of semiconductor substrates, for example. For large diameter substrates, center gas injection through the port of the dielectric chamber window was said to ensure uniform etching and deposition, for example, thus improving the access to such processing chambers.
However, as industry standards increased, further improvements were required to provide even better access to such processing chambers. For example, there was a need to monitor the processes in the chambers, which requires chamber access in addition to access for gas supply. When monitoring an optical signal that may indicate a process condition in the process chamber, an opening, referred to as a clear optical aperture, extended through the dielectric chamber window. Such opening, or clear optical aperture, is configured with a straight unobstructed line of sight, thus “clear” is used to describe the optical aperture. Difficulties arose, however, when the clear optical aperture was physically open to the chamber, because plasma may form in the clear optical aperture. Such plasma formation relates to a threshold electric field strength required to initiate a plasma, which threshold strength is based on gas pressure in and the diameter of a bore of the clear optical aperture that is used to supply the gas to the chamber. The Second Prior Application described those two factors of plasma formation in the gas supply bore. Attempts are generally made to reduce this diameter of the gas supply bore, because the gas pressure tends to be specified by process requirements and generally may not be varied for suppressing plasma formation. The Second Prior Application also taught that when there is multiple, or simultaneous, use of the clear optical aperture (i.e., use simultaneously for both optical access and gas supply functions) the multiple use presents conflicting requirements. That is, for the aspect of facilitating monitoring (or diagnosis) of the optical signal that indicates a process condition in the process chamber, there is a need to increase the diameter of the gas supply bore of the clear optical aperture. For example, in providing optical access for interferometric or spectroscopic observation of chamber processes, the diameter of such gas supply bore must generally be not less than a minimum value, which was defined as about one-half inch, for example. This diameter was described as a minimum diameter that is required to enable proper access to the optical signal, and was referred to in the Second Prior Application as the “minimum diameter of the clear optical aperture”. However, the analysis in the Second Prior Application indicated that for the gas supply aspect of the multiple use there was a need for a relatively small diameter (significantly less than 0.5 inch) of the gas supply bore of the clear optical aperture that supplies gas to the chamber, for avoiding plasma formation in the gas supply bore, for example. This analysis also indicated that to facilitate the multiple use, an optical access window must be used to seal the clear optical aperture so as to maintain a vacuum in the processing chamber, and that the optical access window should be mounted at a location at which the strength of the electric field is substantially reduced. Such mounting was to reduce damage to the optical window, e.g., to reduce damage from plasma formation in the clear optical aperture that reduces window clarity. Such plasma may create particulate contamination and promote deposition onto the optical access window. Thus, the analysis in the Second Prior Application indicated that there is not only the minimum diameter of the gas supply bore of the clear optical aperture, which is in conflict with the need for a small diameter gas supply bore, but that there is also a minimum length of such gas supply bores of the clear optical aperture necessary to reduce such contamination and damage to the optical access window that facilitates the multiple use.
In the Second Prior Application this minimum diameter of the clear optical aperture was compared to gas bore passages provided in shielded gas inlets described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,500,299, issued Dec. 31, 2002 to Mett, et al. Although multiple ones of such passages are provided, the passages are provided only for supplying gas to a process chamber. For such purpose the gas is supplied through grains of dielectric materials such as ceramics, and the passages are defined by interconnected pores of the porous ceramic that do not provide a clear unobstructed line of sight as is required for optical signal transmission. Such passages are thus not suitable for providing clear optical access for the exemplary interferometric or spectroscopic observation of chamber processes. Moreover, it was noted in the Second Prior Application that to mount such passages of a gas bore inside a metal cup and to insert the cup in the side wall of a process chamber as described in the Mett et al. Patent, would undesirably subject the metal cup to the plasma in the chamber, for example, and introduce problems in sealing the metal cup to the wall of the process chamber.
The applicants of the present application have determined that as industry requirements or standards have increased beyond those for which the First and Second Prior Applications were directed, and beyond the use of such interconnected pores in ceramic materials for gas supply, further improvements are required to provide even better access to such processing chambers for simultaneous gas supply and optical access through a clear optical aperture, and to do so at less cost for components. For example, the present applicants have identified a need for further improvements that would provide the benefits of the all-ceramic, single piece injector of the Second Prior Application that provided multiple access (i.e., simultaneous gas supply and optical access) to a process chamber, and to have those benefits without the following considerations: (1) requiring the injector to be fabricated from ceramic material, but allowing use of ceramic materials when appropriate, or (2) requiring the injector to be coated with materials such as cerium oxide, zirconium oxide, yttria-stabilized zirconia, thermally-sprayed aluminum oxide, or yttrium oxide deposited on the access aperture protect ceramic materials from the effects of the process plasma, or (3) depositing damaging deposits of particles on an optical access window leading into the injector, or (4) requiring long spacing of an optical access window from the process chamber window to avoid damage to the optical access window, all while facilitating geometric advantages in an improved injector.
In view of the foregoing, the need for methods of and apparatus for providing further improvements in accessing processing chambers includes ways to provide improved multiple access (e.g., simultaneous gas supply and optical access through a clear optical aperture) to a process chamber. This need also includes providing such improved access when the access is for dual zone gas supply, and when the optical access is subject to the conflicting requirements of a relatively large minimum diameter of the clear optical aperture (for optimum optical access) and of a relatively small diameter of a gas bore for gas supply to the chamber, e.g., to avoid plasma formation in the gas bore. The problem presented, then, is how to such provide further improvements in accessing processing chambers, and how to provide such improved access when the access is for dual zone gas supply, and when the optical access is subject to the above conflicting requirements, without the four above considerations.
SUMMARYBroadly speaking, embodiments of the present invention fill these needs by providing methods of and apparatus for accessing a process chamber, wherein the access may be simultaneous gas supply into the process chamber and clear optical access through an optical access window into the process chamber, and wherein protection of the optical access window from damage due to conditions originating in the process chamber is facilitated. These embodiments fill the above needs by providing the benefits of the all-ceramic, single piece injector of the Second Prior Application that provided multiple access (i.e. simultaneous gas supply and clear optical access through one clear optical aperture) to a process chamber, and by providing those benefits without the foregoing considerations, all while facilitating geometric advantages of an improved injector.
Embodiments of the present invention may include a gas injector for a process chamber configured with an optical access window allowing optical access to and from the process chamber. A sleeve may be configured with a bore defining a path for gas and for the optical access. The bore may be configured with an access area for flowing process gas and transmitting an optical access signal having a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A septum may be configured for reception in the bore, the septum being further configured to divide the access area of the bore into at least two separate access apertures. Each of the at least two separate access apertures may be configured to cooperate with the other access aperture to flow the process gas and to transmit the optical access signal having the desired SNR through the optical access window.
Embodiments of the present invention may also include a gas injector for simultaneously transmitting an optical signal along an optical path from a process chamber through an optical access window to a diagnostic end point outside the process chamber and injecting a first process gas into the process chamber. The gas injector may include a housing configured to receive the process gas, the housing being further configured with a hollow body surrounding the optical path and mounting the optical access window adjacent to the diagnostic end point. A sleeve may also be configured for reception in the hollow body to define a bore surrounding the optical path and configured with an optical access area for simultaneously injecting the process gas into the process chamber and for allowing optical access by an optical signal from the process chamber through the optical access window. The optical signal may have at least a minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A septum may be configured for reception in the gas bore, and may be configured to divide the optical access area into a plurality of optical signal apertures. Each of the optical signal apertures may be configured so that the optical signal apertures collectively transmit through the optical access window the optical access signal having at least the minimum SNR.
Embodiments of the present invention may further include a method for optical access to process events occurring in a process chamber. The method may include an operation of defining a unitary gas and optical access path configured to carry gas and transmit an optical signal from the process chamber to an analysis tool that operates in response to the signal having a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for process analysis. The defined path configuration may provide clear optical access and be capable of transmitting the desired SNR that is high enough for the tool to accurately indicate the process analysis. The method may also include an operation of dividing the unitary gas and optical access path into a plurality of separate gas and optical access apertures between the process chamber and the analysis tool. The dividing configures the separate apertures so that the apertures collectively maintain the desired SNR of the optical signal transmitted to the tool while continuing to provide the clear optical access.
It will be obvious; however, to one skilled in the art, that embodiments of the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to obscure the present invention.
The embodiments of the present invention will be readily understood by reference to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and wherein:
Other aspects and advantages of embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONIn the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to obscure the present invention.
Embodiments of an invention are described including a gas injector for a process chamber configured with an optical access window allowing optical access to and from the process chamber. A sleeve may be configured with a bore defining a path for gas and for the optical access. The bore may be configured with an access area for flowing process gas and transmitting an optical access signal having a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A septum may be configured for reception in the bore, the septum being further configured to divide the access area of the bore into at least two separate access apertures. Each of the at least two separate access apertures may be configured to cooperate with the other access aperture to flow the process gas and to transmit the optical access signal having the desired SNR through the optical access window.
The described embodiments may further include a method for optical access to process events occurring in a process chamber. The method may include an operation of defining a unitary gas and optical access path configured to carry gas and transmit an optical signal from the process chamber to an analysis tool that operates in response to the signal having a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for process analysis. The defined path configuration may be capable of transmitting the desired SNR that is high enough for the tool to accurately indicate the process analysis. The method may also include an operation of dividing the unitary gas and optical access path into a plurality of separate gas and optical access apertures between the process chamber and the analysis tool. The dividing configures the separate apertures so that the apertures collectively maintain the desired SNR of the optical signal transmitted to the tool while continuing to provide the clear optical access.
The facilities 54 may also require access to the chamber 48 via the access region 53 when the facilities include tools (referred to as 54T,
The desired optical access (in response to a signal S-OUT having the desired SNR) may enable the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate. In general, this desired SNR may be typical of the SNR of a signal input to a monitoring tool 54T such as an interferometer or spectrometer, for example. The bore 66 with the desired optical access area 68 is thus configured to facilitate the monitoring by exemplary interferometric or spectroscopic observation of chamber processes so that the signal S-OUT is representative of the exemplary surface of, or structure on, the substrate.
With input to the tool 54T of the signal S-OUT being the desired optical access providing the desired SNR, the SNR may be referred to as being “high enough” for the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate. Thus, the signal S-IN entering the bore 66 to be directed onto the substrate has a relatively high SNR that is “high enough”, and the signal S-OUT exiting the bore 66 and transmitted through the injector 51 and the optical access window 70 still has the relatively high SNR that is “high enough”, all absent the interference described below. Considering interference, even if the bore 66 is configured to facilitate transmission of the desired SNR and provide the desired optical access, without the improvements of embodiments of the present invention the signals S-IN and S-OUT may be interfered with and may have a substantially lower than normal, i.e., lower than desired, SNR, such that the resulting optical access may not be the desired optical access. The interference may be by conditions along, or leading to, the optical path AP. For example, if the optical window 70 of the injector 51 becomes etched or coated with deposited particles, both the S-IN and the S-OUT will have a reduced SNR, the tool 54T may be rendered unable to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate, and the optical access may not be the desired optical access. Such coating may result from an undesired plasma igniting (or lighting up) within the injector 51. Particles created by the plasma may deposit on the optical window 70, reducing the SNR of each signal S-IN and S-OUT, which again may render the tool 54T unable to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate. References herein to “improved optical access” provided by the embodiments of the injector 51 indicate that the injector 51 is configured to reduce such etching and coating of the optical window of the injector 51, and to reduce the likelihood of the undesired plasma lighting up within the injector 51, so that the SNR of each of the S-IN and the S-OUT may remain at the desired SNR, that is high enough for the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate, i.e., to provide the above “desired optical access”.
Without the use of the shield 52, the electric field 62 may extend between turns of the coil 60 above the top of the window 48 and may extend in the window 48 through the port 50. This generation of the electric field 62 without the use of the shield embodiments of the Second Prior Invention tends to induce the undesired plasma in the port 50 within the access region 53. For example, the tendency may be to induce the undesired plasma in the bore 66 through which the gas is supplied, as described below. The undesired induced plasma may result in undesired deposition of particles on various parts within the process chamber 42, including on the substrate (which lowers process yield) and on the optical access window, which as described above reduces the SNR of the signals S-IN and S-OUT. Even if the bore 66 is configured to facilitate transmission of the desired SNR (e.g., with a desired optical access area), and even if such a shield 52 is used, to meet the increased industry standards for access to the processing chamber the improvements of embodiments of the present invention are needed to minimize reduction of the desired SNR, i.e., so that the signal S-OUT is input to the tool 54T having the desired SNR.
The embodiments of the present invention may be used to substantially avoid the problems caused by such undesired plasma induced in the access region 52, while providing other advantages described below.
The injector 51 is configured in two parts. A housing 90 is shown in
As described above, the analysis in the Second Prior Application indicated that for the gas supply aspect of the multiple use of an injector there was a need for a relatively small diameter (exemplary diameter D1 significantly less than 0.5 inch) of an exemplary circular gas bore. The need for this small diameter was to avoid plasma formation in the gas bore. As described below, the embodiments of the injector 51 are configured to overcome this conflict between the high desirability of using a larger (e.g., 0.5 inches) aperture and the need for a relatively small dimension of such aperture for the gas supply, and these embodiments overcome this conflict by providing the desired optical access.
As described above, whichever type of optical access is provided (e.g., the collimated white light or another type of optical signal S-IN), conditions along or leading to the optical path AP may interfere with the signals S-IN and S-OUT, such that the SNR of the signals may become substantially lower than the desired SNR. The above-described “desired optical access”, that avoids such substantially lower than desired SNR, may be provided by the embodiments of the injector 51 that are configured to reduce the above-described etching and coating of the optical window 70, and to reduce the likelihood of a plasma lighting up within the injector 51, so that the SNR of each of the S-IN and the S-OUT may remain at the desired level, described above as being high enough for the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate. The configuration of these embodiments of the injector 51 to provide the “improved (or desired) optical access” is referred to herein as the “improved optical access configuration”, which may be as follows.
The septum 126 may be configured for reception in the tube defined by the inner wall 122 of the sleeve 92 for allowing the desired (or improved) optical access. The configuration of the inner wall 122 of the sleeve 92 (without the septum 126) defines an open area 129 (indicated by a double-ended arrow to denote the entire area inside wall 122). The open area 129 is of the tube defined by the sleeve 92 for gas flow and is also sufficient to transmit the signals S-IN and S-OUT having the desired SNR, as defined above. The septum 126 divides the open area 129 into at least two apertures 136 (
The septum embodiments 126-1 and 126-2 may be configured by machining a solid rod of material to define the webs, for example. Alternatively, the web of the septum 126 may be welded or otherwise secured to the wall 122 of the sleeve 92. Also, as shown in
Other (e.g., non-circular) configurations of the septum 126 (e.g., 126-x, not shown) may be provided, and serve in the manner described below to overcome the conflict between the high desirability of using a large aperture for optical access, and the need for a relatively small dimension of an aperture for the gas supply. Each such embodiment 126-1 through 126-3, and 126-x, is configured to have the “improved optical access configuration”, in which the open (exemplary circular) area 129 defined by the wall 122 is divided into the gas/optical signal apertures 136, each extending parallel to the axial path AP and along the complete length of the septum 126. Each aperture provides the above-described clear optical access. In respect to each such embodiment 126-1 or 126-2 or 126-3 or 126-x, for example, the configuration of the gas/optical signal apertures 136 is such that the collective, or aggregate, open area 142 defined by the internal areas of all of the gas/optical signal apertures 136 together is sufficient to enable the SNR of the optical signals S-IN and S-OUT to be high enough for the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate. Further, in the continued use of such embodiments 126-1 or 126-2 or 126-3 or 126-x, for example, because of the described configuration of the septum 126, the resulting reduced deposition on and etching of the window 70 serves to maintain that higher SNR which tends to enable the tool 54T to continue accurately indicating the processing of the substrate.
The above-described retention of the desired SNR of the signals S-IN and S-OUT despite use of the many smaller-dimension gas/optical signal apertures 136 of the various embodiments of the septum 126 (e.g., less than 0.5 inch) is contrary to the prior teaching of a minimum 0.5 inch diameter of a clear optical aperture to facilitate monitoring of an optical signal that indicates a process condition in the process chamber for the exemplary interferometric or spectroscopic observation of chamber processes. For example, those teachings would prevent use, for the gas supply aspect of the dual use, of a relatively small dimension (significantly less than 0.5 inch) of the gas/optical signal apertures 136 of the septum 126 for supply of the gas G2 to the chamber 42 and optical access, while avoiding plasma formation inside the surface 128.
In another embodiment, minimization, if not elimination, of generation of particles in the injector 51 may result from use of a gasket between the end 92E and shoulder 118 of the interface 150. The gasket may be made from a material (such as PTFE) that has a characteristic of low particle generation, such that any motion of the end 92E relative to the shoulder 118, for example, does not result in any substantial generation of particles.
Additionally, the flexure and related structure that eliminates (or minimizes) relative movement between the end and the shoulder avoid use of any O-ring inside the sleeve 92 and inside the housing 90, which further eliminates a source of particles in the injector 51, and thus in the clear optical aperture through which the optical signals S-IN and S-OUT are transmitted.
It may be appreciated that the 0-ring 174, the flexure 164, the interface 150, and the wiper 184 serve to enable the bore 108 and the apertures 136 of the septum 126 to define separate gas flow paths for the gases G1 and G2. In this manner, separate gas injection into the chamber 42 may be provided from the nozzles 106 (for the first gas G1) and from the injection bore 66 of the housing 90 (for the second gas G2). The separate gas flow paths for the gases G1 and G2 enable the selection during detailed design of the injector 51 of desired mass flow rate(s) of the gas(es) for obtaining desired process conditions.
Embodiments of the present invention may also include a method for providing the desired optical access to process events occurring in the process chamber. An embodiment of the method may be understood by reference to
The method may move to an operation 194 of dividing the multiple, gas and optical, access path into a plurality of gas and optical access apertures that extend between the process chamber and the analysis tool to maintain the desired SNR of the optical signal during the process events occurring in the process chamber. Operation 194 may be performed by the septum 126. The septum 126 divides the open area 129 into at least two apertures 136, each of which is configured with the reduced area 142A that extends parallel to the axial path AP from a location aligned with the port 124 to an end 140 of the sleeve. The apertures 136 combine with the bore 66 and the optical access window 70 to extend between the process chamber 42 and the analysis tool 54T. Also, the configurations of the apertures 136 collectively maintain the desired SNR of the optical signals S-IN and S-OUT during the process events occurring in the process chamber 42.
In more detail, operation 194 may configure the size of the apertures 136 closer to the mean free path of particles in the gas and optical access apertures 136 to promote collisions between the particles and the walls 122 and 138 of the apertures 136. These collisions reduce the energy of the particles and increase deposition of the particles on the walls 122 and 138 of the apertures 136 before the particles reach the optical access window 70. The configuration in operation 194 may also configure each of the apertures 136 with a portion of the wall surface 122 and with the septum surface 138 and provide the dimension across the aperture 136 smaller than a corresponding dimension of the sleeve wall 122, and with the area 142A that is less than the area 129 of the inner wall 122 of the sleeve. The smaller apertures 136 result in more collisions between the surfaces 122 and 138 of the apertures 136 (on the one hand) and particles (e.g., from the chamber or etched from the surface 122 or 138) on the other hand, reducing the energy of the particles and promoting deposition of the particles on the surfaces 122 and 138 of the apertures 136 before the particles reach the optical access window.
The smaller apertures 136 resulting from operation 194 are configured to be effective to suppress light up of plasma in the apertures 136. Any plasma light up has a reduced effect because plasma does not form in a sheath around the surface 128 of the smaller-dimension apertures 136. The sheath reduces the extent of any plasma in the smaller-dimension apertures 136, reducing etching of the optical access window 70 by plasma. The operation 194 result of deposition of the particles on the surfaces 128 of the apertures 136 before the particles reach the optical access window 70 also results in a reduced likelihood of the optical access window 70 becoming coated with deposited particles, and avoids that cause of a reduced SNR of both the S-IN and the S-OUT Also, with a plasma less likely to form, and with a smaller plasma if one is formed, etching of the optical access window 70 will be substantially reduced. By operation 194, the reduced deposition on and etching of the window 70 serve to maintain a high SNR of the signal S-OUT transmitted through the window 70. As described above, the input to the tool 54T of the signal S-OUT having the desired SNR enables the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate.
Operation 194 may perform the dividing by providing walls separating the gas and optical path into a plurality of gas and optical apertures. Each of the apertures may be an aperture 136 as described above, and may be separate from all of the other gas and optical passages. This dividing operation may be performed by the septum 126, to divide the open area 129 into the apertures 136, each of which is configured with the walls 122 and 138 that extend parallel to the axial path AP. As described above, operation 194 results in deposition of particles on the surfaces 122 and 138 of the apertures 136 before the particles reach the optical access window 70. Collectively, all of the plurality of gas and optical apertures 136 are configured to transmit the optical signal S-OUT through the optical window 70 to the analysis tool 54T, wherein the optical signal S-OUT has the desired SNR that may still be high enough for the tool 54T to accurately indicate the processing of the substrate, as described above.
Another embodiment of the method of flow chart 190 may include an operation of removing the deposit of particles from the walls 138 of the apertures 136. For such operation, the sleeve 92 and septum 126 may be removed from the housing 90, and the apertures 136 cleaned before replacing the sleeve and septum in the housing. In another embodiment, a cleaning operation may be performed in the process chamber 42 to remove the deposit of particles from the walls 122 and 138 of the apertures 136, thus avoiding opening the chamber 42.
In summary, the described embodiments of the present invention meet the above-described need for further improvements to provide the above-defined multiple access to a process chamber. The problem defined above is overcome by a problem solution providing further improvements in accessing processing chambers, and providing such improved access when the access is for dual zone gas supply, and when the optical access is subject to the above conflicting requirements. Further, the problem solution is accomplished without the four considerations identified above in paragraph 0005. Initially, the injector 51 provides the above-defined clear optical access and desired optical access.
These needs are also met, and the problem solution is accomplished, without depositing damaging amounts of particles on an optical access window leading into the injector. Oppositely, it is shown above that the septum 126 is configured to provide a dimension across the apertures 136 smaller than a corresponding dimension of the sleeve wall 122, and with the areas 142A that are each less than the area 129 of the wall 122 of the sleeve, increasing the number of collisions by particles with the walls 122 and 138 of the apertures 136. More collisions between particles and the wall 122 and 138 of the surfaces 138 promotes deposition of the particles on the surfaces 122 and 138 of the apertures 136 before the particles reach the optical access window 70. This deposition of the particles on such surfaces results in a reduced likelihood of the optical access window 70 becoming coated with deposited particles, and avoids that cause of a reduced SNR of both the signal S-IN and the signal S-OUT.
These needs are also met, and the problem solution is accomplished, while facilitating geometric advantages in the improved injector 51. For example, as described with respect to
These needs are met, and the problem solution is accomplished, without requiring the injector 51 to be fabricated from a particular material, and instead by allowing use of various materials for the various one of the housing 90, the sleeve 92, and the septum 126. Many combinations of material may be used according to the present invention. For example, in one embodiment, the housing, the sleeve and the septum may be made from either coated or uncoated ceramics or polymers. The ceramics may be the same as those described in the First Prior Application or in the Second Prior Application, e.g., alumina, ceria, yttria, and zirconia. Quartz may be used if the process, for example, is compatible with quartz. Exemplar polymers include PTFE, ETFE, CTFE, FEP, and others sold under the trademark TEFLON; polyetherimide (Ultem); polycarbonate (Lexan); polyetheretherketone (PEEK); and polyimide (Vespel). In general, advantages of low cost result from use of polymers for all of these parts, and combine with ease of manufacture as compared to ceramics. For example, if criteria of a plasma etch application (i.e., substrate type, gases, temperature, power, etc.) are compatible with a particular polymer, then all of these components may be made from that polymer. Of particular advantage is making the housing 90 from a polymer as this alleviates a need for the coating that some ceramics require. It may be understood that a most plasma-resistant embodiment (i.e., most resistant to plasma and high electric fields) is an “all-ceramic” configuration in which each of the housing, sleeve and septum is made from ceramic. Such an all-ceramic configuration allows for the widest plasma etching compatibility due to the better resistance of ceramics to the plasma. The housing 90, that is exposed to the most intense plasma, may require a ceramic coating, but the sleeve 90 and septum 92 may be uncoated ceramic because the sleeve and septum do not experience the same high intensity of plasma. In another embodiment, a combined ceramic-and-polymer configuration may have advantages. The housing 90 may be made from a ceramic for plasma resistance, whereas the sleeve 92 and septum 126 may be made from polymer since these are not located in the same intense plasma as the housing. This allows use of the injector 51 in harsh (intense) plasmas because the ceramic housing 90, whether or not coated, resists the plasma, and the sleeve 92 and septum 126 may be polymer allowing a complex sleeve-septum configuration that is easier to manufacture.
These needs are also met, and the problem solution is accomplished, without requiring long spacing of the optical access window 70 from the process chamber window 48, where the long spacing is in an attempt to avoid damage to the optical access window 70. An exemplary configuration of the injector 51 may provide the septum 126 in the sleeve 92, and the septum 126 defining about 20 exemplary separate optical signal apertures 136, each having a diameter of about 0.90 inches and a length inside the sleeve 92 of about three inches, as shown in
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
Claims
1. A gas injector for a process chamber configured with an optical access window allowing optical access to and from the process chamber, the injector comprising:
- a sleeve configured with a bore defining a path for gas and for the optical access, the bore being configured with an access area configured to flow process gas and transmit an optical access signal having a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and
- a septum configured for reception in the bore, the septum being further configured to divide the access area of the bore into at least two separate access apertures, the at least two separate access apertures extend parallel to an optical path directed toward the optical access window, each of the at least two separate access apertures being configured to cooperate with the other access aperture to flow the process gas and to transmit the optical access signal having the desired SNR through the optical access window.
2. A gas injector as recited in claim 1, wherein the each of the at least two separate access apertures is configured to reduce the likelihood of formation of a plasma in the respective separate access aperture.
3. A gas injector as recited in claim 1, wherein the configurations of the sleeve and the septum define walls of each access aperture to promote adherence to the walls of particles moving in a respective access aperture toward the optical access window before the particles reach the optical access window.
4. A gas injector as recited in claim 1, wherein:
- the optical access signal indicates a condition of a substrate, and
- the at least two separate access apertures are configured by the septum to collectively allow transmission of the optical signal indicating the condition of the substrate, the transmission being from the process chamber through the respective at least two separate access apertures and through the optical access window to a location outside the chamber.
5. A gas injector as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the at least two separate access apertures is at least three separate access apertures.
6. A gas injector for simultaneously transmitting an optical signal along an optical path from a process chamber through an optical access window to a diagnostic end point outside the process chamber and injecting a first process gas into the process chamber; the gas injector comprising:
- a housing configured to receive the process gas, the housing being further configured with a hollow body surrounding the optical path and mounting the optical access window adjacent to the diagnostic end point;
- a sleeve configured for reception in the hollow body to define a bore surrounding the optical path and configured with an optical access area for simultaneously injecting the process gas into the process chamber and for allowing optical access by an optical signal from the process chamber through the optical access window, the optical signal having at least a minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and
- a septum configured for reception in the gas bore, the septum being further configured to divide the optical access area into a plurality of optical signal apertures, the plurality of optical signal apertures extend parallel to the optical path directed toward the optical access window, each of the optical signal apertures being configured so that the optical signal apertures collectively transmit through the optical access window the optical access signal having at least the minimum SNR.
7. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein the septum is configured to reduce the likelihood of formation of a plasma in the respective optical signal apertures and to provide walls for collecting particles moving in the optical path toward the optical access window, the septum configuration reducing deposition of the particles on and etching of the optical access window.
8. A gas injector as recited in claim 7, wherein the septum is further configured to be removable from the bore to permit removal from the septum of the deposited particles and replacement in the bore.
9. A gas injector as recited in claim 7, wherein the septum provides each optical signal aperture with a cross sectional area less than that of the bore to facilitate the reducing of the likelihood of formation of a plasma in the respective optical signal aperture and provides the optical signal apertures with an aggregate surface area greater than that of the bore to facilitate the reducing of the deposition of the particles on the optical access window.
10. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein the septum extends across a diameter of the bore so that the plurality of optical signal apertures are two optical signal apertures.
11. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein the septum is configured with a cross-shape comprising cross pieces extending across respective diameters of the bore so that the plurality of optical signal apertures are four optical signal apertures.
12. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein the septum is configured with a plurality of tubes so that the plurality of optical signal apertures exceeds four optical signal apertures.
13. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein:
- each of the sleeve received in the hollow body and the housing is configured with a mating interface surface configured to minimize particle generation when the mating interface surfaces are urged into contact; and
- the housing is further configured with a first mount for the optical access window, the first mount being configured to cause the mounted optical access window to urge the sleeve mating interface surface into contact with the housing mating interface surface.
14. A gas injector as recited in claim 13, wherein:
- the sleeve is further configured with a first sleeve end having a second mount;
- the injector is further configured with a flexure mounted on the second mount; and
- the mounted optical access window urges the sleeve mating surface by flexing the flexure, the flexed flexure urging the sleeve mating interface surface toward the housing mating interface surface so the sleeve mating interface surface contacts the housing interface mating surface.
15. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein:
- the hollow body is configured with spaced first and second gas inlets and an annular pad located between the spaced gas inlets; and
- the sleeve further configured for reception in the housing defines a gas supply conduit for a second gas, and
- wherein the sleeve is configured with an annular wiper extending across the gas supply conduit into contact with the annular pad to center the sleeve in the bore and direct the received first and second process gases separately into the respective bore and the gas supply conduit.
16. A gas injector as recited in claim 6, wherein each of the housing, the sleeve, and the septum is fabricated from a material taken from the group consisting of:
- ceramic, quartz, and polymer.
3953265 | April 27, 1976 | Hood |
4086870 | May 2, 1978 | Canavello et al. |
4367123 | January 4, 1983 | Beck |
4444492 | April 24, 1984 | Lee |
4838289 | June 13, 1989 | Kottman et al. |
5102494 | April 7, 1992 | Harvey et al. |
5180431 | January 19, 1993 | Sugimoto et al. |
5271774 | December 21, 1993 | Leenaars et al. |
5294257 | March 15, 1994 | Kelly et al. |
5343234 | August 30, 1994 | Kuehnle |
5361449 | November 8, 1994 | Akimoto |
5472502 | December 5, 1995 | Batchelder |
5558111 | September 24, 1996 | Lofaro |
5601655 | February 11, 1997 | Bok et al. |
5654034 | August 5, 1997 | Tulloch et al. |
5660642 | August 26, 1997 | Britten |
5696348 | December 9, 1997 | Kawamura et al. |
5705223 | January 6, 1998 | Bunkofske |
5709757 | January 20, 1998 | Hatano et al. |
5807522 | September 15, 1998 | Brown et al. |
5820686 | October 13, 1998 | Moore |
5830334 | November 3, 1998 | Kobayashi |
5882433 | March 16, 1999 | Ueno |
5893004 | April 6, 1999 | Yamamura |
5916454 | June 29, 1999 | Richardson et al. |
5945351 | August 31, 1999 | Mathuni |
5975098 | November 2, 1999 | Yoshitani et al. |
5989478 | November 23, 1999 | Ouellette et al. |
5997653 | December 7, 1999 | Yamasaka |
6010665 | January 4, 2000 | Dosoretz et al. |
6086454 | July 11, 2000 | Watanabe et al. |
6092937 | July 25, 2000 | Snodgrass et al. |
6103636 | August 15, 2000 | Zahorik et al. |
6108932 | August 29, 2000 | Chai |
6110337 | August 29, 2000 | Sullivan et al. |
6132586 | October 17, 2000 | Adams et al. |
6169244 | January 2, 2001 | Carlos |
6214513 | April 10, 2001 | Cai et al. |
6230722 | May 15, 2001 | Mitsumori et al. |
6341998 | January 29, 2002 | Zhang |
6391166 | May 21, 2002 | Wang |
6398975 | June 4, 2002 | Mertens et al. |
6417117 | July 9, 2002 | Davis |
6433541 | August 13, 2002 | Lehman et al. |
6446358 | September 10, 2002 | Mitsumori et al. |
6474786 | November 5, 2002 | Percin et al. |
6488040 | December 3, 2002 | De Larios et al. |
6491764 | December 10, 2002 | Mertens et al. |
6495005 | December 17, 2002 | Colgan et al. |
6514570 | February 4, 2003 | Matsuyama et al. |
6530823 | March 11, 2003 | Ahmadi et al. |
6531206 | March 11, 2003 | Johnston et al. |
6550988 | April 22, 2003 | Sugimoto et al. |
6555017 | April 29, 2003 | Rushford et al. |
6616772 | September 9, 2003 | De Larios et al. |
6629540 | October 7, 2003 | Mitsumori et al. |
6689323 | February 10, 2004 | Fisher et al. |
6716302 | April 6, 2004 | Carducci et al. |
6764720 | July 20, 2004 | Pui et al. |
6799584 | October 5, 2004 | Yogev et al. |
6851435 | February 8, 2005 | Mertens et al. |
6854473 | February 15, 2005 | Hanson et al. |
6954993 | October 18, 2005 | Smith et al. |
6988326 | January 24, 2006 | O'Donnell et al. |
6988327 | January 24, 2006 | Garcia et al. |
7000622 | February 21, 2006 | Woods et al. |
7069937 | July 4, 2006 | Garcia et al. |
7090562 | August 15, 2006 | Boyd et al. |
7093375 | August 22, 2006 | O'Donnell |
7153400 | December 26, 2006 | Ravkin et al. |
7193232 | March 20, 2007 | Lof et al. |
7234477 | June 26, 2007 | de Larios et al. |
7240679 | July 10, 2007 | Woods |
7252097 | August 7, 2007 | Boyd et al. |
20020121290 | September 5, 2002 | Tang et al. |
20030070620 | April 17, 2003 | Cooperberg et al. |
20030091754 | May 15, 2003 | Chihani et al. |
20030092264 | May 15, 2003 | Kajita et al. |
20040069319 | April 15, 2004 | Boyd et al. |
20040112539 | June 17, 2004 | Larson et al. |
20050092245 | May 5, 2005 | Moon et al. |
20050132515 | June 23, 2005 | Boyd et al. |
20050139318 | June 30, 2005 | Woods et al. |
20050145265 | July 7, 2005 | Ravkin et al. |
20050145267 | July 7, 2005 | Korolik et al. |
20050145268 | July 7, 2005 | Woods |
20050148197 | July 7, 2005 | Woods et al. |
20050217703 | October 6, 2005 | O'Donnell |
0 905 746 | March 1999 | EP |
0 905 747 | March 1999 | EP |
1 489 461 | December 2004 | EP |
1 489 462 | December 2004 | EP |
1 571 697 | September 2005 | EP |
05837190 | March 1983 | JP |
62150828 | July 1987 | JP |
02280330 | November 1990 | JP |
02309638 | December 1990 | JP |
08277486 | October 1996 | JP |
9199488 | July 1997 | JP |
11031672 | February 1999 | JP |
11350169 | December 1999 | JP |
2001220688 | August 2001 | JP |
2003-151948 | May 2003 | JP |
480221 | March 2002 | TW |
483075 | April 2002 | TW |
503455 | September 2002 | TW |
542791 | July 2003 | TW |
WO 99/16109 | April 1999 | WO |
WO 99/49504 | September 1999 | WO |
WO 02/01613 | January 2002 | WO |
WO 02/32825 | April 2002 | WO |
WO 02/101795 | December 2002 | WO |
WO 03/014416 | February 2003 | WO |
WO 03/087436 | October 2003 | WO |
WO 2004/030051 | April 2004 | WO |
- J.A. Britten, “A moving-zone Marangoni drying process for critical cleaning and wet processing,” Oct. 1997, Solid State Technology.
- Owa et al. “Immersion lithography; its potential performance and issues”, Proceedings of the SPIE, SPIE, Bellingham, VA, US, vol. 5040, No. 1, Feb. 28, 2003, pp. 724-733, XP002294500.
- Lim et al., “Atomic Layer deposition of transition metals”, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Nature Publishing Group, vol. 2, Nov. 2003, pp. 749-754.
- ICKnowledge LLC, “Technology Backgrounder: Atomic Layer Deposition”, ICKnowledge.com, 2004, pp. 1-7.
- “Chemical vapor deposition”, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical—vapor—deposition, 2005, p. 1-2.
- Sigma-Aldrich, “Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)”, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/Area—of—Interest/Chemistry/Materials—Science/Thin—Films, 2005, pp. 1-2.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/834,548, filed Apr. 28, 2004, Hemker et al.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,729, filed Jun. 30, 2005, Ravkin et al.
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 6, 2006
Date of Patent: Apr 19, 2011
Patent Publication Number: 20080083883
Assignee: Lam Research Corporation (Fremont, CA)
Inventors: Jeff A. Bogart (Campbell, CA), Leonard Sharpless (Fremont, CA), Harmeet Singh (Fremont, CA)
Primary Examiner: Phillip A. Johnston
Attorney: Martine Penilla & Gencarella, LLP
Application Number: 11/544,316
International Classification: H01J 49/00 (20060101);