Protective metal-clad structures

- H.C. Starck, Inc.

In various embodiments, a metallic structure includes first and second clad structures each comprising a protective layer disposed over a steel layer, a joint joining the steel layers of first and second clad structures, and, directly connecting the protective layers of the first and second clad structures, a layer of metal powder disposed in contact with (i) the joint, (ii) the protective layers of the first and second clad structures, and (iii) a portion of at least one of the steel layers proximate the joint.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/638,625, filed on Dec. 13, 2006, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Tantalum is a highly corrosion resistant, bio-friendly metal. As a result it finds wide use in reactors, heat exchangers, piping and the like in the chemical and pharmaceutical processing industries. Because tantalum is very expensive often the structural components used in this equipment are made up of a steel or stainless steel section for strength purposes that is clad with a thin sheet of tantalum to prevent interaction with the process fluid. In order for the tantalum sheet to provide corrosion protection for a whole vessel many such sheets must be joined together into a single impermeable piece. Many techniques have been used but all of them are costly, have severe deficiencies, and cause the cost of the basic tantalum clad steel section to be higher than necessary. This invention provides a low cost, chemical resistant, material and manpower efficient means of joining the tantalum sheets together.

Cold spray or kinetic spray (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,302,414, 6,502,767 and 6,759,085) is an emerging industrial technology that is being employed to solve many industrial manufacturing challenges (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,924,974, 6,444,259, 6,491,208 and 6,905,728). Cold spray employs a high velocity gas jet to rapidly accelerate powder particles to high velocity such that when they impact a surface the particles bond to the surface to form an integral, well bonded and dense coating. The cold spraying of tantalum powders onto a variety of substrates (including steel) has been suggested (see, e.g., “Analysis of Tantalum Coatings Produced by the Kinetic Spray Process,” Van Steenkiste et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 13, number 2, June 2004, pages 265-273; “Cold spraying—innovative layers for new applications,” Marx et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 15, number 2, June 2006, pages 177-183; and “The Cold Spray Process and Its Potential for Industrial Applications,” Gartner et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 15, number 2, June 2006, pages 223-232). This is all accomplished without having to heat the tantalum powder to a temperature near or above its melting point as is done with traditional thermal spray processes. The fact that dense coatings can be formed at low temperatures present many advantages. Such advantages include reduced oxidation, high density deposits, solid state compaction, the lack of thermally induced stresses and particularly, in this case, the lack of substrate heating. This is critical because at elevated temperatures, such as in a molten Ta weld pool, Ta can dissolve the elemental components of steels and stainless steels with the result that brittle and non corrosion resistant phases form in the tantalum.

As mentioned above, tantalum is a preferred corrosion resistant material in industries that process chemically aggressive liquids. Because of tantalum's high cost rather than being used as a thick structural member, it is frequently used in thin layers as a protective cladding on steel or stainless steel. Many techniques have been developed to attach tantalum clad to the substrate material such as high temperature brazing (U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,104), low temperature soldering (U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,981), diffusion bonding (U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,203), explosive bonding (U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,104), and flouroelastomers (U.S. Pat. No. 4,140,172).

The fabrication problem becomes difficult and expensive however when the individually clad components must be joined together to form a fully functional vessel such as a process reactor. The clad must be fused together to prevent the process liquid from contacting the steel, the steel must also be fused to provide strength to the entire structure. Dissolution of the steel into the tantalum during either fusion process would immediately destroy the desirable properties of tantalum. Thus, all high temperature fusion processes require and use elaborate joint designs and fabrication techniques in order to prevent the tantalum from reaction with the steel during the fusion process.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,073,427 solves the problem of joining the sheets by providing a machined groove around the entire perimeter of all of the structural parts to be joined. The structural steel is then welded and a machined tantalum batten is inserted in the groove to isolate the tantalum from the steel when the tantalum is welded. The tantalum sheet can then be bent flat (it has to be bent up initially to allow insertion of the batten) and the final tantalum weld performed. Further due to the high temperatures involved purge holes must be provided in the steel element to allow for the introduction of inert gases to protect the final tantalum weld.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,629 provides a similar approach except that three battens are used, one steel and two tantalum battens. This approach requires two welds as well as multiple purge holes drilled in the steel backing sheet.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,946 attempts to improve on the above processes by providing a wide single batten that completely fills the gap between the two tantalum sheets and then double welding a tantalum closure across the top of the tantalum sheets. All of the references discussed so far are done so in terms of joining flat sections. The problems become far more difficult when welding rings to rings to form long vessels, or domes to rings to provide a pressure closure or even vessel penetrations for piping. Bending the tantalum sheet in a circular pattern, then bending 90 degrees out of the plane of the circle, inserting the batten and bending the two tantalum sheets flat again is time consuming and difficult.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,062 describes a process using a plasma arc spray overlay to cover the contaminated weld of the tantalum protective layer. First the steel is welded to itself and then the tantalum is welded to itself. Because the tantalum is in intimate contact with the steel, the steel contaminates the tantalum weld and the corrosion resistance of the weld is greatly reduced. A high temperature plasma arc spray is used to provide a protective layer of tantalum over the contaminated weld. Because these joints are used on large structures they usually must be made in air, thus the hot plasma arc causes both the tantalum sheet and the tantalum powder to oxidize due to the plasma's very high temperature. The result is a porous, lamellar structure in the deposit that is high in oxygen content. The porosity and porous grain boundaries greatly reduce the corrosion resistance by percolation effects and the high oxygen content results in a less ductile (than the tantalum sheet) deposit that is prone to cracking and can fail during operation. Additionally, because the coating is put down hot, and because the coefficient of thermal expansion for tantalum is almost double that of steel, as the structure cools the brittle plasma spray deposit is put in a state of tensile stress, a stress that potentially can lead to cracking and failure of the coating.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,002 describes a method of spray joining articles. The patent indicates that cold spray as well as the many types of hot spray forming techniques (such as plasma and twin wire arc spraying) could be used. However, the method is severely limited in that at least one of the articles must be a spray formed steel article and the sprayed particles must be steel particles. Clearly this method is used for making structural steel joints involving at least one steel component. In the invention described below the structural steel joint is provided by traditional welding techniques. In fact there is no desire or requirement that the sprayed material join to the steel. In the present invention, the cold sprayed material, in this case tantalum, is used to join the tantalum surface coating and to provide an impermeable corrosion resistant layer of tantalum between two or more co-existing Ta sheets.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,402 is even more limited in that it describes a method for repairing spray formed steel tooling. It too requires a steel spray formed part on which a steel spray formed coating will be used to fill a region which has been damaged or somehow eroded away. Additionally, once the spray forming is complete, the spray formed filler is melted and fused using conventional electric welding processes. The purpose of the invention below is to avoid heating and especially melting of the tantalum during the joining processes.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows the tantalum clad sections before joining.

FIG. 2 shows the sections joined together.

FIG. 3 shows another embodiment of the invention where a lap joint is used.

FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of the invention where a double lap joint is used.

FIG. 5 is a micrograph of a cross section of a tantalum cold sprayed joint that has been etched to reveal prior particle boundaries.

FIG. 6 shows the same cross section as shown in FIG. 5 after annealing at 1150° C. for one and a half hours.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is broadly directed to a process for joining tantalum clad steel structures comprising:

    • a) providing a first tantalum clad section, said first tantalum clad section comprising a tantalum layer over a steel layer, with a bonding layer optionally therebetween, with a portion of said steel layer in an edge region not being covered by said tantalum layer or said bonding layer,
    • b) providing a second tantalum clad section, said second tantalum clad section comprising a tantalum layer over a steel layer, with a bonding layer optionally therebetween, with a portion of said steel layer in an edge region not being covered by said tantalum layer or said bonding layer,
    • c) locating said steel edge regions adjacent each other,
    • d) welding the steel edge regions together,
    • e) cold spraying a tantalum powder onto the welded edge regions and over the tantalum layers adjacent said edge regions thereby joining the tantalum clad steel sections.

The invention is also directed to a tantalum weld or joint, wherein the weld or joint is formed by cold spraying tantalum powder and consists of elongated tantalum powder particles, elongated normal to the direction of the spray direction, and wherein the powdered particles have a random crystallographic orientation. The invention is also directed to a tantalum weld or joint, wherein the weld or joint is formed by cold spraying tantalum powder followed by heta treatment and consists of equiaxed grains of approximately the same size as or smaller than the sprayed powder and wherein the grains have a random crystallographic orientation.

In one embodiment, a double sided lap joint may be used, although a single sided lap joint may be employed as well.

In one preferred embodiment, each tantalum clad section is produced by cold spraying tantalum powder directly onto the respective steel layer in a pattern such that a portion of each steel layer in an edge region is not sprayed and is thus left exposed. This embodiment does, not require the use of a bonding layer.

Local failures can develop in tantalum clad vessels and do occur frequently. A local failure is when the bulk of the cladding is fine, but a small crack or pinhole may have developed in the clad. This can result from a manufacturing defect (e.g., a gouged tantalum layer, a weld defect or an inclusion), a local hot spot or improper process chemistry. The normal procedure is to enter the vessel, cut out the defect and then weld a patch on top. Of course in doing this there is the risk of overheating the tantalum layer and oxidizing it or causing an undesirable reaction with the steel below the weld. Although not a part of this invention, cold spray could be used to repair these defects without incurring any of the risks just mentioned.

As used herein, the term “steel” is intended to include both steel and stainless steel.

This invention, the cold welding of the tantalum sheet using cold spray technology, forms a high density, low cost, corrosion resistant joint free from the deleterious phase mentioned above. It further allows the joining of clad steel parts where the tantalum clad to steel bonding agent is a low melting temperature solder, brazing material or even a structural adhesive.

By following the present invention, the tantalum layer and the steel substrate require no special machining to provide locations for the insertion of protective battens, since battens are not used. Obviously, machining of battens or other protective strips is not required.

In the preferred embodiment, the protective cladding can be simply cut with either a straight or beveled edge such that the desired amount of steel substrate is left exposed prior to bonding of the cladding to the plate. This eliminates the many folding and unfolding operations used with cladding that must be joined by elevated temperature processes such as welding. A separate bonding or brazing layer may or may not be present depending on how the tantalum is bonded to steel. The clad sections may simply be placed together and the structural steel butt welded to form a single unit. The resultant seam is then filled, and cold welded together by cold spraying tantalum powder into the seam and over the edges of the tantalum clad layer.

Because the cold spray process is done at low temperatures, there is no harmful dissolution of the steel into the cold sprayed tantalum joint. The tantalum joint is fully dense with no porosity or oxygen pick up which would impair the joints performance. Furthermore, there are no thermally induced stresses at the joint after fabrication that could lead to separation, buckling or cracking. Stress is an issue with all high temperature joining processes due to the large differences in thermal expansion between tantalum (LCTE=6.5×10−6 cm (cm° C.)−1 and steel (LCTE=11.7×10−6 cm (cm° C.)−1 In fact to completely eliminate thermal stress during operation, the spraying could be done while the components are held at operational temperatures of less than 250° C.

The present invention also raises the potential for greatly decreasing the cost of the basic tantalum clad steel component. Since the joining of the tantalum layer is done at low temperatures, there is no potential for burn through of the cladding as with high temperature processes that melt the clad to form a fusion joint. Thus, reliable cold joining on tantalum cladding of very low thicknesses is possible. By following the present invention, it is possible to use thickness of the tantalum clad as low as about 0.005 inches (preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.040 inches, more preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.020 inches, and most preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.010 inches). This can result in the use of substantially thinner cladding and a proportionate cost savings when compared to welding techniques that require substantially thicker cladding for reliable “in the field” welds (normal welding techniques require that the clad be around 0.02 inches, while explosive bonding requires thicknesses of 0.04 inches).

Since the process operates at relatively low temperatures, low cost techniques can be employed to bond the clad to the steel substrate, such as using structural adhesives and non-noble metal low temperature solders. Both of these approaches eliminate the need for large high temperature (˜1000° C.) vacuum furnaces, the attendant energy and labor costs of heating large structural pieces to high temperature and the use of expensive noble metal brazes or silver solders. Structural adhesives decompose around 300° C. and low temperature solders melt around 400° C. The need to weld, i.e., exceed the melting point of tantalum (2998° C.), or to use plasma arc spray (the lowest temperatures are typically in excess of 3000° C.) precludes the use of low temperature bonding of the cladding to the steel since the high temperature process for the clad to clad joint would destroy the bond. Cold spray does not have this problem and could be used to join an entirely new class of low cost clad materials. Most tantalum process applications operate at temperatures of less than 250° C. and thus allow for the use of the above discussed bonding agents.

As is known in the art, various gas/powder velocities can be used in the cold spray process. Generally these velocities are in the range of from 300 to 2,000 meters/second. It is generally advantageous for the powder particles to be available in an amount in the stream, which guarantees a flow rate density of the particles from 0.01 to 100 grams/(second cm2) preferably from 0.01 grams/(second cm2) up to 20 grams/(second cm2) and most preferably from of 0.05 grams/(second cm2) up to 17 grams/(second cm2). The flow rate density is calculated according to the formula F=m/[(π/4)*D2] with F=flow rate density, D=nozzle diameter in cm and m=powder delivery rate (in grams per second).

Generally, a stable gas such as nitrogen, or an inert gas such as argon or helium is used as the gas with which the metal powder forms the gas/powder mixture.

Finally, the process may be used to join many types of metals used as protective cladding such as niobium, titanium, zirconium, molybdenum and tungsten.

In the Figures, the same numbers are used to identify the same element. In FIG. 1, two sections, 1 and 2, are placed adjacent each other. Each section has a tantalum layer 3, over a steel layer 4, with a bonding or brazing layer 5 therebetween. Each section has a portion (6 and 7) of the steel layer that is not covered (these exposed sections are only identified by number in FIG. 1—but are shown in each figure). In the left hand section, the portion is exposed via a beveled edge 8, while in the right section, the portion is exposed via a straight edge 9. The beveled edge embodiment is generally preferred.

Processes for the production of tantalum clad steel are known in the art. If desired, tantalum could be cold sprayed onto the steel (thus eliminating the need for a bonding or brazing layer). The spray configuration could be such that edge portions of the steel would be left uncoated. Alternatively, portions of the tantalum layer and, if present, the bonding or brazing layer could be removed to expose the steel edge portions.

As shown in FIG. 2, the exposed portions of the steel are welded 10 and a tantalum powder, 11, is sprayed over the welded edges as well over the tantalum layer adjacent to the exposed portions.

FIG. 3 shows a single lap weld (12). This approach has the advantage of requiring less Ta powder to make the weld (there is no gap to fill) but has the disadvantage that once the steel structure is welded, the larger (upper) piece of tantalum has to be bent and hammered down flat over the lower (smaller) piece of tantalum (another labor operation).

FIG. 4 shows another embodiment wherein a double lap weld (15) is employed. This approach eliminates the bending and hammering operation required by the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, but does use more powder and requires a tantalum batten, 13, to fill the gap formed by the exposed steel portions and a tantalum sheet, 14, to join the two tantalum sections.

To simulate the joining of two tantalum clad steel plates in a reactor vessel, a 0.020″ thick tantalum sheet was bonded to a nominal ⅜″ steel plate, using a high temperature, silver-copper eutectic braze (Bag-8, commercially available from Lucas Milhaupt of Cudahy Wis.). Then a groove was milled approximately 0.022″ deep and nominally 0.20″ wide down the length of the tantalum cladding to simulate the gap that would be left between the tantalum sheets after welding of the steel plate. Next using nitrogen gas preheated to 600° C. at a stagnation pressure of 3 MPa, tantalum powder 15-30 microns in size (Amperit #151, special grade, commercially available from H.C. Starck Inc.) was deposited. Standoff distance of the nozzle was 30 mm and the powder feed rate was approximately 50 g/min. A cold sprayed weld of approximately 0.040 to 0.060″ thick was used to coat the steel, and seal the gap between the tantalum cladding. The cold sprayed tantalum completely filled the gap between the two sheets providing a continuous protective layer of tantalum over both the steel and the tantalum sheet. The cold spray nozzle or gun used was a Kintetiks 4000 commercially available from Cold Gas Technology GmbH, Ampfing, Germany.

While it is well known that sheet tantalum will provide an impervious, protective barrier, this is not always true of powder based coatings. In order for the powder based coating to be protective, it must not only in itself resist corrosive attack but it must also be sufficiently dense (with no interconnected porosity) to prevent percolation by the acids through the coating. Typically for a coating to prevent percolation via interconnected porosity, the coating must be greater than 95% dense. In the tests conducted, the cold sprayed tantalum coating densities were typically greater than 97.5%.

To further prove the impervious nature of the coating, an approximate 0.015″ thick tantalum coating was sprayed on nominal 2″×2″ mild steel sheet. The same process parameters and equipment used above were used to make these coatings, with the exception that the final coating was approximately 0.014″ thick. The tantalum coated side of the steel was then exposed to a 20% hydrochloric acid solution maintained at 70° C. for a period of 4 weeks. When compared to a tantalum sheet that was exposed to the same acid for the same period of time, the cold sprayed tantalum coating resisted the acid as well as the tantalum sheet. In fact in both cases the measured corrosion rates for both the sheet and the coating were less than 0.01 mm/year. After exposure to the acid test, porosity was almost nonexistent, was certainly not interconnected and the coating acted as an impervious barrier to the acid as is evidenced by the complete lack of corrosion build up between the coating and the steel.

Further, the cold sprayed joint is unique in that it produces no heat affected zone (“HAZ”) around the weld compared to thermally induced fusion processes. HAZ is well known and understood by those skilled in the art. In thermally induced fusion bonding, the practice is to carefully minimize potential deleterious effects associated with the HAZ such as excessive directional and crystallographically preferred grain growth. FIG. 5 is a micrograph of a cross section of a tantalum cold sprayed joint that has been etched to reveal the prior particle boundaries (“PPB”). The powder that was used in the spray process was made by the hydride/dehydride process which produces a blocky approximately equiaxed powder (defined as powder having an aspect ratio of approximately 1). The PPBs in FIG. 5 are not equiaxed. In fact they are typically elongated in shape with an aspect ratio of 2 to 3 normal to the direction of spray (it is expected that in the future, as higher gas velocities and higher particle and gas temperatures are used, aspect ratios up to 6 may be obtained). Additionally by using electron beam back scattered diffraction (“EBSD”), it can be shown that the crystallographic orientation of the weld material is completely random. The combined properties of the complete absence of a HAZ with elongated shaped grains, normal to the direction of spray, having a completely random crystallographic orientation are a unique characteristic of a cold sprayed joint.

There may be some circumstances in which it is desirable to heat treat an as sprayed joint post spraying either to relieve some of the mechanical stresses or to improve interparticle bond strength. This heat treatment can result in recrystallization which results in equiaxed grains of approximately the same size as the original powder particles. FIG. 6 is a micrograph of the same joint as shown in FIG. 5 that has been annealed at 1150° C. for 1.5 hours. The new equiaxed grains retain the near perfect random crystallographic orientation displayed in the original as sprayed structure as can be shown by EBSD analysis. Again the joint has a unique structure of fine, non-directional equiaxed grains that have a random crystallographic orientation.

While certain procedures have been illustrated or described herein, it will be recognized that variations can be used without departing from the basic teachings herein.

Claims

1. A metallic structure comprising:

first and second clad structures each comprising a protective layer disposed over a steel layer;
a joint joining the steel layers of the first and second clad structures; and
a layer of unmetaled metal powder disposed in contact with and bonded to (i) the joint, (ii) the protective layers of the first and second clad structures, and (iii) a portion of each of the steel layers proximate the joint.

2. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the protective layers each comprise at least one of tantalum, niobium, titanium, zirconium, molybdenum, or tungsten.

3. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the joint comprises a weld.

4. The metallic structure of claim 3, wherein the weld comprises a butt weld or a lap weld.

5. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the protective layers are substantially resistant to at least one of acid or corrosion.

6. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein, for each of the first and second clad structures, the protective layer is disposed over substantially all of a top surface of the steel layer except for an edge region proximate the joint.

7. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein, for each of the first and second clad structures, the protective layer is irreversibly attached to the steel layer.

8. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the layer of metal powder is substantially free of oxygen.

9. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein, in each of the first and second clad structures, the protective layer is disposed directly over and in contact with the steel layer.

10. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein a structural adhesive, a low-temperature brazing material, or a low-temperature solder is disposed between and in direct contact with the protective layer and the steel layer of each of the first and second clad structures.

11. The metallic structure of claim 10, wherein a structural adhesive having a decomposition temperature less than approximately 300° C. is disposed between and in direct contact with the protective layer and the steel layer of each of the first and second clad structures.

12. The metallic structure of claim 10, wherein a low-temperature solder having a melting point less than approximately 400° C. is disposed between and in direct contact with the protective layer and the steel layer of each of the first and second clad structures.

13. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the protective layers of the first and second clad structures have thicknesses ranging from approximately 0.005 inch to approximately 0.02 inch.

14. The metallic structure of claim 13, wherein the protective layers of the first and second clad structures have thicknesses ranging from approximately 0.005 inch to approximately 0.01 inch.

15. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the layer of metal powder comprises elongated particles having a random crystallographic orientation.

16. The metallic structure of claim 15, wherein the particles are elongated in a direction substantially parallel to a top surface of the first clad structure.

17. The metallic structure of claim 15, wherein the particles have an aspect ratio ranging from 2 to 6.

18. The metallic structure of claim 17, wherein the particles have an aspect ratio ranging from 2 to 3.

19. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the layer of metal powder comprises non-directional equiaxed grains having a random crystallographic orientation.

20. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the layer of metal powder has a density greater than approximately 95%.

21. The metallic structure of claim 20, wherein the layer of metal powder has a density greater than approximately 97.5%.

22. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein the steel layer of each of the first and second clad structures comprises stainless steel.

23. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein neither of the first or second clad structures comprises a heat affected zone proximate the joint.

24. The metallic structure of claim 1, wherein at least one of the protective layer of the first clad structure or the protective layer of the second clad structure comprises a second layer of metal powder.

25. The metallic structure of claim 24, wherein the second layer of metal powder is unmelted.

26. The metallic structure of claim 24, wherein the second layer of metal powder comprises elongated particles having a random crystallographic orientation.

27. The metallic structure of claim 26, wherein the particles are elongated in a direction substantially parallel to a top surface of at least one of the first clad structure or the second clad structure.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3436299 April 1969 Halek et al.
3990784 November 9, 1976 Gelber
4011981 March 15, 1977 Danna et al.
4073427 February 14, 1978 Keifert et al.
4140172 February 20, 1979 Corey
4202932 May 13, 1980 Chen et al.
4291104 September 22, 1981 Keifert
4459062 July 10, 1984 Siebert
4483819 November 20, 1984 Albrecht et al.
4508563 April 2, 1985 Bernard et al.
4510171 April 9, 1985 Siebert
4537641 August 27, 1985 Albrecht et al.
4722756 February 2, 1988 Hard
4731111 March 15, 1988 Kopatz et al.
4818629 April 4, 1989 Jenstrom et al.
4915745 April 10, 1990 Pollock et al.
4964906 October 23, 1990 Fife
5061527 October 29, 1991 Watanabe et al.
5091244 February 25, 1992 Biornard
5242481 September 7, 1993 Kumar
5270858 December 14, 1993 Dickey
5271965 December 21, 1993 Browning
5302414 April 12, 1994 Alkhimov et al.
5305946 April 26, 1994 Heilmann
5330798 July 19, 1994 Browning
5580516 December 3, 1996 Kumar
5612254 March 18, 1997 Mu et al.
5679473 October 21, 1997 Murayama et al.
5693203 December 2, 1997 Ohhashi et al.
5795626 August 18, 1998 Gabel et al.
5859654 January 12, 1999 Radke et al.
5954856 September 21, 1999 Pathare et al.
5972065 October 26, 1999 Dunn et al.
5993513 November 30, 1999 Fife
6030577 February 29, 2000 Commandeur et al.
6136062 October 24, 2000 Loffelholz et al.
6139913 October 31, 2000 Van Steenkiste et al.
6171363 January 9, 2001 Shekhter et al.
6189663 February 20, 2001 Smith et al.
6197082 March 6, 2001 Dorvel et al.
6238456 May 29, 2001 Wolf et al.
6245390 June 12, 2001 Baranovski et al.
6258402 July 10, 2001 Hussary et al.
6261337 July 17, 2001 Kumar
6328927 December 11, 2001 Lo et al.
6331233 December 18, 2001 Turner
6408928 June 25, 2002 Heinrich et al.
6444259 September 3, 2002 Subramanian et al.
6482743 November 19, 2002 Sato
6491208 December 10, 2002 James et al.
6502767 January 7, 2003 Kay et al.
6521173 February 18, 2003 Kumar et al.
6558447 May 6, 2003 Shekhter et al.
6589311 July 8, 2003 Han et al.
6623796 September 23, 2003 Van Steenkiste
6669782 December 30, 2003 Thakur
6722584 April 20, 2004 Kay et al.
6723379 April 20, 2004 Stark
6743468 June 1, 2004 Fuller et al.
6749002 June 15, 2004 Grinberg et al.
6759085 July 6, 2004 Muehlberger
6770154 August 3, 2004 Koenigsmann et al.
6773969 August 10, 2004 Lee et al.
6780458 August 24, 2004 Seth et al.
6855236 February 15, 2005 Sato et al.
6872425 March 29, 2005 Kaufold et al.
6872427 March 29, 2005 Van Steenkiste et al.
6896933 May 24, 2005 Van Steenkiste et al.
6905728 June 14, 2005 Hu et al.
6911124 June 28, 2005 Tang et al.
6915964 July 12, 2005 Tapphorn et al.
6919275 July 19, 2005 Chiang et al.
6924974 August 2, 2005 Stark
6953742 October 11, 2005 Chen et al.
6962407 November 8, 2005 Yamamoto et al.
7053294 May 30, 2006 Tuttle et al.
7067197 June 27, 2006 Michaluk et al.
7081148 July 25, 2006 Koenigsmann et al.
7101447 September 5, 2006 Turner
7108893 September 19, 2006 Van Steenkiste et al.
7128988 October 31, 2006 Lambeth
7143967 December 5, 2006 Heinrich et al.
7163715 January 16, 2007 Kramer
7164205 January 16, 2007 Yamaji et al.
7170915 January 30, 2007 McDonald
7175802 February 13, 2007 Sandlin et al.
7178744 February 20, 2007 Tapphorn et al.
7183206 February 27, 2007 Shepard
7192623 March 20, 2007 Andre et al.
7208230 April 24, 2007 Ackerman et al.
7244466 July 17, 2007 Van Steenkiste et al.
7278353 October 9, 2007 Langan et al.
7335341 February 26, 2008 Van Steenkiste et al.
7399335 July 15, 2008 Shekhter et al.
7402277 July 22, 2008 Ayer et al.
7479299 January 20, 2009 Raybould et al.
7514122 April 7, 2009 Kramer
7582846 September 1, 2009 Molz et al.
7618500 November 17, 2009 Farmer et al.
7670406 March 2, 2010 Belashchenko
7910051 March 22, 2011 Zimmermann et al.
8002169 August 23, 2011 Miller et al.
20020112789 August 22, 2002 Jepson et al.
20020112955 August 22, 2002 Aimone et al.
20030023132 January 30, 2003 Melvin et al.
20030190413 October 9, 2003 Van Steenkiste et al.
20030219542 November 27, 2003 Ewasyshyn et al.
20030232132 December 18, 2003 Muehlberger
20040037954 February 26, 2004 Heinrich et al.
20040065546 April 8, 2004 Michaluk et al.
20040076807 April 22, 2004 Grinberg et al.
20040126499 July 1, 2004 Heinrich et al.
20040202885 October 14, 2004 Seth et al.
20050084701 April 21, 2005 Slattery
20050120957 June 9, 2005 Kowalsky et al.
20050142021 June 30, 2005 Aimone et al.
20050147742 July 7, 2005 Kleshock et al.
20050155856 July 21, 2005 Oda
20050220995 October 6, 2005 Hu et al.
20050252450 November 17, 2005 Kowalsky et al.
20060021870 February 2, 2006 Tsai et al.
20060027687 February 9, 2006 Heinrich et al.
20060032735 February 16, 2006 Aimone et al.
20060042728 March 2, 2006 Lemon et al.
20060045785 March 2, 2006 Hu et al.
20060090593 May 4, 2006 Liu
20060121187 June 8, 2006 Haynes et al.
20060251872 November 9, 2006 Wang et al.
20070116886 May 24, 2007 Refke et al.
20070116890 May 24, 2007 Adams et al.
20070172378 July 26, 2007 Shibuya et al.
20070196570 August 23, 2007 Gentsch et al.
20080028459 January 31, 2008 Suh et al.
20080078268 April 3, 2008 Shekhter et al.
20080145688 June 19, 2008 Miller et al.
20080171215 July 17, 2008 Kumar et al.
20080216602 September 11, 2008 Zimmermann et al.
20080271779 November 6, 2008 Miller et al.
20090004379 January 1, 2009 Deng et al.
20090239754 September 24, 2009 Kruger et al.
20090291851 November 26, 2009 Bohn et al.
20100015467 January 21, 2010 Zimmermann et al.
20100055487 March 4, 2010 Zimmermann et al.
20100061876 March 11, 2010 Miller et al.
20100084052 April 8, 2010 Farmer et al.
20100086800 April 8, 2010 Miller et al.
20100136242 June 3, 2010 Kay et al.
20100172789 July 8, 2010 Calla et al.
20100189910 July 29, 2010 Belashchenko et al.
20100246774 September 30, 2010 Lathrop
20100272889 October 28, 2010 Shekhter et al.
20110132534 June 9, 2011 Miller et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
10253794 June 2004 DE
0074803 March 1983 EP
0484533 May 1992 EP
0774315 May 1997 EP
1066899 January 2001 EP
1138420 October 2001 EP
1350861 October 2003 EP
1382720 January 2004 EP
1398394 March 2004 EP
1413642 April 2004 EP
1452622 September 2004 EP
1715080 October 2006 EP
2121441 December 1983 GB
2394479 April 2004 GB
54067198 May 1979 JP
3197640 August 1991 JP
06346232 December 1994 JP
11269639 October 1999 JP
01/131767 May 2001 JP
03/301278 October 2003 JP
2166421 May 2001 RU
WO-98/37249 August 1998 WO
WO-01/12364 February 2001 WO
WO-02/064287 August 2002 WO
WO-02/070765 September 2002 WO
WO-03/062491 July 2003 WO
WO-03/106051 December 2003 WO
WO-2004/074540 September 2004 WO
WO-2005/073418 August 2005 WO
WO-2005/079209 September 2005 WO
WO-2006/117145 November 2006 WO
WO-2007/001441 January 2007 WO
WO-2008/063891 May 2008 WO
WO-2008/089188 July 2008 WO
Other references
  • “Cold Gas Dynamic Spray CGSM Apparatus,” Tev Tech LLC, available at: http://www.tevtechllc.com/cold—gas.html (accessed Dec. 14, 2009).
  • “Cold Spray Process,” Handbook of Thermal Spray Technology, ASM International, Sep. 2004, pp. 77-84.
  • Ajdelsztajn et al., “Synthesis and Mechanical Properties of Nanocrytalline Ni Coatings Producted by Cold Gas Dynamic Spraying,” 201 Surface and Coatings Tech. 3-4, pp. 1166-1172 (Oct. 2006).
  • Gärtner et al., “The Cold Spray Process and its Potential for Industrial Applications,” 15 J. of Thermal Sprsy Tech. 2, pp. 223-232 (Jun. 2006).
  • Hall et al., “The Effect of a Simple Annealing Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Cold-Sprayed Aluminum,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 233-238 (Jun. 2006.).
  • Hall et al., “Preparation of Aluminum Coatings Containing Homogeneous Nanocrystalline Microstructures Using the Cold Spray Process,” JTTEES 17:352-359. Sep. 2008.
  • IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2006/003967, dated Nov. 6, 2007 (15 pages).
  • IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/062434, dated Nov. 10, 2009 (21 pages).
  • IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2006/003969, mailed dated Nov. 6, 2007 (13 pages).
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/087214, mailed Mar. 23, 2009 (13 pages).
  • IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/081200, dated Sep. 1, 2009 (17 pages).
  • IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/080282, dated Apr. 7, 2009 (15 pages).
  • lrissou et al., “Review on Cold Spray Process and Technology: Part I—Intellectual Property,” 17 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 4, pp. 495-516 (Dec. 2008).
  • Karthikeyan, “Cold Spray Technology: International Status and USA Efforts,” ASB Industries, Inc. (Dec. 2004).
  • Li et al., “Effect of Annealing Treatment on the Microstructure and Properties of Cold-Sprayed Cu Coating,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 206-211 (Jun. 2006).
  • Marx et al., “Cold Spraying-Innovative Layers for New Applications,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 177-183 (Jun. 2006).
  • Morito, “Preparation and Characterization of Sintered Mo-Re Alloys,” 3 J. de Physique 7, Part 1, pp. 553-556 (1993).
  • Search Report in European Patent Application No. 09172234.8, dated Jan. 29, 2010 (7 pages).
  • Stoltenhoff et al., “An Analysis of the Cold Spray Process and its Coatings,” 11 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 4, pp. 542-550 (Dec. 2002).
  • Van Steenkiste et al., “Analysis of Tantalum Coatings Produced by the Kinetic Spray Process,” 13 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 265-273 (Jun. 2004).
  • Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 09172234.8, mailed Jun. 16, 2010 (3 pages).
  • Kosarev et al., “Recently Patent Facilities and Applications in Cold Spray Engineering,” Recent Patents on Engineering, vol. 1 pp. 35-42 (2007).
  • Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 07843733.2, mailed Nov. 30, 2010 (9 pages).
  • English Translation of Office Action mailed Feb. 23, 2011 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880023411.5 (4 pages).
Patent History
Patent number: 8113413
Type: Grant
Filed: Jul 18, 2011
Date of Patent: Feb 14, 2012
Patent Publication Number: 20110300396
Assignee: H.C. Starck, Inc. (Newton, MA)
Inventors: Steven A. Miller (Canton, MA), Leonid N. Shekhter (Ashland, MA), Stefan Zimmerman (Kraftwerkweg)
Primary Examiner: Jessica L Ward
Assistant Examiner: Erin Saad
Attorney: Bingham McCutchen LLP
Application Number: 13/184,665