Color display device

- E Ink California, LLC

The present invention provides a solution for a highlight or multicolor display device, in which each display cell can display high quality color states. More specifically, an electrophoretic fluid is provided which comprises three types of pigment particles, having different levels of size, threshold voltage or charge intensity.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/633,788, filed Oct. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,717,664, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a color display device in which each display cell can display high quality color states, and an electrophoretic fluid for such an electrophoretic display.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In order to achieve a color display, color filters are often used. The most common approach is to add color filters on top of black/white sub-pixels of a pixellated display to display the red, green and blue colors. When a red color is desired, the green and blue sub-pixels are turned to the black state so that the only color displayed is red. When the black state is desired, all three-sub-pixels are turned to the black state. When the white state is desired, the three sub-pixels are turned to red, green and blue, respectively, and as a result, a white state is seen by the viewer.

The biggest disadvantage of such a technique is that since each of the sub-pixels has a reflectance of about one third (⅓) of the desired white state, the white state is fairly dim. To compensate this, a fourth sub-pixel may be added which can display only the black and white states, so that the white level is doubled at the expense of the red, green or blue color level (where each sub-pixel is only one fourth of the area of the pixel). Brighter colors can be achieved by adding light from the white pixel, but this is achieved at the expense of color gamut to cause the colors to be very light and unsaturated. A similar result can be achieved by reducing the color saturation of the three sub-pixels. Even with these approaches, the white level is normally substantially less than half of that of a black and white display, rendering it an unacceptable choice for display devices, such as e-readers or displays that need well readable black-white brightness and contrast.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 2(a)-2(c), 3(a)-3(c) and 4(a)-4(c) depict one embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 5(a)-5(c) depicts an alternative embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b) shows two options where the display cells are aligned or unaligned, respectively, with the pixel electrodes.

FIGS. 7(a)-7(e) shows how a full color display of the present invention is realized.

FIG. 8 shows an example of shaking waveform.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention not only provides a realistic solution for a color display device in which each display cell can display highly saturated color states, but also eliminates the need of color filters.

More specifically, the present invention is directed to an electrophoretic fluid comprising a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein

(a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;

(b) the third type of pigment particles are slightly charged; and

(c) the three types of pigment particles have different levels of threshold voltage, or different levels of mobility, or both.

In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles are of the black and white colors, respectively.

In one embodiment, the third type of pigment particles are non-white and non-black.

In one embodiment, the third type of pigment particles is of a color selected from the group consisting red, green and blue, yellow, cyan and magenta.

In one embodiment, the three types of pigment particles have different levels of threshold voltage. One of the first type and second type of particles may have a threshold voltage. The third type of particles may be larger than the first or the second type of particles. The third type of particles may be about 2 to about 50 times larger than the first or second type of particles. The third type of particles may carry the same charge polarity as the type of particles which has a threshold voltage. The third type of particles may have a charge level being less than about 50% the charge intensity of the first type or second type of particles.

In one embodiment, the three types of pigment particles have different levels of mobility. The charge intensity of the first type of pigment particles may be at least about 2 times the charge intensity of the second type of pigment particles and the charge intensity of the third type of particles may be about 50% less than the charge intensity of the second type of particles. The third type of particles may be larger than the first or the second type of particles. The third type of particles may be about 2 to about 50 times larger than the first or second type of particles.

In one embodiment, the fluid of the present invention is filled in display cells and sandwiched between a common electrode layer and a layer of pixel electrodes. The display cells may be microcups or microcapsules.

In one embodiment, the display cells are aligned with the pixel electrodes. In another embodiment, the display cells are not aligned with the pixel electrodes.

In one embodiment, the third type of pigment particles is of the same color in all display cells. In another embodiment, the third type of pigment particles is of different colors in display cells.

In one embodiment, the fluid of the present invention is driven by a voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode. In another embodiment, there are at least three different levels of voltage potential difference applied to the common electrode layer and the pixel electrode.

In one embodiment, a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprises display cells filled with an electrophoretic fluid which fluid comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein:

(a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;

(b) the third type of pigment particles has the same charge polarity as the second type of pigment particles but at a lower intensity; and

(c) the second type of pigment particles has a threshold voltage, which method comprises driving from a color state of the first type of pigment particles to a color state of the third type of pigment particles by applying a voltage which is the same as or lower than the threshold voltage of the second type of pigment particles.

In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform applied before the display is driven to the color state of the first type of pigment particles.

In one embodiment, when the color of the third type of particles is seen at a viewing side, the first and second types of particles gather at the side opposite of the viewing side resulting in an intermediate color between the colors of the first and second types of particles.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present inventors have proposed a new architecture for color displays.

The electrophoretic fluid of present invention comprises three types of pigment particles dispersed in a dielectric solvent or solvent mixture. For ease of illustration, the three types of pigment particles may be referred to as white particles (11), black particles (12) and colored particles (13), as shown in FIG. 1. However, it is understood that the scope of the invention broadly encompasses pigment particles of any colors as long as the three types of pigment particles have visually contrasting colors.

The display fluid is sandwiched between two electrode layers. One of the electrode layers is a common electrode (14) which is a transparent electrode layer (e.g., ITO), spreading over the entire top of the display device. The other electrode layer (15) is a layer of pixel electrodes (15a).

The pixel electrodes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,046,228, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. It is noted that while active matrix driving with a thin film transistor (TFT) backplane is mentioned for the layer of pixel electrodes, the scope of the present invention encompasses other types of electrode addressing as long as the electrodes serve the desired functions.

For the white particles (11), they may be formed from an inorganic pigment, such as TiO2, ZrO2, ZnO, Al2O3, Sb2O3, BaSO4, PbSO4 or the like.

For the black particles (12), they may be formed from CI pigment black 26 or 28 or the like (e.g., manganese ferrite black spinel or copper chromite black spinel) or carbon black.

The third type of pigment particles may be of a color such as red, green, blue, magenta, cyan or yellow. The pigments for this type of particles may include, but are not limited to, CI pigment PR 254, PR122, PR149, PG36, PG58, PG7, PB28, PB15:3, PY138, PY150, PY155 or PY20. Those are commonly used organic pigments described in color index handbook “New Pigment Application Technology” (CMC Publishing Co, Ltd, 1986) and “Printing Ink Technology” (CMC Publishing Co, Ltd, 1984). Specific examples include Clariant Hostaperm Red D3G 70-EDS, Hostaperm Pink E-EDS, PV fast red D3G, Hostaperm red D3G 70, Hostaperm Blue B2G-EDS, Hostaperm Yellow H4G-EDS, Hostaperm Green GNX, BASF Irgazine red L 3630, Cinquasia Red L 4100 HD, and Irgazin Red L 3660 HD; Sun Chemical phthalocyanine blue, phthalocyanine green, diarylide yellow or diarylide AAOT yellow.

The percentages of the three types of pigment particles in the fluid may vary. For example, the black particle may take up about 0.1% to 10%, preferably 0.5% to 5% by volume of the electrophoretic fluid; the white particle may take up about 1% to 50%, preferably 5% to 15% by volume of the fluid; and the colored particle may take up about 2% to 20%, preferably 4% to 10% by volume of the fluid.

There may be other particulate matters in the fluid which are included as additives to enhance performance of the display device, such as switching speed, imaging bistability and reliability.

The solvent in which the three types of pigment particles are dispersed is clear and colorless. It preferably has a low viscosity and a dielectric constant in the range of about 2 to about 30, preferably about 2 to about 15 for high particle mobility. Examples of suitable dielectric solvent include hydrocarbons such as isopar, decahydronaphthalene (DECALIN), 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, fatty oils, paraffin oil, silicon fluids, aromatic hydrocarbons such as toluene, xylene, phenylxylylethane, dodecylbenzene or alkylnaphthalene, halogenated solvents such as perfluorodecalin, perfluorotoluene, perfluoroxylene, dichlorobenzotrifluoride, 3,4,5-trichlorobenzotri fluoride, chloropentafluoro-benzene, dichlorononane or pentachlorobenzene, and perfluorinated solvents such as FC-43, FC-70 or FC-5060 from 3M Company, St. Paul Minn., low molecular weight halogen containing polymers such as poly(perfluoropropylene oxide) from TCI America, Portland, Oreg., poly(chlorotrifluoro-ethylene) such as Halocarbon Oils from Halocarbon Product Corp., River Edge, N.J., perfluoropolyalkylether such as Galden from Ausimont or Krytox Oils and Greases K-Fluid Series from DuPont, Del., polydimethylsiloxane based silicone oil from Dow-corning (DC-200).

Two of the three types of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities and the third type of pigment particles is slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” is defined in sections below.

For example, if the black particles are positively charged and the white particles are negatively charged, and then the colored pigment particles are slightly charged. In other words, in this example, the charge carried by the black and the white particles is much more intense than the charge carried by the colored particles.

In addition, the third type of particles which carries a slight charge has a charge polarity which is the same as the charge polarity carried by either one of the other two types of the stronger charged particles.

The three types of pigment particles may have varying sizes. In one embodiment, one of the three types of pigment particles is larger than the other two types.

It is noted that among the three types of pigment particles, the one type of particles which is slightly charged is preferably has the larger size.

For example, both the black and the white particles are relatively small and their sizes (tested through dynamic light scattering) may range from about 50 nm to about 800 nm and more preferably from about 200 nm to about 700 nm, and in this example, the colored particles which are slightly charged, preferably are about 2 to about 50 times and more preferably about 2 to about 10 times larger than the black particles and the white particles.

The term “threshold voltage”, in the context of the present invention, is defined as the maximum bias voltage that may be applied to a group of pigment particles, without causing the pigment particles to appear at the viewing side of the display device. The term “viewing side” refers to a side of a display device where images are seen by the viewers.

In the present invention, at least one of the three types of pigment particles may demonstrate a threshold voltage under triangle voltage driving testing.

The threshold voltage is either an inherent characteristic of the charged pigment particles or an additive-induced property.

In the former case, the threshold is generated, relying on certain attraction force between particles or between particles and certain substrate surfaces. A threshold may also be generated via interaction of two types of oppositely charged particles.

In the latter case referred to above, to achieve a threshold voltage, a threshold agent which induces or enhances the threshold characteristics of an electrophoretic fluid may be added. The threshold agent may be any material which is soluble or dispersible in the solvent or solvent mixture of the electrophoretic fluid and carries or induces a charge opposite to that of the charged pigment particles. The threshold agent may be sensitive or insensitive to the change of applied voltage. The term “threshold agent” may broadly include dyes or pigments, electrolytes or polyelectrolytes, polymers, oligomers, surfactants, charge controlling agents and the like.

Additional information relating to the threshold agent may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,115,729, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The following are a few examples illustrating the present invention.

EXAMPLES Example 1(a)

This example is demonstrated in FIG. 2. The black particles (22) are assumed to have a threshold voltage of 5V. Therefore, the black particles (22) would not move to the viewing side if an applied voltage potential difference is 5V or lower.

The white pigment particles (21) are negatively charged while the black pigment particles (22) are positively charged, and both types of the pigment particles are smaller than the colored particles (23).

The colored particles (23) carry the same charge polarity as the black particles which have the threshold voltage, but are slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” is intended to refer to the charge level of the particles being less than about 50%, preferably about 5% to about 30%, the charge intensity of the black or the white particles. As a result, the black particles move faster than the colored particles (23), when an applied voltage potential is higher than the threshold voltage of the black particles because of the stronger charge intensity they carry.

In FIG. 2a, the applied voltage potential is +15V. In this case, the white particles (21) move to be near or at the pixel electrode (25) and the black particles (22) and the colored particles (23) move to be near or at the common electrode (24). As a result, the black color is seen at the viewing side. The colored particles (23) move towards the common electrode (24); however because their lower charge intensity and larger size, they move slower than the black particles.

In FIG. 2b, when a voltage potential difference of −15V is applied, the white particles (21) move to be near or at the common electrode (24) and the black particles and the colored particles move to be near or at the pixel electrode (25). As a result, the white color is seen at the viewing side.

The colored particles (23) move towards the pixel electrode because they are also positively charged. However, because of their lower charge intensity and larger size, they move slower than the black particles.

In FIG. 2c, the applied voltage potential difference has changed to +5V. In this case, the negatively charged white particles (21) move towards the pixel electrode (25). The black particles (22) move little because of their threshold voltage being 5V. Due to the fact that the colored particles (23) do not have a significant threshold voltage, they move to be near or at the common electrode (24) and as a result, the color of the colored particles is seen at the viewing side.

The driving from the white color state in FIG. 2b to the colored state in FIG. 2c may be summarized as follows:

A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising display cells filled with an electrophoretic fluid which fluid comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein:

(a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;

(b) the third type of pigment particles has the same charge polarity as the second type of pigment particles but at a lower intensity; and

(c) the second type of pigment particles has a threshold voltage, which method comprises driving from a color state of the first type of pigment particles to a color state of the third type of pigment particles by applying a voltage which is the same as or lower than the threshold voltage of the second type of pigment particles.

In this method, the first type of pigment particles (21) is of the white color; the second type of pigment particles (22) is of the black color; and the third type of pigment particles (23) is of the red color, as shown in FIG. 2.

In order to drive the display to the color state of the third type of pigment particles, i.e., red (see FIG. 2c), the method starts from the color state of the first type of pigment particles, i.e., white (see FIG. 2b).

In FIG. 2b, the first type of pigment particles (i.e., white) are at or near the common electrode (24) and the second and third types of pigment particles (i.e., black and red) are at or near the pixel electrode (25). When a voltage which is the same or lower than the threshold voltage of the second type of pigment particles (i.e., black) is applied, the first type of pigment particles (i.e., white) are pushed downwards; the third type of pigment particles (i.e., red) move up towards the common electrode (24) to reach the viewing side; and the second type of pigment particles (i.e., black) barely move because of their threshold voltage.

In this scenario, when the color of the third type of particles is seen at the viewing side, the other two types of the particles may be mixed at the non-viewing side (side opposite of the viewing side), resulting in an intermediate color state between the colors of the first and second types of particles. If the first and second types of particles are black and white and the third type of particles is red, then in FIG. 2(c), when the red color is seen at the viewing side, a grey color is seen at the non-viewing side.

The driving method ideally would ensure both color brightness (i.e., preventing the black particles from being seen) and color purity (i.e., preventing the white particles from being seen) in the scenario of FIG. 2c. However, in practice, this desired result is difficult to control for various reasons, including particle size distribution, particle charge distributions and other factors.

One solution to this is the use of a shaking waveform prior to driving from the color state of the first type of pigment particles (i.e., white) to the color state of the third type of pigment particles (i.e., red). The shaking waveform consists of repeating a pair of opposite driving pulses for many cycles. For example, the shaking waveform may consist of a +15V pulse for 20 msec and a −15V pulse for 20 msec and such a pair of pulses is repeated for 50 times. The total time of such a shaking waveform would be 2000 msec (see FIG. 8).

The shaking waveform may be applied to the display regardless of the optical state (black, white or red) prior to a driving voltage is applied. After the shaking waveform is applied, the optical state would not be a pure white, pure black or pure red. Instead, the color state would be from a mixture of the three types of pigment particles.

For the method as described above, a shaking waveform is applied prior to the display being driven to the color state (i.e., white) of the first type of pigment particles.

With this added shaking waveform, even though the white state is measurably the same as that without the shaking waveform, the color state (i.e., red) of the third type of pigment particles would be significantly better than that without the shaking waveform, on both color brightness and color purity. This is an indication of better separation of the white particles from the red particles as well as the black particles from the red particles.

Each of the driving pulse in the shaking waveform is applied for not exceeding half of the driving time required from the full black state to the full white state. For example, if it takes 300 msec to drive a display device from a full black state to a full white state or vice versa, the shaking waveform may consist of positive and negative pulses, each applied for not more than 150 msec. In practice, it is preferred that the pulses to be shorter.

Example 1(b)

In an alternative design as demonstrated in FIG. 3, the white particles (31) are assumed to have a threshold voltage of 5V. Therefore, the white particles (31) would not move to the viewing side if an applied voltage potential difference is 5V or lower.

The white pigment particles (31) are negatively charged while the black pigment particles (32) are positively charged, and both types of the pigment particles are smaller than the colored particles (33).

The colored particles (33) carry the same charge polarity as the white particles which have the threshold voltage, but are slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” is as defined in Example 1(a) above. As a result, the white particles move faster than the colored particles (33), when an applied voltage potential is higher than the threshold voltage of the white particles because of the stronger charge intensity they carry.

In FIG. 3a, the applied voltage potential is −15V. In this case, the black particles (32) move to be near or at the pixel electrode (35) and the white particles (31) and the colored particles (33) move to be near or at the common electrode (34). As a result, the white color is seen at the viewing side. The colored particles (33) move towards the common electrode (34); however because of their lower charge intensity and larger size, they move slower than the white particles.

In FIG. 3b, when a voltage potential difference of +15V is applied, the white particles (31) move to be near or at the pixel electrode (35) and the black particles move to be near or at the common electrode (34). As a result, the black color is seen at the viewing side.

The colored particles (33) move towards the pixel electrode as they are also negatively charged. However, because of their lower charge intensity and larger size, they move slower than the white particles.

In FIG. 3c, the applied voltage potential difference has changed to −5V. In this case, the positively charged black particles (32) move towards the pixel electrode (35). The white particles (32) move little because of their threshold voltage being 5V. Due to the fact that the colored particles (33) do not have a significant threshold voltage, they move to be near or at the common electrode (34) and as a result, the color of the colored particles is seen at the viewing side.

The driving of FIG. 3 may be carried out according to the method as described in Example 1(a).

Example 1(c)

It is also possible to have the colored particles to have a threshold voltage, as shown in FIG. 4. In this case, the colored particles (43) would not move to the viewing side if an applied voltage potential difference is 5V or lower.

The black pigment particles (42) are negatively charged while the colored pigment particles (43) are positively charged, and both types of the pigment particles are smaller than the white particles (41).

The white particles (41) carry the same charge polarity as the colored particles which have the threshold voltage, but are slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” is as defined in Example 1(a) above. As a result, the colored particles move faster than the white particles (41), when an applied voltage potential is higher than the threshold voltage of the colored particles because of the stronger charge intensity they carry.

In FIG. 4a, the applied voltage potential is +15V. In this case, the black particles (42) move to be near or at the pixel electrode (45) and the colored particles (43) and the white particles (41) move to be near or at the common electrode (44). As a result, the color of the colored particles is seen at the viewing side. The white particles (41) move towards the common electrode (44); however because of their lower charge intensity and larger size, they move slower than the colored particles.

In FIG. 4b, when a voltage potential difference of −15V is applied, the colored particles (43) move to be near or at the pixel electrode (45) and the black particles move to be near or at the common electrode (44). As a result, the black color is seen at the viewing side.

The white particles (41) move towards the pixel electrode as they are also positively charged. However, because of their lower charge intensity and larger size, they move slower than the colored particles.

In FIG. 4c, the applied voltage potential difference has changed to +5V. In this case, the negatively charged black particles (42) move towards the pixel electrode (45). The colored particles (43) move little because of their threshold voltage being 5V. Due to the fact that the white particles (41) do not have a significant threshold voltage, they move to be near or at the common electrode (44) and as a result, the white color is seen at the viewing side.

The driving of FIG. 4 may be carried out according to the method as described in Example 1(a).

In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, all three types of pigment particles have different levels of charge intensity, thus different levels of mobility.

For example, the first and second types of particles carry opposite charge polarities and the charge intensity of first type of particles is at least about 2 times, preferably about 3 to about 15 times, the charge intensity of the second type of particles, or vice versa. The charge intensity of the third type of particles is less than about 50%, preferably about 5% to about 30%, the charge intensity of the first or second type of particles, whichever has a lower charge intensity. In a specific example, if black particles have twice the charge intensity of the white particles, then the colored particles may have less than 50% the charge intensity of the white particles.

The particles that carry the least charge intensity are preferably larger than the other two types of particles.

Due to different levels of charge intensity, the three types of pigment particles would have different levels of mobility. The higher the charge intensity, the faster the particles move. The following example demonstrates this embodiment of the invention.

Example 2

This example is shown in FIG. 5. It is assumed that the charge intensity of the black particles (52) is twice the charge intensity of the white particles (51) and therefore the black particles move twice as fast as the white particles. The colored particles (53) have a charge intensity which is less than 50% the charge intensity of the white particles.

Therefore if it takes a driving time, t, for the black particles to travel the distance between the common electrode and a pixel electrode (“d”), it would then take 2t for the white particles and at least 4t for the colored particles, to travel the same distance, d.

In addition, the black particles are positively charged and the white particles are negatively charged. The colored particles carry the same charge polarity as the particles having the highest intensity, that is, the black particles in this case.

In FIG. 5a, when a negative voltage potential is applied to the common electrode (54) and the pixel electrode (55), after a driving time of 2t, the white pigment particles (51) would be near or at the common electrode (i.e., the viewing side) and the black pigment particles (52) would be near or at the pixel electrode. As a result, the white color state is seen. The colored particles (53), due to their larger size and lower charge intensity/lower mobility, they would move a little. In addition, because they are positively charged, they would move towards the pixel electrode (55).

In FIG. 5b, when a positive voltage potential is applied to the common electrode (54) and the pixel electrode (55), after a driving time of 2t, the black pigment particles (52) would be near or at the common electrode and the white pigment particles (51) would be near or at the pixel electrode. As a result, the black color state is seen.

Because of their low charge intensity and low mobility, the colored particles barely move. While the black and colored particles carry the same charge polarity, the black particles would move to be closer to the common electrode because of their higher charge intensity and smaller size.

Before the step of FIG. 5c, it is preferred that the white particles are at or near the pixel electrode (55) and the black and colored particles are at or near the common electrode (54). In FIG. 5c, when a negative voltage potential is applied between the common electrode (54) and the pixel electrode (55), after a driving time of t, the white particles (51) at the bottom would move to an area between the common electrode and the pixel electrode, about at the mid-level, while the black particles (52) would travel the full distance, d, to be at or near the pixel electrode. The colored particles would travel a short distance downward; but remain closer to the common electrode. As a result, the color of the colored particles (53) is seen at the viewing side.

As shown in this example, the switching among three optical states therefore could be achieved by controlling the driving time frame, driving amplitude or both.

The larger and slower moving particles in this example are the colored particles. However, the designs may vary depending on the needs. It is also possible to make the black or white particles the larger and slower moving particles.

The electrophoretic fluid in an electrophoretic display device is filled in display cells. The display cells may be microcups as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,818, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The display cells may also be other types of micro-containers, such as microcapsules, microchannels or equivalents, regardless of their shapes or sizes. All of these are within the scope of the present application.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the display device utilizing the present electrophoretic fluid is a high-light display device and in this embodiment, the colored particles are of the same color in all display cells. Each display cell would be a pixel in such a highlight display device. In addition, as shown in FIG. 6, the display cells may be aligned with the pixel electrodes (see FIG. 6a) or un-aligned with the pixel electrodes (see FIG. 6b).

In another embodiment, the display device utilizing the present electrophoretic fluid may be a multi-color display device. In this embodiment, the colored particles are of different colors in the display cells. In this embodiment, the display cells and the pixel electrodes are aligned.

FIG. 7 illustrates how multiple colors are displayed with a display device of the present invention. Each display cell represents a sub-pixel and each pixel has three sub-pixels. The three display cells, each representing a sub-pixel, are filled with an electrophoretic fluid of the present invention in which the third type of pigment particles is red, green and blue, respectively.

In FIG. 7a, when a white pixel is desired, all three sub-pixels are turned to the white color state. In FIG. 7b, when a black pixel is desired, all three sub-pixels are turned to the black color state. FIG. 7c, when a red color is desired, one of the sub-pixels is turned to red and the remaining two sub-pixels are turned to the black state for maximum color saturation. Similarly, FIG. 7d and FIG. 7e display the green and blue colors respectively. Alternatively, in FIGS. 7c, 7d and 7e, one of the sub-pixels is driven to the color state while the remaining two sub-pixels are driven to the white state for maximum brightness (at the expense of the color saturation). Further alternatively, in FIGS. 7c, 7d and 7e, one of the sub-pixel is driven to the color state while the remaining two sub-pixels are driven to the black and white states respectively.

While the present invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, materials, compositions, processes, process step or steps, to the objective and scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto.

Claims

1. A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising an electrophoretic fluid which is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes, wherein the electrophoretic fluid comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein:

(a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;
(b) the third type of pigment particles has the same charge polarity as the second type of pigment particles but has an intensity lower than that of the second type of pigment particles; and
(c) the second type of pigment particles has a threshold voltage,
the method comprises driving an area corresponding to a pixel electrode from a color state of the first type of pigment particles to a color state of the third type of pigment particles by applying a voltage potential difference which is the same as, or lower than, the threshold voltage of the second type of pigment particles.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second types of pigment particles are white and black, respectively.

3. The method or claim 1, wherein the third type of pigment particles is non-white and non-black.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the third type of pigment particles is of a color selected from the group consisting red, green, blue, yellow, cyan and magenta.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the third type of pigment particles has a charge level less than about 50% of the charge intensity of the first type or second type of pigment particles.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the third type of pigment particles is larger than the first and the second types of pigment particles.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the third type of pigment particles is about 2 to about 50 times larger than the first or second type of pigment particles.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a shaking waveform before the area corresponding to the pixel electrode is driven to the color state of the first type of pigment particles.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the shaking waveform consists of a pair of opposite driving pulses being repeated for many cycles.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein each of the driving pulses is applied for not more than half of the time required for driving the area corresponding to the pixel electrode from a full black state to a full white state.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein when the color state of the third type of pigment particles is seen at a viewing side, the first and second types of pigment particles gather at the side opposite to the viewing side resulting in an intermediate color between colors of the first and second types of pigment particles.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3756693 September 1973 Ota
3892568 July 1975 Ota
4298448 November 3, 1981 Muller et al.
5378574 January 3, 1995 Winnik et al.
5980719 November 9, 1999 Cherukuri et al.
6198809 March 6, 2001 Disanto et al.
6337761 January 8, 2002 Rogers et al.
6373461 April 16, 2002 Hasegawa et al.
6486866 November 26, 2002 Kuwahara et al.
6517618 February 11, 2003 Foucher et al.
6525866 February 25, 2003 Lin et al.
6538801 March 25, 2003 Jacobson et al.
6600534 July 29, 2003 Tanaka et al.
6650462 November 18, 2003 Katase
6680726 January 20, 2004 Gordon et al.
6693620 February 17, 2004 Herb et al.
6704133 March 9, 2004 Gates et al.
6724521 April 20, 2004 Nakao et al.
6729718 May 4, 2004 Goto et al.
6751007 June 15, 2004 Liang et al.
6829078 December 7, 2004 Liang et al.
6864875 March 8, 2005 Drzaic et al.
6930818 August 16, 2005 Liang et al.
6947203 September 20, 2005 Kanbe
6967762 November 22, 2005 Machida et al.
6987503 January 17, 2006 Inoue
6987605 January 17, 2006 Liang et al.
7009756 March 7, 2006 Kishi et al.
7019889 March 28, 2006 Katase
7034987 April 25, 2006 Schlangen
7038655 May 2, 2006 Herb et al.
7046228 May 16, 2006 Liang et al.
7050218 May 23, 2006 Kanbe
7057600 June 6, 2006 Goden
7057798 June 6, 2006 Ukigaya
7075502 July 11, 2006 Drzaic et al.
7226550 June 5, 2007 Hou et al.
7259744 August 21, 2007 Arango et al.
7283119 October 16, 2007 Kishi
7283199 October 16, 2007 Aichi et al.
7312916 December 25, 2007 Pullen et al.
7342556 March 11, 2008 Oue et al.
7345810 March 18, 2008 Chopra et al.
7352353 April 1, 2008 Albert et al.
7365732 April 29, 2008 Matsuda et al.
7411719 August 12, 2008 Paolini et al.
7417787 August 26, 2008 Chopra et al.
7420549 September 2, 2008 Jacobson et al.
7474295 January 6, 2009 Matsuda
7502162 March 10, 2009 Lin et al.
7545557 June 9, 2009 Iftime et al.
7548291 June 16, 2009 Lee et al.
7557981 July 7, 2009 Liang et al.
7652656 January 26, 2010 Chopra et al.
7679599 March 16, 2010 Kawai
7686463 March 30, 2010 Goto
7760419 July 20, 2010 Lee
7782292 August 24, 2010 Miyasaka et al.
7808696 October 5, 2010 Lee et al.
7830592 November 9, 2010 Sprague et al.
7852547 December 14, 2010 Kim
7852548 December 14, 2010 Roh
7911681 March 22, 2011 Ikegami et al.
7982941 July 19, 2011 Lin et al.
8040594 October 18, 2011 Paolini et al.
8072675 December 6, 2011 Lin et al.
8115729 February 14, 2012 Danner et al.
8120838 February 21, 2012 Lin et al.
8159636 April 17, 2012 Sun et al.
8164823 April 24, 2012 Ikegami et al.
8169690 May 1, 2012 Lin et al.
8174492 May 8, 2012 Kim et al.
8237892 August 7, 2012 Sprague et al.
8355196 January 15, 2013 Yan et al.
8395836 March 12, 2013 Lin et al.
8422116 April 16, 2013 Sprague et al.
8441714 May 14, 2013 Paolini et al.
8477405 July 2, 2013 Ishii et al.
8520296 August 27, 2013 Wang et al.
8570272 October 29, 2013 Hsieh et al.
8570639 October 29, 2013 Masuzawa et al.
8704754 April 22, 2014 Machida et al.
20040263947 December 30, 2004 Drzaic et al.
20070002008 January 4, 2007 Tam
20070080928 April 12, 2007 Ishii et al.
20070273637 November 29, 2007 Zhou et al.
20080042928 February 21, 2008 Schlangen et al.
20080174531 July 24, 2008 Sah
20100103502 April 29, 2010 Jacobson et al.
20100165005 July 1, 2010 Sprague
20100165448 July 1, 2010 Sprague
20110199671 August 18, 2011 Amundson et al.
20110217639 September 8, 2011 Sprague
20110234557 September 29, 2011 Yang et al.
20110261433 October 27, 2011 Sprague et al.
20110292094 December 1, 2011 Lin
20120007897 January 12, 2012 Yang et al.
20120307346 December 6, 2012 Sprague
20130057463 March 7, 2013 Zhang et al.
20130057942 March 7, 2013 Wang et al.
20130176612 July 11, 2013 Sprague et al.
20130300727 November 14, 2013 Lin et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
10-2007-0082680 August 2007 JP
2009-116041 May 2009 JP
2009-192637 August 2009 JP
10-2008-0023913 March 2008 KR
WO 99/53373 October 1999 WO
WO 03/016993 February 2003 WO
WO 2009/105385 August 2009 WO
WO 2009/124142 October 2009 WO
WO 2009/134889 November 2009 WO
WO 2010/027810 March 2010 WO
Other references
  • PCT/US02/26077 International Search Report, mailed in Nov. 29, 2002.
  • PCT/US2009/033954 International Search Report, mailed in Apr. 6, 2009.
  • PCT/US2009/042114 International Search Report, mailed in Jun. 3, 2009.
  • PCT/US09/39193 Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of International Searching Authority, or The Declaration, mailed in May 12, 2009.
  • PCT/US2009/054939 International Search Report, mailed in Oct. 20, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/952,136, filed Jul. 26, 2013, Hui Du et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,712, filed Aug. 22, 2013, Zang et al.
  • PCT/US2013/062915 Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Wirtten Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or The Declaration, mailed on Jan. 28, 2014.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,186, filed Feb. 9, 2012, Wang et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,541, filed Jul. 17, 2012, Yang et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,788, filed Oct. 2, 2012, Wang et al.
Patent History
Patent number: 8964282
Type: Grant
Filed: May 1, 2013
Date of Patent: Feb 24, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20140092466
Assignee: E Ink California, LLC (Fremont, CA)
Inventors: Ming Wang (Union City, CA), Yu Li (Fremont, CA), Hui Du (Milpitas, CA), Xiaojia Zhang (Fremont, CA), Craig Lin (San Jose, CA)
Primary Examiner: Loha Ben
Application Number: 13/875,145